Thread: What was it you wanted?: General enquiries 2016 Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=030255

Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on :
 
Seeing as the last thread has now been tidied away with the demise of 2015 I thought I'd start a new one as I have a query.
I'm thinking of going vegan for Lent. I'm OK with food recipes (I think) as I'm already vegetarian and can adapt any with cheese, but I do like a nice cup of tea. Does anyone know of any milk substitute that doesn't taste vile in tea?
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
I find almond milk works best--it has a more neutral flavor than soy.
 
Posted by Hail Mary (# 18531) on :
 
What about skipping the milk and going Russian-style with lemon and a vegan sweetener? Normally I drink tea like this only when I have a cold, but I find it's very happy-making.
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
I'm not sure whether to post this here or on the recipe thread, but here goes.

Can anyone help me out with some pond translations please? I got a cookbook for Christmas that was published in the USA and some ingredients have different names. Some of them I know, for instance zucchini is courgette and cilantro is coriander leaf, but there are a couple I'm not sure about. What is cornstarch? Is that what we would call cornflour? Am I correct in thinking that green onions are spring onions?

Also, a couple of recipes call for mustard oil. I've never heard of this or seen it in the shops. When I search on Google or Amazon the only mustard oil I can find is a skincare product. Is this known by another name?

[ 13. January 2016, 07:59: Message edited by: Spike ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I would make the same assumptions as you about cornstarch/cornflour and green/spring onions.

Mustard oil I'd assume refers to mustard seed oil. which I think I've seen in Asian grocers.
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
What is cornstarch? Is that what we would call cornflour? Am I correct in thinking that green onions are spring onions?

I think you are correct about corn starch/four. The story about green onions is a little more complicated. Short form: green onions are about halfway between scallions and spring onions.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Mustard oil is a South Asian ingredient. Here's a boatload of recipes. You can certainly find it in an Indian grocery store.
 
Posted by Fineline (# 12143) on :
 
Hazelnut milk is lovely in coffee - I don't know about tea, as I drink green tea.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sarasa:
Seeing as the last thread has now been tidied away with the demise of 2015 I thought I'd start a new one as I have a query.
I'm thinking of going vegan for Lent. I'm OK with food recipes (I think) as I'm already vegetarian and can adapt any with cheese, but I do like a nice cup of tea. Does anyone know of any milk substitute that doesn't taste vile in tea?

Haven't tried it in tea, but I prefer cashew milk to almond. Creamier texture.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I think you're looking for "whitener" or "creamer". "Coffee Mate" might be the sort of thing, it's non-dairy. Comes in powdered and liquid forms.

Would you consider omitting the milk substitute altogether and having a spoonful of honey in your tea? It's surprisingly nice - mellower than ordinary sugar.
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Many vegans eschew honey since it is an animal product. (Poor exploited bees! [Frown] )
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
What about stevia as a sweetener? It's plant-based. I'm not sure if I've tried it, but lots of people use it.

Not necessarily for tea, but blackstrap/unsulphured molasses is a good sweetener, and tends to have a little bit of a bite to it. Plus lots of minerals. Start with a *tiny* amount, though--some people have a little trouble with digesting the iron, I think. (IANAD.) Lighter forms of molasses might be suitable for some teas.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've trained myself not to have sugar in tea, but that's with cow's milk, which adds sweetness itself. I halved the amount over a few weeks. Down to one spoon, then half a spoon, then the amount of a salt spoon, then everyone laughed and I stopped completely.
I find with sweeteners that they are too sweet, and half an hour later I feel I want something sweet again.
I have used almond milk in milky drinks like cocoa, made from powder*, but the makers added agave to the originally unsweetened stuff, which has changed my taste for it. I have now bought some almond flour from Sainsburys to try instead. I never tried it in tea, though.
*Because I didn't want to use liquid milk all at once.

[ 15. January 2016, 08:34: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
What about stevia as a sweetener? It's plant-based. I'm not sure if I've tried it, but lots of people use it.

Stevia products have an aftertaste, often not dissimilar to artificial sweeteners. Stevia naturally contains bitter compounds as well as sweet, so you will encounter that or something added to hide it.
Late 2015, a university (Cornell?) announced it had found a solution, but it is not yet commercially available.
If you are already habituated to artificial sweeteners, this may not bother you.
Most nutrition studies I'm aware of suggest reducing one's predilection for sweet is preferable to any substitute for sugar.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I drink unsweetened soya milk in tea fairly often. As I drink black coffee I can't advise on that one. The tea still tastes of tea, although the soya milk is not as neutral as cow's milk. (I quite like soya cream in cooking.)

I have tried the almond milk, which has a fairly nutty taste, coconut milk, which is very creamy so would be horrible in tea, nice in rice pudding. I have no idea what the rice milk tastes like, apparently it's not good as I've been discouraged from buying it.

My daughter is dairy allergic, so when she's around I have soya milk in the fridge and I quite often finish it off rather than throw it away. When we're away from the weekend, there's no point buying both soya and cows' milk, so I just buy soya and drink it too.
 
Posted by Jack o' the Green (# 11091) on :
 
I've never found a good milk substitute for tea or coffee. I only have oat or rice milk on cereal now. Costa soya lattes didn't really float my boat. Although I can drink black 'normal' tea on occasion and quite enjoy it, I find Early Grey is nicer without milk.
 
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on :
 
Thanks for all the non-milk ideas. I've tried almond milk, which was OK, and I think I might get used to in time. I also have some oat milk which the makers claim will make acceptable cappuccinos, but I haven't tried it yet. The soya milk latte I had a few years ago was one of the most vile things I've tasted
 
Posted by Adam. (# 4991) on :
 
How tight are eye-glasses meant to be? I just got new glasses (slight change in prescription) and I keep having to push them up my nose (hmm... not like that... you know what I mean). I never had to do that with my old pair, but they always left marks either side of the bridge of my nose. Were the old pair too tight and these right, or should I get these tightened?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Go back and get them adjusted. It should be part of the service.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I agree. Glasses are difficult enough; at least they should fit.
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adam.:
How tight are eye-glasses meant to be? I just got new glasses (slight change in prescription) and I keep having to push them up my nose (hmm... not like that... you know what I mean). I never had to do that with my old pair, but they always left marks either side of the bridge of my nose. Were the old pair too tight and these right, or should I get these tightened?

Get them adjusted, all part of the service or it should be.

I found that slipping happened even when adjusted sometimes. Since discovering frames with the tiny spring in hinge joint, I will not buy frames without the spring.

No slipping and generally ever so much more comfortable than older design. I have worn glasses since early teens, back in ancient history and think those springs are a wonderful design feature. I guess not all that recent now, but they were a revelation in comfort to me when I tried them on.

[ 17. January 2016, 21:12: Message edited by: Lothlorien ]
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
Keep in mind too, that if the nose pads on your glasses left marks, it may be worth asking for a different material. I am allergic to the vinyl ones and have nose pads that are made of glass. They have various composite options that are much nicer than the standard ones that come with basic glasses. In my experience, there was no extra charge for a different type.
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
Rude Health almond milk is the best and almost indistinguishable from cow's milk in tea. Waitrose/Ocado/Holland & Barrett and independent health food shops. Oat and rice milk is too thin IMO, coconut milk is too creamy, cashew milk is hard to get hold of in the UK. Soya milk is grim unless it's the highly sweetened vanilla version - has a plasticine-like aftertaste.

Coconut milk is however very useful in lots of ways as is creamed coconut, and makes good hot chocolate.

Also Coffee Mate is not dairy-free (milk proteins listed as third ingredient after glucose syrup and palm oil), at least not the kind available in the UK - and you wouldn't use it in tea anyway.
 
Posted by Doublethink. (# 1984) on :
 
Why is it Cambridge and Oxford get multiple teams on University Challenge when other institutions do not - even if they also have a college system ?
 
Posted by ThunderBunk (# 15579) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink.:
Why is it Cambridge and Oxford get multiple teams on University Challenge when other institutions do not - even if they also have a college system ?

To stop them from winning too often. This means that each team has a pool of a maximum of 1000 students, more usually hundreds, rather than the thousands that most institutions can draw own. It means that there is more chance of participation in the earlier rounds, of course, but at a significant cost to the chance of winning.
 
Posted by Adam. (# 4991) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink.:
Why is it Cambridge and Oxford get multiple teams on University Challenge when other institutions do not - even if they also have a college system ?

The different University of London and University of Wales colleges get separate teams too, don't they?
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
I think the Welsh colleges are now separate Universities.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
How much dung would a really big dinosaur- say a Tyrannosaurus Rex or a Diplodocus- have produced? Anyone know?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
You might google on the term 'coprolite', which is essentially fossilized poo. I don't know how, when you look at a coprolite, to tell who excreted it. But you could surely judge volume and size.

The other way to analyze it is to think of the equivalent sized carnivore or herbivore in our modern day. It should be possible to find out how much a bison excretes per day, for instance. Or a tiger. You would want the break between meat eaters and vegetarians, because the volume of food that an herbivore has to ingest is so much greater.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
That's (herbivore/ carnivore difference) just the kind of thing I hadn't thought of- thanks. Does the volume of dung produced by a given kind of animal remain proportionate to body size as that size increases?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Farm animals produce about 7.5% of their body mass daily in dung; this is much less for animals in the wild. I guess it's around 2% for those.

A t-rex weighed around 7 tonnes, and a diplodocus 15 tonnes, so that would give around 300 lbs and 660 lbs of dung per day respectively.
 
Posted by Albert Ross (# 3241) on :
 
If we assume that the amount of dung produced is proportional to metabolic rate Kleiber's Law may help. "metabolic rate scales to the ¾ power of the animal's mass", So comparing an animal of 10 tons (10000 kg) to a human of 75 kg, might produce (10000/75)^(3/4) = 40 times as much dung. Of course, for a given weight, a herbivore eats more than a carnivore, producing more dung.

[Code edited to make url work. - Ariel, Heaven Host]

[ 23. January 2016, 17:49: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Either way, that's really quite a lot, isn't it? I imagine that one of the drawbacks of a Jurassic Park would be the pong.
 
Posted by Albert Ross (# 3241) on :
 
I didn't study the article on Kleiber's Law. It may need modification when comparing a warm blooded mammal (high metabolism) with a cold blooded reptile (low). Also for same metabolic rate, animals' excreta will vary in composition and thus mass / volume. For example, desert animals will have little water in their dung.
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
Isn't current thinking that dinosaurs were more like birds than lizards?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
And I think that work has been done on the ratio of herbivores to carnivores in warm and cold blooded animals. Crocodiles need far less prey than big cats. I think that both the ratio, and evidence of the gait of both carnivores and herbivores suggests warm-bloodedness.

Coprolites can be identified by the contents, fossils they are associated with, and then by comparison with previously identified specimens.
 
Posted by Martin60 (# 368) on :
 
Which British engineer was it who showed that nuclear fusion can never be commercial?
 
Posted by Martin60 (# 368) on :
 
John D. Lawson
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Did it pop into your mind, or did you manage to google it?
 
Posted by Jay-Emm (# 11411) on :
 
All the local supermarkets have the last basket fastened into the metal stand, with a note saying "For H&S reasons this basket can not be removed"?
What are those reasons (I suppose the metal frame is less obvious and might be a trip hazard, but most of the time they are pretty much out of the way anyway)
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Because someone would trip over the basketless frame, which is less easy to see.

They could also get stuck in the doors, slip on the floor, poison themselves with out of date food or stuff they're allergic to, get bitten by spiders lurking in banana bunches, have tins fall off the shelves on them, drop frozen chickens on their toes, get frostbite in the freezer cabinets, collide with someone's supermarket trolley or have an epileptic fit from the fluorescent lighting. Never mind what might happen in the car park. But we're focusing on shopping baskets because they're potential death traps.

My own query is: if it was possible to find a wonder drug that got rid of the plaques in brains that cause dementia, would everything return to normal, or would the bits that the plaques had tangled around be physically damaged, and the person incapable of making a complete recovery?

[ 13. February 2016, 10:43: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I always thought the last basket on the frame was there to train customers to put their baskets in the right place, instead of abandoning them on the floor.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:

My own query is: if it was possible to find a wonder drug that got rid of the plaques in brains that cause dementia, would everything return to normal, or would the bits that the plaques had tangled around be physically damaged, and the person incapable of making a complete recovery?

Not a doctor, but the plaque inhibits blood flow. Any brain tissue with blocked flow for any significant amount of time begins to die. ISTM, the best a remover of plaque could do is halt the progression.
 
Posted by St. Gwladys (# 14504) on :
 
Tangent to the discussion on coprolites:
One of my social work colleagues bought himself one and polished it, just to prove that you can polish t***s after all.
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by St. Gwladys:
One of my social work colleagues bought himself one and polished it, just to prove that you can polish t***s after all.

I have a regular meeting that that would make a wonderful prop for. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by St. Gwladys:
Tangent to the discussion on coprolites:
One of my social work colleagues bought himself one and polished it, just to prove that you can polish t***s after all.

The Mythbusters successfully polished fresh poop. Well the process took several days, so fresh is relative, but it didn't need to have been converted to stone.
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
The Mythbusters successfully polished fresh poop. Well the process took several days, so fresh is relative, but it didn't need to have been converted to stone.

Even for that meeting, there's a limit to what I want to carry around with me.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
This is a computer problem, but I can't find a current computer thread.

A bit of background which may or may not be relevant:
Somebody at church sends out e-mails with attachments to a large group. For some reason I can open but not print these attachments, a problem I share with about 6 other recipients. My husband (on the same mailing list) can both open and print, so it's not a problem.

Today I received an e-mail, with attachment. When I tried to open it, I got a document I'd downloaded several years ago instead. I've tried several times, and the sender has re-sent it, but I'm still getting an old download. My husband has opened his attachment with no problem.

Why am I getting a random old download instead of the attachment?
 
Posted by Adam. (# 4991) on :
 
I don't know about the second one, but for the first one, our old printing set-up had trouble printing certain attachments when you just opened them and pressed 'print'; you had to download them, open up the download you'd saved somewhere, and then it would print fine.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
It's the second one that's the problem; I only described the first in case it had a bearing on the second.

My husband thinks I must have inadvertently / absentmindedly opened the download within the last couple of days and failed to close it properly. I am sure I haven't done that and that I haven't looked at that download for years. Quite apart from anything else it's in a password protected file, so I'm unlikely to have opened it "absentmindedly."
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
This is a computer problem, but I can't find a current computer thread.

North East Quine, I have taken the liberty of reposting your question to the current computer thread!

[Edited for top of page]

[ 16. February 2016, 14:03: Message edited by: jedijudy ]
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
In the pub this evening, the TV was tuned in to some obscure satellite sport channel. It was showing an obscure Indian sport called Kabaddi. There was no sound, so I couldn't really work out what was going on. There were two,teams (Mumbai and Jaipur as it happens). From what I could see, one bloke from one team would try and run somewhere and all the players from the other team would jump on top of him. There appeared to be some form of scoring system, but I couldn't figure out how it worked.

Has anyone ever come across this game and can explain how it works?
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:

Has anyone ever come across this game and can explain how it works?

It's delightfully nuts. It's not terribly unlike games of playground chain tag (in the same sense that rounders is not unlike baseball).

Two teams, each own half of the playing area. The teams take it in turns to send a raider into the other team's area. The raider has to hold his breath while in the other side's zone, and continuously chants "kabaddi" to prove he's not inhaling. His aim is to tag one (or more) of the defending team and get home again, in which case the defenders he tagged are out. The defenders try to grab him and prevent him from leaving their zone - if he inhales when in the other team's zone, he's out.

There's are more rules that I don't think I understand...

[ 29. February 2016, 04:10: Message edited by: Leorning Cniht ]
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
Has anyone ever come across this game and can explain how it works?

I've got no great knowledge of the game, but do remember that Channel 4 used to televised it in the mid 90s when they went through a period of broadcasting strange sporting events (tiddlywinks? Championship skateboarding?). I have a vague recollection that you use elbows and knees a little like the ancient Aztec game, but I could be making that up.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I have come across a reference to a female scientist organising a nettle collection in the Second World War. The stalks were to be used to make paper, but the leaves were to be used for a secret purpose.

What could this be? Google suggests that nettles could be used to make a green dye for camouflage netting, but surely that wouldn't have to be kept a secret?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
They tried to extract the component that makes your skin itch to use in chemical warfare?
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
... the leaves were to be used for a secret purpose ...

Soup? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Stinging nettles were collected for people to make soup.

Tougher nettles were collected and fermented down because the resulting liquid speeds up compost-making and so was a valuable for use on farms.

Children in the British countryside were paid to collect a whole variety of medicinal and useful plants, and were paid a small amount for their efforts. In fact plant and weed collection was a common in rural areas as scrap metal collection in towns and cities.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Nettle soup's good.
I vaguely recall hearing something about nettle fibre being used for bandages or dressings- does that sound right?
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
It must have been more than soup, the collection was being organised by someone with a D.Sc in botany, working in a pharmacy lab. Perhaps it was an experiment which didn't come to anything.
 
Posted by mdijon (# 8520) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
They tried to extract the component that makes your skin itch to use in chemical warfare?

Apparently compounds that cause skin irritation are even called "nettle agents". Whether any of them bear any direct relationship to compounds found in nettles I don't know.
 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
The New Zealand nettle is a small graceful tree, urtica ferox, and is indeed ferocious – it has been known to kill.

As kids in wartime we collected ergot, common then on marram grass (funny, you don't see any now) – was it for blood clotting medication or something?

I remember the whole school going to a river valley to pick rose hips to make syrup for vitamin c for babies because we couldn't get enough oranges.

