Thread: Historical fiction recommendations Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=025686

Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Le Roc's post on the Reading thread:
quote:
I'm interested in reading historical novels, but ones that are set in time periods we don't know an awful lot about. So not something from the Tudors or the late Renaissance, but something from the Babylonian era, or the darker parts of the Middle Ages for example.

Preferably not books of the kind "passive woman finds out she needs a man who can give her a sense of security" (I'm looking at the Book Groop right now [Biased] )

Does anyone have an idea?

I'd be really interested in this too. I've just finished a spate of historical novels set in the Tudor period, which, while enjoyable, have left me feeling I've had enough of Robert Dudley, Lord Cecil and Elizabeth I to last me for a while.

I quite enjoyed Alison Weir's historical novel "The Captive Queen", about Eleanor of Aquitaine, which was a bit of a change and an era that doesn't get covered that often. Eleanor was a lively, spirited personality who had quite a colourful life - you couldn't make it up - and the book was a good read.

Anyone got any good recommendations, as per Le Roc's outline?
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
One I keep meaning to read, so I can't truly vouch for it is The Tale of Genji, written in eleventh century Japan. It is touted as the first novel published and is still read today. I don't think you can get farther off the beaten path of historical fiction than a historical book written by an insider. Of course, it wasn't actually historical to the author, Lady Murasaki Shikibu. [Biased]
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Thank you, that looks interesting! The book itself is in Public Domain because of its age of course, and there are even some free English translations available [Yipee] I'm downloading an epub version here right now.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
There is an historical novel called 'The Eye of God,' in which Richard, Duke of Gloucester (later Richard III) is an important, though not major, character. The leading character is a female apothecary in Canterbury(?) who has an interesting career and love life. It is not lengthy, and I considered it a 'good read.'
Sorry I can't cite the author; I gave the book to a friend!
But with the current news about the remains of R3, it has a certain interest.
 
Posted by AngloCatholicGirl (# 16435) on :
 
If you're good with detective fiction, then I can recommend the Amelia Peabody series, by Elizabeth Peters. Amelia is a female Egyptologist in the pre-WW1 era, who gets involved in all sorts of crime and intrigue (along with her family). Very well written and nice to have a good strong female lead who is also very real and fallible like the rest of us. Link to Amelia Peabody site

Christian Jacq is a French archeologist who started writing novels set in ancient Egypt, I can recommend The Black Pharoah and his Rameses II series (he manages to work in Moses and the Exodus from the Egyptian viewpoint in those). He usually has good strong female characters too.

Also, P C Doherty, as well as writing historical crime set in Ancient Egypt and Medieval England (set during the reigns of Edwards 1,2 & 3) has written historical novels where he has pieced together available evidence of real mysteries and written them up as a novel. Death of a King and Fate of Princes are good. The Rose Demon is strictly non-crime fiction and is worth checking out too. You can find a bibliography Here

If you want more historical crime fiction, I know loads I can recommend!
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Finished downloading The Tale of Genji. It's 1075 pages! [Ultra confused] I'll see you in a couple of months [Smile]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
The Brother Cadfael mysteries by Ellis Peters are set in twelfth century England. They are very well-written, and AFAIK the details of life at the time are accurate.

Moo
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
There is always "The Girl with the Pearl Earring" by Tracy Chevalier, if anyone still hasn't read this. We don't often get historical novels set in the 17th century Netherlands. It's about a maid who comes to work for the painter Vermeer. I enjoyed this one enough to get the book, and the DVD is a visual treat.
 
Posted by Niminypiminy (# 15489) on :
 
Some left-field historical novels:

Out of print but available second hand, Children of the Book by Peter Carter is a gripping novel about the siege of Vienna -- told from three perspectives, an inhabitant of Vienna, a Turkish Janissary, and a Polish soldier.

The Corner that Held Them by Sylvia Townsend Warner follows the fortunes of an obscure East Anglian convent through the fourteenth century -- sounds dull, but is actually fascinating, clear-eyed and full of a sense of time and place.

I once read a historical novel about Athanasius -- I so wish I could remember what its title and author were -- it was a cracking read.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I very much enjoyed 'The Roman' and 'The Secret of the Kingdom' by Mika Waltari. These follow the (separate) stories of Minutus Lausus Manilianus, and his father Marcus Manilianus, who happens to be present at the Crucifixion. They are very well-written, a bit gory at times, and an enthralling read.

A very good novel about Richard III (my hero [Biased] ) is 'The Court of the Midnight King' by Freda Warrington, a dreamy, beguiling fantasy, in a slightly parallel England.
 
Posted by SusanDoris (# 12618) on :
 
Well, these are true stories, but told, I think, in good story style. (maybe that's historical faction.) I have always enjoyed historical fiction too, of course.

'Wedlock' by Wendy Moore, sub-title: 'How England's worst husband got his come-uppance'. True story of Mary Eleanor, Countess of Strathmore and ancestor of the Queen. A gripping story - you just couldn't make it up! [Smile] Friends to whom I recommended it found reading it was a bit tricky because of trhying to remember the names, but I listened to the audio book and it was un-put-downable.

'Perdita' by Hilary Scharper The story of Mary , Robinson late 18th century actress and, in some ways, the first 'celebrity'.

Can't remember the exact title, but it's a biography told in story style of John tradascant, Robert Cecil's gardener.

'Arthur and George'by Julian Barnes. Sir Arthur conan Doyle and George Edaljiand how their lives came together.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Just remembered: if you want a good laugh Gyles Brandreth has written a series of novels in which Oscar Wilde and his friend Arthur Conan Doyle solve murder mysteries! Yes, they are as daft as they sound, and meticulously researched. Very enjoyable.

[ 01. June 2013, 17:26: Message edited by: Pine Marten ]
 
Posted by Hart (# 4991) on :
 
Kristen Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undsett is one of my favorite novels (actually, a trilogy, but the books are normally sold bound together now). It's the biography of a 14th Century Norwegian woman who is anything but passive! The way the characters in the book pray is worth the read alone, plus it's a pretty ripping yarn.
 
Posted by St. Gwladys (# 14504) on :
 
The Sister Fidelma books by Peter Tremayne are good - she's an Irish religeuse in a Celtic monastry, and also a brehon of the Irish law system.
Phil Rickman has written some medieval stories involving Dr Dee. I've read The Bones of Avalon. (He's probably better known for his Merrily Watkins series - she's the diocesan exorcist for the Hereford Diocese - great fun to read if you know Herefordshire and the Borders at all)
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
Simon Levack has a mystery series featuring Yaotl, who is an Aztec slave and failed priest, set in early 1500’s Mexico just prior to the coming of the Conquistadors. All four books are good, but I'd recommend starting with the second in the series, "Shadow of the Lords," then going back to book #1 for more of Yaotl's backstory. Fascinating non-WASP culture ... butterflies,"useless days."
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Ellis Peters, who wrote Cadfael, was also Edith Pargeter, who wrote the Heaven Tree trilogy (which is excellent) and the Brothers of Gwynnedd books (3 or 4 of them, about the last independent Princes of Wales before Edward I took over).
Welsh history isn't that well represented in historical fiction, but the period of Llewelyn the Great and his grandson Llewelyn the Last has also been covered by the excellent Sharon Kay Penman, in Here Be Dragons, Falls the Shadow (which also includes Simon de Montfort) and The Reckoning. Have plenty of hankies ready for the end of The Reckoning!!!
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
The Stephen Sayler Gordianus stories set in ancient Rome are excellent. Good history, good detection and precise writing.
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
I've just finished The Potter's Hand by AN Wilson, about Josiah Wedgwood and the Enlightenment. Wonderful writing and some fascinating reflections on the part played in 18 C England by religion in the shape of Methodism, Unitarianism and the established church.
 
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on :
 
I assume nobody's mentioned Wolf Hall because it's too obvious?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Some good suggestions here! I have to say that detective/mystery isn't exactly my favourite genre, but I guess it might be a good excuse to look into a definite time period as well.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Great question! I love reading historical fiction, especially seeking out unfamiliar times, places, and perspectives, and I love getting other people's perspectives.

I recommend Pauline Gedge on ancient Egypt ... she has a couple of series, if you're looking to explore that direction.

Annabelle Lyon's The Golden Mean and The Sweet Girl are about Aristotle and the people around him.

David Liss has an interesting series of eighteenth-century England mystery novels with an intriguing hero, staring with A Conspiracy of Paper.

Margaret George and Sharon Kay Penman are my two favourite authors of historical fiction, the only caveats being that they do tend to stick to the relatively well-known characters and periods, and in the case of both writers, I like their earlier novels better than their later. George's The Autobiography of Henry VIII and Penman's The Sunne in Splendour (Richard III) are two of the best novels I've ever read and they definitely kick-started my early interest in reading historical fiction.

Katherine Govier's The Ghost Brush is a fascinating novel set in nineteenth-century Japan. Leslie Downer's The Last Concubine is also set in that place and period.

Lawrence Hill's The Book of Negroes (sold under the title Somebody Knows my Name in the US, I think) is a wonderful exploration of the experience of an African slave captured and taken to the United States.

I could go on and on ... I got most of those recommendations from selecting the "historical fiction" tag on my own book review blog, which you could also have a glance through to see if anything else there interests you...

Also I've been looking for some good historical fiction set in ancient Rome for quite awhile (I read Colleen McCullough's Masters of Rome series; loved the subject matter; wasn't thrilled with her writing style). What I'd really like is a novel about Marc Antony, especially one that focused on his marriage to Fulvia, but I've never found any such novel. Anyone know of anything interesting in that era to recommend?
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
Jean Plaidy has covered pretty much every era and not just UK history either. Her Ferdinand & Isabella series is very good and I think she covered some other European dynasties too.

I read Elizabeth Chadwick's books, set around the Norman Conquest, as a teenager but can't remember much about them now.

Michael Jecks is another historical crime author, set in the reign of Richard II if memory serves.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
If you do decide to read Brother Cadfael, I would advise you to take them in the order in which they were written.

The first is A Morbid Taste for Bones. It has a very original plot.

Moo
 
Posted by Gussie (# 12271) on :
 
I've just downloaded 'The Corner that Held Them' to my Kindle as it sounds like my sort of book. Thanks for the suggestion Niminypiminy.
At present I'm reading Merivel by Rose Tremain. As it's set in at the time of Charles II it might be a time in history that's a bit familiar, but it's a good read all the same, as is Restoration the first book about Merivel.

Edited as it's late and I've drunk too much wine to spell properly.

[ 01. June 2013, 21:42: Message edited by: Gussie ]
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Thank you, that looks interesting! The book itself is in Public Domain because of its age of course, and there are even some free English translations available [Yipee] I'm downloading an epub version here right now.

