|
Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: 'Blood-sucking Lawyer'
|
Inger
Shipmate
# 15285
|
Posted
I notice a warning against calling Matt Black a 'blood-sucking lawyer' in an exchange starting here on a thread in Dead Horses. But as the poster later points out, that is how MB describes himself in his profile.
Is it really a C 3 offence in such a situation? Indeed, for good measure the phrase was put in quotes.
Posts: 332 | From: Newcastle, UK | Registered: Nov 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Matt Black
Shipmate
# 2210
|
Posted
TBH, I'd forgotten I'd put that in my profile, so I think perhaps it's me who owes Imersge Canfield an apology ![[Hot and Hormonal]](icon_redface.gif) . Will pop down to the thread concerned and make it so.
--------------------
"Protestant and Reformed, according to the Tradition of the ancient Catholic Church" - + John Cosin (1594-1672)
Posts: 14304 | From: Hampshire, UK | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Inger
Shipmate
# 15285
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Matt Black:
TBH, I'd forgotten I'd put that in my profile
I did wonder!
![[Biased]](wink.gif)
Posts: 332 | From: Newcastle, UK | Registered: Nov 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Louise
Shipmate
# 30
|
Posted
To be honest it doesn't make much difference to me. It's fine for someone to obviously insult themselves. It's not OK for another poster to take something out of its context which is normally (& without the context) an insult and to drop it into a non hell post.
If a poster self deprecatingly calls themselves a fat bastard in their profile, I don't want to see that suddenly being dropped into a post by someone arguing with them.
cheers
L
--------------------
Now you need never click a Daily Mail link again! Kittenblock replaces Mail links with calming pics of tea and kittens! http://www.teaandkittens.co.uk/ Click under 'other stuff' to find it.
Posts: 6918 | From: Scotland | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Printer-friendly view
