Thread: Gold Dust - now what's all that about? Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=023310

Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
A number of Shipmates have attested to seeing the 'gold dust' phenomenon in worship services recently.

I'd moved on from the more full-on revivalist form of charismatic evangelicalism before this apparent phenomena apparently became de-rigeur. So I've never experienced it, but looking back, I think I remember talk of it back in the mid/late '90s.

I've heard of scams and charlatanism - of a Brazilian female evangelist who used to scatter tiny plastic filings to give the impression of 'gold dust.' I've seen some of the You Tube videos.

I'm sceptical.

But I would be interested to hear on this thread from those who believe that they've seen such things, and what they make of them.

For instance, what happens to the 'dust' afterwards? Do people collect it up? If it happens in a hired hall (such as many 'new churches' still use) does it remain there for the indoor bowling group to puzzle over the next morning?

Does it get hoovered up?

Or does it just disappear as mysteriously as it apparently arrived?

I'd ask similar questions, of course, about myrrh-streaming icons in Orthodoxy or weeping statues in popular RC devotion.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a complete sceptic about miraculous claims and so on but this one makes me feel jolly uncomfortable, I must admit.

Those of you who've been around when this has happened, what is your 'take'? What is the gold-dust, what does it signify and what happens to it afterwards?

Is it a case of 'all that glisters' or are you guys onto something?
 
Posted by Unreformed (# 17203) on :
 
quote:
I'd ask similar questions, of course, about myrrh-streaming icons in Orthodoxy or weeping statues in popular RC devotion.
I'm not impressed by them, at the same time it isn't wise to laugh at people who do when "enlightened" Westerners believe in falsehoods and frauds that do far more damage.
 
Posted by Hairy Biker (# 12086) on :
 
Is it a Philip Pullman thing?
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
I don't know, God can do whatever He wishes with matter, it'd be nothing for him to turn O into AU, about as difficult for him as for us to crick our little finger, but I have noticed some of the outfits making the gold dust claims are those whom I wouldn't trust to do anything much other than to pick my pocket and distort the Bible for selfish gain. The gold dust claims seem a little out of step with biblical miracles, which generally seemed more practical (food, health, protection, life), but of course, I am not the determiner of what is and is not "out of step" for the Almighty, so this is just my hipshot opinion.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I'm generally sceptical (I was still around charismatic evangelicalism in the 90s, but didn't see gold dust though I heard plenty about it allegedly happening elsewhere). I'd put it in a similar category as the Toronto Blessing 'manifestations' - I'm sure I've said this here before on these boards, but I was away abroad when that all arrived at my church, in 1994, and when I returned I found church meetings full of mooing and roaring and laughing and falling over and gurning and goodness knows what and I hated it all, and never could believe that - in my case - it would be anything other than autosuggestion. But. People I know and trust seemed really transformed in their daily Christian life, seemed to have a very deep experience of God, and - crucially - in many cases this depth has been sustained (and is reflected, for example, in the depth of their preaching) years later (in a way that I can't say about cynical old me) (though I have to say, as far as I know they've calmed down a lot now and dispensed with the animal noises, thank goodness). Yes they were mooing and clucking on Sunday night in church, but the rest of the week they were serving the poor and 'walking the walk' - and that's why, although remaining sceptical, I couldn't completely dismiss it. It makes no sense to me why God would do that and people would so completely dispense with their dignity when (as has been pointed out already) there are the hungry to be fed. But then Mary Magdalene's sacrifice of the perfume made no sense either, and serving the poor was the response that Judas made, and look where that got him.

It's all bonkers, I can't make head nor tail of it [Big Grin] . It's not for me, and to be honest I'm prepared to take the risk of missing out on whatever-it-is that's going on. But seeing the effect of the seemingly pointless on people I love and trust has given me pause for thought.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
A similar position to my own view ...

But I'm wanting to hear from people who have seen or claim to have experienced this and who consider it legit'.

I'm not out to dismiss or laugh at anyone's sincerely held beliefs, but there were some folk on previous threads who claim to have seen this recently, despite their initial misgivings.

I'm interested in what they have to say. Not so I can take the mickey out of them, but because they strike me as reasonable, thinking people and I'm intrigued by how they can square that up with what they claim to have seen.

I generally think there's a rational explanation for a lot of what passes as 'miraculous' these days and a touch of the Derren Browne about some of it - but I would by no means dismiss all claims of supernatural activity etc out of hand.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
@Jack the Lass - I think your sense of 'disconnect' with the moo-ing and gurning and so on can easily be explained. Good people can do daft things. People walking the talk and being exemplary in other areas doesn't preclude them acting daft when under the influence of revivalist 'cues'.

This neither validates nor invalidates what happened - I'd generally say that the Toronto thing was largely down to auto-suggestion and in most instances was fairly harmless as it died down as quickly as it arose.

I was quite into it myself at the time, I stepped back though once I realised how easily this kind of behaviour could be induced given the right conditions and suggestibility.

So I don't at all doubt that the people you love and respect were capable of gullibility and credulity as well as acts of service and of genuine benefit to people. Most of what we do is mixed, either in motive or outcome.

We are all plonkers in the final analysis and we all do daft stuff - 'Who can discern his errors?'

The hope is that the good things that we do somehow outweigh the harm.

Anyway, that's another issue ...
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
Whats it all about? Wish i knew - we have had this phenomena in recent weeks. I can honestly claim to have a bit of first hand experience of this.

We are not doing anything significantly different in worship to what we have been doing for several years. The gold seemed to appear on peoples hands spontaneously mid-worship. No one was expecting it or led by anyone to expect it.

I am 100% sure we can eliminate charlatanism. I have known pretty much everyone affected for the best part of 10 years and none them could or would make this up. Even my good wife has had this and she is not easily hyped.

What does it look like? Well its not 'Gold dust' as in real gold dust. Its more like sparkling specks on your hands - its obvious if you put it under a light. As for sweeping onto the floor - not really seen enough to do that.

I would take the view that this is a by-product of God's presence but no substitute for it. The nearest biblical equivalent is the idea that Moses's face shone in Exodus and i wonder if that may have been similar. The key part is that God is there and not focus too much on the side effects.

Yes ( to respond to the other poster) this could take us to a bit of self indulgence but we are aware of this risk. We are quite an outward looking lot, anyway, and have also got stuff like a Foodbank, Street Pastors and CAP going on too, as well as Churches Together stuff which should keep us grounded. We have never thought 'inwardly' and a bit of gold dust, nice though it is, isn't going to change that.

So - i don't know exactly , but we see it as a welcome by-product, but one which just points to God being there - not to itself.

Watch this space.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
Any amputees got their limbs back ?

Any eyeless their sight ? Apart from by technology.

If this is God's dandruff then it's because He's shaking His head at us.
 
Posted by Johnny S (# 12581) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
If this is God's dandruff then it's because He's shaking His head at us.

Now that is pure gold.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hairy Biker:
Is it a Philip Pullman thing?

Personally I would much prefer it to be a Tori Amos thing, although some conservative churches might be disturbed by the connection...

...and darn it, I can't provide the appropriate link thanks to it having a bracket in the HTML. Gold Dust, classic Tori song and also the title of her upcoming orchestral album. Due out in October. She's the daughter of a church minister so God is providing advance advertising. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Belle Ringer (# 13379) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
Any amputees got their limbs back ?

Any eyeless their sight ?

I suspect some who crossed the Red (Reed?) Sea at the parting of the waters were blind or lame. God chooses to do what God chooses to do, including one miracle but not another *we* think God should do. That what *we* think should happen doesn't, is no indication that what *did* happen is fraud.

I've never seen gold dust, I'm agnostic about it, I know people who say jewels appeared in their hand, they were freaked out about it. Don't know what happened to the jewels, didn't think to ask, it was as if what happened to the jewels was unimportant, no one was thinking "oh, goodie, I can sell this and pay the rent." But to me NOT thinking that way is consistent with being in worship mode, the focus is awe of God, not "what can I get out of this for me?"
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
I am 100% sure we can eliminate charlatanism.

I'll take your word for it, but I don't think you can eliminate auto-suggestion.

There's a (properly sourced) account (whose details I will try to find) of a small town in the US that thought it had become the victim of some kind of astronomical phenomenon when tiny impacts were discovered in car windscreens, in increasing quantities, across the community. As I recall, people started leaving brown paper over their windscreens at night in an attempt to prevent further impacts, and so on.

It eventually transpired that the impacts were normal and not unique to the town. They were in fact to be found on just about every windscreen of the era. They were simply the usual impacts of small stones thrown up on road journeys that a couple of people in the town had started noticing. Once they had been noticed and reported, more people noticed them, and so it went.

I think that even in the absence of complete fraud (which I'm pretty sure was the case for Silvânia Machado who Gamaliel mentions in the OP) the scope for this 'gold dust' being some kind of combination of perspiration, run-of-the-mill dust and reading too many Ruth Heflin books is not to be neglected. Stop making reference to it altogether and see what happens.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
That's an interesting take, Eutychus. I don't doubt the sincerity of those involved at Beatmenace's church, but I do wonder whether mild perspiration and bits of dust/silica that are normally present on on people's hands might look a bit shiny under certain conditions - and with the kind of 'Ooh, look at this!' thing that Eutychus has mentioned, might be capable of leading people to put 2+2 together and make 5 ...

I'm not sure, Beatmenace, that when Moses's face shone or when Christ was Transfigured we are to understand these things as the presence of particular 'material' - ie. a gold coloured substance or light reflecting material of some kind. Indeed, the scriptural accounts seem to suggest that the light source was completely other-worldly. The Orthodox tradition, of course, talks of the Uncreated Light.

I have no particular beef about the well-attested story of St Seraphim of Sarov's face beaming with light (as attested by one of his disciples in a famous 19th century Russian account) - but my own faith doesn't stand or fall by stories of this kind - as I'm sure yours doesn't either.

I'd be interested to hear whether this 'phenomenon' continues. My own experience, of things like the Toronto Blessing etc is that after a while attempts are made to regularise or embed occurrences of this kind - there was the development of a kind of 'Toronto Liturgy' if you like which was pretty much guaranteed to achieve similar results every time. It built in a degree of expectation. That's where the auto-suggestibility kicked in.

I will watch this space. I'm not sure where your 'gold-dust' thing is going to lead but I'm not sure it'd be somewhere bright and sparkly.

That doesn't preclude the grounded stuff that your church is doing with food banks, churches-together groups and so on and so forth, as I said to Jack the Lass, the more 'out-there' stuff can co-exist with the grounded stuff for quite some time.

I wouldn't be surprised though, if in six months time you'd turn to someone in church and say, 'Remember that gold dust thing? We don't seem to have had it for some time ... what was all that about?'
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I'm further struck by talk of 'by-products' of God's presence - as if God is somehow more present at some times than others. He was omnipresent the last time I looked ... [Biased]

Now, I know that more sacramentally inclined Christians believe that God is particularly present in the Eucharist in some way and I don't have a particular issue with that, although I do have an issue with some popular medieval accounts about bleeding Hosts and so on ...

