Thread: Hell: Pastor "stiffs" the help! Or, Americans are weird about tips. Board: Limbo / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000939
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
"Pastor" stiffs a server for portion of restaurant bill
C'mon, man.
[Because Clergy aren't struggling enough with their collective image]
<small>[ 13. February 2013, 00:09: Message buggered about with by: comet ]</small>
[ 10. November 2014, 18:37: Message edited by: Belisarius ]
Posted by Stetson (# 9597) on
:
Something about this story seems a little off. I'm questioning whether the guy was really any sort of a pastor at all.
Granted, I know there are a lot of jerks wearing clerical collars, and I certainly wouldn't put it past one of them to be a tightass. The detail that rings alarm bells is the word "pastor" added above the signature. That strikes me as something that a wannabe would do, rather than a genuine cleric. I think a real pastor would either use the title as part of his regular singature, or leave it out. Not add it on afterwards as a triumphal victory lap, like this guy seems to have done.
Plus, a real pastor would likely have put a prosletyzing message, maybe including an invitation to come to his church, claiming that to be the tip.
Probably a table of Amway distributors, and the guy had just made Diamond with his bible-based sales pitches, and figured this put him closer to God or whatever.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
Did he "stiff" the waiter in public? Surely there must be some decency law about that sort of thing.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
:snort:
A stiff is one who does not tip or tips poorly. What one calls somebody who seeks to denigrate clergy by portraying them thus I don't know.
(I'm not going to comment on slang I don't already know because I got Styxiliated last time I did that)
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on
:
Firstly, he appears to have paid the included service charge - and maybe this is a pond thing, but a whopping 16.9% would be considered robbery here (why not just up the food price and pay your staff more?), and secondly he wrote '0' in the extra gratuity. Seems very odd to expect an extra gratuity when you already paid a hefty service charge.
People here are also very suspicious of tipping on a machine here because they really don't know if the staff get it, so they tend to tip in cash directly to the person who served them.
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on
:
Just realised the tip was a whopping 18%!
Posted by Kyzyl (# 374) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by fletcher christian:
Just realised the tip was a whopping 18%!
An 18% service charge on groups of over a certain size (8 is standard) is very common in the US. The usual voluntary tip rate in the US is %15, higher in big cities. Wait staff get paid minimum wage or lower, so tips can make or break a week's wages. Of course none of this would be necessary if they were paid a living wage but advocating that makes me some sort of pinko commie these days.
BTW, there is strong evidence afoot on the interwebs that this was a faked story.
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on
:
Thanks Kyzyl for the explanation of the tipping etiquette of mercans. Fairly different from here.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
I have no idea if this thing is real or not, but many folks outside the US shocked at the automatic 18% gratuity for a large party probably don't know that lots of wait staff here are essentially working for tips. The federal minimum wage for tipped employees is $2.13 an hour, so if the state they live in doesn't have a law mandating something higher, wait staff are living off of tips. In California, the minimum wage for everyone is $8/hour, including tipped employees, but given the high cost of living here, $8/hour doesn't go very far.
It would be nice if the cost of service were included in the prices at restaurants, bars and coffeehouses, but since it isn't, it is incumbent upon people who go out to realize that when they pay their tab, they haven't completely paid for the service they've received until they've added the tip. I tip 20%. It's part of the cost of the meal or drink, and if I can't afford that, I can't afford to go out.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I tip 20%. It's part of the cost of the meal or drink, and if I can't afford that, I can't afford to go out.
Precisely.
Christians being shitty tippers is a recurring thread topic on the Ship. Because it's painfully true. And it's even more painful when they're all self-righteous about it, as if treating people poorly were part of our Christian duty.
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on
:
$2.13??!!!! Holy shit! Now that's robbery
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
Lots of stuff about this troubling:
That a person would not tip at all -- bad.
That an actual clergy person would not tip at all -- bad.
That an actual clergy person would denegrate a server at all -- bad.
That a pretending person would target the clergy to harm that group and/or its image -- bad.
Pick your poison.
Posted by jbohn (# 8753) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I tip 20%. It's part of the cost of the meal or drink, and if I can't afford that, I can't afford to go out.
What RuthW said. I've got plenty of friends who put themselves through school waiting tables and tending bar- without tips, it would have been impossible given what wait staff (aren't) paid in the U.S.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
What a po-faced prig. But at least he didn't leave a handy Bible verse to underline his point.
("Comping", now there's a word I haven't heard before.)
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by jbohn:
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I tip 20%. It's part of the cost of the meal or drink, and if I can't afford that, I can't afford to go out.
What RuthW said. I've got plenty of friends who put themselves through school waiting tables and tending bar- without tips, it would have been impossible given what wait staff (aren't) paid in the U.S.
And if you order pizza to be delivered to your home, the pizza delivery person has to pay his own car expenses. Keep that in mind when you're deciding how much to tip!
Posted by ken (# 2460) on
:
If you really cared about this instead of just wanting to whinge at stupid Brits who don't understand the strange American practice of having a compulsory tip added to your bill and them being expected to tip even more on top, then you would find out what restaurants pay a fair wage and only use them. And you would find out what restaurants employ staff who are union members and only use them. And you would let the restaurants and the trade unions know you were doing that. And if ewnpugh people diod it, then soone rort later thigns would change. As it is you are facilitating employers who are addicted to immorally low wages.
Posted by Crœsos (# 238) on
:
Two interesting developments.
The waitress who posted the picture of the check (not the same waitress who served the table) has been fired. The article helpfully includes the information that the national chain restaurant for which she formerly worked paid her the princely wage of US$3.50/hour.
The pastor in question has given an interview to The Smoking Gun.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
then you would find out what restaurants pay a fair wage and only use them. And you would find out what restaurants employ staff who are union members and only use them.
Its really not a choice. Restaurants that pay a fair wage? There are virtually none. It is for that very reason that tipping at a restaurant (and for certain other services) is part of the 'social contract' in the United States. It is optional only in very narrow circumstances (i.e., the wait staff completely ignores your party, you get no service, etc.). Otherwise, it is done as a matter of course and everyone I know would look down severely on a person who did not tip.
No one is 'whinging at stupid Brits'; just clarifying a cultural difference.
Posted by Crœsos (# 238) on
:
And here's an interesting observation from a few years back.
quote:
Take, for example, how Christians tip and behave in restaurants. If you have ever worked in the restaurant industry you know the reputation of the Sunday morning lunch crowd. Millions of Christians go to lunch after church on Sundays and their behavior is abysmal. The single most damaging phenomenon to the witness of Christianity in America today is the collective behavior of the Sunday morning lunch crowd. Never has a more well-dressed, entitled, dismissive, haughty or cheap collection of Christians been seen on the face of the earth.
I exaggerate of course. But I hope you see my point. Rather than pouring our efforts into two hours of worship, bible study and Christian fellowship on Sunday why don't we just take a moment and a few extra bucks to act like a decent human being when we go to lunch afterwards? Just think about it. What if the entire restaurant industry actually began to look forward to working Sunday lunch? If they said amongst themselves, "I love the church crowd. They are kind, patient and very generous. It's my favorite part of the week waiting on Christians." How might such a change affect the way the world sees us? Think about it. Just being a decent human being for one hour each Sunday and the world sees us in a whole new way.
The rest of the essay is pretty insightful as well.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
Then, ken, you would never eat out.
Posted by ken (# 2460) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
Restaurants that pay a fair wage? There are virtually none.
What would John Chrysostom say?
And don't you have minmum wage laws over there? If the restaurants don't pay the minimum, why the hell not? And if they do, then who tips minimum wage employees who don't work facing the public?
Join the union. And if there isn't a union, start one. Its the only way to get employers to play fair. Nothing else works.
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Then, ken, you would never eat out.
No-one HAS to eat out. Plenty of wealthy Europeans and Americans are happy to shout at companies in India or Africa for supposeldy using child labour. The moral issue is the same. If the restaurant business truly is is so corrupt, so, immoral, so ungodly, that not one of them pays a fair wage, then stop supporting them in their sin - which is one we are told cries out to God.
What would Isaiah say? What would Amos say?
[ 31. January 2013, 18:57: Message edited by: ken ]
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on
:
If you want to try eating out ethically, here's a guide to help you make your choices.
[ 31. January 2013, 19:01: Message edited by: Josephine ]
Posted by Pyx_e (# 57) on
:
good stoles nice attitude
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
No-one HAS to eat out. Plenty of wealthy Europeans and Americans are happy to shout at companies in India or Africa for supposeldy using child labour. The moral issue is the same.
I assume, then, that you're going to give up your computer, seeing the condition of the laborers who made it? Or do you have a bit of a double standard here?
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
And don't you have minmum wage laws over there? If the restaurants don't pay the minimum, why the hell not? And if they do, then who tips minimum wage employees who don't work facing the public?
Read my post if you actually want to know something about the minimum wage for restaurant workers in the US.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
Ken, in case you missed it, restaurants are exempt from minimum wage laws when it comes to waitstaff. Because it is assumed that the waiters are getting tips.
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
quote:
then you would find out what restaurants pay a fair wage and only use them. And you would find out what restaurants employ staff who are union members and only use them.
Its really not a choice. Restaurants that pay a fair wage? There are virtually none. It is for that very reason that tipping at a restaurant (and for certain other services) is part of the 'social contract' in the United States. It is optional only in very narrow circumstances (i.e., the wait staff completely ignores your party, you get no service, etc.). Otherwise, it is done as a matter of course and everyone I know would look down severely on a person who did not tip.
No one is 'whinging at stupid Brits'; just clarifying a cultural difference.
Okay, Shipmates, is this a legitimate member of the clergy to you, or a 'pastor?'
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on
:
I do object to automatic service charges - tips should be earned by good service, not assumed. Nandos and Chinese restaurants in particular seem to do this a lot.
While I sympathise with the situation of American waitstaff, I don't agree with rewarding someone just for doing their job, it should be for particularly great service - not automatic.
Posted by fletcher christian (# 13919) on
:
Jade, thats fine so long as the waiters get good wages, but nobody can be expected to live off a miserable $2.13/hour
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
While I sympathise with the situation of American waitstaff, I don't agree with rewarding someone just for doing their job, it should be for particularly great service - not automatic.
the business owners would say the prices of the products are lower in expectation of the tip. they're saving on wages and taxes and pass the savings on to you! I'm not sure I agree this is true.
I will say, though, as a tip earner on minimum wage, that if it weren't for tips I would not do this job. nor would any other server I know. It is not worth it. for the most part, the work sucks ass and you get treated like gum on people's shoe. the only thing that keeps you from going postal is counting out the cash at the end of the night.
And I DO tip based on service. if I get awful service, they don't get tipped. if it's so-so service, 15-20%. great service gets 25-50% depending on how great and how flush I am. if I can't tip, I don't go out. it's part of the price.
as for creating a union... HAH! there are a million drones waiting in the wings for these jobs nowadays. it would never work. and damn few people make a career out of being a server, it's a few years at most. not really worth the effort. you just move on. and yes, the business owners have us over a barrel, thanks for asking.
there are no benefits, either. before you ask. few of us are given full-time hours, either. if you're under full-time status, you don't have to be given much of anything. happy little loopholes.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I have no idea if this thing is real or not, but many folks outside the US shocked at the automatic 18% gratuity for a large party probably don't know that lots of wait staff here are essentially working for tips.
I know it. And it tends to just make me doubly shocked rather than singly. You've basically got a bunch of slaves who have to rely on the kindness of their masters rather than actually being entitled to wages.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Josephine:
If you want to try eating out ethically, here's a guide to help you make your choices.
Bookmarked.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
Okay, Shipmates, is this a legitimate member of the clergy to you, or a 'pastor?'
What, precisely, do you mean?
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
While I sympathise with the situation of American waitstaff, I don't agree with rewarding someone just for doing their job, it should be for particularly great service - not automatic.
It's not "rewarding" them for doing their job. It's how they get paid. It's just a different mechanism than if you buy something at the supermarket and the checkout clerk is "rewarded" in her paycheck at the end of the month.
