Thread: Olympics and Paralympics 2012 Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=024440
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
After 4 years and innumerable Hell threads, the Olympics are upon us. Consider this a thread for discussing the sporting and television spectacle aspects of the Olympics. If you want to gripe about traffic, ticket prices, or the Olympics being all about the money or nationalism, take it to another board.
Competition actually starts today, with the first games in the Women's Association Football tournament. This isn't a two-team show any more. The U.S. Women actually started the tournament by letting France jump to a 2-0 lead in the first half of their game. It is currently 2-2 at the half, and hopefully that was the only wake-up call they will need.
I'm looking forward to the swimming events, even though I am not a lap swimmer, as a local woman is expected to dominate in the pool this year. And despite NBC's belief that no amount of gymnastics is too much, I am kind of dreading the constant gymnastics coverage.
What are you looking forward to?
[Edited thread title. iF]
[ 14. August 2012, 13:58: Message edited by: Imaginary Friend ]
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
I'm looking forward to it all I think (apart from maybe the boxing) But I'm really going to enjoy
- The Cycling - especially the road race (come on Cav) and the track events.
- The Sailing - Looking forward to seeing Ben Ainslie win again
- The swimming, especially the women's 400m individual medley (as I taught the British swimmer!)
And probably the rest of it. I'm looking forward to watching all the events and the fact that the BBC has around 15 extra channels!
Tom
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
Right at the moment Team GB has a 100% record! The women's football team beat New Zealand 1-0 at Cardiff (a well-known London suburb).
eta: In a weird way I'm looking forward to the archery which is to be held at Lords, or #1 cricket ground. Jonathan Agnew, the BBC's cricket correspondent is the man with the Mike but I'm blowed if I know how you do commentary on archery: 'Yes, he's hit the Frenchman on the horse'. Otherwise, it's got to be the cycling. That is so tense, especially as we're against the Aussies most of the time.
We won't mention the 'Wrong Korean flag' debacle at Hampden Park, because this is the sport thread, isn't it?
[ 25. July 2012, 21:45: Message edited by: Sioni Sais ]
Posted by AristonAstuanax (# 10894) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
eta: In a weird way I'm looking forward to the archery which is to be held at Lords, or #1 cricket ground. Jonathan Agnew, the BBC's cricket correspondent is the man with the Mike but I'm blowed if I know how you do commentary on archery: 'Yes, he's hit the Frenchman on the horse'.
Much as I'd like to hear that (or, well, have the possibility of that commentary), I'd imagine archery commentary would be a lot like golf—lots of whispering about form, general discussion about weather and the course, and post-mortem stuff about how groups are falling out and what person X needs to do to have a good end. Really, golf and archery (especially field archery) aren't that different, once you strip away the parts that obviously are.
I swear that last sentence makes sense.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
I get what you are saying- just formalized versions of the old "I bet I can hit that object on the other side of the field with this projectile" game. I had a summer job for several years where that game was the main source of entertainment.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
The first World Record of this Olympic Games has just been beaten! quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
We won't mention the 'Wrong Korean flag' debacle at Hampden Park, because this is the sport thread, isn't it?
That could lead us into the territory of baiting the British, which is a favourite sport of many nations including Australia. Did anybody count the number of stars on the right hand side of the flag at NZ's soccer game last night to check it was four and not five?
I shall be watching the first event where Kazakhstan wins a gold medal with great interest to see what anthem the British officials use.
[ 26. July 2012, 02:06: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on
:
Originally posted by Tom Day
quote:
The swimming, especially the women's 400m individual medley (as I taught the British swimmer!)
This is the event I'll be watching, to cheer on our local hero Hannah Miley! It's given me a real buzz to go to my local 25m pool and see the sign "Lane reserved for Olympic Athlete Training" up.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
I shall be watching the first event where Kazakhstan wins a gold medal with great interest to see what anthem the British officials use.
Apart from those Commonwealth nations that still use GSTQ I expect the only one we will definitely get right will be for Liechtenstein, which uses the same tune. Then again, we could mis-spell the name or use the Luxembourg anthem instead.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
I always look forward to the athletics. The UK team don't have many chances this time; Ennis is probably even-money for the heptathlon gold, Farah will win some colour of medal in the middle distance races, but track and field seems unlikely to be all that great for the UK this time. But bring on the Bolt! He's got much closer competition this time.
I'm looking forward to the triathlons (which don't really count as track and field), thinking that UK's Alistair Brownlee has a great chance in the men's event.
Team GB will win their usual hatful in cycling, sailing and rowing. We're good at sports where you sit down on (or in) something.
But I always spend a lot of time looking at the minority sports (archery, taekwondo, volleyball etc). Not too many opportunities to see those outside the Olympics.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
quote:
I'm blowed if I know how you do commentary on archery: 'Yes, he's hit the Frenchman on the horse'.
Is this likely to happen?!! I thought Horseguards Parade was quite a long way away from Lord's...
I'm looking forward to the equestrian events and the gymnastics, but I might watch the diving as well...
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
[no idea where Greenwich Park is in relation to Lord's though...]
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Originally posted by Tom Day
quote:
The swimming, especially the women's 400m individual medley (as I taught the British swimmer!)
This is the event I'll be watching, to cheer on our local hero Hannah Miley! It's given me a real buzz to go to my local 25m pool and see the sign "Lane reserved for Olympic Athlete Training" up.
I am sure that lots of people will be hoping that someone can dethrone the current champion, amateur bikini model and tweeting while drunk after school special Stephanie Rice.
I do get a kick out of the USA-Australia swimming rivalry. Unlike the East Germans when I was a kid, there is nothing political about it. Just the two big loud kids on the block tangling with one another.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
'Yes, he's hit the Frenchman on the horse'.
Due to budget restrictions, we're running two events of the Modern Pentathlon together.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Due to the English weather there will probably be a rerun of that great spectator sport, Women's Beach Volleyball In The Rain.
Four years ago the semi-final between the USA and ... erm ... there must have been another team, but the American girls were so hot I didn't notice them. They may have been in red.
Anyway, girls in skimpy white uniforms soaking wet is the nearest thing to soft porn that they can show on TV at that time of day.
I now need a cold shower just for thinking about it.
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
We were looking at what tickets were left last night, you can still get ones for the Womens Beach Volleyball semi's. But Anne wouldn't let me spend £300 on a ticket!
Tom
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
The problem is you cannot guarantee rain.
Posted by The Rogue (# 2275) on
:
Could the local Fire Brigade be called on to help out in the event of dry weather?
Opening Ceremony tonight and youngest Rogueling is excited because she will get to stay up for it. I reckon she'll probably fall asleep at some point, though.
We've got some athletics tickets and so will be popping down at some point and once we're in the grounds we ain't leaving.
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on
:
What did we all think of the opening ceremony? For what it's worth, I thought it was almost entirely brilliant.
The montage of Proper British Rock Music™ was just as it should have been, the cauldron for the flame was a work of art and Sir Steve Redgrave was absolutely the right person to bring in the torch.
The James Bond bit and Chariots of Fire IMHO were strokes of pure genius.
Boris was right - we'll do it in our own, very particularly British way.
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
I loved it. It had a sense of humour, showed off britishness and was very well put together. The torch lighting was lovely - I loved the Olympic stars giving 'their' right to light the flame to others - a great touch. However, Paul McCartney does need to be left of the invitation list to these things... Please...
Looking forward to Cav today - come on the Manx Misslie
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
No problem with McCartney here. What could be more British than to end with a singalong, and the final section of Hey Jude is the ultimte sing along.
I was impressed with the Industrialisation of the rural landscape. Although I'd guessed that the copper petals were going to make up the Cauldron, I was still astounded at the way it was pulled off. Beautiful.
Does anyone know what time the Road Race is due to finish? I've got things to do and don't want to miss Cav. (Seriously thinking of getting the t-shirt.)
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
I've got things to do and don't want to miss Cav.
Best way to avoid missing Cav would be to watch the bunch go past and wait for the riders who got dropped on Box Hill. The only question is on which lap he'll get dropped?
With small five man teams and no radios, he won't have the luxury of a full-sized team controlling the race for him like he had at the World Championships last year.
[ 28. July 2012, 09:35: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on
:
60-odd kilometers to go, Team GB looking easy on the front of the peloton, gap to the leaders under a minute, one climb to go. Not looking so good for your boys, is it tgc?
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Just about everybody else who has a top sprinter also has somebody in the break. When we have Stuart O'Grady out in that group (he's a good sprinter) then of course our other guys (including Cav's regular team captain!) wouldn't be wanting to chase it down!
Why didn't anybody from Team (G)B go into the break to give them two options for the win instead of one? Surely that would have been good for somebody like Millar or the UK national champion Stannard?
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Will Cav win the sprint for 33rd place?
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
I hadn't realised how odd long cycling is. It's almost more like a massive multiperson prisoners-dilemna/chicken than a straight sport.
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on
:
Yeah, Jay-Emm, that's about right. It's what it makes it so fascinating.
And can someone bring me some fries to go with my humble pie?
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on
:
Although I have to say, I am pretty happy for Vino.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Kazakhstan greatest country in the world
All other countries are run by little girls...
Well done to Vinokourov, to six-time Olympian and tactics king Stuart O'Grady in 5th position for orchestrating the winning move on the way out of London in the morning, and to Andre Greipel for denying Team B even the chance to lead the second peleton over the line!
[ 28. July 2012, 14:52: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on
:
I tell you what though, I'm surprised more people don't cycle in London - the traffic looked wonderful today.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
They didn't even need to use the lane reserved for the Olympics, the other two lanes were empty!
I don't think the Women's Road Race on the same course (but with only two laps of the Surrey circuit, not nine) will be any more successful for Britain or Oz, except that Judith Arndt winning would be success by association for GreenEDGE if she carries on her good one-day form.
I hope Cancellara is okay for the ITT in a couple of days, that title would lose a little lustre if the defending champion couldn't compete well.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Just about everybody else who has a top sprinter also has somebody in the break. When we have Stuart O'Grady out in that group (he's a good sprinter) then of course our other guys (including Cav's regular team captain!) wouldn't be wanting to chase it down!
Why didn't anybody from Team (G)B go into the break to give them two options for the win instead of one? Surely that would have been good for somebody like Millar or the UK national champion Stannard?
It looked like Team GB had no Plan B, and as you suggested less information than they have on the professional tours.
Plan A failed because when the final move had to be made few other teams were willing to haul the leading group back in, and the leaders kept the pace going, despite the crash and some dithering when a break was hauled in.
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
I like medal tables at the start of the games, before statistics overweighs the luck of the ordering.
At the moment the Korea's if they hadn't been messed about by the great powers almost match China, America or ex USSR. Classical-Europe is a bit lagging but has a large number of countries up there.
And tomorrow will change.
[removed pointless, and not even relevent repetition of previous post]
[ 28. July 2012, 17:19: Message edited by: Jay-Emm ]
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Imaginary Friend:
Although I have to say, I am pretty happy for Vino.
Vino the unrepentant blood doper? I'm not happy.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Come on, it's not like any of them are ever genuinely sorry for anything other than being caught. It's not like David Millar would have fessed up to cheating his way to multiple World Time Trial Championship wins if he wasn't caught, and yet he was still selected by the British team. Going on your standards of not being happy for Vino, I think it's reasonable to be bloody ecstatic none of the tainted GB guys even managed to make the first peleton.
Stones in glass houses.
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
The problem is you cannot guarantee rain.
Oh I think you can .
But it matters not . The athletes who aren't already obliged to immerse themselves in water no doubt appreciate some good old British rain to keep them cool.
The diving is my favorite event . I wonder if there'll be WBVB in Heaven ?
[ 29. July 2012, 11:13: Message edited by: rolyn ]
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
Due to the English weather there will probably be a rerun of that great spectator sport, Women's Beach Volleyball In The Rain.
Four years ago the semi-final between the USA and ... erm ... there must have been another team, but the American girls were so hot I didn't notice them. They may have been in red.
Anyway, girls in skimpy white uniforms soaking wet is the nearest thing to soft porn that they can show on TV at that time of day.
I now need a cold shower just for thinking about it.
In that case, the male gymnasts should have to compete bare-chested. That'd give a bit of something-for-everyone-ness.
