Thread: Heaven: Books make great gifts because they have whole worlds inside of them Board: Limbo / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=001328
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
(Thread title quote from Neil Gaiman. According to the internet, so it must be right).
What are you reading in 2016?
I'm starting off (well continuing) the quest to conquer Mount TBR with Mike Ormsby's "Never Mind the Balkans, here's Romania". He's a British journalist who has lived on and off in Romania for years, is married to a Romanian, and clearly knows and loves the country. This book is a selection of short essays on aspects of life there - each one is just a couple of pages long, and kind of remind me of Radio 4's "From Our Own Correspondent" type pieces. As someone who has also lived there as a British expat I am enjoying this very much. I've also got the Romanian translation, so am reading one English then the equivalent Romanian piece which I hope will shave some of the rustiness off my language skills.
[ 21. February 2017, 19:53: Message edited by: Belisarius ]
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Book tokens make even better gifts because I can choose the world I visit and if it's from
Scorpio our local independent bookshop, it doesn't have a cut off date
I was given a $30 token for Christmas, which I have already spent several times over in my mind. I feel like I did when I was a child in the local dairy (convenience store, corner shop) with a shiny thrippenny bit, choosing between aniseed balls (7 for a penny, but not my favourite taste) and spearmint leaves (3 for a penny, and heavenly).
This year I want to keep a track of books I read and am pondering the best way to do this
Huia
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
I have book tokens too. Most exciting! I might try to find a nice small independent bookshop in London in which to spend them. Suggestions welcome!
I'm currently reading the Laidlaw trilogy by William Mcilvanney . I realised when he died that I'd never read anything by him, so I got the first Laidlaw book on my kindle.
It's wonderful stuff, really considered and well crafted writing, with some lovely bits of dead-pan Glasgow humour, and some real consideration of some big issues. It crackles with life and intelligence. I wish i had discovered his work sooner.
As well as wanting to read his entire oeuvre, I'd like to read more Scottish authors' work this year. I haven't read a lot, considering I'm Scottish, and I think I'd enjoy reading more. Again, recommendations welcome!
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I found another $15 book token which I though was past it's use by date, but isn't. Riches beyond measure!
Luvanddaises I will be watching to see any recommendations you get too.
So many books - so little time!
Huia
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage by Sydney Padua is one I read last year, and would recommend to just about anyone. It's a graphic novel (but don't let that put you off), and it's got a bit of everything. Unusual little gem, and rather lovely.
Probably my favourite book of last year was the light, funny and clever Doctor Dogbody's Leg by James Norman Hall. I read a lot of historical naval fiction, but even if you don't, it's a lovely book.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I finished 2015 with two fairly modern histories of Indian involvement in the 1939-45 and then the 1914-18 European wars so am starting 2016 with yet another reread of Kipling's Captains Courageous but I have not yet chosen its successor. As we have guests arriving on Tuesday for a three week stay probably something fairly light but will see what grabs me when the time comes.
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
As well as wanting to read his entire oeuvre, I'd like to read more Scottish authors' work this year. I haven't read a lot, considering I'm Scottish, and I think I'd enjoy reading more. Again, recommendations welcome!
Well, you did ask:
Iain Banks. O Caledonia (by Elspeth Barker, I think). Sunset Song (if you didn't do it in school). The Visitors by Simon Sylvester is recent and Scottish. I loathe Neil Gunn, but you might like it - start with The Silver Darlings. Confessions of a Justified Sinner by James Hogg. James Robertson - The Testament of Gideon Mack, and his recent one And The Land Lay Still. Denise Mina for Glasgow set crime, Ian Rankin for Edinburgh. Ali Smith for literary stuff. John Buchan, Muriel Spark, Dorothy Dunnett (if you want weighty historical saga).
I'll stop now...
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
What a lovely resolution, luvanddaisies. Glad to recommend a few. I'm sticking to ones set in Scotland, though there is a lot by Scottish authors set further afield too.
Andrew Grieg, The Return of John MacNab. Great fun, but probably best if you first read John Buchan's John MacNab.
D.K. Broster, The Flight of the Heron. For sheer, soaring, homoerotic, Jacobite romance. Unbeatable!
Catherine Carswell's The Life of Robert Burns (1930) is a classic in its own right, and well worth the read.
J.G. Lockhart, Adam Blair. Walter Scott's son-in-law tells a thoughtful tale of lust and presbyterianism!
Robert Louis Stevenson, Kidnapped. Of course.
John Prebble, Glencoe. Because you have to have a John Prebble in there, and Glencoe tells a vivid and moving tale.
My favourite Walter Scott is Old Mortality, with The Bride of Lammermoor coming a close second. No one dissects Scotland quite so brilliantly as does Scott.
Happy reading! Let us know how you get on.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
My daughter bought Vargic's Miscellany of Curious Maps for me.
I'm still working through it. It's uneven but fascinating. I think some 'shrooms and acid may have played a part.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
That sounds rather interesting, and like one of those beautiful books that are lovely just to be around too.
<scribbles down Scottish writer suggestions>
Thanks
Has anyone seen this ?
And would anyone fancy it as an on-the-ship thing? I can't imagine reading as few as twelve books in a year, so I think it should still leave me plenty of time to explore more Scottish writers too. The categories are pretty loose, so it should t be onerous, and it would be interesting to see what people choose and why they choose it - which might also generate ideas for things to read too.
If there is a bunch of people here up for it, do you think it would be worth giving it it's own thread so as not to derail this one?
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I have just been putting books back on the shelves, as completed books often end up languishing on my bedside table for a while, and I spotted my old copy of 1066 And All That - no idea what it was doing on the fiction shelves but there you are. Anyway it seems a suitably light read for the day - then I spotted it was priced at 4 shillings!
It is a fairly old Penguin edition, printed in 1970.
I am looking forward to this.
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on
:
Wodders, that is a Good Thing. I adore that book, and the Knotweed and I are word-perfect on far too much of it!
AG
Posted by Bibaculus (# 18528) on
:
Luvanddaisies - I quite like the idea of the reading challenge. It would certainly mean I would read things that I otherwise wouldn't read, and outside my normal, probably rather narrow, range of books, which would be no bad thing. I might give it a go. Thanks for the link.
Posted by Hail Mary (# 18531) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
This year I want to keep a track of books I read and am pondering the best way to do this
I'm with you on the spearmint leaves. For tracking books, LibraryThing is pretty fab, I think. https://www.librarything.com/
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Hello and welcome aboard, Hail Mary! Hope you enjoy looking around. I suggest you have a look at the board guidelines at the top of each board, as customs vary a bit depending on which board you're on.
I see you've already been over to the Welcome thread - many people here have had some varied journeys so you should fit in nicely.
Happy sailing and exploring, and just ask if you have any questions - we're happy to help.
Cheers
Ariel
Heaven Host
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I fell just short of my target last year of averaging a book a week, being as I was half way through Iris Murdoch's The Black Prince at the turn of the year, which would have been my 52nd title.
This year, I'm going for fewer books, but hoping to get through some longer works. I'm starting the year by finishing off the above, as well as making starts on Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, a complilation of essays entitled Towards a Theology of Church Growth and a nice coffee table book of maths problems from Ian Stewart, Professor Stewart's Hoard of Mathematical Treasures.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I use LibraryThing too and really like it. I only add books when I start to read them (a lot of people use it to track all the books they buy, even if they are yet to read them), but I discuss them in a couple of the discussion groups there (the software they use makes the Ship seem like the height of sophistication, but I quite like it without all the bells and whistles). One group in particular is really friendly and I enjoy interacting there, and it has really helped motivate me to tackle my mountain of unread books.
Yesterday I started, then officially abandoned, a terribly written book. "Auld Acquaintance" by Ruth Hay (the author is apparently a retired Scottish-born Canadian, who is writing and self-publishing quite prolifically, aimed primarily at a similar demographic). The gist of the story is that a 60 year old Canadian semi-retired divorced librarian unexpectedly inherits a property in rural Scotland from a relative she didn't know existed - from reviews it seems that the first half of the book consists of her bunch of friends trying to persuade her to investigate, and the second half is her in Scotland, investigating. Who is the mysterious relative? Why has she left the property to her? Will she stay in Scotland and live a new life? Unfortunately the writing is so spectacularly clunky and cliched I really didn't care. I read 2 chapters and was ready to give up, but thought maybe it was me so read another one till I knew for sure that it wasn't. My eReader showed I still had over 3 hours to go, and my heart sank, so I gave up as I just think life's too short to give 3 hours of my life that I'll never get back to a stinker of a book.
Over on Goodreads the book gets a 4.5 star average review, which amazes me (meanly, I wonder if the author got her friends to write reviews). The amazon reviews are a bit more varied - one that made me laugh said that the scene where she is exploring Glasgow read like it was being narrated by a satnav. I didn't get far enough in to know if that was true, but on the evidence of the first few chapters I can well believe it.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
luvanddaisies, that sounds like a good reading challenge although I can't imagine restricting myself to only 12 books in a year either. I have been known to read that many in a week.
I've read all my Christmas presents, except for the ones which haven't been published yet but I pre-ordered with my book tokens: another good reason for giving book tokens as it means Christmas lasts longer. Last year it went on until March, this year my Christmas will end on 5 May when the last pre-ordered book is due to be published ('Lies, Damned Lies and History' by Jodi Taylor).
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on
:
Jack the Lass observed
quote:
Over on Goodreads the book gets a 4.5 star average review, which amazes me (meanly, I wonder if the author got her friends to write reviews).
I'm always amazed at the number of four and five star reader reviews. Some people apparently don't "believe in" bad reviews, and one very prolific woman who posts on another site has apparently never read a book she doesn't like. A historical novelist who tries to squeeze in as many adverbs as she can (her Renaissance hero "smiles sneeringly" at opponents while playing football) regularly gets raves, even though her prose could be that of a fifteen-year-old in a creative writing class. I took her book back to the library (God bless all public libraries!) after reading only fifty pages.
And then there are the "Egyptophiles" ("Oh I just love anything about ancient Egypt!") who gave great reviews to the worst alleged non-fiction by a specialist I've ever seen--full of vague assumptions and outright mistakes. They go to town on any novel with an Egyptian setting, even though most such efforts aren't fit for anything but kitty litter.
When I read reviews (and I like reading reviews, even of books I'll never bother with), I prefer those written by people who actually have some qualifications.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
I always look at some of the negative reviews as well as the positive ones. You can learn a lot about a book from someone who doesn't like it - even if you end up disagreeing with their opinion.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
For anyone who read and enjoyed Catherine Fox's Acts and Omissions, which we read for Ship's book club here last year and was a wonderful discovery for me, and its sequel Unseen Things Above -- she's just started posting installments of the next book on her blog. Chapter One is up so far. She's done this with each of the previous books -- posted them a chapter at a time online. I'm looking forward to discovering the new book in this way, having read the other two as completed books.
[ 06. January 2016, 10:35: Message edited by: Trudy Scrumptious ]
Posted by Celtic Knotweed (# 13008) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage by Sydney Padua is one I read last year, and would recommend to just about anyone. It's a graphic novel (but don't let that put you off), and it's got a bit of everything. Unusual little gem, and rather lovely.
I haven't yet managed to organise myself into buying the hardcopy, but I've been reading the original webcomic since 2009 It's on my shopping list...
I tend to give a list of ISBNs to the maternal Knotweed before Christmas (with title, author, pb/hb and publishing country details as well). She then passes details round the clan, and I get books! Unfortunately I've now finished reading all the latest Vorkosigan books, so will have to wait for the next one to be in the local library system (no shelf space for it until it gets to paperback) Currently flicking through an interesting set of papers, main book title is The materiality of magic.
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on
:
Over the Christmas holidays, in between singing, cooking and partying, I read The Road to Little Dribbling by Bill Bryson, the sequel to Notes from a Small Island. While it was an enjoyable read, as D. pointed out, Mr. Bryson is becoming a little, um, curmudgeonly. Things seem to annoy him a lot, and at times he seems to be turning into Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells.
Having said that, for the most part he seems to retain his love of Britain and his wry amusement at our little eccentricities.
I've just started on The Blackhouse by Peter May; it's the first in a trilogy of detective novels set on the Isle of Lewis and so far I'm finding it quite unputdownable.
Posted by leo (# 1458) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
For anyone who read and enjoyed Catherine Fox's Acts and Omissions, which we read for Ship's book club here last year and was a wonderful discovery for me, and its sequel Unseen Things Above -- she's just started posting installments of the next book on her blog.
I was given 'Unseen Things Above' for Christmas and am currently 2/3rds of the way through it.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Piglet:
Over the Christmas holidays, in between singing, cooking and partying, I read The Road to Little Dribbling by Bill Bryson, the sequel to Notes from a Small Island. While it was an enjoyable read, as D. pointed out, Mr. Bryson is becoming a little, um, curmudgeonly. Things seem to annoy him a lot, and at times he seems to be turning into Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells.
Having said that, for the most part he seems to retain his love of Britain and his wry amusement at our little eccentricities.
Gave that to my Mum for Christmas. She's loved his other works and the cover features the Seven Sisters which is quite close to where she grew up. I'm rather indebted to him for shaking my hand in Durham cathedral when, in his role as university chancellor, he conferred my degree on me.
Odd thing was, I also gave her an NLT bible as that's the version her church uses. She said it was "the sublime and the ridiculous" though I'm not sure which was which!
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Here's another reading challenge similar to luvanddaisies from upthread. It's one book a month too with things like 'read a book by a local author' and 'read a book based on a true story'.
RE: Christmas books. I'm pacing myself with my Christmas books: volumes 2-5 of the Locke and Key graphic novels and a collection of Christmas detective stories from a friend who received the same thing from me
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Re novels with Egyptian setting:
Elizabeth Peters' mystery series about Amelia Peabody, Victorian Egyptologist, is wonderful, wildly popular, and has some wicked humor. The author is a Egyptologist, writing under a pen name. I love that she includes real people from the time. (E.g., Howard Carter, Walter Budge, etc.) I think there are probably 25 books or so in the series, by now.
The books are so popular that some libraries keep them under lock and key, because fans steal them.
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Re novels with Egyptian setting:
Elizabeth Peters' mystery series about Amelia Peabody, Victorian Egyptologist, is wonderful, wildly popular, and has some wicked humor. The author is a Egyptologist, writing under a pen name. I love that she includes real people from the time. (E.g., Howard Carter, Walter Budge, etc.) I think there are probably 25 books or so in the series, by now.
The books are so popular that some libraries keep them under lock and key, because fans steal them.
Barbara Mertz wrote as Elizabeth Peters. Her "Red Land, Black Land" was a staple of mine during my Egypt period.
And if I am not mistaken she died not long ago. Sadly missed.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Much though I liked Amelia Peabody, I also liked Elizabeth Peter's modern heroines, Vicky Bliss, the museum curator and Jacqueline Bliss, the librarian who kept getting into trouble.
She died 8 August 2013 aged 85.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I'm currently reading Em Teu Ventre ("In Your Belly") by Portuguese writer José Luís Peixoto. It is about the three children to whom Our Lady appeared in the village of Fátima in 1917.
It is very good. I like the down-to-earth feel of the book, describing the fuss in the village after the BVM appears. Quite a lot of people would prefer that she hadn't and that everything would go back to normal
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've just been reading "Feel the Fear and Do It Anyway" which I bought years ago and shelved at the time as it annoyed me. I still find it annoying. There is some good advice but the book has its share of eyebrow-raising tacit assumptions. One being the principle of taking responsibility for your own life, which is fine until you discover that illnesses are entirely your own fault. (Try telling that to a child with the flu or someone with cancer.)
Then there's the idea that as everybody is afraid of trying new experiences, you're all in the same boat, so go ahead and do it anyway. Not that that's even logical, also not everybody has the same anxiety levels, and some people eagerly anticipate new experiences. A book best read in small doses and thought over for yourself rather than followed as a guide.
I've now moved on to Evangeline Walton's "Mabinogion". I've just rediscovered it after many years. It's a fairly free, novelized version but it brings the stories to life and I got completely absorbed in it to the point where I nearly missed my stop on the train this morning, and had to take the book on the bus at lunchtime to find out what was going to happen to Pwyll next.
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Piglet:
... I've just started on The Blackhouse by Peter May; it's the first in a trilogy of detective novels set on the Isle of Lewis and so far I'm finding it quite unputdownable.
Finished the third one last night and am now suffering withdrawal symptoms ...
It's possible that the unputdownability was due to its being set on an island*, and that the main characters were a few years younger than me, so I could sort of identify with them. A jolly good read anyway.
* not the right island, but let's not split hairs
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Have just finished Love Stories for the Shy and Cynical by Robert Shearman and would heartily recommend it to lovers of the odd. Only about love if you squint at them sideways, each story has some plot weirdness treated like an everyday act and taken to it's logical conclusion. What would happen if one day Luxembourg disappeared? What would happen if your wife wanted to split up and returned your heart, freely given in your youth, back to you, still beating, in a Tupperware box?
A little arch, but well worth reading.
[ 13. January 2016, 21:56: Message edited by: ArachnidinElmet ]
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
I've just looked at the challenge luvanddaisies posted above (3Jan) and I think it looks interesting. So I'm game to have a go, if others are. Now semi-retired, I'm trying to get a bit more methodical about my (non-work) reading.
I've been picking a book per library visit off the shelves completely at random - this time it's Elizabeth Hay, 'Alone in the Classroom'. I'd never heard of her, but I'm finding it extraordinarily atmospheric.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I have just finished First Do No Harm by Henry Marsh, an eminent neurosurgeon, describing what a neurosurgeon’s life is like.
For me, the most interesting aspect revolved around some of the ethical dilemmas of neurosurgery and medicine in general, particularly around the treatment of patients with terminal illnesses.
Some readers may also enjoy his obvious contempt for NHS managers.
They are a couple of fairly graphic descriptions of cutting people’s head open but don’t be put off – I am extremely squeamish and I was ok.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I've just started Elly Griffiths' third book about Ruth Galloway, forensic archaeologist in Norfolk (and now single mother). It's called The House at Sea's End, and involves coastal erosion uncovering an old mass grave. Really, I'm reading it because I once lived in Norwich, where I was an archaeologist, so it's bringing back a lot of good memories of that time for me.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marama:
I've just looked at the challenge luvanddaisies posted above (3Jan) and I think it looks interesting. So I'm game to have a go, if others are. Now semi-retired, I'm trying to get a bit more methodical about my (non-work) reading.
I decided to do luvanddaisies' reading challenge as well - I like such schemes, as it makes me pick up books I might never have thought of otherwise. A few years ago I read through the alphabet (by authors' surnames) - the only criterion was that the book be a 'significant' book in one sense or another. It was great.
So I have made a start on luvanddaisies list, and to make things more intentional, have also decided to work through it in order. This meant that the first one had to be 'a book published this year', and as I began on 4th January, this didn't give me a lot of choice. But a hunt through Amazon yielded a sports autobiography published on Jan 1st, and so that is what I am now reading.
I have never actually read a sports autobiography before. I am now realising why.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
LeRoc: I'm currently reading Em Teu Ventre ("In Your Belly") by Portuguese writer José Luís Peixoto.
I just finished this, and liked it a lot. I think there's going to be an English translation soon.
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Cottontail:
This meant that the first one had to be 'a book published this year', and as I began on 4th January, this didn't give me a lot of choice. But a hunt through Amazon yielded a sports autobiography published on Jan 1st, and so that is what I am now reading.
I have never actually read a sports autobiography before. I am now realising why.
Pardon me while I pick my jaw off the ground. Whose autobiography? I suppose it helps you have some interest in the sport, but, for example, I love baseball but there are VERY few autobiographies (or even just biographies) of baseball players that I'd want to read. Honus Wagner, maybe.
I won't be doing the challenge. My fireplace mantel is stacked with Books-To-Read as it is, and some have been there for a lengthy time.
I meant to post this last year, but a few months ago I read In The Buddha's Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pali Canon, edited (and translated by) Bhikkhu Bodhi. After the Buddha died, his teachings were handed down by oral tradition for a time before finally being written down. Eventually, multiple different schools of Buddhism developed, springing from the original stalk. The Pali Canon is the earliest still-existing record of the original discourses of the Buddha. They reflect early Buddhism before the development of the various flavors and varieties of Buddhism.
The discourses are, however, somewhat difficult for a novice to wrestle with. This book gives selections from the discourses in carefully structured categories to give one a better appreciation of the breadth and scope of the Buddha's teaching. The teachings aren't just for the hardcore monks, but for the householder not ready for the monastic life. Each chapter begins with an introduction by Bhikkhu Bodhi to further explain the structure, which builds from obtaining welfare and happiness visible in this present life, to welfare and happiness in future lives, to the ultimate goal of non-rebirth and Nibbana/Nirvana.
The book provides a wonderful grounding in Early Buddhism using the closest that one can get to the original teachings of the Buddha. By definition, it does not touch on later developments of Buddhism or the various schools that have developed, but if one was interested in understanding the basics of Buddhism, or wanted an introduction to it, this book would make a wonderful text book. I have been trying to get my head around Buddhism for years (because its world view is so different from the one I grew up with) and this book is, by far, the best I have found.
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on
:
The reading challenge does look good. One of my few new year's resolutions is to read more books each year than the year before. Bearing in mind I'm starting from a very low base - it's really not that impressive!
Currently reading Life after Life by Kate Atkinson. I really do like Kate Atkinson books, but my goodness I wish she'd lay off the random child death a bit.
Actually, a lot of the child death isn't random in this particular book, but there's still a lot of death.
[ 17. January 2016, 19:18: Message edited by: Jemima the 9th ]
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Hedgehog:
quote:
Originally posted by Cottontail:
This meant that the first one had to be 'a book published this year', and as I began on 4th January, this didn't give me a lot of choice. But a hunt through Amazon yielded a sports autobiography published on Jan 1st, and so that is what I am now reading.
I have never actually read a sports autobiography before. I am now realising why.
Pardon me while I pick my jaw off the ground. Whose autobiography? I suppose it helps you have some interest in the sport, but, for example, I love baseball but there are VERY few autobiographies (or even just biographies) of baseball players that I'd want to read. Honus Wagner, maybe.
Is the surprise at me not having read a sports autobiography before? I'm not really a sporty type, I'm afraid. And I tend to go for prose that's a little more ... worthy ...?
It is called "Man vs Ocean", and it is the account by the British open swimmer, Adam Walker, of swimming the "Ocean's Seven" - seven great swims including the Channel, Gibraltar-Morocco, the Cook Strait, etc. I admit I have learned a lot, and it is an admirable achievement. But I won't be rushing out to read another.
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
I was more shocked that anybody would voluntarily read a sports autobiography unless they were either (a) being paid to do so, or (b) was a zealous sports fan. And from your post I suspected that you didn't fit either category.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
Yeah, you read me. But hey, I'm always open to new things.
[ 17. January 2016, 22:10: Message edited by: Cottontail ]
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
I'll admit I thought it would be easier to read a book published in 2016 rather later in the year, but I admire cottontail''s dedication in actually reading a sports autobiography!
I've started with 'a book published before you were born'(though it could fall into other categories)-Arnold Bennett''s 'An Old Wives' Tale'. I read a few 19th century classics last year, so this is a continuation. So far I'm enjoying it (and the fact that such classics are free or very cheap to download)
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I just finished Sundiver by David Brin. I was slightly disappointed, I usually love Brin, but this was just not quite. Maybe because it was one of his earliest, if not his actual first, books.
quote:
Much though I liked Amelia Peabody, I also liked Elizabeth Peter's modern heroines, Vicky Bliss, the museum curator and Jacqueline Bliss, the librarian who kept getting into trouble.
I LOVE Vicky Bliss! She is my favorite Elizabeth Peters character.
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on
:
I've now finished Entry Island, yet another book by Peter May (my sister sent it along with the Isle of Lewis trilogy to D. for his birthday).
This one is a stand-alone murder mystery, set on a tiny archipelago in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Quebec, but has links to the Western Isles in the plot.
Definitely an author I'll keep an eye open for.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marama:
I've started with 'a book published before you were born'(though it could fall into other categories)-Arnold Bennett''s 'An Old Wives' Tale'.
