Thread: Mordor: twinned with Slough Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.


To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=027926

Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
With Doublethink's permission * have started a new book thread with the title being a great quote from Mary Schmich.

Over the last couple of weeks * have read my way through the complete Sherlock Holmes stories. * tend to read and reread them every few years and every time * pick up on something that is fantastic, wonderful and entertaining. The relationship between Holmes and Watson is always entertaining and the descriptions of the clothes and the lifestyles people had then fascinate me. There is some racism (and the highly unlikely name of a character called Mohamet Singh) but that's just of it's time although it reads badly now.

* find it fascinating that Conan Doyle, who was a believer in spiritualism and all sorts of oddness, could write a character like Holmes.

Today * bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until * read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but * can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.

[ 20. September 2014, 06:35: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Anent detective fiction - the good news is that there is a current author, Paul Halter, who is writing locked room mysteries in the tradition of John Dickson Carr. The bad news is that he has none of that author's flair for atmosphere, and no discernible turn for convincing characters or dialogue. Admittedly, I'm reading him in translation from the French - but I think if he had those qualities, they would survive.

Anyway, off to grub among the Kindling for a stock of holiday reading to take away next week. Any suggestions - particularly 'tec fiction - gratefully received.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
I would recommend against Death comes to Pemberly - it was very disappointing. Mostly seeming to be taken up with exposition of Austen's world and little noticeable detection either.

On the other had, An Instance of the Fingerpost is possibly one of the best mysterys I have read - but not true detective fiction in that it is set during/just after the English civil war so no actual policeman. The chapters are written from the viewpoints of several characters, and they are very well inhabited. The title refers to eye witness evidence as being the one 'instance of the fingerpost' that you can identify in an inquiry.

[ 16. September 2012, 13:29: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Instance of the Fingerpost is brilliant. Among other things, the way it presents events which can be read in different ways - not an easy trick to pull off from a writing POV.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
One of my favourite authors is Arturo Perez-Reverte, one of his best is The Queen of the South - it is a crime novel rather than a detective story. But there are lots of twists and turns, and mysteries within the text to solve. It is written in third person partly, and then in terms of a journalist attempting to piece together the story of the main character's life.

Again, real efforts to create distinctive character voices, and to convey cultures I am really unfamiliar with. Moves from Mexico to Europe and draws a lot of parallels with the wild west when thinking about the world of drug trafficking.

There is a little more sex than I would prefer in a novel of this kind, but it is not written in such away that you feel like the author is trying to slip in some porn to keep you interested. It is one of the few novels where the idea that it advances the plot or reveals character seems to have some validity.

[ 16. September 2012, 14:58: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
This afternoon I reread The Recruit, the first of Robert Muchamore's Cherub series of teen novels. Well written and pacy but possibly not as smooth as some of the later titles - I think he captures teen-boy angst really well and believably for the target audience whilst not being in the least didactic about it.

I have just been looking at Amazon and am sad to see they have currently stopped doing the free delivery of some stuff to India if you buy over 50 quids worth so I have put the titles I am missing on my wish list for a while to see if they bring back the free shipping otherwise my great nephew will have a stack of books to bring over in November!
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Instance of the Fingerpost is brilliant. Among other things, the way it presents events which can be read in different ways - not an easy trick to pull off from a writing POV.

Yes, but best of all is that you still know whodunnit at the end, so it both embraces post-modernism and then very firmly puts it in its place.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
One of my favourite authors is Arturo Perez-Reverte, one of his best is The Queen of the South

Actually, that was where he lost me. I loved The Flanders Panel and particularly The Dumas Club - essentially the ones with an antiquarian element - but not the contemporary stuff.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
Clearly we have some similar tastes in authors. For relaxin holiday reading - if I am not going with Pratchett - I frequently re-read CS Forester's Hornblower novels or O'Brien's Abrey / Mataurin series. They are both set in the time of the Napoleonic wars, though I believe Hornblower is slightly later than Aubrey. They both become Naval Captains (Mautarin is Aubrey's surgeon + friend and sails with him).

Most of the stuff they do appears to be based on the real life exploits of Lord Cochrane - if you read enough novels in this genre Ramage for example - you end up recognising the engagements. Especially the one where the fleet catches a load of Spanish galleons before the formal declaration of war.

Aubrey is more believably a man of his time, believing very much in heirachy and the traditional roles and ways of doing things. Mauturin provides the liberal counterpoint. Where as Hornblower is portrayed as very tortured man burdened by a 20th century sensibility a good half century before his time. Once you get past the jargon they are both very engaging series and usually contain some elements of puzzle amongst the action sequences.

The Aubrey novels are the better written I think, and if you are interested in that historical period they have a good level of detail. O'Brien is very good at conveying the gist of communal conversation and they also have more humour than the Forester novels.

Here is the first of the series.

[ 16. September 2012, 17:02: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
One of my favourite authors is Arturo Perez-Reverte, one of his best is The Queen of the South

Actually, that was where he lost me. I loved The Flanders Panel and particularly The Dumas Club - essentially the ones with an antiquarian element - but not the contemporary stuff.
I liked Queen of the South, but much preferred The Club Dumas, which I found to be rather like Eco but without the intellectual pretentiousness (I do like Eco, but...) I really enjoy the Captain Alatriste novels, in which Perez-Reverte essentially channels Dumas, but does him one better by having real depth to his characters.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
I do enjoy the Dumas club, but I feel I haven't read enough of Dumas to appreciate it as much as I should. If I were to start reading Dumas - which would you recommend first off ?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
I do enjoy the Dumas club, but I feel I haven't read enough of Dumas to appreciate it as much as I should. If I were to start reading Dumas - which would you recommend first off ?

I suppose The Three Musketeers is the obvious choice. I read it in childhood in a bowdlerised translation which left it totally obscure as to what D'Artagnon was up to in Milady's bedroom - I can remember being mystified as to why he had no clothes on in the subsequent scene. The Count of Monte Cristo was in a version probably equally coy and ponderous, but the basic idea is so gripping, it draws you in. And I read Twenty Years After - again in an edition which I suspect was first published in the 19th C - but being hampered, at age 9 or 10, by a certain lack of knowledge of 17th C history - didn't really grasp some of the detail.

I'm sure racier and truer version are available nowadays.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
For detective novels, I've just discovered Melvin R Starr's Unquiet Bones - which is the first chronicle of Hugh de Singleton, surgeon from 1363. I'm finding it engaging, a sort of secular Cadfael, 200 years later, with a sense of humour, neat turn of phrase and modern English barring untranslatable terms, some of which are still the correct words. There is a glossary, which I checked, which is pretty accurate, although he's slightly scrambled his pollarding and coppicing, but I'll give him that - they're pretty arcane terms for similar techniques. I haven't finished this one yet, but it might be worth looking for.

I don't know who you've read in detective fiction. Have you read Kate Charles' Wesley Peterson series where modern day murders echo archaeological ones? Or Linda Fairstein's New York murders? She like Kathy Reichs is writing about the day job. Linda Fairstein was a prosecutor for sex crimes as is her heroine.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I liked the couple of Linda Fairsteen's books that I read too.

I also agree with Doublethink about Death Comes to Pemberley . I stupidly had high hopes for it, but I rarely enjoy an author using someone else's characters.

Huia
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
I've just finished Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall. (I've been on a bit of a Tudor kick recently, having worked my way through many of Alison Weir's books on the wives earlier this year.) Wolf Hall is a telling of the Henry and Anne Boleyn story with Thomas Cromwell as the central character, in that all the action is seen through Cromwell's point of view. Her Cromwell is a complex and driven manager, the one who makes things happen, has the connections, evaluates and appraises everything from financial, legal, tactical, and even artistic angles almost simultaneously. Much of what we see Cromwell doing is putting all the pieces in place to get Henry's divorce and Anne's subsequent enthronement. Ambitious, opportunistic, and tough, he is also shaped by a childhood under a terribly abusive father, and so is generous, taking widows and orphans into his household.

Of course the English reformation is at the center of the story, and Mantel paints Cromwell as a nascent Protestant even from his boyhood, before Protestant was a word. Thomas More is depicted as harsh, unyielding, and unkind to his wife (which startled me, having the Paul Scofield version of Thomas More etched in my brain).

I enjoyed Mantel's writing style very much; it is frequently almost lush in its details. (Cromwell's checkered history as merchant, soldier, household servant and blacksmith's son, informs what he observes and how he takes in information. There's barely a garment worn in this book that doesn't have its fabrics observed and priced.) There were several times where I stopped and re-read a paragraph just because the way she phrased it was just so good.

I have two minor quibbles with the book. It took me several pages to get accustomed to the point of view. Cromwell is always "he" and when the action shifts to another character, it's a little hard to keep the "he's" straight. The other quibble is more a matter of the period as well as a pond difference -- I experienced this with Weir's books too -- it's a bit challenging to have characters referred to by their given names at one point and by their position names at another. The extensive family trees and "cast of characters" provided at the beginning of the book were very useful for this American!

Wolf Hall ends just as things between Anne and Henry start to go south. I'm looking forward to picking up the action with the sequel, Bring Up the Bodies.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
One of my favourite authors is Arturo Perez-Reverte, one of his best is The Queen of the South

Actually, that was where he lost me. I loved The Flanders Panel and particularly The Dumas Club - essentially the ones with an antiquarian element - but not the contemporary stuff.
I've only read his Dumas Club but I loved it and have more of his on the way. I can't wait! and yes, my interests are in the antiquarian side rather than straight crime. I'm a history freak.
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
For detective novels, I've just discovered Melvin R Starr's Unquiet Bones - which is the first chronicle of Hugh de Singleton, surgeon from 1363. I'm finding it engaging, a sort of secular Cadfael, 200 years later, with a sense of humour, neat turn of phrase and modern English barring untranslatable terms, some of which are still the correct words. There is a glossary, which I checked, which is pretty accurate, although he's slightly scrambled his pollarding and coppicing, but I'll give him that - they're pretty arcane terms for similar techniques. I haven't finished this one yet, but it might be worth looking for.

I read that and enjoyed it, but I read it soon after reading Ariana Franklin's Mistress Of The Art Of Death series and it pales in comparison. Historical accuracy I can't speak to, but Franklin's characters are driving and engaging and her plots will not leave you wanting. Melvin Starr is good - but Franklin is better.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mamacita:
I have two minor quibbles with the book. It took me several pages to get accustomed to the point of view. Cromwell is always "he" and when the action shifts to another character, it's a little hard to keep the "he's" straight. The other quibble is more a matter of the period as well as a pond difference -- I experienced this with Weir's books too -- it's a bit challenging to have characters referred to by their given names at one point and by their position names at another. The extensive family trees and "cast of characters" provided at the beginning of the book were very useful for this American!

I think this is fair comment. Occasionally, she does say "He, Cromwell" but I suspect that an exasperated editor probably forced this on her. It's obviously deliberate - she does similar things in "A place of greater safety", which I found even more confusing, perhaps because I know the period less well. In fact, it took me some time in that book to work out who the lead character actually was - I mean, the name by which he is normally known -I'm not going to say it, because that is a deliberate ploy, I assume, and I wouldn't want to spoil that for anyone who hasn't read it yet.

But why does she do it? Perhaps it serves to remind us that this is a partial view - we are very much inside Cromwell's head, which I love, although we don't seem to have much access to his memory banks. When we do, it can come as quite a shock, as with the incident that at least partly explains his Protestant sympathies.

And don't blame your problem with the names on your being American. I know the period quite well, so I know, for example, who the Howards are, but I still had to stop and check fairly often in the Who's Who. More so, funnily enough, at the second reading - the first time I just tended to go with the flow.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I'm reading Frankenstein right now, and I have to say I'm pleasantly surprised by it. Of course, like everyone else I'm familiar with the meme of the Frankenstein monster, but the story isn't at all what I expected. Much better, in fact.

It seems that there different kinds of ethics at play here, especially surrounding Frankenstein's guilt, and what exactly he's actually guilty of. Is he guilty because he created a monster, like he thinks himself? Or, as the monster argues, is he guilty of creating something --someone!-- and than leaving him alone?

I'm 80% through the book right now, and am thrilled to find out what kind of ethics will win out. (Don't tell me yet! [Biased] )
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
I think this is fair comment. Occasionally, she does say "He, Cromwell" but I suspect that an exasperated editor probably forced this on her.

Thanks. I'm glad it's not just me. I like your premise about the editor.
quote:

And don't blame your problem with the names on your being American. I know the period quite well, so I know, for example, who the Howards are, but I still had to stop and check fairly often in the Who's Who. More so, funnily enough, at the second reading - the first time I just tended to go with the flow.

Yes, there were many times I just gave up and kept reading. "Hmm, is Southhampton Anne's uncle? Or it is Suffolk? Oh, well, carry on...."

It happens when I'm reading Ecclesiantics. Over here we tend not to refer to a bishop by the name of his see, i.e., it would never occur to me to write +Chicago instead of the Rt. Rev. Jeffrey Lee. So at first it would throw me a bit when people would refer to +London, etc. [/tangent, sorry]
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
I had the same problem with the use of 'he' in Wolf Hall.
Loved the book all the same and I'm now reading Bring Up the Bodies.
I'm just wallowing in the Tudor-ness of it all, though grateful that I'm not there in reality .
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
For detective novels, I've just discovered Melvin R Starr's Unquiet Bones - which is the first chronicle of Hugh de Singleton, surgeon from 1363. I'm finding it engaging, a sort of secular Cadfael, 200 years later, with a sense of humour, neat turn of phrase and modern English barring untranslatable terms, some of which are still the correct words. There is a glossary, which I checked, which is pretty accurate, although he's slightly scrambled his pollarding and coppicing, but I'll give him that - they're pretty arcane terms for similar techniques. I haven't finished this one yet, but it might be worth looking for.

I don't know who you've read in detective fiction. Have you read Kate Charles' Wesley Peterson series where modern day murders echo archaeological ones? Or Linda Fairstein's New York murders? She like Kathy Reichs is writing about the day job. Linda Fairstein was a prosecutor for sex crimes as is her heroine.

Thank you for this, I have never heard of Melvin Starr and look forward to giving him a try. I enjoy medieval mysteries.

Yes, I have read Kate Charles and enjoy them very much.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:
...

An Instance of the Fingerpost is possibly one of the best mysterys I have read - but not true detective fiction in that it is set during/just after the English civil war so no actual policeman. The chapters are written from the viewpoints of several characters, and they are very well inhabited. The title refers to eye witness evidence as being the one 'instance of the fingerpost' that you can identify in an inquiry.

I started that book years ago, but I found it very hard going and never finished it. Currently in the Ship's book club and reading The Daughter of Time . I have read a bit of Shakespeare and even took a course in it at university, so I was v. familiar with Richard III. I still have my copy of The Riverside Shakespeare which was the text for the course.
 
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on :
 
Mamacita, don't feel bad; I'm moderately expert on the period (English history pre-Union was one of my discount tickets out of my very boring home town) and I still need the table of contents to keep the players sorted out.

"All these people are related to each other. Fortunately, the cardinal left him a chart, which he updates whenever there is a wedding." - from Bring Up the Bodies

I've been rereading BUtB and Wolf Hall since I got my copy of the former back from my dad.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I have just finished Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert.

Having read some reviews, it appears that most readers are women and most of them think it is self-indulgent because it is about a woman who doesn't seem able to get over a messy divorce and who travels the world to 'find herself'.

I disagree with those reviewers - maybe because I am a man? There is a lot of accurate observations about the difficulties people encounter when meditation.

I have already ordered the sequel.

Anyone else know this author?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I have just finished Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert.


More than I managed to do. I'm afraid my feeling about the book were similar to The Guardian critic's about the film.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I have just finished Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert.

Having read some reviews, it appears that most readers are women and most of them think it is self-indulgent because it is about a woman who doesn't seem able to get over a messy divorce and who travels the world to 'find herself'.

I disagree with those reviewers - maybe because I am a man? There is a lot of accurate observations about the difficulties people encounter when meditation.

I have already ordered the sequel.

Anyone else know this author?

I (a woman) enjoyed the book very much. I also like the follow-up,
Committed.

It's a while since I read the first one, but I seem to remember that although she did sail very close to self-indulgence, she somehow--IMO-- got away with it, because the book is universal enough that many people can "relate." I could certainly identify with her desire to become closer to the divine but also to enjoy the good things of life to the full. And I enjoyed her voice.

A wonderful book that is, it has just come to me, related in a sort of way is Teach Us To Sit Still by Tim Parks. Well known as the author of Italian Neighbours and other books about his life as an Englishman in Italy, plus brilliant novels like
Europa , he addresses something different in this book. It's a memoir of how meditation helped him with strange and intractable pains he suffered for a long time....Some have also found this book self-indulgent but I think it's fascinating, especially in what it reveals about the mind-body connection. And I like his voice as well, his wry humour.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Yesterday I saw an ad in the paper for "John Saturnall's Feast" by Lawrence Norfolk, and it sounded like an enjoyable, interesting sort of historical novel. I'm half thinking about taking the plunge and getting it off Amazon. Has anyone read it, or got any views?

(ETA I could really get into a good historical novel right now.)

[ 21. September 2012, 19:59: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I haven't read this one, but did enjoy Lawrence Norfolk's first book
Lemprière's Dictionary It's quite a challenging read though, but rather brilliant.
 
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on :
 
Could you tell us more about it ?

We are trying to avoid this becoming a list thread.

Thanks,

Doublethink
Temporary Heaven Host
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Sorry Doublethink. Yes, I absolutely agree this should be more than a list thread.

I'm afraid I couldn't remember much more about Lemprière's Dictionary . I do know it was unusual and complex and required quite a lot of attention to follow it, but interesting--and I very much admired Norfolk for doing something so different.

Since I wrote the earlier post, I've read a review in today's Saturday Guardian of the new Norfolk mentioned by Ariel, John Saturnall's Feast . Justine Jordan praises this highly, and compares it to the previous books by Norfolk, "historical novelist extraordinaire," as she calls him. And she says, "But if the novel is less determinedly unusual than Norfolk's Lemprière's Dictionary or The Pope's Rhinocerous, its focus [on food in 17th century Britain] lends it clarity, and the material is fascinating."

Her phrase "determinedly unusual" for the first two books conveys what I was trying to say.

His work is well worth reading as long as you're prepared for the unusual, ambitious, and rather brilliant.
 
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:


On the other had, An Instance of the Fingerpost is possibly one of the best mysterys I have read

Likewise ... I rated it a 5/5 on Librarything
 
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on :
 
I finished Hilary Mantel's Bring Up the Bodies yesterday and am ready to pick up the next installment, sad that I will have to wait awhile. [Frown]

As in Wolf Hall, the story unfolds through Thomas Cromwell's point of view. His expert pragmatism has a decidedly cynical edge now, and because his gathered "family" of protegés and apprentices is mostly grown up, we see less of his tender side. We see Cromwell, ever Henry's go-to man, orchestrate Anne Boleyn's fall. In Wolf Hall we saw his merchant/accountant's brain cataloging commodities in the estates of the nobility and the clergy. In Bring Up the Bodies he is still cataloging, but it is an inventory of gossip, observations, slights and jokes, which he draws upon to create a narrative that will get Henry's job done. The scenes where Cromwell interrogates Anne's suspected lovers are chilling:
quote:
Would Norris understand if he spelled it out? He needs guilty men. So he has found men who are guilty. Though perhaps not guilty as charged.
A thread of melancholy runs through the book. If I may include one more quote, I was struck by this passage where Cromwell reflects on a conversation with his son Gregory about the doctrine of Purgatory and whether Gregory should continue to pray for his deceased mother and sisters:
quote:
Imagine the silence now, in that place which is no-place, in that anteroom to God where each hour is ten thousand years long. Once you imagined the souls held in a great net, a web spun by God, held safe till their release into his radiance. But if the net is cut and the web broken, do they spill into freezing space, each year falling further into silence, until there is no trace of them at all?

 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Wool by Hugh Howey which I started to see what the fuss was about (in my particular corner of the internet it was highly praised).

It's set in a post-apocalyptic world where what's left of humanity lives in an underground silo and the worst crimes are punishable by being sent outside for 'cleaning' which involves spending your last few minutes while the poisonous atmosphere eats through your suit, wiping down the cameras so that the silo-dwellers can temporarily get a clear view of the outside. But, as ever, all is not what it seems. Is the silo really all there is?, is the outside really a poisonous uninhabitable wasteland?

