Thread: Dickens' Christmas Carol Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=024179
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
I am enjoying an audiobook of the 1843 tale read by the fabulous Jim Dale.
It got me thinking about the story and the context in which Dickens wrote it.
I understand that it helped to reinvent Christmas, which had fallen on hard times in English society in the 18th and early 19th century.
I have also heard that it was instrumental in forging an enduring cultural link between the celebration of Christmas and the practices and attitudes of a Christian life.
Is this true?
I also wonder about Dickens' device of the spirits that visited Scrooge. Was this something commonly believed at the time? That is, that ghosts might speak to people, that they could show people their early lives, or that people could forge spiritual chains by the actions of their lives.
I'd be interested in any thoughts that you might have about any of these things. The story is so well known that these don't seem like novel ideas. Were they novel at the time?
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I remember reading in some critic - it may have been Chesterton - that given the amount of Christmas folklore, it was remarkable that Dickens actually had to invent some (the spirits of Christmas originated with him).
The thing is, they are not angels, they are - particularly Christmas Present - Dickens: radical, celebratory and nonsectarian. Tiny Tim's saccharine piety aside, it is a very Humanist work.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
No, many of our older Christmas traditions are medieval, some are Dickensian and mid-Victorian, some are late Victorian.
The Dickensian themes of Christmas were already in place; Dickens merely reflected them in his books and thereby published and preserved them.
Things like eating goose, singing Christmas songs like 'God rest ye merry, Gentlemen' and hanging greens were all old English customs anyway.
The obligatory 'Dickensian' snow scene at Christmas is entirely down to the fact that until the 1840s English winters were indeed very snowy, something that changed in the latter half of the century and continues until today, though judging by recent phenomena it seems that the Dickensian snowy Christmas may be making a come-back.
The Christmas tree, as you know, was a European custom brought to England by Prince Albert.
Many Christmas carols are late Victorian, or even American sentiment - stuff like Once in Royal David's City and O Little Town of Bethlehem, respectively.
Finally, as far as visiting spirits are concerned, A Christmas Carol is just another in the long tradition of European fairy tales and nothing more should be read into it than Dickens using a literary device of spirits doing what humans can't do.
Just a comment about the ghost of Christmas present - he is a very pagan spirit and in the illustrations that were published at the same time as the book he is pictured as the pagan kind of Father Christmas that the English - certainly of my generation and before - used to prefer (not the American Santa). He certainly didn't invent him, he included him because he was the traditional embodiment of Christmas (and has been ruined by the Americans, I'm afraid).
see HERE for the original Dickensian GofCP
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
One thing a modern reader might not pick up on is that Ebeneezer Scrooge letting Bob Cratchit have the day off for Christmas was actually pretty generous, since it was by no means a given that workers would have the day off during this period. Note that Scrooge expects that the poulterer will be open and making deliveries on Christmas morning when he orders the turkey for the Cratchits.
The day just wasn't as big a thing in Dickens' English speaking world. While it was a day to drink, eat, dance, and give small gifts, it didn't really interrupt day-to-day life like it does today. As someone else already said, its popularity was actually waning until Dickens almost single handedly arrested the decline.
It was worse off in the US, actually. Anglicans and Catholics, a tiny minority and a tinier one back then, were practically the only people that noted the day. Certainly Congregationalists would have nothing to do with it, since the Puritans associated the day with the sin of enjoying oneself.
[ 24. November 2012, 17:47: Message edited by: Zach82 ]
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I've also heard that contrary to most people's impressions, Bob Cratchett's salery was pretty standard for the time.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
...He certainly didn't invent him, he included him because he was the traditional embodiment of Christmas (and has been ruined by the Americans, I'm afraid).
This American version will always be the Ghost of Christmas Present for me. Sorry.
[ETA Unable to fix this link, DT, Purgatory Host]
[ 24. November 2012, 19:38: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I remember reading in some critic - it may have been Chesterton - that given the amount of Christmas folklore, it was remarkable that Dickens actually had to invent some (the spirits of Christmas originated with him).
That is very interesting. Looking for confirmation I ran into this quote:
quote:
When Dickens wrote “A Christmas Carol,” the London Times hadn’t mentioned Christmas for over 30 years.
But I would love to know if Chesterton did say something about Dickens' inventions in the story.
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
The thing is, they are not angels, they are - particularly Christmas Present - Dickens: radical, celebratory and nonsectarian. Tiny Tim's saccharine piety aside, it is a very Humanist work.
Yes, I am really noticing that.
Posted by Kaplan Corday (# 16119) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
Certainly Congregationalists would have nothing to do with it, since the Puritans associated the day with the sin of enjoying oneself.
I used to know some members of a Scotch Presbyterian splinter group who insisted on always referring to Christmas as Advent, and sedulously ignoring all its cultural manifestations.
For a nineteenth century Brethren attitude toward Christmas, check out the famous Incident of the Slice of Christmas Pudding ("the accursed thing") in Gosse's Father and Son.
Such sentiments persist; my ninety year-old mother-in-law, of ancient Brethren lineage, has a sweet and irenic disposition, but passionately hates Father Christmas.
[ 24. November 2012, 18:38: Message edited by: Kaplan Corday ]
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
The day just wasn't as big a thing in Dickens' English speaking world.
When I lived in West Africa I was disappointed that even though most people were Christian - and passionately so - Christmas was barely noted.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
Aren't we overlooking the whole point here that Scrooge was infamous for NOT wanting to keep Christmas just when others were or wanted to? isn't that the whole point of the story?
I find it hard to believe that anyone would have found the story compelling if no one really celebrated it anyway - what's the big deal with Scrooge if he wasn't keeping Christmas? No one else was so it's hardly a good story:
Great new story ; old man doesn't observe Christmas! Just like you don't!
It is clear to me that the whole point of A Christmas Carol is that people were having a great time at Christmas except this miserable bloke!
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
Scrooge was more being called into account for not being a generous person than merely not celebrating Christmas.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
quote:
Nicolemr: I've also heard that contrary to most people's impressions, Bob Cratchett's salery was pretty standard for the time.
Dickens was campaigning to show the conditions in which the workers were living and working through his books. (As was Hardy to some degree)
I thought Prince Albert brought Christmas observances over from Germany too, famously the tree, but also other things. So there were several things happening together, not just Dickens.
