Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Purgatory: U.S. Presidential Election 2016
|
Pigwidgeon
Ship's Owl
# 10192
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by irish_lord99: Republican voters have already been influenced against Pope Francis for some time now. Fox news criticisms him every chance they get, and talk radio absolutely despises him.
Two more points for Pope Francis!
-------------------- "...that is generally a matter for Pigwidgeon, several other consenting adults, a bottle of cheap Gin and the odd giraffe." ~Tortuf
Posts: 9835 | From: Hogwarts | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
simontoad
Ship's Amphibian
# 18096
|
Posted
-------------------- Human
Posts: 1571 | From: Romsey, Vic, AU | Registered: May 2014
| IP: Logged
|
|
simontoad
Ship's Amphibian
# 18096
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: quote: Originally posted by simontoad: quote: Originally posted by Doublethink.: So the pope has described Trumps views on immigration as unchristian - do we think this will help or hinder him ?
Well, Trump had better be careful or he may lose the Latino vote.
The ones he didn't already lose when he said Mexicans coming to the US are rapists and that he's going to build a big wall between the US and Mexico and get Mexico to pay for it?
sorry, my grin was for this
-------------------- Human
Posts: 1571 | From: Romsey, Vic, AU | Registered: May 2014
| IP: Logged
|
|
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: The ones he didn't already lose when he said Mexicans coming to the US are rapists and that he's going to build a big wall between the US and Mexico and get Mexico to pay for it?
But presumably they don't have votes.
-------------------- Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson
Posts: 7610 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Enoch: quote: Originally posted by RuthW: The ones he didn't already lose when he said Mexicans coming to the US are rapists and that he's going to build a big wall between the US and Mexico and get Mexico to pay for it?
But presumably they don't have votes.
But quite a few of them have children, spouses, friends, aunts, uncles, etc who are, in fact, voters. Barring some sort of memory-erasing mass delusion, that's not going to go down well in Nov.
-------------------- "Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
TurquoiseTastic
Fish of a different color
# 8978
|
Posted
As Rubio said in by far his best quote: "It's really hard to get people to listen to you ... if they think you want to deport their grandmother"
Posts: 1092 | From: Hants., UK | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468
|
Posted
News: As of right now, Trump has won the Rep. primary in S. Carolina, and Hillary has won the Dem. caucus in Nevada.
(Both states have Dem. and Rep. on different days.)
-------------------- Blessed Gator, pray for us! --"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon") --"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")
Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
RuthW
liberal "peace first" hankie squeezer
# 13
|
Posted
Jeb! is bowing out. I wonder if/when/who he will endorse.
Posts: 24453 | From: La La Land | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468
|
Posted
Jeb's bowing-out speech was good, and he actually seemed to mean it. Maybe it was a relief?
-------------------- Blessed Gator, pray for us! --"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon") --"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")
Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Og: Thread Killer
Ship's token CN Mennonite
# 3200
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: Jeb! is bowing out. I wonder if/when/who he will endorse.
Himself vs. Clinton in 2020.
-------------------- I wish I was seeking justice loving mercy and walking humbly but... "Cease to lament for that thou canst not help, And study help for that which thou lament'st."
Posts: 5025 | From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Crœsos
Shipmate
# 238
|
Posted
Just a quick update on the standing of various candidates in the delegate counts. First, the Republicans:
First the Republicans:
- Trump 67
- Cruz 11
- Rubio 10
- Kasich 5
- Bush 4
- Carson 3
- Fiorina 1
- Paul 1
- Huckabee 1
As before anyone listed in italics has dropped out of the race, though they still have delegates assigned to them.
This highlights a bit of a problem for the division of delegates on the Republican side. According to party orthodoxy, the early primaries (meaning 'before Super Tuesday') should be proportional, or at least roughly so. This is to prevent a few early and non-representative states from giving enough momentum to an oddball candidate that the party ends up with an unelectable extremist. The problem is that in practice "roughly proportional" means "any system other than 'winner-take-all'". Hence South Carolina.
