Thread: Readme: the book thread. Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=029395

Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Kindle, paper, vellum, papyrus, clay tablet... What are you reading?

Firenze
Heaven Host

 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
How to be Good by Nick Hornby. Too early to say yet.

Just finished Huckleberry Finn. Haven't read it since childhood (in fact I think my dad must have read it to me, and left out the bit about the feuding families) so although I loved it, I never really appreciated what a great book it was.

Also just finished Why genes are not selfish (etc.) by Colin Tudge - really useful explanation of the science of why Dawkins is Wrong - at least the Biology of why Dawkins is wrong, I'm not sure about the Physics, because I don't have Physics to that level. He seems to take a similar line to Fritjof Capra, and I know some physicists don't really rate Capra, though I daresay that's a topic for a different thread.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I'm in the middle of 1000 Years of Annoying the French by Stephen Clarke, which is a jolly romp of cross-Channel japery and Francophobia.

Also waiting for the next Philippa Gregory to come out in paperback.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I've just returned a book by Joanna Trollope to the library - I must say I prefer Anthony.

I'm re-reading A Darker Place by Laurie R King on my kindle. It's about a woman, an expert on religious movements whose husband and child were killed in a cult years earlier, who is sent into a cult by the FBI to check whether this one too is going to implode.

I like Laurie King as she writes interesting women. She's probably best known for her Sherlock Holmes and Mary Russell series, but I think Folly is my favourite, along with the earlier Kate Martinelli series.
 
Posted by marzipan (# 9442) on :
 
Currently I'm not reading anything, in an attempt to make myself revise the Highway Code for when I take my driving test in a couple of weeks.
My sister got me The Ice Dragon for Christmas - I think it's the shortest George RR Martin book there is (it's an illustrated children's book about dragons). Only problem was I finished it the day after I got it (but if you have kids who are into dragons, they'd probably like it. Chapters are short so it could be a bedtime story).
Though I do need to see if I have a copy of witches abroad floating about so I can maybe join in the book club this time around
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I'm finishing the last few pages of PD James' A Taste for Death (hardback [Smile] ). I've got an increasingly large pile of books to get though (added to by Christmas gifts, of course), including the next two Merrily Watkins stories; the new Anthony Horowitz Moriarty; a children's historical novel; and a biography of Harry Houdini.

Dontcha just lurve books... [Yipee]
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Piglet:
I'm in the middle of 1000 Years of Annoying the French by Stephen Clarke, which is a jolly romp of cross-Channel japery and Francophobia.

I read that last year - I enjoyed it, although I think he was trying a little hard to be Bill Bryson.

I've got a few books on the go at the moment, primarily John G Geer's "In Defense of Negativity" (about attack ads in presidential campaigns - interesting but I'm not far enough in to be convinced yet), and Caroline Sullivan's "Bye Bye Baby" about Bay City Rollers fandom in the 1970s (gently amusing).
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Have just finished Gun Machine by Warren Ellis, and would heartily recommend it as a fresh spin on the American crime thriller. It has some of Ellis' usual preoccupations of interconnectedness and new technology and the weirdness of the world at large, but it doesn't read like any of his other work. A lovingly-crafted gem.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
... "Bye Bye Baby" about Bay City Rollers fandom in the 1970s (gently amusing).

Do you roll up your jeans and put on stripy socks and a tartan scarf while you're reading it? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am reading Lady Audley's Secret, by M.E. Braddon. Also At Day's Close, nonfiction by A. Roger Ekirch.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Just finished my first book of 2015, Susan Jane Gilman's The Ice-Cream Queen of Orchard Street, a fantastic, rollicking historical novel that will also tell you everything you ever wanted to know about the history of ice-cream making in America. I loved every minute of it.
 
Posted by Aravis (# 13824) on :
 
New paperback: In Other Worlds by Margaret Atwood - an account of her lifelong appreciation of science fiction. It's very readable and very thought provoking so I keep rereading bits. Examples of her ideas in the first chapter include a discussion of the origins of superhero costume, and an explanation of how Batman expresses Jungian archetypes.

On my IPad (ie a book to fall asleep with when the light turns itself off) I'm rereading The History of Mr Polly (HG Wells).
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Aravis:
New paperback: In Other Worlds by Margaret Atwood - an account of her lifelong appreciation of science fiction. It's very readable and very thought provoking so I keep rereading bits. Examples of her ideas in the first chapter include a discussion of the origins of superhero costume, and an explanation of how Batman expresses Jungian archetypes.

On my IPad (ie a book to fall asleep with when the light turns itself off) I'm rereading The History of Mr Polly (HG Wells).

Thanks for that, I've just bought it on kindle. The handmaid's tale is probably my favourite fictional novel.
 
Posted by StevHep (# 17198) on :
 
I'm nearly at the end of Là-Bas by Huysmans on Satanism in fin de siècle Paris and the serial murder of children in the Middle Ages by Gilles de Rais one time comrade of St Joan. Its very French.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Read All You Need is Kill after watching the movie version, Edge of Tomorrow last week. Fun, short, pacy SciFi (time loops and alien invasion)

Just finished Witches Abroad for the Jan book group. I enjoyed it better than I expected. Saving my thoughts for the other thread obviously.
 
Posted by Starbug (# 15917) on :
 
I've just finished Stephen Spielberg and Duel - The Making of a Film Career, which was very interesting. As well as interviews and the background to making the movie, it contains the whole screenplay of Duel , which is almost as exciting to read as watching the film.

I'm now reading Zombie Apocalypse: Horror Hospital by Mark Morris.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
Having bought Boy and Going Solo from the shop at the Roald Dahl museum in August, I'm thoroughly enjoying the latter.
His time in Africa first working for Shell, then as a fighter pilot in WW2 was extremely eventful, and as you'd expect, the books are vividly written.
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
I loved "Boy." I read the chocolate shop chapter aloud to one of my classes once.
 
Posted by Athrawes (# 9594) on :
 
I've just started Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell. Has anyone read it? I'm finding it a bit hard to get into, but think it will get easier once the story proper starts.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Yes, it's a wonderful novel, deserving of all the prizes it has won! But it's Dickensian, as you probably know just by hefting it. A slow dense read rather than a fast sharp one. The difference between a beef daube, cooked for seven hours over a slow flame, and a fast stir-fry.
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Athrawes:
I've just started Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell. Has anyone read it? I'm finding it a bit hard to get into, but think it will get easier once the story proper starts.

I really enjoyed it, despite it being heavy going. Even better is her book of short stories of faerie, 'The Ladies of Grace Adieu', which I read beforehand.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I loved Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell when I read it a few years ago. I keep hearing rumours of a sequel and/or a movie adaptation, but nothing definite about either. The novel took her 10 years to write, apparently, so I guess I shouldn't be holding my breath for the sequel, although the ending pretty clearly set up the expectation that there would be more to come.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
At the moment I am reading The Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (all three volumes of it) but only in the way of business.

This evening I hope to have time to read With Fate Conspire - also a book about faeries, by Marie Brennan this time (the final one in her Onyx Court series).

Just before Christmas I read Jen Williams' The Copper Promise (great book, although the heroes have the weakest excuse to go down into the dungeon EVER) and Kristin Cashore's trilogy Graceling, Fire and Bitterblue - also highly recommended for anyone who likes fantasy.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Whilst away at the weekend I finished Joseph Hansen's excellent
Living Upstairs - it had been years since I read it and I was fairly gripped, not only by the plot twists but also by the fabulously tight writing.

I am now happily revisiting Lake Wobegon, again a long time unvisited but surely worth it. Laugh out loud funny.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
How to be Good by Nick Hornby. Too early to say yet.


I liked it, but then I am not everybody. I plan to continue reading the tome for the Ship's book club on Nook. I am about an eighth of the way through it and shall continue later today, carrying on until I finish. It is an epic adventure of 800 pages and I will read it twice before asking questions. Book is Arcanum, written by a Shipmate...
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
I loved Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell when I read it a few years ago. I keep hearing rumours of a sequel and/or a movie adaptation, but nothing definite about either. ....

I've seen a press photo, so they've definitely filmed at least part of an adaptation. The title characters are played by Bertie Carvel (late of Babylon and the Wrong Mans) and Eddie Marsan.
 
Posted by Rev per Minute (# 69) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Athrawes:
I've just started Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell. Has anyone read it? I'm finding it a bit hard to get into, but think it will get easier once the story proper starts.

I loved it, when I read it a few years ago. I saw a trailer recently for a BBC adaptation and found confirmation on IMDb - not sure of the start date though.

Currently on a Pratchett thing - just read Dodger and currently Raising Steam. The first was better than expected - basically Ankh-Morpork meets Dickensian London - and the second is an enjoyable Discworld romp. I am a bit worried about the way the fundamentalist (deep down) dwarves are encouraging young dwarves to attack modern technology - though reading it in the week of the Charlie Hebdo attack might have made me a bit sensitive to simplistic stereotyping. That said, I should cherish new Pratchett while we still have him.

I read Witches Abroad a while ago when I first got my Kindle, but it seems to have disappeared from my screen and my list of purchases - not at all sure why, and asking the Amazon help desk was a waste of pixels. Anyone have a suggestion as to why?
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
On finding out that I would have to wait for weeks in the library reserve queue to get my hands on The Rosie Project, I bought it on my Kindle. A very funny and relaxing holiday read. And a very recognisable main character if you live with anyone even slightly on the autism spectrum. Also on Kindle I am re-reading Middlemarch for the first time since my student days. What a genius was George Eliot! I appreciate it so much more with a lot of years behind me.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Having only managed to finish 40 books last year, am looking to increase that in 2015. So far, I've finished Kate Fox's Watching the English and Catherine Osborne's Presocratic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction.

Am now ploughing my way through Mark Miodownik's highly entertaining Stuff Matters.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
Having only managed to finish 40 books last year, am looking to increase that in 2015. So far, I've finished Kate Fox's Watching the English and Catherine Osborne's Presocratic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction.

Am now ploughing my way through Mark Miodownik's highly entertaining Stuff Matters.

Sipech, what did you think of Watching the English? It has been on my wish-list for a while but I have not actually bought it yet.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
Sipech, what did you think of Watching the English? It has been on my wish-list for a while but I have not actually bought it yet.

I rather enjoyed it. It wasn't quite what I was expecting, as I had thought it would be a literary form of observational comedy, when in fact it's more of an informal sociological study. So it's not exactly a rehash of Bill Bryson's
Notes From A Small Island.

There are some omissions, such as the difference between rural, suburban and urban lifestyles. That said, there is rather a lot about class and class anxiety in there. But it's well worth reading, as I'm sure there'll be things that you recognise there in either yourself or in the those around you as well helping to discover some odd customs you weren't aware of.

For example, a colleague of mine frequently refers to "wetting the baby's head" which I thought was just an Essex euphemism for a christening when it turns out that it actually means going for a drink with a new father.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Revival by Stephen King. It was OK. I think what I thought it was going to be about - a horror/supernatural thriller based around the world of tent revival missions - was only really a small part of the book. In fact I think there's a short story/novella in there about that and the rest is really the story of a man's life over 50 years. If you realise that it's not too bad, otherwise it feels like a very long set up to not that thrilling a conclusion.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I think Watching the English is brilliant--the first edition, haven't read the latest updated one but I would think it's even better. The author, Kate Fox, was very entertaining at the Cheltenham Literature festival this past October.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I've just read a delightfully dull book. I spotted it in the Oxfam bookshop, where (presumably based on the dull description on the back cover) it was a bargain at £2.99.

It's The Aul' Days ; published in 1984, it is the autobiography of Ewan Forbes, full of mildly amusing anecdotes about a childhood filled with with dogs, ponies, cousins and music lessons. Then there was the disappointment of paternal objection to University, but persistence won through, and the author graduated in medicine and became a doctor. More mildly amusing anecdotes about life as a country doctor, marriage, becoming a church elder, and the joys of fly fishing.

A life well lived, with family, friends, career, church, animals.

No mention anywhere that Ewan Forbes started life in 1912 as Elizabeth Forbes-Sempill, no mention of the all-girls school, no mention of being a debutante in a white silk gown presented at court, no mention of the court petition to be issued with a fresh, male, birth certificate, (which enabled his marriage to Isabella to take place, and which enabled him to be ordained as an elder at a time when the eldership was still barred to women).

Just a cosy autobiography by someone who enjoyed dogs, ponies, life in the countryside, who loved his wife, and who was an exemplary country doctor and pillar of his community.

A charmingly dull read.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I've never heard of this person, but my goodness, that seems like a rather large detail to leave out of one's autobiography. Presumably the omission was deliberate -- it couldn't have slipped his mind, could it?
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
It's very carefully written to imply a boyish childhood, without ever actually saying so. He was 40 when he got his new birth certificate, although of course he'd been gender-neutral "Dr Forbes" prior to that.

I had a lump in my throat reading it - warmly written, with no suggestion that life had been particularly difficult. He was born 5 miles from where I live, and some of the older people at my church remember him and speak highly of him.
 
Posted by LutheranChik (# 9826) on :
 
I am reading "The Way North," edited by Ron Biekki, an anthology of authors from Michigan's Upper Peninsula.

Funny story: I'd bought this book, and a book on hunting morel mushrooms that I'd intended to give Dear Partner for her birthday, back in July when we were Iin northern Michigan for our annual family vacation with the visiting LA kids/ grandkids. Sometime in the weeks that followed, which were also very busy for us, I forgot about these books totally. When DP's birthday approached I did finally remember the mushroom book, and searched high and low for it, but to no avail. So imagine my surprise when, Christmas morning, DP handed me two carefully wrapped gifts that turned out to be...my two missing books! She'd found them tucked away in one of our little caches of family Christmas presents that we collect during the year as things go on sale. So apparently I have too many books! We had a good laugh over that one. But, anyway, I'm partway through the anthology, which has the sort of melancholic feel you'd expect coming from writers in the isolated north woods.
 
Posted by The5thMary (# 12953) on :
 
My God, I just read the most incredible book! It's an uncorrected proof, so the final edition might have a few changes and maybe some more pages? Anyway, it's called "Afterparty" by Daryl Gregory. Has anyone else read this? I love the Dr. Gloria character. A sarcastic but loving guardian angel. If you like science fiction with a bit of theology thrown in and you like Philip K. Dick and William Gibson, you'll probably dig this book. I hope Daryl Gregory writes a sequel.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by cosmic dance:
On finding out that I would have to wait for weeks in the library reserve queue to get my hands on The Rosie Project, I bought it on my Kindle. A very funny and relaxing holiday read. And a very recognisable main character if you live with anyone even slightly on the autism spectrum. Also on Kindle I am re-reading Middlemarch for the first time since my student days. What a genius was George Eliot! I appreciate it so much more with a lot of years behind me.

Agree on both counts. I loved every minute of "The Rosie Project," it was just so much fun and "Middlemarch," is on my short list of greatest novels ever. I think it should be required reading before marriage. It had so many good examples of how hard it can be to actually live with our choices.

Yesterday I started, The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt. I'll be back in a few months with a review. It's 1267 pages in my large print version. My thumbs hurt and there's very little room for my dog on my lap! I love this writer, though, her detailed descriptions may make her books massive, but they certainly do put you in the moment.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
You might be interested in the Ship's Bookclub thread on The Rosie Project. We weren't so impressed. In fact, I think some of us were quite rude about it.

I am still enjoying Mel Starr's Hugh de Singleton books and am rationing them. So far I've read The Unquiet Bones, A Corpse at St Andrew's Chapel, A Trail of Ink and Unhallowed Ground, two of them over Christmas. There are three more published. They are detective stories in the style of Cadfael. Set a couple of hundred years later, in and around Oxford and this chief protagonist is a surgeon.

Having seen him on The Write Stuff I discovered Mark Billingham's Tom Thorne series, and have read a few of those on my megacommute and while travelling around. The protagonist here is a contemporary London policeman. The originals were bought at two for £5 at a bus station before I started on a 5 hour journey, but I've since bought some for the Kindle. There's a TV series too. Pushed to give some idea of Tom Thorne, he's a bit like a North London version of Rebus.

One of the very cheap offerings from Kindle when I was buying books to go away was Fractured by Dani Adams, which was based on an interesting idea and would be difficult to discuss without spoilers. I wouldn't pick up her next book as I have a limit to how much chick lit I can read and I suspect from the blurb it might be a rerun of the same idea, neither was her writing wasn't so great I want to read her again. However, the reviews on Amazon are mostly brilliant. (I suspect I'm still suffering from the purchase of The Rosie Project for the Kindle with the offerings suggested now.)

And for breaks between books, I'm reading Saki's short stories - one or two each gap. They are a bit of a liability to read on the tube as they tend to make me laugh out loud, and sitting sniggering at a Kindle tends to get you strange looks.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I have broken out of solely comfort reading and picked up some non-fiction again. I am currently reading The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives but I am not sure I will make it to the end. I am finding it very hard going - not helped by the fact that I know the wrong Ancient Middle Eastern language (and my German is rusty and my French was never up to academic book standard).

I am sure that, for the majority of readers, transliterating Egyptian hieroglyphs into Hebrew is helpful, but it is hard enough for me to remember which set of symbols is which name, without having to also remember that a blocky Y-like thing represents a forearm. [Help]
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
You might be interested in the Ship's Bookclub thread on The Rosie Project. We weren't so impressed. In fact, I think some of us were quite rude about it.


Umm..I just thought it was a fun holiday read, not great art or psychology.
[Smile] [Smile] [Smile]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
cosmic dance - I couldn't even read The Rosie Project as a light holiday read as I found the misconceptions so irritating. But I was frustrated by the inaccuracies in Longbourn too.
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
Yes, I guess I don't know much about autism so misconceptions are not such a concern for me. I agree that misconceptions about a subject that you know about are very irritating.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
I am still enjoying Mel Starr's Hugh de Singleton books and am rationing them. So far I've read The Unquiet Bones, A Corpse at St Andrew's Chapel, A Trail of Ink and Unhallowed Ground, two of them over Christmas. There are three more published. They are detective stories in the style of Cadfael. Set a couple of hundred years later, in and around Oxford and this chief protagonist is a surgeon.

Thanks for that. I hadn't heard of these and will have a look for them. (Hopefully they won't be too gory.)
 
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
And for breaks between books, I'm reading Saki's short stories - one or two each gap. They are a bit of a liability to read on the tube as they tend to make me laugh out loud, and sitting sniggering at a Kindle tends to get you strange looks.

Have you got as far as The Unrest Cure? Possibly the nastiest, most twisted, sickest, most anti-Semitic and savagely funny thing I think I've ever read? Definitely NOT to be read on public transport, especially if passing anywhere near Golders Green because I don't think you'll ever be able to explain it away, but it certainly made me think when I could breathe again...

AG
 
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on :
 
Acts and Omissions - Catherine Fox. So far (early days) so fabulously bitchy about the Church of England. A good thing.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I've just been moved, stunned, and generally had my mind blown by the first chapter of Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States. I've never read history like it. When he pauses in the story to set out his manifesto, it's done with a kind of matter-of-fact passion such that I expected to hear the Marseillaise playing in the distance or something.

I'm not saying this is a book I'll read from start to finish all at once - it's very thick and history and I don't often get on together - but for now, I'm hooked.
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
The Book of Negroes (called Someone Knows My Name in the USA market) by Lawrence Hill, which is also just started as a miniseries by CBC, coming elsewhere next fall. It is excellent.

The actual Book of Negroes was kept by the British to reward the 3,000 blacks who fought for the British against the revolutionary Americans. The people listed in the book were given freedom in Canada. The fictionalized narrative is about a woman who was enslaved in Africa and sold in North Carolina.


I's also recommend The Orenda by Joseph Boyden. Set in the 1600s in eastern Canada (New France), it traces the interaction of the Huron,Iroquois and Haudenosaunee people, with the French missionaries. The spirituality and culture of the Indians is enlightening, though aspects of their culture will probably trouble some readers. It may sound a little too Canadian to you, but I don't think it is. "Orenda" sort of means "soul" but seems to mean a more connected and less individual soul.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Sandemaniac - Yes - already read The Unrest Cure - that was fearsomely savage. I have always loved Tobermory the speaking cat.

Jemima - Catherine Fox has been recommended to me by other people. Interesting to see her name come up here.

@Ariel - so far the Hugh de Singleton books aren't particularly gory - very much Cadfael like in that respect.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
The Book of Negroes (called Someone Knows My Name in the USA market) by Lawrence Hill, which is also just started as a miniseries by CBC, coming elsewhere next fall. It is excellent.

Read that last year and agree with you. There are a few places in the book where you realize that it is fiction, not biography, but it's still a cracking read.

Curiosity: thanks for that. I'm not keen on the faux archaic style that the Cadfael novels were written in, but the TV series was a lot of fun, so I'll see if I can get hold of a copy of one of Starr's books via the library.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've just read the second Lindsey Davis Flavia Albia book, and am barely containing myself until April 9th when the third comes out. {I have also seen a review which criticises anachronisms - rather missing the point of a series (including the Falco books) in which Anachron is an unlisted character, deliberately referencing more recent detectives by referring to walking down mean streets and so on. If you get irritated by people referring to legionaries as squaddies, not for you.}
 
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
Sandemaniac - Yes - already read The Unrest Cure - that was fearsomely savage.

Given that Saki is considered anti-semitic in many circles these days, I was really interested to find at the end of it that I was questioning who was really the anti-semite - Clovis, the other protagonist, the author, or myself for laughing at it so hard. It's a very difficult question because looking at the likes of Chesterton it seems to have been an accepted viewpoint at the time.

AG
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Anyone read the new Murakami book in English (or in Japanese?) I plan to get it in hardback next time I go into the store. He is my favourite writer and I never buy his e-books. Any other fanatics?

I wonder if they have it at Costco.........
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
Just finished LTC Rolt's autobiographical trilogy (The Landscape Trilogy) - covering everything from industrial apprenticeship policy in 1920s Britain, Gloucestershire steam ploughing during the depression, the Foundation of the Vintage Sports Car Club, the beginning of the Inland Waterways Association and the death of canal freight, the rescue of the Talyllyn Railway, I could go on! A hymn for England (and Wales - but mostly my own native borderlands and Wyre Forest).

What a life...
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Just finished reading The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman. Funny, clever, well-written urban fantasy.

Also read 'With passport and parasol' by Julia Keay, a book about seven Victorian women who were travellers and explorers - which has made me want to go off and read all the books in the bibliography to find out more about them.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Finished off Rachel Mann's Dazzling Darkness last week. Have now moved onto F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Currently reading the 3rd Merrily Watkins book on my kindle [Yipee] thanks to various people having mentioned this series on previous threads.

Huia
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Ah! I have two Merrily Watkins waiting to be read (I'm up to about no.11 in the series) after I've finished Anthony Horowitz' Moriarty [Smile]

I too started reading them after threads here.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
A friend recommended "Death in Lacquer Red", by Jeanne M. Dams. I wasn't nearly as enthralled by this book as my friend! The story started a bit slowly for my taste, and ended in a manner that really didn't address the "Who dunnit" aspect very well.

Our detective claimed over and over to be very clever, but she seemed a bit of a butterfly brain to me.

I won't read any more of this series.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've been reading Gladys Mitchell's Mrs Bradley books, after seeing Diana Rigg being her on TV. The TV changed the books far far more than it did Chesterton's Father Brown. And I have written to the local library to suggest that stocking one of them might not be appropriate. Re-issuing a book (The Saltmarsh Murders) with a black character in it of the sort that is in it is deeply questionable. Far, far worse than Pratchett on Mrs Gogol, it used not only the n word, but the attitudes that went with it back below the Mason Dixon line, and not only in the mouths of characters, as can be seen at times about Jews in books of the period, but in the whole drawing of the person, or rather, caricature.
Pity.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Danny Wallace's Who is Tom Ditto? Not sure why I picked it up after I was only so-so about his first novel Charlotte Street. But I did and it was also a bit meh. But it was a not unpleasant easy read I suppose. It's trying to say something about identity and the choices we make to live our lives but it's more of a light downbeat romcom, if such a thing exists.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I am currently reading "Birds of a Feather" by Jacqueline Winspear, featuring Maisie Dobbs, which is leading me to compare and contrast the three female post WWI detectives I read about in library books. Maisie's world is definitely the bleakest (probably the most realistic but, not having been around at the time, I do not know for sure) and the only one to feature the suffering of injured soldiers, as opposed to having an occasional character (usually a doctor), who limps.