Posted by goperryrevs (# 13504) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Crœsos:
Two interesting developments.
The waitress who posted the picture of the check (not the same waitress who served the table) has been fired. The article helpfully includes the information that the national chain restaurant for which she formerly worked paid her the princely wage of US$3.50/hour.
The pastor in question has given an interview to The Smoking Gun.
Interesting that everyone here assumed the pastor was a man. What a bunch of sexists we are.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
Shall we file this with the other "Pond Differences" or is there a discussion to be had?
(I should add that I know a good deal about tipping practice in the USA and I've never been there. See what you learn on the Ship of Fools.)
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
You Americans are in serious trouble. Not paying workers properly. Not advertising prices properly. Automagically increasing costs to individuals because they happen to show up in group beyond a particular number. Just glad to see there were no guns involved.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
Not advertising prices properly.
The food costs what the menu says it costs. It has fuck-all to do with paying the wait staff.
quote:
Automagically increasing costs to individuals because they happen to show up in group beyond a particular number.
Only you would think it is magical. Everyone else knows that large parties have a gratuity added to the bill. If you live in a cave and don't know it, it generally says so on the menu. No one is surprised when the bill comes.
quote:
Just glad to see there were no guns involved.
Go fly a kite, eh.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
[QUOTE]
No, I live in a igloo like all Canadians. Just like you live in a trailer park with the other rotten tooth gorillas.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
Hey, you're funny! You ought to write for television.
In any case, this really is about you being mystified by commonly-understood American social convention. While I doubt it takes much to mystify you, it really isn't my problem whether or not you understand it.
Now tell me: has Canada taken to issuing passports yet, or do you still just show your mullet at the border crossing?
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
quote:
Not advertising prices properly.
The food costs what the menu says it costs. It has fuck-all to do with paying the wait staff.
quote:
Automagically increasing costs to individuals because they happen to show up in group beyond a particular number.
Only you would think it is magical. Everyone else knows that large parties have a gratuity added to the bill. If you live in a cave and don't know it, it generally says so on the menu. No one is surprised when the bill comes.
quote:
Just glad to see there were no guns involved.
Go fly a kite, eh.
'Everyone else knows' = everyone who grew up with the same social conventions. Not tourists. I point this out partly because Australians have a reputation as exceptionally bad tippers? You know why? Because no-one taught us growing up that it was necessary.
Also, food might cost what it says on the menu, but I certainly remember buying other things in the USA and being astounded that there was additional VAT to pay at the till. In this country, such a practice would be illegal.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I point this out partly because Australians have a reputation as exceptionally bad tippers? You know why? Because no-one taught us growing up that it was necessary.
perspective from a very international climbing town: Europeans, generally: 3rd worst. Australians: 2nd worst. Japanese: absolute worst.
within Europe, Scandinavians and Germans are the best.
other places, even non-tipping countries, tend to do okay. maybe they get a little lesson when they leave their country.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
'Everyone else knows' = everyone who grew up with the same social conventions. Not tourists. I point this out partly because Australians have a reputation as exceptionally bad tippers? You know why? Because no-one taught us growing up that it was necessary.
Also, food might cost what it says on the menu, but I certainly remember buying other things in the USA and being astounded that there was additional VAT to pay at the till. In this country, such a practice would be illegal.
Agree. That's why staff in Australia are offended when ignorant loud US tourists offer them tips, they don't like being associated with sex workers.
Keep your wacky practices to yourself. Do not want.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
Hey, you're funny! You ought to write for television.
We already do. Most of your funny people are Canadian.
quote:
Yon the Fati
In any case, this really is about you being mystified by commonly-understood American social convention. While I doubt it takes much to mystify you, it really isn't my problem whether or not you understand it.
You are the world, centre of everything, you five percenter. When people don't agree or understand you just talk louder. Typical schnipical weinerclops.
quote:
Join the Fatpig
Now tell me: has Canada taken to issuing passports yet, or do you still just show your mullet at the border crossing?
No we just give them pickles. You freaking merrycans you want pickles with everything.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
You freaking merrycans you want pickles with everything.
Okay now that's just not true. We even had a commercial back in the 1970s for Burger King that started, "Hold the pickles, hold the lettuce." Would they have put that in a commercial if nobody ever wanted a burger without pickles? No, they would not have. It would have sounded too weird (like, "one hamburger, hold the meat").
This proves beyond the shadow of any doubt that Americans do NOT want pickles with everything.
Love your toque, by the way.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
When people don't agree or understand you just talk louder.
Usually, yes. But not in this case. In this case, you didn't understand it, and I explained it, and you still don't understand it.
Life must be a terrible struggle for you.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Agree. That's why staff in Australia are offended when ignorant loud US tourists offer them tips, they don't like being associated with sex workers.
Keep your wacky practices to yourself. Do not want.
'scuse us for trying to do the right thing.
and ignorance goes both ways.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
How about do the 'right thing' and legislate wages that people can live on?
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
ignorant loud US tourists
BTW this is fucking rich. The aussies who come through here are loud, rude, ass-grabbers who like to get in fights at the drop of a hat and think they have a right to get drunk and be dicks and we're somehow obliged to serve them.
but you know what? I'm going to be the better man and assume these assholes don't represent an entire nation.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Agree. That's why staff in Australia are offended when ignorant loud US tourists offer them tips, they don't like being associated with sex workers.
Keep your wacky practices to yourself. Do not want.
Seeing as American tourists spent AUS$1.8 billion in Australia in 2011, the "fuck you" attitude seems potentially self-harming.
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
How about do the 'right thing' and legislate wages that people can live on?
Tell our Republican friends that for me, would you?
[ 01. February 2013, 01:06: Message edited by: mousethief ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
Hey, you're funny! You ought to write for television.
We already do. Most of your funny people are Canadian.
Well, that made ME laugh.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
ignorant loud US tourists
BTW this is fucking rich. The aussies who come through here are loud, rude, ass-grabbers who like to get in fights at the drop of a hat and think they have a right to get drunk and be dicks and we're somehow obliged to serve them.
but you know what? I'm going to be the better man and assume these assholes don't represent an entire nation.
No, no... the getting massively drunk part sounds about right...
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Seeing as American tourists spent AUS$1.8 billion in Australia in 2011, the "fuck you" attitude seems potentially self-harming.
Was that about when Oprah visited?
EDIT: Note, on no account should any Aussies go offending the Chinese. It's just not going to be worth it.
[ 01. February 2013, 01:14: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
but you know what? I'm going to be the better man and assume these assholes don't represent an entire nation.
Sounds fair. I'll meet that and work on the basis it's possible not all Americans are uncouth fat jerks.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Seeing as American tourists spent AUS$1.8 billion in Australia in 2011, the "fuck you" attitude seems potentially self-harming.
Was that about when Oprah visited?
Was that in 2011? My numbers were for 2011.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Sigh. You're gonna make me Google it...
Yep. She was here in December 2010, and the shows aired in January 2011. So if any year was going to be boosted my a whole bunch of Oprah fans coming down to ooh and ah at the things they saw on television, it would've been 2011.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Love your toque, by the way.
Now I'm putting you on speed dial or whatever the ship allows. This is about the most lovingest thing anymouse has ever said to me. (and yes, I am wearing a toque in the house, always do, how'd you know, and I am not making this up. Must be love, I'm just giddy.)
Posted by Evensong (# 14696) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
ignorant loud US tourists
BTW this is fucking rich. The aussies who come through here are loud, rude, ass-grabbers who like to get in fights at the drop of a hat and think they have a right to get drunk and be dicks and we're somehow obliged to serve them.
but you know what? I'm going to be the better man and assume these assholes don't represent an entire nation.
No, no... the getting massively drunk part sounds about right...
The reason the Aussies don't like the loud Myrrhcan tourists is precisely because many of our own are of the same stereotype.
I have a mild American accent because I attended an International school in SE Asia. Some people hear me and immediately give me cold shoulder. It's quite remarkable.
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
I see no prophet takes Mercans to task for paying low wages to waitstaff. Like Canadians don't as well?
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
I see no prophet takes Mercans to task for paying low wages to waitstaff. Like Canadians don't as well?
at least in the Yukon the tipping tradition is the same as here. I have no idea what the servers make, though. figured it was rude to ask.
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
Trust me, it is all over Canada. At least two of my 40 something years old nieces would be living in abject poverty if it were not for tips.
I learnt not to tip in New Zealand. There they earn wages. In India tipping is not expected, but I find that a 20 rupee tip on a bill of 150 rupees is gratefully received.
Posted by Emendator Liturgia (# 17245) on
:
Comment has been made about Australian being notoreously bad tippers - rightly so, because we pretty well all grew up with the understanbding that tipping was ONLY to give thanks for exceptional service.
Furthermore, we also grew up with realistic mandated wages, a system supported to varying degrees by both major parties. The Liberal (i.e. Republican) party was removed from office in 2007, after 12 years in office, due to an intense public campaign against their wage/conditions policy.
Our national minimum wage acts as a safety net for employees to provide minimum rates of pay for employees not covered by awards or agreements.
In 2012 Australia's minimum wage was $15.96 per hour or $606.40 per week. Now, realistically, an employee's basic rate of pay depends on such things as their age, job classification and what industrial instrument they're covered by (e.g. a modern award, pre-modern award, transitional Pay Scale, workplace agreement and so on). Employers and employees cannot agree to a rate of pay which is less than the applicable minimum wage. An employee may also be entitled to other allowances or loadings, depending on the job they do (e.g. a casual employee may be entitled to a casual loading).
National minimum wages for apprentices, juniors & trainees
For junior employees, the minimum rates are:
Under 16 years of age $5.87
At 16 years of age $7.55
At 17 years of age $9.22
At 18 years of age $10.90
At 19 years of age $13.17
At 20 years of age $15.59.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Re signing "pastor" instead of a proper title:
Actually, in some Christian circles, that is a proper title.
The pastor, if officially ordained, might technically be a reverend. But some people balk at the title, saying only God is to be revered. Plus "Pastor" sounds more personable. You can use it the same way someone might address a priest as "Father".
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
the giant cheeseburger: quote:
That's why staff in Australia are offended when ignorant loud US tourists offer them tips, they don't like being associated with sex workers.
You mean Americans do their odious tipping in restaurants by tucking bills in Aussie wait staff g-strings?
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
[QUOTE]You've basically got a bunch of slaves who have to rely on the kindness of their masters rather than actually being entitled to wages.
I thought slavery had been abolished in the USA or are my textbooks incorrect?
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Emendator Liturgia:
Comment has been made about Australian being notoreously bad tippers - rightly so, because we pretty well all grew up with the understanbding that tipping was ONLY to give thanks for exceptional service.
Pretty much true for England too. The expectation is that you you are paid for what you do and very few people in other jobs get tips so why should a restaurant be any different?
I always tip but tip much more if the person serving smiles, listens and has some interaction over and above waiting duties. Following the company format never gets a big tip: individuality and character always does. It helps too if there's a child or older adult in the party and there is a genuine desire to help them. A bigger tip always comes when Mrs Mark has her teapot refilled with hot water for free without asking. Small beer I know but attention to detail gets rewarded.
I always ask how tips are allocated: adding to the crecit card bill doesn't necessarily mean that the staff get it. If it's been a great time I like to reward everyone, if one person has been esp good, I give something extra to them.
If it's bad, I've been known to remove/not pay cover charges or automatically added service charges. One or two have questioned this but I always have a reason to hand with facts. If you don't meet the contract, you don't get the deal.
I'd never advertise my occupation in the way that the OP says whatever the provocation. Remember though, be kind to your waitoing staff, they have sight of your food before you get it.
Posted by Lucia (# 15201) on
:
The situation of wait staff / servers whatever you call them in the US seems more akin to them being self-employed contractors. The restaurant pays them for what they do for the restaurant but you also need to directly pay them for what they do for you. Seems weird to those of us who come from places where such staff are actually proper employees but lets face it, if the staff are going to be paid proper wages then the food is going to cost more so the net effect to your pocket is the same. However I presume the employers don't want to do this as they would have more responsibility in other ways for their staff, and they don't want that and there is sadly nothing in the law to make them do it.
