Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Purgatory: Is Jesus Christ the Only Way of Salvation?
|
Jason™
 Host emeritus
# 9037
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: And according to the witness of Jesus himself, the Acts of the Apostles, the Pauline and pastoral epistles and the book of revelation, none of these is actually true.
Let me modify this so that it's more accurate for our current conversation.
And according to Mudfrog and Evo1's accepted interpretations of the witness of Jesus himself, the Acts of the Apostles, the Pauline and pastoral epistles and the book of revelation, none of these is actually true.
Just so we're clear...
-Digory
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard: evo0 to evo1 (I'm evonull too, if any one declares themselves to be evo0), when is, was or shall be the 'final reckoning' for the Sodomians?
What I meant by that was before the end of their (earthly) lives (unless specifically provided for by the Lord - that's upto him, I'm sure he knows what he's doing )
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jason™
 Host emeritus
# 9037
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Evo1: I wouldn't dare speculate who would or would not accept Jesus in the final reckoning.
So could Jesus provide this WT&L even after physical death?
quote: let's think of the time Jesus called out to Lazarus. How disabled was he? He was dead! But when Jesus called, Lazarus came.
Does acceptance of this WT&L require Jesus' call, then? If so, why does he not call all of us?
-Digory
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
Roger evo1, evo0 here: And he OBVIOUSLY means something beyond your YOUR final reckoning.
And Laura, you tirrible liberal WOMAN you ![[Axe murder]](graemlins/lovedrops.gif)
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Superslug
Shipmate
# 7024
|
Posted
How do we know he doesnt call all of us. The Lazarus quote implies it is possible to hear his call even after death.
-------------------- I was 'educated' in the UK in the 70s and early 80s. Therefore, please feel free to correct my grammar and punctuation. I need to know!
Posts: 464 | From: Hessle, East Yorkshire | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jason™
 Host emeritus
# 9037
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Superslug: How do we know he doesnt call all of us. The Lazarus quote implies it is possible to hear his call even after death.
That's a good point, Super.
-Digory
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard: Roger evo1, evo0 here: And he OBVIOUSLY means something beyond your YOUR final reckoning.
Oh yes, obviously, I meant to say that I was using this phrase outside of it's normally accepted connotations.
And to PK, as I said, all of these things are to be taken up with him rather than me.
I think Peter mentions something about Jesus preaching to the dead - this could be the Sodomians (is that the same as Sodomites?), who knows.
Why doesn't God call all of us, that's his business too isn't it. I prefer Paul's answer to this type of question, "One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, `Why did you make me like this?' " Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?"
Our earthy logic cannot comprehend God's wisdom. Soon we will know.
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Superslug: How do we know he doesnt call all of us. The Lazarus quote implies it is possible to hear his call even after death.
That's one of the reasons I added, "unless specifically provided for by the Lord - that's upto him, I'm sure he knows what he's doing " But why shouldn't this happen for everyone and other issues of fairness - reference Romans 9 above.
Though given Lazarus already had a personal relationship with Jesus, I think it's probable he had already responded to the call.
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Superslug
Shipmate
# 7024
|
Posted
If it possible to hear the call of God after physical death there is, of course, the possibility that we dont respond to it.
It is more likely, I would suggest, for us to respond with ' I never knew you' than it would be for God. (given that he knew us at the beginning of time, we are told)
Given this, perhaps this is why he gave us the great commission, even if a post death bed call is possible.
-------------------- I was 'educated' in the UK in the 70s and early 80s. Therefore, please feel free to correct my grammar and punctuation. I need to know!
Posts: 464 | From: Hessle, East Yorkshire | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Superslug
Shipmate
# 7024
|
Posted
Oh Evo1 (I forgot to ask) How soon will we know?, have you been on the direct line again.
If so, please share!
-------------------- I was 'educated' in the UK in the 70s and early 80s. Therefore, please feel free to correct my grammar and punctuation. I need to know!
Posts: 464 | From: Hessle, East Yorkshire | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Superslug: It is more likely, I would suggest, for us to respond with ' I never knew you' than it would be for God. (given that he knew us at the beginning of time, we are told)
Allow me for once to play the liberal
Where are we told this?