@Firenze - my daughter studied this one for her GCSE English literature. When writing the coursework essay she was wandering around spluttering indignantly about the Tiny Tim subplot. I suggested bathetic was the word she was looking for. She checked it in the dictionary, agreed and included it.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Freddy: When I lived in West Africa I was disappointed that even though most people were Christian - and passionately so - Christmas was barely noted.
Same here in Mozambique. Although I have to say the lack of Christmas decoration in the shops is quite a relief.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
One does try in vain to imagine what debilitating illness Tiny Tim has that could be easily cured with Victorian era medicine. Cocaine withdrawal?
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
Scrooge was more being called into account for not being a generous person than merely not celebrating Christmas.
Well of course, but all around him people were celebrating Christmas - just look at his nephew and the Cratchett family.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
The day just wasn't as big a thing in Dickens' English speaking world.
It wasn't that big a thing in Scotland. There are people living who can remember when it was just an ordinary working day. (Hogmanay was the major winter festival).
Posted by Chapelhead (# 21) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
One thing a modern reader might not pick up on is that Ebeneezer Scrooge letting Bob Cratchit have the day off for Christmas was actually pretty generous, since it was by no means a given that workers would have the day off during this period. Note that Scrooge expects that the poulterer will be open and making deliveries on Christmas morning when he orders the turkey for the Cratchits.
The day just wasn't as big a thing in Dickens' English speaking world. While it was a day to drink, eat, dance, and give small gifts, it didn't really interrupt day-to-day life like it does today. As someone else already said, its popularity was actually waning until Dickens almost single handedly arrested the decline.
The idea that Christmas is so big that almost everything should stop is really quite recent. A full set of league football (soccer) matches was played in Scotland on Christmas day until 1971, with some matches still being played on that day until 1976. Matches were played on Christmas day in England until 1959.
I think the matches were played in the mornings, so men would go to the match, if it was local, and then home to the lunch their wife had prepared.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
Well indeed - but you're comparing late medieval into early Victorian England with Scotland which had a whole different culture.
Even now New Year is a Scottish-flavoured occasion which, to be quite honest, doesn't excite me very much.
An English Christmas, well that's another thing.
I think we'd be hard-pressed to list many things that Dickens invented and bequeathed to us as 'Christmas'
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
I love Christmas in India. The newspaper hypes in up for the middle classes, the stores may have a Father Christmas, Christians put out the fairy lights (but so do the Hindus). The religious aspects of Christmas is widely celebrated in the part of India I stay in.
Fine by me.
As for Dickens, I quite enjoy his Christmas Carol. I once read a novel based on Tiny Tim as an adult. He dealt in illicit goods. The rest of his family were as bathetic as he was as a child.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
One does try in vain to imagine what debilitating illness Tiny Tim has that could be easily cured with Victorian era medicine. Cocaine withdrawal?
Scurvy ?
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
Even now New Year is a Scottish-flavoured occasion which, to be quite honest, doesn't excite me very much.
Ye dinnae ken what yer missin' hen.
quote:
I think we'd be hard-pressed to list many things that Dickens invented and bequeathed to us as 'Christmas'
Don't forget
Pickwick Papers ...
Dickens was a powerfully nostalgic writer. It's maybe not so apparent to us now, but in PP and in other novels and occasional writings he is evoking his childhood ( he overlapped with Jane Austen). From the POV of even his contemporary readers, this was a pre-Industrial Revolution pastoral England. The 1840s were a decade of famine and revolution. The combination of an evocation of lost paradise with a call to restore that Eden through the exercise of universal benevolence is extraordinarily strong. It transcends its time, and works, ISTM, even yet.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
An unfortunate side effect of the American "system" is that American Thanksgiving sucks up the generosity and eating from Christmas, while American New Year's Eve takes up most of the drinking and partying aspect. Which leaves behind excessive gift giving and an obsession with the cult of childhood for American Christmas. I like the glimpses of Christmas we get in a Christmas Carol more, I gotta say.
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
But I would love to know if Chesterton did say something about Dickens' inventions in the story.
If Chesterton did, it wasn't in his introduction to A Christmas Carol. In that, Chesterton talks about why Dickens' unconscious Christianity makes him so good at writing about happiness. (The answer being that other artists try to show beautiful people being happy and only succeed in depicting melancholy, but Dickens writes about poor and grotesque people who are happy.)
Posted by PaulBC (# 13712) on
:
This is a story of redemption of Scrooge. He starts out as a real mean so & so ends up the man who knew how to keep Christmas .
Cratchitt is every worker who is underpaid,overworked and exploited.
Tiny Tim stands for every person who is sick or maginalized,
It is the story that reminds people you can not be a mean nasty so & so.
President F.D.Roosevelt read this to his family every Christmas .
And it is my 2nd favorite Christmas book Alistair Sims
outside of the Gospels, Favorite ? "A Child's Christmas in Wales , D.Thomas" It is also makes a fantastic movie .Best production "A Christmas Carol"
[ 24. November 2012, 21:07: Message edited by: PaulBC ]
Posted by Chesterbelloc (# 3128) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I remember reading in some critic - it may have been Chesterton - that given the amount of Christmas folklore, it was remarkable that Dickens actually had to invent some (the spirits of Christmas originated with him).
That is very interesting. Looking for confirmation I ran into this quote:
quote:
When Dickens wrote “A Christmas Carol,” the London Times hadn’t mentioned Christmas for over 30 years.
That is, alas, the sheerest poppycock. A quick search of the Times archive for 1800-1842 reveals a hit of 178 pieces where "Christmas" is the key word, and 6238 pieces where it is mentioned at least once.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Dafyd:
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
But I would love to know if Chesterton did say something about Dickens' inventions in the story.
If Chesterton did, it wasn't in his introduction to A Christmas Carol.
He did write a whole book on Dickens. OTOH, it may have been someone else entirely. Nevertheless, the Spirits are original - and have not really had an afterlife outside of CC. Christmas Present has been subsumed into Santa Claus, which is a pity, as the idea of a midwinter king who waxes and ages in a single day is a much more poetic idea.
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
Aren't we overlooking the whole point here that Scrooge was infamous for NOT wanting to keep Christmas just when others were or wanted to? isn't that the whole point of the story?
I wondered the same thing. Yet many sources, such as Wikipedia, make statements like:
quote:
It has been credited with restoring the holiday to one of merriment and festivity in Britain and America after a period of sobriety and sombreness.