The Daisy Dalrymple series (by Carola Dunn) is great fun and wonderful comfort reading. A lot of young men died in the war but now all that is over and it does not impinge very much.
Kate Shackleton (by Frances Brody) is in between the two; people are still suffering from the war but not as much as in Maisie's world and there are fewer seriously injured veterans.

One way of comparing them is fate of the heroines' partners: Daisy's fiance was killed and she is now happily married to somebody else.
Kate's husband is missing, presumed dead, probably blown to smithereens, and she desperately wants proof of his fate.
Maisie's fiance is a vegetable and she feels very conflicted about the idea of seeing somebody else - at least as far as I have read, which is not very many. Maisie is also the only one who was injured herself in the great war.

Does anybody else know all 3 and do you have any comments?
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Brilliant news today. [Yipee]

Harper Lee has announced she is to release her second novel on the 14th of July. Source
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
Brilliant news today. [Yipee]

Harper Lee has announced she is to release her second novel on the 14th of July. Source

I can only hope it lives up to the first one
[Yipee]

JJ I downloaded a Jeanne Dams book on my kindle and was really disappointed. I won't be reading any more either.

Joanna P I have really enjoyed the Maisy Dobbs books - although given how grim they sometimes are 'enjoyed' may not be the right word. I've read one of the Daisy Dalrymple series and while not as dire as the Jeanne Dams mentioned above, I'd only take it out of the library if I couldn't find anything else. I haven't read the other author but will follow up as I'm going on holiday on Friday.

Huia
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I am currently reading "Birds of a Feather" by Jacqueline Winspear, featuring Maisie Dobbs, which is leading me to compare and contrast the three female post WWI detectives I read about in library books.


I've only read the Maisie Dobbs books, not all of them, but I do really like Maisie and her use of her own finely tuned sensitivity to solve crimes. I haven't read the other two detectives but I've always like Carola Dunn and can imagine, her detective been amusing as well as clever. She wrote Regency Romances for awhile and like Marion Chesney's they were all very funny with loveable protagonists.

I finally finished all 1238 pages of my large print The Goldfinch. I thought it was wonderful and didn't want it to end. Adventure, original characters and I learned a little about art and antiques. I went to Amazon to write a review and saw people saying it didn't live up to "the hype," but I was unaware of all that, or that it won the Pulitzer and I still loved it.
 
Posted by Michael Snow (# 16363) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Kindle, paper, vellum, papyrus, clay tablet... What are you reading?

Firenze
Heaven Host

Why Kindle and not Nook? I'm not an e-reader. Just wondering how much of a monopoly Amazon has.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Snow:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Kindle, paper, vellum, papyrus, clay tablet... What are you reading?

Firenze
Heaven Host

Why Kindle and not Nook? I'm not an e-reader. Just wondering how much of a monopoly Amazon has.
In the UK (from where Firenze is posting), whilst not a monopoly, Kindle is definitely the market leader by miles. I found an article from 2013 which said that it had 79% of the UK market, and I was surprised that it was so low - I would have been less surprised if it had said 95%. I happen to have gone down the not-Kindle route, as I didn't want to be tied into the amazon format, but apart from me I only know one other person who has done the same - everyone else I know who has an eReader has a Kindle of some description (or a tablet with a Kindle app). I would even go so far as to say that the word 'Kindle' is heading the same way as 'iPod' has with mp3 players or 'Hoover' has with vacuum cleaners, to delineate any eReader, rather than a specific brand.

As for Nook - it's virtually unheard of in the UK. I've only heard of it because of shipmates from across the Pond mentioning it (am I right in thinking it's attached to Barnes & Noble? That is a store that again is pretty unheard of here, although I gather - again from book threads on the Ship - that it is pretty big Stateside). Kobo is sold by WHSmith, so you see a few of them knocking about, and the only other one that you would find easily in the UK is the Sony eReader (I have a Sony and a Kobo).
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Blackwells is also Nook!

Jengie
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Kindle ebooks are available from Waterstones now. Not that I have used that option yet.

I acquired my Kindle as a hand-me-down from my daughter when she bought an iPad and didn't need to carry both. I now read mostly on the Kindle as I read on my commute and it's so much lighter and smaller than carrying books when I'm already carrying textbooks and a laptop plus teaching resources and my lunch. Also I work in libraries, and the electronic tagging for my local library system triggers the sensors in the libraries where I work. Explaining why I have set off the alarms at every entrance and exit is not a good look. Particularly when I am working with a student who is likely to abscond. Being delayed by the security officers is a great way of losing the kid.

If I'm buying books to read commuting, Kindle is cheaper than lumps of tree. I'm currently reading Arcanum for the book club. I also own it in paperback, weighed it up for carrying, and bought it again on Kindle to stand a chance of reading it in a month. My Kindle also contains a library of books - complete sets of EF Benson and Saki, several by Ben Aaronvitch, Terry Pratchett and a whole range of other books.

Returning to books, Sandemaniac was commenting on the anti-Semitism of one of the Saki stories The Unrest Cure which I reread to see what he meant, and I hadn't picked up on it being particularly anti-Semitic. I read it as anti-unthinking Christianity at the time, as found in many of the hymns that have been rewritten to still be acceptable to sing. More very much of its time, the inter-War years, and dated, like the early Christie's or Allingham's or early Wimsey books.

Those Imperialistic attitudes are also expressed early in the E F Benson story Queen Lucia when the neighbour introduces an Indian yogi. Not that I've got further than that as I began to find it mentally indigestible.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Talk of the past being a foreign country - ebooks have enabled the re-issue of shedloads of period detective fiction: anything which could plausibly (or implausibly) be described as 'Golden Age' has been dredged up.

And what's the first thing happens in these books? They find the body and immediately move it somewhere else. and then trample up and down the scene of the crime, pocketing any interesting items they find.

Nowadays we are so imbued with the idea of CSI that it completely destroys the credibility of the narrative - and no amount of railway timetables or poisoned golf balls or whatever engine the author uses to manufacture the puzzle can rescue it.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished "The Music Room" by William Fiennes, the autobiography of someone who grew up in a historic house that his family have owned for centuries. It's a fascinating tale of growing up in a place I know and like a lot, with lots of quirky anecdotes, but also overshadowed by the story of his epileptic brother who had so severe a fit one day that it left him with partial brain damage resulting in aggression and behavioural problems, which come to dominate the family. Interestingly, the narrator doesn't seem scared of his brother. His writing style is very articulate, poetic, fluent: at times a delight, at times I wonder whether it's a bit over-written, but he certainly captures the atmosphere of a place I enjoy visiting.

On to Ian Mortimer's "Time Traveller's Guide to Elizabethan England" next, in between the Anya Seton historical novels I've been saving.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Harper Lee actually wrote the novel that is now being released before she wrote "To Kill A Mockingbird". It is about an older Scout going back to her town to revisit the crime. Her editor told her to rewrite it to be about young Scout so she did. The first book was allegedly lost behind another manuscript for a few decades.

Harper Lee is very old, fairly deaf and somewhat confused. Her lawyer refuses to let anyone talk to her about whether she wants to release this earlier effort. So there's this awkwardness about whether we're reading something that the author may not have thought worthy of being published.

It may or may not be a good book. It's hard to imagine it expands on the other book given the chronology of the writing.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've got a Nook - from John Lewis. I had some vouchers from their credit card, and could get it for nothing, which I was pleased to do as I did not want to support Amazon. I don't just put novels on it, as I have found I can scan things to PDF and load them, such as extracts from relevant texts to trips. I shall be doing this with Othere's voyage up Norway as told to Alfred, rather than lugging the actual book, together with guides to photographing Aurora and eclipses.

What I find irritating is that there seems no way to remove things that I have finished and don't feel I want filling space. I can get library books off it, and my files, but not bought books.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Firenze I'd agree that some of the golden age mysteries do not hold up well. I was disappointed in reading John Dickson Carr locked room mysteries.

Besides the police practices, the stereotypical broad foreigner; Scotsman/Jew/Italian can be hard to take.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
JDC I like - besides the ingenuity of the plots, he can generate a real frisson of atmosphere: though I agree the characters can be a bit of an eye-roll. But I am currently about to give up on a Ronald Knox because I can see that the Reveal is going to be that the corpse of an unknown character you don't care about will turn out to actually be that of another UCYDCA.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Talk of the past being a foreign country - ebooks have enabled the re-issue of shedloads of period detective fiction: anything which could plausibly (or implausibly) be described as 'Golden Age' has been dredged up.

And what's the first thing happens in these books? They find the body and immediately move it somewhere else. and then trample up and down the scene of the crime, pocketing any interesting items they find.

Nowadays we are so imbued with the idea of CSI that it completely destroys the credibility of the narrative - and no amount of railway timetables or poisoned golf balls or whatever engine the author uses to manufacture the puzzle can rescue it.

I'm watching "Have His Carcase" at the moment, and Harriet very carefully, knowing that the place where the body lies will soon be covered by the tide, removes identifying material from the corpse, and photographs it and its location from various angles. I can't remember if she did that in the book.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
She does. In that case, the fact that the body covered by the tide has a significance for the plot over and above setting up an original situation.

My quarrel is with the ones where the locus of the crime is treated as inconsequential. There were forensic detectives of the period - besides Holmes and his magnifying glass and monograph on the hundred and forty varieties oftobacco ash - preeminently Dr Thorndyke.
 
Posted by Boadicea Trott (# 9621) on :
 
Has anyone read Peter May's mystery/detective trilogy set on the Isle of Lewis? I read "The Black House" and it was very, very dark indeed, but a cracking good story. I read it with a horrified fascination but could not put it down.

I'm part way through no 2 - "Lewis Man" and enjoying it, though the descriptions of Tormod's dementia and his family struggling to cope are heart-rending.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Yesterday, for the first time since primary school, I read Ruskin's King of the Golden River and thoroughly enjoyed it.

My "main" book at the moment is John Keay's The Spice Route, which I last read just after it came out - an excellent writer.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I only read The King of the Golden River for the first time last winter and re-read it again this winter.

It is wonderful.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Still with historical whodunnits but in a different time period, I have recently read The Ides of April by Lindsey Davis, featuring Falco's (adopted) daughter, now working as an informer herself. It was odd... The main problem was that the attitudes of the characters were definitely more 21st century than Roman. The second problem was that the narrative voice was almost the same as in the Falco novels, so I tended to forget that it was a different narrator, until she mentioned her parents.

Having said that, I did eventually get into it and enjoyed it, but I did have to consciously decide not to get worked up about the attitudes. I will probably get the next one out of the library but would not buy it.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have just finished We are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler. I loved it.

I can’t actually say that much about it without some kind of gigantic spoiler, but I highly recommend it. I’ll just say it’s an amazing take on the (unintentionally) dysfunctional family and what it means to be human.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
This weekend I had an Audible credit to spend and a lot of time to listen to something (would've been podcasts otherwise) so I chose Steelheart by Brandon Sanderson.

It's a SciFi-ish fantasy set in a world ten years after an event where "Epics" have arisen. These are people with superhuman abilities. But not superheroes as they all seem to be bad. The story follows a group of non-gifted rebels who oppose one such Epic. They call themselves the Reckoners.

It was fun. It wasn't terribly deep as you'd expect but I enjoyed it. I did find that in the various action scenes I didn't feel the need to rewind if I'd missed something the way I would for dialogue.

I've since seen it, and the series it kicked off, described as 'YA' which kind of makes sense. He did seem a little coy about sex and swearing, but there was plenty of violence.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I have the paperback version of this sitting on the TBR pile, and you make it sound interesting.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Definitely worth a read. I bought the next book pretty much ASAP (ebook this time).
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Just read "The Last of the Tin Can Sailors". It's a historical work about the Leyte Gulf naval battle in WWII where a small group of destroyers and destroyer escorts had to fight a large armada of Japanese Battleships.

Interesting, and reminder of what the war in the South Pacific was and how politics shaped the history.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I read "Foxglove Summer", the newest volume in the Rivers of London series that was a book group selection earlier. It takes the hero out of the city and into the country. It's ok, but it makes me realize how much I enjoyed the part that the City played in the earlier books.
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
My current kitchen* book is Gary Schmidt's Okay for now.

It's not just the onions that make me cry.

*i.e. the audiobook to which I listen while preparing dinner.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
Just read "The Last of the Tin Can Sailors". It's a historical work about the Leyte Gulf naval battle in WWII where a small group of destroyers and destroyer escorts had to fight a large armada of Japanese Battleships.

I read that a few years ago. I thought it was very well-written.

Moo
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Just finished reading The Invisible Library by Genevieve Cogman. Funny, clever, well-written urban fantasy.

I finished that last week. I really enjoyed it as well, it felt like a sequel was likely. Nice touches with the bits of other stories being woven in as well - master thief, werewolves, detectives, and all very cleverly done.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
I read "Foxglove Summer", the newest volume in the Rivers of London series that was a book group selection earlier. It takes the hero out of the city and into the country. It's ok, but it makes me realize how much I enjoyed the part that the City played in the earlier books.

Yes, I agree with that. I enjoy the excursions out of town but it's pretty clear that the author's altogether more comfortable with the London setting.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
My new mobile [cell?] phone has a read facility so I have loaded it with a few .txt files from the Gutenberg Project and yesterday, whilst hanging about waiting for something, I read Anthony Hope's The Heart of Princess Osra which was fun if not wonderful - Hope never quite makes it, does he?

[Though I loved the Miller of Hofbau, great character!]

Next I'll try Rupert of Hentzau just to see if he handles it any better.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I'm reading a biography of Brazilian singer / accordeon player Luiz Gonzaga. It gives an interesting image of life in rural North-East Brazil at the start of the last century.
 
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I have just finished We are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler. I loved it.

I can’t actually say that much about it without some kind of gigantic spoiler, but I highly recommend it. I’ll just say it’s an amazing take on the (unintentionally) dysfunctional family and what it means to be human.

Yes. I enjoyed that too. I'd seen a documentary about one of the real life cases a year or so back so I felt I had some context.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dafyd:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I have just finished We are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler. I loved it.

I can’t actually say that much about it without some kind of gigantic spoiler, but I highly recommend it. I’ll just say it’s an amazing take on the (unintentionally) dysfunctional family and what it means to be human.

Yes. I enjoyed that too. I'd seen a documentary about one of the real life cases a year or so back so I felt I had some context.
I believe we have that scheduled for a book club discussion here in our Heavenly book club sometime this year, so that will be a good opportunity to discuss it spoilers and all!
 
Posted by LutheranChik (# 9826) on :
 
I just finished "Through the Evil Days" by Julia Spencer-Fleming, featuring crime-fighting military veteran/priest Claire Fergusson and her sheriff husband Russ Van Alstyne...I've liked these mysteries in the past, but this time around my suspension of disbelief came less willingly -- so many improbables, too much melodrama piled upon melodrama. (Yes, I know it's genre fiction.) Reading this book felt a bit like watching a new season of a formerly good television drama that's refused to make a graceful exit at its peak and kreps banging out increasingly unsatisfying stories. And judging from the cliffhangers at the end, Spencer-Fleming has at least one more Claire Fergusson mystery in the works.

I'm now headed to the nonfiction aisle, specifically: "One Summer: America, 1927" by Bill Bryson. It's about what it says it is; just a snapshot of what was going on in the US, both in pop culture and in politics, during a few months in 1927. Bryson is an entertaining, witty author, whether he's writing about his own travel adventures or tackling other issues, so I'm looking forward to his take on the Roaring Twenties.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LutheranChik:

I'm now headed to the nonfiction aisle, specifically: "One Summer: America, 1927" by Bill Bryson. It's about what it says it is; just a snapshot of what was going on in the US, both in pop culture and in politics, during a few months in 1927. Bryson is an entertaining, witty author, whether he's writing about his own travel adventures or tackling other issues, so I'm looking forward to his take on the Roaring Twenties.

I read that as my vacation book this summer. Left it in the lounge room of a budget hotel in Copenhagen when I was finished, hoping someone else would enjoy it (it was too thick to carry home). I liked it a lot; a good book to dip into and out of while travelling.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I'm currently enjoying Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. It's one of those books recommended more than once by shipmates (and others) which I put off reading for ages, partly because of its length. But it's definitely been worth finding the time. I was just wondering if it could be film-able and now I find out that BBC America will be releasing a version later this year.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
In a fit of enthusiasm at WorldCon last year, having just met the author, I bought "Kim Stanley Robinson Maps the Unimaginable", a series of academic essays on his work. I've just finished it, reading a little bit at a time because, to be honest, it was rather too academic in places for me. However, there was lots of interesting stuff about his Mars series, and his Science in the Capitol series - and I've been persuaded by the essays on the Orange County series to give that another try.
At least, I've got The Wild Shore, which is apparently the most utopian of the three. When I tried reading these before, I started with the one where the main character is doing some illicit archaeology, and I wanted to smack him around the head, so I gave up on that one.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I finished Rupert of Hentzau today, gloriously Victorian!

I still think Hope is but a mediocre writer but he got the spirit of the age about perfect.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Was Rupert the first volume, or the second? I have a dim idea that there were two.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Wasn't the other Prisoner of Zenda? I read them both years ago, along with H Rider Haggard which have a certain similarity in my mental filing system
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
The Prisoner of Zenda was the first and Rupert of Hentzau the sequel - the other book he wrote about Ruritania was set about a century earlier and was The Heart of Princess Osra. None of them wonderful but they are worth a read.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I loved the Ronald Coleman film of Prisoner of Zenda, of which the Stewart Granger re-make was but a mere shadow (though in colour). I mean - not only Ronald Coleman, but David Niven and Douglas Fairbanks Jr, too - and poor old Stewart Grainger only got James Mason.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I just read a book that was mentioned at the SF convention I went to, it's not Science Fiction though.

Red Sky at Morning by Richard Bradford is a coming of story of a teenager during WWII who is sent with his mother from Mobile to a small town in New Mexico. It's fairly humorous and deals with his mother not being able to adjust to the change in circumstances. I do think the dialog might be a bit anachronistic, I think it was written in the 60's.

All in all a light good read.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I loved the Ronald Coleman film of Prisoner of Zenda, of which the Stewart Granger re-make was but a mere shadow (though in colour). I mean - not only Ronald Coleman, but David Niven and Douglas Fairbanks Jr, too - and poor old Stewart Grainger only got James Mason.

Ah David Niven --- Swooon [Axe murder]
 
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on :
 
The best stage play I ever saw was The Prisoner of Zenda at the Greenwich Theatre about twenty-five years ago. Thoroughly enjoyable romp, as are the books.
I'm reading one of the Merrily Watkins books by Phil Rickman. I can't make up my mind if they like them or not.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Sarasa, I've just finished reading the Merrily Watkins books, well all except the most recent, which I have on order at the library. I decided that Gomer was my favourite character because of his steadfastness.

It took me a while to get into the series, I'm not really sure why except maybe the author took a while to hit her stride, or it took me a while to settle to her style.

Contrasting that with the very different Matthew Shardlake series by CJ Sansom (which I mentioned in the "Wolf Hall" thread) where I just slipped into the story and was hooked. I've almost finished the 3rd book, after which I'm taking a break so I can make the series last longer. [Biased]

If anyone has any suggestions as to other books or authors - I'd be interested. I'd vaguely thought of re-reading "The Alexandra Quartet" by Laurence Durrell as I don't think I really understood it when I first read it over 40 years ago.

Does anyone know of any novels set during Oliver Cromwell's time or there about?

Huia
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Rosemary Sutcliffe wrote a good one about General Fairfax called The Rider on the White Horse. It's told from his wife's point of view. Apparently she wrote it for her mother, who was a staunch Roundhead, while she was rather more "wrong but wromantic" and preferred the Cavaliers, so Fairfax was a good compromise candidate.
Daphen du Maurier wrote something about a Cornish (of course) family during the Civil War, too, but I can't remember the title.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Just finished enjoying 'Engleby' by Sebastian Faulks, about a working class lad at Cambridge. I expected it to be somewhat like 'Gorbals Boy at Oxford' or 'Room at the Top', but it was altogether more disturbing, soon becoming obvious that it was not only class which distinguished the main character from the rest of his student cohort. I won't spoil the plot by revealing too much, but suffice to say there are many twists and turns in the labyrinth of a quite disturbed mind.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I've just finished Whispers Under Ground by Ben Aaronovitch; it took me a while to get into it, mostly because it does not seem to have occurred to the author that somebody might read it without having read the previous two, but it became really gripping. The combination of characters doing magic spells and references to Captain Picard did take some getting used to. I will definitely try to find the others in the library and read them in order.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Does anybody here keep a book diary?

I've been keeping one since 2000, starting on 1st March, so today is the last day of the 'book year'. I'll do a count-up and then start afresh tomorrow. My only rules are no half-read books and no re-reads. Oddly, although there is no competition with anybody else, I always find myself finishing books or reading shorter ones towards the end of February.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Not me, I have enough trouble remembering to write things down in my work diary.

After a fabulous day out in Whitby my TBR pile has grown to nine books - count them, nine! - so that's my spare time taken care of for, oh, at least the next week and maybe longer: one of them is Adrian Tchaikovsky's latest which is big enough to stun an elephant. I will check in again when I've read a few of them, but in the meantime I can heartily recommend Endeavour Books (second-hand) and The Whitby Bookshop for any bibliophiles within striking distance of Whitby.

I only came second in the crazy golf match afterwards, but you can't have everything.

[ 28. February 2015, 20:34: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Does anybody here keep a book diary?

I've been keeping one since 2000, starting on 1st March, so today is the last day of the 'book year'. I'll do a count-up and then start afresh tomorrow. My only rules are no half-read books and no re-reads. Oddly, although there is no competition with anybody else, I always find myself finishing books or reading shorter ones towards the end of February.

No, but this is the second year that I have taken part in a group on Library Thing, where we try and read previously unread books and thus make a small dent in Mount TBR (To Be Read). We all say how many books we are aiming to read for the year, it is added together so we have a group goal as well as personal goal - any books we read over our personal goal are 'donated' to the group total (as not everyone will meet their goal). I certainly found (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) that I was looking out some of the slimmer books at some points if I thought I was in danger of not reaching the goal. As part of the group we all have an individual thread, where we post what we've read, and often post reviews too. It's a nice little community, although of course the problem with that is that you read someone else's review and immediately want to buy that book, thus negating any effect you might have had on the TBR pile! I have found it useful as a spur to read some books that I've owned for ages (like, years) but never read before, although I probably could do better at not acquiring new books. But new books are so lovely...

I recently finished one, Blair Kamin's "Terror and Wonder: Architecture in a Tumultuous Age". He is the architecture columnist for the Chicago Tribune, and most of this book is drawn from his column there (and a few other articles elsewhere). Because of where he writes, a lot of the book is Chicago-focused, although he does include a fair amount of other US-based architecture, and just one non-US building (the Burj Khalifa skyscraper in Dubai). What I liked about this was that because it is aimed at a lay as well as professional audience, it makes the processes around architecture (planning, design, etc) clear and accessible, and I didn't feel like an ignoramus when I read it even though I know absolutely nothing about architecture. And even though I have never been to Chicago, so am not familiar with the buildings and spaces that he is writing about, it still held my interest (and in fact made me quite want to go and see the city). The other plus is that because it is based on a newspaper column, most of the chapters are only a few pages long, so it was great for dipping in and out.

Fiction-wise, I'm persevering with my quest to read War & Peace in a year. I'm a few chapters into Book 3, and finally the other day read a chapter where I was interested in finding out what happened. I still haven't come across a character I like yet, though. Overall I'm finding it a bit dull to be honest (if that's not heretical), but I'm only just over 300 pages in (another 1400+ to go...) so hopefully it will pick up eventually!
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I wouldn't call it a diary. I review every book I read and put it on my blog, which I've only done since 2010. Am coming up to 200 reviews.