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Superslug: Oh Evo1 (I forgot to ask) How soon will we know?, have you been on the direct line again.
If so, please share!
Look Super, as soon as I know, you'll know. I can't say fairer than that can I?
![[Angel]](graemlins/angel.gif)
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
Too late, SS, too late. Dives' parabolic if not fabled call was not to salvation. The characters aren't real and the symbolism Jesus uses conform to the expectations of his audience whatever truths are there. I read from it that there is a point of reprobation which may well be exceeded in this life for some, that reprobate character, like Satan's, can be formed in us.
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Superslug
Shipmate
# 7024
|
Posted
Which bit?
You are much better at scripture recall than I am.
the ' he knew us from the beginning' bit is scripture isnt it?
And as for the us responding negetively to Gods call even after death bit, just my experiance of my own human pride and massive ego will do for starters.
-------------------- I was 'educated' in the UK in the 70s and early 80s. Therefore, please feel free to correct my grammar and punctuation. I need to know!
Posts: 464 | From: Hessle, East Yorkshire | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Superslug
Shipmate
# 7024
|
Posted
Martin,
My massive ego does not stop me from falling at the feet of someone with an imensly bigger brain than mine.
I have absolutly no understanding of what you just said. If possible please repost in a way more easily understood by a simpleton such as I.
Oh for a 'whooshes straight over my head' smiley.
SS
-------------------- I was 'educated' in the UK in the 70s and early 80s. Therefore, please feel free to correct my grammar and punctuation. I need to know!
Posts: 464 | From: Hessle, East Yorkshire | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Martin PC not & Ship's Biohazard: Too late, SS, too late. Dives' parabolic if not fabled call was not to salvation. The characters aren't real and the symbolism Jesus uses conform to the expectations of his audience whatever truths are there. I read from it that there is a point of reprobation which may well be exceeded in this life for some, that reprobate character, like Satan's, can be formed in us.
I think the original reference was to the not-remotely-parabolic raising of Lazarus of Bethany, who very much answered Jesus' call from beyond the grave.
You're the first one to mention Dives.
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
It's me age, 't'. Well worth pursuing doancha think? What?
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
SS - the explanation for a mollusc-brain like yourself is my utter senility.
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
PaulTH*
Shipmate
# 320
|
Posted
Lutheran Chick wrote:
quote: Salvation isn't a catechism exam.
How very true. I think we are underestimating the importance of names, which were very important to Jesus and His followers. Jesus, in Hebrew is Yahoshua which means Yah (YHWH) saves, or Yah is my saviour. IMO, that's all we are required to believe, that YHWH has ordained this universe for our ultimate salvation and reconcilaition. How? Does it matter?
Probably through Christ's sacrificial death and His resurrection and glorification. But that event didn't only happen on the cross, it became available to us, but the sacrifice of the Word lasts from the foundation of the world until all things are reconciled in Him. So I say with confidence that Yah has saved us and continues to do so.
-------------------- Yours in Christ Paul
Posts: 6387 | From: White Cliffs Country | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
But if you and the religion you follow actively rejects the doctrine that Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, what then?
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Demas
Ship's Deserter
# 24
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: But if you and the religion you follow actively rejects the doctrine that Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, what then?
Love is patient, love is kind. Love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails and God is love.
-------------------- They did not appear very religious; that is, they were not melancholy; and I therefore suspected they had not much piety - Life of Rev John Murray
Posts: 1894 | From: Thessalonica | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Demas: quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: But if you and the religion you follow actively rejects the doctrine that Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, what then?
Love is patient, love is kind. Love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails and God is love.
How does that translate into saving everyone? Simply that God will smile, say "I love you, welcome to heaven"?
Is God love only? Is there no justice, no holiness?
I agree that love is seen on the cross in perfect measure, but is that the main reason for the cross? If there is perfect love shown, but no love returned, then how is there a basis for an eternal relationship?
Love rejected is just that - love rejected. Eternally.
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ricardus
Shipmate
# 8757
|
Posted
But that assumes that really they know that Jesus is God and choose to reject him anyway. Whereas IME what they are rejecting is the intellectual proposition that Jesus was God, not Jesus himself.
