Thread: Olympics Opening Ceremony Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=023341

Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on :
 
Brilliant for anybody who lives in UK

Far too parochial ( and therefore unintelligible) for a global audience.

What would the Chinese and Outer Mongolians have made of the Mr Bean slot?

Who was this aimed at?
 
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on :
 
What was this all about?

The opening made sense ( even if excellent sense) to Brits. What did the Chinese and Outer Mongolians make of the Mr Bean slot?

Far too parochial. But we might have expected that.
 
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on :
 
Oooooooooooooops

sorry

problem with posting
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
Personally I don't like Mr Bean, but he has been successful all over the world. Just like Benny Hill was - that sort of visual humour travels well.
 
Posted by Kyzyl (# 374) on :
 
Mr. Bean is in the opening ceremony? I may just have to watch in three hours (USA central time.)
 
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on :
 
We're watching in the Ship's Cafe - abide with us, please. [Smile]
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
However I have just been puzzled by a violent dance going alongside a very peaceful rendition of "Abide With Me". Overall all of this reminds me of a Matt Smith episode of Doctor Who - some striking moments but rather confusing as a whole.
 
Posted by Jahlove (# 10290) on :
 
it was a celebration of UK-ness - left out a lot of our history e.g. Henry VII, EIR, Agincourt etc. but was interesting that it didn't gloss, in fact brought out, the demise of our manufacturing industries. Got a bit daft about 1.5 hrs in but the first part almost had me welling up. Well done, Danny Boyle.
 
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on :
 
The musical hits part was much too long - liked the history part at the beginning. The transformation from rural Britain to the industrial revolution was quite spectacular. After that, it went a bit downhill I thought. Perhaps with the exception of the Mary Poppinses scene with all the kids.
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
A commentator has said that this is the latest opening ceremony ever. Why? A lot of UK athletes aren't going to be there as they have to compete tomorrow, which really sounds mad.
 
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on :
 
I've got a mild ale in the fridge to be enjoyed with the opening ceremony. Sounds like I will be drinking the right thing.

As the games continue, feel free to join us down in the Circus for more sporting and TV spectacle related discussion
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
It's much better than I was expecting it to be.
 
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on :
 
Mr Boyle (now, if a certain Frankie Boyle had done the opening ...!) seems to have insisted on it starting when it's completely dark - thus after 9pm.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I once sent my East German penpal a video of Mr Bean. He thought it was the funniest thing he'd ever seen. But yes, some of the refs are too local (am I supposed to know who Frankie and June were, because I don't).

Loved the bit with the Queen apparently parachuting in! And the drummers were great. Not so sure about the hospital beds scene, inappropriately dark for an opening ceremony, surely.

The whole thing did start to become a bit overblown - a seemingly endless stream of frenetic dancers and music, to the point where I was relieved to be at home and could wander off instead of having to sit through it all. Now we're having the seemingly endless procession of athletes and it'll be a loooong time before they get to the end - somewhere well after midnight I bet.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I want a frock like the Cameroonians.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
The Frankie and June reference flummoxed me too.
 
Posted by Avila (# 15541) on :
 
Before dark would mess up light effects.

Who says it was anything to do with the atheletes tonight??

As for content I just commented on the localism on FB and that even as a Brit I missed references, however I do recall Sydney 2000 opening ceremony including a display of twirling washing lines - celebrating the hillman hoist which you had to have been in the country to comprehend.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
And WHY are the Czechs wearing white sorts and blue wellies?

(These posts might be better suited to the Cafe, but the iPad won't access it).

On the OP - why should the opening ceremony's opaqueness to the Outer Mongolians be a problem? I suspect, were Ulan Bator to host the Games, some parts of the proceedings might be a bit obscure to us. The object is to big up your nation on two fronts; what is unique to it, and what it has contributed to world culture - obviously hoping for a lot of crossover between the two.
 
Posted by Alex Cockell (# 7487) on :
 
What do you all make to the music choices?
 
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
It's much better than I was expecting it to be.

Ditto, and I tend to be cynical about such stuff.

Re the dance with Abide with Me - I think the dance was intended to represent a pulse, and also the violence of the deaths in the 7/7 bombing plus some kind of resolution.

I thought it was a beautiful section, and a surprisingly thoughtful inclusion.
 
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on :
 
Talking of inclusion - they seem to have tried hard with that. (Also, I loved the parachuting queen.)
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
(Also, I loved the parachuting queen.)

She does all her own stunts you know.
 
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
It's much better than I was expecting it to be.

Ditto, and I tend to be cynical about such stuff.

Ditto, but I still thought it was pretty awful. Bejing was quite beautiful and impressive, this seemed to involve a lot of faffing around and pointless puff.

Rowan Atkinson did make me laugh, mostly because I've played viola parts that have made me identify with that sentiment!

Where on earth did Team GB get those awful tracksuits? They're truly chavtastic [Eek!]

How are all those people going to get Tubes home - it's quarter to 1 in the morning, surely most of them'll end up missing their last train home.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
Love what I've seen so far ('twas too early in the morning for me to see the whole thing). Waiting for a full rerun.

I love that the Olympics opening ceremonies contain what is unique about the host country's culture/sense of humour etc. Otherwise it'd just be a boring, homogenous sort of spectacle of fireworks and pop music. I'm all nostalgic for my British heritage now.

What were the British athletes wearing though, a bit Liberace wasn't it?
 
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on :
 
The Olympic Flame lighting was spectacular.

Pity about Macca at the end ...
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
Deliberately chavtastic I thought (the outfits, I mean).
 
Posted by Clodsley Shovel (# 16662) on :
 
Shame about Macca forgetting the words to his own song and i'm not sure what the point of the Arctic Monkeys was.

Other than that, once you've accepted the parade is going to take ages, I thought it was brilliant, with the Queens 'entrance' being the highlight.

Hopefully Wiggins and Cavendish can get us off to a golden start tomorrow. [Smile]
 
Posted by Anglican_Brat (# 12349) on :
 
Good:

The Queen, Bond, and her Coagies. Cute and imaginative.

Mr. Bean's segment and his dream, along with the London Symphony.

The segment dedicated to the NHS, a possibly sly political jibe by Danny Boyle, as well as the segments to children literature.

What I didn't get:

The references to FB and Twitter in the musical segment for the 70s and 80s. It felt a little out-of-place. As well, the mini-story about the guy and the girl was not really needed.

No reference to Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings.

No reference to William Shakespeare or John Milton, it seems that we went from picturesque English rural medieval land right to the Industrial Revolution with hardly a peep towards the Golden Age of the Tudors and the Stuarts. Well, I could understand why they didn't want to mention the English Civil War.
[Razz]
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
I'm shocked, no reference to Shakespeare?

I'm watching on NBC now. I could do without the NBC commentators helpful quips. Oh, ya'll really call it "telly" over there? red poppies associated with WWI? who knew? It's really rather spoiling it for me.

I hope I haven't missed Mr Bean.
 
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on :
 
Harry Potter was represented by the huge (how could you miss it?) puppet of Voldemort.

Shakespeare was represented by the speech made by Sir Kenneth Brannagh.

Keep up.
 
Posted by Anglican_Brat (# 12349) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
Harry Potter was represented by the huge (how could you miss it?) puppet of Voldemort.

Shakespeare was represented by the speech made by Sir Kenneth Brannagh.

Keep up.

Stand corrected, I forgot about Voldemort. I also didn't see the speech by Branagh, though I would say that a small speech doesn't give justice to Shakespeare's legacy, considering that William Blake's Jerusalem got more airtime.
 
Posted by Telepath (# 3534) on :
 
It was all a political statement and portrayed British social and economic history from before enclosure through the Industrial
Revolution. It portrayed the Jarrow Marches and the Suffragist movement among many other things. That's what I liked most about it.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Avila:

As for content I just commented on the localism on FB and that even as a Brit I missed references, however I do recall Sydney 2000 opening ceremony including a display of twirling washing lines - celebrating the hillman hoist which you had to have been in the country to comprehend.

Quite, the Sydney opening ceremony had LOTS of in-jokes, trying to celebrate our
larrikinism , apparently Danny Boyle was doing something a bit similar with British humour, trying to make the games friendly, like Sydney. I think it worked, but I would say that, cos I "get" many British jokes and references.

Oh and it's the Hills Hoist, fancy misnaming one of Australia's cultural icons, I'm outraged, please show more respect in future [Devil]
 
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on :
 
I thought it was quite good, all in all. Bond & the queen was a highlight, McCartney was horrid (though, in some sense, also that was very British, to let an old man stumble through his old tune, just because...).

I thought the spindly cauldron was an rather clever and aesthetically pleasing idea.

I would say that this was quite good in a distinctly British way. It was no Beijing. Good!

(TV director incredibly keeps the camera trained on the queen as she cleans her fingernails, clearly ignoring the proceedings. Commentator says something like "And the queen is also enjoying this immensely, I'm sure." How very British... in China, heads would roll. Literally.)
 
Posted by Meg the Red (# 11838) on :
 
Watching a rerun on TSN - they saw fit to chop out everything between Branagh and the forging of the Olympic rings and keep - gawdelpus - all of Sir Paul's "performance".

The children's choirs made me all weepy, as did Bradley Wiggins' sideburns, but for very different reasons. [Disappointed]

And any opening ceremony that features live sheep is by definition brilliant.
 
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Avila:
Before dark would mess up light effects.

Who says it was anything to do with the atheletes tonight??

As for content I just commented on the localism on FB and that even as a Brit I missed references, however I do recall Sydney 2000 opening ceremony including a display of twirling washing lines - celebrating the hillman hoist which you had to have been in the country to comprehend.

[pedantic aussie] Hills hoist, The hillman is a car I think [/pedantic aussie] About to watch with my daughter; it is her homework.
 
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on :
 
Just to restate what has already been pointed out. [Roll Eyes]

Must read all the flaming thread before typing. sorry. puts self in time-out corner

[ 28. July 2012, 03:26: Message edited by: Patdys ]
 
Posted by Mary LA (# 17040) on :
 
Bizarre and affectionate and surreal, watched from South Africa where 9.30pm was really late for the beginning of a lengthy ceremony. Very Mad Hatter's Tea Party and nothing at all to do with Olympics for the early part. But magnificent too in places --
 
Posted by Gramps49 (# 16378) on :
 
I am on the West Coast of the US. There s a time delay. Just saw the Mr Bean segment. I thought it was very funny, though my son, the musician could tell he was not playing the note.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
I didn't watch it all, but I reckon that the 1951 Festival of Britain (especially the Lion and the Unicorn pavilion, which celebrated British quirks and eccentricity) and the 1977 British Genius Exhibition were influences.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
I enjoyed the quirky bits, went to bed at 10pm and recorded the rest so that I can skim through. Like Ariel, I'm very glad I wasn't there - the noise would have done me in.

Those drummers' arms must have been dropping off by the end of the night!

Apparently the drums were just painted buckets - one drummer says he's going to plant a tree in hos as a momento.
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
The Amosling and I watched the whole thing, and liked it all enormously, apart from the anti-climax of the Arctic Monkeys and Sir Paul Macartney. On one level it was a deliberate riposte to the Beijing opening ceremony, so if you adored the latter you'd be bound to be disappointed. This was not the kind of ceremony where a child who looked imperfect would be kept offstage. It celebrated individuality as well as diversity--not to mention eccentricity. There was Shakespeare--Branagh as Brunel, speaking Caliban's speech from 'The Tempest' to open the 'Dark Satanic Mills' section. Protest was celebrated, along with interracial marriage, the NHS, the World Wide Web (actual doctors, nurses, and yes, patients from Great Ormond Street Hospital. Sir Tim Berners-Lee). The Children's Literature section was unexpected and good. I liked the surreality, and the domesticity of the '70s and '80s music section. A London opening ceremony which gives us tributes to Queen, the Sex Pistols' 'God Save the Queen,' and then Her Majesty herself, with the national anthem sung by a choir of hearing and deaf children singing and signing (in their pyjamas!) is pretty remarkable. And not something you'd get in China. There were unavoidable longeurs--Seb Coe's tedious speech. There were unexpected pleasures--the Mexican team's outfits; Shami Chakrabarti and Ban Ki Moon carrying the Olympic flag. Sir Simon Rattle. The pretty cool cauldron being lit by young, as-yet unknown athletes. Mr Bean and James Bond aren't my cup of tea, but I enjoyed the performing corgis. It was worth staying up until the end.

