|
Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: "Jesus not outside the Church" the Pope
|
Percy B
Shipmate
# 17238
|
Posted
I am challeneged by the report from the Vatican that in his St George's Day message Pope Francis has said, to quote the vatican News source apparently:
quote:
“It is not possible to find Jesus outside the Church”: this was Pope Francis’ message as he marked his name day, the Feast of St. George, this Tuesday celebrating Mass in the Pauline Chapel with the Cardinals present in Rome.
But what about when I was naked you clothed me, when I was hungry... Or have I missed the point?
Here is the link to the Vatican news on this
[ 23. April 2013, 11:26: Message edited by: Percy B ]
--------------------
Mary, a priest??
Posts: 582 | From: Nudrug | Registered: Jul 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76
|
Posted
Pax, Percy B, Pax. You don't have to believe what the Pope says if you're not a Catholic. Indeed, if you did, you would be one.
I don't let it worry me any more.
--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.
Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Percy B:
Indeed Karl.
But does he actually believe that?
Presumably. I daresay that if you put his nuts in a vice and twisted he'd do a bit of wavering on how he defines "the church". If you want a definitive answer you'd need to ask IngoB, of course ![[Biased]](wink.gif)
--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.
Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
L'organist
Shipmate
# 17338
|
Posted
quote:
posted by Percy B
But does he actually believe that?
We'll never know.
Any organisation that can invent and protect the cute little concept of "mental reservation" is always going to be opaque in the final analysis.
![[Devil]](graemlins/devil.gif)
--------------------
Rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet
Posts: 4950 | From: somewhere in England... | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
TomOfTarsus
Shipmate
# 3053
|
Posted
I guess I'd say it's how he defines "the church," as well. I think a "Paulish" view would be along the lines that, yes, we are his body, his hands, his feet, the "boots on the ground"; we are to be the Good News going someplace to happen. People should say of us as they did the disciples in Acts - And they took note of them, that they had been with Jesus.
Jesus-like traits can be found elsewhere - every kind and merciful act, for instance - but it is His body, the church, that has been commissioned to take the Gospel to the ends of the earth. And as Rich Mullins once said, the scary thing about God is that there is no "Plan B" - it's us, it's our responsibility to bring God's life, love, hope and healing to the world.
It's not my responsibility nor my right to say who is and isn't in that body - it's just my responsibility, in every interaction I have, to push or lead someone closer to Heaven, rather than the other direction.
Blessings.
Tom
ETA: cp'd with L'Organist - err... what is "mental reservation"...?
[ 23. April 2013, 11:53: Message edited by: TomOfTarsus ]
--------------------
By grace are ye saved through faith... not of yourselves; it is the gift of God; not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath ... ordained that we should walk in them.
Posts: 1570 | From: Pittsburgh, PA USA | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Raptor Eye
Shipmate
# 16649
|
Posted
I can testify to the fact that Jesus can be found outside of the church, whether or not we use a capital C.
--------------------
Be still, and know that I am God! Psalm 46.10
Posts: 4359 | From: The United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
L'organist
Shipmate
# 17338
|
Posted
Mental Reservation is sometimes referred to as casuistry.
The Catholic Dictionary would say there are two types of mental reservation: wide and defined.
Although the Jesuits didn't invent the doctrine (?) of MR they are renowned for having developed/used it.
An example is in grounds that were sometimes quoted for a catholic anulment: Regardless of the age or mental capacity of the participant, or of how long ago it was, you had only to say that you made a mental reservation about the marriage at the time of the wedding to get an anulment. In other words, say that you thought at the time "this isn't really happening" or "I don't really want to marry you" - NOT ALOUD BUT IN YOUR HEAD (in other words it couldn't be either proved or disproved) - and you got what you wanted. THAT is mental reservation.
The rest of the world generally refers to this in simpler terms: being mealy-mouthed is one, lying is another.
