Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Is Moral Vanity A Left-Wing Disease?
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
Is Lawson onto something here?
I am quite open to listen to, discuss, and assess arguments from a left-wing perspective, and am left-wing myself in some areas, such as the desirability of a national health system.
However I have found that those whose leftness constitutes their self-proclaimed tribal identity ( as opposed to a general label for a group of thought-out opinions)can be capable of a pharisaical certitude and self-righteousness which I have seldom seen equalled by the most fundamentalist of Christians. [ 19. November 2012, 22:01: Message edited by: Ancient Mariner ]
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ricardus
Shipmate
# 8757
|
Posted
I think this is true in one specific area. Left-wing economics tends to present itself as ethically good and working for the benefit of society. Liberal economics (in the European sense) tends to emphasise 'enlightened self-interest' - it doesn't need to be good or moral because people will find it in their own interests to benefit society anyway. I think the UK metanarrative tends to be that right-wing economics are evil and selfish and left-wing economics are naïve and impractical.
On social issues you see just as much self-righteousness from the right as the left. It's all lazy scroungers on benefits and immigrants taking our jobs and bleeding heart liberals giving council houses to asylum seekers and lazy pampered public sector workers going on strike to defend their golden eggs while the rest of us tighten our belts and blame the victim liberals who think thieves and murderers need counselling and liberals fostering an entitlement culture that was directly responsible for the riots in 2011 and political correctness gone mad that means everyone's too scared to tell it like it is.
-------------------- Then the dog ran before, and coming as if he had brought the news, shewed his joy by his fawning and wagging his tail. -- Tobit 11:9 (Douai-Rheims)
Posts: 7247 | From: Liverpool, UK | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110
|
Posted
quote: The most hateful of all such opponents are those, such as the late Keith Joseph, who make the ethical case for markets. This is why that genuinely good and kind man was subjected to boycotts, vile abuse and even physical attacks when he dared to suggest that socialism destroys moral responsibility and that those who make fortunes in competitive markets (through lower prices or better products) are serving the public good more than any trade union leader. If he were alive today, Joseph would definitely be at risk of being labelled a paedophile.
Well, I suppose the problem with the article is to be found there. That's as one-sided as the POV it criticises.
Neither socialism nor capitalism destroy moral responsibility. There is responsibility for oneself and responsibility for others. Socialism and capitalism as creeds may both be criticised for emphasising one, rather than the other. Just different ones.
Have you had a look at this thread recently? The real issue is whether criticism is legitimate. Most of us are only too keenly aware of the "one finger pointing at you, three pointing back at me".
If I criticise statements from the Right wing which assume they come from the moral high ground, assume a corner on Christian virtue (and there are a lot of those), I think I am pointing to a vanity. A vanity which, to judge by its rhetoric, demonstrates an indifference towards a traditional Christian understanding of responsibility for others.
Oh I am sure that vanity may be found on both the Left and the Right. It is a universal disease. [ 19. November 2012, 09:14: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
-------------------- Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
The left is certainly prone to a sort of inflated self-righteousness.
However, I think it is OK to point out, for example, that some companies make big profits by sacking lots of their workers, by paying very low taxes, and by raising prices over and above costs.
However, I would not call this 'evil' really, as that word does not sit well in political discussions. In fact, many capitalists are probably perfectly reasonable people; I think it's the system which can be criticized, since it is oriented towards profits, not people. Or as Marx said rather eloquently, relations between people are replaced by relations between things.
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Justinian
Shipmate
# 5357
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: http://atlanticjaxx.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/dominic-lawson-of-course-hes-an-evil-wretch-hes-a-tory-sunday-times-18-11-12/
Is Lawson onto something here?
I am quite open to listen to, discuss, and assess arguments from a left-wing perspective, and am left-wing myself in some areas, such as the desirability of a national health system.
However I have found that those whose leftness constitutes their self-proclaimed tribal identity ( as opposed to a general label for a group of thought-out opinions)can be capable of a pharisaical certitude and self-righteousness which I have seldom seen equalled by the most fundamentalist of Christians.
No, Lawson is not onto something at all. If Moral Vanity were anything approaching an exclusively left wing disease then there wouldn't be e.g. the right wing crusade against abortion that doesn't do a damn thing to touch the causes of abortion. As Lawson is demonstrably talking out of his hat then the entire article is shown in stark relief to be a pure excercise in Moral Vanity ("Look at us on the right. We aren't intolerant, unlike those on the left.")