First thing to say about Wool is that it was originally published in 5 parts and it shows. The first part - the original short story - is complete in itself. However it gives away some information as part of its climax that I think you'd want to keep back if writing the novel from scratch. Parts 2-5 are more connected but suffer from having being written individually and so characters and plot elements that seem central in part 3 may not be by the end of 5. Particularly with the characters it was harder to care when you realised they may not be around that much longer.

That said it was an intriguing world. (I was going to say "well-built" but you could pick holes in it all day long if you'd a mind to. I don't usually.) And he certainly knows how to create tension. I can see exactly why Ridley Scott bought the film rights. The best bits read like set pieces from a good SciFi thriller movie.

He's written a prequel which I hear good things about and which was at least written as a complete novel from the word go. I will probably check it out eventually but it's not next on my list.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I've just finished reading Iris Murdoch's An Accidental Man. I tried Murdoch when I was a teenager and didn't get on with her (apart from The Bell; only re-discovering her recently (last couple of years) thanks to a Real Life book club. I've already re-read some of the ones I started with, just for the sheer pleasure. However, I've really struggled with this one - many characters neither engaging nor even likeable – particularly the eponymous protagonist, who this NYT review says is “marvelously mapped out”; I'm not so sure. All this coupled with huge doses of relentless misery and a sense of many wasted lives.

I know that human beings are often inconsistent and fickle creatures,and Murdoch captures that well, but I find it difficult when characters are so inconsistent that there is no sense of a thread and one cannot form any real idea of what they might or ought to do. The review cited above says that there are parts which are intended to be emotionally gripping that end up being flat. I wonder if she did intend emotionally gripping. Although I was compelled to read to the end, I also got so distracted that I found myself wondering what Wodehouses's Bertie Wooster would make of some of the women. He'd have found them all terrifying, I think. I suspect that, like Wodehouse, Murdoch is less convincing when she moves out of what is really a very narrow class comfort zone. She can do refugees and other classless people but is perhaps not good at any British characters below the upper-upper middle.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Just finished discworld #25 i.e. The Truth.

Due to what I'd heard about it I'd pegged it as just the next book to get through before I could read Thief of Time but actually I enjoyed it quite a bit. It's about the arrival in Ankh-Morpork of the newspaper business. It has a few new interesting characters (and after Wool I realised how skilfull Pratchett is at drawing characters) as well as old favourites. It hits a lot of familiar themes and some of the jokes are re-treads but at least it didn't have multiple-ending disease which he suffers from at times.

Overall it was a pleasant way to spend a rainy Sunday.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by chive:
I find it fascinating that Conan Doyle, who was a believer in spiritualism and all sorts of oddness, could write a character like Holmes.

Today I bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until I read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but I can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.

Conan Doyle based Holmes on a Dr. Bell, who used Holmesian-level observation to diagnose his patients.

Since you're exploring neo-Holmes stories, how about Laurie King's Mary Russell and Sherlock Holmes series? They're very good.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
Anyone read peter Ackroyd's Hawksmoor? Find it hard going?

Postmodern in its treatment of time and geography, a sort of anti-detective novel, with Satanism and freemasonry, lots of symbolism which would have been lost on me had i not done some homework by reading what other people said about it.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I remember liking Hawksmoor, though it's a good while since I read it. It left with me a tendency to stare narrowly at any actual Nicholas Hawksmoor churches.

I also associate it with Fowles A Maggot which I see was published in the same year. Perhaps there was a vogue for weirdy post-modern historical novels.
 
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on :
 
/Tangent/

At the risk of being deemed silly, the cheapest discount ticket to Reading I have been able to find (from London Paddington) is £16.40 single.

That seems quite a lot but perhaps there is a bus which is cheaper.

Of course you can read while you're on the train!

/Tangent ends/

More seriously, my wife is a school librarian in a very deprived area and she does see reading as a ticket to anywhere for these children whose horizons are so terribly restricted.

[ 25. September 2012, 16:15: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Just finished Darkside - by Belinda Bauer, which is the second in a sort-of-but-not-really trilogy of crime thrillers set in an Exmoor village. It was bleak, melancholic and gripping. I particularly liked the way the characters are drawn. The protagonist is a village policeman who has to help solve a series of murders and butts heads with an arrogant bombastic superior officer sent as part of a homicide task force to investigate the crimes. What's interesting about this is that you're all set up for this second character to be a caricature, a simple idiotic obstacle to the real hero solving the case, but in fact you find yourself sympathising with him more than you'd think. And although he blunders about he does actually get quite a lot right.

The ending was a bit of a WTF moment. I saw it coming but rejected it as I couldn't see how the author could pull that off. I'm still in two minds as to whether she did or not.

Since some of the characters re-appear in the sort-of sequel Finders Keepers I've gone straight on into that to see if it provides any answers. If not, on the basis of the first two books, it should at least be a cracking good read.
 
Posted by Stejjie (# 13941) on :
 
Currently ploughing through Margaret Thatcher's autobiography for my Newly Accredited Minister studies. Which could be subtitled "Why I was right and everyone else was wrong." And, for all the (genuinely) fascinating insights, at times it can be very,very dull, with painstaking detail about things that most people wouldn't be interested in.

Could do with something very light and funny and inconsequential to read afterwards. Any recommendations?
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I could encourage you to read A Tiny Bit Marvellous by Dawn French for October with the Ship's Book Club if you want light weight. It's told in a series of diary entries from different members of the family. I like the characterisations. The daughter's teenspeak entries are all too familiar from working with teenage girls, as are the mother's professional calmness. The teenage boy has a whole other dimension that made me giggle for completely different reasons. I want others to read it to see if they agree with me on this one. It got very mixed reviews, which I can understand as I think people will find it a marmite book.

If not you could virtually murder someone, that's good escapism.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
My current library book is Billy Connolly's 'Journey to the Edge of the World', which is the tie-in book to his TV series from a few years ago where he travelled from Nova Scotia to Vancouver via the north-west passage. Towards the end of the last version of this thread I had read Simon King's Shetland Diaries, another TV tie-in, and I remember commenting then that I wished it had more pictures. This book by Billy Connolly is *exactly* what a TV tie-in book should be like - glossy, beautiful, and at least one picture on every page, stills from the series. I love his commentary, he has such respect for the people and place, and also drops in a lot of musings about his own life and past and place in the world. Yet another library book I suspect I'm going to end up buying as I want to keep it - it's an absolute joy.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Late Paul:
Since some of the characters re-appear in the sort-of sequel Finders Keepers I've gone straight on into that to see if it provides any answers. If not, on the basis of the first two books, it should at least be a cracking good read.

...and it was an ok read. Not as much a must-read-just-one-more-chapter-before-bed as Darkside but I still wanted to know what happened. It was a bit stranger and perhaps that put me off. It did give some answers, sort of, to outstanding character questions.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stejjie:
...
Could do with something very light and funny and inconsequential to read afterwards. Any recommendations?

Well, for truly light and inconsequential, I'm currently reading The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists by Gideon Defoe. I haven't seen the recent film, but the book came first and is one of a series. It is incredibly silly, very funny and occasionally quite satirical. And features the Bishop of Oxford as the bad guy (which in the film was apparently changed to Queen Victoria)...

I am also reading Sea of Ink by Richard Weihe, translated by Jamie Bulloch. It's a fascinating and poetic insight into the great 17th century Chinese artist Bada Shenren, and only short. The style means I can't race through it like I usually do as I have to keep stopping to think about stuff. Hence also needing the Pirates to clear my head.

Oh, and I'm still in the middle of God Collar too - I put it down somewhere and never got back to it. I'm finding the combination of theological musing and ranting about BT and the post office rather odd, but really must get back to it. I don't know what's happened to my attention span - I never used to read more than one book at a time!

(Great thread title, by the way. [Big Grin] )
 
Posted by Mr Curly (# 5518) on :
 
Have just filled in some idle moments this weekend with The Saturday Big Tent Wedding Party, latest in The No 1 Ladies Detective Agency.

While I'm currently writing suspense/thriller, I prefer to relax with quaint and quirky.

mr curly
 
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on :
 
It's been around for nearly ten years now, but Luke Timothy Johnson's The Creed, pitched roughly at an undergrad audience, is a magnificent defence of Christian creedal orthodoxy. He perfects the art of sailing between the schylla of "silly political machinations from a long gone world" and the carybdis of "this is a stone-tablet document dictated by God" (as every biblical theologian should), and treads lightly on the filioque. I personally, when I am supreme dictator of the world, will ensure that this is compulsory reading for all human beings over the age of 17.

These days I'm too lazy/tired to read too much, so it'll still be a day or so before I finish it. It should be about a six hour read as it's very lightly but cogently written.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I'm just finishing Zadie Smith's On Beauty which really has been a ticket to a new place for me, as the main focus is on people of African-British, African-American, Caribbean and mixed race. Although race is central to the story, it's not really the main issue - it's a story about families and relationships. Some of the reviewers quoted in the blurb describe it as funny, but it's a pretty painful kind of funny.

Apart from the above, it also introduced me to a new poetic form: the pantoum. There's a terrific example in the book, which turns out to have been borrowed from a real life poet and leant, by special permission, to a fictional character.
 
Posted by Lady A (# 3126) on :
 
I just finished reading The Hobbit. It's been quite a few years since I did and thoroughly enjoyed Bilbo's first appearance again. *Happy Sigh*
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Amongst the books I have shipped over here, mostly survivors of my late father's collection, is The Importance of Being Idle compiled by Stephen Robins - it makes being a feckless layabout a very proud thing to be!

It is the perfect bedside book.

[Why do I constantly read the title to this thread as being about Reading, the town in Berkshire, UK? Am I alone in this?]
 
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
[Why do I constantly read the title to this thread as being about Reading, the town in Berkshire, UK? Am I alone in this?]

It's not just you.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
Yes - Fr. Brindley of Holy Trinity Reading used to advertise 'fast trains from Paddington'.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Yes, I keep seeing this as a train travel advice thread - "the discount ticket to Reading..."

Anyway: someone recently lent me Lorna Byrne's book, "Angels in My Hair." Lorna is a middle-aged Dubliner who was considered to be retarded as a child and mostly written off as living in her own world: but Lorna isn't at all a sad personality. Her world is full of angels, who come to visit her, and it's also full of the incredible beauty of what she sees.

It's an extraordinary book, a gentle read so full of strong faith and light, a heartwarming story of how her life turned out and how she helps people these days, sometimes is able to heal them and put them in touch with their own guardian angels.

I didn't know what to make of this. Lorna is obviously sincere about her experiences, but some of what she describes left me wondering. None the less it was a lovely book to read if you can just suspend disbelief and enter into the spirit of the thing. It was a pleasure to recognize a lot of the places she describes at a time when I would probably have been around there too. (Did I ever see her working in the department store, I wonder?)

I may try to get hold of the sequel at some point soon.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
I have just recently read 'The Autobiography of Mark Rutherford edited by his friend Reuben Shapcott' and thoroughly enjoyed it.

It gives an insight into the non conformist world of the late Victorian period, and the small minded ness of religion at that time too.

It also tackles heAd on a crisis of faith by a minister and some deeps issues about belief, and how they affect the whole of life.

Quite easy to read, and thought provoking too, I thought.

It is available free from Project Guthenburg to download, in different formats.
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
Have just read the new Ken Follett, Winter of the World. Tripe but good tripe that kept me gripped to my kindle for a few days. (And it's only 20p on there at the mo.)

Also read the first thee Merrily Watkins books which were, again, very gripping.

Thurible
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
Yes - Fr. Brindley of Holy Trinity Reading used to advertise 'fast trains from Paddington'.

When they were run by British Rail. [Disappointed]
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by chive:

Today I bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until I read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but I can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.

Nearly finished it. It is nearly as good as the genuine article! It is full of the usual Doyle stock characters and settings: dodgy aristocrats, vicars up to no good, street urchins, and of course good old (reliable if unimaginative) Dr Watson and Inspector Lestrade. To say nothing of the great genius himself who hasn't lost any of his skill at disguise.

I just get a slightly uneasy feeling that it's full of linguistic and other anachronisms but I can't put my finger on any of them.

Our small book group has just read Laurie Lee's As I walked out one midsummer morning, about his year spent walking through Spain, earning his keep from violin playing, and finally getting caught up in the beginning of the Civil War. Beautiful lyrical prose style; he captures the sense of place brilliantly, and as you might expect the tone darkens considerably towards the end.

Just ordered Sue Townsend's The Woman who went to bed for a Year. Mixed reviews, but everything of hers I've read so far is worth reading. Laugh a minute with a serious sting.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cara:
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I have just finished Eat Pray Love by Elizabeth Gilbert.

Having read some reviews, it appears that most readers are women and most of them think it is self-indulgent because it is about a woman who doesn't seem able to get over a messy divorce and who travels the world to 'find herself'.

I disagree with those reviewers - maybe because I am a man? There is a lot of accurate observations about the difficulties people encounter when meditation.

I have already ordered the sequel.

Anyone else know this author?

I (a woman) enjoyed the book very much. I also like the follow-up,
Committed.

I finished Committed last night - she looks at the history of marriage before reluctantly taking the plunge for the second time.

Despite what conservatives say, marriage is a very malleable condition.
 
Posted by Lady A (# 3126) on :
 
We had a lovely display from a group of artists that all read Mink River by Brian Doyle, and then based their art on that novel at our public library. I was especially intrigued by the raven picture that had these amazing sentences intertwined with the feathers, so I picked the book up at a bookstore on the coast and read it. Really enjoyed it. Set on the Oregon coast, it was the lovely story of a small community that lived there. A reviewer said it well, "This thing reads like an Uilleann pipe tour de force by a Sligo County maestro cast up on the shore of County Tillmook...entirely bardic at heart."
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I'm back with some more of the Muchamore Cherub series but I had a break to reread The Faraway Drums a Jon Cleary potboiler I haven't read for years - well written and pacy but not great literature. The premise was sort of Son of Kim but the structure of the writing was quite pleasing.

Cleary clearly ain't no Kipling.

[ 17. October 2012, 04:47: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Another little break, this time away from Fiction altogether. Years ago my dad asked for Gavin Young's Slow Boats to China for a present and when he died I nabbed it for myself and it was in the consignment of books recently arrived - I have loved travel books since I read Steinbeck's Travels with Charley as a teen and this one is particularly good.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just reading some of Mrs Gaskell's novels. I've just finished "Sylvia's Lovers", which is great - read it years ago and liked it, though it is a sad story. Her characterization is really good, I generally find she draws a very clear portrait of the characters and they come across as quite real.

I'm currently reading "Ruth", which I haven't read before. I don't think it's one of her best. It's the story of an innocent orphaned girl who is seen by her employer talking to a gentleman who has a fondness for her, and consequently loses her job. As she has nowhere to go, he takes her off with him to Wales. Some chapters later his mother turns up and Ruth, now a fallen woman, but still modest and virtuous, is dumped, with a baby on the way. The novel seems to wander a bit with some of the more obvious cliches of Victorian melodrama, but it's still interesting and I can't guess how it ends.
 
Posted by Quinine (# 1668) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Just reading some of Mrs Gaskell's novels. I've just finished "Sylvia's Lovers", which is great - read it years ago and liked it, though it is a sad story. Her characterization is really good, I generally find she draws a very clear portrait of the characters and they come across as quite real.


I really like Mrs Gaskell - she does try to tackle some serious themes (though I agree it is with varying success) and it may come as a surprise to readers who only know her for 'Cranford'. I think my favourite is 'North and South', though I also enjoyed the gentle irony of 'Wives and Daughters' - despite the fact that I didn't know until the end that she had left it unfinished, which was frustrating! It is pretty clear how it is headed, though. And the BBC did excellent TV drama productions of both novels, which are available on DVD (giving a satisfying ending to 'Wives and Daughters'...)
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Thurible:
Have just read the new Ken Follett, Winter of the World. Tripe but good tripe that kept me gripped to my kindle for a few days.

Yes, I felt the same way -- his writing is astonishingly mediocre, but I was interested both in Fall of Giants and in this book because I did like the idea of telling the well-known war (and between-war, and post-war) stories through the eyes of a group of characters from the different countries involved. Apparently it's going to be a trilogy and just as with the last one, he's conveniently set up all his characters to have children at about the same time so they'll all be able to interact with each other in 15-20 years. I wonder if the next one will lack focus without a world war to drive the plot along?

I've just finished Jess Walter's Beautiful Ruins and loved it. The simplest summary is that it's about a man and woman who meet in 1962, never forget each other, and meet again in the present day when they're both much older ... but it's about a great deal more than that. Hollywood and fame and storytelling and, of course, love.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by chive:

Today I bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until I read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but I can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.

Nearly finished it. It is nearly as good as the genuine article! It is full of the usual Doyle stock characters and settings: dodgy aristocrats, vicars up to no good, street urchins, and of course good old (reliable if unimaginative) Dr Watson and Inspector Lestrade. To say nothing of the great genius himself who hasn't lost any of his skill at disguise.

I just get a slightly uneasy feeling that it's full of linguistic and other anachronisms but I can't put my finger on any of them.

I've just read it too! I really enjoyed it, and didn't get anything like as strong a feeling of wrongness from it as I have done from similar tales. PD James's Austen book - not quite right. Jill Paton Walsh's attempts at Sayers - not right either. This felt much more like it made it. The exception was perhaps that Conan Doyle's House of Silk would have been something different.

On a completely different note, I then read two of Dodie Smith's books which I think must have been recently re-printed. I love I Capture the Castle, so was hoping for something to capture my imagination in the same way. I read It Ends With Revelations a couple of years ago and felt I recognised the characters in one of the books, The New Moon With the Old, because of that - very full of life, bubbly teenage girls. In The Town in Bloom the character's morals were interesting, an affair with a married man was fine, being a kept woman was definitely not, which I couldn't quite work out. But the picture of 1930s theatre life was good, I could picture where they lived and imagine the characters in both books vividly, which is certainly true of I Capture.... I enjoyed them, but I don't think they're quite as captivating as Cassandra Mortmain, which would explain why Cassandra hasn't been out of print and these have!
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I'm coming to the end of 'The Child Who' by Simon Lelic. It's not a very demanding read and unrealistic enough for it to be safe for me to read in the middle of the night (there are several child murder books which I definitely wouldn't want to read then!), but a fun read nonetheless. All the dotting about between different times is confusing at first, but gradually the story comes together and it starts to make sense.

Now, I'm just waiting to see how it all ends - with a twist or two, no doubt.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I've just re-read Muriel Spark's A Far Cry from Kensington and very much enjoyed it.
 
Posted by Dormouse (# 5954) on :
 
I've just been given a Kindle touch for my birthday. I don't quite know how I feel about it, yet...I've not downloaded anything - I think Mr D who gave it to me is a bit frustrated by this, but I can't explain why not. I almost feel like I'm betraying "my" books!!!
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Angloid:
quote:
Originally posted by chive:

Today I bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until I read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but I can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.

Nearly finished it. It is nearly as good as the genuine article! It is full of the usual Doyle stock characters and settings: dodgy aristocrats, vicars up to no good, street urchins, and of course good old (reliable if unimaginative) Dr Watson and Inspector Lestrade. To say nothing of the great genius himself who hasn't lost any of his skill at disguise.

I just get a slightly uneasy feeling that it's full of linguistic and other anachronisms but I can't put my finger on any of them.

I had the same feeling when I read it when it first came out. Still can't put my finger on possible dodgy bits either, but the book was an immensely enjoyable read nonetheless. (I was watching an old Robin of Sherwood the other day and was pleased to see that Horowitz was the writer.)

On another tack, I've today ordered an edition of the Septuagint. I've been reading more about it since organising some Bible studies on the first chapter of John's gospel, and have found an online one, but there's nothing like the feel of a proper book in your hands!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Now that' interesting. I wasn't aware there was a reliable translation of the Septuagint into English.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Anthony Horowitz wrote one of my favourite episodes of Robin of Sherwood - Children of Israel, which explained the position of Jewish people in Medieval England beautifully, within an exciting plot. I think the children in that episode were his own children, too.
 
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:

[Why do I constantly read the title to this thread as being about Reading, the town in Berkshire, UK? Am I alone in this?]

