|
Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Girl sues parents for support
|
Amanda B. Reckondwythe
Dressed for Church
# 5521
|
Posted
Read all about it.
What interests me is that:
- The girl is of legal age but not yet "emancipated" under New Jersey law.
- She has voluntarily moved out of her parents' home because she does not wish to follow the rules they have laid out for her in light of certain behaviors they find objectionable (read on). The girl, on the other hand, claims that her parents threw her out of the house against her wishes.
- Despite her claim to be an honors student, cheerleader, and otherwise all-around good kid, she was in fact suspended from school for truancy, and has shacked up with her boyfriend in her boyfriend's parents' house, of all places.
- Not only are her boyfriend's parents apparently in full cahoots with the above arrangement, but they are even paying the girl's legal expenses for the lawsuit.
- Allegations of verbal and physical abuse of the girl by her parents were determined to be unfounded by New Jersey's Division of Child Protection.
- The family in question appear to be devout Catholics.
My question, aside from the almost unbelievable absurdity of all of this, is: WHERE IS THE CHURCH?
The girl attends a Catholic school. Why hasn't the school or the church made any attempt to intervene?
Discuss.
--------------------
"I take prayer too seriously to use it as an excuse for avoiding work and responsibility." -- The Revd Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 10542 | From: The Great Southwest | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984
|
Posted
It strikes me as an odd reaction to a breakdown in your relationship with your daughter, to respond with, lets try to fuck up your future. Which makes me wonder what was happening in the home prior to this.
--------------------
All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell
Posts: 19219 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
anoesis
Shipmate
# 14189
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
Read all about it.
Despite her claim to be an honors student, cheerleader, and otherwise all-around good kid, she was in fact suspended from school for truancy, and has shacked up with her boyfriend in her boyfriend's parents' house, of all places.
No, the article says she went to stay at her boyfriend's home for two nights, and then moved to the house of a friend, where she has been staying since. And yes, the article says she was suspended for truancy, but it also makes it clear that she is back at school now, in fact, the school is educating her gratis at the moment. Which means they must see something worthwhile in her.
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
Not only are her boyfriend's parents apparently in full cahoots with the above arrangement, but they are even paying the girl's legal expenses for the lawsuit.
That's the friend's parents. But yeah, it's amazing.
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
The family in question appear to be devout Catholics.
Where did you get this from? It's not coming through in the linked article, though I suppose there will have been TV coverage about it also in your part of the world. Just sending your kid to a Catholic school is not evidence of devout Catholicism, is it?
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
My question, aside from the almost unbelievable absurdity of all of this, is: WHERE IS THE CHURCH?
The girl attends a Catholic school. Why hasn't the school or the church made any attempt to intervene?
Well, how can you intervene without getting your head taken off by one party or another once things get to this level? I think by continuing to educate the girl, gratis, after her parents withdrew support, the school at least is sending a message here. And probably they know more about the situation than the reporters who are covering it.
Obviously, the kid could just be an entitled little bitch with an attitude problem. This is entirely possible. But she does have support from some quarters, from people who know her. And child protection officers failed to find any evidence of abuse in the household of a former police chief? Astonishing. Who'da thunk it?
--------------------
The history of humanity give one little hope that strength left to its own devices won't be abused. Indeed, it gives one little ground to think that strength would continue to exist if it were not abused. -- Dafyd --
Posts: 993 | From: New Zealand | Registered: Oct 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Arabella Purity Winterbottom
Trumpeting hope
# 3434
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
It strikes me as an odd reaction to a breakdown in your relationship with your daughter, to respond with, lets try to fuck up your future. Which makes me wonder what was happening in the home prior to this.
The only bit I take issue with is the parents not paying her current school fees. Maybe I'm reading it with my behavioural family therapist work hat on, but it reads as though she was acting out in a big way. We don't know the truth of whether she walked out or was kicked out (and on balance I'm going for the former) and given its a "they said/she said" situation it will be impossible to tell. From my experience, one parental, "get out of my sight," or "go away," can be blown up into "My mother told me to get out and never come back," very easily.
I'm interested that the behaviour seems to have started recently, and she's 18. Her honour student status and participation in cheerleading suggests to me that she's been pretty good up until now. Possibly rather spoiled? We don't have enough info though, so its all speculation, but 18 is quite late to start acting out - most kids are well over it by then, or they've started on a life of crime.