I also track what I read on a spreadsheet, recording how long it took me to read a book, how long it was (in number of pages) and how long the review was (in number of words).
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Just read "The Bone Clocks" by the author of "The Cloud Atlas". It has some good characters but seemed overlong and the future section seemed a lot like "The Cloud Atlas".
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I use Goodreads that way. They not only allow you to post a review (which helps me to remember a book years later) but you can categorize books as Read, Reading, or Want to Read. All the books that I hear about, but can't find in the library or afford to buy right this instant, but do not want to lose track of, I put into Want to Read. There is also a feature that allows you to organize your books into various Shelves.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
... but in the meantime I can heartily recommend Endeavour Books (second-hand) and The Whitby Bookshop for any bibliophiles within striking distance of Whitby.

I'd second that recommendation. The Whitby Bookshop used to have a cat that would sit nestled amongst the display books in the window; always a good sign in any shop.
 
Posted by ChastMastr (# 716) on :
 
I am sloooooowly working my way through Screwtape Letters again. I heartily recommend pretty much everything C.S. Lewis ever wrote. [Smile]

I'm about to catch up on Dan Slott's run on Spider-Man, which I am very much behind on. It culminates in Spider-Verse, which I have not yet read, so no spoilers please! I'm still way back in the middle of the Original Sin crossover.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I do the book blog thing as well -- post a short review of every book I've read. It is interesting to look back and see what I've read. What is most interesting is when I look back and see that I read a book a few years ago and have NO recollection of it whatsoever!
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I am currently a bit more than halfway through The Eddie Malloy Series. The writer is not Dick Francis: this author has the same character all of the way through 1670 pages! A jockey who solves murders is the protagonist.

I have been riding horses with a high degree of skill since age eight though I have never done steeplechase. My ideal summer job, as I live in a backwater where work dries to a trickle from May through September would be as a lad at a stables somewhere in California at a job training horses with lodging included!

It is an easy read in spite of its length: I wish I could write like that. Perhaps I need to take a university course in writing novels for publication: my first failed novel is all but unreadable. I cannot even get my wife who is an English teacher and published author to even read a full chapter!

I also go surfing a few times a year in San Diego County and plan to go on another surfing safari later this month. These are my two participant sports. I may visit a Shipmate during opera season...

Anyone, American or English should enjoy this series!
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:


I also track what I read on a spreadsheet, recording how long it took me to read a book, how long it was (in number of pages) and how long the review was (in number of words).

How dreary! Are you retired from work?
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:


I also track what I read on a spreadsheet, recording how long it took me to read a book, how long it was (in number of pages) and how long the review was (in number of words).

How dreary! Are you retired from work?
Not at all. I just like being ordered and keeping proper records.

Can you tell I'm an accountant?
 
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on :
 
I am currently reading Ursula LeGuin's Dispossessed for the first time. I feel like I should have read it eons ago. It's wonderful.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
It's one of those books that sticks in your mind. I read it years ago but revisit it periodically. It really is very good.
 
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on :
 
So far, I'm enjoying it more than I enjoyed the Earthsea Trilogy. Not that I didn't enjoy the Earthsea Trilogy, but I never felt the need to go back and re-read it, or to encourage anyone else to read it. But The Dispossessed ... so far, it's just amazing.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
quote:
Originally posted by Dafyd:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I have just finished We are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler. I loved it.

I can’t actually say that much about it without some kind of gigantic spoiler, but I highly recommend it. I’ll just say it’s an amazing take on the (unintentionally) dysfunctional family and what it means to be human.

Yes. I enjoyed that too. I'd seen a documentary about one of the real life cases a year or so back so I felt I had some context.
I believe we have that scheduled for a book club discussion here in our Heavenly book club sometime this year, so that will be a good opportunity to discuss it spoilers and all!
I ordered it from my library based only on the title and the fact that you three liked it. I didn't even let myself read any of the jacket blurbs. I loved it, too.
 
Posted by Badger Lady (# 13453) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Josephine:
So far, I'm enjoying it more than I enjoyed the Earthsea Trilogy. Not that I didn't enjoy the Earthsea Trilogy, but I never felt the need to go back and re-read it, or to encourage anyone else to read it. But The Dispossessed ... so far, it's just amazing.

I tend to listen to (unabridged) audio books rather than read them so don't normally post on this thread.

But listened to the Wizard of Earthsea recently and was somewhat underwhelmed. I liked it but I think I had it billed in my mind as Seminal Fantasy Work and so didn't enjoy as much as I was expecting.

I may try Dispossessed to re-establish mu faith in Ms Le Guin
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I did read the Earthsea trilogy way, way back, and had problems with it. The obvious one about no women magicians. And I couldn't quite get the meaning of Ged's shadow and the way it was dealt with.

The later books dealt with the first problem, somewhat.
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
I've always had the opposite feelings - I love the Earthsea books, especially the first three. On the other hand "The Dispossessed" and "The Left Hand of Darkness" I found moderately interesting but was left with a feeling that I didn't quite "get" them.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I did read the Earthsea trilogy way, way back, and had problems with it. The obvious one about no women magicians. And I couldn't quite get the meaning of Ged's shadow and the way it was dealt with.

It's now the Earthsea Quartet, although there have been other books set in Earthsea.

Le Guin was a product of her time. You'll find a few other themes of suppressed women in other fantasy writers of that generation. You might also find Marion Zimmer Bradley's Lythande stories interesting, if a little melancholy.
 
Posted by Josephine (# 3899) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TurquoiseTastic:
On the other hand "The Dispossessed" and "The Left Hand of Darkness" I found moderately interesting but was left with a feeling that I didn't quite "get" them.

To be honest, I was struggling with the timeline in "The Dispossessed" at first -- and then it clicked. Shevek is a physicist who is creating a unified theory of time. And all of a sudden, the timeline (and a couple of other quirks of the story) -- things that had been a struggle became clear, even brilliant.

I'm not done with the book yet, but I'm still loving it.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I did read the Earthsea trilogy way, way back, and had problems with it. The obvious one about no women magicians. And I couldn't quite get the meaning of Ged's shadow and the way it was dealt with.

It's now the Earthsea Quartet, although there have been other books set in Earthsea.

Le Guin was a product of her time. You'll find a few other themes of suppressed women in other fantasy writers of that generation. You might also find Marion Zimmer Bradley's Lythande stories interesting, if a little melancholy.

I've got the lot. I did enjoy them, despite the couple of problems. And I didn't see a theme of suppressed women, simply an assumption that women didn't do magic.

At about the same time, I read a non-fiction book by Stan Gooch, on the brain - or possibly the mind. It had a rather odd view of the way the brain was organised, at odds, even then, I think, with the beliefs of those who studied th anatomy of the brain. In this book, for some reason, he felt it necessary to explain why there were no female wizards. (This book was, I should emphasise, in the Dartford Central Library, in a building funded by Andrew Carnegie, and with not obvious links to L-Space, or the activity of an orang-utan.) His arguments seemed to depend on female magic wielders only having access to puny little fairy wands and not proper staffs - pathetic imitations. Also he was much exercised by the way in which female magic users could not be easily defined, as male wizards can be, as either good or evil, but were always ambivalent, and thus untrustworthy. Not having noticed, I thought, that in folk story, they tend to be helpful when treated well, and not when treated badly.

His attitudes did rather colour my second readings of the trilogy. In the first reading, I tended to identify with Ged - having been used to identify with principal characters regardless of gender. It can get pretty boring identifying with some of the females - though there are plenty of good female characters once one wanders away from the famous few like Cinderella.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Apart from the Earthsea series - which I thought was now a quintet, I enjoyed The Lathe of Heaven which I must go back and re-read.

Huia
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I'm currently plodding through The Templar by Paul Doherty; it's a bit too heavy on the details of the battles and too light on the relationships between the characters for my liking, but that's probably just me.

I loved the Brother Athelstan books that he wrote as "P.C. Doherty", but his other characters have never really floated my boat - I don't know why.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Piglet I vaguely remember him writing under another name too - possibly Harding. I agree with your comment, I think it's because Brother Athelstan cared for his strange congregation, and there was a warmth towards him on their part too.

I've just finished Dominion another book by CJ Sansom, but this time set in the 1950s. It takes place in an England where Lord Halifax, rather than Winston Churchill became Prime Minister after Neville Chamberlain and signed an appeasement treaty with Hitler.

It was fascinating.

I'm still putting off reading Lamentation because I don't want to have finished all the Tudor books that currently exist and have to wait ages for the next one.

Huia
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I've been meaning to read Dominion, having just finished Jo Walton's "Small Change" series, which is a brilliant exploration of the same concept -- an alternate timeline where England made peace with Hitler. CJ Sansom's version of it seemed to attract a lot more controversy than Walton's did, either because he's a better-known author or because Walton used made-up characters as British fascist collaborators, while Sansom, as I understand it, used real people whose descendants weren't thrilled about the portrayal.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
I really should have another go at Dominion. I was enjoying it when I read it, but it was a long book, I put it down for a bit and...

This seems to happen to me a lot.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Trudy I didn't know about the other series - thanks.

Paul - I had to put it down for a while - I needed a break from the constant state of menace, but I picked it up again after a few hours because I wanted to know what happened to the characters.

Huia
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I hated Dominion, I thought it was really badly written and his rant at the end that the SNP (who I don't vote for) were akin to the Nazis was extremely offensive.

I did however love Winter in Madrid which is about the Spanish Civil War.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Re-reading "Americanah" by the Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. As they say, it's a story of race, love, and identity; the heroine is a young Nigerian woman who leaves Lagos and her boyfriend to go to university in America, and what happens next.

Astutely observed and well written, and authentically so: not by a non-African author trying to imagine themselves in the skin of an African trying to establish themselves in a different culture, but a genuine African voice on a different continent. The little asides, the things many people may take for granted, observed from a different perspective make this a book well worth reading.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I didn't realize that Lamentation was available yet as an e-book here in Canada, but it is, so I imagine I will be reading that soon and be in that unenviable position of having read all the Shardlake novels and having to wait ages for the next one.

I think I have said this before but if Shardlake does not have a bit more luck with the ladies in this novel I will be very frustrated.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Piglet I vaguely remember him writing under another name too - possibly Harding. I agree with your comment, I think it's because Brother Athelstan cared for his strange congregation, and there was a warmth towards him on their part too.

Huia, yes The Sorrowful Mysteries of Br Athelstan were originally published under the name of Paul Harding. Most of mine are old enough to use that name but the last couple are Doherty - which is really awkward if one likes to arrange books by author...

I agree with Piglet - it is the only series of his that I have enjoyed; it was a real shock when I discovered that Paul Harding was Paul Doherty. I think the Br Athelstan books are less cynical than Hugh Whatsit and his others


I have just finished re-reading Simisola by Ruth Rendell, which I really enjoyed. I knew I had read it before but the bits I remembered were from the sub-plot rather than the main plot, which often seems to be the case with me. I am frequently stunned by how well MrP can recall details of books he has read once, in his teens! It was a shock to realise that Simisola was written 20 years ago; at times it felt contemporary - apart from the prices and the lack of mobile phones.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Funny Girl by Nick Hornby and We Are All Completely Besides Ourselves by Karen Jay Fowler.

Funny Girl is set in the early 60s and is the story of the rise of a young female SitCom star. At least that's what the title and the marketing suggest. It's actually about the team as much as it is about a single character - so the female lead, the male co-star, the writing team and a producer. It's good, readable (as with all Hornby) and enjoyable.

We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves - what can I say about this? Not much because it's an upcoming Ship book club pick, but also for another reason. The book contains what I'll call a shift in perspective about a third of the way in. It's something that causes you to rethink assumptions you've made about the story. It's one of the few cases where I genuinely think the "twist" is helpful to the story and not just there for surprise value. I also think that as you read on you gradually adjust and absorb the new info into the worldview of the book and it ends up not being that different from where you started.

Anyway it's about families and relationships and loyalty and what makes a person worthy of respect. Well worth a read.
 
Posted by pimple (# 10635) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Paul.:
Just finished Funny Girl by Nick Hornby and We Are All Completely Besides Ourselves by Karen Jay Fowler.

Funny Girl is set in the early 60s and is the story of the rise of a young female SitCom star. At least that's what the title and the marketing suggest. It's actually about the team as much as it is about a single character - so the female lead, the male co-star, the writing team and a producer. It's good, readable (as with all Hornby) and enjoyable.

We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves - what can I say about this? Not much because it's an upcoming Ship book club pick, but also for another reason. The book contains what I'll call a shift in perspective about a third of the way in. It's something that causes you to rethink assumptions you've made about the story. It's one of the few cases where I genuinely think the "twist" is helpful to the story and not just there for surprise value. I also think that as you read on you gradually adjust and absorb the new info into the worldview of the book and it ends up not being that different from where you started.

Anyway it's about families and relationships and loyalty and what makes a person worthy of respect. Well worth a read.

And a re-read in my case. I read it some time ago thinking it was a sequel to
We Are All Made Of Glue - I remember being pleasantly surprised but not a thing about the plot - so thanks for not putting any spoilers in.
 
Posted by pimple (# 10635) on :
 
Meanwhile I'm working my way through the poetry of Imtiaz Dharker. I normallt dip into poetry books and take most of them back to the Red Cross Book shop with half of them unread. But this almost like coming across poetry for the first time. Wherever I start I can't stop - even in the ones I don't understand.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Finished another good book - Station Eleven by Emily St.John Mandel.

I suppose you'd call it a post-apocalyptic story but it's also pre- and during apocalypse. And it's about multiple characters and storylines, some of which collide and some which merely glance off each other. There's a group of itinerant musicians and actors that form the Travelling Symphony, a troupe that make their way in the world of the ruins of civilisation by putting on Shakespeare and performing concerts.

But it's also about other things, some of which are very much about the world as it is now.

I enjoyed it but I can imagine some people might not.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I love Imtiaz Dharkar's poetry. I've even been lucky enough to see her perform.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Another case of reading the third book from a series as it was the earliest in the library...A Red Herring without Mustard. Apparently Flavia de Luce has a cult following but I am not part of it. The narrative voice was not credibly that of an an 11-year old girl IMHO and why the hell was she not in school?? If it was set in the 1950's (a big if, as the references to chewing gum and Hiroshima felt very intrusive) then the Butler Education Act was in force...

I am also having difficulty trying to work out a situation in which a married woman could die intestate and her property not automatically pass to her husband. However, these niggles are not serious enough for me to feel compelled to read the two pervious books in hope of answers.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I appear to have been guilty of cultural chauvinism [Hot and Hormonal]

Reading the free sample of the first book in the series, I realised that nowhere did "A Red Herring..." explicitly state that it was set in England, I just assumed that. So the Butler Act may not apply. Likewise it never states when it is (I got the 1950 reference from the Internet).
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Just finished Bart Ehrman's How Jesus Became God. As ever, Erhman's writing is fantastic, though he does fall into the trap of using the "many scholars" argument without saying who or how many. A very interesting read on the historical development of Christology.

Next up, I think I may join in with a few shipmates as I picked up Jessie Burton's The Miniaturist a few weeks ago.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
The Waiting, by Cathy LaGrow.

This was a biography of a woman who was raped at 16, gave birth to her baby in a South Dakota home for unwed mothers, cared for her for a month, and then surrendered her for adoption.

The details of this woman's life are minutely detailed, which is what made it so fascinating for me. The wrench of giving up her child and seventy seven years of "waiting," to find out what happened to Betty Jane are the center of the book but it's also the story of a brave woman's life lived over the course of a century. Really good and very different.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I've just finished a very strange book of short stories by Haruki Murakami, called Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman. It took me a feew days to get through it. but it was very enjoyable. I never guessed what would happen next!
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:

The details of this woman's life are minutely detailed,

This is why I critique books, but never write them.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I've just finished Whispers Under Ground by Ben Aaronovitch; it took me a while to get into it, mostly because it does not seem to have occurred to the author that somebody might read it without having read the previous two, but it became really gripping. The combination of characters doing magic spells and references to Captain Picard did take some getting used to. I will definitely try to find the others in the library and read them in order.

Somebody donated a copy of Rivers of London to the bookshop where I volunteer... It is excellent, a series to buy rather than borrow.

(I did decide to only buy thrillers as ebooks but when I can get 2nd hand copies far more cheaply, it doesn't seem sensible. Until I get home and see the piles of books preventing me from getting to the bookcase. [Help] )
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I bought a few secondhand Nevil Shute novels in UK, had them delivered to my mate Steve who brought them out with him and this afternoon I have finished Trustee From The Toolroom, his last book and possibly his finest. Published over 50 years ago and still just as powerful.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've just finished reading "Master and God" by Lindsey Davis (and have just ordered her latest detective novel to be collected tomorrow). I had the oddest feeling that I had read bits before, but not the whole thing, so I must have glanced through at some stage before putting it into the TBR pile. One passage in which a fly on the wall watches Domitian doing not very much. A passage in which a group of legionaries are held prisoner in Dacia. And another in which the principal characters finally get together. But all the stuff about Domitian and politics and plots was totally new.

However, the opening, with the principal male in the vigiles, merged into the Flavia Alba books on the one hand, and the Watch books of Terry Pratchett's on the other. (The last Tiffany Aching book is due out in September.)

[ 09. April 2015, 18:47: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
The latest Charlie Parker book by John Connolly was released today and pinged onto my Kindle App at midnight. Halfway through already and finding it very hard to put down
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
I just finished The Enigma of China, being the 8th Inspector Chen story by Qiu Xiaolong. As usual, the mystery aspect of the crime is interwoven with political considerations for Chief Inspector Chen...this time to such an extent that he fears it may be his last case as he comes up against powerful foes.

But, apparently, it isn't his last case, because later this year Shanghai Redemption is slated to come out and the title strongly suggests to me that it will be a direct sequel to Enigma, focusing on the fallout from the case.

While Qiu Xiaolong does have a tendency to get up on a soapbox during his novels, the character of Chen and his friends & associates is such that I find the series to be pleasant reading. And I am glad that Enigma wasn't Chen's last case because I really do want to know what happens next!

[Edit: Typo!]

[ 09. April 2015, 20:38: Message edited by: Hedgehog ]
 
Posted by Badger Lady (# 13453) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I've just finished Whispers Under Ground by Ben Aaronovitch; it took me a while to get into it, mostly because it does not seem to have occurred to the author that somebody might read it without having read the previous two, but it became really gripping. The combination of characters doing magic spells and references to Captain Picard did take some getting used to. I will definitely try to find the others in the library and read them in order.

Somebody donated a copy of Rivers of London to the bookshop where I volunteer... It is excellent, a series to buy rather than borrow.

I've read the whole series. I do like it - in particular the mix of reference and the grounding of magic in our world. However, having read them in fairly quick order the stories do get a bit samey and the overall story arch (which I won't say more about for fear of spoilers) grinds to a halt completely in some books which is frustrating.

BadgerGent is a police officer and some of the stuff about police bureaucracy and procedure is *very* accurate.
[Devil]
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kitten:
The latest Charlie Parker book by John Connolly was released today and pinged onto my Kindle App at midnight. Halfway through already and finding it very hard to put down

Wow, that was one hell of a cliffhanger
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I did read the Earthsea trilogy way, way back, and had problems with it. The obvious one about no women magicians. And I couldn't quite get the meaning of Ged's shadow and the way it was dealt with.

The later books dealt with the first problem, somewhat.

Ged's shadow in the first book is a painting-by-numbers take on an important Jungian idea. And pretty crude it is too.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
That would explain the problem I had with it. I have since discovered, through my OU studies, that when I have a problem with something, it can very often be the something that has the problem, not me. I got quite encouraged by pointing out oddities in assignment questions and finding that there was actually an oddity in the question, not my mind. In this case, though, I knew someone pretty intelligent who didn't have a problem, so assumed it was my understanding at fault.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Over the weekend I read Tim Federle's sequel to Better Nate than ever called Five, Six, Seven, Nate!.

I like kids books and this is a well written one and the author seems to have the angst of being 13 down pretty well.
 
Posted by moonfruit (# 15818) on :
 
I've just finished (re) reading The Center Cannot Hold: My Journey Through Madness, a memoir by Elyn Saks. She's a law professor in LA, who as well as being a brilliant scholar has also had schizophrenia for most of her adult life. Her descriptions of her psychosis are gripping, and the way that she has built a great career (and indeed overall life) in the face of ongoing mental illness is inspiring. The whole book is brilliantly written - once I started, I genuinely couldn't put it down.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
I've been planning to read that book, moonfruit, ever since I watched her TED talk, which really impressed me.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I've just finished Whispers Under Ground by Ben Aaronovitch; it took me a while to get into it, mostly because it does not seem to have occurred to the author that somebody might read it without having read the previous two, but it became really gripping. The combination of characters doing magic spells and references to Captain Picard did take some getting used to. I will definitely try to find the others in the library and read them in order.

Somebody donated a copy of Rivers of London to the bookshop where I volunteer... It is excellent, a series to buy rather than borrow.

I have just picked up the latest, Foxglove Summer from the library where
I had it on reserve, It seems so long since I read the others I'm tempted to re-read them as they're already on my kindle, but reading them close together wasn't great the first time round.

Huia

[ 17. April 2015, 04:42: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Just finished The Miniaturist which I was reading along for the book group thread, only that one seems to have died. Perhaps I was the only one reading it.

It's good storytelling, but the whole title is a MacGuffin. One could leave out the whole tale of the miniature house and its figurines without abandoning the story. So I was left a bit disappointed that the book was nothing like what I expected, but it was well told and excellently paced.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Questions in the book group thread normally get posted around the 20th of the month, so the thread will be quite quiet until then, other than people popping in to say, "I'm reading it!"
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've just picked up a batch of the British Library reprints of classic detective fiction by writers one has never heard of. Among them was "Death on the Cherwell" by Mavis Doriel Gay. Set in a women's college in the 20s, it invites comparison with the almost simultaneous "Gaudy Night" by Dorothy L Sayers, and has, so the preface announces (I haven't got much past the first chapter) similar approached to the education of women, at the time deprived of the possibility of being awarded degrees at the end of their "undergraduette" (I quote the disapproval of the local press by the Warden) careers. What the preface did not mention was the hidden reference to the writer in "A Piece of Justice", one of Jill Paton Walsh's Imogen Quy Cambridge detective stories. I don't think there was any open reference in the book (as a note or appendix) to Gay, who ended up not writing, but running a quilting revival in Wales. And I can't find any reference in online reviews, but, with the theme of women students denied degrees in the recent book as well, I can't believe that Walsh didn't choose her plot detail by accident. (Trying to avoid spoilers here.)

[ 17. April 2015, 10:53: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I managed to drown the library's copy of Foxglove Summer with a chocolate drink so I am now reading it on my kindle and have bought the library another copy [Roll Eyes] So much for my attempt to save money by borrowings from the library.

Huia
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
A bit of exploration and I find we are coming up to centenary of first women to get a degree from Oxford which is a bit rich given that St Andrews did it in 1894. Oh Cambridge, do not even mention Cambridge.


Jengie

[ 18. April 2015, 10:31: Message edited by: Jengie jon ]
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Penny - Thank-you, I must look out for that. I've read the Jill Paton Walsh book and found it fascinating.

I am beginning to think I will never read Foxglove Summer. I couldn't find my kindle last night and when I finally found it this morning it was sitting on top of the wheelie bin in the front yard. thank goodness it was a dry night. To avoid further adventures my kindle is now sitting on my bedside table.

Huia
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I've just picked up a batch of the British Library reprints of classic detective fiction by writers one has never heard of. Among them was "Death on the Cherwell" by Mavis Doriel Gay.

She is actually Mavis Doriel Hay; British Library Crime Classics (BLCC) have republished all 3 of her whodunnits. "Murder Underground" is the first, followed by "Death on the Cherwell". I have enjoyed all the BLCC I have read so far, and would warmly recommend the series to anyone else who likes classic detective fiction.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Thanks for correcting that. I was checking the spelling of Doriel, but I think I may have missed the key on Hay. I think I was on the netbook, which has a teeny keyboard. I keep missing things, and G and H are neighbours.

I'm currently on "The Cornish Coast Murder" by John Bude, nom-de-plume of Ernest Elmore, also writer of early SF. There's a sort of easter egg in the first chapter, in which he references other authors of the time, also avsilable now as BLCCs - Farjeon, and Freeman Wills-Croft. Also Edgar Wallace, Sayers and Christie. And, curiously, a J.S. Fletcher. Presumably somebody knew about this writer when writing "Murder, She Wrote." I would expect a name check before inventing a character. I haven't come across any of his books yet.

