Thread: "Evangelii Gaudium". The joy of the gospel. Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=026584

Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on :
 
What do you think of the early reports about Evangelii Gaudium?

There are plenty of other reports, of course, with differing takes on the various parts of the Pope's statement. Someone else may be able to find a link to the whole document, or to a better summary.

What's your take on it?
[title edited - usual guideline on foreign language]

[ 30. November 2013, 14:07: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
 
Posted by Latchkey Kid (# 12444) on :
 
Could you provide a translation of the Latin.
 
Posted by Galilit (# 16470) on :
 
Rocco has got one over at Whispers in the Loggia
 
Posted by Pancho (# 13533) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Josephine:
Someone else may be able to find a link to the whole document, or to a better summary.

It can be read in its entirety at the Vatican Website at the following link:

Evangelii Gaudium

I'm going to try to read it tonight or tomorrow but they say it's over 200 pages long so it's going to take me a while.

Jimmy Akin has a summary of the document and its background at his blog at the National Catholic Register:

Pope Francis’ new document, Evangelii Gaudium: 9 things to know and share

[ 27. November 2013, 02:49: Message edited by: Pancho ]
 
Posted by Pancho (# 13533) on :
 
There's a more extensive summary of the document at the Vatican Radio website:

Pope issues first Apostolic Exhortation: Evangelii Gaudium
 
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Latchkey Kid:
Could you provide a translation of the Latin.

I'm sorry; the title of the encyclical, in English, is "The Joy of the Gospel."
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
I like this fellow more and more.
The prosperity gospel is shite and there was no "eye of the needle" gate.
 
Posted by South Coast Kevin (# 16130) on :
 
I've just seen an intriguing write up in the Daily Telegraph. Given my own interest in church worship practices, I was particularly struck by this comment in the article (albeit I've not seen the actual text):
quote:
It says that traditional styles of worship are not necessarily suitable for newly evangelised non-Western people, or the modern world in general

 
Posted by Gamaliel (# 812) on :
 
Heh heh ... I don't expect him to be recommending Vineyard style worship styles any time soon, though South Coast Kevin but your point is well made.

Incidentally, did I ever tell you about the conversation I once had with a 'new-church' type charismatic dude who complained that they were unable to get many Africans to attend their services in a particular African country but were ending up predominantly with ex-pats because the indigenous people in that area were far more comfortable with the robes and the bells and smells found in the Roman and Anglo-Catholic churches ...

Incidentally, I could show you You Tube videos of Orthodox churches in Ghana which look and sound recognisably Orthodox only with drums and a more African feel ...

The same applies to Anglican and Catholic churches in many African countries.

As far as the RC Church goes, you'll find a very 'Latin American' feel to some of the music and worship in Central and South America and in the Latin American diaspora.

The kind of Brompton Oratory High Mass style isn't the only way they do things.
 
Posted by Jason Zarri (# 15248) on :
 
quote:
As we open our hearts, the Pope goes on, so the doors of our churches must always be open and the sacraments available to all. The Eucharist, he says pointedly, “is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak” And he repeats his ideal of a Church that is “bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets” rather than a Church that is caught up in a slavish preoccupation with liturgy and doctrine, procedure and prestige. “God save us,” he exclaims, “from a worldly Church with superficial spiritual and pastoral trappings!” Urging a greater role for the laity, the Pope warns of “excessive clericalism” and calls for “a more incisive female presence in the Church”, especially “where important decisions are made.”


Text from page http://tinyurl.com/puct2lt
of the Vatican Radio website

All I can say to that is: Wow. [Big Grin]

[ 30. November 2013, 10:40: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gamaliel:
Heh heh ... I don't expect him to be recommending Vineyard style worship styles any time soon, though South Coast Kevin but your point is well made.

Incidentally, did I ever tell you about the conversation I once had with a 'new-church' type charismatic dude who complained that they were unable to get many Africans to attend their services in a particular African country but were ending up predominantly with ex-pats because the indigenous people in that area were far more comfortable with the robes and the bells and smells found in the Roman and Anglo-Catholic churches ...

Incidentally, I could show you You Tube videos of Orthodox churches in Ghana which look and sound recognisably Orthodox only with drums and a more African feel ...

The same applies to Anglican and Catholic churches in many African countries.

As far as the RC Church goes, you'll find a very 'Latin American' feel to some of the music and worship in Central and South America and in the Latin American diaspora.

The kind of Brompton Oratory High Mass style isn't the only way they do things.

You also get very modern RC services in this country - A-C is well, quite different to post-Vatican II RC. I think the relative lack of singing in UK RC churches is the main difference, though...
 
Posted by Olaf (# 11804) on :
 
Emphasis on reaching out to the people in their own context? Check.
Emphasis on preaching the gospel? Check.
Preaching advice? Check.