My experience of working with police officers as parents is that they often veer between being really permissive and really authoritarian - and spend a lot of time confused. In their jobs they have the law to back them, but they are often very fearful to ask for help in their personal lives because of the likelihood of their vulnerability getting out and affecting their image.
I don't see any mention of mediation or family work in the article. If it went straight to court, my belief is even stronger. Obviously, YMMV.
--------------------
Hell is full of the talented and Heaven is full of the energetic. St Jane Frances de Chantal
Posts: 3702 | From: Aotearoa, New Zealand | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lyda*Rose
Ship's broken porthole
# 4544
|
Posted
It's easy to see the breaking point: quote:
Her parents told the teen that she could no longer see her boyfriend, who was also suspended from school.
He was a baaaad influence and the parents wanted to nip it at the bud. That might have worked at fourteen, not a chance at eighteen.
--------------------
"Dear God, whose name I do not know - thank you for my life. I forgot how BIG... thank you. Thank you for my life." ~from Joe Vs the Volcano
Posts: 21377 | From: CA | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gramps49
Shipmate
# 16378
|
Posted
One thing she alleges is verbal and at least the threat of physical abuse by her parents. If this can be proven, doesn't she have the right to seek a safe place and shouldn't the parents be held responsible?
Please understand, I am not affirming this did indeed happen, just asking if it is true, how would that affect your opinion of the situation?
Posts: 2193 | From: Pullman WA | Registered: Apr 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gramps49:
One thing she alleges is verbal and at least the threat of physical abuse by her parents. If this can be proven, doesn't she have the right to seek a safe place and shouldn't the parents be held responsible?
Please understand, I am not affirming this did indeed happen, just asking if it is true, how would that affect your opinion of the situation?
Yes. I am saddened, though not really surprised, to see how many (not so much here but very much in the media) have rushed to accept the parents' version of events.
Right now we have a she said/they said situation. We either have a spoiled, ungrateful kid who refuses to live by her parents' rules yet wants them to support her... or we have an abused child who is finally willing to speak out about the abuse, seeking refuge and the ability to move on with her life. Or something somewhere in between. At this point, there's no way of knowing which is the reality.
If indeed she is fleeing abuse, one of the issues she will face is that, even tho she is over 18, all of the need-based financial aid to pay for college in the US is pegged to her parent's income. This may be why she is pursuing the lawsuit-- to be able to establish that she is "emancipated" so that she can qualify for aid based on her own income, not theirs. I have a student who is in precisely that situation, and it's not easy to establish. I and others in our institution have spent hours writing letters, documenting her situation, in the attempt to establish that determination in order to qualify her for aid. Part of the problem is that abusive parents often use finances as a control mechanism, so they'll give a lot of manipulative and inconsistent messages. They'll promise to pay tuition, but then there's strings attached... and those strings might be anything from something rather reasonable (as long as you stay off drugs and work hard in school) to something abusive (as long as you live at home where dad can continue to abuse you).
Again, there's just no way at this point of knowing what we're dealing with. Just would argue that we need to slow down before accepting either party's version of events wholesale.
A tragic situation either way.
![[Votive]](graemlins/votive.gif)
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
If the article is correct, she is in fact attempting to establish that she is NOT emancipated, does not wish to be emancipated--what she wants is for them to pay her bills regardless of her residency. That seems to me like trying to have it both ways. If you are in fact being abused, for goodness sakes leave and seek emancipation, so your financial aid will be calculated on tge basis of your own income alone and be that much higher. Plus you can cut the financial dependence that ties you to your abusers and gives them power over you. But why you would voluntarily demand to stay unemancipated and financially depndent in a case of true abuse--i don't get it.
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Arabella Purity Winterbottom
Trumpeting hope
# 3434
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gramps49:
One thing she alleges is verbal and at least the threat of physical abuse by her parents. If this can be proven, doesn't she have the right to seek a safe place and shouldn't the parents be held responsible?
Please understand, I am not affirming this did indeed happen, just asking if it is true, how would that affect your opinion of the situation?
I should say at the outset that I work with the parents of challenging teens.