--------------------
Rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet
Posts: 4950 | From: somewhere in England... | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Anselmina
Ship's barmaid
# 3032
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Percy B:
But what about when I was naked you clothed me, when I was hungry... Or have I missed the point?
Here is the link to the Vatican news on this
Well, this would be a cue for someone to point out that Jesus only meant that to apply to fellow Christians because he said 'when you did it.... to the least of my brethren you do it to me'. etc.
I think we'd have to know what Pope Francis means by 'finding Jesus' and 'church' to know what he means here. I have a friend who 'found' Jesus which means she's a born-again Christian with a personal relationship with her Saviour. OTOH, I know many people who 'find' Christ in a kind action, or a thoughtful word etc.
--------------------
Irish dogs needing homes! http://www.dogactionwelfaregroup.ie/ Greyhounds and Lurchers are shipped over to England for rehoming too!
Posts: 10002 | From: Scotland the Brave | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
EtymologicalEvangelical
Shipmate
# 15091
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by TomofTarsus
And as Rich Mullins once said, the scary thing about God is that there is no "Plan B" - it's us, it's our responsibility to bring God's life, love, hope and healing to the world.
The impression I have from the Bible is that everything is dependent on God, not us. That's what grace means, after all.
Of course, we have responsibilities as Christians, but I'm reminded of what Mordecai said to Esther...
quote:
“Do not think in your heart that you will escape in the king’s palace any more than all the other Jews. For if you remain completely silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father’s house will perish. Yet who knows whether you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?”
(Esther 4:13-14)
This gets the balance right. Esther had a responsibility, and if she failed to speak up, she and her family would have suffered, but God would have been able to effect deliverance by some other means. In other words, God had a "Plan B".
Jesus told us to regard ourselves as "unprofitable servants" in Luke 17:10 - hardly the kind of people on whom God could depend, such that if they failed He would be rendered powerless. In fact, such servants had already failed to a degree, otherwise they would not be 'unprofitable'.
I find this "no plan B" idea theologically indefensible, but I can understand how this is championed by certain controlling church leaders who love to 'motivate' their flock by means of fear and guilt.
We know that there is only one Saviour: Jesus Christ. God in Christ paid the ultimate price for our salvation, and a pure and unblemished sacrifice was required. But if Christ's work on the cross is only half of the "salvation formula", then Jesus' words "it is finished" just before He died are a lie. Unless of course, the other putative half of the salvation formula (getting the word out) is also entirely dependent on God. If no one can be saved unless he or she consciously believes in Jesus and a few basic doctrines, and if the promulgation of the knowledge of Jesus and these doctrines is dependent on fallible, blemished and frequently sinful Christians, then clearly Jesus is not the unique Saviour. Christians become co-redeemers. It makes no sense that God would pay such a heavy price by giving Himself in agony on the cross, if that work only completes half the job. Why would God be so whole-hearted in doing half the job, and seemingly so lackadaisical in doing the other half (by relying entirely on unprofitable servants)? It makes no sense.
I have been told in the past that the eternal salvation of many people depends on me. I couldn't live with this blasphemy, and rightly so. I thank God that He has delivered me from this oppressive lie, and assured me that salvation is entirely dependent on Him. Anything that I say and do which may contribute to someone's salvation is merely the outworking of God's work in and through me, and there is nothing 'scary' about it. The moment it becomes 'scary' is the moment the devil has taken over, and we are into propagating and living a false gospel.
--------------------
You can argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome': but you neither can nor need argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome, but I'm not saying this is true'. CS Lewis
Posts: 3625 | From: South Coast of England | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Stejjie
Shipmate
# 13941
|
Posted
ITSM from reading the link that the phrase comes in a passage in the homily about Christian identity and where that identity comes from. Just before the phrase quoted in the OP, he compares the Church to a "Mother who gives us an identity". He goes on to say that "the Christian identity is belonging to the church". And after the OP quote, he quotes Paul VI, talking about how it's impossible to follow Jesus outside of the Church".