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
Went to see both cycle road cycle races in SW London. Surprising how moving it is to see it in the flesh, something about humanity coming together for a common purpose. Tears in the eyes, and I wasn't the only one.
Apparently, the men's race yesterday drew a crowd of a million.
Then went home, and tried to follow the intricacies of road racing tactics. Hard luck, Cav.
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Imaginary Friend:
Yeah, Jay-Emm, that's about right. It's what it makes it so fascinating.
And can someone bring me some fries to go with my humble pie?
Understood it this time (it helps that the commentary didn't describe everything with the hindsight of a British win).
They really are amazing, so close, and it must be heart-wrenching for the punctured.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Watching the slalom canoeing. The New Zealand boat looks really good with the leaf emblem on the bottom. Though I'm not sure we are supposed to be seeing it from that angle.
The Brits are cutting it fine, leaving it to the last run to qualify for the semi-finals in both the C1 and K1. Nail biting, but that's the most exciting way.
And on the bikes, congratulations to Lizzie Armitstead on a Silver for Yorkshire.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
The women's road race was great and in the end the best rider won it. The silver for GB was well earned, but Vos was definitely the boss (as expected).
So far as the men's race is concerned, no point in moaning. I don't think you can win the Olympic road race using large team tactics - nor can you expect peloton co-operation either. All rounders will always have a better chance than the specialist sprinters.
Looks like Cancellara will make the time trial and I hope he's in good shape. Wiggins and Froome too. They were pretty knackered after the road race. By contrast Tony Martin took it easy - which may make him favourite now, after all that happened. Still like to see Wiggins do it, but I think the odds have lengthened now.
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on
:
I went to the women's medal fencing session of the foil competition. It was fantastic to watch, one match was literally won on the last second. In the end of was an italian bronze, silver and gold. Visibility was better than I expected, didn't need to use the binoculars I'd brought with me even though I was on the back row. And they had screens showing slow-mo replays of disputed points etc.
Really enjoyable experience and the travel to and across London was absolutely fantastic - plus I only had to queue three minutes at security at the Excel. If you have the option to pick up one of the remaining tickets on the Olympic website I'd strongly recommend it. I think there are still some sensibly priced tickets going for Taekwondo.
At the moment I am back home watching the British women win beach volley ball - not entirely sure about the benny hill music they keep playing when they sort out the pitch ...
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Leave them out there
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
I'm surprised that there hasn't been any comment on here about Team (G)B's first match in the Women's Basketball tournament. Are there no basketball fans on the Ship?
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
Leave them out there
Hmmm, more evidence they thought they were still in a major stage race with big trade teams and other sprinters who would be looking for points.
The crowds who came out for the cycling were definitely a huge positive, even if they were artificially inflated by it happening a week after the success of Wiggins and company in France. The previous time British spectators had a top-level international peleton compete there was for two stages of the Tour de France in 2007, which makes me thankful for having the UCI World Tour running a race in my backyard every January. If somebody in Britain is looking to establish a major race on the UCI Pro Continental Tour or even the World Tour they will definitely be able to make a case for there being good public support.
Posted by Mr Clingford (# 7961) on
:
Yes, it was good to have the opportunity to watch the cyclists in person and try and spot the famous as they shot past even if I was only able to work out who they were when I got home. I went to Box Hill and watched the field go by 5 times.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
It's always good to see a competitor exemplifying the principle that it is more important to take part than to win.
So let's hear it for sculler Hammadou Djibo Issaka of Niger, one of Africa's driest countries. For a novice I don't think he's got a bad action, though his back needs to straighten more and, yes, he needs a few more strokes/minute.
nb, it's a video so it might not work outside the UK.
[ 30. July 2012, 08:26: Message edited by: Sioni Sais ]
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
3 days in, and I think, by and large, that the coverage and the organisation of these games has been fantastic. I am particularly impressed by the archery, because I have done some archery and know something about it. It is also not considered the peak of sporting excitement*. However, i have seen a lot of comments from people who have enjoyed it, and the coverage means that those of us who enjoy watching it can do so without it getting in the way of others.
And it is lovely to see some very definitively British scenery behind the sports, in the outdoor ones. Actually, the Lords pavilion behind the Archery is awesome.
London 2012 so far: Exceptional.
*Most people would consider it the most boring.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
fuckin'ell, the men's gymnastics is all rather exciting - and not just because of the array of rather hot blokes on offer.
It looks like the UK guys have a possibility of a medal - they're the first UK team to qualify in modern-type gymnastics for an Olympic final, so to be in a tight run-off with Ukraine for a bronze is great for them - and is proving exciting to watch. I think the commentators might explode with excitement in a second - Matt Baker is beside himself.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
They got a medal - that's amazing for them.
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on
:
I say it now so that I am not accused of prophecy after the event.
But I absolutely hate the thought of the BBC commentaries on the athletics.
Sychophantic to the point of nauseous. Such is past experience.
An athlete is expected to "medal". ( Since when have we resorted to changing nouns into verbs?)
Named athelete comes in 5th.
BBC "lovelies" fall over themselves to talk excitedly of a brilliant, brave, unlucky, performance.
I can't bear to either watch or listen. We have already had 3 Golds dashed and its only Day 2.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
I say it now so that I am not accused of prophecy after the event.
But I absolutely hate the thought of the BBC commentaries on the athletics.
Sychophantic to the point of nauseous. Such is past experience.
An athlete is expected to "medal". ( Since when have we resorted to changing nouns into verbs?)
Named athelete comes in 5th.
BBC "lovelies" fall over themselves to talk excitedly of a brilliant, brave, unlucky, performance.
I can't bear to either watch or listen. We have already had 3 Golds dashed and its only Day 2.
Are we in Hell? No. What a shame, I'd better not comment.
Posted by Starbug (# 15917) on
:
I really enjoyed Matt Baker's commentary. He had just the right mix of knowledge and enthusiasm. Not sure why it should be called sycophantic.
As for the female commentator (Ms Stills, I think?), I have no idea what she looks like, but she was equally knowledgeable.
Shame it wasn't a silver, though!
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
I'm surprised that there hasn't been any comment on here about Team (G)B's first match in the Women's Basketball tournament. Are there no basketball fans on the Ship?
I watched the first half of the USA-Serbia Women's Basketball game. They were saying that the USA got off to a slow start because they had not had ample time to acquaint themselves to the court. No mention of the scene from Hoosiers where Gene Hackman famously measures the court at the state final venue to show that it is no different than the court back in Hickory.
I also got to catch some water polo, which was entertaining. Do the guys up front on the attack ever get the ball? As far as I could tell, one guy swam near the goal and attempted to avoid drowning while the rest of the team passed the ball around the perimeter and waited for a good long distance shot.
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on
:
Missed the opening 'cause we couldn't be arsed to watch it live: must research Youtube. Did see the steeplechase today: I was a bit envious of the riders as I have been riding since age eight. My lovely wife did see rather a lot of women's football though.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og, King of Bashan:
I also got to catch some water polo, which was entertaining. Do the guys up front on the attack ever get the ball? As far as I could tell, one guy swam near the goal and attempted to avoid drowning while the rest of the team passed the ball around the perimeter and waited for a good long distance shot.
I watched some water polo in Malta and it looked like the guy up front is there to make life tough for the goalie. Not that it isn't a tough game in the first place - try detecting foul play when 80-90% of each player's body is under water.
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
Enjoying the Volleyball at the moment. Fast paced and good fun. I also read somewhere that it is the 2nd most popular sport in the world after football?
The men's Gymnastic bronze was great, and Ben Ainslie is looking good at the moment.
Tom
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tom Day:
Enjoying the Volleyball at the moment. Fast paced and good fun.
The South Korean indoor Women's team has a phenomenal player named, not surprisingly, Kim. She must be about 6'6, and was giving the US team fits on Saturday, although they eventually pulled away. My sister-in-law (another Kim) is South Korean, and is just over 5 feet tall. Given that, I was surprised by the size of the team, but according to my brother, the South Koreans are actually the tallest East Asians.
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on
:
I went to the Judo today and loved every moment of it! I've decided that one of the reasons I like watching sport live is that you can hear the crowd but not the commentators!
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
A word of support for an excellent commentator: the female expert on swimming in the Australian feed. She is good at pointing out fine points of technique that make a difference at this level. She certainly sounds as though she may be a former Olympian herself. Does anyone know she is.
I might say that here in Fiji, the single local TV broadcaster draws from a variety of feeds depending on the event. Thus (so far) we have been fortunate enough to not have any that were ruined by chauvinistic barracking or patronising.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
I can't bear to either watch or listen. We have already had 3 Golds dashed and its only Day 2.
To repeat a point I made on another Olympic thread you blessed with your presence - Why are contests between the best athletes in the world only worth watching if WE are winning?
No one is obliging you to either watch or listen. Either stop doing so, or take your reactions to this convenient thread where they can be responded to according to their merits.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tom Day:
Ben Ainslie is looking good at the moment.
Tom
Not after the last two races. Ben's not at his best.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
quote:
Originally posted by Tom Day:
Ben Ainslie is looking good at the moment.
Tom
Not after the last two races. Ben's not at his best.
Ben's grumpy, but that's not new! He does have to get gee'd up for things, like that disqualification in the Beijing games which spurred him on.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tukai:
A word of support for an excellent commentator: the female expert on swimming in the Australian feed. She is good at pointing out fine points of technique that make a difference at this level. She certainly sounds as though she may be a former Olympian herself. Does anyone know she is.
I think you're talking about Giaan Rooney, medal-winning swimmer at Sydney (2 silver) and Athens (1 gold). You're right, she has a rare combination of relevant sporting experience and the ability to communicate about it effectively.
It's annoying when you have somebody who is an effective commentator whose knowledge of the sport is out of date, or a fantastic recent sportsman/woman whose talents were limited to their sporting discipline.
Andrew Gaze (Basketball), Jane Flemming (Athletics), Matthew Keenan and Kate Bates (both cycling, but not at Olympics) are probably the best commentators I've heard in terms of having a great balance of both sides.
[ 31. July 2012, 15:37: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
Men's Gymnastics was a disappointment for fans in the States, although we probably had our hopes artificially inflated by the poor performances of the Japanese and Chinese in the preliminary round. Appropriately enough, I was in the middle of a Malcolm Gladwell essay about choking under pressure. He wrote that great athletes are so well trained that they work more out of the muscle memory portion of the brain than the thinking part of the brain. If you get thrown back into the thinking part of the brain, it is as if you are a beginner again, having to think about each movement. You could clearly see that happening to the American gymnasts. I wish it had gone differently for them.
I did enjoy an interview with Michael Phelps last night, when the interviewer asked him which Michael Phelps we were going to see in the 200 Fly final today: the one that finished fourth in the IM, or the one that had one of the fastest split times in the relay. He simply said "I will answer that in the water." I think getting knocked off the podium in the IM might have actually calmed him down a bit, and took off some of the pressure. I will not be surprised if he goes on a tear as the week goes on.
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
quote:
Originally posted by Tom Day:
Ben Ainslie is looking good at the moment.
Tom
Not after the last two races. Ben's not at his best.
He's second overall after 3 days though - not bad...
I was thinking today about the apparent lack of medals so far - but then it took a while in 2008 for the medals to start coming. Do people think that their is too much pressure and media coverage for the athletes??
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
To repeat a point I made on another Olympic thread you blessed with your presence - Why are contests between the best athletes in the world only worth watching if WE are winning?
I am really torn in this debate. On the one hand, I am really enjoying watching some excellent sporting action, and there is a whole lot of it to watch, irrespective of who is winning or even taking part. The Olympics should be a celebration of sporting endeavour, which (so far) it is, and that should be appreciated.
OTOH, every sportsperson wants to do better - they all want to win Gold, however unlikely that is. To accept that "doing well" is good enough is not the mindset you need in sports these days - you need the drive to want to win, and to be crushed if you don't.
So I am supporting my nation, I have a particular interest in my country winning stuff. That is a focus of my interest. But it is not to take away from achievements that do not match that specific focus.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I think that's slightly conflating the athletes and the spectators viewpoints. I doubt there's a single competitor who doesn't commit to the Winning is Everything/Losing Nothing. And there is a vicarious version which comes out in supporting your particular nation.
But surely you don't not watch Usain Bolt because he isn't running for Britain?