I just started reading it, but I am not abandoning the mystery I'm listening to on R4extra. I wish there were page numbers. I am forcing myself to put it down, i.e., shrink it and confine it to the lower right hand corner of the computer screen. It is a v. compelling story!
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
There is always "The Girl with the Pearl Earring" by Tracy Chevalier, if anyone still hasn't read this. We don't often get historical novels set in the 17th century Netherlands. It's about a maid who comes to work for the painter Vermeer. I enjoyed this one enough to get the book, and the DVD is a visual treat.

I enjoyed that novel too. I can also recommend David's Liss's novel 'The Coffee Trader', which is about the Jewish commodity traders of 17th c. Amsterdam. Another novel set in the same time and place is Deborah Moggach's 'Tulip Fever'. I own a copy, but haven't read it yet.

My preferred era for historical fiction is the 18th c. It doesn't seem to be a hugely popular period for British novelists, though, unless you're talking about naval novels set at the end of the century. Many prolific novelists will write one or two novels set in this period, but spend most of their time exploring earlier or later centuries.
 
Posted by Horseman Bree (# 5290) on :
 
A plug here for Mary Renault. Her Alexander Trilogy, and sequel about the scramble after his death are the obvious choices, but there are quite a few others.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
As a huge fan of historical fiction, I can't resist putting in my tuppence-worth.

I'll add my voice to the cheers for Brother Cadfael but less so for Sister Fidelma; I didn't find the writing style nearly so good.

It seems that Brother Cadfael inspired several imitations: Brother Athelstan by Paul Harding (set in London in the 1370s) is lighthearted with larger-than-life characters; Matthew Bartholomew by Susannah Gregory (set in Cambridge in the 1340s) is a doctor and teacher of medicine at the University, more serious in style than Brother Athelstan, but good reads as well.

If twelfth-century sleuthing is your thing, try the Mistress of the Art of Death books by Ariana Franklin, the heroine being a lady pathologist. Sadly, there won't be any more of them, as the author died in 2011. [Frown]

Elizabeth Chadwick's books were very readable, in a rather lightweight, romantic way. If you fancy the period just before the Tudors, Anne Easter Smith's novels set in the time of the Wars of the Roses are quite a good read.

[heresy alert]
As I said over on the Book thread, I gave up on Wolf Hall; I didn't like Hilary Mantel's writing style at all.
[/heresy alert OFF]
 
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on :
 
Pauline Gedge's novels are full of historical errors; one of my students amused herself by compiling two pages of them. Single-spaced. Gedge's love of melodrama and "glamour" often gets the better of her, so that we see historical figures being bumped off when the odds are that they died in their beds, Egyptian women painting themselves yellow all over, Ramesses II sitting at a desk (the Egyptians didn't use them), and the palace being furnished with marble water steps (there's very little marble in Egypt)!

But Gedge is the epitome of taste and accuracy compared to the egregious P.C. Doherty. He's written mysteries set in Egypt--the food is wrong, the trees are wrong, the names are wrong because he didn't take the time to find Egyptian names for many of his characters, just made them up. His detective character is called Amerotke; I assume that sounded Egyptian enough to this loathsome hack when he thought it up, perhaps in the shower. What's even worse is that he uses real characters and he gets them wrong too. Nobody has referred to Egypt's greatest Queen as "Hatasu" for a century; he calls her "Hatusu!" Incidentally, Doherty, using several pen names, churns his stuff out at an amazingly fast clip. What's wrong with publishers these days?

A writer using the pseudonym Lauren Haney has also written a series set in Egypt and Nubia; her main character is an Egyptian MP stationed in Nubia. A good idea, but her plotting is weak and her prose doesn't grip. Also, her research is way way out of date--her characters fret that no Egyptian army has been seen in Nubia in twenty years. Since the action takes place during the joint reign of Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, that's a really elementary error; both co-regents saw action there. And she bought into the now discredited notion of the "Thutmosid feud," with a character wondering why Hatshepsut doesn't do away with her nephew. Umm, what about the future of the dynasty? One suspects that Haney was strongly influenced by the crap-o-rama fiction of Eloise Jarvis McGraw. [brick wall]

So, if you want to read about ancient Egypt, my suggestion is: stick to non-fiction by reputable authors!
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
I highly recommend Mistress to the Crown, a really well-researched and accurate story based on the scant facts we know of "mistress Shore" an amazing woman who was Edward IV's mistress. How she manages to divorce her husband for impotency, survive despite the "moral majority", the queen's powerful family and the turbulence after the King's sudden death is fascinating. It's a shame that the novel is "lumped" in with historical romance because it so isn't your bodice ripping, mushy fantasy.

Link on Amazon

Admission I do know the author but I wouldn't recommend her book if I didn't think it was great.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
My preferred era for historical fiction is the 18th c. It doesn't seem to be a hugely popular period for British novelists, though, unless you're talking about naval novels set at the end of the century. Many prolific novelists will write one or two novels set in this period, but spend most of their time exploring earlier or later centuries.

True, and this has reminded me that I was a huge fan of C S Forester's "Hornblower" novels (young lad at the time of Nelson's navy works his way up to become Admiral and Lord Hornblower. As one does).

My preferred era at the moment is earlier medieval but there doesn't seem to be a great deal around. A book about Jane Shore would be good, if available in hard copy, and there's also "The Goldsmith's Wife", a Jean Plaidy novel about her, though Jean Plaidy's books are old now, and hard to get.

Anya Seton, who also wrote some great novels, is also difficult to get now, but "Katherine", set in Chaucer's day about the woman who had a long on and off affair with John of Gaunt, is a really good read.
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Ariel:
quote:
Anya Seton, who also wrote some great novels, is also difficult to get now, but "Katherine", set in Chaucer's day about the woman who had a long on and off affair with John of Gaunt, is a really good read.
One of my favorites!

ETA: Not only did she live in Chaucer's day, she was most likely Chaucer's sister-in-law.

[ 02. June 2013, 06:09: Message edited by: Lyda*Rose ]
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
I've just remembered a wonderful writer called Norah Lofts. All her novels are very well written and researched, the House at...series in particular, is excellent. It follows the story of a house in Suffolk over the centuries beginning in Saxon times and ending in the early 20C. Some of the characters are loosely linked down the ages.

The other very readable author is Edward Rutherford who takes a great city, for example New York or London, and follows the history of that city from its foundation to the present day.

And another easy writer is Ken Follett whose novels set in the past are well written and excellently constructed.
 
Posted by Haydee (# 14734) on :
 
And Lindsay Davis for Imperial Rome (and the Roman Empire) via her detective Falco
 
Posted by Gee D (# 13815) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
The Brother Cadfael mysteries by Ellis Peters are set in twelfth century England. They are very well-written, and AFAIK the details of life at the time are accurate.

Moo

Should that be AFAIK or IIRC? (Sorry, just picking up on the line under your avatar)
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Egeria:
Pauline Gedge's novels are full of historical errors; one of my students amused herself by compiling two pages of them. Single-spaced. Gedge's love of melodrama and "glamour" often gets the better of her, so that we see historical figures being bumped off when the odds are that they died in their beds, Egyptian women painting themselves yellow all over, Ramesses II sitting at a desk (the Egyptians didn't use them), and the palace being furnished with marble water steps (there's very little marble in Egypt)!

That's good to know; I've read several of her books but as I know virtually nothing about the period, wouldn't have spotted any of those errors. Historical fiction can certainly be full of pitfalls as regards anachronisms and other detail. So many things to get wrong!

Someone recommended Ken Follett -- I personally think he's very mediocre as a writer (in terms of his actual writing style) but if his writing doesn't irritate you, he does do some nice historical blockbusters. A lot of people seem to like his medieval book, Pillars of the Earth, though I wasn't crazy about it. I have enjoyed the first two volumes of his trilogy about the 20th century, Fall of Giants and The Winter of the World ... again, not the writing, but the sweep of historical events and characters he takes in is interesting.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Try looking out for the works of Ben Kane. The Forgotten Legion, The Silver Eagle and The Road to Rome give accurate details about the destruction of Etruscan culture by the Romans, very good details about the ill-fated 54/53BC campaign of Rome against the Parthians and the fate of Marcus Licinius Crassus and also touch on the life of a gladiator and the rise of Mithraism.

Or you could do worse than looking out for anything by Rosemary Sutcliffe: although originally thought of as a children's writer she was historically very good and the books aren't dumbed-down.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I'd second the recommendation of Rosemary Sutcliffe - Roman to early medieval Britain (including Scotland), very well researched, includes Vikings and some periods that aren't well known. Some of it may be inaccurate according to our understanding, but she used the best information she had at the time she was writing. One of the things I particularly like about her books is the unsentimental portrayal of animals - the human characters do sometimes form close bonds with their favourite hounds or horses, but it's very clear that they aren't pets in the modern sense.

Mollie Hunter also wrote historical books for the same age range, mostly published in the 1970s but still fairly easy to obtain second-hand. Hers are all set in Scotland - for example, 'The Stronghold' about the people who built the brochs, or 'The Spanish Letters' (espionage in sixteenth century Edinburgh).

If reading any modern authors do bear in mind what Egeria said; a lot of them don't bother to do much research and those that do may ignore historical reality in order to produce a commercially viable story, so what you are actually reading is a story about modern characters in fancy dress. Some authors do manage to pull off the feat of writing about how things really were without alienating their modern audience, but watch out for the ones who started out as romantic novelists and switched to detective stories because the pay is better, they're the worst.

I don't read many 'straight' historical novels, but if you do want to try a few detective/mystery stories I can recommend Fidelis Morgan (Restoration London with an excursion to France and the Jacobite court in exile in the third book of the series; the first one is called 'Unnatural Fire'); R. S. Downie (accurately researched series about a doctor in Roman Britain); and Catriona McPherson (series about a character called Dandy Gilver set in 1920s Scotland; worth reading for the wry comments about Dandy's unhappy marriage).

Add me to the list of people who find Sister Fidelma intensely irritating... but Peter Tremayne does know the period, so that series is at least historically accurate.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I've read a couple of Sister Fidelma stories and didn't mind them, although the small print of the paperbacks didn't help.

Mary Stewart's wonderful 'The Merlin Trilogy' is terrific, if you want something a little more than just historical fiction.

And Bernard Cornwell's excellent series of 'Sharpe' novels, set during the Napoleonic wars (as per the TV series), are well researched and good fun.
 
Posted by SusanDoris (# 12618) on :
 
I was not a reader of Wilbur Smith's books, but the two Ancient Egyptian books, 'River God' and the sequel, whose name I forget' I enjoyed very much.
 
