homepage
  roll on christmas  
click here to find out more about ship of fools click here to sign up for the ship of fools newsletter click here to support ship of fools
community the mystery worshipper gadgets for god caption competition foolishness features ship stuff
discussion boards live chat cafe avatars frequently-asked questions the ten commandments gallery private boards register for the boards
 
Ship of Fools
Thread closed  Thread closed


Post new thread  
Thread closed  Thread closed
My profile login | | Directory | Search | FAQs | Board home
   - Printer-friendly view Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
» Ship of Fools   »   » Oblivion   » Should Dead Horse Views Prevent You From Running a Company

 - Email this page to a friend or enemy.    
Source: (consider it) Thread: Should Dead Horse Views Prevent You From Running a Company
Hairy Biker
Shipmate
# 12086

 - Posted      Profile for Hairy Biker   Email Hairy Biker   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
Brendan Eich, clearly a brilliant technologist, has been force to resign from the Mozilla Corporation, specifically because of what he has publicly stated he believes about gay marriage.

Now, without getting into the rights and wrongs of his views (or we'll end up in DH), what do shipmates think of this? Does the CEO's view on this issue, however publicly declared, have any bearing on his ability to run the company? Have we come to a kind of inverse-Orwellian point in our society, where the thought-mob are able to control our opinions?

--------------------
there [are] four important things in life: religion, love, art and science. At their best, they’re all just tools to help you find a path through the darkness. None of them really work that well, but they help.
Damien Hirst

Posts: 683 | From: This Sceptred Isle | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Antisocial Alto
Shipmate
# 13810

 - Posted      Profile for Antisocial Alto   Email Antisocial Alto   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
Maybe being dumb enough to shoot off his mouth in public about a controversial belief that has nothing to do with his company's products means he's not fit to be CEO. Presumably he ought to know something about PR. Like not pissing off a bunch of people for no reason.
Posts: 601 | From: United States | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged
Doc Tor
Deepest Red
# 9748

 - Posted      Profile for Doc Tor     Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
Given that Mozilla has employees who are in same-sex relationships, knowing that their boss is bothered enough to donate money to organisations that actively work to prevent their regularising them within law... that's awkward for all concerned.

However, customers who are in same-sex relationships, and their friends, are free to firstly, not use Mozilla products, and secondly, tell Mozilla why they're not.

You could simply put this down to a good, old-fashioned consumer boycott, of which there have been plenty in the past, and undoubtedly will be plenty in the future.

So, arguably, simply holding Dead Horse views won't prevent you from running a company. Being publicly known as an activist for or against those views is going to a different level. Those consumers and employees who are sufficiently bothered one way or another, will vote with their feet.

--------------------
Forward the New Republic

Posts: 9131 | From: Ultima Thule | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
stonespring
Shipmate
# 15530

 - Posted      Profile for stonespring     Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
I already started a thread on this in DH. If he had donated money to a campaign to ban interracial marriage, would people's attitudes be different? No one would have questioned pressuring him to resign. And people would probably be more tolerant (maybe) if he had donated to a campaign to ban abortions.

I think political donations should be public - so many if the huge donations to "social welfare groups" of the KochBrothers and Karl Rove are not subject to disclosure. But then you get people forced to resign for their donations like this. But this is different than just donating to a party or candidate.

The majority in the tech industry especially see same sex marriage as a moral and human rights issue and not so much as a religious freedom or freedom of conscience issue.
Maybe it would be different in a different industry. But people can boycott anything. Still, being a religious conservative is really tough as an executive in the tech industry - even if you keep it private except for making political donations.

I don't know how to discuss this without getting into the DH issue of how same sex marriage is different from (or not different from) other civil rights and religious issues.

Posts: 1537 | Registered: Mar 2010  |  IP: Logged
Hairy Biker
Shipmate
# 12086

 - Posted      Profile for Hairy Biker   Email Hairy Biker   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:


You could simply put this down to a good, old-fashioned consumer boycott, of which there have been plenty in the past, and undoubtedly will be plenty in the future.

But the don't often lead to newly appointed heads rolling in such short order. What happened to the bosses of Starbucks and Amazon when they were called out on tax practices? They were able to ride that storm. It's more than a boycott, I would suggest.

--------------------
there [are] four important things in life: religion, love, art and science. At their best, they’re all just tools to help you find a path through the darkness. None of them really work that well, but they help.
Damien Hirst

Posts: 683 | From: This Sceptred Isle | Registered: Nov 2006  |  IP: Logged
Fr Weber
Shipmate
# 13472

 - Posted      Profile for Fr Weber   Email Fr Weber   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
There's no evidence so far that he's tried to run Mozilla according to his personal beliefs. So he gave some money to a controversial cause. So what?