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on
:
I watched some female gymnastics yesterday and two things struck me:
1) The bar. I hated this - it looked like an accident waiting to happen. Top level sport of any variety carries a risk of injury, but the odds seemed very high here. I felt sick every time someone misstepped. Why is it an important part of the routine?
2) After competing every athlete came off the platform, while the rest of their team rushed up, gave them a peck on the cheek, and then rushed away. It looked like, "We all hate you really, but are pretending to be nice while the cameras are on"!
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
I love the gymnastics - especially the men's (and not just because I enjoy perusing the wares). The beam in the ladies' gymnastics is probably rather dangerous - but them they're chucking themselves into the air and spinning around while swinging on a bouncy bar when they do the uneven bars, so I guess it's pretty dangerous too. The thing about beam is that, while you watch it willing the gymnast to get through, the tiniest slip can't be hidden - it's a 10cm landing platform, and when you see someone nail a routine on it it's bloody impressive.
That USA girls' team yesterday were brilliant - they all seemed just to nail everything they did. Talk about earning a medal - they were brilliant, if they hadn't won gold it would have been a travesty.
Talking of brilliant:
Iordan Iovtchev is competing as a gymnast in his *6th* olympics! - he's 39, and is in the rings final.
Oskana Chusovitina is also in her 6th Olympics, she's 36 or 37, and was competing at international level before most of the other Olympic gymnasts were born! She's the oldest woman ever to compete in the women's gymnastics. I don't think she's in any finals though - amazing lady.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
I don't think she's in any finals though - amazing lady.
wrong - she's in the vault final.
I'd love to see both of those get a medal!
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
Iovtchev is an awesome athlete and I'm not surprised he is in the rings final - he has arms like thighs and must have his shirts made to measure. I've heard that he intends to compete at the 2016 games, and I wouldn't be surprised to see him perform in 2020, if he can be bothered.
Elsewhere Britain has a gold medal! Yah, boo, sucks to all the nay-sayers who reckon we're failing. It isn't so long ago that we won that many in an entire games and back when I was a lad four or five golds was usual. Mind you, we had the Eastern bloc, two Germanies and a vast pharmaceutical industry to compete against then.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
As our antipodean friends said four years ago, it's a sitting down medal, so it doesn't count.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
As our antipodean friends said four years ago, it's a sitting down medal, so it doesn't count.
Sitting down and going backwards! Still, you've got to cut the antipodeans some slack, they have to perform upside down.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
Holy Moly, some sports administrators don't mess around!
I suppose action had to be swift but this was very decisive and essential for the games' credibility.
Posted by Yangtze (# 4965) on
:
Aha, I knew there had to be an Olympics thread somewhere. Have been hunting all over in Heaven, AS & Purg, didn't think to look here.
Caught the women pairs rowing by accident this morning - oh wow, oh wow, oh wow. Brilliant. Was in tears.
As ever I'm really enjoying watching random bits of random sports. Women's weightlifting anyone?
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
As our antipodean friends said four years ago, it's a sitting down medal, so it doesn't count.
I would be in awe if somebody managed to win a rowing medal standing up, might be a better event to introduce to the Olympics in place of tennis or golf
Good job by the Badminton World Federation, nice to see a sporting federation that has a healthy amount of self-respect.
Posted by quantpole (# 8401) on
:
Wiggins 22 seconds up after 30km. Amazing crowds on the route too.
Posted by quantpole (# 8401) on
:
And he's done it, with Froome 3rd. Medals rolling in now!
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Good for Wiggo! The yellow jersey in Le Tour and now this. What a year!
TGC, some news for you when you wake up.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Gold and Bronze, fantastic.
Cancellara is still on the ground, shame that he was injured in the time trial as he'd have made a better race of it. Brave ride.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Well done to Tony Martin getting second, it sucks that he missed out on getting the win but kudos to him for bouncing back that well after a horrible run in the Tour de France this year. Mark him as the favourite for the World Championship later this year.
It's also notable that this result moves Britain into the plurals for Gold medals. They may need to adjust their target downwards a bit with it taking five days to get that far even with the home team factor going their way!
The only person competing in this year's Olympics who I've met (outside of a handshake and autograph at a sporting event) competed earlier this evening our time. Hayley Chapman is a thoroughly great young lady from one of our regional towns north of Adelaide who I've met at a few youth ministry events, at the age of just 20 she came 34th out of 40 in her pistol shooting event, she is notable for being the first daughter to compete at the same Olympic Games with her father.
Alas, no free to air TV coverage for her.
[ 01. August 2012, 15:54: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Mr Clingford (# 7961) on
:
Can you ever be gracious to a Brit, tgc?
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
What does congratulating a German who came within a second of winning an Olympic medal even after bouncing back from a poor Tour de France have to do with being gracious or not to the Brits?
It was omitted from the previous post, perhaps I should have just quoted and edited... quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
Gold, well done Tony Martin for Silver, and Bronze, fantastic.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Is it okay to mock this Brit?
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
Holy Moly, some sports administrators don't mess around!
I suppose action had to be swift but this was very decisive and essential for the games' credibility.
I frequent a highly cynical sports blog, Deadspin. As soon as I heard about this, I knew that they were going to have someone write a defense of the players for throwing the match. Sure enough, the defense came out within hours. The best they could come up with was that the IOC brought this upon itself by choosing a group round robin format rather than the single elimination bracket used in every other badminton tournament. This was kind of like tacking a round robin on to the front of the French Open. Who isn't going to throw a match to avoid playing Rafa in an early round, concluded the author.
I call bull. It is considered bad form to throw matches, period. That is one of those rules that doesn't get thrown out when you shift format. This was the right call.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Yeah, I am not so certain. If they deliberately attempted to lose, then yes. However, if they were conserving energy for a more important (to them) round, I am not so sure.
Swimmers will often give less effort in a semi, if they merely need to qualify and have a heavy schedule. This is called strategy in the pool. It can result in a "worse" position for them, yes. And the badminton players might receive a perceived better matchup. Still, the intent is the key, and it is difficult to assess that.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
What does congratulating a German who came within a second of winning an Olympic medal ..
Err, no. It was 42 seconds.
TGC, I love it when you rise to the bait. Mustn't let that image slip.
Pity really. Sledging is so old...
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Is it okay to mock this Brit?
Definately. That was the hilarious picture of the week.
Well done to our 4 medalists today. Excellent work.
Firenze - what I was trying to say is that yes, I watch all athletes form all countries. But I do make a special effort to watch the Brits. Normally, at work, I have the archery on, and enjoy that, but switch to watch The cycling and the rowing when we are involved ( the archery we are not doing brilliantly, but I watch it because I enjoy it ).
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
It seems that fixing is a constant issue that badminton wrestles with.
I'm not sure that the example of a swimmer (you could substitute runner) racing a bit conservatively in a heat is comparable because they still have to get in the top two or post one of the next-fastest times to go through. If a swimmer can stay just ahead of third place then they've still beaten six others in that heat and performed well. The badminton players were deliberately serving into the net, for which the equivalent in swimming would be to do the doggy paddle.
I think the main problem in the badminton is that the Olympic competition has a much wider spread of rankings than the regular top flight competitions where more than two entries are allowed from a nation. The rankings are so spread out that the advantage of "winning" a more favourable draw in the later stage is so great that it may outweigh the more conventional approach of keeping in good form/momentum by winning every match. Going back to a knockout format might "fix" it by offering no incentive to lose (until you get a match with both players/pairs of the same country*) but that would suck for the Olympic campaign to be over so quickly for the teams losing their first match.
* From the article I linked above...
quote:
Are there previous incidents of players clearly throwing matches?
Not half. Speak to players and officials and they will tell you of a spate of incidents each year on the world tour. As far as the Olympics go, the highest-profile case remains Athens 2004 when Li Yongbo, China’s head coach, admitted to ordering a player to throw a tie, improving chances of gold. It occurred during the women’s singles semi-final when Li decided that Zhang Ning would have a better shot at winning the final against a non-Chinese opponent rather than her opponent Zhou Mi.
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
What does congratulating a German who came within a second of winning an Olympic medal ..
Err, no. It was 42 seconds.
Hmm, the report I read must have been talking about an intermediate time check. Still a worthy effort by the reigning World Champion who is not having his best season ever.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Still a worthy effort by the reigning World Champion who is not having his best season ever.
To be serious for a moment, it sure was. And Cancellara was brave, brave, brave. But even at their best, not sure either would have beaten Wiggo today. Form of his life, year of his life. Next year might be another matter.
Wonder who Chris Froome will ride for next year. Shouldn't think he'll be short of offers.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Anyone see the BBC drama Bert and Dickie about the 1948 Olympic double skulls pair, who won gold by deliberately throwing a race to come second so that they could progress through the repercharge and avoid facing the favourites until the final.
Looks like tactical losing is nothing new but has a long Olympic history.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Is it okay to mock this Brit?
Yes.
To misquote Douglas Adams, the role of the mayor is not to wield power, but to take people attention away from where the real power is.
All the Brits mock him, you might as well join us.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
You can mock my uncorrected typo too.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
Talking of brilliant:
Iordan Iovtchev is competing as a gymnast in his *6th* olympics! - he's 39, and is in the rings final.
Oskana Chusovitina is also in her 6th Olympics, she's 36 or 37, and was competing at international level before most of the other Olympic gymnasts were born!
NYT article about both of them.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
I think the main problem in the badminton is that the Olympic competition has a much wider spread of rankings than the regular top flight competitions where more than two entries are allowed from a nation. The rankings are so spread out that the advantage of "winning" a more favourable draw in the later stage is so great that it may outweigh the more conventional approach of keeping in good form/momentum by winning every match. Going back to a knockout format might "fix" it by offering no incentive to lose (until you get a match with both players/pairs of the same country*)
This is a good point. Unfortunately, I don't know how you even out the competition and keep the international feel. There is a big fuss in this country over the fact that one of our gymnasts, the reigning world champion, got knocked out of the all-around finals despite finishing fourth in the qualifiers, simply because the IOC rules only allow two women per country in the finals, and her team mates finished second and third. But if you want an international celebration of sport, you have to let Eddie the Eagle Edwards in. quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
but that would suck for the Olympic campaign to be over so quickly for the teams losing their first match.
I will feel bad for them until the annual story about the astonishing rate at which the athletes in the Olympic village go through condoms comes out. If I were still single and all I had to do to hang around that orgy of hot toned bodies was get my butt kicked in a badminton match, I would be on the next flight to London racket in hand.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og, King of Bashan:
I will feel bad for them until the annual story about the astonishing rate at which the athletes in the Olympic village go through condoms comes out. If I were still single and all I had to do to hang around that orgy of hot toned bodies was get my butt kicked in a badminton match, I would be on the next flight to London racket in hand.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Don't knock the Eagle, he's the best ski jumper this country has ever had.
In the same vein, spectators have been won over by Niger's Hamadou Djibo Issaka, aka the skulling sloth and by Morocco's Jihane Samlal in the women's kayak.
It is performances like these that give the Olympics their atmosphere.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger: quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
What does congratulating a German who came within a second of winning an Olympic medal ..
Err, no. It was 42 seconds.
Hmm, the report I read must have been talking about an intermediate time check. Still a worthy effort by the reigning World Champion who is not having his best season ever.
For those who like these sorts of details, the checkpoint times were as follows.
@7.4km 5 secs to Martin
@18.4km 11 secs to Wiggins
@29.9km 22 secs to Wiggins
@44km i.e finish 42 secs to Wiggins
The 42 second winning margin is equivalent to about 600 metres at Wiggins' ave speed. Martin's winning margin in last year's WC was over a minute. Martin's prep was disrupted by injuries, but Wiggins' improvement in TTs cf last year has been noticeable all season. The double of Le Tour and Olympic TT is very rarely achieved.
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
Og: quote:
There is a big fuss in this country over the fact that one of our gymnasts, the reigning world champion, got knocked out of the all-around finals despite finishing fourth in the qualifiers, simply because the IOC rules only allow two women per country in the finals, and her team mates finished second and third.
That does seem unfair to her, but on the other hand... well done USA for having so many brilliant gymnasts. I've been amazed at the high standard (it's been a while since I watched any gymnastics at all).