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gussie:
At present I'm reading Merivel by Rose Tremain. As it's set in at the time of Charles II it might be a time in history that's a bit familiar, but it's a good read all the same, as is Restoration the first book about Merivel.

That reminds me of Tremain's Music and Silence. I liked that a lot.

I'm not sure whether it's historical fiction, or sf heavily disguised as historical fiction, but Neal Stephenson's Baroque Trilogy, (Quicksilver, The Confusion, The System of the World) is brilliant. One of the main characters is a friend of Newton and Leibniz.

[ 02. June 2013, 16:19: Message edited by: Dafyd ]
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
May I point out that Rosemary Sutcliffe has quite a bit of pre-Roman stuff! There is a a listing in chronological order of her work on Amazon.

Jengie
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pine Marten:
I've read a couple of Sister Fidelma stories and didn't mind them, although the small print of the paperbacks didn't help.

They were one of those, "historically, these ought to be interesting. What a shame he can't write" occasions.

Christian Jacq is another...
 
Posted by Elephenor (# 4026) on :
 
A quick plug for one of my favourite living authors, Anita Mason. Her latest two books were both fictional depictions of major episodes contemporary with the Tudors, but very foreign to them - the Anabaptist rebellion in Münster (Perfection), and Cortés' conquest of Mexico (The Right Hand of the Sun).
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
They're mysteries, but the Judge Dee series by Van Gulik have held up pretty well for a look at medieval China. The first few are based on traditional Chinese mysteries.

And when you're done with The Tale of Gengi, there's always The Satyricon for a period nove
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Egeria:
... Gedge is the epitome of taste and accuracy compared to the egregious P.C. Doherty ...

He's the same bloke as the Paul Harding/Paul Doherty of the Brother Athelstan books. He's also written several books featuring another medieval sleuth called Hugh Corbett; I read one of them, but couldn't really get into it (I can't remember now which century he came from or what his function was).

I don't know enough about the time of the Brother Athelstan books (early in the reign of Richard II) to make educated gripes about the accuracy, so I just enjoyed them for their entertainment value.

Slight tangent re historical inaccuracy: Trudy mentioned Ken Follett, and we're getting a TV dramatisation of World without End at the moment. In the first episode they had Edward II being buried in the wrong cathedral; there's really no excuse for making mistakes like that. Anyone who watched the abomination that was The Tudors will know what I mean. [Mad]

Sorry. Rant over, and fluffiness restored. [Smile]
 
Posted by St. Stephen the Stoned (# 9841) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:
...the abomination that was The Tudors ...

It's on again. Watch out for
(I made the last one up, but you get the idea.)
 
Posted by Lord Jestocost (# 12909) on :
 
Jan Guillou's Knight Templar trilogy trilogy - "The Road to Jerusalem", "The Knight Templar", "The Kingdom at the End of the Road". Guillou created a fictitious character, Arn, who has become a modern-day Swedish folk hero, and by a bit of handwaving becomes the grandfather of the very real Swedish folk hero Birger Jarl. He falls in love and for various reasons has to go off on the crusades for a decade or two. His one true love back in Sweden is exiled to a convent. Their stories are told in parallel, and as well as very well told romance, church politics, intrigue, battles etc we get the events that led to the creation of what is recognisably the modern kingdom of Sweden, out of the various tribes that just happened to be living in that area.

[ 03. June 2013, 08:34: Message edited by: Lord Jestocost ]
 
Posted by Cottontail (# 12234) on :
 
An oldie but goodie: if you like your historical novels to be Romantic with a capital R, then D.K. Broster's The Flight of the Heron (1925) is hard to beat. It's set during the Jacobite Rebellion, and tells the story of a friendship between two noble-hearted men on opposite sides of the conflict. It also goes down as one of the most homoerotic books of all time. [Big Grin]

(There are a couple of sequels too, but in my opinion, not worth the bother.)

At the other end of the romance spectrum (i.e., realistic to the point of stomach-churning horror), you could try Lewis Grassic Gibbon's Spartacus (1933). It is earlier than the version that the film is based on, but is thoroughly well-written by an author who knew his antiquities. But be warned: it is the most distressing and bloody book, and you will never again be able to talk about the Roman 'civilisation'.

[ 03. June 2013, 08:35: Message edited by: Cottontail ]
 
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on :
 
I've enjoyed a fair number of novels by Elizabeth Chadwick . They've been mostly medieval, set around the time of Henry II.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:

Slight tangent re historical inaccuracy: Trudy mentioned Ken Follett, and we're getting a TV dramatisation of World without End at the moment. In the first episode they had Edward II being buried in the wrong cathedral; there's really no excuse for making mistakes like that. Anyone who watched the abomination that was The Tudors will know what I mean. [Mad]

Sorry. Rant over, and fluffiness restored. [Smile]

I can't let this go without comment: not only was Edward buried in the wrong cathedral, Roger Mortimer was flung from a balcony, if memory serves... and I was going to list other glaring inaccuracies but my brain has wiped them all out in a fit of horror. Oh yes, my favourite nitpicking bleurch which I'm always banging on about these days: long dangly earrings! Medieval ladies (yes, I'm looking at you too, the cast of The White Queen trailer), please do not wear them [Ultra confused] !
 
Posted by Hawk (# 14289) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Edith:
The other very readable author is Edward Rutherford who takes a great city, for example New York or London, and follows the history of that city from its foundation to the present day.

I tried reading Dublin but got quickly put off when he wheeled in some vikings complete with horned helmets! As any fule knows, that's a ridiculous myth - no professional warrior would wear anything so impractical.

If a writer can't get basic historical facts right I worry what else they're making up. I don't mind fiction, but if I'm reading historical fiction, I have to insist the history's right.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Of course, you don't have to stick to the UK/Europe.

Try Gore Vidal: Washington DC, Burr, 1876, Lincoln and Empire are all good reads and fairly accurate in setting.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pine Marten:
Just remembered: if you want a good laugh Gyles Brandreth has written a series of novels in which Oscar Wilde and his friend Arthur Conan Doyle solve murder mysteries! Yes, they are as daft as they sound, and meticulously researched. Very enjoyable.

Then don't forget Willie Rushton's WG Grace's Last Case, which hardly counts as historical fiction but is a very good and highly allusive laugh.

Just read Umberto Eco's The Prague Cemetery, too, about the forging of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which Eco says is carefully researched (but you cvan never be sure whether he's just being post-modernist there).

by the way, slight tangent, but the Eco book reminded me of a kids' novel I enjoyed when I was about 10, I suppose (mid-late 70s), set in mid-C19 northern Italy. I think it involved the Orsini bomb plot and there was a revolutionary who was, or pretended to be, a pencil seller from Ancona. But that's all that I remember about it. Does it ring bells with anyone?

[ 03. June 2013, 13:57: Message edited by: Albertus ]
 
Posted by St. Gwladys (# 14504) on :
 
Rosemary Sutcliffe has already been mentioned. I remember watching a dramatisation of "Eagle of the Ninth" as a unday afternoon serial many years ago. I was extremely pleased to pick up the trilogy in one hardback in a library sale, and found it very readable!
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
I had to look this up because it's been so long …
'Vespers in Vienna' by Bruce Marshall is a good novel set in post-WW2 occupied Vienna. Plot involves the Allies repatriating refugees, some of whom don't want to go back home.
Lead character IIRC is a British colonel, dealing with a Russian refugee ballerina. Much of the action takes place in the convent where the dancer is hiding.
It was filmed as 'The Red Danube' with a star-quality cast.
It's been years since I've seen it, but I still chuckle over the colonel instructing the mother superior in the proper procedure for making tea.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Palimpsest: And when you're done with The Tale of Gengi
Well, I think I can read it a bit faster than I said before [Biased] I'm looking up reviews on the net of various books that are suggested on this thread.

quote:
Pine Marten: In the first episode they had Edward II being buried in the wrong cathedral;
I'm sure that his corpse won't mind [Biased]
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
quote:
May I point out that Rosemary Sutcliffe has quite a bit of pre-Roman stuff!
[Hot and Hormonal] You're absolutely right... how could I have forgotten Sun Horse, Moon Horse !

I forgot to mention Michael Pearce's series of books about the Mamur Zapt (mystery/thrillers set in Edwardian Egypt, depicts tensions between the Egyptians and the British). I started reading them because I couldn't resist a book with the title The Camel of Destruction ; I have sometimes been disappointed by books that do not live up to their titles, but this wasn't one of them.

[ 04. June 2013, 07:43: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Can Three Men in a Boat be considered an historic novel? My copy is well over a hundred years old! I lead a discussion about it in the Ship's book group a few years ago and think that it's one of the funniest books ever written.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
Can Three Men in a Boat be considered an historic novel? My copy is well over a hundred years old!

Historic*? Debatable. Historical**? No. It is a book that was contemporary when it was written.

What we are discussing is books about periods other than the one they were written in.

*= makes history
**= about history
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Originally posted by Cottontail:
quote:
An oldie but goodie: if you like your historical novels to be Romantic with a capital R, then D.K. Broster's The Flight of the Heron (1925) is hard to beat. It's set during the Jacobite Rebellion, and tells the story of a friendship between two noble-hearted men on opposite sides of the conflict. It also goes down as one of the most homoerotic books of all time. [Big Grin]

(There are a couple of sequels too, but in my opinion, not worth the bother.)

I second The Flight of the Heron, but would extend the "don't bother" to several of D.K.Broster's other books, particularly "Almond, Wild Almond" which is drivel.

Fiona Watson's "MacBeth: A True Story" is interesting, as she has melded straightforward biography, where sources exist, with well-informed fiction filling in the gaps. The fiction sections are in italics, but the whole thing is seamless. I was surprised at the extent of the non-fiction sections; the fiction exists to bridge gaps in the historical record and make the whole flow.
 
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by St. Gwladys:
Rosemary Sutcliffe has already been mentioned. I remember watching a dramatisation of "Eagle of the Ninth" as a unday afternoon serial many years ago. I was extremely pleased to pick up the trilogy in one hardback in a library sale, and found it very readable!

I agree; "The Eagle of the Ninth" is one of my favourite books and has been since I read it as a child. I didn't much like the television series but I thought the film "The Eagle" which is based on the book was good. Also agree about "The Flight of the Heron" - I did quite enjoy the sequels but they're not a patch on the first book. (Sensing a homoerotic theme here. [Biased] )

"Wolf Hall" is languishing near the bottom of the list on my Kindle... I just couldn't get on with it and life's too short.

