Thread: Eccles: Incense and thuribles Board: Limbo / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000701

Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
It's time to get back to the real purpose of these boards [Roll Eyes]
HT's suggestion was far too much too ignore.A counterpoint to the gin thread perhaps?
I personally am not too keen on it - or on gin! - but all sorts of questions come to mind.What sort of incense if any should we use?Are there asthmatic-free brands of incense?Should one chink or not?Should it be used as purely a processional ornament,or should it be more than that....
Which is the best incense?
Is it true that there are "No smoking" signs in the vestries of.....well never mind!


[edited thread title to add more information]

[ 29. August 2009, 10:58: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
 
Posted by frater-frag (# 2184) on :
 
There are brands of incense that are less irritating then others. The main cause of allergic reactions are created by the burning coal!

At my parish, we once tried sk "low-allergic incense"... Only problem was that the damned thing burned three times faster than the usual stuff! So... I think you can imageing the clouds of smoke this caused...


Not to mention the reactions from those that was somewhat allergic...

Best way is to get some lab-rats from the pews, and experiment on them! If they can stand the particular blend, then use it!
 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
We blend our own incense and have a different blend for every season. Most of the commercial blends are too sickly sweet. But the most important thing is a clean thurible. It should be cleaned after every use, otherwise the resin builds up and burns the next time, creating an unpleasant odor. Cleaning (acetone is the best) also keeps the chains from getting sticky and not operating smoothly.

Coals are also important. If you have too many and not enough incense, you smell mostly the coals burning. If they are not big enough or hot enough (Kingsford is the best I think) the incense burns badly or not at all. So it's a delicate balance and takes practice.

As to clinking, I prefer a suble clink. Excessive clinking is vulgar, IMO, and calls too much attention to itself. However, I would love to get one of those Orthodox thuribles with the bells for certain occasions.
 


Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
Three Kings Pontifical is low smoking and has a wonderful smell. For those who like a low smoke zone. Glastonbury is also great but has a bit more smoke.
 
Posted by Burma Shave (# 2572) on :
 
This may be a dumb question, but what is the significance and history of incense as part of a worship service, anyway? I was raised in a fairly uptight Calvinist family and never really experienced the incense thing until I went with a friend to a Christmas Eve mass at the RC cathedral in St. Augustine, Florida several years ago. Nowadays, I sometimes attend services at a nearby Episcopal church that does the incense thing.

This also sort of reminds me of a funny story about a former co-worker of mine. He was raised Roman Catholic, and decided that he really liked the smell of the incense used in his parish, as opposed to the little hippie-style incense sticks from his local head shop. So after some searching, he finally found the type of incense his parish uses, as well as the coal and a thurible. So he proudly headed home to fire the thing up.

What he quickly realized, however, is that the church-style incense, with coal and thurible, is designed to be used in a huge sanctuary space -- not a small apartment! His roomates came home to find fragrant smoke billowing out of the doors and windows.

Anyway, I thought it was funny...

-- David
Chicago, IL
 


Posted by Nunc_Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
ROFLMAO Burma Shave!

I've contemplated doing that several times - but have been deterred by the fact that we do have a smoke alarm in the hallway. Grrr.

Hippy sticks are NOTHING compared to the real thing. Lots of people get turned off incense, thinking we use the foul hippy stick stuff in church...

*sigh* we use Pricknash: cathedral, basilica, abbey - whatever's in the cupboard. I do not like Sanctuary in their range - it's a bit tart.

I am a smoke girl myself, and favour subtle chinking in the right places. And it frustrates me when I see a thurifer who has no idea what he/she is doing... Please, can we have the right number of swings for persons in different positions? Is it really that hard to remember/control?

It's all in the technique. I am the only thurifer in my parish who does 360s. Is it that scary?
 


Posted by Cusanus (# 692) on :
 
Now on the subject of clean thuribles... where does one get acetone these days? I couldn't find any this week Even For Ready Money. All the nail polish remover available seems to be proudly announcing its non-acetone status. What to do?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Cusanus, I don't know where you live, but here in the States most hardware stores carry acetone. If you can't find it, olive oil works with alot of rubbing.
 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
So what brand? My vote:
Best of all time (the Chanel trophy) -- Rosa Mystica (nla, alas: WHY??!!).

Best of currently available (the Floris challenge cup) -- Basilica from Prinknash.

What does Bourne Street favour, Incensed? Poke around the dustbins after Benediction if you have to. We must know.

And US quick-lite charcoal is much better than any UK charcoal: it doesn't go out when Father over-enthusiatically puts ten spoonfuls on.

And keep them smoking handbags clean -- USpike is right.
 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
SMV NYC has the best incense, specially blended in their basement by their incensemeister, who lives in Phoenix and comes once a year to mix it up. It would be nice, though, if they cleaned their thuribles more than once a year. When I was there for a couple of years I insisted on cleaning them once a month and they thought I was tres outre.

Quik-lites will never get the smoke that real coals do. They don't get hot enough or last long enough. Kingsford regular is the best if you have a gas burner to heat them up. Most places don't these days so they just use quik-lites because you can light them with a match.

What kind of setup does Bourne Street have? Come on, Incensed, let's have all the smoky details.
 


Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
A gas burner! Thank you Ultra! You take me back to the Advent, which has a big old bunsen burner in the smoke sacristy. I'd forgotten about it, and so didn't realize why the custom I have seen here of lighting the charcoal on a candle-end seemed so odd.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
We have just one bunsen burner type gas jet which is adequate, but SMV has two gas rings like an actual stove top which is marvelous, esp. for two-thurible events. They have a special smokeroom which we covet tremendously, although it lacks the sink and window which are big assets to ours (which is in the corner of the sacristy). When burning real charcoal one must have proper ventilation, as it says on the label, otherwise you risk death by carbon monoxide! (So that's what happened to all their thurifers... )
 
Posted by CorgiGreta (# 443) on :
 
Quoting from "A Guest at Cambridge" by George H, Guest: "...[the choir] should be able to breathe pure, unadulterated air, free from the smell of both incense and stale cassocks."

Apparently St. John's was kept smoke-free for musical, if not liturgical, reasons during his tenure at St. John's Chapel.

I have, however, heard absolutely sublime music sung when the smoke was so thick the church looked like a cigar bar. The same has been true when the choir was quite fragrant due to musty vestments and/or widespread halitosis or alcohol-breath.

Greta
 


Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
If one can't get acetone which is fairly expensive anyway, try using Mineral Turpentine that will clean away the resin we use it at our parish
 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
Simple paint stripper will get the toughest gunk off, but it's nasty stuff.

Available in the UK, Polyclens, that invaluable blue liquid used for cleaning paint brushes, is quite effective for light use -- it contains acetone, that's why.

And when using metal polish, do get the chains really clean afterwards -- Father doesn't like old Brasso all over his hands at the offertory.
 


Posted by PaulTH (# 320) on :
 
Burma Shave asked about the history of the use of incense. I think it goes back to antiquity in human worship. In Numbers 16.17 Moses says to Korah "Each man is to take his censer and put incense in it-250 censers in all-and present it before the Lord." The Jewish Temple worship at the time of Jesus certainly employed much ritual.

I don't know when its use became widespread in Christian worship of if it was from the start. Perhaps someone can answer that. I always think its a protestant myth that the early Christians worshipped at a plain wooden table with a loaf and a cup of grape juice. Perhaps when they met in secret, they sometimes did so in spartan conditions, but all the churches close to the cradle of Christianity such as the Oriental Orthodox churches are very ritualistic and absolutely douse their churches in incense.

As one brought up a protestant, but becoming more catholic with age, I am only getting used to the use of incense now. Sometimes it makes me sneeze or feel nauseous. I don't have a problem with it, but for me it ads nothing to a fine liturgy.
 


Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
From my vague recollections of Dix,I believe Dom Gregory says that in the East incense was accepted pretty early in the Church.In the West it took quite a bit longer as incense became associated with imperial persecution (Christians having to offer incense before a representation of the Emperor or else)
However it's a while since I read "Shape of the Liturgy" so I may have my facts wrong....
 
Posted by Puseyite (# 2546) on :
 
As to the antiquity/universality of the use of incense in worship:

I can't remember where I picked up this particular item, but somewhere I read that incense has long been considered the appropriate offering to a deity (in many faiths) because it is completely consumed in its use, leaving no remains behind to be disposed of. Moreover, the smoke rises, like the prayers of the faithful (this is an example of the allegorization of the liturgy that I mentioned in another post) -- "Let my prayers be set forth in Thy sight as the incense, and the lifting up of my hands as the evening sacrifice."

On a different subject: I have almost always seen the thurifer swing the censer at the altar during the Sanctus, but I can find no liturgical authority for it. Can anyone corroborate?
 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I think swinging during the Sanctus probably became the norm in some places for the practical purpose of keeping the coals going between the censings at the Offertory and the censings at the elevations. We have the thurifer retire into the chapel during this interval where they may do what they must to keep the coals going, out of sight, and then reappear at the end of the Benedictus. Most churches I suppose don't have this option and the thurifer simply remains in place in the sanctuary. This is just my theory.
 
Posted by Regina Caeli (# 2343) on :
 
I seem to have chosen the best time to notice this thread. I thought I'd take the opportunity to ask about what exactly to do with the thurible at the Sanctus.

Now, I've been told that you give it a full circle for each Sanctus and swing violently until the 'hosanna un excelsis' of the Benedictus.

However, I, like Puseyite have not found it in 'Ceremonies of the Roman Rite' and have been told that 'Ritual Notes' makes no mention of this pracrice either, both books that go into explicit detail.

Any enlightenment?

Also, I'm glad Stephen mentioned Dix in response to PaulTH's post, as that's the publication that instantly came to my mind as well. I think you've hit the nail on the head Ste.

When Christianity became the 'state religion' (anachronistic?) of the Roman empire, it's ceremonial adopted many of the practices of the Imperialist state. Incense was used to herald the emperor and other civil dignitaries; the amount of incense increasing with honour.

Bishops then received this honour and incense took on within the church the significance of honouring.

The Most Blessed Sacrament, and rites surrounding it, as a result became fumigated.

Many OT verses make reference to the purifying aspect of fire/coal & the like and so incense also came to symbolise purifying/ sanctifying. This would explain its use at the offertory to 'make holy' the oblations to be offered, the altar on which they are offered, and the priestly people offering them.

Sorry, I got carried away, not all of that is from Dix. I've picked up bits and bobs from various sources.
 


Posted by Jengie (# 273) on :
 
Just to give the non-conformist myth to the inclusion of incense.

It became common place when Constantine decided that the official faith of the Roman Empire should be Christianity.

It was used prior to that in Roman life to stop disease spreading from the crowds to the officials. When Christianity was the official religion, then the officials became important people in church structure but were unwilling to forgo this cleansing priveledge so incense had to be incorporated into worship. The spiritualising of it came after. It of course would still be early.

Jengie
 


Posted by Nunc_Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
I will check Ritual Notes on this RC, but what I learnt, and what I have observed re thurible and the Sanctus was:

The bell is rung three times. At each ring, the thurifer swings the thurible thrice in the manner of censing someone/thing. (Assuming he/she is kneeling before the Altar...) The Thurifer then continues to swing the thurible in small rapid arcs side to side until the Agnus Dei, repeating the censing figure at the elevation of both elements.

I don't know if this is correct.
 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I've never seen the type of censing ND describes at the Sanctus. Sounds like creative ritual to me.
 
Posted by Nunc_Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
Why, what do you do at the Sanctus, US?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
As I said a few posts ago, the thurifer retires to the chapel, out of sight, to stoke the coals and wait for the end of the Benedictus to reappear.

Most churches, I think, don't have a convenient place for the thurifer to retire to as we do, and so have the thurifer merely stand in place, swinging gently to keep the coals going. I've never seen the kind of censing you described during the Sanctus. Perhaps Puseyite can research this burning issue for us. I think someone said already the ceremonials are silent on what the thurifer is to do between the Offertory and the censings at the Consecration so perhaps some local customaries call for creativity...
 


Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
yes, but what brands, shipmates, do the great shrines use? -- I can't believe you all make up your own...

Name names, and tell us what you like..
 


Posted by Fiddleback (# 395) on :
 
Elmore 'Evesham' which is very piquant seems to suit our angular Gothic pile. Have tried Prinknash 'Basilica' recently on the recommendation of some of the aficionados on this ship, but it doesn't seem right here.
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
Prinknash 'Basilica' is horrible stuff in comparison to 'Priory'. Suitable only for the most Lenten of days.

Rosa Mystica is sadly no longer obtainable in its original form. I know not why; only that the monks who blended the original mixture seem to have taken the secret to the grave. Indeed even its original form is so old that it gives off a nasty scent akin to Grandmother's Talcum Powder.

Cosmo
 


Posted by maniple (# 2237) on :
 
Rosa Mystica is great for special occasions such as Theotokian celebrations and should be kept for such occasions and not burnt at Low Masses. Dark coloured incense with Gold bits included looks wonderful in the boat.

Maniple.
 


Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
I was immensely fond of my grandmother, which is perhaps why I love(d) Rosa Mystica...

But Maniple, you imply you have a secret source? Are those poor monks perhaps still slaving away for you, but in Another Place?
 


Posted by Ascension-ite (# 1985) on :
 
We at Ascension and St Agnes in DC do exactly as Nunc describes above, I would have thought most churches do this. The thurifer censes each element as one would cense a prerson/thing all the time while kneeling at the altar. Is this unusual in AC circles?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I think we were talking about the Sanctus, Ascensionite. Nunc says they do a double censing for each bell at the Sanctus, which I've never heard of. What exactly are you censing, the bells?
 
Posted by Ascension-ite (# 1985) on :
 
Never mind. Wasn't paying rapt attention, we don't cense the bells at the sanctus, in fact the thurifer is standing at the sacristy door at that point. Sounds like a very odd practice. As for our brand of incense we usually use Prinknash "abbey" I beleive, sometimes Elmore Abbey's brand as well and sometimes straight frankincense.
 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
I'm not sure it's seemly to have the thurifer just hanging around until Agnus Dei -- he should just leave after he's done his job, tho' perhaps at the end of the Eucharistic Prayer to avoid distractions (though in advanced Roman churches he often leaves right after the elevations, on the basis that the choir are still warbling away during the Sacred Silent Canon and no-one is paying attention anyway).

There is a very bizarre custom over here of censing the Elements as they are slightly elevated at the Doxology of the EP, and ringing the bells too. Surely one of those weird Episcky inventions?
 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
They do that at SMV, the censing and bells at the "by whom and with whom" and the end of the consecration. I thought it was a Fr. Wells invention. Where else does it?
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
They used to ring the bells at the end of the Prayer of Consecration with the Elevation of the elements in St.George's Cullercoats.Now no longer sadly;they have gone for the corrupt practice of ringing the bells at the Words of Institution
Grrrr
 
Posted by Nunc_Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
I think we were talking about the Sanctus, Ascensionite. Nunc says they do a double censing for each bell at the Sanctus, which I've never heard of. What exactly are you censing, the bells?

No we don't cense the bells!!! LOL

How to explain this?

OK. One does the Offertory - censes everyone and everything necessary to eternal salvation - then pops back into the sacristry to top up on the incense/check coals are ok etc etc... I usually try to resurface in the sanctuary just after the sursum corda; on of the other servers makes sure there is a hassock in the right place in the middle of the sanctuary, and one kneels there smack bang in the middle, in front of the altar, swinging the thurible and hopefully creating billows of smoke.

When the Sanctus comes round, at each of the words, "Holy, holy, holy" the bell (we are a bit strange in that we use the sanctus bell for Benediction, and the Benediction gong for mass) is struck. At each of the strikings of the bell one swings the thurible upwards, as though censing someone/something - towards the Sacrament I guess (though not yet consecrated obviously). Now I don;t know about how you do it, but from the way I read Ritual Notes, the celebrant gets 3 swings, as does the bishop if present, deacon/subdeacon get 2 swings if in orders, if not, a single swing... etc etc

A single swing - ie one unit - consists of two movements of the thurible towards the person/object censed. If more than one swing is involved, there is usually a slight pause at the bottom of the second movement thus:

-> -> . -> -> .

If a censing a group:

middle <- -> .

So: when censing during the sanctus, there are 2 swings for every "Holy":

(holy/dong)-> -> . (holy/dong)-> -> . (holy/dong)-> -> . then back to swinging normally. This same pattern happens for the elevation of each element.

(genuflect/dong) -> -> . (elevation/dong) -> -> . (genuflect/dong) -> ->.

Please don't take this like I think you are all simpletons; you know more than I/have done this longer than I...

Is this any different to what you do?


And if so, how, why?
 


Posted by Nunc_Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
Whoops I mean - one swing for every Holy... = two movements.
 
Posted by Regina Caeli (# 2343) on :
 
Doesn't the bishop get three treble, rather than double swings at the Offertory?

As for the swings during the Sanctus, I suppose it's difficult to swing full circle if you're going to be kneeling. And apparently, I'm not the only one who does this, though I cannot at this moment find the Mystery Worship to link to. I think it was in NZ.

I know S Elisabeth's Reddish don't have elevations after the Words of Institution, but only at the Doxology and Great Amen to illustrate the consecratory nature of the entire Eucharistic Prayer.

Though I agree with the theology of this, I still see the Words of Consecration, (along with the epiklesis) as being central and give three swings (again at full length) to the Blessed Sacrament at each elevation.

However we have no standard practice. It really just depends on who the thurifer is at that particular liturgy. We have one who doesn't seem to notice the elevations at all, but just swings from side to side throughout the entire Prayer.
 


Posted by frater-frag (# 2184) on :
 
At my church, S:t Hans(short for John) in Linköping/Sweden we use one swing for the thurifer, two for priests and three for the guys in the funny hats!

Our church is a shoe-box made of bricks, consecrated in 1973. The altar rests on a podium, ca 30 cm high. No steps to the altar...
So, my decision is that the Thurifer is to stand/kneel on the northern side of the altar, slightly behind it. We are using the Versus Populem rite...
No place to retreat to, during canon, so... instead I stay put, on my knees until Pax, then I, after exchanging pax with the celebrant, I simply retreat to my seat, hang up the thuribel and go on with the show!

And, yes, we use "Three Kings" as our favorit choice of incense!
 


Posted by Abouna (# 290) on :
 
Ultraspike:

I can help you with a belled-censer if you would like one. Just le me know.

Abouna


As to clinking, I prefer a suble clink. Excessive clinking is vulgar, IMO, and calls too much attention to itself. However, I would love to get one of those Orthodox thuribles with the bells for certain occasions.[/QB][/QUOTE]


 


Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Abouna, YES, definitely interested. See my PM.

Thanks!
 


Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Did a funeral today, and before it started, the priest darted over to the "choir vestry" to tuck his suitcoat into the closet with the server albs, commenting that he had some sort of social occasion later in the day and didn't want his coat to smell of incense since it clashed with his cologne. I jokingly suggested that he should find a cologne that coordinated with the incense and he replied that we should let the monks know about this request.

I happen to like that fact that after a funeral I get whiffs of incense from my hair at random moments for the rest of the day.

So, shipmates, which colognes and aftershaves go with which incenses?
 


Posted by BirettaBoy (# 2770) on :
 
I was very interested to learn of the differing practices of censing/incense preferences in the discussion so far. Personally I adhere to the rubrics of Fr Fortuescue as to double/single incensations. We also ring the bell and Cense at the "...Through Him, with him..."

I have never been able to find any instructions as to when the thurifer should come or go during the canon, and I remain in the sanctuary, swinging throughout (with the lid open), EXCEPT at the Santus, when I stop swinging and bow.

As to incence preferences, we use Basilica for most Masses (good amount of smoke, fragrant), with our small amont of Rosa mystica reserved for v special occasions!

I heard a rumour that Rosa mystica was 20% Cannabis Resin! I have no idea whether this is true, but it could explain why it is so beloved of all thurifers and Priests I know!
 


Posted by Abu Wuza (# 614) on :
 
quote:
in S:t Hans in Linköping/Sweden we use one swing for the thurifer, two for priests and three for the guys in the funny hats!

Fraggie, is this Svenska kyrkan you're talking about? (Not familiar with your Lincopensian situation.)

If yes, then I can only say I'm most sincerely --why can you use incense when we don't?

pax,
AW
 


Posted by frater-frag (# 2184) on :
 
Yes this "Svenska Kyrkan"(church of sweden)that I´m refering to!

Since many people claims that they are allergic to incense, we simply have some extra services, where we use incense to our hearts delight!

This means that you can see a sunday evening mass announced as "mass with incense".

Those that don´t want it can visit the regular highmass at 1100, the rest of us can stay in bed...

Why you can´t use incense I can´t understand!
Except for reasons named above!
 


Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
From a new thread on Incense

quote:
Originally posted by stbruno:
My nose tells me that various kinds of incense are used at Mass depending on the Feast day being celebrated. For instance at Class 1 feasts I'm sure I detect rose oil, while on ordinary Sundays it justs smells like the usual mix.

So are there any rules re incense or is it purely a matter of taste? [Confused]

quote:
Originally posted by Degs:
Practice in my last parish was:

Rose for Our Lady

Frankincense or 'Three Kings' for Christmas and Epiphany

'Pontifical' when the Bishop popped in and for Easter

and good old Prinknash 'Basilica' for the other occasions.

Purely my personal taste!!

Nowadays I have to use whatever is on offer in the parishes I visit.

quote:
Originally posted by Merseymike:
One of our parishioners brought back this amazingly pungent incense from a Greek holiday. It not only smelled like the Body Shop writ large, but also seemed to combine with the charcoal to produce the most thick smoke I have ever seen. The sound of coughing in the pews was reminiscent of a smoker's convention!

quote:
Originally posted by A name I call myself:
The Body Shop smells of nothing. So there [Wink]

I used to work at The body Shop, and there's litle more annoying that people coming in and going "Ooooh! Doesn't it smell lovely!" when you can't smell a thing.

That aside, an ordinand currently on placement at my own parish church commented "I've never seen a church with such a small congregation have so many types of incense".

We were proud.

Me x


 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
I can't believe I started this thread!!
So what do people think of 360* swings then?
When should they be done?
 
Posted by seasick (# 48) on :
 
360° swings remind me of cheerleaders and suchlike - I think that they're entirely inappropriate, and somewhat over the top.
 
Posted by frater-frag (# 2184) on :
 
The only time that a 360° is allowed is when you are warming up the coals! [Razz]
 
Posted by Duo Seraphim (# 3251) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
I can't believe I started this thread!!
So what do people think of 360* swings then?
When should they be done?

I've only seen this done to get the coals burning hot.

The most incense I have ever seen used at a Mass was at Prinknash Abbey. They had a giant thurible, like Foucault's Pendulum, going in front of the altar and used a smaller thurible to incense the altar, the celebrant and so on.

The incense - Basilica from recollection - filled the entire church. At one stage, the smoke threatened to hide the celebrant entirely from view...
 
Posted by Eanswyth (# 3363) on :
 
Our deacon did a 360° while preparing for the Great Vigil of Easter. Unfortunately, the chain wrapped around his little finger and broke it. He was not a very happy camper during that looong service.
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
Transplanted from a new thread:

quote:
Originally posted by Angelus Domini.:
quote:
From the blessing of incense at the Ofertory:
Through the intercession of Blessed Michael, the Archangel, who standeth at the right hand of the altar of incense, and of all his elect, may the Lord voucjsafe to + bless this incense, and receive it as a sweet-smelling savour.

...or something like that anyway, I couldn't find it on google, so went off memory.

The problem is, it isn't a sweet-smelling savour.

I was recently appointed Sacristan, and thought I'd get the sacristy in order. Among the things I did was to arrange the incense that we had in some sort of seasonal arrangement so that it wasn't a case of 'what thurifer fancies today'.

We had 'Gums of Arabia', which I kept for the rest of Ordinary Time; 'Basilica', which was the nicesat of the lot, which I kept for Easter, and some other not quite so nice stuff (unlabelled), that I thought would be appropriate for Lent.

Now last night, we reverted to the Lenten scent, and after the Gospel, I swiftly made my way to the sacristy to change to Basilica, as it was absolutely vile. As Fr Degs pointed out, it smelt of Harpic.

Now although we aren't a rich parish, I have a bit of leeway when it comes to buying stuff like this.

So...

What's decent? What do you use for the various seasons. I'm guessing some version of Rose for Feasts of Our Lady, 'Three Kings' for Epiphany, 'Pontifical' for Pontifical visits (though it is sickly sweet).

I'd like some ideas for Lent especially, and perhaps Easter. What do you think is seasonally neutral enough to be used in Ordinary Time, but not disgusting at the same time?

Please help.

Thanks,

AD x


 
Posted by boyinthebands (# 4040) on :
 
quote:

What do you think is seasonally neutral enough to be used in Ordinary Time, but not disgusting at the same time?

How does plain frankincense fit?

Ascension-ite mentions it above -- and surely A and St. A in Our Fair City would know.

We don't use incense in our church but every Ethiopian and Eritrean business in the neighborhood has a tabletop censor happily smoking away, and so you get to appreciate the fragrance.
 
Posted by Angelus Domini. (# 2343) on :
 
Frankincense is very pungent. That isn't to say it's a bad thing. But I'm just thinking of when it would be appropriate for. Were you suggesting it for Lent?

AD x
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
AD you've inherited more scents than you need.
A working list might be:

Rose for Our Lady

Frankincense or Three Kings (becoming as rare as rocking horse manure) for Christmas/Epiphany

Pontifical (if you must) for Pontificals

Other than that you can't go wrong with Basilica.

D+
 
Posted by boyinthebands (# 4040) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angelus Domini.:
Frankincense is very pungent. That isn't to say it's a bad thing. But I'm just thinking of when it would be appropriate for. Were you suggesting it for Lent?

AD x

The manager at our local Eastern Church goods house (Icon and Book Service) noted that they carry three grades of frankincense and that some people prefer one over the other, but for the life of me, I can't say why. Perhaps the more expensive ones are more mellow, richer.

Something I neglected to mention earlier is that we get incense in worship from no doing of our own. We rent the fellowship hall (undercroft) to an Eritrean Coptic church which (in theory) finishes as we begin. But sometimes they run over and we get a dose of frankincense from below, just in time for the first hymn.

The parishoners have complained about having to share a building (noise, full corridors, leaving hunks of the antidoron to mummify, etc.) but so far not a complaint about the smoke, which I assume gets to us filtered.

But then again, I like myrrh (and a pint of bitter) and I don't have experience with the other incenses mentioned.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Degs,
I have never had a problem getting Three Kings...It's as common as dirt around here.

By the way, Do most of you use a brand straight out of the box? In our parish we concoct our own blend, not from scratch, but rather from a mixture of several commercially available ones. That way we can control the burning rate a little better and the scent is rather nice too.
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sacristan:
Degs,
I have never had a problem getting Three Kings...It's as common as dirt around here.

By the way, Do most of you use a brand straight out of the box? In our parish we concoct our own blend, not from scratch, but rather from a mixture of several commercially available ones. That way we can control the burning rate a little better and the scent is rather nice too.

Do you have recipes? [Smile]

Our supplier of 'Three Kings' gets it from Holland, so it's hit and mis when it's available.

D+
 
Posted by diapason (# 4230) on :
 
My first post - be gentle with me.... [Embarrassed]
We have a well-kitted out incense cupboard, but none of it (including Priory, Basilica, or indeed any of the Prinknashes & Eveshams)smells to me like good old fashioned proper stuff, with the exception of a tiny box of 'Prinknash Incense' (no subtype specified)I bought years ago at Prinknash. Is it just me, or does anyone know what I mean?
The Faith House bookshop in Tufton St London does orthodox incense in all sorts of exotic hues (rose, lemon geranium, amber, cypress etc) but it's expensive. We use quite a bit of it in mixtures, but still not quite 'right'.
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
Welcome aboard diapason.

Yes, I know, those exotics are rather pricey, but worth it for special occasions.

D+
 
Posted by Raspberry Rabbit (# 3080) on :
 
We've decided I hope that 360 degree swings with the thurible are definitely out?

Raspberry Rabbit
Postmaster
Ulan Bator, Mongolia
The Voice of Moderation
 
Posted by Raspberry Rabbit (# 3080) on :
 
Diapason writes

quote:
The Faith House bookshop in Tufton St London does orthodox incense in all sorts of exotic hues (rose, lemon geranium, amber, cypress etc) but it's expensive. We use quite a bit of it in mixtures, but still not quite 'right'.
If it's what I think it is it comes in a small plastic box - the incense take the form of small extruded forms?

We used it from time to time in my last parish - important that you use very little of it in the thurible. Cut the bits into even smaller bits - it's nice when it's used in small amounts. Too much and its awfully overpowering and sickeningly sweet.

Raspberry Rabbit
Postmaster
Ulan Bator, Mongolia
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
The problem with the Orthodox stuff is that it can be a bit slow to get going. Sometimes one does not get a decent amount of smoke until almost the end of the censing of the altar. This may be due to the large chunks. I have tried breaking them up into smaller bits but they are very hard!
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Sorry to double post-
Degs,
I PMed you. Check your messages.
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raspberry Rabbit:
We've decided I hope that 360 degree swings with the thurible are definitely out?

Good heavens. Why?

Thanks for your PM, sacristan. Git it safe and sound.
 
Posted by boyinthebands (# 4040) on :
 
This Three Kings incense -- I think I bought some tonight. In an Arab grocery in the suburbs. (With a nice box of tea, a jar of tahini, a mango -- and a roll of charcoal.)

It is a small pack -- plastic and sealed, and the package looks curiously like a packet of peanuts.

"circa 30 g" for $1.99 -- which seems high. It is made in Holland.

Is this the stuff?

Stuck the pack on my flatbed scanner
 
Posted by stbruno (# 3505) on :
 
sure is..though you have a domestic size pack...not the church size jumbo box. [Eek!]
 
Posted by boyinthebands (# 4040) on :
 
Thanks! Perhaps its for a house church!

(if I had about $40 to spare, I would have gotten another product there -- a rather strange looking electric incense burner. Runs on 110 V. Nifty, if a potiental fire hazard.)
 
Posted by Angelus Domini. (# 2343) on :
 
I know there was a thread that where someone asked advice about cleaning a thurible that had got to a terrible state.

I cannot currently find the thread, and have found myself ina similar situation, having inherited a thurbible that was about to go, a delightful thurifer last Sunday, decided to leave the lit charcoal in the thurible after Mass, thus melting all of the the resin build-up in the lid. This proceeded to leak out of the thurible, and has now solidified.

I recall that the advice given last time round was to boil it for a few hours (which, I imagine can be most aromatic), but after I have done this, what is the best method of keeping it clean? Are there any particular products, which, if used regularly, can avoid such a build-up recurring?

Do tell.

Thanks, AD x
 
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on :
 
AD, I suggest you get in touch with Ultraspike.

If I recall correctly, 'twas she who provided the answer as to how to clean a thoroughly gunked up thurible. I have a feeling that acetone and/or blow torches came into it somewhere, but can't remember enough of the detail to be much help.

As a matter of interest, can one line the dish that the coals and the incense go in with tinfoil to prevent the resin solidifying and making a dreaful mess?
 
Posted by Incensed (# 2670) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kingsfold:
AD,

As a matter of interest, can one line the dish that the coals and the incense go in with tinfoil to prevent the resin solidifying and making a dreaful mess?

Usually I have to line it with tinfoil so that the build-up of gunk in the bottom of the bowl does not impede my smoking...
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Acetone is the best for cleaning incense resin. Lining it with aluminum foil helps keep down the resin, but some always remains on the bottom. If you have a removable coal container you can turn that upside down over the flames for a few minutes to burn out most of it and then rinse out the residue with water or acetone.

Some people immerse the whole thurible in acetone but that seems abit extreme unless it's really caked with resin. I usually pour a few ounces of acetone into the bottom and then soak a paper towel and wipe the inside and outside, not forgetting the chains which get very sticky also. Use latex gloves for this since the acetone is quite irritating to the skin.

I have also heard of people boiling the thurible in water but that takes much longer and doesn't work as well.

If you really want to be au naturel you can use olive oil but that takes alot of rubbing to work well.

You should also polish the outside occasionally since the acetone or whatever you use will dull the finish somewhat.

A clean thurible is essential to pleasant smelling smoke. The leftover resin that burns will overpower the fragrance of the incense and is no doubt the reason many people hate incense.

Happy smoking!
 
Posted by GeoffH (# 133) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by boyinthebands:
"circa 30 g" for $1.99 -- which seems high. It is made in Holland.

Is this the stuff?

One does assume we are talking about incense and not some other material that comes from Holland and also has an exotic smell. Good for asthmatics I hear.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Here is Tat Tip of the Week , which unfortunately does not have the original discussion which included the use of a blow torch.
 
Posted by Adrian1 (# 3994) on :
 
Much as it grieves me, I have to disagree with my good friend Cosmo. Prinknash 'Basilica' is, in my opinion, one of the best forms of incense - if not the best - and given a choice I would use it every time.

Raspberry Rabbit. Be careful with the Orthodox incense. It's very strong stuff and you don't need much of it to get a powerful effect. [Wink]
 
Posted by saecula saeculorum (# 2883) on :
 
We want to make our own. Has anyone done so? How?

360s are obligatory in any church larger than a shoe box.
 
Posted by Angelus Domini. (# 2343) on :
 
Thank you all for your helpful replies.

Regarding use of acetone, would I be able to purchase this from a hardware store as such, or am I after the old fashioned nail-polish-remover?

Thanks.

We use Basilica during Ordinary Time. I like it.

During Easter, we use 'Gloria', which is sweet but very subtle, and so allows for delightful things like the Orthodox 'Gardenia' to be added to it, without them overpowering the Faithful.

Lent and Passiontide get 'Evesham', while Christmass and Epiphany get 'Three Kings'.

Advent and Feasts of Our Lady get 'Gloria' mixed with the Orthodox 'Rose'.

AD x
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
You can buy acetone at most hardware stores, at least in these parts. Nail polish remover is acetone, usually, but you'll pay alot more to buy it that way.

Anyone wishing to know how to make incense may PM me. We make ours and it is a bit of a process, but I think it's much better than the commercial brands, which are usually nauseatingly sweet, IMHO. Finding the right ingredients is the hardest part, and then getting the right blend is also tricky, but well worth the effort.
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angelus Domini.:
Christmass and Epiphany get 'Three Kings'.

That's if my friends bring some back from their holiday in Amsterdam!!!
 
Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
You can also use Mineral Turpentine to remove the resin. A plastic scourer soaked in mineral turpentine will also get rid of the hard bits as well. I cleaned a thurible that was caked with years of resin this way.
 
Posted by -blood-and-fire- (# 4377) on :
 
You get 3 types of thurifers. Ones that go wild and 360 all the way down the aisle, just about hot-box the church and cling like the bells of Canterbury Cathedral.
Then there is the kind that hold the thurible half way down the chains and hardly swing it at all, with one or two wisps of smoke because Father has smothered the one or two cold coals.
Then you get the mid-way thurifer.

Which do you prefer?
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Host Mobcap ON

Welcome to the Ship, -blood-and-fire-, and especially to MW. Glad to have you aboard.
If you haven't already poked around and discovered the FAQs and the 10 Commandments , you'll want to take a look at them just to get an idea of how things work.

Host Mobcap OFF
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by -blood-and-fire-:
You get 3 types of thurifers. Ones that go wild and 360 all the way down the aisle, just about hot-box the church and cling like the bells of Canterbury Cathedral.
Then there is the kind that hold the thurible half way down the chains and hardly swing it at all, with one or two wisps of smoke because Father has smothered the one or two cold coals.
Then you get the mid-way thurifer.

Which do you prefer?

Difficult to comment as you don't actually define the mid-way thurifer!
 
Posted by Angelus Domini. (# 2343) on :
 
Thanks to all for your replies.

I was unable to obtain any pure acetone, only the diluted stuff in the form of old-fashioned nail polish remover.

However, Father was able to produce some ethanol, which did the trick.

Now to find the Brasso.

Thanks again. xxx
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angelus Domini.:
I was unable to obtain any pure acetone, only the diluted stuff in the form of old-fashioned nail polish remover.

Whose? [Wink]

quote:

However, Father was able to produce some ethanol, which did the trick.

Ah, the Sanctifex! [Snigger]
 
Posted by Joan the Outlaw-Dwarf (# 1283) on :
 
I don't believe it. I don't believe it. I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!!

This evening at mass they burnt the oils. In. The. Thurible. AAAAAGGGGGHHHH!!!! [Mad]

There were orange FLAMES going a couple of inches out of the bowl. The chains are smoke-blacked, as is the lid.

I'm cleaning it on Saturday. AghAghAgh!!

Anyone got a blowtorch I can borrow?
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Joan the Outlaw-Dwarf:
I don't believe it. I don't believe it. I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!!!!!

This evening at mass they burnt the oils. In. The. Thurible. AAAAAGGGGGHHHH!!!! [Mad]

There were orange FLAMES going a couple of inches out of the bowl. The chains are smoke-blacked, as is the lid.

I'm cleaning it on Saturday. AghAghAgh!!

Anyone got a blowtorch I can borrow?

AD and I concur on the following advice:

take the thurible and hit the celebrant with it repeatedly, then strangle said celebrant with the chains.

Finally flame the celebrant with the blowtorch! [Snigger]
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
Did The Boy allow this to happen JTO-D? If so, things are worse than we thought.
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Degs:


AD and I concur on the following advice:

take the thurible and hit the celebrant with it repeatedly, then strangle said celebrant with the chains.

Finally flame the celebrant with the blowtorch! [Snigger]

Gives a new meaning to 'flaming'does it not [Two face]
These things happen in even the best-ordered churches which have no more than two lights upon the Holy Table [Snigger]
That's why liturgy is such fun..... [Wink]
But I'm sure this would never have happened in HH Mar Adrian 1's private chapel [Killing me]
 
Posted by Panis Angelicus (# 3795) on :
 
Jellied methylene chloride does a very nice job of removing thurible gunk.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Next time suggest that the oils be consumed in the sanctuary lamps. If not, perhaps you can pour the oils on the clergy and make "living flames". Think...How dramatic! For all those persons who think symbols need to be bold...How perfect! [Smile]
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Why did they burn the oils? Is this what you do with leftover chrism and oil of catechumens? I've never thought about what happens to the old stock when the new is brought in. What do other people do with them? I guess you can't pour them down the piscina as that would cause a clog. [Confused]
 
Posted by Angelus Domini. (# 2343) on :
 
Morning all!

Yes US,

The remaining Sacred Oils are properly consumed with fire when the new ones arrive from the Chrism Mass. I have known this to be done in the Easter Vigil fire (without ceremony), but like the preparation of the Lenten ashes from the previous year's palm crosses, this is a practival thing that needn't have any ceremony attached to it, and can easily be done in a bowl at home.

AD x
 
Posted by TonyK (# 35) on :
 
We now burn the 'old' oils during Holy Week before the new bottles are collected from the the Cathedral on Maundy Thursday.

It started a few years ago when several years worth of oils were discovered in a cupboard (not the approved place!!). There was so much that we had a mass burning on cotton wool in a biscuit-tin in the churchyard. (It took about an hour on a cold night!). Since then we have experimented with various ways, but have usually had to resort to the biscuit-tin, which hardly seems liturgical!

On a trip to the British Museum (before a London Meet at the Museum Tavern, as it happens!) I found I could buy a replica 'roman' oil-lamp in the gift shop - about £8. We have used it successfully this year, burning during services either on the nave altar or at the foot of a large wooden cross, and have properly disposed of all the oils before today. The only problem is that it seems to burn down the wick as well - I shall have to find a replacement for next year or manufacture something out of cotton wool!

If anyone wants details, please pm or email me. I think the museum runs a website/mail order service. Failing that I could pop in next time I am at a London Meet and 'bulk-buy!
 
Posted by Joan the Outlaw-Dwarf (# 1283) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Did The Boy allow this to happen JTO-D? If so, things are worse than we thought.

I am, of course, no longer at St Boy's, being now ensconsed at DOD's church (see 'location' [Wink] ).

I have just seen the thurible and am grieving [Waterworks] . A trip to B&Q (hardware store) is going to be in order, methinks.

They have apparently done this with the leftover oils since time immemorial. This might explain the state of the thurible when we got here...

Next year I will gently suggest taking the inner bowl OUT of the thurible, lining it with tinfoil and putting it on a biscuit-tin lid.

You don't want to know what the inside of the lid looks like... [Waterworks] [Waterworks]
 
Posted by -blood-and-fire- (# 4377) on :
 
Please could you give me your comments on BOAT BOYS.

Are they a must?? I find them a bit of a pain. 6 or 7 year old boys can't sit still for more than 5 minutes (right?) and the thurifer spends most of his time keeping the boat boy in order.

I tried to get an older boy (10) to be boat but our rector had a cow and said "there will be no ship boys in this parish."

If there is no boat boy, I carry the boat against my chest with thurible in other hand. When loading the thurible I GIVE the boat to the celebrant to hold. Then at least I can concentrate on tending the thurible and not tending the boat boy!
 
Posted by Ethel Sludge (# 74) on :
 
For what it's worth, my son, bane of pious old ladies' devotions and recipeint of dozens of filthy glares every Sunday became a boat boy at the age of 5. Whenever on duty, he desisted from fidgeting and took things very seriously. When back in the pews, he carried on as usual. If he wasn't a server now he is his teens, I doubt that he would be such a willing churchgoer or that he would have the faith he has.
 
Posted by Regina Cæli (# 2343) on :
 
I agree with Ethel Sludge.

I find boat bearers (not necessarily boys!) abit of a hassle as well, and admittedly, they are unnecesary. However, this is one of the many opportunities we have to highlight the accessibility of the liturgy to little people, without doing the most abominable cheesey things that one so often sees in our churches, and to be honest, is the sort of patronising nonsense that often later puts them off church.

It is also a good way to get younger servers accustomed to the preparations for Mass, and correct conduct in the sanctuary, before giving them too many duties.

We have recently had the prospect of three new young servers, and although having a boat bearere is noyt the norm for us, I think I shall employ them as such for a while, and then move them onto other things. Of course, we will need a patient thurifer to take them under wing and guide them. Shame we don't have more patient servers who are willing to welcome newer, less experienced servers. Then people complain about shortages.

Oh and BTW, if there is no boat bearer, you hand the boat to the Deacon, not the Celebrant. If no Deacon is present, it is perfectly possible to manage both thurible and boat in a dignified and safe manner.

RC x
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Regina Cæli:
Oh and BTW, if there is no boat bearer, you hand the boat to the Deacon, not the Celebrant. If no Deacon is present, it is perfectly possible to manage both thurible and boat in a dignified and safe manner.

Quite right AD. Also, some celebrants are very well able to handle a boat, having been thurifers themselves, (and some even boat bearers!).

So, if you entrust the boat to some young person, who knows where it might lead!
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
ooooops [Embarrassed]

I go and put the Regina Caeli in my sig, and then forget, and call you AD.
 