It reminds me of that (probably an urban myth) story of the Frenchman who got on a westbound train at Paddington and found himself in a carriage labelled "for Reading passengers only" ... with a sigh and muttered "les anglais ...." he got off and trudged back to the bookstall to get something to read.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Quinine, I agree with you about Mrs Gaskell's books - they're a great read. I'm currently enjoying re-reading "Wives and Daughters". Cynthia Kirkpatrick seems quite a modern type, but I'm betting these days Osborne Hamley's guilty secret would be the boyfriend he can't bring home to his parents.

quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:

[Why do I constantly read the title to this thread as being about Reading, the town in Berkshire, UK? Am I alone in this?]

No, after years of commuting, every time I see the words "Reading" and "discount ticket" the association is unavoidable and disrupts my, er, train of thought.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Now that' interesting. I wasn't aware there was a reliable translation of the Septuagint into English.

I ordered it from Amazon, and will let you know how reliable it is when it comes!

quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
Anthony Horowitz wrote one of my favourite episodes of Robin of Sherwood - Children of Israel, which explained the position of Jewish people in Medieval England beautifully, within an exciting plot. I think the children in that episode were his own children, too.

The writing in Robin of Sherwood was very good. Where else on the box would you find stories that include Arthur of Brittany, Adam Bell, Isabella of Angoulême and Herne the Hunter [Yipee] ?
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just finished Unity by Michael Arditti. It's written as if an investigation into the filming of a movie about Unity Mitford (an interesting enough subject anyway) in the late 1970s. During the filming one of the actresses blows herself, and several others, up at a memorial service for the Munich Olympic victims.

It's written from a number of viewpoints - letters from the script writer, the diary of one of the actresses, emails and discussions between people.

I found it a fascinating discussion of evil and fascism from both the left and the right. It also shows how the generation after those Germans involved in the Holocaust cope with the consequences of their parents actions.

I really enjoy Michael Arditti's books and I think this is my favourite. Clever, deep and very satisfying.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I've just finished "A Passage to Africa" by TV foreign correspondent George Alagiah. It starts of detailing his own family's emigration from then-Ceylon to newly independent Ghana when he was 5, and then subsequent chapters detail some of the countries he worked in as a correspondent - including Liberia, Rwanda, Somalia, Uganda, Zaire (now DRC), Zimbabwe, South Africa. He talks about stuff that happened while he was working and reporting and his impressions of the wider history/context - it's interesting, though of course harrowing too. It was published in 2001 and it was really interesting reading it a decade later with subsequent knowledge about what happened - I think he's rather too optimistic about Yoweri Museveni in Uganda, for example - and I would love to see him write an updated version giving his take on the last decade. As I was reading it you could tell he was a foreign correspondent, a lot of the phrases were very TV news-friendly I thought, he's good at distilling complex issues into a short paragraph, although of course in the distillation a lot of important detail is lost, as with any TV news report.

Next up: the first part of Stephen Fry's biography, "Moab is my Washpot". It's not our usual book group fare, and I rarely read biographies, but I'm looking forward to this one.
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
I've just finished "A Passage to Africa" by TV foreign correspondent George Alagiah. It starts of detailing his own family's emigration from then-Ceylon to newly independent Ghana when he was 5, and then subsequent chapters detail some of the countries he worked in as a correspondent - including Liberia, Rwanda, Somalia, Uganda, Zaire (now DRC), Zimbabwe, South Africa.

Mini name-drop time here, I knew him slightly when we were at university, and we met again quite by accident in a cheap hotel/guesthouse on the island of Lamu in Kenya in about 1981 - so we caught up and chatted and he told me about some of the things that were later in the first part of that book. Fascinating stuff and some background to the civil war that kicked off in Sri Lanka a few years later. The next time I saw him he was probably on TV talking to Nelson Mandela.

So when I read George's book it took me back to an Indian Ocean evening and palm trees and Tusker beer [Smile]

[ 11. November 2012, 13:14: Message edited by: ken ]
 
Posted by Huntress (# 2595) on :
 
I'm currently reading the Game of Thrones series, but alongside other, different books; partly to make them last longer, partly to avoid emerging blinking and disoriented on the other side. I know there has recently been a Game of Thrones thread and I won't go into much detail here, apart from to say that they are very good escapism for me - I've read a lot of historical novels and I like the alternate fantastical history presented in them.

I'm also reading my way through Patricia Wentworth's series of mysteries, which are particularly good for fitting into a bag and reading on the train or in a coffee shop. She is a great observer of human behaviour and her detective 'Miss Silver', an apparently harmless elderly lady who is often knitting for various relatives, is a wonderful character - compassionate but sharp as a tack. I really like escaping into the 1940s and 1950s world portrayed in the books, in which ladies wear hats and many problems are discussed over afternoon tea, and there is drama during cocktail hour.
They have an element of nostalgic cosiness to them, but the crimes and evil deeds are not sugar-coated. Nor, however, are they uncomfortably graphic.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
My quibble with the Wentworth books is that there are always a couple of characters - the ingenue and the nice young man - who are never going to turn out to be the murderer. At least Agatha Christie occasionally makes an apparently sympathetic character be the killer.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
Yes, but on the whole Wentworth was a better writer than Christie.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
Yes, but on the whole Wentworth was a better writer than Christie.

Most people are a better writer than Christie.

If you like Wentworth, Anthony Gilbert is another name to look out for.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Unusually for me, I've just read a hot-off-the-presses first novel.

Alas, Laurie, the heroine of Zoe Venditozzi's "Anywhere's Better Than Here" is young enough to be my daughter, and, instead of empathising with her youthful angst, I found myself longing to dish out wisdom over coffee and biscuits, give her grotty flat a quick once-over with a pile of J-cloths and some elbow grease and give her a tenner with the instruction to buy herself a wee treat.

Youthful angst? I'm now full of middle-age angst that I've turned into my mother at some point and never noticed.

[ 26. November 2012, 07:36: Message edited by: North East Quine ]
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I've just finished Sacrilege by S.J. Parris, a historical novel featuring the (real-life) Italian philosopher/alchemist/spy/whatever Giordano Bruno. It's the third in a series (a fact I didn't know when I bought it), and I think I'll have to get the others and do a bit of back-tracking. A good read.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Heavens.....I've been so seduced by the Circus games that I forgot all about this interesting thread....

I would have chimed in at several moments...I'd have told Scots Lass,for example, that I too love Dodie Smith's I Capture the Castle which I first read at 18 (perfect age) but then again in my forties, when I liked it just as much. At which point I had a Dodie Smith craze and read most of her memoirs as well as the biography of her by Valerie Grove. Never got around to the novels you mention, though.

I've just read Swimming Home by Deborah Levy. This was short-listed for the Booker Prize and I heard her speak at the Cheltenham Festival (along with the other short-listed authors except Hilary Mantel and Will Self). I admire it very much...it's beautifully written but in a spare yet vivid way. After I'd finished I found it haunting me. It's about a family on holiday in southern France, an older poet, a younger poet...about going home, or the difficulty of so doing...Oh dear. Like so many good books, it's all in the writing, and it's hard to convey its atmosphere.

Now I've just started something completely different, Henry James's The American. I love James, though the later ones are rather heavy going. This is his third novel. He hasn't got into his really long-winded, ultra-convoluted full-blown style yet. I'm enjoying it so far.
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
Just finished "Cancer Ward" by Solzhenitsyn. Lots of well-drawn characters - Rusanov the doctrinaire Communist with the ever-so-bourgeoise outlook is particularly memorable. Gets a bit bogged down with the philosophical musings and agonized introspection of the hero though. I guess all in the great Russian tradition...
 
Posted by Dormouse (# 5954) on :
 
I've never read any Jane Austen. I downloaded her complete works onto my Kindle for 0,89€ - because it seemed like a bargain!! The first novel it brings me to is Sense & Sensibility - do people think that's a good one to start with, or should I try another one first? Advice welcome!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I find it very difficult to get on with Jane Austen, but I did enjoy Northanger Abbey after I'd seen a TV adaptation of it. I've got a very visual imagination, and I just couldn't "see" what was happening in the books until I'd seen it on telly.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Pride and Prejudice is probably the 'easiest' - but also the best, so you might want to save that one up.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
My favourite Jane Austen is Emma. And I think it would be a good one to start with as well.

I enjoyed Henry James's The American very much, although I was irritated beyond belief by the footnotes in the edition I had. It was an edition I picked up very cheap second-hand and obviously prepared for students who knew nothing at all. ("Paris" capital of France. The Seine, river running through Paris..." etc. ) Also the preface gave away the whole crux of the story on the first page.

But anyway, a good read about the encounter of the title's American with an old and very proud French family.
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
I would just start with "Pride and Prejudice", Dormouse. If you don't know whether you are going to like Austen or not, why not give her the best possible chance?
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I've just started reading Jostein Gaarder's "The Christmas Mystery". It's a children's tale for advent, each chapter represents another window from 1st-24th Dec. Each chapter takes about 5 minutes to read so having caught up yesterday on the train (the book arrived on Thursday) I'm reading it a chapter a day to spin out the magic. So far I love it, and (like Joachim, the boy in the book) can't wait to see what's behind the next window.

Plus a 5 minute read is perfect for my attention span [Smile]
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I loved Jostein Gaardner's Sophie's World and also Vita Brevis --the latter was called That Same Flower in the States--why? It drives me mad when titles are changed..

Anyway, VIta Brevis is a letter to Saint Augustine from the mother of his son Adeodatus. Whom one cannot help but feel he treated shabbily, according to his Confessions. This book brings her alive, tells the story from her point of view..I'm sorry if this sounds vague, I don't have the book to hand, but it's well worth a read and I think one of his lesser-known works?
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Percy B:
I just learned today that Margaret Yorke has died. Her obituary is in today's London Times.

Anyone read her? Anyone suggest a good one to read from her works?

Copied from the 'Margaret Yorke' thread.

jedijudy
Heaven Host

 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
I haven't read any Margaret Yorke but she's popular in libraries.
She used to live not far away in Haddenham and a library colleague went to interview her. She came away very impressed.

My favourite Austen is Persuasion ; all that sexual tension!

[ 11. December 2012, 10:33: Message edited by: Tree Bee ]
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
The Sound of a Wild Snail Eating.

A true account of a woman's unlikely companion during a long bout of illness, carried in with a pot of violets. I'm usually a very hard sell on the "heart warming," genre, but this slimey little guy and his life lessons about patience, etc. really got to me.

It's a very small book and would make an excellent gift for anyone on your list who is, ill, not a big reader, young or old.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I'm reading Charles Dickens' other Christmas Books, ie not A Christmas Carol (which is a work of genius). The Haunted Man and The Battle of Life.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I'm reading Charles Dickens' other Christmas Books, ie not A Christmas Carol (which is a work of genius). The Haunted Man and The Battle of Life.

Not forgetting The Chimes which was as popular as Carol at the time, but hasn't lasted as well. It's interesting to consider why this is, since they have very similar themes. IMO, it's that Scrooge is an infinitely stronger character than Trotty Veck, and the supernatural elements - the Spirits of Christmas - are more numinous than any amount of goblins (a species that haven't lasted).
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
I'm reading The Malice of Fortune by Michael Ennis, a marvelous historical thriller in the vein of The Name of the Rose or An Instance of the Fingerpost. Machiavelli, Leonardo Da Vinci, and the famed courtesan Damiata team up to catch a serial killer, with political implications. There's a "CSI: Renaissance Italy" aspect to it, with Leonardo inventing forensic science and Machiavelli working on becoming the first forensic psychological profiler, with arguments about whether it's more useful to try to understand a murderer in order to catch him, or whether one should stick to hard empirical data. Very well researched and well written.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I've just finished reading ' A 1960s childhood - from Thunderbirds to Beatlemania' (Paul Feeney). Not the best-written book in the world, but full of nostalgic memories which means the enjoyment can override any annoyance.

Now I'm reading 'Quiet: The power of Introverts in a world that can't stop talking' (Susan Cain). It's a book Mr. C. chose with his Christmas book token, but I've commandeered it first - he's too quiet to complain [Biased]
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
Over Christmas I read a couple of books, firstly Rebecca Skloot's "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" which I'd bought to read when the Ship book group discussed it several months ago but never quite got round to [Hot and Hormonal] I thought it was excellent - disturbing, but a very compelling read, and I really liked how she wove her story of trying to gain the family's trust alongside both Henrietta's story and those of her family and the HeLa cells and the various scientists and doctors involved (for those unfamiliar with the book, it is the true story both of the cells behind the most successful cell culture line in medical research, and of the woman who had them taken from her). Racism, research ethics, technological progress, medicine - all intertwined so personally, it was really uncomfortable reading, but at the same time I couldn't put it down.

The other book I read, which was just *beautiful*, was Judith Schalansky's "Atlas of Remote Islands". Schalansky was born in East Germany in 1980, and talks in the introduction of how she used to trace her fingers over atlas maps and imagine visiting places. This book takes some of the remotest islands throughout the world, two pages per island, the left hand page being a story from the place (history, myth, factoid) and the right hand page being a scale drawing of the island. It's really hard to describe, but it I thought it was beautiful.

Now I'm reading "The Innocent Anthropologist" by Nigel Barley. It's basically his field notes from his first fieldwork in a remote village in Cameroon in (I think) the late 70s/early 80s, and I'm loving the healthy realism about the realities of fieldwork. It's not disrespectful or condescending the way that lots of early anthropology was, and it's as much about his disasters as it is anything else. As someone who has done ethnographic fieldwork abroad (although I'm not an anthropologist) I'm finding lots I recognise. A very enjoyable read.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have a kindle [Yipee]

I've gone a bit wild downloading free stuff... Almost all of Jane Austen (for some reason Sense and Sensibility isn't free, and I didn't bother with Mansfield Park because I think it's crap), Great Expectations, Dostoyevsky's Notes from the Underground and The Possessed, some random bits of Frances Hodgson Burnett and Grimm's Fairy Tales. I decided to start with something a bit on the short side so read Pride and Prejudice at my parents' over the holidays and I'm now working on The Princess and the Goblin (George Macdonald)(which is awesome and I can't believe I'd been missing it all this time).

After that I am going to start ploughing through Les Misérables (in French). Which may take me slightly longer...

Woohoo free stuff!
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
Over Christmas I read a couple of books, firstly Rebecca Skloot's "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" which I'd bought to read when the Ship book group discussed it several months ago but never quite got round to [Hot and Hormonal] I thought it was excellent - disturbing, but a very compelling read, and I really liked how she wove her story of trying to gain the family's trust alongside both Henrietta's story and those of her family and the HeLa cells and the various scientists and doctors involved (for those unfamiliar with the book, it is the true story both of the cells behind the most successful cell culture line in medical research, and of the woman who had them taken from her). Racism, research ethics, technological progress, medicine - all intertwined so personally, it was really uncomfortable reading, but at the same time I couldn't put it down.

The other book I read, which was just *beautiful*, was Judith Schalansky's "Atlas of Remote Islands". Schalansky was born in East Germany in 1980, and talks in the introduction of how she used to trace her fingers over atlas maps and imagine visiting places. This book takes some of the remotest islands throughout the world, two pages per island, the left hand page being a story from the place (history, myth, factoid) and the right hand page being a scale drawing of the island. It's really hard to describe, but it I thought it was beautiful.

Now I'm reading "The Innocent Anthropologist" by Nigel Barley. It's basically his field notes from his first fieldwork in a remote village in Cameroon in (I think) the late 70s/early 80s, and I'm loving the healthy realism about the realities of fieldwork. It's not disrespectful or condescending the way that lots of early anthropology was, and it's as much about his disasters as it is anything else. As someone who has done ethnographic fieldwork abroad (although I'm not an anthropologist) I'm finding lots I recognise. A very enjoyable read.

Just a quick post to say what wonderful suggestions. I have always had an interest in remote islands and after posting here am going to look up that atlas on amazon!

Trouble is I got an e mail yesterday saying avoid amazon because they are big tax evaders in the UK ! Hmmm not sure I have the courage to take that step [Smile]
 
Posted by deano (# 12063) on :
 
Currently reading “Jeremy Clarkson – The Top Gear Years”.

Be advised that the book is a collection of pre-published articles from the Top Gear magazine from 1994-2012, so if you read that magazine you may well have read some of the pieces in the book.

Having said that, if you haven’t read the material before and you “get” JC, it’s a very good read. I like him and have always enjoyed his polemic, exaggerated-for-effect, left-baiting, shock-jock style.

I would advise any Ship-mates who don’t like their port-sidedness to be mocked to avoid this book like the plague, but to be frank, you were never going to go within a country mile of this book anyway, were you?
 
Posted by moonfruit (# 15818) on :
 
A few things I've been reading recently -

A friend lent me State of Wonder, by Ann Patchett, which after a slightly slow start, grabbed hold of me totally. It's about a scientist, researching a fertility drug deep in the Amazon - no-one's really heard from her in years, until her drug company send another scientist to find her, who then dies. Upon his death, another person is sent after her, and their story takes up most of the book. I was slightly frustrated at the end, as I wanted to know more about what happened to a couple of the characters, but ultimately a compelling read.

Equally compelling was Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn. It's hard to say too much about it without giving it all away, but if you're looking for an emotional rollercoaster of a book, this is it. When a man's wife goes missing, let's just say all is not what it seems.

Anyone read either of these?
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I spent a lot of my holiday reading the Memoirs of Ulysses S Grant. Some compelling reading.
Today I've just gotten "Uncle Scrooge -- Only a poor old man" by Carl Barks due to the evil influence of various people on here.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dormouse:
I've just been given a Kindle touch for my birthday. I don't quite know how I feel about it, yet...I've not downloaded anything - I think Mr D who gave it to me is a bit frustrated by this, but I can't explain why not. I almost feel like I'm betraying "my" books!!!

Now I can really relate to this! Mr C gave me a Kindle Touch for Christmas, a total surprise. He may have heard me (a devoted bibliophile who dreads the death of the "physical book" and feels e-readers are hastening its demise) murmur that perhaps, at last, I might consider a Kindle because we're living in a non-Anglophone country and it's hard to get books in English.....

What he didn't realise is that the only reason I would even have considered it for a second is the existence of the new Kindle Paperwhite. I completely concur with Nicholson Baker who described the ordinary Kindle as looking out of a dirty window onto a grey day, or something like that.

So, poor Mr C, I didn't welcome the gift much, refuse to use it, and am thinking of having him kindly exchange--well, upgrade!-- it for a Paperwhite. Which I have looked at in Waterstones (while buying several "physical books"!!) and it is an easier and more pleasant read than the basic Kindle. But. I still feel the same resistance-cum-betrayal thing that Dormouse describes. It's just not like reading a book.

How much would I use it, really??

Have you been using yours after your initial hesitation, Dormouse?

On the reading front, I have recently read The Land of Spices by a wonderful author I discovered not long ago, Kate O'Brien. The first book I read of hers, and loved, is Without my Cloak. It was her first novel, and was widely acclaimed, though I'd never heard of her or of the book until I picked up a second-hand edition from Virago. In case you don't know of her, she was Irish and lived from 1897-1974, wrote novels and plays.

Land of Spices (the reference to the lovely Herbert poem "Prayer" is important in the story) is set in a convent in 1912, and focuses on a Reverend Mother and a young schoolgirl and their spiritual and earthly paths and difficulties.....quote from Virago blurb, "this complex and moving work offers both a luminous evocation of convent life and a remarkable exploration of the nature of human love and spirituality."

It came out in 1941 and was censored for its "immorality" by the Irish Censorship Board--not because of any shenanigans in the convent itself, but for another reason.
It's moving and subtle and beautifully written.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
Cara, the advantages of the Kindle are many and glorious. I have a Kindle 3, from before the heady days of Touch or Paperwhite. I've never had a problem with the screen contrast - if anything I find the Paperwhite a little too white. And with that satisfying little click as you turn a page, I won't be rushing out to buy a Touch either.

I like reading in bed, for which the Kindle is excellent. It's light and easy to hold - I've never found a comfortable position for reading a heavy, thick book in bed. I also like reading on holiday, and when my friends take a treebook novel or two, I take my Kindle, packed with unread goodies. Also, a lot of out-of-copyright stuff is free (derived from websites such as Project Gutenberg), and the Kindle editions of free stuff are improving all the time. I read a lovely, clear, navigable edition of A Tale of Two Cities last year.