I've just purchased, from one of our charity shops, a copy of Alison Weir's "The Six Wives of Henry VIII" which I'm looking forward to reading.

Nen - loves having a book to look forward to.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Edith:
I've just remembered a wonderful writer called Norah Lofts. All her novels are very well written and researched, the House at...series in particular, is excellent. It follows the story of a house in Suffolk over the centuries beginning in Saxon times and ending in the early 20C. Some of the characters are loosely linked down the ages.


I'll second Norah Lofts. I think she's one of the best novelists of any stripe, ever. I imagine she's out of print now, with a few bios and "How Far to Bethlehem," probably being the exceptions. If you know any old ladies like me it's worth sneaking into our attics to look for them.
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
quote:
Originally posted by Edith:
I've just remembered a wonderful writer called Norah Lofts. All her novels are very well written and researched, the House at...series in particular, is excellent. It follows the story of a house in Suffolk over the centuries beginning in Saxon times and ending in the early 20C. Some of the characters are loosely linked down the ages.


I'll second Norah Lofts. I think she's one of the best novelists of any stripe, ever. I imagine she's out of print now, with a few bios and "How Far to Bethlehem," probably being the exceptions. If you know any old ladies like me it's worth sneaking into our attics to look for them.
If anyone's interested the House series was reprinted by The History Press in 2009.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
Can Three Men in a Boat be considered an historic novel? My copy is well over a hundred years old!

Historic*? Debatable. Historical**? No. It is a book that was contemporary when it was written.

What we are discussing is books about periods other than the one they were written in.

*= makes history
**= about history

I think I meant hysterical!
 
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on :
 
When it comes to historical fiction, no one is better that Patrick O'Brian, and very few even come close: his stories are exciting, his characters vivid, his world so clearly present to the reader! Even if you don't think you're interested in the Napoleonic Wars, you should give his Jack Aubrey/Stephen Maturin novels a try, starting from the beginning with Master and Commander .

Mary Renault is tops for ancient Greece, and like O'Brian she creates a world for the reader to inhabit. I loved her Alexander trilogy--those should also be read in order. (A caveat: don't attempt Funeral Games if you're feeling low. It's one of the goriest novels I've ever finished, although the very end is quite satisfying, as you see one real character and one semi-fictional one finishing up their respective memoirs.)

A recent addition to historical novels set in the ancient world are the books of Gillian Bradshaw. She is especially good at fish-out-of-water situations (Sarmatian cavalryman posted to Roman Britain, Alexandrian Greek businessman tryng to collect a debt in Rome, young Greek skipper trying fit in with the upper level of society). Her Cleopatra's Heir is an alternate history, in which she imagines what might have happened if young Ptolemy Caesar had escaped the assassins Octavian had sent after him. How fortunate for the young man that his mom had required him to learn Egyptian!

P.F. Chisholm has written five mysteries featuring a real historical figure, Sir Robert Carey, nephew of the first Queen Elizabeth. As Sir Robert takes on the duty of keeping the peace in the uncivilized northern border area of England, these are Tudor-era stories with a difference. He does come back to London for the latest two installments, but even so I think readers tired of the Tudor period will find the stories delightfully different. (Will Shakespeare has a role.) Sir Robert's sophisticated, urbane, and debt-ridden character is complemented by his rough-and-ready Land Sergeant.

P.F. Chisholm also writes "straight" historical fiction (lots of plots and spies) as Patricia Finney.

Finally, another mystery writer sets her stories in 1490s Glasgow--this is Pat McIntosh. Her main character is a young notary (previously intended for the priesthood). When he investigates a crime, the whole family gets involved--uncle, sisters, fiance, father-in-law, even the dog!

Happy reading!
 
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on :
 
Oops, that should have read: recent additions to historical novels set in the ancient world are the books of Gillian Bradshaw.
 
Posted by anoesis (# 14189) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SusanDoris:

Can't remember the exact title, but it's a biography told in story style of John tradascant, Robert Cecil's gardener.

Haven't read the whole thread - someone else may have mentioned it - the book is called 'Earthly Joys' and it's by Phillippa Gregory. (and yes, very good).
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Personally I can't stand Patrick O'Brien's style and prefer C S Forester's Hornblower series, which may be less politically correct (having been written about fifty years or so earlier) but reads less like an academic lecture on Some Aspects of the British Navy During The Early Nineteenth Century. Patrick O'Brien tells you the names of all the ropes in the rigging; C S Forester mentions them in passing while Hornblower is hanging upside-down trying to reef the sails in the middle of a storm.

Oddly enough Naomi Novik's Temeraire series, though set in an alternate timeline with added dragons, has an authentic 'nineteenth-century' feel to it...
 
Posted by Enoch (# 14322) on :
 
Something you could try. It's not fiction, but it was written in its own time and is both not very well known and set in an unfamiliar setting, is the Alexiad by Anna Comnena. It's available in Penguin, but there are also downloadable versions. She was the daughter of the Greek Emperor Alexius (1056-1118).

Another possibility is Conan Doyle's Brigadier Gerard stories. The Brigadier was a French officer in Napoleon's army. Some of them are available on Gutenberg.

Also quite entertaining is that The 39 Steps is not the only John Buchan 1st World War novel that features Richard Hannay. There is a series of them. They weren't written as historical fiction. They were written at the time. But they have sort of become so. Again, try Project Gutenberg.

Another option is to try Scott. Nobody reads him much these days but 100 years ago he was still sufficiently popular that the North British Railway named a lot of its engines after Scott characters.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:

Le Roc's post on the Reading thread:

Preferably not books of the kind "passive woman finds out she needs a man who can give her a sense of security."

Almost as bad are the "She was as spirited as she was beautiful, pity the bold rake who tried to tame her." [Biased]

Two that come to mind featuring strong, smart women without anachronistic girl-power stuff:


Year of Wonders: A Novel of the Plague

Geraldine Brooks

The Heretic's Daughter(regarding the Salem witch trials)
Kathleen Kent
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Twilight: Almost as bad are the "She was as spirited as she was beautiful, pity the bold rake who tried to tame her." [Biased]
Indeed! Give me books that have a female protagonist and portray her as a normal human being any time! I think I already spotted some on this thread. (So much to choose from [Smile] )
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Personally I can't stand Patrick O'Brien's style and prefer C S Forester's Hornblower series, which may be less politically correct (having been written about fifty years or so earlier) but reads less like an academic lecture on Some Aspects of the British Navy During The Early Nineteenth Century. Patrick O'Brien tells you the names of all the ropes in the rigging; C S Forester mentions them in passing while Hornblower is hanging upside-down trying to reef the sails in the middle of a storm.

Yes, I'd agree with that. I've read pretty much all of both series a few times, and I still enjoy both, depending on what kind of mood I'm in- but if I had to choose one it'd be Hornblower. There can be something a bit archly precious about O'Brien, and Forester was a better storyteller.
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
quote:

Le Roc's post on the Reading thread:

Preferably not books of the kind "passive woman finds out she needs a man who can give her a sense of security."

Almost as bad are the "She was as spirited as she was beautiful, pity the bold rake who tried to tame her." [Biased]

Two that come to mind featuring strong, smart women without anachronistic girl-power stuff:


Year of Wonders: A Novel of the Plague

Geraldine Brooks

The Heretic's Daughter(regarding the Salem witch trials)
Kathleen Kent

So agree, Twilight. And another couple of excellent writers are firstly, Katherine McMahon, I liked The Alchemist's Daughter best, but everything she has written is good including a novel about Mary Ward who founded the IBVM.

Also strongly recommend As Meat Loves Salt by Maria McCann, set in the English Civil War.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
quote:
Originally posted by St. Gwladys:
Rosemary Sutcliffe has already been mentioned. I remember watching a dramatisation of "Eagle of the Ninth" as a unday afternoon serial many years ago. I was extremely pleased to pick up the trilogy in one hardback in a library sale, and found it very readable!

I agree; "The Eagle of the Ninth" is one of my favourite books and has been since I read it as a child.
Great books. I read them when I ws a kid. In the wrong order, I think I read Lantern Bearers first, but that wasn't a problem. There are some very persistent images in those books.

More recently, I've just read Black Opera by Mary Gentle. Like almost all her books its good. (Declaration of bias: I know Mary slightly - though we haven't met for some years or so - and we used to write reviews for the same magazine)

Strictly speaking its SF, but SF set in the past (in this case 1820s Naples). And it is most certainly not one of those "passive woman finds out she needs a man who can give her a sense of security" books! Not by a long way. Neither are her other sort-of-historical novels Ash (Set in modern France and early-modern Burgundy) and 1610 (go on, guess what year that's about...) All very good, and very worth reading. Ash is not a traditional historical novel but it is about history in a way, how history is produced and remembered. And its bloody good. (with emphasis on the "bloody")

A couple of warnings: they are quite long novels (Ash in particular, which might be the best of them, is huge and as with some other long novels, certain publishers have tried to cash in by splitting it into multiple volumes - its much better to read it as one volume if you can, if only because cheaper. Also there is quite a lot of rather graphically described violence, and a certain amount of sex on stage. And many of the main characters have religious or philosophical opinions, or make, er, "lifestyle choices", that might not go down well in church on a Sunday morning. Its more George RR Martin than Norah Lofts. (not that there is anything wrong with Norah Lofts - she's deeply unfashionable just now, and in some ways very dated, but those few of her books that I've read were worth it).

quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:

If reading any modern authors do bear in mind what Egeria said; a lot of them don't bother to do much research and those that do may ignore historical reality in order to produce a commercially viable story, so what you are actually reading is a story about modern characters in fancy dress.

While the times Mary set those stories in aren't exactly the same as the historical ones (no spoilers!) her research is good (and only shows if you know where to look). Mary had an MA in 17th-century history and she went back to university to get another one in War Studies before she wrote Ash. If you want to know about the arms and armour of 15th-century mercenary companies, its all in there.


What other books?

An Instance of the Fingerpost by Iain Pears. Unreliable Narrators R Us. Brilliant book. Gets the feel of the period.

The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco (getting philosopical here) and Peter Ackroyd's Hawksmoor (perhaps another fantasy-posing-as-historical) are good books but suffer from being modern people in the clothes of a previous age - that's sort of part of the joke of them.

And talking of Norah Lofts being unfashionable, James Michener is also pretty much out of fashion these days, but his huge blockbusters are a Good Read, if a bit sentimental and very much of their time (1940s-1960s) The Source might be the best known. Another rather dated book that's worth looking at: The wind that shakes the barley by James Barke. A fictionalisation of the life of Robert Burns.