-------------------- Then the dog ran before, and coming as if he had brought the news, shewed his joy by his fawning and wagging his tail. -- Tobit 11:9 (Douai-Rheims)
Posts: 7247 | From: Liverpool, UK | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76
|
Posted
I'm trying to see how God's Justice is demonstrated, or His Holiness maintained, by condemning people for guessing wrong the wrong one out of a plethora of equally plausible - or implausible - religions.
Seeing as most people plump for the one most evident in their community, it really comes down to God condemning people for accidents of birth.
Which is neither Just, nor Holy.
-------------------- Might as well ask the bloody cat.
Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
MF - when did, will the Sodomians reject Love = God?
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Demas
Ship's Deserter
# 24
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: quote: Originally posted by Demas: Love is patient, love is kind. Love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails and God is love.
How does that translate into saving everyone?
You appear not to have read the bit about love always protecting, persevering and never failing.
-------------------- They did not appear very religious; that is, they were not melancholy; and I therefore suspected they had not much piety - Life of Rev John Murray
Posts: 1894 | From: Thessalonica | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
daronmedway
Shipmate
# 3012
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by professorkirke: quote: Originally posted by m.t_tomb: So yes, in some respects the paths do all lead up the mountain. But it's Jesus who'll be waiting for everyone at the top. I'm sorry, but IMO, you simply can't change that fact. You simply can't meet God without meeting Jesus, because that is who God is.
So anyone who subscribes to a belief in "god" would then, by this definition, already believe in Jesus whether they say so or not?
Interesting twist, perhaps?
-Digory
Yes it will be an interesting twist! I think that many who have been serving 'god' - even serving 'Jesus' - will find out that they haven't been when they meet him. But if it is going to be possible for Jesus to tell people who have been doing all kinds of things 'in his name' that he never knew them where does that leave people who have deliberately rejected him? The Parable of the Two Sons springs to mind...
Posts: 6976 | From: Southampton | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76
|
Posted
The question of people who've deliberately and consciously rejected Jesus is actually fairly academic, since I don't know of anyone in that category. I dare say it happens.
What happens far more is that people are shown goodness, love and forgiveness and prefer to carry on in evil, hatred and petty feuding. Perhaps that's actually the more important issue. Doesn't John's Gospel say that the Light illuminates every person, not just those who've heard of Jesus of Nazareth, but people often prefer to reject the light, because they don't like what it says about where they are at the time?
The parable of the two sons makes me think of on the one hand those who do not profess Christianity, but act in accordance with Jesus' teachings, compared with those who do profess Christianity, but are unwilling to have some core darkness changed - insisting on maintaing perhaps petty hatreds, refusing to countenance forgiveness, hoarding their wealth, or whatever?
I know who my money is on seeing in the Kingdom of Heaven.
Is this also what the parable of the wedding feast - the odd bit at the end - is about? People think they can sneak in by professing Christianity, but not being clothed in the right clothing - not having the right attitude to the Light - they find they have no place.
-------------------- Might as well ask the bloody cat.
Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
daronmedway
Shipmate
# 3012
|
Posted
Posted by Karl: quote: Is this also what the parable of the wedding feast - the odd bit at the end - is about? People think they can sneak in by professing Christianity, but not being clothed in the right clothing - not having the right attitude to the Light - they find they have no place.
There are quite a few NT texts that seem to speak of Jesus himself as some form of clothing. From my perspective I would say that Christians have been 'clothed' in Christ, not just his righteousness (as per the doctrine of imputed righteousness). In other words, a person needs to clothed in Jesus the person to enter the wedding feast. This now begs the question, what does it mean to be 'clothed' in Christ?
Posts: 6976 | From: Southampton | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jason™
 Host emeritus
# 9037
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: How does that translate into saving everyone? Simply that God will smile, say "I love you, welcome to heaven"?
Sadly, this is some sort of terrible option to the majority of Christians. It sounds absolutely wonderful (and very much like the God I know) to me.
-Digory
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
PaulTH*
Shipmate
# 320
|
Posted
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
quote: But if you and the religion you follow actively rejects the doctrine that Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, what then?
Neither my religion nor I activeley reject this. But I still agree with LutheranChick: we aren't doing a catechism for eternal life, we're in a living relationship with our Creator. I totally reject any form of salvation by creed.
