Thread: Styx: EVERYBODY READ: Policy change Board: Limbo / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000837
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
As some of you old-timers may have noticed, I've been much less active than usual lately. This is due to the giant time sink that is the Ark. (And if you haven't been watching it, give it a shot -- it has been a total blast.)
Anyway, the fact that I haven't been posting frequently does not indicate that I haven't been reading the threads. I have, and I've noticed some things. There are a few threads sprinkled in Heaven, Hell and All Saints which concern me -- they seem to be indicating a greater reliance on the Ship than is healthy or wise. This bothers me on two fronts: first, it opens up all sorts of potential legal problems for us; and second, the Ship (or any bulletin board, really) is not an adequate stand-in for counseling services.
I'll get the legal stuff out of the way first: Ship of Fools is in no way intended as a support or self-help site. We are a debate board, given to discussion of various theological, ethical, political, social, etc. dilemmas that people wrestle with every day. That we have boards dedicated to the community and other, more light-hearted pursuits is testimony to the friendships that have arisen from the interactions here, and that is entirely down to y'all. However, the editors, administrators and hosts of the Ship must draw a line as to what "services" we offer. The line is this: the Ship is in no way to be used as a substitute for counseling services -- be they legal, medical, psychological, psychiatric or spiritual. Posts which seek to elicit such responses are very strongly discouraged, and repeated posts along those lines will be deleted.
Now, to the second part. No matter how much we care, interactions on an electronic bulletin board are wholly inadequate to accomplish significant psychological recovery. Because this is sometimes difficult to see, we are instituting a policy: effective immediately, Ship of Fools' bulletin boards are neither appropriate nor adequate venues for suicidal ideations. Do not waste precious time by posting here -- if you suspect that your feelings of hopelessness or despair are more than just a reaction to a difficult time in your life or normal spiritual angst, or you think about suicide, then you need professional help, immediately, and you can't get that here.
The Ship is not the place to post those feelings, not only for the aforementioned legal reasons, but also because this is a bulletin board with open, unfettered access. The boards alone average over a million hits each month. We are concerned that not only are people using the Ship to substitute for counseling, but also that those who post along those lines make themselves open and vulnerable to others who perhaps do not have your best interests at heart.
We want to see all of you happy and healthy, and it is our responsibility to recognize the limitations of this medium. If you have general questions about this policy, post them here. If you have specific questions relating to yourself or others, send an e-mail or PM to me or one of the other administrators.
Thanks,
Erin
Community Editor
[ 03. January 2012, 20:29: Message edited by: Tubbs ]
Posted by Arrietty (# 45) on
:
Erin
That sounds very sensible.
As a matter of information, if someone who has not read this or doesn't understand/ignores the policy makes such a post in future, will it be deleted?
Posted by marmot (# 479) on
:
Thank goodness! Every time something like that comes up, I want to scream " It isn't that we don't care, we just can't help you the way you need to be helped!" Ask me to pray, I will, but I really worry about the ones who have expectations of rescue in a virtual environment.
Thanks, Erin.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Arrietty, an administrator will contact that person and suggest alternative, more appropriate resources.
[ 18. May 2003, 17:08: Message edited by: Erin ]
Posted by JimT (# 142) on
:
I am greatly relieved by this policy. I've seen the trend to which Erin has referred and have waffled between simply giving my own positive experience as encouragement and offering personal opinions about what therapy can and can not do. I will be happy to do less of both in the future.
When I see someone who definitely needs professional help on board, it puts me in a terrible quandry. I want to say, "You need professional help," but of course in public or in private that is going to be humiliating. In the event that the person is not humiliated but glad that someone has taken an interest, I don't want to be drawn into, "Thanks, tell me more. Where do I get it? What should I look for? How do I choose? What should I talk about? You've read my posts."
There is no shame in seeking professional help. To me, it was the "pearl of great price." I sacrificed as much money and as much time as I needed and would have gladly given every penny I had and every second of my time to achieve a quiet, confident inner peace. We may have been built for conscious sacrifice in pursuit of higher goals, but we were not built for perpetual and unbearable suffering to the point that we yearn for death and release.
Posted by Pipkin (# 1401) on
:
Well done - much wisdom.
blessings
Pip
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I agree with what Jim T said. This policy is sensible and much needed. We all need to let off steam from time to time, but when it isn't cathartic, or it looks like becoming a form of dependency, it's time to get help from someone who specializes in how to deal with it.
Posted by dolphy (# 862) on
:
Echoing Pip; Well said with much wisdom.
Posted by Moth (# 2589) on
:
Can I ask that this policy also be applied to the cafe? I have once or twice been in the situation where I felt almost unable to leave someone in the cafe because of their obvious 'neediness', but I am not a trained counsellor, and don't wish to counsel anyone online!
I don't mean by this that you can't say 'I need cheering up' in the cafe, but unwanted confidences that someone is suicidal are most unfair to other users. It puts us in an impossible situation.
Posted by The Wonderful Nanny Ogg (# 1176) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moth:
Can I ask that this policy also be applied to the cafe?
I agree that it is needed in the cafe, especially as other rooms in the cafe and private conversations have been used for "counselling"
Also, will there be control over the use of private messages to shipmates by anyone who should really be seeking professional help?
What would be the best way of dealing with any such PMs?
Posted by Jenny Ann (# 3131) on
:
hi,
100% behind policy change. hope that everyone understands the reasoning behind it and doesn't give the admins flak for doing their jobs!
J
Posted by Stoo (# 254) on
:
Just for information, the web address for the Samaritans in the UK is www.samaritans.org, and the phone number is 08457 90 90 90 and 1850 60 90 90 for the Republic of Ireland.
Posted by Caver (# 4392) on
:
They can also be emailed from anywhere in the world at jo@samaritans.org and they will endeavour to reply within 24 hours.
Otherwise they are part of Befrienders International and the BI site has details of organisations in other parts of the world that are similar to the Samaritans.
Posted by thegreent (# 3571) on
:
Erin - the ark? whats that?
Posted by Clyde (# 752) on
:
A well thought out policy which makes good sense.
I certainly support it.
Posted by nouwen (# 3103) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Stoo:
Just for information, the web address for the Samaritans in the UK is www.samaritans.org, and the phone number is 08457 90 90 90 and 1850 60 90 90 for the Republic of Ireland.
On reading Erins post I was in full agreement with it (well done hosts), but worried about how folk access support. Thanks Stoo for your post I urge people to make contact with the Samaritans if they need to speak to someone.
Posted by Arrietty (# 45) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by The Wonderful Nanny Ogg:
quote:
Originally posted by Moth:
Can I ask that this policy also be applied to the cafe?
I agree that it is needed in the cafe, especially as other rooms in the cafe and private conversations have been used for "counselling"
Also, will there be control over the use of private messages to shipmates by anyone who should really be seeking professional help?
What would be the best way of dealing with any such PMs?
I am not an admin or host, so this is just my own opinion, but I would have thought the main concern is for messages which are posted and remain in view and for which SOF might therefore appear responsible.
PMs are private so I would imagine it is up to the recipient how to deal with it.
Maybe I'm just hard, but I tend to ignore posts which are asking for an intense emotional response.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
To follow up on that... in the US, suicide hotlines are always listed in the first few pages of the phone book (if you live in a city large enough that the white and yellow pages are split, it's in the white pages).
We fully appreciate that the Ship can be a help in bad times -- I remain eternally grateful for all of the support I had when I was going through my divorce. However, it was not my primary source of support -- I sought out a qualified therapist and went to her weekly for nearly a year, plus I routinely talked to my priest. The Ship absolutely positively cannot substitute for that kind of face-to-face, qualified counseling. I recognize that the community on the Ship is one of the best on the Internet, but there are limits to what we can do, and it's important that we all recognize that, rather than set up the vicious cycle of co-dependency. (I was there, too, it sucks.)
And I didn't even address what I had originally posted to address.
*sigh*
I would say that this does apply to the cafe as well. If someone comes into the cafe and says they are suicidal, then a simple "log off and contact a qualified healthcare professional NOW" message is sufficient. No one here is responsible for someone else's actions. I know this sounds harsh and cold, but I've done the co-dependency thing, and it took me the aforementioned year of therapy to realize that I can't take responsibility for another's failure to seek help. No matter how wonderful I think myself, I'm just not that good.
Same thing with PMs. We obviously can't police them, as we don't have access to them, but I would hope that people would understand that this is a Ship policy and therefore it is inappropriate to circumvent it using Ship resources.
[ 18. May 2003, 23:08: Message edited by: Erin ]
Posted by JoyfulNoise & Parrot, O'Kief (# 2049) on
:
Thanks for setting the perimiters so clearly.
A well thought out policy which makes good sense.
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
I am glad this issue has been addressed - there is a tremendous feeling of helplessness due to the anonymity of posters in distress and also a feeling of responsibility in wondering if you have done or said the right thing.
PMs are a problem - I have wondered whether to contact the Ship admins when this has happened, but decided they have enough on their plate and couldn't help much more than me anyway.
But also hope the people who need help and are reading this thread realise that Shipmates do care and are not rejecting them through this policy - just trying to ensure that the channels of help are appropriate ones.
Posted by chukovsky (# 116) on
:
This sounds like a very sensible thing to do.
For clarification: There are qualified mental health professionals on the Ship (of which I am not one) and I have got the feeling in the past that they may feel even more "obliged" to interact with people in such mental states (a sort of "this person isn't my specific patient but I know what I'm doing and I feel responsible" type thing). I am just wondering if they might benefit from specific absolution of any responsibilities. Probably they are very sensible and grownup and don't need me to say anything, though!
Secondly: I have been in the situation where shipmates don't so much mention on the boards that they are currently feeling suicidal, as indicate on the boards or in PMs "things are really rough for me right now especially since my suicide attempt/period of major depression" and end up by asking for large favours (e.g. accommodation/transport/loan of money or goods) in a way that is not exactly manipulative, but does seem to suggest "if I hadn't been so down I would have been able to manage this myself".
I don't know quite how we should cope with this - it is not, as the situation Erin describes, an immediate request for counselling, in which someone hints their life depends on another, unqualified, shipmate, but it is a situation in which the targetted shipmate or group of shipmates might feel "this person getting home tonight/not sleeping on the streets might depend on my doing something for them, and they might be tipped over the edge mentally again", in a way that a simple "I'm in your area and wonder if you might have a bed for the night, no worries if not because I can always book into a B&B, I have been mega busy/had gastric flu and left it to the last minute!" does not put pressure on someone in quite the same way.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I think the mental health professionals on board probably have much the same attitude as most of the rest of us - they're not here to post in a professional capacity. As for the PMs etc - it's necessary to draw a distinction between attention seeking/emotionally manipulative behaviour, and cases of genuine need which you may or may not want to get involved in at your own risk.
