Thread: The Ship of Fools isn't very welcoming ... Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=027580

Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
Well, I don't think that's true at all - I think we are an inclusive, positive, welcoming bunch of shipmates!

But why don't more people pop along to the Welcome Aboard thread to welcome newbies?

I recently joined two new forums and was inundated with cheerful greeting messages. I think it's important that any place is openly welcoming to newbies - it's part of what makes us human, isn't it?
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
Since this is in Purgatory I'll venture a reply. In my time here, I've noticed that some people post on the 'Welcome' thread, and others will welcome a new poster when he or she joins in a thread on another board. Yet others, as in a church, will leave it to those who have a calling for welcoming new Shipmates. It seems to me there's a good balance, and people are welcomed without being scared off by our effusiveness.
 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
It's not going to be in Purgatory much longer: it belongs firmly in the Styx.
 
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on :
 
I don't find this forum particularly welcoming, but I don't mind. Hang on, though, boo hoo hoo, well, maybe I do mind.
 
Posted by Gareth (# 2494) on :
 
I came back after a lengthy absence, and when I posted on the Welcome Aboard thread I was quite gratified by the response - it is obvious that people do have a look and say something to welcome newbies.

I didn't expect fluffy bunny hugs - I only used the thread to point out that I'm not wet behind the ears really, and have done this sort of thing before.
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
There's nothing I'd hate more than being the centre of attention and being pointed out as a newbie, or surrounded by Very Friendly People on a welcome board. Sorry Boogie - I know it's meant well but for some of us it's actually very intimidating and the opposite of welcoming.
 
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on :
 
There is, of course, no one forcing anyone to post on any thread. That includes there being no requirement for new members to post on the Welcome Thread. So, people who don't want to be welcomed by a bunch of complete strangers can just dive into a thread or two of interest and start to get to know the views and quirks of those who've been here a bit longer. IMO, being treated as a valued contributor to a discussion/game/rant (delete as appropriate depending on the board) on a par with everyone else is the best welcome we can give.
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
There's nothing I'd hate more than being the centre of attention and being pointed out as a newbie, or surrounded by Very Friendly People on a welcome board.

Just raise your hand, and one of our ushers will come to your pew with a welcome packet and a tithe pledge form.
 
Posted by Schroedinger's cat (# 64) on :
 
If I see someone with a single digit count post on a thread I am following, I will try to welcome them. I think many do get greeted, in some way or other. But it is not perfect.

We could have a system where newcomers had to post on a thread, and someone was designated to greet them all. I am not sure that would be more welcoming, because it would be more structured.

Overall, I don't think we do badly. We could do better, and we could do more for some people, I am sure, but we have all sorts to cater for. Including a lot of misfits.
 
Posted by Stetson (# 9597) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
There's nothing I'd hate more than being the centre of attention and being pointed out as a newbie, or surrounded by Very Friendly People on a welcome board. Sorry Boogie - I know it's meant well but for some of us it's actually very intimidating and the opposite of welcoming.

On a message board, I think the best welcome I could recieve is to have someone notice and comment on my posts. An actual formal welcoming process, from people who only know me as words on a screen, doesn't really mean much.

It's different in the analog world, as for example after a church service, where you have to endure the awkwardness of milling about with no one talking to you. But with a message board, you can just click it off and go do something else.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Going to a specific thread on a specific board in order to welcome or be welcomed feels a bit artificial to me.
 
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on :
 
It is a bit artificial. But, it's also a bulletin board so that's par for the course.

I don't think anyone wants a thread discussing whatever serious issue of the day to get swamped by dozens of "hello there, where are you from? How did you find us?" posts everytime someone new joins the conversation. So, we have an artificial welcome thread - which is just an extension of the model here of people holding loads of simultaneous conversations (which is practically impossible in real life).
 
Posted by Gareth (# 2494) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
We could have a system where newcomers had to post on a thread, and someone was designated to greet them all. I am not sure that would be more welcoming, because it would be more structured.

I'm a moderator on another forum where new members can only post in the welcome thread, and nowhere else until their first post has been approved.

There are reasons for it there, and the effect of making people have to work that little bit harder to join the forum does mean that fewer people join. On that forum, it is a desired result. Here, though...?

quote:
Originally posted by Stetson:
On a message board, I think the best welcome I could recieve is to have someone notice and comment on my posts. An actual formal welcoming process, from people who only know me as words on a screen, doesn't really mean much.

The most off-putting part of being new to a forum is when you join a conversation thread, make a comment, quote someone, post something you think is relevant - and the conversation ploughs on around you without even acknowledging your contribution.

It doesn't matter if you've had a nice, friendly response on the designated "Hi I'm New Here" forum - when that happens you basically feel like you're an unwelcome lurker on the edge of a clique.

A friendly forum isn't one where people greet you in a friendly way. It's one where your contributions to discussions are treated just like everyone else's.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:
The most off-putting part of being new to a forum is when you join a conversation thread, make a comment, quote someone, post something you think is relevant - and the conversation ploughs on around you without even acknowledging your contribution.

That happens a lot to non-newbies too. Unless you say something outrageously stupid, there's no guarantee anyone will reply, particularly if you happen to have a pertinent post related to the OP which lands on the middle of a flame war. It's why I rarely comment on threads that are 3 or more pages old, as the conversation has moved beyond the original idea and onto something similar which people like to argue about.
 
Posted by The Silent Acolyte (# 1158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
But why don't more people pop along to the Welcome Aboard thread to welcome newbies?

I almost never darken the door to All Saints. That's why I don't do this. This being a collection of discussion boards, I don't look for and do not offer fellow-feeling except as a byproduct of the cut and thrust.

When I see a poster with a single-digit post count and I otherwise intend to post on that thread, I will welcome the new person.
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
There's nothing I'd hate more than being the centre of attention and being pointed out as a newbie, or surrounded by Very Friendly People...

Or, being instructed in the middle of the eucharist to stand up and "tell us something" about myself.

I'm looking at you, Christ Church, Anchorage!
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheAlethiophile:
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:
The most off-putting part of being new to a forum is when you join a conversation thread, make a comment, quote someone, post something you think is relevant - and the conversation ploughs on around you without even acknowledging your contribution.

That happens a lot to non-newbies too. Unless you say something outrageously stupid, there's no guarantee anyone will reply, particularly if you happen to have a pertinent post related to the OP which lands on the middle of a flame war. It's why I rarely comment on threads that are 3 or more pages old, as the conversation has moved beyond the original idea and onto something similar which people like to argue about.
There's another good reason why posts that are relevant do not attract any replies and that is because they are too accurate to contradict and too comprehensive for further development.

Next time you feel ignored, you can console yourself with that, even here.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TheAlethiophile:
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:
The most off-putting part of being new to a forum is when you join a conversation thread, make a comment, quote someone, post something you think is relevant - and the conversation ploughs on around you without even acknowledging your contribution.