For those who haven't followed the detailed results very closely, Donald Trump received 32.5% of the votes in the South Carolina Republican primary, for which he received 100% of South Carolina's 50 delegates to the Republican National Convention. This would seem to be a failure of the "roughly proportional" principle. In fact, you can look at the way South Carolina's Republican Party assigns its delegates and see that it's deliberately designed to be as close to a winner-take-all system as the national party will tolerate in a pre-Super-Tuesday primary state. (Quick summary: 29 delegates go to the top vote getter, even if he doesn't get a majority, and 3 delegates each to whoever is the top vote getter in each of South Carolina's seven Congressional Districts. It's that breakdown by Congressional district that keeps this from being a winner-take-all system under Republican rules.)
On the Democratic side the breakdown looks like this:
- Clinton 51 (+431)
- Sanders 51 (+16)
- Unassigned 1
- O'Malley 0 (+2)
Apparently one of Nevada's 35 Democratic delegates has not been officially assigned yet, though it seems more likely to go to Clinton than Sanders eventually. As before, the numbers in parentheses are the number of superdelegates each candidate has got to declare support for them.
-------------------- Humani nil a me alienum puto
Posts: 10706 | From: Sardis, Lydia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
RuthW
liberal "peace first" hankie squeezer
# 13
|
Posted
Trump trounced his opponents in Nevada yesterday:
Trump -- 45.9 Rubio -- 23.9 Cruz -- 21.4
He said months ago he would run the table, and it's starting to look like he was right.
The Koch brothers' best political operative has recently gone to work for Rubio's campaign (or his super-pac, I can't remember which, and it's not like it matters!). A quick look at the major papers didn't yield up much else in the way of reporting about what's going on with establishment Republican donors and operatives; if someone here sees something along those lines, I'd be grateful for a link. I would love to be a fly on the wall in one of the meetings they're no doubt holding today.
Posts: 24453 | From: La La Land | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Crœsos
Shipmate
# 238
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: Trump trounced his opponents in Nevada yesterday:
Trump -- 45.9 Rubio -- 23.9 Cruz -- 21.4
He said months ago he would run the table, and it's starting to look like he was right.
There are twelve Super-Tuesday states on the Republican side, controlling a total of 632 delegates. (For comparison, the four Republican primaries/caucuses to date have controlled 129 delegates.) Current polling has four states (Georgia, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and Vermont) going for Trump, one state (Texas) going for Cruz, two more where the polling is sparse enough to be uncertain (Virginia leans Trump and Arkansas leans Cruz in one pre-South Carolina poll apiece), and in five states (Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Minnesota, and Tennessee) there are no polls recent enough to be worth considering.
So yes, the polling data currently available seems to indicate that Trump will have a very good day next Tuesday.
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: The Koch brothers' best political operative has recently gone to work for Rubio's campaign (or his super-pac, I can't remember which, and it's not like it matters!). A quick look at the major papers didn't yield up much else in the way of reporting about what's going on with establishment Republican donors and operatives; if someone here sees something along those lines, I'd be grateful for a link. I would love to be a fly on the wall in one of the meetings they're no doubt holding today.
The shift seems to be in the direction of Marco Rubio. You can understand the basic logic.
Ted Cruz seems to be dead in the water (metaphorically speaking, of course) with Trump out-drawing him in what should be his natural constituency: evangelical voters. That was supposed to be Cruz's strong suit and his base of support. If he doesn't have that (and South Carolina and Nevada seem to indicate that he doesn't) there doesn't seem to be a plausible path to victory for him that doesn't involve Donald Trump leaving the race.
John Kasich's strength is his still-theoretical ability to turn out support in the Rust Belt and upper mid-West. It didn't work for him in Iowa and will be put to the test again on Super-Tuesday in Minnesota. Given how late the states in Kasich's theoretical wheelhouse hold their primaries, the big donors are understandably reluctant to invest in this particular pig-in-a-poke, especially given his lackluster performance to date.