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on
:
This thread's certainly an interesting insight into the entirely different social conventions around eating out across SoF.
In the UK (and AFAICT Australia and New Zealand) there is the expectation that wait staff will be properly (if not generously) waged. The tip is an expression of thanks for something over and above a minimum level of service - or an expression of generosity or joie de vivre or whatever.
In the US (and Canada?) and possibly elsewhere, the restaurant just pays enough to the wait staff for them to be there, a kind of retainer as it were. Then it's up to the customer buying the meal to make sure they are paid a living wage; and there is a standard expectation of the size of the tip (varying form 10-20% depending on the quality of service).
Have I got it right?
{X-posted with Lucia]
[ 01. February 2013, 09:32: Message edited by: BroJames ]
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
'Everyone else knows' = everyone who grew up with the same social conventions. Not tourists. I point this out partly because Australians have a reputation as exceptionally bad tippers? You know why? Because no-one taught us growing up that it was necessary.
Also, food might cost what it says on the menu, but I certainly remember buying other things in the USA and being astounded that there was additional VAT to pay at the till. In this country, such a practice would be illegal.
Yeah, but we're clapped out pinko dolphin shaggin' commie poofters. We don't even carry guns into a restaurant, and have no plans or fallback second amendments (because we the fuck got it right in the first place) to overthrow governments with assault weapons. We hold elections which is just so lefty-democratic (like George Dubya, who imposed that kind of nasty nonsense on Iraq, though even that was because he couldn't spell Iran) , and we pay staff, which is so communist, and .. what can I say ... our Prime Minster is a Sinner™ I tell you ...
Posted by Anglican't (# 15292) on
:
Having established the different tipping conventions in the United States / Canada and the rest of the Anglosphere, have any studies been done to compare the cost of dining out? Does a meal for two at a modest restaurant (with generous tips) in the United States work out at roughly equal to a similar meal (with a 10% tip) in the United Kingdom?
[ 01. February 2013, 11:29: Message edited by: Anglican't ]
Posted by Meg the Red (# 11838) on
:
The tipping situation in Canada is IME indentical to that in the US. On occasion I have read about waitstaff designating days on which they donate their tips to particular charities- a not inconsiderable sacrifice that this thread makes me appreciate all the more. And I believe that tips are required to be declared for taxation, though I'm sure there's some "slippage".
In any case, 20% is my standard tip (more if service is exceptional), particularly since servers are often required to share their tips with other restaurant staff.
I'm with comet - if it weren't for the tips, nobody'd want the job 'cause restaurant patrons frequently exhibit behaviour they'd never tolerate in their own homes.
Posted by Emendator Liturgia (# 17245) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Anglican't:
Having established the different tipping conventions in the United States / Canada and the rest of the Anglosphere, have any studies been done to compare the cost of dining out? Does a meal for two at a modest restaurant (with generous tips) in the United States work out at roughly equal to a similar meal (with a 10% tip) in the United Kingdom?
To do that sort of comparative analysis you would need to incorporate other factors as well: such as the amount of government tax that is imposed (VAT in the UK is 20%; the same sort of tax here in Aus. is only 10%; I don't know what federal/state taxes are levided in the US. Also, one would have to take into consideration the 'compulsary' service levies mentioned in the OP and elsewhere, as aginast the 'tipping' and at what level.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
I see no prophet takes Mercans to task for paying low wages to waitstaff. Like Canadians don't as well?
$10/hour is not good, but it's better than what they're quoting. That's the minimum wage, give or take some ¢. This said, the economy is growing, it's on fire with the oil boom here and there is difficulty retaining employees, such that Tim Hortons is paying $15/hour to start.
I suspect Pete, that you and I, from what I've seen from you previously, would tend to agree that economic policies that cut corp taxes with the notion that this would lead to more jobs and increased "prosperity", has led instead to increased bonuses for executives and continued poor wages. This is Hell however, and we are entitled to point fingers at sinners worse than ourselves. But we Canadians should burn too, and we might welcome it, particularly given the rather cold weather these past weeks.
Indeed, tipping occurs in Canada, but Americans seem to tip everyone. Not just waiters/waitresses (who get 10% rounded to the nearest dollar, but nil if service is poor, and only in real restaurants, i.e., not fast food and not resembling fast food). Americans tip for hair cuts, taxi rides, delivery people. It's just not done on the western Canadian prairies, even if there are those who are progressively adopting customs from the Excited States, like those living in that most American wannabe city of Tronna, which includes all of southern Ontario in western perception.
So, I'll admit to engaging in assholery in some of my posts. Rather enjoying it.
[edited the duplication out - orfeo]
[ 01. February 2013, 12:47: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
no prophet, I took the liberty of editing out the duplicate post - and hence your notice about the duplicate.
orfeo
Hellhost
PS See how nice and fluffy I can be?
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
quote:
Okay, Shipmates, is this a legitimate member of the clergy to you, or a 'pastor?'
What, precisely, do you mean?
I don't have any research to corroborate this, but since it's Hell and I don't have to, I'll opine that the Church is so micro-fractioned any more, that where two or three are gathered in the Lord's name, it's not long before one is dubbed 'pastor,' usually by themself. One can be a self-styled 'Bishop,' 'Deacon,' or 'Priestess,' for that matter just by claiming so. Clerical titles (and beyond) got hijacked a l-o-n-g time ago, at least here in the "tippy" USA, and while it's not out of my belief system to acknowledge that God still speaks to and through some of us, this woman makes me skeptical.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
This tipping crap has me thinking. With the declining number of parishioners and financial squeeze I hear many places, probably we should tip priests and ministers. Poor sods with no money. Y'know, slip them a little something for a good sermon and maybe even a little extra if we felt moved by the spirit. It'd be pretty easy, just a little jar by the door or into the hand while shaking on the way out. If you have a large family, the greeters and ushers will just give you a Holy Tip Total or Godly Gratuity and won't let you leave until you pay out.
If your church uses those weekly envelopes, it'd be easy to add a tip amount line. Part of stewardship would be to target the low tippers and tell them how rude they are.
Problem solved! The clergy would have no further excuse for not tipping waiters.
Posted by Sergius-Melli (# 17462) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
This tipping crap has me thinking. With the declining number of parishioners and financial squeeze I hear many places, probably we should tip priests and ministers. Poor sods with no money. Y'know, slip them a little something for a good sermon and maybe even a little extra if we felt moved by the spirit. It'd be pretty easy, just a little jar by the door or into the hand while shaking on the way out. If you have a large family, the greeters and ushers will just give you a Holy Tip Total or Godly Gratuity and won't let you leave until you pay out.
If your church uses those weekly envelopes, it'd be easy to add a tip amount line. Part of stewardship would be to target the low tippers and tell them how rude they are.
Problem solved! The clergy would have no further excuse for not tipping waiters.
And there was me thinking that the fees for the occassional offices were the in-lieu of tips thing for clergy.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sergius-Melli:
And there was me thinking that the fees for the occassional offices were the in-lieu of tips thing for clergy.
You would continue to get that plus a tip. If you really did it well, you might get, say 22%. If not so well, maybe get stiffed. If average, I'll leave you 10%.
Lots of great possibilities. In your local deanery meetings, you can debate whether the bishop gets a cut of the tip pool.
Posted by Spiffy (# 5267) on
:
Anyone else think signing the check with the title "Pastor" was just her way of being a douchebag in Jesus' name?
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
[QUOTE]You've basically got a bunch of slaves who have to rely on the kindness of their masters rather than actually being entitled to wages.
I thought slavery had been abolished in the USA or are my textbooks incorrect?
Absolutely incorrect. We just hide it under the rug a lot better.
Of course, there's slaves in Australia, Europe, England, Asia... Some facts on human trafficking.
[ 01. February 2013, 15:08: Message edited by: Spiffy ]
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
If you have a large family, the greeters and ushers will just give you a Holy Tip Total or Godly Gratuity and won't let you leave until you pay out.
I came home to my trailer park from the bi-weekly local gun show this morning with several bags of Burger King for the missus, and logged on to find that you are still twatting off about this whole tipping/gratuity thing. It must bother you terribly that social convention differs in other countries. The thought that someone else does something differently than you must really get your toque in a bunch.
Or you're just ignorant. That's where my money is (when it isn't buying assault weapons, that is).
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
It must bother you terribly that social convention differs in other countries.
Not half as much as it seems to bother you...
Posted by Sergius-Melli (# 17462) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
Lots of great possibilities. In your local deanery meetings, you can debate whether the bishop gets a cut of the tip pool.
He probably shouldn't, but I imagine they would expect... no, sorry... demand a share.
We have a very early Easter Vestry, though it's at the start of Lent (don't ask!) I might think about bringing this up...
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
Automagically increasing costs to individuals because they happen to show up in group beyond a particular number.
I understand this might be asking a bit too much, but a tiny bit of reasoning and logic reveals why.
-Serving a large group can be a magnitude more difficult than serving the same number at separate tables.
-People are bastards and some will assume others will cover their paucity or, owing to the size of the group, their individual lack of tip will not be traced to them.
quote:
Originally posted by The Riv:
I'll opine that the Church is so micro-fractioned any more, that where two or three are gathered in the Lord's name, it's not long before one is dubbed 'pastor,' usually by themself. One can be a self-styled 'Bishop,' 'Deacon,' or 'Priestess,' for that matter just by claiming so.
And this is different from how all "established" churches began how?
In regards to the Pastor, she claims her comment was a lapse in judgement. So what is her method of repentance? To complain to the establishment and cause further trouble. Bitch.
Personal behaviour: if I expect anyone to serve me, to do something for me that I am damn well capable of doing myself; I will attempt to ensure they are compensated. In some countries this means their wage, in others my tip. Not difficult to ascertain the local customs. There exist a plethora of guides, books and websites. Attempting to understand the cultures to which you are traveling should be the fucking default.
As to all the cross-cultural sniping, there exists a multitude of sins in all our cultures. No, this is not a can we get along, this is a quit whinging ya bastards!
A "servant of God" used her credentials to display the exact opposite of what those credentials are supposed to represent. And made another suffer for her own (the pastor's) sins.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
So, I'll admit to engaging in assholery in some of my posts.
That's what it is! I knew there was something about them, but couldn't quite puzzle it out.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Meg the Red:
And I believe that tips are required to be declared for taxation, though I'm sure there's some "slippage".
I'm expected to declare all my tips for taxation. in reality I declare about 15% of over all sales, where my average tip income is closer to 20%.
and then there's days like yesterday where I work an 8 hour shift and walk home with ten bucks. some days, it sucks. you just never know. but if I claim less than my 15%, I'm setting myself up for an IRS audit, where I'll be forced to prove the unprovable and then be asked to pay taxes on an "average" tip rate. even if people chose not to tip, I have to claim a tip. so there are times I'm paying taxes on money that doesn't exist. as far as I'm concerned, it makes up for my under-declarations at other times.
yesterday, I claimed $45 in tips for tax purposes, though I only made $10. it's a tough time of year, people here are broke. I cut them a lot of slack.
so if you're considering not tipping as making a statement of how you disapprove of our system, remember who you're harming. and think carefully about who is hearing your statement. the government will not hear and does not care.
and yes, when the right cause comes up, and/or when we're asked, staff will have times where all tips are given to a charity in need. this is voluntary and we're happy to do it.
I will still have to declare those tips and pay the tax, and I don't get credit for the donation because the money never went through my hand.
FYI here, tips are taxed at the exact same rate as wage income.
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on
:
It would be unfair not to tip according to the custom of the country you're visiting. My limited experience of service in the USA is that the waiters usually work very hard to gain their 'share' of the profit on a meal, and are understandably keen on making their customers' dining experience pleasant. If that's how it works out it ought to be a win-win situation.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
So, I'll admit to engaging in assholery in some of my posts.
That's what it is! I knew there was something about them, but couldn't quite puzzle it out.
Understood. Like I said previously, "tipping crap". Direct physical effort might be more efficient though than "puzzling it out".