Posted by -blood-and-fire- (# 4377) on :
 
I see what you are saying Ethel and Regina. You have changed my perception almost compeletly. If you get them when they are young, they are more likely to stay?? And, yes, it is an oppourtinity for the little people to be involved in the liturgy.

Maybe the boat boy could walk with the MC in procession so as not to cramp the thurifer's 'style'.

I'll try get some patience going for boat boys (yes, boys! for some reason the idea of boat girl to me is just not right. I know it is wrong of me, but I can't help it.)
 
Posted by Regina Cæli (# 2343) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by -blood-and-fire-:
If you get them when they are young, they are more likely to stay??

Depends on how you go about it. What I have seen in churches of a certain tradition is strong children's groups, who are taken away for the majority of the Sunday 'Parish Communion' to co children's activities, and so grow up with this concept of church being tailored specificaly to them, in addition to it splitting the community into little separate groups.

When they get to a certain age, this all seems very patronising to them, there is nothing tailored specially for them anymore, and the 'adult' church service is something that is completely foreign to them, as they have never been a part of it. The result is that this bunch of teenagers walk.

Now if they had been included in the liturgy of the church rather than being separated from it because of some misguided notion that they find it boring, then perhaps this would be different. My suggestion to churches that find it necessary to remove children from the liturgy as they find it boring, is that perhaps it is boring, and that they ought to seriously re-assess the way they do liturgy.

Children and young people, and most people for that matter, find their spirituality enriched by bold liturgy, whether it be solid Evangelical or solid Catholic. A watered-down, nonsensical, half-hearted, mix n' match version of these traditions is what puts children and me off. It is so very banal, with bits of different traditions used here and there in a really self-conscious way, with no attachment to their actual meaning.

So yes, I believe that children can develop a faith based on what they see in proper worship, and this can grow and be nourished by the church, but I do not believe that we should offer some sort of special alternative, and then leave them out in the dark when they get to a certain age, as this will ensure that they leave.

RC x

[fixed a typo]

[ 21. April 2003, 15:09: Message edited by: jlg ]
 
Posted by Degs (# 2824) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Regina Cæli:
Children and young people, and most people for that matter, find their spirituality enriched by bold liturgy, whether it be solid Evangelical or solid Catholic. A watered-down, nonsensical, half-hearted, mix n' match version of these traditions is what puts children and me off. It is so very banal, with bits of different traditions used here and there in a really self-conscious way, with no attachment to their actual meaning.

So yes, I believe that children can develop a faith based on what they see in proper worship, and this can grow and be nourished by the church, but I do not believe that we should offer some sort of special alternative, and then leave them out in the dark when they get to a certain age, as this will ensure that they leave.

Well said RC!

"From middle-of-the-road religion: Good Lord deliver us"

(That is in the Litany isn't it?) [Smile]
 
Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
Does anyone know where I can purchase rose incense. I believe it was called "Rosa Mystica" the one I am looking for. But if anyone knows of any other rose incense please let me know
 
Posted by Regina Cæli (# 2343) on :
 
As the brothers who made it became unwell, and it was traced to the manufacturing process, I doubt that anywhere that has any would be willing to part with it.

There are alternatives though. I get the Orthodox 'Purbeck Rose', made by the good people at S Edwards.

RC x
 
Posted by Panis Angelicus (# 3795) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Regina Cæli:
As the brothers who made it became unwell, and it was traced to the manufacturing process, I doubt that anywhere that has any would be willing to part with it.

Speaking of unwell, Regina..... there is an ears-nose-throat surgeon in my parish who insists that the use of incense results in high rates of cancer in the sinus area for thurifers--and that monks on Mount Athos essentially submit to a kind of respiratory martyrdom in some cases because their lungs are eventually packed full of incense dust. I've brushed him off in this assertion for years, but he persists. I would have no intention of ceasing to thurify if he turned out to be correct, but I'd be interested if someone on the board knows of a credible medical study to this effect.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Regina Cæli:
As the brothers who made it became unwell, and it was traced to the manufacturing process, I doubt that anywhere that has any would be willing to part with it.

There are alternatives though. I get the Orthodox 'Purbeck Rose', made by the good people at S Edwards.

RC x

I hate to say this, but making and/or ingesting that foul blend would indeed make one ill. [Projectile]
 
Posted by Regina Cæli (# 2343) on :
 
I discovered today that one of them actually died. [Frown]

It's a fragrance that I doubt was intended to be used alone though. You'd really have to mix it with something a little more frankincesish.

RC x
 
Posted by daisymay (# 1480) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adrian1:
Much as it grieves me, I have to disagree with my good friend Cosmo. Prinknash 'Basilica' is, in my opinion, one of the best forms of incense - if not the best - and given a choice I would use it every time.

Basilica, IMO, is disgusting. It smells like puff and strangulates my throat. Almost anything else would be nicer.
[Cool]
 
Posted by Eminentisimo (# 3924) on :
 
quote:
the choir] should be able to breathe pure, unadulterated air, free from the smell of both incense and stale cassocks
quoted above by CorgaGreti

Never trust waht is written in books.

George Guest tolertaed incense. It was used in my time there - Easter, Ascension, Trinity & a Solemn Evensong to commemorate the anniversary of Bishop Fisher's death (& co-founder of the college). I even have several photos of George with the Sanctuary party including a thurifer and boat boy.

The choir liked it too as it gave them an excuse for the odd bum note (not that there were many, of course) after heavy evenings in the bar....
 
Posted by Panis Angelicus (# 3795) on :
 
Can I get a witness?

http://www.ontario.anglican.ca/scentfree.htm

I'd be interested to know of a confirmed sighting of this plaque in an actual place of worship. Presumably, it applies to incense as well as to "perfumes, colognes, after-shaves" et ceteras?
 
Posted by Joan the Outlaw-Dwarf (# 1283) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by daisymay:
quote:
Originally posted by Adrian1:
Much as it grieves me, I have to disagree with my good friend Cosmo. Prinknash 'Basilica' is, in my opinion, one of the best forms of incense - if not the best - and given a choice I would use it every time.

Basilica, IMO, is disgusting. It smells like puff and strangulates my throat. Almost anything else would be nicer.
[Cool]

I can only assume you aren't having it burnt properly. Sack the thurifer.

Alternatively, as this place did when we got here, it's being kept in the boat, in a damp cellar, and several weeks go by between usages. [Roll Eyes] You do not want to know what that smelt like when put on nearly-out coals (incompetant thurifer). Blech [Ultra confused]

Re: boatkids. They get to dress up and feel important. Of course they're not going to behave like they do when eg bored silly at school. I did have to keep an eye on mine at the Easter Vigil as I gave him a candle, but apart from that (oh, and giving him a tissue to remove his chewing gum [Smile] ) the only problem I had was remembering that effectively my width was doubled, so whereas on my own if I stood just there I wouldn't be in the way, with two of us someone will trip over us.

They also look cute even with runny noses and all the old ladies go aaaaah. And they can go on to be servers, and you can actually teach them to do it competantly, rather than the adults who think that "we've never done it like that before" is a proper argument when discussing how to serve...
 
Posted by stbruno (# 3505) on :
 
In reposne to Interprd Thurifer's request for Rose incense, the Catholic Shop next to the Blessed Sacrament Fathers church in Melbourne sells rose incense...it smells OK too.
 
Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
St Bruno Thanks for the info next time I am in the city I will got to St Francis' and get some. I had no idea I would be able to get rose incense so close to home.
 
Posted by Regina Cæli (# 2343) on :
 
Offer still stands though.

x
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Hostly Mobcap ON

Just moving some relevant posts (all posted on June 9, 2003) from another thread:

quote:
originally posted by angloid:
We had plenty of smoke yesterday but most of it seemed to be charcoal rather than incense. It rather catches the back of the throat and inhibits proper Pentecost(al?) singing. Any thuri-technologists out there who could recommend a remedy? Is it a question of the proportion of charcoal to incense, or how long to let the former burn, or cleaning the thurible, or a combination? I realise a similar thread has been round before but I don't recollect any guidance on this particular problem.

quote:
reply from Merseymike:
Sounds like you need more incense in the mix - and try the more pungent varieties. Next parishioners who go to Italy or Greece. tell them to bring a load back - its good stuff, much cheaper than what we pay here, and usually excessively powerful!

quote:
posted by Ultraspike:
Those self-lighting charcoal briquettes ("Quik-lites" as they're known over here) emit a most noxious odor, and even the strongest incense can hardly overcome it. I recommend "real" charcoal, untreated with chemicals, such as the Kingsford original brand. They take longer to cook but there is much less charcoal smell to compete with. The only problem is you need to have a gas burner or some such setup to cook them. Most sacristies do not have this and must rely on just a lighter or a match to cook the charcoals, hence the need for the self-lighting types. [Frown]

quote:
posted by frater-frag:
At my church we use only real charcoal as well, the trick is to get it really red-hot before the service starts. And of course, make sure that the celebrant only adds three SMALL spoons off incense...

By time I have managed to discipline our priest on that matter, these days he doesn´t put out the glowing charcoal by OD:ing to death [Votive]

As for incense, we mostly use "Three Kings", it burns perfectly and leaves no "coalish" remains in the air.

Of course, using a gas-burner for starting up the coals are also nescessary, and, doing the mighty 360¤ swings as well (remember to lookout for chandeliers)!


 
Posted by angloid (# 159) on :
 
Thanks Jennifer for locating the original thread. Thanks too others for helpful comments. But Frater.frag's advice would frighten some of our more euro-sceptic members who are afraid of the raging inflation implied by
quote:
the mighty 360¤ swings
(At least that's how it reads on my computer, as a euro symbol rather than a degree symbol.)

[fixed code]

[ 09. June 2003, 20:55: Message edited by: Siegfried ]
 
Posted by frater-frag (# 2184) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by angloid:
Thanks Jennifer for locating the original thread. Thanks too others for helpful comments. But Frater.frag's advice would frighten some of our more euro-sceptic members who are afraid of the raging inflation implied by
quote:
the mighty 360¤ swings
(At least that's how it reads on my computer, as a euro symbol rather than a degree symbol.)

[fixed code]

......................................

Thats odd, allthough I do advocate a common EU currency, thats not what I intended! [Razz]

The EURO symbol is located on my E button, ie, €, the ¤ is on my 4 button, toghether with the no longer so mighty $! [Devil]

Are you on a MAC?
 
Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
Hey St Bruno

I bought the rose incense from the Catholic Bookshop next to St Francis church in Melbourne. I am surprised it is really good and not orthodox incense either it was made in Italy. We used it on Pentecost as it is red in colour and we will use it again on the feast of the mother of our lord in August
 
Posted by stbruno (# 3505) on :
 
Pleased to hear the incense was a success Mr Thurifer. Did you notice the other varieties that were also selling..I seem to recall their was one that looked lime green with bright yellow ..not sure what the fragrance was though! Perhaps you could try it out and report back?
Keep on smoking.....
 
Posted by Intrepid Thurifer (# 77) on :
 
The others were Citronella incase you have cockroaches in church I geuss, and one other was Patouli (I think thats how you spell it) for the hippies I guess
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Intrepid Thurifer:
...one other was Patouli (I think thats how you spell it) for the hippies I guess

Also recommended for an Evensnog service. (I'm going to keep making that joke until someone laughs!!!! Don't say I didn't warn you!!!!!!)
 
Posted by Anglicub (# 3413) on :
 
quote:
Siegfried said:

Also recommended for an Evensnog service. (I'm going to keep making that joke until someone laughs!!!! Don't say I didn't warn you!!!!!!)


Perhaps it's just the mood i'm in but that's had me giggling for the last few minutes... hee.
 
Posted by Alogon (# 5513) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CorgiGreta:

I have, however, heard absolutely sublime music sung when the smoke was so thick the church looked like a cigar bar. The same has been true when the choir was quite fragrant due to musty vestments and/or widespread halitosis or alcohol-breath.

Greta

Good choirs are troupers who will come through despite adversity. Nevertheless, too much incense will ruin a choir in the long run. I regret to say it, but it's true.

Recruitment of choristers became very difficult for awhile at Church of the Good Shepherd, Rosemont because word got around to all the schools up and down the Main Line that the place would "choke you to death." And it is rumored that when Peter Richard Conte was negotiating a return to S. Clement's, Philadelphia, one of his conditions was that the amount of incense be moderated, because singers of the caliber he wanted simply would refuse to work under conditions that threatened their voices.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
The choir at my church has only one real whinger about incense and she is a heavy cigarette smoker, so it's hard to be very sympathetic. [Roll Eyes]

They are far enough away that it really shouldn't bother them, since most of the smoke goes straight up to the rafters.

As I've said before, Frankincense and Myrrh are good expectorants and decongestants. Most people inhale much worse things walking down the city streets. [brick wall]
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
relocated from another thread

quote:
Originally posted by boppysbud:
About incense.

I noticed growing up in the 70's when smoking was socially acceptable, the same people who would be complaining of allergies and asthma and coughing their heads off at the merest whiff from the censer could not wait for Mass to end so they could light up. [Ultra confused] [Help]

At coffee hour you couldn't see across the parish hall for the wal-to-wall cigarette smoke. [Projectile]

Seems like what they were really allergic to was Catholicism [Devil]


 
Posted by Deon (# 609) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alogon:
quote:
Originally posted by CorgiGreta:

I have, however, heard absolutely sublime music sung when the smoke was so thick the church looked like a cigar bar. The same has been true when the choir was quite fragrant due to musty vestments and/or widespread halitosis or alcohol-breath.

Greta

Good choirs are troupers who will come through despite adversity.
Witness my lot:

http://genecs.com/smaa/Gallery/Photographs%20-%202002%20-%20Corpus%20Christi/2002_0602_115759AA.JPG

Cheers
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
From another thread on how to clean thuribles

quote:
Originally posted by Fiddleback:
Acetone to get the residue off (not forgetting the chains) then brass/silver polish.

Every week if possible.

quote:
Originally posted by Saint Osmund:
Rubber gloves, ethanol and a toothbrush are what I use. Emptying the thurible immediately after use also helps prevent it getting into the same state again.

Rinse thoroughly with water afterwards, and then dry it. Brasso should then do a sterling job.

M x

(PS - I haven't seen Silvo anywhere for ages. Is this no longer available?)

M x

quote:
Originally posted by Sacristan:
Acetone is great for removing the tar. To polish it is easier to use "Twinkle" if available. You won't get as high a shine as with "Brasso" but it requires a lot less elbow grease.


 
Posted by Alogon (# 5513) on :
 
While we're discussing minutiae, I wonder how others feel about two preferences that I have relating to censing the congregation.

The first is that the thurifer should swing the thurible as far into the nave as possible-- if circumstances permit, from the end of the chain and at arm's length. This looks generous and pastoral. Some thurifers give the chain only about a foot of play and make three little swings from shoulder height. One gets the impression that they're wiping their noses (or thumbing them?) at the people rather than serving them.

I also prefer that the thurifers look out at the congregation while censing them. Custos oculi is a good thing oftentimes, but here it just looks as though one is sleepwalking or in a trance.

These points probably make me a horrible revisionist in the eyes of those who feel that some ancient rubric in fine print must be adhered to at all costs. But if I were a thurifer, this is how I'd hope to proceed. And if I were a master of acolytes, this is how I would train others, and if overruled I just might be upset enough to resign. When you can see such variations in the styles of thurifers at S. Clement's, Philadelphia, you must doubt that any cardinal rule is at stake.

Does anyone care to argue to the contrary?
 
Posted by Magic Wand (# 4227) on :
 
The variation of styles in use at S. Clement's for the censing of the congregation is an utter disgrace! Unfortunately, Alogon the correct method is the one which you seem not to prefer, and soon will be the only one in use there, so I'm told.
 
Posted by Alogon (# 5513) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Magic Wand:
The variation of styles in use at S. Clement's for the censing of the congregation is an utter disgrace! Unfortunately, Alogon the correct method is the one which you seem not to prefer, and soon will be the only one in use there, so I'm told.

Who/what makes it "the" correct method? I suspect that at S. Clement's, this would be a case of the lay popes striking again <sigh>, which in turn suggests a figurehead rector. I wouldn't blame Fr. Reid yet if so, because he is still new; but neither do I suspect, from what little I've gathered, that an enforced uniformity in that direction would originate with him.

Fr. Laister was one of our greater rectors partly because he had what it took to make the congregation feel needed in the liturgy, even if it meant adopting a few details that didn't please the "sacristy rats" for whom ancient minutiae are the nun plus ultra.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Yes, the congo should be censed with three full chains, center-left-right. It is important to smile but not grin. But the sanctuary party should only get a short chain. We have a couple of incorrigibles who insist on censing the acolytes with a long chain and it looks ridiculous. [Mad]

Now, what about figure 8's or Queen Annes, as we call them? I used to like them but now they just seem pretentious, ostentatious and even dangerous. Whence did this practice originate and why? [Ultra confused]
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
Alogon and Ultraspike, I agree entirely with both of you. I also cense the congregation with the thurible at full length, as I believe that, as with any symbol, what we are doing ought to be made clear.

When I served at Mass in Lourdes a couple of years ago, the fact that the liturgical awareness of the regular servers of the Cathedral of the diocese that I accompanied was irreparably poor was most apparent. The seminarians were scurrying, rather then walking all over the sanctuary. One of them refused to allow me to add more incense to the thurible after the censings at the Offertory, despite the fact that there was no smoke whatever emanating from it. As a result, I ended up swinging an empty thurible towards the Blessed Sacrament at the elevations, and all beause of some misguided notion that "only the Bishop adds more incense".

When the Deacon was censing the Offertory, I had to restrain laughter. I had serious doubts that he had ever handled a thurible before. He held it directly in front of his face in his right hand, at arm's length, about 6 inches above the pot, and pulled the rest of the chain tight in his left hand. He then proceeded the strike the chain against the pot to make it move towards the congregation. The idea of swinging it appeared not to have occurred to him.

I believe that there are times (such as occasions where the Deacon is inept) when the less essential rubrics may be laid aside for the better performance of the liturgy (ie, let the thurifer do it!)

I am increasingly in agreement about figure '8's as well. They are highly ostentatious, and if they must be used, perhaps ought to be reserved for more festal outdoor processions. The most I stretch to now is swinging on either side. As the good Saint Percy saith, "The warning, 'Avoid Elaboration' needs constant repetition..."

M x
 
Posted by Alogon (# 5513) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Osmund:
I am increasingly in agreement about figure '8's as well. They are highly ostentatious, and if they must be used, perhaps ought to be reserved for more festal outdoor processions.
M x

I don't have a strong opinion about full-circle swings etc. Festal occasions, and judiciously, fine with me. Whether they look ostentatious depends somewhat on the thurifer's skill (or lack thereof). The best make them so deftly and neatly that they're over before you realize that they're started. "Art is the concealment of art." I'd be inclined to enjoy a well-executed fancy swing similarly to a soaring descant by the choir trebles, or a nearly kaleidoscopic free harmonization on the organ, for a climactic stanza of a hymn, as an occasional adornment.

But I certainly wouldn't insist on it.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Osmund:
When I served at Mass in Lourdes a couple of years ago, the fact that the liturgical awareness of the regular servers of the Cathedral of the diocese that I accompanied was irreparably poor was most apparent. The seminarians were scurrying, rather then walking all over the sanctuary. One of them refused to allow me to add more incense to the thurible after the censings at the Offertory, despite the fact that there was no smoke whatever emanating from it. As a result, I ended up swinging an empty thurible towards the Blessed Sacrament at the elevations, and all beause of some misguided notion that "only the Bishop adds more incense".

When the Deacon was censing the Offertory, I had to restrain laughter. I had serious doubts that he had ever handled a thurible before. He held it directly in front of his face in his right hand, at arm's length, about 6 inches above the pot, and pulled the rest of the chain tight in his left hand. He then proceeded the strike the chain against the pot to make it move towards the congregation. The idea of swinging it appeared not to have occurred to him.


M x

Another problem there was that the deacon should not have been censing the gifts or the people, whatever it was he was doing...
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sacristan:
Another problem there was that the deacon should not have been censing the gifts or the people, whatever it was he was doing...

I am no expert on the Roman rite, but I believe that the Celebrant (bishop, in this instance) censes the gifts and offertory, and Deacon then censes him and any concelebrants, and then the congregation, before handing the thurible back to the thurifer. That is why it didn't seem oddd to me at the time that the Deacon insisted on doing the censings (apart from the fact that he didn't know how).

M x
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
Just checked, and yes, the Deacon censes Celebrant, any concelebrants, choir and congregation before handing the thurible back to the thurifer.

M x
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Thanks SO.

I was under the impression that you were at an Anglican affair. [Big Grin]

I wouldn't want to be a thurifer in that context - not much to do! [Snore] [Snore] [Snore]

Sacristan
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
I'm sorry. I ought to have mentioned it was with the RC Diocese of Salford.

It was a bit dull being the thurifer, which is something I never thought I would type here. Then so was the whole thing, and the bishop was a liturgical disaster as well. (Is this a prerequisite?)

M x
 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alogon:
The first is that the thurifer should swing the thurible...from the end of the chain and at arm's length.

Minutiae indeed, but is there any authority anywhere for this bizarre, undignified and dangerous aberration? The correct handling of the thurible is perfectly clearly described by Fortescue -- are there any other sources, other than Shipmates' (no-doubt well-intentioned!) personal inventions?

I suspect this is an Anglican confabulation of the past thirty years, based on a misunderstanding of the handling of Orthodox thuribles (which are a quite different shape). Is this another attempt to show how anti-Rome we are?

Answers on a postcard please...
 
Posted by Treatise (# 4255) on :
 
I know of no authority for the figure eight or the 360. I was very fond of doing both when I was younger, but now I agree with others who find them cheap and showy.

As for what Alogon and others say on styles and whether particular ways of doing a thing are pastoral or not, I find that the joy of being in a place like S. Clement's is the work that the parish has put into liberating itself from eccentricities and preferences. There are few idiosyncrasies or little moments where the servers or the sacred ministers’ gestures say that I should turn aside from the worship of almighty God to note that someone is doing something that is “meaningful” to them that I should find to be meaningful as well.

When I was much too young, I was the MC for a weekly solemn mass in a beautiful church and got to run amok doing things I had always wanted to try or thought would be meaningful, or, like wild antics with a thurible, just thought were neat. Now that I’m older and wiser, I want consistency so that I need not be distracted from the worship of God by wondering what someone is going to take it into their head to do next or having to pause to decide whether I like or approve of whatever thing just happened. S. Clement’s quest for consistency (God bless every one of our hard-working rats) certainly isn’t for everyone, but I am very glad that there are such places.
 
Posted by Magic Wand (# 4227) on :
 
Pax Britannica is (as usual) spot on. Quoth Alogon:
quote:
Who/what makes it "the" correct method?
The rubrics of the liturgical books, the decreta authentica of the S.R.C., and the commentaries of the approved authors. Is there another authoritative source?

And again:
quote:
I suspect that at S. Clement's, this would be a case of the lay popes striking again
If so, Deo gratias! Heaven forfend that those interested in the intricacies of ceremonial should be involved with producing it.

Finally (and at some length, I'm afraid):
quote:
Fr. Laister was one of our greater rectors partly because he had what it took to make the congregation feel needed in the liturgy, even if it meant adopting a few details that didn't please the "sacristy rats" for whom ancient minutiae are the nun plus ultra.
With respect to the poster's latter comment, assuming that ne plus ultra is actually meant, I would indeed agree--although not with any of the disparagement which I presume is intended. In terms of the former, perhaps Alogon could be a bit more specific?

And from Ultraspike:
quote:
Yes, the congo should be censed with three full chains, center-left-right. It is important to smile but not grin.
And the source of this is? Personal innovation?

However, with respect to:
quote:
Now, what about figure 8's or Queen Annes, as we call them? I used to like them but now they just seem pretentious, ostentatious and even dangerous.
Quite right, Mr Edmund Bishop wrote that "The genius of the native Roman rite is marked by simplicity, practicality, a great sobriety and self-control, gravity and dignity."

I have no particular objection to any of the varieties of ceremonial which have developed in the history of the Church, but I simply loathe the mix-n-match favoured by some clergy and laity. It smacks of the "Bayeux Cathedral Syndrome" which is endemic among the adherents of the S.S.P.X.; it is characterized by deciding questions of ceremonial based on "what I remember from Bayeux cathedral when I was a boy." For the most part, a question of simple laziness and self-aggrandizement!
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Magic Wand:
And from Ultraspike:
quote:
Yes, the congo should be censed with three full chains, center-left-right. It is important to smile but not grin.
And the source of this is? Personal innovation?

Almost every major AC church that uses incenses that I've ever seen censes the congo thusly (although the smile is optional). I always assumed it was in the "rubrics" somewhere. But I dare say every practice was someone's "personal innovation" sometime. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Alogon (# 5513) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Magic Wand:
Quoth Alogon:
quote:
Who/what makes it "the" correct method?
The rubrics of the liturgical books, the decreta authentica of the S.R.C., and the commentaries of the approved authors. Is there another authoritative source?
With respect to the poster's latter comment, assuming that ne plus ultra is actually meant, I would indeed agree--although not with any of the disparagement which I presume is intended. In terms of the former, perhaps Alogon could be a bit more specific?

I'd like to check Ritual Notes and The Parson's Handbook before surrendering. If neither of these support my preference, I will have to concede (reluctantly) that there is no established western authority for it. On the other hand, I don't know why eastern usage should be dismissed simply because their thuribles were of a different shape. What is dangerous about swinging the thurible in a large arc rather than a small one, assuming that there is plenty of open space for it?

I would be happy to be more specific as you requested. Today the epistle is read in the sanctuary facing east. The Holy Gospel is proclaimed in the sanctuary facing the north wall. Most of the Lord's Prayer is chanted by the celebrant alone, even though the Book of Common Prayer has clearly announced, "we are bold to say..." for centuries.

I am aware of the ancient symbolism surrounding the northward position for the Gospel, but it shouldn't take precedence over proclaiming the Gospel to those present. Why the epistle is read facing east or why the people are kept from singing the entire Lord's Prayer, I have no idea, but the latter especially is "offensive" (to quote an old friend in his 70s, a nearly life-long Anglo-Catholic and long-time parishioner, who has, I'm sorry to say, recently departed to a 'breakaway' Anglican congregation.)

These usages flourished, and probably originated, during an era when the laity seldom received Communion and were in general treated as second-class citizens. The effect of all of them when revived today is to suggest that those in the congregation are tolerated onlookers rather than valued participants. The appearance of a merely perfunctory censing of the people looks like one more manifestation of the same attitude. I probably wouldn't even mention it if it occurred in isolation.

If I were convinced that we must adhere to these details, or the walls would come tumbling down and we would degenerate into a garden-variety Rite II Anglo-Catholic-Lite kind of place, I'd gladly applaud every last one of them despite personal feelings. But in some ways I am still an Anglo-Catholic, not a resuscitated 17th-century RC, and I know that Anglo-Catholicism has done very nicely, indeed had its heyday, when it was moved by pastoral as well as historical concerns.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Censing the congo with a long chain must surely have been seen as just a logical way to get more smoke out to a large area. It makes sense (pun) to use the short chain in a smaller area where your object is closer. So what if it's not written down in Fortescue. Those books are only guidelines, not Gospel, imho. Innovations always creep in due to local usage and/or (God forbid) eccentricities.

If you really want the congo to feel censed, do it like the Orthodox or St. Mary the Virgin TImes Square these days. The deacon runs down the aisle censing one side then the other. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
If you really want the congo to feel censed, do it like the Orthodox or St. Mary the Virgin TImes Square these days. The deacon runs down the aisle censing one side then the other. [Roll Eyes]

That's really horrid for a Western Rite church.

Sacristan

P.S. You know what "they" say: Nothing incenses like incense.
 
Posted by Panis Angelicus (# 3795) on :
 
Why is the congregation censed, again? Has this always been done in the West?
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alogon:
These usages flourished, and probably originated, during an era when the laity seldom received Communion and were in general treated as second-class citizens. The effect of all of them when revived today is to suggest that those in the congregation are tolerated onlookers rather than valued participants.

And that is precisely the point!

Some of the more discerning of you may have picked up an inkling in you reading of MW that I have a minor interest in English Catholic rites and ceremonial. [Smile]

My starting point for liturgical authority in such cases is mediaeval Catholic practice, much of which lives on in our beloved Book of Common Prayer. This must then be adapted (and the adaptation required is most often surprisingly minimal) to our current authorised rites.

Further to Alogon's comment above, and to answer PA's question, one will find that in these mediaeval rites, with all of their detailed rubrics, that there were no directions for the censing of the congregation, for the posture of the congregation throughout the Mass, or for the reception of Holy Communion. They were onlookers, often reduced to running around churches to catch a glimpse of the elevations through 'squints'; and apart fro Easter, this was the nearest they came to the Blessed Sacrament.

quote:
Originaly posted by Ultraspike:
So what if it's not written down in Fortescue. Those books are only guidelines, not Gospel, imho.

A-a-a-a-a-a-me-en!

I am a great fan of Dr Dearmer's great work, but I realise that he was adapting traditional English Catholic ceremonial to the liturgy of his day, within the canonical strictures of his day, and so I do not approve of their wholesale adoption; and even he allows for variations based on local circumstances.

As for this talk of 'Western' authority, the tradition in the Western Church was for local variations. This only came to an abrupt end at the Council of Trent, by whih time, Anglicanism had continued in English practice, as adapted to the BCP.

If you have enough room to do it, then do it, and if not, then obviously don't. If your thurible is intact, and properly closed, provided that there is sufficient space, and yout thufier isn't hungover, there is no reason they may not be done.

M x
 
Posted by Saint Osmund (# 2343) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Panis Angelicus:
Why is the congregation censed, again? Has this always been done in the West?

In my previous post, I overlooked the first part of your question. Apologies.

I have never seen this written down anywhere, and have never been taught this, but since I have been old enough to understand (to whatever degree we can understand) what happens at Mass, I have made this association in my mind:

The oblations to be offered are censed, then the Cross, to show that the Sacrifice being mde present is one and the same with the Sacrifice on the Cross. Then in censed the Altar on which the Sacrifice is to be offered, followed by the priest who is to offer the Sacrifice in persona Christi sacerdos magnus, and then the entire congregation, the Kingdom of Priests who also take part in the Sacrifice.

I have always seen it as uniting everybody present in the 'anamnesis' of Christ's Sacrifice at Calvary. To omit the censing of the congregation, or to somhow downplay it seems therefore out of place.

I don't know if this is theologically sound,. but it seems to be, and as for why we cense the congregation, it's an explanation that works for me. [Biased]

M x
 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Osmund:
I have never seen this written down anywhere

Then, sonny, get your Aquinas Summa Theol out of the Manchester Public Library and look up Pars III, q. LXXXIII, art. 5. If you ask nicely, FCB may come and help us.

Of much more interest than "what we did at Bayeaux when I was a boy" is the prayer used at the putting on of the incense and why it erroneously mentions Michael.
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
I have never seen (to my knowledge) this business of censing the congregation with a full chain. I don't quite see the point of it unless you go the full SMtVTSq route which has, at least, the virtue of consistency. After all, not everybody is going to get smoke on them if you choose to use either a full chain or a short chain. Or are we saying we should at least look as though we are censing everybody so as to ensure no-body gets left out. I'm in favour of style over substance as much as the next man but really... Not only that, it's completely inconsistent with what's going on with the sanctuary party.

The Lord Bishop of London insists on censing the altar with a full chain (all the while muttering Greek obscenities), no doubt due to his Orthodox tendencies. It is intensely annoying and, worse, completely out of step with all Western Use. The same, I imagine, would be my reaction if I was in the congo of a church and found myself censed with a full chain.

Cosmo
 
Posted by Sine Nomine (# 3631) on :
 
<Bump>

Henry103, you might find this thread interesting.
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
At St Mary's - if we are using the High Altar the thurifer goes into the blessed sacrament chapel to put the thurible onto the Stand.
If we are using nave altar thurifer sits to the right of the altar with the thurible on the stand underneath the eagle stand.
When it comes to consecration, thurifer moves to the altar during the "Blessed is he who comes to the name of the Lord" in the Lamb of God, everyone kneels when the bells ring.
When the host is elavated, incense is clicked three times with the bells and the same with the cup.
All servers disapear when the great amen is sung and then servers appear in semi circle to recieve communion.
-Henry
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
variously posted by Henry103:
...thurifer sits to the right of the altar...

...the stand....

When the host is elavated, incense is clicked three times with the bells...

Mr. Balkwill, 'right'! Your right? The celebrant's right? Stage right? Your other right? Honestly, the only directions that still work are East, South, West, and North. Now, to which side of the altar does the thurifer sit?

The 'stand'. Ah, yes, that would be the silent acolyte.

And, 'clinking'? Cocktails glasses, perhaps, may be clinked, but the Most Blessed Sacrament of the Altar is incensed. [Thank you Fiddleback for sparing me your withering ridicule, at least while there was a fatter target in range.] It may happen that the thurible makes noise against its chains. Some may approve, while others despair, the untuned sound, but one incenses the MBS. One does not clink anything.
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Henry103:
I think most people are married at St Mary's - except for the younger servers, and myself though I'm only 16.

With howlers such as this, Mr. Balkwill, it's hard for me to believe you are not really a 46 year old troll yanking our chain. But, being the gullible sort, I'll tell you DODwarf found my diction risible: By 'single individual', I intended a person not standing next to another. Will you please stop telling us you are "only 16".

Can anyone attest to Young Henry's true age?
 
Posted by ce (# 1957) on :
 
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:
quote:
With howlers such as this, Mr. Balkwill, it's hard for me to believe you are not really a 46 year old troll yanking our chain. But, being the gullible sort, I'll tell you DODwarf found my diction risible: By 'single individual', I intended a person not standing next to another. Will you please stop telling us you are "only 16".

Can anyone attest to Young Henry's true age?

A quick "google" on "Henry Balkwill" will confirm that Henry appears to be what he says he is, or has a well developed and longstanding "troll persona".

Oh and what exactly were you filmed doing for Childrens TV, Henry? - enquiring minds want to know.

ce
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
A quick "google" on "Henry Balkwill" will confirm that Henry appears to be what he says he is, or has a well developed and longstanding "troll persona".

Oh and what exactly were you filmed doing for Childrens TV, Henry? - enquiring minds want to know.

Wow - Good Research - I was filmed for a Childrens ITV program called "The Top Ten of Everything" I was singing a medley of the top ten christmas carols, I also was on a BBC Gameshow called "2for2000", but I only got to round 2 (there were 2000 contestants and 4 rounds)
Yes, I've been on the internet now since I was about 9, so thats 7 years on the internet!
If you can find out the specs of my first laptop though - I'll be dead impressed [Razz]

-Henry
 
Posted by CorgiGreta (# 443) on :
 
Henry,

I am afraid our gentle jesting has made you shy of using ancient and proper Latin liturgical terminology. You can do better than this: "...thurifer moves to the altar during the "Blessed is he who comes to the name of the Lord" in the Lamb of God, everyone kneels...".

I for one think that you are 16 even though the only proof you have supplied is a photo of a trouser leg and a trainer. Your devotion to the Church is, sadly, far from typical for your age group which tends to be obsessed with more trivial matters.

You communicate very well for someone so young(although I would suggest that you brush up a bit on punctuation), and I shall confess to having enjoyed your posts and threads. I shall even go so far as to opine that you have been a whiff of incense in the MW onion patch.

As an aside, I hate your new screen name. As a life-long Anglo-Catholic, I naturally preferred the old one.

Greta
 
Posted by Sine Nomine (# 3631) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CorgiGreta:
I shall confess to having enjoyed your posts and threads.

Moi aussi.
 
Posted by ce (# 1957) on :
 
Henry,
quote:
Originally posted by Henry103:

If you can find out the specs of my first laptop though - I'll be dead impressed [Razz]
-Henry

OK, I'll rise to the bait, in 2001 you were running a 100meg laptop with 98se.
More seriously (and somewhat back on topic) I would like second what CorgiGreta said. You have given cosiderable entertainment (and provocation) but I suspect that you are quite capable of keeping your side of the dialogue up.

ce
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Henry,

I am afraid our gentle jesting has made you shy of using ancient and proper Latin liturgical terminology. You can do better than this: "...thurifer moves to the altar during the "Blessed is he who comes to the name of the Lord" in the Lamb of God, everyone kneels...".

I for one think that you are 16 even though the only proof you have supplied is a photo of a trouser leg and a trainer. Your devotion to the Church is, sadly, far from typical for your age group which tends to be obsessed with more trivial matters.

You communicate very well for someone so young(although I would suggest that you brush up a bit on punctuation), and I shall confess to having enjoyed your posts and threads. I shall even go so far as to opine that you have been a whiff of incense in the MW onion patch.

As an aside, I hate your new screen name. As a life-long Anglo-Catholic, I naturally preferred the old one.

Greta

Uhuh, ok lets see (thinks of old latin stuff)
Lamb of God = "Agnes Dei" - "es" = "of", "Agn" = "Lamb", "Dei" = "God"
The "Blessed is he..." is called the "Benedictus"? - I don't really listen to the choir when they sing in latin, I just try to work out where everyone should be!
When I say everyone kneels when the bells ring, I mean that everyone falls to their knees as the mass reaches its climax!

-Henry
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
Sorry for Double Posting - the time ran out!
quote:
OK, I'll rise to the bait, in 2001 you were running a 100meg laptop with 98se.
More seriously (and somewhat back on topic) I would like second what CorgiGreta said. You have given cosiderable entertainment (and provocation) but I suspect that you are quite capable of keeping your side of the dialogue up.

Very Good [Big Grin] - it was actually a Dell Latitude XPi 100SD, 100mhz Pentium, 40mb RAM, 2.1gb Hard Disk, 28.8k Modem [Big Grin]

Actually - it's rather scary that people can find so much about me on the internet!
I'll raise the stakes here: which newsgroup I'm I an active member of and what's my nickname on it?

Also what was the name of the boatboy at mass today - I've forgotten so you will all have to remind me! (laughs as this will now be impossible)

-Henry
P.S. Sorry if I'm abusing this forums with my silly games Mr. Admin - this is just a one off!
 
Posted by ACOL-ite (# 4991) on :
 
If I may drag this thread kicking and screaming back to the subject of incense and thurifers...

I'm doing smoke on Wednesday (at my AC parish church) for a funeral (Requiem Mass) for a lady whose family are RC. Are there any simple ways in which I can vary my style to make them feel at home?
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
If I may drag this thread kicking and screaming back to the subject of incense and thurifers...

I'm doing smoke on Wednesday (at my AC parish church) for a funeral (Requiem Mass) for a lady whose family are RC. Are there any simple ways in which I can vary my style to make them feel at home?

Less smoke - many RC Parishes don't actually use incense anymore, and if they do (i'm thinking about one monastry now) smoke is rare when it comes out of the thurible, it really is quite pointless.
When it comes to ritual, I think its pretty much the same!

-Henry
 
Posted by rosamundi (# 2495) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Henry103:
Less smoke - many RC Parishes don't actually use incense anymore, and if they do (i'm thinking about one monastry now) smoke is rare when it comes out of the thurible, it really is quite pointless.
When it comes to ritual, I think its pretty much the same!

-Henry

Beg to differ on that one, Henry - the first RC church I ever went to, you could barely see the altar for the smoke. The same with my current church. I think the thurifer's a pyromaniac. And, to be honest, the same holds true for all of the RC churches I've been in over the last few years, apart from one in Carlisle.

But that had the altar on the same level as the people, and it was all a bit traumatic, frankly.

Deborah
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ACOL-ite:
If I may drag this thread kicking and screaming back to the subject of incense and thurifers...

I'm doing smoke on Wednesday (at my AC parish church) for a funeral (Requiem Mass) for a lady whose family are RC. Are there any simple ways in which I can vary my style to make them feel at home?

Well, if you are in the U.S. and are trying to make Roman Catholics feel at home, you might want to omit incense. [Snigger]
 
Posted by Henry103 (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
I think the thurifer's a pyromaniac
It's part of the job description!

-Henry
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ACOL-ite:
If I may drag this thread kicking and screaming back to the subject of incense and thurifers...

I'm doing smoke on Wednesday (at my AC parish church) for a funeral (Requiem Mass) for a lady whose family are RC. Are there any simple ways in which I can vary my style to make them feel at home?

They're going to know they're not at home, so just do your normal thing. Trust me that they won't have any idea of "proper" use of a thurible. And you can also content yourself with knowing that if they aren't used to incense (or your particular quantity of it), you will have provided them with years of happy indignation to pull out at any and all family gatherings: "Oh my, do you remember all that incense at Gran's funeral?"

Seriously, what's going to really throw them off are the tiny differences in the various congregational responses.

[ 09. May 2004, 23:51: Message edited by: jlg ]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
I seem to recall that as a Requiem Mass is not a Mass 'of this realm', the congregation are onlookers and not necessarily participants.

This is why they do not receive communion and I believe that they are also not censed at the Offertory.

Did I dream this or has anybody come across this before?

[ 10. May 2004, 06:07: Message edited by: Back-to-Front ]
 
Posted by rosamundi (# 2495) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
I seem to recall that as a Requiem Mass is not a Mass 'of this realm', the congregation are onlookers and not necessarily participants.

This is why they do not receive communion and I believe that they are also not censed at the Offertory.

Did I dream this or has anybody come across this before?

I've just checked my Sunday Missal (approved for use in England & Wales, Ireland & Scotland) and the funeral Mass is an Eucharistic Celebration. There's nothing in the rubrics about censing (or not), but it seems to indicate that the congregation do receive Communion.

Deborah
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Thanks, Rosamundi, for that. [Smile]

I'm familiar with the modern Roman position on this.

I ought to have clarified that I meant in an Anglican context, (specifically CE) what is stipulated by the authority in English Catholicism regarding such matters?

I know that the hearse is censed at numeous points in the liturgy, but I don't know that the congregation are. [Confused]

[ 11. May 2004, 20:42: Message edited by: Back-to-Front ]
 
Posted by ACOL-ite (# 4991) on :
 
Nope, every-one got censed and every-one who wanted to received.

It was a lovely service, and I managed not to cry despite being a little "welled up" at a few points. I fear to say it, but it was a marvellous sight when I came out of the back of the church to meet the hearse to lead the coffin in and found a queue of people going over 100 yards down the road and then round the corner waiting to get into church.