Ben Carson has yet to finish in any state higher than fourth place and there is ongoing suspicion that his "campaign" is more of an elaborate, long-term grift than a serious political effort. So there is no stampede to make him the latest non-Trump hope for the GOP faithful.
Which leaves young Marco Rubio as the winner of their affections by default. [ 24. February 2016, 15:53: Message edited by: Crœsos ]
-------------------- Humani nil a me alienum puto
Posts: 10706 | From: Sardis, Lydia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468
|
Posted
Noam Chomsky's take on Trump's popularity:
Chomsky: Trump's rise due to 'breakdown of society' (Politico).
-------------------- Blessed Gator, pray for us! --"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon") --"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")
Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Boogie
Boogie on down!
# 13538
|
Posted
Yes, the politics of fear.
I see Trump"s fear - it's the fear of the rich. They all build more and more walls and live in self-contained bubbles fearful to protect all their stuff and their lifestyles.
But the voters, why on Earth are they taken in?
-------------------- Garden. Room. Walk
Posts: 13030 | From: Boogie Wonderland | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Boogie: Yes, the politics of fear.
I see Trump"s fear - it's the fear of the rich. They all build more and more walls and live in self-contained bubbles fearful to protect all their stuff and their lifestyles.
But the voters, why on Earth are they taken in?
Oh dear. It must be terrible for people like you who can't understand folks who disagree with your politics: "Oh why can't people see that people like me know best?"
Can you see the arrogance behind your argument?
Perhaps, and this is only a suggestion you understand, the voters WANT what they are seeing. Perhaps they are NOT being taken in but actually are voting in the full knowledge of what they are voting for.
I admit that might be a bit of a stretch for committed socialists who have a habit of believing they really do know what is best for people.
Maybe you need to consider the nightmare position, not that Trump is elected, but that people don't actually want your style of politics. Perhaps it is socialism that is wrong, not the voters.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Martin60
Shipmate
# 368
|
Posted
They're voting for privilege, out of irrational fear, for injustice, out of ignorance, for alienation, out of greed, for a lie.
What could be wrong with that? How arrogant to impugn that!
-------------------- Love wins
Posts: 17586 | From: Never Dobunni after all. Corieltauvi after all. Just moved to the capital. | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Pomona
Shipmate
# 17175
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: quote: Originally posted by Boogie: Yes, the politics of fear.
I see Trump"s fear - it's the fear of the rich. They all build more and more walls and live in self-contained bubbles fearful to protect all their stuff and their lifestyles.
But the voters, why on Earth are they taken in?
Oh dear. It must be terrible for people like you who can't understand folks who disagree with your politics: "Oh why can't people see that people like me know best?"
Can you see the arrogance behind your argument?
Perhaps, and this is only a suggestion you understand, the voters WANT what they are seeing. Perhaps they are NOT being taken in but actually are voting in the full knowledge of what they are voting for.
I admit that might be a bit of a stretch for committed socialists who have a habit of believing they really do know what is best for people.
Maybe you need to consider the nightmare position, not that Trump is elected, but that people don't actually want your style of politics. Perhaps it is socialism that is wrong, not the voters.
Because there is nothing in-between Trump and socialism. Obama is not a socialist and I'm quite happy with him, and I'd even be happy with a moderate Republican. Trump is just a fascist.
-------------------- Consider the work of God: Who is able to straighten what he has bent? [Ecclesiastes 7:13]
Posts: 5319 | From: UK | Registered: Jun 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Pomona: quote: Originally posted by deano: quote: Originally posted by Boogie: Yes, the politics of fear.
I see Trump"s fear - it's the fear of the rich. They all build more and more walls and live in self-contained bubbles fearful to protect all their stuff and their lifestyles.
But the voters, why on Earth are they taken in?
Oh dear. It must be terrible for people like you who can't understand folks who disagree with your politics: "Oh why can't people see that people like me know best?"
Can you see the arrogance behind your argument?