Making an accusation of parental "abuse" is a very common strategy among my client group. I've had kids ring child protection because a parent wouldn't let them use the computer, mum's phone, or watch a porn dvd. Obviously they don't tell officials the real reason:instead they say "Dad's been hitting me," or abusing me. I'd say about 75% of my kids will make false allegations of this nature, which is why I'm a bit of a skeptic over this story.
The dad being a police officer makes it a particularly effective ace in the hole, as the last time I dealt with a similar situation the dad had lost his job and his reputation. It was subsequently proved that the child was lying and his employer had to make restitution.
--------------------
Hell is full of the talented and Heaven is full of the energetic. St Jane Frances de Chantal
Posts: 3702 | From: Aotearoa, New Zealand | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
If the article is correct, she is in fact attempting to establish that she is NOT emancipated, does not wish to be emancipated--what she wants is for them to pay her bills regardless of her residency. That seems to me like trying to have it both ways. If you are in fact being abused, for goodness sakes leave and seek emancipation, so your financial aid will be calculated on tge basis of your own income alone and be that much higher. Plus you can cut the financial dependence that ties you to your abusers and gives them power over you. But why you would voluntarily demand to stay unemancipated and financially depndent in a case of true abuse--i don't get it.
If her case is anything like my students', the point of the suit might be to make it clear one way or another. The suit will either resolve she is not emancipated, and her parents will support her education. Or it will resolve she is emancipated-- making her eligible for financial aid. What's deadly for a student hoping to complete their education and move ahead is the manipulative, coercive money-with-strings attached that an abuser will use to keep you dependent (by making you ineligible for aid) while maintaining control over you.
Again, no way of knowing if that's what's going on here or not. It may be that she is just a spoiled brat who wants it both ways. I'm just saying we don't know at this point.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
The other thing that strikes me as odd is why, emancipated or not, she thinks they're obliged to pay for her college education. Once I turned eighteen, my parents left me to handle that on my own, as an adult. (And yes, it really sucked.) And my father even stopped the minimal child support payment he was making to my mother--and no court said he had to keep on. Has the law changed, or something?
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gwai
Shipmate
# 11076
|
Posted
I think that one reason that people are taking the parent's side more is because there are more spoiled children than abusive parents. Of course, it's also just a more comforting narrative.
Re college, I think that people in this country have to have been on their own for two full years before they can apply for financial aid without having their parents' financial situation taken into consideration. (I know that an acquaintance couldn't go to college for that reason a few years ago anyway.) If that is still the case, that may be why it's worth it to her to sue.
--------------------
A master of men was the Goodly Fere,
A mate of the wind and sea.
If they think they ha’ slain our Goodly Fere
They are fools eternally.
Posts: 11914 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
I did have to obtain their data, though they were under no obligation to actually pay what tge computer formula spit out as "expected family contribution." I simply had to take care of that bit too.
Of course, you might need a court order to get some parents to supply the data.
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Belle Ringer
Shipmate
# 13379
|
Posted
According to this article she is asking $650 per WEEK while in high school in addition to tuition. I have friends raising a family on less than that!
The parents say "shortly before she turned 18, she told her parents that she would be an adult and could do whatever she wanted." I often hear kids claim they are adults and can do whatever they want, ignoring that they are still living in their parents' home.
Sometimes I think we should move the age of majority back to 21.
Posts: 5830 | From: Texas | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lyda*Rose
Ship's broken porthole
# 4544
|
Posted
Belle Ringer: quote:
Sometimes I think we should move the age of majority back to 21.
You'd do that to unhappy, abused parents? ![[Disappointed]](graemlins/disappointed.gif) ![[Biased]](wink.gif)
--------------------
"Dear God, whose name I do not know - thank you for my life. I forgot how BIG... thank you. Thank you for my life." ~from Joe Vs the Volcano
Posts: 21377 | From: CA | Registered: May 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Palimpsest
Shipmate
# 16772
|
Posted
There was a case in Italy a few years back where a man in his thirties was living at home and his mother decided to stop cooking his meals. He successfully sued to compel to continue to cook for him as her parental obligation.
Posts: 2990 | From: Seattle WA. US | Registered: Nov 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
I think that one reason that people are taking the parent's side more is because there are more spoiled children than abusive parents. Of course, it's also just a more comforting narrative.