I wish we had the same problems (queues to get in, standing room only, running out of orders of service) every Sunday!
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
(On topic replies from a thread about shelf life of incense)

quote:
Originally posted by Bishop of Stortford:
Rummaging through some cupboards in the sacristy on Sunday, I came across some rusty old tins of incense from Charles Farris Ltd of Hounslow. One is called "Canterbury"; the other seems to have no name. Judging by the state of the tins, I'd guess they've been there since the 1970s, if not before - possibly since the reformation. I was wondering if this stuff has a shelf life. Has anyone tried burning ancient incense? Will it still smell any good? Can it be worse than Glastonbury?

quote:
Originally posted by Fiddleback:
Most commercial stuff is ground far too small and therefore has a very short shelf life once opened, especially the ubiquitous 'Basilica' which is OK on the day of purchase but shite thereafter. We import ours from New York and worth every penny it is too.

quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
Yes, incense does get stale. The frankincense and myrrh by themselves will last indefinitely but the oils which are added have a limited freshness. Keeping the incense in an airtight bag or container helps.
Yesterday at the Anglican Use Rite at St. Vincent Ferrer the incense smelled like it had gotten mixed with grandpa's pipe tobacco about 25 years ago. [Projectile]

quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
Just to reinforce what has already been said:

You're dealing with oils, which can go rancid, undergo chemical changes, or just simply dissapate. Use of any incense, except for a new supply of a known and trusted product, should ideally always be subject to a private test-burn. Even if it smells OK in the solid state, burning it might push it over the edge into something nasty.
(tangent: Essential oils have various shelf-lives; I believe the floral ones tend to break down sooner. The more aromatic or resinous ones (think burial herbs and spices) are quite long-lasting. I have a little vial of oil of cloves which is well over 30 years old and still going strong.)


 
Posted by Hooker's Trick (# 89) on :
 
Having been a few (highly instructive) Roman Catholic masses recently, I was interested to observe that incense was not used at any of them. These are all (I assume) the main masses of the day in large parishes, both urban and suburban.

Have RCs given up on incense? Or is this an American characteristic.

I should hasten to add, lest I be set upon by our Roman Catholic bretheren, that my parish doesn't use incense either, so I am not judging, but merely curious.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I believe incense went out with Vatican II for the most part, although "high" churches like St. Agnes here in NYC use it.
 
Posted by stbruno (# 3505) on :
 
Origionally posted by Hookers trick
quote:
Have RCs given up on incense? Or is this an American characteristic.

I'm sure there are a few Sydney parishes that still like to smoke their proceedings...certainly St Mary's Cathedral uses the stuff at Sunday Solemn Mass and weekly benediction.

Pre Vat II, smoke was only permitted at Solemn Mass (or if the Priest wanted at a Missa Cantata)funeral masses and benediction, and solemn vespers so given that most RC parishes wouldn't know what a solemn mass is, its not surprising that few parishes do smoke even at the principal Sunday mass. I

belive smoke may be found at St Franks (multipara can confirm this) and of course it is almost the rule that smoke should be offered at Lewisham.......
 
Posted by Raspberry Rabbit (# 3080) on :
 
My congregation is not into the incense thing and I'm not making an issue of it. Let them *be* wrong then - I'll still love them.

Luckily, my thurible has no chains (Ho! How does he swing? Funny you should ask. Both ways! Ha!)

Where does one get a set of chains for a thurible anyway...

Raspberry Rabbit
Penicuik, Midlothian
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
You could get a small link chain at the hardware store. Wouldn't look quite as fetching as one specially made, but it would work. Does it have the base for the chains already? If not you'll have to take it to a silversmith to get it retrofitted.
 
Posted by Bishop of Stortford (# 5653) on :
 
Going way back in this thread, something Nunc Dimitus said:

quote:
This same pattern happens for the elevation of each element.

(genuflect/dong) -> -> . (elevation/dong) -> -> . (genuflect/dong) -> ->.


Shouldn't you use 3 sets of 3 swings for the elevations? I've always done this because that's what they do at St Botolph Bishopsgate, where I first came across incense. Is that incorrect?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I believe you'll find in Ritual Notes that it's three double swings.
 
Posted by Fiddleback (# 2809) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bishop of Stortford:
I've always done this because that's what they do at St Botolph Bishopsgate, where I first came across incense. Is that incorrect?

It's good to know that one side of Bishopsgate still keeps the faith.
 
Posted by ORGANMEISTER (# 6621) on :
 
This past Christmas eve I played the 11pm High service. In order to remain awake and alert I had consumed about 3 pot of coffee. When I finally arrive back at my home I had such a caffeine buzz that I turned on the TV and tried to unwind. I caught a broadcast of a beautiful Lutheran Christmas eve service in Chicago. The music was wonderful! Anyway, I noticed that a young boy carying a thurible was in the procession and later on, at the consecration the Pastor censed (?) the elements. I've also heard that at a nearby Lutheran parish incense is being used on "high" ocassions. Is this practice becoming common among Lutherans here in the States??
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
St. Mark's Evangelical Lutheran Church in Baltimore regularly uses incense at high feasts.
 
Posted by Hooker's Trick (# 89) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ORGANMEISTER:
Is this practice becoming common among Lutherans here in the States??

If the Lutherans in question have a Swedish background it's quite common and always has been. Apparently birettas, 6 candles, chancel lights and the rest are not unknown in parishes with a Swedish background.
 
Posted by Bishop of Stortford (# 5653) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cusanus:
Now on the subject of clean thuribles... where does one get acetone these days? I couldn't find any this week Even For Ready Money. All the nail polish remover available seems to be proudly announcing its non-acetone status. What to do?

I got some from http://www.beautyfornails.co.uk/ called "The Edge Acetone". It costs 4 quid for half a litre + vat and postage. Seems to do the job adequately.
 
Posted by Holy Cow (# 6245) on :
 
Mineral Turpentine does the same job as Acetone. I have used turps for may years to remove resin from thuribles.
 
Posted by Henry Troup (# 3722) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Holy Cow:
Mineral Turpentine ...

I'd not heard this term, so I did some research:

quote:
Turpentine (wood) should not be confused with mineral turpentine. Turpentine (wood) is derived by destructive distillation of wood and contains mainly pinene and dipentene. Mineral turpentine is a refined petroleum solvent and is a mixture of straight and branched chain paraffins, naphthenes and aromatic hydrocarbons.
From the Australian Exposure Standard for turpentine (wood).

I'm not sure exactly what other names this product has elsewhere in the world. The mineral turpentine hits in Google are all either Indian or Australia/New Zealand. It might be what North Americans call "mineral spirits" and the UK "white spirit":
quote:
Odorless mineral spirits (OMS), and mineral spirits (MS) also called "white spirit" in Britain and Europe, are petroleum distillate solvents. These and other solvents such as naphtha, kerosene, toluene, and xylene are distilled from petroleum.
From GAMBLIN ARTISTS COLORS

But the exposure limits don't quite match up. I couldn't find full Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) online for either product.

General notes: hydrocarbon solvents are flammable and toxic and should be used in a well-ventilated area. Wash your hands carefully after using. Don't eat or drink while using them. Beware of flammable residues! Dispose of cloths safety. Don't put used solvent down the drain.

(Sorry, my safety-geek persona has emerged.)
 
Posted by Henry Troup (# 3722) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Henry Troup:

... "mineral turpentine" ... might be what North Americans call "mineral spirits" and the UK "white spirit"...

But it's not. I found an MSDS for a product that contains both as ingredients.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Acetone works better though.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Bumping this back up to the top prior to adding the posts from the latest rogue Incense thread to it.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
From the Incense thread started in Purgatory:

quote:
Original Post by Custard123 on 29 June, 2004 19:27

What was the point of the incense in the OT?
Was there one other than it smelling nice (and seeming to be something done as part of worshipping God)?

What do people do with it today and why?

quote:
posted by Madake on 29 June, 2004 19:40

wasn't it a symbol of the prayers going to God?

quote:
posted by Father Gregory on 29 June, 2004 19:41

Dear Custard123

The primary meanings are sacrifice, prayer and the veneration of God. There is a huge amount of biblical material about this.

You could start here with the Torrey reference ...

Torrey - Incense

--------------------
Yours in Christ
Fr. Gregory

quote:
posted by CorgiGreta on 29 June, 2004 21:03

Besides the meanings cited by Fr. Gregory, incense is one of many devices (can't think of a better word) for creating an atmosphere far removed from the profane. Like special vestments, sacred art, ecclesiastical architecture, and liturgical music, incense helps to create the sights, the scents and the sounds of a heavenly space.

Greta


 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Continuing the posts from the Purg thread:

quote:
posted by Vikki Pollard on 29 June, 2004 22:04


Incense is wonderful. Unfortunately I'm really allergic to it and can't go to my local church because I can't breathe in there. [Frown]

You see, Father G, God must want SOME of us not to be Orthodox. [Biased]

quote:
posted by Ultraspike on 30 June, 2004 00:23


It also served a practical purpose of fumigating the place when the unwashed masses used to huddle there, esp. in cathedrals.

But I believe it was first used in the Temple sacrifices, in the Bible anyway. It purified the air there also as well as sending an offering to God.

quote:
posted by Moo on 30 June, 2004 00:50


I think that in the Middle East, incense has been around for thousands of years.

I assume it was used in worship because people wanted to offer something good to God.

Moo

quote:
posted by Anselm on 30 June, 2004 01:45


My 2cents worth
Given the large quantity of slaughtered animals and that was thrown around the temple, the incense would have acted nicely as a deoderant. Indeed there was a special incense/aroma for the temple incense - the temple would have had a distinctive smell. Seeking to reproduce the aroma was a serious offence IIRC.

The smoke from the incense may have also symbolised the presence of the glory of God which had on previous occasions presented iteself as a cloud.


 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Why not add all the replies?
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Yet more posts:

quote:
posted by Sir George Grey on 30 June, 2004 01:49


With Anselm's post in mind, someone definately needs to write a high-church liturgy for use in places such as Sydney, Cape Town or Johannesburg, or anywhere else where people like putting large pieces of meat on the barbecue.

quote:
posted by Ultraspike on 30 June, 2004 01:54


Frankincense and beef! The newer rite is here! [Yipee]

quote:
posted by Sir George Grey on 30 June, 2004
02:17

The beef is here.

Its savour is with us.

Lift up your forks.

We lift them unto the beef

Let us give thanks for this tender, juicy steak.

It is meat, and right so to do.


 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
And more....

quote:
HangerQueen on 30 June, 2004 02:23


Incense gives me a slamming headache. I remember going to an evening service once when I was a kid. They had this huge censer belching out fumes of incense. I thought my head was going to explode.

Guess it's low church for me! [Big Grin]

quote:
posted by Frisbeetarian on 30 June, 2004 02:38


In Wicca, especially the "fluffy" kind, the trailing smoke is supposed to carry messages up to the God and Goddess, especially when a ritual is being done in the open air. Probably does the same thing in Christian symbolism.

quote:
posted by The Dumb Acolyte on 30 June, 2004 05:45

quote:
Originally posted by Custard123:
What do people do with it today...?

Some of the why has been addressed. Perhaps it is helpful to natter on describing some of the what and the when.

Blessed incense is used together with blessed water and prayers to hallow and set objects apart. So, new vestments, rosaries, chalices, new church buildings, homes, candles, what have you, are all blessed with water, incense, and prayers.

It is also used to proceed solemn processions, inside or outside. At the station of a procession , the object of the station (Lady statue, font, rood, west doors, effigy of the patron) is incensed. At a procession of the Most Blessed Sacrament, especial care is used to honor It with incense immediately in It's path.

Anglocatholics generally use incense at the mass at these times:


Which is to say: A lot. But then, perhaps, a friend from the East will confirm or deny my belief that in their rites the thurible is rarely just hanging around in the altar.

At the rite of Benediction, the Most Blessed Sacrament is incensed during the blessing with It in the monstrance.

The above assumes there is no bishop loitering about the sanctuary. In addition, another thread discusses the use of incense at Solemn Matins and Solemn Evensong.

The Paschal Candle has five incense grains, for the Five Holy Wounds, set into it. The grains themselves are sprinkled and incensed before being placed. Then the assembly is sprinkled and incensed again.

Together with prayers, incense is used to hallow baptismal water. The East uses great clouds of it during the Great Blessing of the Waters at Holy Theophany and for the festal icon, incensed from the four cardinal points, on its feast day.

Enterprising thurifers will use incense during Solemn Te Deums to attempt to obscure from view any portion of the chancel from the west end.

And another word about the why. While we post-moderns may squirm at the thought, the church still teaches the apotropaic power of holy things: that blessed objects, and especially blessed water, blessed candles and their light, and blessed incense, can drive away demons.


 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
...still more...

quote:
posted by Mousethief on 30 June, 2004 05:48
quote:
Originally posted by Sir George Grey.:
Let us give thanks for this tender, juicy steak.

It is meat, and right so to do.

That's pretty funny, Sir GG!

[ 30. June 2004, 05:49: Message edited by: Mousethief ]

--------------------
Reader Alexis

quote:
posted by Duo Seraphim on 30 June, 2004 06:22

Hosting

Seems like a perfectly good Mystery Worship thread going to waste.

And with a single swing of the thurible in three directions to the congregation, it was sent to its natural habitat...

Duo Seraphim, Purgatory Host

[ 30. June 2004, 06:22: Message edited by: Duo Seraphim ]

--------------------
Duo Seraphim

quote:
posted by Norman the Organ on 30 June, 2004 08:47

quote:
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:

* the celebrant ... is again incensed by the deacon, who also incenses the choir clergy, if any, and the subdeacon

Not a popular guy then, this deacon - what does he keep doing wrong?


Sorry, I'll get me coat.

quote:
posted by Custard123 on 30 June, 2004 09:03


thanks very much everyone for your helpful thoughts, though the thread does seem to have been killed off by transplatation to MW

or maybe it had just run its course anyway

[ 30. June 2004, 09:03: Message edited by: Custard123 ]

quote:
posted by Sir George Grey. on 30 June, 2004 09:41


Well, I'll put my two cents worth in anyway.

To be frank I'm not as well up on the theology of incense as some. My understanding is that it represents the prayers of the assembled church.

For the most part, for me I find it a helpful aid to worship as one might with songs, silence, candles etc.

In NZ it's being rediscovered in some charismatic/evangelical circles which is interesting.

(and much to be applauded IMHO [Big Grin] )


 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
...and now for the final batch!

quote:
posted by Charles Read on 30 June, 2004 09:43


A priest friend often remarks:

"I tell people to get used to the smell of incense because in the afterlife there are only two smells - incense and brimstone".

quote:
posted by Ultraspike on 30 June, 2004 12:00


quote:
Originally posted by Charles Read:
A priest friend often remarks:

"I tell people to get used to the smell of incense because in the afterlife there are only two smells - incense and brimstone".

There's a good combo I hadn't thought of. Where does one get brimstone? Perhaps we could use it on All Souls Day. [Big Grin]
quote:
posted by Adeodatus on 30 June, 2004 13:49


Maybe the thread has slowed down now that it's in MW because for a lot of us down here, smoke just isn't much of an issue. Now, heating the charcoal just right to that orangey glow, and getting the incense grains just the right size so they do burn properly but don't all go up at once ... they're issues!

Of course, MWers will know what I'd say to the "why do we do it" of incense .....

It's liturgy. You Just Do It.

quote:
posted by Saint Chad on 30 June, 2004 14:42


quote:
Originally posted by Vikki Pollard:
You see, Father G, God must want SOME of us not to be Orthodox.

Oh dear! I'm not Orthodox, I'd better stop using incense. [Eek!]

quote:
Frisbeetarian posted:
In Wicca, especially the "fluffy" kind, the trailing smoke is supposed to carry messages up to the God and Goddess, especially when a ritual is being done in the open air. Probably does the same thing in Christian symbolism.

In Christian ceremonial the incense doesn't actually carry the prayers, it represents them. In some Canons of the Mass we ask angels to do the carrying!

And hear, hear, Adeodatus!


[ 30. June 2004, 14:43: Message edited by: Saint Chad ]


 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
That was a lot of copying and code edits. If I botched anything up or missed a post, let me know.
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
Did Saint Chad really accuse himself of being a heretic?
quote:
Oh dear! I'm not Orthodox

 
Posted by Pax Britannica (# 1876) on :
 
It would seem so..
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Chad:
In Christian ceremonial the incense doesn't actually carry the prayers, it represents them. In some Canons of the Mass we ask angels to do the carrying!

In the authentick Roman Canon, God's holy angel is bidden to carry the Eucharistic sacrificial offerings (haec perferri), rather than the prayers, to the altar in heaven, though what exactly this process entails and is meant to accomplish, which altar that might be, and even which angel has this responsibility, is all unclear.
 
Posted by Fiddleback (# 2809) on :
 
In your Old Testament (that's the big bit of the Bible before S.Matthew's Gospel, Custard 123) incense is usually synonymous with worship. We don't need to ask what it means - it is worship itself. All the other things, music and words and such, are merely an adjunct. You might as well ask about them.
 
Posted by Saint Chad (# 5645) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Crotalus:
Did Saint Chad really accuse himself of being a heretic?
quote:
Oh dear! I'm not Orthodox

Quite the opposite, m'dear! [Biased]
 
Posted by Saint Chad (# 5645) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pax Britannica:
In the authentick Roman Canon

Not just the Roman Canon!

quote:
God's holy angel is bidden to carry the Eucharistic sacrificial offerings (haec perferri), rather than the prayers, to the altar in heaven,
I think I knew that. I was simply trying to point out that Christian Liturgy is somewhat different from wooly wiccan ritual.

[ 30. June 2004, 23:10: Message edited by: Saint Chad ]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Thank you, Fiddleback.

[Fewer than two dozen characters and I still can get it right.]

[ 01. July 2004, 01:14: Message edited by: The Dumb Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
Pardon me if this chucks a thurible-shaped spanner in the works, but wouldn't it be more accurate to say "prayer is like incense" than "incense is like prayer"? (Is it Psalm 41 I'm thinking of? - "Let my prayer rise before you like incense").

Thinking of the symbol this way round, we might be reminded that originally, it was the incense, not the prayer, that was the "primary" element of the sacrifice - the costly, spicy tree gum that one bought, offered, and then set fire to, so that like the roasting meat of the animal sacrifices it would be a "sweet smelling savour to the Lord". So then, the rising smoke wasn't really a symbol of anything. It was in itself the offering.
 
Posted by Custard123 (# 5402) on :
 
I think I'm getting much closer to an understanding of what's going on here.

The question originally arose because of trying to understand the role of the incense altar in the tabernacle (from Ex 30).

Being an evangelical, I believe that the OT tabernacle was designed as a picture of Jesus, so that we can understand more about each by looking at the other.

So it seems to me that the significance of the incense and incense altar is that it represents a distinctive smell to the place where God lives [lots of stuff about psychological importantce of smell with reference to memory and emotion], and that the symbolism is taken to represent prayer (Ps 141, Rev 5).

So I guess my application then would be that the Church (people not building of course) should "smell" distinctive as well as looking distinctive, and that that smell should be prayer.

That and praising God for the awesome and continuous intercession of Christ before the throne of grace.

Does that seem to make sense?

Oh, BTW, do the churches that still use incense use the recipe from Ex 30 or not?

[ 01. July 2004, 11:54: Message edited by: Custard123 ]
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Custard123:
Oh, BTW, do the churches that still use incense use the recipe from Ex 30 or not?

"The Lord said to Moses, Take fragrant spices: gum resin, aromatic shell, galbanum; add clear frankincense to the spices in equal proportions. Make it into incense, perfume made by the perfumer's craft, salted and pure, a holy thing."

I'm not sure what aromatic shell is. For gum resin I use myrrh. Galbanum I have yet to try but I see that it is a good expectorant, so I may try that in my next blend. I add other aromatic oils not listed here, which I'm hoping the Lord doesn't mind, mostly Rose Maroc, for Our Lady's benefit. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by aumbry (# 436) on :
 
Where do folk stand on the use of thuribles with tinkley bells attached? Is this an orthodox phenomenon? Balm no doubt for those who like their smells with bells.

Aumbry
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Thuribles with bells are wonderful - in churches of an Eastern rite. In places which follow a Western rite they are out of place.
 
Posted by The103rd (# 5846) on :
 
I WANT A JINGLY THURIBLE!!! [Big Grin]

Actually - I'll ask the Bath Orthodox Priest if there is one that I could borrow *imagines the faces of the congregation when he swings a jingly thurible (with a short chain - just like the orthodox do) up the aisle saying every 20 seconds "Kyrie Eleison" and signing oneself every 5 seconds [Biased] *

-103
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
Henry, you need to get out more. [Killing me]

Sieg
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
My church has two of those.
 
Posted by aumbry (# 436) on :
 
It seems a bit puritanical to be against tinkley thuribles in western-rite churches - I would have thought them a fairly harmless bit of liturgical-clobber.

What exactly is the significance of the bells and do they have a specific name?

Aumbry
 
Posted by The103rd (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Siegfried:
Henry, you need to get out more. [Killing me]

Sieg

My Parish Priest told me that today - although if I did get out more, I probably would never post on the Ship.
I think prehaps it's a good thing that I don't get out much because then I can be focused on important things in life, rather than Sex, Drugs and Alcohol (The three teenage temptations)

-103
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
I don't know the meaning of the bells. I only know that there are twelve of them. I also know that we should not mix practices from different rites. NO BELLS IN WESTERN RITE CHURCHES! [Mad]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd:
I think prehaps it's a good thing that I don't get out much because then I can be focused on important things in life, rather than Sex, Drugs and Alcohol (The three teenage temptations)

How is this a good thing?

[ 03. July 2004, 04:31: Message edited by: Back-to-Front ]
 
Posted by The103rd (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd:
I think prehaps it's a good thing that I don't get out much because then I can be focused on important things in life, rather than Sex, Drugs and Alcohol (The three teenage temptations)

How is this a good thing?
It just is, mate.
It just is.......

-103
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aumbry:
What exactly is the significance of the bells and do they have a specific name?

Aumbry

They have no significance as far as I know. The name, as we all remember, for such a thurible is a tintinabulatory thurible.

Cosmo
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Sacristan fulminated:
NO BELLS IN WESTERN RITE CHURCHES! [Mad]

Nor apparently in Orthodox Western Rite churches. I attended a solemn high mass in one this weekend. The deacon had great technique, but I was confused about when the icons in the nave were being incensed and when we, the congregation, were getting ours as the deacon never left the chancel.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
No deacons censing the people in Western Rite churches! [Mad]
No icons being censed during the Mass in Western Rite churches! [Mad]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Hold on Sacristan. This may be stretching the concept of icon for our Orthodox brethren, but doesn't your crowd incense the high altar cross?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I made some exciting discoveries this weekend. I went to my favorite oil and resin distributor and asked her about aromatic shell. She guessed right away that it was probably Nakhla (sp?) shell, which is found in Yemen. I bought a few and pulverized them and added them to a mix of frankincense, myrrh and galbanum. I will try it out next Sunday and report back. (This is the Exodus 30 recipe.)

Also, in the New English version there is a note that gum resin probably meant mastic, which I will have to try also. Apparently myrrh was used more for anointing oil than for incense. The myrrh given with the frankincense and gold at Epiphany was not for mixing with frankincense, as most people assume, but for anointing oil (presaging Our Lord's burial).

Also got a wonderful book called The Fragrant Heavens which has alot of information about the spiritual dimension and biblical history of fragrance and aromatherapy.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
Also, in the New English version there is a note that gum resin probably meant mastic, which I will have to try also. Apparently myrrh was used more for anointing oil than for incense. The myrrh given with the frankincense and gold at Epiphany was not for mixing with frankincense, as most people assume, but for anointing oil (presaging Our Lord's burial).

Maybe this is a pond difference or something, but I've always heard that the myrrh presaged the anointing of burial and never that it was to be mixed with the frankincense.

Carys
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Carys is of course right. The mystic meanings of the three gifts are: gold=king, frankincense=deity,myrrh=victim (sacrifice, death).
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:
Hold on Sacristan. This may be stretching the concept of icon for our Orthodox brethren, but doesn't your crowd incense the high altar cross?

Dear The Dumb Acolyte (May I call you that?),

The answer to your question is, of course, in the affirmative.

My problem is in the mixing of rites. The ceremony you describe is eastern. The rite being celebrated was suppossed to be western.

That is a parish which claims to be Western Rite Orthodox, and in all honesty is made up of people fleeing the Episcopal Church for the most part or to a lesser degree the liturgical abuses of the Roman Church. Therefore they should practice what they preach and not call themselves "Western" while decorating the building eastern style or adding elements of the eastern liturgy to what they claim is a western rite.

I think in marketing that practice is called "bait-and-switch".

Sacristan
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Sacristan, Of course you may; after all it's my name. I understand your allergy to mixing practices, but judicious borrowing needn't be dissonant. There's an Anglocatholic church in the Northeast with six side chapels and numerous statues. After the gifts and the altar party are incensed, the deacon walks down the south aisle and then the north aisle incensing both people, altars, and effigies. It doesn't take long and it works well. The Denver Western Rite Orthodox crowd hews more closely to a classic AC rite than most places that style themselves AC. Except for an eastern-style altarpiece and assorted icons, the interior is straight AC. The deacon stands at the entrance to the chancel and does his incensing of icons first (c-l-r) and then the people, in the same order. It's not much different from the Episcopal place.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Dear The Dumb Acolyte,

I just know I'd have to take some Allegra or Zyrtec before Mystery Worshiping one of these places. [Biased]

Sacristan
 
Posted by Grits (# 4169) on :
 
Everytime I see this thread pop up, I think of the '70s pseudo-psychedelic lyrics, "Incense and peppermints, the color of time..."

[ 14. July 2004, 21:47: Message edited by: Grits ]
 
Posted by Gin in the City (# 2572) on :
 
Speaking of incense and thuribles with jingly bells, tomorrow morning will be my first Sunday as thurifur at a large Episcopal cathedral that happens to use jingly-belled thuribles. Wish me luck in not setting anything (nor anybody) on fire...
 
Posted by aumbry (# 436) on :
 
Good luck Gin in the City.

I must say that I would be quite happy to have the tinkly belled thuribles from the East and dump the West's ghastly "Sign of Peace".

Are there any simple folk in Byzantium keen to have a five minute handshake in the middle of their divine liturgy?

Aumbry
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by aumbry:
Good luck Gin in the City.

I must say that I would be quite happy to have the tinkly belled thuribles from the East and dump the West's ghastly "Sign of Peace".

Are there any simple folk in Byzantium keen to have a five minute handshake in the middle of their divine liturgy?

Aumbry

Lol - actually, at the Glastonbury Pilgramage the other day during the peace we did our usual trip up and down the ruins of the church (we're a bit like that) and the rector's dog met another dog, so I took the rector's dog up to the other dog where they did a kiss of peace (aww lovely) followed by some growling and a bit of a fight. (whoops)
The other dog belonged to one of the MCs who were standing at the back of the church! [Big Grin]

Make everybody happy: Jingly Thuribles and the kiss of peace (preferably only about 30secs - 1min though, 5 mins is a bit much, even for me!)

-103
 
Posted by Gin in the City (# 2572) on :
 
I'm happy to report that all went well today... I managed not to do anything like fling hot coals toward the sacred ministers or congregation, or trip and fall face-first down the altar steps. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 103:
I took the rector's dog up to the other dog where they did a kiss of peace

Unless the dogs were neutered this was a highly dangerous liturgical manoeuvre.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
My Old Testament blend turned out well: frankincense, galbanum, mastic (v. expensive!), nakhla shell and styrax. It has a very ancient air about it, and quite transcendental!

Someone pointed out that the four main ingredients perhaps represented the four elements:
frankincense (fire)
galbanum (air)
mastic (earth)
shell (water)
 
Posted by Hooker's Trick (# 89) on :
 
Looking at Ultrapsike's ingredient list made me wonder why non-incense-using parishes of a certain type or sometimes referred to as "High and Dry."

Nothing in incense is wet.

Is it?
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Crotalus:
quote:
Originally posted by 103:
I took the rector's dog up to the other dog where they did a kiss of peace

Unless the dogs were neutered this was a highly dangerous liturgical manoeuvre.
Just hope to God that one wasn't a dog and other a bitch otherwise there'd have been a bit of whelping in the aisle...... [Killing me] [Killing me] [Two face] ...
( I think I need some ice-cream......
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hooker's Trick:
Looking at Ultrapsike's ingredient list made me wonder why non-incense-using parishes of a certain type or sometimes referred to as "High and Dry."

Nothing in incense is wet.

Is it?

Maybe it means dry as in non-inhaling. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by John Holding (# 158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hooker's Trick:
Looking at Ultrapsike's ingredient list made me wonder why non-incense-using parishes of a certain type or sometimes referred to as "High and Dry."

Nothing in incense is wet.

Is it?

"High and Dry" pre-dates by a century or two the use of incense in the C of E. It was used to refer to those parishes in the 18th century whose theology was on the catholic side rather than the protestant side -- but it almost certainly did not reflect any difference in practice, because there probably wasn't any.

John
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
(replying to a post on another thread, from which I have linked here)

The thurifer gives the boat to the Deacon, and presents the thurible. While the Deacon adds the incense, the Celebrant blesses it.

I know that the Roman Use differs from this, but I am writing as an Anglican.

[ 24. July 2004, 05:45: Message edited by: Back-to-Front ]
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
The boatboy/boatgirl holds the boat and opens the lid, the thurifer opens the thurible and the celebrant adds 3 spoonfuls of incense to the thurible. He then blesses the thurible and the thurifer closes the thurible. Sometimes the celebrant will nod at the thurifer so the thurifer has to nod back.

That's Roman Rite - Anglo Catholicism

-103
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
It should always be borne in mind that the celebrant does not kiss the thurible.
 
Posted by Ann (# 94) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy):
... adds 3 spoonfuls of incense to the thurible ...

That's one for each person and one for the pot.
 
Posted by Fiddleback (# 2809) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ann:
That's one for each person and one for the pot.

In a typical F in F parish, yes.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fiddleback:
quote:
Originally posted by Ann:
That's one for each person and one for the pot.

In a typical F in F parish, yes.
One for the pot - I don't understand!

In our parish we just put 3 spoonfuls of incense in the thurible no matter how many priests there are, we normally only have 1 at the beginning of mass.

-103
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
103, the reference is to tea.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Crotalus:
103, the reference is to tea.

Doh! [Killing me]

I'm really stupid aren't I?

Anyway - Knowing FiF priests, it would have to be something a little stronger than tea [Biased]

-103

[ 24. July 2004, 23:47: Message edited by: The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) ]
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
However, when Fiddleback thinks F-i-F use one spoonful of incense for each person and one for the pot, he is surely thinking of the botafumeiro
 
Posted by Saint Chad (# 5645) on :
 
Presumably the mega-pot will be put to use today!
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Crotalus:
However, when Fiddleback thinks F-i-F use one spoonful of incense for each person and one for the pot, he is surely thinking of the botafumeiro

Now I really don't see the point in that - Incense is measured in "Clunkage" and a big thing like that cannot possibly clunk, it just swings which is useless!

Does anybody else measure in Clunkage? - I'm sure there is probably a metric equivilant now!

Oh yes - That Thurible has a Gas ring in it!

-103

[ 25. July 2004, 07:28: Message edited by: The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) ]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy):
Now I really don't see the point in that - Incense is measured in "Clunkage" and a big thing like that cannot possibly clunk, it just swings which is useless!

Does anybody else measure in Clunkage? - I'm sure there is probably a metric equivilant now!

Silly boy!

You aren't one of these thurifers who insist on making as much noise with the thing as possible, causing undue and most irreverent noise and scratching the bowl with the chains, are you?

You must be your sacristan's worst nightmare!

There is a dignity, in a slow, reverent, SILENT, censing, that is lost when it is hurriedly done by bouncing the bowl off the chains. This is one of the hazards of nasty double and treble swings.

Grrrrrr!
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Oh, and incense is not measured in 'clunkage'.

Joan-the-Dwarf (as then was) provides a perfect explanation on this thread, when she writes, in response to the question "What is a thurifer?":

quote:
a) Person in charge of the thurible, which is a tin can on chains in which incense is burnt on charcoals.
b) fire-raiser-in-chief to the Celebrant.
c) person tasked with making the choir cough loudly. There is a system of rewards based on coughs per unit of incense imposed.
d) server who has the most fun.


 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Clunkage? Dear, me.

There is something of a division among the experienced thurifers chez nous. The older and best thurifers do it just fine. Others think it a noisy distraction, especially during the elevations.

A new thurifer recently dumped the pot by tangling the foot of the thurifer in the chains as he was incensing the choir. Two-thirds of the pot landed on the runner and made a nasty burn mark. His first (and last) spill.

I believe the best retort against clinking the body of the thurible against the chains was made by the organist in our sister parish: As the chains have not been tuned, please don't play them.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:
A new thurifer recently dumped the pot by tangling the foot of the thurifer in the chains as he was incensing the choir.

I can't quite picture this, DA. What was the thurifer's foot doing up in the chains? Or was this some kind of liturgical dance you do at the censings? [Ultra confused]

[ 31. July 2004, 01:21: Message edited by: Ultraspike ]
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:
Clunkage? Dear, me.

There is something of a division among the experienced thurifers chez nous. The older and best thurifers do it just fine. Others think it a noisy distraction, especially during the elevations.

A new thurifer recently dumped the pot by tangling the foot of the thurifer in the chains as he was incensing the choir. Two-thirds of the pot landed on the runner and made a nasty burn mark. His first (and last) spill.

I believe the best retort against clinking the body of the thurible against the chains was made by the organist in our sister parish: As the chains have not been tuned, please don't play them.

Firstly - I can't quite picture HOW the thurifer could get his foot stuck in the thurible, but then again prehaps I don't want to know, I'll just get ideas [Biased]

Secondaly - I was told to ALWAYS bounce the thurible off the chains, especially at elevations - the clunkage can even replace the bells at some churches (not my own, but I have been a visiting thurifer to nearby parishes which don't have thier own thurifers and also don't have bells!)

Thirdly - Please note that Clunkage is a word which is © ME!
I just like the word Clunkage, it sounds so dirty [Biased]

-103
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Yes, yes, yes, Smarty Pants--the pair of you. Substitute thurible for thurifer.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Aha! Sometimes the subconscious brain works so well the conscious brain never realizes what happened.

I do remember having a sense of "huh?" when I first read that bit about the foot and the chain, but then I realized it wasn't the person's foot, but rather the object's foot. But I made this mental correction without noticing what necessitated it, and thus was puzzled by the snide posts.

This is especially odd, since at the two churches where I am involved enough to know, the thuribles don't have feet.

Which is a great lead-in to a couple of sub-topics: Does your thurible have feet? Considering they get hot, why would any thurible not have feet?

[typos, typos [Roll Eyes] ]

[ 02. August 2004, 00:56: Message edited by: jlg ]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Yowie zowie. This thread really is snuffling off into the High Weeds.

Feet. Hmmmm. Yes, each thurible our crowd uses does have a foot. The bowl of the everyday thurible is spun brass, as is the base, or foot. The base is spun somewhat like the bowl, but smaller. They are attached flat part to flat part. So, were the foot to contact the floor, the shape of the contact surface would be annular. Is that clear? The silver thurible, bowl and base, are hexagonal in cross section, but topologically the same as the brass one. So, thuribles can have feet, as do mollusks, but they needn't look like the one at the end of your leg, if you are so fortunate as to have one there.

In my story I thought a foot might more easily be imagined to tangle with the chains than a base (modulo my typo).

Now, to the use of this foot. Well-trained thurifers will know that a thurible pendent by chain is inherently stable when hanging. Ill-trained thurifers who attempt rest their thurible on this foot are begging for it to overturn.

Our thuribles can get hotter than the hinges of hell, which is why we keep the blessed oven mitt close to hand in the sacristy.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
Ours has a foot - it also has a little church building on the top, so when it's really smoky it looks like the church is on fire! Ohhh - it's so funny [Big Grin]

-103
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
I recently went to a service at an abbey where the thurible was place on the floor in front of the altar during the service. I was surprised as it was on carpet. Our is always held by the top as they are hot and presuably the weight of the chains could cause it to fall.

Does anyone else put their thurible down?

[spelling and UBB]

[ 02. August 2004, 12:52: Message edited by: Chocoholic ]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Hmmmm,

The purpose of swinging the thurible is to keep the charcoal alight.

Therefore, I would only stop swinging it if the incense had all burnt away and there were a large volume of acrid charcoal smoke emanating from the thurible rather than the fragrant incense. For the more experienced thurifer, this should be a rare occurrence, but it does happen.

I cannot see any reason for actually putting it down, though. One of my previous churches developed carpet rings as a result of this practice.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
We hang our thurible on a stand - I really do try not to hit the floor incase it melts.

Actually, I have a little problem with my thurible, when it gets really hot it jams shut and I can't open it unless I stick a knife in it. People have been cleaning it because they said it was gunk but it still jams shut!
Any suggestions......?

-103
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
I went to 2 services where they used incense and it was put down during both. It puffed away for a little while, presumably until the incense ran out.

[ 02. August 2004, 13:27: Message edited by: Chocoholic ]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy):
We hang our thurible on a stand - I really do try not to hit the floor incase it melts.

Actually, I have a little problem with my thurible, when it gets really hot it jams shut and I can't open it unless I stick a knife in it. People have been cleaning it because they said it was gunk but it still jams shut!
Any suggestions......?

-103

Hmmm,

I was going to suggest that it may be the resin build-up (gunk), but as you say, it has already been cleaned.

Without meaning to cause offence, has it been cleaned properly? I mean, if you look at the inside of the lid, especially where it meets the base, is there any brown/black build-up? If so, this may be the cause of the problem. Ethanol, or any other organic solvent will do the trick. Just invest in some goggles, latex gloves and use an old toothbrush. Have patience, and with a bit of elbow grease, it should clean up. You will need to give it a good wash and then a polish afterwards, but it will be well worth it.

Alternatively, someone once suggested giving it a good long boil - for hours. Apparently it makes the house smell lovely and makes it look good as new.

If it is not a resin build-up, then it may have just lost shape with age and use - heat makes metal pliable, and if it has been accidentally bashed against a pew/wall/congregant &c while hot, it may have altered the shape slightly. See if you can find any kinks in the shape. The light use of a small hammer should get it sorted. Just ensure that you hammer the inside.I hope this helps.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
quote:
Originally posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy):
We hang our thurible on a stand - I really do try not to hit the floor incase it melts.

Actually, I have a little problem with my thurible, when it gets really hot it jams shut and I can't open it unless I stick a knife in it. People have been cleaning it because they said it was gunk but it still jams shut!
Any suggestions......?

-103

Hmmm,

I was going to suggest that it may be the resin build-up (gunk), but as you say, it has already been cleaned.

Without meaning to cause offence, has it been cleaned properly? I mean, if you look at the inside of the lid, especially where it meets the base, is there any brown/black build-up? If so, this may be the cause of the problem. Ethanol, or any other organic solvent will do the trick. Just invest in some goggles, latex gloves and use an old toothbrush. Have patience, and with a bit of elbow grease, it should clean up. You will need to give it a good wash and then a polish afterwards, but it will be well worth it.

Alternatively, someone once suggested giving it a good long boil - for hours. Apparently it makes the house smell lovely and makes it look good as new.

If it is not a resin build-up, then it may have just lost shape with age and use - heat makes metal pliable, and if it has been accidentally bashed against a pew/wall/congregant &c while hot, it may have altered the shape slightly. See if you can find any kinks in the shape. The light use of a small hammer should get it sorted. Just ensure that you hammer the inside.I hope this helps.

I don't do the cleaning, the sacrastry ladies do all of that. It looks pretty clean and I don't think there any dents (There certainly weren't any BEFORE I used it yesterday [Biased] )
I'll take a look at it tommorow, i'm not sure about boiling it, it's very valuable and if i ruin it, i'll be in a lot of trouble.....

-103
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Back-to-Front alleges:
The purpose of swinging the thurible is to keep the charcoal alight.

Not in my experience. The coals burn right to ash without needing much help. If the thruifer is late lighting the coals, open-cover swinging gets them burning evenly. It also gets them red hot again after the thurible has been hanging on the dumb acolyte.

My crowd shovels the incense on, so the purpose of swinging is to produce more billowing smoke. Not enough smoke? Not yet time to recharge? Grasp the thurible by the chains where the ring meets the cover and smartly shake it once or twice to expose unburned incense grains to the coals.
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
No, sorry.

Charcoal can suffocate before being fully burnt out, especially if the thurifer has been a little enthusiastic in the number of pieces used.

The swinging of the thurible is to facilitate the passing of oxygen over the charcoal and prevents this from happening.

However, I do agree that often not all of the incense grains will have landed on the charcoal and it is useful to try to get those back onto the charcoal.

If there are not any, and you have nothing in the thurible except 6 brickets of charcoal billowing pungent charcoal smoke, the best thing to do is to just stop swinging. It is too high a ratio of charcoal smoke to incense that causes people's eyes & lungs to react, and not the incense itself.

People who do have genuine reactions to the contents of the thurible (and not the fakers - re: thread from a few months ago), are usually very understanding when it is explained to them that they are choking on the charcoal smoke and not the incense, and that the solution to the problem is to use more, not less incense. This balances the ratio.
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
It is too high a ratio of charcoal smoke to incense that causes people's eyes & lungs to react, and not the incense itself.
People who do have genuine reactions to the contents of the thurible (and not the fakers - re: thread from a few months ago), are usually very understanding when it is explained to them that they are choking on the charcoal smoke and not the incense, and that the solution to the problem is to use more, not less incense. This balances the ratio.

That makes no sense. The charcoal smoke is still there. It's just being supplemented (and masked) by the incense smoke.

Sieg
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Perhaps it seems so, Siegfried, but Back-to-Front is correct. Maybe an air quality engineer will be along shortly to speak of particulate count and such, but I hope not.
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Dumb Acolyte:
Perhaps it seems so, Siegfried, but Back-to-Front is correct. Maybe an air quality engineer will be along shortly to speak of particulate count and such, but I hope not.

[Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Siegfried:
The charcoal smoke is still there. It's just being supplemented (and masked) by the incense smoke.

You are correct, in that there will still be charcoal smoke, but I should imagine that as more incense is placed on top of the charcoal, that less oxygen gets to the charcoal and it produces less smoke, while at the same time the amount of incense smoke increases.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
The solution to this smoke problem caused by coals, we were told many years ago, was to use an electric thurible. They were being marketed though the mail.

The electric thurible worked on a rechargeable battery which could be plugged in to an outlet. There was an on/off switch for the heating element itself.

Did anyone ever buy or see one of these things?
They looked like they were designed for inter-galactic worship.
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
I think someone posted a link many many moons ago, but I cannot remember whether or not it was here. In any case, they are still available.

I cannot imagine what happens when the gunk needs to be cleaned out. Surely the element gets a bit manky and needs a good scrub, or are replacements available?
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
B-t-F,

Thanks for the above link. Most interesting. It is different form the one which we had seen in the sales flyer mailed to the parish office. This one is not as ugly as the other one.

O.K., now...someone with lots of spare cash...buy it and let us know what it is like.

Sacristan
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Anyone who'd pay that kind of money for that piece of crap should just hire somebody to make a cool one. Could be very easily done, I'd think. Hmmm.... [Biased]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Ultraspike, Do you know shops that fabricate nice thuribles? TDA
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
I know a silversmith here who can make anything you can imagine! It wouldn't be cheap tho.

But on second thought, I think electric thuribles would be like electric barbecue grills. You lose something without that charcoal, that organic negrido element. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Does she work in brass, too?