Perhaps, and this is only a suggestion you understand, the voters WANT what they are seeing. Perhaps they are NOT being taken in but actually are voting in the full knowledge of what they are voting for.
I admit that might be a bit of a stretch for committed socialists who have a habit of believing they really do know what is best for people.
Maybe you need to consider the nightmare position, not that Trump is elected, but that people don't actually want your style of politics. Perhaps it is socialism that is wrong, not the voters.
Because there is nothing in-between Trump and socialism. Obama is not a socialist and I'm quite happy with him, and I'd even be happy with a moderate Republican. Trump is just a fascist.
And maybe that is why they are voting for him. Perhaps they want a fascist.
It is democracy in action. Not a democracy of the few, the elect or the knowing and educated, but democracy of the enfranchised.
It's a beautiful thing. You might not like the end result but not having it is much worse. You are losing the argument if you have to resort to blaming the voters for how they vote.
But the arguments of socialism and beyond-the-centre-left politics have been long lost anyway so blaming the voters for how they vote is all you have left before you have to face up to that reality.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
LeRoc
Famous Dutch pirate
# 3216
|
Posted
I have no objection to questions of the form "why do people vote for candidate / party X?"
-------------------- I know why God made the rhinoceros, it's because He couldn't see the rhinoceros, so He made the rhinoceros to be able to see it. (Clarice Lispector)
Posts: 9474 | From: Brazil / Africa | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
I don't see Trump as a fascist in any case. Of course, it depends on what you mean by fascism, but normally it refers to the incorporation by the state of many normally independent functions. For example, in Germany civil servants had to swear an oath personally to Hitler. Another way of putting this is in terms of being violently totalitarian: the state becomes all-embracing, and dissent is barely tolerated. Thus, Mussolini called the Italian parliament 'a fascist barracks'.
I don't know much about Trump's economic policies actually, but I doubt if he has this in mind. He is certainly a demagogue.
But there is certainly a polarization between left and right in different places, I suppose Sanders and Corbyn show the leftwards movement. Hopefully, we are not about to repeat the 30s.
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
There are some uncomfortable parallels, for example, the Jews have been replaced by Muslims as hate figures, or scape-goats. Intense nationalism seems to be on the increase, coupled with xenophobia; and of course, in Europe there are actual neo-fascist groups.
-------------------- I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
Originally posted by quetzacoatl: quote:
I don't know much about Trump's economic policies actually, but I doubt if he has this in mind. He is certainly a demagogue.
I honestly don't think he has any real policy other than the promotion of Trump. He steers into the updraft, and fear has the strongest current.
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
simontoad
Ship's Amphibian
# 18096
|
Posted
There was a clip of a woman on the news. She was asked what Trump's appeal was and she said something like,'He says what I'm thinking.'
Deano, I reckon the USA is a pretty big and diverse place. I reckon there's lots of people with lots of different political views. I agree with President Obama when he says that Donald Trump will never be President, because he trusts the American People understand that the job of President is a job for serious people.
In the next term, one of the most important decisions will be about upgrading the USA's nuclear arsenal. It will be hugely expensive, but it has to be done. Strategic decisions will have to be made as to whether all three delivery systems for the arsenal ought to be retained. But the issue for me is the money. How the hell is the USA going to pay for this without getting more revenue?
See, I just don't reckon Trump has the brains to make this sort of decision, to make the best decision on this for America and its allies for the next sixty or so years. I don't reckon he's the bloke for this job.
-------------------- Human
Posts: 1571 | From: Romsey, Vic, AU | Registered: May 2014
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
Trump's popularity is fear and frustration. Not logic, nor reason, nor thought. Trump's involvement the in the race is ego, nothing more. [ 25. February 2016, 11:51: Message edited by: lilBuddha ]
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by LeRoc: I have no objection to questions of the form "why do people vote for candidate / party X?"
Neither do I, but Boogie's point about why are the voters being "taken in" wasn't rhetorical in an academic or collegiate way, deigned to actually determine the information.