GG
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
We were still picking rosehips in the late 1960s for rosehip syrup. We took them into our primary school for collection. I just remember a big collection vessel we tipped them into. I guess we were collecting for Delrosa and school funds, because I just remember Delrosa rosehip syrup being given to my little sister at the baby clinic.

Apparently rosehip syrup is now being remarketed as a relief for arthritis.
 
Posted by Jonah the Whale (# 1244) on :
 
There is a whole company in the Netherlands founded on rosehip syrup. It started in 1956. roosvicee - rose v.c. (vitamin c)
 
Posted by jacobsen (# 14998) on :
 
Can anyone tell me how to upload photos to the ship? Yes, there are still technological stone-agers around who don't know..... [Confused] I have them on file, but don't know how to proceed.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
You can't upload photos to the Ship (unless you're RooK abusing his administration rights). That function is disabled.

If you want to share a photo on the Ship you have to upload the photo to a photo sharing site, lots of them around: Flickr, Photobucket, whatever, and then post the link on the Ship.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Jonah the Whale: There is a whole company in the Netherlands founded on rosehip syrup. It started in 1956. roosvicee - rose v.c. (vitamin c)
Brings back memories.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
Is there a difference (and if so, what is it?) between hand cream and body lotion?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Mainly water, which makes it runnier. If you look at the recipes for many cosmetics -- lotion, cold cream -- they are very similar. The only difference is the addition of water or oil (makes it runnier) and perfumes, herbs, colorants, etc.
 
Posted by jacobsen (# 14998) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
You can't upload photos to the Ship (unless you're RooK abusing his administration rights). That function is disabled.

If you want to share a photo on the Ship you have to upload the photo to a photo sharing site, lots of them around: Flickr, Photobucket, whatever, and then post the link on the Ship.

Thanks, Curiosity. I'll take it from there. [Biased]
 
Posted by John Holding (# 158) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Galloping Granny:


As kids in wartime we collected ergot, common then on marram grass (funny, you don't see any now) – was it for blood clotting medication or something?


GG

Ergot was the name for a particular mould that, at least in medieval days, sometimes polluted rye. (Rye and Oats being more common than wheat for making bread for the poor and ordinary people most of the time.) I don't recall the exact repercussions on the healthy, though there were some, but it became a well-known and used (because easily available) abortifacent.

I don't suppose the latter was the reason you were collecting it, if it was indeed the same thing.

John
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
Bread made with ergot-infected grain (flour) gave a skin condition that was very similar to that of the Plague (black death). But when ergot-free bread was provided the symptoms disappeared.

This figures prominently in the novel 'The Eye of God,' which is set in the period just before the reign of Richard III. (Sorry I don't remember the author, but it's a good read.)
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Galloping Granny: As kids in wartime we collected ergot, common then on marram grass (funny, you don't see any now) – was it for blood clotting medication or something?
Wikipedia tells me that a component of ergot works against bleeding after child birth.
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by georgiaboy:
Bread made with ergot-infected grain (flour) gave a skin condition that was very similar to that of the Plague (black death).

And, apparently, cases of bewitchment (scroll down to "Salem witchcraft accusations").

[ 13. March 2016, 20:44: Message edited by: Piglet ]
 
Posted by Adam. (# 4991) on :
 
Art history fans: does anyone know of a depiction in art (painting, sculpture... anything visual really) of the meeting of Dido and Aeneas in Hades? There's plenty of their earthly love story, Dido's death, and Aeneas' entry into the underworld, but I can't find anything of their meeting there. This would just be a 'backdrop' to something I'll be presenting, so not super important, but curious if anyone has any leads.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Ergot of rye is hallucinogenic.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adam.:
Art history fans: does anyone know of a depiction in art (painting, sculpture... anything visual really) of the meeting of Dido and Aeneas in Hades? There's plenty of their earthly love story, Dido's death, and Aeneas' entry into the underworld, but I can't find anything of their meeting there. This would just be a 'backdrop' to something I'll be presenting, so not super important, but curious if anyone has any leads.

Try this: http://hoocher.com/Publius_Vergilius_Maro/Aeneas_and_Dido_in_the_Underworld.jpg
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
And another. Wish it had an attribution for you! http://aneidbook6.weebly.com/uploads/1/6/5/5/16551666/523801868.jpg?270
 
Posted by Adam. (# 4991) on :
 
Thanks, LC!
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I have a brother in the US who gave me his cellphone number, the trouble is I don't know the prefix to ring for International calls there. Is it different if you're calling a cellphone? His number is 10 digits long and starts 323.

I realise this is probably fairly simple, but it's been a difficult day and I amfairly simple too [Roll Eyes]

Huia
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
I have a brother in the US who gave me his cellphone number, the trouble is I don't know the prefix to ring for International calls there. Is it different if you're calling a cellphone? His number is 10 digits long and starts 323.

I realise this is probably fairly simple, but it's been a difficult day and I amfairly simple too [Roll Eyes]

Huia

The country code for the US is '1'. So you dial whatever you dial to get an international number, which I think is 00 from your part of the world, then 1, then 323 and the rest of it.

so 00-1-323-xxx-xxxx
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Wow 13 digits! Thanks Leorning. Now I see it written I remember I used to ring him on a landline - it was just it being a cellphone that put me off. I have had so much trouble with my landline and internet breaking down at the same time that I was learning how to use a new cell phone that I thought I might have to start training pigeons.

Huia [Biased]
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
Is it possible to re-use chocolate that has been melted and set more than once? I have a relative who likes to make "home made" Easter eggs for the youngsters in the family. However they always come out as big, solid, hard lumps of chocolate that you can't break or get your teeth into. I thought of trying to re-melt them in to smaller pieces, would this work? Would they still be edible?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
It is possible to re-use melted chocolate and there are ways on the internet on how to do this if you want to go down that route. I did it with some small themed moulds - they weren't eggs though, which do come out quite solid. You won't get the "polished" look from re-heated chocolate.

I did wonder whether adding a little bit of cream into the melt might make the chocolate softer, but I haven't tried this out myself as the small ones seemed to be all right. I will say, though, in my case the chocolate picked up something of the flavour of the silicone moulds, which wasn't great, but better quality ones should avoid that problem.

I also found that pouring the chocolate into the moulds needed to be done very carefully to avoid air bubbles getting trapped and spoiling the look of the thing when it was turned out.

[ 29. March 2016, 11:33: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
This question arises from pure idle curiosity.

I was thinking about the fact that Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the spring equinox. Then I remembered that in the eighteenth century in the Western countries, the calendar was changed so that the dates were advanced ten or eleven days.

This means that before the calendar change the equinox fell around March 11. This, in turn, would mean that Easter could have been as early as March 13. Did it happen that way?

Moo
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sparrow:
Is it possible to re-use chocolate that has been melted and set more than once? I have a relative who likes to make "home made" Easter eggs for the youngsters in the family. However they always come out as big, solid, hard lumps of chocolate that you can't break or get your teeth into. I thought of trying to re-melt them in to smaller pieces, would this work? Would they still be edible?

You can also melt it to have chocolate fondue which is delicious and popular with all ages. [Smile]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
The other idea is to run it through a Cuisinart and get chocolate chips. Why not experiment with a small bit of it, melting it and seeing what it is like? It sounds like you have enough there to play with. I would melt it very gently, possibly in a double boiler. The other idea is to transform it into fudge, or fudge sauce, or something like that. Chocolate shavings or chips, baked into a cake, would look and taste great and I bet you would notice no change in chocolate quality.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
This is a question arising from total bewilderment. We have used the same car insurance company since 1997; this is our first claim. We had a minor accident last week; clipped wing mirrors with an oncoming vehicle. Perfectly amicable exchange with the other driver, who said that he was driving a company car. No damage apart from the wing mirrors. We have (or had!) an indicator on the tip of ours, so our damage involved wiring. We took the car into our garage (main local dealership, part of a small chain), got a quote, booked it in for last Thurs and then informed our insurance company.

Insurance company said we couldn't get the wing mirror repaired until our car had been checked by their assessor. And their assessor is 50 miles away from us, and couldn't fit in a visit to us for a week. And so they supplied us with a loan car while our car is off the road with a damaged wing mirror. Dropping the loan car off with us involved two people on a 36 mile round trip.

WTF? It's a relatively small repair and this is our first claim in nineteen years so presumably they don't think we are trying to cheat the system. The garage we got the quote from is one of the main garages in this part of the world, and is where our car is always serviced etc, so not an eccentric choice of garage to get a quote from.

Why the fuss? The total cost of an assessor doing a 100 mile round trip to look at a broken wing mirror, plus supplying us with a loan car which is worth almost double the value of our own car for however long this takes must be far in excess of the cost of the repair.

Am I missing something? Or is this this standard practice?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
This question arises from pure idle curiosity.

I was thinking about the fact that Easter falls on the first Sunday after the first full moon after the spring equinox. Then I remembered that in the eighteenth century in the Western countries, the calendar was changed so that the dates were advanced ten or eleven days.

This means that before the calendar change the equinox fell around March 11. This, in turn, would mean that Easter could have been as early as March 13. Did it happen that way?

Moo

Don't know for sure, but I do think that the Catholic countries had changed before that, so the date of Easter could have been as interesting as it was before the Synod of Whitby. Before the calendar change, the date was definitely WRONG. If the calendar had continued unchanged, the equinox would have been falling, eventually, in late December. Very confusing.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sparrow:
Is it possible to re-use chocolate that has been melted and set more than once? I have a relative who likes to make "home made" Easter eggs for the youngsters in the family. However they always come out as big, solid, hard lumps of chocolate that you can't break or get your teeth into. I thought of trying to re-melt them in to smaller pieces, would this work? Would they still be edible?

The Guardian printed recipes for leftover Easter Eggs - despite comments that this was an unknown ingredient.


Leftover chocolate

[ 29. March 2016, 20:54: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Question for Americans.

I'm used to seeing the political designations 'conservative' and 'liberal' w.r.t. US politics but lately (this election cycle I guess) I'm noticing the increased use of 'progressive'. From context this appears to be similar to liberal but perhaps there's a subtle difference?

Also is this used in relation to religious traditions too, where there's also been a liberal/conservative labelling?
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
Well politically of course, liberal does not mean the same thing as progressive or left-wing (and progressive doesn't mean the same thing as left-wing either). Usually the most politically liberal (in the true meaning of the phrase) politicians are the most right-wing!

In terms of Christianity, progressive seems popular with those who are orthodox/conservative (esp evangelical) but flexible on Dead Horse issues. I probably fall in that category and I do feel that liberal wouldn't describe my position.
 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pomona:
Well politically of course, liberal does not mean the same thing as progressive

You say "of course" but it's not obvious to me otherwise I wouldn't have asked the question! Care to elaborate on the differences?
 
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on :
 
As a North American historian, "progressive" also has a specific meaning in relation to two distinct political movements, one in Canada and the other in the United States in the early 20th century.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Paul.: You say "of course" but it's not obvious to me otherwise I wouldn't have asked the question! Care to elaborate on the differences?
I've said this before on the Ship, but in most of continental Europe, liberal parties are right-wing. Examples are FDP, VLD, VVD …
 
Posted by Pomona (# 17175) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Paul.:
quote:
Originally posted by Pomona:
Well politically of course, liberal does not mean the same thing as progressive

You say "of course" but it's not obvious to me otherwise I wouldn't have asked the question! Care to elaborate on the differences?
Liberalism as a political movement is rooted in freedom, and especially in the 20th Century, the free market. Think of libertarianism as more extreme liberalism and you're getting nearer. Economic liberalism in particular has been a hallmark of Reaganite/Thatcherite politics - hardly what one would call progressive! Liberalism in the true sense of the word would generally disapprove of things like hate speech laws, progressivism would not.

Looking up classical liberalism and people like Adam Smith might help.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
This is getting rather Purgatorial, but I find it helpful to look at this from the power triangle government — private companies — citizens.

When you take up the label 'liberal', the question is "what do you want to free yourself from"? I feel that this question has been answered differently in different countries.

In most of Western Europe, the answer to this question has been: "government influence". This resulted in a power shift towards private companies (which may very well have been their intent).

[ 30. March 2016, 13:46: Message edited by: LeRoc ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I would agree that the various nuances of 'liberal', 'libertarian', 'progressive' etc are too various for a Notes and Queries thread and could furnish an entire one of their own.

If you wish to debate them further, Purg is thataway -->

Firenze
Heaven Host

 
Posted by Paul. (# 37) on :
 
Thanks, this is a bigger topic than I realised. Considering whether to open a Purg topic or not.
 
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on :
 
NEQ - regarding your insurance

If you are wanting the repair carried out under the insurance, (ie you don't end up paying for it - presumably your company will claim the money from the insurers of the other driver) then it pretty much has to be done under their terms, regardles of the extent of the damage

Cynical I know, but the more that your company has to do in terms of the adjuster, the car hire and the cost of the repairer of their choice ( tho' you can try asking for the one you want) the more money they can claim from the other company, which then relates to putting everyone's premiums up.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
The other driver was driving a company car, and said he would have to do it through the insurance, so we thought we had to, as well. Both drivers thought they'd been unlucky, and equally responsible (unless the other driver has since said something different to his insurers). We don't want to claim from the other driver, as we don't think he was at fault per se. (Rural road whose edge crumbled in the January floods, awaiting repair, so all drivers are cutting it a bit fine when they pass; in this case we clipped wing mirrors, but it's just the tip of the wing mirror, where the indicator is (or was!) The actual mirror is badly cracked, though not so badly cracked that it doesn't still function as a mirror; obviously we're getting the mirror replaced as well. We are far from being the first car to come to grief since the road was damaged.

If we'd had it fixed last Thursday, the total cost to the insurers would have been £300; now it will be £300, plus the cost of giving us a shiny loan car for a fortnight, plus the cost of their expert. [Disappointed]

On the plus side I'm enjoying driving a shiny new car. It only had 1000 miles on the clock when they dropped it off. We've only ever had second hand cars, I don't think I've ever driven anything so new and expensive before. [Smile]
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Is there a word in English for a lavtory that isn't in some sense a euphemism? 'Urinal', I suppose, isn't, but that's a rather specific and limited kind.
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
I can't think of one, although I see that a pit toilet in New Zealand can be called a "long drop", which sounds rather graphic!

An English pseud might call a urinal a "pissoir", but one might well consider that not to have been sufficiently assimilated into our language.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Yes, that would be pseudy, wouldn't it? Perhaps you could call it a 'pisser' if you were an Anglo-saxonist.
Fowler (1926) says that the eupemistic use of lavatory was to be deprecated, as being likely to drive the original sense of the word out of the language (which indeed it did): but he doesn't suggest an alternative. 'Jakes', perhaps? But that is surely too archaic (and I don't know its origin).

[ 15. April 2016, 16:31: Message edited by: Albertus ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
If you accept the Thomas Crapper theory then crapper is quite nice.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Privy. Close stool. Water closet. Bog. Cludgie. Shithouse. Latrine.

Any of those appeal?
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
I'm pretty sure that "crap" predates Crapper by centuries. I wonder about "jakes" too but couldn't find the derivation. "Shithouse" is by far the best so far.

I rather like the British Colonial "thunderbox", though!

P.S. According to "a well-known only encyclopedia", the word "crap" comes from the Dutch and was long used to refer to chaff, weeds or other rubbish: "Its first application to bodily waste, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, appeared in 1846 under a reference to a crapping ken, or a privy, where ken means a house". I like "crapping ken"!

[ 15. April 2016, 17:11: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Yes, that's a good one.
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
"Dry pit privy" is old fashioned in western Canada for outhouse, though 'dry pit toilet' is said more often, which means it isn't attached to the residence. They are generally illegal now. We calld them "kybo" in boy scouts. "Shitter" is said, but in polite company. W.C. is common in schools 'water closet'.

"Hanging a rat" is a euphemism for the act of defecation; some of the German settlers called the potty the "rat house', which is a play on "Rathaus' which means city hall.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
My Italian grandmother called it the baccaus with accent on the second syllable -- pseudo-Italian for "backhouse".
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
One outside may well be called the "dunny". Down here.

If it isn't a long drop, it could well be emptied by the dunny man. The thought of being caught in the act by the dunny man used to terrify my sister and me when we were young.

Not much chance of that. He used to call in odd early hours of the morning.
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Baptist Trainfan:
I wonder about "jakes" too but couldn't find the derivation.

'Jakes' was current in Shakespeare's day, as he makes some rude jokes about it in 'As You Like It.' (The name of the character Jacques has to be pronounced 'Jay-kwees' in order to scan, and he is the butt (sorry!) of some low humor.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Baptist Trainfan:
I'm pretty sure that "crap" predates Crapper by centuries. I wonder about "jakes" too but couldn't find the derivation. "Shithouse" is by far the best so far.

I rather like the British Colonial "thunderbox", though!

P.S. According to "a well-known only encyclopedia", the word "crap" comes from the Dutch and was long used to refer to chaff, weeds or other rubbish: "Its first application to bodily waste, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, appeared in 1846 under a reference to a crapping ken, or a privy, where ken means a house". I like "crapping ken"!

More comprehensive, but still not complete.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
I knew a family who used the shorthand of Τόπος (place), which was fine so long as you knew in advance what they were referring to.

Of course we were mightily confused when a visiting American preacher asked for the bathroom and then asked for another bathroom when the first proved not to have a WC - and neither did the second.

Why do people from the US refer to a bathroom when clearly the last thing they want is a bath?
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
Or the rest room?
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by L'organist:
Why do people from the US refer to a bathroom when clearly the last thing they want is a bath?