[ 28. July 2012, 06:50: Message edited by: Amos ]
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
Watching at the moment after recording it this morning here in Oz. Taking a coffee break - ain't it great when you can do that! [Big Grin]

And can I just say, I find it hard to believe that anything is going to top the fact that they got the Queen to agree to the Bond thing.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
Dug out a bit about the 'Lion and the Unicorn' pavilion from the Festival of Britain.

It was to
quote:
house an exposition of what came most often to be referred to as the British character, with overtones of national traditions and achievements, though warlike achievements were strictly excluded... The Lion would stand for the more dependable traits in the national character, the Unicorn for the more volatile
I think the opening ceremony stands firmly in this tradition.
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
A couple of poster have commented on the absence of references to Shakespeare. The Brannagh/Brunel speech was from The Tempest. That just about summed up the undoubtedly impressive spectacle: Caliban's Britain.

The other thing that struck me was the almost complete absence of the one set of ideas and organising principles that both explain and, from Alban and Augustine onwards, provide the key to understanding Britain: Christianity.
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
A couple of poster have commented on the absence of references to Shakespeare. The Brannagh/Brunel speech was from The Tempest. That just about summed up the undoubtedly impressive spectacle: Caliban's Britain.

The other thing that struck me was the almost complete absence of the one set of ideas and organising principles that both explain and, from Alban and Augustine onwards, provide the key to understanding Britain: Christianity.
 
Posted by Niteowl2 (# 15841) on :
 
I've never particularly been a fan of Paul McCartney post Beatles, but I must say Sir Paul was horrendous tonight. I've seen live TV shows with him in the past couple of years and he didn't sound anything like he did tonight. Even his "speaking" voice was bad. Perhaps he was ill?

I did love the lighting ceremony and the fireworks. While the Queen was great in going along with the Bond segment, I thought she wasn't up to par when pronouncing the games open in London. Very subpar.
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
How much religion is there generally at Olympic opening ceremonies, Trisagion? I'd expected none, and so was moved by both the Welsh children's choir singing 'Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer,' and the wonderful solo of 'Abide With Me' to accompany the July 7 tribute. Not to mention 'Jerusalem,' which is Christian, albeit in a mystical Blakean way. That, I thought, was enough without the addition of the English Martyrs from St Alban onwards (though they could, I suppose have borrowed the giant puppets from the cathedral).

[ 28. July 2012, 07:44: Message edited by: Amos ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
They were never going to do religion in a show like that, and if they did they would have had to add the Eastern religions as the whole theme was clearly multicultural. Whoever takes the Olympics on next is going to have a hard act to follow and a huge budget if they want to top that. This is all a bit of a gamble, but hopefully it will bring a feelgood factor and some decent revenue to the country.

I'm curious to know what was going on in the arena while we were getting the TV sequences (which were a bit dizzying at times).
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
The other thing that struck me was the almost complete absence of the one set of ideas and organising principles that both explain and, from Alban and Augustine onwards, provide the key to understanding Britain: Christianity.

Was the industrial revolution a specifically Christian innovation??

In any case, if you wanted to make it distinguishingly BRITISH, rather than just 'European', you'd have to be a great deal more specific about your Christianity. Perhaps a re-enactment of Henry VIII getting rid of his first wife, followed by him chopping off the head of number two, followed by some more general depiction of the fact that the trouble all this caused went on through the reigns of his children as well.

[ 28. July 2012, 08:00: Message edited by: orfeo ]
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Was the industrial revolution a specifically Christian innovation??

There's a separate thread to be had discussing that one but I would argue that, in addition to the presence of the physical resources, the legal system and the mental disposition that were key to its early development and the moral system that attempted to ameliorate its oppressive aspects were all direct products of Christianity.

quote:
In any case, if you wanted to make it distinguishingly BRITISH, rather than just 'European', you'd have to be a great deal more specific about your Christianity. Perhaps a re-enactment of Henry VIII getting rid of his first wife, followed by him chopping off the head of number two, followed by some more general depiction of the fact that the trouble all this caused went on through the reigns of his children as well.
Christianity existed for a thousand years and more in these Islands before Henry VIII, but that isn't really the point. An attempt at depiction of Britain and British values (whatever those are) without an explicit reference to the religion that both brought about the notion and formed its ideas, ideals and laws was either ignorant or deliberately misleading. The English countryside without the English Country church? Come off it. Atop the tor a sacred oak and later a symbolic cauldron - all very pseudo-Druidic but not a church in sight.

[ 28. July 2012, 08:14: Message edited by: Trisagion ]
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:

I'm curious to know what was going on in the arena while we were getting the TV sequences (which were a bit dizzying at times).

Pre recorded?
 
Posted by Devils Advocate (# 16484) on :
 
As a Brit who has no interest in the Olympics whatsoever ( and I live in an area on;y 150 miles from London) and bar the torch being taken through the area earlier this month our town will gain nothing from the olympics at all , I watched the opening ceremony with interest. My own opinion is it was spectacular if a little overlong at 3 hours 45 mins so bar the fact it was continuous and there were no intervals it was as long as Wagner's Die Walküre and nearly as long as Siegfried.
I didn't get a lot of the references ( Who were Frankie and June?) and thought it verged on the pretentious.
My main concern is the amount of money it cost to stage. I heard on the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme ( for the non UK readers of this post thats a 6 day's per week current affairs programme) that it cost £27 Million Pounds ( thats $42512990.08 or €34495040.15) My moral problem with this is it is a vast, nay obscene amount of money to spend on a one off one performance only event, especially in a country who are slashing spending on Health care and Welfare benefits and are forcing people out of their homes We have to ask if they will get a return on this investment from the people visiting the country for this event or will it be another case of "Rip off Britain" fleecing tourists?
 
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on :
 
I was very, very impressed that, when the singer sang Abide With Me, the producers didn't leave out the reference to the cross! They could have just sang the bland references to 'thou' but by including the cross, the references to the divine were definately and overtly to Christ.

Excellent [Smile]
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
How much religion is there generally at Olympic opening ceremonies, Trisagion?

Any overt religion would clearly be inappropriate but that is specifically not what I talking about. You cannot honestly or seriously depict an image of Britain's past (or it's present, for that matter) which airbrushed out Christianity. Boyle sought to do just that.

quote:
I'd expected none, and so was moved by both the Welsh children's choir singing 'Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer,'
The clue to understanding what that was about was it's being preceded by Danny Boy and Flower of Scotland: an acknowledgement of the other nations of Britain (interesting to note that the representation of each of three Celtic nations included tries scored in Rugby matches against the English). It wasn't a reference to religion but to nationality.


quote:
and the wonderful solo of 'Abide With Me' to accompany the July 7 tribute.
A song described in the running order as one "sung at every FA Cup Final since 1927 and every Rugby League Challenge Cup Final since 1929 in memory of the war dead.". It wasn't a reference to Christianity but to remembrance. Geddit?

quote:
Not to mention 'Jerusalem,' which is Christian, albeit in a mystical Blakean way.
Which is Blakean albeit it in a way that draws, in part, on the language of Christianity.


quote:
That, I thought, was enough without the addition of the English Martyrs from St Alban onwards (though they could, I suppose have borrowed the giant puppets from the cathedral).
You are entirely missing the point. It is neither honest nor credible to present an image of Pre-industrial Revolution rural England where the single most significant religious, cultural and social institution simply doesn't exist.
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
And WHY are the Czechs wearing white sorts and blue wellies?

They were carrying brollies too . A joke reference to this typically British Summer of ours . Least we had one week of hot weather to put us in the mood .

I thought Becks coming up the Thames in speedboat was pretty cool .
We watched it all and enjoyed it . Yeah you could do the old cynical bit and pick holes but where's the need , it's only a pageant after all .

Does anyone know why Sir Paul McCartney looked like Ken Dodd , or was it just the lighting ?
 
Posted by Devils Advocate (# 16484) on :
 
"Sir Paul McCartney looked like Ken Dodd "

I thought Gollum in the Peter Jackson "Lord of the Rings" myself. Thats what immediately came to my mind when I saw him
 
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on :
 
I watched it all, and I thought it was astoundingly good - very impressive.

Re no reference to Christianity: They had several hymns in the ceremony, including the whole of Abide with Me. What more do you want or expect? I think that reflected our Christian heritage very well.

The Parachuting Queen and the Mr Bean sections were perfect British humour. And very funny. No he wasn't actually playing it, but he performed brilliantly.

Lord Danny Boyle did a wonderful job of reminding us all what Britishness is all about. David Cameron, take note.
 
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on :
 
Meant to say, they should have finished with the Floyd piece over the fireworks. Macca is clearly past it, and the entire ceremony would have been improved without him. Everything went perfectly until his slot, which is is also a remarkable achievement.
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
Re no reference to Christianity: They had several hymns in the ceremony, including the whole of Abide with Me.

See my post above.

quote:
What more do you want or expect?
See my post above.

quote:
I think that reflected our Christian heritage very well.
Well, as they say around here, YMMV.

quote:
Lord Danny Boyle did a wonderful job of reminding us all what Britishness is all about. David Cameron, take note.
And what would that be?
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
Right, well. In between being told awful it was that the world's atheletes didn't come together to celebrate Christianity [Roll Eyes] , I've got to the end and thought the torch lighting was rather lovely. Not Barcelona-dramatic, but very nicely done.
 
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Devils Advocate:
As a Brit who has no interest in the Olympics whatsoever ( and I live in an area on;y 150 miles from London) and bar the torch being taken through the area earlier this month our town will gain nothing from the olympics at all , I watched the opening ceremony with interest. My own opinion is it was spectacular if a little overlong at 3 hours 45 mins so bar the fact it was continuous and there were no intervals it was as long as Wagner's Die Walküre and nearly as long as Siegfried.
I didn't get a lot of the references ( Who were Frankie and June?) and thought it verged on the pretentious.
My main concern is the amount of money it cost to stage. I heard on the BBC Radio 4 Today Programme ( for the non UK readers of this post thats a 6 day's per week current affairs programme) that it cost £27 Million Pounds ( thats $42512990.08 or €34495040.15) My moral problem with this is it is a vast, nay obscene amount of money to spend on a one off one performance only event, especially in a country who are slashing spending on Health care and Welfare benefits and are forcing people out of their homes We have to ask if they will get a return on this investment from the people visiting the country for this event or will it be another case of "Rip off Britain" fleecing tourists?

[Snore]
 
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
How much religion is there generally at Olympic opening ceremonies, Trisagion?

Any overt religion would clearly be inappropriate but that is specifically not what I talking about. You cannot honestly or seriously depict an image of Britain's past (or it's present, for that matter) which airbrushed out Christianity. Boyle sought to do just that.

quote:
I'd expected none, and so was moved by both the Welsh children's choir singing 'Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer,'
The clue to understanding what that was about was it's being preceded by Danny Boy and Flower of Scotland: an acknowledgement of the other nations of Britain (interesting to note that the representation of each of three Celtic nations included tries scored in Rugby matches against the English). It wasn't a reference to religion but to nationality.


quote:
and the wonderful solo of 'Abide With Me' to accompany the July 7 tribute.
A song described in the running order as one "sung at every FA Cup Final since 1927 and every Rugby League Challenge Cup Final since 1929 in memory of the war dead.". It wasn't a reference to Christianity but to remembrance. Geddit?

quote:
Not to mention 'Jerusalem,' which is Christian, albeit in a mystical Blakean way.
Which is Blakean albeit it in a way that draws, in part, on the language of Christianity.


quote:
That, I thought, was enough without the addition of the English Martyrs from St Alban onwards (though they could, I suppose have borrowed the giant puppets from the cathedral).
You are entirely missing the point. It is neither honest nor credible to present an image of Pre-industrial Revolution rural England where the single most significant religious, cultural and social institution simply doesn't exist.

