homepage
  roll on christmas  
click here to find out more about ship of fools click here to sign up for the ship of fools newsletter click here to support ship of fools
community the mystery worshipper gadgets for god caption competition foolishness features ship stuff
discussion boards live chat cafe avatars frequently-asked questions the ten commandments gallery private boards register for the boards
 
Ship of Fools


Post new thread  Post a reply
My profile login | | Directory | Search | FAQs | Board home
   - Printer-friendly view Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
» Ship of Fools   » Ship's business   » The Styx   » Trans threads in Dead Horses?

 - Email this page to a friend or enemy.    
Source: (consider it) Thread: Trans threads in Dead Horses?
GreyFace
Shipmate
# 4682

 - Posted      Profile for GreyFace   Email GreyFace   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
The DH guidelines say that homophobia is a deceased mammal of the equine persuasion and in days long gone I spent many an hour... actually probably several woman-months there as a consequence. But gender identity isn't sexuality. Shouldn't trans-related threads be in Purgatory?
Posts: 5748 | From: North East England | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged
Leorning Cniht
Shipmate
# 17564

 - Posted      Profile for Leorning Cniht   Email Leorning Cniht   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by GreyFace:
The DH guidelines say that homophobia is a deceased mammal of the equine persuasion and in days long gone I spent many an hour... actually probably several woman-months there as a consequence. But gender identity isn't sexuality. Shouldn't trans-related threads be in Purgatory?

I seem to recall that the last time we had a big trans discussion in these parts, someone (Pomona, I think) suggested that the discussion belonged in the paddock, but the conclusion was that we hadn't worn the ruts deep enough yet. (DH being a home for endless arguments-that-never-die.)

So I'd think a discussion that was purely about trans* belonged in purg, as long as it didn't stray into homosexuality.

Posts: 5026 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2013  |  IP: Logged
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333

 - Posted      Profile for lilBuddha     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
So you think that trans, which not even all of the LGB part of the acronym quite accept or understand, is going to transcend the Bible set that God Hates Gayz contingent? Most of the same argument they use are used against any gender permutation other than straight men and women.

--------------------
I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning
Hallellou, hallellou

Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged
GreyFace
Shipmate
# 4682

 - Posted      Profile for GreyFace   Email GreyFace   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Thanks LC.

quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
So you think that trans, which not even all of the LGB part of the acronym quite accept or understand, is going to transcend the Bible set that God Hates Gayz contingent? Most of the same argument they use are used against any gender permutation other than straight men and women.

I don't know. On-shore it's largely the case that there's a huge amount of crossover (I'm neither cis nor straight) but as Dead Horses operates under Purgatorial rules the distinction between transphobia/homophobia and gender identity/sexuality might still be viable. At the very least, if trans issues were going to be sent to the glue factory then the DH guidelines should probably say so I'd argue.
Posts: 5748 | From: North East England | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged
RooK

1 of 6
# 1852

 - Posted      Profile for RooK   Author's homepage   Email RooK   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I'll go poke the responsible Purgatoids and Ex-Equioids Tenders for their nuanced interpretations.

However, my personal preference would be to have at the conversations in either place. If they exhibit too much baseline return to tired ruts of reasoning, let them get shepherded into the paddock. If they prance and dance with ideas unexplored (or, at least less than a kajillion times), let them run free for a while to see where they go.

Posts: 15274 | From: Portland, Oregon, USA, Earth | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333

 - Posted      Profile for lilBuddha     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by GreyFace:
I don't know. On-shore it's largely the case that there's a huge amount of crossover (I'm neither cis nor straight)

In reality there is crossover, in perception much less so.
quote:

but as Dead Horses operates under Purgatorial rules the distinction between transphobia/homophobia and gender identity/sexuality might still be viable.

There are issues regarding homosexuality that fit in Purg. However, these more often shift into DH territory than not. IME.

--------------------
I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning
Hallellou, hallellou

Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged
Eutychus
From the edge
# 3081

 - Posted      Profile for Eutychus   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I'm assuming that this is the thread being referred to.

Any move of that thread is first and foremost the DH hosts' call.

For what it's worth, I'd agree that it might survive in Purgatory - or not. A cursory reading of the thread in question suggests it might, but it could easily veer straight back into DH territory.

I'd be tempted to leave it where it is now, but flag up for future reference the option of asking around a bit before making an OP one is not sure about - I have done this several times in the past by asking a host or hosts.

--------------------
Let's remember that we are to build the Kingdom of God, not drive people away - pastor Frank Pomeroy

Posts: 17944 | From: 528491 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
Gwai
Shipmate
# 11076

 - Posted      Profile for Gwai   Email Gwai   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Like Eutychus I'm not sure whether that thread could stand in Purg without devolving into clear DH issues.

On such threads in general, my feeling is that if trans issues are the only reasons to keep a thread in DH, we should try it in Purg. For one thing, it seems most respectful to trans people and trans issues to not just consider trans a subset of LGBT. Also, procedurally, I think things should be officially added to the list of continuous-argument-causing topics on their own instead of us assuming they will cause troubles.

[ 01. March 2017, 22:47: Message edited by: Gwai ]

--------------------
A master of men was the Goodly Fere,
A mate of the wind and sea.
If they think they ha’ slain our Goodly Fere
They are fools eternally.