It is very rare in the US to have the toilet in a separate room. A room with a bath almost always has a toilet.

In the US people also talk about half-baths, which are rooms with a toilet and sink, but no bath. Then there are the three-quarter baths which have toilet, sink, and shower stall.

Moo
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lothlorien:
Or the rest room?

I was once at an international summer school run by the British arm of an American organisation. It had a designated "rest room" which contained comfy chair, magazines etc. but not a toilet.

Which caused a lot of confusion!
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Toilet? That is what one does in the morning: ablutions and dressing.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
True, but I shouldn't think there are many people left in England who use the word in that sense now. I know what it means but it has died out in contemporary usage.

As can probably be witnessed in the National Gallery on a daily basis by people viewing the famous painting by Velazquez.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Err, still in use in my immediate circle. [Biased]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
My parents used to tell me off for saying 'toilet' - it was 'common'.
 
Posted by Nick Tamen (# 15164) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Albertus:
Is there a word in English for a lavtory that isn't in some sense a euphemism? 'Urinal', I suppose, isn't, but that's a rather specific and limited kind.

quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
In the US people also talk about half-baths, which are rooms with a toilet and sink, but no bath. Then there are the three-quarter baths which have toilet, sink, and shower stall.

FWIW, in the usage drilled into my head as a youth, lavertory is not synonymous with bathroom/toilet/WC/etc. It meant the basin for washing hands or face—what most people call a sink. Where I grew up, a sink was for washing things, such as pots, pans or dishes.
 
Posted by Nick Tamen (# 15164) on :
 
I do hate it when it's only after the edit window has closed that I realize I've misspelled a word not once, but twice. [Hot and Hormonal]

My apologies to all lavatories.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Of course when I was growing up it was all chamber pots.

Historically, if you were posh, you didn't go to a specific room to shit - it came to you, in the form of a close stool or a pot, which some lucky menial then took away and possibly fired out of a window.

There were garderobes, situated on the external wall of the castle usually (I have used one in Bohemia; you don't want to look down) or over the river if you were a waterfront property - - otherwise it tended to end up in the cellar, from which the gong men would shovel it away.

[ 17. April 2016, 20:24: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
It is very rare in the US to have the toilet in a separate room.

I have seen bathrooms where the toilet was separated off via a floor-to-ceiling partition. For some reason it reminded me of a confessional.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I was going to mention this -- it is common in very large luxurious bathrooms, especially the kind with two sinks and jacuzzi tubs. This allows one person to Commune With Nature while the other brushes their teeth or lools in the tub. There is also usually a separate shower stall with a glass door.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
I wouldn't want to be the one in the shower when the toilet was flushed -- I'd be scalded with hot water when all of the cold water was being diverted to the toilet.
[Eek!]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Tch. Modern plumbing valve systems (if you have a bathroom of that elaborateness it is surely all of the best) ensures that you never get temperature variations.
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
I wouldn't want to be the one in the shower when the toilet was flushed -- I'd be scalded with hot water when all of the cold water was being diverted to the toilet.
[Eek!]

Having renovated several bathrooms (meaning sink, toilet, combined tub+shower), it is relatively simply to pipe correctly, ¾" versus ½" lines serving the bathroom is a good start, routing correctly is another) to prevent this and also to prevent water hammer. Toilet services are usually ½", and if there's a valve to regulate the water flow in (if not install one), you can simply make the tank fill more slowly. Newer low water toilets also help.
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
Back to the question, what about "shithouse"? Definitely no euphemism there.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I would make up a word. How about 'defecatory?' The analogy is to factory: "Well, I'm off to the defecatory for half an hour, mind if I take the latest issue of Economist?"
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
There is a perfectly good word - privy.

It is short, easily understood, and conveys that one wishes to go somewhere to be private.
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
But it's still a euphemism as it doesn't explain the actual bodily function that goes on there.

A "privy" could be a place you go to get dressed, or to have a private conversation with a friend, or a nap, or for prayer ... many things.

For that reason "defecatory" is much better although it's rather cumbersome and only describes half of what happens in there!

[ 19. April 2016, 13:40: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
There were garderobes, situated on the external wall of the castle usually (I have used one in Bohemia; you don't want to look down).

If you were down below, you most certainly wouldn't want to look up.

The "heads" on the old sailing ships were much the same.

[ 19. April 2016, 13:43: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nick Tamen:
FWIW, in the usage drilled into my head as a youth, lavertory is not synonymous with bathroom/toilet/WC/etc. It meant the basin for washing hands or face.

Still does in Portuguese: a "lavatorio" is place where you wash: "lavar". English has lost that linguistic connection. (Equally an "oratorio" is a chapel, a place where you go to "orar" or pray).
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have recently come across the idea that garderobes were called so, not out of finding yet another way not to describe the function, but because clothes were hung there in the belief that the fumes would do for the corrupting moths. I can't believe that if true I would have reached the age I am without having come across this - especially considering the number of times I have taken children round Dover Castle, where the multi-storey versions discharged into the basement.

I am beginning to suspect modern guides of Making Things Up.

What was the word used for the tiny projecting rooms on the farmhouses as shown in the Singleton Open Air Museum in Sussex? No room for wardrobe use. Precious little for hoicking up medieval skirts, either.

[ 19. April 2016, 13:52: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
We have now had no less than 35 posts on what to call household sewage disposal units. I hope Albertus is sufficiently answered, and we can now move on to talking about something else for a change, or answering a new (unrelated) query, if anyone has one.
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
I think this one may be unanswerable in any definitive way. It started with a child's question about what happens if a vampire bites a zombie and whether a zombie biting a vampire is different. The additional question that arose is what happens if a vampire takes communion wine. We didn't get around to discussing zombies in this regard.
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
On the communion wine front, there is an episode from Buffy the Vampire Slayer (which is, of course, hard-core scientific proof of how vampires act and respond), in which she tricks a vampire into swallowing some holy water. He burned from the inside out, ending up dusted. I imagine communion wine would have a similar reaction.

I don't know enough about zombies to comment on the rest of your post.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
The answer is whatever your imagination comes up with. Vampires and zombies are both fictitious creatures, whose characteristics and rules of engagement have been varied and elaborated by many hands.

Who do you want to take as your ur-bloodsucker? Nosferatu? Dracula? Varney? Ruthven?

And when did zombies turn from drugged slaves into brain-eating undead?

You could turn it into an object lesson in the creation of mythic material and its underlying significance as an index of subliminal fears.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Hmmmm...undead biting undead? Not sure anything would happen, other than mutual pain and anger. A vampire bites to drink blood. Zombies, I presume, don't have any. A vampire, being undead, probably wouldn't taste good to a zombie. Maybe they should just go for ice cream? [Biased]

Re Buffy: There was a wonderful story line where Spike, vampire, literally goes to Hell to get his soul back, so he can "love [Buffy] proper".

When he gets back to Sunnydale, he's insane from the shock of being re-ensouled. There's a scene where he and Buffy meet in an abandoned church. He tells her about all this, as best as he can manage. Then he wraps his arms around a big cross, causing him to singe around the edges, and says, "Can we rest now, Buffy? Can we rest?"
[Tear]
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
A vampire bites to drink blood. Zombies, I presume, don't have any.

Or if they do, it's dead blood, hence lacking in nutritional value. Junk food for vampires? There's an industry waiting to be spawned. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Periodically I buy cooked chicken portions which have some kind of flavour coating. Usually on the skin, which seems like rather a waste as I always remove and discard it.

It's since dawned on me that possibly you're intended to eat the chicken skin. I always assumed this was just left in place for cooking purposes and should be removed. Do people actually eat it?
 
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on :
 
I definitely eat the skin. I consider it a bit of a treat as it is less healthly, but I think it tastes the best, particularly with flavorings.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I don't because a lot of the fat is found under the skin. I am less sure about chicken than other meat as my mother never cooked it (saying that it looked like roasted baby [Eek!] ). In my childhood chicken was an expensive meat, compared with beef and lamb, now it is the cheapest that can be bought here.

Huia
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I do. If I remove the skin for a specific dish I will save it, and put it (with bones, wing tips, spines, etc.) into the stock pot.
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Hedgehog:
On the communion wine front, there is an episode from Buffy the Vampire Slayer (which is, of course, hard-core scientific proof of how vampires act and respond), in which she tricks a vampire into swallowing some holy water. He burned from the inside out, ending up dusted. I imagine communion wine would have a similar reaction.

I don't know enough about zombies to comment on the rest of your post.

I played a disguised angel chararacter in World of Darkness. For a bunch of complicated plot reasons, I would up running around with a vampire cohort. One of the other player characters told the GM," I want to bite her. I want to roll my instinct on that."
He rolled well.
GM-- "Something tells you that is a very, very, VERY bad idea."

Too bad, it would have been fun to watch.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's since dawned on me that possibly you're intended to eat the chicken skin. I always assumed this was just left in place for cooking purposes and should be removed. Do people actually eat it?

Chicken skin is the Whole Point as far as I'm concerned. It's like pork crackling, or the rim of fat on a chop. The objective is to get it as crisp and flavoursome as possible to complement the relative blandness of the meat.
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Amen!
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Chicken skin is the Whole Point as far as I'm concerned. It's like pork crackling, or the rim of fat on a chop.

I'm a huge fan of pork crackling (and disappointed that it seems to be impossible to buy a pork joint with the rind on in the US) but don't like chicken skin.
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's since dawned on me that possibly you're intended to eat the chicken skin. I always assumed this was just left in place for cooking purposes and should be removed. Do people actually eat it?

Chicken skin is the Whole Point as far as I'm concerned. It's like pork crackling, or the rim of fat on a chop. The objective is to get it as crisp and flavoursome as possible to complement the relative blandness of the meat.
If you're needing to eat the fat for the flavour, you are not seasoning it properly and might well be buying the wrong meat.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's since dawned on me that possibly you're intended to eat the chicken skin. I always assumed this was just left in place for cooking purposes and should be removed. Do people actually eat it?

Chicken skin is the Whole Point as far as I'm concerned. It's like pork crackling, or the rim of fat on a chop. The objective is to get it as crisp and flavoursome as possible to complement the relative blandness of the meat.
If you're needing to eat the fat for the flavour, you are not seasoning it properly and might well be buying the wrong meat.
'relative'. It's the contrast in texture and mouth feel as well as flavour. I would expect the meat on my Chinese style chicken thighs to be soft and taste of chicken, and the skin to be crisp and taste of honey, soy, five-spice, chili etc - and for the sauce to be a meld of the meat juices, rendered fat and introduced flavours.

I never buy the 'wrong' meat because I am well aware of the various farming methods behind what I see on the counter or in the chill cabinet, and what that is likely to mean in terms of taste as well as ethics.

But the more free range/organic/fed on honeydew the meat is, the more important to use every element - lean, fat, bone, skin - to the best effect.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Answers on this point have now been transferred to a crispy new thread.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Does anyone know of a holiday website for the terminally indecisive? I mean one where you know which airport you'd want to fly out from, but have no fixed idea about where you want to arrive or when you want to be travelling.

There must be one somewhere that offers a sort of "this is what we've got coming up"/lucky dip kind of thing that lets you pick something you hadn't thought of. Surely?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Google on 'last minute vacations' and add the name of your city or airport. There are entire businesses devoted to flogging last-minute cruise cabins -- the ship has to sail even if half the rooms are empty, so the price is real low on the last day.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Depends a bit on the airport. Edinburgh, for example, is not a prime holiday departure point (that would be Glasgow), so Googling 'flying from Edinburgh' will get me a relatively small selection of carriers/tour operators. Thompson, for instance, seem to do half a dozen destinations and leave on Saturdays.

Otoh, if it's Gatwick, you could still be boggled for choice.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I'm not actually looking for last-minute stuff, just pot-luck. I have seen such a site but can't remember where it was.

My local airport's website has recently been redesigned for increased unhelpfulness and browser incompatibility. They've done quite a good job on it as it now finds you a flight (if you tell it your travel dates) and cuts out all the inconvenient stuff like asking you what time you want to go at. You can, of course, click on the link to accept the flights and price they present you with, and then spend an indefinite amount of time staring at a completely blank page.
 
Posted by M. (# 3291) on :
 
I can' t link but is it Thomas Cook inspire me?

M.
 
Posted by The Intrepid Mrs S (# 17002) on :
 
I feel as if this might be 'a question expecting the answer 'no' ' but anyway - are there any keen runners on the Ship?

Mr. S has recently taken up running again, via the Couch to 5k programme, but he keeps tweaking a muscle in one or other of his calves. As he puts it, 'they keep mooing at me'.

At a recent half-marathon event I saw a guy wearing long socks, which clearly had some function other than decoration - does anyone know if these would be helpful? I understand they cost around £27 and Mr. S can be very stingy over such things *sigh*

TIA - Mrs. S, guardian of animal welfare [Smile]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by M.:
I can' t link but is it Thomas Cook inspire me?

It wasn't but that's certainly the principle. Thank you! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Mrs. S--

I'm no runner; but is he stretching first?
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Try looking at places that the budget airlines fly to - the real places, not the city X miles away they're meant to serve - and go there. The other thing you can do is look at places which don't really advertise but have transport links to get out/off if you don't like it.

A godchild went to the Faroe Islands (by ferry from Denmark) and then on by another ferry to Iceland. They reported that the Faroes were wonderful and stayed for 9 days rather than the 3 they had planned.

You can fly to the Faroes (Atlantic Airways) from London and Edinburgh and the prices look pretty reasonable.

And there are easyJet flights to the Azores...
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
Does it count as excommunication if your church Twitter account blocks you?

All I sent them was a picture of some bluebells near a retreat centre where we'd all gone, which they even retweeted. [Confused]
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
Sipech: All I sent them was a picture of some bluebells near a retreat centre where we'd all gone, which they even retweeted. [Confused]
I'd have understood it if you'd sent them pictures of blue tits.
 
Posted by moonlitdoor (# 11707) on :
 
Those long socks are called compression socks and yes they are intended to protect against calf injury. You can get them at sports direct for a fair bit less than £27 as well.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Sipech, you may have been blocked following that blister picture, which wasn't lovely.
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
I know it is a punch line to an old joke, but, seriously, how do you know when anchovies have gone bad? I opened a can of filets in oil. I wasn't able to use the whole can. I put it in the refrigerator (which congeals the oil, of course). That was about a week ago. Are they safe?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I would have inhibitions if they are still in the tin. I normally transfer to a small glass or ceramic dish (the sort that desserts come in, of which I have several zillion) and cover with clingfilm. Under those conditions, I wouldn't hesitate to use them after a week.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
If in doubt, don't give fish (or eggs) the benefit of the doubt.

It depends on a lot of things. How cold your fridge is and where they were stored in it. If they're already preserved in oil they may still be all right but you can't always be sure. A week is pushing it with preserved fish, once the container's been opened. If they were mine I'd bin them.
 
Posted by Drifting Star (# 12799) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
Does it count as excommunication if your church Twitter account blocks you?

All I sent them was a picture of some bluebells near a retreat centre where we'd all gone, which they even retweeted. [Confused]

You retweeted a story about the BNP, which may have triggered an automatic filter, or a lazy reader to block you.

To make clear to everyone, it was a story that was critical of the BNP!
 
Posted by The Intrepid Mrs S (# 17002) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Mrs. S--

I'm no runner; but is he stretching first?

Golden Key - he says he is!

Thanks also for the tip re SportsDirect, Moonlit Door, as he has a £5 voucher (or he will have when he collects his new raincoat!)

Much obliged to both [Smile]

[ 07. May 2016, 16:16: Message edited by: The Intrepid Mrs S ]
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
Thank you Firenze and Ariel. I left them in the tin and your comments share my reservations. Out they go!
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
I am getting ready to make some changes in the house I inherited from my father, where I plan to live for the rest of my life (God willing). Many years ago my parents installed carpeting which they had changed out in several versions over the years. I know there is nice oak floor underneath that I am considering refinishing and revealing. I know hard wood floors are again fashionable, but I have questions about their practicality. How difficult are they to keep clean? Are they compatible with pets? Which is safer for an elderly person to live with- carpeting or wooden flooring? I'm just sixty-one but will get older and perhaps wobbly.

Thanks for your input.
 
Posted by Doublethink. (# 1984) on :
 
I have wood floors and a cat without a problem. Rugs are a trip hazard, but I'd think that fitted carpet vs wood/laminate flooring wouldn't make much difference either way. So it may partly depend whether you are going to leave the finished floor as is, or put rugs/carpets on top of them.

You don't steam clean wooden floors, but you can hoover, sweep and mop. Personally, I think they are easier to manage than carpets.

[ 09. May 2016, 07:10: Message edited by: Doublethink. ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
It depends on the finishing. It's sometimes easier to slip on a varnished wood floor (especially if you spill water on it) than it is on a carpet. Rugs can slide more easily on a bare floor.

But if you like the look of a wooden floor, go for it while you have the option.
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
I have wood floors - man, is it hard work with a hired sander. They look nice though, the oiled ones haven't needed re-oiling in 12+ years, I have some large rugs which don't slip, and a sizal mat thing in the hallway which takes the worst of the incoming sh*te. I tend to sweep much more than hoover, which is quick and effective, and mop rather less often than someone more fussy might.

Painted boards can look OK if they turn out to be a bit of a state in places - you can fill gaps between them with sizal string or newspaper and then fill over that with filler or decorators caulk. White filler will stain off-white with something like a Danish Oil finish and look OK, though not as OK as really going for it and gluing wooden slivers run down from similar boards into the gaps before sanding. This looks great but would cost if you were paying someone.

You might notice cold air blowing through all those gaps with no carpet, unless you do a fairly thorough job.