So it seems as though the merriment that Dickens describes was not actually as common as he suggests. Instead Dickens' sentimental descriptions served the purpose of establishing themselves as a popular ideal.
The impression I get is that Christmas had been celebrated in many parts with more enthusiasm in the past. Dickens is partly engaging in nostalgia, and doing it quite successfully.
Posted by Net Spinster (# 16058) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Chesterbelloc:
That is, alas, the sheerest poppycock. A quick search of the Times archive for 1800-1842 reveals a hit of 178 pieces where "Christmas" is the key word, and 6238 pieces where it is mentioned at least once.
True though some of the mentions are for it being a date and not festivities (e.g., "The Duke and Duchess of Cumberland are expected in London soon after Christmas"). And some are articles about how foreign parts celebrate it. And at least a few people had the surname of "Christmas" (including one on trial for embezzlement). More applicable would be a "constant reader" complaining about extortionate charges for sending packages at Christmas time. Or from 1823 "It was bruited forth that a pantomime of more than ordinary spirit would last night crown the delights of the Christmas revellers." In 1825 Father Christmas writes to the Times to warn readers about dishonest sellers of geese. In 1842 "A Quilldriver" writes requesting that masters give Monday off as a holyday since Christmas that year fell on Sunday. "Christmas-day falling on Sunday prevents the usual recreative enjoyments of that festive day, so that Monday would answer the double occasion of making the jocund face of old father Christmas sparkle, and also of celebrating our recent achievements abroad."
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by PaulBC:
This is a story of redemption of Scrooge. He starts out as a real mean so & so ends up the man who knew how to keep Christmas .
Cratchitt is every worker who is underpaid,overworked and exploited.
Tiny Tim stands for every person who is sick or maginalized,
It is the story that reminds people you can not be a mean nasty so & so.
I agree re Cratchitt and the same is true of Scrooge, he isn't meant to be an out of the ordinary misanthropist and tightwad, hence Cratchitt's wage is standard for the day. Scrooge is representing the greedy owners of capital who exploit their employees as much as they can to maximise their personal wealth. Scrooge's redemption is inspirational to all of the other greedy so-and-sos who should see elements of themselves in Scrooge.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
To a certain extent, making the book about just Christmas is to miss the point. Dickens is looking at the spirit at the center of Christmas: generosity to others and gratitude for what one has in life. Dickens hardly mentions Jesus, for he seems to have found the value of Christmas in those virtues instead.
[ 25. November 2012, 01:18: Message edited by: Zach82 ]
Posted by k-mann (# 8490) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
I also wonder about Dickens' device of the spirits that visited Scrooge. Was this something commonly believed at the time? That is, that ghosts might speak to people, that they could show people their early lives, or that people could forge spiritual chains by the actions of their lives.
Not having lived at that period, I cannot know for sure, but I highly doubt it. I fail to see the necessary link, however, between believing in ghosts and believing "that people could forge spiritual chains by the actions of their lives."
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Marley and his clanking chain of money boxes is much more reminiscent of the sin-appropriate penances of Purgatory, or the afterlife journey.
If hosen and shoon thou ne'er gav'st nane
The whinnies shall prick thee to the bare bane
Note the torments in The Lyke Wake Dirge are linked to failures of practical charity.
[ 25. November 2012, 07:23: Message edited by: Firenze ]
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
One does try in vain to imagine what debilitating illness Tiny Tim has that could be easily cured with Victorian era medicine. Cocaine withdrawal?
Scurvy ?
Malnutrition, lack of adequate clothing, cold? All of these things would interfere with the body's ability to heal itself.
Moo
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
One does try in vain to imagine what debilitating illness Tiny Tim has that could be easily cured with Victorian era medicine. Cocaine withdrawal?
Scurvy ?
Malnutrition, lack of adequate clothing, cold? All of these things would interfere with the body's ability to heal itself.
Moo
Rickets? - which, althought the Victorians wouldn't have known about such things, can often be alleviated by an increased intake of vitamin D.
What I'd like to know about is what we're often told is the "tradition" of telling ghost stories at Christmas - CC is, of course, a ghost story, one of several that Dickens wrote. While this certainly was a tradition in some places by the end of the 19th century, where did it come from? Was Dickens instrumental in getting it started, or was it already established by the time he wrote CC?
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
MAMILLIUS:A sad tale's best for winter: I have one
Of sprites and goblins.
HERMIONE:Let's have that, good sir.
Come on, sit down: come on, and do your best
To fright me with your sprites; you're powerful at it.
MAMILLIUS:There was a man--
HERMIONE:Nay, come, sit down; then on.
MAMILLIUS:Dwelt by a churchyard: I will tell it softly;
Yond crickets shall not hear it.
Which rather suggests that in Shakespeare's day sitting round the fireside scaring the bejabbers out of each other was not unknown.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
It might interest people that the celebration of Christmas was not universal in England in the early twentieth century. The reason I note this is that a church I used to go to was founding in the 1920s as a mission by Lancashire Congregationalists. As a fund raiser for the missions local churches were encouraged to hold fairs and such like on the 25th December.
Jengie
Posted by Horseman Bree (# 5290) on
:
quote:
Scrooge is representing the greedy owners of capital who exploit their employees as much as they can to maximise their personal wealth. Scrooge's redemption is inspirational to all of the other greedy so-and-sos who should see elements of themselves in Scrooge.
I had thought that the Leaders of Business and their lackeys (Thatcher, GWBush, Romney, Cameron...) were only trying to take things back to pre-WW1, but I see their history lesson goes back another 80 years or so.
Admittedly, they don't really want the nuisance of keeping slaves if the idea of a wage-slave will do.
Sorry, didn't mean to leave Evangeline's name out of this.
[ 25. November 2012, 15:34: Message edited by: Horseman Bree ]
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
As I said above, Dickens was writing CC at an extraordinarily scary time. An ancient, agrarian way of life, an old England that was still in many way continuous with the Middle Ages was being violently changed by industry and technology. There was strong pressure for electoral reform. Ireland was about to hit the worst episode of starvation and mass migration in its history. Given the Corn Laws, things were not that much better for the English poor.
The message is that the employer class need to attend to the workers, both at an indivual level (your specific Cratchit) but also generally -
This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased. Deny it!' cried the Spirit, stretching out its hand towards the city. 'Slander those who tell it ye! Admit it for your factious purposes, and make it worse! And abide the end!'