So, ITSM, he's not saying that Jesus can't be found in good works, amongst the poor etc. (he may or may not believe that, the point is that's not what he seems to be saying). He's talking about being a Christian, about following Christ and saying that that's impossible outside of the Church.
If it's that he's saying, then I think I'd agree with him (though whether our conceptions of what the Church is are the same I genuinely don't know).
--------------------
A not particularly-alt-worshippy, fairly mainstream, mildly evangelical, vaguely post-modern-ish Baptist
Posts: 1117 | From: Urmston, Manchester, UK | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hawk
Semi-social raptor
# 14289
|
Posted
Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Not the Church, however you may define that. Even if a Catholic believes that the Roman offshoot of the universal church has a monopoly on Christianity, it does not have a monopoly on Christ. Nor does any other branch of Christianity.
The universal church (i.e. everyone who has Jesus Christ as their Lord and saviour) certainly has an important role as the 'body' of Christ, preaching, and practicing God's word and grace in the world. But Christ is the 'head', although connected with the body, He is not enclosed within the body.
Finally, in terms of 'finding' Jesus outside the church, I would argue that in fact everyone finds Jesus outside the church. It is only after someone has found Jesus and been saved that they are then adopted into the body of Christ. They may be pointed to Christ by the church, but everyone is outside the church until they become a christian.
Perhaps it would be more accurate to say it is not possible to follow Jesus outside the church, since by the very act of following Him, one is a part of a great community of others doing the same thing.
--------------------
“We are to find God in what we know, not in what we don't know." Dietrich Bonhoeffer
See my blog for 'interesting' thoughts
Posts: 1739 | From: Oxford, UK | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
PaulTH*
Shipmate
# 320
|
Posted
Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus, or no salvation outside the Church has been widely believed by Christians of various persuasions throughout Christian history. What usually differs is what we mean by "The Church." At the time St Cyprian of Carthage first used the term, in the third century, there was only One Church. Schisms and denominations were still a thing of the future. Luther regarded the Church as the body of believers. Although the Catholic Church has often restated that it is The Church, Dominus Iesus (2000) states:
"for those who are not formally and visibly members of the Church, salvation in Christ is accessible by virtue of a grace which, while having a mysterious relationship to the Church, does not make them formally part of the Church, but enlightens them in a way which is accommodated to their spiritual and material situation. This grace comes from Christ; it is the result of his sacrifice and is communicated by the Holy Spirit; it has a relationship with the Church, which, according to the plan of the Father, has her origin in the mission of the Son and the Holy Spirit."
I think few Christians would deny that salvation is through Christ, even when circumstances permit non Christians to attain it. This article shows that claiming that salvation can only be found in the Church isn't as bleak as it first seems. Note the quote from Bishop Kallistos.
--------------------
Yours in Christ
Paul
Posts: 6387 | From: White Cliffs Country | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
no prophet's flag is set so...
Proceed to see sea
# 15560
|
Posted
It depends where you lost him.
Seriously, though, Jesus is absent within many churches. The RC church claim to exclusivity may also be reinterpreted as inclusive if you make the intellectual leap that we're all one big (un)happy human family.
Or if you'd rather, my Jesus can beat the bejesus out of your Jesus.
--------------------
Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety.
\_(ツ)_/
Posts: 11498 | From: Treaty 6 territory in the nonexistant Province of Buffalo, Canada ↄ⃝' | Registered: Mar 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
dv
Shipmate
# 15714
|
Posted
It's just the Pope doing his denominational branding exercise. Unconvincing, even to most thinking Roman Catholics, I would have thought - and irrelevant to the rest of us.
Posts: 70 | From: Lancs UK | Registered: Jun 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Forthview
Shipmate
# 12376
|
Posted
The Church is the mystical body of Christ.Those who find Christ,including those who claim to have a very personal relationship with Christ,must recognise Christ in others and serve Him in them.