It was a polemical, ideological cry of indignation that people are actually voting for Trump in the first place, and that obviously it was because they are not bright enough to see through his lies.
I made the point that perhaps they actually want him, and that voting for Trump is not an indication that you don't understand his politics, but that they really do understand his politics and further, that they - distasteful as this may be to most of the Ship - agree with his politics and want his politics.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
LeRoc
Famous Dutch pirate
# 3216
|
Posted
I don't have a problem with polemical, ideological cries either.
-------------------- I know why God made the rhinoceros, it's because He couldn't see the rhinoceros, so He made the rhinoceros to be able to see it. (Clarice Lispector)
Posts: 9474 | From: Brazil / Africa | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Boogie
Boogie on down!
# 13538
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: It was a polemical, ideological cry of indignation that people are actually voting for Trump in the first place.
Yes it was. I am utterly bemused that anyone would vote for him.
quote: Originally posted by deano: ... and that obviously it was because they are not bright enough to see through his lies.
I did not say this. Fear has nothing to do with intellect. I am sure very bright people are voting for him.
But all prejudice has its roots in fear. I spend a few weeks every couple of years on one of the poorest communities in Mexico, working on a project with the locals there. I can't even begin to unravel his unbelievable hatred for them.
-------------------- Garden. Room. Walk
Posts: 13030 | From: Boogie Wonderland | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
W Hyatt
Shipmate
# 14250
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Boogie: But all prejudice has its roots in fear. I spend a few weeks every couple of years on one of the poorest communities in Mexico, working on a project with the locals there. I can't even begin to unravel his unbelievable hatred for them.
I gather that they must have neglected to mention that they want to come to the U.S. and take our jobs.
-------------------- A new church and a new earth, with Spiritual Insights for Everyday Life.
Posts: 1565 | From: U.S.A. | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Boogie: I did not say this. Fear has nothing to do with intellect. I am sure very bright people are voting for him.
But all prejudice has its roots in fear. I spend a few weeks every couple of years on one of the poorest communities in Mexico, working on a project with the locals there. I can't even begin to unravel his unbelievable hatred for them.
But the hatred he is espousing is WHY people are voting for him. Because those voters hate poor Mexicans like he does.
It's not that he hates poor Mexicans and people are voting for him because they don't know that. They are voting for him because they hate poor Mexicans AS WELL!
It's an immigration issue, just as it is on this side of the pond.
Okay, Trump has been called a fascist. I'm going to play with the notion a little bit because something is being missed here. I want to posit that the iniquities that were built into the Treaty of Versailles and caused hardships in Germany find a parallel in immigration in modern day USA and Europe.
Now when moderate political parties fail to fix a problem to the satisfaction of the great mass of reasonable people and those people start to hurt, they WILL vote for someone, however extreme, if he can plausibly say "I will fix it!".
Just as the moderate politicians in Germany, France and Great Britain could not fix the issues that were hurting Germans, so moderate political parties in Europe and in the USA have failed (and in some cases worsened) to address the problems of immigration.
"What problems?" I can hear some of you screaming!
To which I will say... "It doesn't matter!". If the problem is real, or it is a misperception, then they are both real to those who feel them to be problems. If if is a misperception but enough people hold that view to swing elections then it is irrelevant that the problem isn't real. And if it is real, then the same thing. I suspect that it falls between the two.
Once a majority of people hold the view there is a problem, and if moderate politicians don't fix it, the majority will gravitate towards someone who says they see the problem and they also have a fix.
I suspect that over the last three or four decades, immigration has become exactly that kind of problem. The reasonable majority see it as a problem and it looks to me that only one person, Trump, is saying "Yes, I understand this is a problem, and I will fix it for you!". That's why he is winning. Not just in the South, but in the mid-west and New England.
I'm sure some here will put that down to racism, but I think it is more subtle. I think it is a rejection against the "other" culture.