'Have they no refuge or resource?' cried Scrooge.
'Are there no prisons?' said the Spirit, turning on him for the last time with his own words. 'Are there no workhouses?'
Posted by Mullygrub (# 9113) on
:
Firenze, I'm so glad you mentioned the boy and girl -- I have long been saddened that two of the most important characters (types, rather than characters, perhaps?) in ACC (imo) are generally excluded from modern adaptations. Probably for space / clarity of the story, I'm sure, but still...
My reading of Dickens generally, and certainly ACC specifically, lends me to view his works as social commentary and a call to action first always, regardless of the particular subject matter (Christmas time / an anonymous benefactor and a crazy old spinster / lives intersecting and combusting (quite literally, in the case of one character ) in Chancery / etc / etc); and it would seem that as he got older, he was less inclined to cage his sharp and biting satire in the humour that he became known for. Or, perhaps (rather) this humour just grew in its bite.
ETA: No, "combusting" is not really a real word. But in the spirit of Dickens, I'm claiming it!
[ 25. November 2012, 23:52: Message edited by: Mullygrub ]
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
We did ACC in about 7 minutes with kids at church last year, but still included those two characters. Too important not to, especially the impact of the Spirit's reminding Scrooge of his own words.
Posted by Mullygrub (# 9113) on
:
Karl: I love you.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
Firenze, I'm so glad you mentioned the boy and girl -- I have long been saddened that two of the most important characters (types, rather than characters, perhaps?) in ACC (imo) are generally excluded from modern adaptations. Probably for space / clarity of the story, I'm sure, but still...
Yet, they have space to add a scene where Scrooge personally delivers the turkey to the Crachits' along with some toys for Tiny Tim.
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
Scrooge personally delivers the turkey to the Crachits' along with some toys for Tiny Tim.
Best part of the whole show. Lost it completely.
Posted by Foxymoron (# 10343) on
:
Ronald Hutton's magisterial "The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain" says that christmas was a massive sprawling twelve-day blow-out throughout the medieval period but post-reformation was frowned upon by the sort of puritans who believed that stained glass windows corrupt the soul. Over a period of 150 years or so christmas withered away due to the combined effect of continual pulpits denunciations and repeated reductions in the length of the holiday, until it was only one day off and hardly acknowledged as an official holiday at all. Parliament met on christmas day, although sarcastic questions were asked due to the regular dramatic drop in the number of MPs attending who all found reasons to be doing "important work in their constituencies" on that day.
So christmas is an original and ancient British festival, rather than something we only knocked up a couple of hundred years ago.
Posted by Lucrezia Spagliatoni Dayglo (# 16907) on
:
quote:
Yet, they have space to add a scene where Scrooge personally delivers the turkey to the Crachits' along with some toys for Tiny Tim. [Roll Eyes]
It was a Turkey! He never could have stood upon his legs, that bird. He would have snapped 'em short off in a minute, like sticks of sealing-wax. "Why, it's impossible to carry that to Camden Town," said Scrooge. "You must have a cab."
So poor Mrs Cratchit is presented with an enormous turkey which presumably she has to pluck and draw before cooking. She'll then have to fit it into her stove (something which many of us have faced on Christmas Day!)and roast the blighter. Presumably they all died from food poisoning
Posted by birdie (# 2173) on
:
You know, I've always thought that. (Speaking as someone who is most familiar with the Muppets' version of the story).
Were I Mrs Cratchit, and someone turned up with a huge, uncooked bird on my doorstep just before lunch on Christmas Day I strongly suspect my response would be along the lines of 'sod that, take us to the Ivy'.
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Foxymoron:
Over a period of 150 years or so christmas withered away due to the combined effect of continual pulpits denunciations and repeated reductions in the length of the holiday, until it was only one day off and hardly acknowledged as an official holiday at all.
Thank you! That really helps to explain it.
Posted by Lothiriel (# 15561) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mullygrub:
Firenze, I'm so glad you mentioned the boy and girl -- I have long been saddened that two of the most important characters (types, rather than characters, perhaps?) in ACC (imo) are generally excluded from modern adaptations. Probably for space / clarity of the story, I'm sure, but still...
This is one of the reasons that the Patrick Stewart film version is my favourite -- that scene is included.
Posted by Lothiriel (# 15561) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucrezia Spagliatoni Dayglo:
So poor Mrs Cratchit is presented with an enormous turkey which presumably she has to pluck and draw before cooking. She'll then have to fit it into her stove (something which many of us have faced on Christmas Day!)and roast the blighter. Presumably they all died from food poisoning
The fitting in the oven may not be such a huge problem -- I can't remember where I read this (maybe in notes in my edition of ACC?) -- but at that time, people would take their roasts to local bakeries for cooking. Since bread was baked in large, very hot ovens early in the day, these were available for people to roast their meat as the ovens slowly cooled down.
Posted by Lucrezia Spagliatoni Dayglo (# 16907) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by birdie
You know, I've always thought that. (Speaking as someone who is most familiar with the Muppets' version of the story). Were I Mrs Cratchit, and someone turned up with a huge, uncooked bird on my doorstep just before lunch on Christmas Day I strongly suspect my response would be along the lines of 'sod that, take us to the Ivy'.
I love the Muppets' version. I've always had visions of Miss Piggy ramming the turkey onto Scrooge's head, 'hiya!'
quote:
Originally posted by Lothiriel
The fitting in the oven may not be such a huge problem -- I can't remember where I read this (maybe in notes in my edition of ACC?) -- but at that time, people would take their roasts to local bakeries for cooking. Since bread was baked in large, very hot ovens early in the day, these were available for people to roast their meat as the ovens slowly cooled down.
Yes, I seem to remember reading/hearing something like that too. Knowing Mrs Cartchit's luck there would have been no room in the oven due to late arrival of her turkey!
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
What turkey? It's a goose, for goosdeness' sake.
The end of the introduction with Scrooge's vision of the moneylenders eternally tied to their money boxes is the most powerful justification of the doctrine of Hell that I know.
And Tiny Tim is surely the Christ child, redeeming through this sufferings.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
I try to imagine the effect a much disliked boss showing up with a turkey on Christmas Day would have on the mood of the family. I would think it would be very awkward.
Though in the book he just sends the turkey off and gets on with his day.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
I try to imagine the effect a much disliked boss showing up with a turkey on Christmas Day would have on the mood of the family. I would think it would be very awkward.