It doesn't matter what the motivation or intent behind the inclusion of these songs was, we knew they were a Christian reference. And iny case, the reason these songs are included in sporting events is because they are Christian and we are a 'Christian-flavoured' nation.
 
Posted by Michael Astley (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gramps49:
I am on the West Coast of the US. There s a time delay. Just saw the Mr Bean segment. I thought it was very funny, though my son, the musician could tell he was not playing the note.

I don't think you need to be a musician to have noticed that his hitting of the key didn't always correspond to the production of the sound. I just took it as part of the fun, and you're right: it was very funny.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Was the industrial revolution a specifically Christian innovation??

There's a separate thread to be had discussing that one but I would argue that, in addition to the presence of the physical resources, the legal system and the mental disposition that were key to its early development and the moral system that attempted to ameliorate its oppressive aspects were all direct products of Christianity.

Actually many scholars, most notably Max Weber, argue that not only was the industrial revolution a specifically Christian innovation but that it was specifically Protestant, the Protestant work ethic etc.
 
Posted by Pyx_e (# 57) on :
 
I thought the inclusion of “Abide with me” was stunning. I too (as you might have guessed) am predisposed it cynicism but I watched the whole thing and thought it very well done. The use of the crowd holing up “pixels” added a real third dimension. All of it was quirkily British.

But I fail to see how it can be described as lacking Christianity when Abide with Me was sung (and performed) so movingly:

quote:
Hold Thou Thy cross before my closing eyes;
Shine through the gloom and point me to the skies.
Heaven's morning breaks, and earth's vain shadows flee;
In life, in death, O Lord, abide with me.

To millions and millions of people. As ever my wife mocks my leaky eyes.

AtB, Pyx_e

p.s. And Guide me O’er .......... come on.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
This just in

quote:
The BBC's coverage of the opening ceremony was watched on TV by a peak audience of 26.9 million viewers in the UK... The record UK TV audience was 30.15 million for EastEnders on Christmas Day 1986 when Den Watts divorced wife Angie
I'm not quite sure what conclusions are to be drawn from this.
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Right, well. In between being told awful it was that the world's atheletes didn't come together to celebrate Christianity [Roll Eyes]

Having problems reading for comprehension this morning, are we Orfeo? That is neither what I wrote or implied.
 
Posted by Niminypiminy (# 15489) on :
 
Some more things I liked:

Doreen Lawrence and Shami Chakraborty (sp?) and Daniel Barenboim carrying the Olympic flag

The 500 construction workers who were the guard of honour for the torch into the stadium

The copper petals being brought into the stadium by the national teams, so that the goblet for the flame has been 'made' by all the countries involved

The drums made out of buckets

I had leaky eyes several times ...

[ 28. July 2012, 09:56: Message edited by: Niminypiminy ]
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
I was expecting Macca, and thought it appropriate that he was the climax of the ceremony. Who are the most famous group ever to come out of Britain? Far more famous than the Arctic Monkeys (why were they so prominent?)? Macca was bound to be there.

And I was genuinely moved by "Abide With Me", especially as it was sung so simply. But I still thought the dance didn't fit the words.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Right, well. In between being told awful it was that the world's atheletes didn't come together to celebrate Christianity [Roll Eyes]

Having problems reading for comprehension this morning, are we Orfeo? That is neither what I wrote or implied.
No, but you did seem to think that the celebration of Great Britain ought to rub either the noses of a chunk of its population OR the noses of a massive chunk of the watching world population in it.

I honestly cannot conceive how anyone could think that an Olympics opening ceremony is an appropriate forum for making a strong religious message. As others noted, the Christian heritage of the UK was tangible, and I'm at an utter loss to think why anyone would want to beef it up beyond the presence it already had.
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
I saw little of the ceremony but would happily have seen less of Paul McCartney. Was it the sound system or him and he looked as if he had escaped from a nursing home.

Abide with me I associate strongly with my much loved grandmother, long gone. It always reduce me to tears even on occasions which encourage my cynicism.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Does anybody know who Frankie and June were?
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
The New York Times sums it up pretty well, too...

quote:
Britain presented itself to the world Friday night as (...) a nation secure in its own post-empire identity, whatever that actually is.

 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Does anybody know who Frankie and June were?

Did the commentary over there not explain? They were two teenagers going out on the town and meeting, interweb style, while going to clubs that played music from different decades.

Their texting and tweeting and so on was all thanks to Tim Berners-Lee.

[ 28. July 2012, 10:07: Message edited by: orfeo ]
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
No, but you did seem to think that the celebration of Great Britain ought to rub either the noses of a chunk of its population OR the noses of a massive chunk of the watching world population in it.

No I didn't. Perhaps you could retread exactly what I wrote and then reconsider what you have just said.

quote:
I honestly cannot conceive how anyone could think that an Olympics opening ceremony is an appropriate forum for making a strong religious message.
Neither do I, as I have already said. I have, in no way, suggested that that would be appropriate or desireable. I repeat: my objection was not that there was no overt religious message but that the image of Britain it proposed was one within which the single most significant cultural contribution to the past and present was, except in an oblique (and, even then, explained away) manner, entirely absent.

quote:
As others noted, the Christian heritage of the UK was tangible, and I'm at an utter loss to think why anyone would want to beef it up beyond the presence it already had.
Fine. But the fact that you are "at a loss" doesn't give you the right to completely misrepresent what someone else has posted. The reason I would have expected it is because I don't buy into the myth that secular progressivism and demotic expressions of pop-culture are what made and makes Britain what it was and is, and if a pageant is being presented to the whole world as to who we are, then it is disingenuous to suggest that they are.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
The whole thing went at such a fast pace that there were probably quite a lot of other references I'd have failed to spot if I'd noticed them.

It's hard to believe that modern British teenagers would be called Frankie and June, but if that's what it was I guess it was so.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
except in an oblique (and, even then, explained away) manner, entirely absent.

Well, for starters you're having a great difficulty getting anyone to agree that it was "entirely" absent. Including yourself it seems.

Abide With Me was sung in full. How on earth does that qualify as 'oblique'?

Your national anthem, in case you've forgotten because it's so common, makes reference to God from the very beginning.

Even if you discount the Welsh hymn on the ground that it was to denote Wales rather than to denote hymns, that is a sizeable segment of references to Christian culture. And in fact in all 3 cases, it was amongst the least 'busy' bits of the ceremony. The words of Abide With Me were positively hanging in the air as Emeli Sande sang them.

Given the response of other posters to your comments, your dismissal of this element as not satisfactory says more about your values than it does about the ceremony.
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
except in an oblique (and, even then, explained away) manner, entirely absent.

Well, for starters you're having a great difficulty getting anyone to agree that it was "entirely" absent. Including yourself it seems.

Abide With Me was sung in full. How on earth does that qualify as 'oblique'?

Your national anthem, in case you've forgotten because it's so common, makes reference to God from the very beginning.

Even if you discount the Welsh hymn on the ground that it was to denote Wales rather than to denote hymns, that is a sizeable segment of references to Christian culture. And in fact in all 3 cases, it was amongst the least 'busy' bits of the ceremony. The words of Abide With Me were positively hanging in the air as Emeli Sande sang them.

Given the response of other posters to your comments, your dismissal of this element as not satisfactory says more about your values than it does about the ceremony.

I am sorry that on a discussion board I have had the temerity to voice an opinion that doesn't accord with the opinion of others. How dare I.
 
Posted by Mad Cat (# 9104) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
I was expecting Macca, and thought it appropriate that he was the climax of the ceremony. Who are the most famous group ever to come out of Britain? Far more famous than the Arctic Monkeys (why were they so prominent?)? Macca was bound to be there.

And I was genuinely moved by "Abide With Me", especially as it was sung so simply. But I still thought the dance didn't fit the words.

Contemporary dance doesn't always sit into its music the way ballet or folk dance does. I felt that the movement in Khan's piece was giving shape to the painful themes being expressed in the hymn. It was all strong, fluid, with a lot of contact. I loved his scene with the little boy - so moving.
 
Posted by Laud-able (# 9896) on :
 
I loved the pastoral beginning, Caliban’s speech from The Tempest, ‘Jerusalem’, the Industrial Revolution, the fiery Olympic rings, Mr Bean, the Mary Poppinses, the National Health and the dancing to ‘In Dulce Jubilo’, the bicycling doves, and the elegant cauldron.

The Queen and Daniel Craig and the corgis were brilliant.

I am not so sure about ‘Abide With Me’: it can be a powerful hymn, but I would have preferred it to be sung by a choir and at a slightly faster tempo to avoid being dreary (the accompanying dancing was tedious and irrelevant).

The speeches of Lord Coe and M Rogge could have been cut in half at the very least. Either Radiohead or Muse are surely better than the Arctic Monkeys. Sir Paul McCartney is perhaps now past it as a singer.

The electrics and the fireworks were splendid.

But all in all, a very good show indeed.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
I am sorry that on a discussion board I have had the temerity to voice an opinion that doesn't accord with the opinion of others. How dare I.

Not as sorry as I am for having the temerity to challenge you on it.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I thought the inclusion of "Abide with Me" and "Guide Me Oh Thou Great Jehovah" were quite strikingly Christian. I could have lived without the OMG! in the texting bit, but it was fleeting.

I'm was so impressed by the inclusion of the NHS; definitely an aspect of "Britishness" we can boast about!

I also loved the Mary Poppinses!
 
Posted by Niminypiminy (# 15489) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I want a frock like the Cameroonians.

And I want one like the Senegalese (I think it was), who wore beautiful dresses, headscarves and robes of daffodil yellow.

I found the proud gait of some of the small teams - perhaps especially Rwanda and Somalia - very affecting.
 
Posted by Michael Astley (# 5638) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's hard to believe that modern British teenagers would be called Frankie and June...

I'm not so sure, you know. I think it's part of the ever-shifting trends in naming culture. When I was a teenager, we would smile at names such as Ethel, Doris, and so forth, as being "biddified" names. Then, in my late teens when some of my former school and college mates had babies, among them were names that I either considered to be surnames or dated first names. Molly and Wilhelmina were among them and the former is apparently fashionable again, along with some biblical names such as Chloe, which I'm told were quite unheard of in this country over the previous few decades. These things come and go. Frankie wouldn't seem odd to me as a teenager's name but June does. Perhaps it has made a comeback.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Astley:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's hard to believe that modern British teenagers would be called Frankie and June...

I'm not so sure, you know. I think it's part of the ever-shifting trends in naming culture.
Yes! My friend's new grandchild is called Elsie!
 
Posted by Bean Sidhe (# 11823) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
However I have just been puzzled by a violent dance going alongside a very peaceful rendition of "Abide With Me". Overall all of this reminds me of a Matt Smith episode of Doctor Who - some striking moments but rather confusing as a whole.

It wasn't made clear enough that - as I understood it - this was primarily a tribute to the victims of the 7/7 bombings, which happened the very next day after London was given the games. Which makes the contrast of 'Abide with Me' with the violence of the dancing and the lurid red lighting, comprehensible and to me, very moving.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Trisagion, what would you have done to include overt reference to Christianity? (Other than include a village church in the initial pastoral scene, as you've already suggested.)
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Astley:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's hard to believe that modern British teenagers would be called Frankie and June...