Both our brass and the silver thuribles are still well serviceable at 90 years, but we need to think about the coming years when they'll be more suitable for lighter duty.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Yes, he does brass work also. Very good at restoring things. I'll give you his address at our next incense meet.
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
This is a cleaning question again. I've got some acetone and a brush, about how much will I need and is it better to warm the thurible first? Our thurible is brass, is there anything I shouldn't do with it?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Just pour a few ounces of acetone into the bowl of the thurible and wipe resin off with a paper towel. You could use a brush if you have alot of crevices or metal work, but paper works well for wiping off resin. No need to heat the thurible. And remember to keep away from flames when you use acetone.
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
Thanks, most of the gunge is in the lid which does have quite a lot of decoration.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
You might want to let it sit in the acetone for a bit. However, remember to be careful of flames/fire.
 
Posted by The103rd (The Ship's Boatboy) (# 5846) on :
 
Whatever you do, don't try cleaning it with petrol/light fluid [Razz]

-103
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
Although acetone may even be more flammable than those!

My main problem is loads of resin build up inside the lid which has lots of decorative bits in. I don't know what its made of and don't want to damage it. It isn't silver and its not brass but its a silver colour, someone suggested a tin like material. I've got some off but ran out of acetone. I did manage to get the stuff round the inside of the lid which was making it stick when it got hot. I've read a lot about resin build up making it smell bad but this hasn't happened to ours.

[ 14. September 2004, 18:15: Message edited by: Chocoholic ]
 
Posted by Ubi Caritas (# 8985) on :
 
I know that there has been alot on here about the best brand of incense, but please allow me to ask the following:

-I am a sacristan in a RC church. We used to use Laudate Incense, made by the Trappists at St. Joseph Abbey in Spencer, MA. It is a very nice scent...woodsy, with a pronounced cinnamon and orange scent that works well at Christmas. However, it produces smoke that our choir finds hard to deal with. We switched to Glastonbury, made by Anglican monks in England (the name of the abbey escapes me at the moment). I learned about Glastonbury incense from the sacristan of the Church of the Advent in Boston--an AC church famous for it's use of both smells and bells. They mix it with pure frankincense. I mixed it with frankincense that I bought from an Orthodox monastery but the resin of the frankincense really does a number on the thurible. We now have a thurible that is sticky and the chains do not operate smoothly. :-(

So, we have been using just the Glastonbury incense, and despite a good amount of smoke (but not enough, in my opinion), the choir is pleased with the brand.

I recently went to St. John the Evangelist Church in Boston (also an AC church) and they had billows of smoke...and, of course, I inquired as to what brand they were using. The sacristan there told me that they use Basilica from Prinknash Abbey. He also told me that he mixes it with pure frankincense and myrh. I asked about the charcoal and he said that they use Three Kings Charcoal.

Now--I am looking for the best incense for producing lots of clouds of wonderful smelling smoke. I also am wondering what brand of charcoal you all advise using. I cannot use real charcoal (Kingsford) because we just don't have the right space, equipment, etc to do that.

How many briquettes should I use in a very average sized thurible? How long before the liturgy should it be lit? Do I need to add any additional charcoal during the liturgy?

We only use it in the entrance procession, at the offertory, and in the recessional. Our liturgy goes for one solid hour, sometimes a little longer.

Many thanks!
 
Posted by TonyK (# 35) on :
 
Just a bump, to give Ubi Caritas another chance - though he's probably given up and left us by now!

Some time ago the non-availability of Rosa Mystica was mentioned.

It seems to have re-appeared! I have just come back from a pilgrimage at Walsingham and the Shrine Shop (and apparently one or two other places in the village) had incense under that name. I gathered from conversation that it was still hard to get - their supply was rationed - and a box (1/2 kilo?? - perhaps more) was priced at £21.50.
 
Posted by Carilloneur (# 8279) on :
 
Indeed, Rosa Mystica is available in the UK! I took delivery of a small jar this morning (in readiness for Easter Sunday) which cost £12.75 plus £6.50 postage and packing. [Eek!] (I hope it's worth it!).

Supplied after a delay of about a month, by Luzar Vestments of Bicester, Oxfordshire.
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
You know, it's a lot more cost-effective, and I should imagine, just as effective, to just buy the frankincense and bung in your own rose essential oil from The Body Shop?
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
Isn't all the scent-mixing what causes coughing? Is the scent really that important, other than that there be one? I think pure frankincense smells churchy, is less irritating, and smokes up better than floral mixtures.

Besides, I eventually will have to learn to be a thurifer, and I don't want the job to be like that of a chef. I'd like to keep it simple. [Votive]
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
I was recently offered some candle samples from a UK based company and they sent me a sample box which included 5 small samples of their own blends of incense. I don't know if they send these out a lot but if anyone wants the name of the company PM me.

Choccie
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Hayes and Finch does that, I think. Upon request, one can be sent small samples of Basilica, Priory and Cathedral, among others. The Basilica is tolerable, but I find that these blends are nasty and sickly-sweet and that Scott is right - frankincense is best.

It was Ultraspike who gave me a detailed description of her blends and I find that this method works well. There's nothing wrong with taking a mortar and pestle to some frankincense and adding essential oils. Myrrh is not easy to get hold of in these parts but I understand mising that with farkincense for Lent is wonderful. I add rose oil for feasts of Our Lady, Sweet Orange for Easter and Christmass.

Pestling the frankincense ensures that there are grains of different sizes. One problem with large grains is that they take a while to get going, but uniform smal grains, although they burn immediately, they don't last as long as they need to. A range of grain sizes is best.

What causes the choking (apart from serial fakers, who steal credibility from the people who genuinely do suffer - and there are a few fakers), is the misguided notion that less incense = a smaller chance of choking.

This is the problem, because using less incense means that those present are inhaling a greater proportion of charcoal smoke. An increased amount of incense allows less oxygen to get to the charcoal, thus decreasing the amount of charcoal smoke produced, and also increasing the proportion of incense smoke.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
*bump*

Posts from another thread:

quote:
Originally posted by Bells&Smells, 03 June, 2005 19:11:
Please Help!

For our Rev'd Mother's anniversary of ordination this September, we're going to be having incense (and lots of it, since I'm swinging!).

Though good Catholic practise is prefered to the usual Anglican mess that is the liturgy today by some of us (the Rector, Rev'd Mother Curate, myself, and the churchwardens included!), the Parish isn't quite ready for general use of incense and Sanctus bells etc. so this will be a somewhat unusual occasion.

We've recently located the Parish thurible (which was, for some reason, very well hidden - I blame the Protty gang!) so that's all good, but we don't have any incense/coals yet. I was hoping for a bit of advice from those in the know.....

We shouldn't have to worry about too much smoke etc. since we'll be publishing the details of the service in the Parish magazine in advance - so those who really object to the Catholic practises will not turn up.

Any help will be gratefully recieved!

quote:
Reply by Back-to-Front, 03 June, 2005 19:26:
Don't get cheap charcoal - it isn't worth the saving over the decent stuff, and will cause more coughs and respiratory reactions.

The answer to coughs is to use more incense, not less - it is usually the charcoal smoke that elicits the reactions and not the incense.

Make sure that the thurible is clean. Some ethanol and a toothbrush can help rid it of any incense gunk.

The thurifer walks behind the taperers in well-ordered Anglican churches.

Do not use the nasty, sickly-sweet, pre-prepared blends, and certainly nothing with a cedarwood base. Frankincense is best, pestled into grains of various sizes. This ensures that there is no delay in smoke-production, while at the same time, ensuring that it doesn't burn away all at once.

If you do use frankincense, you can add a few drops of an essential oil (The Body Shop is very useful here [Biased] ). Rose and Sweet Orange work rather well (though not together).

I'll post more if I think of anything else. I'm sure that there are others who will have much more useful advice.

quote:
Posted by Corpus cani, 03 June, 2005 20:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
The thurifer walks behind the taperers in well-ordered Anglican churches.

Agree with every word bar the above B2F old chap. Both Ritual Notes and O'Connell make it clear that the thurifer leads the procession, i.e. walking in front of the taperers.
quote:
Posted by 103 (One-O-Three), 03 June, 2005 20:13:
Yes - Thurifer leads in front of acolytes in lovely white or oatmeal cassock albs

quote:
Response from Back-to-Front, 03 June, 2005 20:23:
quote:
Originally posted by Corpus cani:

quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
The thurifer walks behind the taperers in well-ordered Anglican churches.

Agree with every word bar the above B2F old chap. Both Ritual Notes and O'Connell make it clear that the thurifer leads the procession, i.e. walking in front of the taperers.
...which further lends weight to my argument.
quote:
Originally posted by MaryO, 03 June, 2005 20:30:
The Scriptural warrant for the thurifer/taperers is that the people of Israel were led by a pillar of cloud by day, and a pillar of fire by night.



[ 03. June 2005, 20:43: Message edited by: jlg ]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Thank you, jlg. [Biased]
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 103 (One-O-Three
...lovely white or oatmeal cassock albs

I think you'll find the Oxymorons thread in the Circus, 103.

Corpus [Disappointed]
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Take the cassock-albs silliness someplace else people, and keep this a useful reference thread. [Mad]
 
Posted by Living in Gin (# 2572) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bells&Smells:
Any help will be gratefully recieved!

Whatever you do, don't use bubbles.
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
Have you used a thurible before? If not practise swinging it and censing things as it will make it easier.

The following advice is really basic stuff so if you know this already I apologise. [Smile]

If you need to get hold of charcoal and incense, the usual liturgical suppliers do both of these things, I think some of them do smaller boxes of incense too which you might want if you're not going to use it very often. The swift light charcoals are quite good.

You'll need a way of lighting them - you can hold them over a candle for a minute or two but if you have a gas ring or camping stove available they are hot in about 15 seconds. You'll be able to tell cos if you swing the thurible or wave the charcoal around the ring around the edge goes red.

A kitchen implement to hold the charcoals in the flame is also needed.

Before adding incense, open the lid a bit and swing the thruible to get the coals hot.

If you are having the incense for different parts of the service you may want to add a new coal for each. Do you have a thurible stand? If not find somewhere you can hang it when its hot and not being used.

After the service empty the coals outside the church on concrete and pour cold water over them.


Hope this is helpful, PM me if you think I can be of any further help!

Choccie
 
Posted by Frater_Frag (# 2184) on :
 
At my church we use mostly Three King´s incense. It tends to go easier on the lungs of most of our congo. Besides, it leaves a very pleasant smell afterwards... [Smile]

When it comes down to cleaning the metallic handbag, I use paint-stripper, the version that you can buy on ordinary spray-cans. Just spray and wait, then rinse with hot water, if nescessary, repeat the procedure. Just be make sure that you have good ventilation when you use the paint-stripper!
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 4754) on :
 
To assist in cleaning, we often line the thurible with tinfoil.

Question for the assembled: who usually cleans the thurible at your place? The thurifers or the Altar Guild/sacristans?

Charlotte
 
Posted by 103 (One-O-Three) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amazing Grace:
To assist in cleaning, we often line the thurible with tinfoil.

Question for the assembled: who usually cleans the thurible at your place? The thurifers or the Altar Guild/sacristans?

Charlotte

Neither - we send it off to some specialist cleaners!!! [Cool]

-103
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
I've twice cleaned a very grotty thurible by spraying the inside (not the silver plating!) with EZ-Off oven cleaner (the lemon-scented low-fumes type that doesn't require turning the oven on) and placing the thurible in the oven overnight (just to contain what fumes were given off). The next morning it wiped clean, and I lined it with foil to help make it easier next time...and not require oven cleaner.
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 103 (One-O-Three):
Neither - we send it off to some specialist cleaners!!!

What? Every time you use it? I spy a parish that doesn't pay its quota! [Snigger]

Corpus
 
Posted by Bells&Smells (# 9553) on :
 
Thanks to all who have replied, this has been most useful (and reading through this earlier thread has helped too).

It seems that using lots of incense on expensive charcoal is best, and that either Prinknash Basillica or Frankincnse with essential oils is best for the actual incense.

This will be the first time that I have actually swung for Mass (though I've seen it pleanty of times, and have had a quick go before), so I will make sure I practise. Any tips will be gratefully recieved.

I'm keen to know how many charcoal briquettes should be used (for a moderate-large thurible), and if its possible to use just one set for the entire Mass (since I think it may be difficult to add more during Mass)?

Thanks again.
 
Posted by 103 (One-O-Three) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Corpus cani:
quote:
Originally posted by 103 (One-O-Three):
Neither - we send it off to some specialist cleaners!!!

What? Every time you use it? I spy a parish that doesn't pay its quota! [Snigger]

Corpus

Of course we don't send it off everytime we use it, it's used at least twice a week (Family Mass and Benediction/Evening Service) - sometimes we have a high mass on certain holy days and Friday Exposition sometimes has incense if I'm around.

We get it cleaned when it's dirty!

-103
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
If you're using quik-lites you should use three or four but they only last about 20 minutes. They can be easily lit and only take 5 minutes to get ready. The real charcoal (we use Kingsford, which I think is the best in the US) takes about 20 minutes to cook but they burn hotter and make better smoke. Use four or five for a moderate size thurible. And no, you won't make it through the whole service with one set of charcoals no matter what type you use. You could get by with one for the introit and the gospel and then get a fresh set for the offertory and consecration. Hope that helps. Happy smoking!
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bells&Smells:
I'm keen to know how many charcoal briquettes should be used (for a moderate-large thurible),...

I'm no expert, but you'll need however many it takes to make a full single layer in your particular thurible; probably better to have a bit of overlap than big gaps that will let the incense grains fall through the charcoal layer.

quote:
... and if its possible to use just one set for the entire Mass (since I think it may be difficult to add more during Mass)?
The trick is to stash a charcoal or two someplace near where the thurible will be at the time it needs replenishing (the credence table, the base of the thurible stand, next to the thurifer's chair/stool - anyplace it won't get stepped on). When the time* comes, the thurifer adopts the time-honored "if you act like you know what you're doing, you can get away with anything" face and just calmly goes to the thurible and does what's necessary, and then returns to his/her usual rest position.

*Decide beforehand on a particular time for this to happen, tied to some liturgical cue like the congregation standing to recite the Creed or when someone else will also be moving around, providing a bit of a distraction. [Smile]
 
Posted by 103 (One-O-Three) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
quote:
Originally posted by Bells&Smells:
I'm keen to know how many charcoal briquettes should be used (for a moderate-large thurible),...

I'm no expert, but you'll need however many it takes to make a full single layer in your particular thurible; probably better to have a bit of overlap than big gaps that will let the incense grains fall through the charcoal layer.

quote:
... and if its possible to use just one set for the entire Mass (since I think it may be difficult to add more during Mass)?
The trick is to stash a charcoal or two someplace near where the thurible will be at the time it needs replenishing (the credence table, the base of the thurible stand, next to the thurifer's chair/stool - anyplace it won't get stepped on). When the time* comes, the thurifer adopts the time-honored "if you act like you know what you're doing, you can get away with anything" face and just calmly goes to the thurible and does what's necessary, and then returns to his/her usual rest position.

*Decide beforehand on a particular time for this to happen, tied to some liturgical cue like the congregation standing to recite the Creed or when someone else will also be moving around, providing a bit of a distraction. [Smile]

Oooh, putting charcoal on the thurible during the mass is a really bad idea!
Go out during the Homily and do it in the Sacristy, that way the congragation won't be distrubed with the odd snap, crackle or pop!

-103
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
At my old church, where smoke is a weekly thing, I used to leave the sanctuary to add more charcoal. It also served as a good time to get rid of the charcoal dust and incense that had settled in the thurible, so that there was a clean thurible. A bowl of water nearby comes in very handy for this. It is better done out of sight of the congo, but if the layout of the church isn't conducive to this (without you walking through the nave), then follow jlg's advice.
 
Posted by Bells&Smells (# 9553) on :
 
Ok. Thanks for that.

From what I've read it seems best to use the Kingsford charcoal - so I will if I can get hold of it.

So how do I manage this: if they take 20 mins to prepare, and the sermon is only 10mins MAX, how am I going to put the new coals into the thurible? Or can I just partially prepare them, then rely upon what's left in the thurible, until they get going?
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
TBH, most churches I know of use the quicklite stuff. If you only use it occasionally, it's perhaps not worth the expense of Kingford, which I think is intended for barbecues, hence the time it tyakes to prepare. The quicklite brickets are manufactured with ecclesiastical use in mind.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Wheeeee! I finally got my chance to be thurifer today (at a funeral). Thanks to all of you here, we had nice clouds of incense and I didn't end up banging the thurible into my legs while turning corners, or any thing else obviously stupid.

(We were serving with a deacon, though, which caused some moments of confusion, but that's another topic.)

And as it happens, I can point out another virtue of the quicklite charcoals -- if you need to break them in half in order to fit them through the access holes on your crummy** thurible when re-stoking the fires partway through the service, the quicklites snap in two quite easily and relatively neatly.

**(Our thurible is designed with large openings in the cover, but no way to lift the cover, once it's hot, except with a hotpad or tongs or something.)
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
**(Our thurible is designed with large openings in the cover, but no way to lift the cover, once it's hot, except with a hotpad or tongs or something.)

Wow...no central chain to pull it up, huh?
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Nope. Which means the incense has to be spooned through these same openings and some of it always ends up on the floor.

The matching boat also has a fixed lid, so one has to spoon in the incense in tiny portions when filling it and there is no way to open it up completely and clean it out when changing 'flavors'.

Where's a good place (US) to get a decent thurible and boat? I've a mind to make a tat donation.
 
Posted by Frater_Frag (# 2184) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
...Where's a good place (US) to get a decent thurible and boat? I've a mind to make a tat donation.

You could try one of these, I´m must confess that I´m rather curious about them! [Biased]

Electric Thurible
 
Posted by 103 (One-O-Three) (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Frater_Frag:
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
...Where's a good place (US) to get a decent thurible and boat? I've a mind to make a tat donation.

You could try one of these, I´m must confess that I´m rather curious about them! [Biased]

Electric Thurible

I'm curious about them too BUT I don't think I would want one until I've seen one with my own eyes. It might be absolutly rubbish!

-103
 
Posted by sheela-na-gig (# 9673) on :
 
There's this one:

http://tinyurl.com/a8pmr

('Quality:Eximious.' Location: Shanghai. Who could ask for more?)
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Couldn't find a price on this one, but the one I saw before was pretty expensive. Somehow I don't think it would be the same without the charcoal smoke. Like making barbecue on an electric grill, it just wouldn't have that primal essence.

You can find some decent thuribles at Patrick Baker.
 
Posted by MarkthePunk (# 683) on :
 
Wow. I had no idea smoking up a church was so involved. This thread will make me appreciate my next visit to Smokey Matt's that much more.

(I might go there tomorrow morning.)
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Frater_Frag:
You could try one of these, I´m must confess that I´m rather curious about them! Electric Thurible

I'm intrigued too, in an appalled kind of way.

What do you suppose "eight cycles per load" means? Makes it sound like a washing machine!

Corpus
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
The e-bay thurible is used in Buddhist temple ceremonies - I've seen one like it. It's not swung towards anything bnut is waved in a circular motion befoe the statue(s) of Buddha. It's not dissimilar to the arto ceremony in hindu temples where a lamp is waved.

The electronic thurible seems like a good idea because all those people who moan about incense and its effects on their asthma might be won over - I think it's largely the additives in speedy-light charcoal that art off their attacks. We had less complaints in the days of my youth when we could only use slow charcoal and stand around with tongues for half an hour to get started. (Then again, we had less asthma then, I quess)
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Oooh, I like that Buddhist one with the dragon!

Father M, however, is a Very Good Catholic Boy and considers Eastern Religions opportunities for Satan. He definitely wouldn't like it. Not to mention it has no chains for swinging.

However, we do share pyromaniac tendencies (you should see our Easter Vigil fire! [Big Grin] ) and no way is an "electric" thurible going to cross the threshold of our church.

Btw, I found a picture of our thurible (it's the upper-right one) on CorgiGreta's site. It seems it is supposed to have a little bakelite knob on the cover for lifting when hot -- ours must have been broken off at some time in the past. If it had that, it would actually be a nice thurible; it's very solid and heavy and so swings nicely and easily, and the openings are big and allow great clouds of incense out with very little action.

The boat, with its fixed lid, is still an abomination, however.
 
Posted by brackenrigg (# 9408) on :
 
My local cathedral (West Riding) uses a small thurible (called the handbag) for women and wimps to swing, and a large one for blokes.
Smoke is in evidence at Sunday Solemn Masses and weekday Solemn Evensongs, and 360 degree swings are allowed.
Parts of the cathedral are out of bounds to the thurifer which makes for more fun in processions, when the thurifer goes off on a different route.
 
Posted by Crotalus (# 4959) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by brackenrigg:
Parts of the cathedral are out of bounds to the thurifer

Why?

[ 20. July 2005, 14:03: Message edited by: Crotalus ]
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Crotalus:
quote:
Originally posted by brackenrigg:
Parts of the cathedral are out of bounds to the thurifer

Why?
Smoke dectectors?

Carys
 
Posted by lazystudent (# 5172) on :
 
Retired standards laid up in side chapels?
 
Posted by sir galahad (# 9912) on :
 
I havn't been a thrurifer for a couple of years- so this may be terribly outre now (apologies) but we always used to gring up half of the incense in a coffee grinder before depositing it in the boat etc. etc.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Welcome, Sir Galahad. I assume you meant to say "grind". Be careful not to grind too fine or you will be burning it up too quickly and it will smell more like burning than roasting. You really don't need to grind it unless you're talking about huge chunks of frankincense and myrrh, which I do sometimes grind to small chunks in a small food processor. But most commercial brands and my own blends do not require grinding. We have a thurifer who likes to grind the incense to a powder with a mortar and pestle (which I now keep hidden). Then he wonders why it smells so acrid. [Disappointed]
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
My jaw drops at:
My local cathedral (West Riding) uses a small thurible (called the handbag) for women and wimps to swing, and a large one for blokes.

Maybe I shouldn't rise to the bait, but...brackenrigg, please tell me this comment was an exception and not evidence of systemic oafishness.
 
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on :
 
Welcome, Sir Galahad.

Please feel free to acquaint yourself with the boards and get to know the posting guidelines for each. Happy sailing.

Anselmina
Ecclesiantics Host
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Ultraspike cautions:
Be careful not to grind too fine or you will be burning it up too quickly....

This is quite true. My crowd loves to shovel it on with heaping spoonfuls (three). We have an offertory procession lead by the thurifer, so, when I think of it, I'll use just powder before I leave the sacristy with the torches. That way the powder is just about gone when we arrive at the sedilia for the charging and blessing. With a pot empty of incense, there no reason for father to stint.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
The following exchange was posted on another thread but belongs here:

quote:
Originally posted by Angelus:
[17 October, 2005 08:36]
I am preparing to act as Thurifer at our Patronal Festival in November, and when I was at Walsingham recently I bought some lovely sweet Frankincense. I am planning to use it, but it comes in very large chunks and I wondered whether it would work when mixed in with our usual stuff, Prinknash Basilica.
Any thoughts?

quote:
Reply posted by Cosmo:
[17 October, 2005 08:52]
Unlikely to work with that horrible acrid Basilica (which is banned from the Cosmodrome except in Lent and Advent for penitence). The nastiness of the scent given off by Basilica is such that even sweetsmelling stuff is unlikely to make any difference.

I would suggest, if you prefer to use Prinknash products, to use their 'Priory' blend or even 'Sanctuary' and then stir your own lumps with the rest; it doesn't need to be cruched up. These brands are much finer in texture, have a more delicate scent and are much more flexible than ghastly Basilica.

quote:
Reply posted by dj_ordinaire:
[17 October, 2005 09:01]
Rather depends upon the church in which you use it - Basilica can go horribly wrong, but in some churches is more-or-less your only option - there's a lot of variation from uilding to building (or Holy House, or 'drome, &c.)...

I'd imagine that the effect of adding frankincense would be similarly stochastic, so whatever you decide I'd suggest trying it out a few days before the service just to get the measure of it.

quote:
Posted by Angelus:
[17 October, 2005 09:23]
Thanks guys,

I have never really been a fan of Basilica, but our head server seems to like it. I will suggest we try one of the sweeter Prinknash brands.

O - how do you mean it can vary from building to building? Do you mean as in the size of the building?


 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Frankincense on its own is quite sufficient. No need to mix it with the sickly-sweet pre-blended stuff (and I must consur with those who have gone before about Basilica). Frankincense just smells of "church". That's the best I can express it.

If the size of the grains is a problem, pestle them into various sizes. All too large and it takes ages before they start to burn properly. All too small and you get an instant puff of smoke that disappears in a few seconds. You want to get a mix of sizes.

If your parish is dedicated in honour of Our Lady, why not add a few drops of rose essential oil - just enough to add a light rose scent and not so much that the church ends up smelling like a whore's boudoir. [Frown]

Do let us know how you get on.
 
Posted by Fiddleback (# 2809) on :
 
Basilica is sickly and very nasty - to the point of being eye-watering. The Burford Priory blends are generally far better than anything they turn out in Prinknash - except the one labeled 'Sherborne' which is crap. Their best are 'Evesham' and 'Glastonbury'.
 
Posted by Fr Alex (# 10304) on :
 
Just to let you know, Rosa Mystica should now be available again direct from Alton Abbey - last year it was in the final drying process.

Also, how do you know what a a whore's boudoir smells like Back to Front? [Smile]
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Hey, a girl's got to make a living. [Biased]
 
Posted by David Goode (# 9224) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fr Alex:
Just to let you know, Rosa Mystica should now be available again direct from Alton Abbey - last year it was in the final drying process.

I bought a bag of it in Walsingham at the beginning of September. Very nice. Nearly all gone now, though.

Dave
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Back-to-Front:
Hey, a girl's got to make a living. [Biased]

Oh Crikey - have we met...?
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
Erm... no I meant to add that, in Trumpton, we use various Prinknash blends with no real problems. Then again, our Lady of Trumpton is a big enough building to conceal hideous odours whilst retaining the "scent of the cense" for days after the Mass.

Whatever incense / blend one uses, there must be enough of it to hide the burning of charcoal (I'm with 103 on this [sorry- can't remember the thread]- it's the burning charcoal that sets off the "I'm allergic to incense / I'm too asthmatic to cope with this" band, unless those who are "allergic" just spark off at the first sight of a thurible.)

We often use Priory with odd nuggets of "things" brought back from Greece by one of our servers. Otherwise, Priory works for us on its own - and it's the one I use at home too.

Granted my Chapel may be bigger than some people's houses, but once one has the servants and one's house-guests ensconced, the air clears quite quickly. Of course, it does horrible things to the inside of the pipes of my Father Willis...

Corpus
 
Posted by Anglo-Smashlick (# 9871) on :
 
I've actually seen one of these electric thuribles used, and it only produced a tiny wisp of smoke. It looked very, very pathetic.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angelus:
O - how do you mean it can vary from building to building? Do you mean as in the size of the building?

quote:
Originally posted by Corpus cani:
Erm... no I meant to add that, in Trumpton, we use various Prinknash blends with no real problems. Then again, our Lady of Trumpton is a big enough building to conceal hideous odours whilst retaining the "scent of the cense" for days after the Mass.

Along with Angelus, I am curious about this business of the effect of a particular incense varying from building to building. Corpus cani seems to be saying that in a large space, objectionable but minor scents in a blend will quickly away while the nicer ones will disperse and linger.

Does anyone else have opinions about this? Is it just sheer quantity of space or do the materials (stone and wood versus plasterboard and carpet?) make a difference?

[ 17. October 2005, 22:22: Message edited by: jlg ]
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
I think maybe I meant that it's a big enough space for the "nice" and the "not nice" to blend in to a "bearable" lingering.

Perhaps if we use a ghastly blend alone it has enough space to spread out and become, if nothing else, at least bearable in its lingering.

Does that help?

Corps
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by David Goode:
quote:
Originally posted by Fr Alex:
Just to let you know, Rosa Mystica should now be available again direct from Alton Abbey - last year it was in the final drying process.

I bought a bag of it in Walsingham at the beginning of September. Very nice. Nearly all gone now, though.

Dave

That stuff is nauseating. Way too much rose, darlin, it's not a tart's boudoir. [Projectile] I have found that a few drops of high quality Rose Maroc with alot of frankincense is the best blend ever. I used to mix alot of different oils but the purity of frankincense with a little rose is surely the scent of heaven! [Yipee] Add some myrrh for penitential seasons.
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Y'all should pay attention to Ultraspike and B2F and take their advice. We did and we've never looked back. A nice frankincense is really all you need, enlivened as they suggest with rose or myrrh.

Search high and low until you find an importer who will sell you a 50 kilo sack of it. Then you can have done with the ruinously expensive here-a-pound-there-a-pound purchasing model.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Any advice on where to get a 50# sack? I'll happily disburse it among my local parishes in return for a promise to make full use of it. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
Does anyone else have opinions about this? Is it just sheer quantity of space or do the materials (stone and wood versus plasterboard and carpet?) make a difference?

I'm not really sure - I asked a more experienced friend about this and he muttered darkly about 'damp' being involved... it just seems to be an empirical thing.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I bought some incense from the shop near Sante Sulpice in Paris, intending it to be kept for my funeral mass in the future but incense doesn;t always smell the same 'cold' as when you burn some and it turned out, when I tried some, to be of the 'tart's boudoir' variety (as far as I can guess, having been in such a room)

[ 18. October 2005, 14:19: Message edited by: leo ]
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dj_ordinaire:
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
Does anyone else have opinions about this? Is it just sheer quantity of space or do the materials (stone and wood versus plasterboard and carpet?) make a difference?

I'm not really sure - I asked a more experienced friend about this and he muttered darkly about 'damp' being involved... it just seems to be an empirical thing.
As you sure it was 'damp' he muttered and not 'camp'? As I'm sure you know, there is all the difference in the world between camp incense and butch incense.

Me, I'd go for camp every time but then I love Spanish baroque altars, Statues of Our Lady with huge copes and gold crowns not to mention tits to toe lace albs.

It's the one way I know that marks me out as straight.

Cosmo
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
Really? The *only* way?

[we were talking about Rosa Mystica at the time... so maybe...]
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
jlg, I can hook you up if you can drive down to the dock in New Jersey to get it, but it's a 110 lb. sack minimum, extra fine quality though, so worth the trip.
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dj_ordinaire:
Really? The *only* way?

[we were talking about Rosa Mystica at the time... so maybe...]

It's only the straight priests who are happy getting the lace albs out of the cupboard, getting the Banners of Our Lady from out of the drawers as well as using the campest incense going.

Those clergy who are 'good with colours' are too scared to; very sad.

Cosmo
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
'good with colours'

That's the best euphemism I've heard for ages. Thank you. May I use it?
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
It's only the straight priests who are happy getting the lace albs out of the cupboard, getting the Banners of Our Lady from out of the drawers as well as using the campest incense going.

Those clergy who are 'good with colours' are too scared to; very sad.

Cosmo

Darlin, you need to get over to New York more often. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
Always happy to do so, my dear. 'Have lace and sermon, will travel'; that's my motto.

BTW, my new Director of Music, who has not been brought up an A/C, told me last Sunday that he now enjoyed opening his briefcase a couple of days later and getting a good whiff of incense wafting out from it. There's obviously hope for him.

Cosmo
 
Posted by angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
I used to mix alot of different oils but the purity of frankincense with a little rose is surely the scent of heaven! [Yipee] Add some myrrh for penitential seasons.

Did any UK shipmates see the wonderful South Bank show with Alan Bennett the other week? He gave a hilarious account of stopping off at a country church on his way to a funeral, and encountering the posh village lady who was telling him about the problems they were having with 'the myrrh'. He was puzzled because 'it didn't seem a particularly high or ritualistic church', but she kept insisting, 'no, I mean the myrrh'. Until Bennett twigged that she was talking about the mower.
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
[Killing me] Angloid - as one would expect from Sir Alan of Bennett.

But I trust you meant it was
quote:
an hilarious account
Corpus
 
Posted by angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Corpus cani:
[Killing me] Angloid - as one would expect from Sir Alan of Bennett.

But I trust you meant it was
quote:
an hilarious account
Corpus
Only if you're common or posh and don't aspirate the 'h'.

BTW, it's interesting to know that Alan Bennett, despite his rather unimaginative dress sense, must be 'good with colours'.
 
Posted by Lamburnite (# 9516) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by Corpus cani:
But I trust you meant it was
quote:
an hilarious account
Corpus
Only if you're common or posh and don't aspirate the 'h'.


Actually, Fowler recomends using "an" before h when the first syllable is unaccented. (So "a history" but "an historic"). Unless you are a Mitford, it takes a bit of nerve to carry this off in real life.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
Fowler? I thought he was dead! Still keep a copy around, though...

Anyone used the incense from Christ Church New Haven (CT)? We use it for benedition, it has lots of lavender (there's a color) in it and it is a a lovely alternative to Basilica.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Fast away the old year passes, and it's almost time to bring out the thurible for its semi-annual battle with the choir.

By Easter I plan to digest this thread and try some experiments with the choir to find out how we can have both lovely smelling smoke and non-peeved choristers.

For Christmas I haven't time though (I think) to get in any alternate supplies, thus:

Any suggestions on how to strike a fine balance between having enough smoke to make the place smell nice, and not sending the choir raving into the streets in revolt? (Given that we'll be using whatever vile substances have caused the choral detestation of incense to date.) Or shall we have to make do with a few tiny symbolic swings of the thurible with barely enough scent or smoke to rouse even a bloodhound?
 
Posted by Monty (# 9227) on :
 
My suggestion is to soften them up - burn a little before mass now and then so they become used to the smell. They only winge when they are caught unawares. It's like the smell in nasty old people's homes - if you are there all the time you don't notice it.
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Despite his calumny that old people are nasty or that their houses smell nasty or that incense smells like nasty old peoples' houses, I think that Monty is on to something. Try sneaking in during the week and burning incense.

It sounds as though your choir would whinge at the sight of dry ice vapor, though. There may be no helping things. If they are actually sensitive to the smell and not just Pavlovian, is there any chance you can not use the self-lighting sort of charcoal. If you can manage the ordinary kind without burning the place down, that really does make a nicer smell--not as irritating to the nose.

[ 17. December 2005, 03:33: Message edited by: The Dumb Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
Cleaning out the thurible and using quality stuff (if you don't want to shop for blends, 100% pure frankincense is won-der-ful - it's what we use) will help all but the hardest core.

Some people will cough at the sight of a completely unlit thurible, sad to say.

Charlotte
 
Posted by Oreophagite (# 10534) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ultraspike:
I have found that a few drops of high quality Rose Maroc with alot of frankincense is the best blend ever. I used to mix alot of different oils but the purity of frankincense with a little rose is surely the scent of heaven! [Yipee] Add some myrrh for penitential seasons.

Not all frankincense and myrrh seem to be created equal. Also, Rose Maroc is pricey. Not for playing around with. Any suggested sources? Also, what exact proportion are you talking about - a few drops, a lot?

A friend want to use incense Christmas Eve, so this thread has been very informative. I've already said that if they put dry ice in the thurible, there will surely be people taken away in ambulances.

A local Coptic Orthodox congregation has incense for the duration of their three-hour service. No demons survive this sort of treatment. The priest does perfect 360's in front of and in back of the altar with an open thurible.
 
Posted by dalej42 (# 10729) on :
 
Interesting, my church had an article in the weekly about incense and the days for 2006 in which it would be used.

Ash Wednesday is listed as one of those days. Is this common? Last year, the clergy brought some of the palms from 2004 Palm Sunday and burned them but there was no thurible.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Burning some palms blessed the previous year is the proper way to create the ashes for Ash Wednesday, though it's normally done ahead of time (not during the mass). In any case, it wouldn't be done in the thurible, which isn't big enough and shouldn't be subjected to such a messy procedure.

The only things allowed in a thurible are charcoal (to provide the heat) and incense.
 
Posted by Lamburnite (# 9516) on :
 
Today at mass, the coals in the thurible were so hot that they burst into flame when the celebrant sprinked on incense at the Introit. "That is only supposed to happen on Pentecost," muttered the deacon as we blew them out....
 
Posted by The Dumb Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Jiminy Cricket! What was your thurifer doing in the sacristy!? The introit is a little early in the service for the thurible to get that hot.

The coals in the thuribles sometimes catch fire at our prayer shack, but only after a long procession with plenty of 360s. They don't ignite during the 360s, since there is too much air forced across the coals. But, once we reach the station we've had to deploy one of the blow-hard sacred monsters to surpress the fire.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Lamburnite, we are mixing our standard Kingsford charcoal with "all natural" charcoal, which burns much hotter. We have two schools of thought about charcoal (or three, if you count quik-lites). We were using the natural charcoal (without additives) but switched to Kingsford which is all uniformly sized briquets. Picnic season was over before we remembered we should have stocked up for the winter, so we are resorting to the natural charcoal stockpile to get us through till Labor Day or near unto. The natural charcoal comes in largist chunks which we have to chop up to fit in the thurible. A tedious and messy process, hence the switch to Kingsford. But I remembered last night as thurifer at the Great O evensong that they take longer to heat through but stay much hotter and you often get fires, which are not pleasant. Kingsford has some kind of paper additive but it burns quicker and stays warm though not blazing, which is preferable.

As for the rose maroc, it is abit pricey ($36/2ml) but you can make alot of incense for that small amount mixed with a couple gallons of frankincense and optional myrrh. I get it from Enfleurage. Good frankincense is harder to come by as most stores sell second rate stuff. I have a great Somalian connection here in NY but you have to be in the tristate area. I would go to your local Arab spice shop and inquire. [Smile]
 
Posted by Petrified (# 10667) on :
 
It's major feast time again and so time for the biannual attempt to get our small, very ornate thurible clean.

I note the advice about acetone for the gunk but does anyone have a good suggestion for the brass. Years of old polish and dirt have accumulated in the ornamentation. Last time I was advised to try soaking in citric acid
but this had little effect.

I am thinking of boiling it in washing powder, this has been good for other jobs, including removing paint. Is this a good idea?
 
Posted by Back-to-Front (# 5638) on :
 
Didn't someone boil one for a few hours a couple of years ago and post back every now and then with progress? I found it rather entertaining.

I think it worked, TBH.

I used to use ethanol for the gunk.
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
I soaked ours in soda crystals and then jet washed it in the summer which seemed quite effective. It was very gunked up inside however.
I wouildn't necessarily recommend this. It's not brass and so I don't know what the soda would do to that. Also, the jet washing can damage it if it's delicate.

As far as the outside is concerned, brass cleaners available in hardware shops and elbow grease seems to be the only way.
 
Posted by Frater_Frag (# 2184) on :
 
If the thurible is made of brass, you can use ordinary paint-stripper! Works like a charm... But be sure to have good ventilation when you do it! Spray, let it burn away at the gunk, then rinse in hot water, dry with paper, then repeat if nescessary.
 
Posted by Petrified (# 10667) on :
 
Thanks for the suggestions.

I've given it a boil to loosen things up and it looks much better already. The encrusted gung was about 4mm thick!!
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Time to have this on page one again, methinks.
 
Posted by Archimandrite (# 3997) on :
 
It's been a while since this thread was active, and, leafing back, I see my question came up. However, it doesn't seem to have been firmly resolved, so I'll ask it again:

My reading of books on liturgy (starting with Fortescue...) leads me to the conclusion that there are two types of swing

Simplex - x1
Duplex - x2.

These are deployed in varying combination according to dignity and circumstance. So, in most places, the congregation is censed with 3x1 (although 3x2 is seen from time to time).
The Sacrament gets 3x2.

Occasionally, one sees or hears of something which ought to be called the Triplex - x3. People say, and it has been written in at least one of the Customaries on the thread on that subject, that the Sacrament (elevated or exposed) is censed with 3x3.

I've never found a reference to the triplex in any book which has footnotes, and is thus not just tat-porn written by people who believe that the MC can wear diamante' buckles and use the Sedia Gestatoria.

So, what is the consensus?
 
Posted by Clavus (# 9427) on :
 
quote:
The censer is swung back and forth three times for the incensation of: the blessed sacrament, a relic of the true cross and images of the Lord solemnly exposed, the gifts on the altar, the altar cross, the Book of the Gospels, the Easter candle, the bishop or presbyter who is celebrant, a representative of the civil authority in official attendance at a liturgical celebration, the choir and people, the body of a deceased person. The censer is swung back and forth twice for the incensation of relics and images of the saints exposed for public veneration. The altar is incensed with a series of single swings... (Ceremonial of Bishops, 92, 93)
Elliot notes that 'these customary rules are slightly different from the former rubrics' (Ceremonies of the Modern Roman Rite, 218, n.32)

In other words, nowadays if in doubt use three single swings!
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Our crowd incenses the altar cross with three swings and the MBS is incensed with three swings during benediction.

Otherwise the celebrant is incensed with three doubles, as is the MBS and MPB after their words of institution, and the MBS/MPB at the Great Doxology.
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clavus:
In other words, nowadays if in doubt use three single swings!

So, no more tic-tac-toe pattern and 2+1 circles over the gifts at the Offertory? [Biased]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Maybe among the slackers of Clavus's crowd, but among ours the True Ceremony is upheld!

[ 18. May 2006, 00:01: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Archimandrite (# 3997) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
Our crowd incenses the altar cross with three swings and the MBS is incensed with three swings during benediction.

Otherwise the celebrant is incensed with three doubles, as is the MBS and MPB after their words of institution, and the MBS/MPB at the Great Doxology.

I take it you mean that the MBS gets 3x3, or do you perhaps mean 3x1? Argh!

Why have the rubrics altered from the "customary" ones, as Elliott calls them above? Nobody ever told all these self-aggrandising MCs to just make up stuff, and in any case I'd always regarded Fortescue as the final seal on what was considered kosher and what was not. In other words, if it's in, it's in, y si no, no.*

Obviously, things get done differently in different places, related to architecture and temperament, but when there are Big Books on liturgy, why these innovations?

Tat-porn, MCs in Sedia Gestatoria, this is where it's all going. And never mind the buckles!

*As the Cortes used to conclude their oath to the Spanish King - "we will serve him if he upholds law and justicse, and if not, not."
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Archimandrite, my apologies. I thought I was being clear and accurate, but I wasn't. Αt our local prayer shack, after the gifts are incensed with that counter-counter-clockwise-tic-tac-toe thurible-jive, then the altar cross receives three singles. At benediction, the MBS receives three sets of three singles.

You ask why innovation? On a level of principle, if we don't innovate we die and our rite loses its connection to its community and culture.

On a more practical level, we don't follow the books, because we wanted to do a lot of stuff that the people who wrote the books didn't think about. Such as: Bring the gospel into the midst of the people, rather than having it be mumbled northerly, in the direction of the barbarians. [In our case that would be the Canadians, and that wouldn't be very polite.] Such as having one of the lessons, the OT, read by a member of the congregation. Such as having the prayers of the people read by a layperson from among the people. And, so on.