Though in the book he just sends the turkey off and gets on with his day.
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by k-mann:
quote:
Originally posted by Freddy:
I also wonder about Dickens' device of the spirits that visited Scrooge. Was this something commonly believed at the time? That is, that ghosts might speak to people, that they could show people their early lives, or that people could forge spiritual chains by the actions of their lives.
Not having lived at that period, I cannot know for sure, but I highly doubt it. I fail to see the necessary link, however, between believing in ghosts and believing "that people could forge spiritual chains by the actions of their lives."
Ghosts have always been a common belief - in biblical times and surely long before.
Some aspects of this, though, have special interest for me as a Swedenborgian.
Dickens had several close Swedenborgian friends. One was James John Garth Wilkinson. In 1841 the Swedenborg Society in London presented him with a copy of Swedenborg's "Heaven and Hell". He responded with thanks, assuring them "that he will not reject the book unexamined and that it shall have his most careful and attentive consideration."
This pro forma response is probably nothing more than politeness, and it has never occurred to me that anything in "Christmas Carol", published in 1843, reflected on that book. In Swedenborgianism spirits do not speak to people, and if they do it is not a good thing, as the Bible says.
But there are several things in ACC that, now that I think of it, may have been plucked from Heaven and Hell if they were not already common ideas:
- 1. Everyone is surrounded by spirits and angels, but they are invisible to us, as we are invisible to them. While communication with spirits is a bad thing, spirits do sometimes speak to people who lead very solitary lives, as did Scrooge (Heaven and Hell 249).
- 2. By the actions of their lives the wicked "become like one bound in chains. But as long as he lives in the world, he does not feel the chains" (Divine Providence 296).
- 3. Everything that a person has done and thought throughout the course of their life is recorded in their memory. After death these scenes can be "replayed", as happened to Scrooge, to show them the turning points of their life and help them know their own quality (Heaven and Hell 462).
I had always thought that these things were standard Christianity, or according to the standard popular view, but maybe not.
It never occurred to me that the enthusiasm for Christmas, the focus on Christian charity, and the universal warmth, love and happiness associated with the celebration of the Lord's birth was out of the ordinary for the time that ACC was written. So interesting.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
As far as the problem of roasting the turkey is concerned, I thought that kind of cooking was still done over open fires.
Moo
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
What turkey? It's a goose, for goosdeness' sake.
In some versions it does end up being a goose. But in the original it is a turkey:
quote:
``Do you know the Poulterer's, in the next street but one, at the corner?'' Scrooge inquired.
``I should hope I did,'' replied the lad.
``An intelligent boy!'' said Scrooge. ``A remarkable boy! Do you know whether they've sold the prize Turkey that was hanging up there? Not the little prize Turkey; the big one?''
``What, the one as big as me?'' returned the boy.
``What a delightful boy!'' said Scrooge. ``It's a pleasure to talk to him. Yes, my buck!''
``It's hanging there now,'' replied the boy.
If it wasn't already the common Christmas practice, it certainly caught on.
But the Cratchits did have a goose in Scrooge's vision with the Ghost of Christmas Present:
quote:
Master Peter, and the two ubiquitous young Cratchits went to fetch the goose, with which they soon returned in high procession.
Such a bustle ensued that you might have thought a goose the rarest of all birds; a feathered phenomenon, to which a black swan was a matter of course; and in truth it was something very like it in that house. Mrs Cratchit made the gravy (ready beforehand in a little saucepan) hissing hot; Master Peter mashed the potatoes with incredible vigour; Miss Belinda sweetened up the apple-sauce; Martha dusted the hot plates; Bob took Tiny Tim beside him in a tiny corner at the table; the two young Cratchits set chairs for everybody, not forgetting themselves, and mounting guard upon their posts, crammed spoons into their mouths, lest they should shriek for goose before their turn came to be helped.
I've never had goose. I imagine it is like duck.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
As far as the problem of roasting the turkey is concerned, I thought that kind of cooking was still done over open fires.
Moo
The poor in that day took their roastables to the baker for spell in the bread oven.
The soot from the Cratchit's coal fire would have made a slow roasted fowl inedible.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
If it wasn't already the common Christmas practice, it certainly caught on.
But the Cratchits did have a goose in Scrooge's vision with the Ghost of Christmas Present:
Turkey for Christmas was an instant hit the moment it hit Saint Henry's court. In the book the family has a miserable Christmas dinner of a very small goose, and someone comments how much they would rather have turkey for dinner.
The repentant Scrooge sends them the turkey they pine after.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I think someone (John Sutherland?) worked out that was why Bob Cratchit was late into work the following day. The time it would have taken to roast a bird that size would have meant the family didn't eat until around 2 am.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
I would think the effort Mrs. Cratchit would have invested in the goose went into the turkey instead. Depending on how early the turkey arrived, and I imagine Scrooge was a very early riser, she might not have even bought the goose yet.
One of my favorite scenes in the book is the market with all the piles of food.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
From the beginning of A Christmas Carol: quote:
"You will be haunted," resumed the Ghost, "by Three Spirits."
Scrooge's countenance fell almost as low as the Ghost's had done.
"Is that the chance and hope you mentioned, Jacob?" he demanded, in a faltering voice.
"It is."
"I -- I think I'd rather not," said Scrooge.
"Without their visits," said the Ghost, "you cannot hope to shun the path I tread. Expect the first tomorrow, when the bell tolls one."
"Couldn't I take `em all at once, and have it over, Jacob?" hinted Scrooge.
"Expect the second on the next night at the same hour. The third upon the next night when the last stroke of twelve has ceased to vibrate. Look to see me no more; and look that, for your own sake, you remember what has passed between us!"
Note three nights.
So what is with these? quote:
The Spirit dropped beneath it, so that the extinguisher covered its whole form; but though Scrooge pressed it down with all his force, he could not hide the light, which streamed from under it, in an unbroken flood upon the ground.
He was conscious of being exhausted, and overcome by an irresistible drowsiness; and, further, of being in his own bedroom. He gave the cap a parting squeeze, in which his hand relaxed; and had barely time to reel to bed, before he sank into a heavy sleep.
Then immediately: quote:
Awaking in the middle of a prodigiously tough snore, and sitting up in bed to get his thoughts together, Scrooge had no occasion to be told that the bell was again upon the stroke of One. He felt that he was restored to consciousness in the right nick of time, for the especial purpose of holding a conference with the second messenger dispatched to him through Jacob Marley's intervention.