It strikes me that people have an in-built yearning for some kind of 'proof' or by-product of the presence of God or the reality of the numinous. I'm not saying that there is anything 'wrong' with that, it's a natural tendency, but I suspect it does lead to watching shadows in the fire, as it were.

The other thing I'd add is that it strikes me that contemporary charismatics have somehow 'sacralised' the worship time because there's a vacuum left by a low view of traditional sacraments. So the arms in the air, let-it-all-roll time becomes the primary place of 'encounter' rather than silence (as per the Quakers) or the Eucharist (as per RCs, Orthodox and 'higher' Anglicans) - or indeed the sermon, as per various more Reformed forms of Protestant (although some Reformed traditions do seem able to combine all these aspects more equitably).
 
Posted by Off Centre View (# 4254) on :
 
Interesting discussion - until a while ago I'd have been very sceptical about things like the appearance of gold dust, and then I saw it happen with my own eyes.

My sister works for a missionary organisation and a few years ago I went with my parents to go and visit her near a base over in the USA. One afternoon there was a house party where a group of leaders (of my sister's outreach) and their families had gathered.

Two of the leaders at the house party, a married couple, had young twins who were then just a few months old. As is usual at those sort of gatherings, people did a bit of "pass the baby around" and my mother ended up holding one of the babies for a while.

My mother and I ended up chatting on the balcony of the house, with her still holding the baby. Then, pretty much out of thin air, what looked like gold dust fell on to the child, and neither I or my mum could explain why it happened. Noone else was nearby to rig up some sort of device to fake it, nor had my mum or I any reason to do so - we were both surprised by it.

As to what happened afterwards, my mother gave the baby back (still covered in bits of what looked like gold dust) and I think the parents were used to seeing such things. I'm still not sure what to make of, except that there's no way such an event could have happened in the natural and also that maybe God takes delight in surprising us in such ways.

To this day, I still can't explain it, save that God is bigger and more capable of wonders than we could ever imagine.
 
Posted by kankucho (# 14318) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
Whats it all about? Wish i knew - we have had this phenomena in recent weeks. I can honestly claim to have a bit of first hand experience of this.

We are not doing anything significantly different in worship to what we have been doing for several years. The gold seemed to appear on peoples hands spontaneously mid-worship. No one was expecting it or led by anyone to expect it.

...... What does it look like? Well its not 'Gold dust' as in real gold dust. Its more like sparkling specks on your hands - its obvious if you put it under a light. As for sweeping onto the floor - not really seen enough to do that.

........

I'm intrigued by this phenomenon. I've never heard of it before reading this thread. Does this glistening happen to everyone present on these occasions, or just the ones who've been to the bathroom on the premises?

My wife, a big fan of shimmery things, bought some of this soap a while ago. The sparkly bits stick to your skin big time, until it chooses to come off and attach itself to your bed linen. We both continued to shimmer for several days after I threw the damn stuff away amid her protestations.
 
Posted by Enoch (# 14322) on :
 
No. I've never heard of it either. Are there any attested cases in Britain?
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
There are plenty of claims, but as is the nature of these things, they are very difficult to 'attest'.

Hence the thread ... I'm interested in what people make of it and in hearing from those who claim to have observed such things.

I'm still wary. Recently, an Orthodox friend sent me a newsletter which contained accounts of angels apparently renewing the paintwork on medieval frescoes in Macedonia.

Why didn't they bob by and do some DIY on a little old lady's cottage while they were at it, I found myself wondering ...

Call me pragmatic, but one of the things that bothers me about some of these claims is the apparent tricksiness and why there isn't any discernible benefit beyond give people who are already committed to some kind of faith position a bit of a buzz ...

It's the old reassurance thing, I s'pose ...
 
Posted by Niteowl2 (# 15841) on :
 
This tickled a memory and now that I've verified it I'm even more skeptical. Remember the good folks at Bethel in Redding? There is a Picture posted by a 3rd year Bethel student that supposedly shows a gold dust cloud, but Bethel has been involved enough in shady dealings that I'm wondering what it really is happening there. They also have claimed diamonds have showed up in the homes of the faithful and angel feathers (which tested out to be regular bird feathers) have appeared in services as well.

I was heavily involved in the charismatic movement for many years and NEVER saw this phenomenon nor heard of it.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I think that most of the Bethel stuff is down to credulity rather than outright shady dealings, but it's not an outfit I'd want to get involved with in any way, shape or form.

The influence is widespread though. A new convert in our Anglican parish became all enthusiastic for a while about white feathers apparently appearing at key moments during the process of her conversion.

I'm not questioning the validity of her conversion, but I am very sceptical about the apparent angelic feathers ...

There's an apparent inability to process metaphor and 'picture-language' in some of these instances, I suspect.
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
Yes they were mooing and clucking on Sunday night in church, but the rest of the week they were serving the poor and 'walking the walk' - and that's why, although remaining sceptical, I couldn't completely dismiss it.

Well, on the other hand the second doesn't validate the first. Most Christian movements have the same divisions of the good the bad and the ugly the bedevils all human institutions.

I think auto suggestion - in the widest sense - explains a lot of what goes on in such circles. The plausibility structures of these circles generally allow for such behaviour, and the behaviour themselves can often end up being an unconscious response to whatever is going on around (whether it really is a 'real sense of the presence of God' or just the worship team unconsciously manipulating the emotional state of the audience.)

Backtracking back to plausibility structures; if you hang around in circles claiming appearances of Gold Dust (and gold fillings and jewels appearing from nothing) you'll sooner or later start to hear stories about angelic visitations, christophanies etc. It occurs to me that these same circles would generally view Marian apparitions as some kind of deception.
 
Posted by Matt Black (# 2210) on :
 
To what extent is this sort of thing so different from eg: the Holy Fool in Orthodoxy? To my mind, that makes no sense whatsoever, but ISTM that all Christian traditions seem to throw up this kind of phenomenon from time to time, so maybe we all need it in some way....?
 
Posted by Mark Wuntoo (# 5673) on :
 
IMO
This gold dust stuff is simply taking over from where the Toronto Blessing stuff ran out of steam. I have been waiting for something but didn't expect this, rather something just as strange / unbelievable but something that was new (as in 'GOD is doing a new thing'!).
My scepticism leads me to wonder about the people who think they see sparkles as the presence of GOD.
As shipmates know, I see no sense in GOD as a being or entity - just a (valuable for some) creation of people's imaginations. So my view is probably unimportant.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:


The other thing I'd add is that it strikes me that contemporary charismatics have somehow 'sacralised' the worship time because there's a vacuum left by a low view of traditional sacraments. So the arms in the air, let-it-all-roll time becomes the primary place of 'encounter' rather than silence (as per the Quakers) or the Eucharist (as per RCs, Orthodox and 'higher' Anglicans) - or indeed the sermon, as per various more Reformed forms of Protestant (although some Reformed traditions do seem able to combine all these aspects more equitably).

Now this is a really interesting idea....that we need a sacred time.

The moment of consecration and distribution of the Eucharist is still a sacred time and the climax of the service to me, as I was brought up Catholic. For the Quakers, as Gamaliel says, the silence becomes the sacred time, the moment of encounter with God. And for some Protestants, it's the sermon....God mediated through the preacher.

I'd be interested in others' responses to this idea...but perhaps it's a tangent....

While interested in the idea that charismatics have "sacralised" the worship time, I'm not saying I believe the "gold dust" is necessarily auto-suggestion.....I don't know what to believe about it.

cara
 
Posted by Matt Black (# 2210) on :
 
I would tend to agree with Gamaliel's analysis that, for charismatics, either the worship time or (going back to the mid-1990s), the 'times of refreshing' are/ were, for them, the 'thin place'.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I think the plausibility structure thing is key here, as Chris Stiles has observed. If you knock around in RC or Orthodox circles sooner or later you'll hear stories of Marian apparitions or weeping iconography etc. Conversely, in charismatic evangelical circles you're going to hear stories about alleged xenoglossy or gold dust etc etc.

The Holy Fool thing is an interesting one, Matt, as generally the 'Fool' by his/her strange behaviour draws attention to something that their more rational colleagues/associates have overlooked - there are some good examples in the hagiographies. It isn't just daft behaviour for the sake of it. Well, not always ... it sometimes has a 'prophetic' edge to it ...

Such as the monk who presented Ivan the Terrible with a steak dripping with blood to deter him from ravaging a rebel city (after he'd slaughtered the population of several other towns).

I do think we 'need' things like this from time to time - Ronald Knox would say so in his magisterial study of 'enthusiastic' religious movements, 'Enthusiasm.'

When all is said and done, he concludes, and for all the daftness, you still need 'enthusiasm'.

Hans Kung observed that in Catholic circles such enthusiasm becomes attached to objects and places, whereas in Protestantism it tends to be verbal stuff - such as 'prophecies' and particular interpretations of the end-times etc.

I suspect that with the 'physicality' of aspects of the charismatic renewal/revivalism we're seeing a blurring of those boundaries - with physical stuff - prostrations, apparent 'glory clouds' and so on showing up in Protestant settings.

As Chris observes, though, these self-same people would be highly sceptical of Marian apparitions and the like.
 
Posted by Mark Wuntoo (# 5673) on :
 
'Enthusiasm' - yes, indeed. Something I was eager to see and frustrated not to see when I was a minister. But enthusiasm about GOD - surely that should be sufficient? The church doesn't need what people outside the church would see as plain stupidity - they may be prepared to accept that Christians are a bit weird to believe in GOD but they just laugh and ridicule stuff like gold dust. It does sensible Christians a disservice ISTM.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
Any amputees got their limbs back ?

Any eyeless their sight ? Apart from by technology.


Martin,

Not go those yet - but we did have a woman arrive at the weekend Ladies Breakfast in a wheelchair - who ended up pushing it out!!!

Now obviously i wasn't there, but my wife was, she was speaking at the LB, in fact, who verified this. Now the real test of the healing is to see if the wheelchair is still surplus to requirements at next months LB!
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
I'll take your word for it, but I don't think you can eliminate auto-suggestion.

I agree its always possible - but i dont think its that likely as none of us were expecting it and it was all mid-worship, with no prompting from the stage or anywhere else.

Quite a few of those to receive this had never heard of the phenomena.

Yes - i am speculating about Moses - i wouldn't dream of suggesting its definitely the same thing - and nor has anyone else, to be fair, its just an idea that occurred to me.

I like to think I can spot Manipulation, Cold Reading and Auto Suggestion when i see it - but we literally were just doing what we always do on a Sunday a.m !
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
I wouldn't be surprised though, if in six months time you'd turn to someone in church and say, 'Remember that gold dust thing? We don't seem to have had it for some time ... what was all that about?'