Posted by chukovsky (# 116) on
:
That's very true, Ariel, but it does leave us in a similar situation to previously: everyone being free to post their current problems, but "I'm feeling suicidal" trumping anything else and people's feeling of responsibility for someone else's life remaining in that circumstance.
I don't know, maybe it seems different in some way, but this has happened before and it did seem quite similar to the situation Erin is trying to avoid.
Posted by Royal Peculiar (# 3159) on
:
And a related issue- that if you give too much away about yourself -or in one thread a third party who was having problems, you (or the person you're discussing) may be identified. It's so easy to forget tht as well as the regular posters there are many lurkers reading these boards.
Posted by ed_m (# 2025) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
To follow up on that... in the US, suicide hotlines are always listed in the first few pages of the phone book
are they listed under S too ?
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote from Erin quote:
To follow up on that... in the US, suicide hotlines are always listed in the first few pages of the phone book (if you live in a city large enough that the white and yellow pages are split, it's in the white pages).
Unfortunately, that's not true. When the Samaritans of South Central New Hampshire started up, we asked to be listed on the 'Help' pages. The phone company said that those pages were full. The Samaritans could be listed only if some organization already listed dropped out.
We took out a yellow page listing under 'Suicide Prevention', but that wasn't nearly as good. I just checked out the Befrienders International website using the link provided earlier on this thread. They do list the Samaritans of South Central New Hampshire.
I have copied down the Befrienders International web address, and I would advise other shipmates to do the same.
Moo
Posted by Pyx_e (# 57) on
:
Ed-m , I doubt it but I did look up " unfunny " under U are your name appeared.
P
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Ed, if that was a joke, it was in very poor taste.
Moo, I wasn't referring specifically to the Samaritans, but a general local suicide hotline. I guess there are white pages that don't have it listed, but I have never seen one.
As to the other issues flagged up on this thread... we can't legislate everything. There will be instances where people will take advantage of that fact. My advice is to (a) remember that you are not responsible for others' actions and (b) respond accordingly.
Posted by dolphy (# 862) on
:
Well said Pyx_e and Erin.
These are serious issues here and, in my humble opinion, not ones to be taken lightly. Even though we are all names and avatars, we are human beings, well most of us, and there are serious feelings involved here.
Posted by sabine (# 3861) on
:
In the US, many hospitals have "crisis hotlines" and many community mental health centers have them as well. They will be listed under "social services" and some sometimes under "Counseling and Social Services" in the yellow pages. But if all else fails, call the hospital for a referral to a hot line.
There is always a 911 option, as well, especially if one feels that the suicidal ideation is becoming uncontrollable.
As a former counselor, I feel that I can handle certain situations on the board or in the cafe (feelings of discouragement, having a rough couple of weeks, sudden crisis of faith, cartain temporary situational issues), but I didn't come here to continue my practice. I came for fun and spirited discussion (and may I add that I find this group to be a highly creative and intelligent bunch overall).
Several people have mentioned going through a Dark Night of the Soul for years or being depressed for a long time. Sometimes it's helpful to understand this about a person, but I agree with Erin--while happiness and health for all is the best possible situation, it can't be achieved by everyone in every case through Ship discussions.
New people post all the time and may not have an opportunity to read this thread. Those of us who have are in a position to gently remind them of the boundaries. It is possible to say (without being cruel) "I care but I can't provide the help you need and the Ship has a policy about on-line therapy, however, I will be praying for your situation" [use your own words].
It's also possible to pass along a tip or two to someone you feel could use it, while at the same time indicating that they follow up in real life.
Erin, appreciated your posting this reminder.
sabine
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by chukovsky:
That's very true, Ariel, but it does leave us in a similar situation to previously: everyone being free to post their current problems, but "I'm feeling suicidal" trumping anything else and people's feeling of responsibility for someone else's life remaining in that circumstance.
Call me cold and hard if you want, but when people post that they are feeling suicidal, I don't generally assume the worst. I tend to think that if they're completely certain they will do it, they're probably not going to post it on a bulletin board, in case anyone stops them. Posting is more likely to be a cry for help - and as such, should be directed to someone who is adequate to cope.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
Moo, I wasn't referring specifically to the Samaritans, but a general local suicide hotline. I guess there are white pages that don't have it listed, but I have never seen one.
Those 'community pages' in the phone directory did not list any suicide hotlines or any type of crisis intervention.
They listed mental health services (which were not manned 24/7); they listed youth services, subsidized daycare providers, etc., but no place to turn in a serious emergency.
Sorry to harp about this, but it still infuriates me, especially since they could have reformatted the pages and put in more listings.
Moo
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Well yes, that is irritating in the extreme. Like I said, I have never seen a white pages that didn't have a 24 hour suicide hotline number printed in huge letters, so that's really surprising. And sucketh severely.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
Like I said, I have never seen a white pages that didn't have a 24 hour suicide hotline number printed in huge letters, so that's really surprising. And sucketh severely.
That's why I'm holding on to the Befrienders web address. I may come across someone who needs it.
Moo
Posted by Zipporah (# 3896) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
Like I said, I have never seen a white pages that didn't have a 24 hour suicide hotline number printed in huge letters, so that's really surprising. And sucketh severely.
That's why I'm holding on to the Befrienders web address. I may come across someone who needs it.
Moo
Moo, good idea. I've now got it bookmarked for easy access.
Posted by Benedictus (# 1215) on
:
Verily, it sucketh indeed. But just to see what would happen, I googled the phrase "suicide hotline" and the first web site appears to have various local numbers for cities in every state, and a national number for the U.S. and for Canada. Also hotline numbers for other services, particularly for teens, in many areas.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Erin quote quote:
it opens up all sorts of potential legal problems for us.
I'm wondering if we really need to fear this. I've never heard of anyone, even the professional sites like WebMD getting into any legal trouble because of online advice.
I think we might be overly concerned about just how expert our advice is. I've posted on other sites where suicidal messages would pop up from time to time and the poster would be given kind responses as well as the occasional "go ahead and get on with it then" posts and still these same people would come back a few weeks later when having another bad night. I think more than anything the posters just want to make human contact. There is no perfect thing to say, even the experts know that.
------
I just pretended it was 2 o'clock in the morning and I was feeling suicidal and had just been told to "seek counselling." My phone book, like some others, had nothing in the front but police, fire, poison control and "Utilities protection service, call before you dig." I looked in the yellow pages under counselling and psychiatrists but got nothing. Now, I happen to know that there is a mental health crisis center in this town with a small staff that includes a semi-retired psychiatrist but it is listed under it's name which is something like; Allegheny Appalation- Shawnee County Mental Health Crisis Center. Only open 9-5 Mon thru Fri.
So I went to the Google site and typed in "Suicide" and after several clicks reached the Befrienders site already mentioned and the place where I could type in a message and get a reply in 24 hours. That's too long for many people, I would think.
I did find this number 1-800-SUICIDE (784-2433)
I think some people are afraid to call the hotlines for fear that a police person will show up at their door and they may not be ready for that. I also think that they fear the $200 per hour cost of a psychiatrist visit and should know that medicare will pay this cost and if they don't have medicare or insurance then the local clinics are usually very nice about adjusting costs to your income.
I would like to say to anyone who is feeling desparate, like hurting yourselves or someone else, very afraid or like you're "going crazy" that you can walk in any hospital or police station, day or night, and tell them just that. They will then call someone who specializes in mental health to come and help you. If you think you won't be able to say "I think I'm going to kill myself" you can always say "I feel like I can't breath" or some such thing. That will get you started through the system and the professionals can do the worrying for you from there.
I do hope that if the ship desides to go with a policy of turning people away who come to the board talking about mental health problems that the rejection will be worded very carefully. people in that state are very fragile.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I do hope that if the ship desides to go with a policy of turning people away who come to the board talking about mental health problems that the rejection will be worded very carefully. people in that state are very fragile.
Now, I'm really curious how you got this out of my OP and subsequent messages.
Posted by sophs (# 2296) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I do hope that if the ship desides to go with a policy of turning people away who come to the board talking about mental health problems that the rejection will be worded very carefully. people in that state are very fragile.
I don't think the ship is turning anyone away, just encouraging them to seek other help...
The policy makes sense
hugs,
sophs
(who went to the doctors yesterday )
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Yay, sophs! I use this ONLY for you...
Don't tell anyone.
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on
:
(((sophs))) atta girl!!!
Posted by ChastMastr (# 716) on
:
(((((((((((((((SOPHS!)))))))))))))))
Posted by sophs (# 2296) on
:
thanks...
but you weren't meant to pick up on that
Posted by Ben26 (# 4201) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
Yay, sophs! I use this ONLY for you...
Don't tell anyone.
Too late, we've all heard you Erin.
Sophs - That is brilliant. I am extremely please to hear that you have been to see a doctor.
Also pleased about the policy as it's not fair if people are faced with situations that they have no clue how to handle. Esp if they hardly know the person.
Ben26
Posted by Ann (# 94) on
:
Well done sophs.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ben26:
Also pleased about the policy as it's not fair if people are faced with situations that they have no clue how to handle. Esp if they hardly know the person.
Ben26
What's unfair about it?
No one is forced to respond to these people if they don't want to or feel clueless about the subject. Those people who feel uncomfortable or who deal with these things in their professional lives don't have to read that particular thread. People come to these boards and talk about all sorts of problems including health problems. No one complained about the calling God to Hell thread or the problems expressed on it. Why is this different? I have no clue about some of the theological problems presented on this board but I don't complain that it's not fair to be faced with them.
I think your final line "especially if we hardly know the person" is probably the real issue here.
Erin quote: quote:
I don't think the ship is turning anyone away, just encouraging them to seek other help...
I don't see much difference and I think someone who is already feeling worthless and unloved is going to take that "encouragement to seek other help" as rejection.
Posted by OgtheDim (# 3200) on
:
From among the group on here from the "helping professions", a hearty thanks to Erin for the reminder and the policy change.
Posted by Adrienne (# 2334) on
:
sophs - that's great news!
An interesting article in yesterday's Media Guardian about how the internet helps people cope with grief - particularly the comments from the Samaritans' spokeswoman about the email version of their helpline service.
A sympathetic modem
A
Posted by sophs (# 2296) on
:
quote:
I don't see much difference and I think someone who is already feeling worthless and unloved is going to take that "encouragement to seek other help" as rejection.[/QB]
I don't think Erin was suggesting just telling people to go and seek other help and leaving them on their own...
In fact just look at how people have responded to me seeking proffessional help (which had nothing to do AT ALL with this thread or the policy change). I needed the encouragement (and nagging) to go and see the doctor, which i got from here. I think that is what Erin is suggesting rather than giving up on people completly...