The books are very attractively produced, as well as being good reads. Good cover design in both layout and choice of images (often from railway poster art in the ones I've read so far). Good feel in the hand.

Someone round here is also keen on them, and passes them on to Oxfam when read, so I'm using the shop as something like a subscription library, renewing the Gift Aid on them when returned, as well. But they are also useful for the extra book when something I want as a keeper is in a BOGOF type offer, as well.

[ 19. April 2015, 15:00: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I've just finished Elizabeth is Missing , winner of the 2014 Costa Book Awards. Beautifully written, it's a book that will linger in my mind.

Before that I read Craig Robertson's Random, a new crime fiction writer to me. It's set in the familiar crime thriller territory of hard-man Glasgow (yawn), but the plot was original. It was sufficiently gripping to be un-put-downable on a noisy train journey.
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
Over the weekend I finished Baroness Orczy's Eldorado, which (if memory serves) was the fourth novel featuring the Scarlet Pimpernel. As usual, there is a strong romance plot...although this time, instead of love conquering all, the love interest is the major obstruction in the plot. Out of love, one of Sir Percy's band of adventurers betrays him, resulting in Sir Percy being captured by the French and thrown into prison, where he is deliberately starved and kept sleep-deprived in order to keep him from hatching a plan to escape. Oh, and there is a sub-plot involving the Dauphin.

While I find Orczy to be overly wordy (especially her tendency, about two-thirds of the way through a book, to recap all that has gone before), there is something enjoyable about her faux-historicals.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
That may be an artifact of how they were originally published. If the work was originally serialized in a periodical, or published over several volumes over a period of time, then a recap would help readers remember. In an ideal universe the author rewrites slightly for the completed book edition (Dickens and Collins did this) but Orczy may not have.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I finished Foxglove Summer the latest in Ben Aaronovich's "Rivers of London" series with PC Peter Grant. I really liked it. Maybe it was because I had had a gap after reading the last one.

Now of course the wait for the next one. I hate that. I am purposefully leaving CJ Sansom's last book
Lammentation unread so I can look forward to it. I plan to start on my birthday as a present to myself - not long to go now.

Huia
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Am falling slightly behind my 'one book per week' average. Just finished Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics which was my 16th title finished this year. Am just starting up on the first 5 books of Livy's History of Rome. That'll take a while so am still charging on with Tom Wright's Simply Good News - that is an excellent book. It's sort of a summary of Paul and the Faithfulness of God, only 1/10th of the length and a bit more forthright.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Today I finished Nevil Shute's The Pied Piper, I remember my brother having it as a set book for his "O" Level in the late 1950s - I haven't read it for probably 40 years. An excellent read and a wonderfully crafted low key ending. Something lighter next, I think.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
My book club, largely consisting of opinionated old biddies like myself, gave an unprecedented, unanimous five star rating to this book:

Big, Little Lies by Liane Moriarty. Not that it was a, Great, capital G, book but just such a rollicking good read.

It's a contemporary mystery about a group of mothers whose children all go to the same kindergarten class.

We all loved that it was set in Australia. From a literary standpoint many of us hadn't been there since "The Thorn Birds." It's changed a lot. [Biased]
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I have enjoyed all the BLCC I have read so far, and would warmly recommend the series to anyone else who likes classic detective fiction.

Alas, this is no longer true [Frown] Murder in Piccadilly is not up to the standard of the others; I don't like whodunnits where the reader knows who did it. Also, the young man who is the main character makes Bertie Wooster look bright!
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I think I would agree with you on that. The characters which reappear on the Cherwell seem to have improved in Oxford.

I am now part way through "The Female Detective" by Andrew Forrester, which is interesting in that it was written in 18something or other, and what it says about its time, but is not gripping. The first story shows the woman just being nosy.

Also "The Antidote to Venom" by Freeman Wills Croft, which is an early version of the Columbo principal of letting us know who the criminal is early on and then showing how they are discovered. I don't like stories about people I don't like doing stuff I don't approve of. There is possibly one reasonable character, apart from the policemen. Apparently FWC's religion influences the end, with repentance being involved.

My reading rate has dropped badly with the two of them.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I'm reading and enjoying CS Lewis' 'Till We Have Faces', a retelling of the Cupid & Psyche myth - it's quite a page turner and it's quite unlike anything Narnian [Eek!] !

[slight tangent]
The Beeb have been trailering their new series 'Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell', a book I have sometimes seen in charity shops but never bought because it was so fat! Has anyone read it? is it worth getting?
[/slight tangent]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Lewis was justifiably proud of Till We Have Faces. To write from the viewpoint of an ugly woman was a leap, he said, for a male writer. I am more impressed with how he orchestrated the protagonist's change of heart -- not easy to do from a first-person viewpoint.

Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell won the World Fantasy Award. It is the most Dickensian fantasy novel going, and the most common complaint is of its length and slow start. I am certain that the TV dramatization will vastly prune and condense. You might consider watching the show and only moving on to the book if you like what you see.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
As the oldest of three sisters (see Sophie in "Howl's Moving Castle"), as the one who did not get asked to dance at church socials and so on when middle sister was the belle of the ball and came back glowing to share the bedroom in which I was silently crying into my pillow, I absolutely hated "Till We Have Faces". It made me feel I was being got at, and told I must accept my place as the failure.
I shouldn't have read it as a teenager.
It may have had many good points. I couldn't see them. I can't bring myself to reread it, though I have occasionally thought I should.
And I think the original is at least as much about Cupid becoming independent of his malicious mother as it is about the apotheosis (?) of Psyche.

[ 30. April 2015, 17:08: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
As the oldest of three sisters (see Sophie in "Howl's Moving Castle"), as the one who did not get asked to dance at church socials and so on when middle sister was the belle of the ball and came back glowing to share the bedroom in which I was silently crying into my pillow,* I absolutely hated "Till We Have Faces". It made me feel I was being got at, and told I must accept my place as the failure.
I shouldn't have read it as a teenager.
It may have had many good points. I couldn't see them. I can't bring myself to reread it, though I have occasionally thought I should.
And I think the original is at least as much about Cupid becoming independent of his malicious mother as it is about the apotheosis (?) of Psyche.

I don't have any sisters and I read it for the first time a few years ago and I also hated it.

I'm sure I must have missed something and right now I don't remember it very well, but at the time, I remember I saw it as the story of an unfortunately plain, young girl who grew up watching her beautiful sister be blatantly favored by their father, became, quite naturally, jealous and was punished for it while the favored one floats serenely off to dwell in marble halls.

I shut the book thinking, thanks a lot Mr. Lewis! Not since Susan burnt in Hell for liking lipstick had I been so convinced he didn't like women.

* This reminds me of the scene in Pride and Prejudice," when the girls come home from the dance and Lydia and Kitty tease Mary about not being asked to dance and no one corrects them for it. I never liked Elizabeth nor Jane as much as I was supposed to because of their failure to try and defend or help Mary.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Given that the book is supposed to have something to do with the way people come to God, I wasn't happy with the hypothesis that God arranges for some people to come to Him easily through the hard work which is done by others who have to struggle to reach Him. I suppose there is a trace of election lurking in there, which is not a doctrine I have ever found comforting.

Thinking about it, I still carry the effect of that book, having seen some people apparently looked after, and having their lives arranged favourably, while others suffer. I don't like that deity.

And I think it is the beginning of my not liking Lewis as much as I did as a child, as well.

[ 01. May 2015, 06:33: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Alyosha (# 18395) on :
 
As a kind of evidence to the whole confusion of the election rituals I realise I have somehow posted on the wrong thread and don't know how to change it. Joy.

Anyway, hello everyone. Blessings to you all.
 
Posted by Alyosha (# 18395) on :
 
Er... I am reading the fairy tales of Hermann Hesse. They are very atmospheric.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alyosha:
As a kind of evidence to the whole confusion of the election rituals I realise I have somehow posted on the wrong thread and don't know how to change it. Joy.

Anyway, hello everyone. Blessings to you all.

Outwith the couple of minutes post-Post edit time - accessible via the little pencil and paper icon - you can't. But a Host can come along and delete it for you. (The power! Bwahahahaha!)


Firenze
Heaven Host

 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Alyosha:
As a kind of evidence to the whole confusion of the election rituals I realise I have somehow posted on the wrong thread and don't know how to change it. Joy.

Anyway, hello everyone. Blessings to you all.

[Smile] It takes a bit to get your sea legs on the Ship, Alyosha! One of my early blunders was somehow posting the same post THREE times. Give it time and you will settle in. Welcome aboard!
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Election doctrine followed by election rituals made a strange sort of sense anyway.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Gosh, such feelings towards Lewis! I haven't got that far into Till We Have Faces yet, Orual has only just found out Psyche is still alive, so I haven't met Cupid.

I haven't got sisters either, and I'm enjoying the story so far. I'll reserve final judgement until I've finished it.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Stumbled across a book I'd been hunting for ages. It is a novella written in German, titled in translation (I thought) The Last at the Scaffold. Turns out the English title is 'The Song at the Scaffold.'

Author is Gertrud von le Fort (I think I've spelled it right; left the book on my desk.)

Anyway it was made into a play and thence into an opera libretto used by Francis Poulenc for 'Dialogues of the Carmelites,' which opera I love.

I'm glad to have the book as a reference, but I don't care much for the writing (or maybe the translation). Perhaps I'll try to find the German original -- should be good for my grammar and vocab.

The story, which is short, tells of a convent of French Carmelite nuns arrested and condemned to death in the last 10 days of the Reign of Terror. The opera ends with the 16 sisters singing the Salve Regina and going to the guillotine one by one. (The sound of the guillotine is written into the orchestra.) A chilling finale, as you might imagine.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Stumbled across a book I'd been hunting for ages. It is a novella written in German, titled in translation (I thought) The Last at the Scaffold. Turns out the English title is 'The Song at the Scaffold.'

Author is Gertrud von le Fort (I think I've spelled it right; left the book on my desk.)

Anyway it was made into a play and thence into an opera libretto used by Francis Poulenc for 'Dialogues of the Carmelites,' which opera I love.

I'm glad to have the book as a reference, but I don't care much for the writing (or maybe the translation). Perhaps I'll try to find the German original -- should be good for my grammar and vocab.

The story, which is short, tells of a convent of French Carmelite nuns arrested and condemned to death in the last 10 days of the Reign of Terror. The opera ends with the 16 sisters singing the Salve Regina and going to the guillotine one by one. (The sound of the guillotine is written into the orchestra.) A chilling finale, as you might imagine.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I just read The Dark Clue, by James Wilson. Terrible.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
After quite a lot of time without, I've finally renewed my library card and have been trawling through the library graphic novel section. Libraries are particularly useful for comic books which are often twice the price of prose books and so too expensive to buy on the off-chance they might be good.

Particular stand-outs have been the Locke and Key series: gothic weirdness, imperfect but heroic characters and genuinely creepy evil. Good for fans of Neil Gaiman.

Also The Pride of Baghdad, about the lions which escaped from Baghdad Zoo after it was bombed. Surprisingly moving and complex for such a short book. This would be perfect as a first graphic novel for an adult; don't be fooled by the cartoon lions into thinking it's YA fiction.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Always going through a few. About half way through Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker which has gone a bit turgid, after a very bright opening.

Also going through Ruth Picardie's Before I Say Goodbye which is both smirk-inducing and tear-jerking in equal measures.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am now reading a book titled Madame Bovary's Ovaries, which for the title alone is irresistible.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished Galileo's Dream by Kim Stanley Robinson, which tells the story of Galileo's life from the time he gets interested in telescopes with a bit of added time travel. Galileo gets to visit the moons of Jupiter far in his future, which is nice. It also incorporates a lot of original documents (edited to read smoothly within the story), so I learned a lot about Galileo's life, and his relationship with his daughter the nun Sister Celeste Marie (and his other daughter who never spoke to him again after he put her in the convent).
When I saw Kim Stanley Robinson - I was lucky enough to go to his Kaffeeklatch at WorldCon last year - he said this was the first book he'd really enjoyed writing again after a long period of hard slogging. It may have something to do with the fact that he now writes under a canopy in his garden, with birds flitting round him - but you can tell from the writing that he was having fun.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I think I would agree with you on that. The characters which reappear on the Cherwell seem to have improved in Oxford.

I am now part way through "The Female Detective" by Andrew Forrester, which is interesting in that it was written in 18something or other, and what it says about its time, but is not gripping. The first story shows the woman just being nosy.

Also "The Antidote to Venom" by Freeman Wills Croft, which is an early version of the Columbo principal of letting us know who the criminal is early on and then showing how they are discovered. I don't like stories about people I don't like doing stuff I don't approve of. There is possibly one reasonable character, apart from the policemen. Apparently FWC's religion influences the end, with repentance being involved.

My reading rate has dropped badly with the two of them.

"The Female Detective", and "Antidote to Venom" are now on their way to Oxfam. My opinion of the latter has changed, as the writer doesn't give everything about the murder away before the detective gets to work, so it gets more engrossing towards the end - when it turns for the last couple of pages into a "Christian" novel. Quotes because overt writing about turning round of lives doesn't quite work, in my opinion, and makes it a little like books I generally try to avoid.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Just finished "All Roads Lead to Murder" by Albert A Bell Jnr, in which the younger Pliny and his mate Tacitus solve a murder in Smyrna, with the aid of a peripatetic doctor by the name of Luke. Pliny doesn't know whether to be more worried by the priestesses of Hecate, or the group he hears talking of body and blood being eaten.
 
Posted by Snags (# 15351) on :
 
I've just joined a new* "book group" or "reading group" in the hope that it will expose me to a books I'd otherwise be blissfully ignorant of.

Our first team effort is Look Who's Back by Timur Vermes. It's German, but we're reading the translation, and explores what happens when Hitler suddenly finds himself alive in present-day Germany.

I found it quite interesting; a bit of a disconnect between Hitler's internal voice and what I'm conditioned to expect, but good nonetheless. Some very sharp observations on people divided by their preconceptions, and on how new/social media
can inadvertently promote all manner of things.

I would love to know how much of the humour/word play is directly translated, and how much has been transliterated or even substituted for something that makes sense in English for an English audience, but an enjoyable and thought-provoking satire.


*As in, it's a new group, not new to me - we're most of us newbies to the whole reading group thing.

(Code edit)

[ 15. May 2015, 18:30: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
...Now of course the wait for the next one. I hate that. I am purposefully leaving CJ Sansom's last book
Lammentation unread so I can look forward to it. I plan to start on my birthday as a present to myself - not long to go now.

Huia

I stormed through that over Christmas, including a point when I had to tell my dad to stop talking to me as I needed to finish it before going back down south. Fortunately I come from a family where this kind of thing is understood. It's a good read - enjoy your holiday!

I've been reading Laini Taylor's Daughter of Smoke and Bone trilogy, which is about angels and chimera (monsters). Not religious angels and monsters, otherwise I'd be avoiding it like the plague. The first book I really enjoyed, but I'm ploughing through the third with a bit less enthusiasm. I think it has that thing you often get with YA trilogies where it's been really successful, in that it's got a story with lots of reasonable loose ends to tie up, but it needs a harsher editor. It's going on a bit, and I just want to know how it ends without all the extra bits!
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Have moved on the the third of Bell's Pliny books, which, excused by the existence of a purveyor of cheese as a character, includes, for no other reason, the line "Blessed are the cheesemakers". Naughty.

Whereas the edition of Thunderbirds in which John is shut out of the space station could hardly have avoided "I cannot do that, John", could it, despite the target audience having absolutely no idea of the reference?
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I am now reading a book titled Madame Bovary's Ovaries, which for the title alone is irresistible.

Once you've got that title, I don't think even matters what you put in between the covers.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have now read Lindsey Davis' short book "The Spook who Spoke Again", and I don't know a) why she wrote it, and b) why it was published. Fun, possibly. A reader needs to know the other stories of the Falco clan.

It is written in the voice of Falco's adopted son Postumus, who seems to be a very difficult child with an odd perception of the world. I suspect that the book could have had the sub-title "The Curious Case of the Ferret in the Circus". I remain unsure of the solution of the ferret situation and need to reread to see if Postumus recorded something which he did not interpret correctly.

It also plays merrily with the plot of a certain Shakespeare play, and the history of its original performance, imposing it on the plot type of a Roman comedy - think of "A Funny Thing Happened" - while the relationships of the central young man and his mother and his uncle really do seem more fitted for the tragic stage. At one point a double act is going to be sent to escort the young man to Britannia, where no-one will notice that he is mad. They do not end up dead, however.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have now found out that she did it because her publisher made her do it.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Have just taken 'The Rosie Effect' to the Oxfam Recycling. Probably best read after reading 'The Rosie Project' by the same author (Graeme Simsion) as it continues the story of Don and Rosie after they get married. This is no normal marriage, but a meeting of two extraordinarily eccentric people who fate has brought together. Edge of your seat stuff, especially when you discover that they are going to have a baby...
 
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on :
 
Our oldest son, who has Aspergers, loved both of those books. He is currently reading Jodi Picoult's, House Rules.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
It would be interesting to know his opinion of the Spook book - a number of comments on various sites have referred to Aspergers in interpreting Postumus' character, and some of them had family experience. Lindsey Davis, in an interview online with her editor, suggests a member of the Addams family, though.
None of the pupils I had in my class who were identified as having Aspergers were much like him, in speech, writing or behaviour.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Has he read The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime ?
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell. I enjoyed it but the many diversions and leisurely pace got a bit tedious toward the end - it is a long book.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I agree. I cannot remember if I actually finished it or not. It's been years and it's probably on a shelf in my den.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chorister:
Have just taken 'The Rosie Effect' to the Oxfam Recycling. Probably best read after reading 'The Rosie Project' by the same author (Graeme Simsion) as it continues the story of Don and Rosie after they get married. This is no normal marriage, but a meeting of two extraordinarily eccentric people who fate has brought together. Edge of your seat stuff, especially when you discover that they are going to have a baby...

I read the first book, but I did not know about the sequel. Must check with the library.

Currently re-reading Murakami's Norwegian Wood. It's one of the first books I read by him. I saw the film too, but I barely remember either: it's been a long time!
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished City of Stairs by Robert Jackson Bennett. A sort of fantasy murder mystery cum political thriller with you know, dead gods and magic and monsters and stuff.

It's good. It works as a page-turner, it has a compelling central character and it has some interesting things to say about religion.

Whether I'll pick up the sequel in a couple of months depends on what I'm reading at the time but I'll be tempted.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I'm currently chugging through The Lady Queen by Nancy Goldstone. It's a factual account of the life of Joanna I, Queen of Naples, Sicily and Jerusalem in the mid-14th century, and while it's mostly a good read (and even quite unputdownable in places), the print is rather small (which I find a bit tiring), and there's sometimes rather more detail than may be necessary.

I doubt that it's one that I'll go back to, but it's interesting for its angles on a monarch I'd never heard of and her dealings with the popes and other rulers of Europe at the time.

[ 08. June 2015, 14:17: Message edited by: Piglet ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
On a whim I sent off for "A Country Child" by Alison Uttley, which I haven't read since I was a child myself. The book works much better for an adult than a child: the descriptive passages of life in a deeply rural setting, a kind of fictionalized autobiography, are rich and beautiful and tell the story of an imaginative, sensitive child growing up on an old farm.

The whole thing comes across as set in a time period much older than 1930s Britain, and is a joy to re-read. If you liked reading Flora Thompson's "Lark Rise to Candleford" you will probably enjoy this one. (I mean "reading", the TV series bore little resemblance to the book.)
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Still unpacking from a recent move, I happened upon 'Five Novels of Ronald Firbank,' which I didn't even know that I possessed!

I'm just finishing the first in the volume 'Valmouth.' I can only describe the prose as 'swimming in a lake of absinthe-flavoured cotton candy,' -- it is that treacherous and habit-forming.

Fortunately all the novels are brief, otherwise I'd be lost for days. I can't wait to dive into 'Concerning the Eccentricities of Cardinal Pirelli.'

I can't decide if this is high art, high camp, or high porn. It seems to be at least some of all three!

Stay tuned!
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Still unpacking from a recent move, I happened upon 'Five Novels of Ronald Firbank,' which I didn't even know that I possessed!

I'm just finishing the first in the volume 'Valmouth.' I can only describe the prose as 'swimming in a lake of absinthe-flavoured cotton candy,' -- it is that treacherous and habit-forming.

Fortunately all the novels are brief, otherwise I'd be lost for days. I can't wait to dive into 'Concerning the Eccentricities of Cardinal Pirelli.'

I can't decide if this is high art, high camp, or high porn. It seems to be at least some of all three!

Stay tuned!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've finally got round to reading Ancillary Justice, by Ann Leckie - I read enough to vote for her in the Hugos last year, and was delighted when she won (and the Nebula).
So I now find myself with a craving for tea, and a vague feeling that I should be wearing gloves.
I like Breq/Justice of Toren, and the whole idea of her controlling vast numbers of ancillaries who are only slightly more than re-animated corpses when she was a warship - which is creepy, from a human point of view, but not from the point of view of the AI, now reduced to just one of those ancillary bodies.
I even liked Seivarden, the recovering drug addict who had once been one of her officers - and of course, Lieutenant Awn, her favourite officer in the flashback sequences of the book.
And of course, they're all "she". To show how the Radch language doesn't mark gender, Ann Leckie switched round the usual way of doing it, to give the reader something to think about (Seivarden, at least, is definitely male).

So now I'm looking forward to the sequel.

And for something completely different, the next book that came off my "to be read" pile was Comrade Don Camillo, where he goes to the Soviet Union with Peppone, the Communist mayor.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by georgiaboy:
Still unpacking from a recent move, I happened upon 'Five Novels of Ronald Firbank,' which I didn't even know that I possessed!
Fortunately all the novels are brief, otherwise I'd be lost for days. I can't wait to dive into 'Concerning the Eccentricities of Cardinal Pirelli.'

There is a wonderful musical of Valmouth by Sandy Wilson, the composer of The Boy Friend. A highlight is Cardinal Pirelli's tango, The Cathedral of Clemanza.

(Search "Valmouth" on youtube for complete recording.)
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Last night I finished my umpteenth reread of The Lord of the Rings - still good - and then today I picked up Nevil Shute's On the Beach. I love his very spare writing especially when dealing with such a tough topic. I am enjoying it, I think.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Last night I finished my umpteenth reread of The Lord of the Rings - still good - and then today I picked up Nevil Shute's On the Beach. I love his very spare writing especially when dealing with such a tough topic. I am enjoying it, I think.

I love both of those. Nevil Shute's writing is so immediate; you feel you are there. Note to self: time to read Lord of the Rings again.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I'm reading through all Lindsey Davis' "Falco" books, which is helpful in picking up long story threads which weren't so apparent when reading as they were published.
But I'm getting quite fed up with errors. Not the one I just found a note from my Dad about. Going south over the Tamesis from Londinium and turning to the west to get to Rutupiae, aka Richborough in East Kent. (I don't know the excuse for that - I think the author lives in Greenwich, which figures in the book.)
No, it's the errors which show that editing was carried out by spell-checker, umpteen homophones, and an intrusive apostrophe. In one case, Brother was transmogrified to Border. (I assume from a typo as Borther). I keep wanting to get out my *green pen and write Sp in the margin. The latest was a Celtic warrior with a torque round his neck. Others only required the average human eye, not an educated one, to be put right.

*Red is too upsetting and aggressive.

[ 12. June 2015, 12:09: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
You should complain to the publisher, whose duty it is to edit and copyedit. They are relying upon computers, but to have a real live literate human being read the final work is vital. The big houses have been throwing these essential support personnel under the bus for some years now, and it's starting to show. I have a nice little file of things that passed through spellcheck and automatic formatting, that is sad to see.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I've currently got a few books on the go, but am most pleased that I'm making progress with "War & Peace". My plan is to read it in a year, which works out in my edition at around 34 pages per week. I had got a bit behind, but am catching up so should be on course still to finish by the end of the year. It's taken a long time to get into, but I'm glad I've persevered, I'm now (on page 700-and-something) starting to appreciate Tolstoy's writing and rich descriptions. I do though think he could have done with a more ruthless editor (5 or 6 chapters to describe one hunt? Really?), and I'm still not that mad on any of the characters, although bumbling Pierre is starting to grow on me a bit.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
War and Peace.