I quite agree - i wouldnt want to us to be forced down a gold dust siding - or even become known for it (I may have said too much already, folks), but if you REALLY want to visit us as a 'Sign Tourist' thats fine with me - as long as you are prepared to encounter God on the way past! We will give you a warm welcome - we like guests. [Big Grin]

That said - i will honour the gold as a gift , if it is from God then it is right to, but encountering the One that it points to is better every time.

I am a great believer in there being 'Seasons' in a church's life. This may be for a Season , or it may continue further - i'm not God ( who knows the answer to that one )- but its not the main event - God's presence is what its about. He can bring as much other stuff with Him as he wants !

[Smile]
 
Posted by Mark Wuntoo (# 5673) on :
 
I am a great believer in there being 'Seasons' in a church's life.

Am I the only one to find that hilarious? And sad?

Doesn't 'normal' worship, study and service suffice? Why do people need a shot in the arm?

But, as I said, it's what this gold stuff is about - whipping up the enthusiasm.
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:

I am a great believer in there being 'Seasons' in a church's life. This may be for a Season , or it may continue further - i'm not God

That's one explanation. It might also be that a subset of church has been so influenced by the entertainment culture that they need a regular change of diet to keep the interest up.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark Wuntoo:
Doesn't 'normal' worship, study and service suffice? Why do people need a shot in the arm?

For the exact same reason they need a shot in the arm in any other aspect of life. Why go on holiday? Why try new things? Because our brains respond differently to new things versus things we are familiar with. It's actually a fairly fundamental part of how, in neuroscience terms, we're wired up.

PS The question seems terribly odd given your view further upthread, but I don't think that changes the answer.

[ 17. July 2012, 12:44: Message edited by: orfeo ]
 
Posted by Laurelin (# 17211) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mark Wuntoo:
Am I the only one to find that hilarious? And sad?

Hey, I'm an Anglican. We follow 'seasons'. [Angel]

OK, yes, it's Christianese jargon, but actually I do believe in seasons of life, including the spiritual life. I mean, it's quite a well-accepted poetic trope, isn't it?

quote:
Doesn't 'normal' worship, study and service suffice? Why do people need a shot in the arm?
Good question. There is a strong mystical tradition in Christianity, of course (and Judaism, and Islam). But people, being people, tend to get hooked onto the spiritual phenomena of the moment, or day, or week, rather than getting ultimately excited about God Himself. And then they want their shots in the arm, and the shots in the arm, however temporary, seem more exciting and exotic than the daily walk in obedience to Christ, denying self, in the general, gritty crappiness of life. It's not as if Jesus didn't give us tools for any of this ...

I haven't experienced gold dust.

I did see some really weird behaviour during the Toronto Blessing. Animal noises, [Ultra confused]

What stands out to me is the meeting I went to at my local New Frontiers church, which was specifically showcasing the Toronto Blessing, not only because of the bonkers mayhem, which was in truth no more bonkers than many other bonkers stuff I've seen in charismatic circles, but because the NF elder who led that meeting didn't refer to the Bible once. Not once. NOT. ONCE. [Mad] And now that New Frontiers is all allegedly Neo-Calvinist, I wonder what their trendy Reformed brethren would make of that. [Roll Eyes] (Oooooh, bitchy! [Two face] )

I have experienced plenty of joyful, uplifting, sensitively led worship without weird add-ons. [Smile] But in all truth my most 'numinous' experiences have been either on my own, in prayer, or with another Christian praying for me at the time. And, unsurprisingly, I have often had those experiences on retreat.
 
Posted by Niteowl2 (# 15841) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
I think that most of the Bethel stuff is down to credulity rather than outright shady dealings, but it's not an outfit I'd want to get involved with in any way, shape or form.

The influence is widespread though. A new convert in our Anglican parish became all enthusiastic for a while about white feathers apparently appearing at key moments during the process of her conversion.

I'm not questioning the validity of her conversion, but I am very sceptical about the apparent angelic feathers ...

There's an apparent inability to process metaphor and 'picture-language' in some of these instances, I suspect.

When Bethel doesn't issue any retractions/updates on erroneous reports that the church has posted on it's site, be it the raising of the dead that didn't happen or angel feathers (and that's what the pastor claimed it was) turn out to be bird feathers, that goes into shady territory. Everyone can understand a possible erroneous communication or thinking something was there that wasn't, but not leaving reports up or simply making them disappear.

I don't question the validity of the girl's conversion either or the sincerity of the flock, but I do think there is a whole lot of manipulation going on and I thought Eutychus had some valid points.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
Not go those yet - but we did have a woman arrive at the weekend Ladies Breakfast in a wheelchair - who ended up pushing it out!!!

What I really take exception to here (again) is the phrase "not got those yet". For the nth time, where on earth in the Bible do you see people "working up" through various degrees of extraordinariness in miracles? This is not Hogwarts.

quote:
Now the real test of the healing is to see if the wheelchair is still surplus to requirements at next months
That is not where the real test should start. The real test should start by establishing why she was in the wheelchair in the first place. You lot would not pass Lourdes' criteria for examining miracles by a mile.

Those shots fired, I suggest we get back to the gold dust, because healing is really a separate issue.

[ 17. July 2012, 13:03: Message edited by: Eutychus ]
 
Posted by Niteowl2 (# 15841) on :
 
I think the danger of needing the shot in the arm, or the current topic of gold dust, angel feathers, diamonds, etc. is that the focus becomes "signs and wonders" and not a genuine communion with God - and this is especially true where in some charismatic circles where manipulation is used through music, lighting and prompts by pastors. However, I've experienced my best times of worship and communion with God in the absence of those things where the focus was solely on God and not out of the ordinary actions or "signs" in other charismatic circles.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
Mark, Apologies - i wasn't too clear about what I meant by seasons. Not talking about a string of serial adrenaline injections....... I was using a methaphor to talk about a church's growth. Because they can.

What I meant is the mission of my church in 2012 is not the same as it was in 1996.

In 1996 - the first few members were in the local Town Hall with a sense of calling but no real sense of what to - perhaps , and i make no apology for using a jargony phrase , ' ' a season of seeking God'

In 2000 or so we were led by a number of convesations and 'coincidences' to merge with a group of Christians who were meeing in what is now our current building but had been decimated by a church split - could i call that a 'season of formation'?

On Easter Sunday 2008 - although already a Charismatic church - the presence of God was so powerful it felt like the start of a new stage in the Churches life , and since then we have seen Healing and Prophetic stuff added to what we do. Season of the Spirit anyone?

Around the same time we became much closer to other more traditional churches in the area - who having previously been bitten by Charismatic groups , were a bit suspicious of us. Since then those barriers have gone and most local churches now have good relations with us - Our Pastor is now officially a member of an Anglican Order - although not actually an Anglican. these warmed relations eventually led to the setting up of the Street Pastors team supplied from nearly all the Churches in the area, and currently (this year) a Foodbank. A Season of brotherhood perhaps.

Now something else is happening. Is it a new season or a distraction. Time will tell.

I never said we were not doing 'normal' worship, study and service throughout, although some things, songs, particularly belonged more to one stage than others.

I really don't think churches are meant to stay exactly the same forever - we may be on a Faith Journey but if you keep arriving back where you started it starts to feel a lot like stagnation......

I wouldn't want to still be where we were in 1992. But i would like a season of stagnation or decline - to use the metaphor - and i have been in churches where both have happened in the past - even less.

Does this make it clearer what i meant?
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
So, what is the purpose of gold dust?
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
That is not where the real test should start. The real test should start by establishing why she was in the wheelchair in the first place. You lot would not pass Lourdes' criteria for examining miracles by a mile.


I actually agree - i was using quite loose language earlier - Any healing is a blessing to the one who experiences and biblically there is no heirarchy of the miraculous.

However the question was specifically why no healing of the blind or amputees. I didn't imply we were building up to 'greater' healings - the above examples just haven't happened for us yet. And i used 'yet' in that sense. There is no reason though why that can't happen, even without the alleged 'run up'.

Agree again - i can't apply the Lourdes criteria -as i wasn't there. I don't know the ladies' medical condition prior to the breakfast, or identity , but it is common that people who appear healed at a meeting will relapse.

This is why i suggested the 'test of time' as its the only one available to me. It cant garantee people were not fooled by someone who wasn't actually ill - (a trick Mr Hinn is quite fond of), since i dont have any medical info or even the persons identity.

In perspective, we have far more sick people than healed ones so while i have the opportunity i am going to rejoice with the rejoicing - whatever actually happened on the day.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
Boogie - still not sure it has a purpose except as a pointer to God Himself.

It feels to me a bit like a 'calling card' but I cant make any theological justification for that.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
To rake in more gold ...
 
Posted by Net Spinster (# 16058) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Off Centre View:
...
My mother and I ended up chatting on the balcony of the house, with her still holding the baby. Then, pretty much out of thin air, what looked like gold dust fell on to the child, and neither I or my mum could explain why it happened. Noone else was nearby to rig up some sort of device to fake it, nor had my mum or I any reason to do so - we were both surprised by it.

As to what happened afterwards, my mother gave the baby back (still covered in bits of what looked like gold dust) and I think the parents were used to seeing such things. I'm still not sure what to make of, except that there's no way such an event could have happened in the natural and also that maybe God takes delight in surprising us in such ways.

To this day, I still can't explain it, save that God is bigger and more capable of wonders than we could ever imagine.

Hmm, in my area of the USA my first thought would be pollen, pine pollen for instance which can blanket the ground with yellow dust.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
I actually agree - i was using quite loose language earlier

OK, I can accept that, but the trouble is that loose language is all too frequently used by people testifying to this or that evidence of the miraculous - people whose words carry weight with their listeners.

That's exactly where loose language shouldn't be used (unless the purpose is hype).

Step back a minute. Such claims are truly extraordinary: spontaneous healings, appearences of unexplained substances, various manifestations of the supernatural. If there's a chance that God really is in our midst in such events, we should not be using sloppy language to describe them.

He's not a tame lion, and he is not to be mocked.

We should be being scrupulously careful to avoid deception and to have accurate descriptions of what's going on. Of course the implications if it is true are tremendous - but so are the implications of being mistaken.

At the end of the day, the widespread lack of rigour in the reporting of these things does not militate in favour of taking the reporters seriously. Neither does the frequent laying of emphasis on the fact that emphasis is not being laid on these manifestations.
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
I am 100% sure we can eliminate charlatanism.