I am not sure that is true. There are certainly a lot less cases like this, than there are documented cases of child abuse.
This young woman also has a fairly serious mental health condition, usually associated with issues of overcontrol. Entering into a battle for control with her, if you had understood the dynamics of eating disorder, strikes me as a major error of judgement.
--------------------
All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell
Posts: 19219 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gwai
Shipmate
# 11076
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
quote:
Originally posted by Gwai:
I think that one reason that people are taking the parent's side more is because there are more spoiled children than abusive parents. Of course, it's also just a more comforting narrative.
I am not sure that is true. There are certainly a lot less cases like this, than there are documented cases of child abuse.
Certainly if the girl is not abused, everyone looks bad. There are not many cases of children suing their parents, but there are many children whose parents don't discipline them and let them run around wild until they get into trouble. If they're lucky, it's mild trouble. If the parents are mostly honest, I'd guess that's the case here.
I guess I would like to hope that a girl of her age canny enough to end up in a trial like this could have found some convincing evidence of abuse. But many here definitely know more about this sort of thing than I, maybe it is easy to hide abuse of even a clever teenager.
--------------------
A master of men was the Goodly Fere,
A mate of the wind and sea.
If they think they ha’ slain our Goodly Fere
They are fools eternally.
Posts: 11914 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
HCH
Shipmate
# 14313
|
Posted
Going back to the original post: where is the church? What would you expect the church to do? This is a lawsuit and (as far as I can tell) the church is not a party to it. Should the church hire an attorney to appear as amicus curiae? Or is the church expected to have been aware of the problem earlier and to have done something about it? A more troubling question is what side the church should take: the girl's side, her parents' side, or simply the side of the truth. The latter, of course, is the role and job of the court.
Posts: 1540 | From: Illinois, USA | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by HCH:
Going back to the original post: where is the church? What would you expect the church to do? This is a lawsuit and (as far as I can tell) the church is not a party to it. Should the church hire an attorney to appear as amicus curiae? Or is the church expected to have been aware of the problem earlier and to have done something about it? A more troubling question is what side the church should take: the girl's side, her parents' side, or simply the side of the truth. The latter, of course, is the role and job of the court.
Both the girl and her parents are within the sphere of the Church, so both should be cared for pastorally. It is not the job of the Church to duplicate the efforts of courts and social workers, who will have the unhappy task of unraveling the web of she said/they said. Nor is it to play the role of cut-rate therapist to "fix" either party. But regardless of where the truth lies, this is a family shattered and damaged-- for whatever reason. The role of the Church then, I would suggest, is to come alongside both the girl and her parents, in deep prayer and practical support. To love them in tangible ways as they walk through this painful journey.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Panda
Shipmate
# 2951
|
Posted
In all fairness, it's perfectly possible that all that has already been happening. 'Church supports family' or 'Catholics broker peace deal' aren't the kind of headlines papers are much interested in printing, or even including as details in passing.
Posts: 1637 | From: North Wales | Registered: Jun 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Amanda B. Reckondwythe
Dressed for Church
# 5521
|
Posted
Somehow I feel that had Mr. and Mrs. Canning approached their pastor or the school principal or guidance counselor ("Rachel doesn't think she should have to obey us in this matter; what should we do?"), the parties wouldn't be in court right now.
--------------------
"I take prayer too seriously to use it as an excuse for avoiding work and responsibility." -- The Revd Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 10542 | From: The Great Southwest | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Panda:
In all fairness, it's perfectly possible that all that has already been happening. 'Church supports family' or 'Catholics broker peace deal' aren't the kind of headlines papers are much interested in printing, or even including as details in passing.
Oh, yes, I certainly didn't mean to imply those things aren't happening. Hopefully they are. As you say, not likely to be in the press if it is.
quote:
Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe:
Somehow I feel that had Mr. and Mrs. Canning approached their pastor or the school principal or guidance counselor ("Rachel doesn't think she should have to obey us in this matter; what should we do?"), the parties wouldn't be in court right now.
You're giving clergy and school personnel waaaay more influence than we generally have, sad to say. In real life I haven't found my words have anywhere near enough sway to stop a good lawsuit.