It has been recently pointed out to me that Fortescue (and Ritual Notes, for that matter) has the thurifer exiting the sanctuary immediately after the words of institution over the cup. I had always breezed by that, never noticing that inconguency with our local rite.

But, for our crowd the thurifer hangs around and incenses the gifts as they are elevated at the final doxology. Why might that be? And, why might one want to vary from the practice outlined in the Big Book of Liturgy, whichever one might be pleased to think that is?

It probably has to do with the shifting theology of the eucharist. Most in the West no longer think that the bread and wine 'get zapped' into the Body and Blood at the words "This is my Body/Blood". When we did think that, it made sense for the thurifer--and the torchbearers, which makes the bigger visual statement--to exit, for The Change had happened and the all the celebrant was doing was tying up a few loose ends.

We in the West, catching up with our friends in the East, don't tend to think that now. We tend to think that asking 'when is the moment of transformation' is to be asking the wrong question. We prefer to wait until the final doxology and the Amen of the assembly's assent before we consider the thing accomplished.

So the innovaters, before my time, thought it sensible for the thurifer and torches to remain until that Amen. And, they probably thought that adding three doubles (same as at each of the first two elevations) was apposite to the action and thelogy. Other places ring a bell and incense at the epiclesis, which is another reasonable choice, I suppose.

Oh, and at our place, the MCs pretty much do as bidden. It is the people who insist that great, billowing clouds of incense issue forth from the thurible, and woe betide the thurifer, of whatever age or rank, if there is not a sufficiency at the gospel procession among the people.

[ 18. May 2006, 14:59: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by EpiscoWhat (# 9660) on :
 
Well I very much am jealous at the those who are lucky enough to have the smoke at their Prayer Shack. My Prayer Shack is so opposed to smoke that when we built a new church and moved someone hid our thurible and even though Father has searched high and low for it (he wants to introduce smoke), it just cannot be found.

I've threatened to make a donation to the church in order to get some smoke going!

EW
 
Posted by Saint Bertolin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by voxmystica:
To burn incense you need some self lighting charcoal...

Welcome aboard! Don't put yourself in the bad books immediately with talk like this! [Biased]

Many would say that the instant-lighting stuff is vile, causing the "sweet-smelling savour" to go rancid very quickly, and that it's worth the little extra time and effort required to light real charcoal.

As for your question about Rosa Mystica, it stopped being manufactured for a while a few years ago. I've heard tales of monks becoming ill due to the manufactureing process. [Frown] This probably explains the revised formula).
If you must burn incenses of various fragrances, then use them sparingly in a base of frankincense.

Alternatively, and less expensively, frnakincense with some drops of essential oil works well, and it is perfectly possible to get hold of rose essential oil, as well as sweet orange and numerous others suitable for incense.
 
Posted by Qoheleth. (# 9265) on :
 
Hi, Hand-made Rosa Mystica is still available in the UK from Alton Abbey. (Note: - best to communicate with them by snail mail or fax. The phone is only answered 16:00 - 16:30 and no practicable electronic communication. Yet.) Don't know about sources in US, though.

Yes, they did stop making it for a while, as a number of the monks developed allergies due to the medieval manufacturing techniques used. Last time I looked, there were still stocks in the cupboard, though. I'm hoping one day to introduce them to more modern methods.

It can be very overpowering, but you can blend it with your favourite "normal" incense.

Hope this helps.
Q.
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Welcome, voxmystica. Solemn Cocktails, huh? I'll have to remember that for our next Guild meeting. [Big Grin] A former rector looked very dimly at people burning church incense in their homes. And in the Old Testament it was absolutely forbidden. But frankincense and myrrh are such wonderful cleansing fragrances, I admit to using them in (rather expensive) sticks from Maroma. Once in a great while if I've been on vacation and the house smells like a cat barn, or if someone has died down the hall, I will light up some quik lites and burn some of my EXP church blend to quickly purify the air. But you should try to get some Kingsford original (not Matchlite) charcoal briquets. They are making them now with little grill marks which are perfect for burning incense. You have to have a high heat to properly burn incense, which quik lites don't achieve and those ceramic burners even less.

I would recommend getting some good quality frankincense and rose attar and blending your own. For what you'd pay for a box of Rosa Mystica you could make many times as much on your own. Just don't inhale the frankincense dust too much. I've heard from doctors that it's actually rather bad to inhale the dust which is quite resinous, but burning is okay and actually rather expectorant. The monks who used to make RM probably inhaled too much dust and not enough smoke. [Frown]
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Quick note: the OT was really only concerned with people burning a particular kind of incense made to God's special recipe. As long as they stayed away from that "official" kind, no problem.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
My local purveyor of fine religious articles sells Quick-Lite briquettes and small bags of frankincense resin for a reasonable price, so that's what I have at home. (Is that regular Kingsford charcoal, available in any store here in the US, or a special liturgical kind, TSA?)

We tend to use unblended frankincense at St. Spike's for our Solemn occasions. Someone got a little floral at the Epiphany and the deacon walked into the sacristry afterwards saying "It smells like my Italian grandmother!" It was also not well received by the choristers (people who don't usually complain, complained). We could probably do better than that blend by, say, adding essential oils to the frankincense, but so far nobody has taken this sort of project on.

Charlotte
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
You can get Kingsford in the US very easily at any place that sells barbecue paraphernalia and grocery stores usually have them even in NYC. Surely they have something similar in the UK? Don't y'all do barbecues also?

Lamb, I think by extension from the OT, any incense I make for use at the altar I would feel wrong about burning at home unless it was for a house mass or other official service. Solemn cocktails? I think not.
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
Thanks for the responses. St. Bertolin, I knew I would get in trouble for that statement about the self-lighting charcoal! I am well aware that the stuff is evil. I don't know where you can get the real stuff in the US. I did read that SMV NYC has their own gas burners to heat the real charcoal.

As for not being able to burn incense in the home due to the priest...I find a little odd. I guess if the incense was blessed and then used in the house it may be a different story. Some friends of mine sing Compline and use incense down in the basement during the school year. We put candles all around and it is a welcome relief to the busy school day. He is Lutheran, so we use the Brotherhood Prayer Book. I think it is basically the Liber minus Saints and BVM prayers... [Frown]

There is not an Episcopal (Anglo-Catholic brand) that has a Solemn Mass around here. My best bet is to venture to D.C. to St. Paul's K Street for the feasts days. Which is about 2 hrs. And I usually play the organ on Sundays in Richomd. So, my experience with solid liturgy and incense is rare.
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
And one more, would it be worth buying the original Rosa mystica that is stored in little glass jars or buying Alton Abbey? I have a friend going over that said he would bring some back for me. As well as a donation of some Glastonbury to a church in Detroit where my organ teacher plays. What is the difference between the Elmore abbey blends and the Prinknash?

A nice chapter on incense by the Ascension and St. Agnes D.C....all may know of this already

http://www.ascensionandsaintagnes.org/mass/freezeframe/AllFF.pdf
 
Posted by mr_ricarno (# 6064) on :
 
Hi folks, on a trip to the Orthodox church at Walsingham today I purchased some Gardenia incense and some Rose incense.

I am serving as thurifer at a middle-high Anglican parish next week.

This means I need some advice on how to use the stuff.

Firstly, the church in question only seems to have the quick-light charcoal. This is something I can't avoid. How many coals would I need to use? Which sort of incense should I use? How much do I need to put on?
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
mr ricarno I thought maybe some more experienced thurifers would help you out. Some people have said that you could use just plain charcoal. I think it may be a bit of a task to light it. The quik-lite stuff will do I suppose, though many may disagree. Probably only want to use one coal for the mid-high Anglican. You want to light the coal and leave for about 10-15 mins so it turns white/gray. Basically, you want it as hot as the little coal will go (which I think is much less heat than real charcoal) As far as how much you put on, I think the priest does that when the incense is blessed. Wait for the more knowledgeable to answer in-depth questions. If this is the first time your a thurifer you may want to do some studying...such as Ritual Notes. At least I would, hopefully others will have some input. If you are just going to wave some before the service, put a small teaspoon amount of what ever you have...rose sounds good, but usally used for Marian days.

I hope to get a response about the difference between the Prinknash and Elmore Abbey incenses, so I don't end up spending a fortune on something that might not be that good.
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by voxmystica:
I hope to get a response about the difference between the Prinknash and Elmore Abbey incenses, so I don't end up spending a fortune on something that might not be that good.

I don't look for brand names, just "pure frankincense" or "natural frankincense." Smells the churchiest and won't offend nor irritate.
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
Do they use pure frankincense at Ascension in Chicago? I went there with a friend for Purification/Presentation/Candlemas and it was lovely. Just across the lake from me at Hope College.

I may try the frankincense with some rose or orange could be nice...
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by voxmystica:
Do they use pure frankincense at Ascension in Chicago? I went there with a friend for Purification/Presentation/Candlemas and it was lovely. Just across the lake from me at Hope College.

I may try the frankincense with some rose or orange could be nice...

Sometimes...but I think I've heard that the various thurifers have their personal blends, so at least some of them use other incenses than pure frankincense. It doesn't seem to get irritating very often. But I've managed to avoid becoming trained as a thurifer, so I could be wrong.

The best of the thurifers manages to smoke up the sanctuary (but not the nave) during the Sanctus with a fog that lingers through much of the Eucharistic Prayer. Quite appropriate, I think.

I shall have to get a closer look at the containers of incense they use and try to report back.
 
Posted by jmoskal (# 5192) on :
 
At my parish we use Frankincense from a local Mid-Eastern Speciality store which sells all foods and such catered to the Mid Eastern Area.

It smells not too sweet, the congregation dont's complain as much and is reasonable at $6.00 per pound.
 
Posted by mr_ricarno (# 6064) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by voxmystica:
If you are just going to wave some before the service, put a small teaspoon amount of what ever you have...rose sounds good, but usally used for Marian days.

Thanks, that's the plan. At the church in question there's a clear division of the service into 'word' liturgy and 'sacrament' liturgy, and i'm expected to put the incense on during the 'word' bit, while the priest does the honours in the eucharistic section. The incense in question comes in relatively large grains (about the size of a small piece of gravel), I'm estimating that one grain on each coal will be enough for my purposes.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
mr_ricarno, it would make good sense for you to do a test run.

Figure out what your work space is. How will you hang the thurible, what hooks and so forth are available. Do you have an incense boat and spoon? If not what are you going to use for one? Where are you going to dump the coals once you are done? Handle the thurible until you are used to opening and closing it. Swing it to get the hang of it.

Is there a smoke detector in any part of the building? If there is, on the QT, get an electrician to figure out how to disable it during the mass. Don't forget to re-enable it afterwards. It's best not to involve the local fire department in any part of things as they tend to frown on the disabling of fire protection equipment.

Decide if you need one set of coals or two. Will the coals for the liturgy of the word suffice for the liturgy of the table, too? Or, will you need to dump after the gospel and relight during the sermon.

Figure out what you are going to do if things go badly wrong. Where are the fire extinguishers and are they charged? Do you have a metal dustpan and a small hand broom (I call it a rat-tail broom)? Decide where you will take your dustpan full of dumped coals once you have them swept up. Often this is the best first approach to cleaning up a dumped pot. Do you have a source of water and some way to carry it in case you need to soak the carpet where the coals have landed? Coals can skitter a fair distance. Make sure you have found them all. Where is the phone if you do need to involve the fire department? You are not allowed to permit a smouldering carpet to set the church on fire.

Light a coal, time how long it takes for it to turn grey. Lay on some incense. See how much smoke you get and how long the incense lasts. It is best you do this together with the celebrant so there are no too-much/not-enough recriminations afterwards.

Worship of Almighty God is a awesome thing. Be sure not to let the use of incense make it a fearful one as well. Oh. And be sure to have fun!

[ 04. June 2006, 18:53: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Cosmo (# 117) on :
 
We used some Rosa Mystica from the good monks of Alton this morning. It's not bad and if one looks carefully after Mass the air is certainly faintly tinged pink. But it's jolly expensive and burns very quickly. I don't find it as cloying as others but then I like eating rose creams.

Anything but Prinknash 'Basilica' which is, of course, banned at the Cosmodrome for reason of being disgusting.

Cosmo
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Cooking tongs are useful for handling a hot thurible in order to dump the coals/ashes.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
An interesting choice, jlg. Our crowd reserves the tongs for holding a coal when it is lighted, preferring the holy oven mit to manipulate the base of the thurible when dumping. Good catch, though. Those things can get hot.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Our thurible has lost its wooden knob, so the tongs are needed both to lift the hot cover and also to pull out the little inner metal liner and help knock out the leftover coals.

An oven mitt would definitely be helpful, I will admit.

I'm sure it's already been mentioned, but it can't hurt to also point out the a propane blowtorch is a great item for lighting the coals. (It is also useful for melting waxdrips off of candlesticks when cleaning up and causing the candlestick socket to expand a bit - and be warm - so your tight-fitting candles will go in without five minutes of struggle.)
 
Posted by Max. (# 5846) on :
 
When I empty the thurible I normally take it outside the church and I rest the base on the ground, open the lid and then tip it upside down with my foot - I then tip it back upright (very carefully so that it doesn't tangle the chains)
I then stamp on the charcoal until it's nothing more than black dust.

It's taken years and years of practice to perfect it but that is (I believe) the best way to dump hot charcoal from a thurible after mass. If anything is stuck at the bottom, scraping a knife around the edge of the thurible bowl after emptying and tipping it all upside down again doesn't hurt - but if you're a good thurifer you never would get anything stuck in the thurible anyway!

Max

[ 05. June 2006, 18:30: Message edited by: Max. ]
 
Posted by sheela-na-gig (# 9673) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
When I empty the thurible I normally take it outside the church and I rest the base on the ground, open the lid and then tip it upside down with my foot - I then tip it back upright (very carefully so that it doesn't tangle the chains)
I then stamp on the charcoal until it's nothing more than black dust.

What about an old paint can half filled with water?
 
Posted by Max. (# 5846) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sheela-na-gig:

What about an old paint can half filled with water?

No - a Brass Thurible full of charcoal and incense

Max

[ 05. June 2006, 20:29: Message edited by: Max. ]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sheela-na-gig:
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
When I empty the thurible I normally take it outside the church and I rest the base on the ground, open the lid and then tip it upside down with my foot - I then tip it back upright (very carefully so that it doesn't tangle the chains)
I then stamp on the charcoal until it's nothing more than black dust.

What about an old paint can half filled with water?
Hmmm. Reading for comprehension...Yes, sheela-na-gig, that works quite nicely. Our sacristy has a big five inch deep enameled turkey pan that serves the same function. It doesn't need a lot of water, just enough to be able to drown the coals. I prefer more of a soupy stew consistency rather than a lumpy consomme.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
I just hang the thing up on a hook in the sacristy and let it completely burn up. Then come back to it a few hours/days/weeks later and clean up. It's quite cool to the touch then. [Biased]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Sacristan, you know I respect you and your judgment, but I have one concern and one comment.

I'm disinclined to leave any fire untended, so the idea of leaving the coals in the thurible untended makes us uncomfortable. So, we don't even leave the thurible untended during the mass. Once cleaned, the top is left suspended above the vessel to show it's empty and has been cleaned.

For the incense we use, from our common special supplier, though we are burning the frankincense straight, the resin accretes in the bowl as a rock hard surface that is next to impossible to clean off, unless it is scraped out when it is soft and gooey.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Well, I should have said that we have an old high fireplace in our sacristy which has been fitted to hold the thuribles. Brick and stone aren't too flammable.

As to the residue, acetone does the job for us quite well (once the fire's out and the thurible cooled off!).

E.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
That's a nice setup, whereas ours are racked over a tile floor, but adjacent to a 'formica'-laminated plywood cupboard. And since we, therefore, must scrape after each use, doing so while hot makes the job easier and safer.

Thanks for the explanation.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Sorry to double post - I didn't read carefuly enough. You were mentioning the BOWL! Those we line with aluminum foil. Just change it after each/a few uses.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Hmm. I've heard of and occasionally seen aluminum foil remaining in thuribles in other sacristies. Both our thuribles have copper bowls that clean up well, so we've thought to use aluminum foil.

[I'll wave off now, cuz we shouldn't make this thread into the Sacristan and TSA Show.]

[ 06. June 2006, 04:31: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sacristan:
Sorry to double post - I didn't read carefuly enough. You were mentioning the BOWL! Those we line with aluminum foil. Just change it after each/a few uses.

And if you're lucky you can get hold of a supply of those little aluminium cases they put mince pies etc. in. Ready made liners.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
We actually wrap the entire copper inner bowl in foil, inside and outside. Then shove the whole thing back in.It is a very tight fit, but keeps the gook out for the most part.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
Blessed Percy says something about "sweet oil" - I guess olive oil - as a preventative to too much gunk building up...
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Yes, sweet oil is olive oil basically, which I've tried but it takes alot more elbow grease to get the residue off than acetone.

We turn the inner bowl upside down and burn off the residue over the flame.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
But acetone is very dangerous especially regarding fumes. Try mineral spirits - a bit safer, less flamable and the fumes are less intense.

Still, all in all it's a messy business to make a fragrant offering.
 
Posted by sheela-na-gig (# 9673) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by EpiscoWhat:
Well I very much am jealous at the those who are lucky enough to have the smoke at their Prayer Shack. My Prayer Shack is so opposed to smoke that when we built a new church and moved someone hid our thurible and even though Father has searched high and low for it (he wants to introduce smoke), it just cannot be found.

I've threatened to make a donation to the church in order to get some smoke going!

EW

There are always thuribles available on Ebay, from points as far afield as Uruguay and Shanghai.

Chinese thuribles seem to be stationary, rather like teapots – I don’t see how they get enough air. Western thuribles must be smokier. Maybe a Chinese thurible would be a compromise for churches divided over incense? Though it's hard to see how you could use it to cense something.

(One of the Chinese ones is marketed as a ‘propitious thurible,’ which possibly deserves to be the name of something – a blog, or perhaps a sailboat.)
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
Thanks for all the responses about Rosa mystica. I think I may get the kind from Alton Abbey. The original formula stored in glass jars may have lost its scent.

Does anyone know about the adoration brand. It kind of looks like little pieces of wood...probably flowers, and it burns as soon as you put it on the coal. Is this a filler? I got a sample of the Vita mundi and the Roma. Both smell similar.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
sheela-na-gig, thanks for the idea of cruising through ebay periodically.

As far as stationary thuribles are concerned, the Chinese settings are not nearly so weather-tight as our Western churches. I suspect there is enough ambient airflow to keep things smoking. Imagine a banked fire and gentle smoke.

Regarding propitious: it merely means "seeking for", so read "supplicatory."
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
What was this thread doing half-way down on page 6?

Over here on the girdles thread, the question of dressing left or dressing right came up.

It was alleged that were thurifer to dress right, the dangly bit of the cincture would interfere with the thurible being carried in the right hand.

Now at my nut job parish (just this morning my priest called me "odd", he really did!) waaaay back in time, as a tender young shoot of a thurifer, I was taught to carry the thurible before it was blessed in my left hand and a pot after it was blessed in my right.

Is this just an oddment of my local parish or are other parishes similarly odd?
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
That was the case in my parish too, TSA (as it was where we were told to get knotted on the left).

Of course, one wouldn't swing the thurible in one's left hand, so the girdle getting in the way wasn't an issue.

Thurible
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
Oh, how I love this tread the best! I did just get back from St. Paul K-Street in D.C. for Solemn Evensong and Benediction. It is always wonderful there! I think they were burning Elmore Abbey "Evesham", which I think is quite nice and not so sweet. Either that or Glastonbury.

Bring out your Rose, almost Assumption-Dormition-Feast of BVM!! [Votive]
 
Posted by Ultraspike (# 268) on :
 
Yes, got my Marian blend ready with extra Rose Maroc. We're entertaining La Rez this year and I'll be high in the Rockies though.

btw, has anyone heard of censing the front door? A certain church included that in their Transfiguration procession yesterday (no it was not Little Church though).
 
Posted by Fishngrl (# 11094) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by voxmystica:
Thanks for the responses. St. Bertolin, I knew I would get in trouble for that statement about the self-lighting charcoal! I am well aware that the stuff is evil. I don't know where you can get the real stuff in the US. I did read that SMV NYC has their own gas burners to heat the real charcoal.

...

There is not an Episcopal (Anglo-Catholic brand) that has a Solemn Mass around here. My best bet is to venture to D.C. to St. Paul's K Street for the feasts days. Which is about 2 hrs. And I usually play the organ on Sundays in Richomd. So, my experience with solid liturgy and incense is rare.


 
Posted by Creature of Salt (# 11610) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
Now at my nut job parish (just this morning my priest called me "odd", he really did!) waaaay back in time, as a tender young shoot of a thurifer, I was taught to carry the thurible before it was blessed in my left hand and a pot after it was blessed in my right.

Is this just an oddment of my local parish or are other parishes similarly odd?

I believe you'll find that practice enshrined in the customary of Advent, Boston. I do it that way too, when I remember.
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Of course, that is most certainly the way God intends it. Left hand for an unblessed,"empty" thurible. Then, if there is no assistant with the boat, one's right hand is the one holding the boat. One always presents with the right hand. So...then we are ready to hand the boat over with the right hand. Then with the empty right hand one can pull on the fourth chain, grasp with the left and raise the thurible with the right to the correct height for laying the incense.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Bringing the mouth of the open thurible to the height of the boat and resting the side of the thurible gently against the side of the boat so the celebrant has less opportunity to let incense grains fall to the ground as they are spooned from boat to thurible.

So. How many spoonfuls at each charging?
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
Three
 
Posted by Corpus cani (# 1663) on :
 
Four - three for the Trinity and "one for our Lady, Father?"

Corpus

[ETA: Actually, this is usually just before a procession - three is the norm for yer acherl work-a-day censing.]

[ 09. August 2006, 10:28: Message edited by: Corpus cani ]
 
Posted by A Lurker (# 3377) on :
 
I'm not sure that spoons are of standard size.

Nor is the ammount of smoke needed standardised; it depends on the size of the sanctuary.

(At my parent's church, the spoon that goes with the boat that matches the big festive thurible is absurdly small)
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
In the copy of the Walsingham Review (Assumptiontide 2006) that has just dropped onto my doormat, there is a photo of a thurifer (accompanied by two boatboys). He is holding the 'top' of the thurible (the disc, I suppose?) in his right hand, and swinging it, open, in his left.

Strikes me as rather an eccentric thing to do.

Thurible
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
We only do this in the sacristy if the thurifer has misjudged the length of the sermon and needs quickly to get the coals all glowing and gray.

Orthodox thuribles tend not to be fully closed, ever.
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
Well, yes, quite. Indeed, I had to do it hiding behind a pillar last week when one of the charcoals had, inexplicably, gone out. But this chap certainly appeared to be processing.

I don't suppose he's a shipmate willing to comment?

Thurible
 
Posted by Maniple (# 2237) on :
 
WD-40 is good for removing much of the tary gunk.

In fact WD-40 is good for anything.

Note to all Sacristans:

Make sure the chains are clean after the thurible has been polished.

The lavabo gets lots of muck off ones hands but polish residue is a little tricky. Much better to make sure the thurible is cleaned propely before Mass.
 
Posted by Maniple (# 2237) on :
 
PS

Does anyone know what the blend used at Walsingham is. I keep meaning to enquire whenever I'm there but always forget.

It produces a decent amount of smoke and smells nice too.
 
Posted by voxmystica (# 11487) on :
 
Walsingham, according to their store website, uses on Glastonbury from Elmore Abbey on Sundays and Rosa Mystica for high feasts. http://shop.walsinghamanglican.org.uk/acatalog/e_Shop_Priests__Supplies_6.html
 
Posted by Myron (# 11737) on :
 
We only use one incense at my church - pure high quality frankincense grown in the Dhofar region of Oman which I was able to acquire several years ago from a vendor in Oman at a reasonable price. There is no offensive additives or perfumes. It is frankincense grown in the same region prized for its superiority for many centuries, even in ancient biblical times. It is described by one of the current vendors as follows:

"Oman Frankincense resin - Boswellia sacra - Superior Hojary grade frankincense from the Dhofar region of Oman. Considered by many to be the finest frankincense resin in the world, Hojary is primarily the larger selected white and lemon-white colored frankincense resins. It comes only from Dhofar region of Oman, whose arid growing conditions are ideal for fine quality frankincense resin.
Superior Hojary frankincense resins produce beautiful light, bright, citrus aromas with slight underlying woody and balsamic tones. Of the frankincense resins from Oman, Hojary is the most sought after of all."

My shipment arrived from Oman in the form of "tears" as picked directly from the trees in Oman, so they had to be crushed in order to use in a thurible. By trial and error, I have developed an efficient (however noisy) method of crushing the tears only when needed so that the resins remain fresh as long as possible.
Unfortunately, over time the prices have escalated for this superior quality frankincense (only the Sultan of Oman is provided with the very best), but can be purchased at several websites. Just google "Dhofar frankincense" to find them. Notice that there are lower quality grades available at cheaper prices, but I didn't buy those so I don't know the difference. I do know that the frankincense sold in most church supply stores is an inferior grade, usually from Somalia, and probably stale from age. We are very pleased with our pure Omani frankincense.

To maximize the emission of the natural and fresh aroma and to avoid as much harshness as possible in the burning of incense, I have developed a method which i think works well: I line the fire pot of the thurible with new foil before each use to avoid the presense of any previously scorched residue. A clean thurible is essential. Rather than placing the lit coals on the bottom of the fire pot, I stand them on their sides leaning against the sides of the fire pot. Before the incense is added, I make sure the coals are red hot by using a battery- operated hand-held fan. The incense is added to the center where the heat from the surrounding coals will activate the resins and begin smoking. This method delays the eventual scorching of the incense. To get more smoke faster and longer the hot coals can be pushed over the incense, although this will hasten the scorch. In my mind, the practise of sprinking incense on top of the coals causes an immediate scorch and tends to extinguish the hot coals. The idea is to keep the the coals hot and the incense fresh and aromatic.
 
Posted by edbakker (# 11719) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Myron:
We only use one incense at my church - pure high quality frankincense grown in the Dhofar region of Oman which I was able to acquire several years ago from a vendor in Oman at a reasonable price. There is no offensive additives or perfumes.

Very interesting post, thank you. I have served as a thurifer for many years, but have never come across this brand of incense. Moreless used the same brand ( pricknash ) at Christ Church,Brunswick ( Melbourne ) for many years. Back in NZ, 2 years ago, I used some insence, which came from a Greek Orthodox Monastry in Greece, which was very pleasant, cannot recall the name unfortunately.


Ed....
 
Posted by Saint Bertolin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by edbakker:
quote:
Originally posted by Myron:
We only use one incense at my church - pure high quality frankincense grown in the Dhofar region of Oman which I was able to acquire several years ago from a vendor in Oman at a reasonable price. There is no offensive additives or perfumes.

Very interesting post, thank you. I have served as a thurifer for many years, but have never come across this brand of incense. Moreless used the same brand ( pricknash ) at Christ Church,Brunswick ( Melbourne ) for many years. Back in NZ, 2 years ago, I used some insence, which came from a Greek Orthodox Monastry in Greece, which was very pleasant, cannot recall the name unfortunately.


Ed....

Ed, where've you been?!

I remember you from aaaaaages ago. Have you re-registered? I did a quick search on your old posts and your one surviving post on the Ship is a reply to me. [Big Grin] I'm rather honoured.

Glad to see you back around.
 
Posted by Fishngrl (# 11094) on :
 
Ultraspike, I saw your post about the Kingsford charcoal and thought that I should report that my prayer shack uses that charcoal also. We polished the brass this past Saturday and I helped carry it to the smoke room. One of my Brothers in Christ schlepped it in from some big box store out there in Jersey...and it made me think of our conversation at the last Shipmeet.

It's better for the church that I stay away from fiery things, so I don't know any details about mixtures, lighting, etc. other than what you've told me. It sure would've been nice to use your acetone trick to clean those enormous thuribles!

Sacristan was saying that his folks line the thurible with foil, and I wanted to add that on the three times per year that incense was (argued about and grudgingly) used at my former parish, we put the charcoal (those little discs) into an empty cat food container, which then went inside the thurible. It seemed to fit our little Southern Protestant holy hardware, replacements are always available - but it did not produce adequate clouds of smoke like we've got up here!

Hope y'all have a wonderful Feast of the Assumption!
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
All the special blends sound so heavenly. Here we use the dried sap of the...Wait I don't know what it is called in English, the ngali nut in Solomons and nangai nut in Vanuatu. Same fruit though. Nice smell but not very much smoke. It is burned on coconut charcoal for the most part. That's why we always have to have a boat boy/girl, to help keep the fire going.
 
Posted by Ed Bakker (# 2706) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertolin:


Ed.... , where've you been?!

I remember you from aaaaaages ago. Have you re-registered? I did a quick search on your old posts and your one surviving post on the Ship is a reply to me. [Big Grin] I'm rather honoured.

Glad to see you back around.

[Smile] It is good to be remembered. Thank you so much.I have had a number of changes in my life, i.e. family circumstances caused us to move from Melbourne to New Zealand, we have been back four years now. Churchmanship compared to OZ became a big problem and left the Anglican Church for the Anglican Catholic Church (TAC). Still in touch with my Finnish Orthodox Friends, which keep me in supply of Orthodox music and video's. Started recently re-joining the ship. Drop us a pvt msg if you have the time.
In XC
Ed....
 
Posted by Jim Olson (# 11857) on :
 
Hello everyone, I've just found this message board while doing a search for thuribles online. Fascinating...I've spent over an hour reading back through the posts.

I teach worship and liturgy at Boston University School of Theology. As you can imagine, most Methodists can't figure out the reason for a good thurible, hence my online search for an inexpensive one. Of course, I know you get what you pay for, so here's the rub...

Would any of you have a thurible that is no longer used that you would be willing to donate to Boston University? It does not have to be in great condition, simply usable. I would prefer a four-chain, (I have access to a single chain one that the Catholics who use our chapel keep...). You would receive in return three things. 1) My personal gratitude. 2) The knowledge that 40 students in the Arts of Worship class each term will at least have had some experience of a thurible and 3) a nice donation letter on Chapel letterhead thanking you for your donation, suitable for tax purposes.

What say you? You can reach me directly at revjj@bu.edu.

Thanks everyone. I will keep reading with great interest.
 
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on :
 
I just attended mass at the cathedral in Santiago, and I saw something there I hadn't seen before (actually, I saw a lot of things I hadn't seen before, but one is relevant to this thread). During the eucharistic prayer, the thurifer knelt on the steps in front of the altar, back to the congregation, and from that position censed the altar at the elevations of the bread and cup. Is this common, unique to Santiago, what?
 
Posted by Nunc Dimittis (# 848) on :
 
We used to do that in my old parish, OLDC in Sydney.

I believe they also do it at CCSL, and other reputable A-C shrines in Oz.
 
Posted by RCD (# 11440) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I just attended mass at the cathedral in Santiago, and I saw something there I hadn't seen before (actually, I saw a lot of things I hadn't seen before, but one is relevant to this thread). During the eucharistic prayer, the thurifer knelt on the steps in front of the altar, back to the congregation, and from that position censed the altar at the elevations of the bread and cup. Is this common, unique to Santiago, what?

How else would he do it? Is it more common for thurifers to incense from the side?

[ 24. September 2006, 12:08: Message edited by: RCD ]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
RuthW, I thought my memory had the position of the thurifer in the Tridentine Rite be as you describe, but when I just checked my Fortescue, they both (1920 & 1958) have schematic of the elevation at high mass with the thurifer next to the MC at the south side of the altar steps. This is where my crowd parks the thurifer, too. I hope someone comes by with an answer. Some of the stiffer Anglocatholic places I've been to (though not for a looong time) put the thurifer in the midst on the pavement.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
On the High Holy Days when Father figures he can get away with the maximum amount of incense in our RC church, the thurifer censes the elevations just as you describe it, RuthW.
 
Posted by Max. (# 5846) on :
 
Yeah - even I (a low church Catholic) will do incense kneeling in front of the altar, back to people.

I don't like doing it on the North Side (more common than South) or South Side

Max
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
hmm... the usual arrangements I've seen involve the thurifer either being on the south horn throughout the EP, or starting off on the steps in front (usually to the north side, ot, exceptionally, in the middle - when we're showing off!) and switching to the south horn during the Sanctus.

These things are probably subject to the constraints of the building though.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
As a point of curiosity, why is everyone convinced that those who complain of being allergic to the incense are really allergic to the coals? I really don't react to coal smoke and I've had enough exposure to know about that one. And I also know that I'm not the only person in my church who either doesn't attend or finds ways around the services with incense.

It took my two days to recover from the last but one Christmas midnight mass I attended and for those two days the stuff that was wheezing out of my admittedly asthmatic lungs was the incense. I also had puffy and swollen eyes, which are another allergic reaction. I coped with the last midnight mass by strategically seating myself as far away as possible from the thurifer's path and a pre-emptive dosing with asthma drugs. It's not too bad at Christmas because I've got a few days to recover before the term starts, so it's worth the recovery time for the service. We do have incense during other services. I avoid Easter by attending the dawn service and taking creche duty during the main parish mass. Last Epiphany the reader wouldn't allow incense as the congregation weren't given advance notice, although I was expecting and had prepared myself for some avoidance tactics if necessary.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Good question Curiosity k. I suspect it is because those of us who aren't allergic think the junk the manufacturers of the fast-light charcoal treat it with smells bad, so it must be bad, so it must be the allergen, not the natural stuff that gets burned as incense. But, as you imply, 'taint necessarily so.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
Data point: I have noted that the complainers complain less when the residual gunk is cleaned out of the thurible properly.

We also got more complaints when someone decided to tart up the blend for the Epiphany, instead of our usual straight frankincense.

Charlotte
 
Posted by Sacristan (# 3548) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
RuthW, I thought my memory had the position of the thurifer in the Tridentine Rite be as you describe, but when I just checked my Fortescue, they both (1920 & 1958) have schematic of the elevation at high mass with the thurifer next to the MC at the south side of the altar steps. This is where my crowd parks the thurifer, too. I hope someone comes by with an answer. Some of the stiffer Anglocatholic places I've been to (though not for a looong time) put the thurifer in the midst on the pavement.

Our thurifer kneels also on the South (Epistle) side. I think this is the most common, if the setting allows it.
 
Posted by Mr. Rob (# 5823) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nunc_Dimittis:
I will check Ritual Notes on this RC, but what I learnt, and what I have observed re thurible and the Sanctus was:

The bell is rung three times. At each ring, the thurifer swings the thurible thrice in the manner of censing someone/thing. (Assuming he/she is kneeling before the Altar...) The Thurifer then continues to swing the thurible in small rapid arcs side to side until the Agnus Dei, repeating the censing figure at the elevation of both elements.

I don't know if this is correct.

Well to be blunt, it's not correct. LOL!

The thurible is gently swung from side to side at the Sanctus (holies). It is swung the same way during the reading of the Holy Gospel. After the the the words of institution or epiclesis, the thurifer may exit. He may also exit after the canon at the beginning of the Lord's Prayer. Anything longer smokes up the sanctuary or altar area too much.
 
Posted by Mr. Rob (# 5823) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jim Olson:
Hello everyone, I've just found this message board while doing a search for thuribles online. Fascinating...I've spent over an hour reading back through the posts.

I teach worship and liturgy at Boston University School of Theology. As you can imagine, most Methodists can't figure out the reason for a good thurible, hence my online search for an inexpensive one. Of course, I know you get what you pay for, so here's the rub...

Would any of you have a thurible that is no longer used that you would be willing to donate to Boston University? It does not have to be in great condition, simply usable. I would prefer a four-chain, (I have access to a single chain one that the Catholics who use our chapel keep...). You would receive in return three things. 1) My personal gratitude. 2) The knowledge that 40 students in the Arts of Worship class each term will at least have had some experience of a thurible and 3) a nice donation letter on Chapel letterhead thanking you for your donation, suitable for tax purposes.

What say you? You can reach me directly at revjj@bu.edu.

Thanks everyone. I will keep reading with great interest.

If you'v been very, very good, the folks at the Advent, Boston, might help you out. Get in touch with them.
 
Posted by RCD (# 11440) on :
 
Does the south side or center position for the thurifer have something to do with whether there is a subdeacon (or equivalent) or not?

[ 25. September 2006, 18:19: Message edited by: RCD ]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr. Rob:
quote:
Originally posted by Nunc_Dimittis:
I will check Ritual Notes on this RC, but what I learnt, and what I have observed re thurible and the Sanctus was:

The bell is rung three times. At each ring, the thurifer swings the thurible thrice in the manner of censing someone/thing. (Assuming he/she is kneeling before the Altar...) The Thurifer then continues to swing the thurible in small rapid arcs side to side until the Agnus Dei, repeating the censing figure at the elevation of both elements.

I don't know if this is correct.

Well to be blunt, it's not correct. LOL!

The thurible is gently swung from side to side at the Sanctus (holies). It is swung the same way during the reading of the Holy Gospel. After the the the words of institution or epiclesis, the thurifer may exit. He may also exit after the canon at the beginning of the Lord's Prayer. Anything longer smokes up the sanctuary or altar area too much.

'He should not swing it while the gospel is sung.' - Fortescue Ceremonies of the Roman Rite described p. 97

'During the godspeol he keps the censer swinging slightly or even motionless (so that the charcoal still glows but not more than required for this). Ritual Notes p. 161
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
I'm disinclined to leave any fire untended, so the idea of leaving the coals in the thurible untended makes us uncomfortable. So, we don't [ever] leave the thurible untended during the mass.

A variation on this fear is the set-up at St. Paul's Savannah. The thurible is suspended on a rack mounted on the east wall directly next to the altar, visible to alll in the nave and to most in the sanctuary. This is where it is kept during the mass. So, coals are added and blown upon by the thurifer in plain sight of God and everybody.

When I visited the church the Saturday before the mass, I noted the holy spoon and tongues on the south steps to the altar and thought they had been mislaid.

Has anyone else ever seen this arrangement?
 
Posted by Spiffy da WonderSheep (# 5267) on :
 
So, I'm at work and I've got the Ordination of Bp. Paul Swain webcast up in the other window for fun. And I click over and see what appears to be a guy censing the lectern microphone.

Took me a minute to realise that he was preparing to read the Gospel.

Is this SOP for big cathedrals/parishes? I'm more familiar with a wireless miked or large-lunged deacon wandering down the center aisle and doing the censing stuff there, but I am yet young.

[Preview post! Preview post! Preview post!]

[ 26. October 2006, 19:35: Message edited by: Spiffy da WonderSheep ]
 
Posted by My Duck (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy da WonderSheep:

I'm more familiar with a wireless miked or large-lunged deacon wandering down the center aisle and doing the censing stuff there, but I am yet young.

[Preview post! Preview post! Preview post!] [/QB]

We certainly have the Gospel proclaimed from the centre aisle in the midst of the people (who all get thoroughly fumigated in the process!)

I would have thought the only reason for using the lectern would be insufficient servers...

Incidentally, we bought some new incense last week, and it is foul - think of burnt rubber with overtones of plastic, coal tar and turpentine.... It's even worse than the stuff brought back from Greece which smelt like lavatory cleaner.

BTW incense is very good from preventing churches being infested with unwelcome insects. Allegedly no Catholic church ever gets zapped by deathwatch beetle. I'm wondering what the effect would be on a resident colony of bats.....
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Well this is just the pic to draw this thread up after a dormancy of a month. I found it sulking on page 6.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
And this one, too.

Orthodox thurifer-deacons are apparently able to incense, walk backward, and carry candlesticks at the same time for great prelates, perhaps there should be less fussing about Anglican thurifers who do the same for the Most Blessed Sacrament.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
Thank you TSA! I can practically smell it!
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Time for me to trawl through this whole thread seeking the magic answers as we try to create nay-sayer-friendly-scented smoke for Christmas. Quick summary AIUI is:

1. Clean the thurible.

2. Use real charcoal, not self-lighting; and get to white-hot temperature. (Prerequisite: acquire brazier and tongs.)

3. Use the right brand of incense (this is the one I need to trawl most totting up which brand is most bestly recommended here).

Anything else I've missed for the quick summary?
 
Posted by MouseThief (# 953) on :
 
What's wrong with self-lighting charcoal?
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Maybe I used the wrong word. Quick lighting? Tiny round bricks for putting right in the thurible instead of starting in a separate brazier?

Anyway, what I gathered from skimming this thread is that the stuff added to certain brands of charcoal to make it work the way it does is smelly & icky & contributes to people not getting along well with the smoke thereby produced.

Maybe it's only the little round bricks named for the Magi that go right in the thurible that are the problem; and not real charcoal-made-from-wood pillows that go in a brazier separately though, self-lighting or not.
 
Posted by MouseThief (# 953) on :
 
Our church uses self-lighting stuff. It has something in it that makes it pop and sparkle, but has no smell that I can discern (even on my best days, nasally) of its own.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
Time for me to trawl through this whole thread seeking the magic answers as we try to create nay-sayer-friendly-scented smoke for Christmas. Quick summary AIUI is:

1. Clean the thurible.

2. Use real charcoal, not self-lighting; and get to white-hot temperature. (Prerequisite: acquire brazier and tongs.)

3. Use the right brand of incense (this is the one I need to trawl most totting up which brand is most bestly recommended here).

Anything else I've missed for the quick summary?

For number 3, save yourself time and use frankincense. I know that the true connisseurs (sp) will argue with me but it's both easily found and seasonally appropriate.

The only time I know of that we switched to something else brought complaints from even the incense lovers!

Charlotte
 
Posted by Joan Rasch (# 49) on :
 
I believe 'self-lighting' charcoal has a bit of gunpowder on the surface. When I have used it, the procedure was to get it going over an ordinary candle flame. I never noticed any fumes from it myself, but in any case, if the coals are started well ahead of the time they are needed, any possible fume-producing part will have burned off.

Our strategy to keep the thurible clean was to line it with a bit of clean aluminum foil each time it was used.

cheers - Joan
 
Posted by Choirboy (# 9659) on :
 
The gunpowder/self lighting stuff does indeed smell fairly acrid when you light the thing up. That should pass quickly - unless the thurifer is making the mistake that self-lighting means he/she doesn't need to spend time before mass getting the thing good and hot.
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
I recently bought a small pack of Prinknash incense to use in my little brass burner. The self-lighting charcoal provided gave off quite a bit of rather acrid smoke when ignited, but this quickly dissipated and gave way to the sweet, sweet smell of the incense itself..........

Ian J.
 
Posted by seasick (# 48) on :
 
I don't know what was going on in the Cathedral's thurible this evening, but the smell was predominantly of charcoal smoke... The smell of incense would have been preferable!
 