That happens a lot to non-newbies too. Unless you say something outrageously stupid, there's no guarantee anyone will reply, particularly if you happen to have a pertinent post related to the OP which lands on the middle of a flame war.
And sometimes it gets missed. Or seen, acknowledged but not commented on. Happens in real life conversations.
AS an aside, non of my comments were replied to for quite some time, here.
But it didn't work people, I'm still here.


I'm still here.....
 
Posted by Prester John (# 5502) on :
 
Are welcoming emails still sent out to new people? I remember getting one from Kelly Alves right after I signed up. I don't remember if that was "official" or something on her own initiative because she was local and friendly.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alan Cresswell:
It is a bit artificial. But, it's also a bulletin board so that's par for the course.

I don't think anyone wants a thread discussing whatever serious issue of the day to get swamped by dozens of "hello there, where are you from? How did you find us?" posts everytime someone new joins the conversation. So, we have an artificial welcome thread - which is just an extension of the model here of people holding loads of simultaneous conversations (which is practically impossible in real life).

I mainly meant artificial for me - which is why I don't generally go there. I wasn't arguing the Ship shouldn't have a Welcome thread.
 
Posted by Lucia (# 15201) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by TheAlethiophile:
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:
The most off-putting part of being new to a forum is when you join a conversation thread, make a comment, quote someone, post something you think is relevant - and the conversation ploughs on around you without even acknowledging your contribution.

That happens a lot to non-newbies too. Unless you say something outrageously stupid, there's no guarantee anyone will reply, particularly if you happen to have a pertinent post related to the OP which lands on the middle of a flame war.
And sometimes it gets missed. Or seen, acknowledged but not commented on. Happens in real life conversations.
AS an aside, non of my comments were replied to for quite some time, here.
But it didn't work people, I'm still here.


I'm still here.....

All sounds like the reaction to most of my posts on SoF. I think I've concluded that there is some element of me not being part of the in-crowd, perhaps not being clever enough or simply being boring. But hey I don't think I'm that great at social interactions in real life either. I either say too much and don't know when to stop or say too little...

Despite that I enjoy reading here and contributing when something to say strikes me. But I agree that feeling that your contribution to the conversation was in some way valued is probably more important to feeling welcome than lots of people saying "Hi".

[ 28. May 2014, 18:20: Message edited by: Lucia ]
 
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lucia:
]All sounds like the reaction to most of my posts on SoF. I think I've concluded that there is some element of me not being part of the in-crowd, perhaps not being clever enough or simply being boring. But hey I don't think I'm that great at social interactions in real life either. I either say too much and don't know when to stop or say too little...

Seriously, I think that's what happens to most of everyone's posts. We just don't notice because by definition if we notice the post and discuss it then it's a post that did stand out more.
 
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on :
 
Just to say you've posted some good stuff on the UKIP thread, including a link to interesting research. But, that thread moves on quite quickly (especially as I was away for a long weekend) and your posts have either been not quite on the particular subtheme that caught my attention, or by the time I read them the discussion had moved on a bit. That's normal.

Personally I never expect anyone to respond to my posts. Unless I'm posting in an official capacity as an Admin in which case I expect everyone to take notice - but even then a response isn't necessary, just obedience.
 
Posted by daronmedway (# 3012) on :
 
Truth be told I don't tend to welcome people because I don't feel fully welcome myself!
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
As a Heaven/AS Host, I normally point out the Welcome thread but always add that it's not obligatory - because I'm the sort that hates being told to say Hello to the other children.

Posting as a poster, I expect 'non-acknowledgement' rate of about 80-90%. Based, I'd have to say, on my own ratio of reading to commenting/quoting.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
I'm fine with not receiving responses -- except when I post something that is ignored, and then a day or two later someone else posts exactly the same thing and gets lots of positive responses. Such is life.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
That is so annoying, but as you say - it does just happen.
 
Posted by Olaf (# 11804) on :
 
Having hung around Eccles for awkwardly long, I'd say that almost every recent enlistee (1-10 posts) receives a greeting. Typically they come from a couple of the regulars who happen by at that moment, and a host or two. If this has happened by the time I discover the newbie, then I'll skip the welcome. If not, then I handle it. It seems to be how we operate. I think the 'machine' works. As for All Saints, I don't make it there often.

Perhaps we should do a rota for Greeters?
 
Posted by Imaginary Friend (# 186) on :
 
Personally, I think the best way to welcome someone is to engage with them in a way that shows you think their thoughts and opinions count as much as those with five figure post counts.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
I'm fine with not receiving responses -- except when I post something that is ignored, and then a day or two later someone else posts exactly the same thing and gets lots of positive responses. Such is life.

Just shout "hey - I just said that!!" [Biased]

quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:

A friendly forum isn't one where people greet you in a friendly way. It's one where your contributions to discussions are treated just like everyone else's.

This is an excellent point [Smile]

[ 29. May 2014, 11:25: Message edited by: Boogie ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by daronmedway:
Truth be told I don't tend to welcome people because I don't feel fully welcome myself!

When I was new I felt hugely intimidated. I edited and deleted my posts several times because I was terrified of inadvertently giving offence to anyone - it was, after all, a forum on the internet that could be seen anywhere in the world. I finally plucked up the courage to post (yeah, ok, 13 years ago the WWW wasn't a fact of life the way it is now) and met with a resounding silence while the discussion swirled and rumbled on past me.

Except for one person, who took the time to say hello and make a friendly remark. I can't remember what he said now, but I do still remember that feeling of relief and gratitude.

There wasn't a welcome thread in those days. If there had been I'd have felt better about posting. But the only option was to try to plunge straight in to discussions with people who mostly seemed to know each other well, be experts in subjects I knew little about, and often seemed to be quite forthright and passionate about what they thought.

Something of the same may still be true today. I'd love to see some of the long-term lurkers come out of the shadows and say hello - do come and join in if you're reading this! I recognize that some of them may find the leap from reading to actual posting a bit scary, though. But after a while, that feeling goes.
 
Posted by MrsBeaky (# 17663) on :
 
I find it a little bit rude if someone responds to someone else's post by quoting them and interacting with what they said but then doesn't a reply...a bit like a real life conversation when you reply to what someone has said, they ignore you and engage with someone else.
I know that some of the threads move really quickly and it may not be intentional but I could quite easily see why the lack of response could contribute to someone feeling unwelcome.
That said, when I first summoned up the courage to post on the boards, I was simply and kindly acknowledged by a couple of shipmates. I then discovered the welcome thread and introduced myself there.
 
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on :
 
After nearly 9 years aboard, I do find it still irritating if I make a point in a discussion and am ignored, but someone might make the same point a few posts down and be congratulated for being so astute and quoted approvingly for the next ten posts.

On the other hand, sometimes I do get picked up, so I just shrug off my irritation and pull up my big boy pants and carry on with life.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Sometimes, though, you don't get a reply because the person you've quoted is either not on the thread anymore (real life etc) or because they can't think of what to say. Or because the conversation has clearly moved way, way on. It's awkward...