Phew.
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
You can get plastic mesh things to put under rugs, to stop them slipping ... try in Lakeland, perhaps, or even Wilkinson?

[ 09. May 2016, 08:31: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lyda Rose
Which is safer for an elderly person to live with- carpeting or wooden flooring?

Wooden flooring, or any hard unyielding surface is better. I speak as an octogenarian.

Moo
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Though if someone were to have a fall, I'd think carpet might cushion it better.
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
My elderly mum fell on carpet, breaking her arm some years ago. Unfortunately she also had nasty carpet burns on that same arm which did not heal well under the plaster.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
We have all wooden floors because of allergies. Cleaning means sweeping or damp mopping. (I hate the sound of a vacuum cleaner.) The only problems I can imagine with pets would be if you had one that wasn't completely housebroken (=stains) or if you had a large dog and didn't keep the toenails trimmed.

Oh, and there are always cats and dogs who think it's hilarious to go running and sliding at top speed on a hard wood floor. But that's more or less on purpose.
 
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on :
 
We have oak floors and large dogs, they are fine. The floors are far less skiddy than carpets in my opinion.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
If you are subject at all to allergies, go to wood. The quantity of dust/pet hair/crap in a carpet would horrify you.
Wood is more permanent that carpet. Your carpet will wear out in 10-20 years and you will have no choice but to replace it. Good hardwood flooring can be refinished -- it's not at all difficult to find a house with wooden floors 200 years old.
If you live in a very cold climate, however, carpeting will be warmer. If you are running the wood flooring through into the bedrooms, you probably will want at least a rug or two by the beds.
I am currently ISO the most permanent and durable flooring I can find. Have considered and reluctantly discarded the idea of polishing and painting the concrete subflooring. (It'd cost a fortune.) I am now seriously contemplating ceramic tile that looks like wooden planks.
 
Posted by Doublethink. (# 1984) on :
 
Have you considered slate flagstones ?
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Thanks, all! You've given me some good ideas. As far as pets go, my cats have been very good (except for the occasional hairball). However I know when they get old it can get rather iffy. Oh, well. Either floor or carpet I'll have to deal with it.
 
Posted by Carex (# 9643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:

Oh, and there are always cats and dogs who think it's hilarious to go running and sliding at top speed on a hard wood floor.

Or children (of any age) who think it is hilarious to encourage pets to go running down the wood floor after it has been waxed, knowing that they won't be able to make the corner at the far end...

The sound of the can opener was often sufficient.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
You can always install a carpet square on the oncoming wall at the end of the slide...

Or a mini trampoline if you are a bit of a sadist.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Lyda--

If you go with the wood floor, I wonder if there might be some kind of less slippery finish that could be put on it, rather than wax? Or even non-skid? Just a thought.

Unless, of course, you're of the pretend ice skating on the floor sect...in which case, you might leave one dedicated space, with pillows around the edge! [Smile]
 
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on :
 
This morning's knee physio was punctuated by a nasty tearing sound as the seat of my trousers split. Has anyone any recommendations for lightweight summer trousers, ideally not cream, that will be cool and not lose all shape after three washes like their (Hawkshead, I think) predecessors?

Ta!

AG (sweltering in jeans)
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
In my experience pants must be tried on, to be sure they fit. The butt has a complicated geometry.

If I have to sit for a long time (car journeys, airplanes) there is nothing like overalls, which get you completely past the binding of the waistband.
 
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
The butt has a complicated geometry.

I do hope you've got that line into a book!

AG
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
It would do in the SoF Quotes file.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Sandemaniac
Look at Charles Tyrwhitt: not cheap but they do reasonable chinos which come in a non-iron variation, or there are linen trousers. Not the cheapest but on a par with M&S for price and far better made and better cut IMHO.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Linen is lovely, but will crease if you even glance at it. You will look crumpled in quite a short space of time. If that doesn't matter then go for it. I'm afraid I have no recommendations for men's trousers.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
If you go with the wood floor, I wonder if there might be some kind of less slippery finish that could be put on it, rather than wax? Or even non-skid? Just a thought.

If the floor has polyurethane varnish on it, no waxing is needed.

Moo
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
Oh, and there are always cats and dogs who think it's hilarious to go running and sliding at top speed on a hard wood floor. But that's more or less on purpose.

I did that once and got a 2 inch wooden splinter lodged in my foot. I highly don't recommend it.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
Yuck. That gave me chills, mousethief! [Eek!]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Sandemaniac, as someone else who used Hawkshead in the past for work trousers, now they've stopped selling anything but technical outdoors clothing which doesn't put up with as much abuse, I'm now mostly using Cottontraders or if I want to be ethical People Tree. Both their stuff puts up with the sort of things I do to them and lasts.

Cycling to work I also found taking a change of clothing to work and changing when I got there meant I didn't live in wet clothes all day, just had to put them back on to cycle home.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I'm thinking about getting a bread slicer, as pre-sliced bread seems increasingly thick-sliced these days and even medium slices are fatter than they used to be. Any recommendations?

I might also get a bread machine at some point but am not sure whether it does work out cheaper to make your own.
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about getting a bread slicer, as pre-sliced bread seems increasingly thick-sliced these days and even medium slices are fatter than they used to be. Any recommendations?

I might also get a bread machine at some point but am not sure whether it does work out cheaper to make your own.

I make my own bread. It probably is rarely cheaper but at least I know it has only a few ingredients. I use an electric knife to slice it. Calorie-wise, I think most home made breads will wind up being higher than store bought so I'm not sure if you could ever slice it thinly enough.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Get a bread-slicing-box -- a box into which you put the loaf, that has slots in it to help you slice evenly and thinly. This should work well with breadh-machine loaves, which always come out square.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about getting a bread slicer

Is that not a bread knife?

Breadmakers have been refined to produce rectangular loaves. I recommend Panasonic. Or you can use the dough setting and have a loaf any shape you want.

Cheaper? If I buy supermarket bread, it's usually a 400g loaf for 85p. If I bake, its 400g of flour + tiny amounts of salt, sugar and butter (which I would have in the house anyway). Bread flour is typically £1.50 for 1.5k. Yeast is £1 for 6 x 7g sachets, and I would expect to get 2 to 3 loaves from each sachet.

So I think my home-made loaf costs roughly 50p.

Other advantages are of course taste and variety - olive, cheese, seeded, brown, wholemeal, brioche etc - and the smell wafting through the house.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about getting a bread slicer

Is that not a bread knife?
It would be, but I haven't mastered the art of cutting consistent thin slices, only erratic doorstep slices, usually with a hole in the middle.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Lakeland have a gadget Bread slicer which you use with a knife - it looks a bit like a grocer's bacon slicer, and like that has ways of varying the thickness.

I have to say that I had an earlier version, and decided I was happier coping with wiggly slices than using it.

[ 15. May 2016, 09:51: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Jings. At £21, you're a a quarter of the way to a breadmaker.

Also, I'm disillusioned with Lakeland since I bought their mouli grater which turned out perfectly useless.

[ 15. May 2016, 10:23: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
With those stupid plastic handles that break off the first time you try to grate a carrot? I have a selection of fairly useless drums without fully functioning handles. The only mouli graters worth having are the metal ones. Don't bother with the herb mills either - nightmare to clean.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
It was a metal one. The previous (plastic handled) one lasted 20 years.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I must see if I can find my mother's grater/mincer. It had a clamp so you could fix it to the edge of the table and was as sturdy a piece of metal equipment as you could hope for. She used it for about 30 years with no problems.

The Panasonic seems to have a lot of good reviews on various sites, this looks like one to go for. Thanks for the suggestion!
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I must see if I can find my mother's grater/mincer. It had a clamp so you could fix it to the edge of the table and was as sturdy a piece of metal equipment as you could hope for. She used it for about 30 years with no problems.

My mother had one of those! It was really heavy, almost like cast iron. I have no idea what happened to it.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
I still have a lump-of-metal mincer, in fact I've two: one smallsize and one enormous one which I suspect was for a butcher's shop before they got electric mincers.

I use one or other for chopping up meat, and they're brilliant for making marmalade.

If you want all metal hand graters and mincers, go to a quincaillerie next time you're in France or Belgium.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Horse-grade, no doubt.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
You can get what they call a fiddle-bow bread knife. They work quite well.

I used to have an electric knife that had a slicing guide--something that attached to the side of the knife. When that knife died, I couldn't find a replacement with a slicing guide. I assume some idiot did something stupid and then sued the company that made the knife.

Moo
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
... I might also get a bread machine at some point but am not sure whether it does work out cheaper to make your own.

In my experience, it does - very much so. As I've said elsewhere on the Ship, our bread-machine is used at least once a week, usually to make French sticks.

In the supermarket they'd cost about $2 - $3 each; a 10kg bag of flour, which costs less than $10, will make about 45 (working out at less than 22¢ per loaf). That's quite a saving - and IMHO they're much nicer than shop-bought ones, and freeze beautifully. And making them is fun - the machine does the hard work and you get the therapeutic rolling-and-shaping bit.

Win-win. [Smile]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I'm still surprised that baguettes cost so much where you are. You can get quite long ones for about 75p here.

I'm quite happy to forego the kneading, rolling and shaping and leave that to them wot likes it [Biased]

What's the best way of avoiding mould with homemade bread, by the way? Freezer, I suppose (though I don't have one as such).
 
Posted by Drifting Star (# 12799) on :
 
I find that homemade bread is vastly less likely to go mouldy than shop-bought bread. The exception to this is when I use a bread mix, which I find very interesting. It will go stale more quickly than shop bread though. If I was more organised I would slice it all and then freeze it in convenient batches. I'm not though, so I eat it fresh for two days and then toast it after that.

I haven't costed it, but I think my homemade bread costs roughly the same as shop-bought for a similar type of loaf. The big difference, though, is in the taste. After getting used to homemade bread I find anything else tasteless and boring - and that's for white bread, never mind the more adventurous loaves.

I have a Panasonic breadmaker and can't praise it highly enough. If I'm going to be around I tend to use the dough cycle and do the final rising and baking in my own tin, but that really is personal preference and nothing to do with the performance of the breadmaker.
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
I also use the dough cycle the most. For me, the main cost of making my own bread is the electricity for the oven. It doesn't take long to bake but every time I heat up the oven just for bread I wonder if I could have planned better. Baguettes in the stores here are at least $3 and a regular loaf of bread is often more.

I buy the yeast in a large package and keep it in the freezer. The yeast itself was one of the biggest expenses before I started doing this.

As far as keeping it fresh goes, all of my bread is sliced and put right into the freezer as soon as it is cool. If I didn't do this, I would eat a loaf before I knew what I was doing!
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
With a homemade loaf I tend to put some effort into using all of it, so once past the sandwiches/toast stages, there's soaking it in ketchup and Worcester and adding it to meat loaf: mixing with mince and seasoning for burgers: dicing into croutons and frying up with bacon to go over a salad: crumbing it and mixing with parmesan as a savoury topping for fish or macaroni cheese: mixing it with lentils and cheese and chili for spicy veggie bake thing. The other w/end I even made proper schnitzel with oven dried breadcrumbs. Oh, and bread pudding.
 
Posted by Cathscats (# 17827) on :
 
I want a Firenze in my kitchen!
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Bread flour is typically £1.50 for 1.5k. Yeast is £1 for 6 x 7g sachets, and I would expect to get 2 to 3 loaves from each sachet.

So I think my home-made loaf costs roughly 50p.

Other advantages are of course taste and variety - olive, cheese, seeded, brown, wholemeal, brioche etc - and the smell wafting through the house.

That's expensive, roughly $3 in devalued Cdn money. I bought 10 kg of unbleached Canadian flour yesterday for $10. Which is about £5. Our all purpose flour has high gluten; all of it is bread flour. (I buy yeast in 250g jars. )

If you're patient, you can make bread with minimal yeast and minimal kneading or other working, stirring mostly. I baked yesterday (Sunday), 3 loaves from 1/2 tsp of yeast, started on Thursday (half whole wheat, with some ground flax, porridge oats, a bit of sea salt, you don't need any sugar if you've more time). Also made a focaccia with thyme and rosemarie.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I'm sure I could bulk buy flour (and yeast) more cheaply. But I have neither the storage space nor the demand.

(My mother - who baked almost daily - kept flour in a large plastic bin under the stairs. The mice gnawed their way in. Which is probably also why I only keep a few kg and it's on the topmost shelf of the tallest cupboard).
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
As this seems a topic that could run, I have transferred the recent relevant posts to Their very own all bread all baking thread

Firenze
Heaven Host

 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
I've had many years' experience making jellies and marmalades and selling them for an overseas aid charity. Yes, there's an occasional failure, but 95% or more turns out perfectly. Currently 21 jars of lime marmalade await labels; my printer needs a colour cartridge.
My original mentor left me her 16 litre pot and her good old Scots shredder – and her jiggler, a little round, domed metal thing which rattles on the base of the pot.
But I can't remember whether its purpose is to prevent jam from sticking on the bottom and burning (yes, it does) or to prevent it from bubbling right up and over, as it can do.
Any Ideas?

GG
 
Posted by Stercus Tauri (# 16668) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
You can get what they call a fiddle-bow bread knife. They work quite well.

Moo

It's also one of the best tools I know for cutting bagels.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I'm thinking about doing a cream tea. Can I use extra thick double cream instead of clotted?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
I don't know where to put this . These posters are all around the place in central Manc / Salford - someone seems to have deep pockets. Does anyone know anything about it? Google does not seem to be my friend.


 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
They appear to have a website - which was the first hit Google brought me. Followed by a report of billboards in Swindon.
 
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on :
 
Mark, it appears to be another fantasy from the "Freemen on the Land" people. Not sure about the link to the Freemen people, but it has similar argumentation to their things, and I found some linkage when I took a look. Link.
 
Posted by Rev per Minute (# 69) on :
 
There is also one in Risca, South Wales. Perhaps 10 miles from the UK Intellectual Property Office (patents, copyright, trade marks, etc.), which seems apposite...
 
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on :
 
Well it's good to know loonytune conspiracy fanatics exist on both sides of the Atlantic. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
There's a legal name fraud poster up in Romford, Essex too.
 
Posted by TonyK (# 35) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about doing a cream tea. Can I use extra thick double cream instead of clotted?

I suspect that even extra-thick double cream will be too runny unless it's slightly whipped.

Anyway, it wouldn't be the same!! There's nothing to compare with clotted cream!
 
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rev per Minute:
There is also one in Risca, South Wales. Perhaps 10 miles from the UK Intellectual Property Office (patents, copyright, trade marks, etc.), which seems apposite...

Surely right outside the offices, where it can be seen by everyone as they report for work in the morning and all their visitors would be better?
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
GG, I have 3 old pennies sitting on my mantelpiece. They were Mum's "jam making pennies" and woe betide anyone in the family who decided to spend them -(when they were valid currency of course). I remember her telling me that they saved the jam from 'catching' and also stopped it boiling over.

My youngest brother pointed out that they went in dull and came out shiny and said he wondered about being poisoned, but never failed to pile it high on his toast.

Huia
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by TonyK:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about doing a cream tea. Can I use extra thick double cream instead of clotted?

I suspect that even extra-thick double cream will be too runny unless it's slightly whipped.

Anyway, it wouldn't be the same!! There's nothing to compare with clotted cream!

I know, but it's 1.5 times the cost and I'm looking at doing this for about 40-50 people.
 
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
Mark, it appears to be another fantasy from the "Freemen on the Land" people. Not sure about the link to the Freemen people, but it has similar argumentation to their things, and I found some linkage when I took a look. Link.

What a surprise. Utterly deluded twonks, the lot of them.
 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
GG, I have 3 old pennies sitting on my mantelpiece. They were Mum's "jam making pennies" and woe betide anyone in the family who decided to spend them -(when they were valid currency of course). I remember her telling me that they saved the jam from 'catching' and also stopped it boiling over.

My youngest brother pointed out that they went in dull and came out shiny and said he wondered about being poisoned, but never failed to pile it high on his toast.

Huia

Thank you; that's interesting. My jiggler is specially designed and it seems it's supposed to fulfil both functions. But I won't stop stirring, or watching the marmalade as it rises in the pot!

GG
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
Our favourite holiday house in Blue Mountains had two cast iron kettles on the wood stove. They had glass marbles in them. When marbles rattled, kettle was empty. It did not happen often, but was noisy..
 
Posted by Piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I remember my mum having a little glass disc which rattled in the milk-pan to stop it boiling over.

Fine and dandy as long as you're still within earshot I suppose. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Honest Ron Bacardi (# 38) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Nicolemr:
Well it's good to know loonytune conspiracy fanatics exist on both sides of the Atlantic. [Roll Eyes]

They are related I think - the Freemen on the Land appear to be the UK manifestation of the Sovereign Citizen movement, via Canada.

Probably mostly of interest to those caught bypassing electricity meters and the like, but Timothy McVeigh (the Oklahoma bomber) was apparently one of these.
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
I would have thought 'I don't have no name, guv' is police dodge #1 for every Friday night drunk. So who is funding the poster campaign? Perhaps they paid for it using a rubber cheque...
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I'm thinking about doing a cream tea. Can I use extra thick double cream instead of clotted?

You could buy a bottles of not homogenised gold top milk, bring it up to scalding temperature, just below the boil (with the glass jiggler), and then allow it to cool. What you get on top will be clotted cream.

But reading on, that wouldn't do the numbers. Many restaurants use whipped cream.

[ 25. May 2016, 17:23: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I've bought one pot of clotted and one of double extra thick, following a recommendation from a colleague who does a lot of cooking. If that runs out there's butter. It should see us through about 40 scones I think.
 