Are those taking the reading challenges reading books that overlap categories, or designating a separate book for each? Or am I overthinking it
I'm attempting both challenges mentioned upthread, so after my current reading I've got The House on Haunted Hill for a book made into a film, and Allen Ginsberg's Howl for a book that has been banned, although it could also cover a book published before I was born.
Posted by SusanDoris (# 12618) on
:
I have not read through this thread but wanted to say that I have just finished reading a really excellent book, A Scandalous Life' by Mary S Lovell, a biography of Lady Jane Elizabeth Digby, one of the most interesting, intelligent and influential (in Syria particularly) , most beautiful women in mid/late 19th century. Mary Lovell was the first biographer to be allowed access to the full archive of the lady. I would be most interested to know if anyone has read it?Jane Digby led the sort of life that, if you made it all up, no-one would believe it.
Posted by SusanDoris (# 12618) on
:
I have now listened through the above posts. It's always fascinating, isn't it, to hear what varied likes there are in reading. It's just about impossible to choose a book for someone else!
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I have a habit of picking up books outside the local Sallies shop. These are the ones that are put in there by the staff, with hopes someone will take them away and thus reduce the amount of unsaleable stuff that they have to pay to be taken to the dump. One such book was my reading on Christmas Day and I really enjoyed it, so I will go in and make a donation next time I'm passing*.
The latest was The Flying Squad by Edgar Wallace. I used to read my mother's EW's when I was a child so picked it up out of nostalgia - it was dreadful. I kept hoping it would get better. Obviously nostalgia isn't all it used to be
*My rule is - if I enjoyed it they get a donation, if not they don't, but it either case I dispose of the book for them so it's win/win as far as they are concerned.
Huia
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
I've just started 'How to be a Tudor' by Ruth Goodman. It very much looks at the social history of the period, my favourite historical era. Ruth was the historian and TV presenter for the 'Tudor Monastery Farm', 'Edwardian Farm' (set in a village near me), and other historical Farm series. So she is well qualified to be the author of such a book.
I like the idea of trying to get inside what it must have been like to live at the time, rather than just look at external events.
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Are those taking the reading challenges reading books that overlap categories, or designating a separate book for each? Or am I overthinking it
[/QUOTE]
I had planned to do one book for each category, so books which could fall into 2 (or more) get counted where most convenient, or needed! But I don't think there are any strict rules about it.
I have found 'The Old Wives' Tale' a revelation: it includes an extraordinary description of a birth (by a man), of the siege of Paris in 1870, and a surprising amount of dry wit
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I just bought For Whom the Bell Tolls. It's a long time since I've read Hemingway and to be honest, I don't remember which ones I've read and which ones I haven't. I'll just start reading and see if it rings a, erm … bell.
Posted by Yangtze (# 4965) on
:
I have owned a copy of For Whom The Bell Tolls since I was a teenager and yet still never read it. Look forward to hearing how you get on with it - if you report favourably maybe I'll actually break my copy open.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
I read For Whom the Bells Toll on my A-Z book project! I can't say I enjoyed it exactly - it is very distressing in places - but it has one of the best endings in all literature. Sheer perfection.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
My Mum and I were discussing this list that has been doing the rounds this week, of the top 25 19th Century Book that people wanted to read but hadn't. Between us we have read 24. By that I mean that Mum has read 23 of them, and I've read 1 and two halves.
I may try and add a couple to my own list year just to balance things out a little.
[ 23. January 2016, 23:09: Message edited by: ArachnidinElmet ]
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
Just finished Baroness Orczy's Unto Caesar. It is one of her lesser efforts, set during the Rome of Emperor Caligula. The plot is thin, with practically zero twists. It is padded out to make a novel by excessive amounts of description. One of the big set pieces is at the Circus Maximus and so one would expect a certain amount of description of the Circus. But when she uses an entire chapter to do nothing but describe various aspects of the Circus without moving the plot forward even a little, I beginning to sense padding. Add to that her usual tendency to have the characters review, in their thoughts, the prior action in the novel (multiple times), you end up with a fairly tedious read.
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
ArachnidinElmet said: quote:
My Mum and I were discussing this list that has been doing the rounds this week, of the top 25 19th Century Book that people wanted to read but hadn't.
I've read fifteen of that list, and am re-reading War and Peace again now. Most of them I read when I was a swotty teenager. There are a couple of others such as Middlemarch and Moby Dick that I've tried and never got into. I'm also not a big Dickens fan, so haven't read many on that list, but as I'm enjoying Dickensian at the moment I feel I probably ought to read a few more.
I wonder why the Bronte sisters aren't mentioned, but If we're going for great 19th Century novels people should read I'd put most of Elizabeth Gaskell on there too.
[ 24. January 2016, 07:53: Message edited by: Sarasa ]
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
I found that list a bit odd too - lots of omissions, one of the obvious ones being the Brontes. And equally odd inclusions - why Little Women?
I've read 8 of the list, including War and Peace which I read as a teenager, and (deliberately) heard another 8 serialised (including most of the Dickens, although I've read Oliver Twist). I heard parts of an additional 4 books there.
I haven't read Tess of the d'Urbevilles although that's one of the partial serialisations I've heard, but Far from the Madding Crowd was one of the GCSE set books, which I suspect has put me off Hardy unnecessarily. The other GCSE books were iirc Lord Jim and Heart of Darkness which have completely put me off Conrad. I am entirely certain it was Heart of Darkness, as Kurtz was such a brutal character. I've blotted out the other Conrad novel we had to read, but the plot of Lord Jim was more familiar than Nostromo.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've read 16 of those and apart from the Dickens books and possibly "The Woman in White" there's nothing there I'd fancy re-reading.
These lists always contain heavyweight but worthy items that you read at school or out of a sense of duty and which are rarely actually enjoyable books that you'd want to keep and re-read. If we're talking 19th century fiction, bring on Marie Corelli, H.G. Wells, Algernon Blackwood, Conan Doyle, and more of Wilkie Collins.
I'm currently looking through a book of street photographs of old London taken in the 1890s. I've had it for a while and have always wondered about the nameless people who appear so clearly in those snapshots: what their stories were, and what happened to them. It's a fair bet that many of the youngest ones, the small boys who appear fascinated by the unusual sight of a photographer with a box on legs, went on to experience fighting in WWI, but other than that, what a time to be alive, with all the changes in society and the technological developments coming in.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Yangtze: I have owned a copy of For Whom The Bell Tolls since I was a teenager and yet still never read it. Look forward to hearing how you get on with it - if you report favourably maybe I'll actually break my copy open.
Okay but it may take a while. I'm a slow reader (don't have much time).
I think I've read eight books of the list.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
I've read 19 of them, and half-read 2! And actually, far from them being 'worthy', I've loved every one of the 19. Not so much Moby Dick, and David Copperfield - they are half-read for a reason!
Though the other book challenge includes 'a book you have started but not finished'. Maybe I should have another go at one of these.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I've read 7 of them on that list (and, unlike Cottontail, loved David Copperfield and have reread it several times - it's by far my favourite Dickens) and started one other (The Woman in White) but not got very far. I have 6 others of them on my TBR pile (7 if you include The Woman in White, which in all honesty I should - I haven't read enough of it to claim anything much about it other than ownership!).
I finally read War & Peace last year and am surprised at how long the smugness about that is persisting (I mention it at every opportunity! ).
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I have read 21 of them, but confess that I cannot recall what some of them were like.
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
I think I've read eight, but I can't remember which Dickens I've read, and which I've seen on film.
Tess was a set text at school, and I hated it. The only interesting thing about it was the Thomas Hardy quote that Tess could not be set in Aberdeen, because of Aberdeen's more ...ahem... relaxed moral code. (I'm paraphrasing, I can't remember exactly what Hardy said about Tess and Aberdeen, but that's the jist of it.)
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
Ariel: quote:
If we're talking 19th century fiction, bring on Marie Corelli, H.G. Wells, Algernon Blackwood, Conan Doyle, and more of Wilkie Collins.
...Sir Walter Scott (the novels were all published in the 19th century), Mrs Gaskell, Robert Louis Stevenson...
*Some* of us have read Madame Bovary in the original language. It was pretty dull in French, too.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Jane R: *Some* of us have read Madame Bovary in the original language. It was pretty dull in French, too.
Yeah, me too.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
Some of the books on that list, there’s a good reason why people don’t get through them. Madame Bovary is the single most tedious waste of my time I have ever ploughed my way through for the sake of my education. NOTHING happens. For five-hundred extremely long pages. I hated Moby Dick for much the same reason.
I also very much disliked Heart of Darkness. “Bloody racist” is right (with thanks to Chinua Achebe).
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I liked the descriptions of whaling in Moby Dick. But don't expect a lot in terms of plot.
(I admit to having read the book because Jean-Luc Picard likes it )
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Moby Dick is basically a collection of essays on topics related to whaling (the sea, ships, the whiteness of the whale, etc.) held together by a thin strand of narrative. IMHO it's a bathroom book.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Tess was a set text at school, and I hated it. The only interesting thing about it was the Thomas Hardy quote that Tess could not be set in Aberdeen, because of Aberdeen's more ...ahem... relaxed moral code. (I'm paraphrasing, I can't remember exactly what Hardy said about Tess and Aberdeen, but that's the jist of it.)
Here lie the bones of Elizabeth Charlotte
Born a virgin, died a harlot.
She was aye a virgin at seventeen
A remarkable thing for Aberdeen
Las Vegas of its day, obviously.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I am currently reading a new debut novel, Joanna Cannon's The Trouble with Goats and Sheep. It's set in an ordinary avenue in an ordinary town in the East Midlands in the summer of 1976 (heatwave year), and two 10 year old girls are trying to figure out what has happened to a woman who lived on the avenue who recently disappeared. Along the way we get to see all the residents of the avenue and uncover the hidden secrets of what happened both in their lives and on the street a few years earlier. It's described as part coming-of-age, part whodunnit. So far I absolutely love it (I'm about a third of the way through), her writing is beautifully light-touch and readable, and she drops her clues about the characters really subtlely but without giving away at all what has actually happened. I am picturing my own East Midlands avenue in 1976, and the other people who lived there, while I'm reading it (I was a few years younger than Grace and Tilly in 1976) - I love all the period details, and she also throws in enough East Midlands expressions to make it completely plausible that it's my childhood avenue and town she was writing about. Highly recommended.
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
Jack the Lass said:
quote:
I am currently reading a new debut novel, Joanna Cannon's The Trouble with Goats and Sheep.
Your description has convinced me to buy this for my Kindle. i too lived in the East Midlands during that summer, though I was a few years older than the girls in the story.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I hope you enjoy it. I should add there is one particular plot device which I don't think is quite working, yet, but it's not enough to sabotage the overall enjoyment!
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
I usually have several books on the go, at least one of them being a re-read. The current re-read is "The White Witch" by Elizabeth Gouge. I'm also reading "Scripture as Spirituality" by Richard Rohr and progress with that is slow because I have to keep stopping and let my mind and theology be blown (in a good way). A book I keep meaning to read is David Nicholls' "One Day." Apparently it was one of the last books my brother read and enjoyed before he died in 2011 and it's his copy that I have. I've tried before and haven't been able to get into it; part of the problem is that it's written in the present tense and I always find that hard work.
I can see lots of other books I want to read from this thread too. As if I didn't always have a long list of Books In Waiting.
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Piglet:
quote:
Originally posted by Piglet:
... I've just started on The Blackhouse by Peter May; it's the first in a trilogy of detective novels set on the Isle of Lewis and so far I'm finding it quite unputdownable.
Finished the third one last night and am now suffering withdrawal symptoms ...
It's possible that the unputdownability was due to its being set on an island*, and that the main characters were a few years younger than me, so I could sort of identify with them. A jolly good read anyway.
* not the right island, but let's not split hairs
I've just finished his "Coffin Road" also set in the Western Isles. A couple of characters from the trilogy reappear in it. I had 20 minutes to read the final two chapters over breakfast this morning, before heading off to church. I was so gripped that I forgot how to eat and breathe simultaneously. Long story short, the North East Man had to use the Heimlich manoeuvre and we didn't make it to church.
I recommend that you ease your withdrawal symptoms by reading it, but don't try to eat breakfast at the same time.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
After seeing multiple recommendations from people on this very thread (or its predecessors) over the last couple of years, I finally started the Lymond Chronicles by Dorothy Dunnett. It took me about the first third of the first book to get into the story -- there are so many characters and so much politics to keep track of, and her writing style is so flowery and discursive I often found myself going back and re-reading a scene to figure out what had actually just happened. But once I got hooked, I was solidly hooked. About halfway through the second book now and very glad there are four more to go.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Cottontail:
My favourite Walter Scott is Old Mortality, with The Bride of Lammermoor coming a close second. No one dissects Scotland quite so brilliantly as does Scott.
I will own up to having read all Sir Walter's novels. I don't recommend anything later than Ivanhoe other than Redgauntlet.
I'd put The Heart of Midlothian top, with the two Cottontail mentions close after.
The novella The Highland Widow is the only work in which we hear directly of the effects on the Highlands of the post Culloden oppression and very powerful it is too.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
The Lymond books are the greatest. Utterly addictive.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I just finished the latest Lois McMaster Bujold novel, Gentleman Jole and the Red Queen.
All her books are excellent but I have to admit to a few issues with this one. Still I recommend it to anyone looking for a good science fiction romance type of novel.
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on
:
Just finished Fathomless Riches by The Revd Richard Coles. I really enjoyed it - loved the tales of sex, drugs and rock n roll earlier in the book, and I found the telling of his conversion quite moving. I think it's also a bit of a love song to the CofE, and a good thing for that too.
Now on to English Passengers, by Matthew Kneale. Recommended on Radio 4's "A Good Read" recently, which is always a good thing in my book. Set in the 1850s, and one of our chief protagonists (a clergyman) is off to prove the writings of his recently published pamphlet "A proof against the atheisms of geology" by chartering a boat and sailing to Tasmania, where the Garden of Eden was. Obviously.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I am envious, Nicholemr! Have not yet got a copy myself yet.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
Brenda C, I pre-ordered it from Barnes and Noble and had it delivered. Got it this past Monday, started reading it immediatly.
Posted by Arabella Purity Winterbottom (# 3434) on
:
Its very different from the others, and it feels as though it might be the last Vorkosigan novel. I think she was going for inner dramas rather than the fast paced action. Still not sure what I think, but I enjoyed it.
For myself, I want to read more about Scottish history. Northern Quine suggested some that I devoured last year. I would like to read more social history rather than the overall sweep of events. Interesting that Aberdeen has been mentioned, because that's one of the places I'm interested in, particularly Peterhead. Any suggestions?
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Thank you to whoever first mentioned The Rivers of London series of books on here, I have read and re-read them with enjoyment. I was delighted than the Hanging Tree which will be the 6th in the series is to be published in June. I am 12th on the Christchurch Public Libraries list of people to reserve this book, but that's only because the Library staff member refused my bribe to delete everyone else from the list (Actually they will probably buy more copies than that so I shouldn't have to wait long after it's been processed ).
Has anyone else read Susan Hill's latest Simon Serrailler book The Soul of Discretion ? I have just finished it. Simon goes undercover in a penal therapeutic community for paedophiles. There is also the rape of an adult woman by a respectable character that mirrors some of the issues in dealing with the paedophile ring. It wasn't an easy book for me to read.
Huia
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Has anyone else read Susan Hill's latest Simon Serrailler book The Soul of Discretion ? I have just finished it. Simon goes undercover in a penal therapeutic community for paedophiles. There is also the rape of an adult woman by a respectable character that mirrors some of the issues in dealing with the paedophile ring. It wasn't an easy book for me to read.
Yes, I just finished it myself. It was a traumatic book in many ways - especially the ending. I like this series and this detective, although sometimes the upper middle class angst can get a little wearing. This one may be her best yet, I think. But yes, very disturbing.
Continuing the Book Challenge, the task this month was "A book you can read in a day". I had a day off yesterday, and spent almost the entirety of it reading Dorothy L. Sayers, "Whose Body?" It was my first encounter with Lord Peter Wimsey, with whom I was assured I would fall in love. Well, maybe a little, but I find myself rather more attracted to Parker ...
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
Slowly making my way through For Whom the Bell Tolls. I find it interesting, although rather militaristic. Currently at page 148. I don't have a lot of time to read, and my tendency to fall asleep after three pages doesn't help either
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
Just finished reading the last book in Jim C. Hines' Ex Libris series. The first in the series is called Libriomancer. The hero is a librarian and an expert in libriomancy (magic using books) with a magic fire spider as a sidekick. It's great. Similar idea to Jasper Fforde's book-jumping, but instead of real characters going into books, the characters in these stories can pull objects out of books into the(ir) real world.
[ 18. February 2016, 10:57: Message edited by: Jane R ]
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Just read in slightly over a day (well, bedtime Monday night to a very late bedtime Tuesday night) the latest release by one of my favourite authors, Joshilyn Jackson (we read her Gods in Alabama as Ship's Book Club selection here some years ago). This one is called The Opposite of Everyone and I loved it and may have cried a bit at the end.
This is a break in the midst of the Lymond chronicles. I think I need Lymond therapy, or at least a dedicated Lymond discussion board, to process this series.
[ 18. February 2016, 12:56: Message edited by: Trudy Scrumptious ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There is an entire and active Lymond fandom out in the internet, which you could look into. It is not quite as bad as LOTR fandom, but very nearly. (Why some enterprising TV exec has not made these into a series is mysterious to me; there's gold in them thar hills, boys. Also Georgette Heyer, whose novels seem ordained by a provident God for endless BBC serialization. They wouldn't even need to buy new wardrobe, just recycle all the high-waisted gowns from the Austen shows.)
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
There's a great Lymond discussion board as a subset of an Outlander discussion board, which I have been reading. For Queen's Play they had a chapter-by-chapter discussion from last year, but the book I just finished reading, Disorderly Knights, they're only just starting a chapter-a-week read-through now. Since I was exercising extreme self-control to make the whole book last me a week, a chapter-a-week discussion isn't much use to me while it's ongoing. I love reading discussions of things I've already read and seeing other people's insights and explanations to help me understand and process things, especially with these books which are so dense and packed with information.
I have mixed feelings about how these would be as a TV series. I mean it would be wonderful to see them done with good writers and actors, of course, but TV series are so good at messing up great books if they're badly done. Or even if they're oversimplified, which would be a real problem here as the books are so complex.
At the same time, they're so full of action and swashbuckling that they would make great TV, even if some of the subtlety of character development was lost. I don't think they could actually use the Jane Austen period drama costumes as there's nearly a 300-year gap between the eras, but I'm sure the BBC costume department has stuff lying around that would work well for mid-1500s Scotland (and the various other countries where the action takes place).
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
LOL, just reread your post, Brenda, and realized that the comment about reusing Austen costumes was in reference to Georgette Heyer books not to the Lymond books ... that makes a lot more sense!! Disadvantages of skimming someone's post quickly.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There was a year when there were two separate British movies about Scotland. (One was with Mel Gibson and then there was a second.) So I know they've got masses of kilts and costuming lying around.
The presence of an active fandom helps to keep these people on the straight and narrow -- the Outlander fan community is a prime example. The TV people know that they need to keep the rabid fans happy, and that if they do the pickings will be good. I haven't read the books nor seen the shows, but am tell that the Outlander show is very true to the written works.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
Good grief Brenda, are you talking about Braveheart?! Braveheart isn't a British film and bears only a passing resemblance to the life of William Wallace. It ignores the cultural differences between Lowland Scots and Highlanders, contains a number of historical inaccuracies and is about events that took place in the 14th century, so even if the costumes were accurate they wouldn't be much use for filming a drama set in the 16th century.
Having said that, the BBC have done several TV series about the 16th century, most recently 'The Tudors'. They could certainly recycle those costumes. Only Highlanders would have worn kilts/plaids in the 16th century; courtiers and Lowland Scots would have worn clothes similar to what the English were wearing at the time.
[ 18. February 2016, 14:59: Message edited by: Jane R ]
Posted by Helen-Eva (# 15025) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
quote:
Jane R: *Some* of us have read Madame Bovary in the original language. It was pretty dull in French, too.
Yeah, me too.
Bless you for saying that! I read it in English and though "meh - maybe it's better in the original" so I read it in French and though "meh" so I gave up. I thought it was because I'm a philistine.
I'm trying to do better with French literature - I was given the nice new deluxe edition of Les Miserables [in English] for Christmas and I'm more than half way through. The story's great but I could stand a little less historical rumination around the edges. Something to which Tolstoy is also prone of course. Maybe something about the Napoleonic Wars brought it out in people.
I've read 22 of the 25 - Les Miserables being one of the three missing. The others are a Tale of Two Cities and Tess both of which I suppose I've always avoided because I know roughly what happens at the end...
[Edited as I noticed another book on the List I hadn't read.]
[ 18. February 2016, 15:22: Message edited by: Helen-Eva ]
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
LOL, just reread your post, Brenda, and realized that the comment about reusing Austen costumes was in reference to Georgette Heyer books not to the Lymond books ... that makes a lot more sense!! Disadvantages of skimming someone's post quickly.
I Googled as a sanity check as I didn't think I'd ever seen a film adaption of Heyer's books. Turns out I was right, there have only been two film adaptions. Despite much lobbying over the years.
I was surprised ...
Tubbs
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I can guess why -- the Heyer estate is being chary of permission. Possibly this was mandated by Heyer herself, in her will or in her instructions to her literary executor. But works do not stay in the estate's purview forever. At some point they'll be public domain. And the TV series will coin money.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
At the same time, they're so full of action and swashbuckling that they would make great TV, even if some of the subtlety of character development was lost.
Yes - they're very visual books. It would be essential to find the right leading actors, though.
You can guess what would happen. Lymond would be played by someone with red hair and Philippa would be a feisty action heroine with some extra fight scenes thrown in just for her, in between her ongoing flirtation with Jerott.
Posted by Aravis (# 13824) on
:
I've just checked the list and have read 16 of them. Also there are two I started but didn't finish (Madame Bovary and Moby Dick).
I'm puzzled as well by the inclusion of Little Women. It's a book I'm very attached to, but why is it on the list of books people intend to read but haven't managed to do so? It's easy to get into, and readily available in charity shops, cheap classic editions and via Kindle or IPad (free).
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Aravis I re-read Little Women recently after a gap of 45+ years and I almost didn't finish it because it bored the socks off me. I added it to my kindles and it was probably worth what I paid for it.
Apologies if this is someone's childhood favourite - I also read one of my childhood favourites and I was appalled (it was much worse).
Huia
[ 19. February 2016, 01:59: Message edited by: Huia ]
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
Oh yes, it's very dangerous to do that. In a charity shop a couple of years ago, I found a novel based John of Gaunt's mistress, then wife, Katherine Swynford, which I adored about 40 years ago. I bought it, read it, hated it! Another fond memory bit the dust
Posted by Helen-Eva (# 15025) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doone:
Oh yes, it's very dangerous to do that. In a charity shop a couple of years ago, I found a novel based John of Gaunt's mistress, then wife, Katherine Swynford, which I adored about 40 years ago. I bought it, read it, hated it! Another fond memory bit the dust
I know someone who read history at Uni because she read that book and fell in love with John of Gaunt!
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Helen-Eva:
quote:
Originally posted by Doone:
Oh yes, it's very dangerous to do that. In a charity shop a couple of years ago, I found a novel based John of Gaunt's mistress, then wife, Katherine Swynford, which I adored about 40 years ago. I bought it, read it, hated it! Another fond memory bit the dust
I know someone who read history at Uni because she read that book and fell in love with John of Gaunt!
She sounds like a gal after my own heart! When I'm down or life sucks I lose myself in history
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I was similar with Jamaica Inn. Loved it first time, but when I re-read it 10 years later I was rather underwhelmed.
I'm now wondering if I can ever re-read other books I've loved lest the same thing happen.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Author Jo Walton created a term for this. It is the Suck Fairy. "What happened to Little Women? It was so great when I was eleven! But in the intervening thirty years the Suck Fairy got to it."
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Author Jo Walton created a term for this. It is the Suck Fairy. "What happened to Little Women? It was so great when I was eleven! But in the intervening thirty years the Suck Fairy got to it."