I suspect that a white, Christian, non-racist, middle-class family from Texas could quite happily spend a week living with a black, non-racist, Christian, middle-class family in Maine and they would get on comfortably. The cultures are so similar that the skin colour wouldn't matter.
I doubt that if you change either of "Christian" or "middle-class" you would get the same result.
I'm not saying war would break out, but there would be a discomfort felt somewhere. That discomfort with the "other" is what Trump is exploiting, and which will be exploited in Europe soon.
With few exceptions people tend to feel more comfortable within a culture with which they identify as being part of. I don't accept that skin colour is relevant to that.
If there is an alternative explanation that doesn't rely on "they are being hoodwinked!" then I would like to hear it. Fear is not that explanation. I suspect that fear is their in the reasonable majority, rightly or as a misperception. I think Trump is exploiting it, but I don't believe he is responsible for putting it there.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
The Riv
Shipmate
# 3553
|
Posted
It seems as if Rubio has "called out" Trump just in time for tonight's Republican *cough* debate *cough*. I'll enjoy the headlines tomorrow, I'm sure, but tonight I think my toenails might grow, and that's actually more intriguing to me than right-wing chest thumping. For variety, maybe I'll sit in front of a freshly painted wall.
#AnointHillaryAlready
-------------------- "I don't know whether I like it, but it's what I meant." Ralph Vaughan Williams
"Riv, you've done a much better job communicating your passion than your point. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about." Tom Clune
Posts: 2749 | From: Too far South, USA. I really want to move. | Registered: Nov 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Crœsos
Shipmate
# 238
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: I'm sure some here will put that down to racism, but I think it is more subtle. I think it is a rejection against the "other" culture.
<snip>
With few exceptions people tend to feel more comfortable within a culture with which they identify as being part of. I don't accept that skin colour is relevant to that.
I think you underestimate the degree to which Americans tie "culture" to "skin color", and overestimated the degree to which racism has been eliminated in America.
To take one example, a poll of likely voters in the recent South Carolina Republican Primary asked "In general do you think that whites are a superior race, or not?" Ten percent of likely Republican primary voters were willing to admit to a pollster that they believed in white superiority, and another eleven percent claimed to not be sure. Trump supporters were an outlier at 16% support for white superiority and 14% uncertainty, making them the group where this belief was most prevalent (and the only group above the average support of 10% for this proposition).
My own curiosity is piqued by the 1% of South Carolina Ben Carson supporters who nonetheless held that whites were the superior race.
It should be noted that South Carolina's Republican primary electorate was 96% non-Hispanic white in 2016, while the state of South Carolina itself is 64% non-Hispanic white according to the Census Bureau's 2014 estimate.
-------------------- Humani nil a me alienum puto
Posts: 10706 | From: Sardis, Lydia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Crœsos
Shipmate
# 238
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by The Riv: It seems as if Rubio has "called out" Trump just in time for tonight's Republican *cough* debate *cough*.
A snarky tweet on the promotional images for that event.
-------------------- Humani nil a me alienum puto
Posts: 10706 | From: Sardis, Lydia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468
|
Posted
deano said:
quote: I suspect that a white, Christian, non-racist, middle-class family from Texas could quite happily spend a week living with a black, non-racist, Christian, middle-class family in Maine and they would get on comfortably. The cultures are so similar that the skin colour wouldn't matter.
re Maine and Texas cultures being that similar, if at all.
-------------------- Blessed Gator, pray for us! --"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon") --"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")
Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Golden Key: deano said:
quote: I suspect that a white, Christian, non-racist, middle-class family from Texas could quite happily spend a week living with a black, non-racist, Christian, middle-class family in Maine and they would get on comfortably. The cultures are so similar that the skin colour wouldn't matter.
re Maine and Texas cultures being that similar, if at all.
Excellent response. Explains Trump's success so eloquently and succinctly.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: Excellent response. Explains Trump's success so eloquently and succinctly.