I'm not so sure, you know. I think it's part of the ever-shifting trends in naming culture.
Yes! My friend's new grandchild is called Elsie!
Its surely a play, the guy is wearing a T-Shirt with "Frankie says Relax" on it, it is seen as a modern creation of a soap opera couple along the lines of "Terry and June". What more of an excuse do you need? Dated horribly but...

Jengie
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
I felt that everything between the opening sequence and the utterly spectacular flame lighting failed by comparison. The athletes parade went on too long, there was too much undistinguished music and leaping and - is it me or has Macca totally lost his voice?

Worth ten bob a head though.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Who remembers when the BBC banned Frankie Goes to Hollywood's Relax? - and now it's part of what represents "Britishness."

I felt very old [Frown]
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Who remembers when the BBC banned Frankie Goes to Hollywood's Relax? - and now it's part of what represents "Britishness."

I felt very old [Frown]

We had the Sex Pistols too, including the opening line from 'God Save the Queen' (but not the next one).
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
We had the Sex Pistols too, including the opening line from 'God Save the Queen' (but not the next one).

I did think it was interesting that got thrown in before the Queen's arrival. Whereas during the big musical montage, the Sex Pistols were represented by another song that didn't leap out to me (born too late to appreciate punk) as so immediately recognisable.
 
Posted by The Rogue (# 2275) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I felt that everything between the opening sequence and the utterly spectacular flame lighting failed by comparison. The athletes parade went on too long, there was too much undistinguished music and leaping and - is it me or has Macca totally lost his voice?

Worth ten bob a head though.

Yes, those athletes just get in the way, don't they. [Biased]
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Trisagion, what would you have done to include overt reference to Christianity? (Other than include a village church in the initial pastoral scene, as you've already suggested.)

I think that would have been an extremely good and sufficiently overt statement to have set the scene perfectly for me. I'm not sure it would have needed more than that.
 
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Niteowl2:
I thought she wasn't up to par when pronouncing the games open in London. Very subpar.

The poor woman had had to sit through hours of drivel, I thought she did pretty well to stay awake at all.

quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
On one level it was a deliberate riposte to the Beijing opening ceremony, so if you adored the latter you'd be bound to be disappointed.

This is true. I thought Bejing was beautiful, clever, well-designed and quite artistic. I thought last night's thing was big-budget, tacky, bitty and gimmicky. It was all a bit embarrassing to be a Londoner, really.
 
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
Far too parochial ( and therefore unintelligible) for a global audience.

What would the Chinese and Outer Mongolians have made of the Mr Bean slot?

Don't underestimate the global audience. The Chinese in particular are obsessed wth Mr. Bean.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
Far too parochial ( and therefore unintelligible) for a global audience.

What would the Chinese and Outer Mongolians have made of the Mr Bean slot?

Don't underestimate the global audience. The Chinese in particular are obsessed wth Mr. Bean.
I see it on almost every plane I go on - watched by all nationalities. It'll be the non-verbal humour that does it, I expect.
 
Posted by Niteowl2 (# 15841) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
quote:
Originally posted by Niteowl2:
I thought she wasn't up to par when pronouncing the games open in London. Very subpar.

The poor woman had had to sit through hours of drivel, I thought she did pretty well to stay awake at all.

quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
On one level it was a deliberate riposte to the Beijing opening ceremony, so if you adored the latter you'd be bound to be disappointed.

This is true. I thought Bejing was beautiful, clever, well-designed and quite artistic. I thought last night's thing was big-budget, tacky, bitty and gimmicky. It was all a bit embarrassing to be a Londoner, really.

I was thinking the Queen was probably up past her bed time. (I also thought the same of Sir Paul} [Biased]

While I did love the closing of the ceremony I have to admit that I preferred the Beijing opening ceremony overall. It was a hard one to top and I felt for anyone having to try to.
 
Posted by sabine (# 3861) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
The athletes parade went on too long. . .

It's all a matter of perspective. During the prarade of athletes, the American commentators kept saying that this was the fastest entrance in their history of covering the event (and NBC has been covering the event for quite a while).

I enjoy the parade of athletes much more than the choreographed parts of the opening ceremony--and by that, I don't mean I didn't enjoy the choreographed parts; I just favor the parade of athletes.

For some (most) of the athletes, this will be the highlight for them; they won't win medals or receive much international attention.

sabine

[ 28. July 2012, 12:49: Message edited by: sabine ]
 
Posted by Mad Cat (# 9104) on :
 
Did anyone else wonder if Sir Paul's 'live recording' of Hey Jude failed to kick in as it should have?

There was a weird bit at the beginning of the song where I heard two slightly different versions playing out of sync.

I managed to miss the opening of Beijing, but I imagine they do large scale choreography really well. One thing I appreciated about Boyle's vision was that the crowds were less regimented. There was a kind of organic ebb and flow. We're not a nation of instinctive followers*, so I think a bit of 'untidiness' (in comparison to other nations) is a proper reflection of what we are like.

*Unless, perhaps we think there is a pair of free/looted trainers in it.....
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
Personally I don't like Mr Bean, but he has been successful all over the world. Just like Benny Hill was - that sort of visual humour travels well.

The actor who plays Mr. Bean is Rowan Atkinson: he is an expert amateur racing driver. He also owns an experimental 2010 Rolls Royce V-16. If motorsports ever becomes an Olympic event, he should lead the team. The current lead singer from AC/DC is also a good fast driver: he was top of the board when he visited Top Gear and he took a quick lap in the reasonably-priced car.
 
Posted by tomsk (# 15370) on :
 
Some mentioned lack of John Milton. Section transforming bucolic Britain into industrial Britain was called Pandemonium (Paradise Lost). I thought there were all sorts of references in (Boyle is a film man). It could have been done by committee with all this ironed out to make it more accessible etc, and it would have been less imaginative as a result (cf Millenium Dome exhibition).

Devil's Advocate. Yes, this stuff costs money, but in the UK, we have lots of problems from fragmented society. Community spirit doesn't just happen because the Government legislates for it or says that we need a Big Society. Things need to build it up. This year, we've had the Queen's jubilee, and now the Olympics. I think it does us a lot of good.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I saw it as far as the athletes' parade and I thought it was utterly superb. Boyle managed to remind cynical old me what a privilege it is to live in these islands, and these days that takes some doing. I loved the way that so much of it could be read on different levels simultaneously - for example, 'Abide with me' could be that tired old dirge that gets sung at FA cup finals, but it also could be a powerful and moving hymn of Christian faith. To read it as one and exclude the other is to make a partial reading. There were several moments when I found myself crying like a Boris*.


*(Boris Johnson, mayor of London, this morning said that he had cried "hot tears of patriotic pride" during the ceremony. He may be an idiot, but he turns a nice phrase.)
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:

I'm curious to know what was going on in the arena while we were getting the TV sequences (which were a bit dizzying at times).

Pre recorded?
They would have been: when I was at university, I went to a TV studio in the Los Angeles area to be in the audience for a taping of the programme Welcome Back Kotter. A large TV monitor was rolled out on a cart so we could see the previously filmed dream sequence. Likely the Olympic visitors also had monitors to look at.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
There were several moments when I found myself crying like a Boris*.

I recorded the second half and watched it this morning. The part which brought a tear to my eye was the passing on of the flame to the seven young athletes. This is the portion which will stay with me.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Trisagion, what would you have done to include overt reference to Christianity? (Other than include a village church in the initial pastoral scene, as you've already suggested.)

I think that would have been an extremely good and sufficiently overt statement to have set the scene perfectly for me. I'm not sure it would have needed more than that.
Would it have sufficed, though? Might it not have seemed as though adding a village church into the maypole / cricket / sheep mix simply represented another twee aspect of olde-worlde "heritage." If you feel that the inclusion of "Guide Me o Thou Great Jehovah
quote:
wasn't a reference to religion but to nationality.
then I don't see how you can think a pretty church would be read as a reference to religion rather than architecture.
 
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on :
 
I thought the whole thing was extremely and accurately English. There where a few references to the other parts of Great Britain. But I enjoyed the whole thing so much, I didn't mind that it was mostly English orientated.

The pre-industrial idyll of rural England, its decimation by the industrial revolution, the progress into technology etc, were excellent. And the nod to the NHS was entirely appropriate.

The Rowan Atkinson and the Queen segments were fantastic. What could be more British than Commander Bond ensuring Her Majesty reaches the ceremony in typical Bond style? The corgies were adorable. And I loved the images of David Beckham speeding up the Thames in a motor-boat with the Torch.

Abide with me followed the moment of reflection on those who had died during the 7/7 London bombing, which took place the day after it was announced London had the Olympics. Again appropriate. And while I'm not normally tuned into abstract dance, I thought the accompanying dance was incredibly moving. Probably because I had my own narrative going on; the red wavy dancers were like flames, and the young man emerged to take a 'dying' child in his arms, through the flames. Memories of 7/7, and with Abide with Me, also Liverpool football disaster. For once the words and dance seemed to go together, in my mind.

The bit with the flag and who was bringing it in to the stadium was great; and touching to see Mohammad Ali present. And handing the torch(s) over to the young people to light the ingenious big torch thingy. Impressive. 'Inspire a generation' is the games' motto this year, so that was well represented.

I have to say that as beautiful and coordinated and spectacular as Beijing's ceremony was, I didn't find it easy to separate it's 'happy' regimentation from the government ethos behind it. 'You will acknowledge how impressively glamorous, and bright and shiny we are! And how happy we all are in our wonderful utopian state!' I would fully expect a strict dictatorship such as China's to put on a slickly regulated, thoroughly uniform, 'everything all right here' kind of performance, no expense spared.

But Britain - rightly or wrongly - glories in certain forms of eccentrism, individual genius, and chaotic and often irreverent traditionalism. I know which camp I'd prefer to put up my tent in!

Votes for Women, smoking chimney stacks, punks, the vision for the NHS etc. The participators all looked like real people, too, if you know what I mean. Different body-shapes, abilities etc.

I could've done without the Arctic Monkeys (Who? asked my Mum), or Paul McCartney. I like some of the Beatles' music. But I don't want to see an elderly ex-Beatle wheeled out at every big occasion. He's being used in some iconic way which to me just doesn't work. Britain is more than the Beatles, and has been for a long time.

I also - surprisingly to me - enjoyed the athletes parade. The costumes were wonderful, the variety again of men and women. The clever thing of putting drummers behind each party of athletes to ensure things were kept moving along.

I have no doubt it was random and baffling and even untidy looking at times. But as I said at the beginning, accurately reflecting the host country! And none the worse for that.
 
Posted by Mad Cat (# 9104) on :
 
I thought Boyle negotiated the home nations well. We have sheep a-plenty in Scotland, and there were early shots of miners who made me think of the Welsh. Paisley in the west of Scotland is a mill town, and the steel segment reminded me of the industry that employed all my dad's family in Lanarkshire until a generation ago.

A nationalist of my acquaintance complained that he was still not convinced by 'Britishness' and that he wouldn't be supporting this 'glorified sports day' until we have an independent Scotland. I saw in the opening ceremony the most genuine reflection of Britishness I've seen in a long time, with so many stories woven together, interdependent. However, I have an English mum, Scottish dad, Irish grandparents on both sides, and have lived half my life on one side of the Scottish border and half on the other. Maybe those less mongrel than I see a different reflection.
 
Posted by Meg the Red (# 11838) on :
 
Anselmina [Overused]
 
Posted by Telepath (# 3534) on :
 
Yeah, Anselmina [Overused] And yeah, Adeodatus.

Moaning is very British, too, but I'm not such a calcified cynic that I didn't get the point. Look what this nation can do when we put our collective mind to it.