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Most of the books I loved when I was younger have stood the test of time for me when I go back and reread them.
One I read over and over when I was in my early 20s that I have never gone back to reread in the last 25 years is Sheldon Vanauken's A Severe Mercy, which was quite popular in some Christian circles when it came out because of the author's friendship with C.S. Lewis. Did anyone else here read it? When I was young I thought it was an incredibly moving memoir about a beautiful and tragically doomed love story, but as I think back on it from the perspective of adulthood I think of it as being about a pretty dysfunctional relationship, actually. I think if I did go back to that the Suck Fairy would have gotten there first.
Little Women is timeless for me because even though I read it as a kid, the only two things that bothered me then still bother me now and otherwise I love everything about it. Those two things being, obviously, the deep narrative wrongness of pairing Laurie up with Amy instead of Jo, and the passivity of the entire family in sitting around watching Beth die without appearing to attempt any medical intervention whatsoever.
I guess those are spoilers but I think I am safe in assuming that book has passed the sell-by date for spoilers.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doone:
Oh yes, it's very dangerous to do that. In a charity shop a couple of years ago, I found a novel based John of Gaunt's mistress, then wife, Katherine Swynford, which I adored about 40 years ago. I bought it, read it, hated it! Another fond memory bit the dust
I still love this book. There is one place where it jars for me though, when Geoffrey Chaucer looks at Katherine and is sure that Neptune must be prominent in her astrological birthchart. Neptune wasn't discovered until 1846.
One book that I've revisited which I loved at the time in my 20s and found very refreshing on the first read was George Macdonald's "Phantastes". I re-read it recently and thought what a load of old twaddle it was, and unbearably twee with it.
I've now finished reading "Half of a Yellow Sun" by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. It was certainly interesting but felt quite contemporary (it was set in postcolonial Nigeria in the 1960s), and went on far too long. The Biafran War is obviously a subject the author feels passionately about but the book seemed to meander and by two-thirds of the way through I just wanted the novel to end so I could read something else. (Of course I could have but someone had lent it to me and I felt obliged to finish it.)
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I too found the eventual union of Laurie and Amy to be totally unreasonable. And I found Prof. Bhaer unconvincing as well. However, I am in a position to do something about it. I wrote a short story in which I entirely repaired the motivations between Laurie and Amy.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
After I finished Gentleman Jole and the Red Queen I went on to a reread (after many years) of Emma Bull's The War for the Oaks. I am happy to sy the Suck fairy did not intrude and it was just as good as I remembered. So I decided to read some of her other works, which i had never done. I started with her second book, Falcon. Sadly I am not in love with it. It's good enough that I want to finish it, but not great.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Alas, there are books that there is a time in your life to read. If you fail to read them at the perfect age, it is a lesser experience to come upon them in age. Consider comic books, or horse novels, or sword-and-sorcery epics. There is a perfect age (young) to read these. If you pick up Misty of Chincoteague or Iron Man for the first time in your fifties, you may well fail to be enchanted.
What makes a book a classic is if it speaks to all ages, all genders. Hamlet says something different to you when you read it at 20 than it does when you reread it at 40.
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
One I read over and over when I was in my early 20s that I have never gone back to reread in the last 25 years is Sheldon Vanauken's A Severe Mercy, which was quite popular in some Christian circles when it came out because of the author's friendship with C.S. Lewis. Did anyone else here read it? When I was young I thought it was an incredibly moving memoir about a beautiful and tragically doomed love story, but as I think back on it from the perspective of adulthood I think of it as being about a pretty dysfunctional relationship, actually. I think if I did go back to that the Suck Fairy would have gotten there first.
Yes, I read that more than once - also its sequel "Under The Mercy" which wasn't as memorable. My memories of it are much the same as yours and I completely see what you mean about it actually being a dysfunctional relationship - certainly immensely claustrophobic and introverted. Did the author marry again, do you know?
As a young and ardent convert back in the 80s I was much impressed by "Where Eagles Soar" by Jamie Buckingham (author also of "Risky Living"). I still have my copy but don't think I could bring myself to reread it. I remember one particular passage where he talks about taking a belt to his son and getting into bed with his teenage daughter. All in the context of an incident of sibling teasing and subsequent father-daughter reassurance, but even so - yikes!
I guess I'm just gullible - I completely bought into the Laurie/Amy pairing and while I always identified with Jo I was entranced by the account of Amy "prinking" herself for the dance with Laurie, tying up her golden curls and draping herself in white muslin. I was convinced by the idea that Jo needed a man rather than an immature boy. And I just blubbered over Beth... was a doctor really not mentioned at all?
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
If Beth had tuberculosis there wouldn't have been much point in summoning a doctor as there were no effective treatments for it in the 19th century. No antibiotics, no vaccines, no CAT scans...
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
Didn't Beth have heart problems as a result of rhumatic fever as a child? Not that anything could have been done about that either...
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I don't think Beth has tuberculosis. I had a vague impression that whatever she had was a long-term complication of the scarlet fever she suffered as a young girl (I was thinking of heart trouble, but it's rheumatic fever, isn't it, that can leave you with a weakened heart?). Tuberculosis is the great literary killer of nineteenth-century heroines, but I don't recall Beth coughing into blood-stained hankies much, though I could have forgotten that. It just seems strange to me that when the topic of Beth's illness is introduced in the second part of the book, when she's in her late teens, there's never a single mention (as their was with her earlier illness) or her seeing a doctor, or any sort of treatment, or even being told there's no hope of treatment. There's no specific diagnosis and everyone just seems to accept that she's dying. Even for the 1860s that seems a little cold for a girl of 19 or so.
Beth dies of a terminal case of Authorial Intent.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Cross-posted with nicolemrw ... maybe it was rheumatic fever she had. I thought it was scarlet fever. Nice assortment of fevers to choose from in the good old days.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
unfortunately rheumatic fever is still very much with us, and here seems to be a disease of the poor exacerbated by crowded living conditions.
I am tempted to go into a political rant here, but it's heaven, so will spare us all.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Cross-posted with nicolemrw ... maybe it was rheumatic fever she had. I thought it was scarlet fever. Nice assortment of fevers to choose from in the good old days.
AIUI both are caused by strep...I think.
Moo
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Beth died of complications following scarlet fever, the story is apparently based on Louisa May Alcott's sister.
I always thought Jo was so devastated by Beth's death that she couldn't take the luxurious life offered to her by Laurie, and her marriage to Professor Bhaer was continuing self-flagellation for her failure to take her share of nursing the Hummel's child, because she was writing. Whereas Amy, as both youngest and least affected psychologically by a requirement to be responsible, gladly took the proffered life-style.
I've never been sure it did Laurie much good though.
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
Is that when Beth becomes a zombie? Or am I confusing this with Pride & Prejudice?
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
Beth died of complications following scarlet fever, the story is apparently based on Louisa May Alcott's sister.
That link doesn't actually give much in the way of a plausible diagnosis -- just says that she never fully recovered and that she got weaker and weaker until she died. Is that something that would actually happen, five or six years after having had scarlet fever? What would the actual cause of death be?
[ 19. February 2016, 23:37: Message edited by: Trudy Scrumptious ]
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Heart failure of some sort, if I remember correctly. My mother was worried about it with me (but then, she always worries ).
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
This blogger discusses the two issues much more cogently IMO.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
This blogger discusses the two issues much more cogently IMO.
Thanks ... that's my blog.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Goodness! I had not noticed! I should send you a copy of the story I have written, repairing the Amy-Laurie relationship. It has been in a couple of e-anthologies here and there.
Posted by Aravis (# 13824) on
:
Personally I don't have a problem with the plot lines in Little Women.
Scarlet fever often had fatal consequences. It's still dangerous now (i.e. can have long term effects on health) if it isn't spotted and you don't have antibiotics within approximately a week, though fortunately only a certain percentage of the population is susceptible, as far as I recall.
Beth wasn't sent to school, but I don't think Meg or Jo were either? And Amy was withdrawn after an incident her mother wasn't happy with. The standard of education was limited in the local school and they had access to plenty of resources at home and next door.
As for Jo and Laurie, I think they ended up with the best of both worlds. They still lived close to one another and remained good friends without having to battle with traditional roles and expectations. Amy, interestingly, fades out once she's got her rich husband and her child. Jo was far brighter than Amy and far less conventional; she needed a partner with age and experience, and his background in a different country made it possible for them to invent their own rules.
I'm grateful to Louisa May Alcott for having created a role model for male/female friendship that never becomes physical. It seems remarkably difficult for people to accept this possibility even now, but it works if it's what you both genuinely want.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Complications from Scarlet Fever from the NHS website - apparently scarlet fever can lead to rheumatic fever - which can affect the valves of the heart and lead to later heart failure (from following the links through), which is what the descriptions sound like here.
(I just accepted it as people died much more easily before antibiotics, like the school friend in Jane Eyre.)
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
My grandmother had scarlet fever that led to rheumatic fever when she was young. It left her with heart problems, though she married and had 4 children. She died of a heart attack when she was about 54 yrs old.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There was no compulsory education in those days. If you felt like it and could afford it, you could send your kids to school. Or you could send them off to work, perfectly OK. If there was a son, he got first dibs on the educational dollars -- he would be expected to support a family and possibly his sisters, if they were spinster, so it was worth investing in him. Since women could not have careers, and were expected to marry and start popping out babies, there was no point in educating them in any rigorous way. Better to have them learn Italian and how to play the harp, so that men might be allured by them and take them off your hands.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
My memory is that Jo and Meg had both been to school but were finished at the time the book opens and expected to be contributing to the family income in such ways as were acceptable for young girls of their social class. Amy was still in school when the book opens, but Beth had never been sent because her shyness made in intolerable.
One of the things I wrote about in the blog post Brenda linked above is how fascinated I am by how not just physical but also mental illness was treated differently in the past. Beth would almost certainly be diagnosed with severe social anxiety today, but the family's response is not "How can we fix Beth?" but "How can we change the environment so Beth will be able to function?"
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
It is also worth keeping in mind that the family is not rich. Four daughters is a heavy load for any man to bear (do you remember Fiddler on the Roof, and Tevye's cri de coeur, "I have FIVE daughters!"), and then Mr. March is off to the wars where (I assume) he is not contributing significantly to the family economy. It was probably a relief, not to have to pay for Beth to go to school. We get no details, about what the March family was living on during this period. A small competency, perhaps? Certainly none of the women are earning a dime.
There was almost nothing a decent girl could do in that period, to earn money. She could not hold an office job, certainly, or have a career. She could not vote nor sign a legal contract. She could be a nurse or a teacher, neither a path to riches. Or she could (as Louisa May Alcott did) turn to her pen. Otherwise your only preserve from want was to marry.
Perhaps, if Beth was not going to be the Sickly One Doomed to Die, she was on the hook to be Mama's Support And Prop in Her Declining Years. The other more marriageable girls would leave the nest, and Beth would stay home to brew Papa's tea and read aloud to Marmee when vision failed. It would be very period, and there are plenty of literary analogues -- Mary, in Pride & Prejudice comes immediately to mind, and in real life Emily (and for that matter Charlotte) Bronte.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I'm pretty sure both Meg and Jo are wage-earners at the beginning of Little Women -- doesn't Meg have a nanny-type job for some awful little children, and Jo is a paid companion to Aunt March? Although in Jo's case it seems whatever pittance she's getting from Aunt March, the real hope is in the payoff they hope to get if Jo stays on the old lady's good side and she leaves the family her money when she dies. A lot of financial hope is being pinned on the death of Aunt March. I'd have to reread to be sure but I think both Meg and Jo are earning a little bit at the kind of genteel occupations acceptable for girls of their class, but you're right, it wouldn't have been much and they would have very limited career prospects. Marriage was the real career.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Right, I forgot about the governessing and companioning. Ugh. And women were systematically underpaid -- a male tutor of those exact same brats would have been paid more than Meg.
Have you read March, by Geraldine Brooks? She has some fine speculation about the March family finances.
Posted by Aravis (# 13824) on
:
Quite. Meg, of course, marries Laurie's tutor John Brooke, and ceases her own paid work at that point. Presumably John is better paid than Meg for what he does; he's teaching at a more advanced level, but has just one pupil. I think he must have got another job after marrying Meg though, as Laurie went off to college?
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
He's doing a lot of work for old Mr. Laurence at one point, once Laurie goes off to college, but somewhere towards the end of the book it is mentioned that Brooke did well and lived to see his name above the door. Which implies he becomes at least a part-owner in the firm. He is not a tutor as a career. What was he in the end, an accountant? Something at involved going to an office every day.
In the later books, I forget which one, he does die leaving Meg a widow. Again there are no medical details at all.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Fascinating. Makes me think I should read LW sometime just for the insight on female employment prospects in the 19thC.
Actually The Song of the Shirt would be a good title for a thread on the topic. Hint.
Firenze
Heaven Host
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
It was perfectly OK if you were working-class. You could be a servant, work in the mills, till the soil -- all kinds of jobs open to you. The big problem was if you were of middling or upper class, like the March girls. The number of jobs that a lady could do could be numbered on the fingers of one hand.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
We've had a lot of mileage out of "Little Women", but if anyone wants to post about other books on this thread, please feel free.
I'm re-reading Frank Herbert's "Dune" trilogy, which I haven't read for years, and enjoying it. I found it cryptic at the time, but am now realizing how much I missed the first time around.
If anyone is interested in the themes and etymology there's a good article here.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
We've had a lot of mileage out of "Little Women", but if anyone wants to post about other books on this thread, please feel free.
I'm re-reading Frank Herbert's "Dune" trilogy, which I haven't read for years, and enjoying it. I found it cryptic at the time, but am now realizing how much I missed the first time around.
If anyone is interested in the themes and etymology there's a good article here.
Oh, l loved Dune trilogy years ago. I'm a little wary of re-reading it (given my experience with Katherine as explained above), think I might give it a go at some point though, I'm reading the Feb Tyler book at the moment.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
Oh, forgot to say, brilliant link to article!
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I loved reading the Dune series, but I ended up getting to into it I read the first 5 books between doing my mock GCSEs and my finals and subsequently dropped a grade on 7 subjects.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I loved reading the Dune series, but I ended up getting to into it I read the first 5 books between doing my mock GCSEs and my finals and subsequently dropped a grade on 7 subjects.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
The first book or two are seminal in the field, but when the franchise was handed off to others there was a sharp drop.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
The first book or two are seminal in the field, but when the franchise was handed off to others there was a sharp drop.
Mm, I loved the first three, but not the subsequent ones so much, so I tend to agree with you.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There is a movie, and I seem to recall a TV dramatization as well. The movie was horrible.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
Another Dune fan here. Yes,avoid the film. The mini series is much better.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
Yes, I've seen both and agree (though the books are much better in my opinion).
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I enjoyed the trilogy and the film, but didn't like the subsequent books much. A series often seems to lose its way after a while and I felt this was one such.
Has anyone else been reading something interesting/enjoyable?
[ 22. February 2016, 18:08: Message edited by: Ariel ]
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I like the first 5 original Dune books, the sixth one was becoming a bit too vague for me.
The posthumous prequels and sequels, some of them are reasonably good SF books in their own right. But they don't live up to Frank Herbert's standard. And many fans (including me) dislike the direction in which they've taken the Dune universe.
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on
:
I've just finished Anthony McGowan's Hello darkness.
A compelling exploration of mental illness in the style of a noir thriller set in high school with an ending that is both inevitable and unsatisfying.
(To continue the tangent, the Dune novel I most enjoyed was Chapter house, which probably makes me persona non grata!)
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Ooh, Dune. My favourite book for many years. I was given a copy for my 14th birthday, read it over a weekend, and then turned round and read it again. And then used it later on as the subject for a GCSE book review. See, see, it was schoolwork all along, honest
Speaking of SF, I've just finished Infernal Devices by KW Jeter. An early steampunk novel, the sentence by sentence writing is really lovely and all the faux Victorian stuff really sets a scene. The plot though, is a complete mess. The main character could almost entirely be lifted out of the story without changing it much and there's a really large chunk of exposition to make up for the clueless hero. Disappointing.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
I had the exact opposite experience when reading The Affinity Bridge by George Mann. Great plot, interesting characters... let down by appalling prose style. Reading it was like listening to Les Dawson playing the piano. You'd be reading along happily, thinking 'Yes, this is good' and suddenly, in the middle of an otherwise innocuous sentence, there would be an adjective (or adverb) that *sounded* similar to the right one for that context but was ever-so-slightly wrong.
Halfway through I skipped to the end to find out what happened, because I couldn't stand it any more.
(For non-UK readers: Les Dawson playing the piano )
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Maybe they should start writing books together?
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I am only slowly climbing out of a deep slough of research, which I must and shall put behind me. I need to read something totally different! But before I shake the Victorians utterly off of my sandals, has anyone read any of the works of Thomas Carlyle? I have read some of his wife's letters, which are great fun, and am hoping to avoid reading the man's own works.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I found Sartor Resartus deeply depressing because it expressed my deepest fears as to the meaninglessness of life.
It was a relief to turn to Ruskin.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I do not want to actually read any of his works. Life is too short, and I have miles to go before I sleep. You confirm my feeling. (But how was Ruskin? Anything you recommend?)
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I would strongly recommend the lecture "The Works of Iron" and the fairy story "The King of the Golden River".
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Oh my gosh. These Lymond books. I'm going to need therapy when this is all over.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
You have not read them before? They are huge and fat and unutterably gripping, so reserve a chunk of time to devour them in peace. Otherwise your work and sleep will suffer, because that last volume is a rocket ride.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
No, this is my first time through. I've been putting them off for awhile because they seemed like a big committment. And yes, they are definitely interfering with both work and sleep (mostly sleep though). I'm just starting the fifth book.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Both the pieces of Ruskin are in this very good book here
http://www.amazon.com/Unto-Other-Writings-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140432116/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1456392610&sr=1-1&key words=ruskin+unto+this+last
The introduction and commentary are very interesting.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I feel bereft - I've lost my kindle at a bus stop.
I'm saving madly.
Huia
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
Hiia - I feel your pain. I managed to put mine in the washing machine last summer - it didn't like it, though the cover came out looking very clean. Got a new one (the old one was an early make) which I like even beter.
Someone might hand it in - fingers crossed.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Since your Kindle account is your own (separate from any device) is it endangered when you mislay your device?
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on
:
On the other hand it might well mean that Amazon are able to link the Kindle back to you. There is advice for UK users at Amazon.
Jengie
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Can you link your Kindle account to other devices? I can read books on my Kindle account on my smart phone, Kindle and tablet (and they usually manage to start me at the right place.)
You might find a tablet is more use to you.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Just been totting up my book total for the year. I keep a book diary running from March to February and had been attempting a Personal Best. I made it by 7 books Might try and do it again, but that might be asking a bit much without deliberately reading thinner books which is a bit silly.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Just been totting up my book total for the year. I keep a book diary running from March to February and had been attempting a Personal Best. I made it by 7 books
Had to read that twice, as I thought you said "made it to 7 books". That doesn't sound all too impressive unless your reading consists of War and Peace, Summa Theologica, In Search of Lost Time, Clarissa, Church Dogmatics, Ulysses and The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
I'm just embarking on Crime and Punishment.
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
Crime and Punishment is one of my favourite books, probably due a re-read, when I get to the end of the pile of books I've got waiting.
I've just finished The Trouble with Sheep and Goats by Joanna Cannon that Jack the Lass mentioned a page or two ago. I like the evocation of the East Midlands int he seventies, a place and time I knew well, and some of the writing and characterisation was top notch. I wasn't too convinced by the way the story was told though.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Just been totting up my book total for the year. I keep a book diary running from March to February and had been attempting a Personal Best. I made it by 7 books
Had to read that twice, as I thought you said "made it to 7 books".
Not quite. I made it up to 80. Other years have been as low as 30-odd, depending on what's going on. Normally I don't go for a particular number but was trying to discipline myself to not leave books unfinished.
I'm reading The Tain at the moment. The Irish legend about a long and bloody war started because a husband and wife fall out over the quality of their respective livestock.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Coming up to the last few chapters of the last book of the Lymond Chronicles now. I am simultaneously unable to put it down, and trying to slow down so it's not over too soon.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There are books I specifically save for times of horrific tedium. If I am stuck in bed on chemotherapy, or having to nurse a sick relative for six weeks, or have to travel on business to Las Vegas, I resort to these sure reads, which I am careful to either not begin now or to not reread often. The Lymond books are these. When I am in traction, or have back surgery, I will need all six volumes. (For years I had the Horatio Hornblower books in permanent holding pattern, knowing I would need them some day. Then I spent six weeks in Oregon with the sick relative, and oh! they were marvelous.)
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Coming up to the last few chapters of the last book of the Lymond Chronicles now. I am simultaneously unable to put it down, and trying to slow down so it's not over too soon.
Yes. I tried the House of Niccolo series afterwards, but I couldn't get on with them: Lymond is a charismatic figure and I wanted more of his adventures, not another character's, even if he is an ancestor.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
No, Niccolo is curiously dry. And she has a mystery series, about a boat (Dollybird?) which I could not get into either. Tell you what she did write that is utterly great, however, is King Hereafter -- a Macbeth novel. It is a standalone, not a series, and truly titanic.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I've been wanting to read King Hereafter because after twenty years of teaching MacB over and over again I can't count how many times I've thought, "It would be great if someone wrote a really good novel based on this story," and I have high hopes this might be it. I didn't have plans to plunge into Niccolo right after Lymond because I don't think even with the same author I would be able to get as absorbed in a different character for a new series, though I thought I'd keep it on the back burner for when I needed something new and long to start. Disappointed to hear that other Lymond-lovers haven't been grabbed by that series.
I'll probably finish Checkmate tonight and then I'll be wandering around for a few days like I've lost a friend or something.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Yes, say hello to Jerott for me. He was always one of my favourite characters, with Marthe and the Dame de Doubtance not far behind. There is only one Francis Crawford, though.
"King Hereafter" is good and worth reading, though the use of the name "Groa" for his wife may be a bit difficult to get used to. Or so I found it. (Too suggestive of "Groan" and "Gro-bag".)
I ought to read something. I'm not reading anything currently, except the daily Metro, free at all good railway stations. Need to do something about that.
[ 02. March 2016, 20:37: Message edited by: Ariel ]
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Her real name was Gruach, apparently, which sounds like a particularly unpleasant Scottish porridge, so maybe Groa is the least-offensive variation Dunnett could find.
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Both the pieces of Ruskin are in this very good book here
http://www.amazon.com/Unto-Other-Writings-Penguin-Classics/dp/0140432116/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1456392610&sr=1-1&key words=ruskin+unto+this+last
The introduction and commentary are very interesting.
'Unto This Last' is a very interesting attack on utilitarian economics, which should IMHO be compulsory reading for all 1st year economics students. A nod to environmentalism too.
Carlyle I find sanctimonious nd depressing too.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Her real name was Gruach, apparently, which sounds like a particularly unpleasant Scottish porridge, so maybe Groa is the least-offensive variation Dunnett could find.
Gruach is even worse. I could see myself saying it on being faced with a bowl of porridge.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I had no problems with her name, but then where I come from characters are named Frodo and Bilbo.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Yes, say hello to Jerott for me. He was always one of my favourite characters, with Marthe and the Dame de Doubtance not far behind. There is only one Francis Crawford, though.
Jerrott and Marthe both irritate the hell out of me with their ridiculous drama. As a result, after the huge "WTF would any author really DO that 10 pages from the end of the book????" moment in the last chapter, I was fine with the ending and felt no sorrow about it at all.
All the characters I loved survived and had more-or-less happy endings*, so I'm very pleased with how the series worked out.
*I mean, "happy" the qualified sense that anyone who happened to be living in Scotland, or pretty much any European country, in 1558, was likely to get a happy ending.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Don't know if you're a fan of the Outlander series (they do nothing for me at all) but the author enjoys a rabid fandom and she recommends the Lymond books for people who need more about medieval Scotland.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarasa:
I've just finished The Trouble with Sheep and Goats by Joanna Cannon that Jack the Lass mentioned a page or two ago. I like the evocation of the East Midlands int he seventies, a place and time I knew well, and some of the writing and characterisation was top notch. I wasn't too convinced by the way the story was told though.