-------------------- Yours in Christ Paul
Posts: 6387 | From: White Cliffs Country | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by PaulTH*: Originally posted by Mudfrog:
quote: But if you and the religion you follow actively rejects the doctrine that Jesus is the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, what then?
Neither my religion nor I activeley reject this. But I still agree with LutheranChick: we aren't doing a catechism for eternal life, we're in a living relationship with our Creator. I totally reject any form of salvation by creed.
If Islam rejects the idea that Jesus died on the cross at all, let alone died as the Son of God for our sins,
If Judaism rejects any notion that Yeshua is the Messiah,
then their adherents, in following those teachings, are rejecting Jesus and his atonement through the cross and resurrection.
There is simply no excuse.
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76
|
Posted
No excuse?
It's a lottery. There are hundreds of religions. You are basically saying that God sees no excuse for picking the wrong one.
And you call it justice.
Go on. Exactly how was Abdul al-Haq, of Kabul, meant to know that Mohummed got it wrong and Jesus got it right? How, exactly?
How do you know that? What if Mohummed did get it right? You're really in the shit if God turns round and uses the same standard of "justice" on you as you've shown here. You'll fry.
It's like saying that there's no excuse for not winning at the lottery. Yes, there were loads of numbers but you should have known which ones would come up. [ 16. November 2005, 15:36: Message edited by: Karl: Liberal Backslider ]
-------------------- Might as well ask the bloody cat.
Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
*small cheering noise for Karl*
You spoke my mind, Karl. Well, I wouldn't call religion a total lottery. I'd like to think I'm a Christian and not a Scientologist because I used my brain. But there's a strong element of the postcode lottery about it, yes.
Mudfrog: If Christianity claims John the Baptist as the last prophet; or if it abandons the Law of Moses; or if it insists on the Trinity of God (denied by Islam and Judaism) - what excuse is there for us, before the God of Abraham?
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
Thats what I like about it here, a fresh and novel view of the world every day. A breath of fresh air.
Is this really new news?
Your religion may just be something you picked out of a lucky bag but if that was all there was to it, I'd still be an atheist (glad I'm not).
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Evo1: Your religion may just be something you picked out of a lucky bag but if that was all there was to it, I'd still be an atheist (glad I'm not).
Whereas if I thought that God would condemn someone who acted well towards others, but sincerely believed a false proposition about God, to eternal damnation, I wouldn't be who I am, and I wouldn't be here having this discussion with you.
This debate and its parallels in other threads are causing me to lean more and more towards a universalist, rather than pluralist, position.
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Teufelchen: *small cheering noise for Karl*
You spoke my mind, Karl. Well, I wouldn't call religion a total lottery. I'd like to think I'm a Christian and not a Scientologist because I used my brain. But there's a strong element of the postcode lottery about it, yes.
Mudfrog: If Christianity claims John the Baptist as the last prophet; or if it abandons the Law of Moses; or if it insists on the Trinity of God (denied by Islam and Judaism) - what excuse is there for us, before the God of Abraham?
T.
Scripture is clear that "God's 'invisible qualities, both his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen; they are perceived in the things that God has made. So those people have no excuse at all."
The fact that the Qu'ran mentions Jesus and, 600 years after the resurrection, rejects him outright as the Son of God, the crucified and risen Saviour of the world, shows that this isn't a case of 'Oh, we didn't know, sorry.' Have you ever spoken to a Muslim and had their vehement opinion shouted in your face as they verbally and passionately reject the Lord Jesus Christ, his person, his nature, his work on the cross?
This is not a case of, we never had the full details, this is a case of we violently disagree with what yoyu say, Allah is god and Jesus (PBOH) is ONLY a prophet, not the Son of God.
The Jews say he is NOT the Christ.
The Bible says:
"Who then is the liar? It is anyone who says that Jesus is not the Messiah. Such a person is the enemy of Christ - he rejects both the Father and the Son. For whoever rejcts the Son also rejects the Father; whever rejects the Son has the Father also." 1 John 2 v 22, 23
"Whoever believes that Jesus is the Messiah is a child of God." 1 John 5 v 1
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: Have you ever spoken to a Muslim and had their vehement opinion shouted in your face as they verbally and passionately reject the Lord Jesus Christ, his person, his nature, his work on the cross?