I can get through some hard stuff - yep, I've read Ulysses.

But the Second Epilogue to W&P is dire.

I liked the hunt scene. The battle scenes go on a bit for my taste.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I disliked that, after all this stuff about the Battle of Borodino, we never got to see the Battle of Borodino. All we got was people talking about it.
 
Posted by Doc Tor (# 9748) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
But I'm getting quite fed up with errors.

Where no electronic copy of older books exist, a paper copy is deboned and fed through OCR software. They are then auto-spellchecked, formatted for ereaders and sold, all without a human eye ever passing over the text.

The publishers will be delighted for some free proof-reading though.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
These books are as first published, as I bought them as soon as they appeared on the market. It would be interesting to see if later editions have the same problems.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Just sat up most of last night re-reading Barbara Tuchman's 'The March of Folly.'

In a single word -- Fantastic!

She examines 4 major military screw-ups, detailing the 'pride, vainglory and hypocrisy' which led the the ultimate defeats. While she never uses theological language, the theology is definitely there.
The events she analyses are:
I learned a lot, and I'm going back to read it again!
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
I am reading the works of George Eliot. I can't understand why it has taken me so long or how I missed out on this when I was younger. But she is probably more comprehensible to me now than she would have been when I was young.
May her name be revered wherever the glorious English novel is read.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
what did you begin with? I have yet to pick up MIDDLEMARCH. [LIST]
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
I began with Middlemarch, after hearing an interview on the radio with someone who had written about George Eliot's life and said that she re-read Middlemarch every year and always got something new out of it. I progressed to Daniel Deronda and from thence to The Mill on the Floss.

Just figuring out where I'll go next.
 
Posted by Boadicea Trott (# 9621) on :
 
Just finished The Shepherd's Life by James Rebanks.
An interesting autobiography by someone who hated and flunked school in favour of familial farm work. He then ended up doing A levels at evening class, going to Oxford and going straight back into farming in the Lake District.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I heard an interview with him on the radio when his book came out - a fascinating story. I meant to look out for the book but then forgot about it, so thanks for that.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I heard that interview too - isn't he working alongside the shepherding? Something with the UN and sustainable tourism? That consultation business is using the degree from Oxford. He's got a Twitter account that has nearly 67,000 followers. Also Buzzfeed article
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have finished On the Beach having taken it slowly, or as slowly as I can, so I can/could savour it. It is bleak! I'm not ashamed to say that I had a little weep at the end.

What I love about his writing is that he writes about ordinary folk in extraordinary situations - and he does it so well!
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
War and Peace.

I can get through some hard stuff - yep, I've read Ulysses.


Maybe I should re-read it. Today is Bloom'sday. Maybe we'll just go out to hear some Irish music tonight.
 
Posted by Badger Lady (# 13453) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
what did you begin with? I have yet to pick up MIDDLEMARCH. [LIST]

I began with Middlemarch but I listened to it as an (30 hour!) audiobook read by Juliet Stevenson. If you listen to audiobooks I highly recommend this version. Towards the end of the book I was taking longer routes so that I could listen to more and find out what happened.

I've now read Silas Marner and have Mill of the Floss downloaded to listen to soon.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
John Brunner is pretty bleak, as well - I've just finished Total Eclipse, and it's like the last scene of Hamlet! Piecing together how the alien society worked from the archaeological remains was fascinating, though.
 
Posted by cosmic dance (# 14025) on :
 
Hi Badger Lady, nice to meet another George Eliot fan. I haven't read Silas Marner yet although my husband assures me he was required to read it at school and liked it because it was "nice and short".
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury.

I'd never read it, saw it in the library and thought, "hey it's quite short".

It may be short but it's written in a kind of poetic language that's hard to read easily - for me at least. I had to keep going back through paragraphs to check whether something had actually happened. I get that he was probably trying to create a particular mood by use of language but it tripped me up a lot.

Overall I'm glad I read it, but it was a bit of a slog.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Penny S:
quote:
The latest was a Celtic warrior with a torque round his neck.
Ooh, that sounds painful... could he turn his head through 180 degrees like an owl?

I read Middlemarch for the first time last year, when I got the job of indexing an academic book about George Eliot's work. I felt quite smug about not needing to read the footnotes to understand (most of) what she was talking about.

But the thing that really stood out to me, that would probably have gone right over my head when I was a teenager, was how well suited Dorothea and the Doctor would have been, if Society had allowed them to get married. She would have supported him in his work; she was probably rich enough to fund his research. He was related to the nobility, so he could have held his own with her friends and relations. Sixty years later, nobody would have raised an eyebrow if a rich young aristocrat had married a doctor; they were too busy being scandalised about Lady Mary Wimsey marrying a policeman...
 
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on :
 
Of late I have been galloping through Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's three novels. Simply wow. And ouch, come to think about it.

Also reading The Luminaries, a massive tome, with a distinct feeling that, 5/8ths of the way through (500 pages in, in other words), I am slightly underwhelmed.

When I finish that I'll read The Anchoress, which just arrived and which looks good.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Paul.:
Just finished Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury.

I'd never read it, saw it in the library and thought, "hey it's quite short".

It may be short but it's written in a kind of poetic language that's hard to read easily - for me at least. I had to keep going back through paragraphs to check whether something had actually happened. I get that he was probably trying to create a particular mood by use of language but it tripped me up a lot.

Overall I'm glad I read it, but it was a bit of a slog.

Strangely enough I'm just about to send off for this. I had a copy when I was at college and thought I'd like to re-read it. From what I remember of it, it's an odd sort of book but I liked it at the time. Just not enough to keep indefinitely.

[ 15. June 2015, 10:57: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Doc Tor (# 9748) on :
 
SWTWC is one of my favourite books ever. Yes, Bradbury's prose is often more poetry than not, but I find it has a rhythm and beauty to it, even when describing terrible things. And the character of the father is one of the finest portrayals of fatherhood ever written.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:
SWTWC is one of my favourite books ever. Yes, Bradbury's prose is often more poetry than not, but I find it has a rhythm and beauty to it, even when describing terrible things.

Sure. It's definitely me. I think I'm missing that part of my brain that allows me to appreciate prose for its own sake. But sometimes I try anyway. I even read Heaney's Beowulf.

quote:
And the character of the father is one of the finest portrayals of fatherhood ever written.
Yes, as a quiet, bookish, middle-aged man, I did appreciate that [Smile]
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
I have just finished Sara Maitland's A Book Of Silence. I've also read Maggie Ross' The Fire Of Your Life, and Thomas Merton. Other books to be recommended on the solitary/eremitical religious life?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
That deserves a thread of its own. There will be quite a few. Care to start one?
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
Certainly!
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I've just finished re-reading a Ngaio Marsh and I can't help feeling that, within the genre, I prefer her writing to that of P D James. This one was Clutch of Constables, published in 1968, but none the worse for that.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I liked that too, and I also prefer Ngaio Marsh to P.D. James. There is a streak of something disquieting in James' writing.

Moo
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
...and Ngaio Marsh's detective has a for more sensible name!

[Biased]
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:
SWTWC is one of my favourite books ever. Yes, Bradbury's prose is often more poetry than not, but I find it has a rhythm and beauty to it, even when describing terrible things. And the character of the father is one of the finest portrayals of fatherhood ever written.

It just hit me that some of Peter Straub's work "sounds" like Bradbury, particularly this book.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
Having got through The Lady Queen, I galloped through The Forbidden Queen by Anne O'Brien, a fictionalised (and very romanticised) story of the life of Katherine de Valois, wife of Henry V (and later of Owen Tudor). A bit fluffy, but readable and enjoyable.

I've now decided it's too long since I read the Brother Cadfael books so, having recently reacquired copies of the first two in the series (which I lent to someone years ago and didn't get back) I've started at the beginning.

That should keep me out of mischief for a wee while ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Waw consecutivum (# 18120) on :
 
Current reading, in no particular order:
New Spring - Robert Jordan
Eye of the World (Wheel of Time 1) - Robert Jordan
The Two Towers
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Paradise Lost - John Milton
Commentary on the Book of Ecclesiastes - Charles Bridges
Finnegans Wake
Plato's Philebus

I started Neal Stephenson's "Cryptonomicon", but it makes "the Wake" look easy by comparison. If algorithms are your thing, OTOH...
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am reading The Lambs of London, by Peter Ackroyd. I have no idea why (it is not in the period I am working in and has no relevance to my research). It just seemed interesting and I took it out of the library.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Am almost keeping up with my average of a book a week at the moment. This morning I finished How God Became Jesus, edited by Michael Bird. It's a response to Bart Ehrman's How Jesus Became God. Straight away I then started on Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse 5 which has kept being pushed down my 'to read' list.

Though I'm really trying to time things so that I finish one work just as Harper Lee's Go Set A Watchman comes out. The 14th is inked in my diary.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
My Young Man sent me the second Ms Marvel graphic novel, Generation Why, which is a lot of fun, with some serious things to say about how teenagers are written off in modern society. Also, Ms Marvel goes completely fan-girl when she meets Wolverine, which is just adorable!
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I'm reading A Rainha Ginga ('Queen Ginga'; I don't know if the book has been translated) by Agualusa, arguably the best Angolan writer of this time.

Queen Ginga was a real person, and she led an African empire that stood up to the Portuguese for a long time, not in the least because of her excellent diplomatic skills. She called herself king and had a harem of dozens of 'women': men who were forced to dress as women, including a number of captured Portuguese.

The book is also about the fight between Holland and Portugal over domination of Angola and Brazil, told from the point of view of a (fictitious) priest who worked as Queen Ginga's advisor and who's gradually losing his Catholic faith.

Very interesting. I've wanted to read something from this writer for a long time, and it's very good indeed.
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
I'm almost finished a re-read of The Perfect Summer by Juliet Nicholson, a biography of the summer of 1911 in England. This is background reading to my re-creation (at Kentwell Hall in August) of a trained Red Cross nurse on leave from France in 1915. Then I'm moving on to A Nurse at the Front by Edith Appleton, a military nurse who worked at base hospitals and on an ambulance train in France. I'm particularly interested in her experiences of nursing the casualties of Ypres.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have just finished "Look to the Lady", an Albert Campion novel by Marjorie Allingham, and I am proper peeved about the ending.

I got it from the library because I had watched the episode on TV, and the recording cut off just before the ending, when it would have revealed, so I thought, what terror had gripped the criminal on looking into the secret room (an echo of Glamis castle, I suspect), leading to death by falling from an anyway inadequate rope.

Read all the way through the book. I think I would have liked her writing in my Haggard period rather than my Sayers period. Anyway, arrived at the last page. This is not a quote, but a paraphrase from memory.

"The visor would have been up" says one character, of the gigantic plate-armoured mummified supposedly Saxon Guardian, implying that the mere sight would have been enough.

"But saying "No, no," as if responding to someone? And I heard something else," says our hero.

"Best not to inquire too deeply," responds another, and the book ends.


Bah, Humbug, and I know a cop-out when I read one. All the rest of the supposedly supernatural through the book had been exposed as not.

It now joins all those children's writings which ended with "and then they all went home for tea - THE END", or "and they woke up and it was all a dream", which I tried to encourage the young to abandon. I only once had to suggest that if a deus ex machina were to be employed, giving a few hints earlier in the story was a good idea. I am pretty sure that there were no clues to this one. (The boy's story was very good, and he totally got the idea of the god in the crane.)

[ 23. June 2015, 13:13: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Gosh, but Neil Gaiman can write some disturbing stuff!
I got his short story collection Fragile Things because it contains The Problem of Susan (his answer to the Narnia stories) which is very good, and I was pleased to see that it also contains A Study in Emerald, his Conan Doyle crossed with Lovecraft story - also very good.
But then there's the one with Mr Alice, narrated by a serial killer who works for him, which is very creepy, and one which seems to be a try out of the idea for the Graveyard Book, where a little boy runs away from home and meets a ghost boy - and I don't think I'm going to read the rest of the stories at bedtime!
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
I recent bought Fragile Things for my 14 year old (we share our kindle account) and he tells me he quite enjoyed the ghost boy story [Smile] He found the book a bit random but I suspect that is because he isn't used to short stories. I didn't realise The Problem Of Susan was in it, I must read that.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
No, Gaiman will pull a fast one on you. He is excellent, but wavers between sweet and scary in a disturbing way. Be very careful never to read the first volume of his Sandman graphic novels before bedtime.
I adored Study in Emerald, however. His Susan story has been famously controversial.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
and now I've been sitting up late into the night to finish Foxglove Summer, by Ben Aaronovitch. It's the fifth PC Peter Grant novel, and sends him to the wilds of Herefordshire to deal with invisible unicorns!
There are several nice little tributes to Terry Pratchett in the turns of phrase he uses, and some of it is very funny.
He also did his homework on Herefordshire - he sets most of the story around Leominster and the Mortimer Trail (I've walked the trail not far from his fictional village). It's recognisably Herefordshire, but quite different from Phil Rickman's novels (I don't think Phil has set one in Leominster yet, though).
Some of my favourite lines:
Peter has packed his boots. "I've been to the countryside before, and I learn from my mistakes."
And when another character says he moved to Hereford for the city life, Peter's opinion is that it's not really a city. "It is!" says Dominic, of the West Mercia Police. "It's got a cathedral and an Ann Summers!"
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I enjoyed that one, but I think the author seems more naturally at home in London. Looking forward to the next!

Revisiting two old Andre Norton favourites - "The Zero Stone" and "Uncharted Stars". Lots of unanswered questions, including who or what was Eet and what are the zero stones really about?

I read a lot of her books at one time but hardly any Witch World ones, so might look for some of those.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Just finished In the Unlikely Event by Judy Blume. It's a fictional set of characters but based on real events, namely the 3 plane crashes that occurred in Elizabeth , New Jersey in the space of 2 months in 1951/52.

I enjoyed it though keeping track of all the characters was a challenge.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I'm nearly halfway through Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell (it's a big book!), which I started reading cos I was enjoying the TV series, which finished last night.

I'm enjoying the book, too, which is surprisingly amusing and often makes me giggle [Smile] ...and having seen it on TV I can hear the actors' voices in my head, which is always nice.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
I read the book in preparation for the TV show, and as happened to me with Game of Thrones, I finished the book but have yet to complete the TV show. I've got them all on my DVR but I need a few hours free to sit through them.

Don't regret reading the book though, it was fun.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Prompted by the TV series I picked up the "Jonathan Strange" book in Waterstones but found the author's style difficult to read. I wanted to like it, but didn't, so didn't buy it. The TV version, on the other hand, was gripping (though it seemed to have been filmed through a green filter which was a bit depressing).
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I'd been saving Foxglove Summer for when I was from home. Unfortunately, it only lasted me a morning. I've got a fair bit of hanging about airport time tomorrow, and it looks as if I may be relying on pieces in the LRB on the economic fortunes of Grimsby and the like.

I have a Georgette Heyer 'tec novel on the go, which is somewhere between sub-enthralling and actively irritating. I looked at some of the titles that came up on Amazon in 'if you liked that, you'll this' for the Aaronovitch - but beyond gathering that magical/fantasy policing in London now seems to be a Thing, nothing seemed to leap out. Anyone have recommendations?
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I like most of Georgette Heyer's detective novels. Which one are you dealing with?

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
IMO Georgette Heyer's core strength was her Regencies. Her detective novels are simply not as good.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
I like most of Georgette Heyer's detective novels. Which one are you dealing with?

Why Shoot the Butler? I don't have demanding standards for characterisation in novels of that period/genre, but this failed even them.
 
Posted by Doublethink. (# 1984) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
and now I've been sitting up late into the night to finish Foxglove Summer, by Ben Aaronovitch. It's the fifth PC Peter Grant novel, and sends him to the wilds of Herefordshire to deal with invisible unicorns!
There are several nice little tributes to Terry Pratchett in the turns of phrase he uses, and some of it is very funny.
He also did his homework on Herefordshire - he sets most of the story around Leominster and the Mortimer Trail (I've walked the trail not far from his fictional village). It's recognisably Herefordshire, but quite different from Phil Rickman's novels (I don't think Phil has set one in Leominster yet, though).
Some of my favourite lines:
Peter has packed his boots. "I've been to the countryside before, and I learn from my mistakes."
And when another character says he moved to Hereford for the city life, Peter's opinion is that it's not really a city. "It is!" says Dominic, of the West Mercia Police. "It's got a cathedral and an Ann Summers!"

Just read the series in the last month, frustratedly waiting for the next. Love the depth in the discussion of place, but the endings tend to be a little weak I think.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
I like most of Georgette Heyer's detective novels. Which one are you dealing with?

Why Shoot the Butler? I don't have demanding standards for characterisation in novels of that period/genre, but this failed even them.
As I said, I like most of Georgette Heyer's detective novels. You have hit on an exception.

Moo
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Firenze - you're right, supernatural policing in London does seem to be a Thing now. I quite like Paul Cornell who, like Ben Aaronovitch, has written for Doctor Who, though he's quite a bit grittier and with less humour. And I may never look at Neil Gaiman the same way again, after Paul Cornell used him as a character in Severed Streets!
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Trying to finish up a few books I've had on the go in preparation for the release of Go Set A Watchman next week.

I'm hoping to polish off Jean-Jacques Rousseau's The Social Contract and Livy's The Early History of Rome (books 1-5) before then.

I also recently started Rebecca Solnit's Wanderlust which is absolutley fantastic. As a bit of a peripatetic, I can identify with much of what she writes, which is done with dazzling clarity and the utmost beauty.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Happy Harper Lee day!!!

Just been out to pick up a copy of Go Set A Watchman. I haven't looked forward to a book's release this much since Paul and the Faithfulness of God.

I may have the avatar of a stern old baptist, but I've currently got a grin like a Cheshire cat. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Just last night read V. Sackville-West's 'The Edwardians' -- and now I have to go right back and read it again. There was just too much to absorb in one pass.

Don't know why I'd missed it before -- it's been on my shelf for at least 15 years, maybe longer.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
Happy Harper Lee day!!!

Just been out to pick up a copy of Go Set A Watchman. I haven't looked forward to a book's release this much since Paul and the Faithfulness of God.

I may have the avatar of a stern old baptist, but I've currently got a grin like a Cheshire cat. [Big Grin]

Me Too! You know, though. Given this novel isn't just a novel, in many eyes, what do we think about opening a thread of its very own to discuss it?
My thinking is that some of those who have not read it may wish to avoid seeing anything which might influence their reading.

ETA: Not the thing about the Paul book, but about the excitement.

[ 15. July 2015, 02:39: Message edited by: lilBuddha ]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I have just finished reading Go Set a Watchman and posted a lengthy blog post about my thoughts on it. I'd love to discuss it further.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Trudy, thanks for linking your blog. I haven't read the book and am not rushing to do so. I think I'll wait until it hits the library.

Huia
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I did suggest having it for the Ship's book club but the idea was poo-pooed.

Trudy, I have no idea how you got the time to finish it. I started reading yesterday lunchtime, on the commutes from and to work and a bit in bed as well, yet I'm only up to page 50.

Good reintroduction to the characters so far, but waiting for the plot to get underway.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I did suggest having it for the Ship's book club but the idea was poo-pooed.

Trudy, I have no idea how you got the time to finish it. I started reading yesterday lunchtime, on the commutes from and to work and a bit in bed as well, yet I'm only up to page 50.

Good reintroduction to the characters so far, but waiting for the plot to get underway.

Remind me to add it to our programme when the paperback comes out. Ta. [Smile]
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
In the middle of reading Val McDermid's Northanger Abbey. I don't usually go for Austen pastiches - but this, this is what Bridget Jones' Diary should have been like. The characters are recognisable modern versions of Austen's originals and the dialogue fairly sparkles.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have been Harry Pottering for the last week or so and finished Deathly Hallows 10 minutes or so ago. I still find it fun though now I think I might move to heavier fare, perhaps a bit of history?
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished Dion Fortune's The Winged Bull, partly because I thought it was about time I dipped into her works, as she's well known for her connections with ceremonial magic and the early Pagan movement.
Well, on the plus side I want to live in the London flat (above an Italian restaurant that feeds the occupants, and a bookshop, and with a roof garden), but most of the characters annoyed me. The "good wizard" really ought to have been more honest with the hero about what he was letting himself in for, and I wanted to slap Ursula, the wizard's sister.
And Dion Fortune head-hops like mad, which is quite annoying.
I don't think I'll be trying any more of her stories.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
In the middle of reading Val McDermid's Northanger Abbey. I don't usually go for Austen pastiches - but this, this is what Bridget Jones' Diary should have been like. The characters are recognisable modern versions of Austen's originals and the dialogue fairly sparkles.

That sound interesting. I was avoiding it because I hated Death Comes to Pemberley another Austen take off by an author I usually enjoy. I'll try to find it in the library.

Lately books that I have reserved have been flooding in, so I might give myself some space before I do this.

Huia - drowning in a river of books [Axe murder]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:

Trudy, I have no idea how you got the time to finish it. I started reading yesterday lunchtime, on the commutes from and to work and a bit in bed as well, yet I'm only up to page 50.

I'm on vacation, which helps.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I've just finished Dion Fortune's The Winged Bull … I don't think I'll be trying any more of her stories.

"The Winged Bull" isn't her best - in fact, possibly her weakest - and not the one I'd have started with. I didn't like Murchison as a character, Astley is a thinly disguised Crowley, and Brangwyn is irritating. I'd recommend "The Secrets of Dr Taverner", a collection of short stories about an occult detective, written from the point of view of his assistant. You might like those better. Her writing style works better on short stories than on longer fiction.

"Moon Magic" is a sequel to "The Sea Priestess", but I don't think you'd particularly like either if you didn't care much for "The Winged Bull". "The Demon Lover" is essentially a love story with a supernatural twist - bad boy achieves redemption through the love of an innocent woman - and "Goatfoot God" is based on reincarnation. It’s quite interesting, but as with all of her novels there are a lot of tacit assumptions that you may find you don’t agree with at all, and they are quite baldly written. They’re also products of her time – they were written about a century ago and do feel a bit dated now. I first discovered them as a teenager, which with hindsight is probably a good age to read these at, as I loved them then, but anyone used to more modern and sophisticated literature may find them disappointing if they come to her novels as an adult.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I’m on an economy drive and back to downloading free stuff on Kindle. I’ve started ploughing through Seven Pillars of Wisdom (of Laurence of Arabia fame) and have to admit I’m finding it slightly hard going. Lots of trekking through the desert on a camel. I’m not finding it easy to keep track of who all the people are.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Probably easier to read on kindle. One of the stories my late father told was about visiting a local eccentric to find he was using The Seven Pillars of Wisdom as a door stop.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Thanks, Ariel - I think I'll look out for The Secrets of Dr Taverner.

Meanwhile I'm trying something else that I failed with the first time. Kim Stanley Robinson wrote a loosely linked trilogy about Orange County, California. I tried one of them, which began with a main character doing some guerilla archaeology - as an ex-archaeologist, the thought of this stupid idiot messing things up really annoyed me.
But this time I'm starting with The Wild Shore, which is set in a future Orange County after a nuclear war, and the descriptions of the new society that's taking shape (with all the mis-understandings of the society that went before) is really interesting.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
For a break after the seriousness and intense discussion around Go Set a Watchman I read Nick Hornby's Funny Girl. I always love a good Nick Hornby and thoroughly enjoyed this one; I imagine it might be even more enjoyable to British readers who could recognize more of what he's writing about and satirizing in BBC history (but a lot of it is universal).
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
I’m having a run of excellent books at the moment. Star of the show is Scientific Lives by John Aubrey(1626-1697), a collection of scraps of biography of prominent 17th Century scientists, intended for publication but never completed. It sound very dry but is actually hilarious.

Aubrey liked documenting odd details about his subjects that no one else would have thought to mention and has a lovely turn of phrase. Isaac Barrow was “a strong man, but pale as the candle he studied by”. James Bovey was never shown any kindness by red-haired people. William Harvey encouraged marriage for love, as marriage for wealth resulted in “weak, fools and rickety children”.

Most appropriate for comment on the Ship is mathematical instrument maker Edmund Gunter who, on preaching at Christ Church, some were heard to say ”our Saviour never suffered so much since his passion as in that Sermon”. Aubrey’s only comment is Non omnia possumus omnes (We cannot all do everything).