I'm glad you liked it (albeit qualified liking! ). I personally liked how it was told, from the view of different residents - I seem to get on better by and large with books where there are different perspectives and the picture is built up gradually that way, rather than books entirely from one perspective. The bit that didn't work so well for me was the girls' search for God.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I was never keen on the Scottish settings in the Lymond books: the attraction for me was the Mediterranean. The books are set in the Tudor period, although the Dame is clearly a leftover from medieval days. I'd love to read her backstory.
[ 03. March 2016, 17:01: Message edited by: Ariel ]
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarasa:
I've just finished The Trouble with Sheep and Goats by Joanna Cannon that Jack the Lass mentioned a page or two ago. I like the evocation of the East Midlands int he seventies, a place and time I knew well, and some of the writing and characterisation was top notch. I wasn't too convinced by the way the story was told though.
I also bought The Trouble with Sheep and Goats based on Jack the Lass's recommendation -- it's in my (very large) collection of to-be-read books.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Don't know if you're a fan of the Outlander series (they do nothing for me at all) but the author enjoys a rabid fandom and she recommends the Lymond books for people who need more about medieval Scotland.
Nah, I read the first Outlander book but I had no desire to read on. It's funny because I often love time travel but not that particular series.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
I also bought The Trouble with Sheep and Goats based on Jack the Lass's recommendation -- it's in my (very large) collection of to-be-read books.
Eek - I feel the weight of responsibility, I hope you like it! (or at least don't hate it! )
I'm just starting "Madame de Treymes" by Edith Wharton now. I've never read any of her work before, but as this is a short novella it should hopefully be a gentle introduction (and if I don't like it at least it won't take hours I'll never get back again!).
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There is a huge, vast subgenrelet called time travel romance, of which Outlander was the kickoff best-seller (in the same way that Jane Eyre is responsible for all those governess in weird manor novels). They all have essentially the same plot -- a hunky Viking/Scotsman/knight/Moor/whatever is confronted via time travel with a modern female, and they have lots of sex. I discover that this subgenrelet is now broken down into even finer subdivisions, Viking TT, Scots TT, and so on.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarasa:
Crime and Punishment is one of my favourite books, probably due a re-read, when I get to the end of the pile of books I've got waiting.
I'm hating it so far. It's such slow going, the characters haven't been properly introduced and I've no idea what's going on.
When I read The Double, it struck me how Kafka-esque Dostoevsky's writing was, but for the last 2 commutes, I've been reading a letter that was in a single paragraph that spanned multiple pages and which made no sense whatsoever. It wasn't until I got to the end and double-checked the name of the signatory with the character list that I realised it was from his mother. I thought it was the mad ramblings of the main character himself.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I think the pleasure one takes in those big chunky Russian novels depends a lot on the translation.
I tried Crime and Punishment a first time and didn’t get on with it at all. I picked it up again later in another translation and loved it.
In a similar vein, The Brothers Karamazov gets my vote for the greatest novel ever written by anyone, but the Penguin translation of it is horrible.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I think the pleasure one takes in those big chunky Russian novels depends a lot on the translation.
I tried Crime and Punishment a first time and didn’t get on with it at all. I picked it up again later in another translation and loved it.
In a similar vein, The Brothers Karamazov gets my vote for the greatest novel ever written by anyone, but the Penguin translation of it is horrible.
Hear, hear! I tried and gave up on Crime and Punishment in three different (bad) translations until I found the Pevear and Volokonsky translation, which sings. They are an amazing team, and I have many of their translations of the Russian classics (and even a collection of the writings of a Russian-born Parisian Orfie saint who smuggled Jews out of occupied France).
I'd say that Brothers Karamazov is my second favorite novel. But then I've only read it 3 times.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
Thanks for the recommendation, mousethief.
The version I picked up was published under Wordsworth Classics imprint, translated by Constance Garnett.
I think the only time I've hated a translation of a book was when I read the George Chapman translation of The Iliad, which forced (mangling the language in the process) the text into rhyming couplets.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
Constance Garnett is the absolute worst. She leaves out whole chunks and invents stuff that isn't there, according to what I've read.
P&V are an amazing team. Larissa Volokhonsky is a native Russian speaker. She writes a very rough, word-for-word wooden translation of the text then hands it off to her husband Richard Pevear, a native English speaker. He then turns it into polished prose, and gives it back to V. to check against the Russian. After a few iterations of this they have a beautiful translation.
Most of their Dostoyevsky translations are in Knopf/Everyman editions. Which are lovely works of art in themselves in these days of crappy, easily-broken paperbacks.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
My friend who has a postgrad qualification in Russian literature is similarly scathing about Constance Garnett. According to her, CG is basically trying to be Jane Austen and translating accordingly, eliminating any sense of Russian style. Wikipedia also notes: "In her translations, she worked quickly, and smoothed over certain small portions for "readability", particularly in her translations of Dostoyevsky. In instances where she did not understand a word or phrase, she omitted that portion." I think your best bet will be to try another translation, rather than give up.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I am fascinated by Dostoyevsky, ever since I read The Idiot as a teenager and found it treated seriously, not to say hysterically, the two subjects of vital importance that could never be discussed in Devon - sex and religion.
I've just re-read it and The Devils in the old Penguin translation by David Magarshack. I think I preferred The Devils.
I managed to get to the end of the Constance Garnett translation of Crime and Punishment a few years ago but found it very slow work although it should be the most approachable.
I'll avoid any further Garnett versions. (Out of copyright translations are freely available as downloads, which I don't think does the original works any favours.)
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I just looked back at the version of Crime and Punishment I read back in 2013 or whenever it was that I was trying to catch up on classics I'd missed, and sure enough Constance Garnett was the translator. Wish I'd been warned in advance as I'd probably have enjoyed it a lot more in a better translation.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I managed the Constance Garnett War and Peace OK.
I guess mousethief’s saint was Saint Maria of Paris, who sounds fascinating. The only saint I know who chain smoked.
I got The Idiot as a teenager in an Edwardian translation by Eva Martin, but recently got the current Penguin translation by David Macduff. La vie en rose hated his Karamazov. I’ve browzed his introduction in a bookshop and he doesn’t think much of Father Zosima.
I wish I’d known mousethief’s recommendation of P&V.
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
I've got the McDuff Crime and Punishment which I think is OK, but as I don't speak RUssian I don't think I'm a good judge. I gave up on Constance Garnett's Anna Karenina as a teenager as every character seemed to be refering to other character's as 'cold fish' and even as a teenager that didn't seem quite the right idiom.
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Her real name was Gruach, apparently, which sounds like a particularly unpleasant Scottish porridge, so maybe Groa is the least-offensive variation Dunnett could find.
Gruach sounds much better to my ears than Groa, which sounds like a groan. Gruach sounds like the wind in the trees. My friend's cat was called Gruach; I like the sound of it.
One book on Macbeth which I can recommend is "MacBeth a True Story" by Fiona Watson. Watson has written a historical biography of Macbeth, and has filled the gaps in his known history with educated guess work, in italics. It's surprisingly readable.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
Whether the Penguin Karamazov is close to the Russian I couldn't say. My objection is to the clunkiness of the English composition.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Someone just put up a review of the entire Lymond series.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
That's me again, trying to process having just raced through them all.
[ 09. March 2016, 23:42: Message edited by: Trudy Scrumptious ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I will reread them all some day. Not this year -- I am on a book award jury, and am doomed to read many many dull and bad books.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I've just finished a delightful book by Tess Evans, an Australian author called The Book of Lost Threads Most of the main characters need to resolve painful things from the past. My favourite character, Mrs Pargeter, was a woman whose grasp on reality had become a little tenuous following the death of her husband, then her unborn baby. She decided she needed to keep busy after that so she knits tea cosies for the United Nations. The way arrival of a hundred tea cosies a year is handled by the clerk at the UN is brilliant.
I thoroughly recommend this book to anyone looking for something with a (mainly) happy ending.
I've now reserved the only other book written by Tess Evans that our library has.
The other slightly wacky book that I haven't yet finished is The Lost Art of Walking a non-fiction book by Geoff Nicholson. A reviewer writing in the NY Times about one of his earlier books, Bleeding London said, Mr Nicholson relates his story with such brio and demented charm and I think the same could be said of this book.
I might chase up his other books if the topics interest me.
Huia
Huia
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on
:
Just finished The Country Girls by Edna O'Brien. One of those books I'd heard of as being Important, but never got round to. I didn't know it was banned at the time of release though! It seems so tame now. Very sad, but brilliantly written. I was on tenterhooks for Cait throughout, and wanted to chuck Baba out of the nearest window.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
The other slightly wacky book that I haven't yet finished is The Lost Art of Walking a non-fiction book by Geoff Nicholson. A reviewer writing in the NY Times about one of his earlier books, Bleeding London said, Mr Nicholson relates his story with such brio and demented charm and I think the same could be said of this book.
Demented charm is right. I love Geoff Nicholson, but his stuff is utterly barking, each in an entirely unique way. I'll have to look that one up.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I have just finished Persuasion by Jane Austen. It was delightful (I hadn't read it before and came to it completely blind, having not seen the TV adaptation from several years ago). Of course it was obvious from the beginning whom Anne would end up marrying, and who would turn out to be the Mr Wickham equivalent, but that didn't stop me thoroughly enjoying it. I think I still prefer Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility, as there seems to be much more going on in both of those, but Persuasion was a very pleasant and pleasing companion this last week.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
I know there are some fans of Buffy the Vampire Slayer on the Ship. If anyone remembers Spike's unfortunate pre-Vampire poetry, they'll know why, when a modern occurrence of the word 'effulgence' used without irony popped up in the book I was reading, I nearly giggled myself of my chair.
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on
:
Just finished reading 'Killers of the King' by Charles Spencer, dealing with the capture and trial of Charles I, the Cromwell problem(s), the Restoration and the pursuit, capture and execution of those who signed Charles I's death warrant.
Very thoroughly researched and very well written -- I had not known (or had forgotten) that several of the fugitives made it to these colonies.
For serious history, it is pretty quick reading.
Did't wake up to the fact that Charles Spencer is IRL Earl Spencer, formerly Viscount Althrop, etc. Made is scholarship even more impressive IMHO.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
March's challenge has been "A book you've been meaning to read". Last summer, inspired by the coming 1916 commemorations in Ireland, I picked up The Dream of the Celt by Mario Vargias Llosa, which is a fictionalised account of the life of Roger Casement.
I can't say I am getting on very well with it. The author has done his research, and I am learning a lot, which is something. But he can't seem to decide whether he is writing a novel or a biography, and so it is not the best example of either category. Sometimes the factual detail overwhelms the writing. And at other times there seems to be a failure of imagination. It's as if Vargias Llosa doesn't quite 'get' his protagonist - Casement simply doesn't come alive from the pages. In particular, he is very coy about the man's sexuality, and so leaves it largely unexplored, so that overall the characterisation is a bit flat.
All that means that I haven't got very far with it. Only a couple of days of March left, so I am going to have to have a good run at it to see if I can finish.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Cottontail: But he can't seem to decide whether he is writing a novel or a biography
I guess this fits in with Latin American magical realism?
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
quote:
Cottontail: But he can't seem to decide whether he is writing a novel or a biography
I guess this fits in with Latin American magical realism?
Maybe it does - I don't know enough about magical realism to know if this is typical of the genre or not. But compared to the few magical realism novels I have read, this doesn't seem to fit. Nothing magical about it, for a start! It just feels a bit awkward.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I've just started Kathleen Jamie's Sightlines and been rather captivated by it. It's form falls somewhere between essay and poetry; it's hard to classify. It's about looking at things in slightly different ways, inviting the reader to see things in the everyday that they've never seen before. At times it's a bit mystical and wishy-washy, but it doesn't lay it on with a trowel.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I'm reading The Bone Clocks by David Mitchell (the less funny David Mitchell that is). I brought it on vacation because I needed a paperback to take to the beach as I don't take my e-reader there, and I saw it in a friend's house before I left and she said she'd thought it was OK but not loved it, and I was welcome to take it and pass it on to someone else when done. I'm about halfway through and it's turning out to be a very good beach read. I think I'm going to enjoy it more than she did. It does suffer from the problem of books that move from one first-person narrator to another in different sections; no reader is going to like all the characters equally well, and it can be difficult to spend a lot of time in the head of a character you don't like much. And he's just killed off one of my favourite characters. But overall I'm still enjoying the book quite a lot.
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on
:
I've just finished The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet by Becky Chambers, which I borrowed from the library as it's a Baileys Prize nominee. I'm so glad I did! I didn't want it to finish, and am really pleased to discover there's a follow up planned for later in the year (although there was no cliffhanger in this one).
It's about a tunnelling space ship (building tunnels through hyperspace) and her crew - including one who joins with a secret past - and the relationships between them all. The different species are well explained without being overly so, and the differences between humans and the other species made clear whilst not tediously spelt out. It's really well written and very readable. Basically, highly recommended!
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I have just finished The Collected Works of A>J Fikry by Gabrielle Levin which is one of the best books I've read in a very long time. According to a note on the cover it was read aloud on BBC Radio
At the end of the book a new publisher's rep is approaching the shop and thinking about his job, "Sure the pay could be better, but he loves books, has always loved books. He believed that they saved his life. He even has that famous C.S Lewis quote tattooed on his wrist."
This sounds really familiar, but it's ages since I read C.S Lewis and I just can't bring it to mind. Does anyone remember the quote please?
Huia
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Is it the one about one life not being enough, and so reading gives you multitudes?
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
"You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me"?
There's been a bit of a fashion for quotes on bags recently, that's one I've seen.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I've been reading graphic novels again - this time The Dotter of her Father's Eyes by Mary Talbot, and illustrated by her husband Bryan. It's the intertwined histories of her own childhood and the childhood of Lucia Joyce, daughter of James Joyce. Mary Talbot's father was a renowned Joycian scholar, which is one link between them, and she gives a fearsome picture of what her father was like.
Poor Lucia ended her days in a mental hospital, while Mary's story ended more happily in marriage to Bryan and her own academic career.
Mary Talbot was shortlisted for the Costa Award for biography for this book in 2012, something very unusual for a graphic novel.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
For anyone who is taking part in the reading challenges. Is anyone having trouble fulfilling: "Read a book that intimidates you"?
I don't find many books intimidating, and those that are I'm unlikely to finish or an am not really interested in. A dilemma.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I am never intimidated (unless the language is unknown to me), but I am so very often bored, which is just as bad.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
I'm not taking part in the Reading Challenge; just checking in to thank Scots Lass and Brenda Clough for their recommendations of (respectively) The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet (which has just been nominated for the Arthur C. Clarke Award) and the Vorkosigan Saga. I wouldn't have picked up either of these otherwise and I really enjoyed them. I also read The Dispossessed by Ursula LeGuin for the first time. I can see why it's regarded as a classic, but it's a bit preachy for my taste. I preferred her Earthsea books. However, I now know where Adrian Tchaikovsky got the title for his recent book Children of Time from (another one that's been shortlisted for the Arthur C. Clarke).
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Since “The Nine Tailors” was a book of the month, I have now read all the Sayers/Wimsey novels, except for re-reading “Five Red Herrings”.
I still think “The Nine Tailors” knocks the rest into the grass, although I liked “Busman’s Holiday” – particularly as it ended with Wimsey distraught on the day of the execution. I was rather chilled by the way Harriet in “Gaudy Night” was so dismissive of opposition to the death penalty
I thought “Gaudy Night” went on far too long and repetitively. When the perpetrator is finally uncovered her justification for her actions and her condemnation of the others come over magnificently with a passion that is not much in evidence in the books otherwise. (The fact that there is no murder involved allows her to have a voice.) It was interesting reading a crime book in which the undiscovered villain is consistently referred to as “she”.
I could do with more of Miss Climpson.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I'm very much enjoying Andrea Wulf's The Invention of Nature - a biography of Alexander von Humboldt.
Everyone I've mentioned it to has responded "Oh, as in the squid?" It's helping to fill in some gaps in my knowledge and amazing to see the web of people that Humboldt influenced, from Carl Friedrich Gauss, to Charles Darwin to Simon Bolivar.
If you've read The Age of Wonder then it's very much in the same vein of writing.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Ditto on Miss Climpson. I was impressed when, in Strong Poison Lord Peter was at a stand, he handed the difficulty over to Miss Climpson and she came through.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I finished reading For Whom the Bell Tolls! I announced starting this book back in January, so I guess it proves that I'm a slow reader.
I'm glad I read it. It's very militaristic and violent at points, as you'd expect, but as you get to know the characters it gives an intimate portrait of the Spanish civil war.
quote:
Cottontail: it has one of the best endings in all literature. Sheer perfection.
Funny, the ending didn't do much for me. I found it rather predictable. I guess there's no arguing about taste.
At the moment I'm in a smallish African city without a book store
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
I finished reading For Whom the Bell Tolls! quote:
Cottontail: it has one of the best endings in all literature. Sheer perfection.
Funny, the ending didn't do much for me. I found it rather predictable. I guess there's no arguing about taste.
Someday we shall debate that over a beer. Or a large gin.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Cottontail: Someday we shall debate that over a beer. Or a large gin.
I'd love to!
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
At the moment I'm in a smallish African city without a book store
Suddenly I better understand Conrad's Heart of Darkness: "The horror! The horror!"
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I used to travel with a suitcase full of books. (Judicious selection of ratty paperbacks means that you can abandon them in hotels without regret, replacing them with souvenirs.) Now I have more books than I could ever carry, vast Victorian triple-deckers, on my Ipad. Technology is a wonderful thing.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Brenda Clough: Now I have more books than I could ever carry, vast Victorian triple-deckers, on my Ipad.
The problem is that I'm not a very organised person
But I'm in the capital of the country now. The problem has been remedied
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
ON the same challenge as Cottontree I have read the following so far this year (I haven't been doing the categories in order):
Book chosen for you by your husband or child: Iain McCalman, 'The Reef: a passionate history' (2013) Environmental history of the Australian Great Barrier Reef, complements David Attenborough's TV series, showing here now.
Book that was banned at some point: Nadine Gordimer 'July’s People' (1981) 1981 Set in an imagined future, as blacks revolt and take over the South African government. Maureen and Bam Smales, liberal and reasonable people, and their three children flee the city helped by their servant July, and shelter in his village. Investigates reversals of role and power, and warns liberal SA whites that they need to share resources and power, not just be polite to the servants. I'd not read Gordimer before - very powerful.
Book recommended by your local library or bookseller: Andrei Makine, 'The Life of an Unknown Man' Another new author to me. Powerful elegy to the power of love in the midst of appalling barbarity (the seige of Leningrad and the gulags). Started slowly, but gripping after first 40 pages.
Published before you were born: Arnold Bennett The Old Wives’ Tale' (1908)
Published this year: Donna Leon, 'The Waters of Eternal Youth' The latest Inspector Brunetti mystery, good as usual
And now I'm about to tackle a book which definitely intimidates me - Joyce's 'Ulysses'
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
My apologies - Cottontail!
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Re: Reading challenge books.
I've just finished Becoming, Unbecoming by Una as 'a book which you can read in a day'.
An autobiographical graphic novel, It is the story of Una growing up in 1970s West Yorkshire, at a time and place of casual sexism and violence against women, set against the backdrop of the Yorkshire Ripper killings and how the former facilitated the latter. Some of the newspaper headlines and quotes from investigating policemen are just gob-smacking to anyone brought up in a different way. The last chunk of pages are depictions of what the dead women might have looked like if they had been alive today, concentrating on the victims instead of the more usual interest in the serial killer.
Not my usual reading preference by I would definitely recommend it.
Posted by leo (# 1458) on
:
Wendy Moffatt's new biography of E. M. Foster is a great improvement on the efforts of others. I ended up liking the man a little, having felt very negative towards him previously.
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marama:
Book that was banned at some point: Nadine Gordimer 'July’s People' (1981) 1981 Set in an imagined future, as blacks revolt and take over the South African government. Maureen and Bam Smales, liberal and reasonable people, and their three children flee the city helped by their servant July, and shelter in his village. Investigates reversals of role and power, and warns liberal SA whites that they need to share resources and power, not just be polite to the servants. I'd not read Gordimer before - very powerful.
Not sure when it was banned, that was the "improving" book my sister was given by cousins in 1984 when we visited South Africa. I was given The Story of an African Farm.
Jengie
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marama:
ON the same challenge as Cottontree I have read the following so far this year (I haven't been doing the categories in order):
Book chosen for you by your husband or child: Iain McCalman, 'The Reef: a passionate history' (2013) Environmental history of the Australian Great Barrier Reef, complements David Attenborough's TV series, showing here now.
Book that was banned at some point: Nadine Gordimer 'July’s People' (1981) 1981 Set in an imagined future, as blacks revolt and take over the South African government. Maureen and Bam Smales, liberal and reasonable people, and their three children flee the city helped by their servant July, and shelter in his village. Investigates reversals of role and power, and warns liberal SA whites that they need to share resources and power, not just be polite to the servants. I'd not read Gordimer before - very powerful.
Book recommended by your local library or bookseller: Andrei Makine, 'The Life of an Unknown Man' Another new author to me. Powerful elegy to the power of love in the midst of appalling barbarity (the seige of Leningrad and the gulags). Started slowly, but gripping after first 40 pages.
Published before you were born: Arnold Bennett The Old Wives’ Tale' (1908)
Published this year: Donna Leon, 'The Waters of Eternal Youth' The latest Inspector Brunetti mystery, good as usual
And now I'm about to tackle a book which definitely intimidates me - Joyce's 'Ulysses'
You've been doing a lot better than I have, Marama. I got stuck on "The Dream of the Celt' by Mario Vargas Llosa, which is a very important story, but was a bit of a plod to read. But today I have finished it!
So now I am just starting a book recommended by a local bookseller. I wandered into the great wee bookshop in Biggar, Scotland, and just asked the server outright. She had spotted me hovering over the crime section, and so pulled out Marjorie Allingham, 'The Tiger in the Smoke'. Both the book and the author are new to me, though I know it is a classic of the genre. It has begun very well, and I have high hopes for this one.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
I'm currently reading Terra Sonâmbula (Sleepwalking Land) by Mozambican writer Mia Couto, about the civil war that took place in his country.
Couto is one of the best writers of Africa; I've read a couple of his books already, and I spoke with him a couple of times.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I just reread 1984, which I hadn’t read since I was in school. I had forgotten what a truly phenomenal book it is. I think Orwell’s Oceania might be the most terrifying place every imagined by a human being.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Having finshed Trollope's Can You Forgive Her? and Phineas Finn, the Irish Member I'm now reading Balzac's Cousin Bette.
What immediately strikes me is the difference between English and French C19 novels. In England, sex can't be mentioned other than as a tradgedy, in France it is talked about all the time, albeit in a pretty cynical way.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Just enjoying re-reading Alexander McCall Smith's "No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency" books. Not only are they lovely, gentle, sunny books that really evoke the atmosphere of Africa, but how could anyone not like an author who is "an amateur bassoonist, and co-founder of The Really Terrible Orchestra. He has helped to found Botswana's first centre for opera training, the Number 1 Ladies' Opera House, for whom he wrote the libretto of their first production, a version of Macbeth set among a troop of baboons in the Okavango Delta."
(Thank you Wikipedia.)
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Just finished reading A Fiery Heart by Claire Harman -- it's the latest biography of Charlotte Bronte. A grand example (Dante is another) of how harsh life circumstances can produce great art.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I've just finished Charles Stross's Iron Sunrise, an SF political thriller involving space Nazis and exploding suns - it's a lot better than I'm making it sound, and the teenage heroine, Wednesday, is a good character. There's also a character on the space Nazi (he calls them ReMastered) side who is basically Servalan from Blakes Seven, which is a lot of fun in a warped and twisted sort of way.
The next book on my bedside table is by the Ship's own Brenda Clough! I don't think I've ever seen one of her books in the UK before, but I recognised the name and grabbed it! The title is How Like a God.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I'm reading Guy Gavriel Kay's River of Stars. Beautiful, wistful, sad, about the fall of an empire. I'm hoping for but not counting on a happy ending for the protagonists.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Good heavens. I know there is no UK edition (if the one you are holding is printed in Britain for Heavens sake let me know) so it must be an import, Rarissimo!