Finally, I'm of an age where print size matters, and this was actually one of the main reasons I first bought the Kindle. The tipping point was when I looked into Oliver Sacks' Musicophilia, which had a font size I would normally associate with a dodgy insurance policy. This isn't a problem with the Kindle. In fact, if you're having problems with the contrast, or reading in a dim light, just turn up the font size and it's fine.

I tend to keep a stock of "to-read" stuff on my Kindle from whatever happens to be free or on offer at the time, which means I only rarely pay full price for a Kindle book.

Having said that, my last three books have been treebooks - Jasper Fforde's The Eyre Affair (utterly brilliant, but I'm having to ration my Ffordes - he doesn't write them as quickly as I want to read them); David Sedaris's Me Talk Pretty One Day, which annoyed the friends I was staying with because of my frequent giggle-quakes; and I'm currently about a third of the way through Stephen King's Salem's Lot, just because.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Cara - I read Without My Cloak when I was at school, and I thought it was marvellous! I only picked it up because I was going through a phase of reading books that other people were not looking at - it had a plain green cover and hadn't been taken out of the school library for a long time (goodness knows what it was doing in the school library in the first place!).
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Adeodatus, thank you! I too often wish for a larger font in printed books, and this, plus the ability to get past-copyright things and such, may tip me kindlewards!

I also love reading in bed and know what you mean about difficulties of so doing with a heavy book.

Also love reading in the bath, though! A bit dangerous with a Kindle...anyway this is all very useful, thank you. Can you also download onto Kindle those old, weird, obscure books that have been scanned into Google? (I think).

Eigon, glad to hear from another o'Brien fan!
 
Posted by Dormouse (# 5954) on :
 
Actually, once I started downloading (mostly) free stuff, I haven't read a "real" book since! I did buy some in the uk, as I'm collecting some series of books. I'm a bit miffed that the most expensive book I downloaded (Ken Follett) has been the most tedious!!
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
Adeodatus-- David Sedaris is like Prozac to me. I highly encourage you to go on a bookstore / Kindle binge and track down everything he wrote. Well worth it.
 
Posted by moonfruit (# 15818) on :
 
Adeodatus - if you're enjoying Jasper Fforde, be sure to check out Shades of Grey as well. It's not a Thursday Next book, but it is very interesting, the basic premise being that society is structured based on what colours people can see, with those who don't see enough colour relegated to an underclass called 'the greys'. Well worth a read.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I'm a lover of tree books. I've made my living in the past writing typographic and font software and there's nothing like a lovely well printed book. However I'm an omnivore and the Kindle is a great way to increase the mix.
The paperwhite is a big improvment on the original, the extra resolution and the back illumination really help. The internal illumination makes it now my preferred reading in bed option
It's also great just to tuck in your pocket and be able to carry a spare half dozen books for when you get stuck in a waiting pattern. The fonts are legible without the eyestrain of a lcd screen but they still haven't gotten the page layout done right. I may have to go do that myself...

I just read the Memoirs of Ulysess S Grant which i wouldn't have done if I had to carry around a big book. It's comforting to have an extra Wodehouse for emergencies. ;-) It hasn't stopped the purchase of print books though. ;-)

The main problem is I haven't figured out how to select from the new books that are only available on Kindle. A lot of them look like trash and I don't want to wade through a slush pile to find the gems.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just been dipping my toes into new waters, first by buying an ebook (which I'm reading on the computer screen - I don't possess any hand held devices, even a mobile phone), and secondly by choosing Gay Fantasy Fiction. I haven't read anything with gay characters since I got all the Mary Renault's I could find out of the school library! I found out about this one by browsing through a blog called LGBT Fantasy Fans and Writers.
I'm enjoying it very much indeed. It's called Bomber's Moon: Under the Hill by Alex Beecroft, and concerns a Lancaster bomber pilot displaced to the present, elves/fairies attacking a house, and the bomber pilot's lover and navigator who is trapped in Elfland and trying to escape. There's a second book, Dogfighters, which includes a fight between a Mosquito fighter/bomber and a dragon! And Mosquitos were wooden aircraft....
Alex Beecroft has also written some historical gay fiction, set around Nelson's navy period, which I may have a look at too (I used to love Alexander Kent).
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by moonfruit:
Adeodatus - if you're enjoying Jasper Fforde, be sure to check out Shades of Grey as well. It's not a Thursday Next book, but it is very interesting, the basic premise being that society is structured based on what colours people can see, with those who don't see enough colour relegated to an underclass called 'the greys'. Well worth a read.

It's on my Kindle, waiting to be read. [Big Grin] (It was on offer at a ridiculously low price a few months ago.)
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
TurquoiseTastic just asked about Susan Howatch on the question thread. It appears she's retired at age 72 after a mere 20 or so gigantic novels. Don't you just hate that?! Thank goodness Ruth Rendell hasn't taken that attitude; she's 82, and I thought her latest was one of her best.

I get seriously sad when we lose any of our great writers. I grieved for Norah Lofts. I could never begin to thank them enough for all the hours of pleasure they've given me.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
I'm a lover of tree books. I've made my living in the past writing typographic and font software and there's nothing like a lovely well printed book. However I'm an omnivore and the Kindle is a great way to increase the mix.
The paperwhite is a big improvment on the original, the extra resolution and the back illumination really help. The internal illumination makes it now my preferred reading in bed option
It's also great just to tuck in your pocket and be able to carry a spare half dozen books for when you get stuck in a waiting pattern. The fonts are legible without the eyestrain of a lcd screen but they still haven't gotten the page layout done right. I may have to go do that myself...

I just read the Memoirs of Ulysess S Grant which i wouldn't have done if I had to carry around a big book. It's comforting to have an extra Wodehouse for emergencies. ;-) It hasn't stopped the purchase of print books though. ;-)

The main problem is I haven't figured out how to select from the new books that are only available on Kindle. A lot of them look like trash and I don't want to wade through a slush pile to find the gems.

Thanks, Palimpsest, for more Kindle info--yes, if I did get the Paperwhite I too would still be an omnivore and buy print books as well.

Please do do something about the page layout, it just doesn't look right!

To have an extra Wodehouse around for emergencies....now you're talking ! I'm beginning to see the light.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
TurquoiseTastic just asked about Susan Howatch on the question thread. It appears she's retired at age 72 after a mere 20 or so gigantic novels. Don't you just hate that?!

Not sure - when she got on to her churchy novels, they all seemed to portray the same stereotyped people, albeit with different names in different books.
 
Posted by Angloid (# 159) on :
 
The only Howatch book I have read (and it was one of the churchy ones) was when I was suffering from the flu. And I felt much iller afterwards.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
Yes - and the 'spiritual director' is always an autocratic anglo-catholic priest who tells people what to do and, eventually, has a massive mental breakdown which exposes his great flaws.

This is the sort of priest Howatch admires - she was interviewed about what sort of Archbishop of Canterbury she waned after Carey and that is what she came up with.
 
Posted by Mr Curly (# 5518) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
The main problem is I haven't figured out how to select from the new books that are only available on Kindle. A lot of them look like trash and I don't want to wade through a slush pile to find the gems.

There are lots of review sites that concentrate on this type of stuff, but not all are OK. Big Al's Books and Pals is pretty good, but there are heaps of genre specific ones depending on what you're into.

The 10% free sample you can download on kindle is enough to judge if something is worth continuing with. There are amazon lists of top sellers/free books by genre as well.

In the end, nothing beats word of mouth.

mr curly
who has a few kindle only books of his own.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Kindle owners in the UK may want to check out Amazon's "12 days of Kindle" sale. It ends tomorrow at midnight. They've been adding 60+ books a day and many are at 99p.

Some well-known books and authors in there, including a few I bought full price and haven't read yet (*sigh*).

In terms of what I've been reading lately, I read Paul Cornell's excellent London Falling and the first two 'PC Grant' novels of Ben Aaronovitch: Rivers of London and Moon Over Soho. If you like fantasy in a modern setting, if you liked the idea of 'urban fantasy' but were disappointed to find most of the books in that genre were romance novels with were-wolves or vampires[*], then these books may well appeal to you. I enjoyed them so much that I'm saving the third one so as not to have to wait too long for number 4.


[*]nothing wrong with that if that's what you were expecting.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
Adeodatus-- David Sedaris is like Prozac to me. I highly encourage you to go on a bookstore / Kindle binge and track down everything he wrote. Well worth it.

I tried reading Naked a couple of years ago, and just didn't "get" him at all. I think I remember finding him a bit too waspish. But Me Talk Pretty was hilarious. I found this gorgeous video of him recounting some of his experiences learning French - "Jesus Shaves".
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
I love David Sedaris too. Sometimes I get him mixed up with "This American Life" -- hope neither party minds too much.

After several diligent years of taping each library receipt in a notebook and highlighting the good ones as I read them, my system went to heck and 2012 slips ended up in a basket. Finally caught them up in my notebook the other day. Here are the highlights:

“The Journal of Best Practices: a Memoir of Marriage, Asperger Syndrome, and One Man’s Quest to be a Better Husband” – David Finch. How funny this was! Apparently David and his wife took one of those silly magazine quizzes – but where she answered ‘yes’ 3 or 4 times (a normal score), he answered ‘yes’ to like 95 questions – so yeah, maybe his quirks really were indicative of something more. Loved his explanation of his approach to work. He had no concept of being part of a team or having any particular goal to reach – he just pretended to be an outstanding employee. And it worked! And his 'logical' suggestions to his tired and dispirited wife: now that she’s staying at home with the baby maybe she can use her spare time to finally keep the kitchen cleaned as it should be. David must be a loveable guy, because she didn’t kill him.

“God’s Hotel: a Doctor, a Hospital, and a Pilgrimage to the Heart of Medicine” – Victoria Sweet. One of those books that makes you shake your head and wonder why we do such stupid things, when a simpler, kinder approach would be more effective and more efficient. Must read more by this author (And, sweaters for everybody!)

“Zoobiqity: what animals can teach us about Health and the Science of Healing” – what, you mean doctors and veterinarians didn’t always realize this? Yikes!

“At Home on the Range: a Cookbook” – Margaret Yardley Potter, originally published in 1947, recently re-released. Fascinating account of home cooking as it evolved from the 1920’s to WWII era. In some ways so modern – she started cooking before ‘convenience’ foods swamped the markets, so of course she sought out the freshest stuff straight from the farmer, etc. However, she was not convinced of the worth of the new electric refrigerators because when you had an ice box you were assured of a supply of ice as well! Breezy style, very friendly, some good recipes, and a still relevant approach to providing food for your family and for your guests.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by nickel:
“God’s Hotel: a Doctor, a Hospital, and a Pilgrimage to the Heart of Medicine” – Victoria Sweet. One of those books that makes you shake your head and wonder why we do such stupid things, when a simpler, kinder approach would be more effective and more efficient. Must read more by this author (And, sweaters for everybody!)

I read that while I was recovering from surgery. She got many of her ideas from Hildegarde of Bingen. One thing Hildegarde said was that after medicine has done what it can, the patient needs "Dr. Diet, Dr. Quiet, and Mr. Merryman". I realized that this is what I instinctively sought--wholesome food, as much rest as I felt like, and things to cheer me up. This is what every patient needs.

Moo
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo: // "Dr. Diet, Dr. Quiet, and Mr. Merryman". //
thanks Moo, that was the very phrase I was trying to remember. Not to throw out the value of modern medicines and hospitals, but to remember a balanced approach to life, especially during recovery from illness. I thought my library had one more book by Dr Sweet, but I was wrong. I must have seen it on Amazon: "Rooted in the Earth, Rooted in the Sky: Hildegard of Bingen and Premodern Medicine (Studies in Medieval History and Culture)" -- looks good, but it's almost $50 -- not sure I want to pay that much without looking for a cheaper copy first. On the other hand, she is a very good writer...
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by nickel:
I thought my library had one more book by Dr Sweet, but I was wrong. I must have seen it on Amazon: "Rooted in the Earth, Rooted in the Sky: Hildegard of Bingen and Premodern Medicine (Studies in Medieval History and Culture)" -- looks good, but it's almost $50 -- not sure I want to pay that much without looking for a cheaper copy first. On the other hand, she is a very good writer...

You can find a slightly cheaper copy at Abe Books.

Moo
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Gosh but I'm predictable!

A couple of days ago I finished my umpteenth reread of Kipling's Kim, a superb little book, and now I have started Peter Hopkirk's In Search of Kim where he tries to follow the trail of Kim's journeyings.

I have also been reading a lot online, as I always do.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
DUH!!

Sorry it is Quest for Kim by Peter Hopkirk.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I remember when I was young and adored The Jungle Book and Just So Stories and I tried Kim, but I couldn't get into it. I think I was too young--should give it another go perhaps.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Kim is one of my favourites. Every line of it vividly expresses the rich, colourful diversity of India: to read it is to be immersed in it. It can be read on more than one level, and it's a cracking adventure yarn.

In a way, it's also a love story: the deep unspoken love that develops between the lama and his disciple Kim, a young street urchin who at first is only in it for the larks, and thinks the lama's a gullible fool, but matures spiritually as the book progresses; and also, less explicitly, it's about Kipling's own love for India. The way the book is written is so evocative: this was an author who knew and loved the country, was completely at home in it - and was irrevocably thousands of miles away in England, and probably homesick when he wrote Kim.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I've just finished Beloved which I had to get through for my Real Life book group - and, being both pessimistic and lackadaisical*, it took me ages to get around sorting out a copy from the library, so I had to read it in less than a week at the start of term. But I'm just so glad I finally got around to it. It's been hovering on my horizons for years, having been recommended by endless numbers of people, though with nobody mentioning - this is not a spoiler - the fact that it was about slavery, though a lot of people said about the dead child. It's an amazing book - how can anything so appalling and so grim be so uplifting and also,for me, as a (broadly speaking) "White"** reader, humbling?

It was also a great one for the book group because, although we all liked it, it also stimulated a discussion that kept going (more-or-less) on topic for the full ninety minutes and then some. I wonder how many others on board have read it, and whether it's worth nominating for the Ship book group.


*They fit together quite well in my case:

**I resist putting "White" on the tick box lists - one day I'll start a Purg thread.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
The last thing I read was an exhaustive biography of JFK by US broadcast journalist Chris Matthews. It was on my wife's Nook e-book.

My brother-in-law, Patrick J. Larkin is a published author has several e-books out which are suspense thrillers (ala Tom Clancy who he is acquainted with). He's on the west coast and his east coast writing partner at the time was Larry Bond; he is now writing books under his own name.

I am slowly writing a book about fictionalized characters I have met in real life and their adventures. I hope to finish it in time for NaNoWriMo.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I remember giving Kim to my ex-husband to read, because he'd never come across it. His comment was "But it's like a good fantasy novel!"
Quest for Kim is fascinating, seeing how the world has changed.
(I even like the film with Errol Flynn and Dean Stockwell!)
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Kim is one of those books that the more I read it, the more I get out of it - if I had ten books to take to my desert island that would be one of them.
 
Posted by deano (# 12063) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
The last thing I read was an exhaustive biography of JFK by US broadcast journalist Chris Matthews. It was on my wife's Nook e-book.

My brother-in-law, Patrick J. Larkin is a published author has several e-books out which are suspense thrillers (ala Tom Clancy who he is acquainted with). He's on the west coast and his east coast writing partner at the time was Larry Bond; he is now writing books under his own name.

I am slowly writing a book about fictionalized characters I have met in real life and their adventures. I hope to finish it in time for NaNoWriMo.

Cool, I've read a couple of Larry Bond thrillers such as Red Phoenix and loved them. I'll look out for your BiL's name and check them out.

How cool is it around here, that I can have a conversation with someone who is related to someone who works with one of my favourite authors? Forget Kevin Bacon, we have 3 degree's of Larry Bond!!
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
My Kindle is the keyboard version from a couple of years ago - I can't abide touchscreens and since I read before bed, I don't like backlit versions since it feels like a computer. I've been gradually working through all the Agatha Christies and since I've been low on funds, free ebooks on various mythologies from around the world. I tend to read non-fiction, even non-fiction about other people's fictions [Biased] Ebooks are also brilliant for short story collections, and I've been devouring the Sherlock Holmes and HP Lovecraft ones.

Having been reading about the Society of the Holy Cross and also the book of Call The Midwife and its philanthropic High Anglicanism, does anyone have any recommendations for books on 19th Century Anglican priesthood and opposition to High Church movements/the Public Worship Regulation Act? It sounds rather specific but I figure that if anyone knows, a Shipmate will!
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
C J Sansom's Winter in Madrid is currently 20p on Kindle. It's excellent.

Thurible
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
Having been reading about the Society of the Holy Cross and also the book of Call The Midwife and its philanthropic High Anglicanism, does anyone have any recommendations for books on 19th Century Anglican priesthood and opposition to High Church movements/the Public Worship Regulation Act? It sounds rather specific but I figure that if anyone knows, a Shipmate will!

Have a nose round Project Canterbury. You could start in a worse place than reading more about Fr Tooth.

Thurible
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
IIRC (it's about 15 years since I read it) Goeffrey Rowell's The Vision Glorious had some good material on philanthropic Anglo-Catholicism - Fr Prynne and the Plymouth cholera epidemic, that sort of thing. I'm not sure about opposition to the Movement, though. You might be better off looking at an older (and delightfully biased!) source such as Sidney Ollard's A Short History of the Oxford Movement.
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
Or The Secret History of the Oxford Movement...

Thurible
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
IIRC (it's about 15 years since I read it) Goeffrey Rowell's The Vision Glorious had some good material on philanthropic Anglo-Catholicism - Fr Prynne and the Plymouth cholera epidemic, that sort of thing.

Very enjoyable.
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
The Vision Glorious was one of the most boringly written things I've ever read. Which, given that the content is something I found terribly interesting, was quite an odd mix.

Thurible
 
Posted by Margaret (# 283) on :
 
No one could accuse The Secret History of the Oxford Movement of being boring, though. I haven't read it for years, but I've still got a copy in my study: exciting revelations about the wickedness of the confessional, and the penances handed out - I seem to remember something about "Englishwomen being beaten on their bare backs" [Eek!]
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I am very much enjoying Mark Forsyth's Horologicon which is all about obscure English words. For instance, if your boss is talking conciliatory nonsense at a meeting, (s)he is a mugwump. Instead of leaving the house with an umbrella in the morning, say you are taking your bumbershoot. The most delightful word in the English language is wamblecropt and I think he might have a point about that (you'll have to read the book to find out what it means) [Big Grin] .

He has another one, the Etymologicon, a tour de force of the origins of English words, which I liked as well but I think the Horologicon is even better.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
I've just finished Beloved
It was also a great one for the book group because, although we all liked it, it also stimulated a discussion that kept going (more-or-less) on topic for the full ninety minutes and then some. I wonder how many others on board have read it, and whether it's worth nominating for the Ship book group.


I've read it with two different real life book clubs and both times the discussion triggered the biggest near-screaming fights the groups had ever had. I never would have believed that retired literature teachers could get so angry.
[Eek!]
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I've just finished Mark Forsyth's Etymologicon and enjoyed it very much--it's the sort of book with which you--well, I-- drive everyone mad in the vicinity by readings bits out. I look forward to the Horologicon.

I read Beloved years ago and thought it very good--horrifying, of course.

I have recently discovered Javier Marias and read A Heart So White (in English translation). I thought it was wonderful--I love W.G. Sebald and the two have many affinities, indeed Sebald called Marais a "twin writer." Similar sort of melancholy, thoughtful, meandering meditations--but in Marias there is also an involving story that you want to follow to the end. Like the books of Sebald, this one by Marias (the only one by him I've so far read) has a special atmosphere but one that's hard to describe or define.
 
Posted by geroff (# 3882) on :
 
Having mis-read the thread title as a town in Berkshire, England wondering how it can be a ticket to anywhere, [Hot and Hormonal] I have now read the thread!
Having not enjoyed the film/musical version of Les Miserables at the cinema last week I have now embarked on the novel (in English, but not sung). This may take some time because I am a slow reader when I have Other Things To Do, but I didn't think I fancied it as a holiday read.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
does anyone have any recommendations for books on 19th Century Anglican priesthood and opposition to High Church movements/the Public Worship Regulation Act? It sounds rather specific but I figure that if anyone knows, a Shipmate will!