Then, too, some of us are just shy. that's why I don't frequent the welcome thread--it feels like putting myself forward too much, becoming some sort of semi-official greeter. No doubt that's stupid and silly, but I'm better off when we have a set topic to discuss, and the "welcome" can come in the context of a discussion of something we're both interested in. (Yes, I'm the kind of person who sits at the back and hides behind the door. Unless I'm one of the hosts for an event, in which case duty takes over)
 
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on :
 
Certainly "not biting the newbies" is nice. I had found the Ship on an internet search which took me to Hell, and I stupidly posted there first and got called names, to which I objected, and was called worse. One shipmate poster then kindly decided to stop the hazing and swearing long enough to provide helpful direction. Without whom, likely I would have gone away. I thought at the time that considering the abuse was also coming from people with official roles that the boards were out of control. I've not seen this since, and perhaps I was merely in the wrong place at the wrong time.
 
Posted by Stejjie (# 13941) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:

Then, too, some of us are just shy. that's why I don't frequent the welcome thread--it feels like putting myself forward too much, becoming some sort of semi-official greeter. No doubt that's stupid and silly, but I'm better off when we have a set topic to discuss, and the "welcome" can come in the context of a discussion of something we're both interested in. (Yes, I'm the kind of person who sits at the back and hides behind the door. Unless I'm one of the hosts for an event, in which case duty takes over)

Yes, that's me as well - especially as I lurk much more than I post here, it feels a bit... like I'm not one of the "regulars" who are s bit more representative of the Ship. Or something like that, anyway.
 
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MrsBeaky:
I find it a little bit rude if someone responds to someone else's post by quoting them and interacting with what they said but then doesn't a reply...a bit like a real life conversation when you reply to what someone has said, they ignore you and engage with someone else.

Interesting, if I agree with someone who quoted me and don't have much to say, I don't usually respond. It feels silly to respond saying, "yeah, that too."
 
Posted by MrsBeaky (# 17663) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
Interesting, if I agree with someone who quoted me and don't have much to say, I don't usually respond. It feels silly to respond saying, "yeah, that too."

I can see the sense of that. I think I probably do respond, simply because I'd feel rude if I didn't!
I'm not a prolific poster but I am an avid reader and so I spend a lot of time wondering how other shipmates might be feeling about responses/ lack of responses....I know, I should get out more..... [Biased]

[ 29. May 2014, 18:51: Message edited by: MrsBeaky ]
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
quote:
Originally posted by MrsBeaky:
I find it a little bit rude if someone responds to someone else's post by quoting them and interacting with what they said but then doesn't a reply...a bit like a real life conversation when you reply to what someone has said, they ignore you and engage with someone else.

Interesting, if I agree with someone who quoted me and don't have much to say, I don't usually respond. It feels silly to respond saying, "yeah, that too."
Or if they've been kind enough to compliment it, what are you supposed to do? Thanks is fine if you see it immediately, but do that too often or too far down the page and it feels like making the thread all about you.
[Hot and Hormonal]
 
Posted by Macrina (# 8807) on :
 
Ho hum.

I don't post very often either. I've been reading the ship religiously (haw haw) for nearly 10 years now but I always felt outside the group of people who were very used to interacting and debating with each other. I am never sure if what I have to say will be considered interesting or useful or worse just stupid so mostly I just shut up. I do like reading though, you all have very interesting and insightful things to say.
 
Posted by Stejjie (# 13941) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Macrina:
Ho hum.

I don't post very often either. I've been reading the ship religiously (haw haw) for nearly 10 years now but I always felt outside the group of people who were very used to interacting and debating with each other. I am never sure if what I have to say will be considered interesting or useful or worse just stupid so mostly I just shut up. I do like reading though, you all have very interesting and insightful things to say.

I think that's a good way of putting it, a "group of people who were very used to interacting and debating with each other". ISTM that it's not so much an "in crowd" who are all very much alike (the accusation that I've seen levelled here sometimes), more that there are a core group of Shippies who are used to each other and to reacting to each other in certain ways. And if you're not part of that group, it can be a bit harder to put in your contribution when the discussion between some of them is in full flow.

And, yeah, you can feel a bit like your contribution's being a bit ignored. And it probably is a bit silly to get too worked up about that, but just sometimes you can't help thinking "If xxx had posted that, it'd have got a response". Which probably isn't true, but the thought does cross your mind.

But then, OTOH, something happens like Kelly putting something I wrote in the Quotes Files (never did thank you for that, Kelly, even though it was aaaages ago [Hot and Hormonal] ) and I think I do have a place here.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
for the record, I'm generally accused of being part of the mythological "in crowd" and I often post only to have it completely ignored. Usually, because I didn't express myself well or misunderstood the topic at hand or someone said something better than I did or (most often) because I made some useless aside comment. it happens to all of us.

It's the nature of the media. in a conversation of a bunch of friends sitting around the table, it's not linear. in a discussion "thread" it has to be linear. and there's no place for eye contact and a nod or a little chuckle showing that we did in fact hear you, but we are responding to someone else, or more often, just listening.

if you want to know if we're seeing your posts, go say something really stupid in Hell. should clear that question right up. [Biased]
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by comet:

if you want to know if we're seeing your posts, go say something really stupid in Hell. should clear that question right up. [Biased]

Getting UBB code wrong in Hell is a surefire way to get noticed. Like drawing the target and providing a laser designator.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Also, there are distinct - albeit perhaps overlapping - 'crowds'. I have no idea who posts in Kerg or Eccles and very little for DH. Purg and the Circus, I would say I'm at best a peripheral poster (though I probably read more of Purg). Everybody reads Hell, c'mon.

AS and more particularly Heaven, I think of myself more as part of the furniture.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
Firenze, think of yourself as the striking statement piece - a bright red arty coffee table - and not the ancient, comfy, beige lazy boy. [Biased]
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I would say I'm at best a peripheral poster

Sorry. That's totally delusional...
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I've always thought of myself more as a Baroque sideboard.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Following Garasu's post rather than Comet's, that does sound a tad delusional...
 
Posted by Cenobite (# 14853) on :
 
I'm hesitant to post this, but maybe the appearance of this thread is the prompt I need to test the waters and see if it's time to get back into posting.

I lurked for quite a while before actually registering and starting to interact. I haven't posted a lot, as you can see, but it tended to be in All Saints (mostly) and on a couple of the threads in Purgatory and the Circus. I didn't really get any reaction to anything I posted, but I figured that was to be expected when I was new.

However, the experience which caused me to think, "Whoa, I'm really not welcome here, am I?" was when Mrs. C was expecting our first (and only) baby. I posted a couple of times in the 'Shipmates Expecting thread'. The first time was to announce that we were expecting (after many years of trying). No response. Not even an acknowledgement. Again, I figured it was because I was still new.

Then, a little later, when the pregnancy was going through a very difficult and worrying period, I posted again to say this. Again, not even an acknowledgement in what I thought was a supportive thread. Other conversations continued around my post, but no one offered any support or prayer for us. And so that was it. I haven't left completely - just gone back to lurking and following threads which I find personally interesting - but my posts since then could probably be counted on one hand (I haven't checked exactly how many).