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
How Like a God is the only one of Brenda's works I've read (I enjoyed it), but I cheated and got the ebook.
Is/was there a sequel? It finishes in a logical place, but you are left wondering what happens next...
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
How Like A God is secondhand - it must have come in with someone's collection - and is a US edition that has wandered across the Pond. I'm looking forward to reading it.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Yes, there was, titled The Doors of Death and Life (from the text I think in Exodus). (I am the type of knitter who knits a garment as big as there is yarn. And there was more story, so I just kept on knitting...) Not sure it is available in eformat, however. Tor will have it, if there is. But it didn't sell and they wouldn't buy any more, alas! I may get them all up on Book View Cafe some fine day.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
Thanks to the bus journeys to and from the General Assembly, I have finished April's reading challenge - The Tiger in the Smoke by Marjorie Allingham. It turned out to be a jolly good romp of a police procedure, with a genuinely scary villain roaming the streets of post-war London in a proper old peasouper. And it was surprisingly theological too ... about how evil, which can seem so compelling and energetic, is utterly empty and cannot sustain even those who embrace it. In the book, evil is ultimately overcome, not by even police-sanctified violence, but by true goodness and pity and laughter.
The book suffers a bit from too many heroes. Albert Campion, who I think is the star detective of her earlier novels, here has almost nothing to do, and the story would have worked perfectly well without him. He does manage to rescue one of the other heroes at one point, but not by any particular insight or act of bravery, and actually, it was a bit stupid of him not to let the police do it. The main police detective is the best of the heroes, and I wish it was more his book. He is compellingly similar in personality to the villain, and I was expecting a proper show-down between them that never happened. But the vicar is a very convincing and tough-minded old saint, and a good contrast to the various heroic men of action.
So in short, I will read Allingham again. Meanwhile, it is on to May's challenge: a book you should have read at school. This one was all over the Higher English syllabus back in the 1980s, but I never read it: Neil Gunn's, The Silver Darlings.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
If you've not read Allingham, then you have a lot of treat in store. Did you know Campion is supposedly modelled on George VI?
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
I did not know that! So now I have a mental picture to help me along.
I'm definitely going to read more, and I hope that Campion got a bit more to do in his younger years.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I think Tiger in the Smoke is her best work. I wouldn't dream of calling it a romp. A wonderful sinister atmosphere.
As I remember the other hero - Geoffrey - spends half the book in the hands of the sinister gang - a nice change from the cliche of the helpless heroine.
Wodehouse and Christie continued to turn out works post WW2 barely adapting the formulas of their 1930s works. They are fun if you like the formula but not a patch on the earlier work.
By contrast, Allingham's work developed after WW2 to produce more interesting works, of which Tiger in the Smoke is definitely one.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
Tiger in the Smoke is one of my two favorites. My other favorite is Tether's End. It's possible that Tether's End was published under a different title in Britain.
Moo
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
Tiger in the Smoke is one of my two favorites. My other favorite is Tether's End. It's possible that Tether's End was published under a different title in Britain.
Moo
I think it was called Hide my Eyes when originally published. I can't remember it, but looking it up on Google, it sounds interesting.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
I like Tiger in the Smoke too, but I think my favourite is Traitor's Purse.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I must scout the shelves and dig out the old green Penguins (now there's a sentence you have to be a certain age to understand).
With luck, the senile decay of memory will enable me to enjoy them again.
[ 25. May 2016, 08:59: Message edited by: Firenze ]
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
With luck, the senile decay of memory will enable me to enjoy them again.
{tangent alert}
When my grandmother was in her seventies, she said that when she was younger she enjoyed reading the novels of William Faulkner, but she felt depressed afterwards. Now that her memory was failing, she could enjoy reading the novels, but she didn't remember them well enough to feel depressed.
{/tangent alert}
Moo
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on
:
I'm surprised no one's mentioned Patrick O'Brian's Aubrey and Maturin series; there's a story with a whole vanished world inside of it. Characters you come to know as though they were members of your family (and sometimes loathe as though they belong in the "difficult relatives" discussion--hi there, Mrs. Williams). Settings that burn themselves into your memory and make you want to start checking out fares to faraway places. The small vignettes that pop into your mind and make you smile: Jack singing along while the crew practices the Hallelujah Chorus, the men trying to comfort frightened slaves who've been taken off a pirate ship, Stephen talking to the Bishop's mule..."you are a kind of tame mule, I find."
I have never been a really big fan of Peter Wimsey, but I did have a good time last weekend reading Jill Paton Walsh's pastiche The Late Scholar. The Oxford setting was part of the charm--I definitely class this novel as comfort reading--especially since I once spent a couple of happy weeks there when researching my dissertation As for Gaudy Night , I wish I could enjoy re-reading it. As a fan of mysteries and historical novels, I've encountered a lot of nasty villains in my time (Dorothy Dunnett's got some of the very worst, and most persistent, evil characters I can think of), but the perp in Gaudy Night was just so detestable, so foul, that I can't seem to pick that book up again. (Perhaps making matters worse is my experience as a student sharing an office with The Queen of Malicious Gossip. She didn't go in for poison pen letters, but character assassination, rather than archaeology, was her main interest in life.) If I want to revisit Oxford in fiction, I will have to find an alternative.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Egeria:
the perp in Gaudy Night was just so detestable, so foul, that I can't seem to pick that book up again.
I felt great sympathy for her. But there we go, reactions differ. A little reminder that inequalities are due to class as much as to gender.
I'm not going to re-read it in a hurry, though.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
I like and reread Gaudy Night, but basically ignoring the perp in favor of the other storylines (Peter and Harriet, of course; Miss deVine's development and that of a bunch of others as they deal with women's roles; St. George's relationship with his uncle; Padgett; Cattermole and Pomfrey; Harriet's regaining of her mental balance.
The perp is a sad, sad person, but really not the core of the book. And she's got such a terribly limited view of the world that it comes close to mental illness in my opinion, making what she did more forgivable.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I felt great sympathy for her. But there we go, reactions differ. A little reminder that inequalities are due to class as much as to gender.
I find her enormously believable. And I agree - very much to be pitied. She's not likeable, of course, and I don't enjoy reading her parts of the story, but she provides a necessary contrast, and the book would be much poorer without her.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
Have never read anything by Virginia Woolf before, but am going to have a go at Mrs Dalloway this weekend. Also just coming to the end of H is for Hawk, which is very very good.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I felt great sympathy for her. But there we go, reactions differ. A little reminder that inequalities are due to class as much as to gender.
I find her enormously believable. And I agree - very much to be pitied. She's not likeable, of course, and I don't enjoy reading her parts of the story, but she provides a necessary contrast, and the book would be much poorer without her.
I wonder if Sayers based her on a real person.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
Have never read anything by Virginia Woolf before, but am going to have a go at Mrs Dalloway this weekend. Also just coming to the end of H is for Hawk, which is very very good.
I really liked Mrs D., hope you do too (I won't say any more in case I spoil it for you).
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've just picked up another Edward Rutherfurd doorstop-size multi-generational epic at the railway station, where they have a book swop area. (Everything goes really quickly, no matter what it is.)
This time, it's "The Forest", set in and around the New Forest in England. I quite like his books but he does have the irritating habit of half developing a scene and plot, then you abruptly find he's moved on a century or so and what's happened to the characters you'd just got to know? Not always as well written or fleshed out as I'd like but still interesting.
[ 26. May 2016, 19:08: Message edited by: Ariel ]
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I felt great sympathy for her. But there we go, reactions differ. A little reminder that inequalities are due to class as much as to gender.
I find her enormously believable. And I agree - very much to be pitied. She's not likeable, of course, and I don't enjoy reading her parts of the story, but she provides a necessary contrast, and the book would be much poorer without her.
I wonder if Sayers based her on a real person.
Maybe not on an individual, but certainly on an important human condition.
And spiteful though she is, from her point of view, it is the women dons who are limited, with the leisure to study prosody and not having to bring up two girls and keep a fulltime manual job.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I've just picked up another Edward Rutherfurd doorstop-size multi-generational epic at the railway station, where they have a book swop area. (Everything goes really quickly, no matter what it is.)
This time, it's "The Forest", set in and around the New Forest in England. I quite like his books but he does have the irritating habit of half developing a scene and plot, then you abruptly find he's moved on a century or so and what's happened to the characters you'd just got to know? Not always as well written or fleshed out as I'd like but still interesting.
Mm, I agree, but I did think it one of his better ones when I read it some time ago.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
And spiteful though she is, from her point of view, it is the women dons who are limited, with the leisure to study prosody and not having to bring up two girls and keep a fulltime manual job.
I think that, since she believes that a woman's job is to serve her husband and children, she detests the woman and the system that drove her husband to suicide. I don't think she envies the female dons their leisure to study; she is outraged that she has been deprived of what was important to her by people whose value system is different.
Moo
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Yes, that was put together truly well. All parties had a solid case to be made, that could be rationally and morally defended. It was a clash of worlds, not just a purse-snatching. Necessarily, because of the mystery form, the female dons and their world (through the viewpoint character of Harriett) are delineated in far more detail and with much more sympathy. But I don't see how she could have told it from the other point of view, and still keep it a mystery.
Posted by leo (# 1458) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I've just picked up another Edward Rutherfurd doorstop-size multi-generational epic at the railway station, where they have a book swop area. (Everything goes really quickly, no matter what it is.)
This time, it's "The Forest", set in and around the New Forest in England. I quite like his books but he does have the irritating habit of half developing a scene and plot, then you abruptly find he's moved on a century or so and what's happened to the characters you'd just got to know? Not always as well written or fleshed out as I'd like but still interesting.
I'm going to get that - I enjoy his stuff
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I'm afraid I don't feel a lot of sympathy for the man who committed suicide in Gaudy Night - because his work was judged fairly. He wasn't ruined because of those terrible women dons, but because his work wasn't good enough.
By the way, I'm about half way through Brenda Clough's How Like a God at the moment, mostly because it's one of those "just one more chapter before I go to sleep" books. But at the beginning, there's a bit that I'm positive I've read before - where the main character convinces all his work colleagues he's in the building when he's actually taken the day off, and he comes back to find there's been a fire, and everyone thinks he's still inside. I have no idea where I read it, but it's just that bit!
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doone:
Mm, I agree, but I did think it one of [Edward Rutherfurd]'s better ones when I read it some time ago.
The first one I read was London, which I still think is the best of the ones I've read so far. Dublin was a disappointment and Paris is going back to a charity shop, only half read. I don't think I've read Sarum yet but the preview pages look like something I'd want to read.
Posted by leo (# 1458) on
:
I think Sarum was his best one.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
The only Rutherford I've read is Sarum which I enjoyed, but it felt as if he got bored, or had reached his maximum allowed wordage, for the last hundred years, as they were sped through unseemly fast compared to the rest of the millennia.
The perpetrator in Gaudy Night was also a deliberate contrast against all the dons doing their own unwomanly thing rather than being proper married women. A salutary lesson of some of the dangers of marriage and motherhood. Sayers was at Cambridge in the time when women were allowed to study but before they could receive degrees and she was 55, nine years before her death, before women could become full members of the university.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Surely she was at Oxford?
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
My bad - she was at Oxford, but Sayers still wasn't allowed to graduate when she first studied, as women weren't awarded degrees in 1912.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
True. She had to wait until 1920 to get her MA.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Hmm. I can't recall any similar incident in a book. But now that I think about it there are at least a couple not dissimilar occurrences in the old Superman comic books, usually moments when Clark Kent is trying to hide his super powers.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
I've just reread A Town Like Alice by Neville Shute, which is an incredible story based around WWII in the East (Singapore / Malaysia / Indonesia) and the aftermath. I first read it as a teenager and rereading is a real education as to how far language usage has changed in not very long, particularly the nomenclature for Aborigines and Malaysians.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Drat, not quite right for my research. I am ISO an identical novel set one century earlier.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I was browsing the opening of an Amazon suggestion - since it was by a writer I'd quite enjoyed as a holiday read. Period, late 19th C, heroine young single woman: early scenes involve a conversation with a vicar and his wife - who is referred to throughout as 'the vicaress'. We are also given to understand the heroine has been taking unaccompanied trips abroad since she was 18, on each of which she has had one or more affairs - but it's fine, because she has totally worked out failsafe contraception.
I call fraud. Why even pretend to be writing historical fiction if you can't be bothered to introduce a scintilla of believability into the attitudes or experiences of your characters?
I suppose there is a market for the modern-woman-in-fancy-dress chicklit, but you're not chiselling 7.99 out of me for anything less that a genuine attempt at imaginative recreation. And no 'Him? Sits in that corner drinking every night. Edgar Allan somebody-or-other' either.
[ 30. May 2016, 13:41: Message edited by: Firenze ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Happens all the time, alas. Which is why research should always be done with the source documents and never with novels. The question is always whether your readers are knowledgeable enough to spot your errors, and whether they will care. There are certain areas (guns, horses, fashion) where mavens are fanatical, and will call you on it. But with a lot of stuff, either nobody will know that Dante Alighieri never went to Paris in 1304, or not enough people will care to make any difference. At least I hope so...
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
There are sufficient lacunae in the records of the lives of most historical figures that you can slip in any feasible incidents you please. And even more do, with an invented character.
What irritates me is making the character totally anachronistic in language, beliefs and attitude, plus totally immune to the social conventions of the day. In fact, those are invoked - usually in a highly cariacatured form - just so the writer can say through the heroine 'what silly attitudes! See how much more liberated and enlightened we are today!' Never any suggestion that sexual promiscuity, for example, might have its downside in any era.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Well, that's just bad writing. And evil, because it fosters the dimwitted notion that everybody in the past was just like us. Why didn't Abraham Lincoln's doctors do CPR on him, when he was shot in Ford's Theater? Why was there no YouTube video of the crime? Did John Wilkes Booth take a selfie?
The briefest tour through the historical record reveals to you that people in the past were both different, and the same as us. A properly written novel set in the past will balance this, but never perfectly. Because all authors carry with them their own culture and time, and this inevitably colors the work.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
There are sufficient lacunae in the records of the lives of most historical figures that you can slip in any feasible incidents you please. And even more do, with an invented character.
What irritates me is making the character totally anachronistic in language, beliefs and attitude, plus totally immune to the social conventions of the day. In fact, those are invoked - usually in a highly cariacatured form - just so the writer can say through the heroine 'what silly attitudes! See how much more liberated and enlightened we are today!' Never any suggestion that sexual promiscuity, for example, might have its downside in any era.
I've only read a few of the Tasha Alexander's Lady Emily series of crime novels, but she uses the fact that the heroine's detective work is not an acceptable occupation for a Society Lady in Victorian times to drive the story forwards in really clever ways.
That seems a far more sensible approach. But that involves doing some research and who's got time for that
Tubbs
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
I have just finished Book 5 of the Reading Challenge - "A book you should have read in school". I chose The Silver Darlings by Neil M. Gunn, and it was a good choice. Set in Caithness c. 1810-30 as the herring industry was taking off, it is about a people in transition from an old world to a new one. It was beautifully written with likeable characters, and although there is no 'plot' as such, it is full of both tragedy and adventure. The descriptions of the seas and the storms are wonderful.
Men are true heroes in Gunn's book - noble, pure, and immensely strong mentally as well as physically. The women are likewise noble and pure, though they are obviously some holy mystery to Gunn. (Mind you, all his characters are holy mysteries to some extent.) His male lovers have a habit of overpowering their feebly-protesting women, who then melt in glad surrender. (I'd have liked a faint 'Yes yes' in among the faint 'No no's.) But the sea is the main character, to be loved and fought and overcome by the men, and yet to compel them and overcome them in return ... a bit like the women, really.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
I'm hoping to kill several birds with one stone during my holiday reading, including Jane Eyre as the 'book you should have read at school'. Everyone else seems to have read it as a teenager.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I read Jane Eyre at school - but I never realised what a feminist book it is until I saw it on stage last year! Charlotte Bronte presented her heroine with all the choices available to a young woman in her position (starting with becoming a governess, then the option to become Rochester's mistress, or marry St John to be his helpmeet) and she sticks to her principles and comes through to what she wants in the end.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
And she poured all of her personal life into the work. So vividly, that when the book came out the unfortunate proprietor of Lowood School (which really exists under another name, and was neither worse nor better run than any other boarding school in Britain of the period) was excoriated and pilloried in the press.
It is fun to read the critiques of JE from the day. People complained bitterly of how passionate and stubborn Jane was, totally unwomanly and an inappropriate example for young minds. 'Coarse' was the favorite epithet. When you read it, see if you feel it is coarse.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I've just finished William Goldman's "The Princess Bride" (yes, *that* Princess Bride). The film's much better - I found Goldman's frequent asides in the book increasingly unnecessary and annoying. When he just stuck to the story it was great, and I loved that I had the image of the cast in my head as I read. But if you're just going to do one or the other, watch the film.
Next up, a new book: Melissa Hastings' "Rain: Four Walks in English Weather". Looking out of the window (granted, in Scotland, but still) I can't help feeling it's very apt reading for now.
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
Next up, a new book: Melissa Hastings' "Rain: Four Walks in English Weather". Looking out of the window (granted, in Scotland, but still) I can't help feeling it's very apt reading for now.
Mm, it's raining here as well, and poor Glastonbury is not far down the road from us
[ 25. June 2016, 16:51: Message edited by: Doone ]
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
I've just finished William Goldman's "The Princess Bride" (yes, *that* Princess Bride). The film's much better - I found Goldman's frequent asides in the book increasingly unnecessary and annoying. When he just stuck to the story it was great, and I loved that I had the image of the cast in my head as I read. But if you're just going to do one or the other, watch the film.
The Princess Bride is not only one of my all-time favourite movies, it is the one shining example that I, a book-lover, can think of where the movie really WAS better. The movie is gentle and sweet, and while it's very funny, it's never a mean-spirited kind of funny. The book (particularly Goldman's narrative voice with, as you say, the frequent asides) has a cynicism and an underlying meanness that's entirely lacking in the film. I can see how it would be to some people's taste, but I'm so glad the filmmakers made the movie they did, rather than one that echoed the book in tone.
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
I've just finished William Goldman's "The Princess Bride" (yes, *that* Princess Bride). The film's much better - I found Goldman's frequent asides in the book increasingly unnecessary and annoying. When he just stuck to the story it was great, and I loved that I had the image of the cast in my head as I read. But if you're just going to do one or the other, watch the film.
My thoughts exactly. I got increasingly fed up with the supposedly 'real life' bits and frankly didn't care about the guy and his messed-up life at all.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Interestingly, on some level Goldman must have been aware that these interpolations were self-indulgent and not successful. He wrote the screenplay for the movie, you may recall. And he knew exactly what to bob out. (Possibly also the director and the other suits insisted on a more focused story line.)
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Yes, I've thought a lot about the fact that he did a much better (for my tastes) job of writing the screenplay than he did of the novel. I feel like the general sweetness of the tone (the nice framing story of Grampa Columbo and the little boy as opposed to Goldman's rather less nice frame story) might have been a suggestion of the movie's producers rather than Goldman's idea. But I may be judging the man too harshly.
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
I finished reading For Whom the Bell Tolls
At the moment I'm in a smallish African city without a book store
Have you read Shakespeare in the Bush?
and Scoop by Evelyn Waugh which can be bought online?
[ 28. June 2016, 04:42: Message edited by: Palimpsest ]
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
Has anyone else read any Jasper Fforde? I've just started The Eyre Affair (under 'a book recommended by a best friend'), and I am not sure yet if it is very good, or too-clever-by-half. I'm not loving it yet ... I think that will depend on whether the characters and the story are strong enough to overcome the cleverness. Which they may be.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I loved it. See if the ending does not make you shout with joy.
But he went on to write a number of sequels, which are more annoying.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
You have to be in the mood (and possibly on holiday). The Tuesday Next ones were tolerable, but I started on one of the Nursery Crimes and found I couldn't be arsed.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
I have a Jasper fforde sitting on my to read pile that I've failed to get into a couple of times. It needs more time and attention than I have to give it normally.
I finally read The Dark is Rising over half term, which was a Ship's Bookclub book a few months back and loved it. I think I must have read Under Sea, Over Stone and that trilogy previously.
I signed up foe one of these book club things that ask members to comment on book covers and posters for new books, and as well as winning a free book for discussing my natural history book collection, they must have got fed up with my response of 'that poster/cover is worst because it's selling this author as chick lit, and she's better than that', so the last author was Eva Dolan who has a series of detective novels based on characters from a hate crimes unit in Peterborough. I was prompted to buy the first in the series and am enjoying it so far, albeit finding it bleak reading at moments during the Brexit campaign.
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
That's interesting and helpful - thank you. They do seem to be a particular taste, which I am hoping I acquire. I appreciate the incentive to keep going to the end, Brenda.
[ 29. June 2016, 15:41: Message edited by: Cottontail ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
No, I haven't been able to manage anything else by Fforde, either. This cannot be a good thing, IMO.
The entire question of book covers is a painful issue and could absorb much discussion. It helps however to think of them as a semiotic signal. It is not important, if the armor isn't right, the main figure is the wrong race, or the entire thing looks like a bodice ripper. All a cover is is the signal, to the reader (or more crucially the bookstore buyer) about what kind of book it is inside. Hence the use of very standard tropes like hunky shirtless heroes under a swooshy purple title (romance) or swords and dragons (fantasy). Anything more you get out of the cover is an extra.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
If you can afford to commission artwork, make sure your artist is classically educated. One of the crime novels of a successful author depicted a melange of the significant objects mentioned in the text, including a stone statue of a baby deer. Because the story made much play of a marble faun.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Owtch! But one of the great pitfalls in the world of letters is the almost-correct word. This has become far more common here in our internet day, when you can just google a word and slam it into the text without fear or favor.
My favorite example is from a student manuscript. It was a vaguely Tolkienish fantasy. The heroine had a magical ring, which she carried around her cervix. I couldn't face it. I said to the author, This is not in my job description. Take this word, and google it. Absorb its meaning fully, and then change your manuscript. Do not tell me anything about what you know, understand, or assime about the meaning of the word. Leave my ignorance pure and untouched. Please!
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Birth control methods in Middle Earth. Very under-explored subject.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I love everything Jasper Fforde writes, but I can completely see how his writing wouldn't appeal to every reader. I think he's one of those writers where you either love him or you don't and there's not a lot of middle ground.
Brenda, I would have had a hard time restraining hilarious whoops of laughter if I had to discuss that MS with a student. Do you have any idea where she THOUGHT the cervix was?
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
I think I am one of those rare middle ground people, Trudy! I've finished The Eyre Affair (thanks to train journeys today), and I quite liked it. The adventure was fun, the characters likeable, and the craziness, though tiresome at times, was okay once I got used to it. So fair enough. I may read another some time, but I'm not too worried.
Though - sorry, Brenda - I actually didn't like the ending so much. I was rooting for her to get together with one of the other characters, so was a trifle disappointed. I think this must be the middle child in me: I always seem to be a bigger fan of the sidekick than the hero ... Parker instead of Lord Peter, Horatio instead of Hamlet, Dick instead of Julian ...
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
The cervix thing was a prime example of Roget's Disease. In which, troubled by the thinness of your vocabulary, you open the thesaurus and have at it. If you look under 'neck', you will find 'cervix' as one of the entries. I gather this means that the character was wearing the ring around her neck, Frodo style. But I carefully did not ask for details. There are some things on does not want to know.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I have become a fan of the British Library reissues of early crime classics, and have a binge every time they bring out a new set. I have just been delighted by 'The Secret of High Eldersham' by Miles Burton, aka Cecil Street, published in 1930, because it does something more recent novels have driven me up the wall for not doing. (And TV - yes you, 'New Tricks'.)
The hero goes to a remote village where newcomers find themselves unwelcome. There are 'mommets' ('poppets' in 'The Crucible'), mysterious gatherings with misused church candles and a person with sleeves ending in cloven hooves.
And it is not a long established Wicker Man tradition going back hundreds of years. It has been cooked up by someone who has read too much Margaret Murray. Hooray! The right history for it. Though I suppose, being closer to the source, attribution was easier.
