Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: How much Big Brother is Appropriate?
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
Proposed legislation in Washington D.C. would enact a 24hr cool off period before getting a tattoo. This has prompted this OP. That government acts as a "nanny" is undoubted. And, to a point necessary. But how much is too much? This legislation. ISTM, goes too far. I do think placement and visibility ought to be considered. And I would highly suggest much thought and sobriety be part of ones decision. But laws?
-------------------- I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Amos
Shipmate
# 44
|
Posted
Ah, the bill to prevent people waking up on Sunday morning with a tattoo they don't remember getting.
-------------------- At the end of the day we face our Maker alongside Jesus--ken
Posts: 7667 | From: Summerisle | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Hairy Biker
Shipmate
# 12086
|
Posted
I don't much care about tattoo artists and their customers. I don't see this as a gross intrusion on civil liberties. Constant surveillance by video and interception of electronic communication is far more worrying.
-------------------- there [are] four important things in life: religion, love, art and science. At their best, they’re all just tools to help you find a path through the darkness. None of them really work that well, but they help. Damien Hirst
Posts: 683 | From: This Sceptred Isle | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
the giant cheeseburger
Shipmate
# 10942
|
Posted
I approve of that legislation. The industry has clearly demonstrated that it's not able to self-regulate and ensure that informed consent is given, therefore the industry needs the government to kep an eye on it.
-------------------- If I give a homeopathy advocate a really huge punch in the face, can the injury be cured by giving them another really small punch in the face?
Posts: 4834 | From: Adelaide, South Australia. | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lucia
Looking for light
# 15201
|
Posted
Encouraging a bit of careful (sober!) contemplation before having something permanent like a tattoo would seem like a good idea really.
Dave Gorman could perhaps have done with this law...
Posts: 1075 | From: Nigh golden stone and spires | Registered: Oct 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leorning Cniht
Shipmate
# 17564
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by lilBuddha: That government acts as a "nanny" is undoubted. And, to a point necessary. But how much is too much?
The more irreversible the decision, the more a cooling-off period is useful.
My understanding is that you can't just walk in to a plastic surgeon's office and get a breast enlargement or a rhinoplasty that day. A tattoo isn't quite as invasive as that, but it's much more like a nose job than a haircut.
Posts: 5026 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
HCH
Shipmate
# 14313
|
Posted
The latter argument could be a slippery slope. Should there be a cooling-off period before (in no particular order):
--- getting married? --- having in-vitro fertilization? --- having an abortion? --- adopting a child? --- having oneself sterilized? --- enlisting in the Marines? --- buying a gun? --- getting a divorce? --- buying a house? --- giving up custody of a child? --- signing a DNR order? --- disowning a child? --- having preemptive mastectomies? --- enrolling in college? --- dropping out of college? --- quitting a job?
Posts: 1540 | From: Illinois, USA | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
no prophet's flag is set so...
Proceed to see sea
# 15560
|
Posted
It is rather startling to consider what is wanted to be regulated. Tattoos? really? One can think of many other things more important to regulated. I'd like to see a cooling off period before one of those mega sugar drinks, getting a gun and purchasing online pornography. Particularly the porn with maybe certification of having had a cold shower. (we know guns are given to babies as shower gifts in the USA so not even going to bother further with that one)
-------------------- Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety. \_(ツ)_/
Posts: 11498 | From: Treaty 6 territory in the nonexistant Province of Buffalo, Canada ↄ⃝' | Registered: Mar 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
the giant cheeseburger
Shipmate
# 10942
|
Posted
Most of those examples already have them, whether they are explicitly called cooling-off periods (as in selling a house) or not.
I doubt that many GP offices would have a full surgical team ready like sprinters at the starting blocks for the moment a person says the words "I would like to get a preventative mastectomy."
-------------------- If I give a homeopathy advocate a really huge punch in the face, can the injury be cured by giving them another really small punch in the face?
Posts: 4834 | From: Adelaide, South Australia. | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dal Segno
al Fine
# 14673
|
Posted
All of those quoted below have an in-built cooling-off period in the UK:
quote: Originally posted by HCH: The latter argument could be a slippery slope. Should there be a cooling-off period before (in no particular order): --- getting married? --- having in-vitro fertilization? --- adopting a child? --- buying a gun? --- getting a divorce? --- buying a house? --- enrolling in college? --- dropping out of college? --- quitting a job?
-------------------- Yet ever and anon a trumpet sounds
Posts: 1200 | From: Pacific's triple star | Registered: Mar 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sioni Sais
Shipmate
# 5713
|
Posted
I expect tattoo parlors will move outside the D.C. limits. The Health Board and legislators can then pat themselves on the back for A Job Well Done.
-------------------- "He isn't Doctor Who, he's The Doctor"
(Paul Sinha, BBC)
Posts: 24276 | From: Newport, Wales | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Olaf
Shipmate
# 11804
|
Posted
The tattoo limit is too far. A test of "Who else is physically endangered?" should be employed. If the action impacts only the receiver, then the government is acting as a nanny. I suppose some sort of infection argument could be made, but until I see some hard proof of that, I'm not willing to assume it is a widespread problem.
Posts: 8953 | From: Ad Midwestem | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
malik3000
Shipmate
# 11437
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by no prophet: I'd like to see a cooling off period before one of those mega sugar drinks, getting a gun and purchasing online pornography.
Why a waiting period on purchasing online porn? Any regulation of porn should be done before it gets to the point of being marketed to the consumer (e.g., ensuring that no underage persons were involved, insuring that no one is being exploited to do things against their will, and other things of that sort). But if none of those things is the case, why shouldn't adults be able to purchase material that provides erotic stimulation to them (if they don't mind running the chance of of infecting their computer with viruses or malware). [ 09. September 2013, 03:24: Message edited by: malik3000 ]
-------------------- God = love. Otherwise, things are not just black or white.
Posts: 3149 | From: North America | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|