As far as I can see, the same night as the evening he gave Bob Cratchit permission to have the next day off, not two or three days before. In fact, Scrooge doesn't even receive the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come back at his own house but when and where he is left by Christmas Present. I don't remember anyone mentioning this in my reading of commentaries. It seems like a strange gaffe. Or it must be that ghosts can squeeze three spectral nights into one earthly one.
Or it could be that Scrooge was right in the first place: these were very vivid, life-changing dreams, from the visit of Marley to that of Christmas Future caused by indigestion and inspired by the suggestive conversations with people he had talked to that day.
Oh, and one more thing. Scrooge seems to have a glimmer of generosity in his flinty old soul. He did give Cratchit a paid holiday.
Posted by Freddy (# 365) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyda*Rose:
I don't remember anyone mentioning this in my reading of commentaries. It seems like a strange gaffe. Or it must be that ghosts can squeeze three spectral nights into one earthly one.
I always thought it was a central "ah-hah" of the whole story.
The spirits were able to fit three nights into one night. Celestial time is different than earthly time.
All so that Scrooge can be reformed in time for Christmas.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
You obviously have a much more poetic soul than I, Freddy.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
"What's today, my fine fellow?" said Scrooge.
"Today!" replied the boy. "Why, Christmas Day."
"It's Christmas Day!" said Scrooge to himself. "I haven't missed it. The Spirits have done it all in one night. They an do anything they like. Of course they can. Of course they can..."
No mistake. It's in the story.
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on
:
Zach82 posted the following on a different thread. I think it was meant to be here:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82
I was under the impression that the visitations took place over three Christmases. The Ghost of Christmas Present doesn't bugger off until after a children's 12th night party.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
Oops. Sorry.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Originally posted by Zach82 quote:
I was under the impression that the visitations took place over three Christmases. The Ghost of Christmas Present doesn't bugger off until after a children's 12th night party.
I don't think that would work. Anyone one Christmas can have a Past, Present and Future, but if you had a series the various spirits would have to double up various manifestations depending on whether it was 'their' Christmas.
Meanwhile Tiny Tim would have been having an uncommonly lingering end even for a child of Victorian fiction.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Why can't people read the book? Il n'y a pas de hors-texte.
Marley visits Scrooge on Christmas Eve and the Spirits visit him during one night. He awakes in time with the church bells ringing for Christmas Day to buy a goose (at Leadenhall Market presumably) to send to the Cratchits in time for Christmas dinner, which he has already viewed in advance in an alternative reality.
Dickens was fairly hostile to what is often called "organised religion", but there are a whole number of significant religious references throughout the book, which are likely to be overlooked in the light of the present secular view of Christmas. When he does quote scripture in his other works, it is often very moving (Mrs Gummidge of all people in David Copperfield)
[ETA Translation link, "il n'y a pas de hors-texte" = There is nothing outside the text, please remember to translate foreign phrases - DT, Purgatory Host]
[ 27. November 2012, 05:41: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Whoops. Just looked up the book. Scrooge does send a turkey to the the Cratchits on Christmas Day. I wasn't reading the text. Apologies.
And it is Sutherland who calculated the cooking time.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Why can't people read the book? Il n'y a pas de hors-texte.
Which, being translated, means?
---
We have a 2-CD set purporting to be the Patrick Stewart one-man stage play. After Scrooge's "conversion" he portrays him walking into a church and singing a stanza of a hymn. I couldn't find that in the text. Is there an ur-text out of which it was left? Or a later text that it was added into? Our book has an inscription with the date 1913.
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on
:
Sutherland suggests that perhaps Scrooge knew the turkey would make Bob late. He deliberately engineers this as a practical joke so that he can pretend to be angry with Bob before raising his salary...
Posted by Lola (# 627) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Why can't people read the book? Il n'y a pas de hors-texte.
Marley visits Scrooge on Christmas Eve and the Spirits visit him during one night. He awakes in time with the church bells ringing for Christmas Day to buy a goose (at Leadenhall Market presumably) to send to the Cratchits in time for Christmas dinner, which he has already viewed in advance in an alternative reality.
Dickens was fairly hostile to what is often called "organised religion", but there are a whole number of significant religious references throughout the book, which are likely to be overlooked in the light of the present secular view of Christmas. When he does quote scripture in his other works, it is often very moving (Mrs Gummidge of all people in David Copperfield)
Yes - I am always in bits over Mrs Blinder and the three orphaned childern of the debt collector and her "t'aint much to forgive 'em the rent" and how he notes that in as much as it was done for the least of these she would one day find it was indeed much. Dickens mostly likes doctors over clergy but he has good and bad of both and his concern for the poor and marginalised is sincere. I believe he once tried to write a children's Bible too.
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
What turkey? It's a goose, for goosdeness' sake.
The end of the introduction with Scrooge's vision of the moneylenders eternally tied to their money boxes is the most powerful justification of the doctrine of Hell that I know.
Yes: and in distress because they now wish to relieve the want that they see but have no means of doing so. A very powerful passage which is much to Dickens' credit both as a writer and as a man.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
---
We have a 2-CD set purporting to be the Patrick Stewart one-man stage play. After Scrooge's "conversion" he portrays him walking into a church and singing a stanza of a hymn. I couldn't find that in the text. Is there an ur-text out of which it was left? Or a later text that it was added into? Our book has an inscription with the date 1913.
Scrooge's activity on Christmas Day, after meeting the men to whom, the day before, he had refused a request for a gift to charity:
'He went to church, and walked along the streets, and watched the people hurrying to and fro and patted the children on the head...etc.'
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on
:
Interesting. Dickens may have been ambivalent about organised religion but he did rent a pew in the chapel at The Foundling Hospital and was a regular attender at services there. He supported the Hospital a great deal and lived nearby on Doughty Street.
I get the impression that he wasn't antagonistic about religion per se but just some of the kant and hypocrisy that can surround it ... which might apply to most of us I s'pose (ie. our own attitudes towards religion of whatever form and our own kant and hyprocrisy ...)
One could argue that Dickens was off-kilter in his own personal morality - viz Ellen Terry - but generally I'd suggest he was on the side of the angels.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
One could argue that Dickens was off-kilter in his own personal morality - viz Ellen Terry -.