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
Why do waiters get tips but not the chef? After all, he's the one who's actually done the work. All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Posted by Spiffy (# 5267) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Why do waiters get tips but not the chef? After all, he's the one who's actually done the work. All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Most places the servers have to share tips with the other staff.
A interesting blog on this is located at the fantastic site Waiter Rant.
[ 01. February 2013, 19:35: Message edited by: Spiffy ]
Posted by Organ Builder (# 12478) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Why do waiters get tips but not the chef? After all, he's the one who's actually done the work. All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Chefs don't get tips because they usually get a living wage--sometimes (if they are really good) a quite fantastic salary. They also (usually) have benefits.
Of course, some of them own the restaurants in which they work as well. Lest one get the idea that waiting tables is a sentence to long term poverty, I'll point out that in some of the finer dining establishments it is quite possible for a waiter to make enough to pay for their own benefits and still have more left over than a teacher with a graduate degree would have. That requires a large city though--that's not the way it's going to be in a small town. It's also not the way it's going to be at the bottom of the "food chain"--which is what Applebee's is.
The thing is, almost everyone in the US has either worked in food service or had a close friend who worked in food service at some time in their life (quite often in college). There was a time I was grateful to have the job. If you're not in a large rich city, though, it's a crap way to have to make a living. That's one reason why it is often a "moonlight" job.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
I've never been waitstaff. However, merely from observation, I know this is bollocks.
The job is pure customer service.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Remind me not to eat in the sort of restaurants you evidently frequent.
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Not true. Sometimes they sneeze on it, too.
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sergius-Melli:
And there was me thinking that the fees for the occassional offices were the in-lieu of tips thing for clergy.
What fees for occasional offices? In the C of E they go straight to the diocese.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
In regards to the Pastor, she claims her comment was a lapse in judgement. So what is her method of repentance? To complain to the establishment and cause further trouble. Bitch.
Yes, I was 'impressed' by that as well.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
quote:
Originally posted by Meg the Red:
And I believe that tips are required to be declared for taxation, though I'm sure there's some "slippage".
I'm expected to declare all my tips for taxation. in reality I declare about 15% of over all sales, where my average tip income is closer to 20%.
and then there's days like yesterday where I work an 8 hour shift and walk home with ten bucks. some days, it sucks. you just never know. but if I claim less than my 15%, I'm setting myself up for an IRS audit, where I'll be forced to prove the unprovable and then be asked to pay taxes on an "average" tip rate. even if people chose not to tip, I have to claim a tip. so there are times I'm paying taxes on money that doesn't exist. as far as I'm concerned, it makes up for my under-declarations at other times.
yesterday, I claimed $45 in tips for tax purposes, though I only made $10. it's a tough time of year, people here are broke. I cut them a lot of slack.
so if you're considering not tipping as making a statement of how you disapprove of our system, remember who you're harming. and think carefully about who is hearing your statement. the government will not hear and does not care.
and yes, when the right cause comes up, and/or when we're asked, staff will have times where all tips are given to a charity in need. this is voluntary and we're happy to do it.
I will still have to declare those tips and pay the tax, and I don't get credit for the donation because the money never went through my hand.
FYI here, tips are taxed at the exact same rate as wage income.
About every second sentence of this post made me think the system is even more fucked up than I realised. Paying tax on income you didn't get because it's easier than telling the truth and going through the hoops? That is just nuts. Not you individually, the fact that the situation arises.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
<in reply to comet> Paying tax on income you didn't get because it's easier than telling the truth and going through the hoops? That is just nuts. Not you individually, the fact that the situation arises.
It's exactly the reverse of the situation that large corporations and the super-rich are in, namely not paying tax on income they do get, because the taxman makes it easy.
When you look at it like that, the impulsiveness of a waitress and a pastor looks trivial compared to that of Applebees for sacking an employee.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Yes, Applebees are the bigger bastards in this. The customer is not always correct.
Posted by nomadicgrl (# 7623) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Organ Builder:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Why do waiters get tips but not the chef? After all, he's the one who's actually done the work. All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Chefs don't get tips because they usually get a living wage--sometimes (if they are really good) a quite fantastic salary. They also (usually) have benefits.
Of course, some of them own the restaurants in which they work as well. Lest one get the idea that waiting tables is a sentence to long term poverty, I'll point out that in some of the finer dining establishments it is quite possible for a waiter to make enough to pay for their own benefits and still have more left over than a teacher with a graduate degree would have. That requires a large city though--that's not the way it's going to be in a small town. It's also not the way it's going to be at the bottom of the "food chain"--which is what Applebee's is.
The thing is, almost everyone in the US has either worked in food service or had a close friend who worked in food service at some time in their life (quite often in college). There was a time I was grateful to have the job. If you're not in a large rich city, though, it's a crap way to have to make a living. That's one reason why it is often a "moonlight" job.
Posted by nomadicgrl (# 7623) on
:
Sorry for screw up of reply there.
Was just going to say that in some family restaurants most of the cooks don't make above minimum wage (the head cook made a bit more, but not that much). I know that was the case when I worked in a family restaurant similar to Applebee's. In my province, at the time - it may have changed since, wait staff made the same minimum wage as anyone else. So most kitchen workers wanted to move to front staff for the increase in pay via tips.
That being said, I know that in many provinces and in the USA minimum is different for wait staff and even if not, it's bloody hard to make ends meet on a minimum wage. So even if it's the system that is screwed up and it SHOULD be the establishment that pays a living wage, I wouldn't feel right letting someone work for such a pittance to serve me, and if I can't afford to tip I don't eat out.
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Not true. Sometimes they sneeze on it, too.
Especially over the food of those who think all they do is carry it to the table .
Posted by Sergius-Melli (# 17462) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by Sergius-Melli:
And there was me thinking that the fees for the occassional offices were the in-lieu of tips thing for clergy.
What fees for occasional offices? In the C of E they go straight to the diocese.
After a little look, so they do!
It was one of the suggestions in the Harries Report in the CinW that the Occassional Office fees be paid to the PCC instead of the Incumbent but that has been widely resisted so I don't know at the minute. Have to wait and see whether the working group on all of this is going to go forwards with the proposals from the report...
Posted by Zacchaeus (# 14454) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Anselmina:
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Not true. Sometimes they sneeze on it, too.
Especially over the food of those who think all they do is carry it to the table .
Surely not ..
...sometimes they spit in it instead
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
On reflection, I've realised that one of the most distasteful things about the pastor's written remark is treating giving God money as equivalent.
You give God 10 per cent? How, exactly? By depositing it in His bank account?
And it's also false equivalence to say 10% without identifying 10% of what. If it's 10% of your income, then it's okay, honey, "God" is still coming out ahead of the waitress who gets 18% of the cost of one meal out. Unless your income is really small.
So yeah, not only was the remark nasty, it's only purpose was to set up a false comparison to suggest that getting more than God was wrong. And you know, actually getting more than God might well be wrong, or at least questionable, but that wasn't in fact what was being asked for. Which only makes our Pastor look worse for employing a cheap rhetorical flourish.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
On reflection, I've realised that one of the most distasteful things about the pastor's written remark is treating giving God money as equivalent.
You give God 10 per cent? How, exactly? By depositing it in His bank account?
And it's also false equivalence to say 10% without identifying 10% of what. If it's 10% of your income, then it's okay, honey, "God" is still coming out ahead of the waitress who gets 18% of the cost of one meal out. Unless your income is really small.
So yeah, not only was the remark nasty, it's only purpose was to set up a false comparison to suggest that getting more than God was wrong. And you know, actually getting more than God might well be wrong, or at least questionable, but that wasn't in fact what was being asked for. Which only makes our Pastor look worse for employing a cheap rhetorical flourish.
Are you suggesting pastors might use some kind of cheap rhetoric? Plenty of 'em major in it and I don't want to get driven into the 10% debate, because that belongs on the cheap burger board (IMHO).
Posted by Angel Wrestler (# 13673) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Re signing "pastor" instead of a proper title:
Actually, in some Christian circles, that is a proper title.
The pastor, if officially ordained, might technically be a reverend. But some people balk at the title, saying only God is to be revered. Plus "Pastor" sounds more personable. You can use it the same way someone might address a priest as "Father".
This is true. In many African American churches, the term "pastor" denotes seniority and respect.
I recall one pastor telling about going into a difficult church and how hard a time he had relating to people who were suspicious of anyone new. They respectfully called him, "Rev," (in america it's used as an honorific title, even though it's not technically proper) until he somehow cracked the elderly curmudgeon, who began to call him, "Pastor." That was the indication that he was accepted as their spiritual leader.
Still a pretty low-down thing to do. One ought not throw their title around. Period.
Posted by Angel Wrestler (# 13673) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
In regards to the Pastor, she claims her comment was a lapse in judgement. So what is her method of repentance? To complain to the establishment and cause further trouble. Bitch.
Yes, I was 'impressed' by that as well.
Exactly. How about, "I'm so sorry for my behavior. I wrote that impulsively because I do disagree with automatic gratuities, but I shouldn't have responded in that way." And then contacting the owner privately, acknowledging what she said is wrong, but expressing her displeasure with it having been made public - not getting up a lawsuit blaming Applebee's for ruining her ministry - she did that on her own!
Posted by anne (# 73) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sergius-Melli:
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by Sergius-Melli:
And there was me thinking that the fees for the occassional offices were the in-lieu of tips thing for clergy.
What fees for occasional offices? In the C of E they go straight to the diocese.
After a little look, so they do!
It was one of the suggestions in the Harries Report in the CinW that the Occassional Office fees be paid to the PCC instead of the Incumbent but that has been widely resisted so I don't know at the minute. Have to wait and see whether the working group on all of this is going to go forwards with the proposals from the report...
DBF and PCC it is! As the 2013 fees list shows, fees are now divided between the portion for the Diocesan Board of Finance and the portion retained by the PCC. A new system this year, and judging by a discussion at clergy chapter this week, there are still some gremlins to deal with - but no 'incumbent's fees' or equivalent. Which is as it should be, I think.
anne
Posted by Crœsos (# 238) on
:
Apparently an atheist has posted a counterpoint receipt from a trip to Applebee's.
Posted by Porridge (# 15405) on
:
Even better would be a petition to get the poor staffer her job back.
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Porridge:
Even better would be a petition to get the poor staffer her job back.
I read Facebook. Apparently you don't.
The restaurant chain in question has been scrambling to cover its ass in a fairly large shitstorm of negative opinion.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
The restaurant chain in question has been scrambling to cover its ass in a fairly large shitstorm of negative opinion.
And failing spectacularly.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Anselmina:
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
All the waiters do is carry it to the table.
Not true. Sometimes they sneeze on it, too.
Especially over the food of those who think all they do is carry it to the table .
Penny from "Big Bang Theory", is that you?
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Re firing the waitress:
There was a discussion on NPR today. (Don't remember which show.) One caller works in Human Resources, in a different industry.
He said that it was right to fire her, since she included identifiable info (the signature) from the receipt; without that, he said he wouldn't have fired her.
He also said that he warns his kids and everyone he knows to stay off Facebook, because it's too easy for something to go wrong and come back to bite you.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
He said that it was right to fire her, since she included identifiable info (the signature) from the receipt; without that, he said he wouldn't have fired her.
"One strike and you're out," then? No warning, no reprimand, just fire on the spot? Saying that it was right to reprimand her, or that what she did was wrong, does NOT mean it was right to fire her. (not arguing with you personally, GK)
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Re firing the waitress:
There was a discussion on NPR today. (Don't remember which show.) One caller works in Human Resources, in a different industry.
He said that it was right to fire her, since she included identifiable info (the signature) from the receipt; without that, he said he wouldn't have fired her.
In Applebee's case, they themselves posted a receipt with a name prior to the waitress having done so. Of course, that one contained a positive note.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
MT--
I think the HR guy's position was that the waitress endangered the pastor's security and identity by putting the signature on the Net. Anyone could copy and paste it, and use it for identity theft.