Which doesn't mean the Church can't, or shouldn't (or didn't, to Panda's point) reach out. Just that I don't have such over-inflated notions of my own power. God's power, though... which is why we pray.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Moo
Ship's tough old bird
# 107
|
Posted
It has occurred to me that no matter how the trial turns out, Rachel loses. If the judgment is against her, she obviously loses. If it is for her, the victory was gained by her friend's father, not by herself. In either case, she has not managed to strike a blow for independence. She is at an age when she should strike such a blow.
The fact that she does not want to be considered as emancipated suggests that she finds dependence attractive. I don't think that's healthy.
Moo
--------------------
Kerygmania host
---------------------
See you later, alligator.
Posts: 20365 | From: Alleghany Mountains of Virginia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
The fact that she does not want to be considered as emancipated suggests that she finds dependence attractive. I don't think that's healthy.
Moo
Or, again, that she needs to establish legally one way or another in order to qualify for aid.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
That's a very kind way to look at it--but what I'm reading suggests (heck, states) that she DOES in fact have a preference, which is for parental money and NOT emancipation-with-likelihood-of-extra-financial-aid. Which troubles me.
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
That's a very kind way to look at it--but what I'm reading suggests (heck, states) that she DOES in fact have a preference, which is for parental money and NOT emancipation-with-likelihood-of-extra-financial-aid. Which troubles me.
I don't think we can know that at this point. The actual purpose of a lawsuit may very well be just to get them on the record one way or another. Again, I have a student right now who is in precisely that situation, her efforts to document her emancipation in order to qualify for aid apart from her parents' income has been hellish and has set back her education over a year. Her case may similarly have to go to a civil suit in order to resolve.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
BessLane
Shipmate
# 15176
|
Posted
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm deluded, but if she's adult enough, in the eyes of the law, to file a lawsuit (regarless of who is paying the lawyers), then she's an adult. Emancipated, for whatever that means, as a legal adult in this country. For the first 18 years of your life, your parents are obligated to provide food, shelter, clothing, care, and an education. After that magic 18th birthday...not so much so.
[anectdote] I worked with a girl who was pissed off at her her parents because they didn't buy her a brand new sports car for her 16th birthday. Spoiled brats are spoiled brats. [/anectdote]
[ 08. March 2014, 07:42: Message edited by: BessHiggs ]
--------------------
It's all on me and I won't tell it.
formerly BessHiggs
Posts: 1388 | From: Yorkville, TN | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110
|
Posted
The most helpful skill set in dealing with teenage flexing of independent wings is industrial relations negotiations. Cooling off periods, talks about talks, third party mediation, finding effective compromises which will work at least for a while, restoring the peace, looking for "win-win" answers. You are trying to model reasonable behaviour to the often unreasonable. It can be very wearing and wearying, but it comes with the territory.
Sure, you sometimes get into withdrawal of privileges, groundings etc. Late in the game, and always with the knowledge that, whatever the gain, something gets lost when you have to resort to force majeure. During this time of change, loving relationships are not generally fostered by force majeure.
And if you are really lucky, and work really hard at it too, you may emerge from the dark tunnel to discover that you have a mutually respectful adult-adult relationship in place of the parent-child relationship with which you started.
This court case is a classic example of the kind of hideous mess you can get into when force majeure locks horns with stubborn resistance. And a very expensive way to find that out, to boot.
[ 08. March 2014, 10:08: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
--------------------
Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?
Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Autenrieth Road
Shipmate
# 10509
|
Posted
In the article Belle Ringer linked to, somehow this seems the most bizarre, but I can't quite put my finger on why:
quote:
Inglesino told the the Daily Record that he and his wife decided to pay for the lawsuit because they fear Canning will lose opportunities for a strong education and a happy future without her parents’ contributions.
I suppose my reaction is something like "why is that any of the Inglesinos' business?" but I'm not sure if that's quite it.
[ 08. March 2014, 12:13: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
--------------------
Truth
Posts: 9559 | From: starlight | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
no prophet's flag is set so...
Proceed to see sea
# 15560
|
Posted
I don't think she should have a case at all. Frankly. It is too late for family therapy probably, suing shows she's no Smurf, though the parents are also be blameworthy.
While lawyers like the idea for the threshold for suing to be rather low ($35 cost to register one here, wonder what it is there?), I can't see the parents winning it and registering costs against their daughter.