Please correct me if i'm wrong someone...
Posted by duchess (# 2764) on
:
Sophs, years ago, been to the docs. Life just gets better and better...keep looking foward young one.
Posted by Ben26 (# 4201) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
quote:
Originally posted by Ben26:
Also pleased about the policy as it's not fair if people are faced with situations that they have no clue how to handle. Esp if they hardly know the person.
Ben26
What's unfair about it?
No one is forced to respond to these people if they don't want to or feel clueless about the subject. Those people who feel uncomfortable or who deal with these things in their professional lives don't have to read that particular thread. People come to these boards and talk about all sorts of problems including health problems. No one complained about the calling God to Hell thread or the problems expressed on it. Why is this different? I have no clue about some of the theological problems presented on this board but I don't complain that it's not fair to be faced with them.
I think your final line "especially if we hardly know the person" is probably the real issue here.
Erin quote: quote:
I don't think the ship is turning anyone away, just encouraging them to seek other help...
I don't see much difference and I think someone who is already feeling worthless and unloved is going to take that "encouragement to seek other help" as rejection.
Nope. Knowing someone doesn't effect whether I am prepared to talk to them one little bit. Otherwise I wouldn't have joined the ship in the first place. Shipmates and apprentices who feel suicidal should, IMHO, seek professional help - esp as those not qualified to give help may give them bad advice.
Your right in that no-one is forced to read or respond to threads or posts but I was thinking of the cafe, which is a different story*. Erin hasn't said depressed people aren't welcome here and I am pretty sure that isn't her meaning. If your in the cafe with a depressed person, it might be awkward for some people to know what to do or say. It may make them feel responsible for "saving" that person - but they aren't responsible. It's not their decision whether someone else does something silly.
Ben26
*note to the shipmates I have talked to in the cafe about depression. No, I am not getting at you and it was fine. If I didn't want to talk, I wouldn't have. Please don't take this the wrong way.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Well, setting aside you attributing someone else's words to me, Twilight I'm having a real problem with your posts. You're drawing a whole bunch of conclusions that are completely unwarranted from what I've said so far and taken a policy in which we encourage members seeking professional help while using the Ship as a tertiary means of support to us closing the door on anyone with any mental illness.
Complete non sequitur, Twilight, and I don't appreciate you making us out to be the bad guys for encouraging people to actually get real live help. It kinda pisses me off.
Posted by thegreent (# 3571) on
:
Well done sophs
Erin - im jealous...... is sophs the **only** one to get your affection??
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Call me cold and hard if you want, but when people post that they are feeling suicidal, I don't generally assume the worst. I tend to think that if they're completely certain they will do it, they're probably not going to post it on a bulletin board, in case anyone stops them. Posting is more likely to be a cry for help - and as such, should be directed to someone who is adequate to cope.
I cant remember the statistics precisely - but didnt they find out that most people who commit suicide **have** tried to see a doctor in the last 6months/ ask for help somewhere etc...
I think its quite posssible that people *will* reach out on the ship/ other sites looking for help *before* trying to commit suicide/ self-harm etc. And although its certainly not our *responsibility* to 'rescue' these people, I think its only valuing people to take them seriously. Ie ask if they really do intend to.. / suggesting the samaritans website/ phone local hospital.
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on
:
I've been in two minds about the new policy. I am, I think, one of the people Erin referred to when creating the new policy (because of certain posts I made). I am now getting professional help... but I'm not sure I would have done so were it not for some wonderful shipmates convincing me it was a good idea.
I'm well aware (now) that the internet is no substitute for therapy. And I think the way people responded to me was perfect... gently informed me that the ship couldn't give me that kind of support, and that people here would be sympathetic but that I really needed to see someone about it.
Basically, my main worry is that because of the new policy, some people might start turning people away with just the phrase "Get help". We should tell people that no, we can't help them get better - but we (as a community) are still here for them in every other sense, and that we still want them as a member.
There's a big difference between being there for people and taking responsibility for them. I dunno - I'm just concerned that some people interpreting this policy might cause it to end up with sweeping certain disorders under the carpet. There's a poster in college that says "When John broke his ankle, his mates all supported him. But when he tried to do himself in, they didn't want to know." If someone posted that they had broken their ankle, but they weren't going to hospital to fix it, we'd politely inform them that there was no chance the ship could help mend it (unless you count blind faith... but remember the joke about the priest in the flood?), but we'd definitely be sympathetic, probably inviting them into the Oh Sit Down thread after they get back from hospital or whatever. That's how we should react to mental disorders... we can't help and you should find someone who can, but we're not going to discount your pain unless you refuse to help yourself.
quote:
Originally posted by sophs:
quote:
I don't see much difference and I think someone who is already feeling worthless and unloved is going to take that "encouragement to seek other help" as rejection.
I don't think Erin was suggesting just telling people to go and seek other help and leaving them on their own...[/qb]
That's how I worry that some people might interpret the policy. In a society like ours, where mental disorders are often trivialised or ignored, getting help is a really big step. Heck, it took me nearly three years between realising I needed it and getting it. I just worry that people will see this policy and ignore anyone who mentions certain topics on the grounds that "The hosts won't let me talk to you until you get help."
Regarding legal issues, btw... couldn't the ship just post "Ship of Fools is not responsible for any user submitted content posted on our forums"? That'd get round the 'no copyrighted stuff' policy too, wouldn't it?
Amorya
Posted by Arrietty (# 45) on
:
Amorya
I had never noticed you posting anything suicidal
I think the policy may be more to discourage people from taking on 'caseloads', than to discourage people from posting when they are sad/pissed off etc.
It seems from Erin's answer to me above, that anyone whose posts imply they are feeling very very low and can't cope and are asking a website to help them, will be getting a helpful and caring email from an admin to direct them to apropriate sources of help in the real world.
That's a bonus I think.
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Arrietty:
Amorya
I had never noticed you posting anything suicidal
I don't do straight up posting, I tend to make oblique references. I'm not going to repeat things here - let's just say I said enough to make a few people worried about me.
quote:
I think the policy may be more to discourage people from taking on 'caseloads', than to discourage people from posting when they are sad/pissed off etc.
If that's what it succeeds in doing, then I'm all for it. I was more worried about it being misinterpreted to mean that any mention of suicide or mental illness was banned.
quote:
It seems from Erin's answer to me above, that anyone whose posts imply they are feeling very very low and can't cope and are asking a website to help them, will be getting a helpful and caring email from an admin to direct them to apropriate sources of help in the real world.
That's a bonus I think.
That would be great.
I've just seen more than one place where such a post would get "That's a banned topic: discussion closed" and no further explanation.
I should have known really, not to expect anything like that from the ship admins. When I first read Erin's message, I was all set to respond in defiance with all guns blazing. But now I think I understand better what the policy is all about.
Amorya
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Erin, I'm sorry I attributed Soph's post to you,someone else just made the same mistake with something I had said. It got a little confusing there for a minute with every post ending with Soph's name. My board doesn't show the names and avatar's on the left unless I scroll vertically.
I didn't mean to suggest that the new policy would be worded in a cruel way, just to remind everyone that people in a state of despair might read the slightest suggestion to seek help elsewhere as a rebuff.
If someone came here and said they had cancer we would probably commiserate; I don't think we would tell them that we weren't oncologists and they should quit wasting time here and go see a specialist. I would hope no one would delete their threads if they continued to post. That can leave anyone feeling a little disoriented and hurt.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote from Twilight quote:
If someone came here and said they had cancer we would probably commiserate; I don't think we would tell them that we weren't oncologists and they should quit wasting time here and go see a specialist.
If a woman said she had just found a lump on one of her breasts, and she was scared, I would gently tell her to see a doctor immediately.
Moo
Posted by jlg (# 98) on
:
quote:
from Arietty's post:
I think the policy may be more to discourage people from taking on 'caseloads', than to discourage people from posting when they are sad/pissed off etc.
That's an excellent description.
quote:
from Ben26's post:
Erin hasn't said depressed people aren't welcome here....
Good grief, if we got rid of all the depressed shipmates, the Ship would probably be deserted (except perhaps for a tiny group cheerfully playing party games in Heaven and a couple of hard-core trolls hanging around Purgatory and Hell ).
quote:
from Twilight's post:
If someone came here and said they had cancer we would probably commiserate; I don't think we would tell them that we weren't oncologists and they should quit wasting time here and go see a specialist.
But if anyone started recommending a particular course of treatment for the cancer, they would be asked to stop. This is exactly the point.
Where did anyone say that the response should be to tell the depressed person he or she "...should quit wasting time here..."? There is nothing in the policy that says that.
quote:
Twilight again:
I would hope no one would delete their threads if they continued to post. That can leave anyone feeling a little disoriented and hurt.
Again, where does it say anything about deleting threads? Not to mention the fact that the Ship doesn't delete threads until they have been inactive for at least two weeks, so why are you even bringing this up, since it doesn't happen here?
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Did I read a different OP than everyone else? Italics mine.
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
The line is this: the Ship is in no way to be used as a substitute for counseling services -- be they legal, medical, psychological, psychiatric or spiritual. Posts which seek to elicit such responses are very strongly discouraged, and repeated posts along those lines will be deleted.
Now, to the second part. No matter how much we care, interactions on an electronic bulletin board are wholly inadequate to accomplish significant psychological recovery. Because this is sometimes difficult to see, we are instituting a policy: effective immediately, Ship of Fools' bulletin boards are neither appropriate nor adequate venues for suicidal ideations. Do not waste precious time by posting here -- if you suspect that your feelings of hopelessness or despair are more than just a reaction to a difficult time in your life or normal spiritual angst, or you think about suicide, then you need professional help, immediately, and you can't get that here.
The Ship is not the place to post those feelings, not only for the aforementioned legal reasons, but also because this is a bulletin board with open, unfettered access.
The idea that precious time is wasting seems curious to me. A person can't commit suicide and post on the internet at the same time. Professional help often isn't available until morning. If posting here is what gets someone through the night then how can it be helpful to tell them to go away? As for the open access, since I don't believe depression is a shameful secret to be hidden from others - I don't get that.
Maybe I've misunderstood every word of the OP. If I have then someone else might also.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
The stuff about posts being deleted, Twilight, was in reference to those seeking -- and I quote -- "legal, medical, psychological, psychiatric or spiritual" counseling services. So, to make it perfectly clear, any post that seeks counseling services on the Ship will be deleted.
quote:
Amorya said:
Regarding legal issues, btw... couldn't the ship just post "Ship of Fools is not responsible for any user submitted content posted on our forums"? That'd get round the 'no copyrighted stuff' policy too, wouldn't it?
No.