(Tim Berners-Lee!)
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Originally posted by Mad Cat:
quote:
Maybe those less mongrel than I see a different reflection.
I'm 100% Scottish for at least 6 generations back. I had heard the the opening ceremony was going to feature cricket on the village green etc and had expected it to be very anglified and exclusive, but in the event I thought it was "British" rather than English. The NHS is, truly, "British" and the music was British, too. The history was post 1603, and therefore British (no Tudors!) and so generalised (industrialisation and the extension of the franchise) that it applied to the whole of Britain.

I would have liked a different Scottish song - "A Man's a Man", for example, rather than "Flower of Scotland" but if they wanted a song sung at rugby matches, then I suppose it had to be FoS. Personally, I could have done without a song which refers back to a pre-British battle, especially as everything else was post 1603 "British."

There were no shortage of nods to Scotland - Peter Pan (part of the GOSH bit) was written by a Scot, and the excerpt was read by Edinburgh resident J.K. Rowling.

I gather there was a passing reference to the discovery of steam power, but I missed it.

Emile Sande grew up 16 miles from where I live, so there's a local buzz to having her sing "Abide With Me." She was the main attraction of the concert held when the torch passed through Aberdeen, so it was good to see her included in the main event.

I don't think they put a foot wrong, as far as the home nations were concerned.
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
I can't for the life of me see that Christianity didn't have a fair and proper representation in the Olympic opening Ceremony .
I saw a timid looking Arch-Bishop of Canterbury peeping out from behind a peed-off looking Queen on at least 3 shots .
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Would it have sufficed, though? Might it not have seemed as though adding a village church into the maypole / cricket / sheep mix simply represented another twee aspect of olde-worlde "heritage." If you feel that the inclusion of "Guide Me o Thou Great Jehovah
quote:
wasn't a reference to religion but to nationality.
then I don't see how you can think a pretty church would be read as a reference to religion rather than architecture.
Well it wasn't me who said that 'Guide me...' was a reference to nationality but the explanation provided by Boyle et al.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
quote:
Who remembers when the BBC banned Frankie Goes to Hollywood's Relax? - and now it's part of what represents "Britishness."
But as Sir Humphrey Appleby pointed out in the 1980s, this is how the British Establishment deals with threats to its existence - by making them part of the Establishment. Exhibit A: Sir Bob Geldof. I'd have laughed in your face if you'd told me back in the 1970s that one day he'd be knighted... So including "Relax" in the opening ceremony is indeed very British.

[ 28. July 2012, 15:51: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rolyn:
I can't for the life of me see that Christianity didn't have a fair and proper representation in the Olympic opening Ceremony .
I saw a timid looking Arch-Bishop of Canterbury peeping out from behind a peed-off looking Queen on at least 3 shots .

[Overused] [Killing me]
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rolyn:
I can't for the life of me see that Christianity didn't have a fair and proper representation in the Olympic opening Ceremony .
I saw a timid looking Arch-Bishop of Canterbury peeping out from behind a peed-off looking Queen on at least 3 shots .

I'd like to challenge this a bit. As others have noted, the production almost exclusively concentrated on the last couple of hundred years. I've been thinking and I'm a bit at a loss to think what Christainity has had to do with "Britishness" or British accomplishments during that time. I think it's mostly been a cultural background for some of our major historical figures. To make it something explicit, or to place it in the foreground, would certainly go against my reading of the main trends of history. I think Christianity's influence was well on the wane by the time there was any such thing as "Britain".
 
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on :
 
Quite brilliant, I thought, except, as others have said, for McCartney. Great use of imagery, such as the cycling doves; the cauldron absolutely visionary; the Queen and Bond, very good; the mills emerging from the rural idyll also v. good.

The NHS stuff was a bit wobbly, but overall I thought a fantastic mix of vision, irony, cuteness, etc. Awesome actually, to be able to produce something like this.
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rolyn:
I saw a timid looking Arch-Bishop of Canterbury peeping out from behind a peed-off looking Queen on at least 3 shots .

I thought ++Rowan seemed to be enjoying himself. I was disappointed, but not at all surprised, that the NBC announcers didn't point him out. They probably didn't even recognize him, and their producers (or whoever supervises the scripts) probably didn't have him on their radar screens. And 90% of the American public probably don't know what an "Archbishop of Canterbury" is. [Disappointed]

[ 28. July 2012, 16:03: Message edited by: Mamacita ]
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
Sorry to DP. I thought the Queen simply looked tired last night. Up past her bedtime, as others have pointed out. She was certainly a good sport to do that James Bond bit.
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
Was it too PC and 'leftie' for you? The MP for Cannock Chase tweeted to that effect but naturally he was misunderstood, like he was misunderstood about some ill-advised remarks about Nazism at a stag do a while ago.

FWIW I felt some Tory Boy would say something like this, pointing to the black faces in the cast of thousands and the substantial NHS presence. Did they sleep through the transformation of rural Britain into the first industrial economy, which was red-hot capitalism!
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
'Abide with me' could be that tired old dirge that gets sung at FA cup finals, but it also could be a powerful and moving hymn of Christian faith. To read it as one and exclude the other is to make a partial reading.

I've been thinking about this, and I think 'Abide with me' exactly represents the way christianity and culture fit together in the UK today. It embodies the way bits of what we call 'judaeo-christian heritage' here in France have become enmeshed in cultural identity. In that sense it is an accurate representation of the place of christianity in the UK today, however much Trisagion may object.
 
Posted by cliffdweller (# 13338) on :
 
Viewing it cross pond... in addition to all that's been said, the very positive affirmation of NHS seemed particularly apt (hilariously so) & well timed given the gaffes Romney made earlier in the week. I know that must have been planned long, long in advance, but the sheer beauty of envisioning him squirming was priceless. He's making the denunciation of nationalized health care his central calling card, and with it the repeated assertion that "everyone" in England/Canada agrees their health care is in a shambles. Three cheers for the prescience or sheer good luck of being able to throw that back in his face.
 
Posted by Anglican_Brat (# 12349) on :
 
"Abide with Me" in many ways is a good representative hymn of quiet, introverted English Christianity of the middling sort. The simple description of God "O Thou who changest not" speaks more volumes than many contemporary praise songs today.

I suppose however if the UK wanted a more gusto hymn to cheer its own athletes, there is always "Onward Christian Soldiers." [Devil]
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
The current lead singer from AC/DC is also a good fast driver: he was top of the board when he visited Top Gear and he took a quick lap in the reasonably-priced car.

Was he in the opening ceremony too? I must have missed that bit.
 
Posted by mrs whibley (# 4798) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Originally posted by Mad Cat:
quote:
Maybe those less mongrel than I see a different reflection.
There were no shortage of nods to Scotland - Peter Pan (part of the GOSH bit) was written by a Scot, and the excerpt was read by Edinburgh resident J.K. Rowling.
<snip>
I don't think they put a foot wrong, as far as the home nations were concerned.

I agree (as someone >90% English, living in Scotland). There was also Eric Liddell, Trainspotting, Gregory's Girl et al. I can't get excited about Flower of Scotland either, but was crying by the end of the first line of Jerusalem! I thought it was a bit batty, but marvelous. [Yipee]
 
Posted by Mad Cat (# 9104) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
The MP for Cannock Chase tweeted to that effect.....

He was keen to bring back to The Stones..... conveniently overlooking how influenced they were by rhythm and blues.

Mrs Whibley - I was thrilled to see Gregory's immortal "She's GORGEOUS!" in the British movie montage, and I jumped out of my seat for Trainspotting!

[ 28. July 2012, 17:19: Message edited by: Mad Cat ]
 
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mamacita:
Sorry to DP. I thought the Queen simply looked tired last night. Up past her bedtime, as others have pointed out. She was certainly a good sport to do that James Bond bit.

Yeah, that was a big surprise. I couldn't help turning to my Mum, at the bit where the Queen turns round to Bond in the Palace and speaks to him, and saying: 'It's herself!' We spent the next fifteen minutes wondering if it really was her, it just seemed so uniquely unlikely. (And I know it wasn't her parachuting over the stadium!)

I'm afraid she didn't look completely on-song during the ceremony. I thought she might've been fantasizing of a pair of slippers, her own sofa and a mug of horlicks. I sometimes wonder if occasionally she looks a bit intense or cross because she's actually having to concentrate on not looking shagged out or fed up?
 
Posted by Gramps49 (# 16378) on :
 
Now that is the morning after, one thing I am disappointed in was the decision of NBC to cut to an interview with Mark Phelps while the rest of the world saw a tribute to the terrorists who were killed on 7.7. I had to see a youtube outtake this morning. I thought it was a great sketch.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
The stunt double was a bloke [Smile]
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gramps49:
Now that is the morning after, one thing I am disappointed in was the decision of NBC to cut to an interview with Mark Phelps while the rest of the world saw a tribute to the terrorists who were killed on 7.7. I had to see a youtube outtake this morning. I thought it was a great sketch.

That was a tribute to the 52 people killed and the 77 injured in the terrorist bombings, Gramps.
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
I was able to find a link to the "Abide with me" sequence [apologies for the commenters' invective] and it is absolutely stunning. I am beyond disappointed that NBC decided to cut this for an interview with Mark Phelps.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Anselmina:
I'm afraid she didn't look completely on-song during the ceremony. I thought she might've been fantasizing of a pair of slippers, her own sofa and a mug of horlicks. I sometimes wonder if occasionally she looks a bit intense or cross because she's actually having to concentrate on not looking shagged out or fed up?

She is 86 and was probably half deafened by the sheer volume of the thousand drummers, as well as having to sit through a fairly energetic, at times frenetic, performance until after midnight. I know she's accustomed to this sort of thing, but someone of her age who wasn't the Queen wouldn't be expected to sit through it.

(Either that or she'd just been told she couldn't parachute back into Buckingham Palace when it was all over. Bless her, at this rate, she'll probably be abseiling down the Houses of Parliament to open the next session.)
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
I was very, very impressed that, when the singer sang Abide With Me, the producers didn't leave out the reference to the cross! They could have just sang the bland references to 'thou' but by including the cross, the references to the divine were definately and overtly to Christ.

Excellent [Smile]

Yes. The whole thing was much, much, better than I expected, and that song the best bit.

Much, much, much, better.
 
Posted by Jahlove (# 10290) on :
 
Over-all, I see the Industrial Revolution as the start of the movement by which a previously basically-feudally ruled, tied-cottage populace could make genuine advance (which is not to say that it was an easy birth) to (eventually) better wages, workers' rights, better housing, education etc. While I am no historian, it seems to me that these aspirations were not only not supported by the CofE of the day but that it was often a force of suppression (both materially and spiritually ), a prop to the ruling classes; and so, if Boyle's theme is one of progress for the majority, a Methodist chapel might have been a more appropriate addition.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jahlove:
Over-all, I see the Industrial Revolution as the start of the movement by which a previously basically-feudally ruled, tied-cottage populace could make genuine advance ....

So it seems does Danny Boyle. Going by yesterday's performance the biggest hero in British history is Isambard Kingdom Brunel. And Britain's greatest historical achievement is the NHS.

As someone else pointed out it was a very political ceremony, and much of the politics quite clearly directed against the against government - maybe that in itself is a very British way of doing it. I'm sure it didn't happen in China or Russia - or even the USA.
 
Posted by Jahlove (# 10290) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jahlove:
And Britain's greatest historical achievement is the NHS.


For the majority of the UK population, that (and the welfare state in general) is probably true. Inadequate as it is, it's there for everyone. I can't imagine the horror of being turned away from A&E with a life-threatening condition because I couldn't pay $$$$$$$$$ for treatment - or being landed with a bill for $$$$$$$$$$ afterwards (which I couldn't pay either). As Bruce Springsteen once said *I got debts no honest man can pay*

Anyone see the archery today? I felt so sorry for Mexico!
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
I was very, very impressed that, when the singer sang Abide With Me, the producers didn't leave out the reference to the cross! They could have just sang the bland references to 'thou' but by including the cross, the references to the divine were definately and overtly to Christ.