Now there's a bit of scandal has never made it into the biographies.... One just hopes Nelly Ternan never got to hear about it.
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on
:
Ellen Ternan, not Terry. And his treatment of his wife was appalling.
However the few scriptural references in the other works are very telling. There's a very good clergyman, Frank Milvey, in Our Mutual Friend.
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on
:
Whoops ...
My bad, as the Americans say.
Serves me right for posting in a hurry.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
---
We have a 2-CD set purporting to be the Patrick Stewart one-man stage play. After Scrooge's "conversion" he portrays him walking into a church and singing a stanza of a hymn. I couldn't find that in the text. Is there an ur-text out of which it was left? Or a later text that it was added into? Our book has an inscription with the date 1913.
Scrooge's activity on Christmas Day, after meeting the men to whom, the day before, he had refused a request for a gift to charity:
'He went to church, and walked along the streets, and watched the people hurrying to and fro and patted the children on the head...etc.'
That doesn't say he sang a stanza of a hymn. Did you read what I wrote?
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
mousethief, when you say in this production Scrooge sang a stanza of a hymn, what were the details? For example: Was it an empty church, he goes in, sings a stanza, leaves? During a service, he happens to stop in while a hymn is in progress, sings a stanza, leaves? Or was it indicated in the production that he attended an entire church service (or more than just the single stanza of a hymn), but they only showed the one stanza? Or something else?
How would you dramatize "he went to church"?
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
IIRC, Scrooge (Stewart) came in late during the Christmas service while a hymn was being sung. He had to politely nudge his way into a pew, and then sang with gusto. I think it was inferred that he stayed for the rest of the service.
Posted by Kaplan Corday (# 16119) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
kant and hypocrisy
Well, yes, some have drawn connections between Kantianism and Christianity….sorry, we all make typos, but I couldn’t resist it.
(One of my university lecturers, who had a thick Czech accent, used to provoke unseemly mirth by his pronunciation of that philosopher's name).
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
He was never worried about Unitarianism, and met with one of its churches for some time.
His The Life Of Our Lord, written for children, is not only scripturally inaccurate (he describes Herodias, not Salome, as a “fine dancer”!), but contains hints of universalism (“Heaven, where we hope to go, and all to meet each other”) and Adoptianism (the infant Jesus “will grow up to be so good that God will love Him as His own Son”).
It is non-soteriological (“It is Christianity to DO GOOD ALWAYS” because ”people who have done good all their lives long will go to Heaven”), and one good thing for which a child should pray is, “Make me kind to my servants”.
He not only (almost certainly) had an affair with Ellen Ternan, but also told a friend that he would find it strange if his sons did not experiment sexually before marriage, and tried to attract some other friends down to a holiday at Broadstairs by promising to point out to them the house where the local prostitutes lived.
[ 26. November 2012, 20:26: Message edited by: Kaplan Corday ]
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
mousethief, when you say in this production Scrooge sang a stanza of a hymn, what were the details? For example: Was it an empty church, he goes in, sings a stanza, leaves? [etc]
[transcribing from the mp3...]
Scrooge found himself near the open door of a church. He went inside, and for the first time as a man, he joined his voice to those of his fellow creatures in a Christmas hymn:
God rest you m... gentlemen, let nothing you dismay
Remember Christ your saviour was born on Christmas day
To save good souls from Satan's power when they had gone astray
Oh tidings of comfort and joy
Oh tidings of comfort and joy
Afterwards, he walked about the streets...
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
If it is morally loose to DO GOOD ALWAYS and be kind to one's inferiors, I'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more moral looseness in our churches today.
Posted by PaulBC (# 13712) on
:
mousethirf right on the mark
Posted by Kaplan Corday (# 16119) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
If it is morally loose to DO GOOD ALWAYS and be kind to one's inferiors, I'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more moral looseness in our churches today.
Inferiors?
Posted by Imersge Canfield (# 17431) on
:
Very inspiring and up-lifting thread.
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
To a certain extent, making the book about just Christmas is to miss the point. Dickens is looking at the spirit at the center of Christmas: generosity to others and gratitude for what one has in life. Dickens hardly mentions Jesus, for he seems to have found the value of Christmas in those virtues instead.
There is much to Zach82's observation. The spirit of Christmas is not primarily a religious one--and so neither are the 3 Spirits who visit Scrooge. The legend is that Dickens saved Christmas with his story and that is debatable. But if the prevailing attitude at the time was that Christmas was just a religious celebration and nothing more, then its strength and viability would be directly related to the strength and viability of religion. Dickens, however, separated it from formal religion and focused on what I would call the true point of Christmas--Love. Love of others (as shown by reformed Scrooge's charitable contributions); love of friends and colleagues (his care of Cratchitt and wee sicko Tim); and love of family (Fred and his wife). This is what saves the celebration of Christmas
In fact, one of my favorite bits is Scrooge surprising his nephew by simply coming to be with him. Scrooge accidentally startles Fred's wife and the story adds that he had forgotten she was sitting in the corner and, if he had remembered, would never have done it on any account. He shows love to her as well even to the part of regretting that he has startled her.
Even today, around this time, it is always the fashion to start "keep Christ in Christmas" campaigns and insist that everybody get religious--but that has always seemed to me to miss the point. The point is Love. Rather than religious division, we need to keep Love in Christmas and, in so doing, we accomplish God's desire for what is God but Love? As Kris Kringle states in Miracle on 34th Street, Christmas isn't a day--it's a frame of mind. That is what Scrooge discovers and what, God willing, we all will discover.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
If it is morally loose to DO GOOD ALWAYS and be kind to one's inferiors, I'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more moral looseness in our churches today.
Inferiors?
Don't go self-righteous on me. You know what I mean.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
Even today, around this time, it is always the fashion to start "keep Christ in Christmas" campaigns and insist that everybody get religious--but that has always seemed to me to miss the point.
There is a scene when Scrooge thinks the Ghost of Christmas Present must support those pious people campaigning to close bakeries on Christmas Day, and the Ghost sternly insists they have nothing to do with him, for it would deprive poor people of a hot Christmas dinner.
Posted by Mudfrog (# 8116) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Hedgehog:
quote:
Originally posted by Zach82:
To a certain extent, making the book about just Christmas is to miss the point. Dickens is looking at the spirit at the center of Christmas: generosity to others and gratitude for what one has in life. Dickens hardly mentions Jesus, for he seems to have found the value of Christmas in those virtues instead.