Posted by M. (# 3291) on :
 
Easy to sneer at Freemen on the Land (and very, very tempting) but several people have been deluded into gaol, for things like non payment of tax. And I remember reading a news report last year about a couple who had their house repossessed because they declined to pay their mortgage after drinking in this nonsense.

M.
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
It's probably not possible to offer folks who wish to exercise their personal sovereignty and opt out of society, an anarchy field trip to Somalia. I don't think a state is allowed in law to leave someone stateless, even if that seems to be what they are looking for!
 
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
Mark, it appears to be another fantasy from the "Freemen on the Land" people. Not sure about the link to the Freemen people, but it has similar argumentation to their things, and I found some linkage when I took a look. Link.

What a surprise. Utterly deluded twonks, the lot of them.
Very likely. A link to the "Legal Name Fraud" website mentioned a "Crown Corporation" and that this now has possession of one's "name" (sorry for the quotes). While in Canada these are enterpises owned by the crown, all I can find in the UK is a limited company, now dissolved, that until 2011 was in the radio and television business.
 
Posted by M. (# 3291) on :
 
From what I've read on the Internet, some also seem to have an obsession with common law (while not apparently having a clue what it is), Magna Carta (ditto) and some seem to have an unhealthy fixation on admiralty law, drawing all sorts of odd conclusions because of the similarity in sound of 'birth' and 'berth'.

There is also some obsession (which sounds like this legal name thing) that if your name is, eg, John Smith, if you call yourself John of the family Smith, it means something different - goodness only knows what and why. There are some case reports on line from Canada, Australia and, I think, California, comprehensively rubbishing all the various arguments.

It's very sad that desperate people listen to this stuff that just makes it worse for them. I can't link, but wiki Freemen on the Land.

Sorry for the rant, but I come across this sometimes on law discussion boards.

M.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
It sounds like the sovereign citizens movement, here in the US. I just did a quick search, and a couple of hits said that the FBI and Homeland Security consider them domestic terrorists! Though perhaps they're focusing on the more extreme folks, and maybe lumping in folks like the ones who took over part of the Malheur Wildlife refuge.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
I don't know where to put this . These posters are all around the place in central Manc / Salford - someone seems to have deep pockets. Does anyone know anything about it? Google does not seem to be my friend.


I glimpsed an identical poster in Croham Road, South Croydon today. I didn't understand it and I still don't.
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
By the railway bridge?
 
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on :
 
Does anybody know anything about how the records of next of kin work in the NHS?

Naturally I have always been the next of kin for my son, but when he went to A and E a couple of days ago they told him that they had a different name down as his next of kin - the name of someone whom neither he nor I would ever have nominated for that role (never in a million years!!!). It came as a bit of a shock to him, and to me too, and it makes us wonder how on earth it happened and whether there is any likelihood of it happening again. Does anyone know? (Or know to which organisation we should complain?)
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Smudgie - try this on your next of kin. Basically you nominate your own next of kin, so if there is anyone else they've been nominated at some point and the record has stuck, but it isn't something that needs to remain like that and can be changed.

The thing that might be lingering is a right to see records - BMA (pdf) (owly link because the original html address is full of all the things I tell students not to use!)
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Smudgie:
Does anybody know anything about how the records of next of kin work in the NHS?

Naturally I have always been the next of kin for my son, but when he went to A and E a couple of days ago they told him that they had a different name down as his next of kin - the name of someone whom neither he nor I would ever have nominated for that role (never in a million years!!!). It came as a bit of a shock to him, and to me too, and it makes us wonder how on earth it happened and whether there is any likelihood of it happening again. Does anyone know? (Or know to which organisation we should complain?)

No idea. The only thing I can surmise is that it may be from quite a long time ago, possibly in a conversation with someone related to the NHS, without either you or him realizing that the answer was going to be written up afterwards.

People can and do get some wrong answers down even when told the correct information, but you can get the records amended. If you want to actually complain, this page might be a starting point.

quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity:
The thing that might be lingering is a right to see records - BMA (pdf) (owly link because the original html address is full of all the things I tell students not to use!)

For anyone thinking of accessing it, the link asks you to download and save a pdf. The pdf is aimed at health care professionals. If you don't want to do that, you might try the NHS webpages as a starting point.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I have a radio question. Is it possible to get LW stations on a DAB radio? I'm a bit confused about what DAB actually is and does, and the internet isn't very clear.

From what I can make out, DAB radios seem to have mostly just FM stations and the ones that are local to your area; I'm looking for something that can receive international stations as there are two I sometimes listen to. Reception on a normal radio is tricky at times so it would be good to know whether there is a better alternative.
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
DAB radios that receive FM do so via a separate tuner, and another different tuner would be required for LW. There are some products that have this option, typically DAB/FM/AM/LW, though the ones I have seen seem to be out of stock/discontinued.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Recently there was a query about "legal name fraud" appearing on billboards all over the country. The BBC have now picked it up and done some investigation, but what it's about and who's behind it is still a bit of a mystery.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Recently there was a query about "legal name fraud" appearing on billboards all over the country. The BBC have now picked it up and done some investigation, but what it's about and who's behind it is still a bit of a mystery.

Nice to know my initial assessment of the poster as complete cobblers is accurate.

Someone has money to burn renting all that advertising space.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Indeed.

The Kate of Gaia website has a section about the Book of Revelation and how it was garbled, but she has rearranged the verses.
 
Posted by Yangtze (# 4965) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I have a radio question. Is it possible to get LW stations on a DAB radio? I'm a bit confused about what DAB actually is and does, and the internet isn't very clear.

From what I can make out, DAB radios seem to have mostly just FM stations and the ones that are local to your area; I'm looking for something that can receive international stations as there are two I sometimes listen to. Reception on a normal radio is tricky at times so it would be good to know whether there is a better alternative.

Have you considered getting an internet radio? Friends of mine have one (she is Swedish and wanted to get Swedish radio) and love it http://www.robertsradio.co.uk/Choosing_your_radio/About_internet_radio.htm
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Thanks for that, Yangtze. I had actually thought about it, but don't have wireless internet. ISTM that if an internet radio needs to be plugged in to the pc otherwise, then I might just as well click on the relevant station's radio player and listen while I surf, though it does mean it can't be moved easily into another room.

I've settled for an app on my phone instead which has eaten 32MB of my remaining phone memory (I really wish more apps would give the option to live on the SD card), but is something I can use while moving around, or travelling if free wifi kindly permits. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Information please:

Any botanists about?

Do trees shed pollen by the clock?

It is Teak tree blossom time and I always suffer with my allergies this time of year but somehow it is always at its worst from 04:30 to 09:00. I cope with it and I take antihistamines and so on but I am beginning to think some of this might be the tree'so fault.

Any ideas?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
No botanist here, but flowers certainly do open and close by the clock (different species, different times). Winds also come up and carry pollen at particular times, depending on your local climate and topography. So yes, you could be getting pollinated by a clock!
 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Recently there was a query about "legal name fraud" appearing on billboards all over the country. The BBC have now picked it up and done some investigation, but what it's about and who's behind it is still a bit of a mystery.

Nice to know my initial assessment of the poster as complete cobblers is accurate.

Someone has money to burn renting all that advertising space.

The New Zealand version is when a group of Maori declare that they do not have to obey the law because the Treaty of Waitangi 1840 gives them sovereignty over their own land. Latest version: police find car with a non-legal Warrant of Fitness (MoT) sticker for which driver has paid $150. Car is then found to be in a non-warrantable condition so they get fined $150 for that and then they'll have to pay to have the car fixed plus the cost of a genuine WoF when it is okay. Once the scam is spotted it's soon dealt with.

GG
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
No botanist here, but flowers certainly do open and close by the clock (different species, different times). Winds also come up and carry pollen at particular times, depending on your local climate and topography. So yes, you could be getting pollinated by a clock!

Thanks LC - after I read your reply it occurred to me that one of my mum's favourite flowers was Night-Scented Stock which sort of proves your point!
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
I know that my orchids with scents only smell in the morning. There's no scent at all in the evening, which led me to believe that the insects they want to attract are out and about in the mornings only.

It's fascinating to consider the many differing methods various plants use to assure their species' survival! I guess they don't care at all about our sinuses or watery eyes!
 
Posted by Mili (# 3254) on :
 
I found out from a gardening teacher at a school I teach at that white flowers release their perfume at night, because they are pollinated by moths. Hence why flowers like Jasmine smell strongly in the evening, but not during the day. I'm not sure if this also influences pollen.
 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
'Sweet evening primrose' are just that.

GG
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
It's fascinating to consider the many differing methods various plants use to assure their species' survival! I guess they don't care at all about our sinuses or watery eyes!

Are you familiar with the book or documentary "The Botany Of Desire"? Author Michael Pollan works with the idea that maybe plants work to get *us* to do things for *them*. I've seen the documentary on PBS, and it's really good. (Clips available.) Haven't yet read the book.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Are you familiar with the book or documentary "The Botany Of Desire"? Author Michael Pollan works with the idea that maybe plants work to get *us* to do things for *them*. I've seen the documentary on PBS, and it's really good. (Clips available.) Haven't yet read the book.

And I thought it was bad enough being manipulated by a cat. I hope the cat and plants don't gang up against me or I'm finished.

Huia
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
The North East Man and I visited Reykjavik. In addition to original works in Icelandic, bookshops carried a good selection of books translated into Icelandic. We went to the Public Library to print out our return boarding passes and ended up wandering about, surprised at the number and range of books in Icelandic.

Iceland has a population of 330,000. What are the economics of translating a lengthy book such as e.g. Jessie Burton's "The Miniaturist" or a children's book such as David Walliams "Gangsta Granny" into a minority language? I've read the former and though I enjoyed it, it's not a "must-read." Plus, with children's books, presumably the market is at maximum one per household as siblings would share (and some children would borrow from a friend or a library.)

How big does a market need to be to justify translating and publishing in a minority language? Are there subsidies? How does it work?

[ 28. June 2016, 09:53: Message edited by: North East Quine ]
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
quote:
Originally posted by Golden Key:
Are you familiar with the book or documentary "The Botany Of Desire"? Author Michael Pollan works with the idea that maybe plants work to get *us* to do things for *them*. I've seen the documentary on PBS, and it's really good. (Clips available.) Haven't yet read the book.

And I thought it was bad enough being manipulated by a cat. I hope the cat and plants don't gang up against me or I'm finished.

Huia

When you see how they manipulate insects, is it surprising?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I wrote a story once, about parasites manipulating us. It was, as you might imagine, a horror story.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
Golden Key, I was not aware of that! It certainly puts a spin on what I have assumed my whole life.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Looking at the author's name, it is hard not to think of nominative determinism - almost.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
Iceland has a population of 330,000. What are the economics of translating a lengthy book such as e.g. Jessie Burton's "The Miniaturist" or a children's book such as David Walliams "Gangsta Granny" into a minority language? I've read the former and though I enjoyed it, it's not a "must-read." Plus, with children's books, presumably the market is at maximum one per household as siblings would share (and some children would borrow from a friend or a library.)

How big does a market need to be to justify translating and publishing in a minority language? Are there subsidies? How does it work?

You are not going to find this easy to grasp but they are darn good story tellers. Basically people consume more books because the quality of the stories is higher, which produces better story writers and so an ongoing upward spiral.

Jengie
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
In addition to the writers, there must be a flourishing translation industry. What is the economics of getting a 400 page book such as "The Miniaturist" translated into Icelandic and then published?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I'm not sure how that is an answer to her question [ETA: Whoops, crosspost!]. The economics problem is a real one--we face it whenever we try to publish something for the Vietnamese speakers, which is a considerably larger group, even in the U.S. alone. It isn't on the face of it cost-efficient to secure rights, pay a translator, do the typesetting, proofread, print, distribute, and market books for this smaller audience. In our case the (very) few books we've managed to do have been paid for by grant funding, subsidized by the money expected to flow in from other more popular books in the series (e.g. the Spanish version), and/or done in a cheaper way (let's use a staple instead of perfectbinding!).

But things are different for us, because all the publishers available to us (bar e-publishing) are also in the English-language market, and much more drawn to that. I would imagine the Icelandic publishers simply charge what they must to purchasers given the size of a print run, and also that the average price is considerably higher than that of the same book in English in the US/etc. If all the books are more expensive across the board, readers are likely to see that as normal--which in their context it is.

[ 28. June 2016, 18:09: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
In addition to the writers, there must be a flourishing translation industry. What is the economics of getting a 400 page book such as "The Miniaturist" translated into Icelandic and then published?

It seems as though mainstream publishers pay $0.10 to $0.20 per word for a translation of something like a novel. So call it $10K - $20K for a typical novel.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
If it is a situation where maybe a tenth of the population will buy it if they charge £10 per book then you have a situation where they make a substantial profit on that.

Jengie
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jengie jon:
You are not going to find this easy to grasp but they are darn good story tellers. Basically people consume more books because the quality of the stories is higher, which produces better story writers and so an ongoing upward spiral.

Anyone in Scotland (that'll be me and NEQ for starters) and of a literary bent, will be familiar with participating in a linguistic subset such as Lallans or Doric. It will not come as a surprise that nevertheless such traditions can have both richness and vitality.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
Looking at the author's name, it is hard not to think of nominative determinism - almost.

LOL! Hadn't thought of that!
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Jengie jon:
You are not going to find this easy to grasp but they are darn good story tellers. Basically people consume more books because the quality of the stories is higher, which produces better story writers and so an ongoing upward spiral.

Anyone in Scotland (that'll be me and NEQ for starters) and of a literary bent, will be familiar with participating in a linguistic subset such as Lallans or Doric. It will not come as a surprise that nevertheless such traditions can have both richness and vitality.
It's one of the markers of the differences between Scotland and England that our linguistic subsets have not persisted past the late 14th century as sources of literature. Shame, that.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I'm not surprised people write books in Icelandic; there as here I'm sure there are authors who write knowing that they are unlikely to make much money out of it. It's the cost of publishing books in translation that intrigues me.

We bought four Arnuldur Indridason crime novels (in English translation) and they cost about £13 each - almost double what we'd pay here. But there is such a splendid selection of books that it seems unlikely that many would be bought by a tenth of the population.

Take "Gangsta Granny" - admittedly much less work to translate. Wiki tells me that Iceland has about 17,000 children who fall within the target age range, with an additional 4,400 children reaching the target age annually. As time goes on, more of the children reaching target age will already have a copy in their home, bought by an older sibling, or handed on from a cousin. Many, perhaps half, won't particularly like David Walliams, and others will like him but be happy to borrow from a library. (We saw several copies in the public library.) ISTM that 5,000 sales would be exceptionally good. Even allowing for the higher cost of books in Iceland, can it be profitable to pay a translator and then publish a book like "Gangsta Granny"?
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
By way of a tangent; in the last month I've been to the theatre for a performance in Doric (with another play in Doric coming up); I've read newspaper columns in Doric, and I've used it in everyday speech, but I have at most ten books in Doric, out of a collection numbering many hundreds and I can't remember the last time I read a whole book in Doric. Pretty much everything published in Doric was written in it; the New Testament is the only adult book I can think of which has been translated into Doric, and I'm sure that was a labour of love rather than a paid commission.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Imagine book buying as people on the ship do was the norm for British culture. I would guess this would up the book sales by several hundred percent.

To match the UK market Iceland would have to sell just over 0.61 books per person per annum.

Jengie
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
By way of a tangent; in the last month I've been to the theatre for a performance in Doric (with another play in Doric coming up); I've read newspaper columns in Doric, and I've used it in everyday speech, but I have at most ten books in Doric, out of a collection numbering many hundreds and I can't remember the last time I read a whole book in Doric. Pretty much everything published in Doric was written in it; the New Testament is the only adult book I can think of which has been translated into Doric, and I'm sure that was a labour of love rather than a paid commission.

Continuing the tangent, how does orthography work in written Doric? Words specific to Doric, or even more generally Scots, would naturally be able to have their own 'secure' spelling (although quine is a case in point which shows that doesn't always apply), but would you write 'Whit like?' Or 'Fit like?'?
And I'm used to the standard diminutive of my own name being written 'Jamie' but said 'Jimmy'
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I wrote a story once, about parasites manipulating us. It was, as you might imagine, a horror story.

May not be far from the truth...with the help of cats... (The Atlantic).
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
Any Latin speakers out there? How would you translate "You'll never walk alone" into Latin?
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
Try this:

Cum ambulaveris a tempestate
Tene te ad high,
Et nolite timere tenebras
In fine tempestate
Illic 'a caelo aureae.
Argentum et calamum suave canticum alauda
Et ambulate per spiritus,
Et ambulate per pluviam,
Quamquam vexationem sufflata somnia.
Ambulate spe ambulare in corde tuo
Et ego non solus ambulo,
Numquam solus incedere.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
Fantastic!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Can we have a link to the English words please? (No, not everybody is equally familiar with the lyrics.)

Ta,

Ariel
Heaven Host

[ 29. June 2016, 17:42: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
Here we go
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by L'organist:
Try this:

Cum ambulaveris a tempestate
Tene te ad high,

Erm, shurely shome mishtake.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
I would suggest the following:

Progrediens per tempestatem,
Exalte caput tuum,
Et noli timere tenebras.
Tempestate finita
Est caelum aurum
Et alauda quasi argentum cantat.
Vade per ventum,
Vade per pluvium,
Cum somnia sint agitata et iactata.
Vade, vade cum spe in corde,
Et numquam vades solus,
Numquam vades solus.

[ 30. June 2016, 13:39: Message edited by: Amanda B. Reckondwythe ]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Yes.