This is what pope Francis is reminding us,that we are all members of that Body of Christ and it is within that Body of Christ that we find salvation.
A lack of interest in others,a lack of service to others is not a good way of serving Christ.
I wish so much that those who are not Catholics,visbly linked in communion with the Holy See,would stop imagining that Catholics (linked visibly with the Holy See) are only interested in themselves to the exclusion of all others who follow Christ and to the exclusion of all other human beings.
It is almost as bad as those relatively few Catholics,linked visibly with the Holy See, who believe that they are the only ones who have any real contact with God.
Posts: 3444 | From: Edinburgh | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
Indifferently
Shipmate
# 17517
|
Posted
There is indeed no salvation outside the Catholic Church. But what does the Pope mean when he refers to the Church? The universal Church, the Body of Christ? Or merely the Roman Communion therein?
Posts: 288 | From: United Kingdom | Registered: Jan 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715
|
Posted
I know: if he says it quickly enough, often enough, he might actually begoin to believe it.
I don't.
Hard not to be cynical. Three cheers for ecumenism eh? When's the next boat leaving for the ordinariate? An Argentian who allegedly believes the falklands should return to Argentina? Well, no sane English person should give him house room. Perhaps he's losing it oo, like JP and Benny.
Posts: 3845 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Indifferently
Shipmate
# 17517
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Forthview:
The Church is the mystical body of Christ.Those who find Christ,including those who claim to have a very personal relationship with Christ,must recognise Christ in others and serve Him in them.
This is what pope Francis is reminding us,that we are all members of that Body of Christ and it is within that Body of Christ that we find salvation.
A lack of interest in others,a lack of service to others is not a good way of serving Christ.
I wish so much that those who are not Catholics,visbly linked in communion with the Holy See,would stop imagining that Catholics (linked visibly with the Holy See) are only interested in themselves to the exclusion of all others who follow Christ and to the exclusion of all other human beings.
It is almost as bad as those relatively few Catholics,linked visibly with the Holy See, who believe that they are the only ones who have any real contact with God.
Perhaps we will stop doing so when the Church of Rome stops calling itself 'the Catholic Church' and evangelizing other Christians.
Posts: 288 | From: United Kingdom | Registered: Jan 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
leo
Shipmate
# 1458
|
Posted
In context, he did not say that you cannot encounter Christ in the poor, as the Matthew story of the sheep and goats has it.
He is talking about being a Christian and needing to be a member of the church: quote:
it is not possible to find Jesus outside the Church. The great Paul VI said: "Wanting to live with Jesus without the Church, following Jesus outside of the Church, loving Jesus without the Church is an absurd dichotomy." And the Mother Church that gives us Jesus gives us our identity that is not only a seal, it is a belonging. Identity means belonging.
--------------------
My Jewish-positive lectionary blog is at http://recognisingjewishrootsinthelectionary.wordpress.com/
My reviews at http://layreadersbookreviews.wordpress.com
Posts: 23198 | From: Bristol | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Laurelin
Shipmate
# 17211
|
Posted
As an evangelical, I am completely unsurprised by this latest evidence that Pope Francis is, in fact, an orthodox Catholic. Who knew? ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
quote:
Originally posted by Forthview:
I wish so much that those who are not Catholics,visbly linked in communion with the Holy See,would stop imagining that Catholics (linked visibly with the Holy See) are only interested in themselves to the exclusion of all others who follow Christ and to the exclusion of all other human beings.
I can assure you, Forthview, that there really do exist evangelicals who don't take such a crass and uncharitable view of our Catholic brethren (and sistren). ![[Cool]](cool.gif) ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
quote:
Originally posted by Indifferently:
Perhaps we will stop doing so when the Church of Rome stops calling itself 'the Catholic Church' and evangelizing other Christians.
To be fair, my own constituency - the evangelical one - has been known to 'evangelize' other Christians ...