I acknowledge that you two have disagreements with the policy. This has been passed by Ship's Counsel, and this is how it is. I'm sorry, I'm not going to open the Ship up to liability for encouraging someone to use us as a poor substitute for much-needed therapy. If someone really needs an intervention, posting here IS wasting time as they have no guarantee there's going to be anyone around here anyway.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by thegreent:
I cant remember the statistics precisely - but didnt they find out that most people who commit suicide **have** tried to see a doctor in the last 6months/ ask for help somewhere etc...
Maybe so. I'm just speaking from my own experience. I avoided going to a doctor or asking for help during the run up to my own attempt 20 years ago. If anyone had asked me whether I felt suicidal I would have lied to reassure them. I was scared stiff of possibly ending up in a psychiatric hospital, and I didn't want to bother people by telling them about my feelings, or, when it came to the crunch, have anyone stop me. As it happened, it didn't work, but I'd meant it to.
Having said that, I agree with the second part of your post, although the inquiry as to intention would need to be worded carefully.
Posted by golden key (# 1468) on
:
Hmmm...
We need a seesaw smiley. I see good aspects to the new policy, and I have *no* worries about the intent of the hosts/admins.
I am concerned, though, about how the policy might be perceived by people in trouble, and how shipmates might choose to act on it. Some of the posts on this thread--and, to a certain extent, the OP--SOUND as if no discussion of personal problems, past or present, especially depression, is welcome. I did read the OP and the thread carefully, and was *not* looking to read anything particular into it.
I've been suicidal. I know others who have been, and I did lose one friend that way. My personal policy is to *always* take it seriously. I may just say something as simple as "don't", "I care", "please hang on". And I've had people tell me how glad they were I did that. Some people tell me they weren't serious, but sometimes people who are serious deny it. I'd rather take it all seriously, than not take it seriously enough and be wrong.
A question--not just because of the OP, but because of some of the comments here: What about my "Brainstorming" thread in All Saints? It's about my ongoing personal situation. Is that endangered?
Please understand: I'm not yelling at anyone--just thinking and pondering.
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by golden key:
I am concerned, though, about how the policy might be perceived by people in trouble, and how shipmates might choose to act on it. Some of the posts on this thread--and, to a certain extent, the OP--SOUND as if no discussion of personal problems, past or present, especially depression, is welcome. I did read the OP and the thread carefully, and was *not* looking to read anything particular into it.
That's exactly what I was trying to get at.
quote:
Erin wrote:
I acknowledge that you two have disagreements with the policy. This has been passed by Ship's Counsel, and this is how it is. I'm sorry, I'm not going to open the Ship up to liability for encouraging someone to use us as a poor substitute for much-needed therapy. If someone really needs an intervention, posting here IS wasting time as they have no guarantee there's going to be anyone around here anyway.
You're missing my point, I think. (Not that my point was very clear, when I was posting late at night and was decidedly ambivalent about the policy.)
I know that the ship is no substitute for councelling. I fully recommend that we don't attempt to take on responsibility for someone in that state. What I don't recommend is turning them away for any mention of mental illness or whatever. As I said before, we should treat it like someone with a physical illness - we can't make it all better (and we should make that very clear), but we can provide a friendly ear when the pain is getting you down, same as we would for anyone else with any other problems.
Amorya
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
The question is whether we can provide a friendly ear, much as we might like to. I was in the cafe one time when someone came in and the discussion instantly changed to the mental health problems they were experiencing. I am not denigrating the validity of anyone's experiences but what had been a lighthearted chat with a few others suddenly became an intense dialogue between two people about their experiences of schizophrenia. I felt quite out of my depth on this one. There was nothing I could say, and an attempt to brighten up the conversation or divert it to some more frivolous topic would have been inappropriate at that point as they clearly needed to talk. I made my excuses and left.
Posted by Mrs Tubbs (# 440) on
:
But nowhere in Erin’s various posts on this subject does it say that any discussion of personal problems / depression is unwelcome.
IMO, the policy is designed to prevent Shipmates attempting to use the Ship as a substitute for professional help. But it doesn’t stop Shipmates asking for support from the community while they are plucking up courage to speak to someone; going through the process of finding the right treatment or receiving it. And reporting on their progress. (Please correct me if I have mis-understood, but it is a subtle and crucial difference).
Twilight wrote:
quote:
I didn't mean to suggest that the new policy would be worded in a cruel way, just to remind everyone that people in a state of despair might read the slightest suggestion to seek help elsewhere as a rebuff.
Or it might be just what they need to hear. Sometimes it takes an outsider to point out something that our friends and family are too close to a situation to see (or too scared of the reaction to do).
Any such suggestion would be made privately so no one else on the Ship would be aware of it. And I trust the Admins to do it in the best way possible.
Golden Key wrote:
quote:
I am concerned, though, about how the policy might be perceived by people in trouble, and how shipmates might choose to act on it. Some of the posts on this thread--and, to a certain extent, the OP--SOUND as if no discussion of personal problems, past or present, especially depression, is welcome. I did read the OP and the thread carefully, and was *not* looking to read anything particular into it.
As I said, I don’t think that’s the intention. And I would hope that if Shipmates felt that another poster was crossing the line they would speak to a Host / Admin privately about it and leave them to deal with it rather than post something publicly.
Tubbs
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
But where have we said we're going to be turning people away for mentioning mental illness? I know firsthand the Ship can be a wonderful source of tertiary support -- therapy (and medication if necessary) being primary support, real-life networks of family and friends being secondary. I'm glad when people find that here. I'm less glad, though, when I perceive that people are using it in lieu of the aforementioned primary and secondary support. And I and others have had the very distinct feeling that this has been happening of late.
Posted by Jenny Ann (# 3131) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
I'm less glad, though, when I perceive that people are using it in lieu of the aforementioned primary and secondary support. And I and others have had the very distinct feeling that this has been happening of late.
I agree. I think for some people it is easier to spell something out on a keyboard to people you don't know, and will probably never meet rather than talk to people who you will see again. This doesn't mean it works though. the people you talk to can feel very helpless, especially if they are on the other side of the world and you yourself are not getting the ongoing support you need.
J
Posted by dolphy (# 862) on
:
This community is truly wonderful, I think most of us would agree. It is a place where we can discuss serious issues, have fun, ask for prayers and also a place where many of us have made great friends, either as a screen name, or in real life. However, although we can be supported through hard times, I certainly found this throughout my court case (see my Trials and Tribulations thead in the depths of All Saints), we can not expect fellow shipmates to take the place of professionals. We can talk about our worries, our troubles, etc, and that is wonderful to be able to do. As has been said before, sometimes it is easier to talk on the ship than in real lfe, as it were but if somebody really does seem to need qualified professional help in whatever shape or form that comes, well, that has to be the way forward. I know that many shipmates are in contact with others, we help, advise and listen as best we can, and more often than not that advice is accepted. This does not mean that we are turning away from others problems, we are merely giving them help. I hope this makes sense, I am not sure that I have portrayed exactly what I am meaning but I hope you get the jist of it!
(P.S. Well done Sophs )
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
The question is whether we can provide a friendly ear, much as we might like to. I was in the cafe one time when someone came in and the discussion instantly changed to the mental health problems they were experiencing. I am not denigrating the validity of anyone's experiences but what had been a lighthearted chat with a few others suddenly became an intense dialogue between two people about their experiences of schizophrenia. I felt quite out of my depth on this one. There was nothing I could say, and an attempt to brighten up the conversation or divert it to some more frivolous topic would have been inappropriate at that point as they clearly needed to talk. I made my excuses and left.
I think that the people who wanted to discuss schizophrenia should have gone to another room in the cafe. I don't know how you could have told them that, though.
Moo
Posted by OgtheDim (# 3200) on
:
Any professional counsellor who begins to counsel on this board is not acting like a professional. So, if you get any help, you are getting either bad advice or non-professional help.
For those concerned about the feelings of those calling out for help, anybody crying out for help usually gets the following response"
quote:
for you. Can I suggest you get some professional help on this issue?
As a practioner in one of the areas covered by this policy, please let that be enough.
Posted by eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
[QUOTE]I think that the people who wanted to discuss schizophrenia should have gone to another room in the cafe. I don't know how you could have told them that, though.
There was a similar situation in the café recently (discussing serious, though not 'professional help needed' issues) where someone took the rather gracious initiative of saying: "I'm off to the saloon ". Those wishing for light chit-chat took the cue and moved over. As new people came in, if it looked like they just wanted to chat they were sent a "private conversation" message quickly summarising what was going on in the Gangway and telling them the fun bits were in the saloon. That seemed to work well.
Alternatively, I suppose a similar private message could have been sent to the 'serious' protagonists.
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on
:
Bravo sophs!!
[looking for clapping-hands smilie]
Posted by sophs (# 2296) on
:
[small somewhat random observation]
I've just read through the thread, and found 2 bits that are kinda wierd on the same thread...one is the discussion about whether the ship is turning people away, and other is people saying things like "yay sophs"....Is it me or does one of these show that the other is, at least in some ways, not happening?
[/small somewhat random observation]
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on
:
In my opinion, you've hit the nail on the head, Sophs
May I add my twopenn'orth?
I have great confidence in (and respect for) those who manage the ship and make policy decisions about the way things should be around here. I am sure that no decisions are made on a whim and that changes such as these are discussed thoroughly, with thought, prayer and concern for all involved.
This is a supportive community. Granted not all see it that way, but the majority do and revel in the Christian ethos of the site which makes all welcome (unless they make moves deliberately to jeopardise that welcome)and provides a secure environment through the 10 Commandments. But that very sense of community is, I believe, testament to the conscientious and caring approach of the team which maintains it as well as to the openness and mutual concern of the people who "reside" here.
This policy is not intended to drive people away, in my opinion, nor to straitjacket people into a particular response to need. I think it presents a structure within which we are all able to work. I think it protects those who are at their lowest by directing them towards the people best qualified to help and helping them not to become over-dependent on this inadequate source of support alone. I think it protects those who do care - those who feel out of their depth and helpless in the face of posts about impending self harm, those who feel cornered into a sense of responsibility which circumstances make it impossible to do anything about. In PM I can listen and talk and listen some more and maybe do some good, but when it is posted on the boards I can do nothing but sit and worry.
And if I am totally honest about this, there are even occasionally times when I just don't want to - times when I have come onto the ship for my own stress-relief and escape from being "strong" and this gives me "permission" to state gently that there is more appropriate support available.