Further I question that it is a virtue to tolerate every moral failing (as Lawson seems to imply). Sure you can take things too far (as the notorious "Libertarian Republican" did after the last election) - but certain attitudes and behaviours hurt people and social sanctions need to be taken against them.
-------------------- My real name consists of just four letters, but in billions of combinations.
Eudaimonaic Laughter - my blog.
Posts: 3926 | From: The Sea Coast of Bohemia | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
I'm also getting the whiff of an anti-BBC diatribe building up. Look at them, all left-wingers, break the whole thing up, and privatize it! I don't think that Lawson actually shares this view himself, but the various troubles at the Beeb have given ammunition to those on the right who would love to dismember it.
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Boogie
Boogie on down!
# 13538
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by quetzalcoatl: I'm also getting the whiff of an anti-BBC diatribe building up. Look at them, all left-wingers, break the whole thing up, and privatize it! I don't think that Lawson actually shares this view himself, but the various troubles at the Beeb have given ammunition to those on the right who would love to dismember it.
I hope not. I think it is people's love for the BBC which caused such shock at recent events. I imagine the drive to preserve it will be strong.
I, for one, would - I detest commercial channels and never watch them.
-------------------- Garden. Room. Walk
Posts: 13030 | From: Boogie Wonderland | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
orfeo
Ship's Musical Counterpoint
# 13878
|
Posted
I would have thought Romney's infamous remarks about how 47% of the population just wanted handouts had a healthy whiff of moral vanity about them.
-------------------- Technology has brought us all closer together. Turns out a lot of the people you meet as a result are complete idiots.
Posts: 18173 | From: Under | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
George Spigot
Outcast
# 253
|
Posted
I got as far as the ludicrous straw man hitler comparison and gave up. A group gets judged by it's past actions. This is normal. It's perfectly normal for people who lived through the previous long streach of Tory rule to harbour resentment at the damage done to our society just as it's normal for people to feel resentment at the broken promises of the more recent stretch of Labour rule. Here's a tip for Torys. If you want people to stop resenting you do something positive. Hint, making life difficult for the most vunrable in society will have the opposit effect
Matthew 7:16 and all that.
-------------------- C.S. Lewis's Head is just a tool for the Devil. (And you can quote me on that.) ~ Philip Purser Hallard http://www.thoughtplay.com/infinitarian/gbsfatb.html
Posts: 1625 | From: Derbyshire - England | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
LeRoc
Famous Dutch pirate
# 3216
|
Posted
While I don't deny that a level of arrogance sometimes exists with some people on the Left (myself included), I also can't escape the feeling that the phrase 'The Moral Vanity of The Left' is often a shorthand for "I don't like your point of view, but I can't make a good argument against it, so let's try a disguised ad hominem."
-------------------- I know why God made the rhinoceros, it's because He couldn't see the rhinoceros, so He made the rhinoceros to be able to see it. (Clarice Lispector)
Posts: 9474 | From: Brazil / Africa | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
Disguised?
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Adeodatus
Shipmate
# 4992
|
Posted
Moral vanity is ubiquitous: from the politicians who "keep the rules" (but do bugger all else), to the yob who slaughters his granny and asserts, "I ain't done nuffink wrong."
In British politics it's particularly ingrained and particularly smelly. In my experience, it manifests as contempt in left-wingers, as smugness in right-wingers, and as a whiny martyr complex in everyone else.
-------------------- "What is broken, repair with gold."
Posts: 9779 | From: Manchester | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110
|
Posted
That's very good, Adeodatus. (Checks moral armpits - hmmmn)
-------------------- Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sioni Sais
Shipmate
# 5713
|
Posted
What Adeodatus said. Also, we had a thread a while ago that fell on its arse because it assumed the "the left" was homogenous? Anything but in my experience. Leftist political parties outdo the Baptists and Brethren combined for splits and disputations, over points of doctrine and practice that are invisible to anyone on the outside. It is these minute differences that render leftist parties unelectable at times and, let's face it, if you aren't going to get into power, you can be as vain as you like. Hello? Is that Mr Clegg?
-------------------- "He isn't Doctor Who, he's The Doctor"
(Paul Sinha, BBC)
Posts: 24276 | From: Newport, Wales | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
tclune
Shipmate
# 7959
|
Posted
ISTM that moral vanity is, indeed, a left-wing disease -- and immoral vanity is a right-wing disease...
--Tom Clune
-------------------- This space left blank intentionally.