I wish sedan chair racing was an Olympic sport. Now that would be worth watching, especially if you had to carry your country's Prime Minister (or equivalent) in the chair...
[ 02. August 2012, 09:27: Message edited by: Jane R ]
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
I wish sedan chair racing was an Olympic sport. Now that would be worth watching, especially if you had to carry your country's Prime Minister (or equivalent) in the chair...
Over the years Germany wouldn't have won many medals! Some solid citizens have been PM/president over the years. At the moment I suppose France would be favourites with Sarkozy.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
Er Sioni, Monsieur Sarkozy, 'e eez not ze Président any more...
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
Er Sioni, Monsieur Sarkozy, 'e eez not ze Président any more...
My mistake. I plead confusion by the new president's name, M. Hollande.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
I wish sedan chair racing was an Olympic sport. Now that would be worth watching, especially if you had to carry your country's Prime Minister (or equivalent) in the chair...
I'm all for that, given that Australia has Julia Gillard who is not exactly a huge person. We would, however, be screwed if it was each country's ambassador to the USA who was being carried
It's quite disappointing to see that the recent success of British cyclists (British-registered at least) still has some way to go in raising motorists' awareness of cyclists. A cyclist was hit and killed by a bus driver working for the Games organisation last night.
Time for high-profile British cyclists like Hoy, Wiggins, Frrome, Cav, Pendleton, Pooley and so on to donate their time to front a huge safety awareness campaign, perhaps also a minute's silence before the start of the opening track cycling events tonight?
I agree with the comments further up about Chris Froome moving to a different pro team for next year, and I would not be shocked if Cave went elsewhere (Rabobank) as well. Team Sky has way too many superstars in one place at one team to keep them all happy, and the motivation to work together in the run up to the home turf Olympics is now over. Team Sky also has the huge challenge of securing sponsors for 2014 after all their current contracts run out at the end of next year, they only need to look at Discovery Channel, Highroad-HTC and RadioShack-Nissan to see that even with their success they are in a very vulnerable position being completely reliant on a big ticket sponsor who is not a bike manufacturer.
The track cycling starts tonight with both team sprint competitions and the qualifying round of the men's team pursuit. The highlight of this will be the women's team sprint, namely because it's the first time Anna Meares and Victoria Pendleton will compete against each other.
I was pleased to see Lauren Jackson do well in the Opals' win from last night (I watched on delay today) with a proper captain's game. She took the record for all-time point scoring at the Olympics away from Lisa Leslie during that game, which is not the first thing she's taken from LL
Posted by The Rogue (# 2275) on
:
I understand (Wikkipedia) that Taufa'ahau, The King of Tonga between 1965 and 2006 weighed 209.5kg at his peak. Is there a sedan chair which could have coped? I would like to see the Chuckle Brothers doing this one.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og, King of Bashan:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
I think the main problem in the badminton is that the Olympic competition has a much wider spread of rankings than the regular top flight competitions where more than two entries are allowed from a nation. The rankings are so spread out that the advantage of "winning" a more favourable draw in the later stage is so great that it may outweigh the more conventional approach of keeping in good form/momentum by winning every match. Going back to a knockout format might "fix" it by offering no incentive to lose (until you get a match with both players/pairs of the same country*)
This is a good point. Unfortunately, I don't know how you even out the competition and keep the international feel. There is a big fuss in this country over the fact that one of our gymnasts, the reigning world champion, got knocked out of the all-around finals despite finishing fourth in the qualifiers, simply because the IOC rules only allow two women per country in the finals, and her team mates finished second and third. But if you want an international celebration of sport, you have to let Eddie the Eagle Edwards in.
...
None of the women who got through could be even remotely described as Eddie the Eagle. They’re all good – just maybe not as good as some who didn’t make the cut. The new rule affects other countries as well – China, Russia and us – but there hasn’t been the same comment here.
It would be better if the best gymnasts went through to the all around regardless of where they’re from. But most sports seem to put a limit on the number of entrants per country in each event. Athletics has three – which means that Weber would have made the cut. It could be worse – IIRC, in cycling its one competitor per country.
Tubbs
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on
:
I just started a new thread on the sedan chair racing tangent - here
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
... It could be worse – IIRC, in cycling its one competitor per country.
It doesn't work that way.
Individual events in cycling allow more than one competitor per nation, while team events have only the single team entry per nation. This is the same as athletics, swimming and most of the other sports where there are both single and team events.
Where things get complicated in individual events is when it comes to working out the number of entries each country is to be allowed in the individual events. Cycling generally does this based on the UCI national and individual ranking points for each discipline, and it's a system that generally works quite well. Athletics and swimming generally do this by setting A and B qualification standards, so an athlete needs only to reach the required standard to get in.
The arrangement of the individual events seems to be where the setup in gymnastics has gone a bit wonky. It seems a little silly to allow a nation more than two entries but only letting two of them through to the final round at two.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
... It could be worse – IIRC, in cycling its one competitor per country.
It doesn't work that way.
Individual events in cycling allow more than one competitor per nation, while team events have only the single team entry per nation. This is the same as athletics, swimming and most of the other sports where there are both single and team events.
Where things get complicated in individual events is when it comes to working out the number of entries each country is to be allowed in the individual events. Cycling generally does this based on the UCI national and individual ranking points for each discipline, and it's a system that generally works quite well. Athletics and swimming generally do this by setting A and B qualification standards, so an athlete needs only to reach the required standard to get in.
The arrangement of the individual events seems to be where the setup in gymnastics has gone a bit wonky. It seems a little silly to allow a nation more than two entries but only letting two of them through to the final round at two.
That’s … complicated. Thank you for explaining.
I’m not sure if it’s gone a bit wonky or not, because gymnastics is a mixture of team and individual competition. Teams compete for a place at the team finals and in the individual events –apparatus and the all around. The team event is 5-4-3 – five gymnasts on the team, four compete and the best three scores count. (That does allow some margin for error as, hopefully, if you fluff it, one of your team mates will do better).
Looking at the Wiki page, the limit of two gymnasts per country appears to apply in both the World Championships and the Olympics for the apparatus and the all around. You know when you’re competing if you want a place in the all around or event finals, you need to be in the top 2 for your country. It sounds brutal when written down, but it’s probably no worse than things like the swimming where thousandths of a second decide whether or not you’re in a final or out on your ear.
Tubbs
[ 02. August 2012, 13:22: Message edited by: Tubbs ]
Posted by quantpole (# 8401) on
:
I thought the UCI had got pissed off with the GB domination in 2008 so limited it to one rider/team for the track cycling. That's why Chris Hoy isn't defending the sprint as Jason Kenny got the nod instead. Anyway, two more golds (so far) today!
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
One last comment on the Badminton players. My wife played varsity field hockey and lacrosse for our high school, and both of those teams were usually the second or third best team in the state every season. Our rival high school on the other side of town usually had the best team in both sports. I asked her last night if, hypothetically, in the last game of the regular season, her old team could have lost the game and consequently avoid the rival school until the end of the tournament, would the coach have tolerated anyone putting in less than full effort. She gave me a serious look and said "no way." So I think the ban was the right call.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by quantpole:
I thought the UCI had got pissed off with the GB domination in 2008 so limited it to one rider/team for the track cycling.
Nope, that was just part of the wholesale changes to the track cycling program which was decided before the 2008 Olympics. The UCI was ordered to equalise the number of events for men and women (5 each rather than 7/3) without increasing the number of competitors.
The other cycling events remain open to more than one entry per nation, as I said above.
That ride by China in the women's team sprint qualifier was quite something!
[ 02. August 2012, 15:55: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
Today I was watching the Womens Archery Individual final, which was fantastic, and went down to penalties. And, FYI, no Brits involved.
Definitive proof, however, that all the hot chicks do archery.
Posted by quantpole (# 8401) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
quote:
Originally posted by quantpole:
I thought the UCI had got pissed off with the GB domination in 2008 so limited it to one rider/team for the track cycling.
Nope, that was just part of the wholesale changes to the track cycling program which was decided before the 2008 Olympics. The UCI was ordered to equalise the number of events for men and women (5 each rather than 7/3) without increasing the number of competitors.
The other cycling events remain open to more than one entry per nation, as I said above.
That ride by China in the women's team sprint qualifier was quite something!
I know they changed the events so there were equal numbers (quite rightly imo but it would have been nice to increase the women's to match rather than reduced the men's to compensate). However, they do not allow for more than one entry per country for the individual events on the track whereas last time they did. In Beijing there were four individual track events where Britain won two medals. It dilutes the quality of the competition compared to the worlds but that's true of a lot of sports.
Shame about all the relegations in the women's sprints but thems the rules. Two world records for the men though, so not too bad!
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
The team event is 5-4-3 – five gymnasts on the team, four compete and the best three scores count. (That does allow some margin for error as, hopefully, if you fluff it, one of your team mates will do better).
In the final every score counts - there's no margin for error, nobody can afford to make a big mistake. The UK guys did well (and for the UK, team bronze is amazing in olympic medal terms) by being consistent and all doing their thing solidly. The USA girls' team were just incredible - they just all nailed everything.
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on
:
Did any of you hear some stupid woman on the Today program saying we should be ashamed of bronze and silver medals as only gold count? I wanted to throw something at her! (She was a Tory MP, which didn't help
)
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
Did any of you hear some stupid woman on the Today program saying we should be ashamed of bronze and silver medals as only gold count? I wanted to throw something at her! (She was a Tory MP, which didn't help
)
No, but anyone saying that is an idiot. Although thankfully doesn't matter as she's not the Prime Minister and therefore her opinion doesn't count.
There was 4 seconds between first and last over 2 minutes in the swimming just now.
The difference between gold and silver is so often literally a ripple.
(and in the road race that's so ridiculously stupid, it's ridiculously chaotic)
*which now I can understand it a bit more makes it very cool.
[ 02. August 2012, 19:28: Message edited by: Jay-Emm ]
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jay-Emm:
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
Did any of you hear some stupid woman on the Today program saying we should be ashamed of bronze and silver medals as only gold count? I wanted to throw something at her! (She was a Tory MP, which didn't help
)
No, but anyone saying that is an idiot. Although thankfully doesn't matter as she's not the Prime Minister and therefore her opinion doesn't count.
There was 4 seconds between first and last over 2 minutes in the swimming just now.
The difference between gold and silver is so often literally a ripple.
(and in the road race that's so ridiculously stupid, it's ridiculously chaotic)
*which now I can understand it a bit more makes it very cool.
I wouldn't suggest that everyone saying that is an idiot. Bradley Wiggins has said so, in response to people saying he is Britain's greatest Olympian, but he's entitled to say that as he has won Olympic medals, including gold ones.
I suppose any MP has come first in some sort of a competition, but let's be honest, first of all they come in the top fifty or so of a list of centrally approved candidates, then they are hawked around constituency associations that are looking for a candidate. If they are adopted by a constituency that usually returns a member for their party, as is the case for about half the constituencies in the UK, just what have they won? So long as they don't bite a baby, it's a shoo-in.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
I do know that medal count charts are done differently in some countries. In 2008, I thought I read that most countries list the medal count in terms of most gold medals, but the USA lists it in terms of most medals overall. Under the first system, we are a ways behind China right now. Under the US system, we are hanging right in there. Is that true? How might that color this MP's statement?
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Good day for Team GB, culminating in a cycling performance, on the track this time, which seems likely to turn a knight into a Baron. [Particularly if Sir Chris wins the Keirin again.]
I love cycling. Been watching it with passion for a lot of years now. The Olympic Velodrome looks great and a lot of hot teams have turned up this time - should be much more competitive than Beijing. Five WR breaks in the first evening - look for more of the same.
Speaking of Beijing ....
Strange that China's gold went up in smoke for the same reason that Varnish-Pendleton got relegated. Hard to believe any of the teams left in would repeat that error. Ah, the need to make split second decisions, fuelled by adrenaline. Such decisions may cause heartache for a long time afterwards. But that's track cycling for you.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
It'll have to be Sir Bradley Wiggins in the next Honours List, doncha think?
Unfortunately, it sounds like a 19th C Lord Chief Justice rather than a skinny guy who rides a bike.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
It'll have to be Sir Bradley Wiggins in the next Honours List, doncha think?
Unfortunately, it sounds like a 19th C Lord Chief Justice rather than a skinny guy who rides a bike.