And why not go back to the fount and origin of historical fiction, Walter Scott and Alexander Dumas? Dumas's books are also huge and often abridged in translation, especially when the translations are aimed at children. I thought I had read The Count of Monte Cristo but when I got hold of a translation of the whole thing, I realised that I hadn't. I'd missed out on a lot of the politics, and also the bit where Edmond Dantes is praised as the best dope-dealer in all Europe. Really, its in there - if your copy misses the chapter with the hallucinatory drugs and the mariajuana, someone has decided to cut it out on your behalf! And there is some really unpleasant sex and violence in the later parts of the Musketeers series. Much darker than the films. Hmmmm, I'm not selling these well, am I?

[ 05. June 2013, 18:18: Message edited by: ken ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Patrick O'Brien tells you the names of all the ropes in the rigging; C S Forester mentions them in passing while Hornblower is hanging upside-down trying to reef the sails in the middle of a storm.

Yep. Apologies to the O'Brien fans out there, but I found the characters a bit too nice. The Hornblower books seemed a bit more realistic - the cloying Maria, the evil Simpson, the embittered Captain Keene, etc. Life on an 18th century warship was no bed of roses and Hornblower's being driven to contemplate suicide by bullying and homesickness strikes a convincing note. Having said that, some people do find him annoying as a character.

Let's try to keep the thread to historical fiction in the sense that it's fiction written in one era set in a previous era. It gets a bit too broad and tangential otherwise.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ken:

<snip> not that there is anything wrong with Norah Lofts - she's deeply unfashionable just now, and in some ways very dated,


I'm curious about this. What makes her unfashionable and dated? I can understand that criticism when it's used about contemporary fiction but not so much when discussing books set several centuries ago.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
We all view history from within the context of our own times. Mention has been made already of the kind of books that simply transpose modern (and anachronistic) characters/attitudes to the past. Sort of written equivalent of Julie Christie being a Victorian countrydweller in mascara and white lipstick.

Better writers will do more convincing recreations - but nevertheless incorporate assumptions which are so integral to the current worldview of both themselves and their contemporary readers, that they don't 'show' - at the time. But 20 or 30 years on, do. Conan Doyle's medieval knight errants seem indisputably Edwardian gentlemen now...
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
And if you want another example, you could compare the portrayal of the Jewish characters in Ivanhoe (Sir Walter Scott) with those in The Sempster's Tale by Margaret Frazer. The periods of history they describe are several hundred years apart, so the condition of Jews would not have been exactly the same; but the attitude towards the Jewish characters is completely different. In the first book, having a sexual relationship with the (beautiful, modest, intelligent, honourable) Jewish maiden is completely out of the question (and Bois-Guilbert's abduction of her is a sign of utter moral depravity); even publicly acknowledging her beauty is unwise. In the second, having a sexual relationship with the (brave, handsome, intelligent, honourable) Jewish man is unwise, perhaps foolhardy, but completely understandable; the fact that the couple are separated by religion and culture is a tragedy. Both books have sympathetic Jewish characters but the way they are presented is completely different.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
It's so hard, in writing historical fiction, to get that right -- that business of attitudes and underlying beliefs that are true to the culture you're writing about, rather than importing your own. It's something that really strikes you when you read a novel written in a particular time period, in contrast to a novel written later ABOUT that time period. (The Scott/Frazer comparison above is a good example of that). One of the biggest things, I think, are the prejudices that characters in the past took for granted that would horrify us today -- their casual racism, sexism and classism, and the fondness of otherwise admirable people for schemes like eugenics.

I remember being struck when I read Gaskell's North and South that a modern writer, creating a character as sympathetic as her main character is in the novel, would probably not have put in her horror of having to mingle with what she calls "shoppy people."

I think religion is another thing writers tend to get wrong -- usually underestimating how religious people were in the past and to what an extent deeply-held religious beliefs guided their choices.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
I agree with all three above posts, in fact superimposing todays attitudes on characters living hundreds of years ago is a pet peeve of mine -- but I wouldn't call those books "unfashionable." In fact I might call them, "fashionable," as a criticism, meaning the writer was trying too hard to please young readers of today with feisty heroines and racist villains. Maybe I need an example of what Norah Lofts has done wrong exactly to make her unreadable today.
 
Posted by Gussie (# 12271) on :
 
Two writers of children's historical novels whose work I loved as a child were Geoffrey Trease and Cynthia Harnett. Trease's books covered a wide spread of history and Harnett's were mainly set in the Middle Ages. They both seem very out of fashion now,which is a shame as they were well researched, and in Trease's in particular, well written. Harnett's came with little line drawings of rosaries and such in case you weren't sure what they were.
 
Posted by Earwig (# 12057) on :
 
I love historical fiction. Seconding "An Instance of the Fingerpost" by Iain Pears, "Arthur and George" by Julian Barnes and "Year of Wonders: A Novel of the Plague" Geraldine Brooks - but don't read the last if you're feeling blue! Very harsh in places.

I recently read "Creation" by Gore Vidal, a look at Greece, Persia, India and China in the 5th century BC. The hero travels around meeting people like Zoroaster, the Buddha, Lao Tsu, and Confucius, so it's a bit of a crash course comparative religion as well as a fine historical novel.

If anyone likes WW2 historical fiction, I'd recommend "The Kappillan of Malta" by Nicholas Monsarrat, about a priest in wartorn Malta. You get a real flavour of the politics of the war and how they really affected people on the ground, as well as a great plot.
 
Posted by Hawk (# 14289) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by L'organist:
Of course, you don't have to stick to the UK/Europe.

Try Gore Vidal: Washington DC, Burr, 1876, Lincoln and Empire are all good reads and fairly accurate in setting.

Gore Vidal goes a little too far to fiction rather than history, and enjoys having his characters poke fun at the recorded history of the period. It's highly entertaining though. His novel 'Creation' was amazing. Following the grandson of Zoroaster as he travels the known world meeting Socrates, the Buddha, Mahavira, Lao Tsu, and Confucius. It's a crash course in Vidal's ideas about comparative religion. Reminds me of Robert Graves.
 
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on :
 
May have missed any mention by others, and it does relate to the Tudor period, but we've enjoyed the Matthew Shardlake series written by C J Sansom (first book "Dissolution" features a murder in a monastery). Tudor whodunnits, with lots of vivid historical detail, and an unusual and very sympathetic central character. (Matthew Shardlake is a hunchbacked lawyer).
 
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on :
 
I don't think anyone has mention Bernard Cornwell yet. I like his Saxon novels.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Cornwell
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Yes, I mentioned his 'Sharpe' series upthread [Razz] .
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gussie:
Two writers of children's historical novels whose work I loved as a child were Geoffrey Trease and Cynthia Harnett. Trease's books covered a wide spread of history ...

Yes, Gooffrey Trease was good. Also his near namesake Henry Treece, who wrote a cracking trilogy about a Viking, following him from boyhood to old(ish) age.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
I agree totally about the difficulty of a writer's separating out today's attitudes (and vocabulary!) from the period being written about.

Personal case in point: I am attempting a fictionalized biography of my great-grandmother (born 1840s & lived through the American Civil War) -- fictionalized because I have not much actual history of her. But there's enough to make the skeleton of a good story. But in the US writing about slaves is HARD! It's booby-trapped throughout with still-existing attitudes and prejudices. And you can't have a story set in the South in the 1860s without the slaves -- you'd be missing out many important characters.
But if you get the conversation and attitudes right, you're bound to offend readers all across the spectrum.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Albertus:
quote:
Originally posted by Gussie:
Two writers of children's historical novels whose work I loved as a child were Geoffrey Trease and Cynthia Harnett. Trease's books covered a wide spread of history ...

Yes, Gooffrey Trease was good. Also his near namesake Henry Treece, who wrote a cracking trilogy about a Viking, following him from boyhood to old(ish) age.
Bringing back some good memories here.

My copy of Cynthia Harnett's The Wool Pack got lent out to several visitors. As a child it was one of my favourite books because it was about places that I knew.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Albertus:
quote:
Originally posted by Gussie:
Two writers of children's historical novels whose work I loved as a child were Geoffrey Trease and Cynthia Harnett. Trease's books covered a wide spread of history ...

Yes, Gooffrey Trease was good. Also his near namesake Henry Treece, who wrote a cracking trilogy about a Viking, following him from boyhood to old(ish) age.
Yes, yes, yes!
I also enjoyed "Bran the Bronze-smith" by J. Reason, "They fought for Brigantia", M Rowling, "Keiran (sp?) the Watcher", which I can't trace, and various by Alfred Duggan.

I must check out Norah Lofts.

eta: C.J. Sansom also excellent, of course - I liked "Winter in Madrid" (Spanish Civil War and its aftermath) just as much as the Tudor stuff, though I recognise the OP was looking for books set in much earlier times.

[ 06. June 2013, 19:24: Message edited by: QLib ]
 
Posted by HCH (# 14313) on :
 
For fun, I suggest Leonard Wibberley's "Beware of the Mouse".

I also recommend the novels by Charles Todd about Bess Crawford.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by georgiaboy:
In the US writing about slaves is HARD! It's booby-trapped throughout with still-existing attitudes and prejudices. And you can't have a story set in the South in the 1860s without the slaves -- you'd be missing out many important characters.
But if you get the conversation and attitudes right, you're bound to offend readers all across the spectrum.

I presume that the difficulty you refer to is experienced by white American authors rather than black ones?

The British engaged enthusiastically in the slave trade, of course, but because it happened far away, (white) British people don't feel that slavery was a foundational part of their national identity. It's just one part of the colonial story, and it competes for novelistic attention with Africa and India. But I can recommend two good novels about the slave trade by (white) British authors: Philippa Gregory, 'A Respectable Trade' and even better, Barry Unsworth, 'Sacred Hunger', which won the Booker Prize. There's a sequel, 'The Quality of Mercy', which I haven't read. I also intend to have a look a recent novel by Lloyd Shepherd, 'The English Monster', which apparently explores the beginning of the English/British slave trade in a magic realist fashion.

Black British and Caribbean authors have a different relationship with this history, of course, and have devoted more attention to it. Let me recommend some relevant novels for anyone who's interested:

Marlon James, The Book of Night Women
S. I. Martin, Incomparable World
Caryl Phillips, Cambridge
David Dabydeen, A Harlot's Progress
Fred D'Aguiar, Feeding the Ghosts
Lawrence Hill, The Book of Negroes (The author is Canadian, and the action moves from Africa - America - Canada - England.)

I can't recommend Andrea Levy's famous bestseller, The Long Song because I haven't read it yet. Has anyone else enjoyed it?
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
Yes, I've read The Long Somg and thought it was very good.