It’s illuminating to read someone to whom the Civil War, Restoration and Great Fire of London were recent history. He doesn’t make judgements on protestant vs catholic or royalist vs roundhead, he just reports what is said about the individual.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I've finished Go Set A Watchman now. Well, I've finished what was printed. The version I had, and some others have mentioned, had the bottom quarter of some pages missing, most notably towards the end, including the penultimate page. [Mad]

It is a great book, but it leaves you thinking some rather unpleasant thoughts. In an effort to be balanced, Harper Lee tries to get the reader to see things through the eyes of pro-segregationists.

I'm moving onto Moltmann's Theology of Hope next.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am reading THE BRONTES by Juliet Barker. An enormous fat tome (an e-version will save your wrists) but every page is luscious.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
Because it happened to be lying about (in the bathroom IIRC), I've just finished re-reading (again!) Do Not Pass Go: From the Old Kent Road to Mayfair by Tim Moore.

It's a hugely enjoyable, in places laugh-out-loud funny travelogue of the streets, stations and utilities on the British Monopoly board with a bit of history of the game (and of London) thrown in, which I would thoroughly recommend to anyone who's ever picked the "Advance to Mayfair" Chance card just after their next-door neighbour's put a hotel on it.

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on :
 
Although I would never vote technology in preference to paper and ink, I have got to say that the big bonus to having a Kindle is that I can alternate easily between light reading and snobby reading - sometimes in the fraction of a second when I realise someone's going to ask what I'm reading? [Biased]

But to be honest, I am totally loving reading Les Miserables. I'm making slow progress (mainly because I forget to carry my Kindle with me) but once I start reading I cannot put it down. For my "real" book, I'm re-reading The Eyre Affair and trying to resist the temptation to read bits aloud to the Smudgelet.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I like it because nobody can see the trashy covers. [Two face]

And if someone really annoying starts bugging me about what I'm reading, I can flip it to something in Greek. Because I'm evil that way. [Razz]
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Smudgie:
Although I would never vote technology in preference to paper and ink, I have got to say that the big bonus to having a Kindle is that I can alternate easily between light reading and snobby reading - sometimes in the fraction of a second when I realise someone's going to ask what I'm reading? [Biased]

But to be honest, I am totally loving reading Les Miserables. I'm making slow progress (mainly because I forget to carry my Kindle with me) but once I start reading I cannot put it down. For my "real" book, I'm re-reading The Eyre Affair and trying to resist the temptation to read bits aloud to the Smudgelet.

Tee hee hee. It reminds me of when I had a silent "out-snobbing" contest on a train with a fellow reader. The chap opposite me was looking quite smug reading his copy of Anna Karenina. Then I pulled out my copy of Herodotus' Histories. It may be slightly shorter but I figured it had a bigger geek value.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
I tend to be the opposite - happy that my ereader hides the fact that I'm reading classics, because I don't want people to think I'm being pretentious or overly-intellectual, or to feel alienated from me! Plus, an actual paper book of Tolstoy is very heavy to carry around in one's bag!
 
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on :
 
Fineline, at the moment I'm doing the same seeing as I would get some funny looks from some of my acquaintances if they realised I was reading Les Miserables.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
A Song for Issy Bradley by Carys Bray. This is the best book I have read this year. I heard it serialised on Radio 4, and loved it, but hesitated before reading the book because I enjoyed The Miniaturist on Radio 4 but then disliked the book.

This book manages to explore big issues of faith and life. The characters are Mormons. I found the details about Mormon life an interesting bonus, but many of the issues they face are applicable to any faith. At the same time there are some very funny bits. Has anyone else read it?
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
quote:
Originally posted by Smudgie:
Although I would never vote technology in preference to paper and ink, I have got to say that the big bonus to having a Kindle is that I can alternate easily between light reading and snobby reading - sometimes in the fraction of a second when I realise someone's going to ask what I'm reading? [Biased]

But to be honest, I am totally loving reading Les Miserables. I'm making slow progress (mainly because I forget to carry my Kindle with me) but once I start reading I cannot put it down. For my "real" book, I'm re-reading The Eyre Affair and trying to resist the temptation to read bits aloud to the Smudgelet.

Tee hee hee. It reminds me of when I had a silent "out-snobbing" contest on a train with a fellow reader. The chap opposite me was looking quite smug reading his copy of Anna Karenina. Then I pulled out my copy of Herodotus' Histories. It may be slightly shorter but I figured it had a bigger geek value.
Sipech, I just read that as Horrible Histories. That probably would not have had the same effect.
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
Currently reading The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula LeGuin.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Sipech, I just read that as Horrible Histories. That probably would not have had the same effect.

No, probably not [Big Grin]

Pomona, I hope you enjoy it. It's so long since I read it I would probably enjoy re-reading it. I remember really enjoying her
Lathe of Heaven as well as the Wizard of Earthsea books.

Huia
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
The Left Hand of Darkness and Wizard of Earthsea were serialised on BBC Radio 4 recently, and very well done, too.

I'm in the middle of The Lifer's Club, by Francis Pryor, who is rather better known as an archaeologist. He's written quite a bit of non-fiction about archaeology, and this is his first novel. His hero, Alan Cadbury is, of course, an archaeologist - a circuit dig director based in the Fens, who gets involved in a mystery surrounding an "honour killing" in a Turkish family in Leicester.
I used to be a circuit digger myself, for a couple of years, and the descriptions of the dig took me right back to the trowelling line! He even mentions, in flashback, a digger called "Wraith" - who I strongly suspect is a nod towards a real digger called Ghost, who I met back in the 1980s.
The plot is thickening in a very interesting way, and I will probably be looking for the sequel.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
What is it with The Catcher in the Rye?

I know we've discussed this before at some length but now it appears to be a set book over here in the second year of a Commerce degree - [?] - the protagonist is an unbearable, self-obsessed, arsehole of a character from a culture that the kids here can't possibly understand and that disappeared long ago. I read it way back when because it was sort of expected that one would but surely there are better books 64 years on that are more relevant? - Jayabrato Chatterjee's Last Train to Innocence, for instance.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I finished The Lifers' Club - and it was a very satisfying climax. The ends weren't tied up too neatly.
I'll be looking for the sequel to that.

And I may go looking for his non-fiction Seahenge, which is mentioned in the acknowledgements of another archaeological mystery I've just read. This one was by Elly Griffiths, the first in her series about archaeologist Ruth Galloway, The Crossing Places. It involves a sea henge, Iron Age bodies, and the landscape of North Norfolk. And the policeman she works with on the modern murder comes from Blackpool, where I spent a lot of time as a child.
I enjoyed it (though the ending here was maybe a bit too neat) and I'll be looking for her sequels.
It's nice to see a heroine who is middle aged and overweight for a change!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
What is it with The Catcher in the Rye?

I agree - it's horrible. Another one that often seems to come up on book lists and is rated as one of the greats is "Lord of the Flies", which has to be one of the most repulsive and depressing reads inflicted on anyone at school.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I didn't read "Lord of the Flies" at school but there were copies around. I was aware that it was thought shocking that school boys without adult supervision would begin humiliating and murdering each other.

I can remember wondering what was shocking about that. It only reflected my experience of the school playground.

I found the book a bit overwritten.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
I liked Lord of the Flies as a kid - the idea of kids being stuck on an island with no adult supervision was quite fascinating to me, and, like venbede, I figured it was probably realistic of what kids would do, if the playground was anything to go by.

I didn't read Catcher in the Rye till adulthood, and I was aware that lots of people hated it, but I actually found it incredibly amusing. He seemed very believable as an immature, sheltered teenager at a private school, trying to prove how tough/clever/superior he is, while really proving himself to be very naive and foolish. Trying to do 'grown up' things and finding himself completely out of his depth - the prostitute scene was great! I read it as sheer comedy. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I've just finished The Broken Road the third and final volume of Patrick Leigh Fermor's account of his teenage trek across Europe. It was unfinished at his death and ends in mid sentence but has been polished up for publication by his editors. I find Fermor endlessly re-readable.

Encouraged in the genre of English-public-school-boys-wandering-round-the-Levant, I went on to read Alexander Kinglake's Eothen (which has a nice line in detached irony) and Robert Curzon's Visits to Monasteries in the Levant (which I really enjoyed).
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I finished The Lifers' Club - and it was a very satisfying climax. The ends weren't tied up too neatly.
I'll be looking for the sequel to that.

Hmm, interesting. The birthday of a friend who spent a little time as a field archaeologist is coming up soon. This sounds perfect.

I've not read any of Pryor's non-fiction but have seen his stuff on tv. It's been on my reading list for a while.
 
Posted by Hilda of Whitby (# 7341) on :
 
As I mentioned on the Anthony Trollope thread, I am in the midst of a terrific bio of him by Victoria Glendinning. I just finished her bio of Leonard Woolf and liked it so much I wanted to read more by her. I also checked out two volumes of Leonard Woolf's autobiography.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Fineline:
I tend to be the opposite - happy that my ereader hides the fact that I'm reading classics, because I don't want people to think I'm being pretentious or overly-intellectual, or to feel alienated from me! Plus, an actual paper book of Tolstoy is very heavy to carry around in one's bag!

Find a nice old World's Classics hardback- very compact!
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
What is it with The Catcher in the Rye?

I agree - it's horrible. Another one that often seems to come up on book lists and is rated as one of the greats is "Lord of the Flies", which has to be one of the most repulsive and depressing reads inflicted on anyone at school.
I rather liked both of them. They're not as good as they're cracked up to be, and Catcher stretches credulity a bit far at times.

When it comes to over-rated books, my ire is aimed to three in particular: The Life of Pi, Midnight's Children and Catch 22.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
"Catch-22" is one of those books that polarizes people. I loved it, but I've never met anyone else who did.

Currently reading Bill Bryson's "Shakespeare" which I found on a book exchange shelf at a railway station. I haven't read any of his other books, but am enjoying this one sufficiently to think about exploring his other works.

(I do wish people wouldn't underline bits in wobbly pencil, though; it's very distracting.)
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Last night I finished my umpteenth reread of The Lord of the Rings ...

So about six weeks ago I saw this and thought, "Hm." I hadn't read LOTR for many, many years, so I started ...

... And this morning I got as far as the crowning of King Elessar.

What an experience! Better than I remember it by far. What really impressed me this time round was the way Tolkien revels in landscapes. The language he uses to describe woodland, in particular, is luminous. So, just a couple of chapters to go. I'm thinking of re-reading The Once and Future King next, or if not next, then soon.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I'm another one who enjoyed Catch-22 but that was over 40 years ago. I thought it was great BUT I have never wanted to reread it.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I just saw an online definition that applies to me this evening - Book Hangover: when you can't start a new book because you're still living in the world of the last one.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I know that condition well. For me it only happens with books I really enjoyed. I think there's even an element of grief about it.

I have been known to start re-reading the book I just finished.

Huia
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
ditto. to all that Huia said.

I often follow fiction with a good solid dose of History or Travel or something to avoid that issue - which is why I am currently rereading Ramachandra Guha's excellent A Corner of a Foreign Field - an Indian History of a British Sport - a sort of political history of cricket in India.

Fascinating stuff.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I went into one of the bigger branches of the library last week and was asked if I wanted to join their book discussion group which starts tomorrow. I am really looking forward to this as our smaller branch only has a less formal "discuss what books you've read" group meeting once a month. I really enjoy it, but it doesn't feed my passion for books.

Also it takes place just after the very useful "help technopeasants join the 21st century*" group so I can go from one to the other.

I love libraries [Yipee]

*OK, so the Library call this something else, but I think my name for it is more accurate.

Huia
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Just popping in to thank Eigon for recommending Elly Griffiths - I found a couple of her books in the library and enjoyed them in spite of the slightly annoying writing style (I am not a fan of historic/narrative present).

Something else I read and enjoyed recently was Marie Brennan's two-part series 'Warrior' and 'Witch' - it's a fantasy set in a world where women can become witches if their mothers perform a magical ritual after they are born, but before they get their souls. The unfortunate side-effect is that the ritual turns the baby into twins, one with the ability to work magic, one without... and the one without magical ability must be killed or neither will survive.

The heroine is a witch who has just completed her training and learned that her doppelganger survived; if she wants to go on living herself, she has to kill it. It could easily have developed into a Good Twin/Evil Twin conflict, but it doesn't. Along the way there are some interesting moral dilemmas and various Dead Horse issues are explored.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
I'm another one who enjoyed Catch-22 but that was over 40 years ago. I thought it was great BUT I have never wanted to reread it.

Actually yes, now that you mention it, neither have I.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
This is a long-awaited day for me as a reader ... one of my favourite fantasy authors (possibly my very favourite), Robin Hobb, has just released her new book, Fool's Quest, the second volume in her latest trilogy. I read the first when it came out last year and then re-read it over the weekend to refresh my memory before reading the new book. And there's the new book, safely delivered to my e-reader while I slept. Already devoured four chapters before convincing myself to get up and shower this morning.

Is anything better than a long-awaited new book from an author you know you can trust to deliver a good story?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There is no joy like it. (And Lois McMaster Bujold has a new Vorkosigan novel coming out!!)
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I can't help but note that a lot of my recent reading has contained some rather unsavoury language with regards to race.

I had expected it with Go Set A Watchman, but later on I have, after years of encouragement from others, begun reading P.G. Wodehouse with Thank You, Jeeves which includes a scene where Bertie Wooster escapes a sticky situation by blacking-up and pretending to be part of a minstrel show! [Frown]

Then this morning, as I was progressing through Darwin's The Descent of Man again cropped one of n-words.

It's maddening and not a little embarrassing when someone on the bus is reading over my shoulder.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've been meaning to get round to reading something by Octavia Butler for ages - I keep reading about how good she is, and her books almost never come up second hand (which is a good indication that people who buy her books hang on to them). I finally found a copy of Kindred at Forbidden Planet, and I started reading it last night in bed.
I had to force myself to put it down at about 1am! What a good writer! What a compelling story (time travel to the ante bellum South involving a black woman from 1976 and her husband).
I'll be looking out for whatever else of hers I can find.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Is anything better than a long-awaited new book from an author you know you can trust to deliver a good story?

True. Come on Dickens, get with it and finish Edwin Drood.
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
Robin Hobb I've always found a real effort to read (and have just given up).

Strangely, Megan Lindholm's books I find quote compelling!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Dan Simmons wrote a novel Drood which is the story of Dickens writing Edwin Drood. Kind of tough sledding unless you are deeply familiar with Victoriana and the Dickens oeuvre. His The Terror is actually a better book.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Garasu:
Robin Hobb I've always found a real effort to read (and have just given up).

Strangely, Megan Lindholm's books I find quote compelling!

We're all so different when it comes to books. I haven't tried any of her Megan Lindholm books yet (but probably will now that I've read everything she's written as Robin Hobb).
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I've been re-reading a lot of John Dickson Carr recently (great thing about age - you totally forget stuff you read 20 years ago). But the thing he has - besides the ingenuity of the mystery - is the evocation of times and places: a New England mansion in the 1920s, London in the early months of the 2nd World War.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I've just finished Me Before You, by JoJo Moyes which was sent to our book discussion group as a starter by the organisation that we are signed up with.

Will, formerly a highflying businessman, is a quadriplegic following an accident where he was run down by a motorcyclist. Lou, an out of work waitress becomes his carer, unaware that he has agreed with his parents he will be taken to Dignatus to commit suicide in 6 months unless he changes his mind.

It's the story of their relationship and how Lou tries to prove to Will that life is worth living despite his disability.

In the notes that were in the book the author stated that if she was writing a moving scene she didn't incorporate it into a book unless it left her with tears streaming down her face. None of the book left me crying (and I am someone who cries very easily). I felt that my emotions were being manipulated, so that probably affected my reaction.

It will be interesting to hear what the other people in the book group think.

Huia
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I'm not fond of most of John Dickson Carr's mysteries. The locked rooms often seem silly. However I have a special fondness for "Fire Burn" about a policeman who solves a murder when he's transported back in time to the beginning of Scotland Yard.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
The Historicals - of which he wrote quite a few - were the first of his I read (waaay back in the late 60s). But I've come to prefer the early ones set in what were, to him, contemporary times, but which now have a quality of first hand reportage which the reconstructions don't, if you see what I mean.

I like locked room mysteries.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I've just started re-reading Christopher Isherwood's Mr Norris Changes Trains. I seem to be doing a lot of re-reading at the moment, but it must be thirty years since I read Isherwood's Berlin books.

I'd quite forgotten (assuming I ever knew, the first time I read it) how outrageously funny Mr Norris is. Last night about 1a.m. I was breathless with laughter at a scene involving the awful Mr N. and a Berlin dominatrix. And yet - presumably because it was written in the 30s - so much of the depravity is merely hinted at, which somehow makes it even funnier.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have now, just now, a few minutes ago, received delivery of my pre-ordered copy of "The Shepherd's Crown" by Terry Pratchett. Purdah ensues.

[ 27. August 2015, 19:02: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm looking forward to The Shepherd's Crown, too.
At the moment, though, I'm reading a couple of SF stand alone novels by Paul Cornell, which are interesting to compare with his Doctor Who work and his more recent London supernatural police series.
The first was British Summertime, set in Bath, which makes a nice change (other cities than London are available to writers!).
It's a time travel story, in which the future is basically that of Dan Dare - one of the characters is even called "the pilot of the future" several times. The plot involves the evils of the economic system (which seems to have been personified into a group of Golden Men) and climate change (in one possible future Bath is underwater), and has a realistic vicar (not surprising since Paul Cornell is married to one). He also writes good female characters - but how he makes them suffer! Especially poor not-Dan Dare.
So that was good, and now I'm getting into Something More, set in a future after a Great Economic Collapse, in which Britain is divided up under various great families. Again, there are some very good female characters, including a vicar of a very strange future Church of England which seems to place a lot of reliance of interpreting dreams and picking up emotional resonances from buildings with the help of drugs and technology. And there's a very strange house at the centre of it, designed by Lutyens in 1922 and still practically untouched by time in the 22nd century.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I just picked up a used copy of Period Piece by Gwen Raverat. She was a grand-daughter of Charles Darwin, and this seems to be an innocuous memoir of life in the 1880s. Has anyone ever read it?
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
I just finished 'The Shepherd's Crown'. A fitting swan song, tissues were needed.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Yes - but I had a curious aftermath (and in the ancient sense of the grass regrowing after the hay being made, too.) While reading "The Shepherd's Crown" I had noticed a few things which I couldn't tie up properly to what I had previously read, and had the awful feeling that either I had read "I Shall Wear Midnight" much too fast, and skipped bits, or that I had started to develop a loss of memory.
However, following a comment from someone elswhere about "Equal Rites", I checked that up on Wikipedia (having the recliner chair reclining at the time, and ER being downstairs, as well) and found a reference to Eskarina showing up in "Midnight", which I definitely did not recall, because wanting to know what happened to her was something I had thought about recently.
So I went downstairs and got both ER and ISWM, and found that the flap at the front of ISWM was inserted at the end of Chapter 3. Research by sampling further on suggested that I had not read past there, odd though this seemed.
Using hindsight, I think I had started it just before I went to family for Christmas, where I had been given a book, which I had switched to out of politeness. Why I didn't return to the Pratchett afterwards, I know not, but I spent Friday night reading ISWM into Saturday morning.
Which is why I am very tired now. But happy. And reading all of Tiffany again.
My great-grandfather was a shepherd on the Chalk. When he died, the local paper reported that he had loved his sheep as much as his family. (Or maybe more?)
 
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on :
 
Our church book group will now be tackling Mysticism by Evelyn Underhill. Crumbs, but it's hard work. I can only hope my reward will be in heaven....

Anybody else read it? How did you get on? (This is a thinly disguised, frantic plea for someone to say "It'll get easier once you get into it")
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kitten:
I just finished 'The Shepherd's Crown'. A fitting swan song, tissues were needed.

I got it on Kindle and have just finished. A lovely finale indeed. Farewell, Terry.

I did feel that there was more of the genuine Terry in it than in the most recent, Raising Steam, which I felt was clearly not just Terry's authorship.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I am going to have to reread Ken McNamara's "The Star-crossed Stone", which I am wondering if Terry came across. Non-fiction, it examines the history of the interaction between micraster fossils and humans - how they became the shepherds' crowns, among other things.
I have one myself, but it's not perfect.

Terry does women (and girls) very well, doesn't he?

[ 30. August 2015, 21:03: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I just picked up a used copy of Period Piece by Gwen Raverat. She was a grand-daughter of Charles Darwin, and this seems to be an innocuous memoir of life in the 1880s. Has anyone ever read it?

I belive that my mother was fond of it. Late C19 Cambridge, fairly intellectual, life, lots of Darwins and Wedgwoods (a formidable clan, still going strong)?

[ 30. August 2015, 21:47: Message edited by: Albertus ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am about a third of the way in. I would say that any organizational gene skipped this generation, but otherwise well worth while.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I read Period Piece back in the heyday of the mini skirt - and was suitably gobsmacked by the detail of how many layers of underwear were considered proper in the Edwardian era. And also why these multitudinous petticoats were often a bit smelly.

Being in need these days of a lot of light distraction, I'm chomping through the Bryant and May series by Christopher Fowler.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Yesterday I finished a reread of Kim - I wonder how many times I have read it over the years?

Putting the book back on the shelf and wondering what to read next my eye was drawn by the cover of Armistead Maupin's Michael Tolliver Lives so this afternoon I finished that as well. A very evocative and funny book revisiting many of the characters from his Tales of the City series back in the last century - now older but not a whit wiser.

Not quite fair really, perhaps the wisdom is in no longer worrying if we appear foolish as we age.

Is that wisdom?
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Yesterday I finished a reread of Kim - I wonder how many times I have read it over the years?

I re-read Kim at the time when the Middle East started heating up. When I read it earlier, the whole spying business almost went past me.

Moo
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Have been reading my way through Miriam Drori's debut novel, Neither Here Nor There. Given the title, it's ironic that one my biggest bugbears about the book is that while it is set in Jerusalem, it's fairly lacking in a sense of place.

But if you like a light, dialogue-driven romance then I suppose it's OK.

Should finish it tonight, before I start on Albert Schweitzer's classic The Quest of the Historical Jesus.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I've been Delderfielding again! Today I finished a reread of To Serve Them All May Days still as good, still as mushy - but I like well written mushy.

Gazing at my fiction shelf wondering what to take next and chose an early Le Carré Call For The Dead which I was enjoying immediately.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
As I recall To Serve Them All My Days is set at a boys' boarding school. Is there a great deal of school stuff, or does the plot revolve more around the teacher-protagonist's personal life?
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
I've been Delderfielding again! Today I finished a reread of To Serve Them All May Days still as good, still as mushy - but I like well written mushy.

Gazing at my fiction shelf wondering what to take next and chose an early Le Carré Call For The Dead which I was enjoying immediately.

May I suggest, for your next read, Le Carré's A Murder of Quality , which will very neatly bridge the worlds of the two books you mention.
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
As I recall To Serve Them All My Days is set at a boys' boarding school. Is there a great deal of school stuff, or does the plot revolve more around the teacher-protagonist's personal life?

Well I suppose the answer to that question rather depends on what you want it to be! I could make a case for either really, depending on what you want...

Given it's set in a rural 5th rate boarding school (I believe based on West Buckland) in the middle of nowhere it'd be difficult for there not to be a lot of school in it. On the other hand, the characters of both boys and masters are fully realised - I first read it when I was about 15 and the headmaster Algy Herries, and Judy Cordwainer have stayed with me ever since.

I think it's Delderfield's best book, but only because the Horseman Riding By trilogy sprawls so much - with a bit more editing and the judicious removal of the odd chapter here and there, that would have been much better.

I agree with Albertus about A Murder of Quality - sort of the missing third corner of the Delderfield-Molesworth-George Smiley triangle.

If you like Delderfield you might like the mighty-but-these-days-almost-forgotten Francis Brett Young.
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
Forgot to say, as a slightly more helpful answer to Brenda perhaps, the plot revolves around:

war, loss, regret, personal improvement, fire, pacifism, love, socialism, the struggles to write history at the same time as teaching it, local government politics, the depression, the General Strike, Englishness, Welshness, the English rural sensibility, shell-shock, bereavement....I could go on...