I won't say why, because of spoilering, and the book is a little hazy on the original setting up. But I was so pleased to find something rooted in reality.
[ 05. July 2016, 19:04: Message edited by: Penny S ]
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
Having finished Jasper Fforde in record time, I am now back up to speed with the reading challenge. Book 7 is "A book that was published before you were born". As this is a rather sweeping category, I decided to narrow it down by choosing a book that was published just before I was born. So I invested a book token that has been lurking in my purse, and am about to embark upon Patrick O'Brian's Master and Commander.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Oh, what pleasures lie before you!
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've just been working my way through a stack of Mary Stewart novels. They may be dated by now but the Crystal Cave novels are still excellent, polished and articulate, and the best Arthurian novels you will find.
I've now embarked on John Buchan's "Witch Wood" which I attempted to read as a child and didn't like. It makes more sense as an adult, though I do hate it when authors attempt to present dialect speech as it's spoken and write in an accent. It takes longer to decipher and it's quite irritating. Still, the book is quite interesting so far.
There's a definite difference in style between the more leisurely pace of novels written decades ago, which are more descriptive and set the scene rather better, than the cut-down sort you get these days which generally have at least one gratuitous sex scene. There was more of an art to writing in those days.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I've got that Buchan somewhere - must look it out. And am now getting a horrible feeling that I disposed of the Merlin series of Stewarts during a purge. I do hope not.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've now finished reading John Buchan's "Witch Wood". It was the novel the author regarded as his own favourite, and it is indeed a good story, but (for anyone not familiar with Scottish dialect) sadly hampered by the prolific use of dialect speech.
"There's a wheen fosy bodies yonder, and they're as keen at a niffer as a Musselburgh wabster..."
When every page is liberally sprinkled with this kind of thing, it can make it difficult to get the details of the story. None the less an interesting read that kept me guessing how it would turn out. That's the mark of a good book: when you have to stop reading, for whatever reason, you go on thinking about it, wondering how it will end and what will happen to the leading characters. It didn't end the way I thought it would, either, which is good.
[ 10. July 2016, 10:09: Message edited by: Ariel ]
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
That may be the reason I started but never got very far. Hmm. But I obviously thought it worth keeping about.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I have just started reading the 2-for-1 of Dr Johnson's "A Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland" (published originally in 1775) and James Boswell's "The Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides" (published originally in 1785), both accounts of the two men's tour together around the Hebrides in summer 1773. I'm so far only a short way into Johnson's Journey (which starts in Edinburgh and heads up the east coast, before heading west a bit later), but am already enjoying it immensely. He manages to be bitchy, scathing, snobby, and yet also enchanted, without being overly wordy. I enjoyed the sum total of his remarks on Dundee ("We stopped a while at Dundee, where I remember nothing remarkable..."). And then I was very taken by a passage after he leaves Aberdeen, which I reckon is referring to the area of epic sand dunes now occupied by Donald Trump's monstrosity of a golf course (and which nature is, as predicted, already trying to reclaim): "We travelled over a tract of ground near the sea, which, not long ago, suffered a very uncommon, and unexpected calamity. The sand of the shore was raised by a tempest in such quantities, and carried to such a distance, that an estate was overwhelmed and lost. Such and so hopeless was the barrenness superinduced, that the owner, when he was required to pay the usual tax, desired rather to resign the ground."
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I'm a great Johnson fan. I last read the Journey when I visited Edinburgh. I have to say I haven't bothered with Boswell's journal though.
That man is little to be envied, whose patriotism would not gain force upon the plain of Marathon, or whose piety would not grow warmer among the ruins of Iona!
Beautiful!
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on
:
and began reading it. By page 14 I had decided a) quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
I love everything Jasper Fforde writes, but I can completely see how his writing wouldn't appeal to every reader. I think he's one of those writers where you either love him or you don't and there's not a lot of middle ground.
Yeah. I bought Something Rotten and began reading it. By page 14 I decided a) I didn't have access to the chemicals he was on, and b) life was too short. Oh, and c) the title was apt.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I have this on the TBR pile. Alas, I am not going to get to it this year. (Stupidly, I signed up to be on the jury for an award, and now I have to read all these awful new books.)
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I have started on "Witch Wood", which may be a mistake at the same time as watching "The Living and the Dead", what with the framing from Buchan's present, and Daft Gibbie being like the character played by the actor who played Pythagoras in 'Atlantis'; and then that detective story with the Margaret Murray witches in it. All twitching at each others' plots.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I haven't read much fantasy lately, but have just finished The Gracekeepers by a Scots writer Kirsty Logan. It is her first novel, but she has previously published a collection of short stories.
The book is set in a world that is almost entirely sea (although it's clear it wasn't always like this). North is part of a circus that sails between islands giving performances to the landlockers (people who live on the land). Callanish is a Gracekeeper who lives alone and tends the graves of those who die at sea as a penance for something in her earlier life.
Ursula Le Guin, is quoted as saying, "A highly original fantasy, set in a haunting sea-world both familiar and mysterious."
I liked it and am going to chase up The rental heart and other Fairytales her short story collection.
Huia
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I've finished 'Witch Wood', and think my early attempt failed not on the rich use of the local language, but on my sad ignorance of Scottish history, especially of the rulings of the Kirk. Having come across more of it through the historical detective stories of Sheila McKay, I have a better understanding of the extremes of Presbyterianism (and of what drove my mother from our local Congregational church with its strict leavening of Scots).
Buchan was drawing on Deacon Brodie, and on Hogg's 'Confessions of a Justified Sinner', I suspect (which I have not yet read) and its influence on Stevenson and his 'Jekyll and Hyde'.
The Reformation led to horrors across Europe, didn't it, which its founders probably had no idea they were unleashing? Last year I learned of the imposition of the death penalty in Iceland, for crimes which had hitherto not been seen as serious, with drownings of women whio had the temerity to name the ministers or the chief citizens as the fathers of their babies, and far fewer hangings for male adulterers.
I never know how much credence to place in the framing of novels with claims of historical accuracy and researches in obstruse documents.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I'm currently reading Kate Tempest's debut novel, The Bricks That Built The Houses. There's the characteristic rhythm that one finds in her poetry while fills the book, though it's rather London-centric, relying on references to specific roads as having connotations that might be lost on those who don't live around Brockley & Lewisham.
[ 17. July 2016, 14:29: Message edited by: Sipech ]
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
I'm halfway through Jon Ronson's So You've Been Publicly Shamed.
I've heard him on NPR and think of him as a sort of Bill Bryson of pop-psychology. This book isn't as funny as his radio personality or the title led me to expect, although I have laughed, but it is fascinating.
His subject is primarily social media as the modern public stocks and whipping post, only with a much wider reach. His stories of how one poorly worded tweet can ruin a life or how an unknown blogger can end a glittering career are more frightening than funny, but I'm glued to the pages.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I've just finished re-reading Right Ho! Jeeves as a the prequel to The Code of the Woosters which I think is the August book.
Very pleased to do so.
I'm also browzing the letters of Horace Walpole as I hope to visit his home at Strawberry Hill in the near future.
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
I've just read Kate Morton's "The Distant Hours" which I found absorbing if a tad longwinded in places. I'm now revisiting some of my childhood books. I've kept a lot of them and thought I'd reread them one day when, perhaps, housebound or convalescent (ever the optimist, me) but then thought - heck, why not now? So I've read Elizabeth Enright's "The Saturdays", "Then There Were Five" and "Spiderweb For Two" in the last few days. It's been great!
Nen - getting in touch with her inner child.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I loved the Melendys. Although don't you wonder what Mr. Melendy was doing?
Posted by SusanDoris (# 12618) on
:
Having been introduced to Jasper Fforde's world (by a shipmate) years ago, I read through all the books until I came to one which was so complicated and required so much concentration, that I lost interest and gave up. I did, however, very much enjoy his excellent use of the English language and his comprehensive knowledge of all points of grammar.
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Although don't you wonder what Mr. Melendy was doing?
Briefly I did, on this re-reading. I can't say it even crossed my mind as a child.
Now partway through Cynthia Harnett's "The Wool Pack."
[ 31. July 2016, 21:25: Message edited by: Nenya ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I like the idea (all my own work) that he is secretly James Bond.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Brenda, I can't remember if he was away all the time - if so maybe he was in jail for insider trading.
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
Now partway through Cynthia Harnett's "The Wool Pack."
You just sent me scurrying to Google. I remember enjoying her historical novels as a child, particularly The Load of Unicorn . I must see if the library has any of them.
I must have read thousands of books since I read them, but they were both well written and exciting.
Just checked Amazon On the other hand the Library has all of them
Thanks Nenya - it will be a break from murder mysteries.
Huia
[ 01. August 2016, 08:16: Message edited by: Huia ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I can't recall the details, but he was away for most of the books -- a tradition in children's literature, so that there are no adults to intervene/appeal to in crisis/stop you from having fun. In the E. Nesbit books the parents tended to be war correspondents, traveling far away. In the LION WITCH & WARDROBE the parents are in London while the kids are safely out in the boondocks. Huckleberry Finn's father was a vagrant.
These are all depressing. Far better for Mr. Melendy to be James Bond, slipping awawy for horrible adventures parachuting out of jump jets and fighting SMERSH and then coming back to pay the property taxes and see to the leak in the cupola.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I have just overdosed on fathers, having given in to temptation at the supermarket checkout and bought "Harry Potter and the Cursed Chiild".
A very fast read, without the description which would be covered by all the theatre stuff.
Satisfying. And sent me to find out about Tom Riddle's orphan status (not a spoiler).
It leaves me with a couple of questions, instead of the one I had after the original books.
Why did Rowling not show any female bullying at Hogwarts? Hermione, one would think, could have attracted it for her ancestry.
My new one. Why are there no problems with mothers?
And another new one, just surfaced. Why no female/female friendships, when friendship is a major thread throughout the series?
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
Why did Rowling not show any female bullying at Hogwarts? Hermione, one would think, could have attracted it for her ancestry.
My new one. Why are there no problems with mothers?
And another new one, just surfaced. Why no female/female friendships, when friendship is a major thread throughout the series?
She did (f-on-f bullying). Millicent Bulstrode is shown wrestling/attempting to pound Hermione (I think this was in the disastrous dueling class). They appear to have some history, as Hermione selects her for her target Slytherin in the polyjuice affair.
Problems with mothers--well, there's Aunt Petunia, whom Dumbledore accuses of abusing Dudley (in concert with Uncle Vernon, to be sure). Sirius Black's mother is definitely wacko and evil. Merope is more ineffectual and pathetic than anything else, but she definitely plays a role in Voldemort's psychological development. Quite a few mothers in HP are dead or missing (e.g. Longbottom's mother, whose mind is permanently damaged). I wonder if this is partly due to the fairytale trope where mothers are also almost always dead in childbirth?
On female-female friendships--I suspect this is due to JKR choosing a male viewpoint character who is also pretty self-absorbed (like most kids, to be fair). We see males most of the time because that is who he lives and hangs out with, bar Hermione, who is something of a nerdy loner outside the trio. There are distant glimpses of f/f interaction, but it's mostly things like the three chasers on the Gryffindor quidditch team, or the girls who go to Hogsmeade together and argue over the cursed necklace.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I missed the Millicent thing - but in my experience as pupil and teacher, sustained female bullying is much more common than the sort of thing shown by Draco, Flashman and co. And it was absent. Rowling must have been very lucky at school.
I think I was thinking that there is no psychological mother problem to be dealt with in the manner that the father problems are. (And the play is crawling with them. I don't think this is a spoiler.) I suppose Petunia and Dudley have a dysfunctional relationship, but, as you say, most of the mothers are missing. Merope's mother is so much missing that there is nothing there about her, no name, no history, nothing.
Not a trace of Hamlet and Gertrude, Orestes and Clytemnestra, or the one which I took some time to fathom, Cupid and Venus in the Psyche story, and its later version in Part 2 of Sleeping Beauty, which I came across in a fairy story book by Roger Lancelyn Green, in which the Prince tries to keep Beauty and their children from his mother because she is an ogre who will want to eat them.
Devouring mothers exist - as in Kelly's problems.
[ 01. August 2016, 21:09: Message edited by: Penny S ]
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I like the idea (all my own work) that he is secretly James Bond.
That is genius.
Alternatively he could just have had a minor admin-type role but made out that he was indispensable to get time away from the family.
I read "The Load of Unicorn" years ago but didn't like it as much as "The Wool Pack" and must have got rid of my copy as I no longer seem to have it.
I think Barbara Sleigh's Carbonel books might be next.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I missed the Millicent thing - but in my experience as pupil and teacher, sustained female bullying is much more common than the sort of thing shown by Draco, Flashman and co. And it was absent. Rowling must have been very lucky at school.
Moaning Myrtle clearly describes herself as being a victim of the kind of female bullying you describe, and there are occasional hints of bullying female cliques elsewhere, but mostly I suppose JKR didn't want to write that kind of book.
It is, as has been noted above, a male-dominated series. The books are almost entirely written form Harry's point of view. So significant mentions of female bullying would have to come from one of the major female characters - probably Hermione or Ginny - complaining to Harry, or in Harry's presence, about it.
Ginny has had a crush on Harry forever, and isn't going to come whining to him.
How does the female bullying dynamic interact with the House contest? Hermione is a valuable asset to Gryffindor - she regularly earns significant numbers of points for the House - which to me makes it more than usually likely that her housemates will be on her side. And if the bullies are from other Houses - well, perhaps their opinions aren't important.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
Of course, Luna suffers from the exclusion sort of bullying.
And Draco is in another house, and he matters. Rowling seems to have been doing some thinking about why he bullied, incidentally.
Is it a generally accepted thing that all young men have to challenge their fathers? Because I have asked, and no one I know seems to have had to deal with that sort of thing. (I was on a course about Sophocles, and the tutor claimed that everyone had an Oedipus complex, and everyone on the course said they didn't, and he said they were in denial. Including the women. And despite Oedipus provably not having one, either. The tutor's status dropped after that.)
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
And another new one, just surfaced. Why no female/female friendships, when friendship is a major thread throughout the series?
Isn't this the other side of the "why no female bullying" coin?
The books are about Harry, and his point of view. Obviously he can't have female/female friendships.
Suppose Hermione were to have a close female friend at Hogwarts. Then the Harry/Ron/Hermione dynamic wouldn't work - the stories only make sense if Harry and Ron are Hermione's only confidantes.
We see female friendships present - there are schoolgirls moving through the background in friendship groups - but Harry wouldn't notice the internal dynamics of female/female friendships.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that another reason not to show female bullying is because it introduces a whole crop of issues JKR isn't really addressing in her books--notably the sexual/attractiveness stuff. My own experience of F/F bullying had a pretty strong flavor of "you're ugly and could never attract a guy in a million years." Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think M/M bullying is more impersonal, in a way. Or maybe it's personal in another way, but not one with sexual overtones. Does this make any sense at all?
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
Atttractiveness wasn't the driver of f/f bullying at primary school. It was about being or not being the friend of the group leader, being in the group or excluded. The girls use whatever tool they can to attack the victim, and would clearly develop to include attractiveness to boys once puberty kicked in. Coming top in class while being useless on the sports field seems to have been my failing at primary age, and by the time I hit puberty I was at a school where bullying didn't seem to be happening much. I never saw any, anyway.
Hermione having arrived with a friendship with two lads may have helped.
I'm probably a bit too alert to mother damage at the moment. But I don't see why, for example, Draco's father or Voldemort's mother or father couldn't have had one of those mothers without changing the overall plot pattern.
I suppose I want a more complete pattern of life in it. And when the same pattern is repeated several times, I start to want a bit of variation.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
Atttractiveness wasn't the driver of f/f bullying at primary school.
Hogwarts isn't a primary school, of course. It's a secondary school.
I don't remember much mention of what education primary-age wizarding children typically get. There's no mention of any kind of magical primary school, and all the wizarding family kids are sufficiently clueless about Muggledom that they can't possibly attend Muggle schools, so one assumes that young wizarding kids tend to be educated at home.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
An extremely dangerous strategy, as is seen by the sort of children they turn out to be. Especially if born to Slytherin parents.
Perhaps they have modules of basic literacy and numeracy which can be installed in the mind by some suitable spell - Ofstedius?
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Looks like there's material for a thread on Hogwarts and (non)recurring themes in the works of JKR. Why not start one? I'm sure people would find it interesting.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I'm not sufficiently a Potterhead to do that, I think. I'd have to read them again.
(I did once try riffing on a cartoon in the Guardian's sociology pages - "... and the Interfering Social Worker." I got as far as the Headteacher explaining to the foster parents the need for them to read the anti-bullying policy and why the children had been expressing concerns about the foster child in circle time. The foster parents were very dubious about circle time. I thought I had got further, to the morning visit from the social workers and the police, the news about the school the cousin was supposed to be going to, and the kindly old wizard having to arrange an alternative placement with the Stoatlies, but this seems to have vanished, or may be on paper! This was before it became clear that the boy HAD to be with the aunt.)
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
For what it's worth the first and therefore most traumatic bullying I experienced was by a girl. It was not physical but very spiteful.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
If you want to discuss bullying, I suggest a separate thread, either in Purgatory or Hell.
Thanks,
Ariel
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on
:
Luna Lovegood is bullied and excluded.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Gill H:
Luna Lovegood is bullied and excluded.
Yes indeed, but by everyone, for being weird, rather than the specific f/f cliquey behaviour Penny was talking about.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I had the next book in the Rivers of London series ( The Hanging Tree, ) on reserve at the Library. Last night I received an email saying that the publican date had been "indefinitely delayed"
I did some Googling and I didn't get a clear idea of why.
Does anyone know please?
signed Bereft
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
If you know the publisher, go to their web site. Google and see if the author has a web page. Or, go over to Goodreads (www.goodreads.com) and search on the author and title in the discussion groups, to see if anyone else is chattering about it. Finally, go over to Amazon, search on the book's name, and see if there is any discussion or gossip. It may be as simple as a contractual difficulty.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Amazon seem pretty definite that it will be released 21 September next year.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Thanks Firenze and Brenda
Next Year!!!!???? Damn, I did check Amazon and I thought they meant this year - I shouldn't look things up when I'm tired and cranky.
Maybe I'll go back and read all of Douglas Adams again, or have another go at Terry Pratchett. I loved Maurice and his mice, (thanks to Doublethink for the recommendation) but never got into anything else.
Huia
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
According to my daughter and Google, Ben Aaronovitch has been writing comic books - and continuing the Rivers of London series in that format. According to his blog there are two graphic novels out that fit into the series and another that continues the story line. There are another two planned that continue the chronology before The Hanging Tree.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Oh, no. I hate graphic novels. And I love his stories.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Yeah, Ariel, my thoughts entirely. One of the reviews was fairly disbelieving about having to pay at least the cost of a novel to buy a short story in comic book form.
It also means carrying books not a Kindle.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
You can get graphic novels in e-format. It is in fact better -- you can biggify the art and see the detail.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
you can biggify the art and see the detail.
Wash your mouth out! The word I believe you are looking for is 'enlarge'. It's preferable to such butchering of the language!
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda:
You can get graphic novels in e-format.
Urgh, not for me, thanks. One of the pleasures of reading a real book is that you get to use your imagination, and form your own mental pictures of characters, scenes, etc. This is part of what makes reading such a great experience, especially in childhood when those mental images are formed that can make you love a book for years afterwards. I don't want an artist's interpretation of how a character should look. It was bad enough when they did a film version of LOTR with Frodo, Legolas and Elrond looking completely wrong, and "Howl's Moving Castle" had an 8 year old Michael and a very girly Howl.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
Who couldn't have played rugby to save his life!
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
For those of us with failing vision, having stuff on a screen allows for reading. I can no longer handle paper print at all, very worrying.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
you can biggify the art and see the detail.
Wash your mouth out! The word I believe you are looking for is 'enlarge'. It's preferable to such butchering of the language!
Embiggen is more cromulent.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Oh, no. I hate graphic novels. And I love his stories.
Me too.
When I was a child a graphic novel would be one that went into lurid details, . The first time I saw the term used (as an adult) was as a classification in a bookshop. I sidled up to the shelf for a peek and was surprised to find that they were only what I would have called comic books. The only graphic novel I have read was one by Neil Gaiman, though I suppose the
Classic Comics I read as a child were similar. I remember they were helpful to me as a child sorting out the difference between Agnes and Dora in David Copperfield . I always wanted to read their version of War and Peace , but if they did one I never saw it.
Huia
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I've been following the Ben Aaronovitch comic books, and really enjoying them. I think the artwork is good, as well.
My first ever foray into the world of comic books was years ago in London, when I started reading Green Arrow stories, on the grounds that you couldn't go far wrong with what was basically an updated Robin Hood. It turned out I had just caught by chance one of the best stories of the 1980s, by Mike Grell, where Oliver Queen has moved to Seattle with Black Canary and opened a flower shop called the Sherwood Florist.
The second thing I tried, again totally by chance, was Black Orchid by Neil Gaiman (who I'd never heard of back then).
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There are things you can do, and stories you can tell, only in the graphic-novel format. Just like there are stories that only can be told on stage with actors, or only on wide screens with CGI and SFX.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Eigon - thanks for the info re the Ben Aaronovitch graphic novels. I need to see what's in the Library and stretch my comfort zone a bit.
Now my kindle has sorted out its problem (without the phonecall I was dreading having to make to Amazon) I have been re-reading a series called Midnight Texas by Charmaine Harris. I have the first two books downloaded and the third isn't available on kindle. I was until I walked into the small, suburban branch of the Library and there it was, sitting on the Best sellers shelf at $3 a week. Better that than $US10 ($14-01 plus tax).
I my library
Huia
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
... I have been re-reading a series called Midnight Texas by Charmaine Harris. I have the first two books downloaded and the third isn't available on kindle...
I've read (also borrowed from the library) the first two books having read several of her other series. They're an engaging and speedy read, although I haven't felt the need to rush out and buy my own copies. Particularly clever is how some second string characters from those other series make appearances in this series: all her books, including the non-supernatural purely detective novels are set in the same universe.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
Just finished 'Spiderlight' by Adrian Tchaikovsky. Original idea, very well done. Funny, but also examines serious issues, and very subversive; takes fantasy cliches and twists them around, somewhat in the style of Diana Wynne Jones' 'Tough Guide to Fantasyland'.
(Mild spoiler)
The hero is a giant spider who is magically transformed into a humanoid shape to help a group of adventurers overthrow the Dark Lord.
[ 09. August 2016, 09:13: Message edited by: Jane R ]
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Particularly clever is how some second string characters from those other series make appearances in this series: all her books, including the non-supernatural purely detective novels are set in the same universe.
Yes! I loved the Lily Bard and Harper Conolly books, but I thoroughly detested the character of Aurora Teagarden. (I note the is a new book in this series about to be published, which I will probably read - to see if my mind has changed). Sookie Stackhouse fits somewhere in between, in terms of enjoyment for me possibly because I read too many in a row.
Huia
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I'm in the middle of Family Trade by Charles Stross. And it's been compulsive reading so far, maybe even better than his Laundry Files series. It's the first book in a parallel worlds fantasy, where a family in the alternate universe is able to travel to this world, and have become fabulously rich by trading between the two. The main character was brought up in this world, and discovers that she belongs to this world hopping family.
The set up is fairly straightforward - magic amulet is portal to other world, and then it gets really interesting, and very involved in economics, because that's what Charles Stross is good at - working out the implications of the world hopping talent.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
Daughter-Unit and I each got the new Harry Potter and the Cursed Child (J.K. Rowling, John Tiffany & Jack Thorne) and we discussed it this morning.
Both of us found the book ...interesting... but very disappointing. As you may know, the book is written as a play, which is not a problem, but I really prefer a novel with well detailed descriptions.
So as to not spoil the story for those who want to read it, I will not post specifics about the book. The characters don't really act as we would think from reading the previous novels. There is a very large gross, yuck factor in the story. The ending is very weak.
D-U and I decided that if we have a chance to see the play, we wouldn't.
I recommend that you give this a pass.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
So as to not spoil the story for those who want to read it, I will not post specifics about the book. The characters don't really act as we would think from reading the previous novels. There is a very large gross, yuck factor in the story. The ending is very weak.