This policy does not turn people away, nor does it forbid the offering of help or support. I see it as giving a baseline, and a very wise one. There are those who are unmoved by such cries for help, yes - those people don't need a policy such as this to walk by on the other side. They will do it anyway. Those who care, and that includes the administrative team I know, will continue to care and love and pray and support, but within the security of knowing that they are not expected to act as counsellors or experts in any way, and that it is not being callous to refer people to appropriate support.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
Everyone please keep in mind that this policy is going to be administered by admins alone. We are not saying that shipmates should be responding to depressed or suicidal-sounding posts by saying, "Hey, get help!" If a host sees a post that expresses suicidal ideation, he or she will refer it to the admins. An admin will contact the poster privately and suggest that while Ship of Fools is an excellent source of online support, it cannot and should not take the place of professional help where warranted and of real-life caring friends.
Aside from the legal issues, which are important given the Ship's monetary inability to defend even the most frivolous of suits, suggesting that people who are feeling suicidal get other kinds of help while we continue to provide our own kind of support is really the most caring thing we can do. People will always receive the support this community can give.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
Cross-posted with Smudgie - who has grasped exactly what we are trying to do. Thanks!
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
I've noticed it too Sophs and I see it, not so much as proof of the dependable kindness of the shipmates but as ironic discrepancy.
Here we have you and Dolphy talking about how supportive the ship has been while, at the same time, others are talking about how uncomfortable it was to have their fun times spoiled by some strangers in pain.
Now I've never been to the cafe, my server line is too slow, so I can't picture what it's like there. I do know that one time when I came here feeling upset in the middle of the night I was told by a shipmate (exact quote) "The whole wide world isn't interested in your personal life." I responded angrily and was promptly suspended by the hosts who obviously thought what he had said to me was just fine.
I think it's like this; nice people who have been here a long time like you and Dolphy are treated with sympathy but prickly people who are not well liked or not well known are treated very differently. You have total trust that what they say to these people will be tactful and kind and not cool and dismissive. Me, not so much.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Cross posted with Ruth who has finally given an example of how it would be handled that sounds much nicer than the impression I had from the OP of curt warnings followed by deleted posts.
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
Cross posted with Ruth who has finally given an example of how it would be handled that sounds much nicer than the impression I had from the OP of curt warnings followed by deleted posts.
Yeah, that sounds about right.
I reckon both me and Erin were misunderstanding each other before... I was concerned about how people would interpret the policy, whereas Erin thought I disagreed with the main gist of it. In response, I think I misunderstood how things were actually going to be handled.
Thanks guys.
Amorya
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
Cross posted with Ruth who has finally given an example of how it would be handled that sounds much nicer than the impression I had from the OP of curt warnings followed by deleted posts.
Despite how many posts of mine that specifically said this was not the case.
Gah, I give up.
Posted by Presleyterian (# 1915) on
:
Hell, even I read the prayer threads.
So here’s a zany idea. Howza about we all lay off with the criticisms and put-upon italics until the happy day when our prayers are answered and we can hear Erin say "I’m at the finest medical facility in the freakin’ universe and those excrement-for-brains doctors put me through hell waiting to find out that everything’s OK after all." After that, we can all carp away.
And by the way, in what bizarro world galaxy are we living when I have to be the voice of sensitivity and discretion?
Yeah, I know. It doesn’t suit me.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
I have no idea what you're talking about Preslyterian but since I'm the last person to use italics maybe you're criticizing me? What are "put upon italics?" Was that one?
I don't read the prayer threads so if the answer to the mystery is there I won't figure it out.
Posted by Presleyterian (# 1915) on
:
If you've got a sec and it's not too much trouble, Twilight, you might want to read the prayer thread from May 18th.
Posted by Black Dog (# 2344) on
:
Don't flame my ass.
i've read this really quick, busy day, and i'm off to bed soon, so sorry if i'm blurring issues.
However from my experience this suicidal thing can often be a joke. And a master troll work at that. Now as i've said i've whizzed thru the details so I can be seen to be missing stuff, so if I go things wrong i appologise. But its an old hand to publish the suicide 'note' stuff. Infact there is alot of humour out on the internet based on topping oneself. I can't think of the website but there are plenty out there that started out as finding humour in killing oneself, only to attract those who actually do want to kill themselves. Stick with this, appologies if I've trod on anyones toes, but these people are out there.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Okay. I did just go read it and frankly I'm very upset to find out that Erin might be very sick. In fact that's why I usually don't read the prayer thread, all of you are very real to me and I get shook up when something like this is going on. I'm sure she'd never believe it but Erin is one of my very favorite people on this board and right now I'm crying for her.
However, Preslyterian:
What you just said and did to me is total bull crap. I come to this board to debate. I seldom post or read below Hell. I mainly stay on Purgatory. Are you saying that before I disagree with anyone I have to check the prayer thread to see if they're sick? Heck, and this just shows how wrong doctors (and I pray Erin's doctor can be) a few months ago my doc was absolutely sure I had melanoma, and it tutned out that I didn't. I happened to get suspended during that time. It didn't help with my anxiety to not have my usual time wasting distraction of the ship to go to but not in a million years would I have expected anyone to know about it or to make it a consideration if they did know. My gosh the OP asks for questions about the policy to be posted here. I thought I was defending mentally ill people from possible hurt, not criticizing Erin. This just totally pisses me off.
Posted by golden key (# 1468) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
But where have we said we're going to be turning people away for mentioning mental illness"
Keeping in mind that I trust the intent of the hosts/admins, and am just concerned how this might be *perceived* by persons in trouble, and how shipmates might choose to act upon it... These are some of the comments here that I found troubling.
--“The Ship is not the place to post those feelings.” (OP)
--"I don't mean by this that you can't say 'I need cheering up' in the cafe, but unwanted confidences that someone is suicidal are most unfair to other users. It puts us in an impossible situation. "
--"If someone comes into the cafe and says they are suicidal, then a simple "log off and contact a qualified healthcare professional NOW" message is sufficient."
--"Same thing with PMs. We obviously can't police them, as we don't have access to them, but I would hope that people would understand that this is a Ship policy and therefore it is inappropriate to circumvent it using Ship resources."
-"Several people have mentioned going through a Dark Night of the Soul for years or being depressed for a long time. Sometimes it's helpful to understand this about a person, but I agree with Erin--while happiness and health for all is the best possible situation, it can't be achieved by everyone in every case through Ship discussions."
I didn't include posters' names because my issue is with the ideas, not the people.
When you're seriously depressed and need someone to *hear* you (and I'm not talking about counselling), you can hang on every word the other person says. So I'm afraid that if someone is told "don't talk about this any more", no matter *how* kindly, they may feel devalued and ignored. And while I sort of understand the resson for deleting the posts, the person might feel even more devalued and ignored.
quote:
Erin wrote:
I know firsthand the Ship can be a wonderful source of tertiary support -- therapy (and medication if necessary) being primary support, real-life networks of family and friends being secondary. I'm glad when people find that here. I'm less glad, though, when I perceive that people are using it in lieu of the aforementioned primary and secondary support. And I and others have had the very distinct feeling that this has been happening of late.
Yes, but...not everyone has that secondary support from friends/family--and not everyone can get it.
In my particular case, almost all my friends are e-friends. Due to health problems, most of my adult life was spent in work/eat/sleep mode, with no chance for a social life. I've been stuck at home for most of the last couple of years, and don't have the energy to go out and do much.
So I rely on the Net a lot. I've made great friends. And that's how *I* get most of that secondary support.
Just food for thought, ok?
If nothing else, please word the policy very, very carefully.
Thanks for listening!
Posted by Caver (# 4392) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Black Dog:
Don't flame my ass.
i've read this really quick, busy day, and i'm off to bed soon, so sorry if i'm blurring issues.
However from my experience this suicidal thing can often be a joke. And a master troll work at that.
I know Trolls are supposed to be pretty thick-skinned, but it would take a particularly stupid inconsiderate troll to lead somebody on about committing suicide. I have known both people that have committed suicide and others that have wanted to do so. Being there for somebody who is genuinely that desperate is one of the hardest things that anybody can do. It is an incredibly hard, draining, and helpless experience. When they aren’t actually there in person it is even harder. I cannot think of anything more despicable than somebody pretending to feel suicidal for the kicks.
However, I notice that you don’t actually say that you have done that Black Dog so I won’t ask for this thread to be moved to Hell just yet.
Posted by da_Musicman (# 1018) on
:
Okay jumping in the deep end here.I read the new policy as the ship saying its can't help really sick people so you need to go somewhere else for that. We are still willing to pray for you and support you but we can't do anything else so don't expect us too.
Have I missed anything or is that what it says in a nutshell?
Posted by sarkycow (# 1012) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Black Dog:
Don't flame my ass.
And gee, exactly why not? You pop up on this thread, where people have posted taking this issue very seriously, and debating about how to word policies so that they don't hurt people, but convey the information that's needed, and you jump up and down on it, and on peoples' feelings. Saying 'Don't flame me' indicates you know that your comments will come across as flameworthy ones. If you were seriously concerned, a PM to an admin would have worked better.
quote:
However from my experience this suicidal thing can often be a joke. And a master troll work at that.
Yes, these people might be out there. If you had actual concerns, then PMing an admin was the way to go, instead of posting a sweeping generalisation, particularly one which includes several shipmates who have outed themselves on this thread as having posted suicidal ideations. If I had posted to this thread saying 'Yes, I have occasionally posted wanting to hurt myself, and I'm sorry guys' (or whatever) and then had some slackjawed dipshit say 'Yeah, but everyone who ever posts about suicide is trolling' then I'd be feeling really really shitty now.
I'm looking round, but only seeing one troll right now. And I know the advice is: Don't feed the troll, but you cannot make sweeping generalisations like that and not get challenged.
Viki
Posted by Viola (# 20) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by da_Musicman:
Have I missed anything or is that what it says in a nutshell?
Nope. Yep.
Well done da_Musicman
Posted by da_Musicman (# 1018) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Viola:
Well done da_Musicman
Yay
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by golden key:
When you're seriously depressed and need someone to *hear* you (and I'm not talking about counselling), you can hang on every word the other person says.
I'm probably going to make myself very unpopular with this but... the Ship isn't the place for this. It's really and truly not. Setting aside all of the other issues that went into this decision, by "hanging on every word the other person says", you're assigning a burden to others that they've neither asked for nor agreed to take on.
There are websites out there whose members are happy to take on this sort of burden. They know up front that this is the type of support the site offers and join it willingly. We are not that. I would think that would be fairly obvious from the fact that we have a no-holds-barred forum for knock-down, drag-out fights. We are about open and honest debate, and by encouraging a culture where people hang on others' every word, we are compromising that.
We're NOT trying to drive anyone away. But we have to draw a line to determine what is appropriate for us. This is it.
Posted by Hooker's Trick (# 89) on
:
This is the sound of my mind being boggled. I'm struggling to read this post:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I've noticed it too Sophs and I see it, not so much as proof of the dependable kindness of the shipmates but as ironic discrepancy...[snip]
You have total trust that what they say to these people will be tactful and kind and not cool and dismissive. Me, not so much.