Posted by Laurence (# 9135) on :
 
With regard to Protestant coughs, a little while ago I had the joy of getting married! Thus my family composed of Welsh Presbyterians and the bride's semi-atheistic Cornish tribe gathered together in a very spangly Oxford chapel. This was liberally filled with incense. And there was not a cough to be heard, despite the use of quick-lighting charcoal! I'm convinced there were four factors in this:

Firstly, the inside of the thurible was given the cleaning of its life beforehand. It was a good, big, shiny thurible, borrowed from a high AngloCarthlick establishment, not the mean little College thurible!

Secondly, the chapel was sufficiently high (in terms of altitude, tho' the theology was pretty good too...) that there was no stale smoke lingering; it came out of the thurible and went straight up.

Thirdly, we used pure frankincense with a sprinkling of rose scent- no potions or strange mixtures for us.

Fourthly, I imagine the Protestants in the congregation were stunned into silence by the roaring of the bombardes on the organ anyway!

But a clean thurible, an airy church and good pure incense definitely go a long way to quelling the Calvinist consumptives in the congo.

L.

PS There are some quite fun photos, too, if anyone wants to see a good tat-laden procession. It was all very Sarum- lots of copes and lovely winged English surplices. I was sorely tempted to Mystery Worship it, but had other things on my mind at the time...

[ 30. November 2006, 22:11: Message edited by: Laurence ]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Autenrieth Road, check with Ultraspike (does he still post here any more?) for a lead on suppliers. You'll be glad you did.

MT, I fear you may be terminally nasally challenged. To clear yourself of this charge, should you so choose, can you tell us what brand of quick lights your crowd uses? Joan Rasch's explanation is also the one I use.

Our lot uses a hobbyist's butane torch with tongs for lighting the charcoals, with a candle nearby for quick relighting when the gunpowder ignites and blows out the torch.

Before we added boatbearing ankle-biters to our rota, we would keep the sacristy door shut when lighting a new pot after dumping it after the gospel. Now it seems prudent to leave the view of the thurifer and the thurifer's seven-year-old charge in the sacristy unobstructed, during these depressingly hysteria-freighted times.

Perhaps this question will finally expose me as not knowing my anatomy from a rabbit hole, but who says that a thurible has to be clean to be sweet smelling, and, if so, why exactly is this the case?

Laurence: post the pics! Post the Pics! [please?]
 
Posted by Fishngrl (# 11094) on :
 
AR, over here at SMV, we use a major well-known barbeque type charcoal in the thuribles. They are cleaned out on a pretty regular basis and polished using Brasso (our task this Saturday).

For your information, A Friend Who Is Expert highly recommends using acetone to get a thurible really super clean. This same friend makes her own incense, on account of she's that cool. But as The Silent Acolyte suggested, I don't think the cleanliness of the thurible affects coughing, it seems to do more with how hot the charcoal is.

Regarding types of incense, ours is homemade in the basement (and sold in the gift shop). (You can go to the photo gallery on our web page to see how it's done.) I think there is also a brand called Resurrection that a former parish used to use on occasion.

Have a great time with it - thank you for smoking!
 
Posted by Pearl B4 Swine (# 11451) on :
 
thank you for smoking!
[Killing me]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
And this one, too.

Orthodox thurifer-deacons are apparently able to incense, walk backward, and carry candlesticks at the same time for great prelates, perhaps there should be less fussing about Anglican thurifers who do the same for the Most Blessed Sacrament.

I know this is a little obsessive, but here is another shot of the deacon-thurifers. I'll cease and desist now or start a new thread if more pics come to me that absolutely must be seen.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Thanks for the comments.

A check of the sacristy reveals Three Kings quick-lights. Do these burn hot enough? We only do incense during the procession in, and then at the offertory. I.e. don't need something that can last for the entire Eucharistic Prayer or something.

If we use a separate brazier to get a heap of coals going in, and then transfer some to the thurible, do we need to station someone to stay with the brazier? I'm nervous about leaving fire unattended. We haven't got adequate ventilation in the sacristy to leave carbon-monoxide producing coals burning for too long, so I guess we'd have to set it up outside.

We have Almy Revelation (or is it Resurrection? rats, I've forgotten) in a can. Also a baggie labelled Frankincense, but I've forgotten what vendor it said (if it did). I'm inclined to try the Frankincense instead of the pre-made stuff, on the grounds of it being least likely to have random irritating things in it, and I want the highest probability of success in pleasing those who have had problems with our smoke in the past.

Plus two tiny little packs marked Frankincense and Myrrh, with an instruction sheet for various ways of releasing the scent including by warming between the hands. No little packet marked Gold though; maybe I can lend my gold locket for an authentic three kings procession at epiphany.

Early in the thread people had said the cleaning is important because the leftover resins in the thurible produce bad smells the next time. I don't know if it also produces coughing, but I'm inclined to try all the stops simultaneously.

[ 01. December 2006, 15:33: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
AR - if there is a free-standing coat hanger somewhere in the church, get it out.

Also, if you don't have a gas match (available in any hardware store and larger groceries with the barbeque or fireplace supplies), get one. It's a useful thing to have in the sacristry anyways [Biased] .

Charlotte
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
And what are these implements for?

By the freestanding coat hanger, I presume you mean a coatrack? We have many freestanding coat hangers, although more frequently they are free-lying at the bottom of the closets [Big Grin] . But what is this freestanding coatrack for?

By a gas match, do you mean one of those sort of long things that you click and a flame spouts out of it? And why would it be useful in the sacristy apart from lighting coals?

I gather that it's better to light the coals by holding it with tongs over a flame -- rather than our current procedure, which is to put them in the thurible and then poke at them from the top or sides with the same tiny matches we use to light the torches. Yes?
 
Posted by MouseThief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
By a gas match, do you mean one of those sort of long things that you click and a flame spouts out of it? And why would it be useful in the sacristy apart from lighting coals?

Lighting candles and lamps?
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Our most frequently used candles are tall or high or both so are lighted with the taper. The lower-down candles are easily lighted by continuing on with the taper since it's already being carried about for the tall candles, except for the window candles which have chimneys, but to use the gas match effectively on them would require a tall person in any case to reach in over the chimney, so not necessarily a win over current procedure which involves one acolyte lifting the chimney so the other can use the taper.

The torches it would occasionally be useful to have something other than a match (for when the acolyte fumble-fingers trying to light the match); on the other hand a small box of matches is easily put in an acolyte robe pocket. People have occasionally suggested we use cigarette lighters instead; I've ignored this suggestion since I'm not particularly enamoured of new-fangled technology and have seen enough cigarette lighters (or even gas matches) being ineffectually clicked with no flame emerging to not see it as a particular improvement over matches.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MouseThief:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
By a gas match, do you mean one of those sort of long things that you click and a flame spouts out of it? And why would it be useful in the sacristy apart from lighting coals?

Lighting candles and lamps?
Correct and correct.

I often use it for the sanctuary candles (which are lit when nobody else is around [Biased] ) and to light the wick on the ceremonial brass candle lighters/snuffers because someone bought the el-cheapoest matches and I dislike using them.

I had pilotless gas stoves previously so relied on them at home!

Charlotte

[ 01. December 2006, 16:19: Message edited by: Amazing Grace ]
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
And what are these implements for?

By the freestanding coat hanger, I presume you mean a coatrack? We have many freestanding coat hangers, although more frequently they are free-lying at the bottom of the closets [Big Grin] . But what is this freestanding coatrack for?

Yes, it's a coat rack. We use it for holding the thurible.

If you have sufficient humans around, it's not necessary, as one of them can hold it.

Charlotte
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
By the freestanding coat hanger, I presume you mean a coatrack?...But what is this freestanding coatrack for?

These things are properly called Dumb Acolytes or Silent Acolytes. They are various in shape, but essentially consist of a heavy base attached to which is a single vertical shaft (about five feet tall) surmounted by a hook or cross bar from which the central discus ring of the thurible can be hung. Having one made from wrought iron is best.

Some places have two: one in the sanctuary and one is the sacristy. Some places make do with a large hook mounted on the wall.

Proper silent acolytes are better, because with a wall-mounted hook, the thurible usually rests against the (potentially inflammable) plaster wall of the sacristy.
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
I gather that it's better to light the coals by holding it with tongs over a flame -- rather than our current procedure, which is to put them in the thurible and then poke at them from the top or sides with the same tiny matches we use to light the torches. Yes?

Well...it's like this. Don't light the coals with matches. If you must, use a taper instead, but these tend to be expensive. Spend a couple sawbucks on the hobbyist butane torch. That'll allow you to spill flame on the top, sides, and bottom of the coals placed in your thurible.

Tongs are okay, but there is a drawback. The advantage is that you can view the entire coal as you flow the flame (from the torch) over its surface, thereby visually confirming that you have ignited all the accelerant. The drawback is that you can fumble and drop the coal (bad), or hold the coal so tightly that you fragment it and scatter pieces (much worse).

In any event--and, I know this isn't practical for your lot AR--it is best to have a portion of the sacristy reserved for *just* this activity. Purchase a large glass cutting board for your work surface if you can't have the work surface properly tiled over. Tiling the backsplash and the proximate flooring and wall, too, is also a good thing.

Regarding the long-skinny clicking things (gas matches), there are some foamers who think they hew to the 'old ways of striking fire from flint' (wtf?) by using these new-fangled cigarette lighters instead of safety matches. Ignore the the foamers and use these devices or matches as you find convenient.
 
Posted by Choirboy (# 9659) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
Tongs are okay, but there is a drawback. The advantage is that you can view the entire coal as you flow the flame (from the torch) over its surface, thereby visually confirming that you have ignited all the accelerant.

-- which also points out a possible problem with the self-light charcoal that I hadn't thought of. With more stale coals, or if you don't put enough effort in to getting it going properly, there may still be unburned accelerant on the coals when mass starts. Eventually as the thing heats up during mass, it will spark and light, but discharge the somewhat acrid accelerant odor.

Could someone recommend brands or suppliers of non-self lighting charcoal for thuribles? I've only seen the self-lighting varieties out here.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Finished reading all 109 (!!!!) pages (printed) of this thread.

Next task: cleaning of thurible, using some assortment of tools recommended by all and sundry here: rubber gloves, goggles, toothbrush, plastic scourer, ventilated area, container for putting cleaner dregs in so as not to put them down a drain or on the ground, and cleaner -- variously acetone, mineral turpentine, ethanol, paint stripper, wd-40, jellied methylene chloride, olive oil w/ elbow grease, and/or boiling water.

All this for the once-a-year appearance of the thurible. [Help] .
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
AR, forget the turpentine, boiling water, mineral whatever, and go directly to the jellied paint stripper. Gloves are a prudent precaution.

It is a solid brass thurible, though, isn't it?

Maybe you should ignore my first paragraph if your forebears invested in some plated affair.

Please tell us how it goes, though!
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
These things are properly called Dumb Acolytes or Silent Acolytes.

Our most usual thurifer is a gentleman who suffers from any number of mental difficulties, and who absolutely refuses to be instructed in any degree of how to thurify. But, if he isn't allowed to thurifer, he just elopes to a different church, so it appears that we are stuck with him [Smile]

His latest trick is to use the curtain rail above the door to the sacristy - which once had a drape suspended from it, but no longer - as a silent acolyte, during the EP. It looks really rather weird...

Anyway, I'm off to Hispaniola for a week.

See all soon, and please for me to ensure I don't catch malaria or get kidnapped by pirates!

Peter
 
Posted by scopatore segreto (# 11848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
And this one, too.

Orthodox thurifer-deacons are apparently able to incense, walk backward, and carry candlesticks at the same time for great prelates, perhaps there should be less fussing about Anglican thurifers who do the same for the Most Blessed Sacrament.

No prelates required: Orthodox clergy and servers do this every (liturgical) day of the year, although it might disquiet the Anglo-Catholic mind to know that the honor is paid to the offerings of bread and wine before, not after, the metamorphosis!
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
It doesn't disquiet this Anglican mind in the least. With Schmemann, she understands the profitable meaning of predestination of the gifts.
 
Posted by moveable_type (# 9673) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
AR, forget the turpentine, boiling water, mineral whatever, and go directly to the jellied paint stripper. Gloves are a prudent precaution.

I found this out the hard way renovating this summer: there are special gloves for using paint stripper, which is what is required. They're quite long and thick. Home Depot stocks them with the paint stripper, conveniently enough.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
AR, forget the turpentine, boiling water, mineral whatever, and go directly to the jellied paint stripper. Gloves are a prudent precaution.

It is a solid brass thurible, though, isn't it?

Maybe you should ignore my first paragraph if your forebears invested in some plated affair.

Please tell us how it goes, though!

I don't know if it's solid or not. It seems rather too lightweight to be solid, but who knows.

It's now clean. Tools: acetone, goggles, gloves, rags, turkey roasting pan, two jars, an outside deck, and one teaspoon.

I'll wait till I'm on the brass-polishing rota later this month to polish it; there are different procedures for plain brass vs. lacquered brass (or lacquered brass plate), and I don't know how to tell which is which yet.
 
Posted by pater ursus (# 2512) on :
 
Hi Folks.

I am off to bed now, but just stopped by and saw this thread.......I found the following MANUAL on the web. Not sure it is universally correct, but hey!! its fun to read.

And NEVER forget the "chink", where else do you get the true "smells and bells" from? [Killing me]


Peace and Love
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Whether or not we're going to have an incense is up and down like a hot potato (to mix metaphors) at the moment. On the chance that we have it, a suggestion that has been made is that only one coal be used instead of three.

Is this likely to be of any use, in reducing the number of irritations caused?

Our thurible is of a size that three of the round Three Kings brickets nicely cover the floor (for lack of a better word) and tuck up a bit on the sides.

AFAICT we are going for a token amount of scent, and no attachment to visible smoke necessarily.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
I am thurifering at Mass this Sunday, and want to make use of what I take to be a stock of resin which I found at the back of the vestry cupboard in a clear unmarked plastic bag (yes, I know this could go v. badly wrong, but I'm not one to let I dare not wait upon I want like the poor cat i'th'adage, so here goes)...

What would be a good procedure? Just grind it up in a pestle and mix with the usual stuff?
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
Hmm. Have a little practice with it first! It may be absolutely ghastly........

Ian J.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
Is this likely to be of any use, in reducing the number of irritations caused?

More accurately, is this likely to be counterproductive?

(e.g. is a single coal more liable to go cold, and does a cold coal (after having been hot) tend to produce more obnoxious stuff as opposed to just nothing; or other possibly unforeseen results?)

I'm starting to wonder if it would be easier simply to dab some rose oil liberally behind my ears and wave an empty thurible.
 
Posted by scopatore segreto (# 11848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by pater ursus:
And NEVER forget the "chink", where else do you get the true "smells and bells" from?

The Orthodox, who swing from the end of the thurible, make up for the lack of “chink” with sleigh bells on the chains.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
(e.g. is a single coal more liable to go cold, and does a cold coal (after having been hot) tend to produce more obnoxious stuff as opposed to just nothing; or other possibly unforeseen results?)

One coal will give less offense than three. And that is the number you should use: one. At Our Lady of Hardwork, we typically use four, but could just as well manage with three. And our crowd demands that the sanctuary be wreathed with smoke and that they return home of a Sunday with their clothes reeking of frankincense. One coal should do. You might consider breaking one in half and seeing if that is sufficient.

You might also fashion a small jig of aluminum foil to keep the coal from sliding around. Just be mindful not to restrict the air flow.

Your caution about the coal failing to fire is reasonable. Just sit with the thurible watching it until you see it turn gray over a convincing fraction of the surface. A cold coal is inert; it doesn't smell. A hot coal doesn't transform itself into a cold coal unless it wasn't thoroughly hot to begin with, which is why you look for 60% gray before you decide you don't need to watch it any more. It is completely burned out when it is reduced to powder; although sometimes there'll be a hard unburnt black core.

And, practice at home with several coal and incense. This'll enable you to measure the lag between lighting the coal (which'll take a minute or three by itself) and grey-all-over-and-ready-for-incense. These little buggers are cheap.

How old are these coals? Yes, definitely practice. It's fun and stokes (yuk) your primitive need for fire.

Also, at the risk of being tedious, an investment of $25.00 in a hobbyist's torch may be too steep for your taste, but it sounds as if the stakes are high enough to warrant the expense.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Thank you for that very informative post.

I think just the chance to sit out on my deck this week making charcoal fires and scenting the neighbourhood will be worth the price of a hobbyist's torch.

(* makes shopping list... glass cutting board, mortar and pestle, torch, tinfoil, tongs, oven mitts... plus a Holy Biscuit Tin for discarding the burnt coals *)
 
Posted by moveable_type (# 9673) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dj_ordinaire:
I am thurifering at Mass this Sunday, and want to make use of what I take to be a stock of resin which I found at the back of the vestry cupboard in a clear unmarked plastic bag (yes, I know this could go v. badly wrong, but I'm not one to let I dare not wait upon I want like the poor cat i'th'adage, so here goes)...

My in-laws found a similar little package in a house they'd just bought. Turned out to be heroin -
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
AR--One more thing. I'm enthusiastic about the hobbyist's torch, but beware.

The flame is almost invisible and so with a slight straying of attention you can give yourself a wicked, bloody burn.--TSA (who wouldn't want to feel responsible for a third degree burn).
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
This thread, so far, has been heavy on the words and light on the pictures.

Hope this pic stolen from another thread remedies this somewhat.

It looks as though the man with the thurible has the beginnings of a nice smokey pot. More incense and vigorous swings'll get him the kind of billowing smoke that big room deserves.
 
Posted by My Duck (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dj_ordinaire:
I am thurifering at Mass this Sunday, and want to make use of what I take to be a stock of resin which I found at the back of the vestry cupboard in a clear unmarked plastic bag (yes, I know this could go v. badly wrong, but I'm not one to let I dare not wait upon I want like the poor cat i'th'adage, so here goes)...

What would be a good procedure? Just grind it up in a pestle and mix with the usual stuff?

Judicious investigation first, would be my advice - particularly if you want to avoid judicial investigation!!! It might just be the curate's secret stash [Killing me]
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
I have visions of the entire Midnight Mass congregation doing a Bishop of Southwark on the way home. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
Simon Jenkins' book " England's Thousand Best Churches" remarks about St Cuthbert's Philbeach Gardens' reredos as having a "theme of incense".

Never enough, never enough.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
I have visions of the entire Midnight Mass congregation doing a Bishop of Southwark on the way home. [Roll Eyes]

In the style of HIGNFY: an alleged Bishop of Southwark.

It's the morning service anyway - for Midnight I'm going to my Dad's MotR place, thus spurning the advances of two other churches which wanted me to serve...
 
Posted by Martin L (# 11804) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
...doing a Bishop of Southwark on the way home. [Roll Eyes]

[Confused] What's a "Bishop of Southwark"?
 
Posted by scopatore segreto (# 11848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin L:
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
...doing a Bishop of Southwark on the way home. [Roll Eyes]

[Confused] What's a "Bishop of Southwark"?
My fellow American, I too came late to this story, but it’s priceless: seems Matey got drunk as a Lord on port (how appropriate) and was found in Crucifix Lane! See the “It’s What I Do” thread in Purg.
 
Posted by Martin L (# 11804) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scopatore segreto:
My fellow American, I too came late to this story, but it’s priceless: seems Matey got drunk as a Lord on port (how appropriate) and was found in Crucifix Lane! See the “It’s What I Do” thread in Purg.

[Killing me]

Thanks, ss! Here I was thinking he was a new Jensenite or something.
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin L:
quote:
Originally posted by scopatore segreto:
My fellow American, I too came late to this story, but it’s priceless: seems Matey got drunk as a Lord on port (how appropriate) and was found in Crucifix Lane! See the “It’s What I Do” thread in Purg.

[Killing me]

Thanks, ss! Here I was thinking he was a new Jensenite or something.

No, I think some people would like to believe that the Jensenites spiked his drink (though what they would be doing at the Irish Embassy....?) Call for Daniel 'James Bond' Craig.
 
Posted by scopatore segreto (# 11848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
No, I think some people would like to believe that the Jensenites spiked his drink (though what they would be doing at the Irish Embassy....?) Call for Daniel 'James Bond' Craig.

Surely the Irish Embassy is in league with the Jesuits -- or would it be the Opus Dei these days?
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by scopatore segreto:
Surely the Irish Embassy is in league with the Jesuits -- or would it be the Opus Dei these days?

Funnily enough, I had a dream about Opus Dei early this morning: an Opus Dei member caused controversy by wearing not an actual cilice around his thigh (self-mortification gizmo) but a tattoo of a cilice instead. Just before I woke, I was pondering the significance of the fact that the initials for Opus Dei are commonly used to mean "overdose." Whatever all that means.
 
Posted by Martin L (# 11804) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Knitter:
Whatever all that means.

It means you've watched The DaVinci Code one too many times.

By the way, that has got to be the first time someone has said, "I had a dream about Opus Dei early this morning"!
 
Posted by scopatore segreto (# 11848) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin L:
By the way, that has got to be the first time someone has said, "I had a dream about Opus Dei early this morning"!

As for dreaming about thigh cilices, that sort of thing would have cost you quite a few Paters and Aves in my day!
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
You perverts should get your own thread.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
I dunno... I make a perfectly innocent enquiry, and suddenly the thread is collapsing about us!

I blame the Rigours of the Season.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Indeed. Can we get back to incense and thuribles, please? This is supposed to be a good reference thread that we can stash in Limbo some day.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
Well, the reader will doubtless be delighted to know* that it all went off extremely well this morning. I ground the resin up in a pestle, mixed it in with just a touch of the usual Prinknash, and got burning...

By the Consecrations, the altar was barely visible for smoke, and one lady who'd been at home arranging flowers during the Mass told me that she could smell it from the far side of the alley outside. All most satisfactory really!

* although there may be others who will be disappointed that I didn't come a cropper. Schadenfreude and all that.
 
Posted by Qoheleth. (# 9265) on :
 
Rosa Mystica is on the menu here for Midnight Mass tonight.

Well, actually, a 1:1 blend with Basilica to ensure the most sublime sublimation (1). And only the MC and I know. [Big Grin]


Q.

Pedants' Footnote:
(1) - sublimation is the transition from the solid to the gas phase with no intermediate liquid stage. Technically, we sublime incense, not burn it. Isn't that wonderful? [Cool]

 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
Indeed it is. I will probably end up mentioning it in the sacristy. More than once or twice. In fact, probably so often (along with "swing that thing, we want lots of smoke!") which will make me even more obnoxious about incense than I already am.
 
Posted by Qoheleth. (# 9265) on :
 
quote:
Previously posted by me:
Rosa Mystica is on the menu here for Midnight Mass tonight.

.. and on Christmas Day In The Morning.

Approving comments were to be heard from the regular congregants; hopefully the annual visitors will also have appreciated it. We'll finish the boat-full off for the Feast of the Holy Family.

Oh yes, and 100% pure Frankincense for Epiphany.

Q.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
I want to thank all those with suggestions for our incense procedures. In the end the decision was made not to use incense this year. We will see what next year brings.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
We see. Too bad time ran out and the rector was found to be a flop instead of a flip. Condolences for all your fretting and work gone for naught.
 
Posted by brackenrigg (# 9408) on :
 
My son learned the hard way - he stoked up the thurible just before the procession and put the spent match into the charcoal.
Just as he reached the Gospeller, the match caught fire and there were flames leaping out of the thurible.
He only did that once.
 
Posted by jerusalemcross (# 12179) on :
 
If you finish mass on any high day or holiday, can see the high altar clearly after the Offertory procession and don't leave reeking of incense the thurifer hasn't done his/her job properly!! (unless your god shop has air conditioning or allergy air filters)

By the way if anyone goes to Istanbul you can get pure frankincense in the Spice Market for about a tenner a kilo (this was in 2004)not quite as nice as Yemenite frankincense but far cheaper than anything you can get here...
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Hmmm. Page 4? Not the right spot for this thread.
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
Don't know if this has been covered in these eleven pages, but anybody have any advice for a boatpersonless service?

Just this very morning we had a funeral for a revered member of the Mothers' Union.

No boat boy or girl was available, so we had to have the thurifer do it himself. Very confusing! But I understand that overseas most people don't use a boad (person).

How in God's name is that possible, I'd really like to know how you can keep the fire going outside and slip back and forth in and out with the thurible, even how does a boatless thurifer open the darn thing as that takes two hands, if he or she is holding the boat.

Please enlighten me. This morning we were juggling everthing. I pray it wasn't unseemly, I meaning handing the boat to the crucifer of all people, for a second of course, then fill the thurible, blessing. I still held it while thurifer closed, and then gave it back.

Very curious indeed.
 
Posted by My Duck (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mama Thomas:
Don't know if this has been covered in these eleven pages, but anybody have any advice for a boatpersonless service?

Just this very morning we had a funeral for a revered member of the Mothers' Union.

No boat boy or girl was available, so we had to have the thurifer do it himself. Very confusing! But I understand that overseas most people don't use a boad (person).

How in God's name is that possible, I'd really like to know how you can keep the fire going outside and slip back and forth in and out with the thurible, even how does a boatless thurifer open the darn thing as that takes two hands, if he or she is holding the boat.

Please enlighten me. This morning we were juggling everthing. I pray it wasn't unseemly, I meaning handing the boat to the crucifer of all people, for a second of course, then fill the thurible, blessing. I still held it while thurifer closed, and then gave it back.

Very curious indeed.

The thurifer should be able to juggle it surruptitiously behind the scenes if necessary. S/he then approaches with the thurible in the right hand , lid already raised, and the boat in the left hand, lid ditto. The celebrant takes the boat and the thurifer raises the thurible. The celebrant spoons the incense on, the thurifer lowers the lid and takes the boat back from the celebrant, who then blesses the incense.

If this is too difficult then another server can stand by to hold the boat. Normally the deacon or subdeacon would hold the boat in a High Mass situation.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
We have a boatlad about half of the time - just put the boat on a handy stall rail or whatever, then take it up in the left hand to hand to the Deacon (or MC, if need be) to hold it whilst it is shovelled on and blessed. One more thing to think about, admittedly!
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
About the only reason to wear a girdle with a cassock-alb: the thurifer slips the boat between the girdle and his/her tum. I've only seen it done by reasonably slim people, so I imagine it might not always be so easy.
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
Thanks all! Will copy, paste and print. But really, have a boat boy/girl is MUCH better, and far more participatory.

Remember once at an evensong I was either mildly angry or amused when the usual thurifer, about 6'4" who usually uses his son as boat boy were getting ready for the service.

At the opening hymn I noticed that the little tyke was nowhere to be seen, but Thurifers brother-in-law, 6'8" or so it seemed took his place. In a tiny, tiny church too. Land of the Giants, but a good service none the less.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
About the only reason to wear a girdle with a cassock-alb: the thurifer slips the boat between the girdle and his/her tum. I've only seen it done by reasonably slim people, so I imagine it might not always be so easy.

Well this thigh-slapper has been up for almost half a day without being denounced, so I guess it's up to me.

Anathema!

It is just looking for trouble. It is needless. It looks silly. It invites the congregation to let their minds depart from the divine mysteries being celebrated and to make odds, instead, on what how soon the buffoon thurifer will dump the boat.

Me? I'd say five gets you eight. I'll entertain side bets on whether the buffoon spills the thurible, too.

To Mama Thomas's post, though. I don't think it has been fully answered.

Between the thurifer and the celebrant, we usually can count four hands. If there are fewer, then a boatbearer (of whatever age and height) is called for. Rope-a-dope with the boat is never called for.

With four hands, we deploy like this: thurifer passes the boat to the celebrant. The celebrant then uses two of them: one to hold the boat and one to operate the spoon (and boat lid, there being one). With the remaining two of the four hands, the thurifer keeps his left on the discus and opens the lid with his right and uses the right hand grasps the chains to raise the vessel to rest gently against the side of the boat. Celebrant spoons the incense onto the coals, directly from boat to thurible.

The celebrant then waits (patiently!) till the thurifer has closed the thurible and has passed the discus into his right hand. The celebrant then hands the boat back to the thurifer's left hand, ensuring the thurifer has a secure hold on it.

When walking with the thurible, the thurifer grasps the boat by its base and rests it against his chest—the same place he puts that spare hand when he doesn't bear the boat. In the other hand (usually the right), he bears the thurible by the discus.

[ 15. January 2007, 21:04: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
TSA, now THAT sounds much smoother. Think I'll copy and paste that one. We use incense every Sunday here, and yesterday was the first time without a boatperson, but that wasn't a regularly scheduled service. We did have an unvested brother outside taking care of the fire. Remember in most countries there is not place to get such modern miracles as "self-lighting charcoal."

Are boat-bearers common? Or are they rare. Just recruit them; they make life easier, and it looks great for two to handle the incense.

Also the question comes up as it did last Thursday at St. Francis--Mass is about to begin, and someone comes up and says there is only a teeny tiny amount of powder, might get more by banging the lid of boat. Hmmm. What to do. Grate wax (horrible but done--frequently. I refuse. I personally have grated mosquito coils. Last Thursday I just used a grain or two each time, and a couple of going through the motions, scoop and bless, hoping a dust speck of incense fell into the fire.
 
Posted by Rossweisse (# 2349) on :
 
A host has closed my thread that asked a thurible question, and booted me here; apparently we are to look to see if topics exist even unto Page 5. Whatever.

Trying again:

A friend asks

quote:
I just heard that there is a figure eight way of swinging the thurible. I think I heard it called the "Queen Mary." Is that right? Do you know?
Can someone lighten her darkness?

Thank you!

Ross
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I've never heard it called a Queen Mary. I've heard one or two thurifers called ... oh never mind. [Biased]

Figures-of-eight are, of course, difficult, dangerous, often egotistical on the part of the thurifer ...

... and, of course, totally fabulous! (In moderation.)
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rossweisse:
A host has closed my thread that asked a thurible question, and booted me here; apparently we are to look to see if topics exist even unto Page 5. Whatever.

Nah, just to guess that it wouldn't be MW* if there wasn't a thread on smoke available at all times!

As to the double 360, I though it was called a Queen Anne - or am I getting confoosed with lace again?

And why should it be named after any Queen at all?

*except that it isn't, of course
 
Posted by Rossweisse (# 2349) on :
 
Thank you for the replies!
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dj_ordinaire:
quote:
Originally posted by Rossweisse:
A host has closed my thread that asked a thurible question, and booted me here; apparently we are to look to see if topics exist even unto Page 5. Whatever.

Nah, just to guess that it wouldn't be MW* if there wasn't a thread on smoke available at all times!

As to the double 360, I though it was called a Queen Anne - or am I getting confoosed with lace again?

And why should it be named after any Queen at all?

*except that it isn't, of course

We called it the Queen Anne Salute - what a hoot - Why on earth Queen Anne should be so honored is beyond reason!
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
The Church Times St. Gargoyles cartoon is wonderful this week! Their Caption Competition* is relevant to this thread too.

*Did they still this idea from the Ship???
 
Posted by DitzySpike (# 1540) on :
 
Does anyone know if it is possible to fire up charcoals using a toaster oven? Hope this doesn't turn up to be a silly question; trying to find an easy way to light up in a church. [Smile]
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DitzySpike:
Does anyone know if it is possible to fire up charcoals using a toaster oven? Hope this doesn't turn up to be a silly question; trying to find an easy way to light up in a church. [Smile]

I'm inclined to think that this might be a very bad idea... if you're using the quick-light stuff, it has bits of gunpowder on the outside and I can easily imagine such a scheme being quite a fire-hazard. [Ultra confused]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Hmmm. Found this thread down on page three.
quote:
DitzySpike clearly never went through the child-pyromaniac phase:
Does anyone know if it is possible to fire up charcoals using a toaster oven? Hope this doesn't turn up to be a silly question; trying to find an easy way to light up in a church. [Smile]

This is really not a good idea. Can you squat outside on a fire escape or by the back door and pretend to be lighting the brazier for dinner?

We made the switch from pure frankincense to pure myrrh last night. If any were uncertain if the fast had begun, the pervadingly thick scent quickly corrected them.
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DitzySpike:
Does anyone know if it is possible to fire up charcoals using a toaster oven? Hope this doesn't turn up to be a silly question; trying to find an easy way to light up in a church. [Smile]

Don't try this! I think you really need a flame, and you need reliable ventilation. You don't want charcoal fumes indoors.

Our church has a niche in the sacristy where the coals are prepared with a gas burner, something like a wall-mounted blowtorch, so the flame and charcoal smoke go up a flue and aren't smelled in the building. Coals aren't removed from there until they're covered with white ash.

If no such ventilated facility is available, the coals should be prepared outside, and make sure the smoke can't blow back in through the door or a window.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Knitter:
Our church has a niche in the sacristy where the coals are prepared with a gas burner, something like a wall-mounted blowtorch...

Scott, how is the gas delivered to the burner, from a bottle, from the piped-in-from-the-street natural gas supply?
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
Scott, how is the gas delivered to the burner, from a bottle, from the piped-in-from-the-street natural gas supply?

The latter.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
*bump* as we seem to be talking about incense and thuribles on the Paschal Candle thread. I have a story as well but don't want to derail that thread further [Big Grin] .
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
*bump* as we seem to be talking about incense and thuribles on the Paschal Candle thread. I have a story as well but don't want to derail that thread further [Big Grin] .
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
So, we switched from frankincense to myrrh on Ash Wednesday. The myrrh is a sparkly god and, unlike the frankincense, burns with almost no residual goo—more of a powdery residue.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Are you going to share your story, Amazing Grace?
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
here's the story ...

We have a new (to us; he was actually another diocese's suffragan) bishop. We are still getting used to this concept in a lot of ways because the previous incumbent served over 25 years.

He was educated at the Virginia seminary, which I gather isn't much of a place to learn high(er) church ceremonial, and served in Alabama, which I guess tends to be pretty low. We tend towards the higher side of middle in this diocese and use the smoking handbag whenever we can get away with it at this parish.

One of our assisting clergy at St. Spike's died recently after a long full life. As is meet and proper, the Bishop was celebrant at the solemn Requiem.

He wielded the thurible quite competently. I was chatting with the lay thurifer and the young priest who was chaplain (who knows his own way around a thurible) at the reception. Fr M said that the head verger at the Cathedral had taken the Bishop asides and said, "Marc, let me show you how to do this." The lessons apparently took.

Charlotte
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Oh my! [Smile] . Just goes to show that even if only the priest can cense certain things, it's still the acolytes & vergers who know all about how to do it.
 
Posted by Martin L (# 11804) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
Oh my! [Smile] . Just goes to show that even if only the priest can cense certain things, it's still the acolytes & vergers who know all about how to do it.

Thankfully you had a verger who was confident enough to do this. In the Lutheran world, pastors are almost invariably taught to think they are the only ones who know anything church-related. If somebody had tried this with one of our bishops, he/she would have just rolled his/her eyes and did whatever he/she wanted anyway, because of his/her 'expertise.'

We have pastors trying to tell organists about proper registration when they have never so much as touched an organ in their entire life, and trying to tell people about liturgical customs and practices when they themselves have never darkened the door of one liturgical class and clearly have no interest in it at all.

[/Lutherant, takes deep breath]
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
ISTM that it is greatly to the Bishop's credit that he not only agreed to wield the thurible but was also willing to be taught.

It may look easy, but I bet it isn't!

Ian J.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Wielding thuribles or teaching bishops?
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
Yes, we think we have a good shepherd, in many ways. [Axe murder]

I heard that +Marc had embarrassed the head verger somewhat during the transition period when he and his wife were living in the guest flat at the Cathedral while arrangements were made to re-house the previous incumbent.

The verger (who lives at the Cathedral) had put some laundry in the dryer and come back to find his underwear neatly folded by you-know-who.

So I guess he figured that +Marc wouldn't bite his head off for suggesting that he needed thurible lessons. [Biased]

Charlotte
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
Things I learned yesterday in my first experience with the thurible paraphernalia (we used incense in a brazier at Evensong):

1. The gas burner in the sacristy is lighted with a match; it doesn't pop on from the pilot light like the cooker at home. The longer you wait, the more gas you're wasting.

2. The coals are self-lighting and don't need five solid minutes in the gas flame to get going, no matter what one of the thurifers seems to do on Sundays. In fact, they can be lighted with a match while they sit on the unlighted gas burner.

3. At cleanup time, assume everything is either hot or dirty or both; use tongs to handle everything.

Learning the hard way; fortunately, mostly without witnesses... [Hot and Hormonal]
 
Posted by Perry the Pirate (# 12362) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Knitter:

3. At cleanup time, assume everything is either hot or dirty or both; use tongs to handle everything.

I still have the scar tissue on my index finger to validate this point! Incense on the coals is similar to molten plastic - don't try to "move" a piece without benefit of spoon/tongs!
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Scott Knitter, I'm sorry to hear that. Why waste the money on self-lighting coals? Why put up with the ancilliary stink they produce? Why not just send that piped in gas over to our joint? We'd use nice and proper.

Regarding hot stuff. This is where the Venerable Oven Mitt comes into play. With our crowd, it's tongs when lighting the coals, the VOM to hold the thurible while a soup spoon is used to scrape the bowl. The acolytes also wear gloves, so the thurifer gets extra insulation from the heat.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Another thread was getting off-topic. So here's my response to AR's and PtP's posts.

Small censers can indeed be gotten from Orthodox bookstores. Feed orthodox censer into your favorite search engine and find this Wikipedia article, where the third picture shows several devices. Monastery Greetings offers this page of devices—is this the crowd with spiritually dangerous icons?

Borderline lunatic that I am, none of these censers are heavy or capacious enough for the number of coals I tend to use.
 
Posted by Chadsman (# 12348) on :
 
Rosa Mystica, every time. And available again! Try the Shrine Shop at Walsingham.

As to 360s, they are permissible in processions but only in groups of three, and should always be swung from front to back, with the chain at full length (i.e. with the right hand only).

Figures of eight are also possible but you need a wide aisle, a wide berth, and to be tall enough to know you're not going to smash the thurible to pieces on the floor (or in my case be using a thurible with a short enough chain).

The only other time a 360 is permitted is at the "Tu Rex Gloriae Christe" in a Solemn Te Deum, while the sanctuary party are formed up on the pavement after censing the altar - clockwise. That's what we do!
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Can you describe the figure-8s more? Which direction do they go in? And why would they occasion any more concern for being sure not to smash the thurible into the floor, than the 360s would?
 
Posted by Chadsman (# 12348) on :
 
Figures of eight are swung in front, horizontally...I don't quite know how best to describe it! Perhaps it's time for someone to demonstrate on youtube? They run more risk of hitting the floor because it's trickier to keep your hand still while doing them than it is with the 360.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
Small censers can indeed be gotten from Orthodox bookstores.

We have a miniature thurible... I'm not quite sure why, but we had to use it whilst the 'big boy' was being fixed. It looked pretty silly, didnt' let enough air in for anything to burn properly and refused to close. If I never have to use it again, twill be too soon!
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
Byzantine censers are (almost?) always used at full-length and open. They aren't made for the same sort of use as the larger western ones and I can imagine it looking silly indeed to see them used this way. I mean, for example, what are this and this all about?

(I'm leaving aside for now the question of why on earth the bishop is dressed like that).

[ 10. May 2007, 15:39: Message edited by: Saint Bertelin ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
A question to those to whom it applies:

How do you clean your thurible?

Ours is silver, and it never gets cleaned. I've been trying to clean it whenever I can since last summer, but it's always a day-long task, it seems.

When I need to get burnt-on crud off my pans at home, I boil water in them. Is it safe to boil a silver thurible (as opposed to just soaking it in hot tap water)?

I think what I'm looking for is a way to soften all the creosote (is that the right word?) so it can be safely scrubbed off without scratching the silver. Most of the crud is inside the thurible, of course, but some gets on the outside as well.

Any ideas would be appreciated! But please say what kind of metal yours is, since I assume some cleaning methods would be harmful to some metals even if safe on others.

Thanks!



[ 11. June 2007, 19:23: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertelin:
We had a rather entertaining thread about this some time ago where somebody boiled it for hours and kept reporting back to let us know about the progress made. I have used ethanol and a toothbrush in the past.

The key, once it has been cleaned, is to give it a good clean after every use. Also, do not leave it closed while the charcoal dies inside it. Rather, remove the charcoal and place it in a sealable tin, and stifle it. Then dispose of it on clean ground. and clean your thurible.



[ 11. June 2007, 19:21: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertelin:
We had a rather entertaining thread about this some time ago where somebody boiled it for hours and kept reporting back to let us know about the progress made. I have used ethanol and a toothbrush in the past.

The key, once it has been cleaned, is to give it a good clean after every use. Also, do not leave it closed while the charcoal dies inside it. Rather, remove the charcoal and place it in a sealable tin, and stifle it. Then dispose of it on clean ground. and clean your thurible.

What did the experiment conclude? Was any progress made?

I'd love to clean the thurible after every use, but I can't. I usually only am at the cathedral on Saturdays and Sundays, and am usually quite busy both days. I'm also not a thurifer, so I can't do much about how they handle the thurible, although I believe the practice is to leave the thurible open outdoors while the charcoal cools, and then dispose of the charcoal in the dirt. Although they might actually just put the hot charcoal into the soil, too.

Here's a dumb question: Is the gunk mostly from the charcoal, the incense, or both?

[ETA:]
Is ethanol safe for silver? Does it seem to help?



[ 11. June 2007, 19:22: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertelin:
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
What did the experiment conclude? Was any progress made?

This was a thurible that hadn't been cleaned in years and so had a thick layer of gunk. If memory serves correctly some good headway was made.

quote:
I'd love to clean the thurible after every use, but I can't. I usually only am at the cathedral on Saturdays and Sundays, and am usually quite busy both days. I'm also not a thurifer, so I can't do much about how they handle the thurible...
That's a pity. It's good when somebody like you takes the initiative to do this because, IME, so many people are in a rush to dash off and things just don't get done.

quote:
Here's a dumb question: Is the gunk mostly from the charcoal, the incense, or both?
Not dumb at all. I think it's predominantly incense resin.

quote:
Is ethanol safe for silver? Does it seem to help?
It worked a treat on our brass thurible. I used it outside, of course. As for whether it's safe for silver, I'm not sure. My then parish priest's first degree was in metallurgy and it was he who suggested (and supplied) it but I couldn alwayws ask for you.



[ 11. June 2007, 19:22: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by Comper's Child:
As I recollect St Percy suggests "sweet-oil" which is I think a term for olive oil. I've tried it and found it useless with any build-up of resins. We use "mineral spirits" allowing the thurible to soak for a half hour or so. I would, however carefully clean off any residue from the spirits as they might spoil the silver if left on for a long time. If it's cleaned after each use (and this case olive oil can work) there will be far less maintenance.

nb. If the thurible is large it can be submerged one side or one half at a time in a container of spirits.



[ 11. June 2007, 19:22: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Knitter:
Don't take my advice if it's bad, but in a previous parish I used EZ-Off oven cleaner, the kind that doesn't require heating up the oven, on the non-silver-plated inside surfaces only. I put the thurible with this stuff on it in the oven overnight purely to contain the fumes somewhat. It was a low-fume lemon-scented formula.