Excellent [Smile]

Yes. The whole thing was much, much, better than I expected, and that song the best bit.

Much, much, much, better.

Yes. Exactly my response. One of the things that was so impressive about the way in which 'Abide with Me' was sung and staged was that every word was allowed its full resonance. I would never have thought I could be so moved by a hymn I sing just about every week at the Crem.
 
Posted by Telepath (# 3534) on :
 
I actually thought the tessatura was right off for Emeli Sandé. The Telemum says she should have been about a fifth higher. It was very uncomfortable to listen to.

That, and Macca, we're the two bits I thought didn't work. The dancing was pretty great though.
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
In all seriousness I thought the 7/7 inclusion was a very bold, and unexpected endeavour . 'Abide with me' was sung in as moving a way as ever it could be .
It hit the right note IMO, and whatever those 4 bombers were out to achieve I wouldn't have thought getting a mention at this ceremony was part of it .

Coming back to our dear Queen , I agree with the posters above . She looked drawn at this event, and is probably still recovering from Jubilee fatigue . But duty demanded her presence and all due respect to her for that .
But I do so wish that, with all the communication and camera technology in existence, they didn't catch the Queen staring at her finger nails with the commentator saying "Her Majesty is clearly enjoying herself ".
 
Posted by PaulBC (# 13712) on :
 
Way too long and too parochial. As to showing all UK I don't think that "Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer" (Wales) ," Danny Boy" (Ireland)
and "The Flowers od Scotland") shows all of Briatin.
As to the sedments with the Queen, the Ciorgis bad taste. The producer should be glad the headsman at the Tower of London has been retired. And HM was a good sport about it.
But then it goes to being too long, HM is after all 86 and HRH Prince Phillip 90 and they weren't going to get much peace & quiet, unless they went to Windsor.
As for the memorial segement great idea. However and this does not reflect on Mr. Boyle
but on the IOC was the ignoring the fact that this is the 40th anniversary of the murder of 11 Israelis at the Munich games .The ommission was like the day of mourning at Munich, back dated to the previous day.The IOC should be ashamed as should the LOCOC.It
marred a decent opening cermonioes
And just what was Mohammad Ali doiing there ? A great athelete and hummanitereian indeed CNN had been speculating that he would light the flame , and that sounded dumb.And who pulled the Olympic Flag party up > It should have been great UK Olympians .
I watched this here on Canada's west coast almost made want to go back to the UK.I did say almost !Have a great games [Votive] [Angel] [Smile]
 
Posted by Gramps49 (# 16378) on :
 
There was an interesting juxtrapositioning on NBC, though. It did a cutaway showing Michelle Obama in the dignitary section clearly enjoying the show, then it cut away to the Romneys who seemed to have been shunted to one side. Mitt looked stiff. Guess that came from having to eat some words from a couple of days before.
 
Posted by cliffdweller (# 13338) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gramps49:
There was an interesting juxtrapositioning on NBC, though. It did a cutaway showing Michelle Obama in the dignitary section clearly enjoying the show, then it cut away to the Romneys who seemed to have been shunted to one side. Mitt looked stiff. Guess that came from having to eat some words from a couple of days before.

As well as the celebration of the NHS which completely undermines his party line of "nationalized medicine is a disaster and no one likes it".
 
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on :
 
From a celebratory opening to a disastrous first day.

The Brit cycling team were favourites to win Gold in the road race.

They didnt even get near a medal.

And the expected Gold medallist said; "No one wants to help us. They just sat there. They were happy to see us lose.

What do you expect? That your opponents should help you win? Or do our Olympians live in a parallel universe?
 
Posted by Polly (# 1107) on :
 
Just proud to be British. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Zacchaeus (# 14454) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Anselmina:
I'm afraid she didn't look completely on-song during the ceremony. I thought she might've been fantasizing of a pair of slippers, her own sofa and a mug of horlicks. I sometimes wonder if occasionally she looks a bit intense or cross because she's actually having to concentrate on not looking shagged out or fed up?

She is 86 and was probably half deafened by the sheer volume of the thousand drummers, as well as having to sit through a fairly energetic, at times frenetic, performance until after midnight. I know she's accustomed to this sort of thing, but someone of her age who wasn't the Queen wouldn't be expected to sit through it.

(Either that or she'd just been told she couldn't parachute back into Buckingham Palace when it was all over. Bless her, at this rate, she'll probably be abseiling down the Houses of Parliament to open the next session.)

As you get older and your skin and sags and droops, faces often look stern when 'resting.' It is not necessarily a reflection of what is going on inside the head as it where. My 'at rest' or 'thinking face' is awful I look really cross and miserable when I am not..
It mus tbe really hard when your every expression is scrutinised.

In the jubilee interviews HRH grandchildren said she had a great sense of fun, which might be why she was game for the bond sketch.
 
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on :
 
@shamwari

Presumably you do not follow professional road-cycling.

Whilst it is sour-grapes to solely blame other teams' lack of interest in a temporary 'alliance' in catching the breakaways there are three things to remember:

1)One-day 150 mile Olympic Road Races are always lotteries when teams are no larger than 5 riders.
2)The breakaway riders were expected to breakaway. They were attacking to avoid having to come up to the line in a bunch sprint where no-one is likely to beat Cavendish.
3)The complaint of the British team is that, unlike stages in the Tour de France, no other Team (that also had focused on winning using a fast Sprinter in a bunch sprint) was willing to share the workload of chasing down the breakaway

Eg., Germany (who have the only man on current form who can beat Cavendish – in Griepal) and who also didn't have anyone in the Breakaways to take a shot at winning, gave up their chances of a win because they were that obsessed with saving riders to lead-out Griepal in a sprint that they forgot that they needed to catch the Breakaway for any of that to matter.

In road-cycling, the British are very unused to being the 'favourites'. And no-one likes to see the all conquering favourites to win all the time.
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
Did anyone else think that the Brunel imitators seemed to be dancing about for ages? I wondered if it was an attempt to convince the rest of the world that we are still at the peak of the Industrial Revolution and a great manufacturing power.
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
quote:
Originally posted by Jahlove:
Over-all, I see the Industrial Revolution as the start of the movement by which a previously basically-feudally ruled, tied-cottage populace could make genuine advance ....

So it seems does Danny Boyle. Going by yesterday's performance the biggest hero in British history is Isambard Kingdom Brunel. And Britain's greatest historical achievement is the NHS.

As someone else pointed out it was a very political ceremony, and much of the politics quite clearly directed against the against government - maybe that in itself is a very British way of doing it. I'm sure it didn't happen in China or Russia - or even the USA.

And Brunel was surely no random choice: the fact that he was an immigrant (or at least the son of one) was very significant. Two fingers to the MP for Cannock Chase.
 
Posted by justlooking (# 12079) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Polly:
Just proud to be British. [Big Grin]

Me too.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mrs whibley:
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Originally posted by Mad Cat:
quote:
Maybe those less mongrel than I see a different reflection.
There were no shortage of nods to Scotland - Peter Pan (part of the GOSH bit) was written by a Scot, and the excerpt was read by Edinburgh resident J.K. Rowling.
<snip>
I don't think they put a foot wrong, as far as the home nations were concerned.

I agree (as someone >90% English, living in Scotland). There was also Eric Liddell, Trainspotting, Gregory's Girl et al. I can't get excited about Flower of Scotland either, but was crying by the end of the first line of Jerusalem! I thought it was a bit batty, but marvelous. [Yipee]
Yep and even your former Antipodean colony, Australia got a nod with Mary Poppins, the author, P.L.Travers was actually an Aussie.
[Snigger]
 
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on :
 
'Frankie and June say thanks Tim' was a mystery until the end of the segment. The other segment titles (eg Happy and Glorious) were shown on screen rather than live, so I didn't twig it was a title. The story: guy meets girl on tube, girl drops phone, guy follows her through decades of British music, aided by technology of the phone. They eventually find each other, and the house is lifted up to reveal it was all thanks to Sir Tim Berners-Les for inventing the internet. Hence 'thanks Tim'.

I loved the 7/7 bit. The juxtaposition of a song of hope and trust in the face of death, and the violent, angry dancing of the fire and confusion of the bombing, was very powerful.

Could have done without Arctic Monkeys or Macca (he seemed to have a click track that started early, so for the first few lines he was out of synch, then realised and skipped a bit so it joined up).
 
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
From a celebratory opening to a disastrous first day.

The Brit cycling team were favourites to win Gold in the road race.

They didnt even get near a medal.

And the expected Gold medallist said; "No one wants to help us. They just sat there. They were happy to see us lose.

What do you expect? That your opponents should help you win? Or do our Olympians live in a parallel universe?

Total failure to understand the tactics of road racing in this format. Did you notice the final breakaway two - they actually helped each other to begin with, so that they could maintain the breakaway after Putney High St. You could see them look at each other, and perhaps even speak, that they would take turns to lead. Then it is understood, that come the final sprint, it is every man for himself. So initially, they work together to maximize their chances of gold and silver, and it worked.

So the peloton needed to catch the early breakaway group, but the Brits needed other countries to help with this. But why would they, if Cav is waiting to pulverize them in the sprint finish?
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
From a celebratory opening to a disastrous first day.

The Brit cycling team were favourites to win Gold in the road race.

They didnt even get near a medal.

And the expected Gold medallist said; "No one wants to help us. They just sat there. They were happy to see us lose.

What do you expect? That your opponents should help you win? Or do our Olympians live in a parallel universe?

Total failure to understand the tactics of road racing in this format. Did you notice the final breakaway two - they actually helped each other to begin with, so that they could maintain the breakaway after Putney High St. You could see them look at each other, and perhaps even speak, that they would take turns to lead. Then it is understood, that come the final sprint, it is every man for himself. So initially, they work together to maximize their chances of gold and silver, and it worked.

So the peloton needed to catch the early breakaway group, but the Brits needed other countries to help with this. But why would they, if Cav is waiting to pulverize them in the sprint finish?

All that's true (and the Ozzie commentators explained it during the race-they said GB should look to Germany for help) BUT if your tactics don't work (ie you can't get the help you need) don't whinge about it after the race and blame your opponents-the tactics are all part of the race- suck it up and say "we had nothing left in the tank blah blah but it wasn't enough on the day blah blah".
 
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on :
 
Oh come on, whinging has an honoured role in professional sport, in fact, in amateur sport as well. It's a safe way to release one's anger, frustration, and so on. Yes, one also needs to examine very closely one's own tactics, and criticize them, but a bit of whinging is psychologically important I think.
 
Posted by Gramps49 (# 16378) on :
 
quote:
Just proud to be British.
Can you hum a few lines?
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
Oh come on, whinging has an honoured role in professional sport, in fact, in amateur sport as well. It's a safe way to release one's anger, frustration, and so on. Yes, one also needs to examine very closely one's own tactics, and criticize them, but a bit of whinging is psychologically important I think.

So that's the British excuse for whinging is it? [Razz]
 
Posted by bib (# 13074) on :
 
I got up very early (5.30am) in Oz to watch. I must say that I loved the tableaus about the history of England up to the Industrial revolution. I could have watched a lot more in that vein.
However, after that the whole production became disjointed and boring. It was almost as though the second half had a different producer. The NHS beds scene was long and incomprehensible while the pop music section was just plain silly.
Mr Bean was fun, but I would have also enjoyed something about the Tardis and the Daleks - I'm sure that would have struck a cord with many viewers. Some of the visual techniques were amazing, probably the most enjoyable for me were the 'birds' riding bikes.
I would really like a return to a more austerity Olympics as the amount of money countries need to spend is obscene and I don't know that they recoup it in the long term.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bib:
Mr Bean was fun, but I would have also enjoyed something about the Tardis and the Daleks - I'm sure that would have struck a cord with many viewers.