And then go down a few more and come to this post:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I don't read the prayer threads
and then contain my sense of how ironic it is that on the one hand you find this community cool, insular, and dismissive, and then admit that you do not even bother to read the very threads where the community is at it warmest, most affirming and welcoming.
Wow.
One more thing:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
Cross posted with Ruth who has finally given an example of how it would be handled that sounds much nicer than the impression I had from the OP of curt warnings followed by deleted posts.
Sometimes we may not be (or seem) as quick to clear up confusion or answer questions as we could be. Remember that the Administrators all have jobs and other responsibilities in addition to our role here on the Ship.
I hope that it is clear that the Hosts and Administrators are committed to the smooth-running and well-being of this community and its members. We really are. Please try to believe that. Even if you feel a policy decision is one that you personally do not agree with, know that a great deal of thought and consideration and debate (and sometimes argument) lies behind each decision we take. And we make these decisions for what we hope and believe is the greater good of this community and the individuals that compose it.
So before you draw the very worst conclusion, or rely on the very lowest impression you can draw from a policy post like the one at the beginning of this thread, can I ask please for one moment's reflection that we do try to act for the greater good, and to extend the benefit of the doubt?
So rather than assume that the policy Erin outlined must mean "curt warnings and deleted posts" would it be so hard to assume (in Christian charity after all) that our intention (even if you feel it is badly expressed) is caring and compassionate?
HT, Admin
Posted by golden key (# 1468) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
quote:
Originally posted by golden key:
When you're seriously depressed and need someone to *hear* you (and I'm not talking about counselling), you can hang on every word the other person says.
I'm probably going to make myself very unpopular with this but... the Ship isn't the place for this. It's really and truly not. Setting aside all of the other issues that went into this decision, by "hanging on every word the other person says", you're assigning a burden to others that they've neither asked for nor agreed to take on.
Ok, let me try this again!
What I'm trying to say is that a depressed person is apt to have that "hanging on every word" response to the policy e-mail that they'll get. And to any suggestion of "you can't talk about this here".
And, therefore, all such contact must be worded very carefully, with consideration of the depressed person's state of mind.
FWIW!
Posted by Viola (# 20) on
:
Of course all contact will be worded carefully (which is more than this post will be, given the lateness of the hour). Ruth has given an example above, as have other admins. Other shipmates have also grasped the fact.
We care about our members - but we are in no way set up to deal with all types of issues. We were not formed with that in mind, and though the caring community here is a truly lovely offshoot of the boards, it is not the original function.
No-one is going to be sent away for posting their feelings. Private, individual contact will be made, suggesting their best way forward in their predicament.
(is there an echo in here?)
K.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
OK, that I can understand. I've sent out a couple of e-mails already, and it doesn't appear that I've said anything that has alienated or discouraged anyone, though I suppose only time will tell us that.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Originally posted by Hooker's Trick:
quote:
This is the sound of my mind being boggled. I'm struggling to read this post:
You start your post to me by insulting me, implying that my words are so stupid as to boggle your mind and so awful that it is a struggle for you to even read them. This is how I'm used to being addressed on this board.
So is it any wonder that I find the folllowing a little hard to believe.
quote:
would it be so hard to assume (in Christian charity after all) that our intention (even if you feel it is badly expressed) is caring and compassionate?
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
Twilight, I'm sorry, but you've misread HT's post. He hasn't said or implied that your words are stupid or awful. That's not what "my mind being boggled" means. What it does mean is that he finds your various statements jarring with each other. And I must say, I do as well. On the one hand you complain that people here have been cool and dismissive, and on the other you note that you have not read the All Saints board, which is exactly the place to go if you want to avoid cool, dismissive comments and instead receive warm support.
I'm sorry you had a cancer scare. And believe me, if you're ever going through something so scary anxiety-making again and you want support from people here, the folks in All Saints will welcome you with open arms. At they rate they use the smiley in there, it's a wonder they haven't burned the place down.
Black Dog: while it is true that there are folks out there who think pretending to be suicidal is funny, when someone posts about their suicidal ideations on the boards we have no way of knowing whether they belong to that small group of rather twisted people or whether they are truly troubled. If someone says they feel like dying, we are going to take it seriously and will take the actions Erin discussed and I reiterated. You don't have to take them seriously - but the admins do and will.
Posted by Arrietty (# 45) on
:
There have been people in the past who have appeared very emotionally dependent on SOF and this has worried me for their sakes. Because it is not a reliable form of support - it can go offline, people may not check in for a number of reasons, and it is not the right medium for advice/counselling/direction. If there are other websites that do provide such things via the bulletin boards I am not sure how effective they can be.
I am sure lot of people do as I do and send the occasional PM to someone if they sound stressed etc saying 'hang in there' or 'this happened to me too' but I would never get involved in anything 'professinal' such as counselling spiritual direction online, not becaus eof the SOF policy (though I would not ignore any SOF policy) but because it isn't helpful to them or to me.
In real life you choose a counsellor and when to be counselled, same with any other 'professional' intervention unless you are so bad that you are 'sectioned' (compulsorily committed to psychiatic care).
I have not notieed anyone giving inappropriate support on the boards but it's slightly worrying if anyone feels that they are responsible in any way for anyone posting here unless there is a 'real life' relationship as well. In which case I think it's more appropriate to ring them up or email them that conduct the 'helping' conversation on the boards. You wouldn't suggest meeting a friend in the middle of a shopping mall to offer care and support.
Posted by mimsey (# 3757) on
:
I've read through this whole thing now, and I think I agree with the new policy, but at the same time I just can't stop thinking about a story my dad tells, about a time when he lived in a house where the phone number was only one number different from the local suicide hotline.
One night a suicidal guy called the number. My dad answered, and discovered that this guy was in a phone box and on his last 10p (apparently the hotline wasn't free.) So my dad called the phonebox back and spent about an hour talking this guy out of killing himself.
I guess my point is that, while it may well be "unfair" to be expected to provide help, when you meet someone - off the internet or on it - who is seriously considering suicide, especially in such an immediate situation as the cafe, you have to be ready to look after them. I completely agree with suggesting professional help, but at the same if they really wanted to talk and just have someone listen, I don't think I could interrupt/stop them.
I don't know - I suppose every situation is different, and we will just have to approach this with sensitivity and caution, and not judge any situation too fast, policy or no policy.
Posted by Karl - Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
It is one thing to act in this way when circumstances conspire.
It is another for the Ship to set itself up for such circumstances.
Posted by Fr Cuthbert (# 3953) on
:
The internet will help some people cope with grief or bereavement. It is very limited, and so much about careing is about look, physical manner, touch etc.
I have a concern that for some - especially lonely people in their late teens and twenties, internet friends and cyber talk, messaging etc. sadly replaces personal interaction.
A 21 year old young lady of a church I attend, who is painfully quiet and withdrawn in social interaction has built up an internet persona very different from this. No doubt this is an aspect of herself, but it does seem to me a dangerous thing to do.
On a Christian site such as this I am sure it is a good idea to encourage honesty and integrity about oneself. I also hope we may be alert to those for whom a large part of their life may centre around posting to this and other sites.
Here I am not criticising anyone, simply sharing a thought that crossed my mind.
Cuthbert
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
The Prayer Thread;
I think it's surprising that we are expected to judge the tone and attitude of this entire ship on one thread on one of the ten boards. I don't have the habit of going to All Saints because most of it is about meets that I will never be able to attend. I read the Prayer Thread one time and ended up feeling very drained. I have a prayer circle list from my church and after I go through it each day I don't feel able to do more. I wish I had the time and spiritual energy to pray for everyone in the world everyday but I just don't.
This reminds me of the man (B. M. Smith was it?) who complained about his treatment here and was repeatedly refered to the Fields of Gold Thread as though that was proof that the people on this board are all wonderful, caring people. All it proved was that if you're a really, really great lady and you happen to be dying, then we'll be nice to you. I think the board has to be judged as a whole if it's to be judged at all.
da_Musicman
quote:
Okay jumping in the deep end here.I read the new policy as the ship saying its can't help really sick people so you need to go somewhere else for that. We are still willing to pray for you and support you but we can't do anything else so don't expect us too.
That's pretty much how I read it also and while you and Viola might think that's the perfect thing to say, I think that last line would be rude and hurtful. It presumes that the person you're talking to doesn't know the difference between a doctor and a message board and it jumps in with warnings about the limitations of our caring before it's even asked for. Imagine going to your friend's house with a tale of woe and getting that speech on the doorstep.
Arrietty: quote:
and it is not the right medium for advice/counselling/direction.
I use WebMd very often and have gotten very good advice.
quote:
I would never get involved in anything 'professinal' such as counselling spiritual direction online, not becaus eof the SOF policy (though I would not ignore any SOF policy) but because it isn't helpful to them or to me.
I've found lots of helpful spiritual advice online.
quote:
In real life you choose a counsellor and when to be counselled, same with any other 'professional' intervention unless you are so bad that you are 'sectioned' (compulsorily committed to psychiatic care).
In real life many people cannot afford (or believe they cannot afford) the cost of professional treatment. I went to the doctor a few months ago for the first time in five years because the doctors in this town were not taking new patients. It's just not always as easy as you make it sound to get professional help.
quote:
You wouldn't suggest meeting a friend in the middle of a shopping mall to offer care and support.
I think this is very different. This is quiet and annonymous and just as real and comforting as talking to someone on the phone. Many people don't have friends to meet them anywhere.
I do believe that the policy was made with good intentions; my doubts had to do with the inate tactfulness of a few of the hosts not the kindness of their intentions.
I realize the policy is in place and that this is not a democracy so any opinions expressed by the general ship population are just that - opinions. It's just my humble opinion that it might be tricky wording it so that no feelings are hurt.
In spite of what Preslyterian may think,I didn't post here to criticize anyone. I am a volunteer advocate for the mentally ill (NAMI org.) and have had some training in that area. I was thinking of what's best for them not the feelings of the hosts. I'm sorry if I hurt anyone's feelings but these decisions could mean life or death for someone.
Posted by da_Musicman (# 1018) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
da_Musicman
quote:
Okay jumping in the deep end here.I read the new policy as the ship saying its can't help really sick people so you need to go somewhere else for that. We are still willing to pray for you and support you but we can't do anything else so don't expect us too.
That's pretty much how I read it also and while you and Viola might think that's the perfect thing to say, I think that last line would be rude and hurtful. It presumes that the person you're talking to doesn't know the difference between a doctor and a message board and it jumps in with warnings about the limitations of our caring before it's even asked for. Imagine going to your friend's house with a tale of woe and getting that speech on the doorstep.