As I said, he wasn't against her posting the receipt (or, at least, wouldn't have fired her for it)--it was just the revealing of personal info. If there were to be identity theft, I suspect the restaurant could be in deep doo-doo.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
That doesn't answer what I said, though. I can agree that she did something wrong without agreeing that the proper course of action was to fire her. Also, what lilBuddha said.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
The restaurant chain in question has been scrambling to cover its ass in a fairly large shitstorm of negative opinion.
And failing spectacularly.
Oh WOW. A fascinating read.
I think the most bizarre bit of that is telling people again and again that the person who was fired wasn't the person who served the table. When a heck of a lot of people already know that. Thinking that this would somehow change people's opinion about the incident is just a little loopy.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Re firing the waitress:
There was a discussion on NPR today. (Don't remember which show.) One caller works in Human Resources, in a different industry.
He said that it was right to fire her, since she included identifiable info (the signature) from the receipt; without that, he said he wouldn't have fired her.
In Applebee's case, they themselves posted a receipt with a name prior to the waitress having done so. Of course, that one contained a positive note.
Yep. Nothing will kill you faster in this situation than proof of your inconsistency. You can get away with a nasty, mean decision if people can see it fits within the rules. But when you're making a nasty, mean and inconsistent decision, people just aren't going to buy it.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
The restaurant chain in question has been scrambling to cover its ass in a fairly large shitstorm of negative opinion.
And failing spectacularly.
Oh WOW. A fascinating read.
I think the most bizarre bit of that is telling people again and again that the person who was fired wasn't the person who served the table. When a heck of a lot of people already know that. Thinking that this would somehow change people's opinion about the incident is just a little loopy.
Completely insane. To take off on something Mamacita said on Facebook, it's like watching a bunch of thirteen year old girls engage in status update wars.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Re firing the waitress:
There was a discussion on NPR today. (Don't remember which show.) One caller works in Human Resources, in a different industry.
He said that it was right to fire her, since she included identifiable info (the signature) from the receipt; without that, he said he wouldn't have fired her.
In Applebee's case, they themselves posted a receipt with a name prior to the waitress having done so. Of course, that one contained a positive note.
Yep. Nothing will kill you faster in this situation than proof of your inconsistency. You can get away with a nasty, mean decision if people can see it fits within the rules. But when you're making a nasty, mean and inconsistent decision, people just aren't going to buy it.
It's one thing for head office to post a nice happy feedback note (quite possibly with permission even) and a completely different thing for a waitress to post one on her own initiative for the purpose of embarrassing a customer.
I don't think it's deserving of sacking, but I can see why they can afford to when there's such an oversupply of unskilled labour (including skilled labour who are unemployed) in the US and management needs to keep the pecking order intact. A head chef at an independently owned high-end specialty restaurant probably would have gotten away with a slap on the wrist because they would be harder to replace than a waiter at a diner only one step above McD's.
[ 05. February 2013, 08:00: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by The Man with a Stick (# 12664) on
:
Before I get too outraged about this, can somebody explain where that 18% added service charge would usually go? To the wait staff? If so, then my understanding from American friends is that 15-20% is the usual tipping rate, right? So not leaving anything extra would be OK (though you could add more if it had been really good service).
Posted by Tortuf (# 3784) on
:
Applebees could have dealt with this by throwing the particular restaurant under the bus. They did mention it was a franchisee. That means the actual owner of the restaurant had to follow rules about appearance, costs, menu, etc., but is not otherwise controlled by Applebees.
It really doesn't matter to me though. I have never seen Applebees serve anything other than dreck and will not go back to one short of having a loaded gun pointed at me.
The 18% theoretically goes to the wait staff.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
How about do the 'right thing' and legislate wages that people can live on?
Indeed. I get tired of being over a barrel to pay the restaurant owner's employees for him. We do pay at least 15% but it's always seemed archaic to me.
My first job was as a waitress (45 cents an hour) and no tips because I was new and the older waitresses sent me to the tables where they knew the customers didn't tip. For the rest of my life I worked in other customer service jobs like bank teller, made minimum wage but of course never got tips. Only a few of the customer service jobs have the expectation of tips figured in, why certain jobs like food service do, I don't really know.
I do know the low wage can be misleading in many cases. The fast food places like MacDonalds usually do pay minimum wage because tips aren't expected there -- yet I've never know a waitress who would rather quit her nice restaurant job to work fast food. My husband drove a cab in this town for years and he drove waitresses home every evening. They would sit in the back and count the hundreds of dollars they had made that day. Not one of them ever left him a tip.
I still don't envy them. I would rather have my guaranteed low income than depend on the kindness of strangers. The whole idea of tipping is gross to me. I feel patronizing when I leave a tip and would much rather pay twice as much for the food and know the wait staff had decent pay and benefits from their employer.
Posted by Augustine the Aleut (# 1472) on
:
I've always checked on local tipping practice-- one size does not fit all. In Chile, I was told that the maid gets folding money-- even the same or a larger amount of coins would be insulting. In Spain, I've had tips returned to me. A compensation specialist friend in Toronto leaves 10-15% in Canada, but 15-20% in the US-- when asked why, she said that very few US restaurants provided health insurance and, while she felt that this was irresponsible on the employer's part (as well as foolish, as lack of benefits increases turnover and seriously increases staffing and training costs), she could not honestly penalize the employee.
Posted by Augustine the Aleut (# 1472) on
:
I must remember that Add Reply does not equal a paragraph break. A few waiting friends have told me of the practice of leaving small cards with a text of scripture instead of a tip. I do not know if this practice has increased reverence for the Bible among the waiting classes, or if there have been many spontaneous conversions on this account. One Toronto friend told me that her best tips were from a small group of priests who came for lunch after their AA meeting.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
t's one thing for head office to post a nice happy feedback note (quite possibly with permission even) and a completely different thing for a waitress to post one on her own initiative for the purpose of embarrassing a customer.
Intent is irrelevant, only permission would be a factor.
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
I must remember that Add Reply does not equal a paragraph break. A few waiting friends have told me of the practice of leaving small cards with a text of scripture instead of a tip. I do not know if this practice has increased reverence for the Bible among the waiting classes, or if there have been many spontaneous conversions on this account.
Yeah, I shall hazard a guess and say the instead part will gain no good will.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RuthW:
I tip 20%. It's part of the cost of the meal or drink, and if I can't afford that, I can't afford to go out.
quote:
Originally posted by Josephine:And if you order pizza to be delivered to your home, the pizza delivery person has to pay his own car expenses. Keep that in mind when you're deciding how much to tip!
My last job (1999) was part time, lunch relief, teller in a Georgia bank. I made five dollars per hour. I had to have at least five nice business suits or dresses to start the job. My first week there the boss told us that we were to have "casual Fridays," when we would wear Atlanta Braves shirts and jeans. It cost me my first week's pay.
My point is that every job has hidden costs, whether it's the Pizza driver's car expenses or the supermarket worker's back brace.
Why is it that when I was a waitress the expected tip percentage was 10% and now Ruth is paying 20%? It can't be inflation because the rising cost of the meal itself should have taken care of that.
Basing your tip on what you perceive to be the person's need is feeding into the Republican view that we don't need welfare because charities and churches should take care of the needy. No person's livelihood should be dependent upon the whim of random customers. Comet says her customers are tipping less because "times are hard," that's horrible and illogical and oh so typical of human nature.
If our country worked harder toward equality-- things like minimum wage and free health care and reasonable university costs for everyone-- with less distraction toward certain groups that seem to tug at the heart strings then surely we would all be better off.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
If our country worked harder toward equality-- things like minimum wage and free health care and reasonable university costs for everyone
Do that first, then complain about tipping.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
It's one thing for head office to post a nice happy feedback note (quite possibly with permission even) and a completely different thing for a waitress to post one on her own initiative for the purpose of embarrassing a customer.
If the reason given for sacking her was that she violated customer privacy, then no, it's not two different things. It's the same thing. They violated a customer's privacy. They don't then get to turn around and use that as a reason to come down heavy on someone else without being decried as hypocritical and heartless. It just don't work.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
I'm violating my own rule here about posting with having read the thread fully, but time is a little short so here goes, with full apologies if it's already been answered upthread.
Is it not the case that people in the US who do tip are actually propping up an unjust system, where some people are treated unequally because of the job they do by both the Government and by employers.
What would be the result if people stopped tipping. I mean everywhere. No tipping in any restaurant or bar. A national campaign organised by some of the big unions with Hollywood endorsee's and so on.
Yes I will be the first to admit that the immediate effect would be very hard on the waiting staff, but beyond that wouldn't it result in something better and more just?
[ 05. February 2013, 14:20: Message edited by: deano ]
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Is it not the case that people in the US who do tip are actually propping up an unjust system, where some people are treated unequally because of the job they do by both the Government and by employers.
That's the way I see it but there will always be people who have a knee jerk response to those who have been stereotyped as "poor," and will bend over backward to help them while ignoring others who are equally hard up but don't fit the image. Is that impulse kindly meant? Yes, but like you, I don't think it's ultimately very helpful.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
What would be the result if people stopped tipping. I mean everywhere. No tipping in any restaurant or bar. A national campaign organised by some of the big unions with Hollywood endorsee's and so on.
An awful lot of people would be cast out of their homes and onto the street, and an awful lot of restaurants would close. This would have a ripple effect on the economy which would not be salutary, and would contribute to potential recession, which would put more people out of work.
It's a simplistic, short-sighted, unworkable, and very very very cruel idea.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
What would be the result if people stopped tipping. I mean everywhere. No tipping in any restaurant or bar. A national campaign organised by some of the big unions with Hollywood endorsee's and so on.
An awful lot of people would be cast out of their homes and onto the street, and an awful lot of restaurants would close. This would have a ripple effect on the economy which would not be salutary, and would contribute to potential recession, which would put more people out of work.
It's a simplistic, short-sighted, unworkable, and very very very cruel idea.
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
Would restaurant owners definitely choose to close down their businesses rather than changing their system?
And will customers stop buying those meals because they are being asked to pay... the same as they were before but knowing that the money is going to the higher wages?
Posted by Spiffy (# 5267) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
[ 05. February 2013, 15:57: Message edited by: Spiffy ]
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
deano, I think you'll have to face up to the fact that almost any American knows more about American labour relations than almost any Brit.
(and yes, we've all heard that you sell fancy software to Americans, but they are Americans with money not Americans with jobs paying minimum wage or below.)
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
... Americans with jobs paying minimum wage or below.)
It's the paying below minimum wage which has me baffled. The employees of similar eateries here get $10/hour, with an online seach suggesting Applebee employees get less than $4.50. Not sure how "less than minimum" ever developed. Very odd.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
... Americans with jobs paying minimum wage or below.)
It's the paying below minimum wage which has me baffled. The employees of similar eateries here get $10/hour, with an online seach suggesting Applebee employees get less than $4.50. Not sure how "less than minimum" ever developed. Very odd.
We'll have to leave explaining that to Americans, won't we?
Posted by ken (# 2460) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
Which is exactly why all employees, everywhere, in whatever business or trade or industry, should be in a union. And be prepared to strike in soilidarity with other workers. And if the local laws where you make that illegal, be prepared to break the unjust anti-union laws. If we were all in it together they could not possibly beat us.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
Which is exactly why all employees, everywhere, in whatever business or trade or industry, should be in a union. And be prepared to strike in soilidarity with other workers. And if the local laws where you make that illegal, be prepared to break the unjust anti-union laws. If we were all in it together they could not possibly beat us.
Ken you are just the best!!
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
... Americans with jobs paying minimum wage or below.)
It's the paying below minimum wage which has me baffled. The employees of similar eateries here get $10/hour, with an online seach suggesting Applebee employees get less than $4.50. Not sure how "less than minimum" ever developed. Very odd.
We'll have to leave explaining that to Americans, won't we?
And here you go. (The Google is an American, yes?)
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
Which is exactly why all employees, everywhere, in whatever business or trade or industry, should be in a union. And be prepared to strike in solidarity with other workers. And if the local laws where you make that illegal, be prepared to break the unjust anti-union laws.
Agree.
quote:
If we were all in it together they could not possibly beat us.