And I suggest we hand both contestants a laurel wreath apiece, and leave it at that.

Ta/gratias ago.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
Shouldn't it be Vadis? As in "Quo Vadis?"
 
Posted by Spike (# 36) on :
 
Hopefully we will be moving house in a few weeks and for the first time ever we are using a professional removals company (I usually hire a self drive van and get a few mates to come and help)

Is it the done thing to tip the removal men at the end of the job and, if so, how much?
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
I would definitely tip them, but since U.S. and U.K. tipping standards are so different I won't recommend an amount. Refreshments and/or lunch (depending on the circumstances) are usually provided as well.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sparrow:
Shouldn't it be Vadis? As in "Quo Vadis?"

Actually I should have written "vades" (future tense). "Vadis" is present tense 2nd person singular; "Vadas" is present subjunctive. Miss Amanda could never keep her vowels straight. [Razz]

Now for a really pedantic tangent:

My Spanish professor, knowing that I am a retired Latin teacher, asked me if I knew why the Spanish verb "ir" (to go), which comes from the Latin "ire", is conjugated in the present tense as "voy, vas, va, vamos, van" in Spanish, but as "eo, is, it, imus, itis, eunt" in Latin. She said she didn't know.

It's because "voy, vas, va" is actually from "vadere", not "ire". Apparently in colloquial Latin, "ire" and "vadere" (which actually means "to step forward") were pretty much interchangeable.

[/END OF PEDANTIC TANGENT]

[ 30. June 2016, 13:38: Message edited by: Amanda B. Reckondwythe ]
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
I would definitely tip them . . . . Refreshments and/or lunch (depending on the circumstances) are usually provided as well.

I've never provided lunch. I've tipped them $20 each (for a local move), and $50 for the driver and $20 for each of his helpers (for a long distance move).
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
When I last moved about 7 years ago I tipped them £10 each, prices have obviously gone up a bit since then.
 
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
My Spanish professor, knowing that I am a retired Latin teacher, asked me if I knew why the Spanish verb "ir" (to go), which comes from the Latin "ire", is conjugated in the present tense as "voy, vas, va, vamos, van" in Spanish, but as "eo, is, it, imus, itis, eunt" in Latin. She said she didn't know.

It's because "voy, vas, va" is actually from "vadere", not "ire". Apparently in colloquial Latin, "ire" and "vadere" (which actually means "to step forward") were pretty much interchangeable.

[/END OF PEDANTIC TANGENT]

The same is true in English -- "went" is clearly the past tense of "wend" not "go." Somewhere along the line, "to go" adopted the other verb's past tense, requiring "wend" to adopt "wended" to fill the void.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
"went" is clearly the past tense of "wend" not "go."

Interesting. I never realized that before.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
quote:
Originally posted by mousethief:
"went" is clearly the past tense of "wend" not "go."

Interesting. I never realized that before.
Nor me. But when you think about it .... bend - bent, lend - lent.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
That's interesting. But what about 'fend', 'mend', 'pend', 'tend', and 'vend'?

'Rend' and 'send' are obviously of the same pattern as 'wend', though.
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
No one ever claimed that there is any rhyme or reason to the phenomenon of "strong" vs. "weak" verbs in English.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
In the back of my store cupboard I have found an unnopened box of icing sugar that has consolidated into a solid brick like lump. What can I do with it? I don't have a food processor or any other way I can think of of breaking it up.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Put it either into a cloth or a heavy plastic bag (zip loc for preference), and lay it on the counter. Hit it with a heavy frying pan. Smaller bits can be crushed with a rolling pin.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sparrow:
In the back of my store cupboard I have found an unnopened box of icing sugar that has consolidated into a solid brick like lump. What can I do with it? I don't have a food processor or any other way I can think of of breaking it up.

Would that be a bit old by any chance? You may be better off buying a new one rather than having one that's been shattered into a mixture of shards and dust.

If you really are set on using it you might whack it against a hard wall or hit it with a hammer but the results will never be as good as if you had a new one. It sounds as if the moisture's basically evaporated out of it.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Dissolve it in water (1 to 1 ratio, I think?) to make simple syrup and then freeze (in measured amounts) to be used in recipes later. It's just sugar. Anything that wants both water and dry sugar should be able to use it if you keep track of the amount used. Lemonade is another option.

Alternately, freeze it in ice cube trays and use them as lumps for very hot tea.

[ 02. July 2016, 19:07: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Put it either into a cloth or a heavy plastic bag (zip loc for preference), and lay it on the counter. Hit it with a heavy frying pan. Smaller bits can be crushed with a rolling pin.

Well that sort of worked ... a rolling pin had no effect and I ended up taking it into the garden and bashing it with a brick. Then when I brought it back inside the bag split. I now have a bag full of little lumps and a fine layer of icing sugar snow in the kitchen!

[Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
This is not good, I agree! But at least brick dust is not involved.....
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
I have a question about the Methodist Recorder.

Does anyone know where in the West Midlands (UK) I would find a library or a newsagent's where individual copies of this paper are available? Birmingham Central Library and WHSmith used to have the MR but this is no longer the case.

(I realise that some Methodist churches subscribe to the MR, but I'm after copies I can peruse at my own convenience, not for 10 minutes after a Sunday service.)

Many thanks.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Can you get a reading pass to Queens? They should have copies.


Jengie
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
That might be possible. Thanks for that idea.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I want to ask about buying a modern tv in the UK.

My current tv is about 12 years old (a Sony Trinitron Wide) and there's a time lag between turning the tv on and when the picture appears. It started off at a few seconds, but now is getting up to 5 minutes.

So I'm looking at getting a new tv, and am drowning in techno-babble.

For example, if I'm asked "Do you want UHDTV or 4K" my answer is: I want something that shows moving pictures that I can see.

Now I have Freeview box and a DVD player, both connected via a scart cable and the current tv is connected to the aerial via another kind of cable (not sure what the technical name is). So the new tv would need to be compatible with those.

Also, some models mention wi-fi, which is something I don't have, and have no intention of getting. My data roaming on my mobile is the only home internet connection I need. Would a new tv fail to work without a wi-fi connection?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I suggest you write down the name, maker and parts no (if you have one) of everything you want to keep using, and then take the list into the shop with you. There should be several people who can look at that and tell you what would work.

It would be a shorter conversation if you can tell them up front that you have no intention of using your future TV to hook up to the Internet--either for Youtube, or Netflix, or any of the other services that come in that way. All you want to use is [insert your current TV service here].

They'll probably point you to exactly what you need in 30 seconds.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
I have another TV question. When I moved into my current flat a few years ago, there was (still is) a satellite dish attached to the outside wall with one cable coming through the wall into the living room, but with no plug of any kind on the end of it. It seems to be the same kind of cable as the standard rooftop aerial (coaxial?)

I was wondering whether to get a Freesat box and make use of the dish (I don't want to take on a subscription to Sky or anything like that). So what do I have to do - if I get the box and get the right kind of plug on the cable, will that work? And what kind of plug would I need? Is it the same as the one on the TV aerial, or would it be different?
 
Posted by Landlubber (# 11055) on :
 
Sipech - don't expect your new television to last as long as the old one [Frown]

Check the SCART connection; they don't all have them. However most (all?) seem to have Freeview built in.

To add to what Lamb Chopped said: think about screen size. Nowadays they seem to come in extra-large or enormous. If you want something smaller, it will reduce the options and make it clear you want a basic model.

Avoid like the plague any shop where the sales assistants cannot or will not explain in plain English why you might want a feature. Google tv buying guide and add the name of your preferred shop and you'll find explanations you can use to check the answers you get.

Check about the wifi. You don't want to find they have sneaked in a registration or updating process which requires it.

[Disclaimer: my only credential is being the owner of a very small, basic tv which is the replacement for a broken two year old model which replaced a ten year old one.]
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I wouldn't dream of going into a shop to buy a tv. I would only be looking to order online.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I wouldn't dream of going into a shop to buy a tv. I would only be looking to order online.

It is worth visiting a shop none the less if only to get an idea of what the sound and picture quality are like before you splurge out on your new set. They do vary.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
If you were to have near you a small shop staffed by ancient acolytes of the electrical who do repairs as well as sell stuff, you might find they could track down a model which works really well doing what you want and no more. That's what I did a while back. Sadly, by the time I needed to upgrade to digital, the expert acolyte had passed on.
 
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on :
 
you will probably find that any TV you buy will have an in-build Freeview tuner, which would use your RF cable (your traditional aerial cable) to get a signal.
It may even have Freeview HD capability for certain channels which your current box may not.

If you get a TV which has "freeview +" it will also contain a hard drive which will record programs.

Most TV's will come with a SCART socket where you can plug in your DVD player. Nowadays the thing seems to be multiple HDMI sockets to plug in a Bluray player/ super games console / HD TV provider box (Sky/Virgin) / PC or laptop / chromecast for beaming phone content to TV

as has been mentioned, TVs are getting "smart" and expecting to connect to the internet. You might not need to, but it may be a way that they register or get updates.

UHDTV or 4K is only needed if you have something which transmits in that definition, again it sounds like you don't need that either.

as well as lots of TVs to choose from , the Richer Sounds website has a "knowledge" section to help you out.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
I am wanting to give my niece (bright, geeky twelve year old) a challenge to find out about three significant women this summer (and she will get a reward for it)

So far I have

Amy Johnson - 75th anniversary of her death this year so there should be plenty around about her. She also crosses the language/science boundary which my niece does as well.
Isabel Menzies-Leith - which will be quite a challenge but due to her relatively recent death plenty of biographies online. I suspect my niece has an innate interest in why people do things.

but I would like to add one current woman scientist or engineer

Requirements

Any Suggestions?

Jengie
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
Two Canadian women who would be great --- except for the fact that they aren't British --- would be Julie Payette and Roberta Bondar. Both were astronauts and have amazing stories.
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
The ones that immediately come to my mind are Helen Sharman, Jocelyn Bell Burnell, or Susan Greenfield. I also came across this page which might help.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I like the Trowelblazers site. Some parts may be beyond a twelve year old, but I suggest you have a browse yourself and see if any of the women are likely to appeal to her.
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BroJames:
The ones that immediately come to my mind are Helen Sharman, Jocelyn Bell Burnell, or Susan Greenfield. I also came across this page which might help.

(BTW Love the idea of this challenge. I'm thinking now about doing something about explorers/adventurers/discoverers for my daughter)
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
What is it called when someone is the opposite of distractible--when they can't/won't pull themselves out of a movie/book/lawn-mowing/what-have-you without force majeure being applied, and when you do apply it, then they swear at you for a week? Like, on everything. I'm wondering if it's some sort of syndrome, as I tried to teach a relative of this person to drive, and gave up after she hyperfocused so hard on the road that she failed to notice the flashing, screaming ambulance directly on her tail for lo these fifteen minutes straight.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Hyperfocused sounds good. Also you might say borderline obsessive-compulsive?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Don't know. There are none of the more classical signs of it.
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
Perseveration?
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Jengie--

Jane Goodall?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've woken up with a brown stain on my left hand, which is not the one I use for most things. It is mostly on the thumb, but also on the gripping surfaces of the three largest finger tips. It has got behind my fingernails. It reminds me of potassium permanganate. I have some of that, but it is in the depths of a cupboard in the garage, behind a stack of boxes. I don't smoke, so nicotine or similar can't be involved. It also reminds me of the stain in the biology lab - Millon's Reagent, was it? Don't have any of that. It was obviously liquid, as it seems to have flowed. It is not water soluble, and isn't shifted by exfoliating gunk.

I have been eating black cherries from a brown paper bag, using my right hand. I put some clove oil on a tooth last night, with my right index finger. (I'm just doing a test with that, but it isn't doing anything.) I have also tested Olbas Oil, and am currently trying juice from a cherry which had gone past edible. It is not cherry juice.

I have also been reading through recipes torn out of magazines and cutting them with a small blade and stuffing them in plastic folders. With my right hand.

Last night I ate a sandwich with grated carrot in it. With my right hand.

I have now noticed a fainter colouration on the right hand, with the same distribution.

Any ideas? It's very puzzling.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
quote:
What is it called when someone is the opposite of distractible--when they can't/won't pull themselves out of a movie/book/lawn-mowing/what-have-you without force majeure being applied,
Infuriating?

The North East Man can do this when at his desk, focused on his academic subject. Once, after a fire alarm, he was discovered at his desk having been entirely oblivious to the fire alarm, the building being evacuated, the fire engines outside, people trooping back in....

I don't think it's a syndrome with him, he's just at the far end of the brainy spectrum. He has an amazing, off-the-end-of-the-scale IQ, he's easily the most intelligent person I've ever met. But he has what he calls a "trivia filter" so he doesn't clutter up his mighty brain with "trivia" such as external noise (even fire alarms) when he's concentrating on his subject, or humdrum stuff at any time.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Penny - we don't do diagnoses on the Ship. If you are worried, please see your doctor.

Thanks

Ariel
Heaven Host
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Oh Lor, I didn't mean to ask for a diagnosis or think it's something which needs to see a doctor. I just wanted to know if anyone had any idea of something which would leave a stain that I might have touched. I'm not worried - just curious. It will wear off, it's just superficial.

I haven't been dealing with onion skins recently, either.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Is there any chance you touched a surface with slightly wet e.g. creosote on it? Opened a gate latch with your right hand while pulling the gate open with your left?
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Penny--

Have you bought any new clothing, shoes, blankets, etc. of or near that color? I've had the dye come off on me, and sometimes it took a while to figure out what it was.

Good luck!
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Don't think so, NEQ. And I think I would have noticed something like that. Though I am now wondering about things I handled in Burgess Park, where the gates closing roads off are red-brown - but weren't wet. Could be a two stage thing, I suppose. I did carry a cold bottle of lemonade in the left hand afterwards. Your suggestion has made me look further back.

I made a mocha blancmange with coffee in it, and held the bowl in my left hand to pour the mix into the saucepan. I shall keep my eyes skinned.

And no new clothes. I have some which I have dyed with terracotta colour, but haven't worn them recently.

[ 08. July 2016, 08:53: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
LC - I have noticed a variant of that. Someone who, if a new and fascinating idea is presented, becomes so preoccupied by it as to lose virtually all sense of the world around them and have to be steered about like an automaton until they regain the ability to spare some attention.

I've had the experience, in the first flush of some creative activity, of disregarding inessentials like food or sleep, in order to pursue it - but never actually becoming oblivious.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Black cherry juice will definitely produce such stains provided it has been left in place long enough.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
It has worn off now. But the new lot of cherries, Merton Biggareau, are not having any such effect. The last ones were Merchant, and blacker. I suspect the skins, rather than the juice alone. And I also suspect the moving around of the split paper bag before I ate them, for I can't remember which hands did what about that.

Thank you all for putting up with the trivia - it was very dramatic! And as I eat cherries in quantity every year, and have not noticed such an effect before, it was a surprise.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Black cherries will also stain plastic dishes, cloth, countertops, and any number of things you don't want them to. If they are in a bag, check to be sure the bottom of the bag is not damp.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I looked into perseveration, but it seemed to me that had more to do with repetition of the same thing (a sentence, an action) or a refusal to quit doing same. What I'm seeing is more like inertia--when the person is moving (metaphorically), they keep moving in that direction regardless of whether it's already 3 a.m. and the task is not that important, or they've got a hungry child and it's almost 2 in the afternoon.

Similarly it's almost impossible to get person X into motion once they've settled into "doing nothing." Which is the excuse offered for why X absolutely MUST mow the lawn at anti-social o'clock on Saturday morning, because to wait until 9 (or even 8) means "it's all over now" and "I can't do anything now, you know how I am." (You can imagine how this works out when you invite X to breakfast sometime.)

X will work for sixteen hours at a stretch if it seems necessary to them, but cannot cope with two hours broken by a half-hour break and then two more hours. They routinely skip meals for this reason, often until late in the evening. Did I mention X is diabetic?

WTF?

[ 08. July 2016, 18:32: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
I know someone like that. With them, it also means that they won't (for example) trim a bit off their hedge so as to be able to get out of the gate - because in their mind that would mean also staying-in-the-zone and re-landscaping front and back into the bargain.

I'm starting to resign myself to having lost them to their career, having tried (ineffectually) to help them to change for a long time - it's a shame.

I'm running out of the kind of patience which applies the word 'focused' and am moving towards 'selfish'.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I had a friend once who was a recovering anorexic. She was nice but one reason the friendship didn't last was because Things Had to Be Done in a Particular Way.

There were a limited amount of items she would eat for lunch. It had to be those at a particular time and there could be no deviation from that. Eating out was a minefield I never ventured on for that reason. I asked her once what would happen if she went into a restaurant and they didn't have what she wanted. She said simply she wouldn't go in.

"But what would happen if you did?"

A look of fright crossed her face as she admitted she didn't know - but it would be awful. I got the impression it would be a situation beyond her control, leading to possible breakdown, etc.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
Black cherries will also stain plastic dishes, cloth, countertops, and any number of things you don't want them to. If they are in a bag, check to be sure the bottom of the bag is not damp.

The bottom of the bag was indeed damp with juice, and kept from damaging stuff by being in a tapas dish, and subsequently in a plastic bag while I used the dish for the stones. It wasn't this batch responsible for the small stain on the sheet. That was Early Rivers, dark red rather than black. Not had trouble with plastics though. And never before with my hands.

The cherry garden has a marvellous succession of varieties to ensure pollination, and they go through until the end of the month at least. I'm looking forward to the Kent Naps, which are only available briefly, a white variety and our local one. Non-staining.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
I know someone like that. With them, it also means that they won't (for example) trim a bit off their hedge so as to be able to get out of the gate - because in their mind that would mean also staying-in-the-zone and re-landscaping front and back into the bargain.

