homepage
  roll on christmas  
click here to find out more about ship of fools click here to sign up for the ship of fools newsletter click here to support ship of fools
community the mystery worshipper gadgets for god caption competition foolishness features ship stuff
discussion boards live chat cafe avatars frequently-asked questions the ten commandments gallery private boards register for the boards
 
Ship of Fools


Post new thread  Post a reply
My profile login | | Directory | Search | FAQs | Board home
   - Printer-friendly view Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
» Ship of Fools   »   » Oblivion   » Is the answer stark and right? (Page 2)

 - Email this page to a friend or enemy.  
Pages in this thread: 1  2 
 
Source: (consider it) Thread: Is the answer stark and right?
Callan
Shipmate
# 525

 - Posted      Profile for Callan     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Originally posted by Croesus:

quote:
The biggest problem with arguments like this is they mostly depend on cherry-picking a very narrow set of examples. For instance, if Christianity is required for economic prosperity, why is non-Christian Japan (GDP $34,871 per capita) more prosperous than Christian Romania (GDP $9,157 per capita)? Or why was Christian Europe much less economically prosperous than the Muslim middle east or imperial China in the Middle Ages?

The obvious problem with that comparison is that economic development in Romania was retarded by a command economy foisted upon them from the late 1940s to 1989 by a government that could hardly be characterised as Christian.

But the example of Japan, I think, points to a more profound objection. One the West had started developing science, industry and representative governments other societies could follow suit. Christianity wasn't an integral part of the model. Which obviously raises the question as to what extent it was a cause of the rise of the model in the first place. To be honest I would be somewhat surprised if it made no contribution but to some extent there was the introduction of something truly novel which some Christians were unable or unwilling to suppress and which other Christians sought to justify with Christian arguments. Macaulay's essay 'On The Civil Disabilities Of The Jews' is a case in point. Macaulay sincerely makes the case for giving Jews full civil and political rights from a Christian point of view, but we would hardly deduce from this that Christianity was inherently and intrinsically philosemitic.

--------------------
How easy it would be to live in England, if only one did not love her. - G.K. Chesterton

Posts: 9757 | From: Citizen of the World | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Freddy
Shipmate
# 365

 - Posted      Profile for Freddy   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by shadeson:
It is probable that later theological changes in christianity enabled more stable populations to communicate ideas and kick off the technological revolution.

Another take on this idea is not that Christianity caused the technological revolution. Rather, God caused the technological revolution to facilitate the spread of Christianity. Which it did.

--------------------
"Consequently nothing is of greater importance to a person than knowing what the truth is." Swedenborg

Posts: 12845 | From: Bryn Athyn | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged



Pages in this thread: 1  2 
 
Post new thread  Post a reply Close thread   Feature thread   Move thread   Delete thread Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
 - Printer-friendly view
Go to:

Contact us | Ship of Fools | Privacy statement

© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0

 
follow ship of fools on twitter
buy your ship of fools postcards
sip of fools mugs from your favourite nautical website
 
 
  ship of fools