Posts: 11914 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged
Louise
Shipmate
# 30

 - Posted      Profile for Louise   Email Louise   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I've argued before that trans-related threads should go in Purgatory for that reason: gender identity isn't sexuality, but I do apologise, I had forgot where that discussion had got to and I hadn't picked up on that thread to re-open it.

We used to have a very transphobic poster who would almost without fail derail any such thread onto his pet theory about transgender and homosexuality, but he no longer posts, so I think it should be possible to have trans-related threads in Purgatory without too much unrelated Dead Horse stuff being brought up these days.

--------------------
Now you need never click a Daily Mail link again! Kittenblock replaces Mail links with calming pics of tea and kittens! http://www.teaandkittens.co.uk/ Click under 'other stuff' to find it.

Posts: 6918 | From: Scotland | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
mr cheesy
Shipmate
# 3330

 - Posted      Profile for mr cheesy   Email mr cheesy   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
FWIW, I think this gets to the heart of the purpose of DH. As I understand it, it is for discussions with positions so hardened that the other boards would be cluttered up with the same people saying "A is correct" and the other people responding "B is correct"* and other posters just don't want to talk about it any more.

I'm sure strong opinions exist on various trans issues, but I don't see them as being things that are obviously regular battlegrounds for the same combatants derailing all threads that they touch. There seem to me to be better candidates of issues to be declared Dead Horses.

Not that anyone cares what I think, but that's my 2p.


* and actually, it is quite interesting how much nuance is detectable in debates in DH, IMO. Some of the discussions do actually seem to get somewhere (of course others basically don't).

--------------------
arse

Posts: 10697 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110

 - Posted      Profile for Barnabas62   Email Barnabas62   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
There have been some significant social changes since we introduced and limited the DH category to "all aspects of homosexuality". The increasing use of the group category LGBTI does not infer that all members experience the same civil rights and social challenges, but it does make clear that there are significant similarities in the challenges faced. I think we should consider changing the DH category to reflect this.

But as things stand, and under recent interpretations of the guideline, the thread belongs in Purgatory.

--------------------
Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?

Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Eliab
Shipmate
# 9153

 - Posted      Profile for Eliab   Email Eliab   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I suspect that any thread with transphobia as a theme is reasonably likely to have issues of homophobia brought in, as the two are frequently co-exist, and therefore there's a real possibility that it would either end up in DH or be somewhat artificially restricted. The various forms for prejudice and discrimination raise similar issues and can often usefully be compared and discussed together (as is happening on the gay-bakery thread in DH at present).

But trans issues are conceptually distinct from homosexuality and on the guidelines as I understand them a thread started in Purg on trans issues would not automatically be moved for that reason.

--------------------
"Perhaps there is poetic beauty in the abstract ideas of justice or fairness, but I doubt if many lawyers are moved by it"

Richard Dawkins

Posts: 4619 | From: Hampton, Middlesex, UK | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged
Amorya

Ship's tame galoot
# 2652

 - Posted      Profile for Amorya   Email Amorya   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
We could solve the issue in one of two ways:

1. Amend the Dead Horses description to explicitly include debating trans people's right to exist. (The topic is not encompassed by "all aspects of homosexuality", so at present the guideline doesn't include trans issues.)

2. Keep such threads in Purgatory, and leave the DH description as-is.

I tend to stay out of such discussions, TBH. But I don't agree that they will never die… the tide of public opinion is changing, albeit slowly, and eventually those who think their morals lets them judge someone else's right to exist will be in a clear and tiny minority. But I guess you could say the same thing about people who are anti-LGB.

Posts: 2383 | From: Coventry | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
Doc Tor
Deepest Red
# 9748

 - Posted      Profile for Doc Tor     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
There is the inevitable side-bar that threads involving DH topics often generate Hell calls. I don't think we've had a trans-inspired one yet, though it's only a matter of time.

It's difficult to debate trans issues without someone coming along who both denies trans people's existence and denigrates their experience: it has that in common with homosexuality, at least.

--------------------
Forward the New Republic

Posts: 9131 | From: Ultima Thule | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110

 - Posted      Profile for Barnabas62   Email Barnabas62   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Based on a recent thread started in DH, I'm going to suggest a way forward.

Because of trans distinctives, there is value in trans threads being started in Purgatory and that should be normal. Future trans threads started in DH will get moved immediately to Purgatory.

But if a trans thread widens to incorporate the range of arguments associated with threads on homosexuality, we'll move the thread to DH.

--------------------
Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?

Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Louise
Shipmate
# 30

 - Posted      Profile for Louise   Email Louise   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Sounds good to me!

--------------------
Now you need never click a Daily Mail link again! Kittenblock replaces Mail links with calming pics of tea and kittens! http://www.teaandkittens.co.uk/ Click under 'other stuff' to find it.

Posts: 6918 | From: Scotland | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged


 
Post new thread  Post a reply Close thread   Feature thread   Move thread   Delete thread Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
 - Printer-friendly view
Go to:

Contact us | Ship of Fools | Privacy statement

© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0

 
follow ship of fools on twitter
buy your ship of fools postcards
sip of fools mugs from your favourite nautical website
 
 
  ship of fools