I have read it, and will likewise refrain from posting specifics.
I don't think it's surprising that the characters act differently from the way they act in the novels - the children in the novels are now adults with teenage children. I'm pretty sure I don't act the way I would have acted when I was a teenager.
I'd say that the adult characters (I don't think it's betraying any kind of secret to mention that Professor McGonagall is in the play) seem quite consistent with their portrayal in the novels.
There are differences imposed by the difference in medium, but I don't find the play any more implausible than the novels. I'd watch the play.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
I would like to offer for your amazement the book Yuge! by GB Trudeau. This is a chronological collection of commentary regarding Doonesbury's observations of Donald Trump over the period of thirty years.
This erudite and astute journal pointedly tells the story of a man (Trump) who really, really believes in himself and his wealth and influence. In his own mind, he is also very intelligent and well spoken. To quote Mr. Trump, "I know words. I have the best words." and "You know, I did well in school, but for the life of me, I still can't understand what Doonesbury is all about."
Mr. Trudeau writes, "You can't make this stuff up, so why try?"
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on
:
I read Act One of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child this morning and am greatly enjoying it so far.... so will see how it goes. Thank you for not posting spoilers! Very suspenseful at this point. I was thinking, "No, bad idea, don't go there!" which of course we did with Harry, Ron, and Hermione through all the original series, But there's a malevolence at the center of things here, seeming to reside within the characters (one of them at least) rather than in opposition to them. But it *is* "The Cursed Child, so...."
[ 22. August 2016, 18:10: Message edited by: Mamacita ]
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
There are rather a number of candidates for the title at various times.
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
There are rather a number of candidates for the title at various times.
I finished the last half of the book last night and can only agree!
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
At very nearly sixty-seven and a half years old I am attempting The Scarlet Pimpernel for the first time. Very stylised.
The copy I'm reading was actually printed in France, spot the irony!
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
A case can be made that Pimpernel is the first of the masked super-heroes. (Certainly it is suspicious how rapidly he can get across the Channel.) Everyone from Zorro to Iron Man is his lineal descendant.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
The style obscures what is otherwise a good story that unfortunately needed a film version to bring it out.
I've been reverting to childhood and feasting on some old Patricia Lynch stories. They're still lovely and imaginative (and full of warmth), though the Ireland they depict is, I fear, mostly vanished. Still some of the old magic there in the tales though.
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
I really enjoyed Harry Potter and the ursed Child though I thought some of the charaterisation was a bit weak. I assumed that if I saw the play the actors would get round that.
I'm also annoyed by the delay in the next Ben Aaronovitch novel. I don't get on with graphic novels at all.
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
At very nearly sixty-seven and a half years old I am attempting The Scarlet Pimpernel for the first time. Very stylised.
Orczy wrote a number of Pimpernel novels (albeit sometimes with him as a tangential figure as we focus on the supporting characters). I downloaded an Orczy collection to my Kindle just for the sake of getting them because, unlike the original novel, virtually all the sequels have long been out of print. I think the last one I read was El Dorado, which was quite a corker!
But highly stylised, as you say.
Along the same lines, a publisher is beginning to re-issue the complete Zorro stories (novels, novellas and short stories). I have bought the first 2 volumes. Again, like the Pimpernel, while the original novel is almost always in print, it is rare to find any of the sequels. This series satisfies one of my lifelong curiosities--what were the subsequent stories like?
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
I read "The Load of Unicorn" years ago but didn't like it as much as "The Wool Pack" and must have got rid of my copy as I no longer seem to have it.
I think Barbara Sleigh's Carbonel books might be next.
I gave up on Carbonel and have been treating myself to some of the Narnia books. I think Swallows and Amazons might be next.
I've been lent - rather, it was landed on me - "The Last Letter from your Lover" by Jojo Moyes. Not sure it's my kind of thing at all, but willing to give it a go.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
The Scarlet Pimpernel was one of half a dozen fairly ripping yarns deemed suitable for 11 year olds when I started grammar school. I remember our history teacher saying he couldn't be doing with it because a character is described as quaffing wine from a tankard. Though from what I've subsequently gathered about the late 18th C, this may not have been that far out (they put it away in those days).
In second year, the set book was D K Broster's The Flight of the Heron - a work of simmering homoeroticism one now realises (though even at 12 we could see it was all about these two chaps and the supposed female love interest was nowhere).
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
I wouldn't say Alison Cameron, nee Grant, was nowhere - but a tad two-dimensional, perhaps. I was always entranced by the endearments Ewen used for her - heart's darling, little white love, and so on. I had high hopes of marriage but all Mr Nen manages is "luv."
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
In second year, the set book was D K Broster's The Flight of the Heron - a work of simmering homoeroticism one now realises (though even at 12 we could see it was all about these two chaps and the supposed female love interest was nowhere).
I know that it is verging on pulp fiction, and is sheer romantic nonsense, but this book has survived in my all-time top five since I first read it aged 12. I was thrilled by its intensity, though I had no word for 'homoeroticism' back then! Though when my 14 year old niece read it, her response was, "Why don't they just snog each other already?"
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
Yes, I loved 'The Flight of the Heron' too. It is clearly homoerotic, but oddly seems to have teenage girls swooning over it, and was written by a woman. So it's a bit more complex than just homoeroticism. The sheer romantic stuff must account for most of the appeal
Certainly the only other bit of homoerotic literature I read at the same age left me completely cold. But I still think it funny that an examining board thought the homosexual love story of Nisus and Euraylus a suitable Latin set text for O level, and no parental complaints that I remember!
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Ah, but that was because it was in the decent obscurity of a learned language as Gibbon remarked.
Anyway, you were lucky: we never got anything racier than a bit of implied nookie in Aeneid IV.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I am sitting here wondering just how fast the packet boats were from Dover back in the 18th century. With a good wind.
And remembering how our good Methodist Lay Preacher of a history teacher told us (in Folkestone) of the fishwives of Folkestone who rowed across to the French camp behind Boulogne to offer services to the troops. (Their husbands were away, having been pressed.)
Also how, at a Taise service in Cornwall, largely populated by yachty people, I was told that one of the congregation had sailed from Brittany the previous night - which had had me panicking about trees falling on my tent.
I don't think the Channel was all that much of a barrier. There's English and Irish names in the Pas de Calais, and French in Folkestone and Dover.
Which leads me to my other teenage devouring of Thorndike's Dr Syn books. Another masked - not a hero, really. As I grew, I went off the irreverend vicar. Knives through hands, for example. And forming romantic relationships with women who were much too young for him.
[ 27. August 2016, 07:41: Message edited by: Penny S ]
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
I read pretty much all the Orczy books as a teenager. My mother liked them in her time and we had a set of hardbacks on the shelf. And I was allowed to read them, unlike some of the other books.
I also found Thorndike's Dr Syn books, probably in the library, but don't remember reading more than one or two. My overall impression was that Dr Syn was a bad lot dressed up as a hero. I think I found George MacDonald Fraser's Flashman shortly after and decided they were more entertaining, weren't making any pretence that Flashman was particularly good and had much better settings.
The other one that I remember for the romance was Daphne du Maurier - Frenchman's Creek anyone?
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Sailing across the Channel doesn't take long in reasonable conditions. I never had a problem with the Orczy accounts of that crossing because I spent entirely too much time in sailing clubs as a child and saw people who'd just sailed over regularly. These guys were sailing 20-30 foot yachts, so similar in size to those packet ships, I reckoned.
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
Sailing across the Channel doesn't take long in reasonable conditions.
Crossing in foul weather on a car-ferry Seacat was not nice a few years ago. We went very slowly, and the motion of a catamaran on rough water is much more sick-making than the motion of an ordinary ship.
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marama:
Yes, I loved 'The Flight of the Heron' too. It is clearly homoerotic, but oddly seems to have teenage girls swooning over it, and was written by a woman. So it's a bit more complex than just homoeroticism.
Homoeroticism, especially covert, is immensely appealing to a lot of women. Maybe because it's non threatening.
I am not getting on very well with "The Last Letter from your Lover" and should have suspected I wouldn't given the friend who landed it on me - our tastes differ immensely.
My current re-read is Mary Stewart's "The Hollow Hills." I have at least two Richard Rohr books on the go as well.
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Baptist Trainfan:
Crossing in foul weather on a car-ferry Seacat was not nice a few years ago. We went very slowly, and the motion of a catamaran on rough water is much more sick-making than the motion of an ordinary ship.
IIRC, Seacat didn't have an open-air deck you could go and stand on either, which makes it much worse.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sarasa:
I'm also annoyed by the delay in the next Ben Aaronovitch novel. I don't get on with graphic novels at all.
Me too!
Huia
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
Gosh, I was an innocent child! I was one of those teenage girls who swooned over The Flight of the Heron without noticing any homoeroticism at all, and I loved the Scarlet Pimpernel. Didn't he have his own yacht zipping between England and France all the time?
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Because travel is by and large dull, and by definition is not your destination (where all the action will be) there is a powerful artistic temptation to simply shorten any transit time. It has been some years since I read Pimpernel but I remember being struck by how rapidly the hero could shuttle between Britain and France, especially when you notice that all the action does not take place on the beaches of England or France.
You can see the same travel contraction in many other stories -- they gave Batman the Batmobile, Batcopter, etc. but it is still a stretch to get him to the right place at the right time all the time. And (one of the worst offenders) in Return of the Sith (the last Lucas Star Wars movie) you would believe that getting from one planet to another takes two hours, tops.
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Because travel is by and large dull, and by definition is not your destination (where all the action will be) there is a powerful artistic temptation to simply shorten any transit time.
A good many fantasy authors have yielded to the opposite temptation and used travel from point A to point B to fill up the otherwise devoid of plot middle book of their trilogy.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
You need a sharp eye to spot it, but in the Hornblower novels by C. S. Forrester the author essentially cycled through a year twice, so as to wedge in all the stuff he wanted Hornblower to do.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I have decided life is too short - Baroness Orczy is being returned to the shelf. I can see that it would be a great play, as it originally was, but it is a poor excuse for a novel.
Posted by Marama (# 330) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
Gosh, I was an innocent child! I was one of those teenage girls who swooned over The Flight of the Heron without noticing any homoeroticism at all,
Well I don't think I noticed at the time either, so you're not the only innocent - but re-reading it now (it's still on my bookshelf) it is pretty clear.
I found Nenya's comment about the attractiveness of homoeroticism to many women interesting. All I can add is - isn't human sexuality complex?
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
I read and loved The Flight of the Heron when I was in primary school and loved it. I didn't notice any homo-eroticism but I wouldn't have, at that age.
I read my father's copy; he recommended it!
Next time I visit my parents I will swipe it and re-read it.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I'm reading Tony Hawks' "One Hit Wonderland", the third of his books of adventures-doing-silly-things-for-a-ridiculous-bet (following "Round Ireland with a Fridge" and "Playing the Moldovans at Tennis"). I loved the first two, and to be honest to start with I thought this third one was going to be a bit disappointing - it's a bit of a slow starter. But then the last two sections I've read have had me laughing out loud, and the bit with him wearing a pixie costume in the airport had me crying with laughter. I still think (with a few chapters to go) that this is the weakest of the three, but as a light and untaxing read to cheer me up it's been great.
The bet, I should add, is that having had a minor hit in the UK charts in the late 80s, he can't have another hit record anywhere in the world. Cue trips to Nashville, Africa, Eastern Europe and the Netherlands to try his luck.
[ 08. September 2016, 20:51: Message edited by: Jack the Lass ]
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
I'm currently reading Michael Smith's Autobiography 'At Cross Purposes'. Michael was Director of Music at Llandaff, 1970s-1990s, turbulent times in the life of the Cathedral. A sad and sorry tale of personalities which do not gel, of stubbornness, intractability and collective heads in the sand.
The author complains of all the problems he encounters, but of course none of them are allowed to rest at his own door - he is always the one sinned against, or so you are meant to believe. 6 of one and at least a quarter of a dozen of the other, I reckon...
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
I'm reading Anthony Powell's Dance to Music of Time and I've nearly finished volume 3 An Acceptance World.
Very mannered prose style and a socially limited cast (we meet at the Ritz, well I mean where else do you go?) but I'm finding it very readable.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I'm reading Zenna Henderson's Ingathering: The Complete People Stories. The People are human-appearing, but supernaturally gifted aliens who have lived on earth since the late 1800s. They aren't very scientificly realistic (interstellar distances covered in a single lifetime, aliens who can interbreed with humans with no help) but very good reading none-the-less. They are also very spiritual without being overtly religious or Christian.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
Ooh, is that a new publication? I don't think I have my old collection, or even if it was complete, anyway. (There was a cover on one of the paperbacks that derived, for some reason, from 'American Gothic', which I did not know at the time, but did know was not entirely appropriate.)
[ 15. September 2016, 22:03: Message edited by: Penny S ]
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
I have both. The complete collection is i think some 20 years old.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I don't think it's too new, I got it used on Amazon. After checking the book, it was printed in 2011.
If you don't have it though it's worth getting because it contains a People story printed nowhere else before this. I am eagerly awaiting getting to it. It's called Michal Without.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Henderson was a great writer, who combined a Christian world view with distinctly American settings and viewpoints. And she was purely SF. She has always been admired by the knowledgable, and deserves to be more widely appreciated.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
When I used to give blood, I always followed something from one of her not-People stories, and prayed for the receiver. I don't expect it made as much difference as in the story, though.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
Does anyone remember the TV film of The People? I think William Shatner was in it as a doctor. That's what led me on to find the original stories.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I remember it - and I keep hoping it will turn up again.
I have now ordered the book. Not cheap. But also not via Amazon. And new, so the money goes to the right place. Some second hand ones are exorbitantly priced.
I had the impression that Henderson was, rather than Christian, Jewish. The theme of ingathering, and the use of the expression "The Name" for God seemed to be indicating that.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
No, born into Mormonism and later a Methodist. Can anyone recall the name of the story with one character named Eliada?
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
She had some quite Christian-orientated stories in a collection called "The Anything Box" -"Food for all Flesh" and "Stevie and the Dark" come to mind.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I am surprised the miniseries people haven't glommed onto her work -- some of the stories would be ideal for the screen. (Her and Georgette Heyer, another natural for drama.)
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
No, born into Mormonism and later a Methodist. Can anyone recall the name of the story with one character named Eliada?
It was "Tell Us a Story". It's in the anthology "Ingathering".
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Ah! Thank you.
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
The funniest book I have read this year is "A man you can bank on" by Derek Hansen. A small Australian town makes good use of a million dollar stash of cash that big-city thieves have buried nearby. But when those thieves get out of jail 10 years later, mayhem ensues comparable to that in the best of Carl Hiassen's Florida capers.
And I can also commend the series of spy novels by Stella Rimington, featuring a female agent of MI5. Since Rimington rose through the ranks to become head of MI5, it is not surprising that her depiction of interagency rivalries and patronising male bosses sounds authentic. What is more of a surprise is the quality of her writing and plotting.
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I'm not a big fan of poetry, on the whole - I just find it really very daunting. But I have just finished a beautiful book of poetry, "Nort Atlantik Drift" by Robert Alan Jamieson, which is a series of short poems in Shetland dialect, with commentary and translation in English. The poems actually work pretty well in English, but I was pleased at how much of the dialect I was able to get (I read them first). I found them really beautiful and profound yet also very simple - musings on island life, seafaring, travelling, home, history. My only complaint about the book was that the photographs which accompanied every poem were a bit grainy. Shetland is so beautiful I really wanted to see it in all its glory.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I have spent a satisfying couple of days renewing acquaintance with familiar Henderson stories, and going on to meet new ones. One to go.
She doesn't seem to be very sympathetic to the cultish end of the Christian spectrum, does she?
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
I've been enjoying rediscovering Tove Jansson's Moomintroll books, as a pleasant, delightful bit of escapism. I just bought myself "Moominpappa at Sea", which I hadn't read before.
If you think the Moomin stories are simple little stories for children, then "Moominpappa at Sea" will change your mind about that. Not only is it a creepy and uncomfortable read, it's also a rather adult portrayal of the effects of claustrophobia, isolation and adversity on a tiny group on a small island. I carried on reading it because I needed to know how it ended, but can't say it was either light or pleasant. It had the ring of truth about how perception can be distorted into obsession and delusion.
The bits where the trees and rocks could be seen moving of their own accord, and how nothing seemed to thrive on the island, just added to the general flavour of, for want of a better word, malaise. I hadn't seen the Moomin world as dark before, and it doesn't strike me as a children's book. I don't know that I'd want to read it again.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Having read Finn Family Moomintroll as a child and liked it, I thought I'd try the others a few years back.
The earlier Comet in Moominland seems to me to be about imminent nuclear destruction. I didn't enjoy it.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
Even as a child, I picked up a constant undercurrent of melancholy in the Moomin books - but I did like Moominmama in Moominpapa at Sea, painting a mural on the lighthouse wall that she could disappear into.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
We read the Moomin books when we were children - my next sister down fell in love with them and I picked them up after her. She was convinced that the Groke was Ted Heath. This was in the middle of the three day week power cuts of the 1970s, but having just googled, the similarity is completely lost in the film version.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
I've been reading Mary Roach's Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal. It's fairly light hearted, yet graphic at the same time. I must confess to feeling rather queasy on the commute to work yesterday while with reading about autocoprophagy.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I am thinking of having another go at Kafka. I tried reading The Trial ages ago and gave up, I think partly on account of the suckiness of the (French) translation I read it in.
Who’s read it? Which translation did you like? Which one should I avoid like the plague?
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I am thinking of having another go at Kafka. I tried reading The Trial ages ago and gave up, I think partly on account of the suckiness of the (French) translation I read it in.
Who’s read it? Which translation did you like? Which one should I avoid like the plague?
No idea on French translations. I read Idris Parry's English translation. It was still tough going, but mainly because of the lack of the overly long paragraphs (a single paragraph could be up to 3 pages) but I understand that was a feature of Kafka's writing, not the translation or editing.
If you've not read any Kafka before, then The Trial is possibly diving in at the deep end. Have you read any of his short stories? In The Penal Colony and The Metamorphosis are excellent.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I've read the short stories but gave up on The Trial.
No problem with English translations. I picked it up in French at the time because it was in a second-hand book shop (but I guess there was a reason the original owner didn't want it anymore ).
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
The Trial was required reading for a 20th Century Literature course I did as part of my teacher training about 40 years ago. It made a big impact on me, but I never got into anything else Kafka wrote.
Huia
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on
:
Books make great gifts... yes indeed and as a child I did not consider Christmas or birthday to be complete without books figuring as gifts. Yesterday I received a belated birthday present from my sister. Passages of Time by Mary Edgeworth David, the daughter of a distinguished geologist here.
Certainly a world is inside it. She was born in nineteenth century, and lived in several places I knew of near me here now. Her father's house was on the road named after him in Hornsby and I passed it on the way to my high school in that road.
There is a fascinating account of her childhood in the BLue Mountains here, of learning to drive and acting as a driver in WW I. The book has a well drawn picture of life in a world very different today. You may find it in a library but the book is out of print and I just bought the last copy in Australia as a present for my brother.
A glimpse of a world quite different to today.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
For me the most exciting book news of the week is that Arundhati Roy's second novel will be published next year - I think it is likely to be a must-buy.
It reminds me that I really must re-read The God of Small Things, a staggering work.
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on
:
I mentioned Edgeworth David and his house. His daughter's description made me think it was another street. Indeed. Some misinformation was common among local peoples when I went to school in area. It should have been Burdett Street for anyone interested. His daughter was born 1888 and died at around 100 years.
Posted by Barnabas Aus (# 15869) on
:
I have read Mary Edgeworth David's biography of her father, but not Passages of Time. Prof. David Branagan has also written a superb biography of TWED, who is revered in our district for his geological work on the coalfields and for his relationship with the miners in the tunnelling corps on the Western Front. I think he was only the second private citizen in NSW to be accorded a State funeral, after Henry Lawson.
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on
:
Unfortunately, Barnabas, you may have to borrow from a library. My sister bought my copy knowing I would enjoy it. My brother was very interested in it too. I spent quite a bit of time tracking it down yesterday and finally found a second hand copy in hopefully good condition. The only copy available in Australia. I snapped it up and have had it sent directly to him.
They lived when she was young at Woodford in the Blue Mountains and her descriptions tallied with time spent by me a bit higher up. A big dose of nostalgia.
[ 06. October 2016, 23:14: Message edited by: Lothlorien ]
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I just downloaded Garth Nix's new Old Kingdom novel, Goldenhand, to my Nook and have started reading it. Very enjoyable so far.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
This morning I finished the ninth [and final?] book in Armistead Maupin's Tales of the City series, The Days of Anna Madrigal. Even more bitter-sweet than any of the previous stories but ultimately, I think, triumphant. I finished at just before 8am and it is now nearly 11am and I am still teary eyed!
I love my Samsung Tablet with its Kindle app.
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on
:
I enjoyed a famtasy "The Goblin Emperor" by Katharine Addison. It's all about court politics but a gripping yarn. I think someone may have recommended it on ship.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I've only just got round to reading How the Marquis Got His Coat Back by Neil Gaiman. It's a tiny thing, a companion to Neverwhere (in which the Marquis loses his magnificent coat), and it is wonderful. It reveals more about the Marquis de Carabas's past, and introduces the Elephant of Elephant and Castle (characters are named for London Underground stations, so there is an Earl at Earl's Court, and an Angel called Islington), and the sinister Shepherds of Shepherds Bush.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
For my own nefarious purposes, I have been ISO of a 19th century novel with certain specific qualities. And, eureka! I have found it: Salammbo by Gustave Flaubert, published 1862. Has anybody read it? He is better known for Madame Bovary, which I have read, but which is entirely different in tone and subject. I shall not have time to read it until 2017.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I've only just got round to reading How the Marquis Got His Coat Back by Neil Gaiman. It's a tiny thing, a companion to Neverwhere (in which the Marquis loses his magnificent coat), and it is wonderful. It reveals more about the Marquis de Carabas's past, and introduces the Elephant of Elephant and Castle (characters are named for London Underground stations, so there is an Earl at Earl's Court, and an Angel called Islington), and the sinister Shepherds of Shepherds Bush.
My first encounter with Neverwhere was on tv (which I think predated the book, but could well be wrong), in my head the Marquis de Carabas & the Angel Islington will always look like Patterson Joseph & Peter Capaldi (and vice versa).
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
You're quite right, ArachnidinElmet - Patterson Joseph was brilliant as the Marquis, and although Benedict Cumberbatch has a marvellous voice, he still wasn't quite right as the Angel Islington on radio.
I understand How the Marquis got his Coat Back is going to be dramatised for radio this Christmas - not sure who's going to be in it.
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
Just finished Jim Crace's Quarantine. I expected better from a book that won the Whitbread Novel Award.
It just petered out into nothingness. The promise of the opening was left wilted in the Judean desert, the life drained from it, just as the life was drained from the characters. It was all a bit 'meh'.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
In a break in my Harry Potter-athon after Volume 4 I am re-reading Gita Mehta's entrancing A River Sutra about a semi-retired bureaucrat running a Government Rest House by the Narmada River in Central India and the strange characters he encounters. It really is a fabulous read, I don't know why I have left it so long before reading it again.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
I just finished Written in My Own Heart's Blood by Diana Gabaldon, which is the eighth book in the Outlander series.
The adventures of Claire and Jamie continue during the time of the American Revolution. They interact with George Washington, Benedict Arnold and other historical figures. Meanwhile, back in twentieth century Scotland, daughter Brianna and her children and husband have their own problems to deal with.
So, I'm ready for the ninth book! Bring it on!
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Yes, this is one reason I could do with a time machine. I doubt we'll see book nine until 2019--a year earlier if we're very lucky.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
There are snippets available!
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on
:
Has anyone else here read The Silent Mentor. This book is a spiritual memoir set in a fictional narrative and I am still trying to sort out what I make of it.