I'll take your word for it, but I don't think you can eliminate auto-suggestion...I think that even in the absence of complete fraud ...the scope for this 'gold dust' being some kind of combination of perspiration, run-of-the-mill dust and reading too many Ruth Heflin books is not to be neglected. Stop making reference to it altogether and see what happens.
I saw some people at a previous church wife and I attended running up to me--skeptical prof--and saying "See, see, it's gold dust!" I took a close look and it seemed an awful lot like bits of sweat under the lights, that people were taking normal phenomena and making great miracles of them. Likely the reason they don't notice the bits of perspiration on their hands in everyday situations is because they're not usually sweaty indoors in a location with spotlights above (as many newer church buildings and fellowship hall-type environments have). Also because they aren't looking for it outside the church building. As I go through my day I occasionally wipe my glistening hands "Blasted sweaty palms" and think nothing of it. I played a table tennis tournament over last weekend and probably wiped my hands 100 times, they sparkled pretty brightly, but never thought it was a miracle (other than the miracle that the Lord made us in this marvelously complex way for our survival). On one occasion an acquaintance at that church thrust her hands out to me and there did honestly seem to be more than mere sweat. Not gold necessarily, but something. But I can't say it was a miracle or wasn't. I do know miracles occur and have seen some whoppers, but never, to my knowledge, in the presence of a big-haired pompous evangelist with diamond rings.

I've had the opposite experience of the deeper relationship Jack the Lass described seeing in others. The church was an independent charismatic that eventually revealed itself to be a destructive cult, they abused members and eventually revealed their theological position that Christ was not divine while He walked the earth and when He died for our sins.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
The only gold dust I've seen in church was inside the pendant of a necklace someone in our choir had made up from the gold she panned in the Yukon. I guess that doesn't really count.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
Aslan lives despite our chaos. In our chaos.

He does NOT heal amputees, Down's syndrome, aging, bipolarity, you name it.

He does NOT start Holy Fires in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

He doesn't rain gold dust.

Twenty years ago He didn't give people gold fillings.

He is far above such parlour tricks.

He's with us in our decay, our loss, our weakness, keeps us from committing suicide today with a word from another who doesn't know what it was.

And He doesn't NOT answer our prayers.
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Laurelin:
What stands out to me is the meeting I went to at my local New Frontiers church...because the NF elder who led that meeting didn't refer to the Bible once. Not once. NOT. ONCE. [Mad]

You expect genuine concern for what God says in the Bible in a NF church? Little credulous there, eh? Hey, if they're not mentioning the Bible, at least they're not distorting it. That's about all I ever experienced in my former (thankfully) NF church.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
Hush, stay on topic [Biased]
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
quote:
Now the real test of the healing is to see if the wheelchair is still surplus to requirements at next months
That is not where the real test should start. The real test should start by establishing why she was in the wheelchair in the first place. You lot would not pass Lourdes' criteria for examining miracles by a mile.
Exactly, Eutychus. That's what I was thinking.

In the Bible, Jesus healed those known by the community to have been blind, lame, what-have-you, from birth. In the current milieu of Super Apostles and False Prophets, an elderly person is oft given a wheelchair as they enter the church or the arena as a courtesy (this is a documented tactic). Then the evangelist approaches grandma, who's perfectly spry but sitting in the wheelchair, and shouts "WALK IN THE NAME OF JESUS!" Grandma, every eye on her now, is embarrassed into standing up and taking some steps. The arena erupts into adoration for Jesus (or, just as likely, the evangelist with the Bentley out back).

[ 17. July 2012, 14:45: Message edited by: CSL1 ]
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
Hush, stay on topic [Biased]

Sorry, and to think I just got back from another thread where I chastised people for taking it off target into a Calvinist-Arminian debate. Shame on me, you're right, Eutychus. By the way, you are THE Eutychus, aren't you?
 
Posted by Laurelin (# 17211) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CSL1:
Little credulous there, eh?

I'm neither credulous nor stupid. And NFI is hardly unique in being a church that has screwed people up (sadly). I've never been part of their constituency, nor would I ever be. But their constituency did give us Stuart Townend, so, you know ... some of them must be going to heaven. [Biased]

quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
Aslan lives despite our chaos. In our chaos.

He does NOT heal amputees, Down's syndrome, aging, bipolarity, you name it.

He does NOT start Holy Fires in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

He doesn't rain gold dust.

Twenty years ago He didn't give people gold fillings.

He is far above such parlour tricks.

He's with us in our decay, our loss, our weakness, keeps us from committing suicide today with a word from another who doesn't know what it was.

And He doesn't NOT answer our prayers.

*like*
 
Posted by windsofchange (# 13000) on :
 
This "gold dust" may actually be something real and material, but frankly, that makes me more skeptical that it's NOT from God and is being faked. (They sell that sparkly stuff by the pound at craft shops; how hard would it be for one or two people to stand near a fan or an air vent and quietly let a handful loose?)

It could be fakery, or maybe gullibility, or a combination of the two.

Reminds me of when I was in high school and got involved in a Charismatic prayer group. The leader, a very charismatic (small c intentional), was always telling us about the wonderful things she was seeing as we prayed - a bright blue ribbon floating over our heads; a rainbow; a "cloud of glory" (whatever that might have been).

And, wanting to please her (because she was a teacher and SO COOL!), we would always smile and agree that we saw it too! And try very, very hard to believe it.

The Emperor's new clothes had nothing on the Charismatic Prayer Group Leader's newest miracle. But they had about the same amount of substance. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by windsofchange (# 13000) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by windsofchange :
... The leader, a very charismatic (small c intentional) teacher , was always telling us about the wonderful things she was seeing as we prayed - ...

(sorry, lost my window of time to make the above edit!! [Big Grin] )

(Also wanted to add: I have a cousin who is a very prominent speaker in the evangelical world (here in the U.S.) and is constantly proclaiming "miracles" like this. Knowing the kinds of stunts he pulled when we were growing up makes me even more certain that, at least at the events he attends, they're probably faked. [Roll Eyes] )

[ 17. July 2012, 15:08: Message edited by: windsofchange ]
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Laurelin:
quote:
Originally posted by CSL1:
Little credulous there, eh?

I'm neither credulous nor stupid.
Not accusing you of being stupid--by no means--some of the most intelligent people are quite credulous, it's almost a cliche: idealistic, naive hard sciences whiz--brilliant, but credulous. E.g., Alfred Molina in Spiderman 2, Albert Einstein.

I was just using the opportunity to gratuitously slam NF, I apologize for putting you in the crossfire.
 
Posted by Laurelin (# 17211) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CSL1:
I was just using the opportunity to gratuitously slam NF, I apologize for putting you in the crossfire.

No worries. [Smile] I'm not a fan of theirs.

I'm mildly intrigued by this gold dust thing now, but not because I want to see it or experience it, just because I've heard about it now and then and I find it odd.

Although not as unpleasant as all that barking under the Toronto Blessing.

Truth be told though, I am really tired of religious silliness, not least the charismatic variety. Never mind the gold dust and the what-not, I want the simplicity of the gospel and the power of the Spirit. More pure, clear, transparent water of the Holy Spirit ...

The church in the developing world does seem to experience more of the direct power of the Spirit. Maybe because their worldview is less cluttered by materialism and all our other many 'isms'.
 
Posted by no_prophet (# 15560) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
Aslan lives despite our chaos. In our chaos.

He does NOT heal amputees, Down's syndrome, aging, bipolarity, you name it.

He does NOT start Holy Fires in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

He doesn't rain gold dust.

Twenty years ago He didn't give people gold fillings.

He is far above such parlour tricks.

He's with us in our decay, our loss, our weakness, keeps us from committing suicide today with a word from another who doesn't know what it was.

And He doesn't NOT answer our prayers.

It is very good of you to post this. What I personally struggle with is the last 2 sentences and how to discern, or otherwise figure out anything about some of the apparent 'non answers'. The manipulation of peoples' hopes (and my own) that wants any form of divine intervention or presence such we can all be persuaded. The 'please come soon' of some of our prayers.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
There's a (properly sourced) account (whose details I will try to find) of a small town in the US that thought it had become the victim of some kind of astronomical phenomenon when tiny impacts were discovered in car windscreens, in increasing quantities, across the community.

Well the town was hardly small [Hot and Hormonal] (Seattle), but I've found the book I read it in and from there got a reference. It's apparently a famous example of a collective delusion:

The Seattle Windshield Pitting Epidemic (longer but rather better summary here; sociology journal article here - the latter requires registration or payment to read in full).
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
God may work in that way .... but if he does, what exactly is he saying by putting gold dust on people's hands or in their hair? That he wants to bless us (as many prophecies seem to say)? Why us, why now?

I'd put myself in the charismatic camp, allied to a healthy dose of scepticism along the lines of "all that glitters is not gold." I'm firmly in the con evo camp. Yet .....

... in 35 years in various churches, I've heard lots of claims about the presence and power of God: I speak in tongues: I've prayed for people to be healed - some have been (but it's not down to me or my prayer as such), some haven't - at least not visibly so. Most say that they feel more at peace as we have brought all the circumstances to God. I've seen apparent impossibilities happen and don't doubt that God can turn our expectations upside down. I believe that God is a God of miracles.

Sadly, my experience also finds that there is as much hype within the church as outside it. Ministers and celebrity preachers are bigged up; everyday events assume a significance way beyond their actual facts and impact. Healings - generally organic or unseen ones (eg leg lengthening are routinely claimed: what is God saying through that one?) - and the church has become subject to the hype of the latest snake oil salesman.

I'm not disillusioned with the church at all - i still believe and I still see a God of power working in people's lives - but I also see Christians who accept stuff at face value that doesn't bear testing (this is biblical) or close scrutiny.

Gold dust? Very 1996. The next thing after Toronto and the forerunner of Pensacola. New monasticism? Yes - then comes emerging church. Oh yes, and somewhere along the line Todd Bennett. Well, a few people who I love and trust and who I respect for their thinking thought Todd was "it" - it took 6 months to reveal him as a liar and adulterer, and the fad blew out.

The fads come round quicker these days and they are often repeat items from a few years back. We just don't test this stuff anymore nor do we ask the real question: it's not what or how -- always think "why" is God doing this? What is he pointing to?

The values the church hads adopted are indistinguishable from those of the world around. We are as open to advertising and marketing as anyone and we just aren't content with the everyday and sacrificial anymore. Gold dust manifestations have the same bleat of the me, me me narcissism of the secular world.

The real miracles come on our church's doorstep: people welcomed; the mentally ill supported; prostitutes prayed for: a sick man of 25, dying, from a drug reaction, healed; others coping with loss through God's compassion shared by others. Children off the streets and in a club, a place of safety, every week.

Not spectacular when compared to glory clouds or gold dust - but I know which one is closest to God's heart even if we do mess it up from time to time.

[ 17. July 2012, 19:44: Message edited by: ExclamationMark ]
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
That's as well as I've heard it put, Exclamation Mark.
 