As I wrote that last sentence I thought someone would pick up on it.For heavens sake I was just trying to clarify the policy in terms I could understand.People seem to be blowing this out of all proportion.Nobody is saying they don't care. Nobody is planning on ostracisieng and belittleing suffering people. What is being said is that the Ship is not the place to come for help.For that you need to go elsewhere.As for all you know the person on the other side of the screen could be a mad axe murderer.
Jumping in with warnings before care has been asked for?I don't know about other people but whenever I see someone posting/saying something personal I assume they are in someway looking for care and support otherwise why say anything?Surely its better to let people know this before they bare their souls and then find out that we can't do anything except for say "Sorry to hear that.I'll pray for you."
With my friend on their doorstep I'd already know they lacked the capacity to help so when they recommended I go elsewhere I'd know they were doing it becasue they cared.I'd still know they wanted to help but realised their limitations.This policy is the ship seeing its limitations and telling everyone about them to protect them.And the reason? The Hosts/Admins genuinely care for those who post here.They don't want to see people getting damged furthur on their ship when with a gentle word they can help point them in the right direction of professionals. Part of careing is knowing when to help and when to direct ot others to help.
There is the legal side as well which I'm very poorly equipped to address but it seems that if the ship doesn't have this policy it leaves itself open to all sort of trouble.People would be able to point their finger at the ship and say "It didn't help.It hurt me" and the ship wouldn't be able to say "We never claimed we could".
With this policy it covers itself but most importantly it helps to protect us. That is current shipmates and those who have yet to join.That is those who want to be part of a community and those who don't.That is those of us who are qualified to help and those who aren't.That is those of us who are hurt and damaged and those that aren't.
Posted by Tina (# 63) on
:
Twighlight, you seem to feel that people here are using double standards.
But then you seem to imply that Shipmates should always be ready to provide any amount of care and support, and that it is wrong to say 'I'm sorry, I don't feel equipped to handle this', and yet you don't read the personal threads in All Saints because you find them too emotionally draining!
I'm not trying to flame you here, just pointing out what looks to me like an inconsistency.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
Twilight, I will say this once more, and please listen to me this time. It IS the final word on this subject: while there are other websites out there who may have taken it upon themselves to offer the kind of support and advice you're talking about, we are not one of them. That is a decision made by the editors and administrators, and it will not be revisited, reversed, or altered. We have decided that our scope of services is something entirely different, and we are asking that all of the members on here respect that. I can't see HOW that is a bad thing. Do you go to places like WebMD and demand that you be allowed to debate theoretical theological issues? NO, because they do something different from us. We do something different from them. GET OVER IT.
You may or may not like that, but at this point I really don't care. You have been riding the slippery slope argument ever since you popped in on this thread, and I am starting to think you're being this difficult on purpose. Your objection has been noted. The policy stands as is.
Posted by sabine (# 3861) on
:
A quote by me posted to the thread:
quote:
-"Several people have mentioned going through a Dark Night of the Soul for years or being depressed for a long time. Sometimes it's helpful to understand this about a person, but I agree with Erin--while happiness and health for all is the best possible situation, it can't be achieved by everyone in every case through Ship discussions."
I understand that--as written--this could be misinterpreted. Others may have also felt troubled by this part of my post, so I direct my comments to the thread as a whole:
Further in my post I also say:
quote:
It's also possible to pass along a tip or two to someone you feel could use it, while at the same time indicating that they follow up in real life.
Going back to the original quote from me, specially the point that not everyone is going to find health and happiness here at the Ship.... This is simply true. This is not a statement that one shouldn't be honest about their life situation, but a statement that
all the answers may not be here.
When we know that someone is going through a rough time, we know to pray for them, offer advice, encourage them, etc. I don't think that the majority of us want the Ship to be superficially happy or concerned only with theological debate. The Ship is as varied as life itself, and this is good.
Some of us have credentials, some of us have big hearts, some of us have time to be of service or to pray for others. There are many ways to support a person going through a rough time, and one of them is to encourage people to broaden their search for answers and help, especially if the situation seems dangerous.
We can give only what we have to give at the time, and then suggest that our help is limited. Referral is one of the foundations of many helping/healing professions. At it's best, it is a way to get people proper care.
Used in this way, it serves both the one doing the referral and the one being referred, and used in this way, it can make the Ship even more supportive.
Of course, we can't control how others are going to interpret our concern. One person might interpret the suggestion to seek RL professional help as an encouragement while another might interpret it as a rejection.
And yet, a sympathetic suggestion to seek professional help might well be made by a minister or priest or a devoted friend in RL, so I don't find the policy as outlined and clarified by Admins on this thread to be that much different.
sabine
Posted by sabine (# 3861) on
:
I can't believe how long it took me to compose my post since several others have posted since I began. Such are the ways of a discussion board.
sabine
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
Remembering my own experience with "damaged" people - addicts of various kinds as well as those with mental illnesses - I think it has to be borne in mind that some of the people posting this kind of message may actually be suffering from a different form of mental disturbance - and they're posting in the way they do just to wind us up.
Problem is of course, you just can't tell.
Posted by Annie P (# 3453) on
:
I have read this thread, said "Jolly good" to the policy, and therefore thought that would be the end of the matter and I wouldn't feel the urge to post. But anyway...
I'm not sure if people are getting confused here, but just to try and clarify further, this policy (it seems to me) pertains to a particular situation.
People on the ship will always look out for others, and care and pray for others, so far as it is possible. However, when it comes to people feeling suicidal and espressing this on the boards, publicly, or even expressing feelings of extreem depression, and expecting fellow posters to respond, I believe that's when this policy will kick in.
I know for certain that I cannot help people in the best way who need help like that. Therefore I am glad that we will legit be able to say to people - please go and seek professional help.
I too, like Smudgie says, come here sometimes just for relaxation and care myself, (not in the way we're talking about here). Occasionally I've come away drained and concerned about individuals (through my own choice, please don't get me wrong, I would have helped what ever) so for me, this is here to protect caring types as well as those who are in need.
This helps two sets of people
1. Those who would seek to care for people, who should know that it is not their responsibility for someone's actions.
2.Those who need professional physiacriatric help.
All people are supported here, in so many different ways, and I know that will continue. We need a safety valve for serious cases, and this policy will help make sure we know where we all stand. It's not cruel, it doesn't stop the care in other ways, and I'm sure that in the future, you'll be glad that the admins have decided to take the decision.
It will be the admins who will, in the best possible way, contact people who they believe need that gentle nudge, NOT shipmates, so no one should feel the responsibility (bar them) to take actions. If you are unsure about how this will work, then I suggest you let some time go by and see how it all pans out. Then if there is anything going on which you still think is unfair, I would take it up with the appropriate people.
As for Molly - I don't think that was a stand alone case. If you can stand to take the time and look at many different threads - Depression thread, Calling God to Hell, Prayer Request thread, Sit down - you will see a variety of people posting helpful, encouraging things to many different people's needs. Even some of the more difficult customers here find their requests taken note of. It doesn't just take a great lady with an amazing personality. If it did depended on a persons character, what a shallow bunch of Christians we would be.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tina:
Twighlight, you seem to feel that people here are using double standards.
But then you seem to imply that Shipmates should always be ready to provide any amount of care and support, and that it is wrong to say 'I'm sorry, I don't feel equipped to handle this', and yet you don't read the personal threads in All Saints because you find them too emotionally draining!
I'm not trying to flame you here, just pointing out what looks to me like an inconsistency.
Tina, I've not at any time suggested that someone stay on a thread or talk to someone who makes them feel at a loss or uncomfortable, in fact, I think the example given of people in the chat room quietly going to the saloon when the conversation got too heavy was a very good one and probably what should be done.
When the day comes where I go to the Prayer Thread and say, "Please quit posting here, we are not able to cure your illness or bring your loved ones back from the dead. I care about you and I think you should know before you bare your souls like this that I am not a doctor or a faith healer so I advise you to seek professional doctors and grief counselors rather than post here where I'm afraid I'll face legal charges for listening to your troubles," then you can call me inconsistent.
Posted by Mrs Tubbs (# 440) on
:
Twilight wrote:
quote:
It presumes that the person you're talking to doesn't know the difference between a doctor and a message board and it jumps in with warnings about the limitations of our caring before it's even asked for.
Think of it as a boundary – a way of saying what the Ship community can and can’t do – that’s designed to protect everyone within it. And like any boundary, you will only ever come across it if you get too close to it.
quote:
Imagine going to your friend's house with a tale of woe and getting that speech on the doorstep.
You seem to be forgetting that the doorstep owner is a person too – with their own needs, problems etc. Your expectation seems to be, as Tina points out, that the doorstep owner should be ready to provide endless care and support whenever it is asked for.
But, in some circumstances, the best response for the doorstep owner to their friend might be, “I’m sorry, although I love and care for you I can’t handle this. You need someone with the right experience and training to do so. I will support you as much as I can while you do this”
Tubbs
Posted by Og: Thread Killer (# 3200) on
:
Sabine....good words.
Now as for this one.....
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
....
When the day comes where I go to the Prayer Thread and say, "Please quit posting here, we are not able to cure your illness or bring your loved ones back from the dead. I care about you and I think you should know before you bare your souls like this that I am not a doctor or a faith healer so I advise you to seek professional doctors and grief counselors rather than post here where I'm afraid I'll face legal charges for listening to your troubles," then you can call me inconsistent.
Can somebody explain to me why this is not trollish behaviour?
Posted by MaryO (# 161) on
:
(warning: self-disclosure ahead)
Last year I spent part of September and October in a psychiatric unit for depression and suicidal ideation. I was unable to work for three months.
People who are that sick are _unable_ to process communications in a normal way. Would I have taken a "take this to a therapist" message badly? Absolutely. However--it _is_ not and _cannot_ be the responsibility of anyone here to predict what a sick person's (distorted!) reaction will be to a posted message. Saying otherwise is giving a sick person permission to emotionally hijack the virtual community, and is the last thing s/he needs.
MaryO
Posted by golden key (# 1468) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og: Thread Killer:
Can somebody explain to me why this is not trollish behaviour?
I don't think it's trollish. I don't agree with all of it; but, as I read it, the gist of it is similar to what I'm trying to say. It's just more strongly worded.
Posted by Og: Thread Killer (# 3200) on
:
Hmmmm.....O.K., I can see what your are saying golden key.
Enuff said on this one.
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
When the day comes where I go to the Prayer Thread and say, "Please quit posting here, we are not able to cure your illness or bring your loved ones back from the dead. I care about you and I think you should know before you bare your souls like this that I am not a doctor or a faith healer so I advise you to seek professional doctors and grief counselors rather than post here where I'm afraid I'll face legal charges for listening to your troubles," then you can call me inconsistent.