Perhaps it would be best to give the courts and lawyers the treatment recommended by Dick the Butcher in Henry VI. Or preferably kill the lawsuit very quickly. The court and lawyers have no business meddling in a family conflict and tragedy like this. None.
--------------------
Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety.
\_(ツ)_/
Posts: 11498 | From: Treaty 6 territory in the nonexistant Province of Buffalo, Canada ↄ⃝' | Registered: Mar 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Belle Ringer
Shipmate
# 13379
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
...her efforts to document her emancipation in order to qualify for aid apart from her parents' income...
According to the article I cited upthread, this gal is asking $650 per WEEK plus tuition. Nowhere that I've heard of in USA hands out that kind of money through social services.
The case might be a battle over a boyfriend. Parents told her give him up or get out. She got out. She wants zero consequences for her choice. (Don't most kids keep the boyfriend and lie to the parents about it?)
Posts: 5830 | From: Texas | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Net Spinster
Shipmate
# 16058
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by BessHiggs:
Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm deluded, but if she's adult enough, in the eyes of the law, to file a lawsuit (regarless of who is paying the lawyers), then she's an adult. Emancipated, for whatever that means, as a legal adult in this country. For the first 18 years of your life, your parents are obligated to provide food, shelter, clothing, care, and an education. After that magic 18th birthday...not so much so.
Except that for federal financial aid for higher education including student loans, her parents' income has to be known and used in the calculation unless she is over 24 or can prove her parents have disowned her. Her parents can make it really difficult for her to go to college just by refusing to give the information (or if wealthy, by giving the info but refusing to pay one cent towards it). On the face of it the lawsuit may be to force her parents to pay but if she loses completely it also establishes beyond a doubt that her parents won't pay and so their income should not be used when calculating financial aid. I also wonder what health insurance she has (dependent coverage can continue until 26 but if her parents drop her is she eligible for medicare or can she afford to pay for her health insurance).
--------------------
spinner of webs
Posts: 1093 | From: San Francisco Bay area | Registered: Dec 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Belle Ringer
Shipmate
# 13379
|
Posted
quote:
Powerful attorney John Inglesino, who took Rachel under his wing, let her get drunk on vodka in his Rockaway Township house when she was 15, according to a report in the Daily Mail.
...Rachel’s parents also claim the Inglesino family hosted parties and paid for rides in limousines filled with wine coolers.
“Rachel was angry because we would not host an alcoholic party,” her dad said in court papers.
“Rachel’s first time drinking alcohol was at the Inglesino house.”
More facts? Apparently the relationship with the man sheltering her goes back some years, and so does the parents' disapproval of his ways of dealing with their daughter.
Posts: 5830 | From: Texas | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Belle Ringer:
quote:
Powerful attorney John Inglesino, who took Rachel under his wing, let her get drunk on vodka in his Rockaway Township house when she was 15, according to a report in the Daily Mail.
...Rachel’s parents also claim the Inglesino family hosted parties and paid for rides in limousines filled with wine coolers.
“Rachel was angry because we would not host an alcoholic party,” her dad said in court papers.
“Rachel’s first time drinking alcohol was at the Inglesino house.”
More facts? Apparently the relationship with the man sheltering her goes back some years, and so does the parents' disapproval of his ways of dealing with their daughter.
ewwww... that does shed new-- and dark-- light on the matter. Much cause for concern there. This may turn out to be about neither spoiled privileged kids nor abusive controlling parents-- but something far darker.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
leo
Shipmate
# 1458
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Belle Ringer:
quote:
Powerful attorney John Inglesino, who took Rachel under his wing, let her get drunk on vodka in his Rockaway Township house when she was 15, according to a report in the Daily Mail.
...Rachel’s parents also claim the Inglesino family hosted parties and paid for rides in limousines filled with wine coolers.
“Rachel was angry because we would not host an alcoholic party,” her dad said in court papers.
“Rachel’s first time drinking alcohol was at the Inglesino house.”
More facts? Apparently the relationship with the man sheltering her goes back some years, and so does the parents' disapproval of his ways of dealing with their daughter.
She sounds like a typical teenager to me - but her parents look as if they are completely intolerant, not willing to make allowances (literally!)