Which is why the powers that be will do everything they can to prevent that from happening.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
Which is exactly why all employees, everywhere, in whatever business or trade or industry, should be in a union. And be prepared to strike in soilidarity with other workers. And if the local laws where you make that illegal, be prepared to break the unjust anti-union laws. If we were all in it together they could not possibly beat us.
sounds great!
but for many of us, the daily tip money is how we eat. we can't voluntarily opt out of work or we don't eat. more importantly, our kids don't eat. I'm all for solidarity and standing up for what's right, but first I have to feed my kids. and yes, I'd cross picket lines if it was the only way to feed my kids.
Posted by ken (# 2460) on
:
Of course.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
It's one thing for head office to post a nice happy feedback note (quite possibly with permission even) and a completely different thing for a waitress to post one on her own initiative for the purpose of embarrassing a customer.
'Quite possibly' with permission. Aye there's the rub. Because the correct response, if they had customer permission, would be to point that out. Again, that would give them a basis for showing that there was a consistent policy applied.
Because if there wasn't permission, you're just back to a form of "Do As I (head office) Say, Not Do As I Do".
The other part of the problem, though, is that the initial response gave the impression that no-one in Applebee's can post customer information. Ever. In Any Circumstances. It didn't give the impression that it could only be done with permission.
So they have to back-pedal out of that overreach.
EDIT: It appears that someone attempted to do the back-pedal at around 3am, with a reference to a policy requiring written approval from the Vice President of Operations, but they buried this in an awful lot of extraneous detail that people already knew and would have been very irritated to be told again. That key point is buried about 75% through a long-winded Facebook comment, buried amongst 20,000 other Facebook comments. You think that's going to work?
If there is a policy that personal information can be revealed with the approval of specific people, then that could just about work as an explanation. But given the failure to initially say "the policy is that permission is required", Applebee's is going to have to work much, much harder to stop the fallout.
[ 06. February 2013, 00:43: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
In short, Lesson Number One is do not say "We never do X" if the correct situation is "We do X according to the following procedures". Because someone is going to call you on it, and then explaining the procedures, however reasonable they might be, becomes far harder.
Whoever wrote that first, "we never release personal information" response seriously fucked up.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
In short, Lesson Number One is do not say "We never do X" if the correct situation is "We do X according to the following procedures". Because someone is going to call you on it, and then explaining the procedures, however reasonable they might be, becomes far harder.
Whoever wrote that first, "we never release personal information" response seriously fucked up.
I expect that was stated for public consumption. To state the truth, ie, "We never release personal identification" unless a) or b) or c) or ..... r), s) or t) wouldn't convince anyone, least of all Facebookers, but that's closer to the truth.
Applebee's will continue the damage limitation and will happily sacrifice employees and franchisees to that end.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
Of course.
Oh Ken, you've let me down. Comet would be a scab, a blackleg surely!
Have some courage man and tell her what she would be if she crossed a picket line under ANY circumstances. Kids have been sacrificed to "the cause" before, why should hers be special?
Come on Ken. Grow a pair man!
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Read all about it! Lefty fails to live down to rightwinger's unflattering caricature!
In other news, Pope - does he lean towards the church of Rome? Bears and woodlands - could there be a scatalogical connection?
Posted by k-mann (# 8490) on
:
Although this pastor seems to be total prick, I must say that a 18 percent tip seems a bit high.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by k-mann:
Although this pastor seems to be total prick, I must say that a 18 percent tip seems a bit high.
I'm getting pissed off reminding people to read the rest of the fucking thread.
This incident happened in the USA. Tipping is in the range of 15-20%, so 18% is normal and tipping at that rate is no more unusual than knife, fork, plate and table.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
Read all about it! Lefty fails to live down to rightwinger's unflattering caricature!
In other news, Pope - does he lean towards the church of Rome? Bears and woodlands - could there be a scatalogical connection?
It's not a caracture though. Ask a Nottinghamshire miner what they were called by their Yorkshire colleagues when they wanted to work during the strike, in order to put food in their childrens bellies.
It really isn't a caracture is it Ken? It's what people who cross picket lines are.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Deano - I had no idea that Ken was a member of the Yorkshire NUM during the 1980s.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
deano,
Do you truly see complex, nuanced situations in such a black and white manner? oh, right, Conservative.
Karl, I told you once.
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
Perhaps the best unionization effort re: this issue would be if the so-called 'pastor' in question joined the International Clergy Assn. Maybe then she could at least afford to offer a reasonable gratuity, if not gain a theological and pastoral education.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by The Riv:
Perhaps the best unionization effort re: this issue would be if the so-called 'pastor' in question joined the International Clergy Assn. Maybe then she could at least afford to offer a reasonable gratuity, if not gain a theological and pastoral education.
All the education in the world doesn't stop people from being pricks.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
Oh, sorry. I forgot. You can't call your lefty friends scabs when they cross picket lines. Mea Culpa.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Oh, sorry. I forgot. You can't call your lefty friends scabs when they cross picket lines. Mea Culpa.
Non sequitur. Go back 5 spaces.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Oh, sorry. I forgot. You can't call your lefty friends scabs when they cross picket lines. Mea Culpa.
I thought perhaps by mentioning your mining example was far from a simple matter of strike v. not strike and then offering a flat, non-nuanced barb in your direction, it might cause you to think. To perhaps, reevaluate your view re this discussion.
Instead, I owe you an apology.
An apology for giving you far too much credit. While I believe it serves to set the bar high whilst instructing, it is unfair to place it out of any possible reach.
My mistake.
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
FYI: late night U.S. talk show host and comedian, Jay Leno, included this story in his opening monologue last night.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
To be fair, this is comedy gold. If I had a late night talk show, I would definitely hash this over in my monologue.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Oh, sorry. I forgot. You can't call your lefty friends scabs when they cross picket lines. Mea Culpa.
I thought perhaps by mentioning your mining example was far from a simple matter of strike v. not strike and then offering a flat, non-nuanced barb in your direction, it might cause you to think. To perhaps, reevaluate your view re this discussion.
Instead, I owe you an apology.
An apology for giving you far too much credit. While I believe it serves to set the bar high whilst instructing, it is unfair to place it out of any possible reach.
My mistake.
Ask the family of David Wilkie about the nuance of people who cross picket lines, and the shades of grey.
It's not red ken who comet needs to be worrying about as she crosses the line, he'll be shuffling his feet and looking at the ground embarrased, its the other strikers on the lines who she will have to watch for.
Posted by Tortuf (# 3784) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Is it not the case that people in the US who do tip are actually propping up an unjust system, where some people are treated unequally because of the job they do by both the Government and by employers.
What would be the result if people stopped tipping. I mean everywhere. No tipping in any restaurant or bar. A national campaign organised by some of the big unions with Hollywood endorsee's and so on.
Yes I will be the first to admit that the immediate effect would be very hard on the waiting staff, but beyond that wouldn't it result in something better and more just?
Interesting thought. As has been pointed out, it would cause quite a bit of suffering on the parts of the people you say you are trying to help in the short run. Whether or not it would work in the ling run is an issue that may never be resolved by evidence.
The only reason why restaurants pay wait staff so little it that they can. Federal law sets the minimum wage for workers across the country. There are exceptions for salaried people, waiters, and commissioned workers if memory serves correctly.
The problem only starts with minimum wage applying to wait staff. It might resolve problems at places like Applebees where I imagine most tips are not substantial. It would not resolve issues in higher end restaurants where tips are bigger because the price tag on food is bigger. I dare say that a wait person at a restaurant that served food at around $25 to $35 a plate would walk out if they were told they would now be receiving minimum wage and no more tips.
Raising the minimum wage for wait staff is still overall a good idea. Tips would be less and at the same time, wait staff might be more fairly compensated. Of course, the higher minimum wage would be passed on to the diners. At the same time they wouldn't feel obliged to tip as much.
Practically the only group that would lose out would be the chintzy tippers. They deserve to lose out so I have no sympathy.
How to bring about the change is not through everyone refusing to tip. Lobbying your pet congress critter is a far better way to change things.
Posted by cliffdweller (# 13338) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
quote:
Originally posted by k-mann:
Although this pastor seems to be total prick, I must say that a 18 percent tip seems a bit high.
I'm getting pissed off reminding people to read the rest of the fucking thread.
This incident happened in the USA. Tipping is in the range of 15-20%, so 18% is normal and tipping at that rate is no more unusual than knife, fork, plate and table.
Further, when restaurants add an automatic tip for large parties (as was the case here) the policy is generally printed in the menu. In small print, to be sure, but there is some notice usually, for what is a common practice this side of the pond.
Posted by malik3000 (# 11437) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
Posted by malik3000 (# 11437) on
:
This thread raises my blood pressure, angers me, and saddens me all at the same time. It's just reason number 1,000,000,001 why civilized people are disgusted with the shitbag political-economic entity that is the U S of A. And to any that want to attempt to defend the morally indefensible, i say (this being Hell) bite me.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tortuf:
The problem only starts with minimum wage applying to wait staff. It might resolve problems at places like Applebees where I imagine most tips are not substantial.
Every now and then, some bright spark decides to poll waiters and ask whether they would prefer a system of decent wages and no tips. The vast majority always prefers to stick with tips - they know they're doing much better off tips than they would on a wage alone. Yes - even waiters at places like Applebees.
So the fact is that for all their voluble complaints about being "stiffed" by customers (and I have a European colleague who was once chased down the street by a waiter for not leaving a tip, because he hadn't understood that it was normal practice in the US), waiters prefer the current system.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffy:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It wouldn't lead to an increase in meal prices to compensate and better wages provided for by those higher prices for the waiting staff then?
You are absolutely ADORABLE that you think they give a shit about anything but the almighty dollar in their pocket.
You're pretty adorable yourself if you don't see how much restaurant owners rub their hands in glee over the fact that they've figured out how to get customers like you to buy their product and pay their staff. Many a bank owner has probably cried himself to sleep because he can't get his customers to pay his tellers for them.
The buying public should be able to regulate all this themselves. If it bothers you, don't frequent restaurants that under pay their staff. Don't keep raising your tip percentage because you mistakenly believe that you're covering for inflation, the price of the meal takes care of that. When I was an 18 year-old waitress the rate was a simple ten percent. So the typical five dollar meal gave me 50 cents to supplement my 35 cent an hour wage. Now that same meal in the same restaurant would cost $50 and give me a $5 dollar tip. Yet for some reason those who are particularly worried about seeming generous when others are looking have edged that up to 20% and are giving the waitress a $10 dollar tip. That's ludicrous. Considering she may be covering four or five tables an hour, do you think she'd give this job up for a $7.50 an hour job at the supermarket?
Tortuf is right as usual. If you're worried about the wait staff at Applebees, write your congressman to demand minimum wage for everyone. In the mean time tip 10 or 15% and give the extra to the homeless guy outside.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
Why has this thread started up again after a fortnight? Has Ken decided to expand on my his friends are allowed to cross a picket line but people like me will be called names for doing so?
Nah. That can't be it.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
Nah. That can't be it.
Mainly its that Malik apparently couldn't be bothered to get his shots in in a timely fashion, and as such felt the need to resurrect a this thread to update us on his blood pressure, or some darn thing.
But I like your explanation as well.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Why has this thread started up again after a fortnight? Has Ken decided to expand on my his friends are allowed to cross a picket line but people like me will be called names for doing so?
Nah. That can't be it.
Miss having your own Hell thread much?
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyda*Rose:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Why has this thread started up again after a fortnight? Has Ken decided to expand on my his friends are allowed to cross a picket line but people like me will be called names for doing so?
Nah. That can't be it.
Miss having your own Hell thread much?
Don't worry, I've a feeling he'll soon have frequent flyer privileges down here.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Why has this thread started up again after a fortnight? Has Ken decided to expand on my his friends are allowed to cross a picket line but people like me will be called names for doing so?
Nah. That can't be it.
Hostly Notice
Whether threads live or die is not up to you, sunshine. Feel free to throw insults around here but leave hosting to the Hosts. It's one of the few compensations of the job.