I'm starting to resign myself to having lost them to their career, having tried (ineffectually) to help them to change for a long time - it's a shame.

I'm running out of the kind of patience which applies the word 'focused' and am moving towards 'selfish'.

You see, that's almost the reverse of what I'm doing here--I've chalked this up to "being a PITA" for so long, especially since "That's just the way I am" was so often said with -- well, a dash of arrogance? -- but now I'm starting to hear a distinct note of desperation, as if they want to change, but don't know how, and doubt it can be done. And my saying "just do it" isn't any use.

It's been a lifelong problem and there is autism in the family, though this person shows no other signs of anything on the spectrum. There is also mild OCD (again, no signs in this person) and anxiety.

I suppose I could just call it a quirk. And yet, it's such a distinct thingy, and I'm hoping if I can name it, I can understand it better and maybe find some way to be helpful (and prevent myself from bopping the person over the head when they get this way).
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
LC--

One practical thought, FWIW: If X is using a power mower, is there any chance of getting them to use a simple push mower? Would get around the anti-social o'clock problem. YMMV.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I think I managed to impress the consequences of anti-social o-clock upon X sufficiently the last time it happened. The pattern continues, but not with a lawnmower anymore.

I did have the chance to see that X was making an effort this week to break one particular all-or-nothing pattern. Thank God.
 
Posted by Mrs Shrew (# 8635) on :
 
The Infant Shrew is due in a week. I'm intending to breastfeed but have backup bottles etc just in case.
Should I sterilise these now, on the basis that it will be One Job Less To Do With Newborn, or next t, on the basis that actually they would need doing again next week anyway?
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
This might be 20 years out of date, but my midwife told me to make no back up preparations for bottle feeding. She said the time to make preparations for bottle feeding was 30 minutes after I had decided that solo breast feeding wasn't working.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
FWIW my daughter gave birth last month. She acquired (mainly from friends) the hugest lot of baby bottles you ever saw -- all types, all styles, all totally incompatible with each other. She boiled them all, before birth, and they are stored in boxes in her pantry. (Her parents had the pleasure of matching up all the assorted bottles, rings, nipples, caps, etc. -- it was a huge puzzle.)
She is nursing now, but plans to start law school in August (!!) and will probably need to switch to bottles by then.
 
Posted by Mrs Shrew (# 8635) on :
 
Thank you both [Smile]
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
All the best, Mrs Shrew!
 
Posted by Ferijen (# 4719) on :
 
Hello Mrs Shrew

Things don't stay sterile for very long, so make sure they're clean now and sterilise later. And if you're hoping to bf ask everyone you see for help if you think it's not working as well as you'd expected.

//currently dealing with mastitis//

Good luck!
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
For those interested in the final selection they are:


My niece can choose three of the five. Carole Chaski is probably the hardest, but I wanted someone with her sort of expertise because of my niece's own skill set. My niece is maths mad and a pretty good linguist (first in the family).

Jengie
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
This week I'm in charge of the projects table for our church's vacation bible school. The theme, besides the theological, is science. I am planning on using the old salt garden creation for one evening's project on transformation. The only problem is that the usual ingredients include ammonia. I don't want ammonia around the kids. The ammonia is evidently used to speed up evaporation of the water in the salt and bluing solution. Would anyone know if a little added alcohol would work similarly? Thanks.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Lyda Rose--

I did a search on "how to grow crystals non-toxic". This looks like it might work for you:

"Growing Salt And Vinegar Crystals" (chemistry.about.com).
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Thanks, that looks good. Vinegar is a much better option.
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Alright

Walking shoes have changed since I last seriously considered a pair. I bought a pair that is by my standards comfortable from a specialist shop. Today by accident I went for a walk without the footbeds in. Walking shoes did not use to have footbeds. I noticed before I realised I had forgotten these, that despite walking about nine miles I was in no hurry to get the shoes off. This is not a long walk but it is a reasonable length.

So the question is, should I try them out on a longer walk without footbeds or should I continue to use only with footbeds?

Jengie
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Personally I wouldn't, Jengie. Mainly because I used some shoes with the insufficient cushioning (which weren't painful to use) and developed plantar fasciitis, which took over a year and a pair of very expensive custom fitted orthotics to come right.

Having said that - the next pair I tried were deemed by the podiatrist to have too much cushioning so the effect was like permanently walking on sand, and there wasn't enough support.

The whole sequence sounds a bit like Goldilocks and the 3 Bears so I'm hoping the current pair will turn out to be "Just Right".

If you do decide they are better without the foot beds it might be wise to discuss it first with the people who sold them to you. The specialist shop I now use sometimes has a podiatrist in attendance, which was how I solved my foot problems. (Fingers Crossed)

Huia
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Actually, a bit of reading around and I think I might need to change my foot beds. My feet take largely after my mum's which are unusual (straight, narrow and with a relatively high arch). This is something of a discovery for me. Mum never allowed that my feet took after hers, so I was told I had broad, flat feet. I suspect the default one is for the average person which basically is slightly flat footed.

Jengie

p.s. I still got my Dad's arthritis though but at present foot exercises keep the bunions at bay.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
Can anyone recommend a newish Christian book from a con-evo perspective? I am needing to write a book review for a particular audience.
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
Evangeline, I don't know if this really counts as "newish" but it certainly fits the bill in other areas for Sydney. I can tell you from years of experience in SU bookshop that this is the go to resource. Quite small.

Just for Starters From Matthias press and all! Perfect for Sydney, covers everything Sydney deems as necessary. [Big Grin] we used to sell out of these almost as soon as I ordered more.

The other one which requires some knowledge and experience of reading books which are definitely more than little pamphlets is Jim Packer's Knowing God. Much more depth to it than the first one I mentioned.

Do not try Tom Wright who has a very poor reputation here as you probably have found out.

[ 27. July 2016, 01:21: Message edited by: Lothlorien ]
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
OK, on re-reading this I see you probably want a newish book, not a book for newish Christians. My brain has been a bit frazzled. Sorry.
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
Thanks anyway Loth, yeah I am looking for a recently published book [Smile]
 
Posted by Jengie jon (# 273) on :
 
Evangeline


How about My Story So Far by Canon Andrew White? I have not read it but it is the sort of book which I could see myself getting something from with very good Evangelical credentials.

Jengie
 
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on :
 
Thanks Jengi, I'll check it out. xx
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Evangeline--

I followed Jengie's link. (Book looks interesting.) I'm not up on recent evangelical books. But at that link to the Good Reads site, I plugged "evangelical" into the search at the top, and got tons of hits. Looks like some are for evangelicals, and some are about them.

If you're at all in the mood for something controversial, you might try Rob Bell's "Love Wins". He's a pastor (don't remember what denomination, but I think it was Evangelical) who came to believe in universalism, as part of Christianity. (I.e., God will save everyone.) He brought relief to many people, and angered many others. IIRC, he got into some trouble over it. Not sure where he is now.

If you're interested in books from the '60s-'90s, I can make more suggestions. I think Anne Lamott's "Traveling Mercies" is from the 2000s. Not Evangelical, per se. But it's a gritty, down in the gutter, finding God account. Basically, a born-again story. She eventually wound up in an unusual Presbyterian church (IIRC, even Jews and atheists went), with a great woman minister. Anne makes some pithy, witty comments. Like saying she'd done something so bad "it would make Jesus want to drink gin out of the cat dish". [Smile] Much beloved of many Shipmates. Great if you're down on yourself, feeling like you'll never be a good Christian, etc.
 
Posted by Sarah G (# 11669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Evangeline:
Can anyone recommend a newish Christian book from a con-evo perspective? I am needing to write a book review for a particular audience.

quote:
Originally posted by Lothlorien:
Do not try Tom Wright who has a very poor reputation here as you probably have found out.

Best to avoid Tom Wright if you're looking for con-evo, but only because he's not con-evo. (Although he is orthodox.)

I would very strenuously challenge the claim that he has a poor reputation on this site. There is a Purg thread to discuss this here.
 
Posted by Lothlorien (# 4927) on :
 
Sarah G, i think you have misinterpreted my comment about a poor reputaion. Evangeline and I are both in Sydney where his reputation is the pits. Absolutely rock bottom. She and I would have understood my allusion, nothing to do with the Ship in the slightest.
 
Posted by Sarah G (# 11669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lothlorien:
Sarah G, i think you have misinterpreted my comment about a poor reputaion. Evangeline and I are both in Sydney where his reputation is the pits. Absolutely rock bottom. She and I would have understood my allusion, nothing to do with the Ship in the slightest.

Now I understand the context, it all makes sense.

Which, ironically, is what Tom Wright does so well.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have passed on my doll to my great niece, with a small allowance of clothes, what she was wearing when my mother finished dressing her last. I had the sudden idea that this is what I could use my spare material for, but no.

Mary Rose (how did I know about Barrie's lost bride?) is a 20 inch doll, and all modern doll clothes patterns which are not for Barbie are for 18 inch dolls. Not only that, but they are emphatic about being for one size only, so they know that people want other sizes, but they don't care. We've obviously lost Mum's patterns, since I can't remember seeing them, and they were probably worn out.

Any suggestions, possibly with advice on sizing up?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
She's not a baby doll, more a toddler.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Try Googling?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Did that first - well, DuckDuckGo'ed, since I avoid Google.
And ebay'ed.
Where I found that 20 inch dolls were assumed to be babies - Mary Rose is a walking doll - sort of.
Just been reading instructions in making toiles aka 'slopers' using vilene.

[ 15. August 2016, 16:16: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
But thanks, anyway.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Etsy have a range of different styles of dolls clothes, as do Pinterest, but I find Pinterest a pain. (I probably have some knitting patterns)

Or there's a book to teach dressmaking for dolls - apparently available on Amazon

[ 15. August 2016, 16:20: Message edited by: Curiosity killed ... ]
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I also find Pinterest difficult. And try to avoid Amazon, as well! Picky, aren't I?

I used to make smaller doll clothes as a child by wrapping things round and working out where to cut, so I'll probably go the toile route. And then, when I have the basic, I can riff on it. But it is irritating.

My Granny used to knit us girls sweaters, and when they came, beautifully wrapped in tissue paper, there would be a matching sweater for the doll in with it. Knitting patterns for 20 inch dolls seem to be available, but are probably old. They won't wear out like sewing patterns.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
Mary Rose (how did I know about Barrie's lost bride?) is a 20 inch doll, and all modern doll clothes patterns which are not for Barbie are for 18 inch dolls.

Not quite. The majority are - as you'll have discovered almost everything is geared towards "American Girl" - but it's still possible to find other sites.

(I have a doll I rescued from my mother's house before clearance, a beautiful little creature only 12" high who, by way of project, I'm attempting to restore to her former glory as it was before my impatient 7-year-old self got hold of her. This is how I know about the link, because finding replacement clothing items for a 12" doll is a struggle, even on eBay.)
 
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on :
 
Yeah, I dug into an Etsy store, and this pattern looks good. And at $4.75, it's a deal.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
And that one is not too baby style, either. I think I can get it over this side, as well.

So many of the things are like the baby clothes we were supposed to make in Needlework at school, very delicate little things with lace and embroidery, and tiny French seams, that took so long to make that the making lasted longer than the baby would have stayed the size to wear them. At least dolls wouldn't grow out of them, but I've seen my great niece playing.

And someone after my time has dislocated the arms, so they need work as well.

And Ariel, I did find that site, which is where I got the idea of the toile. Some of the photos of the doll being fitted for pants look very odd, don't they?

[ 15. August 2016, 17:30: Message edited by: Penny S ]
 
Posted by AngloCatholicGirl (# 16435) on :
 
What in Sam Hill is 'cocktail festive' for a dress code for a wedding in Boston? Can anyone illuminate me?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I assume this is in summer, or at least in the warmer weather. If this is so, then I would wear a sleeveless or short-sleeved short dress in some festive and dressy fabric or color, but not black. Not denim or tee shirt material, in other words. Something that you would wear to a cocktail party of the fancier sort. Sexy and revealing, if your tastes/figure run that way. Dangly earrings? Striking necklace? High heels, if you can manage them.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have just found a site with a brilliant idea for changing the size of doll patterns. Photocopier with size adjustment. 18" patterns here I come.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I assume this is in summer, or at least in the warmer weather. If this is so, then I would wear a sleeveless or short-sleeved short dress in some festive and dressy fabric or color, but not black. Not denim or tee shirt material, in other words. Something that you would wear to a cocktail party of the fancier sort. Sexy and revealing, if your tastes/figure run that way. Dangly earrings? Striking necklace? High heels, if you can manage them.

This is my take on it as well. Plus take along a wrap or shawl in case the venue is chilly.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by AngloCatholicGirl:
What in Sam Hill is 'cocktail festive' for a dress code for a wedding in Boston? Can anyone illuminate me?

Would you be able to ask one of the organizers/person who sent the invitation/someone else you know who's going?
 
Posted by Leorning Cniht (# 17564) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by AngloCatholicGirl:
What in Sam Hill is 'cocktail festive' for a dress code for a wedding in Boston? Can anyone illuminate me?

"Cocktail festive" doesn't exist, so clearly it's a naturist wedding.

If you don't fancy that, then I'd suggest a sparkly cocktail dress rather than LBD. Sparkles, sequins, bright colors. Glitzy shoes, showy jewellery.

If there's a Mr. ACGirl, perhaps a jewel-tone pocket square? It should complement, not match, his tie.
 
Posted by AngloCatholicGirl (# 16435) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Leorning Cniht:
quote:
Originally posted by AngloCatholicGirl:
What in Sam Hill is 'cocktail festive' for a dress code for a wedding in Boston? Can anyone illuminate me?

"Cocktail festive" doesn't exist, so clearly it's a naturist wedding.

If you don't fancy that, then I'd suggest a sparkly cocktail dress rather than LBD. Sparkles, sequins, bright colors. Glitzy shoes, showy jewellery.

If there's a Mr. ACGirl, perhaps a jewel-tone pocket square? It should complement, not match, his tie.

ACToddler would be down with a naturist wedding, he certainly loves running round sans clothes. Maybe I should let him attend au natural [Big Grin]

Sadly Mr. ACGirl is unable to attend, so there goes the opportunity for jewel tone pocket square. I'll have to keep it in mind for future events though!
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I think the only dress code I could manage is Weird Frumpy.

Google 'cocktail festive' and you get lots of pix of red drinks in rim-frosted glasses in which various red (or green) things have been drowned. So I think your best bet is a red satin dress, white feather boa and some holly in your hair.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I suspect it means "dress up but we aren't going to follow the black tie/white tie rules or anything out of an etiquette manual." Basically, look pretty and do what you want. (Well no, NOT those rainbow tennis shoes)
 
Posted by Fredegund (# 17952) on :
 
Sounds to me like something from the 20s. Definitely the feather boa - if you can avoid shedding. I once left a trail of shocking pink feathers over the lawn of a retreat house after an Open Day. The Warden's kids had a field day tracking me.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Ooh, awesome!

Rhinestones. Lots of rhinestones.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Re dress code:

Sounds like a fun wedding. Haven't been to that kind. But, if I may suggest, be mindful not to upstage the bride. IMHO, some of the outfits discussed might.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
The other no-fail solution is to ask other wedding guests what they are wearing. If everyone else is wearing rhinestones, yours will fit right in.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
If everyone else is wearing rhinestones

In that case come in floral taffeta with pearls, pumps and a straw hat.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
One of the joys of living in Arizona is that dress codes are extremely flexible. People asked to wear 'cocktail festive' might show up in anything from nice jeans to evening gowns and hardly raise an eyebrow. (But I personally would still go with Brenda's suggestions above.)
 
Posted by AngloCatholicGirl (# 16435) on :
 
As much as I'd love to roll up in a feather boa and sparkly rhinestones with nekkid ACToddler in tow, it's going to have to be a floral knee length dress so as not to upstage the bridal party. *sigh*
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Ah drat.

You could put the boa on the toddler!
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
My murine guests are back. [Eek!]

Any hints on how to lure them onto the mousetraps? I've currently got them armed with chocolate, though this current bunch seem to be keen on old carrots.

I noticed a rustling in the kitchen and saw a tail quickly disappear down the side of the washing machine. It had nibbled a hole in the bottom of a bin liner. I placed a trap by the hole, but the next morning the trap was gone. No sign of it anywhere!

Last night, when chopping some carrots for dinner, a small bit fell on the floor. As an experiment I placed it next to one of the traps; this morning, that little bit of carrot was gone but the trap hadn't been sprung.

In the past, I've tried arming the traps with carrot but they then never touch the traps.

So what might you try if you were in my position?
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
I hear they're partial to corn flakes. Never had the opportunity to try it myself.
 
Posted by cattyish (# 7829) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
My murine guests are back. [Eek!]

<snip>

So what might you try if you were in my position?

Oor wee cowerin' timorous Scottish beasties like peanut butter. Smooth or crunchy.

Cattyish, trying to keep the jars separate.
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
So do our Westmerian ones
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
My murine guests are back. [Eek!]

I never knew this definition of 'murine' (thanks, Sipech). So now I'm wondering how ' Murine' got its name.
[Confused]

(Sorry for the tangent...)
 
Posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe (# 5521) on :
 
What would the Ship be without tangents? [Razz]

I wonder if Murine was named on the notion that those little red veins in irritated eyes look like mouse tails?

The Latin for mouse is mus. "Muscle" is musculus in Latin, or "little mouse" -- because that's what it looks like running up and down your biceps when you flex them.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
What would the Ship be without tangents? [Razz]

A non differentiable manifold witness!
 