I have theological differences with Rome. I wouldn't be a Protestant otherwise! But the Catholic Church does not have a monopoly on arrogance. Far from it.
--------------------
"I fear that to me Siamese cats belong to the fauna of Mordor." J.R.R. Tolkien
Posts: 545 | From: The Shire | Registered: Jul 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fr Weber
Shipmate
# 13472
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
In context, he did not say that you cannot encounter Christ in the poor, as the Matthew story of the sheep and goats has it.
He is talking about being a Christian and needing to be a member of the church: quote:
it is not possible to find Jesus outside the Church. The great Paul VI said: "Wanting to live with Jesus without the Church, following Jesus outside of the Church, loving Jesus without the Church is an absurd dichotomy." And the Mother Church that gives us Jesus gives us our identity that is not only a seal, it is a belonging. Identity means belonging.
It sounds like he's saying that it's not possible to be a Christian outside of a Christian community (however small or dispersed). Which makes me think of those who claim that they can be Christians all on their own, worshiping God in the Rocky Mountains or fishing on the lake or whatever. Which is bullshit, of course.
To the extent that Francis identifies the Church exclusively with the Roman Catholic Church, I'd say he's wrong. But if by "the Church" he means not a particular visible community but what the prayer book calls "the blessed company of all faithful people," then I agree with him.
--------------------
"The Eucharist is not a play, and you're not Jesus."
--Sr Theresa Koernke, IHM
Posts: 2512 | From: Oakland, CA | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
So ...
Matthew 25:33-40
New International Version (NIV)
33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
... who is outside Jesus according to Him here ?
--------------------
Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Russ
Old salt
# 120
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Fr Weber:
sounds like he's saying that it's not possible to be a Christian outside of a Christian community (however small
I agree that that is what Paul VI was saying, and what Pope Francis means by quoting him.
Nothing controversial - many protestants would agree.
The following sentence ("Mother Church") seems to me to be addressed specifically to Catholics, and is urging them not to distance themselves from the community that formed them. (as some might be tempted to do given some of the occurrences of the last decade).
So I see nothing here at which non-Catholics should take offence.
Although it is understandable that all those who hope for greater unity among Christians would look to the words of a new Pope for signs as to how he views ecumenism.
Best wishes,
Russ
--------------------
Wish everyone well; the enemy is not people, the enemy is wrong ideas
Posts: 3169 | From: rural Ireland | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Schroedinger's cat
Ship's cool cat
# 64
|
Posted
There are two options to interpret this:
1. If you take a narrow or restrictive view of "the church", then he is wrong. Completely, utterly, fundamentally wrong. In fact, I think it is often easier to find Jesus outside the church than inside it.
2. If you take a very wide and inclusive view of the church, then it is true because it is a tautology. The wide and inclusive view of the church is that anywhere that God is active, there is the church. But what is that saying? Nothing.
There is no other option, because anything "between" these, is just a restrictive view of the church, even in slightly wider than other views. So he is either completely wrong or meaningless. I tend towards the former.
--------------------
Blog
Music for your enjoyment
Lord may all my hard times be healing times
take out this broken heart and renew my mind.
Posts: 18859 | From: At the bottom of a deep dark well. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
loggats
Shipmate
# 17643
|
Posted
Quite a few sour comments from non-Catholics, interesting.
Maybe the Pope is just refining Rahner's ideas of "anonymous Christians" into "anonymous Catholics" - welcome aboard, one and all
--------------------
"He brought me into the banqueting house, and his banner over me was love."
Posts: 245 | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Angloid
Shipmate
# 159
|
Posted
As an Aff-Cath Anglican I find the atavistic anti-popery in this thread rather depressing. Of course you can't be a Christian without the Church. That isn't the same thing as saying Christ isn't present in everyone and especially the poor. Recognising him there might well be the first step to recognising him in the Church.
--------------------
Brian: You're all individuals!
Crowd: We're all individuals!