Sioni Sais
Hellhost
Posted by passer (# 13329) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
Whether threads live or die is not up to you, sunshine. Feel free to throw insults around here but leave hosting to the Hosts. It's one of the few compensations of the job.
Sioni Sais
Hellhost
bad deano. know your place.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by Tortuf:
The problem only starts with minimum wage applying to wait staff. It might resolve problems at places like Applebees where I imagine most tips are not substantial.
Every now and then, some bright spark decides to poll waiters and ask whether they would prefer a system of decent wages and no tips. The vast majority always prefers to stick with tips - they know they're doing much better off tips than they would on a wage alone. Yes - even waiters at places like Applebees.
So the fact is that for all their voluble complaints about being "stiffed" by customers (and I have a European colleague who was once chased down the street by a waiter for not leaving a tip, because he hadn't understood that it was normal practice in the US), waiters prefer the current system.
yep. that's why the field has such a low turnover rate and so many people stick with it for a career.
sure, we like the cash-in-hand. but offer us a real job and chances are we're out of here.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by passer:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
Whether threads live or die is not up to you, sunshine. Feel free to throw insults around here but leave hosting to the Hosts. It's one of the few compensations of the job.
Sioni Sais
Hellhost
bad deano. know your place.
Passer! take your fucking stupidass grudge to the Styx if you must, but don't be a dick to the hosts here.
comet
Hellhost
Posted by malik3000 (# 11437) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jon in the Nati:
quote:
Nah. That can't be it.
Mainly its that Malik apparently couldn't be bothered to get his shots in in a timely fashion, and as such felt the need to resurrect a this thread to update us on his blood pressure, or some darn thing.
Such clever humor. Sorry, I just came across this thread yesterday when i posted the above posts. But re bothering, I wouldn't bother trying to mine for sympathy on this thread.
Posted by Spiffy (# 5267) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
The buying public should be able to regulate all this themselves. If it bothers you, don't frequent restaurants that under pay their staff. Don't keep raising your tip percentage because you mistakenly believe that you're covering for inflation, the price of the meal takes care of that.
you're absolutely ADORABLE that you think I don't know anything about economics despite having a degree in social science and I spend all my days working in finance and therefore understand the concept of 'inflation' and 'minimum wage not keeping up with' along with the concept of 'you can both work for justice on a macro and micro level', and therefore you think you're qualified to match your wages from the dawn of prehistory with the current economic situation.
I tip my bartenders one dollar a drink, and most places I drink at the price is $3 a pint. Because my bartenders are human beings stuck in a shite situation in a country where 16% of people under 30 are unemployed and just can't go out and get a job at a supermarket, plus they don't get anywhere near 40 hours a week of employment and don't even ask about health insurance or paid time off for illness.
The added benefit is I don't get a lager with a side of loogie. Which I am absolutely certain your piddly 10-15% is getting you with your food. But hey, some people like beets, some people like spit. I don't like neither but it's no skin off my nose what you eat.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Spiffy: Once again you've read far more into my post than was actually there. It's partly my fault, I should have drawn a line under my first paragraph and made it clear that after that I wasn't talking to you anymore.
I also should have made it clear, although I hate the bragging going on in this thread, that I myself tip 20% these days because that's become the expectation and we eat lunch out every day and are friends with our waiters. At the same time, I feel guilty for perpetuating a bad system that plays into the hands of the business owners while forcing workers to depend upon the fluctuating economy and the kindness of strangers for what should be a guaranteed living wage.
One thing I've never done is tipped out of fear of someone spitting in my food. My expectations of what other people might do is based on what I would do and I know I would never do that. YMMV
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
I also should have made it clear, although I hate the bragging going on in this thread, that I myself tip 20% these days because that's become the expectation and we eat lunch out every day and are friends with our waiters.
If they're friends, why are you tipping them?
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
friends are the second-best tippers. other servers are the best.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
If they're friends, why are you tipping them?
Because they're doing their job? I used to have a friend who owned a convenience store - neither of us expected that he would give me free groceries.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
If they're friends, why are you tipping them?
Because they're doing their job? I used to have a friend who owned a convenience store - neither of us expected that he would give me free groceries.
An admirably polite answer to a fucking stupid question.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
My expectations of what other people might do is based on what I would do and I know I would never do that. YMMV
Um, do you find that works as a way to get through the world?
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
If they're friends, why are you tipping them?
Because they're doing their job? I used to have a friend who owned a convenience store - neither of us expected that he would give me free groceries.
An admirably polite answer to a fucking stupid question.
Fair enough. I suppose the reason I asked it was as I was curious to know whether the waiters really are friends, or whether Twighlight just thinks they're her friends because they're nice to her while doing their job.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
Because they're doing their job? I used to have a friend who owned a convenience store - neither of us expected that he would give me free groceries.
Of course not, but did you pay him over the odds or did you pay the standard price that everyone else paid?
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
The point is, here tipping IS part of the price everyone pays. Everyone decent, that is, and not having been subjected to outrageously horrible service. I think the only occasions we've failed to tip are when we've been on the receiving end of blatant racism for being a mixed family.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
When I was in Germany in the 1950s, restaurants automatically added a Bedienungszuschlag (service charge) to the bill.
The difference between this and a tip was that this was not optional.
Moo
Posted by ken (# 2460) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
I think the only occasions we've failed to tip are when we've been on the receiving end of blatant racism for being a mixed family.
That's not a reason for not tipping, that's a reason for walking straight out and not coming back again. Or paying at all.
Its also possibly a reason for writing to the manager/owner/local paper/city council/whoever naming and shaming the restaurant.
And if you thought you could safely get away with it, maybe firebombing the place and buring it to the ground.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Fair enough. I suppose the reason I asked it was as I was curious to know whether the waiters really are friends, or whether Twighlight just thinks they're her friends because they're nice to her while doing their job.
As hard as it is for you to believe that I might actually have a friend, stranger things have happened. We do lunch out every day and some of the people who see us daily have begun to tell us about their own lives, their children, their car problems, etc. Other waiters we knew already, from clubs or churches.
I can tell the difference between real friendliness and "doing their job" just as easily as I can see the insult in your question. The fact is, most often, it's a case of us being nice to them while our food gets cold, so while they aren't friends in the same way as the people we've been close to since high-school they still are friends of a sort -- last month we drove one of them an hour's drive to the city to see a heart doctor. You'll notice Spighke, I keep saying "we," if you can't picture me having a friend, remember the husband is there and he's way different from me.
Posted by Jon in the Nati (# 15849) on
:
quote:
The point is, here tipping IS part of the price everyone pays.
And that is really the point, and it is also what people who understand American social convention have been saying since page 1 of this thread. Tipping, in the United States, is part of the social contract; the vast majority of the time it is simply not optional, and almost no one, regardless of socio-economic status, thinks that it is.
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on
:
Bottom line is, the "pastor" was being extremely churlish and cheap, and Applebee's deserves all the opprobrium that can be heaped on it for punishing someone who was simply calling attention to that fact.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
Bottom line is, the "pastor" was being extremely churlish and cheap, and Applebee's deserves all the opprobrium that can be heaped on it for punishing someone who was simply calling attention to that fact.
That last is tricky. In general, customers deserve privacy. In my view, publishing any details about individual customers without their permission is grounds for instant dismissal.
Even if you had to ask some famous actor to leave because he was behaving inappropriately, or whatever.
The trickiness comes in over the question of whether Pastor Alois Bell, by adding the word "Pastor" to her signature, has brought the whole thing into the public domain. I'm not certain of the answer to that one.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
I doubt the waitress who published this thought she *was* publishing the personal details of anyone. It was only because someone was able to figure out the identity.
Which is not an uncommon route these days - nothing like a bit of crowdsourcing on the internet to uncover this information. And perhaps the waitress should have thought of that. I'm just saying she probably wasn't intending to target the particular pastor, just the 'Christian' attitude.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
I think the only occasions we've failed to tip are when we've been on the receiving end of blatant racism for being a mixed family.
That's not a reason for not tipping, that's a reason for walking straight out and not coming back again. Or paying at all.
Its also possibly a reason for writing to the manager/owner/local paper/city council/whoever naming and shaming the restaurant.
And if you thought you could safely get away with it, maybe firebombing the place and buring it to the ground.
Don't tempt me!
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
I think the only occasions we've failed to tip are when we've been on the receiving end of blatant racism for being a mixed family.
That's not a reason for 1) not tipping, that's a reason for 2) walking straight out and not coming back again. 3) Or paying at all.
Its also possibly a reason for 4) writing to the manager/owner/local paper/city council/whoever naming and shaming the restaurant.
And if you thought you could safely get away with it, 5) maybe firebombing the place and buring it to the ground.
Yes, it really is a 1) reason for not tipping plus...
Yes, to 2 and 4. (Figuratively) burn their bigoted asses.
No to 3 and 5 only on the grounds that you don't need the legal trouble.
But tempting indeed.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Re racism in restaurants:
Denny's has been in the news many times for this. Mostly aimed at African Americans. Not sure of Denny's current practices.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Missed the edit window. Denny's is a chain of relatively inexpensive family-style restaurants.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Yes, Denny's was one of the two.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
In a recent family trip to the USA, there were either 6 or 8 of us together for restaurant meals. All of them added a "tip tax" (or whatever it might be rightly called) of 18%. There was no option, they just did it always.
My sister, who is the most assertive Canadian I know, was prepared to let an incident go until this occurred at the first such restaurant where she dined with us. She had reserved on-line weeks earlier via Open Table, but the restaurant told us when we arrived (a) reservations were not really taken although they had indeed accepted our's, (b) that we would not be getting the requested outdoor patio away from music and loudness which was a specific request re one of our party being hard of hearing. Notwithstanding that we had confirmation of both.
On balance, we discussed afterwards that their inclusion of the 18% probably results in their getting more forthright (angry) comments, and I thought, might have gotten some front end staff either fired or reprimanded. I'm not sure I like that outcome, particularly as we don't know the circumstances of the people who might be out of work.
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on
:
I see the issues with the restaurant but I fail to see how any of those are related to the performance of your waiter or any of the people who served you while you ate. Sounds like a bad restaurant policy for sure, but why would that make you want to stiff your server?
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I doubt the waitress who published this thought she *was* publishing the personal details of anyone. It was only because someone was able to figure out the identity.
Which is not an uncommon route these days - nothing like a bit of crowdsourcing on the internet to uncover this information. And perhaps the waitress should have thought of that. I'm just saying she probably wasn't intending to target the particular pastor, just the 'Christian' attitude.
Actually the woman's name was not blacked out or otherwise concealed from the original posting (as a note: in violation of Reddit's rules, too). Not to say that internet detectives wouldn't eventually have pieced it together had some basic precautions been followed, but it would have been harder.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
It wasn't about tipping or not. It was that the automatic adding of an 18% amount pushed my sister into confronting an issue that would not have been raised by her otherwise. The process without the automatic addition would have been a tip percent amount that reflected what the group had wanted to pay, and the incident about the reservation would not have been raised.
There seem to be 3 psychological differences with an automatic tip. First, that not paying is wrong or that not paying some conventional percentage is wrong versus that a tip percentage is the decision of the patron depending on all the factors present in the restaurant situation re food and service. Second, that because it was automatic, it may increase the probability that a patron may confront a restaurant / staff regarding the service.
If this had occurred where we live, the likelihood would have been for a 10-15% tip amount based on discussion among us, and at most a quiet comment to the waiter about about the reservation issue and staff response. There is nothing like culture I guess. A tip percent or amount is not something you "stiff" someone with here, it is a voluntary amount reflecting your appraisal of the level of service. From prior discussion, with local waiter hourly pay being 3 times or more what waiters are paid in the USA (approx $12-15/hour here), tips signify something versus apparently being an integral if unpredictable income amount there.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
You were not in your country, though, you were in theirs. It is incumbent upon guests to understand the rules of their hosts.
Advanced reservation arrangements, as mentioned, have naught to do with the servers in most cases.