The thurible came out spectacularly clean (once it was wiped with a damp cloth, easily removing the liquified crud).

Again, this is something that worked, but if you ask a sacristan or parish priest about doing this and s/he says not to, don't do it. I did it because it needed doing and nobody knew nor cared about the thurible where I was, other than that it would be used at a particular service and needed to be as non-irritating as possible. Make sure to get all the EZ-Off out of it if you do this.



[ 11. June 2007, 19:23: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Copied from closed "Cleaning a thurible" thread:
quote:
Originally posted by Comper's Child:
quote:
Originally posted by Scott Knitter:
Don't take my advice if it's bad, but in a previous parish I used EZ-Off oven cleaner,

Don't use this if the silver is plated on... otherwise it's okay, but again watch out for residue and clean it thoroughly after the "cleansing".


[ 11. June 2007, 19:23: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
 
Posted by churchgeek (# 5557) on :
 
Thanks, Autenrieth Road, for moving the relevant posts from the "Cleaning Thuribles" thread - I stupidly didn't search to see if there already was a thread. [Hot and Hormonal]

Thanks to everyone for their good advice.

Meanwhile, I had an unexpected chance to speak with our diocese's thurible guru, and she suggested ethanol, and said it won't harm silver. She said to use ethanol, and follow it with hot water & detergent (ie, dish soap). I'll give that a try.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
I've been meaning to raise this question as our thurible is in a dreadful state. I remember from reading the thread in the past acetone being suggested but we've been unable to get hold of any. We'll have to try ethanol I think.

Carys
 
Posted by TonyK (# 35) on :
 
I've never been quite sure what 'ethanol' is, but found that turpentine (but not turps. subsitute - i.e.white spirit) did a good job on a brass thurible that we have on extended loan.

I left it to soak for a couple of hours, then found that I could clean it with a plastic scourer, finishing off with hot water and 'washing-up liquid' to remove the oily residue. Only one particularly difficult area required a repeat procedure!
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
I never thought of this before I heard of someone having an actual silver thurible (sterling or otherwise), but our priest has warned us about being careful when cleaning chalices about not stressing any joints between dissimilar metals which might have a mechanical connection.

(E.g. In these days when solid gold is simply way too pricey, a chalice might be made up of separate sterling and silver-gilt (gilded silver) pieces held together by an internal screw -- too vigorous washing could lead to either water getting into places it doesn't belong or placing strain on the mechanical connection and some combination of problems.)

Even with simpler metals, one needs to ask and know about what the thurible is made of and how it might react to various cleaning methods.

If in doubt, I would suggest finding a local jeweler or metalsmith and asking/paying for basic advice about the metals, how they are joined, and the best way to take care of it.
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TonyK:
I've never been quite sure what 'ethanol' is, but found that turpentine (but not turps. subsitute - i.e.white spirit) did a good job on a brass thurible that we have on extended loan.

If anyone wants to research this and try to come up with a common vocabulary, I'm sure millions (OK, thousands) of people would be greateful.

On the other hand, I can't come up with any consistent terminology for the usual cleaning solvents even in even my tiny local community, so it may be a serious challenge to identify and codify all the different terms.

Not to mention that some commercial substances are made up of various combinations of the basics; and many commercial suppliers refuse to provide detailed ingredients lists.
 
Posted by Sacristy Rat (# 5034) on :
 
I've also used oven cleaner on brass thuribles. Worked like a charm, even on a particularly nasty one that looked like it had a century's worth of gunk on the inside.
 
Posted by churchgeek (# 5557) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TonyK:
I've never been quite sure what 'ethanol' is, but found that turpentine (but not turps. subsitute - i.e.white spirit) did a good job on a brass thurible that we have on extended loan.

I left it to soak for a couple of hours, then found that I could clean it with a plastic scourer, finishing off with hot water and 'washing-up liquid' to remove the oily residue. Only one particularly difficult area required a repeat procedure!

Ethanol is a type of alcohol, but not the kind you'd drink (unless, I suppose, you were really desperate). [Biased]

ETA: Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it derives from corn? Anyway, it's often added to auto fuel, but I have to confess I'm not sure if that's to reduce pollution, or enhance performance, or what. Maybe to make the engine shine like a silver thurible!

[ 12. June 2007, 00:02: Message edited by: churchgeek ]
 
Posted by basso (# 4228) on :
 
Ethanol is exactly the same alcohol that's in the spirits you drink - but probably more concentrated. It may also be labeled grain alcohol.
 
Posted by Quam Dilecta (# 12541) on :
 
In most churches which are modern enough to delay the consecration until after the Sanctus and Benedictus, but still traditional enough to pay some attention to Ritual Notes and/or Fortescue, extra incense is added during the chanting of the Preface. The thurifer, who is kneeling at the epistle side of the altar, gently swings the thurible to keep the coals hot during the singing of the Sanctus and Benedictus. At the Elevation of each species, the bell is rung three times, accompanied by a threefold censing. A further censing, but no ringing, accompanies the doxology at the conclusion of the Canon. The thurifer and torchbearers depart either during the Our Father or after the Ecce Agnus Dei.

When the Sactus and Benedictus "cover" the Canon, there are two possibilities: either the music is timed so that the Elevations occur during a break between sections, or the music is interrupted arbitrarily when the Elevations occur.
 
Posted by churchgeek (# 5557) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by basso:
Ethanol is exactly the same alcohol that's in the spirits you drink - but probably more concentrated. It may also be labeled grain alcohol.

Thanks, shows what I know. [Biased]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Quam Dilecta:
In most churches which are modern enough to delay the consecration until after the Sanctus and Benedictus, but still traditional enough to pay some attention to Ritual Notes and/or Fortescue, extra incense is added during the chanting of the Preface. The thurifer, who is kneeling at the epistle side of the altar, gently swings the thurible to keep the coals hot during the singing of the Sanctus and Benedictus. At the Elevation of each species, the bell is rung three times, accompanied by a threefold censing. A further censing, but no ringing, accompanies the doxology at the conclusion of the Canon. The thurifer and torchbearers depart either during the Our Father or after the Ecce Agnus Dei.

When the Sactus and Benedictus "cover" the Canon, there are two possibilities: either the music is timed so that the Elevations occur during a break between sections, or the music is interrupted arbitrarily when the Elevations occur.

Ritual Notes directs that the censings be done at each elevation and that the thurifer rises and leaves after the second elevation.

The practice of censing at the doxology probably comes from those churches that don't elevate after the dominmical words but confuse elevation with presentation at the end of thr prayer.
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
quote:
Originally posted by basso:
Ethanol is exactly the same alcohol that's in the spirits you drink - but probably more concentrated. It may also be labeled grain alcohol.

Thanks, shows what I know. [Biased]
If anybody manages to acquire and use some, do not, do not, do not store it in the part of the sacristy where you keep the incense-related things, or anything to do with fire, or in any hot place. It really doesn't take much to get it to combust, so you really want to wash and polish the thurible properly after you've used the ethanol.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
Ethanol (C2H5OH) is the alcohol which is in alcoholic beverages... the principle reason one doesn't drink the industrial sort is that it contains trace amounts of its more toxic little brother, methanol (meths) which sends you blind and kills you.

And yes, it is pretty flammable so don't keep it near any flames.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertelin:
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
quote:
Originally posted by basso:
Ethanol is exactly the same alcohol that's in the spirits you drink - but probably more concentrated. It may also be labeled grain alcohol.

Thanks, shows what I know. [Biased]
If anybody manages to acquire and use some, do not, do not, do not store it in the part of the sacristy where you keep the incense-related things, or anything to do with fire, or in any hot place. It really doesn't take much to get it to combust, so you really want to wash and polish the thurible properly after you've used the ethanol.
Unless you have a really ugly church that you want to have re-ordered - in which case burn it down and claim on the insurance.
 
Posted by Petrified (# 10667) on :
 
Our special thurible gets handed to me before the two major feasts. The technique is being refined gradually.
As mentioned above (Dec 05) I boil it for several hours using a non bio washing powder which removes all the gunk, (change the water several times) I then soak in kettle descaler before polishing - comes up lovely!
I tried steam cleaning but that does not really work.

(eta our thurible is brass)

[ 13. June 2007, 07:55: Message edited by: Petrified ]
 
Posted by Hennah (# 9541) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:
I remember from reading the thread in the past acetone being suggested but we've been unable to get hold of any.

Acetone is a solvent which sold here as plain old nail varnish remover.
Not sure what it'd do to your thurible, though...

Hen x
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hennah:
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:
I remember from reading the thread in the past acetone being suggested but we've been unable to get hold of any.

Acetone is a solvent which sold here as plain old nail varnish remover.
Not sure what it'd do to your thurible, though...

Hen x

A (male) friend reckoned that that had mostly gone acetone free, but another (female) friend said that wasn't true and she's more likely to have bought some recently!

Carys
 
Posted by Tiffer (# 3073) on :
 
I heard leaving it to soak in vegetable for a long time is a good idea. Also if you line your thurible with thick foil the need for cleaning is lessened
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tiffer:
I heard leaving it to soak in vegetable for a long time is a good idea. Also if you line your thurible with thick foil the need for cleaning is lessened

We've taken to doing that, but we need to clean the gunk caused by previous users who haven't done that!

Vegetable what?

Carys
 
Posted by Tiffer (# 3073) on :
 
Oil - sorry.

I get the impression you just have to leave it in there for a whole long time. I haven't tried it though.
 
Posted by Holy Cow (# 6245) on :
 
In Australia we have a product called mineral turpentine. I used it to strip the resin from many an old thurible. Mineral turpentine is uded to clean oil paint from brushes.
 
Posted by Choirboy (# 9659) on :
 
I've just taken a propane torch and heated the inside of the thurible. The gunk melts and is scraped out easily.
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
Probably best not to coat it with turps though, before taking the blow torch to it...

I noticed that our thurible has been promoted from a dark cupboard to a place on the altar... I wonder if that's a sign of things to come? [Two face] Progressing from once or twice a year, to more often? [Yipee]
 
Posted by jlg (# 98) on :
 
On the ALTAR?!

(That thumping sound you hear is all the tat-queens fainting en masse at the very thought.)
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Choirboy:
I've just taken a propane torch and heated the inside of the thurible. The gunk melts and is scraped out easily.

A blow torch? Oh, dear. I fear this advice taken enthusiastically bodes ill for the durability of the thurible. Surely a gentle touch is wanted—that akin to finishing crème brûlée rather than searing paint from woodwork. The heat created by using the thurible is sufficient (and more natural) to heat the residue for scraping immediately after the thurible is used.

As far as the thurible resting on the altar, I've heard of, but never seen, the practice laying out on the altar (table?) the best communion plate for display on big occasions. Perhaps this is how the thurible get placed there.
 
Posted by Henry Troup (# 3722) on :
 
Good charcoal should be mostly carbon; so the charcoal residue is pretty much soot. If there's sticky gunk, it will be from the resin. There are various commercial solvents, most of which have been mentioned.

I'd think that (real) turpentine would probably be the most effective, since it's distilled from pine wood. The Wikipedia article notes that "mineral turpentine" is a petroleum product, used as a substitute. The category Solvents lists a number of other possibilities. Many are a bit hazardous, though.

A mixture sold as "lacquer thinner" will dissolve a lot of things that nothing else does, but be careful with it. I used some once to de-gunk a car license plate, and it stripped the paint [Hot and Hormonal] (North American license plates, stamped and painted metal.)

I might try something like Citrisolve, with care. It will remove things like wax crayon and pine tar. The active ingredient is mostly d-Limonene. It may be easier to clean up than some other solvents, too.

Safety note - after any solvent based cleaning, I'd wash the thurible carefully, with several rinses, then heat it outdoors to make sure that I wasn't going to add unexpected chemicals to the perfumed smoke. Nor have residual solvents crawl out of the thurible and drop on the carpet, either in liquid form or on fire!

ETA: resist the urge to mix multiple solvents. If one doesn't work well, wash it off then try another.

[ 28. June 2007, 12:07: Message edited by: Henry Troup ]
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jlg:
On the ALTAR?!

(That thumping sound you hear is all the tat-queens fainting en masse at the very thought.)

Sorry, not literally ON the altar! [Hot and Hormonal]
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
Well um... where then? Next to the altar? Credence table? A hook cunningly worked into the reredos?

Enquiring minds want to know!
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
It dangles from some sort of stand (freestanding) [Hot and Hormonal]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
It dangles from some sort of stand (freestanding) [Hot and Hormonal]

A proper name for this is the Dumb or Silent Acolyte.
 
Posted by Choirboy (# 9659) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by Choirboy:
I've just taken a propane torch and heated the inside of the thurible. The gunk melts and is scraped out easily.

A blow torch? Oh, dear. I fear this advice taken enthusiastically bodes ill for the durability of the thurible. Surely a gentle touch is wanted—that akin to finishing crème brûlée rather than searing paint from woodwork.
Well, a plumber's torch.

Have you seen meringue peaks browned in a restaurant kitchen? This is what they use.

You are right that it only requires a light touch. But if meringue can take it, I think the metal thurible will be fine.
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
It dangles from some sort of stand (freestanding) [Hot and Hormonal]

A proper name for this is the Dumb or Silent Acolyte.
When you were "The Dumb Acolyte" I didn't get the reference until you explained what a dumb acolyte was. Until then, I had always simply called it a thurible stand (because that's what the catalogues call them). Never before then and never since then have I heard anybody use dumb acolyte in this way, and a quick google doesn't generate any results for that expression either, other than references to your Ship identity and an occasion of use of the words dumb and acolyte together but seemingly with another meaning.

Is it fairly localised? My suspicion is that it's one of those expressions, such as laic, that only really get used on the other side of the pond.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Choirboy:
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by Choirboy:
I've just taken a propane torch and heated the inside of the thurible. The gunk melts and is scraped out easily.

A blow torch? Oh, dear. I fear this advice taken enthusiastically bodes ill for the durability of the thurible. Surely a gentle touch is wanted—that akin to finishing crème brûlée rather than searing paint from woodwork.
Well, a plumber's torch.

Have you seen meringue peaks browned in a restaurant kitchen? This is what they use.

You are right that it only requires a light touch. But if meringue can take it, I think the metal thurible will be fine.

One can also use them to peel tomatoes quite effectively. [Smile]
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
Meringue is disgusting. That and crème brûlée. How can anybody eat gloopy desserts like that? The thought alone makes me feel unwell. Give me a nice, solid cake any day.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
(a) I agree with you about 'the Dumb Acolyte': tis not a name I've heard... 'thurible stand' does fine.

(b) I disagree with you about creme brulee. If they don't have it in Heaven, I aint'nt going (arrogantly supposing for a moment that I might be anyway).
 
Posted by Archimandrite (# 3997) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Saint Bertelin:
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
It dangles from some sort of stand (freestanding) [Hot and Hormonal]

A proper name for this is the Dumb or Silent Acolyte.
When you were "The Dumb Acolyte" I didn't get the reference until you explained what a dumb acolyte was. Until then, I had always simply called it a thurible stand (because that's what the catalogues call them). Never before then and never since then have I heard anybody use dumb acolyte in this way, and a quick google doesn't generate any results for that expression either, other than references to your Ship identity and an occasion of use of the words dumb and acolyte together but seemingly with another meaning.

Is it fairly localised? My suspicion is that it's one of those expressions, such as laic, that only really get used on the other side of the pond.

I imagine it is a ludic development of the dumb-waiter, or Lazy Susan*. Come to think of it, there's scarcely a serving-team in the land that doesn't have a Lazy Susan...

*Dumb-waiter means two things, Lazy Susan is the same as one of them.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
I recall dimly a priest referring to the Silent Acolyte as, I think, a Jeraboam, or some other OT character who was struck "dumb". Anyone else heard something to this effect?
 
Posted by Archimandrite (# 3997) on :
 
Zechariah, father of John the Baptist, was struck dumb. Jeroboam had his hand withered whilst standing by the altar burning incense. Either seems appropriate!

- by the way, the large wine bottle containing 10-12 normal-sized ones is called a Jeroboam because he was a "mighty man of valour" who "made Israel to sin".

[ 29. June 2007, 20:19: Message edited by: Archimandrite ]
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
Thanks, perhaps that's what he'd said. It's been many years... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Siegfried (# 29) on :
 
I'm quite amazed that this thread is still active after 5 years!!
Anyway, no one's mentioned this week's thurible sighting on The Colbert Report. After talking about reports that former PM Tony Blair would be converting to Catholicism upon his departure from the office, Stephen Colbert (himself RC) produced a thurible. Unfortunately, he encountered difficulties with the chain and ended up chucking it over his shoulder rather than swinging it, which I imagine was his intent.
 
Posted by My Duck (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
It dangles from some sort of stand (freestanding) [Hot and Hormonal]

A proper name for this is the Dumb or Silent Acolyte.
I rather like the concept of a dumb or silent acolyte - many of them are far too lippy IME. Chance would be a fine thing though! [Disappointed]
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Frankly, I've never heard anyone outside of my parish refer to these things as dumb acolytes. But, then I've never seen one outside of my parish, either. (Do I need to get out more?) Mostly the need seems to be filled with a hook on the wall. A moveable thurible stand is quite useful when the occasion demands incense, yet there are not enough acolytes: Place the stand in the sanctuary and let the pot fume away when it is not being used by the celebrant or thurifer.

Regarding laic: I was recently appalled to read of clergymembers [sick!] and laypersons in a local newspaper. Although in on article an gay marriage, clergymember seemed only risqué while layperson seemed just needless. I thought there had to be something corresponding to cleric for laity. Good bless English. Laic is attested from 1562 and laical from 1290. Though the arriviste laicize (1881) is in the popular lexicon, I'm the only one I know who uses laic.

So, call me queer.


Oh, and lippy acolytes are likely also to be swans. They are pests on the order of raccoons in your rubbish bins or rats in your cellar. No hunting license is needed; they should be shot on sight.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
No, darling, you're not alone - Clerics... Laics...There, I've said it.

But silent acolytes are so much more useful... [Biased]
 
Posted by Canute the Holy (# 9394) on :
 
Having just cleaned a thurible, I have a question for next time it's going to be used...

Where do you put the coals? In the bottom, under the small insert, and then place the incense there, or in the insert and place the incense directly on the coals?

I have usually placed the incense on the coal, but is that wrong?
 
Posted by Scott Knitter (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Canute the Holy:
Having just cleaned a thurible, I have a question for next time it's going to be used...

Where do you put the coals? In the bottom, under the small insert, and then place the incense there, or in the insert and place the incense directly on the coals?

I have usually placed the incense on the coal, but is that wrong?

You were right. Typically at our church, the inside bowl gets lined with aluminum foil first. The coals are ignited on a gas burner. The foil-lined inner bowl is placed into the thurible, and when the coals are coated with gray ash, they are placed (using tongs) into the bowl. When it's time to cense the altar, the celebrant spoons incense directly on the hot coals and blesses the incense.

The foil lining makes cleanup much easier, although the lid still needs to be wiped after every use.

But by all means put the coals in the inserted bowl, not under that, where they would make the thurible very dangerously hot and probably damage it and anything the thurible touches.

[ 10. July 2007, 12:38: Message edited by: Scott Knitter ]
 
Posted by Mishkle (# 11381) on :
 
foil... that's a really good idea... *notes down*
 
Posted by Petrified (# 10667) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mishkle:
foil... that's a really good idea... *notes down*

Foil pudding (as in Steak & Kidney) or pie dishes work fine
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Canute the Holy:
Having just cleaned a thurible, I have a question for next time it's going to be used...

Where do you put the coals? In the bottom, under the small insert, and then place the incense there, or in the insert and place the incense directly on the coals?

I have usually placed the incense on the coal, but is that wrong?

Charcoal in the insert. Incense on the coals.

[ 10. July 2007, 14:52: Message edited by: leo ]
 
Posted by PD (# 12436) on :
 
One thing that might be worth noting is that individual pie dishes in the USA are usually made of treated cardboard and are not suitable as thurible insert protection. In the UK they are usually made of heavy Aluminium (Aluminum) foil.

PD
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
Well, EJCardiff found some acetone and on Sunday it was actually fine when I was at home so while my lunch was cooking I had a go at the thurible. The acetone worked a treat, especially on the top which was just incense residue. The inset with a lovely mix of charcoal and incense more than 5mm thick in places was a bit more challenging and unfortunately I ran out of acetone (50ml bottle) before it was clean. But it looks a thousand times better already. I applied it with cotton wool pads which worked well on the whole, but I perhaps need a brush for the inset given the thickness of the gunk. So hopefully we can anticipate the transfiguration by a day with incense in a couple of weeks and have it at my house-blessing/warming too the following week.

Carys
 
Posted by magnum mysterium (# 3418) on :
 
Can anyone recommend a place to buy a decent Anglican [Biased] thurible for not too exorbitant a price?
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
In our bookshop:

A thurible $7,038.10
matching boat $5,973.20

(Solomon dollars)

What I did when rector of an impoverished village, was take the thurible from the main church in town to a metal-work shop. They took an industrial pipe, cut it and welded to make a thurible. We used dog-leads from the hardware store to make the four chains.

It was a cold, industrial grey. Having no nut trees in the vicinity to make incense, I pounded mosquito coils and use that for incense. The cost of the thurible was about 4,000 vatu. Much better than the prices for the imported thuribles above.
 
Posted by Choirboy (# 9659) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:
So hopefully we can anticipate the transfiguration by a day with incense in a couple of weeks and have it at my house-blessing/warming too the following week.

You don't need the interior to be completely spotless. A little patina is a good thing in my view.

You may actually want to burn some incense in the thurible a time or two after cleaning it before the big day. I've found that when I clean a thurible, it doesn't seem to put out as much odor the first time or two after use. I have no explanation or insight - it may just be superstition on my part.
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
magnum mysterium, it depends on how much you can afford/are prepared to pay! They seem to range from around £180-£800, depending on size, material and elaborateness.......

Vanpoulles have some nice little plain thuribles from around £180 - this is the website I found:

http://www.van.aspenhost.co.uk

They crop up now and then on good old eBay - worth a look, even though proper church thuribles tend to get mixed up in the listings with Oriental thingies.

Ian J.
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
Oh dear - the Vanpoulles site I've linked to seems to be for their January 2007 sale! Gives an idea of what's on offer generally, though.

Ian J.
 
Posted by LostinChelsea (# 5305) on :
 
I just bought a (very) used thurible at a supply house that deals in used churchy things: everything from candlesticks to pulpits and lots of used vestments.

There must be others around the world who do this sort of thing. I happen to be in driving distance of this place and it's the only one I'm familiar with in the US, though there may be others. I have no connection with this company; I only offer it as a suggestion of the sort of company that most of us wouldn't know exists.

I used lots of elbow grease and tips I picked up from this thread -- boiling seemed to work to get the gunk out!

[ 06. September 2007, 22:25: Message edited by: LostinChelsea ]
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
I suppose I shouldn't get TOO excited before the PCC meeting, but can I just say that a certain object is about to come out of the cupboard on a more regular basis... [Yipee] (if I say anymore I'll have to kill you... [Two face] )
 
Posted by YMS (# 12951) on :
 
i am not sure if we are on the original question, but looking at what incense we use at sundon:

Never prinknash - it gets down your throat and can also smell acrid. The Basilica is ok as prinknash goes but we don't tend to use it here.

We have a kind of a rota, incorporating the Nashdom blends (now made at Burford) and Orthodox incense both from walsingham (ROse) and from the S Edward Brotherhood:

Festivals:
Nashdom Valle Crucis or Malmsbury
+ Alexandria Rose + Chertsey Carnation.

Ordinary time:
Nashdom Rievaux + orange blossom or rose (W)
(sometimes this can change and is more often rose than orange these days)

Lent + Advent:
Nashdom Rievaux or Evesham or Glastonbury
+ Purbeck Rose or Rose (W).

although this isnt set in stone, but it does mean that the fragrances change from time to time. Some poeple like prinknash...just i dont!
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
Well, there yer go - I happen to much prefer Prinknash (used at the church I now attend) to the Orthodox variety (St. Edward, IIRC) burnt in the Cathedral on the rare occasions on which incense is used there. Each to his own!

Ian J.
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
I like Prinknash too!
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I don't - it is cheap and nasty.

Go to St. Sulpice in Paris. I purchased some incense for my requiem!
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
Is that what they call "forward planning"? Will you have a dry run while you're still alive, to make sure that its just as you want it? [Two face]

If anyone is willing to send me samples, I'm willing to experiment with incense... [Yipee]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I have already used some - trouble is, the longer I live, the more the incense will go off, despite being in a sealed bag.
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
You'll just have to keep visiting to replenish... its been some years since I've been to Paris, not so much fun with anklebiters, I think...
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I need no excuse to visit Paris, especially St. Sulpice.
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
I served at a church yesterday that uses large charcoal brickets, by which I mean some about 2 to 2 1/2 times the size of those that I've always known. They're brilliant. They're slow burning and last for ages (we used three over the course of about four hours), and have made me realise that it is perfectly possible to light these things easily without them being coated in gunpowder. It takes longer but only slightly.

I didn't notice the brand because I was busy doing things and I didn't think to ask because my mind was otherwise occupied. I can easily find out where they get them from but I thought I'd mention it here in case anybody may know about them. They come in stacks in a foil-type wrapper, just the smaller ones. Does anybody use them regularly?
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
Apparently, they're briquettes and not brickets. [Hot and Hormonal]
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
What you describe sounds like what we use (I've only been let loose at prepping the thurible once)
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
Thank you, LTYYH. Where do you get them?
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
I'll ask the "boss" - he buys them...
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
Ta muchly!
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
They sound superb, St. B. Here we use coconut shells. They're good, but require a "boat boy" or "boat girl" to keep the fire going throughout the service. With those charcoals, an important lay position in the service is made redundant by technology.
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
I'm going to have to ask, Mama T! How do they keep the coconut shells going.........?

Ian J.
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
St B, this is what "the boss" said:

"spck in cambridge stock them (downstairs), or the guild shop walsingham, mayhew, dupont, vanpoulles, hays & finch, etc..."

Apologies for the fact he couldn't find the capslock... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
St B, this is what "the boss" said:

"spck in cambridge stock them (downstairs), or the guild shop walsingham, mayhew, dupont, vanpoulles, hays & finch, etc..."

Apologies for the fact he couldn't find the capslock... [Big Grin]

Tis ok. [Big Grin]

Thank you so much for that, and please pass on my thanks. I'm rather embarrassed actually. I had for some years, until recently, been subscribed to the catalogues of the last four, (I'm guessing he means Dumont), and had never noticed the larger variety of charcoal.

I'm glad to have received a reply from you because I contacted a server at the church who gave me the brand name and told me that they import them from Holland via Germany, (don't ask). Fortunately, he also gave me the brand name (Three Kings) and some googling reveals that they're readily available online. I'll do some price checks against the sources you mention. These ones are 4cm across rather than 3.3cm, and they're thicker as well, (so I may have unwittingly exaggerated a little in my earlier post).
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mama Thomas:
They sound superb, St. B. Here we use coconut shells. They're good, but require a "boat boy" or "boat girl" to keep the fire going throughout the service. With those charcoals, an important lay position in the service is made redundant by technology.

I don't think anybody in St Kitts thought of using coconut shells. It isn't as though they weren't plentiful. We used to fell a tree every couple of years, dig a pit in the churchyard, lob the tree in it and set it alight, before covering it over again. We'd let it smoulder for a week or so and then dig it up to reveal the next two years' supply of charcoal.
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
That's a good idea too! Bishop's Finger, just light them like another wood well before the service, let them burn down, and if you are being honoured, a catechist will spoon the resin while you are saying, "Be blest by him in who's name you shall be burnt." On Sunday when St. Michael was being celebrated, I particularly felt moved by the traditional blessing at the offertory.

By the way: I noticed something strange yesterday at a funeral. The person was incensed and then sprinkled being smoked. I've always sprinkled and then incensed the departed? Which way, guys?
 
Posted by Triple Tiara (# 9556) on :
 
HI - Holy water then Incense
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
I know that. You know that. The world knows that. Every liturgical book ever written knows that. But our clergy receive no training in these things AT ALL. So we get what we deserve....
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Okay. That's the mnemonic and gets us half way to remembering the order.

But—I gotta ask—what's the ritual reason why?
 
Posted by Saint Bertelin (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mama Thomas:
[QB] I know that. You know that. The world knows that. Every liturgical book ever written knows that. [QB]

Not quite. IIRC English Uses had the body censed at the Gradual and then again at the Offertory. Finally, at the Absolutions ovber the Bier, there were three censings of the body: one after each of the three prayers of "Absolution". After the final censing, the body would be sprinkled.
 
Posted by Mama Thomas (# 10170) on :
 
Chapter and verse? Or weblink.

Because the sprinkling is a removal, a cleansing, the censing is an adding, of holiness, prayers. If these are added, the rain afterward can be perceived to be taken away. That's the only way I ever seen. But this is symbolism and that can be different in in differnt rites.

Thanks for your info, but if there is a link to a Sarum funeral or somesuch, let's have it!

All the best.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Page eight? No, no, no, no. That certainly won't do.
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
You could at least have pretended to have a real reason for bumping it, dear [Razz]

tetchy host
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
She saved me hunting for it!

Couple of questions from a learning thurifer. I've tended to hold the thurible by the ring on the top when swinging it but noticed that the thurifer at E&B on Sunday was holding the chain just below that. What's best?

How does one turn corners well?

I'll also note Amos' answer to me on another thread about where to buy tongs for the charcoal. She suggested Lakeland which isn't somewhere we've tried yet.

Carys (who's looking forward to Midnight Mass and Epiphany having just had incense for Christ the King)
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
I vote for holding the chains right below the "ring" with a firm grip. One has, then, far better control over movement. It's then simple enough, when it comes time to lift the lid, to loosen the grip.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Comper's Child:
I vote for holding the chains right below the "ring" with a firm grip. One has, then, far better control over movement. It's then simple enough, when it comes time to lift the lid, to loosen the grip.

That was the impression I got. I'll have to practice. I need to. There was a bit of fumbling on Sunday (partly because we need a boat boy) and doing that might also prevent the mess Father got into at one point.

Carys
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
I'm looking forward to midnight mass and incense too! Even more so for Epiphany, our new nave altar is being consecrated, and I believe it will need censing as part of the consecration [Overused]

\slight tangent
I've got a smiley with thurible somewhere, do you reckon there'd be any mileage in getting it added to the list of smileys?
\slight tangent off
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:
I'm looking forward to midnight mass and incense too! Even more so for Epiphany, our new nave altar is being consecrated, and I believe it will need censing as part of the consecration [Overused]

[grins] Incense is good (whatever one might think of nave altars otherwise [Snigger] )

quote:
Originally posted by Love the You you hide:

\slight tangent
I've got a smiley with thurible somewhere, do you reckon there'd be any mileage in getting it added to the list of smileys?
\slight tangent off

Yes please!

Carys
 
Posted by J Whitgift (# 1981) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Comper's Child:
I vote for holding the chains right below the "ring" with a firm grip. One has, then, far better control over movement. It's then simple enough, when it comes time to lift the lid, to loosen the grip.

Not being a Thurifer myself but ...

I think that the holding it by the chain thing looks tacky, personally [Disappointed] . You can't get a proper swing on it and it all looks rather poor. The ring is there for a purpose (not just for hanging it on its stand [Razz] ) and it should be used as such!
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
In truth Whitgift, I've found I get a much better swing when I have full control over the thurible by holding the chains. It does look a bit more precious held at the ring, but is far less practical which, as a thurifer, I can assure you is the case.
 
Posted by Cusanus (# 692) on :
 
Add me to the 'hold the chains' side of the debate. Makes it easier, in my experience, to keep the swing in a single plane.

(Good to see that we're debating something important, while they're wittering on about Nestorianism in Purgatory.)

I've seen two ways of turning 90 degrees. One is to reduce the arc of the swing over a couple of steps, turn and then pick up the swing again. The other is the slightly more dangerous method of changing the direction of the swing by turning your swinging arm before you turn the rest of your body.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
There seems to a confusion over rings; here's the straight dope: There is the ring on the discus, there is the ring of the lid chain, there is the discus, and there is the other ring. They are different items.

The ring is the loop of metal at the tippy-top of a pendant thurible, the plane of which is perpendicular to the ground. This ring is useful for hanging up the thurible on a hook. Some also use it to hold and operate the thurible by placing a finger (the middle) through the ring with the palm facing up. If you have a light thurible and don't swing it much, this is a reasonable, if delicate, option. But if you have a thurible with any heft—or an immense one that looks like a small castle, with clerestory windows and spires and pinnacles and such—then you want to hold it by grasping the chains in your fist directly beneath the discus.

The discus is the flatish, broadly conical disk to which the ring is attached on top; and to which the (four) chains are attached, equally spaced around its circumference.

The ring of the lid chain is attached to the top end of the lid chain, while the other end of this chain is attached to the lid. This chain threads through a hole in the discus, permitting the thurible lid to be raised above the vessel of the thurible.

The other ring encloses the thurible's four chains. Three of these chains suspend the vessel of the thurible from the discus, attaching at the rim of the mouth of the vessel of the thurible. These chains thread through holes spaced equally around the circumference of the lid of the thurible. When this other ring is cinched down firmly against the lid of the thurible, it keeps the lid in place.

images.google hauls up pretty poor pics, but here are two: thurible one and thurible two. Thurible two shows clearly an oblong ring attached to the discus. The picture of thurible one also does this, but, in addition, it shows the other ring enclosing the chains a couple of inches above the thurible lid.

If your thurible has only one chain, don't try any of the tricks described in this thread; and, immediately start shopping for a proper thurible with four chains.


How does one turn corners? Make the turn when the thurible is in its back swing, then use the hand holding the thurible to push the discus in the direction your want the thurible to go so that the thurible goes in this direction on its forward swing; about 45° through a 90° turn works for me.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Sigh. Technical writing is harder than it looks. Please substitute these two paragraphs for those in my post above.
quote:

The discus is the flatish, broadly conical disk to which the ring is attached on top; and to which three chains are attached, equally spaced around its circumference, while the fourth chain threads through a hole in the discus.

...

images.google hauls up pretty poor pics, but here are two: thurible one and thurible two. Thurible two shows clearly an oblong ring attached to the discus. The picture of thurible one also does this (showing a round ring), but, in addition, it shows the other ring enclosing the chains a couple of inches above the thurible lid.


 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
TSA has once again clarified an important point! If the thurible is the single chain lightweight type use the discus (I couldn't for the life of me remember the term). Grasping the chains is for the longer chained or heavier types I'm accustomed to using.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
Thank you for that TSA, that's very helpful.

When it comes to the ring round the chains just above the lid, what's the best position for this? Should one change it in the course of the service?

Carys
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
When a well-crafted thurible is held by the ring on top of the discus, the chains ring (what I called the other ring, above) can be moved to just about any height between the discus and the top of the lid. The spread of the chains and the irregularity of the links keep this ring situated wherever you move it.

So, basically there are only two modes: open and closed.

When the thurible lid is closed, the chains ring should be cinched down on top of the lid. All four of the chains are bunched around the eyelet on the top of the lid and tend to hold this ring in place. As the thurible is swung (especially at the incensing of the gifts and the altar), this ring will work its way up. This is not a problem; just cinch it back down when necessary.

When the thurible lid is open, it is only necessary to have slid the chains ring up the chains to height that allows you to raise the lid so it's convenient for you and the celebrant when he or she shovels on the incense. I prefer raising the lid pretty high, but then I have the arms of an orangutan, so that's easy for me to do.

[ 27. November 2007, 21:09: Message edited by: The Silent Acolyte ]
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
Thanks. This is helpful, because although I served at a church with good thurifers I was never senior enough to become one, but now I've moved to a church where I am the thurifer so I've never actually been trained by someone with more experience but am having to go on what I've observed and I've not always been paying enough attention.

Another thing I struggle with is going from swinging it as I walk to holding it so as to cense the congregation. I didn't do this at all smoothly on Sunday.

I'm also confused about which hand to hold it in when and what to do with the boat at times (that's partly a logistical problem of lacking a boat child and having a cylindrical altar rail).

Mmmm, maybe I need to ask my old church for a lesson next time I'm back in Cambridge.

Carys
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:

Another thing I struggle with is going from swinging it as I walk to holding it so as to cense the congregation. I didn't do this at all smoothly on Sunday.

I'm also confused about which hand to hold it in when and what to do with the boat at times (that's partly a logistical problem of lacking a boat child and having a cylindrical altar rail).


I tend to find it much easier to swing at it the celebrant and then to keep it in that position as I walk to/turn round to face the congregation.

Left hand when you're taking it to be charged/when it's not got incense in; right hand when it has. (For these purposes, even though the celebrant put incense in at the sacristy, there isn't any incense in it just before the gospel so assume it's empty.)

Thurible
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Carys, no thanks are necessary. Your unworthy servant lives to do the appointed duty. Anything that advances the use of incense in God's holy churches I am willing to do. As the much missed Fiddleback used to say the worship of Almighty God is the offering of incense. Check out your Old Testament. All the music and words, pretty dresses and fancy buildings are merely window dressing.

To your questions. The first one about transitioning from walking to incensing the people is, perhaps, a particular instance of a more general mistake. Walking is one thing, turning is another thing, incensing a person or object is yet something else, and handling the thurible is distinct from all of them. Make sure you divide each of these activities so that you are not trying to turn and fumble the thurible, nor turning before you have finished walking. Do one action and finish it before you start doing another distinct action.

I am assuming that you are right handed, that you have placed the boat somewhere in the sanctuary (at the sedile, on an acolyte's bench or stool, on the credence (certainly not to be preferred), or there is no shame in placing it on the floor where it won't be kicked over, if need be), and that you are walking with the thurible in your right hand, with your left hand placed on your breast.

When you approach the congregation swinging the thurible at full-chain (as I assume you are, though you might not be), stop at the place you intend. Look down at your hands to see what you are doing. Pass the discus from your right hand to your left hand. Grasp the chains with your right hand at a comfortable place near the lid. You do all this deliberately. There is no rush. If you are worried that the congregation is watching, surprise!, you are right, they are. They need to be to know when to return your bow to them.

So look 'em in the eye for a second or two so that they know that you think the ritual you are about the exchange with them is important. It is important, so give it the gravitas is merits. Bow graciously to them as icons of Christ, as sacred co-celebrants of the Holy Mysteries you are corporately enacting, or with any other metaphor that helps turn your mind and theirs Godward. Incense them as one does any group of three persons or more. Bow to them with the same prayerfulness as you did before you incensed them. Pass the discus back to your right hand. Then turn. Then walk to your appointed place in the sanctuary.

A few other points.

(i) There is no reason in God's creation that you can't make the trip from the sanctuary to where you stand to incense the congregation (or deacon or acolytes or choir clergy or choir or whomever) holding the discus in your left hand and the chains in your right as you might like to have them when you actually swing the thurible. This is what Thurible also suggests.

(ii) I'm not sure I understand your question about cylindrical altar rails and absent boat bearers. Where is the flipping MC? Absent a third person, the thurifer hands the boat to the celebrant, who holds it himself while he spoons on the incense. Then the celebrant waits patiently until the thurifer has closed the lid and cinched the ring, before he hands the boat back to the thurifer. Don't take it from him unless you are ready. You need both your hands to safely open the thurible. You need both your hands to safely hold the opened thurible while it is being charged and blessed. You need both your hands to safely close the thurible. Only then can you safely take the boat back from the celebrant.

(iii) One usually bears the boat in the left hand; though, see below.

(iv) Boat bearers needn't be children. Upon my first visit to Smokey Mary's, Time Square, I believe it was Methuselah himself who bore the boat in a grand procession to a Lady shrine. At Our Lady of Hardwork, the ancient acolyte warden isn't too august to serve a newly fledged thurifer as his assistant to bear the boat.

(v) Thurible is right about the left-hand-unblessed/right-hand-blessed rigamarole, but if you are driving a child as boat bearer, it's best to leave this rule by the wayside so as not to confuse the boat bearer. It's hard work being led around by an adult thurifer; there is no need to make it any harder for a six year-old by mysteriously switching sides.

(vi) Unless the celebrant is blessing the incense in the sacristy (or wherever before the mass) (and he shouldn't be) it isn't necessary for the celebrant to spoon in the incense. The smell of burning charcoal (quick light or not) is not edifying for anyone. Part of the preparation of the thurible is for the thurifer to 'sweeten' the pot with a small bit of incense just before the bell. The thurifer prepares the way for the processional cross, so this thurifer thinks a full spoon's worth is the right amount.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
According to this post, Carys is driving boat bearers while not dropping the thurible. Congratulations are in order! I think recruitment is a wonderful thing. Get'em while they're young.
 
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on :
 
Thank you to all who provide the marvelousness of burning incense. I was at a service on Sunday at a church which always has incense and the church was redolent with the blessed scent of itself even before the thurifer appeared. Then he did an (incredibly calm) 360 [Yipee] in procession right as he passed my pew! Did he sense an incense-starved visitor?
 
Posted by Love the You you hide (# 12249) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
According to this post, Carys is driving boat bearers while not dropping the thurible. Congratulations are in order! I think recruitment is a wonderful thing. Get'em while they're young.

What IS a good age for starting them? I think my son is still a little lively at 6, but it would be good to think about giving him a role in church in the not too distant future [Yipee]
 
Posted by highchurc (# 11491) on :
 
quote:
Part of the preparation of the thurible is for the thurifer to 'sweeten' the pot with a small bit of incense just before the bell. The thurifer prepares the way for the processional cross...
And just where does this come from?

Any Anglo-Catholic know that a processional cross is only used when a proper procession precedes the Liturgy.

The entrance of the Sacred Ministers from the sacristy is NOT a procession.

'Sweeten' the pot, indeed!
 
Posted by Liturgy Queen (# 11596) on :
 
Really? We always use a cross during the entrance of the Sacred Ministers, servers, and choir.

We don't enter from the sacristy, though, but process up the main aisle.

[ 08. January 2008, 12:57: Message edited by: Liturgy Queen ]
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by highchurc:
quote:
Part of the preparation of the thurible is for the thurifer to 'sweeten' the pot with a small bit of incense just before the bell. The thurifer prepares the way for the processional cross...
And just where does this come from?

Any Anglo-Catholic know that a processional cross is only used when a proper procession precedes the Liturgy.

The entrance of the Sacred Ministers from the sacristy is NOT a procession.

No, but the Cross is still commonly used in this context. Local usage and all that.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
It is good to have you back highchurc; I was hoping you wouldn't abandon us. Don't be such a stranger.

Regarding processions at the entrance, I hate to quote chapter and verse to you, but an insufferable ceremonialist like me has gotta do what an insufferable ceremonialist has gotta do.