Yeah! Not like your reasoned response to Crœsos. Oh wait. There is a fear and a frustration shared across boundaries, this much you got right. But limiting the cause to moderate politicians is insane to the point being concerned for the competence of anyone who truly believed it. If a finger could be pointed in a single direction, it would be at conservative politicians, as both the financial and security fears are a more direct result of their policies. The honest assessment is that politicians of all stripes share in the fucked-up system that causes much of the frustration. As Trump plays to these insecurities without offering any real path beyond them, it is right and proper to be derisive of those who support him. They are akin to people tired of being in a leaky, sail torn boat grabbing on to a lead weight simply because it is different.
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by lilBuddha: quote: Originally posted by deano: Excellent response. Explains Trump's success so eloquently and succinctly.
Yeah! Not like your reasoned response to Crœsos. Oh wait. There is a fear and a frustration shared across boundaries, this much you got right. But limiting the cause to moderate politicians is insane to the point being concerned for the competence of anyone who truly believed it. If a finger could be pointed in a single direction, it would be at conservative politicians, as both the financial and security fears are a more direct result of their policies. The honest assessment is that politicians of all stripes share in the fucked-up system that causes much of the frustration. As Trump plays to these insecurities without offering any real path beyond them, it is right and proper to be derisive of those who support him. They are akin to people tired of being in a leaky, sail torn boat grabbing on to a lead weight simply because it is different.
Nope. My analysis was taken from Robert O. Paxton's "An Anatomy of Fascism". Sorry to pop that bubble.
Moderate people ignored by moderate politicians will turn to the extremes if they don't have their problems fixed in a reasonable way.
Have another go.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Pigwidgeon
Ship's Owl
# 10192
|
Posted
It just gets crazier and crazier... David Duke, former Ku Klux Klan leader, says voting against Trump is "treason to your heritage."
-------------------- "...that is generally a matter for Pigwidgeon, several other consenting adults, a bottle of cheap Gin and the odd giraffe." ~Tortuf
Posts: 9835 | From: Hogwarts | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Brenda Clough
Shipmate
# 18061
|
Posted
As you probably know, a case could be made that if you want to see Jesus, you should follow Jimmy Carter around and do what he does. A similar but quite opposite corollary involves David Duke. You can hardly go wrong in life, if you take care to always do and espouse the opposite of what he does.
-------------------- Science fiction and fantasy writer with a Patreon page
Posts: 6378 | From: Washington DC | Registered: Mar 2014
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: My analysis was taken from Robert O. Paxton's "An Anatomy of Fascism". Sorry to pop that bubble.
I haven't read that book, so I looked it up. From a review quote: Paxton debunks the consoling fiction that Mussolini and Hitler seized power. Rather, conservative elites desperate to subdue leftist populist movements ''normalized'' the fascists by inviting them to share power. It was the mob that flocked to fascism, but the elites who elevated it.
So perhaps you should quote:
Have another go.
at reading it.
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by lilBuddha: quote: Originally posted by deano: My analysis was taken from Robert O. Paxton's "An Anatomy of Fascism". Sorry to pop that bubble.
I haven't read that book, so I looked it up. From a review quote: Paxton debunks the consoling fiction that Mussolini and Hitler seized power. Rather, conservative elites desperate to subdue leftist populist movements ''normalized'' the fascists by inviting them to share power. It was the mob that flocked to fascism, but the elites who elevated it.
So perhaps you should quote:
Have another go.
at reading it.
I have read it. Okay, I will proof-text from it if you want. Wait one...
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
Hey buddha boy. Here is one to be going on with...
"“An essential step in the fascist march to acceptance and power was to persuade law-and-order conservatives and members of the middle class to tolerate fascist violence as a harsh necessity in the face of Left provocation.84 It helped, of course, that many ordinary citizens never feared fascist violence against themselves, because they were reassured that it was reserved for national enemies and “terrorists" who deserved it.85”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
simontoad
Ship's Amphibian
# 18096
|
Posted
hmm, so has Trump got an armed security force yet? Has he been talking to any of the militiamen?