Yes, the psychology of an automatic tip is different. Yes, other circumstances can affect judgement. Cannot help you there except it is not unreasonable to expect someone with a plus average IQ to work beyond reactionary pride.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
We ought to do good to others as simply as a horse runs, or a bee makes honey, or a vine bears grapes season after season without thinking of the grapes it has borne. (attrib: Marcus Aurelius)
How deliciously ironic your signature is, given your bitching about tipping.
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on
:
I don't like the automatic 18% policy either. However, assuming the service was satisfactory, it does take the bother out of calculating an appropriate tip.
Mind you, there have been times when I've been in large parties where the service was more than satisfactory, even exceptional. In those cases the 18% policy did not prevent me from tipping over and above that amount.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
I see the issues with the restaurant but I fail to see how any of those are related to the performance of your waiter or any of the people who served you while you ate. Sounds like a bad restaurant policy for sure, but why would that make you want to stiff your server?
I see what you're saying, but the language here just seems so strange. The mere idea that I have to mentally treat the restaurant and the server as separate entities is part of what makes the translation to American tipping culture so difficult. It's just weird to think that I am effectively getting 2 different bills - one for the restaurant with set prices, and one for the staff with a somewhat fluid price.
Because it seems to me that's effectively what your system is. The restaurant pays the wait staff a very small wage to be on the premises. The customers then pay those staff for their actual service.
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it. I'm used to thinking that the staff get paid a wage for their time/availability, and that if we add a bit to the bill it's a bonus for the restaurant as a whole.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
If only that were the craziest thing in the US.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Ruth's line could go in the quotes file without even knowing what particular thing she's talking about.
------------
Mousethief brought up No Prophet's Signature line:
quote:
We ought to do good to others as simply as a horse runs, or a bee makes honey, or a vine bears grapes season after season without thinking of the grapes it has borne. (attrib: Marcus Aurelius)
I used to be all for that. It fits right in with Jesus' admonition to give to whoever asks of us. Now I'm not so sure. Marcus Aurelius's phone didn't constantly ring with requests for the "Police's and Fireman's Fund," his mail box didn't overflow with requests ($150, $200, $300 check which one) for the Ocean Conservatory, Unicef, Doctors Without Borders, Friends of Animals, Ally Cat Rescue, and my personal favorite "Farm Animal Rescue," for all the mistreated chickens out there. His neighbors didn't knock on the door every single year for the Heart Fund, Red Cross and Cancer drives. His church didn't keep everyone late every week to talk about the annual Relay for Life, wells for African villages and motorcycles for preachers in Vietnam. His local news didn't have Breast Cancer Awareness month every year and his TV didn't jerk your heart strings for St Jude's hospital and Jerry's kids. His trips to the market didn't include requests for the March of Dimes and other assorted drives.
These are all good causes, even those damn chickens, but our wages are finite.
If we give to the ones who ask every year then when will the Diseases-without-TV-time ever get a penny. If we always give to that same beggar who stands at the exit ramp off Route 50, what will we have to give to the local food bank?
Charity Navigator. com plus a list of "diseases vs the amount donated," changed my mind. Now I give one large lump per year to the disease that most concerns me (and has no big annual drive) and I refuse to let the others nickle and dime me to death. Everyone in town probably thinks I'm the meanest (in both the British and American sense) person in the world but I actually give 2/12 of my annual income which isn't that bad.
Marcus and Mousethief would no doubt sneer at me for saying "No thanks" to the cashier who sweetly asks for a dollar "It's only a dollar," to help out whoever but I refuse to be bullied by those big charities that spend more money asking for money than they do helping the cause.
Our town has a multipurpose place where anyone at all can come twice a week and fill up a large garbage bag with donated clothing, toys, and household goods. Anyone and their families can eat a large cooked meal there three times a week, get their taxes done for free, and, twice a week, do their laundry for free. This is supported jointly by the local churches.
This year donations are down and cuts will have to be made. It was suggested that the laundry thing be cut down, or out, since it costs over ten thousand per year in laundromat quarters. "Not fair," shouts the woman who started and runs it, "This was put on my heart to do!" She has never contributed to it financially or made any effort to collect funds for it. So they were considering cutting the cleaning lady's hours from once a week to every other week to make up the laundry money. I mentioned that this is the cleaning woman's livelihood we're talking about. A woman who is willing to clean public toilets and a greasy industrial kitchen for her wages will be cut back in order to wash clothing for the people who wouldn't dream of washing clothes by hand and are getting free bags of slightly used, clean clothing, twice a week. That was churlish of me.
There are no answers to this. Some children might go to school in dirty clothes if this program is cut. An extra large tip for your waitress may help her raise her fatherless children. Or you can tip only 15% percent and put the difference in the jar for the sick man sitting by the register. Or give it to the homeless man down the street.
I do know that most of us don't have enough money to just continuously hand it out to the first people who ask, so thinking about it a little bit doesn't make us bad people. Meanwhile quit judging the people who aren't giving what you think they should give (or tipping what you think they should tip.) It's not your business.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I see what you're saying, but the language here just seems so strange. The mere idea that I have to mentally treat the restaurant and the server as separate entities is part of what makes the translation to American tipping culture so difficult. It's just weird to think that I am effectively getting 2 different bills - one for the restaurant with set prices, and one for the staff with a somewhat fluid price.
Because it seems to me that's effectively what your system is. The restaurant pays the wait staff a very small wage to be on the premises. The customers then pay those staff for their actual service.
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it. I'm used to thinking that the staff get paid a wage for their time/availability, and that if we add a bit to the bill it's a bonus for the restaurant as a whole.
Thank for saying this so very well. That's it exactly.
The one very clear thing that this thread has taught me is that waiters in some countries are basically on commission without normal wages, with the commission they get is sometimes decided by the customer and sometimes set by the restaurant.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
Marcus and Mousethief would no doubt sneer at me for saying "No thanks" to the cashier who sweetly asks for a dollar "It's only a dollar," to help out whoever but I refuse to be bullied by those big charities that spend more money asking for money than they do helping the cause.
Your name must be Bell+Howell because you're a good projector.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it.
So what you're saying, then, is, "Waaah! You guys don't do it the way we do!"
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
Marcus Aurelius's phone didn't constantly ring with requests. . . . I do know that most of us don't have enough money to just continuously hand it out. . . . Meanwhile quit judging the people who aren't giving what you think they should give (or tipping what you think they should tip.) It's not your business.
Perhaps not, but the waiter wasn't asking for charity. You're comparing apples to oranges.
As for your name finding its way onto the call list or mailing list of every charity in God's creation -- well, that's to be expected when mailing lists are bought and sold. What worked for me was the following canned response: "I am happy to give to your cause, but on my own schedule. If I ever receive a mailing (or call) from you again, you will never see another penny from me, ever."
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it.
So what you're saying, then, is, "Waaah! You guys don't do it the way we do!"
No we're saying that this particular custom is not immediately comprehensible.
Most the world doesn't want to do as the less than 5% of the world that the Excited States' population makes up. That would be another thread to discuss which nation whines more than another.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
I keep meaning to do this, but have never been organised enough. For similar reasons to those Twilight sets out - there is unending need and I would like to be more rational in how I use my money.
I tend to tip 10% in the UK - though I don't always tip. But that is in a situation where I know people are being paid guaranteed minimum wage. When travelling abroad I would generally take advice from a travel guide. (So I would probably default to 20% in the US because the maths is easier.)
All of which is beside the point of the OP - I object to the smartarsiness - but the server shouldn't have put it on the internet, and the restaurant should have reprimanded rather than fired the person who did put it on the internet.
I have occasionally left novels instead of money as a tip (ie have sat and eaten meal read book, and left book) - I have no idea what the wait staff thought about that.
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
I see the issues with the restaurant but I fail to see how any of those are related to the performance of your waiter or any of the people who served you while you ate. Sounds like a bad restaurant policy for sure, but why would that make you want to stiff your server?
I see what you're saying, but the language here just seems so strange. The mere idea that I have to mentally treat the restaurant and the server as separate entities is part of what makes the translation to American tipping culture so difficult. It's just weird to think that I am effectively getting 2 different bills - one for the restaurant with set prices, and one for the staff with a somewhat fluid price.
Yeah, it's a terrible system. I just wish most bad tippers were foreigners who didn't get it!
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
I have occasionally left novels instead of money as a tip (ie have sat and eaten meal read book, and left book) - I have no idea what the wait staff thought about that.
I'm afraid the natural assumption here would be that you'd left it by accident, and therefore it would end up in the lost and found spot, to be left until you called for it.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Oh I did tell them.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Well, bookworm thst I am, it might have worked for me, if we had the same tastes...
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Well if not, you could always have sold it on for an appropriate amount.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it.
So what you're saying, then, is, "Waaah! You guys don't do it the way we do!"
Oh fuck off you stupid little rodent. I wrote a post that was quite deliberately avoiding any sense of complaint or "Waaah!" in it. You want to talk about projecting?
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
There is a certain logic to that, but it's simply not the way that many of us from other countries are used to thinking about it.
So what you're saying, then, is, "Waaah! You guys don't do it the way we do!"
Oh fuck off you stupid little rodent. I wrote a post that was quite deliberately avoiding any sense of complaint or "Waaah!" in it. You want to talk about projecting?
So your point was what then? That y'all don't do it the way we do? Glad you pointed THAT out on page 5 of this thread, as nobody else has before.
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
Most the world doesn't want to do as the less than 5% of the world that the Excited States' population makes up. That would be another thread to discuss which nation whines more than another.
Are you saying you don't want to do it in your own country, or that when you come here, you don't want to do things according to the customs of our country? The former is hardly worth saying - nobody is requiring you do do it our way. The latter is selfish at very very best in this case.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Goodness me mousethief, I am so terribly sorry for engaging in conversation with Gwai in a manner not acceptable to your good self. Despite the fact that no prophet thanked me for the clarity of expression and Gwai appeared to understand what I was saying as well, I can see I didn't add anything to the conversation.
Meanwhile, everything you've said in the thread has contributed hugely to the world's understanding on the topic.
Now, would you kindly fuck off to your pedestal in the sky and leave us poor mortals to scratch around without the benefit of your incredible wisdom? Ta.
You really have been a spectacular pain in the butt in recent months. Or maybe it's not the timing, maybe it's the topic, because on several occasions your pain-in-the-buttness has been related to commentary on a topic where the way Americans do something is different to the way that people in the rest of the world/a particular other part of the world do something. Perhaps it's just that you are so relentlessly insecure in your identity that you have to go all macho and defend The American Way in as belligerent a way as possible.
[ 04. March 2013, 05:10: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
Now, boys, stop waving your peckers around.
There are ladies present.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Perhaps it's just that you are so relentlessly insecure in your identity that you have to go all macho and defend The American Way in as belligerent a way as possible.
Yeah, that must be it. Feel better now?
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
Now, boys, stop waving your peckers around.
There are ladies present.
Ladies? in Hell? On the Ship of Fools?
WOW!!
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
we're flexible in our definitions. You better believe I'm a motherfucking lady.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Ah, there you are comet. I need to borrow an electron microscope if you have one; there's supposed to be some pecker-waving going on somewhere...
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
rather cute, aren't they?
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Ladies are entirely safe from my pecker, so you needn't concern yourself with the size question.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Some epic FLP's happening right now...
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Ladies are entirely safe from my pecker, so you needn't concern yourself with the size question.
we always want what we can't have. makes you boys impossibly sexy.
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on
:
Tip that barkeep 20%, won't someone? There's a dear.
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
MORE GRIST FOR THE MILL -- A $10 TIP FOR DELIVERING 85 PIZZAS VALUED AT WELL OVER $1000! OH, THE HUMANITY!!!
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Didn't your mother teach you not to shout on the internet?
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Huge Manitee
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Karl, kindly take your penchant for wordplay out of this hellhole and put it back where it belongs. In the Circus.
Posted by The Riv (# 3553) on
:
You're right, Orfeo. Apologies. I was just excited there for a moment. I'm now back to being rather sedate.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Sorry Orfeo. Many of my colleagues believe that my penchant for wordplay belongs in Hell...
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
No, no, no, Karl. Critiques of your wordplay belong in Hell.
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0