Lone voice: I'm not!
Posts: 12927 | From: The Pool of Life | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
What difference does being a Roman Catholic or further out in the nine circles make to inheriting the Kingdom?
--------------------
Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
no prophet's flag is set so...
Proceed to see sea
# 15560
|
Posted
Now where did the idea of 'mother church' come from? Perhaps a mistranslation or reification of a peculiar latin image. It is obviously 'father church', the pope being king, not a queen and the cardinals being princes, not princesses. The pope is styled as an heir to the Roman emperor as well as Peter. It's all a boys' club except for a few sexless nuns, and unless I missed something. And unless we're talking about some introjected sexually deconstructed oedipal thing.
And it is obviously about power.
--------------------
Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety.
\_(ツ)_/
Posts: 11498 | From: Treaty 6 territory in the nonexistant Province of Buffalo, Canada ↄ⃝' | Registered: Mar 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
loggats
Shipmate
# 17643
|
Posted
The Church is described as female because Latin and Romance languages don't usually use neuter nouns - and she is referred to as the Bride of Christ (Ephesians 5:22-33). And Mary the Mother of God has been described as the archetype of the Church (very beautifully, by Von Balthasar).
Also - I think it's more than a little ignorant to call nuns "sexless" (unless you meant celibate), because they're quite obviously female.
--------------------
"He brought me into the banqueting house, and his banner over me was love."
Posts: 245 | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fr Weber
Shipmate
# 13472
|
Posted
All of which pales in comparison to the need to scold Rome for not sharing my politics!
--------------------
"The Eucharist is not a play, and you're not Jesus."
--Sr Theresa Koernke, IHM
Posts: 2512 | From: Oakland, CA | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Percy B
Shipmate
# 17238
|
Posted
I can't help thinking, given the variety of attempts to clarify here, that the pope's comments as reported are far from clear.
I am disappointed, I'd expected more ....
--------------------
Mary, a priest??
Posts: 582 | From: Nudrug | Registered: Jul 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
L'organist
Shipmate
# 17338
|
Posted
I've always found it odd that one of the most misogynistic institutions on the planet refers to itself as "mother" church - especially since it doesn't allow its servants to marry.
As for being anti-Catholic: not so. They are entitled to their brand, but it would be courteous if they would acknowledge that the rest of us are entitled to ours.
--------------------
Rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet
Posts: 4950 | From: somewhere in England... | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
loggats
Shipmate
# 17643
|
Posted
See, this 'they are entitled' and 'rest of us' is problematic. I'm one of 'them' and don't think you have any less right to your own views, even if they aren't in conformity with the Church.
[ 23. April 2013, 23:24: Message edited by: loggats ]
--------------------
"He brought me into the banqueting house, and his banner over me was love."
Posts: 245 | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Zach82
Shipmate
# 3208
|
Posted
Dang, I agree with the pope.
--------------------
Don't give up yet, no, don't ever quit/ There's always a chance of a critical hit. Ghost Mice
Posts: 9148 | From: Boston, MA | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
L'organist
Shipmate
# 17338
|
Posted
quote:
posted by loggats
See, this 'they are entitled' and 'rest of us' is problematic. I'm one of 'them' and don't think you have any less right to your own views, even if they aren't in conformity with the Church.
Not "The Church" : the Roman Catholic church: its one of many, you know. ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
And m views are absolutely in conformity with the Church, just not with your Church.
--------------------
Rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet
Posts: 4950 | From: somewhere in England... | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
loggats
Shipmate
# 17643
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by L'organist:
quote:
posted by loggats
See, this 'they are entitled' and 'rest of us' is problematic. I'm one of 'them' and don't think you have any less right to your own views, even if they aren't in conformity with the Church.
Not "The Church" : the Roman Catholic church: its one of many, you know.
And m views are absolutely in conformity with the Church, just not with your Church.
It isn't so much mine as Christ's.