--------------------
My Jewish-positive lectionary blog is at http://recognisingjewishrootsinthelectionary.wordpress.com/
My reviews at http://layreadersbookreviews.wordpress.com
Posts: 23198 | From: Bristol | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
I'm finding it hard to laugh about entitled teens when it's possible there's a predator (though not a parental one) involved...
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Moo
Ship's tough old bird
# 107
|
Posted
John Inglesino, the man who is sponsoring the lawsuit, is a well-known tort lawyer. He appears to think that suing people is one of the first things you should think of doing in a difficult situation.
Moo
--------------------
Kerygmania host
---------------------
See you later, alligator.
Posts: 20365 | From: Alleghany Mountains of Virginia | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
John Inglesino, the man who is sponsoring the lawsuit, is a well-known tort lawyer. He appears to think that suing people is one of the first things you should think of doing in a difficult situation.
Moo
If he also has a habit of getting 15 year olds drunk, then inviting them to leave their unreasonable parents and come live with him, I'm afraid that might not be the worst of his traits...
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
I'm finding it hard to laugh about entitled teens when it's possible there's a predator (though not a parental one) involved...
That's what worries me. It didn't sound right from the beginning that some unrelated adult was willing to bankroll her lawsuit... And where's the freakin' boyfriend in all this? He seems to have dropped out of the picture altogether.
[ 09. March 2014, 01:11: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
I'm finding it hard to laugh about entitled teens when it's possible there's a predator (though not a parental one) involved...
That's what worries me. It didn't sound right from the beginning that some unrelated adult was willing to bankroll her lawsuit... And where's the freakin' boyfriend in all this? He seems to have dropped out of the picture altogether.
I was willing to see the bankrolling parent as either gullible-soul-hoodwinked-by-pouty-teen or courageous-caring-adult-protecing-vulnerable-abused-child... until I heard about the pattern of getting her drunk that led up to his "generous" offer of more --um, accommodating-- room & board. Now the whole thing is looking potentially much, much darker. I hope I'm wrong, but the pattern of his behavior is giving me the willies. And not in a good way. I'm seeing the kid as a victim now, but in a whole different way...
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
Yes, I thought potentially "publicity seeking public figure/lawyer finds another excuse to embarrass other public figure/retired police chief" which would be bad enough; but this would be worse. And do you know, has anyone heard anything of the boyfriend? I thought at first he was the son of this guy; but if so, he seems to have faded out of the picture, which is not what I'd expect if that relationship was the font and source of all this mess. I mean, what PITA boyfriend is going to miss the chance to show up and look righteous and supportive in court, or on the Facebook post? And yet it seems he has...
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
Okay, I've had a Google (yeah, yeah, should've done that before) and apparently he is NOT related to the lawyer she's staying with. The first articles I read were wrong. And if it were my son, I'd certainly try to keep him out of this shitstorm, so no blame to them for lying low.
--------------------
Er, this is what I've been up to (book).
Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Eliab
Shipmate
# 9153
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
quote:
Originally posted by Belle Ringer:
Apparently the relationship with the man sheltering her goes back some years, and so does the parents' disapproval of his ways of dealing with their daughter.
ewwww... that does shed new-- and dark-- light on the matter. Much cause for concern there. This may turn out to be about neither spoiled privileged kids nor abusive controlling parents-- but something far darker.
My thought on reading that was to wonder how parents can let children reach age 15 without giving them the opportunity to try alcohol in a safe home environment. By that age, they should be treating her as much like an adult as possible, to encourage her to act that way.
On the boyfriend point, I asked my daughter last year (she was five, we'd watched a film in which the situation occurred) what she would do if I told her she wasn't allowed to see a boy whom she wanted to be friends with. It took her about half a second to give her response: "I would kick you in the nuts".
It astonishes me that there seem to be parents who would want a daughter to give any other answer to that question than that one. If there's anything in the world worth fighting for, the right to choose your friends is it.
--------------------
"Perhaps there is poetic beauty in the abstract ideas of justice or fairness, but I doubt if many lawyers are moved by it"
Richard Dawkins
Posts: 4619 | From: Hampton, Middlesex, UK | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Curiosity killed ...