Jengie
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on
:
I finished His Bloody Project last week (then read the latest of Jonathan Stroud's fab Lockwood series). His Bloody Project is set in a crofting community in the Highlands in the 19th century and relates to a boy who murders one of his neighbours and two members of the neighbour's family. I'm from the Highlands, and the crofting community aspects rang true from what I know about the geography and the history of the area. The subsequent trial and associated write-ups also convey a lot about attitudes to Highlanders at that time, again it rings true. I tend to like novels based on "found documents", if they're done well, and this one really is. It's Booker-nominated, which doesn't always equal readable, but I found it very easy to read and got quite into it very quickly.
I'm very much hoping my dad doesn't see it, as otherwise it's totally going to be part of his Christmas present - crofts, history and the law is a perfect combination!
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I want to hear about the new Jonathan Stroud. I have been recommending his Bartimaeus trilogy for years, as the equivalent of crystal meth in book form.
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on
:
Then hear about the new Jonathan Stroud you shall! It's the 4th in his series about Lockwood & Co, ghost hunters. The world is relatively modern-day, but lacking in internet and mobile phones, with a serious ghost problem. Ghosts can kill, people don't go out at night just in case, and only children/teenagers can actually see them. There are two major agencies who deal with The Problem, Lockwood & Co is a small agency and unique in that it's run by teenagers - Lockwood, George and Lucy. Lucy is the narrator, occasionally aided by a skull in a jar which only she can hear (his snarkiness is not dissimilar to Bartimaeus in some ways). I discovered them when my colleague left the first one on my desk, which she did when she read something she thought I would like (always accurately).
The most recent book, The Creeping Shadow starts with the team dealing with a nasty ghost of a cannibal, then moves to a village with a major ghost problem - especially the eponymous Shadow. There are relic hunters, rival agencies, corrupt officials all contributing to the plot (and The Problem). The books are funny and fast-paced, but they also deal well with the relationships between the agents - and there are some nice digs at how a bunch of teenagers would organise their home/diets as well. If you liked Bartimaeus then definitely read these.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I read the first of the Bartimaeus books, and agree it was a rattling read (albeit the footnote thing was overdone). OTOH, the story arc and character development of the next two are so obviously signposted that I feel no curiosity to read them.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
The momentum of Bartimaeus #1 was such that it carried me through 2 and 3 without my noticing. One of my pet literary theories is that authors converse, over time, with their works. (I saw a promo film only this morning, arguing that Worlds of Warcraft is actually a reply to Dante's Inferno. The Bartimaeus books are clearly a reply to Rowling's Harry Potter works.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I read the first of the Bartimaeus books, and agree it was a rattling read (albeit the footnote thing was overdone). OTOH, the story arc and character development of the next two are so obviously signposted that I feel no curiosity to read them.
I did actually read them because the first was so enjoyable. However, the subsequent ones felt like an overdose and I enjoyed the third much less than the others, especially the ending. I had no desire to re-read them after that and gave the books away.
The "Rivers of London" series is another that started off with a brilliant first book but flagged a bit after that. Still great reads though, and I re-read the series from time to time. There's a new one due out next month, too.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Oh goodie.
I am combing Amazon at the moment for stuff to load on the Kindle ap, the better to while away a week in suburban Prague. (I know, I could take the Metro into town but have been there, done that on many previous occasions).
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
quote:
The "Rivers of London" series is another that started off with a brilliant first book but flagged a bit after that. Still great reads though, and I re-read the series from time to time. There's a new one due out next month, too.
Are you sure it's coming out next month? I've been waiting for it for months, the date has been pushed back.
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
"The Hanging Tree", due out on November 3rd. That may just be UK distribution, though.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I hope it's not just UK. I enjoy that series, although I think the first was the best.
Huia - off to investigate at the library - where a quick catalogue search brought up only some country and western music called The Hanging Garden
[ 21. October 2016, 21:42: Message edited by: Huia ]
Posted by Tobias (# 18613) on
:
On the subject of the Bartimaeus books:
After reading, and indeed enjoying, the first one, I looked desultorily through the numerous quotations (preceding the title page) by reviewers and other authors praising the book. I was surprised to find it called something like 'a deft and subtle satire on New Labour'.
Is that true?
(I am presuming that the publisher would not have printed the quotation with the book if it were a complete misinterpretation, though that may be a wrong assumption on my part.)
I found it very off-putting. I hadn't picked up on any satire, and wouldn't have known enough about UK politics to make any sense of it if I had - and so was left with something of the feeling of the patronised child over whose head the adults are talking.
[ 22. October 2016, 09:32: Message edited by: Tobias ]
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tobias:
...was left with something of the feeling of the patronised child over whose head the adults are talking.
I sometimes think that that is what the reviewers intend.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Moreover, whatever other virtues the books have, subtlety isn't one.
You could as convincingly argue the Prime Minister character is based on Cameron as on Blair.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
It all went right over the head of this American reader, if it was there at all. Of course that might well indicate that it was cleverly done. However, I will point out that lit critics create mountains out of molehills every day, and an equally good case could be made that the books are an argument for almost anything you could name from Brexit to the authorship of the book of Revelations.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
quote:
"The Hanging Tree", due out on November 3rd. That may just be UK distribution, though.
Well I have it pre-ordered on my Nook, since ages ago, so I guess I'll find out when it shows up there.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
*sigh* Just checked barnes and Noble and they are saying it will be available in January. No fair!
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on
:
I shall have to stop reading this thread. I usually run a gift account on Amazon to purchase Kindle books. Yes, I know it is a free loan to Amazon, but it is convenient to me to be able to purchase books with it. I top it up in US dollars which saves an international conversion fee multiple times when I purchase books. It is not long since I topped it up and have just checked it to find balance was zero. I have bought quite few from recommendations on this thread. So I have topped it up again. I know I can have it topped up automatically when it reaches a threshold, but that makes it just too too easy to spend squillions of dollars. All from getting ideas here.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I agree Lothlorien, it is all their [collective] fault!
eta: I topped mine up yesterday but happily there is an Amazon.in so I can pay in rupees.
[ 23. October 2016, 06:34: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on
:
I will investigate their Aust. Site. I think that regardless of where I buy it, I will still use the same methods. My everyday bank account has a limited number of free withdrawal per month . I have payments direct debited and usually go over the number, but one large ithdrawl to top balance up is still convenient to me.
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Scots lass:
I finished His Bloody Project last week (then read the latest of Jonathan Stroud's fab Lockwood series). His Bloody Project is set in a crofting community in the Highlands in the 19th century and relates to a boy who murders one of his neighbours and two members of the neighbour's family. I'm from the Highlands, and the crofting community aspects rang true from what I know about the geography and the history of the area. The subsequent trial and associated write-ups also convey a lot about attitudes to Highlanders at that time, again it rings true. I tend to like novels based on "found documents", if they're done well, and this one really is. It's Booker-nominated, which doesn't always equal readable, but I found it very easy to read and got quite into it very quickly.
I'm very much hoping my dad doesn't see it, as otherwise it's totally going to be part of his Christmas present - crofts, history and the law is a perfect combination!
My father-in-law lent me his copy and I've just finished it. I found it believable, intriguing and rivetting. The North East Man is next in the queue to read it.
[ 23. October 2016, 12:48: Message edited by: North East Quine ]
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on
:
Is this the right place to ask learned shippies what they make of the ending of Dostoevsky's 'The Idiot'? I finished it today, and found one or two web places where other readers confirmed my impression of 'a long daytime soap with some good bits which kind of falls off a cliff at the end'. In fact, on reflection, perhaps it's a bit like 'Blake's 7'...
Posted by Tobias (# 18613) on
:
Thank you, Welease Woderwick, Firenze, and Brenda Clough for your responses to my question about the Bartimaeus books. It was years ago that I read The Amulet of Samarkand, perhaps as long ago as when it was published - and I think I trust my own judgement a lot more these days. I will reread it next time I come across it.
At present I am reading Pelagia and the Red Rooster, the third (and alas, the last) of the Sister Pelagia books by Boris Akunin. These books are set in late-nineteenth-century Russia, and the heroine is an Orthodox nun who solves mysteries. I am enjoying it immensely.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Do they have psychopaths? I was put off the Erast Fandorin series because every one seemed to have a character who was completely conscienceless manipulative and ruthless - and usually successful.
Not merely a bit depressing, but also tending to shut down interest, since this character could not change or develop, just go on being the personification of evil.
Posted by Tobias (# 18613) on
:
It's a long time since I read Pelagia and the White Bulldog (Book 1), and I now realise that I remember next to nothing about it - so I can't tell you whether there are psychopaths in it! Similarly, I'm not far enough into Pelagia and the Red Rooster (Book 3) to comment.
Pelagia and the Black Monk (Book 2) kept me guessing until the last chapter. There are a great many characters who might be the villain - some of whom are indeed psychologically abnormal. But the villain is certainly not identifiable in the course of the book as a personification of evil.
It's also a long time since I read any Erast Fandorin books, so perhaps I can't make a valid comparison, but going by the degree of enjoyment they have afforded I would reckon the Sister Pelagia books as the better.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Nicolemr:
*sigh* Just checked barnes and Noble and they are saying it will be available in January. No fair!
Amazon.com have it as available on Nov 3
I just re read Foxglove Summer on my kindle and the advertisement to pre order came up.
Huia
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
Is this the right place to ask learned shippies what they make of the ending of Dostoevsky's 'The Idiot'? I finished it today, and found one or two web places where other readers confirmed my impression of 'a long daytime soap with some good bits which kind of falls off a cliff at the end'.
It's not like any soap opera I know. I still haven't got my head around what happens at the end - why the murder?
But when I was a teenager I was enthralled reading The Idiot. It took seriously two vital area of life that were never discussed where I grew up - sex and religion.
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on
:
Yes, the murder surprised me. It turns into what my (small-ish) kids call a 'French film' - bleak for its own sake - and kind of abandons it's characters - or so it seemed to me.
Well, it's better than 'she dies of mystery 19C illness in R.'s arms before consummating her illicit relationship with him, leaving prince M free to run back to A. who takes it all in her stride and marries him, and they all live happily ever after...' But it feels like the author thought 'f*ck it, I've had enough of this, let's draw the bloody thing to a rapid close.' Or even 'f*ck it, the only right outcome here for Virtue is a lonely room in a clinic, in a coma.' Or is that the point? 'Be Christ, get crucified, deal with it'?
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
the only right outcome here for Virtue is a lonely room in a clinic, in a coma.' Or is that the point? 'Be Christ, get crucified, deal with it'?
That is certainly a view of it.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
"The Hanging Tree", due out on November 3rd. That may just be UK distribution, though.
The Library still don't have any hint of getting it, so I put in a purchase request which
should mean I am on the top of the list when they do.
Thanks Ariel.
Huia
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I have just started Douglas Adams' "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency". I haven't got very far yet, and have next to no idea what is going on, but I am thoroughly enjoying it - not a single word is out of place or excessive. It is just a joy to read, so far.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Oh, I love that first Dirk Gently book! The second one, not as much, though it still delightfully silly and all that. But the first one is a gem.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
That's funny, I liked the second Dirk Gently better than the first. Though I did like both of them quite a bit.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
Just over a century since it was first published yesterday I finished Frances Hodgson Burnett's The Lost Prince. I think it is my favourite Burnett so far, nowhere near as syrupy as Fauntleroy or The Secret Garden and streets ahead of The Little Princess. It is fairly certain that I shall read it again soon.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Just over a century since it was first published yesterday I finished Frances Hodgson Burnett's The Lost Prince. I think it is my favourite Burnett so far, nowhere near as syrupy as Fauntleroy or The Secret Garden and streets ahead of The Little Princess. It is fairly certain that I shall read it again soon.
Although The Secret Garden may be a bit syrupy towards the end, I find it impressively profound in the way it shows how people can make themselves miserable.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
...I topped mine up yesterday...
...and spent most of it this morning when I remembered Alan Garner!
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Excellent - which Garners did you get? I was somewhat taken aback by his later work. "Thursbitch" and especially "Boneland" were powerful, elliptical books that I wasn't at all sure I wanted to read again.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I bought The Weirdstone of Brisingamen, The Moon of Gomrath, Elidor and Thursbitch - the last being the only one of his that I haven't read before.
I am deliberately not putting too much money on my gift card account as I know only too well where that could lead! Now I will allow myself to add another Rs 1000, about UKP 12.50, later in the week.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
Not The Owl Service? (I'd forgotten Alan Garner too, but loved his books)
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Be prepared for a jump in style when you get to "Thursbitch". It's a far more sophisticated and less straightforward piece of writing than his earlier works. Also, you may find it holds emotional shocks.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
Yes, I pondered The Owl Service, which I found a bit disquieting when I read it in my teens but ran out of money. Next time.
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on
:
We seem to be keeping Chapters (the bookshop chain over here) in business at the moment; as our belongings (including most of our books) are in storage, we keep having to top up our supply.
At the moment, I've just started Shadow on the Crown by Patricia Bracewell, which is a fictionalised account of the story of Emma of Normandy, second wife of Æthelred the Unready. I'm finding it quite unputdownable, and it has the two-edged advantage of being written in (a) the past tense and (b) the third person. Hurrah!
It's a slight departure for me: most of the historical fiction I've been reading recently centred round the protagonists in the Wars of the Roses, but this is quite literally a whole new era - Emma was born in a year with only three digits in it ...
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
My brother in the US and I both loved Alan Garner so I recently bought him the third book in the Weirdstone of Brisingamen trilogy which I never actually finished myself and can't remember the title.
My favourite book of his is Red Shift which I must read again to see if I still like it. I also liked The Owl Service for the brooding sense of menace.
Huia
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I was rather hoping that someone here would enlighten me as to the name of the third in trilogy but it seems I am to be disappointed.
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on
:
Its called Boneland
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
As with "Thursbitch" it's a far more sophisticated piece of writing than his earlier works. Don't expect it to be anything like in the same vein or half as accessible. You may find it disquieting. It left me with a lot of unanswered questions.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
So far I think I am enjoyng Thursbitch and will probably buy Boneland when I finish this one. The reviews I have just read make it sound worth the money.
Thank you Kitten for the name and Ariel for your comment.
[ 01. November 2016, 11:47: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I've just finished Thursbitch ten minutes ago and am not at all sure about it. I think I enjoyed it but will have to think about it before I finally decide - I suppose I'm a sucker for triumphant endings and I think this one qualifies.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
I agree Lothlorien, it is all their [collective] fault!
eta: I topped mine up yesterday but happily there is an Amazon.in so I can pay in rupees.
Boneland final book in the Weirdstone series and features Colin. It's strange ... Brilliant but strange! Well worth a read.
I shall have to pick my way though this thread at some point and add things to my wish list. The Kindle's a bit overstuffed at the moment!
Tubbs
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
Someone has just lent me a collection of Neil Gaiman stories called "Fragile Things" which is quite a good read. There are some I definitely didn't enjoy but it's a varied enough collection to be interesting.
I'm also reading "Jimbo" by Algernon Blackwood - ancient but I quite like his stories. The mark of a good book is that you find yourself thinking about it and the characters in it at points throughout the day and wondering how this is going to turn out. I certainly did that with both the latest Garner books - they are excellent if uncomfortable and hard to like.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
It is not really accurate to call Boneland part of the same story as Weirdstone and Gomrath, even though some of the same characters appear. It is an entirely different novel, in a quite different and very adult style, and if you are looking for a work in anyway similar to the first two you will be disappointed. I have never seen prose pared down so taut and thin; it takes great skill to do that but it's not an easy read.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
It is not really accurate to call Boneland part of the same story as Weirdstone and Gomrath, even though some of the same characters appear. It is an entirely different novel, in a quite different and very adult style, and if you are looking for a work in anyway similar to the first two you will be disappointed. I have never seen prose pared down so taut and thin; it takes great skill to do that but it's not an easy read.
I would say it's part of the same story arc, as it would be difficult to read it without some knowledge of the other two. It has more in common with The Stone Book or Red Shift. I didn't love it in the same way, but I'm glad I did.
Tubbs
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
"Boneland" is regarded as the concluding part of the trilogy, a view also shared by its author. It isn't a lot like the earlier ones but it was written 50 years later, and you expect an author's style to change and mature over that time period.
I haven't read "Red Shift" - perhaps I should.
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
I have bought "Boneland" but not read it yet, meaning to run up to it with re-reading the earlier two. I never took to "Red Shift". Loved "The Stone Book". I think, also, I may have been put off, not only by various comments, but also by a memory of Penelope Farmer's "Castle of Bone" which I never got into. Not only the word doing that, though, but also some ideas in the comments about the Garner that seemed to resemble ideas in the Farmer.
(I have just read some reviews of that, and, to my joy, discover others who felt the same. I have been thinking there was something wrong with me for years.)
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Read. It and tell us what you think!
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
In a fit of nostalgia yesterday I both bought and read an e-edition of City by Clifford D Simak - I read it first as a teen about half a century ago and must have lost my by then dog-eared copy sometime in the 1970s so it is a while since I had the chance. I no longer read much "science fiction" as a genre so I was unsure how I would enjoy it again after all these years.
How else can I describe it but SUPERB!?
It really is a stunningly good read and will stay in my Kindle collection - so I have also bought George R Stewart's Earth Abides - very slightly older but similar era and my paper copy of that is a bit past dog-eared.
City may be relatively short and, like Earth Abides may be pretty pessimistic about humanity but it is an excellent read and the conceptualisation is stunning - I found the early references to atomic [rather than nuclear] power jarred a bit a bit but then it is from the days when it seemed that this new power source was the answer to all ills, but that is a minor little rankle in the great scheme of things of what is otherwise a tour-de-force.
What was interesting was to read the epilogue that Simak wrote much later, and which I'd never seen before - I suppose the Apotheosis of Jenkins, the robot who had served so faithfully for millennia. I think Simak saw him as the true hero of the story - faithful to the end.
If the world truly is going to the dogs then it may not be such a bad way to go!
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
I picked up The Fuller Memorandum by Charles Stross on Monday, and foolishly started reading it while waiting for the bus home.
I have now put aside all my other reading to concentrate on the further adventures of Bob and Mo, and a plot that reaches back to the Russian Civil War around 1921.
One delight was in recognising the author of a letter Bob finds in an old file from the clues "Evgenia and I" and "Manchester Guardian". Charlie Stross has involved Arthur Ransome in the story!
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I second Brenda's encouragement Penny. I intend to read it when life settles down - at the moment only comfort reading is possible.
Huia
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on
:
Huia, do not, under any circumstances, read Conan Doyle's 'When the World Screamed'. I started it, but found the geology, for Sussex, unconvincing, and did not persist. Just don't. His non-Sherlock books are not as good as the detective ones.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I picked up The Fuller Memorandum by Charles Stross on Monday, and foolishly started reading it while waiting for the bus home.
I have now put aside all my other reading to concentrate on the further adventures of Bob and Mo, and a plot that reaches back to the Russian Civil War around 1921.
One delight was in recognising the author of a letter Bob finds in an old file from the clues "Evgenia and I" and "Manchester Guardian". Charlie Stross has involved Arthur Ransome in the story!
Ransome was married to Trotsky's secretary so it all fits - it sounds like a book I might enjoy, if I ever get aroound to reading a book I've never read before.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
Now we're in the final stretch, how is everybody doing with their 2016 reading challenges?
I was doing pretty well in the first half of the year trying to complete both challenges mentioned upthread, but then ground to a halt. I'm still reading, but not going out and searching for books that fit the categories. Am still short a library recommendation and a new author among other things.
I'll soon be finished with my 'friend recommendation': The Brendan Voyage written by Tim Severin who built a leather and wood curragh to replicate one reportedly sailed by St Brendan, and sailed across the Atlantic.
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on
:
WW - yes, Charlie Stross made it fit very well! The Fuller Memorandum was a bit too much full on horror for my tastes - I prefer the snarky humour to the gore and zombies - but very well done.
It also involves a combat violin, for use against demonic entities!
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
After a few slightly heavier reads, I'm now back with a couple of fiction books. Firstly "Redwall" by Brian Jacques, which I was given as a present by a school friend and never managed to finish so I'm giving it another go, and secondly Charlotte Bronte's "Jane Eyre" - again another I read at school and never since, and other than cultural references to 'the wife in the attic' I remember next to nothing about it.
I must admit I'm making slightly heavy weather of Redwall. It's well written, but it's just not grabbing me yet. I'm determined to finish it this time though, although I doubt I'll read any more of the (very extensive) Redwall series.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I haven't read Redwall either. But let us know how you like Jane. An entire genre was built upon that book.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I'm back Delderfield-ing again - I've just purchased Kindle editions of the A Horseman Riding By trilogy so that is me living in a bubble until about Christmas! Last night I also bought a field guide to Indian Birds, which I shall now have to learn to navigate on my Tablet.
All good fun.
One of the neat things about re-reading old favourites is sitting there thinking:
NO!! Don't marry her, she'll never make you happy - marry the other one instead! You will in the end anyway.
Delderfield is a bit transparent at times but it is all very well written.
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I just finished a reread of Ben Aaronovitch's Rivers of London books... did we discuss them on this thread or was it the comfort reading thread? Anyway, they are wonderful, and I can't wait until The Hanging Tree is released in America.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
I raved about The Rivers of London after following someone's recommendation some time ago. I've just re-read them and I think Whispers Underground is my favourite. I am waiting with impatience for the Hanging Tree and am hoping that my early reserve at the Library when the new date was set* will mean I am one of the first to borrow it.
* Thanks to Ariel for mentioning it
Huia
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on
:
I read a surprisingly good (for a freebie!) book recently, a memoir of life in contemporary rural North Carolina, "Memory Cards" by Michael Brantley. He's a pretty ordinary guy - same age as me, now working as a teacher of creative writing, married, previously a professional photographer, brought up on a tobacco farm. Rather than being a linear memoir, each chapter takes either a topic or a person in his life and provides little vignettes about them, leaping backwards and forwards in time much like memories tend to. Having read some reviews I know that some people really didn't get on with that style of writing, but it really worked for me, and I thoroughly enjoyed it and liked him very much. The one thing he said next to nothing about was politics, but from his descriptions and views of church, guns, farm life, and family life, amongst other things, I'd hazard a guess that he'd most likely be a Republican voter. I found myself wondering what on earth he'd made of 2016 politics (the book was published in 2015, so before all the madness really took off), as despite describing himself as conservative, he didn't come across at all like the stereotypical Trump supporter has this year. I'll keep an eye out for other things he writes.
[ 22. December 2016, 13:11: Message edited by: Jack the Lass ]
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
With just a few days left in the year, I'm on course to finish 53 books, totaling 14,000 pages of reading. Got 3 on the go at the moment:
- The Essex Serpent by Sarah Perry
- Further Mathematical Diversions by Martin Gardner
- Confessions of an English Opium Eater by Thomas de Quincy
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
We read Rivers of London as a Book Club book a few years back - mea culpa.
(Procrastination are us)
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
YaY! The Hanging Tree arrived at the library for me, but I am keeping it to start on Christmas night. I always check the reserves shelf first when I visit the library in case something has arrived since the bulk email notifications were sent out. Good thing the area around the reserves shelf is not a quiet part of the library as I let out a loud noise
Huia - letting my joy be unconfined.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
For Xmas a relative who knows I am reading old books sent me a curiosity: Sex Training in the House, by a Dr. Winfield Scott Hall. It came out in 1927, and is positively stiff with the most appalling advice and knowledge. Did you know that getting your feet wet while you are menstruating can damage your childbearing ability? That having sex more than twice a month leads to sterility, debility, and weakness in children?
It's not quite in period, but I am inflicting this advice in this work on my characters anyway. I can think of nothing that would make you unhappier than being married to a man who follows this book.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Would that I could find you the book (probably 1900 or thereabouts) which my parents had and have probably discarded. It was written by a woman and gave excellent advice on those subjects in a very starched up and "delicate" style. You could tell she felt frighteningly progressive, but determined to do right by her readers (particularly on the subject of "the rhythmic clock," i.e. menstruation.)
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
This one is mostly taken up with urging boys not to masturbate. There's also a good deal about eugenics.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
Bleurrghhh.
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on
:
I have an .pdf of Knowledge for the Growing Boy [1954, revised edition 1964] by Sid G. Hedges which a former colleague [sexual health worker] sent to me that is utterly abysmal and factually highly dubious.
A definitive guide to how NOT to do it all!
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0