I can't lay hands on my copy of Judgement on Hatcham so I can't say who was the author (Joyce Coombs?) but it gives a blow by blow of Father Tooth SSC's improvements and the machinations of his opponents (including attending a said Holy Communion, just in order to stand in front of the altar rail to prevent the sole communicant receiving - because the BCP says there must be three communicants.)
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Kipling again-- Kim was praised upthread and now I'm reading Julian Barnes's new essay collection Through the Window and find two essays about Kipling and his relationship with France. Interesting--and another nudge Kim -wards.

But I want to take a minute to praise Julian Barnes. I think Flaubert's Parrot brilliant. Very much admire Arthur and George . And I thought his recent Booker-winner The Sense of an Ending powerful, subtle, moving, economic, and the kind of book that you immediately want to read again once you've finished it for the first time.

I'm having trouble putting my finger on what his particular gift is (remembering the injunction on this thread to say more than just "I loved it" or "I hated it"!). Immense readability and yet layers meaning. Straight-foward style yet underlying complexity.

He's so gifted at non-fiction as well--the recent Nothing to be Frightened Of is a confrontation with the biggest bugaboo of our time, Death--an extended personal and yet wide-ranging essay that is interesting and compelling.

His critical writing--as for example in his essay on Penelope Fitzgerald, which is in Through the Window --often makes you want to go back again and read the book in question with renewed attention and appreciation.
 
Posted by Dormouse (# 5954) on :
 
Anyone else read Ken Follet's "Fall of Giants"? I read his "Pillars of the Earth" series and enjoyed them, but I have found this book tedious, with certain bits of writing jarringly bad. I usually can't put books down and finish them quickly. I've been reading this since before Christmas.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Hm Dormouse, this isn't a proper answer to your question really--some people rave about Follett, especially Pillars... , but I've heard others say his books are not well written. This has put me off (life is short, etc!) so I've never read him...unlikely to now, as you're adding your voice to theirs!
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
Science! Tattoos! "Science Ink" by Carl Zimmer. Not only do you see pictures, there's a page or so write up of what & why & how the tattoo relates to a scientific field of study. Physic equations. Molecules. Darwin's finches. Swamps. Planets. My favorite was probably the most simple: a stack of four lines, three lines, and three lines. It harks back to tattoos found on the "ice man" frozen in the Alps 5000 years ago.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Sounds interesting, nickel. I enjoyed a fascinating book about tattoos called...hmmmm...am not where my books are.

Ok, found it on Amazon: Written on the Body :the tattoo in European and American History by Jane Caplan. (The subtitle and the author's name are important to distinguish it from the novel of the same basic title by the brilliant Jeannette Winterson).

I haven't read others to compare, but it seemed to me an excellent survey of tattooing through history. Convincingly argues that slaves in ancient Rome were often marked with a tattoo, and that the ancient Britons tattooed themselves.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've nearly finished "The Disorderly Knights" by Dorothy Dunnett - the third Lymond book. I've found it less gripping than the first two, somehow, although that might be more to do with my own frame of mind. There are some things I've found disturbing too.
 
Posted by The Intrepid Mrs S (# 17002) on :
 
Not actually reading, but listening to an audiobook - 'Murder in Peking' by Paul French. It's quite recent, I think, but an account of the murder of a young girl in 1930's Peking. She's the daughter of an ex-British Consul, and French's treatment of the twin dichotomies of European and Chinese Peking on the one hand, and the schoolgirl Pamela/young woman Pamela on the other, is really fascinating.

As an aside, I was deeply moved by the parallels between her situation and that of other young girls 'led astray' looking for love and fun, in much more recent times. I really wanted to hug my own daughter out of sheer gratitude for her survival of adolescence!

And having it as an audiobook means you can't skip ahead - you have to listen to it at the pace the author wrote it.

Mrs. S, absolutely riveted by it.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished two books:

"I Leap Over the Wall" by Monica Baldwin. A fascinating account of someone who entered an enclosed order of nuns in 1914 and came out in 1941, to find the world much changed. Her reflections, and her difficulties in adjusting to the new world in which she finds herself, make this a fascinating read. What comes across is that the convent left its mark; she might have left it physically but her outlook is still very much the "ex-nun" rather than the spinster relative.

The other book is "The Coram Boy" which was on a book swop table. Set in the 17th century, it tells the tale of two boys, one African, one the illegitimate son of a gentleman, who grow up together in an orphanage. It is a children's book so it turns out all right in the end, but there are some thinly veiled references to some of the altogether less savoury practices of the time, and the two boys narrowly escape slavery. It's an odd read, less predictable than you think, and at times a bit uncomfortable. Not one to keep, but one to return to the book swop table.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
On a related theme to the Monica Baldwin book, Karen Armstrong has written two books about her life in a convent and then outside. The first one, "Through the Narrow Gate," was written soon after she came out and later she says it was written too soon and without enough distance and was inaccurate and unbalanced in many ways.

The later book, The Spiral Staircase, is one of the best memoirs I've ever read. It describes her youth, her attraction to the convent while still a girl, her life there--pre-Vacitan II-style novitiate, severe and aimed at crushing the spirit out of the young women. damage mental and physical ensued....she left, and then had to readjust to the world. But as she herself says, her life as a writer is very cloistered and dedicated, in a way like being a nun still. (Except for her public speaking engagements--I've heard her speak live and she is an absolutely riveting speaker. )

An amazing writer as well--"Spiral Staircase" has stayed with me, its tone, its depiction of the strong desire for a path, a vocation, the way it illuminates and brings alive the contours of her mental and spiritual quest, the way a poem by T S Eliot clarified so much for her--written n a way that's restrained and yet all the more profoundly moving.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
Just finished "I Shall Wear Midnight", the last of Terry Pratchett's Tiffany Aching quartet. (It's a branch of the Disc World series.)

Tiffany is a girl in a very rural region called "The Chalk". Throughout the quartet, she grows into being a witch and into being herself.

The Tiffany books are much quieter than most of the rest of the DW series, IMHO. There's definitely humor and wit and puns, but not usually in a raucous way. (Ok, except when the Nac Mac Feegle are around... [Biased] ) The books are deeply rooted in the land.

I've read (and reread) the previous Tiffany books ("Wee Free Men", "A Hat Full Of Sky", "Wintersmith", and "I Shall Wear Midnight"). I strongly recommend reading them in order, so you can pick up on nuances.

The whole quartet is awesome. But the last one is...wow...just wow.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dormouse:
Anyone else read Ken Follet's "Fall of Giants"? I read his "Pillars of the Earth" series and enjoyed them, but I have found this book tedious, with certain bits of writing jarringly bad. I usually can't put books down and finish them quickly. I've been reading this since before Christmas.

I've read "Pillars of the Earth," "Fall of Giants," and its sequel "Winter of the World" and I think Follet is an astonishingly mediocre writer. The thing that bothers me most is that everything is so obvious -- not a hint of subtlety. Everything that everyone says and does is exactly what they mean, and then the narrator tells you again, just in case you missed it. So if a character says, "I'm so proud of you, Son," not only do you know he is actually proud of his son, but the next sentence will be something like, "He had never been as proud of his son as he was at that moment."

When I can get past the terrible writing, I do find the storylines in the Century Trilogy mildly interesting -- I enjoyed, for example, the perspective of what it might have been like living in Germany during WW2. So I'll probably go on and read the 3rd volume when it comes out, but after that I doubt I'll ever feel the need to read another Ken Follet book.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I've never read Follett, but I discovered that my brother-in-law (who is German) is a big fan. His English is practically perfect (of course!), but I wonder if reading something not in your mother tongue helps to overlook the worst of the bad writing? I don't know.

I was looking for something similar to get him for presents and now that I know he's into historical fiction like that was wondering about trying Diana Gabaldon? Has anyone read any of her stuff? Would you recommend it? There were so many books of hers I didn't know where to start so got him a comedy instead for Christmas, but I got the impression from the cover art that her stuff is along similar sorts of lines to Follett.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've nearly finished "The Disorderly Knights" by Dorothy Dunnett - the third Lymond book. I've found it less gripping than the first two, somehow, although that might be more to do with my own frame of mind. There are some things I've found disturbing too.

Are you not finding yourself saying "Where is Pawn in Frankincense, I must start it immediately!"? Certainly that's my reaction to the end of The Disorderly Knights, I immediately wanted to know what happens next!
There are some disturbing aspects to it though, mainly around Joleta. Although Pawn in Frankincense is probably more so, but you can let us know what you think when you've read it!
 
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on :
 
Diana Gabaldon is one of my favourite writers but I'd say she's more of a writer for women rather than men if you get my.. er.. drift. The writing is from a female viewpoint and the male protagonists are... er... good food for the imaginations?

If his English is good, how about John Grisham, though that's not historical fiction. Ellis Peters is good, and I have just finished Martyr by Rory Clements which I could hardly put down. Very readable, slightly gritty, three dimensional characters, and a touch of humour - with Shakespeare's elder brother John as the main protagonist.
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just read Bad Pharma by Ben Goldacre and it terrified me. It's about how drug companies, regulators, medical journals and doctors all conspire (knowingly or unknowingly) in a distortion on drug trials etc. Some of the statistics and stories were absolutely shocking. It made me wonder if we really do know the efficacy and safety of the drugs we take every day.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Smudgie:
Diana Gabaldon is one of my favourite writers but I'd say she's more of a writer for women rather than men if you get my.. er.. drift. The writing is from a female viewpoint and the male protagonists are... er... good food for the imaginations?

If his English is good, how about John Grisham, though that's not historical fiction. Ellis Peters is good, and I have just finished Martyr by Rory Clements which I could hardly put down. Very readable, slightly gritty, three dimensional characters, and a touch of humour - with Shakespeare's elder brother John as the main protagonist.

Thanks Smudgie, that's really helpful. Historical fiction isn't my thing at all so I was a bit clueless. Martyr looks promising, and the reviews there also led me to CJ Samson, those books also look like they'd fit the bill. I think that's one lot of presents sorted for the next few Christmases and birthdays (we've been getting him CDs for the last several years so this will make a nice change!).
 
Posted by Boadicea Trott (# 9621) on :
 
Chive,

I am in the process of reading Bad Pharma and it is bringing me out in a cold sweat of fear. I knew the pharmaceutical industry was on occasion economical with the truth, but Bad Pharma is terrifying.

Have you read "The Patient Paradox: Why Sexed Up Medicine is Bad for Your Health " by Dr Margaret McCartney ? She looks at the whole of medicine, not just medications. I've just finished it and it was a fine -if jaw-dropping - read.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
Oh yes, I'd second the "Patient Paradox" recommendation, which I read last year (I think at the end of the previous book thread [Smile] ). It's brilliant, and very readable. I think I said then anyone who likes Ben Goldacre would like Margaret McCartney - it's very "Bad Science"-ey. She often appears on Radio 4's "Inside Health" (she's a Glasgow GP).
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scots lass:
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've nearly finished "The Disorderly Knights" by Dorothy Dunnett - the third Lymond book. I've found it less gripping than the first two, somehow, although that might be more to do with my own frame of mind. There are some things I've found disturbing too.

Are you not finding yourself saying "Where is Pawn in Frankincense, I must start it immediately!"? Certainly that's my reaction to the end of The Disorderly Knights, I immediately wanted to know what happens next!
There are some disturbing aspects to it though, mainly around Joleta. Although Pawn in Frankincense is probably more so, but you can let us know what you think when you've read it!

I've got Pawn in Frankincense lined up, but I'm almost scared to start it, because so many people have said they hate it or that it's heart breaking.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've got Pawn in Frankincense lined up, but I'm almost scared to start it, because so many people have said they hate it or that it's heart breaking.

YMMV. "Pawn in Frankincense" and "The Disorderly Knights" are the two I like the best. I didn't find "Pawn" heart-breaking, although it is a powerful story that leaves you asking a few questions.
 
Posted by The Great Gumby (# 10989) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by chive:
I've just read Bad Pharma by Ben Goldacre and it terrified me. It's about how drug companies, regulators, medical journals and doctors all conspire (knowingly or unknowingly) in a distortion on drug trials etc. Some of the statistics and stories were absolutely shocking. It made me wonder if we really do know the efficacy and safety of the drugs we take every day.

I finished that recently, and it's the little details that really hit me. I knew the broad brushstrokes of it, but seeing it all set out point by point was quite shocking. But don't get terrified, get campaigning. And remember that the solution (or part of it) is more and better research, not the rejection of it.

I'm now onto The Geek Manifesto by Mark Henderson, which is another very good, important and timely book on why science matters and why we should be making sure it plays a proper role in politics and public life in general.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
Bump.
 
Posted by Freelance Monotheist (# 8990) on :
 
I've just started G.K. Chesterton's Father Brown Mysteries, as they were going cheap on the Amazon Kindle site. I'd seen the TV version some time ago, but the books are so much better. I get the pleasure of detective fiction with the feeling that I'm reading something high-brow/intellectually stimulating! I'm also reading a really fascinating Young Adult novel set in a dystopian society where the US is split into The Republic, that's warring with The Colonies. Basically a teen girl and boy from different social classes end up on the run together, after discovering that The Republic isn't as benevolent/truthful as it seems. The first book is called Prodigy, and I finished it in a few hours, so now I'm onto the sequel, called Legend.
I've also just finished the latest Oscar Wilde Mystery by Gyles Brandreth, and this one takes place when Oscar Wilde is in prison, towards the end of his life, and a series of murders of chaplains & prison warders takes place in the various prisons he's transferred to (Pentonville, Wandsworth & Reading). There's a lot of detail about the prison regime which is pretty horrific, but most of the books uncover the darker aspects of life at the time. Brandreth recounts Oscar's encounters with various well-known literary/artistic/scientific figures of the time, which is really interesting too, and I get the feeling the crimes are based on events that actually happened. Also, a lot of Wilde's bon mots crop up in various situations, so it's fun trying to guess when they'll crop up/which play/story of his they're from.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Ooh, ooh, more Oscar - I greatly enjoyed Brandreth's Oscar Wilde and the Vatican Murders(Oscar and Conan Doyle: how [Killing me] ) so you've prompted me to check on the others...

I recently started on Matthew Lewis' The Monk, written in 1796 and which fairly races along and is very modern in style. The blurb says it 'still terrifies, over 200 years after it was written'... I can't wait [Biased]

I'm also working my way through the Merrily Watkins series, by Phil Rickman, which I got into courtesy of a thread here on the Ship - for which, many thanks!
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I'm giving up buying books for Lent and you people are just big nasty temptors. [Biased]

This year I have decided that I'm going to work my way through the complete work of Trollope. Last year I managed the entirety of Tolstoy and loved them. I'm not finding Trollope so much fun though [Frown]
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I am reading ian Kelly's Mr Foote's Other Leg - a biography of the actor, writer, wit and amputee, Samuel Foote.

We're just off to a rip-roaring start in which he gets out of debtors' prison by writing up the ongoing story of the trial and execution of one of his uncles for the murder of another.

Take that, Hello magazine.

[ 15. February 2013, 16:55: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I recently finished re-reading Murder at St. Adelaide's.

It's about a private detective who is asked to come back to the convent school she attended years before. The mother superior has a job for her.

The book has an interesting plot and well-developed characters. What interested me most, however, was the background. The author obviously attended such a school, and she remembers details of her schooldays. Things have changed greatly since Vatican II. The school has closed, and there are no novices at the convent. I enjoyed getting a picture of a way of life with which I was completely unfamiliar.

Moo
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
Just finished Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell. I haven't seen the movie yet, but I certainly will. It's a wonderful novel, with a structure that could easily have come off as annoying postmodern pretension, but doesn't, mostly because Mitchell never forgets that he's telling a story about people--and he's really good at that. There are six story lines, different genres set in different times and places, with only minimal overlap of plot and character, but thematically it all comes together in the end.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I'm re-reading John Lahr's biography of Joe Orton - Prick Up Your Ears which is at times hilarious - weird to think he would have been 80 on New Year's Day just gone had he lived!
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I'm reading Winterkartoffelknödel by Rita Falk. The title means "Winter Potato Dumplings" and food features fairly heavily in it. It's billed as a provincial crime story and is the first in a series starring a Munich policeman who gets sent packing back to his rural Bavarian village after a break down of sorts. At the moment I'm 3/4 in and it's still not clear whether or not any crime has actually been committed, or whether it's all in his head.

Very funny in a dark kind of way.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I loved Mitchell's Cloud Atlas long before it was a film. I think Mitchell is brilliant. His much more straight-foward books Black Swan Green and The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet are wonderful too--the former a coming-of-age story with an excellent evocation of childhood and adolescence, and the latter a historical novel.

I haven't seen the film--recently read an interesting review of it (possibly by Anthony Lane in the New Yorker?) where he compares it to the book, especially the structure, multiple story-lines etc, and said the film didn't work as well--yes, have just checked, he says the story-lines are too tangled in the film and you have no time to settle into any one of them. But still, sounds worth seeing, and many reviewers have raved.

Interestingly, another writer came out with a novel also called
Cloud Atlas at around the same time. Unfortunate co-incidence for both authors, as when both David Lodge and Colm Toibin simultaneously brought out novels based on the life of Henry James.

I've just finished Nicholson Baker's The Anthologist, about a poet who is stuck in writing an introduction for his poetry anthology, whose girlfriend has just left him, and whose life is falling apart in many ways; in which he expounds his ideas and thoughts about poetry--and life-- in a way that's engaging and readable and original--as you'd expect from the brilliant Baker. I enjoyed it very much.
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
I've never read Follett, but I discovered that my brother-in-law (who is German) is a big fan. His English is practically perfect (of course!), but I wonder if reading something not in your mother tongue helps to overlook the worst of the bad writing? I don't know.

I was looking for something similar to get him for presents and now that I know he's into historical fiction like that was wondering about trying Diana Gabaldon? Has anyone read any of her stuff? Would you recommend it? There were so many books of hers I didn't know where to start so got him a comedy instead for Christmas, but I got the impression from the cover art that her stuff is along similar sorts of lines to Follett.

Follett is not about the writing, it is about the story telling. What about sending him a book by James Michener? Each book covers a very wide span of history of a very specific location or region. His stories are well told and I've enjoyed reading each one.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
I was looking for something similar to get him for presents and now that I know he's into historical fiction like that was wondering about trying Diana Gabaldon? Has anyone read any of her stuff? Would you recommend it?

I've read and enjoyed her books. I don't think I would call it historical fiction, more of a fantasy with some bits of history thrown in.

If you like lots of sex, this might be an interesting series for you! IIRC, the first book is Outlander.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Having finished the John Lahr I started a re-read of Le Guin's Earthsea quartet but wasn't in the mood so am now having some light fun by re-reading Armistead Maupin's Michael Tolliver Lives - just what I needed.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
I am rereading The Hobbit again. This time it's on my Nook.

[tangent]My dear friend who is 93 years young was fascinated as I showed her all the books in my Nook. Then I asked her which book I should add to my collection. She suggested The Hobbit, as we had just seen the movie together. She was amazed to see how easy it was to purchase, and that it was on my device immediately. It's not easy to impress her, but I think that little trick did it![/tangent]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I've started on a project this year to read a bunch of classics that I either didn't enjoy, didn't finish, or didn't appreciate as much as I was told I was supposed to, when younger. Last month I read The Great Gatsby, which I had to read in college. This month it was Les Miserables (which I read after first seeing the stage musical and remember being terribly bored by). Now I'm rereading Pride and Prejudice, which unlike the others I did like when I first read it, but it's been many years and since I've been watching The Lizzie Bennet Diaries I've realized how sketchy my memory of the original was.

In every case, I've found the books far more enjoyable and absorbing than when I read them in my late teens or 20s. Am I getting to be a smarter, more thoughtful reader in middle age, I wonder?

I'm not sure I'm brave enough to give The Old Man and the Sea a second chance though ...
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lily pad:
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
[...]
I was looking for something similar to get him for presents [...]