At least he's got sideburns, very 19th century.
btw, the Hindes/Hoy/Kenny team also came close to being disqualified!
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
It looked like a false release from the starting gate, and it also looked as though Hindes deliberately fell down to make sure it was noticed. Close call in the heat. I should think Brailsford has been giving Hindes some verbals sknce his 'lost in translation' post race comments. Bet the French are livid.
[ 03. August 2012, 05:19: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
It'll have to be Sir Bradley Wiggins in the next Honours List, doncha think?
I'm waiting for Limburg next month. If Wiggo wins there it will be the greatest achievement in cycling since Stephen Roche in 1987.
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
If Wiggo wins there it will be the greatest achievement in cycling since Stephen Roche in 1987. [/QB]
Greatest achievement in British cycling maybe. Have a look at the record of the Cannibal, Eddie Merckx, to see what a really dominant winning record looks like.
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by the giant cheeseburger:
Going back to a knockout format might "fix" it by offering no incentive to lose .... but that would suck for the Olympic campaign to be over so quickly for the teams losing their first match.
Maybe , but that is just what most of the competitors from this small country (and their supporters!) expect to happen, especially in athletics and swimming. The two Fiji swimmers both swum in the first [weakest] heat of the one event they were allowed to enter under the IOC's "universality" rule (which allows one male and one female competitor from a "weak" country in a sport to enter even if they have not met the qualifying standard). Like just about everyone else in the first heat of an event, they were certainly trying their best, and were stimulated by the atmosphere and the competition to do a personal best performance. You can't reasonably ask for more than that.
And when they get back home, I'm sure we'll hear about how they benefited from hints and encouragement from champion performers and their coaches, which they can then pass on here.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tukai:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
If Wiggo wins there it will be the greatest achievement in cycling since Stephen Roche in 1987.
Greatest achievement in British cycling maybe. Have a look at the record of the Cannibal, Eddie Merckx, to see what a really dominant winning record looks like. [/QB]
Roche is Irish, not British. Merckx was before 1987. Should Wiggins win the world time trial in the Netherlands it will be the greatest achievement in a single season in the last 25 years.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
According to this authoritative source Wiggo's double is already a first. So the triple would be doubly unique.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
Did any of you hear some stupid woman on the Today program saying we should be ashamed of bronze and silver medals as only gold count? I wanted to throw something at her! (She was a Tory MP, which didn't help
)
I hope they asked her how many medals she'd won. Stupid cow.
Tubbs
[Stupid typo]
[ 03. August 2012, 13:40: Message edited by: Tubbs ]
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Current score, gold-siver-bronze for team GB is 6-6-6.
Be afraid, be very afraid.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
'sallright, they've just ticked on to 6-6-7.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
quote:
Originally posted by Tukai:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
If Wiggo wins there it will be the greatest achievement in cycling since Stephen Roche in 1987.
Greatest achievement in British cycling maybe. Have a look at the record of the Cannibal, Eddie Merckx, to see what a really dominant winning record looks like.
Roche is Irish, not British. Merckx was before 1987. Should Wiggins win the world time trial in the Netherlands it will be the greatest achievement in a single season in the last 25 years. [/QB]
I would think that the 2008 season of Alberto Contador when he won two Grand Tours in one year to complete the set of all three in only 15 months should count as a greater achievement than Wiggins winning one Grand Tour and a Time Trial or two.
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
'sallright, they've just ticked on to 6-6-7.
one medal shy of 1/4 of countries taking (at least) one home.
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Jay-Emm:
one medal shy of 1/4 of countries taking (at least) one home. [/QUOTE]
And now Hong Kong has got a medal.
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
Canada is leading GB 1-0 in the women's football quarter-final.
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Caissa:
Canada is leading GB 1-0 in the women's football quarter-final.
Good game though, I don't know if Canada's been the same. But Britain in the first game looked like a lower division in the men's side, (you could justify it on funding etc..., or occasionally find yourself lapsing into sexism)
Now I'd fancy there chances to put a respectable showing against any premier league side. Although at 2-0 down...maybe not against Canada.
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
This appears to be Canada's best game so far. They were pedestrian against South Africa and didn't wakeup in the Sweden game until they spotted them a 2-0 lead after only 16 minutes.
Posted by Mr Clingford (# 7961) on
:
Summary: swimmers crap; rowers and cyclists great.
Nod to Jess Ennis ATM.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
Trampolining's been fun to watch.
It's all very simply organised; 16 people come out, two rounds of ten bounces each, bottom 8 leave, top 8 do the final in reverse order, medals awarded.
interestingly, there was another 'old' gymnast in the trampolining... Anna Dogonadze . She didn't make the final, but still - between her and these two, both in artictic gymnastic apparatus finals , I almost feel young (at my grand old age of 33).
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Well, that was something else!
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Six golds in one day. And three athltics golds in one hour. I can remember when that would be the tally for the whole games. Phew.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Distance runners are skinny in any case, but Mo Farah is a stick insect. He looks as if he would snap at a touch.
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on
:
Well done, British chaps and chapesses. Brilliant day.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
Bit of a shame about the bit of "Team GB" cheating in the velodrome though article here - although the UK press is very quiet about it, funnily enough.
quote:
Hindes "let the cat out of the bag" when asked about his crash on the opening bend of the first heat in a post-race interview with the BBC. As he came out of the gates Hindes's wheels began to wobble and then his bike crashed to the ground before the first bend, allowing the British team to restart their race.
"We were saying if we have a bad start we need to crash to get a restart," Hindes explained to Jill Douglas. "I just crashed, I did it on purpose to get a restart, just to have the fastest ride. I did it. So it was all planned, really."
quote:
When Hindes next appeared in front of his reporters he had either brushed up his grasp of English or been thoroughly briefed on what to say by Team GB officials.
Was the crash deliberate? he was asked again. "No," said Hindes. "I just went out the gate and just lost control, just fell down. My back wheel slipped and totally lost control and then I couldn't handle the bike any more and just crashed."
British cycling officials later said Hindes comments were "lost in translation", a laughable comment considering the teenager is representing Great Britain. The Telegraph says that despite the controversy the International Cycling Union has confirmed that the matter is now closed.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
It got loads of coverage on the BBC.
There's an interesting paradox in play. The 'Chef' relegated Pendleton and Varnish as a result of a strict application of the rules, despite the fact that the GB pair were easy winners. It was a minor infringement.
So far as the men's sprint team is concerned, there was no rule break. If it wasn't a poor gate release, Hindes cheated by acting as though there was. Stupid really, all he had to do was raise his hand and ride into the well of the track - as other riders have done during this event. The claim of a poor release is always accepted if the rider acts swiftly. It's one of the problems of using the gate.
What the whole thing showed was Hindes' naivity. Both at the time and in the interviews later. I think the Chef was right to let it go under the current rules, but the French are right to call for a change to those rules.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
Watching the BBC coverage of the fantastic athletics on Saturday night, did anyone else feel quite jarred by the way just after winning 3 gold medals in one evening – an event never accomplished before by a British team – the coverage cut straight to a (losing) Penalty Shoot Out in the Mens Football.
I felt it was like Football was a selfish adolescent bursting into the room yelling “Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!” as it couldn't cope with another Sport having the limelight, even for one evening.
More seriously though, Football* has no place in the Olympics because:
1)The Olympics is not the pinnacle of achievement in Football
2)The World Cup is IMHO arrogantly seen by Football as a bigger thing than the Olympics (as in more important than the whole Olympic movement)
3)Football is highly commercialised and professionalised – These are not Olympic virtues - despite all the Olympics “Proud to only accept VISA for your Big Mac” nonsense
*I do appreciate that getting rid of Football completely is harsh on Women's Football, but even so, I understand that the Women's World Cup is more important than the Olympic tournament.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
It got loads of coverage on the BBC.
There's an interesting paradox in play. The 'Chef' relegated Pendleton and Varnish as a result of a strict application of the rules, despite the fact that the GB pair were easy winners. It was a minor infringement.
Rubbish. The whole basis of the team sprint is that the first rider leads over the line at the end of the first lap.
I wouldn't think it reasonable for a runner to get let off if they said "I won the race easily, it didn't matter that I false-started by only a little bit" or a long-distance swimmer to get let off if they said "I won the race easily, it didn't matter that I only cut inside that buoy by only a little bit."
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
Last night was awesome. If nothing else, I hope that one result of these Olympics is that the footballers get less attention and less money, because they are not up to the standards of so many of our other athletes.
I was struck in the 10K by the runner who was accidentally tripped - someone caught the back of his shoe. Did he make a fuss? No, he put his shoe back on, got up and carried on running, and was up with the leaders again.
Take that, you pathetic diving footballers.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
TGC
The Chef has discretion. This one chose not to use it, and said so in advance. Pendleton put her hands up to it, didn't complain. Neither am I.
My point was different. If you apply the rules strictly over that point, you do so over the other point. The starter stopped the race, as he has sole discretion to do so, because Hindes fell over. A fall is one of the reasons he can use. Those are the current rules.
The paradox is that an accidental infringement with no impact on the race caused a relegation; a (probably deliberate) fall rules didn't. That's what the strict, zero discretion application of rules does.
That's not rubbish, that's just the rules as they stand.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
quote:
@ the giant cheesburger
...The whole basis of the team sprint is that the first rider leads over the line at the end of the first lap.
Indeed. These are the rules of that event.
Dave Brailsford ruled out any moaning immediately and shot down the BBC presenter (Linekar) who seemed to want to make a fuss over it.
Hindes 'controversy' – Philip Hindes' first language is German. Oh yes, so its quite possible what he meant was lost in translation. Because cycling is so popular in continental europe, the British team have developed a lot of connections there over the years – in sport, being comfortably close to other countries that don't speak English is not something the British public will immediately pick up on.
Tactical complexity - Its quite notable that the complexity of both track and road cycling tactics are not something people new to watching the sport pick up easily. That was notable in the road race when the various non-cycling related presenters just didn't seem to understand that the other nations chose to use tactics that would minimise the chances of Cavendish by hurling breakaways forward and not working with the chasing British team. That's not being nasty – its just tactics.
British winning streak - As Britain are currently better than everyone else in most cycling disciples – inevitably that's making Britain the Team to Beat. This is something no British team is used to and will have to develop ways of dealing with it.
Australia et al will be determined to not let this British winning streak continue much longer...
And TGC...Waugh and Ponting never took the foot off the neck once in any Ashes series. Dont expect that to happen for you now...
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
I'm not saying Hindes was in the right or wrong, he did take a gamble on exploiting a grey area in the UCI rules. It turned out to be a successful gamble with him getting the big gold-coloured gong at all costs, very Germanic it its cold-blooded efficiency at that.
Not applying the discretion to disqualify them there is very different to relegating the women's team for not completing the race.
It would have been a very brave commissaire who disqualified the British team from the final in front of that crowd after police had to arrest and eject four British spectators for abusing family members of other competitors. Just saying.
[ 05. August 2012, 13:39: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Yangtze (# 4965) on
:
I am EXHAUSTED with all this supporting. Isn't it marvellous.
Was lucky enough to be in the Olympic Stadium for the athletics yesterday morning (as were some other Shippies though we didn't see them.) It was a fantastic session to be at - we were on the corner right between the long jump pits and the pole vaulting - both of which were in action.
Saw Ennis (and my new favourite Johnson-Thompson) plus Bolt, Prestorius, and all the amazing GB 100m runners who did brilliantly.
Atmosphere in Stadium and Park was fantastic. Getting there was easy - crowded but it kept moving. Sadly elderly parents decided they didn't want to stay and hang out at the Big Screen otherwise I'd have stayed there into the evening when the atmosphere must have been electric.
(Oh and on the way in I met the man who rode the motorised bike in the keirin.)
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on
:
I thought the Olympics were just for amateurs. Now I know that's almost meaningless these days, but how come all the big tennis names from Wimbledon have been reappearing? I thought they were professionals?
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
I thought the Olympics were just for amateurs. Now I know that's almost meaningless these days, but how come all the big tennis names from Wimbledon have been reappearing? I thought they were professionals?
It's been that way for ages, some sports (particularly the team ones?) being later than others.
Really by 1936, it was more or less going* (and while Chariots Of Fire is a bit storyfied gives hints from earlier).