The 288 Theses? (sans indulgences, of course). [Snigger]

[ 28. November 2013, 02:08: Message edited by: Olaf ]
 
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on :
 
I've just read the chapter and paragraph headings and thought, yes indeed. Will repay greater study of the text. I'm going to take a couple of days for a first read.

Interesting man, this new pope. He's certainly accentuating the positive.
 
Posted by CL (# 16145) on :
 
I like how he states that the reservation of ordination to males is not open to question and that there is a difference between power and sacramental function. Both points seem to have been studiously ignored by some.
 
Posted by Horseman Bree (# 5290) on :
 
Ah, but will the sharing of power with the other half of the humans actually be looked at?
 
Posted by Honest Ron Bacardi (# 38) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Horseman Bree:
Ah, but will the sharing of power with the other half of the humans actually be looked at?

The bazillion dollar question, Horseman Bree.

Of course, what "power" consists of, and in what sense we should be talking about it at all is another interesting question.
 
Posted by stonespring (# 15530) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
I like how he states that the reservation of ordination to males is not open to question and that there is a difference between power and sacramental function. Both points seem to have been studiously ignored by some.

I won't go further into DH territory than this, but there is a certain amount of authority that only people ordained as priests and bishops can have unless a whole lot of unchangeable Catholic doctrine other than that regarding the ordination of women is to change. Even if women are cardinals or occupy high positions in the curia, their decisions will always be able to be reversed by the current pope and probably some other men in positions of authority between the pope and them. (The only exception being that in a conclave where female cardinals vote, their votes will be equal to that of male cardinals). The same is true for women who have positions of ecclesiastical jurisdiction in Catholic dioceses and religious orders - a bishop, pope, or other male will always be able to overrule them.
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
I like how he states that the reservation of ordination to males is not open to question and that there is a difference between power and sacramental function. Both points seem to have been studiously ignored by some.

See? This Exhortation has something even for you, CL!
 
Posted by Olaf (# 11804) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by stonespring:
The same is true for women who have positions of ecclesiastical jurisdiction in Catholic dioceses and religious orders - a bishop, pope, or other male will always be able to overrule them.

This has always been the case, but it usually came down to being able to administer the sacrament of holy orders. Honestly, I don't expect any sort of widespread change.

That said, in theory, it seems that the language of the document attempts to steer the organization back toward a collection of bishops each heading their own respective churches, rather than an emphasis on the head organization micromanaging everything, irrespective of vast differences in culture. (Vox Clara, anyone?)

So what if the pope starts appointing mitred abbesses (something Olaf certainly suggested for the ordinariate)? They would still have to depend on bishops for ordinations, but those abbesses of yesteryear wielded enough financial and political power to see to it that their goals were achieved. In modern times, there would have to be some way for the abbesses to exercise their oversight.

The fact that the ordination question has been flat out shut down shows that this administration is closer to the last than the media chooses to convey.
 
Posted by CL (# 16145) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Olaf:
quote:
Originally posted by stonespring:
The same is true for women who have positions of ecclesiastical jurisdiction in Catholic dioceses and religious orders - a bishop, pope, or other male will always be able to overrule them.

This has always been the case, but it usually came down to being able to administer the sacrament of holy orders. Honestly, I don't expect any sort of widespread change.

That said, in theory, it seems that the language of the document attempts to steer the organization back toward a collection of bishops each heading their own respective churches, rather than an emphasis on the head organization micromanaging everything, irrespective of vast differences in culture. (Vox Clara, anyone?)

So what if the pope starts appointing mitred abbesses (something Olaf certainly suggested for the ordinariate)? They would still have to depend on bishops for ordinations, but those abbesses of yesteryear wielded enough financial and political power to see to it that their goals were achieved. In modern times, there would have to be some way for the abbesses to exercise their oversight.

The fact that the ordination question has been flat out shut down shows that this administration is closer to the last than the media chooses to convey.

Rome has never micromanaged and has never wanted to. The Church lives by the principle of subsidiarity. The problem is that diocesan bishops and episcopal conferences have progressively abdicated responsibility for difficult issues to Rome over the past half a century of more. A good recent example would be the Irish hierarchy trying to pass the buck to Rome for the botched handling of the abuse crisis in Ireland, aided and abetted by the Kenny government, rather than manning up and taking their lumps. The problem is compounded by the doctrinal unreliability of many of the episcopal conferences - the big Vatican bogeyman is a convenient strawman for "pastorally difficult" doctrine.
 
Posted by Erroneous Monk (# 10858) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jason Zarri:
quote:
As we open our hearts, the Pope goes on, so the doors of our churches must always be open and the sacraments available to all. The Eucharist, he says pointedly, “is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak” And he repeats his ideal of a Church that is “bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets” rather than a Church that is caught up in a slavish preoccupation with liturgy and doctrine, procedure and prestige. “God save us,” he exclaims, “from a worldly Church with superficial spiritual and pastoral trappings!” Urging a greater role for the laity, the Pope warns of “excessive clericalism” and calls for “a more incisive female presence in the Church”, especially “where important decisions are made.”