[...] What about sending him a book by James Michener? [...]
Len Deighton? Modern-era historical, mostly to do with spies or the military (and lots about Nazis, come to think of it maybe not such a good present for a German!) and its not Shakespeare, but its well-constructed and often exciting, even compelling. You want to know what happens next. Bomber might be a genuinely great novel. And I cried when I read it. (Though again an odd choice of gift for a Brit to give a German, outwith some ongoing discussion about the bomber war - maybe just read it yourself?)
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
On Les Misérables - I finished volume 4 on the metro this morning (one to go). I'm reading it in French.

Looking at Les Misérables in the Kindle bestsellers is kind of hilarious actually - on the French Amazon site, the first volume is at about number 50, volume 2 is nearer number 80, and volume 3 is nowhere to be seen (you have to download it as separate volumes to get it for free). You can see the people dropping off as they realise just how absurdly long the thing is. The first point where huge numbers of people drop out is the battle of Waterloo, which if you really can't be bothered with, you can skip past most of and still not really miss anything in the main story.

I personally love the sprawl, but well, there's a reason why the sucker is 1400 pages long. The actual Jean Valjean - Cosette - Marius - Javert - Thénardier - Gavroche story probably only makes up about half the book and the rest is kind of his epic heroic history of France/Paris, I think. Whether or not you get on with this depends on whether you appreciate the style, the sentences that run on for pages...

I personally also love his vision of Paris, who it seems to me is actually the main character in the story.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I will admit I did a lot of skimming -- didn't skip anything altogether, but there were some bits, like Waterloo, where I read fairly quickly. I do agree about Paris being a major character in the story. It's also interesting to see the differences from the (to me) better-known musical version. Cosette is marginally less annoying but Marius considerably more; Eponine is just as tragic but far less noble.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
In every case, I've found the books far more enjoyable and absorbing than when I read them in my late teens or 20s. Am I getting to be a smarter, more thoughtful reader in middle age, I wonder?

A retired English professor taught a course on Shakespeare for the retirees at our Senior Center. She was in her late twenties when she wrote her dissertation, and she said she was not mature enough at the time to understand everything Shakespeare was saying.

Moo
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I agree; I think life experience adds a lot to your appreciation of any literature -- which makes it ironic that the only exposure many people get to great works of literature is at an age when they're least prepared to appreciate them (and forced to read them under duress, which is another whole problem).
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
On the other hand, there is the phenomenon that we discussed on these boards a long time ago, which is that you tend to meet less life-changing books as you get older. I enjoy the greater depth - there's so many books I want to re-read now - but I do miss the Wow! life-changing experience coming along every coupla years (or even months in some cases).
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've found a whole new genre to play in.
I'd always avoided graphic novels - not because I thought they were trashy, or anything like that, but because I didn't really know where to start with them. I didn't really want to read "superhero fights crime" stories and though I was aware that wasn't all there was to graphic novels, I didn't know where to find them.
I find now that Neil Gaiman is my 'gateway drug' to the genre, as I have just been reading Marvel 1602, which takes Marvel superheroes and places them in the year 1602 - old Queen Elizabeth is dying, King James of Scotland hates witches (so that's the X-men in trouble for a start) and there's a fascinating plot involving the Four of the Fantastick, a blind Irish minstrel, Count Otto von Doom, the Spanish Inquisition, and a young girl from Roanoake colony who's come to see the Queen with her Native American protector. Oh, and Sir Nicholas Fury is the Queen's spymaster, Dr Strange is her physician, and Fury's assistant is a young lad called Peter who has a fascination with spiders!
I found that I didn't need to know any previous history of the superheroes involved, and I already had some familiarity with them from movies.
I understand the sequels are not as good as the first story, being by other authors, but I'm going to be tracking them down anyway - and I'll be browsing the shelves of Forbidden Planet next time I'm in Cardiff, too!
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Oh, I love me a graphic novel. I learnt to read on Marvel comics (amongst other things), so never had the anti-superhero thing some others do, but completely get how all those decades of slightly silly backstory can seem weird to purely prose readers. The best comics add something in a single panel that would take a whole chapter to explain in words.

Eigon, if you like the historical detail in the Neil Gaiman stuff, try Alan Moore's 'From Hell'. You have to have a fairly strong stomach, and try to forget the dodgy Johnny Depp film, but the depth of detail is incredible. There's a whole subplot about Nicholas Hawksmoor, the architect, and his interest in the occult. Also the paintings of Walter Sickert and what it was like to have Queen Victoria as your mum.

[ 20. February 2013, 21:43: Message edited by: ArachnidinElmet ]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Golly, that sounds good! Thanks, ArachnidinElmet!
I do have an interest in Hawksmoor, having read the novel by Peter Ackroyd, and I've read a book about Sickert that suggested he was Jack the Ripper. And I haven't seen the Johnny Depp film. I've also heard good things about Alan Moore (and some weird things!).
While I'm looking out for that one, I have Grandville, the first Inspector Le Brock story, and The Longbow Hunters, starring Green Arrow, looking down at me from the "to-be-read" shelf.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
I tried to read Peter Ackroyd's Hawksmoor, but got stuck half way through. This seems a good time to have another go.

Grandville is an excellent book; I bought it off the back of seeing Bryan Talbot at the Thought Bubble conference in Leeds. Inspector Brock is definitely the most charismatic (and weirdly attractive) lead character I've come across to have the head of a badger. [Biased]

[ 21. February 2013, 23:40: Message edited by: ArachnidinElmet ]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
I tried to read Peter Ackroyd's Hawksmoor, but got stuck half way through. This seems a good time to have another go.

One of the best books that I read last year.

Worth persevering with because it isn't until the end that everything begins to make sense.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
I am enjoying Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hall. It's a bigger book than I usually read, but it is keeping my attention.

I find at times I am a little confused at who her pronouns are referring to, but it seems a device to refer mainly to Cromwell.

The news of her unprovoked comments about the Duchess of Cambridge put me off the author a little, but I will try not to let it bother me!
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Percy B:

The news of her unprovoked comments about the Duchess of Cambridge put me off the author a little, but I will try not to let it bother me!

Have you actually read text of her lecture ? You may find it to be somewhat other than represented.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
No I haven't read the lecture - just the press report. I am pleased you say it's not what it seems.

It didn't actually colour my reading too much.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Percy B:
No I haven't read the lecture - just the press report. I am pleased you say it's not what it seems.

I provided the link in order that you might form an opinion of your own.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
Thank you, how kind. I do have an opinion of my own, why think I don't?

My original remark on the issue was to highlight how the opinions of an author outside of her or his novel can influence the reader, in this case me. That was what I was more concerned about rather than the actual incident reported. But it was still kind of you to take the time to signpost to the lecture.

On a bigger point, I was uncomfortable reading H G Wells novels some years ago, for a while, when I learned of some of his extreme comments.
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
I'm rereading Freedom and Necessity by Emma Bull and Stephen Brust. It's a fantasy in the form of a 19th century epistolary novel, whose protagonists are English Chartist radicals in 1849. Engels makes a major cameo appearance. The fantasy element is subtle and builds up slowly, but it should be counted as one of the best fantasy novels ever. Unfortunately, I suspect the fantasy readers saw the title and said "Huh?" (it's a reference to Hegel).
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
On the graphic novel front-- if you are in the mood for something really different, and want to experience a master of the genre, pick up Gilberto (Beto) Hernandez's Heartbreak Soup, or if you really want to be shook up, his Blood of Palomar--both are compilations of his "Palomar 'series run through the nineties in the ground breaking comic book, Love and Rockets.

Beto's story is, when he started running this series about strange happenings in a secluded Central American town people started congratulating him on his excellent homage to Gabriel Garcia Marquez. His response: "Who?" he then picked up One Hundred Years of Solitude and said to himself, "Damn, my stuff is a homage to this guy." and he immediately wrote a couple scenes where his characters argued about Gabriel Garcia Marquez.

Other compilations of Love and Rockets include novelized versions of his brother's stories, Las mujeres perdidas (The lost women) and The Death of Speedy, the latter which won an Eisner and is considered a classic of ninteis era underground comics.
Mujeres marks the transition of L&R from a punk-flavored sci-fi series about girl rocket mechanics to a more magical realism treatment of the punk scene in Oxnard,/ Greater Los Angeles, CA. (Basically, it's the last major story line in L&R that revolves around rockets.)Speedy is firmly set in the punk/ Latino gang scene of Oxnard, and traces the downfall of a reformed gangbanger as he alienates those closest to him.


I must add, all of the above graphic novels are quite-- uh, graphic.

[ 23. February 2013, 04:51: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
For the last year or two I've been signed up to free ebooks from University of Chicago Press. You get sent a link once a month to a free book to download - most months I'm not that interested in the title on offer and don't bother, but I have downloaded 4 or 5 that looked interesting. One of those that I finished recently was "The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government" by David K. Johnson. It details Government paranoia and the systemic and systematic persecution and rooting out of gays and lesbians from government jobs from the 1940s onwards, and the links to the much better known McCarthy-led persecution of alleged Communists (although arguably the 'Lavender Scare' was much more pervasive and had a much more devastating effect) starting with the State Department but moving on to every other department also. It features both government sources, media reports and also accounts from many people who lost their jobs but also those who then mobilised to lobby for change and for their rights. It was a great read, although very depressing - I'd highly recommend it.

I've just started one of the others I downloaded a few months ago - "Pilgrimage to the End of the World: The Road to Santiago de Compostela" by Conrad Rudolph. I'm not very far into it yet, so can't say much about whether it's any good, but it seems to start by giving the history of the pilgrimage, then a bit of a guide to what to expect, and a bit of a reflection on what the author himself learnt from the pilgrimage.

Having also recently got an eReader I discovered Project Gutenberg and Feedbooks, and I decided that having reached this advanced age having never read any of the Russian classics this would be a good chance to discover some. I started slowly - a Pushkin short story, "Queen of Spades", which was OK but I think I need to build myself up a bit before I tackle "War and Peace".

I'm also reading Frances Hodgson Burnett's "The Secret Garden" (an old-fashioned paperback!). I have spent my adult life thinking that I had read it as a child and this would be a re-read, but now I'm quite a way into it I don't think I remember it at all. I know I read (and reread, many many times) her "A Little Princess" as a child - I wonder how I didn't ever get to read "The Secret Garden" then? Anyway, although it is very much 'of its time' I am really enjoying a little bit of escapism.
 
Posted by churchgeek (# 5557) on :
 
My reading for pleasure has often been biographies (and autobiographies), especially about artists & creative people. Being a huge Joy Division fan, I've read a few books on the band, but now Peter Hook (who played bass) has come out with Unknown Pleasures: Inside Joy Division. The US release is gorgeous: black on black hard cover with a tiny dust jacket, and the edges of the pages are black. (It actually looks like an old 3/4" videotape case to me, which isn't gorgeous, but the book is.)

Anyway, the point is that this book is hilarious! When you read books about JD written by outsiders (people who weren't in the band, i.e., every other book written prior to this one), they can be downers, or they focus on the myth and image. Peter Hook's writing style is really conversational and he recounts everything with a great sense of humor. Plus, he really does give insight into the band's creative process, which is precisely what I like to read bios of creative people for. And you get to see where the myth and image of JD came from. If you see someone on the bus or train reading this book and laughing their ass off, they're not some twisted sicko. Well, they might be, but that's another matter.

I also enjoy reading histories of or pertaining to Detroit, my hometown, which is a lot more fascinating than people realize. I'm pleased to see myself becoming fairly knowledgeable on the subject!

Mostly, though, I have to read what I'm working on in school - although some of that is related to Detroit, happily, since I'm working on industrial ruins.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Jack the Lass, re Russian classics, though I don't know that many of them, I love Anna Karenina and have read it several times, would recommend it before War and Peace as easier to get into--and it's also brilliant.

Churchgeeek, you must surely know already, but I'll mention it just in case, that a new book about Detroit has just come out, and been widely reviewed--ah yes, found it-- The Last Days of Detroit by Mark Binelli, reviewed in the British press in January.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
Seconded re Anna Karenina. It's the only Russian classic I ever really got on with although I have read others.
 
Posted by The Great Gumby (# 10989) on :
 
Huh, just goes to show. I stalled completely on Anna Karenina, although admittedly that was with a small baby in the house. In contrast, Crime and Punishment was utterly gripping, and remains one of my favourite novels.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished the Green Arrow graphic novel, The Longbow Hunters - and I want to go straight out and buy the sequel!
When I worked in London, I used to get Green Arrow comics occasionally, and I think I must have been reading stories just after this one, because Black Canary was recovering from something very traumatic that had happened in her recent past. This story shows the traumatic event, along with a rival archer lurking on Seattle's rooftops, a plot about Japanese gold and drug running - and Oliver Queen wants to settle down and get married. There's a flashback to show how Oliver became Green Arrow, too, to get the reader up to speed on the character. All that and a mention of Errol Flynn as Robin Hood! It's all great fun.
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
Might I recommend Unapologetic by Francis Spufford?

quote:
'The point... is to show those on the fence that belief need not mean the abandonment of intelligence, wit, emotional honesty. In this, Francis Spufford succeeds to an exceptional degree.' Theo Hobson, Times Literary Supplement

Also correctly described in 'Third Way' along the lines of 'probably the swear-iest Christian book you'll ever read...'.

Read it in case anyone you've ever thought is entirely hard-boiled against Christian propaganda/dogma/apologia, ever gives you the opportunity to suggest a book by a Christian which they might enjoy. It really is (IMHO) fantastic.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Ah, great to know this about Spufford's Unapologetic , Mark, which is on my shelf, but as yet unread--will get to it the sooner for this recommendation.

Gumby, I was gripped by Crime and Punishment , too. But I'm surprised you couldn't be doing with Anna Karenina --well, as you say, it just goes to show. Perhaps it was the presence of the small baby--I know how distracting they can be! Not necessarily conducive to sitting down with a Russian for long chunks of time...as I recall, it does take a little while to get into Anna K, but once in, I was well and truly in.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
Thanks for the thoughts on the Russian classics! I am a bit daunted by the prospect so am trying short stories first, most recently "First Love" by Turgenev. Are all Russian classics populated by princesses, countesses, hussars and soldiers down on their luck? I can't say I've been grabbed by any of the characters so far.

I'm also having a break and have just started Jonas Jonasson's "The 100 year old man who climbed out of the window and disappeared". I'm not too far in yet, but it seems to be a bit slapstick, and (possibly - too soon to say for sure) a bit dark. I'm enjoying it so far.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I think with the Russian classics, the translation makes a huge difference. The first time I read Crime and Punishment I couldn't get on with it all, but later I tried it in a different translation and couldn't put it down.

In the same vein, despite thinking The Brothers Karamazov to be one of the most phenomenally amazing novels ever written, I think the Penguin translation sucks (I love it so much that I've read it twice nonetheless, but sigh over what a better translator could have done with it).
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I haven't read any Turgenev but have read a wonderful book about him, which made me want to read him...
Twilight of Love: travels with Turgenev by Robert Dessaix. One of those wonderful cross-genre books I like so much, part travel, part exploration into history...I can't do better to convey its atmosphere than the jacket raves from writers I admire: "A moving,melancholy, vastly informative excursion into the Russian mind. This is one of the best travel memoirs I've read in years." Alberto Manguel.
Michael Arditti said: "The most inventive portrait of a writer's life and legacy since "Flaubert's Parrot." (High praise indeed, I think Flaubert's Parrot is brilliant.)
The book is about the desire to understand a writer, to follow in his or her footsteps, to see what he saw, feel as he felt, to try and transcend the barrier of time, even though we know it's impossible. In S Petersburg Dessaix stands opposite a house where Turgenev lived: "I wanted to fly back across the gap between then and now, but it was unbridgeable."
In a quick flip-through now, I don't see any reference to the story "First Love" (there's no index), but anyway it's a wonderful book.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have finally slogged my way to the end of Les Misérables. I honestly think the last volume is the weakest of the five, which is a bit irritating after you've already waded your way through a thousand-odd pages. Also of all the wordy digressions that go on for chapters, I have to admit that I find the one about the sewer one of the less inspiring ones.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I have finally finished reading Pawn in Frankincense, the fourth Lymond book (see earlier discussion).

Although just as heart-breaking as I'd been led to expect (and I was seriously annoyed with myself for stumbling on a massive spoiler on a review of an earlier book from the series. Grr. mumble...), I did actually enjoy it more than the previous one. Was still skipping masses of description to get to the plot, but more engaging for me. I got to a stage though where I'd got to within sight of the end but couldn't bear to know what happened and put off reading it for ages!
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
I've been waiting to find out what you thought of it! I remember it left me stunned.

The development of Philippa is well done though, and the relationships between the group are fascinating. It also made me really want to visit Istanbul and North Africa!
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I have finally slogged my way to the end of Les Misérables. I honestly think the last volume is the weakest of the five, which is a bit irritating after you've already waded your way through a thousand-odd pages. Also of all the wordy digressions that go on for chapters, I have to admit that I find the one about the sewer one of the less inspiring ones.

I found Les Mis to be much less of an awful slog than I'd remembered/expected, but I certainly share your thoughts about the sewer digression. Also, not knowing much of these matters (or wanting to) I wondered, Is Hugo correct about this? Would human sewage make wonderful fertilizer if only we channeled it properly? Surely if this were true, in 150 years since he wrote that someone would be actually doing it?
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
... but I certainly share your thoughts about the sewer digression. Also, not knowing much of these matters (or wanting to) I wondered, Is Hugo correct about this? Would human sewage make wonderful fertilizer if only we channeled it properly? Surely if this were true, in 150 years since he wrote that someone would be actually doing it?

A number of people are.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
... but I certainly share your thoughts about the sewer digression. Also, not knowing much of these matters (or wanting to) I wondered, Is Hugo correct about this? Would human sewage make wonderful fertilizer if only we channeled it properly? Surely if this were true, in 150 years since he wrote that someone would be actually doing it?

A number of people are.
Good to know, I guess.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I'm currently reading 'Sir John Hawkins' by Harry Kelsey. I love reading the exploits of the Elizabethan 'pirates' - Hawkins and his cousin Sir Francis Drake, et al. There are so many connections with Creamtealand, and so many legends of derring-do. For sure, they were terrible men at times, doing trade in all sorts of questionable ways, using slaves as pawns in a global game of wealth aquisition, using threats to get what they wanted (often with the connivance of the Spanish and Portugese who were equally as knavish in their tricks) but also with the support of the Queen of England, and also while doing good, founding Hospitals and other worthy ventures on the way. Perhaps they were the ancient equivalent of Sir Jimmy Saville - at once devil and do-gooder? Stories of what they got up to, and what they considered to be acceptable practice, take your breath away.
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
Just finished The Marriage Plot by Jeffrey Eugenides. It definitely earned the Pulitzer, the way it was a really engaging traditional novel while in its subtext quite unobtrusively but deliberately demolishing postmodernist literary theory.

Now reading Why Priests? A Failed Tradition by Garry Wills, who is always delightful to read (though he's preaching to the choir on this one).
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Yes, I thought The Marriage Plot was brilliant.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
An odd memory, but I believe that areas particularly famed for their market gardens around London were often recipients of London's night soil, its take a bit of hunting but here is one page that corroborates out this story.

Jengie
 
Posted by Freelance Monotheist (# 8990) on :
 
About a third of the way through Life After Life by Kate Atkinson. Really quirky and odd set-up for a story, but so intriguing.
I couldn't get on with her novels about the policeman at all, but this seems like a return to form. I love Human Croquet though and still consider that to be her best work and one of my favourite books!
I've also got Robin Hobb's latest offering on the go, which is the fourth book in her Dragon series, which I'm completely addicted to, as it has strong female characters, the fantasy world it's set in is really diverse and it has dragons! Plus it's set in the same world as her other series, about magic ships, so the plots are interlinked.
Need to buy the first book in the Game Of Thrones series and Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit, plus whatever gems Amazon suggests I should purchase!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Just finished Jeanette Winterson's memoir Why be happy when you can be normal?

The title is what her adopted mother said to her when she said she was a lesbian and wanted to be normal.

Perhaps it's better to have read Oranges are not the only fruit first.

Despite her mother's Elim church trying to exorcise her of her lesbianism and locking her up for three days with no food, she is quite without self-pity and appreciative of the meaning and support that church could give in the context of working class Accrington in the 60s.

I found it very moving and hopeful.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Just finished Jeanette Winterson's memoir Why be happy when you can be normal?