Posts: 8013 | From: Western MA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Sioni Sais: What Adeodatus said. Also, we had a thread a while ago that fell on its arse because it assumed the "the left" was homogenous? Anything but in my experience. Leftist political parties outdo the Baptists and Brethren combined for splits and disputations, over points of doctrine and practice that are invisible to anyone on the outside. It is these minute differences that render leftist parties unelectable at times and, let's face it, if you aren't going to get into power, you can be as vain as you like. Hello? Is that Mr Clegg?
Left-wing groups are prone to that 'narcissism of small differences', which probably, as you say, stems from their impotence. As you also say, reminiscent of some religious groups.
I suppose the extreme right have the same narcissism, but the Tory-type right wing just have a ruthless lust for power, which enables them to cover up differences for the duration.
Isn't it morally vain to point out moral vanity in others?
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322
|
Posted
Moral vanity is not a left wing disease. It's a human one.
Having said that, though, I agree with Dominic Lawson's article. I think many on the left do exhibit this quite badly, and that one reason for this is that many left wing assumptions have the unfortunate side effect of inhibiting some areas of humility and self questioning.
-------------------- Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson
Posts: 7610 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
ken
Ship's Roundhead
# 2460
|
Posted
Q: Is Moral Vanity A Left-Wing Disease?
A: No.
Next? [ 19. November 2012, 17:24: Message edited by: ken ]
-------------------- Ken
L’amor che move il sole e l’altre stelle.
Posts: 39579 | From: London | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sioni Sais
Shipmate
# 5713
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Enoch: Moral vanity is not a left wing disease. It's a human one.
Having said that, though, I agree with Dominic Lawson's article. I think many on the left do exhibit this quite badly, and that one reason for this is that many left wing assumptions have the unfortunate side effect of inhibiting some areas of humility and self questioning.
Had Dominic Lawson looked at the raspberries instead of the strawberries he would have found rotten fruit there too. He also enters Godwin's Law territory stating "Can it really be “standard” that grown-up men and women, rather than just undergraduates working off adolescent rage, believe there is no moral distinction between, say, John Major and Adolf Hitler?" No, Dominic, it isn't. Stupid man.
If you want to hear cogent arguments against "the left", you'll get better from pub bores just before stop-tap.
-------------------- "He isn't Doctor Who, he's The Doctor"
(Paul Sinha, BBC)
Posts: 24276 | From: Newport, Wales | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Russ
Old salt
# 120
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Ricardus: I think this is true in one specific area. Left-wing economics tends to present itself as ethically good and working for the benefit of society. Liberal economics (in the European sense) tends to emphasise 'enlightened self-interest' - it doesn't need to be good or moral because people will find it in their own interests to benefit society anyway. I think the UK metanarrative tends to be that right-wing economics are evil and selfish and left-wing economics are naïve
True as far as it goes, but I think the article is saying something slightly stronger. That a depressingly large proportion of left-leaning people (not necessarily extremists, just those who are ordinarily left-of-centre) believe that the mainstay of Toryism, the whole underlying spirit of right-of-centre belief, is to do with making the poor poorer.
And looking at some of the posts you see here on the Ship, it seems to me that he has a point.
He's not saying anything about moral vanity being exclusive to left-wingers, which would of course be untrue.
If you came across someone who believed that trade unionism was about serving Satan, you wouldn't take him seriously. Because of course the trade union movement has a history and a value system neither of which feature the Prince of Lies.
So if those who believe that the world would be a much better place if the power of trade unions were greatly reduced can at least treat their opponents as well-meaning-but-misguided rather than as minions of the Evil One, why is it so difficult for those on the left to return the courtesy ?
Best wishes,
Russ
-------------------- Wish everyone well; the enemy is not people, the enemy is wrong ideas
Posts: 3169 | From: rural Ireland | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Beeswax Altar
Shipmate
# 11644
|
Posted
Yeah, I don't think the article makes the case for the moral vanity of the left as opposed to the moral vanity of the right. However, based on reading posts on the Ship, I'm inclined to agree with him about how the Left in the UK perceives Tories. Did that attitude contribute to the unfounded attack on Lord McAlpine? While you can't prove it one way or the other, I'd be surprised if it didn't.
-------------------- Losing sleep is something you want to avoid, if possible. -Og: King of Bashan
Posts: 8411 | From: By a large lake | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984
|
Posted
It could be worse ...