No. The only religious people who've been that rude to me are Christians and atheists. I've spoken to many Muslims about faith, including some who would most definitely be classed as fundamentalists, and they have always been civil to me. So take your nasty caricatures elsewhere.
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Teufelchen: Whereas if I thought that God would condemn someone who acted well towards others, but sincerely believed a false proposition about God, to eternal damnation, I wouldn't be who I am, and I wouldn't be here having this discussion with you.
I find myself agreeing with you T with one problem, I don't know anyone who consistently and continuously and for their entire life has acted well towards others (save one of course). If these mythical characters actually existed, they would have no need of Jesus - in this we are agreed.
Love,
Evo1
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Evo1: I find myself agreeing with you T with one problem, I don't know anyone who consistently and continuously and for their entire life has acted well towards others (save one of course). If these mythical characters actually existed, they would have no need of Jesus - in this we are agreed.
Definitely! I'm not proposing a solely works-based system. Are you suggesting, though, that of two people who do as much good and harm as one another by intent, only the Christian would be saved? No matter how much opportunity to understand the faith correctly each of them had?
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Teufelchen: quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: Have you ever spoken to a Muslim and had their vehement opinion shouted in your face as they verbally and passionately reject the Lord Jesus Christ, his person, his nature, his work on the cross?
No. The only religious people who've been that rude to me are Christians and atheists. I've spoken to many Muslims about faith, including some who would most definitely be classed as fundamentalists, and they have always been civil to me. So take your nasty caricatures elsewhere.
T.
Hyde Park. 3 young Muslim men v me.
They had copies of the Athanasian creed and were literally surrounding me as they shouted at me, eyeballed me, intimidated me, angrily tried to prove to me that my faith was infidel and wrong. All I could see were three angry faces as near to me as they could be.
These guys had come prepared, looking for a Christian to verbally attack. They were neither universalist nor pluralist, neither tolerant or rational. They were not civil either - and I cannot imagine any group of 3 white Christian men deliberately singling out a Muslim in order to yell at him, whilst pointing to copies of the Qu'ran, that he was the AntiChrist.
It's no charicature. But it was nasty. It happens. [ 16. November 2005, 16:16: Message edited by: Mudfrog ]
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Teufelchen: Definitely! I'm not proposing a solely works-based system. Are you suggesting, though, that of two people who do as much good and harm as one another by intent, only the Christian would be saved? No matter how much opportunity to understand the faith correctly each of them had?
T.
No, I can't take the credit for suggesting that. Jesus is the Only Way to salvation - He suggests that, not me. I only believe it. (Providing of course that by Christian you mean someone that actively believes that Jesus is the Son of God)
Love,
Evo1 [ 16. November 2005, 16:18: Message edited by: Evo1 ]
-------------------- Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus
Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: I cannot imagine any group of 3 white Christian men deliberately singling out a Muslim in order to yell at him, whilst pointing to copies of the Qu'ran, that he was the AntiChrist.
The Christians are too busy doing this to each other. Check out the 'Why do Catholics get the bigotry' thread if you don't believe me. I've been told I was in league with the AntiChrist by Wee Frees because I attended an ecumenical pilgrimage.
T.
-------------------- Little devil
Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Teufelchen: quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: I cannot imagine any group of 3 white Christian men deliberately singling out a Muslim in order to yell at him, whilst pointing to copies of the Qu'ran, that he was the AntiChrist.
The Christians are too busy doing this to each other. Check out the 'Why do Catholics get the bigotry' thread if you don't believe me. I've been told I was in league with the AntiChrist by Wee Frees because I attended an ecumenical pilgrimage.
T.
The Free Presbyterian Church is hardly in the same league as a 1500 year old world wide religion that has as as its basic tenets the false history that Ishmael was the son of promise and was rescued from sacrifice (thus handing the arabs a good excuse for anti-semitism) and the assertion that Jesus never died on the cross and was not the Son of God.
This is a powerful world religion that has in wholesale fashion rejected the history of the Old Testament and the theology of the New - rejecting Jesus Christ and the Gospel of salvation.