Bugger Republican primary voters, I'm petrified.
-------------------- Human
Posts: 1571 | From: Romsey, Vic, AU | Registered: May 2014
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
Here you go...
“One reason why the Nazis succeeded in supplanting the liberal middle-class parties was the liberals’ perceived failure to deal with the twin crises Germany faced in the late 1920s. One crisis was many Germans’ sense of national humiliation by the Treaty of Versailles”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright. [ 25. February 2016, 20:47: Message edited by: deano ]
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
But it gets worse...
“In Germany after 1930 only the communists, along with the Nazis, were increasing their vote.35 Like the Nazis, the German communists thrived on unemployment and a widespread perception that the traditional parties and constitutional system had failed”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
And for those who think that Trump doesn't know how to govern because he isn't a professional politician....
“A central ingredient in the conservatives’ calculation was that the Austrian corporal and the greenhorn Italian ex-socialist rabble-rouser would not have the faintest idea what to do with high office. They would be incapable of governing without the cultivated and experienced conservative leaders’ savoir faire.”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
Bored now. Football awaits.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by W Hyatt: quote: Originally posted by Boogie: But all prejudice has its roots in fear. I spend a few weeks every couple of years on one of the poorest communities in Mexico, working on a project with the locals there. I can't even begin to unravel his unbelievable hatred for them.
I gather that they must have neglected to mention that they want to come to the U.S. and take our jobs.
... while simultaneously lying about collecting welfare....
-------------------- "Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Crœsos
Shipmate
# 238
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano: I'm sure some here will put that down to racism, but I think it is more subtle. I think it is a rejection against the "other" culture.
quote: Originally posted by deano: But it gets worse...
“In Germany after 1930 only the communists, along with the Nazis, were increasing their vote.35 Like the Nazis, the German communists thrived on unemployment and a widespread perception that the traditional parties and constitutional system had failed”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
And for those who think that Trump doesn't know how to govern because he isn't a professional politician....
“A central ingredient in the conservatives’ calculation was that the Austrian corporal and the greenhorn Italian ex-socialist rabble-rouser would not have the faintest idea what to do with high office. They would be incapable of governing without the cultivated and experienced conservative leaders’ savoir faire.”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
Maybe I'm not picking up on some subtlety of your argument, but "Trump's followers can't be racist because they're more like Nazis" seems an extremely unconvincing point to make. Can you expand a little on why fascism precludes racism?
-------------------- Humani nil a me alienum puto
Posts: 10706 | From: Sardis, Lydia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
Oh I'm not saying some sizeable majority of Trumps supporters aren't racist. I believe that a sizable majority probably is.
But not all.
Some, like the majority of middle-class and working claess who voted for fascist organisations in between-the-wars Europe are frightened that they will become poor, frustrated that none of the mainstream parties can help them, and relieved that someone is saying they understand their fears and is offering a solution.
And those numbers will probably dwarf the racist supporters. [ 25. February 2016, 21:23: Message edited by: deano ]
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by deano:
"“An essential step in the fascist march to acceptance and power was to persuade law-and-order conservatives and members of the middle class to tolerate fascist violence as a harsh necessity in the face of Left provocation.
quote: Originally posted by deano:
“A central ingredient in the conservatives’ calculation
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
deano
princess
# 12063
|
Posted
Oh but little buddha belly, I thought your first response would be to...
quote: Originally posted by deano: Here you go...
“One reason why the Nazis succeeded in supplanting the liberal middle-class parties was the liberals’ perceived failure to deal with the twin crises Germany faced in the late 1920s. One crisis was many Germans’ sense of national humiliation by the Treaty of Versailles”
Excerpt From: Paxton, Robert O. “The Anatomy of Fascism.” Random House, 2005-01-02T00:00:00+00:00. iBooks. This material may be protected by copyright.
Maybe you're having a think about that one.
-------------------- "The moral high ground is slowly being bombed to oblivion. " - Supermatelot
Posts: 2118 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
|