Posted by BroJames (# 9636) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
My murine guests are back. [Eek!]

I never knew this definition of 'murine' (thanks, Sipech). So now I'm wondering how ' Murine' got its name.
[Confused]

(Sorry for the tangent...)

Apparently, some of the earlier (c. 1911) Murine eye drops were basically a weak solution of borax. I wondered if hydrochloric acid (aka muriatic acid) might have been used in the preparation. But I'm wondering if the simplest answer is that muria is the Latin for brine or salt water. Certainly the American Academy of Medicine was not impressed with the product in the early C20th.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
I need a new DVD recorder, and I'm wondering which type to go for. I've just come back from visiting friends who have a Tivo and very impressed by that. However I don't have cable or satellite TV, only Freeview, so would I gain anything by getting a Tivo?
 
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on :
 
You could get a Freeview+ box - or whatever they are calling recordable Freeview boxes nowadays

Similar to a Tivo in that it will record your programmes and you can set up series link recordings, though I'm not sure if it would do the Tivo thing of automatically recording "suggestions" of other programmes based on other things you like

If they come with Freeview play then you can connect them to the internet and get Catchup services like BBC iPlayer and also Youtube/Netflix

some of them combine a TV hard drive and a DVD player all in the one machine

Freeview recorders in John lewis
 
Posted by Carex (# 9643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
My murine guests are back. [Eek!]

Any hints on how to lure them onto the mousetraps?


Peanut butter smeared all around the trigger mechanism works well for us. We used to keep a small jar of creamy around for such purposes, as it is better for getting into the cracks on the trigger.

The next level of escalation was to drill a hole in an almond and wire it to the trigger. They'll typically try to run off with the whole nut rather than licking off the peanut butter, which isn't always enough to trigger the trap.
 
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on :
 
I daren't bring peanut butter into my home. I've found that the guest is in fact rather larger than a mouse. About 6-8 inches long (excluding tail) when it ran past me at 5am yesterday morning, having woken me up by gnawing at an empty milk bottle.

I've found that it's quite partial to carrot dipped in caramel. Stage 1 was to leave a bit on the kitchen floor - this was taken. Stage 2 was to put some on an unset trap - this too was taken. Stage 3 was to put some some on a set trap - I will find out the result when I get home tonight.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
NB this isn't a medical question, it's got nothing to do with my health.

If someone was in their 60s and discovered that they had a genetic condition, would it ever be necessary to establish whether the condition had been inherited from their mother or father?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
It might be of interest not for the parents, but for any children. It is certainly worth the children knowing, because if/when they have children it might be important. Who knows where science will have taken us, two or three generations down the pike?

The inheritance of many conditions (like hemophilia) are sex-linked. Or, you can spot a family tendency to problems by scoping out the family history. Bruce Springsteen, the rock star, has an autobiography coming out, in which he discusses the strain of mental illness than seems to run in his family. There was never a diagnosis, back when his grandparents were alive, but it was clear even to him, a little boy, that there was a fatal family tendency.

I am still waiting to find out what happened to Sipech and the caramel.
 
Posted by Hedgehog (# 14125) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by North East Quine:
If someone was in their 60s and discovered that they had a genetic condition, would it ever be necessary to establish whether the condition had been inherited from their mother or father?

I could think of reasons. For example, if genetic from the father, it is doubtful that it started with the father, but was handed down to him too. It might therefore follow that others in the father's family tree (his siblings and their descendants, for example) would have the same genetic condition, and they might like to know. Under that situation, there would be no need to track down relatives on the mother's side, who was not the source of the condition.

Or am I misunderstanding the question?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I can think of some really rare and esoteric cases where someone might want to know, but it seems to me very unlikely. I do know that there is such a thing as paternal/maternal imprinting (is that the word?) of genes--basically something that differs on the gene depending on whether you got it from father or mother--and that affects whether and how the gene gets expressed. If there is a disease under discussion, the matter might become relevant. But I can only see this happening if the answer wasn't obvious already, e.g. if the gene is expressed only when inherited from one's mother, and it leads to growing two purple heads, you wouldn't do investigation to see what the situation was at the gene level--you'd just look for the two heads. It would also have to really matter--for example, if someone might have inherited a gene that was not expressed (because inherited from father, or whatever) but she can still pass it to her children where it will be expressed because for them it comes maternally, AND the result of expression is that you grow six foot fangs--well, in that case you might want to investigate. But you might not need to get into the whole mother/father thing--you just want to know whether the freaking gene is there at all, expressed or otherwise. So it might be easier just to get out the DNA analysis kit and forget about parents.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Ach, it might also be necessary if you were trying to establish either maternity or paternity in an inheritance case--and the genetic condition, whatever it is, seems to be at odds with the putative parents. Queen Victoria and the whole hemophilia thing comes to mind. If one were trying to establish Jewishness among those who assign it only to those born of a Jewish woman, then a genetic disease or characteristic highly specific to Jewish people might lead a person to ask which side it came down, with an eye to establishing (or not) his/her sociolegal status (which might bear on whether one was required to go through a formal conversion ceremony to Judaism, or whether the law of return applied to him/her).
 
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on :
 
If I have a length of rope and want to tie one end around something like a carabiner and make a fixed loop in the other end, what knots would you suggest I use?

(Basically need to form very large loop to feed through a long tube in order to be able to lift it, but need to be able to undo rope to unwind something stored around the tube. I can't store it upright.)
 
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on :
 
Some knots
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
The usual fixed knot is a bowline
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
If the rope and knot are going to be in any way important (i.e. holding something heavy onto your car, or the safety of the ship depending on it, etc.) I would get someone who knows their knots, and not try to learn on the job. Do they still make Boy Scouts learn knots? It was the only skill my husband picked up in Scouts and I make him do all the rope and knot stuff.
 
Posted by Carex (# 9643) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kingsfold:
If I have a length of rope and want to tie one end around something like a carabiner and make a fixed loop in the other end, what knots would you suggest I use?

There are many ways that could be done, some of which might not require that the rope be untied to unwind stuff from the tube.

But as far as knots go, the bowline is convenient, though takes a bit of practice to get it right every time (otherwise it just comes apart). You can make the bowline "slippery" by tucking a loop under the last rope rather than an end - that makes it much easier to untie.

When safety is critical the "figure-8 follow-through" (or "figure-8 loop") is what we mostly used in rescue work, with an additional stopper knot (free end tied around rope) to keep it from working loose under varying tension. It's easy to tie when the end of the rope is free, and can still be tied around something if you start with a figure-of-8 knot in the standing part of the rope and weave the end back through it. It takes longer to tie, however.

If you are using a carabiner anyway, it may be easier to make a sling that slips through the tube with a loop in each end, and clip those to a carabiner on the end of your rope. Unclipping the ends is much faster than untying a knot, and if done properly you could leave the sling through the tube when not in use so you don't have to thread the rope each time.
 
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on :
 
Thanks folks, that's given me a few hints.
 
Posted by St. Gwladys (# 14504) on :
 
What was Mediteranean cookery like before the discovery of the Americas? We tend to think of tomatoes when we think of Italian cookery, for instance - or I do - but tomatoes were an import from the New World.
 
Posted by Teekeey Misha (# 18604) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by St. Gwladys:
What was Mediteranean cookery like before the discovery of the Americas?

It was probably all "archetypal" Roman cookery so, presumably, roast dormouse and bl**dy olives.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There are at least a couple Ancient-Rome cookbooks around. Fennel and lovage featured prominently in the Romans' cooking.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
You had rotted fish sauce (liquamen) on everything. And you probably had a lot of everything on bread - a free grain dole was used to keep the plebs happy (the bread in Bread and Circuses). There are entire hillsides in Rome made of the bits of amphora used to store olive oil. And while they may not have had tomatoes, they had all the other fruit and veg that grow round the Mediterranean.

I fancy everyday food would be something like you have in the Greek islands.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
It was for centuries a cuisine without tomatoes, potatoes, sugar and chocolate but many people managed quite healthily on grains, fruit and vegetables, with honey and figs, eggs, nuts, bread, cheese and olives. Fish and seafood also played a large part for coastal communities and chickens and meat for the better off. And yes there was pasta (though not as much as there is now) and it is likely there was a form of pizza in Roman times - somewhere there's a record of some sort of baked dough slice topped with cheese and onions.

Roman cooking was fairly distinctive. I still have Apicius' recipe book and have made dishes from it. It's the most complete recipe book available. Many people seem to think of the description of Trimalchio's Feast in Petronius' "Satyricon", which is a satire and doesn't reflect ordinary reality (so please forget the dormice, they really aren't representative).

Your average Roman's diet would have depended on what they could afford, or what they were able to grow. I've mentioned most of the things already. They did know about rice but it was a luxury food specially imported from India at a price beyond most people's pockets. There were also street vendors who would sell you fast food. You could get sausages, though whether they were ever sold in a bun with onions isn't recorded.

Food was flavoured with herbs and spices. The better off went for some fairly heavy spice and herb combinations, some of which are quite jarring to modern tastes, and lovage, which has quite a distinctive flavour, was a particular favourite. There was also "garum", the famous Roman fish sauce, for which the closest modern equivalent is said to be Thai fish sauce, and vinegar and honey were also used.

As time passed and the Roman empire began to fall apart, local influences became more pronounced so that by the Renaissance, the more affluent were still going with the medieval idea of the four humours as applied to cooking. Fish, being cold and moist, had to be counterbalanced by a hot dry sauce, and so on. The less affluent continued to eat whatever they could get. The discovery of America didn't alter things significantly at first and tomatoes were smaller, paler, different colours, and altogether less popular than they are now and took some determined growing and marketing before people would accept them. People were suspicious of the potato at first but then took to it. The turnip fell from favour at that point, possibly because potatoes were easier to prepare and cook, and has never regained its popularity.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Olives stuffed with anchovies, fruit in savoury dishes and the bread looked and tasted like atotties. I have a recipe book at home and have made Roman food.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
The other thing we would notice (if we stepped into the time machine and popped out in Nero's Rome) is how little sweetening there was. We hardly notice the sugar that manufacturers smuggle into tomato sauce, cereals, salad dressings, etc. The Romans had neither sugar cane nor sugar beets; honey was the only way to go if you wanted sweetening. That meant that sweetness was expensive, for rich people. Roman chefs would, for instance, sugar the meat for banquets -- ew!
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Nice dish with cooked fresh peas, chopped white of boiled eggs, chopped spring onions, olive oil, topped with the yolks pushed through a sieve. I put this Roman dish in our school cook book. Also one with lamb and lovage.
 
Posted by Ricardus (# 8757) on :
 
Latin cookbook.

(Probably more reflective of the wealthy than the plebs though ...)
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
The Romans had neither sugar cane nor sugar beets; honey was the only way to go if you wanted sweetening. That meant that sweetness was expensive, for rich people. Roman chefs would, for instance, sugar the meat for banquets -- ew!

Honey, and also figs and dates for sweet things. And they didn't sugar the meat, they'd make a sauce using honey, and wine and spices. Cooking with honey is much nicer than cooking with sugar, by the way. As for "sweetmeats", if you think about it, in this era, there are quite a few Chinese dishes that manage to be both sweet and savoury and delicious. "Sweet and sour" being one of the most popular and duck in plum sauce being another.

Anyhow, that's the Romans: as for Mediterranean cooking in general (Spain and Greece and so on), there were always regional traditions which expanded as and when areas were introduced to new items that the Romans brought. After the Roman Empire’s influence declined the regional traditions flourished more and with the course of history, diverged into the culinary traditions that we have today. The mezze of the Near and Middle East was brought to Spain by the Islamic Conquest and became tapas. The French, by contrast, went the other way and French cuisine needs no description.

[ 04. October 2016, 10:22: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Galloping Granny (# 13814) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
I daren't bring peanut butter into my home. I've found that the guest is in fact rather larger than a mouse. About 6-8 inches long (excluding tail) when it ran past me at 5am yesterday morning, having woken me up by gnawing at an empty milk bottle.

I've found that it's quite partial to carrot dipped in caramel. Stage 1 was to leave a bit on the kitchen floor - this was taken. Stage 2 was to put some on an unset trap - this too was taken. Stage 3 was to put some some on a set trap - I will find out the result when I get home tonight.

There's a big drive on here to get rid of rats & other predators for the sake of threatened native species (New Zealand had no native mammals so birds felt safe nesting on the ground – and of course some of the nasties climb anyway). So anyone who wants to can ask for a free trap, and I gather some not far from here are reporting large numbers of dead rats and mice. And peanut butter seems to be the most effective bait.

GG
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Does anybody have any bright ideas for a good online source of:
1) region 1 DVDs
2) audio books

available in the UK, but not via Amazon?
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
You could try whsmith.co.uk for Audiobooks.

Do Waterstones do them online?
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Galloping Granny:
There's a big drive on here to get rid of rats & other predators for the sake of threatened native species (New Zealand had no native mammals so birds felt safe nesting on the ground – and of course some of the nasties climb anyway).
GG

I saw a recent Dominion-Post (Wellington newspaper) headline that said
[I]Make Wellington predator free) and amused myself for a while pondering on the human predators who would have to leave the Capital if this edict was applied over all species.

Certain moneylenders, landlords, con artists and other nasties would have to find somewhere else to live. (Not Christchurch - we have enough of our own).

Huia

[ 06. October 2016, 20:47: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Does anybody have any bright ideas for a good online source of:
1) region 1 DVDs
2) audio books

available in the UK, but not via Amazon?

Are you ISO of specific audiobooks, or just in general? Nearly every audio book purveyor is on Amazon, because they are the big dog and widely available.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
Does anybody have any bright ideas for a good online source of:
1) region 1 DVDs
2) audio books

available in the UK, but not via Amazon?

Are you ISO of specific audiobooks, or just in general? Nearly every audio book purveyor is on Amazon, because they are the big dog and widely available.
Nothing specific, just hoping for a hypothetical alternative source. I keep reading about interesting book recordings and I'd rather someone else received my money.

Thanks, Baptist Trainfan. I'll give WH Smiths a go.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
AiE--

Are you looking specifically for recent books?

If not, you might try the LibriVox Free Audiobook Collection (Internet Archive). I've listened to a few of these. They're done by volunteer readers, so they're not necessarily professional performers and the quality varies. It can be like someone reading you a bedtime story, or like a theater student, or like a professional actor. LibriVox has more than 10,000 entries.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
LibriVox--better link.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
S'funny. I just read about this today.

Thanks, Golden Key, I'll check it out.
 
Posted by Celtic Knotweed (# 13008) on :
 
AiE - I've just been poking round Blackwell's site, and they stock audio books too. Currently have an offer on of free delivery if you order over £10 worth of stuff - only reason I'm not tempted is I always go into the shop to collect...
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Thanks for the info, CK.

I've got a birthday coming up, maybe I'll pass on some of the links as a gentle hint.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
I need advice on the best way to mark/identify old photographs. I have a ton of old pictures (mostly undated and unidentified, but I can guess the majority of them). I am getting some of them ready to send to the Historical Society in the town where I grew up (I have verified that they would welcome them). I don't want to write on the backs of them with any sort of pen that will smudge or that will leak through to the front. Any suggestions?
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Small sticky notes. I presume they're going to find a more permanent way of housing them, and that will give them the right information.

Alternately, use light pencil on the back.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
...or, if you have a scanner, scan them then annotate them and send them off digitally - or load them on a pendrive or disc or some other device and take them in.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
Years ago I was taught that if you write on the back of a photo with a pencil, it's okay.

Moo
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I write on a self adhesive label in pen, then stick it to the back of the photo.
 
Posted by Doone (# 18470) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
Years ago I was taught that if you write on the back of a photo with a pencil, it's okay.

Moo

Make sure it's a very soft-leaded one.
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
Small sticky notes. I presume they're going to find a more permanent way of housing them, and that will give them the right information.

Alternately, use light pencil on the back.

Thanks, everyone, for your suggestions. I think I'll go with the sticky notes, since I can print them from my computer and no one will have to decipher my hand-writing.

I did discover yesterday that some of them were identified by myself over 50 years ago (helpful stuff, such as "my house"!) -- and I did indeed use light pencil.

Now to deal with all the ghosts that are coming back to life as I sort through this stuff.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
You can use sticky notes to ID those as well. [Devil]
 
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
You can use sticky notes to ID those as well. [Devil]

I don't want to ID them, I want to send them packing!

[Razz]
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I've just been watching Michael Moore in Trumpland, and I can't identify the theme played at the end. I think it's from some war film, but can't place it. Has anyone any idea what it was?
 
Posted by jrw (# 18045) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny S:
I've just been watching Michael Moore in Trumpland, and I can't identify the theme played at the end. I think it's from some war film, but can't place it. Has anyone any idea what it was?

It's Elgar - Pomp and Circumstance No.4.
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
Thanks! I woke this morning thinking Elgar and have just run it down. I just knew it was British! And hence a bit out of place. But oops about film music! OTOH it would do for it, final credits as the camera pans over the graves of the few - including Poles - listing DFCs etc.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Two related questions. We decided to blow away the cobwebs today by visiting the ruins of a medieval church, surrounded by graves of varying ages. The wall round the churchyard is oval shaped. Is there some significance to this? One of the medieval gravestones had a symbol which I think I've seen before, but can't identify. It's a cross potent, but with a triangle on the bottom leg of the cross, like a 4. What is it?
 
Posted by Penny S (# 14768) on :
 
I have seen it suggested that oval or circular church enclosures are a sign of being a sacred site prior to Christianity. But it was in book about yew trees which for a number of reasons I found not wholly convincing about the trees, and I think my doubts should perhaps be extended to other claims.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0