-------------------- "The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid." G.K. Chesterton
Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ricardus
Shipmate
# 8757
|
Posted
But Mudfrog - rejecting a person and rejecting an intellectual proposition are two different things. You can't just conflate the two, as you seem to be doing.
Rejecting a person means telling them to sod off. Rejecting a proposition is just a colourful way of saying "not believing it".
-------------------- Then the dog ran before, and coming as if he had brought the news, shewed his joy by his fawning and wagging his tail. -- Tobit 11:9 (Douai-Rheims)
Posts: 7247 | From: Liverpool, UK | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
PaulTH*
Shipmate
# 320
|
Posted
Origianlly posted by Mudfrog:
quote: then their adherents, in following those teachings, are rejecting Jesus and his atonement through the cross and resurrection.
It seems to me that Mudfrog is aying that "their adherants" (Muslims and Jews) are automatically hellbound for that rejection. Mudfrog, we don't worship the same God. I wouldn't want a part in a system as you envisage it.
-------------------- Yours in Christ Paul
Posts: 6387 | From: White Cliffs Country | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Niënna
 Ship's Lotus Blossom
# 4652
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider: The question of people who've deliberately and consciously rejected Jesus is actually fairly academic, since I don't know of anyone in that category. I dare say it happens.
What happens far more is that people are shown goodness, love and forgiveness and prefer to carry on in evil, hatred and petty feuding. Perhaps that's actually the more important issue. Doesn't John's Gospel say that the Light illuminates every person, not just those who've heard of Jesus of Nazareth, but people often prefer to reject the light, because they don't like what it says about where they are at the time?
The parable of the two sons makes me think of on the one hand those who do not profess Christianity, but act in accordance with Jesus' teachings, compared with those who do profess Christianity, but are unwilling to have some core darkness changed - insisting on maintaing perhaps petty hatreds, refusing to countenance forgiveness, hoarding their wealth, or whatever?
I know who my money is on seeing in the Kingdom of Heaven.
Is this also what the parable of the wedding feast - the odd bit at the end - is about? People think they can sneak in by professing Christianity, but not being clothed in the right clothing - not having the right attitude to the Light - they find they have no place.
Excellent post, Karl ![[Overused]](graemlins/notworthy.gif)
-------------------- [Nino points a gun at Chiki] Nino: Now... tell me. Who started the war? Chiki: [long pause] We did. ~No Man's Land
Posts: 2298 | From: Purgatory | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jason™
 Host emeritus
# 9037
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: Scripture is clear...
Clearly, it's not.
quote: This is not a case of, we never had the full details, this is a case of we violently disagree with what yoyu say
Do you ever try to "witness" to someone who doesn't believe? Why? Is it because you think they already have the "full details" and you just hope that you can somehow market them into the faith by reminding them of the important parts? I'd guess people try to convert others precisely because they believe these others to not have these allegedly full details. And we are quite prepared to give them to anyone who is willing to listen! In fact, there seems to be quite a rush to do so, because it's believed that if these full details are not disseminated properly before people die, they will end up in hell, apparently for not believing something that they were never given the "full details" of anyway.
quote: Allah is god and Jesus (PBOH) is ONLY a prophet, not the Son of God.
At least they give our Jesus even THAT much credit. Christians typically write Mohammed off as a thug, a liar or just a general jerk. Most Muslims that I've encountered or read or heard speak tend to respect Jesus very highly, and they sometimes understand his teachings better than a majority of Christians I encounter.
Yes, Jesus can be the only way to salvation---but if he ends up saving everyone, according to their circumstance, isn't he still the Only Way™?
-Digory
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ricardus
Shipmate
# 8757
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mudfrog: This is not a case of, we never had the full details, this is a case of we violently disagree with what yoyu say
Yes, except those "full details" come to us something like this: "Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation. Allah is the only way of salvation. Something very profound and Buddhist. Let's just stuff ourselves and get bladdered, for tomorrow we die. Worship me and I will save you through the medium of giving me lots of money. You can't know for sure so it's pointless to speculate." - and we then have to work out which of those statements, if any, is true, either by brainpower or luck.
-------------------- Then the dog ran before, and coming as if he had brought the news, shewed his joy by his fawning and wagging his tail. -- Tobit 11:9 (Douai-Rheims)
Posts: 7247 | From: Liverpool, UK | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|