The title is what her adopted mother said to her when she said she was a lesbian and wanted to be normal.

Perhaps it's better to have read Oranges are not the only fruit first.

Despite her mother's Elim church trying to exorcise her of her lesbianism and locking her up for three days with no food, she is quite without self-pity and appreciative of the meaning and support that church could give in the context of working class Accrington in the 60s.

I found it very moving and hopeful.

Brilliant books - we did the Why be normal... one in my book group.

She's far more sympathetic to her mother than in Oranges...
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Just finished Jeanette Winterson's memoir Why be happy when you can be normal?

The title is what her adopted mother said to her when she said she was a lesbian and wanted to be normal.

Perhaps it's better to have read Oranges are not the only fruit first.

Despite her mother's Elim church trying to exorcise her of her lesbianism and locking her up for three days with no food, she is quite without self-pity and appreciative of the meaning and support that church could give in the context of working class Accrington in the 60s.

I found it very moving and hopeful.

I read Why Be Happy without having read Oranges first. Really enjoyed it and it did make me want to read the novel.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Freelance Monotheist:
About a third of the way through Life After Life by Kate Atkinson. Really quirky and odd set-up for a story, but so intriguing.
I couldn't get on with her novels about the policeman at all, but this seems like a return to form. I love Human Croquet though and still consider that to be her best work and one of my favourite books!

Longing to read this but there's a queue of 60 at the library so may be waiting a while...
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Just finished Jeanette Winterson's memoir Why be happy when you can be normal?

The title is what her adopted mother said to her when she said she was a lesbian and wanted to be normal.

There's an awful typo there. JW said she was a lesbian and wanted to be happy. Her mother said "Why be happy..."

Her mother was distinctly not normal even I should imagine by Elim Pentecostal standards.

I read Oranges when it first came out, and the gay press was saying it showed how dreadful religion could be to gays. That wasn't exactly how it came across. In the book there are some feisty old women in the congregation who are quietly supportive. And the lesbian seems to gain strength from the bloody-mindedness in the face of a hostile world which she learns from Elim.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
The later book shows how Jeanette valued religion, to some extent, partly be appropriating it. or example, she wrote
quote:
I understood twice born was not just about being alive, but about choosing life.
She writes warmly about church
quote:
Mrs Smalley opened her mouth underwater to praise the Lord and lost her top teeth. ....I saw a lot of working-class men and women — myself included — living a deeper, more thoughtful life than would have been possible without the Church. These ' were not educated people; Bible study worked their brains. They met after work in noisy discussion. The sense of belonging to something big, something important, lent unity and meaning
However she is very damning in her exposure of her exorcist
quote:
He shoved me onto my knees to repent those :words and I felt the bulge in his suit trousers. He tried to kiss me. He said it would be better than with a girl
....The church was a place of mutual help and imaginative possibility.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Re Jeannette Winterson and the church, she has also always credited her childhood knowledge of the Bible, which was all-pervasive in her home and church, as contributing enormously to her work and life as a writer. The Biblical stories, language, and imagery were deeply formative........

I don't have "Why be happy...." near me but I'm pretty sure this brilliant book mentions this, and it's come up in various essays as well.
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
I'm glad I just read this as I have been thinking about reading 'Why be happy'. The BBC dramatisation of Oranges is one of my favourite pieces of TV drama, I have it on DVD.
Off to buy a copy of the book.
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Perhaps it's better to have read Oranges are not the only fruit first.

There's a good film of that. Saw it on the PBS network, years ago.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
"Charmed Life", by Diana Wynne Jones. This is the first book I've read by this author, after several people have recommended her.

It was very readable, lively and interesting, and the story was original. I don't know whether I'd want to read it again, though. It was clearly aimed at children and isn't as grown-up in tone as some other children's books I've read. But it would be a great book to read to a child. I also found Chrestomanci irritating - too much of a fop without a great deal of character.

But good fun overall, and I wouldn't mind reading another.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just been reading Black Orchid by Neil Gaiman, a graphic novel (the pictures are by Dave McKean).
I sort of remember reading it when it first came out, in 1988, though at the time I had no idea who Neil Gaiman was - I was just looking for a comic that was a bit different from Superman and other caped crusaders.
There was an awful lot that I missed first time round that I've picked up this time. For instance, I know more or less who Swamp Thing is now, and I have at least heard of the Arkham Asylum (but who was the little man in the big hat, I wonder?). And it's a brave storyteller who kills off the main character right at the beginning of the story.
It does make me happy though, to think that somewhere in the Amazon rainforest there are purple flower ladies being worshipped by Amazonian Indians.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Ooh, Black Orchid. I've got a copy of the first edition of the comic signed by Dave McKean. Worth nothing on Antiques Roadshow, but it makes me happy.

I read the first couple of stories in an anthology series (the name escapes me, Shockwave maybe?)which also included Grant Morrison's Animal Man and a Hellblazer story. It came out in the early 90s and specified 'for more mature readers' on the front due to the sex and drug use and violence. As a teenage reader of superhero comics it was catnip. [Big Grin]

[ 31. March 2013, 22:14: Message edited by: ArachnidinElmet ]
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I just finished Caesarion by Dutch writer Tommy Wieringa, but I have to say I wasn't much impressed by it. Especially because of the clichés: a boy discovers that his mother was in the porn industry, he looks in the jungle for his father who abandoned him when he was young, he becomes a gigolo for rich elderly ladies, his mother dies of cancer because she only resorts to alternative treatments... It was a bit too much for me.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Someone lent me "Howl's Moving Castle" by Diana Wynne Jones. What a delightful read - unpredictable, interesting and amusing. I've been lent the DVD as well, I don't much like animations but the story has been so enjoyable that I'll watch it and see how it goes.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Someone lent me "Howl's Moving Castle" by Diana Wynne Jones. What a delightful read - unpredictable, interesting and amusing. I've been lent the DVD as well, I don't much like animations but the story has been so enjoyable that I'll watch it and see how it goes.

Except it's more manga, and can't capture the play on Howl/Hywel.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I have recently read two novels by Peter Ackroyd, both about murders in London: Hawksmoor and Dan Leo & the Limehouse Golem .

They are both clever, post-modernist works but at an ordinary, story level, you can also smell the hovels in which people lived - and died.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
They're both stoating reads, though of the two, I thought Hawksmoor the more compelling. There's something about the 17thC and the blend of surviving ancientry and nascent modernity (Newton was an astronomer and an astrologer) which makes it such a good locale for a certain sort of novel ( An Instance of the Fingerpost is another case in point).
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
Does that mean I ought to forgive Ackroyd for his utterly inaccurate portrayal of the Public Record Office in The House of Doctor Dee and read one of them? I didn't much like it anyway to be honest, are the others better?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Inaccuracies about the PRO are the least of it; he was totally off boil in Dr Dee IMO.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
I'm sure that was the least of it but it was what stuck in my memory! (Over-attached to my profession, perhaps...)

I'll try and track down the ones mentioned up-thread and give him another try.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
Because it was free on Kindle... I just finished Apparent Danger, the true story of the fundamentalist pastor of the first megachurch in the USA, who was put on trial in Texas in the 1920s for shooting a man to death.

It's a phenomenal courtroom drama that I was completely gripped by. (I was a bit bummed at how the trial turned out, but that's history's fault, not the author's [Roll Eyes] )
 
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on :
 
If the Dr. Dee mentioned above is the one from Eliz. I's time, try the novel "The Fyre Mirror". I don't remember the author's name, but she's written a series of Elizabethan mysteries--with the queen as sleuth!

[Smile]
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I'm in the middle of Pratchett's Snuff - was really enjoying it, but kind of stalled. It's a big hardback though and doing lots of travelling next week so will need lots of littler books to take with me. Choices, choices...
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Just finished Guy Gavriel Kay's latest, River of Stars. Wonderful, wonderful fantasy. Actually I guess that depends on what you read fantasy fore --it's barely fantasy at all; the fantastic elements are very minimal. It's more like parallel-world history -- his Kitai is basically medieval China, but making it fantasy leaves him free to play fast and loose with history. And I love that it's set in something other than a European society, since most fantasy worlds are so Eurocentric. Very rich, very detailed, very real characters, as always with Kay. And then I had a Twitter conversation with him (fangirl squeeeee!!! GGK answered me on Twitter) about how unfair it is (for both author and reader, in a way) that an author works for 3-4 years on a book that I can finish reading in 3-4 days ... and then long for more ....
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
Just finished The Black Count by Tom Reiss, a biography of the father of Alexandre Dumas pere (also named Alex Dumas). One of the best biographies I've read in a long time--he was clearly the inspiration for many of his son's protagonists (a great soldier, a principled republican, a thoroughly decent human being, and an unjustly persecuted prisoner). If you didn't hate Napoleon already, this book should do the trick.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
Just finished C.J. Sansom's Dissolution which has been on my radar for years, since reading shipmates' recommendations. Over the last year or so, I've read a couple of others in the Shardlake series, and Winter in Madrid - all good - but didn't bother too much to track down Dissolution because I'd heard it done as a radio play and wasn't that impressed. Well, that was my loss - I thought it was very, very good and stands comparison with The Name of the Rose IMHO.

I must say, Sansom's view of Cromwell accords more with what I used to think before I read Wolf Hall. I rather fell in love with Mantel's Cromwell. I've got Bring up the bodies sitting on my shelf - I'm saving it for the summer, as I hope I'll then have more chance to savour it; Sansom has whetted my appetite.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I'm distantly related to Cromwell: maybe he wasn't all bad....
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
I just want to say what a smug feeling it gives one to read (and say positive things on the internet about) a book (The Black Count) only days before it wins a Pulitzer Prize.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
At my father-in-law's house yesterday, we heard Samuel L. Jackson read a charming little book aloud on his wife's Kindle: it was called "Get the Fuck to Sleep!" Not appropriate for schools or houses with pre-adolescent children!!! Very funny!
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I've just finished The Kingmaker's Daughter by Philippa Gregory. It's written through the eyes of Anne Neville, daughter of Warwick the Kingmaker* and wife of Richard III, which puts quite an interesting light on the major players in the Wars of the Roses, and portrays Warwick himself as a bit of a rat who'll sacrifice anything, especially his two daughters, to fulfil his own ambitions.

* As it says in 1066 and All That, if you wanted to be King in the fifteenth century, you had to apply to him. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
Sounds interesting, Piglet. I read Jean Plaidy's (I think!) version of Anne Neville years ago. I'll have to try and track this one down.

Lymond fiends may be interested to know that I'm now onto The Ringed Castle. Enjoying it a lot so far as the political bits are more up my street this time.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Speaking of Philippa Gregory, I've just finished re-reading The Virgin's Lover. She does seem to be the modern successor to Jean Plaidy. I like her earlier novels - the more recent ones seem to be written in present tense which I don't care much for. Anyway, this is the story of the young Queen Elizabeth I coming to the throne and her romance with Sir Robert Dudley (the death of his wife Amy Robsart remains an open verdict to this day).

Interestingly, it portrays Elizabeth as a nervous, insecure young girl who by the end of the novel is almost completely under the spell of Robert Dudley. You start out liking him, but by the end of the book it's pretty clear how ambitious he is (or how the author has portrayed him, he expect to be king and thinks it's where he should be) and how dominant a personality he is, and the interplay between characters, with his sometimes ally and sometimes political opponent Lord Cecil, is fascinating.

It was a good read, though I could have done with fewer references to Elizabeth's nails and cuticles, which always seem to suffer at moments of crisis, or look particularly good when she's happy.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I've just finished "A Childhood in Scotland" by Christian Miller. It's the autobiography, up to age ten, of Christian Grant, born into a wealthy family in 1921. She recounts, in crisply photographic detail, the surroundings in which she grew up, her home, the nearby village, the local kirk, the clothes they wore, the books they read and the food they ate.

In the midst of plenty, her life was solitary with her four oldest siblings mostly at boarding school. Her parents, she presumed, loved her, but "in spite of their undoubted concern, three of the twelve indoor servants ... were employed for the sole purpose of making sure that my parents had as little as possible to do with us."

I was enthralled by this book, both by the minutiae of her life and the emotional vacuum at the centre of her family. Only 97 pages long, I was disappointed to reach the end.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I seem to remember Elizabeth's bottom lip featuring a lot in that book too, Ariel - she bit it constantly when she was anxious.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I have such an ambivalent relationship with Philippa Gregory -- some of her books I love, and some really bore me. I very much disliked that one with the young Elizabeth that made her seem such a weak and passive character. In her recent series about the Wars of the Roses, the one I really loved was The Red Queen, where she pulled off the difficult trick of taking a really unlikeable character, Margaret Beaufort, and making her a compelling central character without in any way whitewashing her or making her any nicer. The others have been all right but not nearly as good as that one, in my opinion.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
... written in present tense which I don't care much for ...

Preach it, sister!

When I started reading The Kingmaker's Daughter that was exactly what I thought. I'm glad I persisted with it though - it was a good read, better IMHO than The Virgin's Lover.

It's also part of the reason I can't be doing with Hilary Mantel. I know that's treason, verging on heresy these days, but I don't care. I wonder why authors do that? I mean, it's patently obvious that the events they're describing happened in the past, so what's wrong with the past tense?

[Confused]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Philippa Gregory's later novels come across to me more like a kind of self-indulgent vicarious experience, where she describes events as they unfold, present tense, first person. OK now and again but it's a shame she's switched to using that style for all her novels. Also, it limits an author to pretty much only being able to describe events they witness.

Having said that, I went round the bookshops last night to see if I could get any more of her novels that weren't 1 sg. pres. and found two, so I'll be reading "The Changeling" which is aimed at young adults and "The Virgin Earth" which is about John Tradescant and his adventures in the New World. I've read that before, and it was interesting.

I couldn't get on with Hilary Mantel at all, by the way - someone lent me "Beyond Black" a few years ago and I finished it more out of a sense of obligation to the lender than anything.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I love Mantel, but don't really care for Beyond Black. I've determined, one day, to give it a second chance, but it's my least favourite. I started with A Place of Greater Safety - it took a lot of getting into, but in the end I loved it. I know what piglet means about the style, though. I don't normally care for it - and it seems most peopl I know find it maddening - the use of ambivalent pronouns even more so, but Mantel is just different (and brilliant), IMHO. I recommend Fludd for beginners.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
I've decided I really ought to plough through the works of Walter Scott so its round the second-hand shops to find a few. I read Waverley years ago (wet holiday in remote cottage, limited books...)
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I've just finished reading 'Under the Same Stars' by Tim Lott. It's a story of two brothers meeting up after a long gap to embark on a journey to see their father one last time before he dies. The journey opens up old memories of how the brothers did/did not get on, their troubled relationship with their father, their differing attitudes to religion, their relationships with their partners, and the cultural differences between America (where one brother now lives) and England (where the other brother remained living).

Interesting quotes, to give you a taster for the rest of the book, include:

'I'm not a Christian like you. I don't have to go around forgiving every fucking prick in the Universe'.

'We don't know about outcomes. It isn't given to us. You just do what you must, or what you're brave enough to do'.

'The headlines made him feel oddly cheerful. It was the comforting predictability of the English mind, he supposed - the habit of expecting the worst and being vaguely reassured when it transpired'.
 
Posted by basso (# 4228) on :
 
I've just read a really charming little book.
Lost Cat appealed to me because I'm a cat lover, a lover of San Francisco, of illustrated books, and a bit of a geek.

The author, Caroline Paul, is laid up with a broken ankle after crashing her ultralight plane. While she's still in bed, one of her cats disappears. He's gone for five weeks before he saunters back into the apartment. He's perfectly healthy, has gained a little weight, and isn't interested in eating at home.

The author and her girlfriend (who's also the illustrator) do what any young hip SF geeks would do. They equip the cat's collar with a GPS device and set about finding where Tibby (the cat's name is Tibia) has been hanging out.

The subtitle is "A True Story of Love, Desperation, and GPS Technology". If any of those appeal to you you'll enjoy the book.
 
Posted by Percy B (# 17238) on :
 
I like to read novels set in places I would like to visit or have visited.

I enjoyed recently Henning Mankel's 'the dogs of Riga' for example, though its set in a soviet world.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Just devoured (heh heh) Ian McEwan's Sweet Tooth in a day and a half ... loved the voice of the main character and the pages kept turning quickly as I wanted to find out what happened to her. Really enjoyable book.

In my project to read or re-read classics I'd either missed or hadn't appreciated the first time around, I've gotten to Hemingway and am hating him much less than I remember doing in my 20s.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
This book is a hilarious read and also makes a great gift. I loved the fact that the 'cat' writing it has attitude, it is definitely not a fluffy bunny (or pussy) book. I read the whole book in half an hour, but would recommend that what you actually do is read the poems slowly and savour the humour, perhaps two or three poems at a time rather than continuously all at once.

If you are wondering what to send your relatives who are always posting cute kitty pics on Facebook, then perhaps this is the correct antidote!
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
I have just finished the first book of the Mary Russell series by Laurie R. King. My BFF suggested that I would probably enjoy the stories since I am a huge Sherlock Holmes fan, and one of the locations is on the Downs, which is a favorite place of ours! It helps to have an idea of the location when reading, IMHO.

Forgive me if we've already discussed this series. There have been so many great suggestions!

Anyway, Sherlock Holmes is keeping bees after retiring (at a very young age!) He has met young Mary Russell who at 15 is someone Holmes has discovered can think! He takes her as his apprentice, and has some interesting adventures in the first book ("The Beekeeper's Apprentice".) My friend was right, I did enjoy it, so have gotten the next two books from the library and will start "A Monstrous Regiment of Women" this evening.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished "The Changeling" by Philippa Gregory. As she says, it's her first fictional historical novel, rather than a fictionalised biography, and aimed at young adults. It came across pretty much like her own version of "The Name of the Rose" with a young monastic investigator sent by the Inquisition to root out wrongdoing and correct error where he came across it. Which is quite a good premise for a leading character as it gives lots of scope.

Anyway, off he goes to a nunnery and has a few adventures as he investigates the sudden suspicious death of a nun, other weird happenings and the disclosure that the convent has been poisoned by belladonna, and acquires some motley companions on route which sets the scene for sequels.

It was an interesting read but not one that I ever really got into. It felt altogether too much like some very modern characters having been transplanted into a historical setting, and didn't really convince as a historical novel. Also, the "discussion questions" at the end put me off - this is the second children's book I've seen that has these, and to me it gives the book an "educational" feeling which feels inappropriate for what is essentially light entertainment.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
A lot of books nowadays include questions at the end because of the popularity of book clubs. Sometimes the publisher asks the author to make up a list of questions for possible book-club discussion.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
My copy of The Kingmaker's Daughter had a book-club question section; I thought exactly what Ariel thought and ignored it.

At the Cathedral sale yesterday D. bought a slim volume called Romantic Royal Marriages, despite the fact that it's by Barbara Cartland. It purports to tell the stories of royals who married for love, rather than for political reasons, but it's so sugary it would rot your teeth (and had one or two factual errors and omissions).

Published in 1981, the last page bears a photograph of the Prince and Princess of Wales (whose qualifications for entry in the book were dubious, to say the least) with the caption "and they lived happily ever after".

Oh dear ... [Help]

[ 06. May 2013, 03:03: Message edited by: piglet ]
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
My Kindle has died [Waterworks] Would like recommendations for gothic horror, Victorian fantasy/sci-fi, Lovecraftian horror/fantasy. Thanks!
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Re the discussion questions in the back of the book: I've had to provide them for each of my last couple of books, and I have attended book club meetings where they used the discussion questions as well as many where they didn't. Discussion is invariably more interesting if they ignore the questions. I suppose it gives people a place to start, but I don't find it produces nearly as interesting discussion as people just giving their impressions of the book.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jade Constable:
My Kindle has died [Waterworks] Would like recommendations for gothic horror, Victorian fantasy/sci-fi, Lovecraftian horror/fantasy. Thanks!

From earlier thread postings

SF/Fantasy

Lud in the Mist
The Phoenix and the Mirror by Davidson
Among Others by Jo Walton
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
During my foray into the second hand bookshop in The Big City recently I picked up a copy of Eragon as I have heard some folks praise it and am now just over halfway through it - I am quite enjoying it and I love Saphira's very cynical feminine sense of humour.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have just finished Heart of Darkness but I only made it to the end because it's pretty short. I feel like I need to take a shower.