Ship's Mug
# 11770
|
Posted
Eliab, it was interesting your reading of this. I am not comfortable that another family has taken it upon themselves to introduce other people's children to alcohol consumption. But it really reminded me that there is a huge Pond divide on attitudes to alcohol and young people. I've read a few American novels when bits of the plot have been hinged on people giving alcohol to minors or covering up parties when children have been drinking aged 15 or 16. It's a completely different world to our 13 year olds getting drunk on the streets, which isn't ideal either. And our almost European attitudes to teaching children to treat alcohol appropriately,
--------------------
Mugs - Keep the Ship afloat
Posts: 13794 | From: outiside the outer ring road | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Gee D
Shipmate
# 13815
|
Posted
Eliab, your comment about supplying alcohol to under 18s may well work in the UK, but not necessarily elsewhere. That sort of action, even in your own home, may be held to be a criminal offence here and in many US states also.
--------------------
Not every Anglican in Sydney is Sydney Anglican
Posts: 7028 | From: Warrawee NSW Australia | Registered: Jun 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gee D:
Eliab, your comment about supplying alcohol to under 18s may well work in the UK, but not necessarily elsewhere. That sort of action, even in your own home, may be held to be a criminal offence here and in many US states also.
And it's the context that makes this look so very suspicious. This isn't a parent looking the other way while their son/daughter holds an after-prom party and raids the liquor cabinet. This is not giving your own son or daughter a small glass of wine at dinner. This is alleged to be a grown man getting a 15 year old drunk and supplying her with alcohol in a number of potentially compromising situations-- not with her peers, but with this same older adult-- who then ends up becoming her "caretaker" and her living under his roof.
Again, my *danger* meter is pinging.
If I were the parents I would want to be doing something much more significant than just cutting off $$. But perhaps they have tried and this is just one aspect of a larger picture.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
justlooking
Shipmate
# 12079
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Eliab:
My thought on reading that was to wonder how parents can let children reach age 15 without giving them the opportunity to try alcohol in a safe home environment. By that age, they should be treating her as much like an adult as possible, to encourage her to act that way.
I totally agree with this. I've lived in a European country where children were introduced to wine at a young age and which had no minimum age for drinking alcohol in restaurants and bars. The usual practice was to give young children diluted wine at meals and to decrease the dilution with advancing age. It was common to see teenagers leaving school in the afternoon and gathering with their friends in the cafes and bars where it was left to the discretion of bar staff as to what they would be served. A couple of beers or glasses of wine was OK but they wouldn't be served with spirits or allowed to become drunk.
In the UK parents can give alcohol to any child over the age of five and certain low-alcohol drinks can be served in licensed premises to people of 14 or over if they are having a meal. In practice there has always been some discretion allowed to bar staff. When I was a 15 year-old, many years ago, I used to go to an after-school ice-skating club which ended at the time the bar opened and the bar would serve us certain alchoholic drinks. AFAICR these included lager and lime, shandy made with beer (not just the bottled stuff) cider, Babycham, and something called CherryB. In the opinion of the barman Babycham had been invented specifically for girls.
[ 09. March 2014, 12:57: Message edited by: justlooking ]
Posts: 2319 | From: thither and yon | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Curiosity killed ...
Ship's Mug
# 11770
|
Posted
justlooking - the legal situation is that children are only allowed in pubs if there is a children's room. A young person of 16 may be bought a glass of beer, wine or cider with a meal. Nobody under 18 may buy an alcoholic drink for themselves or others.
Your barman was definitely acting illegally.
--------------------
Mugs - Keep the Ship afloat
Posts: 13794 | From: outiside the outer ring road | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Gee D:
Eliab, your comment about supplying alcohol to under 18s may well work in the UK, but not necessarily elsewhere. That sort of action, even in your own home, may be held to be a criminal offence here and in many US states also.
If that's really true, I actually find that quite a shocking intrusion into how one parents one's children. Is such a law actually enforced or is it de facto ignored?
I also, though, find it shocking that someone should presume to give alcohol to somebody else's fifteen year old child without apparently taking any account of what her parents' take was likely to be. That's also an improper intrusion.
On the other hand, weirdly, this story seems to have reached our Daily Mail. So that makes me wonder whether it was ever true in the first place.
[ 09. March 2014, 13:49: Message edited by: Enoch ]
--------------------
Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson
Posts: 7610 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view