-------------------- All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell
Posts: 19219 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
mousethief
Ship's Thieving Rodent
# 953
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: However I have found that those whose leftness constitutes their self-proclaimed tribal identity ( as opposed to a general label for a group of thought-out opinions)can be capable of a pharisaical certitude and self-righteousness which I have seldom seen equalled by the most fundamentalist of Christians.
Then you need to get out more, or take the blinders off.
-------------------- This is the last sig I'll ever write for you...
Posts: 63536 | From: Washington | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bullfrog.
Prophetic Amphibian
# 11014
|
Posted
So tribalism leads naturally to moral vanity? Hm...
What mousethief said about this being a leftist problem. Methinks everybody finds it easier to see the "moral vanity" of those who disagree, and harder to see it among their ideological tribe-mates or co-ideologues.
-------------------- Some say that man is the root of all evil Others say God's a drunkard for pain Me, I believe that the Garden of Eden Was burned to make way for a train. --Josh Ritter, Harrisburg
Posts: 7522 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mousethief: you need to get out more
Don't know about you, but I have known fundamentalists (as opposed to evangelicals) and left-wing ideologues (as opposed to people with left-wing views on certain issues) all my adult life, and been pissed off by both.
One possible reason for the difference between the two is that the former retain a residual awareness of their fallen state, while the latter inhabit a supralapsarian mind-state in which the possibility of their being mistaken does not exist.
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
mousethief
Ship's Thieving Rodent
# 953
|
Posted
Nobody who thinks there are "worthy" and "unworthy" poor retains any sense of their own fallen state, whatever the fuck they may say when their lips are flapping.
-------------------- This is the last sig I'll ever write for you...
Posts: 63536 | From: Washington | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Porridge
Shipmate
# 15405
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Rosa Winkel: So, us on the left have moral vanity as well as being instinctively anti-semitic?
Good job I don't come here to learn about politics.
Thank you, Rosa Winkel. You beat me to the punch. Any bets as to when the Apostle will appear?
-------------------- Spiggott: Everything I've ever told you is a lie, including that. Moon: Including what? Spiggott: That everything I've ever told you is a lie. Moon: That's not true!
Posts: 3925 | From: Upper right corner | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110
|
Posted
Heck, anyone can be vain! Or have a vain moment. Including Dominic Lawson. And me.
The really dodgy issue for people of faith (and without) is self-righteousness.
Does the self-righteousness of folks on the political and religious right bring out indignation in me? It sure does. Does that tempt me towards a kind of personal holier-than-nowness? Sometimes it does just that. A sort of pharisaic "God, I thank thee that I do not think and behave like those assholes". And of course as soon as I think like that, I just did join them in their personal holier-than-nowness.
Is that just me or does anyone else recognise the temptation of that? [ 20. November 2012, 06:28: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
-------------------- Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mere Nick
Shipmate
# 11827
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Barnabas62: [QB] Heck, anyone can be vain!
Sums it up for me.
-------------------- "Well that's it, boys. I've been redeemed. The preacher's done warshed away all my sins and transgressions. It's the straight and narrow from here on out, and heaven everlasting's my reward." Delmar O'Donnell
Posts: 2797 | From: West Carolina | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Marvin the Martian
Interplanetary
# 4360
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by ken: Q: Is Moral Vanity A Left-Wing Disease?
A: No.
Next?
Next:
In that case, why is it that it is most often (in Britain, where we both are) the left who characterise their political opponents as evil, rather than simply wrong?
-------------------- Hail Gallaxhar
Posts: 30100 | From: Adrift on a sea of surreality | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jolly Jape
Shipmate
# 3296
|
Posted
@Martin
Because, in Britain, some members of the right choose to portray groups, other than their political opponents, as evil, be they single mums, immigrants, the bureaucrats of Brussels, you name it, and reserve their indignation for those who they know can't fight back.
-------------------- To those who have never seen the flow and ebb of God's grace in their lives, it means nothing. To those who have seen it, even fleetingly, even only once - it is life itself. (Adeodatus)
Posts: 3011 | From: A village of gardens | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
alienfromzog
Ship's Alien
# 5327
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Marvin the Martian: quote: Originally posted by ken: Q: Is Moral Vanity A Left-Wing Disease?
A: No.
Next?
Next:
In that case, why is it that it is most often (in Britain, where we both are) the left who characterise their political opponents as evil, rather than simply wrong?
Because they are?
To say that the left do it more than the right I think shows selective sight. Are there people on the left who show breathtaking moral vanity? Absolutely. (Most often on the issue of abortion in my experience) Are there people not on the left who show similar moral vanity. Indeed yes.