*At least according to a library book from years ago, which dedicated a page comparing the British Boxer, who barely got time off and the Turkish spa's, American somethingorother and probably the German's.
Posted by the giant cheeseburger (# 10942) on
:
Most sports are open to everybody now and have been for quite some time, only a couple of sports still restrict the Olympics to amateur status only (most notably Boxing). Some are by default professional-only because there is not a meaningful level of amateur international competition and no method of objectively assessing qualification (like Athletics and Swimming have with their qualification times).
Many athletes across many of the sports are still amateurs, especially the 'traditional' Olympic sports where the level of media exposure outside the Olympics (and hence professionalism) is low. Many athletes who are technically professionals (because they accept prizemoney and/or sponsorship) don't earn enough from sport to live off and still need to top it up with employment, donated support or government funding to sustain the required level of training.
In my opinion, Tennis should be dropped from the program completely, and Golf should never have been brought into the program for 2016. They really aren't sports that fit in since they have a quite well-established international structure which generally doesn't involve national teams, and the equipment and facilities required have traditionally restricted them to the privileged classes (and others in those countries rich enough to have talent scouting programs).
[ 05. August 2012, 17:28: Message edited by: the giant cheeseburger ]
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
As tgc said, the real issue is where the amateur scene is not at a level to include, they permit professionals. The difference is a subtle one, as many of the "amateurs" are all but professionals. Boxing is one sport where the amateur and professional rules are different, and so the amateur sport is the one included.
Having watched the tennis today, I am convinced it should be included. Not just because we did so well, but because the players are competing for their country, not for themselves, and that makes a difference.
Football I am less convinced about, because t national teams get to compete in competitions that are higher status in the sport (World Cup). Golf has the same (Ryder cup I believe, is national or regional teams). Olympic sports should be the pinnacle of national team competition.
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on
:
Great win for Andy Murray - he really annihilated Federer, which isn't something many people can do.
I suppose the British press won't be referring to him as "the Scot" tomorrow morning ...
Posted by Mr Clingford (# 7961) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:
Great win for Andy Murray - he really annihilated Federer, which isn't something many people can do.
I suppose the British press won't be referring to him as "the Scot" tomorrow morning ...
DOn't be silly.. Brit Andy won the Singles gold but Scot Murray lost the mixed final.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Armin:
I thought the Olympics were just for amateurs. Now I know that's almost meaningless these days, but how come all the big tennis names from Wimbledon have been reappearing? I thought they were professionals?
Eastern bloc countries in the past were virtually professional, USSR and East Germany in particular. Good athletes were drafted into the army and allowed to train full time. Levelling the playing field by making the Olympics open.
Where are the Russian Federation and a reunited Germany this year? At least China, the only remaining major Communist country, is maintaining that tradition.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
It's a bit of a Purgy topics, but I've enjoyed the reflections on which sports are "proper" for the Olympics. The old traditional boundaries have become pretty blurred.
The Olympics has evolved into a massive global happening, watched by billions on TV as well as millions attending the events, and costing £billions to stage. Amateurism is mostly out of the window (with the exceptions others have mentioned) because of the relentless pursuit of excellence, coupled with the dimension of national pride. The great majority of the performers can only get there by full time commitment. and even then they need specialist coaching, training and training facilities, medical and (where relevant) equipment support. It's a big business now, with substantial "front end" costs both for the event organisers and the performers. In this evolution, some things have been lost, some things have been gained. There is no going back. Arguments about "too big, too small, too nationalistic" can't really be disentangled from now from this complex mix.
I think it's in that context that the addition (or subtraction) of sports from the competition needs to be considered. Adding popular sports, like golf, has the enormous advantage of increasing gate receipts, drawing in a separate group of loyal supporters.
Some sports, like tennis, basketball, golf, don't need the Olympic Games. Perhaps its worth remembering that there is an extent to which the popular sports, guaranteed to draw the crowds, probably provide a subsidy for the more Cinderella sports? These global festivals provide enormous pleasure for the global audience, life targets and ambitions for some very talented people. I guess we need to be realistic about how the "piper" is to be paid.
[ 06. August 2012, 08:01: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
Congratulations to Scott Brash.
Not just for the gold medal, but for having a fantastic name.
Posted by Cod (# 2643) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:
Great win for Andy Murray - he really annihilated Federer, which isn't something many people can do.
I suppose the British press won't be referring to him as "the Scot" tomorrow morning ...
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Balaam:
Congratulations to Scott Brash.
Not just for the gold medal, but for having a fantastic name.
We were stuck at Strensham services on the M5 waiting for the rain to ease off. The jump-off gave us great entertainment and gee'd us up for the last hour of the trip home. The M50 usually knocks out Mrs Sioni (some roads just send you to sleep), but not after the adrenalin rush of a show jumping gold medal!
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
On another note: I'm fed up with unfit athletes competing. It's one thing when you pick up an injury in competition, as one of our yachtsmen has done, but one of our runners in the women's marathon went into the event carrying an injury, Goldie Sayers wasn't fit, Phillips Idowu wasn't either and that's just those I know of in Team GB for athletics! I'm sure there are others carrying a knock and for the sake of the team and especially their estwhile replacement they should not be there. I'll bet other countries have the same problem but they have a better excuse as it's difficult flying a replacement in from the other side of the world (and all but impossible to get a replacement horse flown in!). Amongst other things it gives credit to Paula Radcliffe, pulling out just a week before the games, knowing that it's probably her last chance.
I know athletes are desperate to compete in the Olympics, especially on home turf, but every time an injured athlete competes it devalues the competition. Any ideas? There seems to be a 'not trying' principle: should that be extended?
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on
:
Difficult, because then you have those people carrying some injury who win. I suspect they are so highly strung it is really impossible to know how much of a difference it will make. Plus in elite sport it seems many will be carrying what I would consider an injury. Just look at the amount of people with strapping on.
Posted by passer (# 13329) on
:
I have to say that the naive foolishness of the policy leading to this article did actually make me giggle.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
Plus in elite sport it seems many will be carrying what I would consider an injury. Just look at the amount of people with strapping on.
I ran 5000 meter cross country in High School (not well, mind you), and by the end of the season, everyone had a sore something. I think it must be worse in marathon running, which, as I understand it, is just plain bad for your body. I think it would also be hard to get anyone to admit to being hurt if there was a hard and fast rule that prevented them from competing.
On a lighter note, did anyone outside of North America get to see this cracker of a header? "Wow" is about all you can say.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og, King of Bashan:
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
Plus in elite sport it seems many will be carrying what I would consider an injury. Just look at the amount of people with strapping on.
I ran 5000 meter cross country in High School (not well, mind you), and by the end of the season, everyone had a sore something. I think it must be worse in marathon running, which, as I understand it, is just plain bad for your body. I think it would also be hard to get anyone to admit to being hurt if there was a hard and fast rule that prevented them from competing.
I think it is one thing for young and recreational athletes to feel a bit sore but another for elite athletes. With the support they have how difficult is it to decide whether they should carry on, rest, apply some strapping or get some physiotherapy/surgery? You can be motivated, dedicated and have all the talent on earth but if your body isn't fit, how can you deliver?
I tend to agree that 'hard and fast rules' wouldn't help, just a principle understood right round the team.
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
The referee in yesterday's Canada-USA women's football match would probably make a good subject of a hell thread.
Posted by shamwari (# 15556) on
:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
The good news is that you can go on-line and order a self-same bike.
Problem. It will only set you back £20000.
And here is me thinking that the Olympics is about people not machines.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
There was a really good quote about the men's 400m on the BBC last night. Someone described that final as "a race between the West Indes and a Belgian family". The twin men there did manage to make history as the first set of twins in an olympic final.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
The good news is that you can go on-line and order a self-same bike.
Problem. It will only set you back £20000.
And here is me thinking that the Olympics is about people not machines.
Put an Olympic bicycle sprinter on an old Schwinn that has been left out for five winters and me on one of those £20000 bikes, I would bet that the sprinter would still beat me around the track easily.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
The good news is that you can go on-line and order a self-same bike.
Problem. It will only set you back £20000.
And here is me thinking that the Olympics is about people not machines.
If you go back two thousand years you will probably find a clay tablet describing the disqualification of Somethingocles for using a pilum that was the wrong shape.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
I say it now so that I am not accused of prophecy after the event.
But I absolutely hate the thought of the BBC commentaries on the athletics.
Sychophantic to the point of nauseous. Such is past experience... [snip]...
Named athelete comes in 5th.
BBC "lovelies" fall over themselves to talk excitedly of a brilliant, brave, unlucky, performance.
How disappointing for you that there have been so few opportunities for commentators to dwell on 5th placings. But sterling work there, to find another opportunity for disparaging the athletes.
[ 07. August 2012, 20:55: Message edited by: Firenze ]
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
If you go back two thousand years you will probably find a clay tablet describing the disqualification of Somethingocles for using a pilum that was the wrong shape.
In the ancient Olympic foot-races, athletes competed naked, so perhaps someone was disqualified for wearing clothes. With all those beautifully honed bodies on show this month, perhaps some shipmate could start a petition to the IOC to bring back that rule!
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I think it is one thing for young and recreational athletes to feel a bit sore but another for elite athletes. With the support they have how difficult is it to decide whether they should carry on, rest, apply some strapping or get some physiotherapy/surgery? You can be motivated, dedicated and have all the talent on earth but if your body isn't fit, how can you deliver?
It's often tricky to decide how long it takes to recover from an injury. A fit young person helped by good physio, ice-baths, etc can get back to good form in a a couple of weeks after an injury that would put most players out for a season. And even 90% fit, many of the stars can perform better than most athletes at 100%.
Example 1: Any elite rugby player near the end of the season.
Example 2: Bikila Abebe , who won the Olympic marathon in 1964, just 6 weeks after coming out of hospital with acute appendicitis
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
Tukai - while it may be a nice idea for some of the athletes, I am not sure it would improve viewing figures for the shot putt and weightlifting.
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tukai:
In the ancient Olympic foot-races, athletes competed naked, so perhaps someone was disqualified for wearing clothes. With all those beautifully honed bodies on show this month, perhaps some shipmate could start a petition to the IOC to bring back that rule!
I'm sure Sepp Blatter is waaay ahead of you.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
@The Giant Cheeseburger
I've been watching too much Olympics to keep up with this thread...
Nevertheless.
Despite Australia's lack of success compared to previous games I really must insist that your whole country consider Anna Meares a proper Australian Champion*.
She's the only Australian (or for that matter, competitor from any other country) to really defeat the British racer in the Bear-pit that the Velodrome became. I really enjoyed the rivalry between her and Pendleton. Both won a gold, so everyone's happy.
British people like a scrap with Australia – its a fun rivalry and simply not as political (and so bitter) as rivalry with France, Germany or Argentina.
*From my own skew-wiff British perspective I say that a proper Australian champion is like Warne, McGrath or Thorpe and now Meares or also Pearson – the likes of Mitchell Johnson and Shane Perkins are I'm afraid, not proper Australian champions.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
By the French. Isabelle Gautheron is on a fishing expedition, playing on "perfidious Albion", using distraction tactics.
Rather like the rowing team, the cycling team peaked at the right time, over fitness, equipment, tactics. If Brailsford/Boardman found a way within the rules to improve cycle performance, and also ensured timely introduction of the changes, that's a part of the current competitive process.
I suppose cycling could in theory go for "standard bikes" rather than construction standards, but given the commercial hinterland, that seems very unlikely to happen.
I'm sure the UCI will be reviewing the 2012 Olympics. The UK dominance of the last two games is bound to be a source of some concern. My guess is that there will be some further changes.
I also reckon that Brailsford could name his own salary if he fancied a transfer, and a number of national associations (probably including the French) would give their eye teeth to snaffle him up.
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
The good news is that you can go on-line and order a self-same bike.
Problem. It will only set you back £20000.
And here is me thinking that the Olympics is about people not machines.
You are cordially invited to explain your point here.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I think it is one thing for young and recreational athletes to feel a bit sore but another for elite athletes. With the support they have how difficult is it to decide whether they should carry on, rest, apply some strapping or get some physiotherapy/surgery? You can be motivated, dedicated and have all the talent on earth but if your body isn't fit, how can you deliver
Hmmm, for one, there would be only recreational athletes in the Olympics were your guideline put in play.(what a sorry spectacle that would be.) Given the level of performance expected from top athletes, it is difficult to avoid injury.