Posted by Stejjie (# 13941) on :
 
Exclamation Mark: [Overused]
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
The real miracles come on our church's doorstep: people welcomed; the mentally ill supported; prostitutes prayed for: a sick man of 25, dying, from a drug reaction, healed; others coping with loss through God's compassion shared by others. Children off the streets and in a club, a place of safety, every week.
Absolutely - but why cant you have both? Signs are precisely that - they point to a King and a Kingdom. So does the activism which Mark describes. There isn't an either/or here.

As i have said in previous posts this is VERY NEW to us. I mean last 3 weeks new.

I really cant vouch for what other setups like Bethel do. The 'Glory Cloud' does look like it could be staged in the way some suggest - but that would be pretty obvious and by now someone would have squarked.

Ours isn't like that at all. Its more like the 'glitter soap' stuff except its not that. I suspect it may be chemical - similar to crystals coming out of solutions. I can see issues with Conservation of Matter otherwise. It's too shiny for Pollen, and anyway you need a Summer for that....

We are a pretty high energy bunch but not enough to generate new substances (150 GeV anyone?).

Can speculate on 'how' but that's are not the BIG question to me.

Why spontaneously in worship? And why now and not in the 15 years or so previously? My best idea is that its a calling card......
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
[QUOTE] Why spontaneously in worship? And why now and not in the 15 years or so previously? My best idea is that its a calling card......

Of course you can have both but do we really need such a sign? Is that how God wants to talk to us with gold when money has becoem so devalued in a moral and ethical sense?

I seem to remember, too, Jesus himself taking a fairly tough line on signs that included reference to the sign of Jonah!

We have the greatest sign of all -- a man returning from the dead -- and gold dust is pulling them in?

A calling card? Well perhaps - but to what and to whom? The litmus test is who it all pooints to and to what end - in other words, what impact does it bring on the 2 F's of discipleship: faithfulness and fruit? is it perhaps a caling card warning you NOT to embrace the superficial but to experience the sacrificial?

What changes, can I ask, has it brought to your community of faith? What difference is it making to Whitley Bay (assuming you live there!). physical community?

[ 17. July 2012, 21:58: Message edited by: ExclamationMark ]
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
...and by now someone would have squarked.

I've been in a church where the pastors could have openly thrown glitter about by the handful, told the parishoners it was the miraculous work of God and that their eyes were being deluded by Jezebel spirits into thinking it was a trick, and the people would've sat there silent and forced themselves to believe they were witnessing a bona fide miracle. They'd have soon started spreading the word about the new "outpouring" and come to literally believe it themselves. The mind is a strange thing.

Why do I think people would fall for trickery? Because people (and for some strange reason Christians especially) are almost unbelievably gullible. They will believe without a second thought ridiculous rumors about Proctor & Gamble, they will throw their money as fast as they can at whatever charlatan multilevel marketing scheme comes along, they will give donated funds away to Ponzi schemes, they will justify the most ridiculous behavior imaginable (if the pastor of one of these fellowships were to drop trousers and defecate on the altar, I'm sure there'd be people either calling it the Hand of God. People in churches will stand by passively while their families are destroyed and the Gospel distorted and say nothing about the abuse until years later if at all. A friend of mine watched passively as the pastors destroyed his wife through public and private humiliation (I remember her breaking down in front of her husband, my wife and me--heart rending). But the husband's best friends were at that church, and he wanted a healing, by gosh, and that church made the biggest claims in town to miracles, so he was willing to put up with anything, evidently, to get it. I begged him to get out and leave with us. He died anyway of his infirmities, and left his widow, so far as I know, to the wolves.

People will fall for anything and say nothing of it. Not saying that's your situation, just harshly questioning your assessment that word would've gotten out if it was a fraud. Not necessarily so.
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
It's all there - just look at the 7 churches of Revelation 2 & 3. Nothing new under the sun.
 
Posted by Belle Ringer (# 13379) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
[QUOTE] Why spontaneously in worship? And why now and not in the 15 years or so previously? My best idea is that its a calling card......

Of course you can have both but do we really need such a sign? Is that how God wants to talk to us with gold when money has becoem so devalued in a moral and ethical sense?
I think some comments on this thread are being distracted by the dual meaning of "gold." The metal named "gold" has monetary value to us earthlings in this life. But the word "gold" also names a color shining and beautiful independent of any financial value of the metal named gold; and that's the sense I get from those who say they've see it -- the beauty is what they are seeing, not a dollar value.

What is "gold dust" for? I used to wonder what all those wildflowers growing for centuries in places where no man (or beast) ever saw or admired them, now I just think God enjoys beauty. If the "gold dust" stories are real, perhaps that's what it's about, God enjoying the beauty of people who see what they think is gold dust and delight in the beauty WITHOUT thinking "Maybe I can gather this up and make some money off it." For once people are being non-materialistic, that's beautiful!

Skeptics chatter about potential monetary value of the gold if it's real; who cares? Alabaster box and all that. God isn't always financially pragmatic. Those looking to use the expensive oil for it's financial value were the ones chided.

Not saying "believe all you hear," just saying objections along monetary lines about the supposed practical material value of the "gold dust" as if the focus of the meeting should change from God to gathering up "gold dust" to sell, are not relevant.

Are some stories fake? I wouldn't be surprised, I doubt the ones where ONLY the speaker is affected. But I've heard a few reports from friends who don't usually make things up, who saw it at meetings where there were no appeals for donations, or where any "gold dust" appeared late in the meeting, long after the routine collection had been received.
 
Posted by windsofchange (# 13000) on :
 
Just out of curiosity, has anyone either tasted this stuff, or rubbed their eyes after touching it?
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I'm broadly where ExclamationMark, NightOwl2 and Eutychus are at on this one - and CSL1 too, although I've not had as many bad experiences as he has.

I'm also very sceptical about the idea of 'seasons' in church life beyond the ones that happen as a result of moving buildings or changing direction strategically etc. Like Laurelin, I would rather follow the set liturgical seasons - and build the rhythm of my spiritual life around that. I find that far more personally fulfilling than all the talk of 'seasons' that we used to get back in the 'new church' restorationists days ...

We were always 'entering a time of ...' or expecting a 'new thing ...' or 'on the verge of a breakthrough ...' yadda yadda yadda ... all things that Eutychus could probably recite backwards along with me (despite being in a different 'network').

It all makes for a very vertiginous and see-sawing , roller-coaster ride faith.

Of course, as Orfeo says, there are times when we need refreshment or a shot-in-the-arm. That's what conferences/retreat centres and so on can provide, but I suggest that we need to be careful how we use all of these things - they can become ends in themselves.

I'm certainly not saying that people in Beatmenace's congregation are faking things still less that there's a diamond-ringed evangelist in a Bentley out the back - this is Whitley Bay not Whoop-it-Upsville, Alabama ...

But I wouldn't be surprised, as Eutychus suggests, that this is some kind of collective illusion/misapprehension of what might turn out to be otherwise perfectly natural events - lights and sweat come to mind - as CSL1 has suggested.

Of course, 'Aslan is not safe' and God can do some pretty strange things ...

As for the thing about why it only happens in the middle worship services, I suggest that this may be because levels of humidity have had time to rise to a level where glittery sweat may occur or where levels of credulity have risen.

I don't care what anyone says, but there is almost inevitably a kind of swoozy-woozy atmosphere about half or two-thirds of the way through any contemporary 'worship-set' even if the praise band isn't trying to hype things up necessarily. It's the way the songs work. You could achieve similar effects by singing 'Mull of Kintyre' over and over again.

Of course, one could say the same about a 'High Mass' with the sense of drama heightened by smoke and bells. But generally in a context like that, people are aware of the artifice and aren't being 'conned' ...

I'm not saying that your lot are being deliberately mislead or messed with - but from what you've posted Beatmenace, it seems axiomatic to me that your church belongs to a milieu where it is expecting to see 'new things' and seasons of this that and the other and tangible, 'calling-card' evidence of God's presence - consequently that will act as a 'self-fulfilling prophecy' to some extent.

I know this is out of context, but didn't Jesus say somewhere about it not being for us to suss out 'times or seasons that the Father has determined by his own authority?'

[Biased]

I'm less 'reformed' than I used to be but I'm with Chris Stiles on the church's business being to preach the word and celebrate the sacraments and allow God to determine the rest.
 
Posted by Laurelin (# 17211) on :
 
I don't get the impression that the 'gold dust' has anything to do with gold in a literal sense, i.e. the 'health, wealth and prosperity' nonsense. Perhaps some would see the gold dust more as a manifestation of the Shekinah, the presence of God in a shining cloud.

quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
We were always 'entering a time of ...' or expecting a 'new thing ...' or 'on the verge of a breakthrough ...' yadda yadda yadda ...

Oh boy, yes. [Roll Eyes] [Big Grin]

'Yadda yadda yadda' sums it up perfectly. [Biased]

quote:
I don't care what anyone says, but there is almost inevitably a kind of swoozy-woozy atmosphere about half or two-thirds of the way through any contemporary 'worship-set' even if the praise band isn't trying to hype things up necessarily. It's the way the songs work. You could achieve similar effects by singing 'Mull of Kintyre' over and over again.
As someone who sings with her praise band, and is often quite partial to the 'swoozy-woozy', this strikes me as a valid criticism.

At least song-writers like Townend and the Gettys include some good theological content in their songs. (Also, the ballad form works really well with congregations. Ballads are easy to sing!)

But then there's Taizé worsip (which I also love). Taizé chants are all about repetition, but don't produce the same 'swoozy-woozy' effects. But I find Taizé worship deeply prayerful and meditative, and beautiful in its contemplative simplicity.

quote:
Of course, one could say the same about a 'High Mass' with the sense of drama heightened by smoke and bells. But generally in a context like that, people are aware of the artifice and aren't being 'conned' ...
Fair point.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
It's all there - just look at the 7 churches of Revelation 2 & 3. Nothing new under the sun.
Spooky Mark strikes again.

Thats the teaching series we have been doing for the last 8 Sundays (Podcasts are available [Smile] ).

Now that is an impressive word Mr Mark (although i may just being credulous).
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all there - just look at the 7 churches of Revelation 2 & 3. Nothing new under the sun.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spooky Mark strikes again.

Thats the teaching series we have been doing for the last 8 Sundays (Podcasts are available ).

Now that is an impressive word Mr Mark (although i may just being credulous).

Either that or you've been checking our website [Smile]
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
Gamaliel,

You reminded me of this - in a good way.

http://www.charismaministries.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/pk1.jpg
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
I use think i use 'seasons' in a slightly different way to the way Gameliel does - i dont mean to call whizzy fads a 'season', whatever their value - i am thinking of something much more long term - seasons can take years on my planet....

In fact i thought i had invented the term in relation to church life - from what you say in your post it sounds like someone got there before me. Nothing new under the Sun then.