Toni Morrison's Beloved is a fantastic book - the best on slavery that I know, though I admit I haven't read Sacred Hunger. I also thought Gilead by Marilyn Robinson was terrific. I find Philippa Gregory a bit middle-of-the-road.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I mentioned Lawrence Hill's The Book of Negroes earlier in this thread but I'll second the mention of it among books that do an excellent job of dealing slavery and race issues. I'd like to check out Sacred Hunger too.

Some of the historical fiction fans here might be interested in this vlog of mine in which I raise some questions about accuracy in historical fiction, using an (excellent, even though I disagree with his approach to history) book by a local author as an example (Wayne Johnson, The Colony of Unrequited Dreams -- on the off chance anyone's interested in Newfoundland history that's not particularly historically accurate but VERY well-written).
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
QLib

I read Beloved a long time ago, and if I remember rightly I was impressed by it. However, because of my own ancestry and interests I lean more towards explorations of Caribbean rather than American slavery. I do read about both, but I regret the tendency to see the experiences of the American South as normative for slavery throughout the Americas. We need to hear a diversity stories about slavery. In that vein I'd recommend some of the historical novels of the Guadeloupean author Maryse Condé, such as I, Tituba, Black Witch of Salem, and Windward Heights (which is a Caribbean retelling of Wuthering Heights). Although she writes in French, most of her work has been translated by her English husband.

Phillipa Gregory is a middlebrow, bestselling author, but I think it's great that someone with her profile deems it worthwhile to write about the slave trade, and I'm impressed that in her novel A Respectable Trade she brings this history to the streets of 18th c. England rather than sticking to the more commonplace African/Caribbean/American settings. It's not a perfect novel, but it's well worth reading if you want to go beyond cruelty on cotton or sugar plantations. Sacred Hunger goes beyond this too, but in a very different way. It's a much more literary novel; but both of these books require a certain suspension of disbelief, the latter probably more than the former.
 
Posted by Hilda of Whitby (# 7341) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:


Anya Seton, who also wrote some great novels, is also difficult to get now, but "Katherine", set in Chaucer's day about the woman who had a long on and off affair with John of Gaunt, is a really good read.

Agreed. Another terrific Anya Seton novel is "Avalon", set in Anglo-Saxon England. I read in high school and never forgot it. Re-read it as an adult; it still holds up.

Norah Lofts also wrote some excellent historical novels. One I really liked was "Hester Roon". Set in the 18th century, the story moves from England to the West Indies, with an intelligent and enigmatic heroine at the center.

As someone else wrote, the Thomas Cromwell novels ("Wolf Hall" and "Bring Up the Bodies") by Hilary Mantel are obvious choices.

Pat Barker's trilogy of novels about WWI are superb; I especially recommend the first one, "Regeneration".

Alan Furth's extremely atmospheric novels about intrigue in pre-WWII Europe are wonderful. My favorite is the first one I read, called "The Polish Officer".
 
Posted by Egeria (# 4517) on :
 
I have to respond to the derogatory comments about Patrick O'Brian's novels. The characters are "too nice"! What about Captain Harte, "that red-faced son of a blue French fart"? Slimy Mr. Canning? And the dreadful, dreadful Mrs. Williams, the mother-in-law from Hell?

After reading O'Brian, I find Forrester's prose dry and colorless. And Hornblower himself is a bit of a cardboard character. He's so painfully self-conscious, it's hard to read about him. Yeah, Maria is awful; when I was a teenager reading these books for the first time, I found myself saying, "Oh, Horatio, don't do it!"

I don't get the comment about "political correctness" (which is a pretty meaningless expression usually employed by people who feel it is their "right" to be narrow-minded, uncharitable, and rude); Jack Aubrey and Stephen Maturin both have their prejudices, and some of the best moments come when they have to rethink them. (As Jack does when he unthinkingly makes an anti-Catholic remark, and then remembers that he's speaking to a Catholic...)

As for the technical side of O'Brian's work, he does a very good job of having the rigging etc. explained to Stephen, one of nature's landlubbers. And if you're not in the mood for a lot of nautical detail, you can skim those parts and still enjoy the story.

When I'm reading Forrester, I'm always aware that I'm reading a reasonably good historical novel; when I'm reading O'Brian, I'm taking a trip to the early nineteenth century and some fascinating places, and I'm doing it in the company of interesting, complex people.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
Phillipa Gregory is a middlebrow, bestselling author, but I think it's great that someone with her profile deems it worthwhile to write about the slave trade, and I'm impressed that in her novel A Respectable Trade she brings this history to the streets of 18th c. England rather than sticking to the more commonplace African/Caribbean/American settings. It's not a perfect novel, but it's well worth reading if you want to go beyond cruelty on cotton or sugar plantations.

I have that and it's quite a read.

On the African-American theme I also have "The African" by Harold Courlander, and I don't know whether Alex Haley's "Roots" counts, but I found both absorbing reads. I'll look out for the others mentioned.

quote:
Originally posted by Egeria:
I have to respond to the derogatory comments about Patrick O'Brian's novels. The characters are "too nice"! What about Captain Harte, "that red-faced son of a blue French fart"? Slimy Mr. Canning? And the dreadful, dreadful Mrs. Williams, the mother-in-law from Hell?

Maybe I should give them another go, but I actually rather like Hornblower as a character.

quote:
When I'm reading Forrester, I'm always aware that I'm reading a reasonably good historical novel; when I'm reading O'Brian, I'm taking a trip to the early nineteenth century and some fascinating places, and I'm doing it in the company of interesting, complex people.
Ah. For me, it's the other way round as when I read Forrester's novels, they're a bit of an immersion into everyday life in the Napoleonic era, and I couldn't get into O'Brian.

Qlib - I remember "Kieran the Watcher" as well, used to be one of my favourite novels in the school library. I can't remember who wrote it, though.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Niminypiminy:

I once read a historical novel about Athanasius -- I so wish I could remember what its title and author were -- it was a cracking read.

Was it "The Beacon at Alexandria" by Gillian Bradshaw? I'm pretty sure he plays a major part in that.

I'd also second all the praise for Mary Renault, I remember reading The King Must Die as a teenager and being totally blown away. I still think it's her best, it transports you totally into the ancient Greek/Minoan world.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
I just remembered that Poisonwood Bible is historical, deals with American missionaries to Africa in I suspect the 1950s, and has strong women characters.

Jengie
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Egeria:
quote:
I don't get the comment about "political correctness" (which is a pretty meaningless expression usually employed by people who feel it is their "right" to be narrow-minded, uncharitable, and rude);
If this is aimed at me, I hope you do not think I am narrow-minded, uncharitable and rude. I think we will have to agree to differ about the relative merits of O'Brien and Forester.

I used the term 'politically correct' as shorthand for 'anachronistically in tune with modern ideas about slavery, racism, sexuality and women's rights.' Authors writing fifty or even thirty years ago are less likely to be guilty of this than contemporary writers; there has been a huge shift in attitudes in my lifetime, even within the last 15 years. If you have read any of my contributions to the threads on gay marriage (to take one example) you will know that I am generally in favour of "political correctness" as it is now interpreted. That doesn't stop me from being irritated by clunky anachronisms, though.

The past wasn't monolithic either; "The British" were not all "enthusiastically engaged in the slave trade" as Svitlana puts it. Some of them were, certainly; some were equally vehemently opposed to it and eventually succeeded in having it banned. Some were victims; during the seventeenth century large numbers of white British people were transported to the West Indies, for example after Monmouth's rebellion and the Bloody Assizes.. So it would be plausible to have one or two characters who are abolitionists, maybe several people who are involved in the slave trade or have relatives who are, quite a lot of people who haven't really thought about it one way or another and perhaps someone who changes his or her mind during the course of the story. I'm sorry to bring up Naomi Novik again but she does deal with the issue of slavery very well in her books, both directly in her treatment of black characters and indirectly in how people relate to dragons.

A contemporary writer might ignore the issue completely or put in a few veiled hints that are too subtle for modern readers to pick up. Jane Austen's Mansfield Park has been criticised for not mentioning slavery, despite the fact that Austen herself was opposed to the trade - but she doesn't really mention the Napoleonic Wars either, except as a source of men in uniform for her heroines to flirt with. And some critics have pointed out that Sir Thomas's West Indian estates might have been among the handful of plantations that were worked with free labour, which would explain why he approves of Fanny (in favour of abolition) quizzing him about the slave trade at dinner. This reference is almost thrown away and easy to miss, but then Austen was writing a 'Girl Meets Boy' romance, not a political tract.

A modern author can't get away with that. Jane Austen's contemporaries already knew what people wore at balls and who unpacked your luggage when you went to stay with someone, so she didn't bother telling them things like that; modern writers go into great detail about styles of bonnet and what jewellery to wear with the ballgown and so on. And they have to tell you about the politics because you want to know that the protagonists are sympathetic characters; part of that is whether they would agree with what we think about issues like slavery and women's rights.

Or take another example: Tess of the D'Urbervilles. Modern readers are usually so appalled by the double standard that allows Angel, but not Tess, to be forgiven for a premarital affair that Hardy's portrayal of her as a 'good woman' who is forced into going back to Alec is unquestioned. Some contemporary critics disagreed; Elizabeth Gaskell, for example (who wrote a book about an unwed mother, so was no stranger to moral ambiguity) points out that Tess was a skilled dairymaid in the middle of an agricultural boom. Finding a job where nobody knew she'd been disgraced might have been difficult, of course; but if she really didn't want to live with Alec she didn't have to.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Or take another example: Tess of the D'Urbervilles. Modern readers are usually so appalled by the double standard that allows Angel, but not Tess, to be forgiven for a premarital affair that Hardy's portrayal of her as a 'good woman' who is forced into going back to Alec is unquestioned. Some contemporary critics disagreed; Elizabeth Gaskell, for example (who wrote a book about an unwed mother, so was no stranger to moral ambiguity) points out that Tess was a skilled dairymaid in the middle of an agricultural boom. Finding a job where nobody knew she'd been disgraced might have been difficult, of course; but if she really didn't want to live with Alec she didn't have to.
I agree with Jane and think Tess is a perfect example. I've been in groups where the majority of women absolutely hate Angel for his attitude after Tess's revelations. My heart always breaks for Tess during that scene but also for Angel who finds out that the Tess he married is not exactly the same person he has idealized for the past year. She is not the girl he has defended to his parents as from a poor background but more "pure," than the young women of his own class. He has held that quality in his mind as her best and most defining feature and now feels that he barely knows her without it.

When I first read Tess, at about fifteen, I thought she went to Alex, not because it was her only means of support but because, from a Christian standpoint, he was her true husband. These days I'm not so sure and as wonderful and dramatic as the ending is I don't really understand Tess' motive for murdering Alex. (I'm not convinced he ever raped her and I pity him along with the other two.)