For another, the Olympics are every four years. In some events, this makes the window for competitiveness very small. Not to mention the potential for a worse injury ruining the chance next go round.
Judging by the Kinesio tape, every athlete in the Games is injured. It is very humorous how prevalent the stuff has become, given the lack of evidence of its efficacy. A bit like painting the rug to fix a foundation crack.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I think it is one thing for young and recreational athletes to feel a bit sore but another for elite athletes. With the support they have how difficult is it to decide whether they should carry on, rest, apply some strapping or get some physiotherapy/surgery? You can be motivated, dedicated and have all the talent on earth but if your body isn't fit, how can you deliver
Hmmm, for one, there would be only recreational athletes in the Olympics were your guideline put in play.(what a sorry spectacle that would be.) Given the level of performance expected from top athletes, it is difficult to avoid injury.
For another, the Olympics are every four years. In some events, this makes the window for competitiveness very small. Not to mention the potential for a worse injury ruining the chance next go round.
Judging by the Kinesio tape, every athlete in the Games is injured. It is very humorous how prevalent the stuff has become, given the lack of evidence of its efficacy. A bit like painting the rug to fix a foundation crack.
In stating that only recreational athletes would be able to compete I think you've extended my argument into the long grass!
I can accept that athletes can be below 100% and that because they are striving for the ultimate they are more likely to strain or even break something. But that's where the level of support they receive kicks in: they, their coaches and their medical advisors will know whether they can carry that injury and still be as successful as they would be without it.
What peeves me is that unfit athletes, who deep down must know they can't deliver, take the places of others that could do better. I don't want to lay down a hard and fast rule and Sayers and Idowu (and Daniel Awde, our decathlete) were clearly the best Britain had to offer in their events and had genuine medal chances; whether they could ever have won a medal despite injury we'll never know. I just hope they can all recover, especially Awde who should have years ahead of himself.
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on
:
I used to play amateur beach volleyball when I was at San Diego State University. It was rather a long time ago, but I had a killer overhand serve and lived only 300 yards away from the beach at La Jolla Shores. Those ladies were awesome!
Posted by Tom Day (# 3630) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
Judging by the Kinesio tape, every athlete in the Games is injured. It is very humorous how prevalent the stuff has become, given the lack of evidence of its efficacy. A bit like painting the rug to fix a foundation crack.
I suppose though that not every athlete who wears it is injured. It is part of the British Cycling teams 1% thing - if they can improve their performance by even 1% then it is worth doing, and if they do enough of that then it might be 5-8% which is enough for a Gold medal.
The BMX'ing was interesting yesterday - looking forward to watching 8 of them go down that track together - looks like a recipe for disaster in my book!
Tom
Posted by The Great Gumby (# 10989) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
quote:
Originally posted by shamwari:
The cycles of the Brits are coming under close examination.
By the French. Isabelle Gautheron is on a fishing expedition, playing on "perfidious Albion", using distraction tactics.
I'm not sure if it's distraction tactics from the French, or if GB have successfully got into their heads. There's been a bit of talk about the British team carefully keeping their wheels under cover, which is funny, because everyone gets their wheels from the same French supplier. It could be psychological warfare, like the fabricated story about destroying the Beijing skinsuits to keep them secret, or it may be an obvious ploy to distract attention from the real source of the advantage, much like Lotus in the Colin Chapman days kept people completely ignorant of their use of ground effect by ostentatiously covering up a specific part of the cars.
quote:
I'm sure the UCI will be reviewing the 2012 Olympics. The UK dominance of the last two games is bound to be a source of some concern. My guess is that there will be some further changes.
They tried to change it already, and even dropped the pursuit as a result, but it didn't work. Short of further reducing the number of riders we're allowed in each event from 1 to 0, I'm not sure what more they could do. In any case, the gap will close, because it always does. Every additional step to gain a slight edge is harder to find than the one before, and other teams have the option to study and copy GB.
The biggest threat to British Cycling in Rio might be in the US at the moment. It looks like the Armstrong doping case is going to get very messy, and it's looking ever more likely that the UCI are complicit in covering up for him in the past. If this is proven, the sport may implode and cycling could disappear from the Olympics altogether. Stranger things have happened.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Getting into the heads of the Germans and the French has been British foreign policy for over 500 years! Mind you, the Germans have got successfully into British heads over penalty shoot-outs.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
Getting into the heads of the Germans and the French has been British foreign policy for over 500 years! Mind you, the Germans have got successfully into British heads over penalty shoot-outs.
It is standard European policy between all European countries. Thats what comes of having history.
Posted by The Great Gumby (# 10989) on
:
Here's a good article about some of the potential ramifications of the UCI's ridiculous behaviour recently. After a lot of detail about what the UCI needs to do to be WADA-compliant and what WADA can do to enforce that, it includes this observation:
quote:
Note the last sentence: if a governing body doesn’t follow the [WADA] Code, it can be ejected from the Olympics.
At the moment, I don't think it'll come to that, but based on the way this case has developed so far, I wouldn't bet on it.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
I'm sure the UCI will be reviewing the 2012 Olympics. The UK dominance of the last two games is bound to be a source of some concern.
Why? Nobody cares that the USA (well, Phelps) dominates in the pool, or that Jamaica dominates in sprinting. Nobody is suggesting that swimmers should only be able to enter one event per Olympics or that countries should only put forward one runner for each sprint distance. So why, when it happens to be the UK that's destroying the field, does it suddenly become imperative to give everyone else a chance?
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on
:
Have you seen the kerfuffle aboutthetaekwondo selection by team GB. We passed over the opportunity to havetheworldnumber one in our team in favour of the world 57th. The official reason given was that the latter's style better suited some rule changes re head kicks. Unofficially everyone thinks that Aaron Cook was left out because he dropped out of the team GB program because he thought it wasn't working. He went away funded his own training and won the world championship and now Team GB won't take him. Even the olympic association suggested they have a rethink.
Looking into it (mainly cos I happen to have tickets for taekwondo) I read a daily mailarticle - I know I apologise but there we are - that notes that selection or a lot of minority sports is less than open and transparent. Our wrestling 'team' maybe the best example of this - I believe our one entrant, Olga Butkevych, is originally from the Ukraine. She became a British citizen in February 2012, which suggests she was selected before she was eligible - if you see what I mean.
Interestingly, one of the folk on the taekwondo selection panel is a shrink with the cycling team.
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on
:
We appear to have a very special relationship with the Ukraine.
Posted by Think² (# 1984) on
:
Triple posting, something with a bit more depth. It is a shame that they didn't invest the money on developing home athletes. I have no objections to people who obtain citizenship in adulthood competing for the UK - but to fly them over expressly for the purpose seems unreasonable and of course does nothing to develop wrestling in the UK.
As I understand it - other sports went with talent selection and development programs in schools in the UK to increase the strength and depth of the field.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Think²:
We appear to have a very special relationship with the Ukraine.
With luck we should have some shit-hot wrestlers in about 30 years time.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
Why? Nobody cares that the USA (well, Phelps) dominates in the pool, or that Jamaica dominates in sprinting. Nobody is suggesting that swimmers should only be able to enter one event per Olympics or that countries should only put forward one runner for each sprint distance. So why, when it happens to be the UK that's destroying the field, does it suddenly become imperative to give everyone else a chance?
I'm not trying to excuse the UCI – just speculating on an explanation.
Cycling has a lot of 'Frenchness'
In many spheres of life France is suspicious of out-and-out Competition, which is perhaps seen as an 'Anglo-Saxon' notion that clashes with France's idea of fairness.
In Competition you can lose. That seems to be the problem. Especially when the reasons for losing are mostly based on not training hard enough and wanting it more than anything else.
There is also the fact that cycling is a national sport in France and despite all the success this year, in Britain cycling is still a minority sport – so that will get up their noses.
I'm not wanting to be anti-French. I love the TdF. Its just there are very different perceptions on what 'Competition' should be between France and Britain
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
The lady's beach volleyball final was a bit of a disappointment, even with the balmy weather and the return of the bikinis. I was rooting for the underdogs, and they barely put up a fight. The semifinal against the Chinese team, on the other hand, was about as compelling as sports get. The Chinese star was phenomenal. The Economist described beach volleyball as a silly sport, and I think the costume causes people to take it less seriously as a sport. But I dare anyone who saw that semifinal to say that these women are not seriously talented athletes.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Much against my expectation, I absolutely loved the individual dressage. Drove straight out to pick up my grandson who had had a brilliant adventure day at Hilltop Sheringham, and on the way home we listened to Nicola James win the first ever women's Olympic gold at boxing. Lots of noise from grandson!
And this evening, more of Usain to savour. It's been a fantastic two weeks. GB to top 60 medals? Could happen.
[ 09. August 2012, 17:39: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Wow. That 800 metres was amazing!
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
And so was Bolt. A privilege to view these marvellous athletes.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
Couldn't agree more
David Rudisha is amazing.
The 200m final lived up to the hype.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
The headlines will be Bolts 200m, but David Rudisha breaking the world record, and leading all of the runners to PBs or better, is, I think, a better representation of what these games are about.
We seem to be doing well in making horses dance, punching people, and kicking them in the head. Hmm.
Posted by Shire Dweller (# 16631) on
:
Kicking people in the head has proven to be a fine British virtue.
Jade Jones - Gold Medal!
Really, winning in something like Taekwondo is something else...
You expect British people to make a fist of Cycling or Rowing - but this
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Shire Dweller:
Couldn't agree more
David Rudisha is amazing.
The 200m final lived up to the hype.
That new world record is equivalent to eight successive 100 metre runs in a shade over 12.6 seconds. Rudisha makes a nonsense of tactical running.
Posted by Tukai (# 12960) on
:
I'll be watching the Javelin final with a feeling of "what could have been". The thrower from Fiji, Leslie Copeland, threw his best (over 80 m) in an early round of the preliminaries, and watched his ranking slip from 6th to 12th over the next 2 hours as the next group went through their throws. Then with only 5 throws left (out of 150 = 50 competitors X 3 throws each) someone threw 20cm further, and so he just missed out on being our first ever Olympic finalist. But - who knows? - next Olympics we might crack a first ever medal as those other small island states of Grenada and Barbados did this time. (And as for Jamaica...well, what can one say!?!)
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
Tom Daley is actually showing something of his worth this weekend - I am amazed that these divers can do what they do. It would scare me stupid.
But does anyone else think that if Daley and Pete Waterfield were in any other situation, people would talk? A pretty boy and an old man, who like hanging out together dressed in just swimming trunks?
Not that I am suggesting anything, but without them being Olympians, it would be considered odd, I reckon.
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on
:
Sorry: you're not suggesting anything... by suggesting something?
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tukai:
I'll be watching the Javelin final with a feeling of "what could have been". The thrower from Fiji, Leslie Copeland, threw his best (over 80 m) in an early round of the preliminaries, and watched his ranking slip from 6th to 12th over the next 2 hours as the next group went through their throws. Then with only 5 throws left (out of 150 = 50 competitors X 3 throws each) someone threw 20cm further, and so he just missed out on being our first ever Olympic finalist. But - who knows? - next Olympics we might crack a first ever medal as those other small island states of Grenada and Barbados did this time. (And as for Jamaica...well, what can one say!?!)
Golf is in at Rio (let's not argue the merits of it) but does that give Vijay Singh a chance of bringing home a medal for Fiji?
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Garasu:
Sorry: you're not suggesting anything... by suggesting something?
Yes. And what is more, there is a word for that. Paralepsis.
Ha!
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
The BBC Radio 4 comedy programme The Now Show (last three of their live Olympic special episodes still on iPlayer) has been drawing attention to some great quotes from the commentators. Here's my favourite, from Beach Volleyball, apparently.
quote:
"Lands that one, grounds it! Smashes it into the floor! You give that one to a gang of robots, back in the 70s, and they'd put it in the microwave and turn it into mashed potato!"
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
It would scare me stupid.
I don't care how scared you are, it'sno excuse for calling us stupid
Mo comes up to the bell...