Text from page http://tinyurl.com/puct2lt
of the Vatican Radio website

All I can say to that is: Wow. [Big Grin]
Do you think there's any chance that this and the upcoming synod may open the door to communion for those in unorthodox marriage arrangements?

*hopeful face*

[ 30. November 2013, 10:42: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
 
Posted by Desert Daughter (# 13635) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
The Church lives by the principle of subsidiarity. The problem is that diocesan bishops and episcopal conferences have progressively abdicated responsibility for difficult issues to Rome over the past half a century of more.

Indeed, and the Curia found it increasingly appealing to call the shots. All shots. The fault is certainly on both sides. May I add that while I am a great fan of the principle of subsidiarity and I actually study it and its implications from an Organisation Theorist's point of view as part of my day job, one of the great challenges is that in order to be successfully applied, this principle requires the "base" to be (a) educated to a level that enables them to exercise true discernment, and (b) able and willing to think beyond their own backyard/immediate gratification. Neither are really given in the present situation.
 
Posted by Jason Zarri (# 15248) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Erroneous Monk:
quote:
Originally posted by Jason Zarri:
quote:
As we open our hearts, the Pope goes on, so the doors of our churches must always be open and the sacraments available to all. The Eucharist, he says pointedly, “is not a prize for the perfect, but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the weak” And he repeats his ideal of a Church that is “bruised, hurting and dirty because it has been out on the streets” rather than a Church that is caught up in a slavish preoccupation with liturgy and doctrine, procedure and prestige. “God save us,” he exclaims, “from a worldly Church with superficial spiritual and pastoral trappings!” Urging a greater role for the laity, the Pope warns of “excessive clericalism” and calls for “a more incisive female presence in the Church”, especially “where important decisions are made.”


Text from page http://tinyurl.com/puct2lt
of the Vatican Radio website

All I can say to that is: Wow. [Big Grin]
Do you think there's any chance that this and the upcoming synod may open the door to communion for those in unorthodox marriage arrangements?

*hopeful face*

You know, before this document was released I never would have thought so, but now, who knows? [Smile]

[ 30. November 2013, 10:39: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
I hope this guy has strong, supportive, shrewd people who are watching his back.

Pope JP1 was going to shake things up, too...

[Paranoid] [Votive]
 
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on :
 
Jason Zarri

I've fixed the scroll lock which your coding broke. I appreciate you probably did not know this would happen. Our ancient software does not wrap around very long links.

So you need to practise your coding. If you use tinyurl for direct links, that avoids the breaking of the scroll lock, which is why this page went all pear-shaped. A better way is to use the url button and give the link a label.

Each of these options is easy after a bit of practice. Try the practice thread in the Styx. if you're stuck, send me a private message and I'll explain more fully.

Barnabas62
Purgatory Host
 
Posted by CL (# 16145) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
I hope this guy has strong, supportive, shrewd people who are watching his back.

Pope JP1 was going to shake things up, too...

[Paranoid] [Votive]

Sure he was. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on :
 
I've managed to read through the 200+ pages of this apostolic exhortation…

I doubt that many will.

And that to me is symbolic for what I would say about most of its content.
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I've managed to read through the 200+ pages of this apostolic exhortation…

I doubt that many will.

And that to me is symbolic for what I would say about most of its content.

Why would I want to read 200+ pages of the opinions of the leader of somebody else's church? Thinking there is something wrong with me for not doing so is symbolic of something.
 
Posted by Jason Zarri (# 15248) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
Jason Zarri

I've fixed the scroll lock which your coding broke. I appreciate you probably did not know this would happen. Our ancient software does not wrap around very long links.

So you need to practise your coding. If you use tinyurl for direct links, that avoids the breaking of the scroll lock, which is why this page went all pear-shaped. A better way is to use the url button and give the link a label.

Each of these options is easy after a bit of practice. Try the practice thread in the Styx. if you're stuck, send me a private message and I'll explain more fully.

Barnabas62
Purgatory Host

Sorry about that. I had no idea. I'll be sure to use one of those options next time.
 
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Why would I want to read 200+ pages of the opinions of the leader of somebody else's church? Thinking there is something wrong with me for not doing so is symbolic of something.

[Roll Eyes] I was critiquing the content of the exhortation, not its (non-)readers.
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
Why would I want to read 200+ pages of the opinions of the leader of somebody else's church? Thinking there is something wrong with me for not doing so is symbolic of something.

[Roll Eyes] I was critiquing the content of the exhortation, not its (non-)readers.
That was far from clear.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0