So that's my story, for what it's worth. It didn't bother me if no one responded to a post of mine in Purgatory - it was the lack of response in a thread which I thought was designed to support people that prompted me to withdraw.

I'm not even sure if I want to get more involved! But since I noticed this thread, it felt right to share my experience. Make of it what you will.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by PeteC:
After nearly 9 years aboard, I do find it still irritating if I make a point in a discussion and am ignored, but someone might make the same point a few posts down and be congratulated for being so astute and quoted approvingly for the next ten posts.

Hey - I just said that!!
[Razz]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cenobite:
I'm hesitant to post this, but maybe the appearance of this thread is the prompt I need to test the waters and see if it's time to get back into posting.

I lurked for quite a while before actually registering and starting to interact. I haven't posted a lot, as you can see, but it tended to be in All Saints (mostly) and on a couple of the threads in Purgatory and the Circus. I didn't really get any reaction to anything I posted, but I figured that was to be expected when I was new.

However, the experience which caused me to think, "Whoa, I'm really not welcome here, am I?" was when Mrs. C was expecting our first (and only) baby. I posted a couple of times in the 'Shipmates Expecting thread'. The first time was to announce that we were expecting (after many years of trying). No response. Not even an acknowledgement. Again, I figured it was because I was still new.

Then, a little later, when the pregnancy was going through a very difficult and worrying period, I posted again to say this. Again, not even an acknowledgement in what I thought was a supportive thread. Other conversations continued around my post, but no one offered any support or prayer for us. And so that was it. I haven't left completely - just gone back to lurking and following threads which I find personally interesting - but my posts since then could probably be counted on one hand (I haven't checked exactly how many).

So that's my story, for what it's worth. It didn't bother me if no one responded to a post of mine in Purgatory - it was the lack of response in a thread which I thought was designed to support people that prompted me to withdraw.

I'm not even sure if I want to get more involved! But since I noticed this thread, it felt right to share my experience. Make of it what you will.

And now people will read this and not quite know what to say, and you will feel overlooked again...

I don't know what to say either. I've ocassionally gutspilt on threads - generally to no reaction. Probably just as well.

I don't know how many thousands of words are written on the Ship every day. Several, I should think. Everyone, bar the Hosts, must skim. Some posters - the late, lamented ken for one - probably get read more thoroughly than the rest, because they're more interesting, more flamboyant. They write well. I suspect my few deeply felt posts were also rather terse and not particularly riveting.

I was watching today - unusually for me - commercial TV, because it was showing the French Open. And I found I could, with very little practice, blank out Save the Children's skeletal babies as easily as I could the car insurance and Stannah stair lifts.

So I suppose what it comes down to is that it's not necessarily enough to have something pertinent, or personally important to say, you also need to catch the attention. Obviously enough posters catch either other's attention enough to sustain the boards, but as often as not the audience for any particular post didn't show up today.
 
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cenobite:
Then, a little later, when the pregnancy was going through a very difficult and worrying period, I posted again to say this. Again, not even an acknowledgement in what I thought was a supportive thread. Other conversations continued around my post, but no one offered any support or prayer for us.

Well, no one told you that they had. I mention the difference because I remember when that happened. I prayed. I just didn't tell you because I have a very uneasy relationship with telling people that I pray for them. Feels like it might be helpful, but it could also be boasting or something.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
like Gwai, I will "pray" (it's not quite praying, exactly, but that's not the point) when I see a need but very rarely say so. like she said, it feels awkward. like I'm bragging or trying to get attention. I suppose it's good to remember that I should post occasionally to let people know they are heard. please rest assured, you are heard. I believe there are many of us that pray our way through AS daily.

on another note, though: if we don't know you yet, it can be hard to say the right thing. Me, I've been here forever and I'm an open book. so if I ask for prayers for my son, a good portion of people will know that he's in college doing a theater degree and having serious issues coping with his father and is currently doing a prestigious internship in the states and is therefore far from home and I worry. that right there is a lot of information to start a conversation with. But if you're new, and considering most of us attempt not to be rude and nosy, we send up a prayer and await more information.

keep diving in. keep talking. interact. BUTT IN! we're here. we're just letting new folks work their way into the community at their own speed.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Absolutely I didn't see the post about the pregnancy problems because that's one of my hot buttons and I would have definitely responded. And do so now, saying I'm so sorry, I've been there myself and it was awful.

But it goes to show you, doesn't it? I'm on the Ship usually several times a day, and I read the prayer thread and other All Saints threads--and yet I missed it. Don't know if I was in a rare period away from computers or what. But it definitely isn't intended.

Please do give us another chance.
 
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on :
 
I suspect that Cenobite is probably speaking to the experience of a much larger demographic. In the spectrum of social constructs, a discussion forum - even a very fine one such as ours - is fundamentally disposed to not rank as being particularly welcoming. However, on the spectrum of web sites, I suspect that the SoF is probably about as welcoming as is reasonable to hope for.

For an all-volunteer Crew and incredibly diverse Shipmates, this is a rather jolly old boat. Just don't forget about the crossbones behind Jolly Roger.
 
Posted by Cenobite (# 14853) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
quote:
Originally posted by Cenobite:
Then, a little later, when the pregnancy was going through a very difficult and worrying period, I posted again to say this. Again, not even an acknowledgement in what I thought was a supportive thread. Other conversations continued around my post, but no one offered any support or prayer for us.

Well, no one told you that they had. I mention the difference because I remember when that happened. I prayed. I just didn't tell you because I have a very uneasy relationship with telling people that I pray for them. Feels like it might be helpful, but it could also be boasting or something.
Thank you for praying - and thank you too for remembering (that's pretty amazing, considering when this was happening!) I appreciate that some people are uncomfortable saying that they are praying for others, and I wouldn't expect them to make an exception for me. What I found hurtful was that some people did tell others they would pray for them, but didn't do the same for us.

quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
Absolutely I didn't see the post about the pregnancy problems because that's one of my hot buttons and I would have definitely responded. And do so now, saying I'm so sorry, I've been there myself and it was awful.

But it goes to show you, doesn't it? I'm on the Ship usually several times a day, and I read the prayer thread and other All Saints threads--and yet I missed it. Don't know if I was in a rare period away from computers or what. But it definitely isn't intended.

Please do give us another chance.

Oh dear, this is why I was hesitant to post, because I really didn't want to cause anyone to feel guilty. I know that probably 95% of the Ship wouldn't even look at that thread - why would they unless they were 'Expecting Shipmates' too?
Lamb Chopped - I don't blame you - maybe it was just a case of the right people not being around at the right time. And maybe if the same thing was happening now and I posted about it, there would be a response! I can look back at what happened now with a certain amount of detachment in a way I definitely couldn't then!

Anyway, I don't want to turn this thread into the Cenobite support thread! As Rook says, there probably are others who have had a similar experience, as there are also people who have had nothing but positive experiences. A bit like joining a church, really!
 