Yet today's reader usually is convinced he raped her and hates Alex along with Angel.

This novel is also a good example of the difference between "historic" and "historical." In Hardy's day this was probably close enough in time to be contemporary so it's not an historical novel. I love seeing the difference between books written in X-time verses books written now and set in X-time. I hope the day never comes when we quit reading Hardy and Dickens because their characters' beliefs and motivations are "unfashionable."
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I found and read books by Naomi Mitchison in my teens, some historical, some riffing on history, and I have some waiting on my shelves to be read for the first time or reread. She has depths I certainly couldn't fathom in my teens. (Trivially, there's still a joke in "To the Chapel Perilous" I can't make head or tail of (though reading the Wikipedia article suggests my doubted deduction might have been correct), and it took me ages to find out what a Chad was.)

[ 07. June 2013, 18:21: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I was catching up with last week's Elizabethan Time Traveller, when his remarks about witchcraft being acceptable unless used for killing reminded me of Elizabeth Goudge's "The White Witch". I used to read her books a lot, and as Wikipedia says, she has Christian themes.

Checking on my Mitchisons, I found that rather than having "The Conquered" which I thought to start with, I had two copies of "Cloud Cuckoo Land". One is part of a group of three in common binding. The other, one of a set of historical fiction selected by Rosemary Sutcliffe, with an introduction by her. Decisions, decisions - which one goes to Oxfam?

There is a list of 8 books in the second series, one of which may not be chosen by Sutcliffe. Might be interesting.

An Infamous Army - Georgette Heyer
Elizabeth, Captive Princess - Margaret Irwin
Poor Man's Tapestry - Oliver Onions
The Golden Warrior - Hope Muntz (I've read that when I was reading as many novels about 1066 as I could - there was something about it that I wasn't happy about, but I can't remember what. It's waiting to be reread to find out.)
The Golden Strangers - Henry Treece
Monmouth Harry - A.M. Maughan
Cloud Cuckoo Land - see above
The Rider of the White Horse - Rosemary Sutcliffe (introduction by Elizabeth Goudge)

I notice something about that author list.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:

Toni Morrison's Beloved is a fantastic book....

A wonderful book. But not light reading. Harrowing and disturbing and scary, because of the things depicted.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I found and read books by Naomi Mitchison in my teens...

Its Friday night and I'm aabout to go to the pub so I can't resist my second name drop of the thread - I was once introduced to Naomi Mitchison. About thirty years ago. In the bar of the Central Hotel in Glasgow, at an SF convention. I was utterly unable to say anything sensible -she is the only famous person I've ever met who rendered me speechless. A little Scots woman very much like my Gran in some ways, but Gosh! Wow! This is Me! Sitting! At! The ! Same! Table! As! Naomi! Mitchison!

And yes another person worth reading. There are so many!

(If I was to namedrop utterly shamefully I could add that I think I once knew Pat Barker very slightly in that I rented some rooms off her - but she wasn't famous then - and I'm not 100% sure it was the same Pat Barker - though the famous Pat Barker was married to one of my university lecturers so I was at minimum one handshake away from her but I can't actually remember if that was the Pat Barker who was my landlady... it is so long ago...)
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:

The past wasn't monolithic either; "The British" were not all "enthusiastically engaged in the slave trade" as Svitlana puts it. Some of them were, certainly; some were equally vehemently opposed to it and eventually succeeded in having it banned. Some were victims; during the seventeenth century large numbers of white British people were transported to the West Indies, for example after Monmouth's rebellion and the Bloody Assizes.. So it would be plausible to have one or two characters who are abolitionists, maybe several people who are involved in the slave trade or have relatives who are, quite a lot of people who haven't really thought about it one way or another and perhaps someone who changes his or her mind during the course of the story.

I've come across some fascinating books about white slavery - let me recommend the novel 'Testimony of an Irish Slave Girl' by Kate McCafferty - and I've also read about the abolition movement, some of whose participants were from my very own city. Nevertheless, 'the British' as a nation sanctioned and pursued the Transatlantic slave trade because it was good business, from which the nation benefited. The abolitionist movement then came along, thankfully, but it couldn't change the past, only the future. In fact, in the case of my own industrial city, many of the abolitionists (even the Quaker ones) were from families that had directly or indirectly profited from the slave trade in their business activities. And once decency supposedly prevailed and the slave trade was abolished, the British government compensated slave owners for the loss of their slaves, to the tune of £20 million....

I agree with you that novels set during the era of the slave trade and then slavery could include a range of different attitudes, and I find that they often do. Most of the novels I mentioned above indicate to some degree the psychological complexity that this situation often generated. This sort of complexity would be interesting to explore in a novel about the ideals and difficulties enveloped in the British struggles for abolition.

'Strange Music' by Laura Fish is well worth reading. It's about the poet Elizabeth Barrett (before she married Robert Browning) and how she and her slave-owning family coped after the abolition of slavery.

[ 07. June 2013, 20:00: Message edited by: SvitlanaV2 ]
 
Posted by Antisocial Alto (# 13810) on :
 
A couple of mystery series set in slightly unusual places / times:

-the Yashim series by Jason Goodwin. (Begins with The Janissary Tree). His sleuth is a Muslim eunuch in Turkey in the 1830s, which is a period I've never read much about so I have no idea how accurate any of it is, but it's beautifully written.

-the Burren mysteries by Cora Harrison. (My Lady Judge et al.) About a female judge and law professor in the West of Ireland in the 1500s- a totally different legal/political system to the English law of the time. Definitely better written than Sister Fidelma.
 
Posted by Melangell (# 4023) on :
 
I don't think anyone has yet mentioned Cynthia Harrod-Eagles. I started reading her modern-day Inspector Bill Slider detective series and enjoyed these books so much that I was persuaded to try her British historical series with the overall title The Morland Dynasty. This is based on a family living just outside York, but with various members moving elsewhere, including the US. Volume 1 is set in the period of the Wars of the Roses, and by volume 34, the saga has reached 1925, with more volumes to come. So if you find you enjoy this series, it should keep you occupied for quite a while!
 
Posted by St. Gwladys (# 14504) on :
 
A friend's visit to the Saxon churches in Exeter reminded me of Bernard Kight's "Crowner John" series, set in Medieval Exeter and the surrounding area.
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
Rosemary Sutcliffe has been mentioned. The other great historical novelist writing of the medieval era (and I really do mean great--I don't understand why she isn't on the shortlist for the next Nobel, except that historical fiction is out of fashion) is Cecelia Holland. She writes modern psychological realism, but set in (mostly) medieval times and places. Her protagonists are an 11th century Irish chieftain, the wife of a Norman king of Sicily, one of Ghengis Khan's commanders, etc.--and she gets inside their heads in astonishing ways that illuminate their world view (Sister Fidelma, by contrast, is just a 20th century Unitarian Universalist in an 8th century Irish nun's habit). My favorite is The Kings In Winter, which is about the aforementioned Irish chieftain.

[ 12. June 2013, 04:56: Message edited by: Timothy the Obscure ]
 
Posted by Edith (# 16978) on :
 
Another writer that I have just remembered is Thomas Armstrong. He wrote a number of historical novels which were hugely popular in their day, but the best by far was KIng Cotton. I believe it was Harold Wilson's favourite book! It's years since I read it but it tells the story of the cotton industry in the North West and has a wonderful narrative sweep.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Timothy the Obscure:
The other great historical novelist writing of the medieval era (and I really do mean great--I don't understand why she isn't on the shortlist for the next Nobel, except that historical fiction is out of fashion) is Cecelia Holland.

I'll have to look out for these. The only book of hers I've read is "Floating Worlds" which is an odd sort of sci-fi novel. I wasn't sure if I'd enjoyed it.

There are some great recommendations on this thread, many thanks to those who took the time to post suggestions.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
The only Thomas Armstrong I've read was "Dover Harbour" because that was where I lived, and the machinations of the people concerned made sense in the context of place. (Think I've got a copy somewhere from my parents' effects.) I thought it was good at the time, in my teens.

[ 15. June 2013, 21:30: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
I just saw a bit of news about Prince William having an Indian woman as a great-great-great- grandmother on his mother's side. I'm already looking forward to the novel based on this.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
A novel about an obscure time and place that I loved is Dominic Cooper's Men at Axlir, set in 18th century Iceland.
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Timothy the Obscure:
The other great historical novelist writing of the medieval era (and I really do mean great--I don't understand why she isn't on the shortlist for the next Nobel, except that historical fiction is out of fashion) is Cecelia Holland.

I'll have to look out for these. The only book of hers I've read is "Floating Worlds" which is an odd sort of sci-fi novel. I wasn't sure if I'd enjoyed it.

There are some great recommendations on this thread, many thanks to those who took the time to post suggestions.

When Holland gets out of the historical fiction area she's less satisfying. Her most recent books are historical, but with a fantasy element that I don't care for so much, even though I like fantasy.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
Tim the Obscure - could you recommend where to start with Cecilia Holland - which novel you like the most? I'm interested in reading one of hers.
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
My personal favorite is The Kings in Winter, which is set in Ireland around the time of the Battle of Clontarf in 1014. Great Maria (11th century Norman Sicily) is another good one to start on.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I've just finished reading my first Norah Lofts' novel, The House at Old Vine and am grateful to shipmates for their recommendations. Although the book is the second in a trilogy, that didn't matter, because the main connecting link is the house, though I gather there are other threads as well. Actually, one of the best things is the way she interweaves the series of stories, so Character Two's tale often fills in details about Character One, and so on, in a kind of chain. Apart from the interest of the stories themselves, and the quality of the historical research (which seems pretty spot-on to me, though I admit my expertise stops with A level History and a bit of wider reading) this manner of telling stories encourages one to reflect on the brevity and vanity of human existence. A lot of historical novels centred on ficitonal characters often have a happy ending – I'm not averse to a happy ending, but they're often a bit unrealistic. She's certainly avoided that and yet the effect isn't grim. Now my only dilemma is whether to go back to Book One, or on to Book Three, but I expect the town library will make that decision for me.
 