Oh, and school.

Being on a nineteenth century kick at the moment, I've this morning finished Framley Parsonage, and will this evening be embarking on RS Surtees' Ask Mama.

[ 06. September 2015, 16:15: Message edited by: betjemaniac ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Oddly I just got A Murder of Quality off the shelf as I returned Call for the Dead - it was excellent.

I have neither read nor even heard off Francis Brett Young but shall have a scout through my online secondhand book supplier and see what I can find.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by betjemaniac:

I agree with Albertus about A Murder of Quality - sort of the missing third corner of the Delderfield-Molesworth-George Smiley triangle.

[Smile]
Slightly surprised to discover that To Serve Them All My Days was written as late as 1972: if you'd asked me I'd have put it, from its style, in the late 40s (or indeed even the 30s, were it not for the fact that it ends during the Second World War).
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I just finished Só por hoje — e para sempre ("Just for Today — and Forever") by the late Brazilian rock singer Renato Russo. This book, which was published almost 20 years after his death, contains the diaries that he wrote when he was in a rehab clinic in 1993, as well as his answers to the exercises he did for the Twelve Step Programme: "Describe three situation where you didn't feel in control, and how you dealt with that", that kind of things.

I admit that I'm a big fan of the group Legião Urbana of which he was the frontman, so that obviously colours my reading, but I found that this book gave an interesting insight both of what goes on in such a clinic and in the mind of someone with obvious above-average intelligence trying to deal with his addiction. I enjoyed reading it, it gave me a lot to think about.

The title "Just for Today" obviously refers to the Twelve Step Programme, and became the brilliant song Só por hoje. This is one of a couple of songs he wrote about this experience.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I am shocked!

Towards the end of A Murder of Quality I decided I'd follow it with Edmund Crispin's wonderful The Glimpses of the Moon but when I looked at my shelves I didn't have it! I must have let one of my brother's take it from my dad's collection when we were clearing the house.

Oh well, one more for the list.
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Oddly I just got A Murder of Quality off the shelf as I returned Call for the Dead

I have neither read nor even heard off Francis Brett Young but shall have a scout through my online secondhand book supplier and see what I can find.

Prolific would I think be the word. Also, I've half an idea he was the best-selling British novelist of the 1930s (which is no recommendation but nevertheless impressive).

2 of his novels were filmed - My Brother Jonathan (which is good in a late 1940s British film sort of way, and contains some excellent footage of the last days of the Watlington branchline...) and Portrait of Clare.

His genre and writing style is all over the place though - covers horror, magic realism, straightforward family saga and other points. At least he usually settled on one per book. Some loosely connect with each other, but they can all be read as individual pieces.

Probably the best description I can think of is he sits somewhere between Galsworthy, Delderfield, and Arnold Bennett, with a slight dash of du Maurier.

I'd recommend starting with The Black Diamond and seeing how you get on.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Thanks for that - I was about to come and ask for a recommendation of where to start and there was one ready formed!

As I hadn't got the Crispin I picked up The Daffodil Affair by Michael Innes, which I haven't read for probably 40 years, and I'm not yet sure - I'm a third of the way through - it seems a bit weird even for him!
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
After several years of good intentions Watchmen finally made it onto the TurquoiseTastic reading list this summer.

Lots of people rave about Watchmen and I think I can see why. I certainly found the denouement powerful and disturbing, in a John Wyndham sort of a way. The various threads of the narrative all add depth and I found myself thinking about many aspects of them for a while afterwards, which must be a good sign.

So I liked the final cake, but I wasn't so sure about some of the ingredients. I found various parts of the build-up flawed in different ways, which made it unexpectedly hard going sometimes. Nite Owl is preposterous as a superhero. Several episodes are rather heavy-handed and obvious (e.g. the bit with Rorschach's psychiatrist). And then there's the pirate story - well, whenever it appeared I inwardly groaned "Oh no - not the ghastly pirate story again...". OK, that was probably the intention, and the thread was very important to the general theme, but the fact that it was quite so horrible was, I think, an overall minus.

Still, there were lots of good things about it. It was interesting, for example, that despite Rorschach's obvious reprehensibility, eventually he's almost a genuine hero. The fact that some superheroes are totally outclassed by others is also handled well. And although Moore's art style isn't quite my cup of tea it's certainly got something about it.

It's not going to knock Maus off its pedestal though - now that's a stone-cold masterpiece.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I loved Nite-Owl. He is a more realistic Batman, if you will, open to all of the doubts and ageing that the Dark Knight will never know (because the movies are too profitable). Did you notice how Laurie, after years imitating her mother, begins to fallow in her Father's footsteps?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Now reading The Miniaturist by Jessie Burton. It's interesting to see an English writer describe 17ᵗʰ century Amsterdam. Most of the time, she seems to hit the nail on the head.
 
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TurquoiseTastic:
And although Moore's art style isn't quite my cup of tea it's certainly got something about it.

Dave Gibbons drew the art. Moore just did the plot and incredibly detailed descriptions of what he wanted in each panel and why and what other options Gibbons might want to put in.
 
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on :
 
Question for LeRoc:
Clarice Lispector. Should I read her? If so, where to start?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Dafyd: Clarice Lispector. Should I read her? If so, where to start?
Yes I heartily recommend her, but I'd like to warn you that it is rather complex reading. Lispector concentrates heavily on the inner dialogue of her characters, which is very interesting but they can go on for dozens of pages. These inner dialogues often follow very non-linear patterns; that's just like our own inner dialogues do, but it often made me having to go back several pages.

I haven't read all of her; I mostly remember A Maçã no escuro ("The Apple in the Dark"). My sig line is from that novel. I loved it, but it took me weeks to finish it.

So if you're up for a challenge take that one; otherwise one of her short story collections might be easier to begin with (I don't know whether they have been translated into English).
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Now reading The Miniaturist by Jessie Burton. It's interesting to see an English writer describe 17ᵗʰ century Amsterdam. Most of the time, she seems to hit the nail on the head.

That's good to know. I've just had this passed over from a friend and am looking forward to starting it. My Mum has first dibs though whilst I'm busy with 90's cyberpunk novel Teacup From an Empty Cup by Pat Cadigan.
 
Posted by Full Circle (# 15398) on :
 
I've just enjoyed 'The Drosten's Curse'. It is a Dr Who book by A.L.Kennedy. Great fun but I would wait till out in paperback
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Now reading The Miniaturist by Jessie Burton. It's interesting to see an English writer describe 17ᵗʰ century Amsterdam. Most of the time, she seems to hit the nail on the head.

Gosh, I didn't realise you were that old!
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Sipech: Gosh, I didn't realise you were that old!
Hehe, me and my TARDIS [Smile]

I have the feeling that she gets 'Dutchness' right, and that isn't easy to do for a foreigner. So I'm rather impressed by that.

There are one or two places where she gets it wrong, and those stick out like a sore thumb a bit, but overall I feel she's doing a rather good job of it.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Just started Death and Mr. Pickwick by Stephen Jarvis. This is not going to be one of those mile-a-minute action-packed plots, I can tell. But I am enjoying it.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
I'm reading The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage by Sydney Padua at the moment, the book version of web comic 2d goggles. The fictional stories of real life friends and colleagues Ada Lovelace, mathematician and daughter of Byron, and Charles Babbage, engineer and inventor of proto-computer: the difference engine with occasional appearances by Isambard Kingdom Brunel and Queen Victoria.

It is a thing of wonder. I'm reading it a chapter at a time with other books inbetween to try and string out the experience. The illustrations are a steampunk joy and I'd read the footnotes by themselves. You may have gathered, I'm really enjoying this book [Smile]

There is a BBC4 'Digital Season' documentary on Ada Lovelace on Thursday, interviewing Sydney Padua, for anyone interested.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Fell off of Death and Mr. Pickwick about 150 pages in. If the plot does not show up by now, the book is not written right. Far, far too many digressions; the author packed in all his research and neglects to keep the plot (if there is any) moving. It is like reading The Lord of the Rings only with The Silmarillion blended in.
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
Recently finished The Man of Feeling by Mackenzie. I very much enjoyed it. But I think I must be a horrible person because I laughed and laughed in places where I suspect the author may not have meant me to do this.

It was somehow like a much, much nicer and sweeter version of Candide. Not unlike Forrest Gump, in a way. I would be sure that Voltaire had intended a merciless spoof of it, if Candide hadn't been written 12 years earlier.

[ 15. September 2015, 16:09: Message edited by: TurquoiseTastic ]
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Brenda life's too short to read books you don't enjoy.

I'm meant to be reading The Madonnas of Leningrad for my book group but it didn't look interesting so I've misplaced it. (I don't do it on purpose, but if I don't like a library book it's the most likely one I will return late0.

Has anyone read it?

Huia
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Brenda life's too short to read books you don't enjoy.


Yes and there are far too many good books that you may not have time for. Since second grade when my teacher commented that I had read a hundred books that year and I thought I was in trouble for it, that was my average, two books a week. Until about ten years ago when my eyes got weaker and the internet hooked me. Now it's more like two books a month and all the more reason not to waste time with a dud. If I'm about fifty pages in and doubtful, I go to Amazon and see what the reviewers are saying . If I see a lot of, "It starts slow but then, wow," sort of things I keep going, but if I sees several people sharing my complaints about it I toss it.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Brenda life's too short to read books you don't enjoy.

Yes and there are far too many good books that you may not have time for.
But how do you know which is which? There are many books I've come to with high expectations only to find they are very poor indeed (my top 3 hated books are Cloud Atlas, Life of Pi and Midnight's Children - largely because they were so highly rated by others).

Plus, I like to read books that challenge my worldview. I recently read Hayek's Road to Serfdom specifically to challenge my socialist views. As it turns out, it didn't, as it was littered with straw men, but I'm still glad I read it as it helped me to see how fundamentalist right-wingers view socialism.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I'm at the stage of life when I don't often read new books but take great comfort rereading ones I've read before - not necessarily for anything to do with the plot but for the sheer joy of superb writing. I once told a Marxist friend about my love of Kipling and was treated to a mini rant about what a terrible old imperialist he was - and he may well have been but he was also a superb observer and writer.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
But how do you know which is which?

Again, Amazon can be your friend. Look up, say, "Life of Pi," and find someone who also hated it for the same reasons, then check his other reviews to see if he likes your sort of thing. Now you have someone who's recommendations you can trust.

I use this thread, too, ignoring all the genres I don't much like and finding people whose taste is similar to mine. For example, I would be happy to have Welease Woderwick choose all my books for me. He's never steered me wrong. [Smile]

[ 16. September 2015, 14:21: Message edited by: Twilight ]
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
I'm reading A Rainha Ginga ('Queen Ginga'; I don't know if the book has been translated) by Agualusa, arguably the best Angolan writer of this time.

This novel sounds really interesting, but it doesn't seem to have been translated into any other European language, which is a great shame. I hope there's a good biography or historical account of this queen that I might read instead.

As for me, I've recently started 'Casanova' by Andrew Miller. It's not that I have a particular fascination for lotharios but that I want to learn more about 18th century London, especially in fictional accounts. It's an enjoyable read so far. Dr Johnson will soon be making an appearance.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Last month I was in Portland, OR, where I visited Powell's. Surely the greatest used bookstore in the world! There are far, far too many books in the world that I must and shall read. I do not have time for books that don't enthrall me. Life is just too short.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
I'm at the stage of life when I don't often read new books but take great comfort rereading ones I've read before - not necessarily for anything to do with the plot but for the sheer joy of superb writing. I once told a Marxist friend about my love of Kipling and was treated to a mini rant about what a terrible old imperialist he was - and he may well have been but he was also a superb observer and writer.

How is Kipling thought of, if he is thought of at all, in India nowadays? I'd imagine he might be seen rather ambivalently- as an imperialist but at the same time one whose love of India shines through what he wrote.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
...I would be happy to have Welease Woderwick choose all my books for me. He's never steered me wrong. [Smile]

[Eek!]

What a terrible responsibility!

OR

[Yipee]

What an amazing privilege!

* * * *

I'm not quite sure how Kipling is viewed here but certainly there are a fair number of his books on the shelves in the bookshops I frequent. I shall see if I can find a tame English teacher and ask about it.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Still ploughing my way through Albert Schweitzer's The Quest of the Historical Jesus. Not at all what I had expected. I've been reading it for a fortnight now and am only just over half way. [Confused]

It has this curious property whereby you can read for a good hour and yet not seem to make any progress.

Das Kapital was a bit like that. Maybe it's something to do with German writers... [Snore]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
A friend of mine wrote a dissertation on some aspect of eighteenth century German history. She said the contemporary documents were written in a much clearer style than the modern ones.

Moo
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I'm guessing your friend wasn't reading a lot of Hegel?
[Biased]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I'm guessing your friend wasn't reading a lot of Hegel?
[Biased]

No, she was reading local history. She said it was written much more clearly than the same type of document two centuries later.

She said it seemed to be a change in fashion.

Moo
 
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on :
 
My family & other animals, by Gerald Durrell. Yes, I know it's a children's book. My mum was always on at me to read it when I was a child, and I never did. So now I am.

It is, as they say, of its time. But it's also hilarious. Larry's protestations of the donkey tied up outside the villa made me laugh a lot, Gerry's endless cycle of tutors, the boats, the scorpions...

There are a lot of things you notice as an adult, and wonder about - where did they get all their money? Where was Pater Durrell? Isn't Larry a bit of a tit? It's all rather romantic about the peasants, and all a bit colonial in spirit, if you see what I mean.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I forget whether it's in this one or the next one Birds, Beasts & Relatives that Mrs. Durrell urges Gerry to mention that she is a widow, "because you never know what people might think." I too wonder what they all lived on.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Just finished a re-read (well, honestly, a 'skim') of Janet Flanner's 'Paris Was Yesterday.' It's a collection of her columns for The New Yorker (mostly) written from Paris beginning in 1925 and ending as the German invasion was approaching the city in WW2. She covers an amazing range of subjects -- music, fashion, politics, and lots more.

I enjoy it every time I dip into it. And I've got to find 'London Was Yesterday,' which covers the war years.

As the reviewers say 'Highly Recommended.'
 
Posted by Jemima the 9th (# 15106) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I forget whether it's in this one or the next one Birds, Beasts & Relatives that Mrs. Durrell urges Gerry to mention that she is a widow, "because you never know what people might think." I too wonder what they all lived on.

Yes, it's in the introduction to My Family & Other Animals. I do think Mother Durrell is a bit fab.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
It's very rare for me to give up on a book, but I'm having to take a break from Albert Schweitzer's The Quest of the Historical Jesus. It's just incessantly turgid and he keeps writing in the voices of those he is critiquing. I seem to read the same thing over and over again, for half an hour at a time and yet somehow I've only progressed 5 or 6 pages. I'll come back to it later.

In the mean time, I shall embark upon a much lighter affair: Stella Gibbons' Cold Comfort Farm. I've had some trepidation about this, as I'm a big fan of Thomas Hardy and I fear her work may destroy some of my favourite works of fiction.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Cold Comfort Farm is a delight, sadly my copy is now very old and very battered [Penguin, printed 1941] - enjoy!

I am currently rereading a favourite book; it deals, amongst other things, with cannibalism in Alabama in the late 1920s and is supremely funny. Possibly not as funny as Stella Gibbons but still laugh out loud funny.

Well done Fannie Flagg!
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Just read Mars Evacuees and Space Hostages by Sophia McDougall. These are YA science fiction set in a near-future Earth, very well-written, funny, thought-provoking. Highly recommended.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
In the mean time, I shall embark upon a much lighter affair: Stella Gibbons' Cold Comfort Farm. I've had some trepidation about this, as I'm a big fan of Thomas Hardy and I fear her work may destroy some of my favourite works of fiction.

AIUI she was aiming more at Mary Webb, so you may be OK.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Cold Comfort Farm is absolutely delightful.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
My mother liked Cold Comfort Farm a good deal, as she grew up on a small farm in Sussex. I don't think there was anything nasty in the woodshed.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm in the middle of A Slip of the Keyboard, collected articles and speeches and so on by Terry Pratchett. There's a lot of excellent advice about writing, amongst other things.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jemima the 9th:
There are a lot of things you notice as an adult, and wonder about - where did they get all their money? Where was Pater Durrell? Isn't Larry a bit of a tit? It's all rather romantic about the peasants, and all a bit colonial in spirit, if you see what I mean.

I don't know if this is correct, but I have a vague idea Pater Durrell was stationed in India (it's where Gerry was born) and I always envisaged the family living on his pension.
after he died. Corfu then would have been really cheap.

Have you read any of Larry's books? I read
White Eagles Over Serbia as a teenager and remember being disappointed that it wasn't funny. I've also read The Alexandra Quartet, four interlinked books told from the viewpoint of the different characters. I remember my English lecturer at Teachers' College saying "Laurence Durrell needs to be read with a dictionary in hand", as his vocabulary is amazing. I'm not sure I really understood the books and had vaguely planned to re-read them some day, but the convoluted relationships between the people put me off (there is incest and some of the relationships are quite dark).

I also remember reading Bitter Lemons a non-fiction book he wrote about Cyprus.

Huia
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I just finished The Miniaturist and I mostly agree with what the Ship's Book Group has said about it here. (But not with all. I can see why Johannes would only have two servants.)
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Having been a bit under the weather for a few days I wanted something easy and fun and have revisited The Old Bailey in the company of Horace Rumpole - there was a problem with that in that some bits are side-achingly funny and my stomach wasn't really ready for it but I survived - full marks to John Mortimer.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Having been a bit under the weather for a few days I wanted something easy and fun and have revisited The Old Bailey in the company of Horace Rumpole - there was a problem with that in that some bits are side-achingly funny and my stomach wasn't really ready for it but I survived - full marks to John Mortimer.

Rumpole is perfect under-the-weather reading!

I've just finished Agatha Christie's Endless Night. If you can reconcile yourself to all the anti-Romani prejudice voiced by some of the characters (and I'm afraid, I suspect, by the author), then it's a thrilling story, even though the first half is almost all set-up. And when the plot starts getting twisty - [Eek!]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm in the middle of the Spiritwalker trilogy by Kate Elliot, which has that wonderful "just-one-more-chapter" thing where you suddenly realise it's midnight!
It's a wild and heady mixture of Regency romance, with magic, airships, a city in the Caribbean, that world's version of Napoleon, the spirit world which only a few characters can access, the Wild Hunt, intelligent feathered dinosaur lawyers, Phoenecian spies, and a history which sends the inhabitants of the Malian Empire into Celtic lands, resulting in lots of mixed race characters. And zombies - well, sufferers from the salt plague, but they're basically zombies.
Epic fantasy as I've never seen it done before, and it's great fun!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Cold Comfort Farm is absolutely delightful.

How true. I re-read it recently and it inspired me to re-read Jane Austen.

The other novel by Stella Gibbons I've read was worthwhile, but not on the level of genius as CCF. Forgot its title.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
She's written 2 or 3 sequels to CCF which are not anywhere near as funny. One cannot read Thomas Hardy or Mary Webb with the seriousness they deserve, after CCF.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Or D H Lawrence
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Stella Gibbons published a selection of short stories called after the opening story "Christmas at Cold Comfort Farm". The other stories are quite good, but the title story is weak.

I don't think she wrote any other CCF related works.

Nightingale Wood is the book I have read and I enjoyed it.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I recently bought All the light we cannot see by Anthony Doerr. I more or less grabbed it at random from the airport bookstore while running to catch my flight. So far, the first pages have been good.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I'm reading Pendennis by Thacheray and enjoying it.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I just read "Homesick" and "World Cup Wishes" by Israeli author Eshkol Nevo on the suggestion of an Israeli friend. They deal with relationships between friends and couples. Interesting, and the quality of the writing survives a less than stellar translation.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am halfway through The Dean's Watch by Elizabeth Goudge. Was it here, that someone warned me it was a slow start? This is palpably a book of the last century; there is no way one could ramp it up so slowly today. I think the plot is finally in motion, but it took her a hundred pages to set the scene and get it in motion and the payoff had better be worth it. It is also (possibly because of the setting and characters, Victorian England and clergymen in a cathedral town) overtly Christian in nature. Is this a consistent feature of Goudge's work?
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
No, I read quite a bit of Elizabeth Goudge's work when I found some in the library more years ago than I want to remember. I think I struggled with The Dean's Watch, but it's ages since I read it.

I loved the Eliots of Damerosehay series, particularly The Herb of Grace (and that line about going into the woods and laughing), The White Witch and quite a few others. Wasn't there one set in the Channel Islands, called Island Magic which I loved?
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I am halfway through The Dean's Watch by Elizabeth Goudge. ... It is also (possibly because of the setting and characters, Victorian England and clergymen in a cathedral town) overtly Christian in nature. Is this a consistent feature of Goudge's work?

I've always thought reading one of Goudge's novels was like riding horseback through the countryside -- sometimes posting along at quite a good pace, sometimes walking, sometimes stopping to admire a view. I read 'TDW' a long time ago and don't really remember it, and I've read some that I don't even remember the titles. I did like 'Towers in the Mist' quite a bit -- set in Oxford in the time of QE1, but with LOTS of older history.
I think her short stories are far better than the novels.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I have just acquired Arnold Bennett's Books and Persons 1926-1931. It's a collection of columns he wrote for The Evening Standard.

For years I have been a fan of Bennett's novels about the Five Towns. I decided to get this book to see what it was like. I am enjoying it very much.

Here is a sample* that shows why I like it.
quote:
Norman Douglas has a considerable reputation--as the author of South Wind. It is a book like no other. His more excitable admirers count Mr. Douglas among those few writers each of whom is in a class consisting of one person. For myself, I think that South Wind has the fault of monotony, and that the second half is much inferior to the first. But at worst it is a better book than They Went, which in half an hour dangerously lowered my temperature to sub-normal. Old Calabria, mainly descriptive, I prefer to either of the chief fictional works. Mr. Douglas's creative method is to get an idea or let an idea get him. He then says (I surmise): "That's an idea! And it is. He then says: "That's a very good idea!" And it is. Finally he says: "I can make that idea into a book." And he does.

But in my opinion he is apt to be too content with his idea. When he says that he will make the idea into a book he does not give sufficient importance to the word make. An idea must be made; it will not make itself: it will only expand itself or nullify itself into a series of similar cells. The process of making an idea includes thrashing it, hammering it, tearing it to pieces, putting it together again, diluting it, draining it, shaping it, heating it, hardening it, chipping bits off it, adding bits to it, colouring it, and generally transforming it so that its own father wouldn't recognise it. There is more difference between an idea raw and the finished, fashioned product than there is between a musical comedy star when she gets out of bed in the morning and a musical comedy star when she prances at night on to the stage in full, carefully-contrived glory of complexion, coiffure, and costume.

pp. 380-381

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
What I am noticing about The Dean's Watch, in the first half of it at least, is how very unhappy just about every character in the book is. They are all unhappy in different ways, and their miseries are lovingly delineated and described -- not enacted, in action, but described by the author to us. The plot, I trust, will involve somebody doing something about their unhappiness, but most of the characters seem to have endured their misery for years, all their lives, and so the odds of this are not high.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Eigon:
quote:
I'm in the middle of the Spiritwalker trilogy by Kate Elliot, which has that wonderful "just-one-more-chapter" thing where you suddenly realise it's midnight!
I'm halfway through it now (having bought it on your recommendation) and I agree; it's great fun.

There are so many good fantasy books around at the moment I'm spoilt for choice... a wonderful situation to be in.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
On an economy drive and only reading stuff I can download for free, I have just finished the Phantom of the Opera (in French). I think I must have read it when I was a teenager but didn’t remember it all.

My main memories of the story come from the musical, but the book is actually quite different. A very enjoyable read at all events.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
Over the weekend, for a little light Hallowe'en reading I read Susan Hill's The Small Hand.

[Eek!]

It's not quite in the same league as The Woman in Black, but it's an extremely well told story, very difficult to put down.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Forgot any Halloween reading. Normally do The Call of Cthulhu in one sitting.

Am trundling through Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise which is rather good, even if it is a bit politically right wing. If you work in financial forecasting, it's well worth a look.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Sipech: Am trundling through Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise which is rather good, even if it is a bit politically right wing.
That's interesting, because Silver identifies as a Democrat (although he separates his personal political stands from his statistical work).
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I read the first volume of the 'Spiritwalker' trilogy at Halloween, which was very appropriate but completely coincidental!
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
On an economy drive and only reading stuff I can download for free, I have just finished the Phantom of the Opera (in French). I think I must have read it when I was a teenager but didn’t remember it all.