Yes! I was waiting for the Doctor Who references and they never came! But maybe they couldn't get the permission to use the characters.

quote:
I would really like a return to a more austerity Olympics as the amount of money countries need to spend is obscene and I don't know that they recoup it in the long term.
Yes. I know I felt uneasy thinking how much they must have spent on this production. The opening ceremony's become a competition to see which country can top the efforts of the last, and I read somewhere that the expense of hosting the 2004 Olympics was a contributory factor in Greece getting into financial difficulties.

[ 29. July 2012, 07:21: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on :
 
I found the beds scene easy to follow - kids put to bed, read under the bedclothes, literary baddies pop up in their nightmares (Queen of Hearts, Voldemort etc) but are chased away by Mary Poppins. Perhaps our commentary was better.

Did your commentary explain the link between GOSH and Peter Pan? That would have helped.
 
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
This just in

quote:
The BBC's coverage of the opening ceremony was watched on TV by a peak audience of 26.9 million viewers in the UK... The record UK TV audience was 30.15 million for EastEnders on Christmas Day 1986 when Den Watts divorced wife Angie
I'm not quite sure what conclusions are to be drawn from this.
That a lot of people watched it on other channels? Or on the internet?
 
Posted by Auntie Doris (# 9433) on :
 
I really enjoyed the opening ceremony. I particularly liked the first half with the British tableaux and I loved Abide With Me. The second half with all the different types of music represented was OK but I found that more disjointed that the first half. As for Paul McCartney I thought he was dire and I was disappointed that he ended the show.

I thought this blog was an interesting take on the whole ceremony.

Auntie Doris x
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
Thanks for that link Auntie Dorris -

From the blog - "The implication that J.K Rowling's Lord Voldemort could be compared to health secretary Andrew Lansley was both excruciating and exquisite."

Haha - yes, I felt that too!
 
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Evangeline:
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
Oh come on, whinging has an honoured role in professional sport, in fact, in amateur sport as well. It's a safe way to release one's anger, frustration, and so on. Yes, one also needs to examine very closely one's own tactics, and criticize them, but a bit of whinging is psychologically important I think.

So that's the British excuse for whinging is it? [Razz]
Sez you, who has been whinging about people whinging!

Oh no, I forgot, yours is a carefully considered and calm critique, I guess. Yeah, right.

[ 29. July 2012, 09:15: Message edited by: quetzalcoatl ]
 
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on :
 
Suggest that Shipmates move to the Circus for discussion of the Games themselves, rather than the Opening Ceremony. This thread gives plenty of scope and major sporting events normally get discussed in the Circus anyway.

Barnabas62
Purgatory Host

 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
Yes, one also needs to examine very closely one's own tactics, and criticize them, but a bit of whinging is psychologically important I think.

I agree - a good old moan is good for the soul. A friend and I get together weekly for that very purpose.


[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ceannaideach (# 12007) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Yes! I was waiting for the Doctor Who references and they never came! But maybe they couldn't get the permission to use the characters.

See now during the music, in fact around the Bohemian Rhapsody part, I could have sworn I heard the TARDIS de/rematerialising sound.
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
Those cyclists with wings ought to get a mention . Produced an impressive and serene moment . I couldn't quite see but the wings seemed to be operated by the riders' elbows .

Got the makings of a new Olympic event there.
Could be slightly tricky when you get bunching on the bends.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PaulBC:
[...] I don't think that "Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer" (Wales) ," Danny Boy" (Ireland)
and "The Flowers od Scotland") shows all of Briatin.
As to the sedments with the Queen, the Ciorgis bad taste. The producer should be glad the headsman at the Tower of London has been retired. [...]And just what was Mohammad Ali doiing there ? A great athelete and hummanitereian indeed CNN had been speculating that he would light the flame , and that sounded dumb.And who pulled the Olympic Flag party up > It should have been great UK Olympians [...]

I saw it from a crowded pub, and every single one of those things got cheers and claps. And Ali a standing ovation, not that he would have heard it ten miles away in Stratford. It did seem to go down well.

quote:
Originally posted by Auntie Doris:
I thought this blog was an interesting take on the whole ceremony.

Yes, and very different from what some people have said here!

quote:

"It's essentially a Catholic theory of British history"
[...]
It is perhaps not coincidental to learn that Boyle himself was raised in a Catholic household in the north of England and was at one time considering attending seminary to become a priest.


 
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Originally posted by bib:
I would really like a return to a more austerity Olympics as the amount of money countries need to spend is obscene and I don't know that they recoup it in the long term.

Yes. I know I felt uneasy thinking how much they must have spent on this production. The opening ceremony's become a competition to see which country can top the efforts of the last, and I read somewhere that the expense of hosting the 2004 Olympics was a contributory factor in Greece getting into financial difficulties.

This is the nub of the issue. The opening bash apparently cost about £27million, which is rather excessive for what it delivered.

[ 29. July 2012, 11:53: Message edited by: luvanddaisies ]
 
Posted by Inger (# 15285) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
Thanks for that link Auntie Dorris -

From the blog - "The implication that J.K Rowling's Lord Voldemort could be compared to health secretary Andrew Lansley was both excruciating and exquisite."

Haha - yes, I felt that too!

Oh good! I'm not alone!
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ceannaideach:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Yes! I was waiting for the Doctor Who references and they never came! But maybe they couldn't get the permission to use the characters.

See now during the music, in fact around the Bohemian Rhapsody part, I could have sworn I heard the TARDIS de/rematerialising sound.
Seconded!
 
Posted by Alwyn (# 4380) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ceannaideach:
... during the music, in fact around the Bohemian Rhapsody part, I could have sworn I heard the TARDIS de/rematerialising sound.

Yes, I heard that too.
 
Posted by Triple Tiara (# 9556) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:

quote:
Originally posted by Auntie Doris:
I thought this blog was an interesting take on the whole ceremony.

Yes, and very different from what some people have said here!

quote:

"It's essentially a Catholic theory of British history"
[...]
It is perhaps not coincidental to learn that Boyle himself was raised in a Catholic household in the north of England and was at one time considering attending seminary to become a priest.


Interesting indeed. I was talking about the opening ceremony this morning with one of my confrères, a Salesian priest. Danny Boyle is the product of a Salesian School (Thornleigh in Bolton). My colleague was able to identify all sorts of influences, including the speech from The Tempest, which was apparently the passion of one of the priests who taught Boyle.

Before the ceremony I was of the same opinion as Trisagion, believing any reference to Christianity would be airbrushed, and predicting the absence of a church from the landscape, which would be odd indeed. In the end I was pleased that there was NOT a church because the narrative was the sweeping away of that rural idyll by the industrial age. Having a church there would have implied the sweeping away of Christianity by "progress", so I ended up being very pleased indeed that there was not a church in the opening tableau!

Even if the hymns were references to nationality and sport and remembrance, I thought those were powerful reminders of the Christian influence on the culture. One secular commentator I read said something like "it showed there were still bits of God and religion lying around in our culture". Which is probably the most accurate statement. The Archbishop of Canterbury was very prominently seated - not sure a senior churchman has ever been that prominently seated at any other games.
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PaulBC:
Way too long and too parochial. As to showing all UK I don't think that "Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer" (Wales) ," Danny Boy" (Ireland)
and "The Flowers od Scotland") shows all of Briatin.

OK, I'll put the cat among the pigeons here.

From day one, it's been hailed as the "London Olympics". It's London Council Tax payers money that has gone towards funding it (anyone else remember Ken Livingstone's comment about the walnut whip?). It's also Londoners that are having to live with the disruption. Perhaps it should have been more parochial with more emphasis on London to the exclusion of other parts of England, let alone the UK.
 
Posted by dorothea (# 4398) on :
 
My son attended the football at Old Trafford and said he couldn't help thinking it was a bit 'off' having 'London 2012' on display at the ground. When you think about it, this is, after all an Olympiad taking place in Great Britain, in the year 2012. The reality, however, is 'London 2012' is a brand name for LOCOG the company delivering the games, hence the over use of the official logo.

One of the things that was so good about Boyle's 'vision' for the opening ceremony is that it was anything but corporate.

[ 29. July 2012, 14:19: Message edited by: dorothea ]
 
Posted by Trisagion (# 5235) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
... It's London Council Tax payers money that has gone towards funding it (anyone else remember Ken Livingstone's comment about the walnut whip?).

That isn't what this would seem to suggest. The burden would seem to have been sufficiently widely shared for non-London residents to feel it might be their Olympics too.

[ 29. July 2012, 14:30: Message edited by: Trisagion ]
 
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
quote:
Originally posted by PaulBC:
Way too long and too parochial. As to showing all UK I don't think that "Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer" (Wales) ," Danny Boy" (Ireland)
and "The Flowers od Scotland") shows all of Briatin.

OK, I'll put the cat among the pigeons here.

From day one, it's been hailed as the "London Olympics". It's London Council Tax payers money that has gone towards funding it (anyone else remember Ken Livingstone's comment about the walnut whip?). It's also Londoners that are having to live with the disruption. Perhaps it should have been more parochial with more emphasis on London to the exclusion of other parts of England, let alone the UK.

I'm not sure that carries convincingly. The Sydney Olympics was about Australia showcasing itself and hosting the games; the Beijing Olympics, China etc; the Moscow Olympics, USSR etc.
 
Posted by Telepath (# 3534) on :
 
Auntie Doris, thank you, that blog post is very illuminating.

I was speaking to a Chinese woman this afternoon about the comparison to the Beijing ceremony, which I haven't seen, and she agreed with the view that Beijing had been a propaganda show, and that the London show had far more authenticity.
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:

"It's essentially a Catholic theory of British history"
[...]
It is perhaps not coincidental to learn that Boyle himself was raised in a Catholic household in the north of England and was at one time considering attending seminary to become a priest.

[/QUOTE]
And the chief scriptwriter Frank Cottrell Boyce is a Catholic from Liverpool.

But I think it would be more accurately described as a 'Nonconformist' (in the broadest sense) theory of British history. The Establishment, in the sense of the C of E and indeed any political figures apart from HMQ, was totally absent. Which explains William Blake. There is much more in common between protestant nonconformity and Catholicism than many people might think. Thomas Merton was a great fan of Blake and the Shakers.
 
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on :
 
Struck me that concentrating on the transformation of the industrial revolution and after made sense - int hat it is pretty much guaranteed the world already knows Shakespeare was a Brit and we had various kings and all the rest. I felt they were wanting to present things that were more recent and less obvious - as if to say, yes you know that but look at this !

I liked the Elgar and shipping forecast at the beginning, I also thought the older generation - likely to dislike the pop and go to bed earlier, would have got the references and stuff they liked in at a civilised time.

Folk commented asking about music choices, where was Adele etc - I definitely heard Adele being played during the parade and the pet shop boys, there was a good hour or more of various artists over that.

(BTW re Londoness, surely that was why Beckham and Dizzy Rascal were getting a high profile ?)
 
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on :
 
Also, I noticed Prodigy Twisted Firestarter during the house party section - I wondered if that was a deliberate reference to the riots ?
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
Very fortunate, I sometimes think, that we got those ever so nasty riots, (that had been brewing for some time), out of the way last year .

< Conspiracy theory alert over >
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
From a celebratory opening to a disastrous first day.

Because there's obviously no point in watching the world's best if we're not winning, is there?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Re the music choices, here's the playlists for those who were wondering:

The Telegraph's list

If that doesn't cover it, there's the Compleat: full, with credits
 
Posted by tessaB (# 8533) on :
 
According to that list the Doctor Who Theme was played. I didn' hear it and I'm a big fan. One of the family must have been talking when it played [Paranoid]
 
Posted by Rosina (# 15589) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trisagion:


The other thing that struck me was the almost complete absence of the one set of ideas and organising principles that both explain and, from Alban and Augustine onwards, provide the key to understanding Britain: Christianity.