Posted by M. (# 3291) on :
 
I think I never expect to be responded to, and I'm never sure if I'm pleased or worried if someone does respond.

M
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cenobite:

Then, a little later, when the pregnancy was going through a very difficult and worrying period, I posted again to say this. Again, not even an acknowledgement in what I thought was a supportive thread. Other conversations continued around my post, but no one offered any support or prayer for us.

Sorry about that Cenobite [Frown]

I don't look at that thread.

I know why too, it makes me jealous! I am such a motherly person and it makes me all broody to hear of others expecting. (Which is no use to me at all at 57 years old) Which is no excuse at all, I know.

Of course, some people never visit any other area of the Ship except Purgatory. When this thread was moved to the Styx I thought it would just sink away. But I was wrong.

I still think that when people have posted on the 'Welcome' thread it would be good if more people acknowledged their posts - people who are shy don't have to go there at all of course. I also like the 'how did you choose your Shipname?' type questions.

[Smile]
 
Posted by daronmedway (# 3012) on :
 
After many years aboard, it still annoys me if I make a point in a discussion and get ignored, but then someone else makes the same point further down the thread and gets quoted for it in the sigs of the in-crowd. [Razz]
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stejjie:
I think that's a good way of putting it, a "group of people who were very used to interacting and debating with each other".

Speaking personally, as a relatively noisy Shipmate, I would think that an even better way of putting it is "a series of individuals, each of whom is very used to interacting with and debating other individuals they encounter on message boards".

I don't think me being highly active on the Ship comes from knowing the other highly active people. To me it's the other way around: I know the other highly active people on the Ship because I'm the kind of person who is highly active when signed up to a message board. That's my personality. It's been my personality on other message boards, with completely different sets of people.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by daronmedway:
After many years aboard, it still annoys me if I make a point in a discussion and get ignored, but then someone else makes the same point further down the thread and gets quoted for it in the sigs of the in-crowd. [Razz]

You are not alone. In fact, far from it.

Maybe it's that people don't read threads before posting?

[ 30. May 2014, 17:04: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
I feel that way too a lot of the time. Now I don't feel so bad, though, since I know that others experience it as well.
 
Posted by Gareth (# 2494) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Maybe it's that people don't read threads before posting?

TL;DR is a curse that we all fall victim to at some point.
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gareth:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Maybe it's that people don't read threads before posting?

TL;DR is a curse that we all fall victim to at some point.
This (in the absence of :like)
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Page and a bit? Less than even the snappiest article in the LRB? Stuff that.

Speed/skim reading is a skill any literate person possesses.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
LRB?
 
Posted by Amos (# 44) on :
 
London Review of Books.
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Page and a bit? Less than even the snappiest article in the LRB? Stuff that.

Speed/skim reading is a skill any literate person possesses.

It's a skill that can be acquired. Hosting demands it and when you aren't ready-cos-you-have-to it helps you get to that TL;DR point earlier.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Page and a bit? Less than even the snappiest article in the LRB? Stuff that.

Speed/skim reading is a skill any literate person possesses.

This is my third attempt at a reply but some of us are literate despite not being able to skim read. My Dad can skim read phenomenally, getting through a 600 page book between lectures in a day so as to be able to contribute to a seminar. On the other hand, that is several weeks reading for me.

I do drop out of threads because they are moving too fast for me to keep up. I am not asking the boards to go slower nor for everyone to read as I do. What I am trying to say is that quick processing of words is not given to everyone.

Jengie
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by daronmedway:
After many years aboard, it still annoys me if I make a point in a discussion and get ignored, but then someone else makes the same point further down the thread and gets quoted for it in the sigs of the in-crowd. [Razz]

You are not alone. In fact, far from it.

Maybe it's that people don't read threads before posting?

Sometimes you just miss the first post. Or have a different focus or just are not in the mood to reply when the first post is made.It can be difficult not to take being ignored personally, but often it simply is not personal.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Hum. I still think that if you are going to make a substantive point in a post, it behoves you to check that someone hasn't already said the same thing. Often, in the process, you may find what you were about to post changes.

If you are not going to join the thread, partial, inattentive or not at all is fine, of course.

[ 31. May 2014, 08:49: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Gareth (# 2494) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Page and a bit? Less than even the snappiest article in the LRB? Stuff that.

Speed/skim reading is a skill any literate person possesses.

I've taught far too many academic high-flyers who read painfully slowly for me to agree with that.
 
Posted by jrw (# 18045) on :
 
I would imagine most people are more likely to respond when they disagree than if they agree.
 
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on :
 
Probably partly cos just agreeing without anything else to add doesn't feel like it is adding anything to a discussion.

But I do agree with you [Biased]
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chocoholic:
Probably partly cos just agreeing without anything else to add doesn't feel like it is adding anything to a discussion.

But I do agree with you [Biased]

I do quite like 'like' buttons for that reason.
 
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cenobite:
I know that probably 95% of the Ship wouldn't even look at that thread - why would they unless they were 'Expecting Shipmates' too?

Well, it doesn't always follow. I am a self-confessed lurker and occasional poster on the Truth Universally Acknowledged thread for singles, despite being an old married. [Biased] I am sorry for your experience and ask, with Lamb Chopped, that you give us another chance.

I haven't visited the Welcome thread before today and I've been thinking about why. I can't remember whether I posted there myself when I joined, possibly not, because in my initial post here in a thread I think I must have said something like, "Hi, I'm new" and got several nice welcoming posts. To go to the Welcome thread would have felt a bit artificial and as if I were trying to make too big a thing of my arrival.

Like a number of people I read most of the boards but only post in a few as in places like Purgatory and Ecclesiantics I feel well out of my depth most of the time and can only watch in awe when the threads are in full flow. [Eek!] [Overused]

I do see, from today's visit there, that the Welcome thread is a valuable place for helping people to settle in and showing them where to stow their dunnage, also learning a bit about new shipmates, so I'll make a point of going there more often. [Smile]

Nen - God bless the Ship and all who sail in her.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
I didn't post on the Welcome thread when I joined because I was much more concerned about anonymity than I am now. I didn't want to post "Hi, I'm Pigwidgeon! Sorry, I don't want to tell you where I live or anything else about me!"

Now I sometimes read the Welcome thread, but too many welcomes to each new person remind me of a 12-step meeting, where the newbie says "Hi, I'm Bill W., and I'm an alcoholic." And then everyone starts shouting out "Hi, Bill!" It's almost like a dogpile. One or two welcomes are nice -- I especially like Welease Woderwick's.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
I think the art of being replied to is to either a) be very smart and insightful or b) say something someone else will disagree with strongly enough to want to argue against.

I actually spend a fair amount of time prior to posting thinking about what I'm going to say from various angles, thinking about potential objections. I wonder sometimes if that isn't why 95% of my musings are too middle-of-the-road reasonable/bland to be worthy of comment.