Criticizing him for it is fine. Calling for his ouster because of political contributions (which he made from his own money, not from the company's funds) is disgusting. If he were an entry-level employee who got fired for posting a marriage-equality flyer in his cubicle, there would be a shitstorm (led by the very people who are now baying for him to be sacked, no doubt).

--------------------
"The Eucharist is not a play, and you're not Jesus."

--Sr Theresa Koernke, IHM

Posts: 2512 | From: Oakland, CA | Registered: Feb 2008  |  IP: Logged
Doc Tor
Deepest Red
# 9748

 - Posted      Profile for Doc Tor     Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
quote:
Originally posted by Hairy Biker:
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:


You could simply put this down to a good, old-fashioned consumer boycott, of which there have been plenty in the past, and undoubtedly will be plenty in the future.

But the don't often lead to newly appointed heads rolling in such short order. What happened to the bosses of Starbucks and Amazon when they were called out on tax practices? They were able to ride that storm. It's more than a boycott, I would suggest.
Yes, they were able to ride out that storm, but that was because the boycott wasn't effective enough. If it had been, they would have gone.

Mozilla is a company that relies on the good will of both its employees and its customers, putting it in a more vulnerable position than say, Amazon, which enjoys an almost monopsonic position. (Amazon could probably sacrifice a kitten every time someone placed an order and still enough people would use it...)

--------------------
Forward the New Republic

Posts: 9131 | From: Ultima Thule | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Doc Tor
Deepest Red
# 9748

 - Posted      Profile for Doc Tor     Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
quote:
Originally posted by Fr Weber:
Calling for his ouster because of political contributions (which he made from his own money, not from the company's funds) is disgusting.

Why? I can choose to do business with who I want (as are you), and I'm free to make pubic what my conditions are to conduct business with any company (as are you).

If the boss of HugeCorp was giving money to build Wahhabi mosques across the US, you'd be cool with that, right?

--------------------
Forward the New Republic

Posts: 9131 | From: Ultima Thule | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Nicolemr
Shipmate
# 28

 - Posted      Profile for Nicolemr   Author's homepage   Email Nicolemr   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
Seems to me that it's a matter of degree. Simply holding odious beliefs should be a personal, private thing.

Making them public becomes problematical. If you annoy enough people there will be a reaction. And making a big enough noise about them does make questionable fitness... as someone pointed out it's bad PR for the company and that's a problem. And the problem with employee relations too.

Where this case lies in the continuum between the two extremes, between holding beliefs privately and making a big noise about them, probably closer to the first. Much as it makes me queasy to admit it, if all he did was donate a contribution to a cause, not get on a soap box about it, he should probably get a pass.

--------------------
On pilgrimage in the endless realms of Cyberia, currently traveling by ship. Now with live journal!

Posts: 11803 | From: New York City "The City Carries On" | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Horseman Bree
Shipmate
# 5290

 - Posted      Profile for Horseman Bree   Email Horseman Bree   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
So: how is it different between Mozilla having a boss who wants to dictate whether some of his employees get to marry or the boss of Hobby Lobby wanting to dictate the conditions by which some of his employees have sex?

Mozilla is precarious because the clientele and its own work force can't see the connection between one's marriage and the work that the company does - but bad labour relations will destroy the company.

Hobby Lobby gets away with it because...they rely on hiring docile minimum-wage workers who can't question company policy? because the customers of HL don't give a rat's ass about employment conditions? (Cheap is all in small-item sales) because they only sell in anti-gay states?

--------------------
It's Not That Simple

Posts: 5372 | From: more herring choker than bluenose | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110

 - Posted      Profile for Barnabas62   Email Barnabas62   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
There is already a thread in Dead Horses on this very theme and that is the right place for this discussion. I'm closing this thread and linking the posts here to the DH thread.

Barnabas62
Purgatory Host.

--------------------
Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?

Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Barnabas62
Shipmate
# 9110

 - Posted      Profile for Barnabas62   Email Barnabas62   Send new private message       Edit/delete post 
Minor adjustment. To avoid losing the link to these posts, I'm moving the thread to DH then closing it again.

B62
Purg Host

--------------------
Who is it that you seek? How then shall we live? How shall we sing the Lord's song in a strange land?

Posts: 21397 | From: Norfolk UK | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged


 
Post new thread  
Thread closed  Thread closed
Open thread   Feature thread   Move thread   Delete thread Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
 - Printer-friendly view
Go to:

Contact us | Ship of Fools | Privacy statement

© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0

 
follow ship of fools on twitter
buy your ship of fools postcards
sip of fools mugs from your favourite nautical website
 
 
  ship of fools