The title of the thread is much like the one about the Left being inherently anti-semetic...And my thoughts are much the same too: Questions to which the answer is "No, don't be silly."
AFZ
-------------------- Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. [Sen. D.P.Moynihan]
An Alien's View of Earth - my blog (or vanity exercise...)
Posts: 2150 | From: Zog, obviously! Straight past Alpha Centauri, 2nd planet on the left... | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Porridge
Shipmate
# 15405
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by alienfromzog: The title of the thread is much like the one about the Left being inherently anti-semetic... AFZ
Rosa Winkel beat you to the punch, too, upthread:
quote: Originally posted by Rosa Winkel: So, us on the left have moral vanity as well as being instinctively anti-semitic?
Good job I don't come here to learn about politics.
-------------------- Spiggott: Everything I've ever told you is a lie, including that. Moon: Including what? Spiggott: That everything I've ever told you is a lie. Moon: That's not true!
Posts: 3925 | From: Upper right corner | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mousethief: Nobody who thinks there are "worthy" and "unworthy" poor retains any sense of their own fallen state, whatever the fuck they may say when their lips are flapping.
If they are not saying (or writing) it, how do you know they think it?
Are you psychic?
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bullfrog.
Prophetic Amphibian
# 11014
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: quote: Originally posted by mousethief: Nobody who thinks there are "worthy" and "unworthy" poor retains any sense of their own fallen state, whatever the fuck they may say when their lips are flapping.
If they are not saying (or writing) it, how do you know they think it?
Are you psychic?
God knows I've heard lots of people complaining that people haven't earned their food stamps, which is basically a statement of worth if you think about it.
-------------------- Some say that man is the root of all evil Others say God's a drunkard for pain Me, I believe that the Garden of Eden Was burned to make way for a train. --Josh Ritter, Harrisburg
Posts: 7522 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Palimpsest
Shipmate
# 16772
|
Posted
Moral Vanity is a disease of all groups, except of course the Peoples Front of Judea.
Posts: 2990 | From: Seattle WA. US | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Bullfrog.: God knows I've heard lots of people complaining that people haven't earned their food stamps, which is basically a statement of worth if you think about it.
Nobody would dispute that people say such things.
The salient point, in context, is whether they are all, or predominantly, fundamentalist Christians.
Or, to turn it around, what evidence is there that fundamentalist Christians are any more likely than others to distinguish between the "deserving" and "undeserving" poor? [ 21. November 2012, 05:39: Message edited by: Kaplan Corday ]
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ricardus
Shipmate
# 8757
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Marvin the Martian: quote: Originally posted by ken: Q: Is Moral Vanity A Left-Wing Disease?
A: No.
Next?
Next:
In that case, why is it that it is most often (in Britain, where we both are) the left who characterise their political opponents as evil, rather than simply wrong?
Have you read The Daily Mail recently?
-------------------- Then the dog ran before, and coming as if he had brought the news, shewed his joy by his fawning and wagging his tail. -- Tobit 11:9 (Douai-Rheims)
Posts: 7247 | From: Liverpool, UK | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
mousethief
Ship's Thieving Rodent
# 953
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: quote: Originally posted by mousethief: Nobody who thinks there are "worthy" and "unworthy" poor retains any sense of their own fallen state, whatever the fuck they may say when their lips are flapping.
If they are not saying (or writing) it, how do you know they think it?
Are you psychic?
WTF? Where did I say they weren't saying or writing it?
-------------------- This is the last sig I'll ever write for you...
Posts: 63536 | From: Washington | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
alienfromzog
Ship's Alien
# 5327
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Palimpsest: Moral Vanity is a disease of all groups, except of course the Peoples Front of Judea.
The People's Front of Judea?
Splitters!
-------------------- Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. [Sen. D.P.Moynihan]
An Alien's View of Earth - my blog (or vanity exercise...)
Posts: 2150 | From: Zog, obviously! Straight past Alpha Centauri, 2nd planet on the left... | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
LeRoc
Famous Dutch pirate
# 3216
|
Posted
quote: Palimpsest: Moral Vanity is a disease of all groups, except of course the Peoples Front of Judea.
We from the Judean People's Front are much more morally vain than you. So there!
-------------------- I know why God made the rhinoceros, it's because He couldn't see the rhinoceros, so He made the rhinoceros to be able to see it. (Clarice Lispector)
Posts: 9474 | From: Brazil / Africa | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322
|
Posted
Whereas we of the United Judean Popular Front outdo you all not just in our humility but in the unity of both our members.