That and the fact that the in-crowd hates me obviously. [Two face]
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
quote:
Originally posted by Chocoholic:
Probably partly cos just agreeing without anything else to add doesn't feel like it is adding anything to a discussion.

But I do agree with you [Biased]

I do quite like 'like' buttons for that reason.
Like.
I post on the welcome thread very occasionally, only when something the new poster says resonates with me. Otherwise I bore myself.
Having said that, I've greatly appreciated a warm welcome on other boards.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
"Like" buttons kill discussion, IMO. You make a remark and nobody actually says anything, you just get a quantity of thumbs-ups. Fine if you just want validation but on a discussion board it's unhelpful.

I think WW and the AS hosts do a fine job of welcoming people on the thread. WW used to do it before he became a host, too; some people do, but I agree it's better not to have too many people doing it simultaneously on the same thread. Friendliness to new people can be shown on other threads at other times in different ways.
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
"Like" buttons kill discussion, IMO. You make a remark and nobody actually says anything, you just get a quantity of thumbs-ups. Fine if you just want validation but on a discussion board it's unhelpful.


Yes I agree - it means there's no discussion and you don't have to thing about what the person has said - there may be things you could add to the discussion for instance which you then don't do!
On the whole I think S-o-F does pretty well - the various arguments are often well presented and personal attacks are prohibited - people are expected to think about what they post before they actually do so. Compared with some of our newspapers (some?) it's quite a haven!
[Smile]
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Ooh, my trigger finger was all ready to press 'LIKE' on Stephen's post....
 
Posted by Lucia (# 15201) on :
 
Actually this thread has been quite heartening to hear my own experiences reflected by others too! (It's not just me!!) Thank you folks! (And thank you Alan for you kind comment) [Smile]

[ 01. June 2014, 13:37: Message edited by: Lucia ]
 
Posted by Candide (# 15755) on :
 
Speaking as a frequent lurker, trying to gather the courage to become a frequent poster, then I also rather like this thread.

There are a lot of intelligent, knowledgeable, witty people posting here. That certainly makes it a little bit scary to make a post of your own. Still, having an inclusive sort of atmosphere, like the one demonstrated here, makes it a lot easier.
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
"Like" buttons kill discussion, IMO. You make a remark and nobody actually says anything, you just get a quantity of thumbs-ups. Fine if you just want validation but on a discussion board it's unhelpful.


Yes I agree - it means there's no discussion and you don't have to thing about what the person has said - there may be things you could add to the discussion for instance which you then don't do!
Disagree. I don't think there are people with things to say who merely click "like" instead of saying them. I think it's more the case that people who don't feel they have anything to say, but still want to indicate their approval of someone's comment, click the button.
 
Posted by Raptor Eye (# 16649) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Candide:
Speaking as a frequent lurker, trying to gather the courage to become a frequent poster, then I also rather like this thread.

There are a lot of intelligent, knowledgeable, witty people posting here. That certainly makes it a little bit scary to make a post of your own. Still, having an inclusive sort of atmosphere, like the one demonstrated here, makes it a lot easier.

Don't worry Candide, there are plenty of us who are not so intelligent, witty or knowledgable too. [Smile]
 
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
I don't think there are people with things to say who merely click "like" instead of saying them. I think it's more the case that people who don't feel they have anything to say, but still want to indicate their approval of someone's comment, click the button.

But, knowing someone agrees with a post does not add to the discussion. Hence there is no need for such a feature on a discussion board.
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raptor Eye:
quote:
Originally posted by Candide:
Speaking as a frequent lurker, trying to gather the courage to become a frequent poster, then I also rather like this thread.

There are a lot of intelligent, knowledgeable, witty people posting here. That certainly makes it a little bit scary to make a post of your own. Still, having an inclusive sort of atmosphere, like the one demonstrated here, makes it a lot easier.

Don't worry Candide, there are plenty of us who are not so intelligent, witty or knowledgable too. [Smile]
Heck, some of us get to be Hosts!
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
Well that's what I think Alan. It would have been the easiest thing for Mousethief to click a 'don't like' button. Instead he gave a reason. Nobody's any the wiser really with those buttons - if you have to give a reason then you are, even if you don't agree with it.
The websites I was thinking of seem to rejoice in people saying the most controversial things just for the sake of it and lo and behold they collect lots of 'likes'
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Raptor Eye:
quote:
Originally posted by Candide:
Speaking as a frequent lurker, trying to gather the courage to become a frequent poster, then I also rather like this thread.

There are a lot of intelligent, knowledgeable, witty people posting here. That certainly makes it a little bit scary to make a post of your own. Still, having an inclusive sort of atmosphere, like the one demonstrated here, makes it a lot easier.

Don't worry Candide, there are plenty of us who are not so intelligent, witty or knowledgable too. [Smile]
I've said this before - you have as much right to your opinions as anyone else, and you shouldn't be scared off. The main thing is that you can show reasons for your views - at least in Purgatory but similar rules apply across the board. If you're feeling nervous try Heaven or The Circus to try the water as it were. And I'm not particularly knowledgeable I can assure you! and to be honest some of us may seem that way as a result of what we've learned on SOF
[Smile]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
And I'm not particularly knowledgeable I can assure you! and to be honest some of us may seem that way as a result of what we've learned on SOF
[Smile]

I'm not sure we shouldn't work that up into an ad along the lines of those you used to find at the back of magazines - 'Shy? Tongue-tied? Totally unable to do an off-the-cuff brilliant exegesis of Colossians 2:5 with special reference to Dispensationalism and witty asides about the Patristic Fathers? Read Ship of Fools!' - alongside a black and white drawing of a Bondian figure in a DJ, blonde on arm, Martini in one hand, Cruden's concordance in the other.
 
Posted by passer (# 13329) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
And I'm not particularly knowledgeable I can assure you! and to be honest some of us may seem that way as a result of what we've learned on SOF
[Smile]

I'm not sure we shouldn't work that up into an ad along the lines of those you used to find at the back of magazines - 'Shy? Tongue-tied? Totally unable to do an off-the-cuff brilliant exegesis of Colossians 2:5 with special reference to Dispensationalism and witty asides about the Patristic Fathers? Read Ship of Fools!' - alongside a black and white drawing of a Bondian figure in a DJ, blonde on arm, Martini in one hand, Cruden's concordance in the other.
Like. [Biased]


 
Posted by Candide (# 15755) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
quote:
Originally posted by Raptor Eye:
quote:
Originally posted by Candide:
Speaking as a frequent lurker, trying to gather the courage to become a frequent poster, then I also rather like this thread.

There are a lot of intelligent, knowledgeable, witty people posting here. That certainly makes it a little bit scary to make a post of your own. Still, having an inclusive sort of atmosphere, like the one demonstrated here, makes it a lot easier.