--------------------
"He brought me into the banqueting house, and his banner over me was love."
Posts: 245 | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by TomOfTarsus:
. what is "mental reservation"...?
For an interesting historical controversy over it, follow up the dispute between John Henry Newman and Charles Kingsley, which led to the former's writing Apologia Pro Vita Sua.
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Kaplan Corday
Shipmate
# 16119
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by PaulTH*:
At the time St Cyprian of Carthage first used the term, in the third century, there was only One Church.
No there wasn't.
At a spiritual level, of course there was only one church, but at an institutional level, the doctrinally impeccable Novatianists were as much a legitimate church as anyone or anything else at the time.
Posts: 3355 | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Angloid
Shipmate
# 159
|
Posted
So you* expect the leader of the Roman Catholic Church to be clear and unambiguous in his teaching at all times, with no room for paradox or apparent contradiction? Unlike that of our Lord, at least as reported in the gospels?
*not addressed to any one poster in particular.
--------------------
Brian: You're all individuals!
Crowd: We're all individuals!
Lone voice: I'm not!
Posts: 12927 | From: The Pool of Life | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by loggats:
[QUOTE]It isn't so much mine as Christ's.
In that case, you're part of mine too. Welcome to the club!
Posts: 3845 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
IngoB
Sentire cum Ecclesia
# 8700
|
Posted
The pope almost certainly did not think about Protestants, Orthodox, Anglicans, or other non-RCs in his comments. This one was squarely aimed at 1) general missionary activity by the RCC, and 2) "(soon to be) fallen away" Catholics in particular of the "spiritual but not religious" and/or the "hierarchy evil, laity good" kind.
I doubt very much that Pope Francis would say anything contrary to Vatican II concerning the various heretic and schismatic Christian that regrettably live their faith more or less removed from the RCC. By all reports I have heard so far, he's rather a typical modern Jesuit concerning such ecumenical matters, i.e., accepting and encouraging to a fault.
While with rather different priorities, there is little doubt that this pope will continue setting priorities on getting his own house, the RCC, in order. Protestants/Anglicans in particular will be either considered as basically unimportant because disappearing/self-destructing all on their lonesome (Europe, partly USA), or simply as competitors to be "out-missioned" (rest of the world, in particular South America with this pope). The Orthodox/Oriental Churches are - still - a special case, and it is unclear what role they will play.
The only indirect relevance of this speech to Protestants/Anglicans is then that Pope Francis is apparently intending to reinvigorate the RC missions, and is trying to stem the losses of anti-hierarchy RCs. Protestants/Anglicans better get used to not being central to RC agendas (other than as competitors where they are competitive) for the foreseeable future.
--------------------
They’ll have me whipp’d for speaking true; thou’lt have me whipp’d for lying; and sometimes I am whipp’d for holding my peace. - The Fool in King Lear
Posts: 12010 | From: Gone fishing | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
EtymologicalEvangelical
Shipmate
# 15091
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's Cat
There are two options to interpret this:
1. If you take a narrow or restrictive view of "the church", then he is wrong. Completely, utterly, fundamentally wrong. In fact, I think it is often easier to find Jesus outside the church than inside it.
2. If you take a very wide and inclusive view of the church, then it is true because it is a tautology. The wide and inclusive view of the church is that anywhere that God is active, there is the church. But what is that saying? Nothing.
There is no other option, because anything "between" these, is just a restrictive view of the church, even in slightly wider than other views. So he is either completely wrong or meaningless. I tend towards the former.
![[Overused]](graemlins/notworthy.gif)
I agree with this post in its entirety.
Nothing more to add.
--------------------
You can argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome': but you neither can nor need argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome, but I'm not saying this is true'. CS Lewis
Posts: 3625 | From: South Coast of England | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Uncle Pete
Loyaute me lie
# 10422
|
Posted
I wondered how long his honeymoon would last. Got it about right. Oddly, it usually happens when the Roman Pontiff speaks to his Church, but everyone else gets their knickers twisted.