Back in the 90's i was an Anglican so maybe i have ingested this one subconciously.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by windsofchange:
Reminds me of when I was in high school and got involved in a Charismatic prayer group. The leader, a very charismatic (small c intentional), was always telling us about the wonderful things she was seeing as we prayed - a bright blue ribbon floating over our heads; a rainbow; a "cloud of glory" (whatever that might have been).

And, wanting to please her (because she was a teacher and SO COOL!), we would always smile and agree that we saw it too! And try very, very hard to believe it.

The Emperor's new clothes had nothing on the Charismatic Prayer Group Leader's newest miracle. But they had about the same amount of substance. [Roll Eyes]

This sounds rather like a visual migraine. Or just possibly synesthesia, though mine isn't so well-defined. She may have been deluded herself.

Just sayin'.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
This sounds rather like a visual migraine. Or just possibly synesthesia, though mine isn't so well-defined. She may have been deluded herself.

Synesthesia sounds worthy of a thread in itself - so at risk of lurching way off topic:

I had heard Synesthesia accociates colours with Letters, Numbers and Musical notes. In that, it sounds quite quantifiable. Are there more abstract aspects which would sound more like the above?
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I don't have a problem with the way you are using 'seasons' in the sense that it might apply as follows (to give a fictitious example):

- From 1996 to 1999 we had a sustained season of evangelism, marked by the appointment of a youth-worker who led evangelistic youth-work in our area, at the same time we held several sustained programmes of evangelism which led to the conversion of a number of individuals. Some families also joined the church and we had several young people volunteering to undertake mission/development work abroad.

- From 2003 to 2005 we had a season of consolidation following a move from our hired hall into our own building ...

- From April 2007 to November 2007 we had a season of re-evaluation as we examined our core principles and decided on the direction we felt we would like to take as a church ...

If that's what you're referring to, then fine.

But if you're saying that there's somehow been a change in the 'spiritual atmosphere' or the 'heavenlies' or what-have-you and that this is marked by greater fervour, a sense of God's presence in the meetings, various tokens or 'calling-cards' ... that's when I begin to feel uncomfortable ...
 
Posted by Laurelin (# 17211) on :
 
St Hildegard of Bingen, who had extraordinary visions, suffered from migraines.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegard_of_Bingen

I'm now wondering whether she also had synesthesia.

(I just found out through Google that on 7 October 2012, the Pope is going to declare her to be the 35th Doctor of the Church. I'm not a Catholic, but I like Hildegard, and that's very cool. [Smile] )

Then there's Joan of Arc, another female visionary (who this time came a cropper!)

This has got me thinking. [Smile] God could speak through a person with synesthesia, couldn't He?

The mind is a strange and wonderful thing. And I do believe that God speaks.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
no prophet, that's very good of you to say so.

And that's the CRUX isn't it ? Answered prayer. Including unasked prayer.

God answers ALL of our prayers in the positive in and through His Son, by the Spirit.

We are to discuss EVERY concern with Him. And He can't NOT respond.

Let's get REALLY real here. I have intrusive thinking from various traumata including and especially self-inflicted ones from adolescence 45 years ago. There are more ways of self-harming than cutting oneself. When it's bad, it's very very bad indeed. Along with chronic pain, underachievement, marriage and family breakdown, insecurity, early geriatrics (trapped sciatic, cervical/thoracic nerves, IBS, diabetes), etc, etc this constributes to 'mild' depression, especially on waking on weekdays.

And God is with me in this. Suffers with me. I praise Him for His tender mercies. For all respite. Barely. Barely coherently. I read Brian McLaren and work with desperate, broken, socially irredeemable poor, mentally ill, addicted, substance abusing people a few hours a week and experience disconnection AND affirmation at the same time.

NONE of them will make it in this life.

Neither will I: when I do get cancer (skin, prostate, bowel, lung, stomach), if I live long enough with my damaged faculties. Of which I will NOT be healed. As I won't be of dementia, stroke, heart disease, liver and renal failure.

Prayer that does not start and end with thanks and praise IN all this - when it could - cannot be 'rewarded'.

My children will continue to drain my savings which are to pay of my ex-wife's mortgage, I will die in the next 20 years at most (hopefully!) in mentally and physically crippled poverty.

So ? All we can do is invoke Him, Father, Son and Holy Ghost ALL the time, in the Cloud of Unknowing.

Is rejoice. In our grimness [Smile] Our light affliction.

All will be well and therefore all IS well.

[ 18. July 2012, 12:56: Message edited by: Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard ]
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by beatmenace:
quote:

It's all there - just look at the 7 churches of Revelation 2 & 3. Nothing new under the sun.

Spooky Mark strikes again.

Thats the teaching series we have been doing for the last 8 Sundays (Podcasts are available ).

Now that is an impressive word Mr Mark (although i may just being credulous).

Either that or you've been checking our website [Smile]
I do know where Whitley Bay is - the Geography degree does help a bit in all fairness. But, no, I haven't accessed your web site.

If you take the suggestion to read Revelation 2 & 3 as a word, well thank God for giving it in the first place, not me for passing it on. All I can say is don't just read it, do what it says and above all, be careful out there! Been around in churches (in leadership and as a mediator in troubled churches) long enough (35 years plus)to recognise that the truth is out there but so are lies and deceptions. Roaring lions aren't all Aslan you know.
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
...almost inevitably a kind of swoozy-woozy atmosphere about half or two-thirds of the way through any contemporary 'worship-set' even if the praise band isn't trying to hype things up necessarily. It's the way the songs work. You could achieve similar effects by singing 'Mull of Kintyre' over and over again.

Oh yes, they've done research on this, and though I'm by no means knowledgeable in the field, I;'ve read that repeated use of a phrase, such as oft happens in the praise songs such churches employ ("Yes Lord, yes Lord, yes, yes, Lord, yes Lord, yes, Lord, yes yes Lord, etc. etc. etc., repeat in crowded, hot environment with friends about, eyes closed, hands raised, expectations high, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, longer) can produce an altered state of consciousness that may have nothing to do with the Holy Spirit. Hindus, Buddists and others have stumbled upon this as well, of course they call it a "mantra", and in my opinion, have given the phenomenon false spiritual significance.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
Agreed.

Not all use of repetition can be harmful, but we do have to bear the warnings about 'vain repetitions' in mind ... it's funny though, how some of the worst exponents of the practice criticise more liturgical traditions for this when babbling away themselves 19 to the dozen ...
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
Agreed.

Not all use of repetition can be harmful, but we do have to bear the warnings about 'vain repetitions' in mind ... it's funny though, how some of the worst exponents of the practice criticise more liturgical traditions for this when babbling away themselves 19 to the dozen ...

Isn't that the truth! I'd take a good solemn liturgy accompanied by ancient hymns on the organ over the forced hand waving, matra-esque, "Let's all get excited, now, come on, why aren't you as excited as me, bro?" repetition any day.
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
I don't have a problem with the way you are using 'seasons' in the sense that it might apply as follows (to give a fictitious example):


Gamaliel,

Its sounds like we are more or less in agreement here (see my earlier post on this).
The changes i described as 'seasons' earlier havn't been particularly planned and you can see more clearly in hindsight how they can be demarked as 'stages' in a churches life.
 
Posted by NJA (# 13022) on :
 
Unless I missed it, no-one seems to have drawn attention to the bible reference to gold dust in worship:

"And he took the (golden) calf which they had made, and burnt it in the fire, and ground it to powder, and strawed it upon the water, and made the children of Israel drink of it" (Exodus 32:20)

Aaron then blames the people and that it kind of just happened:

"For they said unto me, Make us gods, which shall go before us: for as for this Moses, the man that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we wot not what is become of him. And I said to them, Whosoever has any gold, let them break it off. So they gave it me: then I cast it into the fire, and there came out this calf."
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Whenever I hear of this phenomenon, I imagine the younger John MacEnroe going to church and shouting insistently: 'I saw gold-dust!'

Am I the only one?
 
Posted by beatmenace (# 16955) on :
 
quote:
Unless I missed it, no-one seems to have drawn attention to the bible reference to gold dust in worship:

"And he took the (golden) calf which they had made, and burnt it in the fire, and ground it to powder, and strawed it upon the water, and made the children of Israel drink of it" (Exodus 32:20)

NJA - might be a bit of a Golden Herring that.

I think the spontaneous story of the calf's birth is just Aaron trying to claim to Moses that it 'really was a god, honest guv, and nuffink to do wiv me'

Any how Moses isnt fooled by that - 'come on, you made it yourself didn't you?' 'Well yes'.

The Gold Dust was the Golden Calf ground to powder (by Moses) and added to the water as a punishment for their unfaithfulness.

If you want to link the Gold Dust sign to a reminder of not making any Idols - then feel free to do so - its as good an interpretaion as any and i certainly cant argue agaist it. I hadn't thought of that one.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
Altered states of consciousness are not biblically normative at all, easily invoked and are nothing to do with the Holy Spirit.
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
Altered states of consciousness are not biblically normative at all, easily invoked and are nothing to do with the Holy Spirit.

I tend to agree, and too many Christians have made these the bedrock of their worship. They want the flash, they don't want the substance.

Simply taking up a cross and following Jesus, serving widows and orphans, being the last in line, willing to do the most degrading jobs around the fellowship, being a servant of all without calling attention to self, that's too tedious. People want An Experience, they want something that will call attention to themselves ("I saw the Spirit of God hovering during our worship!" "I caused three legs to grow out this week!" "I can read your mail!") that will cause people to respect them look at them and say "What an anointing!", to fear them even (see Mark Driscoll).

Doing the real work of the church is just too prosaic.

[ 19. July 2012, 15:43: Message edited by: CSL1 ]
 
Posted by justlooking (# 12079) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by windsofchange:
Just out of curiosity, has anyone either tasted this stuff, or rubbed their eyes after touching it?

If it's mica it probably wouldn't do any harm because this is used in cosmetics as well as in craft materials.

It's also used widely in electrical products and insulating materials so it may be a component of heating and ventilation systems. I think it would be very easy to fake these 'glory clouds' using ground mica but could it occasionally happen accidentally via damaged electrical systems?

IMO most of the reported occurrences are likely to be faked. None of the youtube 'evidence' I've seen is remotely convincing. I wouldn't close the door completely on spiritual manifestations but I think they are rare.
 
Posted by Birdseye (# 5280) on :
 
That shimmery stuff on their hands looks exactly like the shimmery stuff on my hands when I've applied my usual moisturising day-cream with added 'luminescence' -which ALSO comes off on my hands if I then put my hands on my face.

But it could be bronzing powder or simple sweat -which can also sometimes twinkle a little -urea is a little bit yellow after all...

Well if it helps people to grow in their discipleship and give them encouragement as they walk the path of suffering in the hopes of the resurrection and eternal life with Christ... And if it helps them to expand their minds a little bit and recognise the great mystery that is the loving sustaining power of God...