Don't worry Candide, there are plenty of us who are not so intelligent, witty or knowledgable too. [Smile]
I've said this before - you have as much right to your opinions as anyone else, and you shouldn't be scared off. The main thing is that you can show reasons for your views - at least in Purgatory but similar rules apply across the board. If you're feeling nervous try Heaven or The Circus to try the water as it were. And I'm not particularly knowledgeable I can assure you! and to be honest some of us may seem that way as a result of what we've learned on SOF
[Smile]

Thanks for that, both of you. The lowest rung of the ladder might not be all that prestigious, but at least I won't be lacking for company. [Biased]
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
And I'm not particularly knowledgeable I can assure you! and to be honest some of us may seem that way as a result of what we've learned on SOF
[Smile]

I'm not sure we shouldn't work that up into an ad along the lines of those you used to find at the back of magazines - 'Shy? Tongue-tied? Totally unable to do an off-the-cuff brilliant exegesis of Colossians 2:5 with special reference to Dispensationalism and witty asides about the Patristic Fathers? Read Ship of Fools!' - alongside a black and white drawing of a Bondian figure in a DJ, blonde on arm, Martini in one hand, Cruden's concordance in the other.
challenge accepted.

obviously the final would be done by somebody who actually knows what they're doing.
 
Posted by Dave Marshall (# 7533) on :
 
Brilliant!
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
Like!

[Razz]
 
Posted by Stephen (# 40) on :
 
Excellent, comet...! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ancient Mariner (# 4) on :
 
Rolling on the floor laughing my Arius off.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
10 nerd points to House Mariner.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
I got about a hundred responses to my first post but as my mother used to say, "There's good attention and then there's bad attention."

I always try to give some sort of response when I see a post from a newbie but I never go to the "Welcome," thread. God Bless Welease Woderick and others who keep that up. What bothers me about it is the huge number of people who introduce themselves there, receive a warm welcome from several people and then never post again. Big chickens.

Here's what seems unwelcoming to me: Someone makes his first post on a thread in Heaven or Purgatory and the host responds with some variation of, "Welcome! Please read our FAQ's." Maybe it's just me but I would feel like I had just done something wrong and needed to go back and check each rule to see which one I'd broken.
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Twilight:
quote:
What bothers me about it is the huge number of people who introduce themselves there, receive a warm welcome from several people and then never post again. Big chickens.
Ah! The friendliness of the Ship in action!

Some people like to lurk. At least the people who sign up and introduce themselves let us know that they are there. Good on them!
 
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on :
 
Some people in inherently polite in their posts and some are not. Warm Fuzzies versus Cold Pricklies. When people are new, have little experience and don't know the culture of the Ship, it is perhaps best to pull in the prickles. and Assume Good Faith (AGF) more generally.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
What bothers me about it is the huge number of people who introduce themselves there, receive a warm welcome from several people and then never post again.

That. I know several people who fit into that category. I think the Ship intrigues them for awhile, then they lose interest for whatever reason and move on. Unlike us old Shippies who were hooked from the start and remain so.
 
Posted by Oscar the Grouch (# 1916) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Candide:
Thanks for that, both of you. The lowest rung of the ladder might not be all that prestigious, but at least I won't be lacking for company. [Biased]

As someone who has been around the Ship a long time, can I offer this? I remember well how many ties I used to write something, preview it (as a one always should!!) and then chicken out and delete it on the grounds that no-one wanted to hear my foolish ideas. It took ages for me to get to the point where I could write something and then post it without endless internal debates about whether I should or not.

It does get easier once you have started dipping your toe in the waters.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyda*Rose:
Twilight:
quote:
What bothers me about it is the huge number of people who introduce themselves there, receive a warm welcome from several people and then never post again. Big chickens.
Ah! The friendliness of the Ship in action!


"Big chicken," is what I think of as gentle, friendly, sibling-like teasing. It would make me more comfortable than the fear of being completely misunderstood and chastised by someone.
 
Posted by moonlitdoor (# 11707) on :
 
quote:

originally posted by Oscar the Grouch

It does get easier once you have started dipping your toe in the waters

It does get a bit easier but after 8 years I still don't post in 90 per cent of the Purgatory threads that interest me. There's a strange statement in the Purgatory introduction that all points of view are welcome, which seems to me so conspicuously false that it confused me for a long time.
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
quote:
Originally posted by Lyda*Rose:
Twilight:
quote:
What bothers me about it is the huge number of people who introduce themselves there, receive a warm welcome from several people and then never post again. Big chickens.
Ah! The friendliness of the Ship in action!


"Big chicken," is what I think of as gentle, friendly, sibling-like teasing. It would make me more comfortable than the fear of being completely misunderstood and chastised by someone.
Sorry. Should have added a winkie smilie for teasing in turn. Pax.
 
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on :
 
You know what would be funny? If I suspended everyone on this thread. No good reason; just funny.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RooK:
You know what would be funny? If I suspended everyone on this thread. No good reason; just funny.

You pull the legs of spiders too, don't you?
 
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
Well that's what I think Alan. It would have been the easiest thing for Mousethief to click a 'don't like' button. Instead he gave a reason.

A 'Don't like' button is a whole different ball game! It doesn't necessarily follow that having a 'like' button means also having a 'don't like'.

I've seen buttons used to good effect in a couple of different ways:

1. For example, on Ars Technica. In this style, there are upvote and downvote buttons (+1 and -1). They're specifically not called like and don't like, because you're meant to vote on how good (relevant, etc) a comment it was, not how much you agreed with it. Ones that get loads of downvotes and no upvotes are hidden (readers can click a small link to view the hidden comment). If it gets a lot of both downvotes and upvotes, it is flagged as "Controversial", which means a big icon appears at the top of the post.

2. For example, on the OmniGroup forums. There's a Like button but no Dislike. Liking a post doesn't do anything except adds to the count of "X people like this" below it. (This is the same as on Facebook.) People with things to say still say them, but people who just want to offer support for someone else's post will Like it instead. That means you get a much higher signal-to-noise ratio in threads.

On a board like the Ship, where there are boards like All Saints as well as ones like Purgatory, it would be hard to set expectations for the upvote/downvote buttons. If they're there, it has to be the poster's choice to use them — so we couldn't have any rules against downvoting someone's "My father is dying" post on the prayer thread, which would seem really insulting.

However, I think having just a "Like" button could work well. Similar to on Facebook, people would end up using it to show support, or to agree, or to complement a good post, and all of those uses would be fine.

Having said all that, this is a big tangent, because I don't think UBB supports them anyway.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I still don't think validation buttons would add anything worthwhile to a discussion board. It's the equivalent of someone saying something and a bunch of other people sitting round the table going "Yeah" and the conversation grinding to a halt. The Ship is intended primarily for discussion, whereas FB is intended more for short announcements and status updates.

Besides, it's only one step short of member ratings. "Look at my post, it got 43 likes!"
 
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
Some people in inherently polite in their posts and some are not. Warm Fuzzies versus Cold Pricklies. When people are new, have little experience and don't know the culture of the Ship, it is perhaps best to pull in the prickles. and Assume Good Faith (AGF) more generally.