Posted by PaulBC (# 13712) on :
 
Napoleonic sweeps CS Forester Hornblower, Dudley Pope Ramage series, Bernard Cromwell Sharpe
Medivel the Brother Cadfael series Ellis Peters
Roman Rosemary Sutcliffe Eagle of the Nineth
all of the above I have read and enjoyed.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
QLib, I'm thrilled that you've discovered Norah Lofts! I hope you can find both books one and three of that series and then go on to many more of her books. You'll find that her continuity of characters runs sideways from novel to novel as well as backwards and forwards. Characters mentioned in "Jassy" will show up as party guests in another novel or a horrible incident you read about in one novel will explain why that part of the woods seems to have a bad vibe around it in some otherwise unrelated novel. Another thing that makes them seem real and connected to me is that she seems to set most of them in the same area around Bury St Edmunds with the various towns on the fingertips and in the crooks of a huge forest shaped like a hand. As I said. Thrilled.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
That's a really nice idea, Twilight, that characters or incidents turn up or are mentioned in different novels - I like that kind of continuity, a sort of elongated sideways story arc.

After reading QLib's post I had a look on Amazon to see the descriptions of the trilogy, and read sample pages, and they do look very good. I might keep them in mind for future reading... I've got a shelf or two of books lined up and waiting to be read first though [Smile] .
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Edith:
I've just finished The Potter's Hand by AN Wilson, about Josiah Wedgwood and the Enlightenment. Wonderful writing and some fascinating reflections on the part played in 18 C England by religion in the shape of Methodism, Unitarianism and the established church.

Thanks for this recommendation. I've had my eye on this book ever since it came out. It seems to have everything I like in a novel: 18th c. setting, Nonconformist history, Transatlantic connections, and lots of famous local people (I'm from the West Midlands). I'll definitely buy it now it's out in paperback. It would be even better if I could get it signed by the author.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
That sounds a very interesting book. I hadn't realised it would cover those issues.

I am interested in reading about church groups in a historical setting e.g. Unitarians etc. and I would appreciate recommendations.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
Percy B

I'd love to read more fiction about historical Nonconformist church life. Unfortunately, the average British reader prefers to read about medieval Catholic monks or comedy Anglican vicars. IMO other denominations smell too much of religious 'enthusiasm', and that makes most British people rather nervous.

These titles are on my To Read list, and if anyone can recommend them I'd be grateful:

Arnold Bennett, 'The Old Wives' Tale'' (Partly about late 19th c. Wesleyan Methodism in the Potteries.)

Luther Blissett, 'Q' (About the religious ferment on the Continent during the Reformation.)

Arthur Quiller-Couch, 'Hetty Wesley' (About one of John Wesley's sisters. Written in the early 20th c.)

Deborah Swift, 'The Lady's Slipper' (17th c. Quakers)

Helen Pike, 'The Harlot's Press' (Radical politics and religion, debauchery, early 19th c.)

Richard Francis, 'Ann the World: The Story of Ann Lee, Female Messiah, Mother of the Shakers, Clothed with the Sun' (This isn't a novel, but the reviews make it sound gripping. Ann Lee founded the Shakers in Manchester.)

I have read Cedric Barber, 'Slaves, Sinners and Saints: A True Story of the Barber Family over Three Centuries'. It's family history rather than fiction, but it reads very well. The historical aspect deals partly with the Primitive Methodists, again in the Potteries. Mr Barber is a descendant of Francis Barber, the Jamaican manservant of Dr Samuel Johnson.

I'll wager that Barber and Johnson both appear in 'The Potter's Hand', and that Joseph Priestley, the 18th c.'s most famous Unitarian, also does a turn. Priestley deserves a novel to himself, but he doesn't have one as far as I can tell.

The Americans have written a couple of novels about John Wesley.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
There's also Sheila Kaye-Smith's 'The Tramping Methodist' (1908). I think it's about a Methodist preacher in the rural south of England.

The late Victorian Hocking brothers were Methodist ministers who also wrote novels, as did their sister. Silas was a bestselling author at one stage. Some of his work dealt with faith issues, so I understand. But I don't think these books were 'historical' as we'd understand the term.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:

Richard Francis, 'Ann the World: The Story of Ann Lee, Female Messiah, Mother of the Shakers, Clothed with the Sun' (This isn't a novel, but the reviews make it sound gripping. Ann Lee founded the Shakers in Manchester.)
.

If you do want a novel about her - and a gripping one at that - John Fowles A Maggot.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
That's cool!! Thanks!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I find John Fowles quite hard going, and really disliked The Magus, but A Maggot is very good.

I've got as far as I can go in the Game of Thrones saga now (yay! Daenarys! Not so yay! Jon Snow! and Tyrion coming up smelling of roses again)
So, now for something completely different - I'm about to start The Morville Hours by Katherine Swift, which I've been wanting to read for a long time.
 
Posted by cygnus (# 3294) on :
 
I would second the Cynthia Harrod-Eagles suggestion. I have been reading her Morland series for close to 30 years, eagerly waiting for the next volume each fall (Volume 35 comes in September- it's one of the few series I buy in hardback).

The series starts in 1450, and now she's in the 1930s. She started out planning a 12 volume series, with each book covering 50 years or so, but about volume 4 she got involved with the characters, slowed down and took her time, and the series improved greatly (although the first few aren't bad!) The Battle Of Waterloo is a book in itself, as is each year of WW1. Despite the hundreds of characters in the series so far, no two run together- they are all quite distinct and individual, with strong women characters especially- although they are very much of their times- NOT feisty modern heroines who happen to wear long dresses. She does a good job of giving you a feel for each era of history- the rich and the poor, and has a real gift for describing war and battles as well as more domestic scenes.

The main problem I have is with her idealization of some of the older historical figures who interact with the family- Richard 111, Anne Boleyn and Rupert of the Rhine in particular. But that's a minor quibble in an otherwise outstanding series. I think she wrote Elizabeth 1 well, though. I also spotted a couple of problems with aristocratic titles and how they are used in a couple of places. But given the thousands of pages of writing so far, it's an amazing achievement.

Recommended for people with a lot of time who want to lose themselves in another world for a while!
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
Percy B

I'd love to read more fiction about historical Nonconformist church life. Unfortunately, the average British reader prefers to read about medieval Catholic monks or comedy Anglican vicars. IMO other denominations smell too much of religious 'enthusiasm', and that makes most British people rather nervous.

These titles are on my To Read list, and if anyone can recommend them I'd be grateful:

Arnold Bennett, 'The Old Wives' Tale'' (Partly about late 19th c. Wesleyan Methodism in the Potteries.)

Luther Blissett, 'Q' (About the religious ferment on the Continent during the Reformation.)

Arthur Quiller-Couch, 'Hetty Wesley' (About one of John Wesley's sisters. Written in the early 20th c.)

Deborah Swift, 'The Lady's Slipper' (17th c. Quakers)

Helen Pike, 'The Harlot's Press' (Radical politics and religion, debauchery, early 19th c.)

Richard Francis, 'Ann the World: The Story of Ann Lee, Female Messiah, Mother of the Shakers, Clothed with the Sun' (This isn't a novel, but the reviews make it sound gripping. Ann Lee founded the Shakers in Manchester.)

I have read Cedric Barber, 'Slaves, Sinners and Saints: A True Story of the Barber Family over Three Centuries'. It's family history rather than fiction, but it reads very well. The historical aspect deals partly with the Primitive Methodists, again in the Potteries. Mr Barber is a descendant of Francis Barber, the Jamaican manservant of Dr Samuel Johnson.

I'll wager that Barber and Johnson both appear in 'The Potter's Hand', and that Joseph Priestley, the 18th c.'s most famous Unitarian, also does a turn. Priestley deserves a novel to himself, but he doesn't have one as far as I can tell.

The Americans have written a couple of novels about John Wesley.

Such a helpful list, SvitlanaV2. Many thanks.

I will look out for the Ann the World biography too.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
Just a quick correction: the book about the Shakers is called 'Ann the Word', not 'Ann the World'. My mistake!
 
Posted by Pancho (# 13533) on :
 
Willa Cather wrote a couple of novels the OP might find interesting: "Shadows On he Rock", about a father and daughter in late 17th century Quebec, and "Death Comes for the Archbishop", about a French bishop sent to serve in 19th century New Mexico just after it was conquered by the United States. It's one of her best known novels.

If the OP doesn't mind trying a children's novel he can try the books of Scott O'Dell. They're often set in California and Mexico and several have won awards. I recommend "Island of the Blue Dolphins", inspired by the true story of a 19th century Indian woman who lived alone for many years after being left behind on one of California's Channel Islands.

[ 13. July 2013, 07:19: Message edited by: Pancho ]
 
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jengie Jon:
I just remembered that Poisonwood Bible is historical, deals with American missionaries to Africa in I suspect the 1950s, and has strong women characters.

Jengie

That book haunted me for months after I'd read it and not in a good way. I still feel nauseous when I think about baby birds, snakes and small girls in that context. [Frown]

I've just read "The Last Wife of Henry VIII" by Carolly Erickson, which I enjoyed.

Nen - delicate disposition.
 
Posted by Sighthound (# 15185) on :
 
I recommend pretty much anything by Elizabeth Chadwick and Sharon K Penman.

Robert Graves is the all-time great of the genre, but somewhat neglected now.

Less well known, Susan Higginbotham, Anne Easter Smith (though her books are very 'feminine' for want of a better word.)

Bernard Cornwell writes some good stuff, but he is the antithesis of Easter Smith, his female characters are sketchy at best. Dorothy Dunnett is rewarding but generally needs a couple of reads as she is quite a demanding author. I also like C J Sansom's Shardlake novels, even if they are set in Tudor times, which I dislike. If you can find it, as it is scarce, The Heron's Catch by Susan Curran is well worth a read (15th Century).

I could go on, but perhaps that's enough for now.

[ 18. July 2013, 16:12: Message edited by: Sighthound ]
 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
The key aspect of a good historical novel is that it doesn't simply 'ventriloquise' or represent the narrative history in fictionalised form. This can be difficult to pull off.

J G Farrell managed it in 'The Siege of Krishnapur' (fictionalised siege during the Indian Mutiny) and 'Troubles' (about the Irish Troubles of the early '20s).

He arguably failed to do so convincingly with 'The Singapore Grip' about the fall of Singapore in WW2. The historical facts and narrative are too close to the surface in that one.

I agree with SvitlanaV2 that Priestley deserves a novel, but it would be hard to see how it could work without ending up as, 'So what are you working on now, Dr Priestley? Have you discovered oxygen yet?'
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:


I agree with SvitlanaV2 that Priestley deserves a novel, but it would be hard to see how it could work without ending up as, 'So what are you working on now, Dr Priestley? Have you discovered oxygen yet?'

What about the riots that led to his house being burned down in Birmingham? Or his new life in America? Or his theological and other writings? Or his connections with influential men from around the West Midlands - not to mention his friendship with Benjamin Franklin?

There's a lot that could be said about him as a radical public figure and as a family man. Science was only one aspect of his life.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0