... and as long as it DOESN'T mislead them into thinking that THIS world is heaven and it's going to rain money on them because Jesus is a sugar-daddy who wants to buy your affection...
... or shift their focus away from seeking Christ and onto seeking an exciting worldly experience
... then it's probably alright.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
CSL1 : "I caused three legs to grow out this week!" LOL! Well sol. In our desperate 'charismatic evangelical' fellowship of 750 people that covers the best that the healing on the streets team has claimed from the congregation in two years. No wonder the vicar doesn't ask any more.

Is anybody ever prayed for in healing prayer sessions on how to endure with cancer or bipolarity or dementia or dropsy or teenagers UNTIL they are healed ?

[ 19. July 2012, 19:53: Message edited by: Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard ]
 
Posted by catthefat (# 8586) on :
 
I can't see bhow it's "probably alright" to believe something that is a lie. Do lies ever lead to the truth?
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by catthefat:
I can't see bhow it's "probably alright" to believe something that is a lie. Do lies ever lead to the truth?

No, the type discussed typically lead to pompous pinky ring wearing evangelists, abusive systems devised by those who want to zealously guard their status as "anointed", gullible believers who lust after experience rather than truth, loss of the ability to engage in rational thought, shallow belief systems, heresies, apostasies, death.
 
Posted by windsofchange (# 13000) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
quote:
Originally posted by windsofchange:
Reminds me of when I was in high school and got involved in a Charismatic prayer group. The leader, a very charismatic (small c intentional), was always telling us about the wonderful things she was seeing as we prayed - a bright blue ribbon floating over our heads; a rainbow; a "cloud of glory" (whatever that might have been).

And, wanting to please her (because she was a teacher and SO COOL!), we would always smile and agree that we saw it too! And try very, very hard to believe it.

The Emperor's new clothes had nothing on the Charismatic Prayer Group Leader's newest miracle. But they had about the same amount of substance. [Roll Eyes]

This sounds rather like a visual migraine. Or just possibly synesthesia, though mine isn't so well-defined. She may have been deluded herself.

Just sayin'.

Hmm, I had migraines too (growing up; they decreased as I got older, one of nicer things about aging [Smile] ); but never saw anything really cool like that. Just auras and flashing dots.
 
Posted by Ramarius (# 16551) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
CSL1 : "I caused three legs to grow out this week!" LOL! Well sol. In our desperate 'charismatic evangelical' fellowship of 750 people that covers the best that the healing on the streets team has claimed from the congregation in two years. No wonder the vicar doesn't ask any more.

Is anybody ever prayed for in healing prayer sessions on how to endure with cancer or bipolarity or dementia or dropsy or teenagers UNTIL they are healed ?

Yes - very much so. It's a journey we walk with people, even if it ends in death.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I can't speak to the migraines from experience, only from verbal and artistic description of the auras. But as for synesthesia, what caught my attention was the fact that she wasn't describing (I think) any terribly well-defined item such as an angel or a trumpet or something, her claims as described are of shapes and colors--a blue ribbon, a cloud of glory. And that is similar to how my colored hearing operates. I don't see defined items such as a hairbrush or a Chihuahua, I see cones and moving ribbons and colored slashes of light. Sometimes o-rings and surfaces of various textures and directions.

I've always had colored letters and numbers. But I did not become aware of my colored hearing until about six years ago, (and just realized I have some colored/shaped TASTE last week, yikes--strong garlic in tomato soup is a very clear smooth yellow cylinder if you were wondering, laid right across the middle of the bowl.)

I tell you all that because I imagine she might have had synesthesia all her life but only recently had it move to the forefront of her attention, like my hearing and taste forms. In which case she might very well have mistaken it for something supernatural. Having been aware of it from an early age, I knew perfectly well it meant I was just a neurological weirdo. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Laurelin:
The church in the developing world does seem to experience more of the direct power of the Spirit. Maybe because their worldview is less cluttered by materialism and all our other many 'isms'.

Yep, instead it's cluttered by all their other many 'isms' instead. I think the desire to control the transcendent and have it on tap is pretty universal.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
[Overused]
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Yes. And there's no particular merit if you aren't materialist because you haven't (yet) got the material to be -istic about, yet.

Wait till they get here and go off the deep end. [Roll Eyes] (Been dealing with the fall-out of that crap for a couple decades now)
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
[Overused]
 
Posted by Pyx_e (# 57) on :
 
St Stevie sums it up:

quote:
Rock on- gold dust woman
Take your silver spoon
And dig your grave

AtB, Pyx_e.

p.s I want Martin's babies, I love him so much.
 
Posted by LutheranChik (# 9826) on :
 
Pyx_e: [Overused] That song became an earworm for me, reading the OP.

On a more serious note: I haven't read all the comments here so I don't know if anyone else has made the same point, but...when I think of Jesus' miracles, all of them -- even the initial miracle at the Cana wedding party -- served the needs of others at the moment; they were about helping people. He also didn't seem to be much in the mood to deal with curiosity seekers looking for him to produce magick tricks to prove his connection to God -- see his comments about a wicked and adulterous generation seeking signs and wonders.

How does the phenomenon of "gold dust" (has anyone actually captured any of the stuff?) stack up to Jesus' example of effecting God's saving power on behalf of those around him?
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LutheranChik:
Pyx_e: [Overused] That song became an earworm for me, reading the OP.

On a more serious note: I haven't read all the comments here so I don't know if anyone else has made the same point, but...when I think of Jesus' miracles, all of them -- even the initial miracle at the Cana wedding party -- served the needs of others at the moment; they were about helping people. He also didn't seem to be much in the mood to deal with curiosity seekers looking for him to produce magick tricks to prove his connection to God -- see his comments about a wicked and adulterous generation seeking signs and wonders.

How does the phenomenon of "gold dust" (has anyone actually captured any of the stuff?) stack up to Jesus' example of effecting God's saving power on behalf of those around him?

Yes, that point's been made more-or-less by me and others. And I agree with you, spot on.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
Pyx_e ... there's summat going here. Summat emergent. But I am frigid with men. Mainly.
 
Posted by Komensky (# 8675) on :
 
The gold dust phenomenon can be explained, to some degree, like many similar things ('gold teeth', jewels appearing, etc.). There is not one single case that I have seen verified of 'gold' dust. There was a case a few years ago (was it in Canada?) where someone collected some of the stuff and it was plastic. Believers in the stuff of course argued that, perhaps, God, in his wisdom, *chose* to send them plastic. And so on. I don't believe that all of these things are faked, but many are.

So what about those that are not deliberately staged? People certainly see 'something', but it is almost certainly not gold dust because if was, someone would have proven it by now. I've met people who say that they've seen it happen, falling from hands, but I've also met people who claim they've seen a UFO. I'm sure they saw something, but not a spaceship from another planet.

There is a very interesting pattern and this is that the wackier the phenomenon, the wackier the theology. Bethel in California is a case in point.

K.
 
Posted by CSL1 (# 17168) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Komensky:
The gold dust phenomenon can be explained, to some degree, like many similar things ('gold teeth', jewels appearing, etc.). There is not one single case that I have seen verified of 'gold' dust. There was a case a few years ago (was it in Canada?) where someone collected some of the stuff and it was plastic. Believers in the stuff of course argued that, perhaps, God, in his wisdom, *chose* to send them plastic. And so on. I don't believe that all of these things are faked, but many are.

So what about those that are not deliberately staged? People certainly see 'something', but it is almost certainly not gold dust because if was, someone would have proven it by now. I've met people who say that they've seen it happen, falling from hands, but I've also met people who claim they've seen a UFO. I'm sure they saw something, but not a spaceship from another planet.

There is a very interesting pattern and this is that the wackier the phenomenon, the wackier the theology. Bethel in California is a case in point.

K.

Funny you mention UFOs. I thought I saw a UFO when I was a boy, my mom was there with me, one evening in the early 1970s we were stepping outside and squinting to see one of the Apollo missions as it was passing over our state in orbit. We saw what looked like an object much closer than the Apollo must have been, you could see in the gloom of the evening more of it that you'd expect from something many hundreds of miles up, it had flashing lights.

We told dad we'd seen Apollo next day and described it, he said that wasn't what Apollo was supposed to look like at all. We quickly became convinced we'd "seen a UFO" instead, our descriptions of the "UFO" over time became more detailed, over the years, they became quite elaborate, dad smirked and let us harbor our delusion. But it seemed absolutely real to us, and subtly, without consciously trying, we egged each other on until this became a hard fact in our minds.

Of course now I know exactly what it was: an airplane that happened to be passing overhead that we'd initially taken for the Apollo, then in our embarrassment at being told we were mistaken, we twisted things into the UFO and convinced ourselves of it. Mom still believes it to this day.

[ 25. July 2012, 17:09: Message edited by: CSL1 ]
 
Posted by Saul the Apostle (# 13808) on :
 
If we accept God sprinkles gold dust in Christian services, why gold specifically? Why not titanium? Or another precious metal? Or diamonds? Or silver flakes?

As Eutychus said we aren't in Hogwarts.

The miraculous is present with us, but often in more subdued ways and as Lutheran Chick said, Jesus' miracles had a degree of context to them (water into wine at a wedding feast etc.). Gold dust seems highly random and a little out of any context - IMHO.

To answer the OP perhaps auto suggestion maybe is a thing going on here? Group dynamics, which can work so that the whole group may believe they've seen or experienced something which is in fact not there. Try it - go out of doors in the day and start pointing upwards, better do it with a chum, and then agree you've seen a flying Morris 1000 (a car for our foreign chums) and keep pointing sky wards; you'll be amazed what reaction you get and how many people actually ''see'' what you claim to see (this is a light hearted suggestion by the way BUT it does work).

Saul the Apostle
 
Posted by Midlands Chaucer (# 8986) on :
 
I remember in the late 90s that a local charismatic evangelical church experienced something related to the 'gold dust' miracles. Christians reported the miracle of receiving 'gold' tooth fillings. I went to a meeting where small cameras were even inserted into people's mouths, so that the miraculous fillings could be seen.

I have not spoken personally to any of those people reporting the miracles, so I'm unable to verify the 'reality' of the miracles. What I do seem to remember is that those being interviewed were the more extrovert and vocal members of the local church.

I don't think they would have been deliberately lying. But, then again, neither am I sure that these were 'gold' fillings. What the miracles may illustrate is that, charismatic churches especially, are drawn to sensationalism; to an over-emphasis on the dramatic and unusual. Although perhaps, these days being the post-Toronto period, there was a vogue, a fashion, for this kind of thing at the time.

Charismatic christians feel a keenness to believe, and the eagerness to believe may sometimes result in an uncritical attitude which means that people exaggerate or interpret certain phenomena.

There doesn't seem to be much of a point to the gold fillings phenomenon. One would expect God to heal real diseases, rather than giving people a cosmetic makeover.