I was struck in quite the opposite way Trisagion and agree with Amos - Abide with me - guide me oh thou great Redeemer and William Blake's Jerusalem were very moving and quite sufficiently referenced "Christianity"

Shame the singer of Abide with me couldn't breath through "help of the helpless oh Abide with me" without taking a big breath between help and less.

[Roll Eyes]

Apart from that I thought the whole thing was quite wonderful and particularly loved the inclusion of so many children and young people.
 
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on :
 
Has anybody else noticed that the camera angle on the Olympic cauldron the BBC likes to present during their regular programming - directly from underneath - provides the most perfect physical rendition of The Eye of Sauron? [Eek!] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
I threw a party yesterday (nothing connected to the olympics) My niece doesn't have a TV and there was so much chat about the ceremony we ended up watching the highlights on iplayer. I'm glad we did - there was so much I missed the first time round.

(No distractions - I watched it on my own)

[Smile]

<typo>

[ 30. July 2012, 07:51: Message edited by: Boogie ]
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dorothea:
My son attended the football at Old Trafford and said he couldn't help thinking it was a bit 'off' having 'London 2012' on display at the ground. When you think about it, this is, after all an Olympiad taking place in Great Britain, in the year 2012. The reality, however, is 'London 2012' is a brand name for LOCOG the company delivering the games, hence the over use of the official logo.

One of the things that was so good about Boyle's 'vision' for the opening ceremony is that it was anything but corporate.

I can't think of a games that didn't have city-year emblazoned all over it. It was Sydney 2000 everywhere in Sydney, i think that it's traditional-so LOCOG (whoever they are) were probably obliged to use that as the official logo and to have it emblazoned everywhere.
 
Posted by Hawk (# 14289) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Anglican_Brat:
No reference to Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings.
No reference to William Shakespeare

quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
Harry Potter was represented by the huge (how could you miss it?) puppet of Voldemort.

Shakespeare was represented by the speech made by Sir Kenneth Brannagh.

Keep up.

Also I'm not sure but the capering creatures in the NHS scene looked very similar to the Orcs from the LOTR stage show - so this may have been a reference to them

Shakespeare is such a well-known cultural landmark he only needed a line or two, its a truism that the most famous people need the least introduction. Plus everyone already knows about him, I'm glad this highlighted all the other great stuff about Britain that's usually obscured by the Bard's greatness.

I do think we should have had a bit more Dickens though - I noticed only the 2 second clip from the film of Oliver.

I think this was so much more imaginative and creative than Beijing. Beijing was what a totalitarian state dreams of, the masses moving in perfect drilled unison, like unthinking automatons for the glory of the state. London was about individuals choosing to work together for their own collective goal. It was a work of artistic genius and made me proud to be British, especially after the bedraggled shamble that was the Jubilee parade. And the main thing was that it showed we can celebrate our Britishness without embarassment or cringeworthiness - finally we proved such a thing is possible. I never thought I'd see such a thing.

quote:
Originally posted by Jahlove:
if Boyle's theme is one of progress for the majority, a Methodist chapel might have been a more appropriate addition.

A Wesleyan open-air sermon to the miners would have been good to reference somehow - much more appropriate to Boyle's vision of change, progress and the vibrant energy of the masses than a cooped up chapel. I agree with Trisagion that Christianity could have been more overtly represented, but I can understand why it wasn't highlighted more - there was so much in there already. And besides, like Shakespeare, you only need one reference to bring to mind the whole shebang.
 
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dorothea:
My son attended the football at Old Trafford and said he couldn't help thinking it was a bit 'off' having 'London 2012' on display at the ground. When you think about it, this is, after all an Olympiad taking place in Great Britain, in the year 2012. The reality, however, is 'London 2012' is a brand name for LOCOG the company delivering the games, hence the over use of the official logo.

The Olympics are hosted by a city (London) which is why they are called London 2012 and not England 2012 or Britain 2012. It's the proper name for events that are part of the Olympic Games being hosted by London in 2012, not a corporate branding issue

That other cities get to host most of the soccer matches is an exception to the rule brought on by FIFA's rules about the number of matches a given field may host in a short time period to allow the surface to recover. The alternative to hosting matches in other cities would be to use a bunch of smaller local venues which would allow fewer spectators to attend the soccer matches.

I went to see Spain against South Korea at Adelaide's Hindmarsh Stadium where there was Sydney 2000 signage everywhere and we had the same Sydney 2000 tickets as all other ticket holders. I think there was also a good mix of the then-current 'Sensational Adelaide' branding around the edge of the ground as well.
 
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on :
 
My 74yr old pop hating father sat up for the whole thing and really enjoyed it (but would have liked a bit more classical music). Ditto my sport-hating mother, she particularly loved the chimneys and the forging of the rings.

You could have knocked me over with a feather [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rosina:

Shame the singer of Abide with me couldn't breath through "help of the helpless oh Abide with me" without taking a big breath between help and less.

You would have done far better!

(seriously - I have heard Rosina sing)

[Smile]
 
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
quote:
Originally posted by Rosina:

Shame the singer of Abide with me couldn't breath through "help of the helpless oh Abide with me" without taking a big breath between help and less.

You would have done far better!

(seriously - I have heard Rosina sing)

[Smile]

I was just impressed she stayed on her feet and performed, in front of a crowd like that, live and broadcast to the world!

The slip in breathing was unfortunate, but it was a lovely understated rendition, where every single word was clearly audible, in tune and didn't take away from either the hymn it self or the dance. If there is such a thing, an ego-less performance which otherwise could've been self-consciously painful if not approached in such a simple way, imo.
 
Posted by justlooking (# 12079) on :
 
I thought the hymn was sung in a way which perfectly reflected the context. It was sung as a prayer not as a performance.

(a tangent but does anyone else remember 'Waltzing Matilda' being sung in operatic style when Charles and Diana visited Australia? It was technically perfect but so very Wrong.)
 
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on :
 
Many parts of the ceremony were amazing in their artistry and inventiveness.

Due largely to the "sub letting" of contracts for specific segments to professional organisations.

Well done to them.

But Danny Boyle had an agenda (fortunately lost on the rest of the world who didnt "get it".) I have looked at other websites which simply didnt get the message.

But we in Britain did. Why else give so much emphasis to an NHS which is seemingly under threat? And needs to be rescued by a variety of Mary Poppinses?
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by justlooking:
I thought the hymn was sung in a way which perfectly reflected the context. It was sung as a prayer not as a performance.

That was true of the other hymns/ songs as well, sung by children, amateurs or the disabled/deaf signing choir. Much more real.
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Re the music choices, here's the playlists for those who were wondering:

The Telegraph's list

If that doesn't cover it, there's the Compleat: full, with credits

Oh cool, there was a Monty Python tie-in! (I came in late and left early, didn't see the whole thing.)

Much as I love alot of the music, too much (not all) of the spectacle was just people choreographing to pop music. It felt like a MTV video. The thing I liked best was the Mr Bean segment. Can't imagine my country even attempting a deliberate injection of humor like that!
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by nickel:
The thing I liked best was the Mr Bean segment. Can't imagine my country even attempting a deliberate injection of humor like that!

I'm not sure many other countries produce any humour that is as widely accessible as Mr Bean, though some of it makes me reach for the remote control.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
Thomas Merton was a great fan of Blake....

And if he'd only been one-twentieth as good a writer as Blake it woudl be possible to read him and stay awake at the same time [Two face]
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
(BTW re Londoness, surely that was why Beckham and Dizzy Rascal were getting a high profile ?)

Beckham because, for reasons I never quite understood, he's a fair bet to be the most famous sports person in the world. Which for a huge segment of the population makes him the most famous person in the world.

A few years ago when someone did an opinion poll in Iran askibng who was your greatest hereo, David Beckham came second to the Ayatollah Khomeini (who was already dead by then) ((yes, they have opinion polls in Iran, unlike some countries round there supposedly allied to us))
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
Beckham because, for reasons I never quite understood,

'Cause he's pretty. And was a fair hand at football.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
Beckham because, for reasons I never quite understood,

'Cause he's pretty. And was a fair hand at football.
He is, was maybe, certainly a very good footballer. But I don;t think anyone would claim he was the very best in the world. Or even in the top ten. Maybe even hundred. Arguably one of the best three or four set-piece-taking midfielders of his generation. But would he have been in any objective neutral's fantasy world eleven?

(As for pretty, being a Bloke I am unable to comment. I tend to find the vast majority of men (inbcluding David Beckham, and indeed myself) not very pleasant to look at at all, and the few I do find interesting to look at tend not to be the ones women, and perhaps gay men, find most attractive)
 
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
Beckham because, for reasons I never quite understood,

'Cause he's pretty. And was a fair hand at football.
Then there's Maradona, who is an ugly old man and infamous for being a very unfair hand at football [Big Grin]
quote:
Originally posted by ken:
He is, was maybe, certainly a very good footballer. But I don;t think anyone would claim he was the very best in the world.

I'm not really a football (soccer) fan but I do have a decent amount of respect for David Beckham. It's not just that he's a great player (regardless of whether he's the best or not) who plays honourably, but that he seems like a great bloke who isn't getting kicked out of teams for racist tweets.


I think honouring a nation's greatest athletes who aren't able to compete at the Olympics is worthy for an opening ceremony, a celebration of sport need not be limited just to those sports which the organisational committee deems worthy. Nobody in Australia complained when Ron Barassi (Football legend) walked on water* in the 2006 Commonwealth Games opening ceremony with the Queen's baton.
 
Posted by Pre-cambrian (# 2055) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
But Danny Boyle had an agenda (fortunately lost on the rest of the world who didnt "get it".) I have looked at other websites which simply didnt get the message.

But we in Britain did. Why else give so much emphasis to an NHS which is seemingly under threat? And needs to be rescued by a variety of Mary Poppinses?

Some in the rest of the world think they got it. At least, one of the denizens of Free Republic believes the NHS section was a "political taunt", a "shot over the bow", that was "clearly aimed at America". Apparently it helps to understand why the US War of Independence happened. [Roll Eyes]

[ 02. August 2012, 10:54: Message edited by: Pre-cambrian ]
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pre-cambrian:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
But Danny Boyle had an agenda (fortunately lost on the rest of the world who didnt "get it".) I have looked at other websites which simply didnt get the message.

But we in Britain did. Why else give so much emphasis to an NHS which is seemingly under threat? And needs to be rescued by a variety of Mary Poppinses?

Some in the rest of the world think they got it. At least, one of the denizens of Free Republic believes the NHS section was a "political taunt", a "shot over the bow", that was "clearly aimed at America". Apparently it helps to understand why the US War of Independence happened. [Roll Eyes]
I'm damn sure 'No health care to be paid for by tea duties' wasn't a rallying cry for American independence. [Confused]
 
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pre-cambrian:
Some in the rest of the world think they got it. At least, one of the denizens of Free Republic believes the NHS section was a "political taunt", a "shot over the bow", that was "clearly aimed at America". Apparently it helps to understand why the US War of Independence happened. [Roll Eyes]

Wasn't it a desperate attempt by the British to rid themselves of being too associated with the Americans?
 
Posted by Pre-cambrian (# 2055) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I'm damn sure 'No health care to be paid for by tea duties' wasn't a rallying cry for American independence. [Confused]

Now you're confusing things by introducing facts!
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
According to this article, the ceremony was a dramatisation of Rerum Novarum.

quote:
The spiritual values transmitted throughout were uplifting, and remarkable in a secular age. The ceremony was subtly infused with Christian culture, but in a way that was inclusive and respectful of difference. .....Danny Boyle’s vision of Britain was joyful, profound, generous, and spiritual. We are stuck with a government whose vision is joyless, shallow, mean-spirited and entirely materialistic.

 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0