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
... and wins. Well done Mo.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
That was quite a diving competition.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Well, there we were in our lounge at home; my wife and I, our eldest son, our eldest grandson, yelling "GO GO GO" at the top of our voices during that last 150 metres. And Mo won, an unlikely double gold. Kind of topped the whole thing off, we thought.
Then there was a 'little matter' of a very fine boxing gold, and the greatest ever high diving competition! I suppose normality will return soon ... meanwhile
Posted by Sir Pellinore (ret'd) (# 12163) on
:
I am delighted that the Australians who won gold were either women or in the minor sports and seemed, in the main, perfectly normal and modest.
There are calls from John Coates and our other overpaid sports administrators for more money to be poured into their troughs. I hope that won't happen. Far too much money IMO is spent on "Sportz Admin". I wish Barry Humphries would add another sleaze a la Les Patterson to his repertoire from this group.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
Apparently the Sports Industry Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University predicted that Team GB would win 27 Golds, and 56 total medals.
They got that wrong.
The Guardian predicted 25 Gold, and 85 in total.
They were also wrong.
We beat the Gold tally from both predictions, which seemed, when they were made, wildly optimistic. We got 29, and a total of 65.
Awesome. That is a fantastic achievement - every single one of them, as well as the many others who achieved top 10 places, finals places, and even just getting here and doing their best.
I will be doing a blog post on the legacy of these games, but I think from a sporting perspective, it has been exceptional.
Posted by alienfromzog (# 5327) on
:
An asylum seeker, a mixed race woman and a ginger all walk in to a bar...
And everyone buys them a drink.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
I've instructed my son to call me when the closing ceremony becomes half as interesting as the opening ceremony.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
Not that wildly out, though. Sheffield Hallam seem pretty ballpark.
The home nation do get a bounce. I'll be interested to see what the effect will be for Brazil/ other Latin American countries in Rio, give that their showing these Games wasn't that high profile.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
I've instructed my son to call me when the closing ceremony becomes half as interesting as the opening ceremony.
So far it seems like an extended TOTP.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
There was an fluorescent inflatable octopus, and a python, and a phoenix, and vampires, and Boris Johnson dancing to the Spice Girls - what more do you actually want !?!
Oh, and Darcy Bussell, and fireworks, and Brazilian samba, and more fireworks, and dead people getting the crowd to sing, and 80,000 people singing we will rock you, and stuff and more stuff ...
[ 12. August 2012, 23:06: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Balaam (# 4543) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Pellinore (ret'd):
I am delighted that the Australians who won gold were either women or in the minor sports and seemed, in the main, perfectly normal and modest.
The games in four years in Rio will probably be at a better time of year for summer sportsmen in the Southern hemisphere. I expect the Australians to do a LOT BETTER then.
[ 12. August 2012, 23:52: Message edited by: Balaam ]
Posted by Og: Thread Killer (# 3200) on
:
Nice Olympics.
Shame you couldn't pull off the closing ceremony but then neither did we really....(most of the Winter games athletes were taking off before the end to go out and drink, shag, party etc. etc.)
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
'Happy and glorious Games' was a nice touch by Jaques Rogge. Special finale props to Gary Barlow.
I think the UK did a good job overall. Lots of people rose to the occasion. Maybe Lord Coe can pull off the legacy too? That may be an even harder task.
Feels very 'Monday morning' today. But McIlroy's PGA win was well-timed ....
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
OK, the closing ceremony did wake up once the athletes got involved. Jacques Rogge has shown himself to be a human being, what with a couple of interviews, singing and travelling on the Dockland Toy Railway.
I was amazed at an absolute level. The games were not only better than I had hoped, but very good indeed, and not just because GB did well. David Rudisha's run was the highlight, and the sight of Usain Bolt running hard and dipping for, I think, the first time! The BBC Olympic website was awful though, and we can't hold LOCOG, the IOC or any sports administrators responsible for that.
One problem is how do you reward (Lord) Seb Coe for a successful outcome? I mean he's already a peer. Answer, you give him an even tougher job. Gee, thanks, I hope he gets a decent package for it, and a holiday before he starts.
See you all in Rio, when there will be the definitive venue for the Beach Volleyball! Brazil may even win the Football.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
Doublethink: and Brazilian samba
Unfortunately we missed it due to a power outage. I understand that there was some Maracatu in Brazil's presentation as well, I really would have liked to have seen that.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
This is my favourite "funny moment" from the games.
The calm impartiality of the BBC athletics presentation team.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
The closing ceremony was not a patch on the opening. But then it is a different thing. It was a bit of an odd party, but a party none the less, which is what it needed to be.
It was heralded as far more than it was, and it failed at being that. That does not mean that it was bad, just a little odd.
And overall, I think it has been a spectacular games. I will be doing a blog post on it at some point. Well done to everyone, and to Rio - follow that.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
I thought the extinguishing of the flame (including the Take That and dance intro) was very good. Could have done without the Who (who I like) at the end but they were a lot better than Macca. Overall, it was a curate's eggy closing ceremony, but I was mostly too euphoric to be all that critical.
This was a pleasant surprise - the poll I mean.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
The paralympic torch has been lit today. This is the start!
It may be lower profile than the Olympics, but I think there is a particularly British buzz over these games. They have sold out.
And if anyone missed the program on the starting of the paras "The Best of Men" from the BBC this week, watch it. Very inspiring, and some shocking insight into what happened to spinal injury patients before Dr Guttman arrived - they were left to rot and die.
John Snows programs on the paralympics are also very interesting.
Greenbelt is my current focus, but as soon as I am back, the paras begin, which is exciting. This is turning into a fantastic summer.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
The Best of Men was fab, still available on iplayer.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
OK, so did you see Ellie Symonds get her gold, Richard Whitehead's muscles, Sarah Storey nail her race and stuff ! And things ! I am all over excited because I am going, and therefore totally over enthusiastic
Plus my TV reception is finally working for Channel 4.
Just saw Oscar Pistorius break the world record in the 200m heat ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
[ 01. September 2012, 19:43: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
What do we think about Spain fielding a convicted terrorist, murder conviction, who is disabled as a result of a hunger strike. Is this a good example of rehabilitation, or a bad example ?
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
What do we think about Spain fielding a convicted terrorist, murder conviction, who is disabled as a result of a hunger strike. Is this a good example of rehabilitation, or a bad example ?
If he has been rehabilitated, then it is a fine example. If it is part of rehabilitation it is probably well worth it too.
It's pissed off the Daily Mail, so it can't be all bad. YMMV.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Well,I can go with the rehab - but I do think issuing a pardon on the grounds of his sporting success is a bit off.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
I was reminded this morning that, were it not for Dr Guttmann, and the many others who followed him in making life better for disabled people, at least 80% of the paralypians would be dead. That is itself is a cause for celebration.
I am also reminded that the late Jimmy Saville, who was a huge supporter of Stoke Mandeville, would have been proud of these paralympics.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
Well,I can go with the rehab - but I do think issuing a pardon on the grounds of his sporting success is a bit off.
At first sight it is strange, but there is a political link to the Spanish athlete's crime, so it could be like the situation in Northern Ireland, where all kinds of arrangements are made to further the peace process. If a British/Irish athlete, convicted of terrorist offences had been 'kneecapped' I doubt he would be barred from entry to these games, and given the situation may well have received a pardon.
Posted by Yangtze (# 4965) on
:
Am just back from a brilliant day at the Park. Athletics and cycling. The noise (and warmth) of the velodrome was quite something though I still don't understand the whole slow, slow, slow, wheeeee fast thing of the sprint.
And the Stadium was alive. Particularly for David Weir's brilliantly executed 5,000m.
So very lucky to have been able to be there for both Olympics & Paralympics. And more to come.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
I am going to the athletics tomorrow, and really looking forward to it. Finally being part of the greatest event in my lifetime.
Posted by ElaineC (# 12244) on
:
One daughter and I were in the Olympic Park for the Wheelchair Tennis yesterday. We had a really great day. Lots of walking though and my legs are feeling it today.
Friday morning and tomorrow afternoon I'm at Greenwich with my other daughter for the Equestrian
events.
The paralympians are truly inspirational.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
The comparison with some of the footballing whingers is, I think even more for the paralympians, especially the wheelchair ones. They have broken their spines, are stuck in a wheelchair for life, and then someone knocks them over strapped into their wheelchair.
And they right it and get on with the game.
I'm watching the basketball ATM, and they point out that they only stop play if someone is actually in the line of play, and liable to get run over. Otherwise, it is up to them to sort themselves out.
Next time some well-overpaid footballer dives complaining that someone has ruffled their hairdo, remember the wheelchair basketball players.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
We were watching the athletics today, at the fantastic stadium.
Blind Long Jump. They are guided by their coach, and they run and jump, without being able to see where they are going. They achieve some incredible distances.
Ignoring everything else, the sporting aspects of the paralympics are amazing.
Posted by Invictus_88 (# 15352) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
The Best of Men was fab, still available on iplayer.
Got to chip in, it really is worth watching if anyone here's not yet seen it..
Posted by Anselmina (# 3032) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
Next time some well-overpaid footballer dives complaining that someone has ruffled their hairdo, remember the wheelchair basketball players.
There was a comment like this on 'The Last Leg' with that Australian comedian on Channel 4. They were doing a segment (I think) on the blind football, and he said the next time some overpaid footballer dives because someone's touched him, someone should point to the blind footballers and say 'now that's an injury!'
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on
:
We don't seem to be getting the Paralympics as a regular broadcast on TV here: I am watching a report on Sky Sports which is on my cable system. First I had to sit through cricket and rugby reports which I don't understand!
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
Blind Long Jump. They are guided by their coach, and they run and jump, without being able to see where they are going. They achieve some incredible distances.
Did anybody else know that there's a blind actor on The Archers ? It's a good thing that he doesn't really have a milk round or live in a first-floor flat! The character is' Jazzer' and he is quite a skirt-chaser.
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
We don't seem to be getting the Paralympics as a regular broadcast on TV here: I am watching a report on Sky Sports which is on my cable system. First I had to sit through cricket and rugby reports which I don't understand!
No, NBC decided that the paralympics would not be of any interest to anyone, so they are showing something like 5 hours of highlights, in a couple of weeks time.
I think they may have realised that they have got that wrong.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
100m blades final, go Johnnie Peacock ...
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Falsestart !?!
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Yes !! Peacock wins gold
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
As an extra to the London Olympics there are a whole lot of other things going on - The Mayor of London site gives some of them. If anyone is terminally bored, I've walked all the Discovery Strolls with all 83(?) mascots and taken photos
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on
:
The Werewolf is astounding too. three medals, and he moves so fast.
What a fantastic night! These athletes are exceptional.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Yup he was fab.
Currently, am watching yesterday's The Last Leg on 4OD. Anybody enjoying this daily comedy round up ? Its a really good laugh.
Posted by Nanny Ogg (# 1176) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
Yup he was fab.
Currently, am watching yesterday's The Last Leg on 4OD. Anybody enjoying this daily comedy round up ? Its a really good laugh.
I've been watching it
Love the "isitok" tweets
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Yes, you now know it is never OK to pass a beer back over someone's head.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
I also love Adam Hill's manic bonding over his prosthetic foot.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Just back from 2 weeks holiday. The Paralympics - wow! And double-wow!! Caught some of the live evening performances on hotel/B & B TV, after exploring some of the beauty of Western Scotland.
I hope Seb Coe is right, that perceptions have been changed for ever - at least in the UK.
Taking both events together, I've been proud to be British this summer. Not just for the great results by the athletes, but for the organisation, infrastructural support, marvellous volunteers and all the crowds attending. Inspirational. And a privilege to see such performances from all over the world.
Posted by Enigma (# 16158) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
Just back from 2 weeks holiday. The Paralympics - wow! And double-wow!! Caught some of the live evening performances on hotel/B & B TV, after exploring some of the beauty of Western Scotland.
I hope Seb Coe is right, that perceptions have been changed for ever - at least in the UK.
Taking both events together, I've been proud to be British this summer. Not just for the great results by the athletes, but for the organisation, infrastructural support, marvellous volunteers and all the crowds attending. Inspirational. And a privilege to see such performances from all over the world.
Me too. I'm not a sporty person usually but I've been enthralled by the para and olympics. How on earth can bodies do such things????
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
Armed.
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0