I remember at the time (in the late 1990s) that tongue-piercing was becoming fashionable (especially among young people) and I wrote an article speculating that the gold fillings might be God's alternative to a perhaps rather dangerous youth trend (as tongue-piercing has health risks). Of course, I don't know think that God necessarily had anything to do at all with the gold fillings phenomenon. I don't know. I don't think God was trying to create a fashion trend. To say or believe that would constitute a gross anthropomorphism.
 
Posted by Avila (# 15541) on :
 
Tidying up a major glitter spill in the church today - the after effects of holiday club - made me think of this thread...

Perhaps we can start a rumour about a little rural parish church, we have the gold glitter that will be emerging from nooks and crannies for months to come!
 
Posted by Komensky (# 8675) on :
 
Midlands Chaucer is right about this. The signs-and-wonders lot (Wimberites, Vinyardies and parts of the C of E it now seems) buy into the expectation that God will do magic tricks (or more often that God enables *them* to do magic tricks). If your tricks don't happen—then you lack faith!

Part of this thread was discussed in another thread about Bill Johnson (who is on the wackier side of these hoaxes) and Bethel church in California. People mentioned the appearance of feathers. In several of those cases people collected samples and took them to a ornithologist. You won't believe it, but they were just ordinary bird feathers.

You don't believe that 'Jesus showed up' [sic]? Then you must not want all of what Jesus has to offer. It's a sick, sick part of modern evangelical culture.

K.
 
Posted by Komensky (# 8675) on :
 
A website that lists a number of documented fakes of gold dust and gold teeth, etc.
 
Posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard (# 368) on :
 
MC. They were deluded. Brainwashed. By themselves. NO other explanation is faithfully necessary. There were NO gold teeth.

Just like no amputee EVER gets their limb(s) back.

Not yet.
 
Posted by justlooking (# 12079) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard:
MC. They were deluded. Brainwashed. By themselves. NO other explanation is faithfully necessary. There were NO gold teeth.

Just like no amputee EVER gets their limb(s) back.

Not yet.

True.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
Yes, it's the 'not yet' thing that narks me about a lot of this stuff. As if by having 'gold dust' and so on you somehow make it more likely that the real big miracles are going to take place.

Sure, in the OT you see David tackling 'first the lion, then the bear and then Goliath' but the first miracle Jesus did was pretty spectacular. He didn't start off with a couple of bottles of Evian and turn them into Beaujolais, he went straight into the deep end ...

Nah, none of this stuff 'computes'. It's all a bit of a distraction.
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
This - very old - article Andrew Walker (posted on the Ship) may be apposite here:

http://old.shipoffools.com/Cargo/Features99/Features/TorontoGoldWalker.html
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
It's old but still stands the test of time. I think he's struck gold - or is on the money ...

[Biased]
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
The questions don't change

1. Why would God want to give people gold teeth?

2. What evidence is there (independantly verifiable) that this has happened?

3. How do you deal with those who misrepresent such things that deflect us away from what God is doing? How have such been dealt with in the past?
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
God is doing what he has always been doing - being God.

How I'd deal with it is to allow the people involved with sort of thing to come to a fuller, and I believe better, understanding by - as they appear to be doing in the case we've been discussing - keeping up relationships with other outfits, using their brains and waiting to see what happens.

As Eutychus, and Andrew Walker, both suggest, fads pass in time. This one crops up every now and then and has done so in various parts of the world in charismatic and Pentecostal circles. Undoubtedly it will happen again. Eventually it will run its course.
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
Eventually it will run its course.

Agree with you most of the way but if we adopt too much of a "wait and see approach," how will we justify to God and/or ourselves the (often irreparable) damage caused to people in the meantime?

Are we really happy to allow people to become disillusioned through this stuff or are we ready to come out and say it's wrong, if it obviously is?
 
Posted by Komensky (# 8675) on :
 
Of course there are no verified cases, this is entirely the point. The few cases when someone offered their gold filling as proof where either proved to be done by a dentist or they mysteriously turned back to old-fashioned, boring old fillings. The same things goes for the 'gold dust'. Either they tell they world that, for some reason, no one was able to collect any ('it was too small' or 'that wasn't really on our minds', which was the Bethel line), or when samples are collected they turn out to be some kind of plastic.

If any of this BS had actually happened by a miracle, the humans involved would be keen to prove that they weren't deluded. And so despite the hundreds if not thousands of these stories of feathers, gold teeth, gold dust, etc., not one has been demonstrated to be genuine. It beggars belief that any right-thinking person continues to believe these stories. But there you have it!

One problem (among others) with the whole WoF (WtF?) and Signs and Wonders lot is that once they start these yarns they have to keep going. Occasionally they get caught telling outright porkies (like the Bethel group who claimed to have raised people from the dead) and then later apologised. One of the leaders at Bethel told the congregation with a straight face that several members of their you group walked on water—to cheers and whoops from the crowd (I mean congregation).

There is some loon (soon to be on the charismatic preaching circuit, no doubt) in Wales now, along the same lines, that claims that Christians should be able to breathe underwater.

K.
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
I have no problem with telling people that things are wrong when they actually are, EE.

In my experience, though, being 'against' someone's sincerely held view can be counter-productive and only serves to drive them into a corner or to adopt a more entrenched position.

Hey ... that doesn't stop me posting here, though, does it? [Help]

Seriously, I know that if I kept challenging our local charismatic evangelical vicar over putative words and so-called signs-and-wonders he'd very quickly stop listening to me over anything else I might say. I have challenged him on such things (and he's pretty mild compared to the Bethel crowd) and it didn't get me very far.

Ultimately, we can warn and speak as we find but people have to learn from their own mistakes.

If I tell him that I've had over 30 years experience of the charismatic scene and can see where this sort of thing leads he just shrugs that off and says that although he's younger than me he grew up in a charismatic household (charismatic vicar Dad) and that this is almost as much experience as I've had and that my views have been skewed by experience of those nasty heavy-shepherding restorationists and not the lovely, cuddly New Wine Anglicans ... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Belle Ringer (# 13379) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Komensky:
The same things goes for the 'gold dust'. Either they tell they world that, for some reason, no one was able to collect any ('it was too small' or 'that wasn't really on our minds', which was the Bethel line), or when samples are collected they turn out to be some kind of plastic.

I'll quarrel with a bit of this without taking sides on physical "gold dust."

Without getting into the question of whether God is in some way more specifically or more blatantly present than at other times (like when the glory of God so filled the tent of meeting no human could enter? or in the upper room on Pentecost day but not the day before that?), many of us do experience times of being deeply aware of the presence of God beyond just theological belief that God is present. (Whether it's a matter of more fully turning our attention to God or a matter of God making God's presence more obvious, is irrelevant for these comments.)

When one has an unusually strong awareness of the presence of God, one's focus is on God, delight and awe of awareness of God, NOT on proving anything to potential skeptics later.

How many sermons have I heard mentioning the post resurrection appearance of Jesus and "throw the net in the water on the other side" and jumping into the water running to Jesus, rowing hard to get to shore fast, and then someone reports the number of fish -- must be a dozen sermons in my life have mentioned that scene and most or all raised the question in passing bemusement "how could someone turn away to count the fish?"

If our academic mainline preachers can think there's something peculiar about turning attention away from Jesus to count fish, surely it's just as peculiar to turn awareness away from the strong immediate awareness of God's presence to pull out sticky tape and collect gold dust and put it in an envelope for later analysis.

I had a somewhat parallel experience when I went to a showing of the shroud. Again, not taking sides on whether it's real, just standing in line 4 hours to see it thinking it just some Catholic tourist thing but what the heck. Somehow being in front of it staring at it for the minimal time they give you was such a profound spiritual experience that upon exiting the church I started to go window shopping but the things that normally attract me to drool over -- fine china, jewelry -- were drab, uninteresting, I quickly calculated the remaining time before the bus left and got back in line to see the shroud again, nothing else appealed so much.

Gold dust would be drab in comparison to strong awareness of the presence of God. Bethel's "that really wasn't on our minds" comment is exactly what I would expect if the gold dust were true and from God. The brain in the awareness of God's presence is in awed, amazed mode, not in analytical mode.

I'm not taking sides on Bethel's claims, just saying the reported claimed reaction is what I would expect if it were real. (Which doesn't answer the question of whether it's real or just a well faked reaction.)
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Belle Ringer:
I'm not taking sides on Bethel's claims, just saying the reported claimed reaction is what I would expect if it were real. (Which doesn't answer the question of whether it's real or just a well faked reaction.)

The problem is that many people from these circles and others, then examine their experience in the 'cold light of day', and the only thing they can gloam onto is the supposed miracle. When it is proven to be fake, it then casts doubt on their entire experience (which doesn't answer the question of whether it was an actual experience of God, or something else).
 
Posted by ExclamationMark (# 14715) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
I have no problem with telling people that things are wrong when they actually are, EE.

I presume you mean me - EM not EE!

I can see the point of what you are saying. I am perhaps rather less sensitive than you in being concerned about someone backing into a corner if I take issue with something that's going on with them. Oh, I know that many would say that I have no right to be prescriptive but I'd rather take that flack than see someone walk into a brick wall. What is the greater damage?

To pick up on one of the points you made, to what extent are you prepared to allow a no go area (signs and wonders), to determine the parameters of your relationship with your vicar? What are you prepared to overlook in the interests of "wait and see" (your namesake's response)? Or, to get an easy life with someone ignoring you on one issue but listening on another?

Perhaps your Vicar does know a bit about the signs and wonders movement but being a Vicar's son ain't really in the qualifications. Your (and my) 30 + years of experience in it all does tend to give a broader perspective.

I'm no fan of the universal application of the Gamaliel principle as you can gather - wait and see works in some cases but not in all. It seems to have such a specific term of reference in Acts that I can't see that it is meant to be a universal maxim for dealing with spiritual matters.

I remember all too well Toronto, Pensacola, the 1st lot of gold teeth, Todd bentley et al and didn't adopt a wait and see approach at the time. It may not have made me friends but certainly it's lost me a few and in the early days cost me a place at bible college.

One thing is, despite all the hype, smoke and mirrors - I still believe that God works in special ways in people's lives today. Trouble is, most people are looking in the wrong places - God's hand is often in the ordinary and simple, and the everyday.

[ 27. July 2012, 15:49: Message edited by: ExclamationMark ]
 
Posted by chris stiles (# 12641) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
I'm no fan of the universal application of the Gamaliel principle as you can gather - wait and see works in some cases but not in all. It seems to have such a specific term of reference in Acts that I can't see that it is meant to be a universal maxim for dealing with spiritual matters.

Many people act as if Gamaliel was the only wise man in the bible but I'm not even sure whether it is a principle we should be following.

After all, the passage is descriptive rather than prescriptive. Both the Gospels and the Epistles contain injunctions to 'beware of false prophets' but following Gamaliel would have us 'wait and see'.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0