It really depends on one's taste, but let's start with Lamburn's 11th edition of Ritual Notes.
quote:
[tangent]And before you lot start you carping about the inferior, modern version I'm quoting from, lemme tell you that (purchased at the bookstore of the National Cathedral of St. Peter of the Bendy Poles for fifty shekels!) this is the only one I can afford. Should you be willing to donate an approved edition to my library, I would be much obliged.[/tangent]
As I was saying, in the columnar presentation of The Ceremonies of High Mass, Before the Service, in the sections headed The Vesting and The Entry into the Church (153), Lamburn writes these things:
quote:
[The thurifer] … prepares glowing charcoal in the censer.

At the signal from the MC [the thurifer] leads the procession into the church, carrying the censer with the glowing charcoal in his left hand, and the incense boat in his right.

At the signal from the MC [the acolytes] take up their candles, and follow the thurifer at the head of the procession. If the processional cross is carried, the crucifer walks between the acolytes.

In the 10th edition of Fortescue's and O'Connell's Ceremonies of the Roman Rite Described in the section entitled "§ 3. PROCESSION TO THE ALTAR" (98) we find the following "order of procession":The footnote for ² is this: "Putting into the thurible and blessing incense to be carried at the head of the procession, and the use of a processional cross, are features of a pontifical Mass celebrated at the throne (C.E. II, viii 23, 24)."

So we can see that the walk from the sacristy to the sanctuary is, indeed, a procession, and that, depending on who you read, such a procession may be headed by the processional cross. Modern churches often have the vesting sacristy for the sacred ministers close by the sanctuary. It is not unheard of for the vesting sacristy to be at the west end while the altar is at the east end. Surely for such a trip through the unwashed in the nave a mace, incense, and a processional-cross-lead procession are merely practical.

The peccadillo to which I was admitting (shoveling in incense to cover the smell of the charcoal) gets a glancing mention in Fortescue and O'Connell.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
Another day for the thurifer at our place this Sunday (yes I don't like transferring to a Sunday but it's better than not keeping at all). Hopefully have a boat girl again.

Carys
 
Posted by churchgeek (# 5557) on :
 
Seeing this thread at the top of the page reminded me - I never reported back on the latest in my attempts to get the long-neglected thurible clean.

ACETONE works best. Nearly dissolves all the gunk on impact, and doesn't hurt the silver. The only issue is that you have to wipe off the dissolved gunk fast or it re-sets, but that's not a major issue, since you can just add more acetone. I bought a plastic spray bottle and found that spraying the acetone on the thurible allows me to get it where I need it without wasting as much of the chemical as pouring tends to do.

The main problem is the fumes, so you have to be careful about that. And it's tough on your hands, so wear gloves.

The ethanol, a.k.a. ethyl alcohol, worked OK but still required a lot of effort. Then again, I never found any stronger than 70%. Which is another point in favor of the acetone - it's easier to come by.

Then I tend to follow up with a silver polish or at least dish soap to get rid of any remaining acetone (since it's highly flammable) and any remaining sticky residue.
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:

So we can see that the walk from the sacristy to the sanctuary is, indeed, a procession, and that, depending on who you read, such a procession may be headed by the processional cross. Modern churches often have the vesting sacristy for the sacred ministers close by the sanctuary. It is not unheard of for the vesting sacristy to be at the west end while the altar is at the east end. Surely for such a trip through the unwashed in the nave a mace, incense, and a processional-cross-lead procession are merely practical.

In many churches with an east-end sacristy the entry procession nevertheless comes through the nave. It's important because the priest and ministers are thus identifying themselves with the whole congregation, not just appearing from the wings like actors in a play.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
Seeing this thread at the top of the page reminded me - I never reported back on the latest in my attempts to get the long-neglected thurible clean.

ACETONE works best. Nearly dissolves all the gunk on impact, and doesn't hurt the silver. The only issue is that you have to wipe off the dissolved gunk fast or it re-sets, but that's not a major issue, since you can just add more acetone. I bought a plastic spray bottle and found that spraying the acetone on the thurible allows me to get it where I need it without wasting as much of the chemical as pouring tends to do.

I'm with you on the acetone though my technique differs -- I use cotton wool pads (currently organic cotton!) and put the pad on the top of the open bottle and quickly tip it upside down and back again (and usually do this four times in slightly different places on the pad) this can then be used to wipe around the thurible. I started with neat acetone, but used up the 50ml on the first clean. Now I've got a nail varnish remover that still has acetone in it (thank you Co-op pharmacy) which is diluted but does the job of keeping the thurible clean. I also line the thurible with the bottom of quiche trays which keeps the coal gunk off the inside of the thurible.

Carys
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
So we can see that the walk from the sacristy to the sanctuary is, indeed, a procession, and that, depending on who you read, such a procession may be headed by the processional cross. Modern churches often have the vesting sacristy for the sacred ministers close by the sanctuary. It is not unheard of for the vesting sacristy to be at the west end while the altar is at the east end. Surely for such a trip through the unwashed in the nave a mace, incense, and a processional-cross-lead procession are merely practical.

In many churches with an east-end sacristy the entry procession nevertheless comes through the nave. It's important because the priest and ministers are thus identifying themselves with the whole congregation, not just appearing from the wings like actors in a play.
Quite so, Angloid. It serves something of the same purpose as the odd loop-de-loop through the nave with the Gifts, done in Orthodox churches at the Great Entrance.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:
quote:
Originally posted by churchgeek:
Seeing this thread at the top of the page reminded me - I never reported back on the latest in my attempts to get the long-neglected thurible clean.

ACETONE works best. Nearly dissolves all the gunk on impact, and doesn't hurt the silver. The only issue is that you have to wipe off the dissolved gunk fast or it re-sets, but that's not a major issue, since you can just add more acetone. I bought a plastic spray bottle and found that spraying the acetone on the thurible allows me to get it where I need it without wasting as much of the chemical as pouring tends to do.

I'm with you on the acetone though my technique differs -- I use cotton wool pads (currently organic cotton!) and put the pad on the top of the open bottle and quickly tip it upside down and back again (and usually do this four times in slightly different places on the pad) this can then be used to wipe around the thurible. I started with neat acetone, but used up the 50ml on the first clean. Now I've got a nail varnish remover that still has acetone in it (thank you Co-op pharmacy) which is diluted but does the job of keeping the thurible clean. I also line the thurible with the bottom of quiche trays which keeps the coal gunk off the inside of the thurible.

Carys

We use mineral spirits which is less flammable and less toxic - fume-wise and also milder on your hands.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
Our crowd uses jellied paint stripper. It is nasty to humans (use it at a work sink, take the trouble to mount hooks for the thurible's ring and for the chain-ring so thurible and its lid can be suspended, keep the area well ventilated, and wear rubber gloves), but it doesn't seem to damage the solid brass thurible. We treat the less-used silver thurible much more gently.
 
Posted by Laurence (# 9135) on :
 
Dear All-

Would anyone have any suggestions as to a good brand of incense for burning quietly at home, a few grains at a time on a charcoal lozenge, while saying / singing the Daily Offices by the fireside?

I imagine the lush spendours of Rosa Mystica, while perfuming a sixty-foot tall nave rather effectively, would probably be a bit overwhelming for a small front room!

And, indeed, could people suggest the best place from which to get said austere and restrained incense?

Many thanks indeed!
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
You can get little packets of the various Prinknash incenses for a couple of quid or so from the St. Paul's Bookshop at Westminster Cathedral (and doubtless from elsewhere!). Each pack contains 5 charcoal lozenges (IIRC) and enough incense to last for quite a while. I would recommend breaking a lozenge into two or three pieces, and lighting just one of the bits, if only a small amount of smoke is required. I find it's quite sufficient, and the smell is certainly not overpowering or oversweet, no matter which variety you use. Others may differ in their opinion, of course.

My local New Age crystal etc. shop sold me a nice little brass incense-burner - not a thurible as such, as it is designed to simply sit there and smoke........!

Ian J.
 
Posted by Oblatus (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Laurence:
Would anyone have any suggestions as to a good brand of incense for burning quietly at home, a few grains at a time on a charcoal lozenge, while saying / singing the Daily Offices by the fireside?

Check your local (Roman) Catholic church-supplies store for natural or pure frankincense with no scents added. It's the churchiest!
[Smile]
 
Posted by Brian M (# 11865) on :
 
The Hare Krishnas make rose-scented incense sticks that smell like the English Rose we tend to use at our parish. St. Percy would approve.
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
If you scroll down on this page to picture 14 you can see incense-on-a-string in a Bhutanese Buddhist coronation rite in a way that I've never seen outside of Christendom.
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
Is this how they are training priests these day? Egan's hand is practically higher than his head! How on earth can the fool get a good snap of the wrist with his arm waving up in the air like that? Does he do it this way so folk can see the thurible? He's got good smoke—that's what we want to see, not the phreaking appliance.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Prosfonesis:
Is this how they are training priests these day? Egan's hand is practically higher than his head! How on earth can the fool get a good snap of the wrist with his arm waving up in the air like that? Does he do it this way so folk can see the thurible? He's got good smoke—that's what we want to see, not the phreaking appliance.

Nah, looks like he's afraid of the blessed thing...
 
Posted by catholicedinburgh (# 12668) on :
 
A question for the experts. I have recently recommenced serving again after a 4 year lapse during which I swam the Tiber. Last Sunday I was thurifer when His Eminence was in residence. What I would like to know is this. Is it permissible to top up the thurible when on the sidelines before the Sanctus so there is sufficient smoke for the elevations? Last Sunday after everyone at the altar had been censed and we had sung the Sanctus there was not much smoke left at all [Frown]

I would like to avoid this situation if at all possible

Thanks
 
Posted by dj_ordinaire (# 4643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by catholicedinburgh:
A question for the experts. I have recently recommenced serving again after a 4 year lapse during which I swam the Tiber. Last Sunday I was thurifer when His Eminence was in residence. What I would like to know is this. Is it permissible to top up the thurible when on the sidelines before the Sanctus so there is sufficient smoke for the elevations? Last Sunday after everyone at the altar had been censed and we had sung the Sanctus there was not much smoke left at all [Frown]

I would like to avoid this situation if at all possible

Thanks

Well firstly: welcome back!
[Smile]

And secondly: yes, it's generally considered quite appropriate to 'top up' blessed incense without the need for further blessings, if one is running out. As 'little and often' is the best way of getting good smoke without smothering the coals, this is what will generally happen, in fact.
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
Somewhere on the Candles thread, I think, there is the description of the thurifer going to the sacristy after the incensation of the all the con-celebrants of the mass (to use an emerging Orthodox turn of phrase that means everybody), returning before/after(?) the Sanctus.

At Our Lady of Hardwork, the MC and thurifer are kneeling together in the sanctuary after the Benedictus qui venit and have enough time to blow, stir, and spoon so that the Gifts cum Mysteries get the honor they deserve.
 
Posted by Ceremoniar (# 13596) on :
 
It has always been customary for the thurifer to add incense prior to the consecraion. In addition to the practical aspects of doing so, incense used on the Blessed Sacrament Itself is never blessed; its use on the Most Holy is considered its own blessing. This is why the priest spoons, but does not bless, incense at Benediction.
 
Posted by Clavus (# 9427) on :
 
This is no longer true - the priest now blesses incense at Benediction as usual (Ceremonial of Bishops, para. 1109, noted in P. Elliot, Ceremonies of the Modern Roman Rite, para. 680 note 10).
 
Posted by catholicedinburgh (# 12668) on :
 
Thank you all for your responses, I will take the opportunity to disappear into the sacristy for a little topping up at the appropriate moment! DJ _Ordinaire, Thank you, it is a great joy to be serving at the altar again.

'This is no longer true - the priest now blesses incense at Benediction as usual (Ceremonial of Bishops, para. 1109, noted in P. Elliot, Ceremonies of the Modern Roman Rite, para. 680 note 10).'

When I lived at Alnmouth Friary in the not too distant past it was definitely understood that the presence of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament at Benediction was all the blessing that was required.
 
Posted by Triple Tiara (# 9556) on :
 
Yes but Alnmouth is an Anglican friary. They do not necessarily follow RC rubrics. Clavus is correct.
 
Posted by catholicedinburgh (# 12668) on :
 
Hey Triple Tiara

Of course you are quite correct. [Overused]

It's a bit odd at times adjusting to the quirks of serving mass now as opposed to mu episcopalian days. eg holding the thurible and waiting for the celebrant to bless it and he just looks at you blankly. However I'm getting used to it and as I said before it is a joy to be serving again.
 
Posted by Max. (# 5846) on :
 
Made the same journey as you then (CofE to RC) and I can sympathise with you re: Altar Serving.

However I'd love to know your opinion: Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

I find it so as the Anglican places I served at were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.


Max.
 
Posted by Sarum Sleuth (# 162) on :
 
Originally posted by Max
However I'd love to know your opinion: Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

It depends on the church! There is a lamentable "sacristy mentality" that manifests itself in a lot of the shrine churches that can make serving a real penance, but I don't think it is that widespread. Curiously, it seems to be linked with excessive reliance on Roman, rather than Anglican sources of ceremonial. The truth is that most churches do not have enough servers to indulge in this sort of behaviour.

I admit to getting annoyed with our servers sometimes, but it is generally over poor behaviour rather than ceremonial errors. All I ask is that servers follow clear instructions, don't do anything that is actually stupid, and don't invent ceremonies. Thinking back to last Sunday's High Mass, which had the joys of a Nativity Pageant by the kids included, a sense of humour was a definite advantage as one disaster followed the next!

If the ceremonial is kept simple and the servers realise that they are there for a purpose and stay unobtrusive, all this sanctuary stress can be avoided.

SS [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Bishops Finger (# 5430) on :
 
We have only a small number of regular servers (plus one or two from other churches who help us out on special occasions), so ceremonial is kept as simple as possible. There is not usually such a large altar party as on SS's visit some years ago!

On the whole, my impression is that the two or three younger servers do a good job, though their deportment whilst in the sanctuary sometimes leaves a little to be desired........

Our MC's main complaint is the (very) last-minute arrival at church of one of the girls - he never knows if she's going to turn up or not, though I don't think she has ever actually let us down. She just seems to operate on a different time-scale to everyone else.....

We are fortunate to have three or four very competent thurifers these days, BTW, and we are hoping that a new recruit will be swinging the smoke on Christmas morning (at a Solemn Low Mass with Carols)!

Ian J.
 
Posted by Hart (# 4991) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:

I find it so as the Anglican places I served at were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.


Max.

Never come and serve in our Mother Church then! One of our regular MCs was banned from continuing in the role by his heart doctor as he got too stressed out by it all.
 
Posted by catholicedinburgh (# 12668) on :
 
Hey Max

Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

It is indeed - there is much less fuss about precision, no-one is sitting marking you out of 10 against the Ritual Notes. In some places, they could start a new reality TV programme:

'Strictly Serving'

In the mother church that I attend,as long as matters are attended to efficiently, neatly and unobtrusively all is well.
 
Posted by Cyprian (# 5638) on :
 
Our Mother Church is fine. The serving team, including the under 10s, the adults, and the ordained reader and subdeacon, all know what they're doing but it flows smoothly because they have clearly grown accustomed to serving together and not because it is regimented. It just falls together now, to the point where they're happy for the newbie to turn up and get things wrong and just absorb that into what happens.

We have a few problems when something different happens, such as at an hierarcical Liturgy, in which cases we take direction from the subdeacon. That way, at least if he's wrong, we're all wrong together and it doesn't distract people.
 
Posted by J Whitgift (# 1981) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

I find it so as the Anglican places I served at* were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.

[* Emphasis added.]

It depends where you've served Max, h ence my adding the emphasis to your earlier comments. Most of the Churches I have served in, which include a Central London Cathedral have had precisely the same attitude as them one you describe in Catholic Churches. We 'just get on with it' under the helpful eye of an eagle-eyed MC who makes sure we're in the right place at the right time.

[Given the requirements/demands of the oft mentioned GIRM, surely such an attitude is quite difficult to maintain, given that so much is leguislated for/against.]

quote:
Originally posted by catholicedinburgh:
It is indeed - there is much less fuss about precision, no-one is sitting marking you out of 10 against the Ritual Notes.

Snide comments aside, I've never seen anyone do that. Some Churches are more precisionist than others in terms of the way in which the liturgy is performed.

However, nback to Max's point, it is on the whole done prayerfully, whether it is done in a precisionist or a more relaxed style. I'm not sure one can make such windows on men's souls or on how they worship.
 
Posted by Ceremoniar (# 13596) on :
 
quote:
This is no longer true - the priest now blesses incense at Benediction as usual (Ceremonial of Bishops, para. 1109, noted in P. Elliot, Ceremonies of the Modern Roman Rite, para. 680 note 10).
One of the many failings of the Ordinary Form. Since I attend an Extrordinary Form parish, I had forgotten this little slip of the OF.
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by J Whitgift:
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

I find it so as the Anglican places I served at* were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.

[* Emphasis added.]

It depends where you've served Max, h ence my adding the emphasis to your earlier comments. Most of the Churches I have served in, which include a Central London Cathedral have had precisely the same attitude as them one you describe in Catholic Churches. We 'just get on with it' under the helpful eye of an eagle-eyed MC who makes sure we're in the right place at the right time.

Indeed. Interestingly, at my old church, I used to think that the servers knew exactly what they were doing and were very well-trained. Then I started serving and learnt how much of it was done on a wing and a prayer.

Serving can be well-done and relaxed.

Carys
 
Posted by Oblatus (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
I find it so as the Anglican places I served at were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.

Our Anglican place is blessed with a saintly, patient, kind MC who sets out expectations but doesn't enforce them through fear...just gentle reminders. And he knows just when we need a cue or a helpful look or gesture. And he's reliable, faithful, and generous with his time.

Lately we're working on getting our communal standings and sittings to be a bit more together, remembering to coordinate these moves with those of the deacon of the Mass: we stand as he stands, etc. Occasionally we get a bit sloppy on such things and get reminders of what our training told us. But the goal is never a military precision, just reverent attention that shows we're in tune with what's going on at the moment.
 
Posted by Oreophagite (# 10534) on :
 
Our church has received the gift of a brand-new brass thurible. The rector would like to use it next year on Christmas Eve. This gives him a year to figure out how to do so - I think he's clueless. But, that is his problem.

My challenge will be to find and train a thurifer between now and then, and this thread has been quite useful. It also has some good information on how to take care of the thurible.

But I don't think it has any tips on how to break in a brand new thurible. This one is shiny brass, not very heavy. I put some sand in the bottom, and have lined the inside removable bowl with heavy duty aluminum foil. I will fire it up a few times and practice outdoors myself. Is there anything else I should do?
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
Sand in the bottom? I guess they'll be doing very gentle swings in that case...

I'd eliminate the sand if I were you and count on the liner. If there's a lot of space below that you could fill it with some wadded up aluminum foil.

Just be aware that that shiny finish will be darkened as it's used and it will need regular polishing.
 
Posted by moveable_type (# 9673) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Oreophagite:
Our church has received the gift of a brand-new brass thurible. The rector would like to use it next year on Christmas Eve. This gives him a year to figure out how to do so - I think he's clueless. But, that is his problem.

My challenge will be to find and train a thurifer between now and then, and this thread has been quite useful. It also has some good information on how to take care of the thurible.

But I don't think it has any tips on how to break in a brand new thurible. This one is shiny brass, not very heavy. I put some sand in the bottom, and have lined the inside removable bowl with heavy duty aluminum foil. I will fire it up a few times and practice outdoors myself. Is there anything else I should do?

Honestly? I'd find the nearest place that uses incense frequently, then find an ancient acolyte who has been around that place forever, and ask him for lessons. Buying him lunch may be part of the package.
 
Posted by Oreophagite (# 10534) on :
 
Maybe some rocks to give it some weight, then. It can't have cost a fortune. It does have the 4 chains, disc, etc., but it isn't made of heavy metal.

The interior bowl is quite shallow.

If it is used, I think we will be the only place in town that has incense on Christmas Eve. So, I'm not sure whom to ask for one-on-one instruction.
 
Posted by PD (# 12436) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Max.:
Made the same journey as you then (CofE to RC) and I can sympathise with you re: Altar Serving.

However I'd love to know your opinion: Is serving in the Catholic Church less stressful than serving in the Anglican Church for you?

I find it so as the Anglican places I served at were very fussy when it came to ceremonial and "doing it right", Catholic places tend to have more of an attitude of "Just get on with it" which I find is actually a lot more prayerful than just following the instructions given to you in a rehearsal by a fierce angry MC.


Max.

In my experience of serving, there was a difference in attitude between Shrines, run of the mill conservative A-C places, and everywhere else.

Shrines are a pain in the backside as there is always someone there marking you out of 10 against Fortescue ot whatever it is they use. It is made worse by the fact they usually make complete nuisences of themselves by explaining in elaborate detail afterwards how you should have done it. Usually I did not have an idea what the hell they were on about anyway.

Run of the Mill A-C places like you to get it right, but no-one is going to rip you a new arsehole of you make a small mistake. OTOH, everything such a well greased routine that it is difficult to foul it up anyway. You might get some good natured ribbing in the Sacristy afterwards, but nothing annoying/embarrassing.

Everywhere else seems to work on the principle of "no harm; no foul." In other words, it has to be a really egregious cock up which everyone notices before anyone gets bent out of shape, and you nearly have to burn the church down before anyone actually gets cross with you.

PD
 
Posted by angelicum (# 13515) on :
 
Max - it's not just the Anglicans who can seem overfussy. Most traddie RCs are like their mainstream counterparts, but the odd princess here and there creeps up as well. One particular comment on what appeared to me to be photographs of a beautiful Solemn High Mass featured on the NLM blog - one particular server should have matched the soles of his shoes with the other servers, it was dark brown soles (though a perfectly respectable looking black lace-up pair of shoes), while the soles of everyone else's footwear were black.
 
Posted by FCB (# 1495) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hart:
Never come and serve in our Mother Church then! One of our regular MCs was banned from continuing in the role by his heart doctor as he got too stressed out by it all.

Having served once as deacon at your Mother Church (I presume you mean the Basilica of the Sacred Heart), I can attest that it has some of the most stressed-out MCs I've ever seen. Also one of the most, um, helpful sacristy teams I've seen: I got so much help dressing I felt like I was about to have an audience with the great and powerful Oz. But the liturgy was well-done, so I guess that's the price you pay.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by angelicum:
Max - it's not just the Anglicans who can seem overfussy. Most traddie RCs are like their mainstream counterparts, but the odd princess here and there creeps up as well. One particular comment on what appeared to me to be photographs of a beautiful Solemn High Mass featured on the NLM blog - one particular server should have matched the soles of his shoes with the other servers, it was dark brown soles (though a perfectly respectable looking black lace-up pair of shoes), while the soles of everyone else's footwear were black.

Oh, the comments at NLM are more than entertaining...
[Ultra confused]
 
Posted by chiltern_hundred (# 13659) on :
 
I was told by one venerable lady at my place of worship that they had, some years ago, an absolute martinet of a head server who would inspect the soles of servers' shoes before mass and kept a tin of boot black ready in case they weren't dark enough.

The abolition of that sort of rubbish has been one of the benefits of women servers.

quote:
Originally posted by angelicum:
Max - it's not just the Anglicans who can seem overfussy. Most traddie RCs are like their mainstream counterparts, but the odd princess here and there creeps up as well. One particular comment on what appeared to me to be photographs of a beautiful Solemn High Mass featured on the NLM blog - one particular server should have matched the soles of his shoes with the other servers, it was dark brown soles (though a perfectly respectable looking black lace-up pair of shoes), while the soles of everyone else's footwear were black.


 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PD:
Run of the Mill A-C places like you to get it right, but no-one is going to rip you a new arsehole of you make a small mistake. PD

? There is a certain type of anglo-catholic who would wallow in such a punishment.
 
Posted by Canute the Holy (# 9394) on :
 
Time to bump from page 10...

I'm planning vespers for this week-end, and as we will be using incense I just wanted to check the correct usage...

Is it correct to have the alter incensed during the Magnificat?
 
Posted by seasick (# 48) on :
 
Yes and the officiant, choir clergy (if any), choir and congregation.
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
macasher posted these on an adjacent thread:
quote:
In our church (backstreet catholic), the apostolic chain of thurifers has been broken, so now we don't know what we're doing. Could we have some advice, please? There is plenty of smoke but the wonderful fragrance of the incense is quickly overtaken by what seems like burnt tar. I thought it was the accumulation of black on the top of the thurible, but cleaning it hasn't made much difference. We've tried using more or less charcoal and more or less incense without much effect. Any ideas.

This is my virgin post, so if I've missed a previous thread, please direct me to it.

quote:
Many thanks for the welcome and the advice.

As far as I can tell from the previous thread, it's best to clean the thurible every time with polyclens, to use Kingsford charcoal, and to experiment with different kinds of incense.

What's the function of the top of the thurible? Is there such a thing as a simple open-top censer to minimise the unwelcome tar blow-back?

macasher, there are three ingredients: the metal container, the coals, and the incense.

I'm not sure what this black-tar smell is that you describe, but cleaning the thurible after every use isn't going to fix things. Either the thurible at its inaugural use wasn't clean, the coals by themselves give off this rank smell, or and most likely, your incense is rank.

Perhaps you are using too many coals? If they are of the quick-light variety then the accelerant that gets them lighted quickly smells bad by itself. A heavy hand with the incense spoon or fewer coals is the answer.

The lids is designed to keep the coals in the pot as one swings the thurible. The lid is important. If the lid is dirty only with the product of combustion, then it's got nothing to do with the smell.

You identify your best remedy when you state "the apostolic chain of thurifers has been broken." Find an AngloCatholic joint that his an unbroken chain and get their advice. I'm consulted about once every two or three years for this reason. If you haven't an AngloCatholic place nearby then the Orthodox could be a second best option.
 
Posted by LostinChelsea (# 5305) on :
 
It was my privilege to assist recently at a Greek Orthodox funeral at my own TEC parish (long story). I provided the thurible - no bells, alas - and he provided the incense. I noticed he brought only a few large-ish grains. I've always been prone to excess, so this showed me that a little can go a long way. No lumpy, glumpy residue from overzealousness with the spoon.

Did I inquire as to his source? Of course not.

BTW, it was a glorious occasion on many levels for many reasons. Them Orthodox can send you off in style!
 
Posted by macasher (# 14748) on :
 
Many thanks. I'll try two rather than three coals and more incense. We use a Prinknash variety. Any suggestions about the make of the charcoal or the incense?

I'll check out the local AngloCatholic church but the punters there are of the sort that would object to being called a joint. Bit of social class division but perhaps incense is the thing to bridge it . . .
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Yes and the officiant, choir clergy (if any), choir and congregation.
This is the board on which to be fussy, yes?

Okay then. Altar first. Then the Officiant, then the choir clergy, then the (hopefully coped) assistants to the officiant, the acolytes in the sanctuary, the choir, and finally the congregation. All done deliberately, without rushing, but before the Gloria Patri is concluded.


I intentionally say "joint" and "prayer shack" to bring just such folk down a peg or two.

[ 27. April 2009, 16:52: Message edited by: Prosfonesis ]
 
Posted by Low Treason (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by macasher:
I'll check out the local AngloCatholic church but the punters there are of the sort that would object to being called a joint. Bit of social class division but perhaps incense is the thing to bridge it . . .

I think using the words 'smoke' and 'joint' in the same sentence should be avoided if possible.... [Big Grin]

To be more practical, we have found that grinding the incense as fine as possible makes it easier to burn.
 
Posted by Prosfonesis (# 1158) on :
 
That's interesting, Low Treason.

We tend to be pretty enthusiastic about keeping the coals visibly red-hot, to the extent that the contents of the smaller thurible burst into open flame every five years or so. We then soundly spank those thurifers and it doesn't happen again for another half-decade.

But, the point is that if one is having trouble getting the incense to bubble 'n' burn, then either (1) the coals are not nearly hot enough or (2) the incense blend has got a lot of uninflammable crap in it.

We use straight frankincense (except during Lent) and it always burns down to nothing.

[ 27. April 2009, 21:04: Message edited by: Prosfonesis ]
 
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on :
 
This may have been asked before, but if so maybe you could direct me to the right page (cos I'm lazy that way [Razz] )

What's the significance of three triple swings for the cross, 3 down front, 2 to the side, 3 back (bow), 3 more & 2 to the side then six across the front low?

And the significance/symbolism of the three circles over the elements? Is it just a Trinitarian thing?

And why only 2 for certain other things?
 
Posted by Living in Gin (# 2572) on :
 
*bump*

Yours truly has been charged with the task of finding a way to clean three heavily-gunked-up thuribles. In skimming this thread and in consultation with several friends who have extensive experience cleaning bongs, the general consensus seems to be that acetone is the way to go.

Is it sufficient to simply apply the acetone with a rag, or would it be more effective to fill a bucket with acetone and allow the thuribles to soak for at least a day? Or is there some other preferred method?

Thanks...
 
Posted by Oblatus (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Living in Gin:
Is it sufficient to simply apply the acetone with a rag, or would it be more effective to fill a bucket with acetone and allow the thuribles to soak for at least a day? Or is there some other preferred method?

In our sacristy, I've seen a thurible soaking in tomato juice, and I've seen a sacristan dumping a pot of recently boiling water that I believe was used for cleaning thuribles. As I'm neither a thurifer nor a sacristan, that's about all I can say.

But in a previous parish I had very good luck with cleaning the inside of a thurible using the no-heat type of EZ-Off oven cleaner. I was careful to apply it to the filthy inside only and put it in a cold oven overnight (to contain the fumes). It was easily wipeable in the morning...nasty and gunky, but easily wiped clean.

I disclaim all responsibility for anything bad that may happen to your thurible if you try this.
 
Posted by Comper's Child (# 10580) on :
 
We use "Mineral Spirits" which is less flammable. But it requires soaking the thurible which we do section by section for the larger ones.
 
Posted by Low Treason (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Living in Gin:
*bump*
Is it sufficient to simply apply the acetone with a rag, or would it be more effective to fill a bucket with acetone and allow the thuribles to soak for at least a day? Or is there some other preferred method?

Thanks...

NO!!! NO!! NO!!!!

Acetone is not Nice Stuff.

It's extremely volatile and would therefore evaporate quickly. When large quantities of acetone fumes mix with air there is the risk of explosion.

You can also get a 'high' by breathing it....

Apply with a cloth.

Probably a better method for extremely gunged-up thuribles is to use a proprietory paint stripper
 
Posted by RevEv (# 3626) on :
 
I have had some success with WD40 and the tarry inside of a small thurible...then I read the instructions on the can. "Caution hightly flammable".

If you do go down this route, I'd wash and wash and wash again in very hot water with plenty of washing up liquid or similar, and ensure that every last bit of WD40 has been washed off and the whole is squeaky-clean before reassembling.
 
Posted by Seraphim (# 14676) on :
 
Our most experienced alter server tends to remove charred incense from the coals before it can risk giving off a burnt smell. Once the censer is handed back to him if it is going to be a while before it is needed again, he removes the old incense then adds new before it will be called for. Needless to say he knows the rubrics fairly well and has his cues down pat for when to do what. The quality of the incense can also make a difference. A high grade will not leave a bad smell as it burns and just quietly turn to ash.

While I don't know about Anglican or RC censering practice in the Orthodox Church I've noticed at certain points the priest or deacon will swing the censer in a kind of figure 8, which is as close as a swinging bowl of hot coals can get to making the sign of the cross. I think it takes a little skill to get the hang of it and not sling hot cinders everywhere.

In the Orthodox practice the priest, when outside the altar will cense left and right to cense the icons of Christ and the Theotokos and will cense the choir, servers, and people as they are also icons of Christ.
 
Posted by Qoheleth. (# 9265) on :
 
Nitromors (methyl chloride) works a treat for cleaning thuribles.

Disclaimer: Read the safety instructions carefully before use.

[ 21. May 2009, 20:22: Message edited by: Qoheleth. ]
 
Posted by Oblatus (# 6278) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RevEv:
If you do go down this route, I'd wash and wash and wash again in very hot water with plenty of washing up liquid or similar, and ensure that every last bit of WD40 has been washed off and the whole is squeaky-clean before reassembling.

Same with my dubious EZ-Off oven-cleaner method or anything else that might leave a chemical residue. Best not to find out what that residue will do when heated. Make sure all of the cleaning-substance is completely gone.
 
Posted by Tom S (# 10433) on :
 
How exactly does one turn corners?

On the last page Cusanus offered the following advice:

quote:
I've seen two ways of turning 90 degrees. One is to reduce the arc of the swing over a couple of steps, turn and then pick up the swing again. The other is the slightly more dangerous method of changing the direction of the swing by turning your swinging arm before you turn the rest of your body.
I'd love to perfect the second method (I've seen it done and it looks cool!) but it scares me. Prosfonesis suggests:

quote:
How does one turn corners? Make the turn when the thurible is in its back swing, then use the hand holding the thurible to push the discus in the direction your want the thurible to go so that the thurible goes in this direction on its forward swing; about 45° through a 90° turn works for me.
But doesn't that mean that you end up with a red hot thurible swinging into the back of your legs?
 
Posted by Petrified (# 10667) on :
 
I boil ours in a large pan after adding washing powder - usually for several hours with a couple of water changes, then treat with descaler.
This year it got a quick wizz in my ultrasonic cleaner too.
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RevEv:
I have had some success with WD40 and the tarry inside of a small thurible...then I read the instructions on the can. "Caution hightly flammable".

If you do go down this route, I'd wash and wash and wash again in very hot water with plenty of washing up liquid or similar, and ensure that every last bit of WD40 has been washed off and the whole is squeaky-clean before reassembling.

Mind you, the result of not not wiping every last remnant could be very effective at Pentecost
 
Posted by uncletoby (# 13067) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tom S:
How exactly does one turn corners?

On the last page Cusanus offered the following advice:

quote:
I've seen two ways of turning 90 degrees. One is to reduce the arc of the swing over a couple of steps, turn and then pick up the swing again. The other is the slightly more dangerous method of changing the direction of the swing by turning your swinging arm before you turn the rest of your body.
I'd love to perfect the second method (I've seen it done and it looks cool!) but it scares me.
I think the way to do it is to change the direction of the thurible swing before changing the direction of your own movement, first swinging the thurible in the direction in which you intend to turn, letting it swing back in front of you, and then turning on the second foward swing. I haven't perfected this by any means, but it does look nice when it's done well.
 
Posted by Tom S (# 10433) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by uncletoby:
I think the way to do it is to change the direction of the thurible swing before changing the direction of your own movement, first swinging the thurible in the direction in which you intend to turn, letting it swing back in front of you, and then turning on the second foward swing. I haven't perfected this by any means, but it does look nice when it's done well.

Thanks. This still sounds like a very dangerous activity to me! I think I'll just be very cautious until I get the hang of it.

I'm now puzzling over how many swings are "right" when censing. I'm at a fairly broad catholic Anglican parish which borrows most of its liturgical practice from the modern RC form, as well as maintaining some older practices from days of yore.

GIRM suggests three swings for anything I would need to cense (sacrament, celebrant, deacon, servers, choir etc).

My 11th edition of Ritual Notes suggests three for the celebrant, and double swings for more or less everyone else.

Meanwhile Wikipedia (don't laugh!) suggests that "traditionally" Anglican practice is:
quote:
* Three sets of triple swings: When censing the Most Blessed Sacrament
* Three sets of double swings: When censing images, relics, and other sacramentals, also when censing the celebrant.
* Two sets of double swings: When censing a Deacon.
* One set of double swings: When censing a Sub-Deacon.
* Three sets of single swings: When censing the congregation

What gives?
 
Posted by LostinChelsea (# 5305) on :
 
Don't you think that "what gives" is the fact that there are no canons governing such things in Anglican churches? I've found on this [and many other liturgical practices] that the loudest proponents of the "right" way often have limited exposure to practices. What's "right" at home or in the parish you most respect becomes normative.

More often, there are a handful of "wrong" things -- hitting congregants with the thurible, burning illegal substances during during acolyte practice, etc. -- and lots or "right" practices.

In liturgy: Have a reason for everything you do, be consistent in parish practice, and do it all with love. Can't go wrong that way.

Oh, I think Ritual Notes is "right" on this because it's easiest to remember! [Biased]
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LostinChelsea:
Don't you think that "what gives" is the fact that there are no canons governing such things in Anglican churches?

No canons governing them because most of our canons come from a time, not so long ago, when Anglicans almost never used them.

We have no canons governing the use of photocopiers either.
 
Posted by Organ Builder (# 12478) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LostinChelsea:
... hitting congregants with the thurible, burning illegal substances during during acolyte practice, etc.

Your church sounds a lot more interesting than any I've ever attended!

Were congregants whacked on purpose or accidently?
 
Posted by LostinChelsea (# 5305) on :
 
quote:
Ken observed:
We have no canons governing the use of photocopiers either.

Exactly. So there's no un-Anglican way to use photocopiers. We may lament that there's no enforceable thurible rubric, or we may invent or import norms for swinging the pot where we worship. For the historical reason you point out, we simply cannot say there is one right way to use incense in an Anglican service.

p.s. For photocopiers, there is no canon, but there is the unchangeable cosmic law that they will break down during the heavy copy load of Holy Week.
 
Posted by Tom S (# 10433) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LostinChelsea:

More often, there are a handful of "wrong" things -- hitting congregants with the thurible, burning illegal substances during during acolyte practice, etc. -- and lots or "right" practices.

[Smile]
As long as I get through my first Mass without burning the place down, I'm happy!

I've just learnt that our head server takes the thurible home to practise around his garden! Quite what his neighbours think, I don't know...
 
Posted by Ann (# 94) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LostinChelsea:
quote:
Ken observed:
We have no canons governing the use of photocopiers either.

Exactly. So there's no un-Anglican way to use photocopiers. We may lament that there's no enforceable thurible rubric, or we may invent or import norms for swinging the pot where we worship. For the historical reason you point out, we simply cannot say there is one right way to use incense in an Anglican service.

p.s. For photocopiers, there is no canon, but there is the unchangeable cosmic law that they will break down during the heavy copy load of Holy Week.

Our church photocopier is a Canon.
 
Posted by LostinChelsea (# 5305) on :
 
I'm ashamed I didn't see that one coming!
 
Posted by Cyprian (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ann:
Our church photocopier is a Canon.

They bestow canonries for doing just about anything these days, don't they?

[ 23. May 2009, 10:10: Message edited by: Cyprian ]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tom S:
quote:
Originally posted by uncletoby:
I think the way to do it is to change the direction of the thurible swing before changing the direction of your own movement, first swinging the thurible in the direction in which you intend to turn, letting it swing back in front of you, and then turning on the second foward swing. I haven't perfected this by any means, but it does look nice when it's done well.

Thanks. This still sounds like a very dangerous activity to me! I think I'll just be very cautious until I get the hang of it.

I'm now puzzling over how many swings are "right" when censing. I'm at a fairly broad catholic Anglican parish which borrows most of its liturgical practice from the modern RC form, as well as maintaining some older practices from days of yore.

GIRM suggests three swings for anything I would need to cense (sacrament, celebrant, deacon, servers, choir etc).

My 11th edition of Ritual Notes suggests three for the celebrant, and double swings for more or less everyone else.

Meanwhile Wikipedia (don't laugh!) suggests that "traditionally" Anglican practice is:
quote:
* Three sets of triple swings: When censing the Most Blessed Sacrament
* Three sets of double swings: When censing images, relics, and other sacramentals, also when censing the celebrant.
* Two sets of double swings: When censing a Deacon.
* One set of double swings: When censing a Sub-Deacon.
* Three sets of single swings: When censing the congregation

What gives?

+ Vincent used triple swings to cense the cross on Thursday.
 
Posted by Ceremoniar (# 13596) on :
 
There are only single and double swings. Ritual Notes and the GIRM speak of three doubles, but never three swings.

http://www.ewtn.com/library/liturgy/zlitur132.htm
 
Posted by Carys (# 78) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by uncletoby:
quote:
Originally posted by Tom S:
How exactly does one turn corners?

On the last page Cusanus offered the following advice:

quote:
I've seen two ways of turning 90 degrees. One is to reduce the arc of the swing over a couple of steps, turn and then pick up the swing again. The other is the slightly more dangerous method of changing the direction of the swing by turning your swinging arm before you turn the rest of your body.
I'd love to perfect the second method (I've seen it done and it looks cool!) but it scares me.
I think the way to do it is to change the direction of the thurible swing before changing the direction of your own movement, first swinging the thurible in the direction in which you intend to turn, letting it swing back in front of you, and then turning on the second forward swing. I haven't perfected this by any means, but it does look nice when it's done well.
As I believe I was the person who asked about corners on the previous page. The advice given was handy and I've got the hang of them reasonably well these days I believe.

This is a good time of year for us incensewise -- we only have it on 'big days' but these include Rogation Sunday, Asension Day, Pentecost and Trinity so that's 4 times in three weeks! Though I'm actually away for Trinity as I'm crucifer for a friend's wedding the day before.

Carys
 
Posted by highchurc (# 11491) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Carys:
I'm crucifer for a friend's wedding

I didn't know that weddings had people acting as crucifers. Where can this be found in The Book of Common Prayer ? Live and learn.
 
Posted by Cyprian (# 5638) on :
 
Oh no!
 
Posted by Triple Tiara (# 9556) on :
 
Where does a crucifer appear anywhere in the Book of Common Prayer?

I too want to live and learn.

[ 25. May 2009, 01:29: Message edited by: Triple Tiara ]
 
Posted by Saint Hedrin the Lesser-Known (# 11399) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cyprian:
quote:
Originally posted by Ann:
Our church photocopier is a Canon.

They bestow canonries for doing just about anything these days, don't they?
[Killing me]
 
Posted by Low Treason (# 11924) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Triple Tiara:
Where does a crucifer appear anywhere in the Book of Common Prayer?

I too want to live and learn.

I think its one of the Ornaments which may, or may not be referred to by the Rubric [Biased]
 
Posted by New Yorker (# 9898) on :
 
I served as thurifer for the first time this morning. I noticed that when I began to take a swing at Father, he bent backwards just in case. So much for the confidence vote!
 
Posted by Cyprian (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by New Yorker:
I served as thurifer for the first time this morning. I noticed that when I began to take a swing at Father, he bent backwards just in case. So much for the confidence vote!

You didn't lunge your whole body forward, did you? It doesn't make the smoke travel any further but it's funny to watch people do it. It reminds me of one occasion when I was little and the batteries in the remote control to my grandmother's television set were on the brink of death. She would swing the remote control violently while pressing the button, almost like an aspergillum, seemingly trying to give the signal some momentum so it would reach the television. [Axe murder]

[ 22. June 2009, 14:40: Message edited by: Cyprian ]
 
Posted by New Yorker (# 9898) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cyprian:
You didn't lunge your whole body forward, did you? It doesn't make the smoke travel any further but it's funny to watch people do it. It reminds me of one occasion when I was little and the batteries in the remote control to my grandmother's television set were on the brink of death. She would swing the remote control violently while pressing the button, almost like an aspergillum, seemingly trying to give the signal some momentum so it would reach the television.

Actually, rather than lunge forward, I stepped back to ensure I would not hit him. And my grandmother did the same to her remote and I still do to this day!
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0