-------------------- Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson
Posts: 7610 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bullfrog.
Prophetic Amphibian
# 11014
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: quote: Originally posted by Bullfrog.: God knows I've heard lots of people complaining that people haven't earned their food stamps, which is basically a statement of worth if you think about it.
Nobody would dispute that people say such things.
The salient point, in context, is whether they are all, or predominantly, fundamentalist Christians.
Or, to turn it around, what evidence is there that fundamentalist Christians are any more likely than others to distinguish between the "deserving" and "undeserving" poor?
Actually, if these people are merely conservative, then it disproves your claim that such attitude is merely the territory of liberals.
Also. don't see why the goalpost has to be "most them are fundamentalists." Given that the majority in this country is non-fundamentalist, setting the goalpost thus is unreasonable. I do know some fundamentalists who rant quite vociferously about those lazy worthless welfare queens, so there are some.
But again, last I checked, the point was that moral vanity is a liberal failing, and this is the point I am tilting heavily against.
-------------------- Some say that man is the root of all evil Others say God's a drunkard for pain Me, I believe that the Garden of Eden Was burned to make way for a train. --Josh Ritter, Harrisburg
Posts: 7522 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mousethief: quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: quote: Originally posted by mousethief: Nobody who thinks there are "worthy" and "unworthy" poor retains any sense of their own fallen state, whatever the fuck they may say when their lips are flapping.
If they are not saying (or writing) it, how do you know they think it?
Are you psychic?
WTF? Where did I say they weren't saying or writing it?
It was not clear from your post whether the “flapping lips”, about which you waxed so cynical, referred to fundamentalists claiming to being fallen and fallible, or fundamentalists claiming to not distinguish between the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor.
Not being psychic myself, and unable to read your mind, I assumed the former when you meant the latter.
Ok, then what’s your evidence?
I have no doubt that some fundamentalists make that distinction, but then I also know that some Orthodoxen are anti-Semitic, and I see no justification for making generalizations about either tradition on the basis of their disreputable minorities.
It might be argued that Dawson is making a similarly unjustified generalization about doctrinaire leftists, a possibility which I am quite ready to admit, despite my visceral hunch that there is something in what he says.
There is a huge and serious difference however, between opining that some leftists are a bit up themselves, and an accusation that fundamentalists, as a group, ‘mock the poor’ (Pr.17:5). [ 22. November 2012, 03:27: Message edited by: Kaplan Corday ]
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
George Spigot
Outcast
# 253
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Russ: True as far as it goes, but I think the article is saying something slightly stronger. That a depressingly large proportion of left-leaning people (not necessarily extremists, just those who are ordinarily left-of-centre) believe that the mainstay of Toryism, the whole underlying spirit of right-of-centre belief, is to do with making the poor poorer.
If the shoe fits...
-------------------- C.S. Lewis's Head is just a tool for the Devil. (And you can quote me on that.) ~ Philip Purser Hallard http://www.thoughtplay.com/infinitarian/gbsfatb.html
Posts: 1625 | From: Derbyshire - England | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
mousethief
Ship's Thieving Rodent
# 953
|
Posted
KC, you have backed off your earlier claim. You first claimed that the right-wing fundies retain a knowledge of their fallenness; now you admit some don't. My work here is done.
-------------------- This is the last sig I'll ever write for you...
Posts: 63536 | From: Washington | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mousethief: KC, you have backed off your earlier claim. You first claimed that the right-wing fundies retain a knowledge of their fallenness; now you admit some don't.
Try reading this out loud to yourself, and listen to how desperate it sounds.
You are grasping at straws.
Did you read what I wrote about generalising from minor and inevitable exceptions - for any group?
quote: My work here is done.
Au contraire, it hasn't even begun.
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
mousethief
Ship's Thieving Rodent
# 953
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Kaplan Corday: quote: Originally posted by mousethief: KC, you have backed off your earlier claim. You first claimed that the right-wing fundies retain a knowledge of their fallenness; now you admit some don't.
Try reading this out loud to yourself, and listen to how desperate it sounds.
You are grasping at straws.
Did you read what I wrote about generalising from minor and inevitable exceptions - for any group?
I wasn't generalizing. And calling something "desperate" is not a logical refutation. It's play-acting like a grown-up conversationalist.
-------------------- This is the last sig I'll ever write for you...
Posts: 63536 | From: Washington | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|