My main memories of the story come from the musical, but the book is actually quite different. A very enjoyable read at all events.

You're right. It a great little read, done a great miservice by only being known for the musical. It's more of a mystery story than anything.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
quote:
Sipech: Am trundling through Nate Silver's The Signal and the Noise which is rather good, even if it is a bit politically right wing.
That's interesting, because Silver identifies as a Democrat (although he separates his personal political stands from his statistical work).
YMMV but I would still class most Democrats as a bit right wing.

My comment was based on two things:

1) He seems to see the 2008 financial crash as primarily a problem about prediction failure, rather than anything inherent in the financial sector and its under-regulation, which led to the creation of over-complicated instruments.

2) A bit later in the first half of the book he states that he advocates competition between public and private sectors, seeing the free market as an inherently good thing.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Sipech: YMMV but I would still class most Democrats as a bit right wing.
Okay yes, so would I. I understand a bit more of what you mean by 'right wing' now. I haven't read his book, but I would classify the two examples you mentioned as right wing too.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
Wasn't there one set in the Channel Islands, called Island Magic which I loved?

Yes. I think there was more than one set in the Channel Islands - they were delightful. I don't think "The Dean's Watch" was one of her best.

"Towers in the Mist" is one I enjoyed for its setting and "Green Dolphin Country" is a powerful and more adult novel that is worth reading (a happy-go-lucky young man from the Channel Islands, friendly with two sisters, emigrates to New Zealand and writes back asking one of the sisters, who he secretly had warm feelings for, to come out and be his wife. Unfortunately, he puts the wrong sister's name in the letter, and what follows is the story of their marriage and what happens next...)

[ 03. November 2015, 18:10: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I posted a review of The Dean's Watch over on Goodreads. Is Green Dolphin Street her best book? Or should I seek out The Little White Horse?
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
The Little White Horse is lovely, I. Still have the copy I bought when I was eight and occasionally re read it.

I liked The Dean's Watch, one of my favourite of her adult books, but didn't care that much for Green Dolphin Street. City Of Bells is another favourite
 
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on :
 
The Little White Horse is one of my favourite books. Her descriptions of animals (and I'm not that much of an animal lover) are great.
I'm reading my way through the Eliots of Damerosehay. I must have read them before as I knew twins would turn up somewhere but don't really remember anything else.
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
Re. The Little White Horse, it was ages after I moved to Devon before I realised that I lived near the (fictionalised) setting for this, Moonacre manor was inspired by this
and the castle in the Dark woods was inspired by this this

Ive also recognised settings for some of her other books locally

[ 04. November 2015, 15:13: Message edited by: Kitten ]
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Ordinary Grace by William Kent Krueger.

I just finished this literary mystery and thought it was quite good. Several mysterious deaths in a small Minnesota town in 1961. The protagonist is a 13 year-old boy who uses the freedom of childhood to snoop out things the police and adults are blind to.

The boy's father is a Methodist minister and his wise advice and sermons add a nice dimension as the writer tries to explain the "awful grace of God," through him..
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:

"Green Dolphin Country" is a powerful and more adult novel that is worth reading (a happy-go-lucky young man from the Channel Islands, friendly with two sisters, emigrates to New Zealand and writes back asking one of the sisters, who he secretly had warm feelings for, to come out and be his wife. Unfortunately, he puts the wrong sister's name in the letter, and what follows is the story of their marriage and what happens next...)

I just saw the movie version of this on Turner Classic Movies! (Green Dolphin Street")It starred Lana Turner and Donna Reed as the sisters and was kind of fabulous. I loved it.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Today I finished yet another re-read of Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings + some, but not all, of the appendices - and now I am free to start Yasmin Kahan's The Raj at War - A People's History of the Second World War which was delivered after I had started the Tolkien. I also have on order the book on India and the First World War which will be published next month.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am reading the letters of Jane Welsh Carlyle. It is interesting to watch Christian charity (or writerly discretion) warring against an innately waspish pen. (It was a friend of the Carlyles who noted how fortunate it was, that they had married each other. If they had married others, then four people would be unhappy, not two.)
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I'm currently reading Alex Bellos' Alex Through The Looking Glass. It's his follow-up to Alex's Adventures in Numberland, which was one of the best pop-science books on maths I've ever read. The follow up started shakily, by looking at the psychology of numerology, but it's picked up and is now rather enjoyable.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
LeRoc: I recently bought All the light we cannot see by Anthony Doerr. I more or less grabbed it at random from the airport bookstore while running to catch my flight. So far, the first pages have been good.
I liked the description of Saint Malo during the War. The salty closeness of the sea, the French oldness of it, the claustrophoby behind those thick walls … I didn't care much about the characters or the plot though.

Today I bought Meursalt, contre-enquete by Kamel Daoud. Let's see.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Having read and loved some of Geraldine Brooks's other books (March, Year of Wonders), I picked up her novel about King David, The Secret Chord, and thoroughly enjoyed it. It's the story of David as told by the prophet Nathan, and I found it engrossing. Biblical historical fiction is not often done really really well, but this is one I would add to my collection of favourites in that genre.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I just started Landmarks by Robert MacFarlane. It's a collection about language and place - the author has over the years collected lots of place-words, in lots of the various languages and dialects of the British Isles, related to landscape, nature and weather. The blurb describes it as 'both a field guide to the literature he loves ..., and a 'word-hoard' ... we come to realize that words, well used, are not just a means to describe landscape, but also a way to know it and to love it.' I've only read the introductory chapter so far, but it's exactly the sort of beautiful nerdy read I love, and his writing is gorgeous.

He wrote about collecting words as he came across them in random notebooks here and there, and I suddenly was reminded of our dear departed shipmate ken - I remember giving him a lift to Greenbelt a couple of times, and he had a notebook with him where he would write down all the various flowers, grasses and birds he saw in the verges on the way there. And then as I read I thought how much he would like this book, and then I felt a bit sad [Frown]
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Just read Rose Macaulay's The World my Wilderness . Beautifully written, slightly surreal (at least, seventy years on) and morally serious. I think it will stay with me.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I was chatting with a Swiss friend recently and found he'd never heard of Johann Rudolf Wyss's The Swiss Family Robinson, which shocked me a bit, so I picked it up to reread. I've now nearly finished it and I now feel I have to congratulate him on avoiding what is really a terrible travesty of a book chock full of pious platitudes and appalling geographical and biological anomalies!

But it is still okay as a bit of fun - it was written for kids and at that it is okay but still a bit over pious for my taste.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
As I have tangentified the inquiry thread too much, I've nipped over here. I've just re-read "Red Moon and Black Mountain" by Joy Chant. The invented world descriptions, the peoples and their lives are brilliant - so much thought and knowledge in there. The plotting is intricate and skillful - things that didn't seem important at the beginning turn out to be critical at the end. The character development works well, and the way that she sustains the language style is impressive. I liked the way that each of the children had their own essential part of the story.

Up to the major battle, I'm with it all the way.

But, I realise that it is one, possibly the first of the books that made me unhappy about the emphasis on blood. Specifically, royal blood. It's usually in pagan contexts (which is odd). There seems to be an idea that, even in a war where thousands of the ordinary folk have spilt their blood on the ground, things can only be resolved by the one spill of the blood of someone with a special heritage. And it must be spilled willingly. Only, in this book, the character doesn't have the choice. He could say no, but he has been Chosen, and herded down a funnel to a place where he can only say yes. And this herding has been done by the agents of someone who is identified in the book as God.

This is not like our world, where God does the necessary Himself, and when he needs someone's choice, there is genuine freedom to say no. (We assume.)

And, being of a republican bent, I am not too keen on the idea of there being some special property of royal blood - unless it's haemophilia or porphyria, of course. Why does that idea hang around in literature. And why the idea about sacrifice? Once for all, wasn't it?

[ 12. December 2015, 17:08: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
And, being of a republican bent, I am not too keen on the idea of there being some special property of royal blood - unless it's haemophilia or porphyria, of course. Why does that idea hang around in literature. And why the idea about sacrifice? Once for all, wasn't it?

Because of the ancient idea that the king is the leader of the land, and personifies it. You'll find that exemplified in the Fisher King, who is wounded and the land suffering along with him until he can be healed. The king was expected to be ready to give his life for the kingdom if necessary. There have also been ancient traditions where the real king would step aside for a bit while a surrogate was treated royally then sacrificed at the end of it for the good of the land. Blood is the life force. It had to be shed to give life, and healing and fertility to the land, or to appease the gods and atone. That sort of thing.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
It is also well articulated in The King Must Die by Mary Renault.
It's been some years since I read it, but as I recall Red Moon, Black Mountain was definitely a post-Tolkien fantasy. It could never have been written, without LOTR. And you will recall that in LOTR it was Frodo who had to lose things, so that others might have them.
I believe you could prove by analyzing the text that Chant had closely read both Tolkien and Renault. This is not necessarily a bad thing; every fantasy writing of that period and many years after is either following Tolkien or rebelling against him.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Oh, and as to Swiss Family -- there is a name for this phenomenon. Jo Walton coined it. You were visited by the Suck Fairy. With her magic wand she tapped a book that you enjoyed thoroughly in youth, and suddenly it sucks. All the idiocies, contradictions, plot holes, and limp characters are now painfully visible.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I found that when I finally tracked down and bought a copy of Aunt Robbo by Ann Scott-Moncrief [Waterworks]

Huia
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Kindle, paper, vellum, papyrus, clay tablet... What are you reading?

Firenze
Heaven Host

I wasn't reading anything the day this thread was started as it was my birthday, but I met a college professor yesterday who is a Joyce scholar. I told her I need to re-read "Ulysses" which originally took the whole summer.

I am also thinking about my sporadic romp through "Three Men in a Boat". My first-edition is over 100 years old and is in bad condition: fortunately I also have the paperback but I am not certain it contains the funny illustrations of the older one.

This is arguably the funniest book ever published in the English language!

I shall start next week when school is out for Christmas break.
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Albertus:
quote:
Originally posted by betjemaniac:

I agree with Albertus about A Murder of Quality - sort of the missing third corner of the Delderfield-Molesworth-George Smiley triangle.

[Smile]
Slightly surprised to discover that To Serve Them All My Days was written as late as 1972: if you'd asked me I'd have put it, from its style, in the late 40s (or indeed even the 30s, were it not for the fact that it ends during the Second World War).

Somewhere in Zimbabwe last month, stuck for something to read, I happened upon an ancient copy of Delderfield's "Diana" in an equally ancient hotel (pictures of George V and Queen Mary on the dining room wall....).

What a horrible, horrible book.

I'm not given to violence but I spent 600-odd pages unsure whether to punch the hero, or the bloody awful heroine he refuses to drop like a hot potato.

I'm (generally) a big Delderfield fan, but I'm not surprised this one had passed me by until now. By the end I was genuinely crying tears of rage about that dreadful woman and the way she managed to screw up so many other people's lives. Yet they kept going back to her.

About as unsettling as Lanark, but without the humour or the dragons.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have tried Diana several times and have never made it to more than about a third of the way through - I think it is destined to sit on my shelf unread for ever!

[ 14. December 2015, 07:08: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
On the same sort of lines, have you ever read Alan Hollinghurst's The Line of Beauty? Beautifully written but all the main characters are complete and utter bastards!

Irredeemably so.
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
On the same sort of lines, have you ever read Alan Hollinghurst's The Line of Beauty? Beautifully written but all the main characters are complete and utter bastards!

Irredeemably so.

Yes, it's ok until they all turn on him. Not a massive fan of Hollinghurst. I can do bleak with the best of them, but Diana's somewhere out beyond the wilder shores of Thomas Hardy, where the plot spent some time in the permafrost. It's just so wildly out of character for Delderfield. In some ways it's good to know he wasn't just a one-trick pony, but I can't help thinking he must have been in a very dark place when he wrote it.

For those who haven't come across it, if you imagine the second half of A Handful of Dust where Waugh's marriage has broken down and he's throwing it all into the book (and yes, he did write lineally so this is what happened) but string that out for 680 pages with no redemption for anyone and a steady spiral to the bottom of the drain, then you're not even halfway close to approaching what a bitter, joyless, painful book this is.

It's well written, but it's horrible.

I'm recuperating with a re-reading of LTC Rolt's Railway Adventure.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Oh, and as to Swiss Family -- there is a name for this phenomenon. Jo Walton coined it. You were visited by the Suck Fairy. With her magic wand she tapped a book that you enjoyed thoroughly in youth, and suddenly it sucks. All the idiocies, contradictions, plot holes, and limp characters are now painfully visible.

Is there a name for the opposite phenomenon? I loved the Little House books as a child, but when I read them as bed time stories to my own kids, I saw the stories through Ma's eyes instead of Laura's. The husband who wouldn't settle, the poverty, the uncertainties and hardships of life; the books came alive in a whole new way.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
It's getting towards the end of the year and I'm getting into stats geek mode. I've just finished Daphne Du Maurier's The House on the Strand which was entertaining in parts, but didn't knock my socks off. I'm part way through Slavoj Žižek's On Belief and James Dunn's Baptism in the Holy Spirit. I'm on course to finish both of these in the next couple of weeks, which will leave me having finished 51 books in the year and averaging a little under 36 pages a day.

I would like to finish the year having finished 52 books and averaging 36 pages a day, which would mean I need a book that is a little over 400 pages long.

To even up my stats, I'd also ideally be looking for a non-British, female author. If it were a book on science, that'd be all the better.

Suggestions for something that fills those criteria?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
"Suck Fairy". Oh yes.

I can see that Chant was influenced by Tolkien, but I suspect she would have written something not dissimilar without him - though whether she could have found a publisher without him is moot. (There's an obvious Lothlorien borrow, isn't there, though?)

I don't think that what Tolkien does with Frodo is the same as what Chant does with Oliver. I have never felt any sense of wrongness with it. Frodo embarks on the way to Mount Doom with an adult understanding of hazard - even if he doesn't quite know how bad it will be, he does know it will be bad, and he may die. At the beginning. No afterthoughts.

I know where the king dying concept comes from - and have you read Naomi Mitchison's Corn King and Spring Queen? That's in my re-read pile! Maybe I shouldn't. Is it before or after Renault? And all those bog bodies in the real world. It doesn't mean it's an idea that needs to be used now as if it means something.

I keep having a little thought popping up whenever I type Chant's name. "It's a good name" - out of Wynne Jones.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I know where the king dying concept comes from - and have you read Naomi Mitchison's Corn King and Spring Queen? That's in my re-read pile! Maybe I shouldn't. Is it before or after Renault? And all those bog bodies in the real world. It doesn't mean it's an idea that needs to be used now as if it means something.

It's one of those archetypal things. If you look at fantasy novels, you won't have to look far before you find some with quasi-medieval settings where people travel by horse, women have long hair and skirts, men fight with swords, and technology as we know it in the 21st century has mostly not yet been discovered but magic is king. The "Celtic strain" is a whole subset of romanticized mush that includes sacrifice, noble druids, mysterious stone circles, the wonders of an artistic civilization besieged by the barbarian Romans and so on. It's a sort of persistent B-movie script that lurks in the back of many people's minds and comes out when they try to put something together in written form.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I now find myself in the throes of regret. I know that during my teens and early teaching years I read a vast amount of stuff, even while working at learning, writing essays (try fitting that stuff into a discussion of Hazlitt) and building up a lesson bank. (That involved reading up real medieval history because Y3 hadn't reached 1066, which they should have done, and I was supposed to fill in the gap between then and the Tudors.*)

And now, in retirement, I find reading like that pretty difficult. I did manage to do "Midnight Folk" and "Box" in about four days, with another two on "Red Moon", but they aren't new stuff.

There is, as it were, a huge mental undercroft** of books which not only can I not remember the content of, but I cannot recall at all. I know I read Tolkien for the first time. And the second. And the third. As one does. Until I rebelled at the sole active female only doing anything by pretending to be a man, and the only realistic female human, Ioreth, being such a stereotype despite being crucial to the plot. And Fred Hoyle, Apuleius, Virgil, Lewis, Williams, Homer (frequently - definitely did women better than Tolkien did); books on cancer, American First Nations, nuclear fusion; Mitchison, Renault, Sutcliffe, Engdahl, Dunnett, Bradbury, Asimov, Le Guin***. And the books from earlier on, of which I can remember the content, but not the titles or the authors.

I can read what I think of as fast reads, but the serious stuff is only readable in small chunks, despite my having the time for it, and a stack of books to do it with.

*I was somewhat put out by a bunch of "historical" novels which, in the midst of the well researched facts, would insert some Margaret Mead stuff about practices for which there can be no evidence. (Yup, William Rufus, sacrifice, but not the only such stuff. A Victorian novel has Harold Godwinsson's mum going off into the forest to call on Ran to drown Beorn Estrithsson, which she might have done. But she would not have been answered, which, in the novel, she was.)

**By analogy with the recent Dr Who season, though whether it is a better match for Skaro's slimy undead Daleks or Gallifrey's Cloister Wraiths I wouldn't like to say.

***I left out Andre Norton, because I wanted to comment that I think there may have been another influence on Chant there - she was very good at tribal societies as well.

PS Along with the books espousing the idea of royal sacrifice I couple (note the metaphors surfacing from the substrate unbidden) books suggesting that droit de seigneur was a thing, and that it should not be joined with women taking knives to bed with them, husbands climbing through windows with cudgels, or, possibly, with the aforementioned royal sacrifice. (Wikipedia claims no evidence for the practice, except it being described as having happened in days of old when things were bad, and giving a more usual name, the right of the leg, which sounds derogatory. It is also reported more recently in tribal societies or corrupt Africa, where is should more properly be called rape.)
The middle ages of that sort should stay in the subconscious.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I too have difficulty recalling books. I have been using Goodreads to log my reading (the chat boards are useless) and it is always a pleasure, when I go and enter a book in, to discover that I already read it five years ago. The system allows you to add your own comments about it, which is a tickler for the sievelike memory.

Someone, elsewhere on the webs, propounded the delightful theory that Diana Wynn Jones was really Susan Pevensie. As you recall, Bob, Susan was the only Narnia child who grew to adulthood, the other three going off to be with Aslan. Calendrically it works out exactly right, and Jones indeed took courses from both Lewis and Tolkien when she was in college.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
It's the forty years ago, the fifty years ago that are a pain!
I should have kept a record then!

There used to be an SF and fantasy shop in Soho called "Dark They Were and Golden-Eyed". A tiny front room, and another behind it, and an excellent man behind the counter who, once he had the measure of what you bought (and I used to go up to town monthly, the Saturday after payday, and come away with a stack), would recommend others he thought you would like. They would get things in early from the States. Then they moved to a large glass premises. Then, shortly after, they disappeared. The last time I went, I came away through a tremendous summer storm, when it became as dark as under a near total eclipse, the rain fell down like a waterfall, and the pavements were like streams. I was wet through, but because it was warm, that wasn't a problem. (I must have had the books in a plastic bag!)
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've just looked up that shop on Wikipedia, and had a little giggle at the fictional shop named "There will come soft rains".
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Yesterday afternoon I finished Tom Sharpe's Blott on the Landscape, which was as good as ever, so that last night I could start Shrabani Basu's For King and Another Country about the Indian involvement in the First World War - it arrived yesterday but isn't officially published until tomorrow, and I'm already well into it. For History buffs, it is well worth it - fascinating stuff - but all so very tragic.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
The problem with DWJ being Susan would be that it is impossible to imagine that she ever went through a phase of being only interested in nylons and lipstick.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Tch. We never actually see that on screen/page. We only hear it alleged, by embittered siblings.
 
Posted by pimple (# 10635) on :
 
I've just finished "The Observations" - Jane Harris's homage to the Victorian novel. Probably wouldn't have given it a second glance if it hadn't been thrust in my hands last month at a U3A bookclub meeting. Couldn't put it down. I wonder if it was put up for the Booker Prize in 2006/2007. Probably not? Not literary enough? If so, they should change the rules. The depiction of the 15-year-old Irish heroine is a tour de force of wit and gaiety and empathy. I defy anyone not to fall in love with her!
 
Posted by betjemaniac (# 17618) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I've just finished Daphne Du Maurier's The House on the Strand which was entertaining in parts, but didn't knock my socks off.

Interesting, that's in my all-time top 10 I think. Where did you think it falls down?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Tch. We never actually see that on screen/page. We only hear it alleged, by embittered siblings.

And Polly, old enough to know better.

I have thought that Susan would have had a really lousy time afterwards. She was still a minor, and would have needed guardians - likely to be the Scrubbs, who would add the weight of their own loss to hers, blaming her siblings for his death, as well as his moving away from their own beliefs. Quite apart from their initial obnoxiousness. She would have had a lot to work through, and support services would have been scant back then. Anything she wrote would have been horrendously dark.

I shall have to try the House on the Strand next, I think. It being on my re-read pile.

[ 15. December 2015, 18:46: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
In the circles I move in there is a considerable interest in Susan, and there's a good deal of material of one kind or another. Neil Gaiman wrote a short story about her (only for the strong of stomach).
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
In the circles I move in there is a considerable interest in Susan, and there's a good deal of material of one kind or another. Neil Gaiman wrote a short story about her (only for the strong of stomach).

I've read that. It isn't on the re-read list. There was one clever piece I read that linked her with Pullman's Oxford. (One of them.)
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I think Susan's fate can be related to the short story Lewis wrote - "The Shoddy Lands", in which the narrator experiences the narrow dreamworld of a woman known to one of his friends.
My English tutor at college was not a fan of Lewis, having had a woman friend of his turn up for a tutorial with him, and be rejected as soon as she walked through the door of his room with no explanation. My tutor thought it was misogyny. It was curious to find that cohort of women writers who did benefit from him and Tolkien after hearing that.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Is it usual to take a friend to a tutorial? Sounds odd to me. I'm afraid I too would have (politely) done the same. Nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with an ability to concentrate without distractions.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I parsed Penny S to mean that a woman friend of his (the narrator) turned up for a tutorial with him (Lewis), not that she accompanied the narrator - which would indeed have been an odd proceeding.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Firenze has it right. The woman thought she had a personal tutorial with Lewis, and, being rejected, reported it to her friend. Who clearly carried the anger at her treatment for some time.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Some people interested in "the problem of Susan" may enjoy reading or re-reading this Purgatory thread from several years ago.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
If a tutor is due to give a tutorial, it is his job to do so. He can't just tell the student to bog off when he sees them.

If Lewis did behave like that, it should have been reported, but in those days that probably wouldn't happen.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Some people interested in "the problem of Susan" may enjoy reading or re-reading this Purgatory thread from several years ago.

Thank you for that link - I hadn't read it, and it's nice to see that things I thought out for myself have been thought out by others as well!

The tutorial story was always odd.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
If a tutor is due to give a tutorial, it is his job to do so. He can't just tell the student to bog off when he sees them.

There's always at least two sides to a story. Lewis might have told her to bog off for all sorts of reasons. For all we know it could have been the wrong time slot, or he might have been expecting someone else. She might not even have been his pupil if he'd been covering for someone else that week and hadn't met her before. Who can say.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Quite. Or someone might have been playing a very nasty trick. It's not unheard of for someone to tell a pupil/student that a member of staff wants to see them when they don't.
But Mr Toomey was still somewhat unhappy about it. And that's all I can say.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
To go back to For King and Another Country, which I have now finished - it really was excellent and I would recommend it highly to those interested in the period BUT I thought it was sad that it only covered The Western Front and did not look at Indian involvement in the Dardanelles, Palestine, Egypt, etc.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
How to be Good by Nick Hornby.


I have liked Nick's books and I have liked his films.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
We never actually see that on screen/page. We only hear it all

Dunno about this Susan, but my wife does not transmogrify characters from other books. My lovely bride has completed NaNoWriMo and her first book is SF. She is about midway through it. God willing she will finish it in 2016. It is SF and is about a certain sort of marine mammals who may or may not speak with humans. Dunno where it is going but it shows promise. I am just collaborating on locations at this point. Her published authors to this point were book reviews of young adult literature when she was in grad school.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0