And when the day comes that I institute anything like this as a policy, this will be a relevant contribution to that discussion.
I've just about had it with your willfull and deliberate misrepresentation of my words, Twilight. You are just about on my last damn nerve.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
Twilight, you are being inconsistent - you complain that people aren't supportive here, but you don't want to read the threads where support is offered. You're also assuming the absolute worst about the administrators and misconstruing almost everything we say. If you don't like the Ship and the way it's run, there are lots of other bulletin boards out there.
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on
:
MaryO, thank you for your openness and honesty. I for one really appreciate that. And although I don't have the first hand experience you do, I agree with what you are saying about responsibility. Thank you.
Twilight, please don't take this the wrong way, but I think you have made your point and it's not doing you or the issue any favours to belabour it. Maybe this is the time just to wait and see how things develop.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Erin:
I've just about had it with your willfull and deliberate misrepresentation of my words, Twilight. You are just about on my last damn nerve.
And I'm getting more and more confused as to why you think all my posts are directed at you.
Almost all my posts on this thread have been in response to people who have quoted me and engaged me in debate with direct questions.
My last post was to Tina who said my not going to the Prayer Thread was inconsistent with being against the policy. Almost every word was a paraphrase of what da-Musician had said (in another post directed to me). If I misrepresented anyone's words it was his.
If you look at his words, taken out of contect for simplicity) I think you will see the similarity: quote:
We are still willing to pray for you and support you but we can't do anything else so don't expect us too.
What is being said is that the Ship is not the place to come for help.For that you need to go elsewhere.As for all you know the person on the other side of the screen could be a mad axe murderer.
... whenever I see someone posting/saying something personal I assume they are in someway looking for care and support otherwise why say anything?Surely its better to let people know this before they bare their souls and then find out that we can't do anything...
Part of careing is knowing when to help and when to direct ot others to help.
There is the legal side as well ... it leaves itself open to all sort of trouble.People would be able to point their finger at the ship and say "It didn't help.It hurt me" and the ship wouldn't be able to say "We never claimed we could".
... most importantly it helps to protect us.
It seems to me that lots of people have expressed their opinion on this thread so I don't understand why only my opinion is considered trollish and irritating.
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I'm sorry if I hurt anyone's feelings but these decisions could mean life or death for someone.
Please let me try to explain why this statement is virtually the equivalent of emotional blackmail, seriously. I'm not belittling your concern.
As a volunteer many years with suicide/distress hotlines one of the first things we had to take on board with our training was that regardless of how 'well' or 'badly' we did with a would-be self harmer the decision to self harm was always their own responsibility. They weren't being driven to kill themselves because a volunteer happened not to strike the right note of 'aw, poor you'; and neither were they finding the will to live because someone was 'successfully' responding to them.
It is precisely because some of the issues that people bring could be life and death that they shouldn't be mucked about with or exposed to a potential advice-pool of several hundred would-be Freuds or freaks (no offence folks! .
Let's say Theoretical Self-harm Shipmate strikes up intense needy/advice relationship with Kind Listener. Self-harm Shipmate may gladly take on board all the great advice given; may go off on a cloud of loving support and good intentions based on Kind Listener's wise words. But may still decide to take the bottle of sleeping tabs at four in the morning when reality kicks in. Because that's her decision over her life.
Trained listeners and counsellors know how to cope, usually, when this happens (when they know it's happened); how not to curl up in a corner praying for the end of the world. But on the kind of format of these boards it's not even possible to gauge the likelihood of someone's response to what they read here, let alone assume responsibility regarding 'life and death for someone'.
When one considers how even light-hearted banter can sometimes be misconstrued on a thread debate, the heart shrinks to think of the potential damage when discussing issues of personal mortal destiny with a fragile person.
So yes there may be people involved with the boards who are struggling with life and death issues but apart from an SoF decision to implement a policy of individually hate-spamming all vulnerable would-be self harmers, no decisions made of the nature suggested by the OP will add to the suicide rate.
Be realistic. You don't have to go far on the Ship boards to see the genuine concern and support there is for people in need. That's as much that can be safely asked of such a community. And that's why I think that quote is, perhaps unconsciously but still, a kind of emotional blackmail to compel Shipmates or the Ship itself to assume a responsibility it simply doesn't have.
Posted by Pyx_e (# 57) on
:
Twilight, drop it. Enough already. I heard what you are saying (I heard it the first time) now just move on. Drop it, Drop it, Drop it. If you can not bring yourself to apologise for banging on, on this thread and making it twice as long as it should be then that is OK. But now is the time to just DROP IT, please.
P
Posted by Erin (# 2) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
And I'm getting more and more confused as to why you think all my posts are directed at you.
Because we have told you how this policy will be implemented -- through myself and the administrators. You have consistently indicated your concern for Theoretical Self-Harmer because of how awful the administrators have been.
quote:
I think it's like this; nice people who have been here a long time like you and Dolphy are treated with sympathy but prickly people who are not well liked or not well known are treated very differently. You have total trust that what they say to these people will be tactful and kind and not cool and dismissive.
quote:
Cross posted with Ruth who has finally given an example of how it would be handled that sounds much nicer than the impression I had from the OP of curt warnings followed by deleted posts.
quote:
my doubts had to do with the inate tactfulness of a few of the hosts not the kindness of their intentions
If this isn't about how awful the admins and I are -- the ones who will be implementing the policy -- what's it about, then?
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Anselmina,I only meant to try to explain why I was belaboring the discussion, not to try to blackmail anyone but I do think your post is very informative. What you have said, as well as MaryO's post has caused me to change my mind about the issue somewhat. As I've said from the first I don't think the policy is wholly a bad idea or at all ill-intentioned. I was just concerned that the wording not leave anyone feeling rejected.
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
If you don't like the Ship and the way it's run, there are lots of other bulletin boards out there.
As much as you dislike me and as many times as you've invited me to leave it probably will not happen unless I'm forced to.
Obviously I do like many things about the ship or I wouldn't have stayed for a year. I like the liberal Christian tone, I like the subjects discussed in Purgatory, I love the humor and fun of Heaven and the equal number of laughs from Hell. Another reason I seldom make it to the prayer thread is that I start at the top of the board and work down and I'm usually either out of time or caught up in something before I get to the lower boards.
I really like about 95% of the regulars on this board. I think they are kind and supportive. I've learned an incredible amount from these people. There are only a few people who are sometimes cruel and tactless but it only takes one to really hurt someone.
P.S. If anyone has a link to a similar board I'll be glad to give it a try and maybe you'll be rid of me. I have looked and found nothing comparable.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote from Twilight quote:
I was just concerned that the wording not leave anyone feeling rejected.
I'm another shipmate who has answered the phone for a suicide hotline.
I don't think it's possible to do things so that no one ever feels rejected. Sometimes desperately unhappy people want someone else to take charge. A hotline volunteer or someone on the ship cannot do that. When the unhappy people don't get what they want, they feel rejected.
The problem is they want the impossible. Moreover, when they want someone else to take charge, they usually know exactly what they want that person to do. Hotline volunteers and shipmates are willing to listen sympathetically, but they can't do more, and they can't give professional advice. At the Samaritans I used to say, "I'm glad you called. Feel free to call again any time you like. But I do think you need more than I can give you."
I hope no one felt rejected when I said this, but it's very likely some people did.
Moo
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Pyx_e:
Twilight, drop it. Enough already. I heard what you are saying (I heard it the first time) now just move on. Drop it, Drop it, Drop it. If you can not bring yourself to apologise for banging on, on this thread and making it twice as long as it should be then that is OK. But now is the time to just DROP IT, please.
P
This thread has 125 posts. Fourteen of them are mine. How does that make me responsible for making this thread twice as long as it needs to be. People like you keep saying things to me and I reply.
I'm sure your 2000 plus posts have all been of earth shaking importance. If not maybe you would like to apologize for wasting so much space.
Posted by Ben26 (# 4201) on
:
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I was just concerned that the wording not leave anyone feeling rejected.
We will of course word our messages to apparently suicidal posters very carefully. Again, this is just you assuming the worst about us.
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
If you don't like the Ship and the way it's run, there are lots of other bulletin boards out there. quote:
As much as you dislike me and as many times as you've invited me to leave it probably will not happen unless I'm forced to.
I only said this because you have spent so much time on this thread talking about how awful we are. I wouldn't dislike you so much if you wouldn't assume the worst about us and our intentions.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Oh come on Ruth. Out of all my posts, Erin just dug out the worst sentences she could find and even in them you can see me say that I trust the hosts to have kind intentions. The worst I've said is that there might be some coolness or tactlessness. Never have I called anyone awful.
You and Erin seem to think I'm talking about you personally but I don't know how the admin heirarchy works and who out of all the moderators will be assigned to what duty. The initial OP did not make it clear to me that only hosts would be saying that we weren't to talk about these things. I thought anyone on board might be expected to tell the person that they should seek help from a professional.
It's not Erin whose tact I'm not too sure of.
Posted by Laura (# 10) on
:
Okay. This is intensely simple. I can't believe it's gone to three pages.
The Ship is legally and ethically barred from being an official counseling service for the suicidal. This does not mean shipmates cannot help, or that the Ship is going to post "go away" messages. It just means that the Ship Admins will officially recommend that the suicidal seek professional help they can't get here. It's that simple.
Why is this causing such a fuss? With people reading anything into anything? We mean what we say. That's all.
[ 23. May 2003, 03:57: Message edited by: Laura ]
Posted by Og: Thread Killer (# 3200) on
:
Twilight, let it go. You've heard from the lawyers about being wrong. You've heard from the counsellors about being wrong. You've heard from the distress centre volunteers about being wrong. You are not going to win on this one so give it up and let it go.
Posted by Og: Thread Killer (# 3200) on
:
I feel the need to say something here.
I wish to clearly indicate to all that I do not consider Twilight's posts on this thread trollish. I asked an honest question, received a response from one poster suggesting the answer to my question was no. Upon reflection I agreed. I apologise if I looked like I was indicating he was trolling; I was wondering, not suggesting.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
You and Erin seem to think I'm talking about you personally but I don't know how the admin heirarchy works and who out of all the moderators will be assigned to what duty.
Yet we've explained several times that it will be the ADMINS ONLY who will deal with these situations. If after 500 posts you have not figured out who the admins are, read the FAQs.
Posted by Hooker's Trick (# 89) on
:
I think we've pretty much run this wholly into the ground, so I'm going to close this thread.
Anyone who thinks that the Hosts and Admins are unmitigated meanies is obviously free to start a NEW thread for everyone's weekend entertainment.
Thanks to all who thoughtfully contributed here, and thanks for reading.
HT, Admin
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0