There is much to Zach82's observation. The spirit of Christmas is not primarily a religious one--and so neither are the 3 Spirits who visit Scrooge. The legend is that Dickens saved Christmas with his story and that is debatable. But if the prevailing attitude at the time was that Christmas was just a religious celebration and nothing more, then its strength and viability would be directly related to the strength and viability of religion. Dickens, however, separated it from formal religion and focused on what I would call the true point of Christmas--Love. Love of others (as shown by reformed Scrooge's charitable contributions); love of friends and colleagues (his care of Cratchitt and wee sicko Tim); and love of family (Fred and his wife). This is what saves the celebration of Christmas
In fact, one of my favorite bits is Scrooge surprising his nephew by simply coming to be with him. Scrooge accidentally startles Fred's wife and the story adds that he had forgotten she was sitting in the corner and, if he had remembered, would never have done it on any account. He shows love to her as well even to the part of regretting that he has startled her.
Even today, around this time, it is always the fashion to start "keep Christ in Christmas" campaigns and insist that everybody get religious--but that has always seemed to me to miss the point. The point is Love. Rather than religious division, we need to keep Love in Christmas and, in so doing, we accomplish God's desire for what is God but Love? As Kris Kringle states in Miracle on 34th Street, Christmas isn't a day--it's a frame of mind. That is what Scrooge discovers and what, God willing, we all will discover.
Or, as per the quoted Christmas Carol - 'God rest ye merry, Gentlemen' - Remember Christ our Saviour was born on Christmas Day.
That's what Christmas is about, not some Christmas movies 'Kris-Kringle-love-is-what-Xmas-is-all-about' sentimental mulch.
I speak as one whose front room is made to look like a grotto at Christmas, including a 7' tree with 200 lights on it - but if it weren't for Jesus it would be a very empty celebration indeed; even with the charitable work we do.
Posted by Zach82 (# 3208) on
:
quote:
Even today, around this time, it is always the fashion to start "keep Christ in Christmas" campaigns and insist that everybody get religious--but that has always seemed to me to miss the point.
There is a scene when Scrooge thinks the Ghost of Christmas Present must support those pious people campaigning to close bakeries on Christmas Day, and the Ghost sternly insists they have nothing to do with him, for it would deprive poor people of a hot Christmas dinner.
Posted by Kaplan Corday (# 16119) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
If it is morally loose to DO GOOD ALWAYS and be kind to one's inferiors, I'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more moral looseness in our churches today.
Inferiors?
Don't go self-righteous on me. You know what I mean.
If querying the designation of other human beings as 'inferiors' constitutes 'self-righteousness', then i'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more self-righteousness.
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Kaplan Corday:
Dickens’s Christianity was both theologically and morally loose.
If it is morally loose to DO GOOD ALWAYS and be kind to one's inferiors, I'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more moral looseness in our churches today.
Inferiors?
Don't go self-righteous on me. You know what I mean.
If querying the designation of other human beings as 'inferiors' constitutes 'self-righteousness', then i'd say we could do with a hell of a lot more self-righteousness.
Cute deflection from the gross inadequacies of your stated positions. Okay since you like being self-righteous and pretending you don't understand plain English, I will explain it in small words. I mean people who make a lot less than you, or who are on public assistance --sorry, help--, or are of a lower social class. Get it? Get it? Done being self righteous now? Care to defend your outrageous claim that his morals are loose?
No?
Didn't think so.
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on
:
Mousethief - I was lucky enough to see Patrick Stewart's one-man show. It's a show rather than a straight reading. The bit I will always remember is the Fezziwigs' party, where he managed to show Scrooge dancing in a ring with the other guests, purely through mime. He was giving his hand to the next dancer, then passing them - and then lowered his hand as if the dancer was a child. I really 'saw' the other dancers in my mind's eye.
Stewart's audiobook version is great too.
The Muppet version is wonderful - captures the spirit (ha!) perfectly.
And for Brits, the 'I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue' parody version is great fun.
Posted by Mullygrub (# 9113) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Gill H:
The Muppet version is wonderful - captures the spirit (ha!) perfectly.
Indeed! I love it, too, and was dismayed when the DVD came out, sans this sweet little bit of fluff and pathos. Michael Cain's verse three gets me every time
(Actually, I'm doing a gig this week wherein I shall expose the masses to this song, lightly samba-ed up )
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
Or, as per the quoted Christmas Carol - 'God rest ye merry, Gentlemen' - Remember Christ our Saviour was born on Christmas Day.
That's what Christmas is about, not some Christmas movies 'Kris-Kringle-love-is-what-Xmas-is-all-about' sentimental mulch.
I speak as one whose front room is made to look like a grotto at Christmas, including a 7' tree with 200 lights on it - but if it weren't for Jesus it would be a very empty celebration indeed; even with the charitable work we do.
On the contrary, that "sentimental mulch" is what Jesus came to teach us. Celebrating Jesus without love is what would be a hollow and pointless celebration. But acting with love, even by those who have never heard of Jesus, is still touched by the hand and spirit of God. Love is the keystone.
Posted by Mullygrub (# 9113) on
:
And by the way,
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Why can't people read the book? Il n'y a pas de hors-texte.
quote:
Whoops. [snip] I wasn't reading the text. Apologies.
How refreshing. I'm glad to see that my previously developing opinion of you as an ungracious jerk was perhaps premature.
And ETA: what Mousethief said re: translation.
[ 27. November 2012, 02:20: Message edited by: Mullygrub ]
Posted by Kaplan Corday (# 16119) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
plain English, I will explain it in small words. I mean people who make a lot less than you, or who are on public assistance --sorry, help--, or are of a lower social class.
I quite seriously can't think of anyone these days whose "plain English" would run to referring to such pople as "inferiors", but it does contribute a Victorian ambience for talking about Dickens - countless people would not have hesitated to use the term in his day.
quote:
Done being self righteous now?
Can't help it - it's my left-wing moral vanity.
quote:
Care to defend your outrageous claim that his morals are loose?
Mea culpa.
Genuine remorse and apologies for failing to do what I am always criticising others for doing, ie equating morality with sexual morality.
In the narrow sexual sense, there is an overwhelming case that Dickens was not only immoral but a hypocrite.
In the broader picture of morality as a whole, Dickens was, of course a moral giant.
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0