Big clue to Protestants. He's not [your pope. Go on ignoring him.
--------------------
Even more so than I was before
Posts: 20466 | From: No longer where I was | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
L'organist
Shipmate
# 17338
|
Posted
I agree too EE.
And in my head is repeating that much-loved hymn
O Jesu, thou art standing
Outside the fast-closed door...
Bishop W Walsham How (English Hymnal 578)
--------------------
Rara temporum felicitate ubi sentire quae velis et quae sentias dicere licet
Posts: 4950 | From: somewhere in England... | Registered: Sep 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
EtymologicalEvangelical
Shipmate
# 15091
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB
I doubt very much that Pope Francis would say anything contrary to Vatican II concerning the various heretic and schismatic Christian that regrettably live their faith more or less removed from the RCC.
...
Protestants/Anglicans in particular will be either considered as basically unimportant because disappearing/self-destructing all on their lonesome (Europe, partly USA), or simply as competitors to be "out-missioned" (rest of the world, in particular South America with this pope).
...
Protestants/Anglicans better get used to not being central to RC agendas (other than as competitors where they are competitive) for the foreseeable future.
I think RCC mission needs comments like these like the proverbial "hole in the head".
To see the church in mean-spirited 'competitive' terms rather betrays a total lack of understanding of the Christian life, not to mention the nature of Christ. Seeing the Church of Jesus Christ in terms of outward authority, power and "market share" is about as carnal and worldly as it is possible to imagine.
It is also deeply disobedient to the utterances of the so called "Holy Father", who, unless my ears have been deceiving me, has been talking about something called humility!!
--------------------
You can argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome': but you neither can nor need argue with a man who says, 'Rice is unwholesome, but I'm not saying this is true'. CS Lewis
Posts: 3625 | From: South Coast of England | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Laurelin
Shipmate
# 17211
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I doubt very much that Pope Francis would say anything contrary to Vatican II concerning the various heretic and schismatic Christian that regrettably live their faith more or less removed from the RCC.
'Regrettably'? Very happy where I am, ta, and thanking God for my security in Christ.
I have respect for the Catholic Church, and don't approve of Catholic-bashing. It's a shame when the courtesy isn't returned. This sort of snide silliness will get on my nerves no matter who's spouting it.
As for Pope Francis ... I've already said that it's hardly news that he's talking up a good orthodox Catholic spiel. He's the POPE, for Pete's sake! (Ha. Freudian slip. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) )
--------------------
"I fear that to me Siamese cats belong to the fauna of Mordor." J.R.R. Tolkien
Posts: 545 | From: The Shire | Registered: Jul 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
I like your commnets Laurelin. And IngoB is just being consistent, bless him. We love him despite his invincible ignorance. As we must.
[ 24. April 2013, 13:00: Message edited by: Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard ]
--------------------
Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Forthview
Shipmate
# 12376
|
Posted
Laurelin, I have to thank you for your kind words earlier on.I hope that I didn't imply that all christians who do not happen to be visibly lionked in communion with the Holy See are ipso facto anti Catholic.
Even those who do not agree with the Catholic church are not necessarily anti Catholic. They are more than entitled to disagree with the Catholic church as they have a different viewpoint.
What I cannot undersytand is how Indifferently can suggest that the roman Catholic church should not attempt to evangelise.I would have thought that for a Christian of any sort every word,every action should be an attempt to bear witness to Christ or in other words to eveangelise,to bring the good News in both word and deed to our brothers and sisters.
Presumably Indifferently is a baptised and fully fledged christian but does he not need any further evangelisation ?Within the Catholic church evengelisation is an ongoing thing,every reading, every liturgy, every eucharist is an attempt at evangelisation as we have to be reminded constantly of the teachings of Jesus that we should love both God and our fellow beings as we love ourselves.
Posts: 3444 | From: Edinburgh | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view