That sounds awfully like pretending to be nice in order to draw them in, then revealing our true natures once they're caught. I prefer honesty, warts and all. If someone doesn't like the prickles, they're not going to be any more happy about them if they're encountered after five posts or fifty.
 
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I still don't think validation buttons would add anything worthwhile to a discussion board. It's the equivalent of someone saying something and a bunch of other people sitting round the table going "Yeah" and the conversation grinding to a halt. The Ship is intended primarily for discussion, whereas FB is intended more for short announcements and status updates.

Yeah.
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amorya:
quote:
Originally posted by Stephen:
Well that's what I think Alan. It would have been the easiest thing for Mousethief to click a 'don't like' button. Instead he gave a reason.

A 'Don't like' button is a whole different ball game! It doesn't necessarily follow that having a 'like' button means also having a 'don't like'.

I've seen buttons used to good effect in a couple of different ways:

1. For example, on Ars Technica. In this style, there are upvote and downvote buttons (+1 and -1). They're specifically not called like and don't like, because you're meant to vote on how good (relevant, etc) a comment it was, not how much you agreed with it. Ones that get loads of downvotes and no upvotes are hidden (readers can click a small link to view the hidden comment). If it gets a lot of both downvotes and upvotes, it is flagged as "Controversial", which means a big icon appears at the top of the post.

2. For example, on the OmniGroup forums. There's a Like button but no Dislike. Liking a post doesn't do anything except adds to the count of "X people like this" below it. (This is the same as on Facebook.) People with things to say still say them, but people who just want to offer support for someone else's post will Like it instead. That means you get a much higher signal-to-noise ratio in threads.

On a board like the Ship, where there are boards like All Saints as well as ones like Purgatory, it would be hard to set expectations for the upvote/downvote buttons. If they're there, it has to be the poster's choice to use them — so we couldn't have any rules against downvoting someone's "My father is dying" post on the prayer thread, which would seem really insulting.

However, I think having just a "Like" button could work well. Similar to on Facebook, people would end up using it to show support, or to agree, or to complement a good post, and all of those uses would be fine.

Having said all that, this is a big tangent, because I don't think UBB supports them anyway.

It's an okay idea in principle that 'you're meant to vote on how good (relevant, etc) a comment it was, not how much you agreed with it', but how such buttons are used is very much the function of the culture of a place.

I've encountered a forum that has the ability to give people's posts green dots and red dots, but in fact the person themselves would end up with an overall rating. It would only ever display one red dot for your overall rating, so I don't know if there was some kind of inbuilt floor score beyond which you couldn't go. Whereas the green dots could grow to a sizable number.

And the strength of your own rating affected how much your ratings of other people's posts were worth.

There were, frankly, some appalling bullies on that forum, and red dots were delivered for disagreeing with the party line, sometimes in quite trivial fashion. Sometimes just because someone didn't like other things you said and the system was allowing them to rate you again (there was some kind of safeguard about giving reputation to the same people too often). It was vindictive and toxic.

Whereas I'm quite sure there are other forums using similar systems where their use is more sensible - and probably more regulated. The key question is whether vindictive, petty use is seen to be acceptable or not.

Another forum I'm on has a similar dot system, but only allows positive approval. It's generally a nicer place, but it has some cultural problems of its own, including with the way the owner of the site sometimes chooses to rewrite history.

On both forums I've communicated that here on the Ship, some of the behaviour simply wouldn't be tolerated. If Shipmates tried it, the hosts and admins would come down on it, and if the hosts and admins tried it, there would be an outcry from the Shipmates.

The culture of the Ship is going to be determined by the behaviour of the people, not by the technological features. Similarly, any problems in the culture of the Ship are going to have to be dealt with at the personal level.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet:
Some people in inherently polite in their posts and some are not. Warm Fuzzies versus Cold Pricklies. When people are new, have little experience and don't know the culture of the Ship, it is perhaps best to pull in the prickles. and Assume Good Faith (AGF) more generally.

That sounds awfully like pretending to be nice in order to draw them in, then revealing our true natures once they're caught. I prefer honesty, warts and all. If someone doesn't like the prickles, they're not going to be any more happy about them if they're encountered after five posts or fifty.
But what exactly is the context being talked about? If someone is posting that they're new, in a 'welcome newbie' thread, would a grumpy/prickly person going in to be rude to them simply be a case of 'honesty, warts and all'? Surely the purpose of the thread is to welcome - and being prickly doesn't make a person incapable of welcoming someone. In my experience of real life social situations, people generally are politer when they first meet someone, not because they're not being real, but because the person doesn't know them yet, and so doesn't yet know how to read them.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
I quite like the idea of a 'like' button. I don't think it discourages discussion - if people want to discuss and give reasons, they will do so. But a 'like' button would probably encourage more people to join in - people who may not feel they want to say something yet, but who want to express agreement with certain views. That's what I find on FB anyway.

At the moment, if someone really likes a post here on the Ship, they sometimes post a reply quoting it and putting the [Overused] smilie after it. I've always seen that as a sort of equivalent to a 'like'.
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
The Ship isn't a hidden, closed community. Many of those who join the Ship have lurked for some time. Just as some join and never post I'm sure others lurk for many years without joining. The "Apprentice" stage gives newcomers a bit more room for manoever although if they abuse that, others will put them straight.

I don't think anyone who posts on the welcome thread in All Saints is ever ignored.

[ 06. June 2014, 12:33: Message edited by: Sioni Sais ]
 
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fineline:
At the moment, if someone really likes a post here on the Ship, they sometimes post a reply quoting it and putting the [Overused] smilie after it. I've always seen that as a sort of equivalent to a 'like'.

I agree that is probably the Ship equivalent.

The main difference is that it's used sparingly, but also that it's quite public. Facebook tends to just communicate the number of people that liked something - I know you can see exactly who liked something if you investigate further, but the first thing most people see is just that a post was popular. And in fact FB use that to make the post more prominent in other people's feeds.

I'm not sure FB is a great example, though, because it isn't a message board. It doesn't encourage discussion. It's mostly about friends broadcasting news about themselves.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I'm not sure FB is a great example, though, because it isn't a message board. It doesn't encourage discussion. It's mostly about friends broadcasting news about themselves.

Facebook is quite versatile though. People use it in all sorts of ways. It is often used for discussions. Not just for personal information and announcements. I suppose it depends on who your circle of friends is, but I have several friends on FB who like to discuss and debate things and use FB to do this, and I often do it myself too. The status update is like the original post here, and the comments are the discussion. You don't have the 'quote' feature you have here, but it's quite easy to use an equivalent by naming (even tagging) the person you're replying to.
 
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on :
 
I've used a couple of other sites were newbies get a hugely warm , sometimes OTT, welcome . Some stick around, most are never seen again.

I'm not knocking those who do the Ship's welcoming but personally I don't think it makes much difference to the stickability of new contributors .
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rolyn:
I'm not knocking those who do the Ship's welcoming but personally I don't think it makes much difference to the stickability of new contributors .

I think being included in discussions is much more important to newbies.

Moo
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0