Chinua Achebe called Joseph Conrad a "bloody racist". He was right.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I picked up Mollie Moran's autobiography, "Aprons and Silver Spoons" at the weekend. She wrote it last year when she was 96, and it's the story of how she became a scullery maid at a big house in the 1930s and worked her way up to become cook at another grand house. It's a fascinating story - Mollie is full of life, a real flirt, often getting into scrapes through curiosity and an unwillingness to sit back and just let life happen to her, and lives through a fascinating period of history as WWII starts to unfold and society changes radically. By the end, the Edwardian way of life with domestic service has come pretty abruptly to an end, though Mollie's life doesn't finish there.

The book is a heartwarming read, and you get a sense that Mollie is sitting there telling you how things were. Amazingly, her best friend from those days, Flo, is still alive at 100 years old and they are still in touch.

I really enjoyed this book - it was an absorbing read and Mollie manages to end chapters on a bit of a cliffhanger so you really want to carry on reading. It's the sign of a good book that you wish there was a bit more.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I just glanced at this thread title again and the first thing I thought is how can the city of Reading be a discount ticket to anywhere?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
I just glanced at this thread title again and the first thing I thought is how can the city of Reading be a discount ticket to anywhere?

An association with the town* in Berkshire has already occurred to several other Shipmates.

*not city

[ 08. May 2013, 15:40: Message edited by: Firenze ]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Anyone else read Kate Atkinson's Life After Life? I found it completely riveting and I'm dying to talk about it with someone ...
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
I just glanced at this thread title again and the first thing I thought is how can the city of Reading be a discount ticket to anywhere?

An association with the town* in Berkshire has already occurred to several other Shipmates.

*not city

I can, by the way, heartily recommend Alberto Manguel's A History of Reading, which I read a few years ago. It's about reeeeding, not Redding.
 
Posted by Haydee (# 14734) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:


Lymond fiends may be interested to know that I'm now onto The Ringed Castle. Enjoying it a lot so far as the political bits are more up my street this time.

My favourite of them! Perhaps because I've always been fascinated by Russia since I was a melodramatic teenager. But also, I think, because his group of friends/subordinates really take shape and a life of their own [Smile]
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Haydee:
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:


Lymond fiends may be interested to know that I'm now onto The Ringed Castle. Enjoying it a lot so far as the political bits are more up my street this time.

My favourite of them! Perhaps because I've always been fascinated by Russia since I was a melodramatic teenager. But also, I think, because his group of friends/subordinates really take shape and a life of their own [Smile]
I've just finished it. I liked it a lot although I found Lymond at his most unlikable, if that makes any sense. I enjoyed feeling more at home with Tudor London while learning stuff about Moscow too. Slightly fuller thoughts on the blog if anyone's interested.

quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Anyone else read Kate Atkinson's Life After Life? I found it completely riveting and I'm dying to talk about it with someone ...

No, not yet. On a loooong waiting list at the library for a copy...
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Anyone else read Kate Atkinson's Life After Life? I found it completely riveting and I'm dying to talk about it with someone ...

Yes.

It's well written and engaging but by the final third I was ready for it to be over and I didn't quite "get" the ending.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Thanks for sharing the link to your review (I haven't posted mine yet). I put my lengthy comments over on your blog so as not to spoil it too much here for anyone who hasn't read it. I think I had some of the same doubts you did about the ending, but they bothered me less because overall I found the book more engrossing than you did, probably because the concept is one that's always fascinated me.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've just finished it. I liked it a lot although I found Lymond at his most unlikable, if that makes any sense.

I'd say the first Lymond novel was the one where I found him quite irritating. A pretentious quote for every occasion. He'd calmed down a bit by the Russian one. My favourite character is probably still Jerott Blyth, though.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Thanks for sharing the link to your review (I haven't posted mine yet). I put my lengthy comments over on your blog so as not to spoil it too much here for anyone who hasn't read it. I think I had some of the same doubts you did about the ending, but they bothered me less because overall I found the book more engrossing than you did, probably because the concept is one that's always fascinated me.

I agree with you Trudy, I loved Life After Life too. As for Ursula's mother, there was a hint right at the end that she was experiencing repeated chances of life too as she had scissors to hand to cut the cord. And I guess if you're caught in a repeated loop suicide might seem attractive.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've just finished it. I liked it a lot although I found Lymond at his most unlikable, if that makes any sense.

I'd say the first Lymond novel was the one where I found him quite irritating. A pretentious quote for every occasion. He'd calmed down a bit by the Russian one. My favourite character is probably still Jerott Blyth, though.
I'd be inclined to agree with that, from the reader's perspective. Lymond is at his most damaged in The Ringed Castle (referred to by everyone I know who's read it as "the Russian one") which is why he's most difficult to like, but he's a bit more of a smart-arse in the first one! When you realise his age it makes a little bit more sense in some respects. I like how Phillippa develops in the later books though, and I do like her arrival home in this one.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Interesting you should say that... I agree that in the first one Lymond shows his age as a callow youth looking for kicks and attention, but matures throughout the series. I didn't dislike him in the Russian one, er, I mean "The Ringed Castle"; I did dislike him as Thady Boy Ballagh in "Queens Play" and think he was pretty visibly damaged in that.

It says something about Dunnett's skill as a storyteller that she created these completely unforgettable characters that we are still discussing decades after the novels were first written. Apparently she complained to her husband that she couldn't find the kind of books at the library that she wanted to read, to which his reply was, "Well, why don't you write one then," and the rest (as they say) is history.

I've borrowed a bunch of historical novels from the library today, all by authors I haven't read before, so will see how those go. Just finishing off the sequel to "Call the Midwife" at the moment ("Shadows of the Workhouse"). I've read it before - if fans of the series haven't read it, it's a hell of a read, full of emotional punches. The TV series was toned down from the books.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tree Bee:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Thanks for sharing the link to your review (I haven't posted mine yet). I put my lengthy comments over on your blog so as not to spoil it too much here for anyone who hasn't read it. I think I had some of the same doubts you did about the ending, but they bothered me less because overall I found the book more engrossing than you did, probably because the concept is one that's always fascinated me.

I agree with you Trudy, I loved Life After Life too. As for Ursula's mother, there was a hint right at the end that she was experiencing repeated chances of life too as she had scissors to hand to cut the cord. And I guess if you're caught in a repeated loop suicide might seem attractive.
I thought that about Sylvie and the scissors too -- doesn't she say something like "Practice makes perfect?" I also thought Teddy might have been experiencing the repeated lives. Doesn't he say "Thank you" to Ursula near the end, as if acknowledging that she's done something that made his rescue possible this time around?

I'm still a bit worried about spoilers but in another way it doesn't really make sense because it's hard to "spoil" a book where the main character lives her life over and over with several different outcomes. SPOILER -- Her brother is killed during the war! SPOILER -- No he's not!! Either could be equally possible, or likely, which is what I loved about the book.

I particularly liked the several times Ursula tried (in response to that nagging sense of deja vu) to do something that would change her destiny, like the time she runs out of the house instead of into the cellar during the bombing ... and the end result is the same anyway. I don't know why but I found that really interesting.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I have just read "The Curewife" by Claire-Marie Watson, which I bought as part of a cheap deal at a bookshop. It won the Dundee Book Prize 2002. In it, Grissel Jaffrey, burnt as a witch in 1669, tells her story.

I was partially drawn to this book, because I'd noticed that someone had graffittied "God rest her soul" onto the wall next to the spot where Jaffray was burnt, and had reflected on the way in which the witch-stories remain vivid to this day.

Jaffray in this book is an intelligent, active woman, with a lively mind, struggling to survive as disaster after disaster - war, famine, disease, storms - hit Dundee.

I liked this book very much.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
quote:
Originally posted by Tree Bee:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Thanks for sharing the link to your review (I haven't posted mine yet). I put my lengthy comments over on your blog so as not to spoil it too much here for anyone who hasn't read it. I think I had some of the same doubts you did about the ending, but they bothered me less because overall I found the book more engrossing than you did, probably because the concept is one that's always fascinated me.

I agree with you Trudy, I loved Life After Life too. As for Ursula's mother, there was a hint right at the end that she was experiencing repeated chances of life too as she had scissors to hand to cut the cord. And I guess if you're caught in a repeated loop suicide might seem attractive.
I thought that about Sylvie and the scissors too -- doesn't she say something like "Practice makes perfect?" I also thought Teddy might have been experiencing the repeated lives. Doesn't he say "Thank you" to Ursula near the end, as if acknowledging that she's done something that made his rescue possible this time around?

I'm still a bit worried about spoilers but in another way it doesn't really make sense because it's hard to "spoil" a book where the main character lives her life over and over with several different outcomes. SPOILER -- Her brother is killed during the war! SPOILER -- No he's not!! Either could be equally possible, or likely, which is what I loved about the book.

I particularly liked the several times Ursula tried (in response to that nagging sense of deja vu) to do something that would change her destiny, like the time she runs out of the house instead of into the cellar during the bombing ... and the end result is the same anyway. I don't know why but I found that really interesting.

Thanks for what you say about spoilers.
I was a little concerned about my post but then thought as you describe above.
Yes, I liked the way she managed to change her future, especially when avoiding her odious helper when she fell (being more circumspect now!)
Mr Bee was amused by the number of times I said, Doh! She's died again!
 
Posted by Haydee (# 14734) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scots lass:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
I've just finished it. I liked it a lot although I found Lymond at his most unlikable, if that makes any sense.

I'd say the first Lymond novel was the one where I found him quite irritating. A pretentious quote for every occasion. He'd calmed down a bit by the Russian one. My favourite character is probably still Jerott Blyth, though.
I'd be inclined to agree with that, from the reader's perspective. Lymond is at his most damaged in The Ringed Castle (referred to by everyone I know who's read it as "the Russian one") which is why he's most difficult to like, but he's a bit more of a smart-arse in the first one! When you realise his age it makes a little bit more sense in some respects. I like how Phillippa develops in the later books though, and I do like her arrival home in this one.
I found the first one difficult to get into, I hadn't a clue what was going on and there were all these quotations and references I didn't understand - I'd have given up except so many people raved about them! I enjoyed the second though, and yes, the rest is history [Biased]
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I'm currently reading a book which was a birthday present from one of my sons, called 'Chocolate, a Global History' (yes, he knows me well!) by Sarah Moss and Alexander Badenoch. From it, I'm learning all sorts of interesting information about chocolate, not least that the women of C17 Spain couldn't last out the whole of Mass without sending for their maids to bring them cups of hot chocolate midway through the service! And that, when the bishop tried to stop it happening, he was mysteriously poisoned (by a doctored cup of chocolate)!

I wonder if a hot chocolate interval during Mass these days might catch on? Café church, anyone?
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
http://www.sainsburysentertainment.co.uk/media/ProductImage/largeImage/ProductImage-3086980.jpg

I'm reading James Hoggs' The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner.

All my prejudices about protestantism confirmed.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
That is an excellent book, Venbede! I also recommend Hogg's Tales of Love and Mystery.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I'm also reading my way through Walter Scott, and although Hogg includes the supernatural in a way Scott wouldn't dream of (there's always a rational explanation) his dialogue and narrative make Scott look mannered.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I picked up a pile of Georgette Heyers in a charity shop the other day, and then finally got hold of Jean Aiken Hodge's biography - The Private World of Georgette Heyer - from the library. The biog is interesting for any fan of the books because it uses them as the starting point - she was such a private person that the books were felt to be the best way to approach getting a sense of her life. You can also trace the development of her writing over the years.
 
Posted by Freelance Monotheist (# 8990) on :
 
I've read Life After Life and thought it was really interesting, with all the attempts at changing history/the course of one's life hinging on a few details. I'm not sure I got the ending either and was still unsure what had happened to Ursula in her life.I thought the version where Ursula plans to get a degree but ends up travelling & staying in Germany really interesting but didn't catch the references to Sylvie and/or Teddy also being able to change the course of their futures. I was, however, very annoyed at the Time review that reveals who Ursula shoots, which had me guessing as it could potentially have been another person. Thankfully I'd finished the book by then, but it still annoyed me!
On my Kindle, I'm now reading The Great Gatsby before I see the film, and so far I find all the characters pretty annoying or despicable. My paper (library book) is by Maggie O'Farrell, about a father who walks out on his wife & his 3 children come back (all with their own baggage/secrets) to help/see their mother. It's really good so far.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Freelance Monotheist:
My paper (library book) is by Maggie O'Farrell, about a father who walks out on his wife & his 3 children come back (all with their own baggage/secrets) to help/see their mother. It's really good so far.

I'm guessing that's her most recent one, as the plot doesn't sound familiar! I really enjoy her books, so will have to track that down.

Currently I've abandoned my efforts to read Antonia Fraser's The Weaker Vessel (about women in 17th century England). It's interesting and readable, but I needed a minimal effort book so I'm on Georgette Heyer's The Quiet Gentleman, which I've read before. Gentle humour and romance, ideal fluffy reading whilst still being good quality writing!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Finished Alison Weir's historical novel "The Captive Queen", about Eleanor of Aquitaine. This was a lively account of a spirited personality and an era of history I wasn't that familiar with. I read this on the commute and it kept me interested; one of those books which almost make you wish the commute was a bit longer so you could finish it in one go.

It was easy to read, though it switches quite suddenly throughout from faux archaic to modern and back again - "You think she's hot, don't you?" "Father, do not impugn the lady's honour."

Fun to read, would look out for more by this author.
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Finished Alison Weir's historical novel "The Captive Queen", about Eleanor of Aquitaine. This was a lively account of a spirited personality and an era of history I wasn't that familiar with. I read this on the commute and it kept me interested; one of those books which almost make you wish the commute was a bit longer so you could finish it in one go.

It was easy to read, though it switches quite suddenly throughout from faux archaic to modern and back again - "You think she's hot, don't you?" "Father, do not impugn the lady's honour."

Fun to read, would look out for more by this author.

I don't tend to like her historical fiction but love her biographies. Her biography of Eleanor is one of my favourites [Smile]
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
The last comment has just reminded me that I had meant to post in here about Alison Weir. I've just re-read her 'The Princes in the Tower', prompted by the discovery of Richard the Third's body. It was interesting reading it in light of the discovery, and it was great to go over the background to their story. Not everyone might agree with her conclusions but her examination of the circumstances is thorough. I'm not quite at the end but will miss it when I've finished.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I really disliked Alison Weir's Princes in the Tower, but I can't remember why now. I remember objecting to her logic, but perhaps it was just that I disagreed with her conclusions... [Biased]

It was interesting to see her and Philippa Gregory on that Anne Boleyn thing on BBC2 last night. Neither of them looked how I imagined, which shows how much attention I pay to author photos.

Anyway, I'm currently rereading a German thriller "Das Kindermädchen" by Elisabeth Herrmanns, which looks at the role of forced labourers from Eastern Europe for childcare in Nazi Germany.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Rules of Civility by Amor Towles

This takes place in Manhattan during 1937, beginning on New Year's Eve when our protagonist and her roommate pool their last few dollars and go out on the town. They end up sharing a table with the most elegant, handsome young man either has ever met. It's a three way infatuation-at-first-sight situation. He has never met such smart, good looking, witty women and they have never met anyone at all from his upperclass world.

Before the year is out they have all three grown much older and experienced tragedy and disillusionment, but it's all told with such vivid descriptions and atmosphere you won't want it to end.

The title comes from a guidebook on proper manners written by George Washington when he was sixteen.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I just started reading De intrede van Christus in Brussel ('Entry of Christ into Brussels') by Belgian writer Dimitri Verhulst.

Of course, it is inspired by the 1888 painting by James Ensor, but Verhulst took it quite literally.

Jesus announces that He'll return to Earth on July 21st. In the city of Brussels. Verhulst describes in hilarious detail the reaction of various people to this news, giving a poignant image of Belgian society.

I really like Belgian writing like this.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Finally got around to reading Kate Atkinson's Started Early, Took My Dog. This is the 4th Jackson Brodie "Case Histories" book. bought it after watching the Jason Isaacs TV adaptations last year and thought I'd jump in on the one that hadn't been made for TV yet. Except now it has so that pushed me to actually read it - which was good because it got me out of a short spell where I hadn't been reading.

It was interesting to read this after having read Life After Life. It's a very different style of writing. Also quite dark - it concerns a historic murder that was thought at the time to be related to the Yorkshire Ripper. Not as dark as David Peace's 1977 but has some tough stuff in it. It also has a fair bit of humour and a protagonist that Atkinson clearly likes - the prose takes a lighter, wryer tone whenever it's his POV.

I like my crime fiction a little less convoluted I guess but this was fun all the same. I may read the next one but I'm not sure I'll go back and read the first three. I will however watch the adaptation of this which is sitting on my DVR.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished Emily Purdy's "A Court Affair". I've been reading through a stack of historical novels lately, most are one-offs that I wouldn't read again, but this is rich, descriptive, vivid and with excellent characterization. It's advertised on its cover as a "Sunday Times bestseller" and deservedly so.

It's the story of Amy Robsart, Robert Dudley and Elizabeth I. Most of it's told from Amy's perspective in retrospect in her final days of suffering from breast cancer. She is a likeable young woman most at home in the country, married to an increasingly abusive, sometimes violent husband who is infatuated with Elizabeth. Elizabeth is a real coquette - you can see both her parents, Anne Boleyn and Henry, in her character. Privately, she has a lot of sympathy for Amy and sees straight through Robert. The deterioriating relationship between Amy and Robert is portrayed with a lot of insight.

Very well written, better even than Philippa Gregory. One to keep a copy of.

[ 30. May 2013, 18:34: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
Needed to be in the right frame of mind for this, but I am feeling brave so I'm going in.

I have attacked Notre Dame de Paris*. In French. 10% into the book I am starting to understand just why it is so long (Quasimodo only just made his appearance).

*Which for some reason that doesn't really make sense to me is translated in English as The Hunchback of Notre Dame

[ 31. May 2013, 08:57: Message edited by: la vie en rouge ]
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I've got it in English; dunno how far I got into it, but abandoned it years ago. Did see the old black and white film though...


I'll get me coat.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Is it ok to ask for book recommendations here?

I'm interested in reading historical novels, but ones that are set in time periods we don't know an awful lot about. So not something from the Tudors or the late Renaissance, but something from the Babylonian era, or the darker parts of the Middle Ages for example.

Preferably not books of the kind "passive woman finds out she needs a man who can give her a sense of security" (I'm looking at the Book Groop right now [Biased] )

Does anyone have an idea?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Curiously enough I was just wondering about starting a thread on this very topic, as I'm looking for the same kind of thing. How about if I do so, and we can see what comes in?
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Great!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Done! looking forward to some recommendations being posted there.

I'm just about to read "Time's Echo", by the way, thanks to the book group [Biased]
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just finished Zbinden's Progress by Christoph Simon which was very enjoyable. It's one of those monologuey things with no plot but an engaging, garrulous narrator in his 80s looking back over his life and trying to enthuse anyone in earshot with his love of walking.

I'm about to start Véronique Olmi's Beside the Sea and not exactly looking forward to it: "a haunting and though-provoking story about how a mother's love for her children can be more dangerous than the dark world she is seeking to keep at bay". But I'm going to an event with the publisher and translator on Wed and feel the need to have read it first!
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I'm currently reading 'The Lay Clerk's Handbook' by Robert Dufton. Although the book is written in a somewhat naïve style (the author was 24 when he wrote it), and the proof reader - if there was one! - fell asleep on the job, the author has good experience of being a Lay Clerk himself, and is therefore well-placed to advise other current and potential Lay Clerks of the requirements, and pitfalls, of the job.

It would be a good gift to give a sixth-former thinking of spending his (and, more frequently, her) gap-year in a Cathedral choir but also for someone singing, or planning to sing, in a good church choir, as many of the sections would be equally applicable to the amateur SATB chorister.
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just read A Time for Machetes by Jean Hatzfield and I cannot recommend it highly enough. I've been fascinated by the genocide in Rwanda for a long time and read many books on the subject but this was far and away the best.

It's written by a French journalist who goes to a prison in Rwanda and interviews people who were involved in the genocide. People who murdered lots and lots of people. Reading it is sobering, saddening and horrifying. It's clear that although the perpetrators have pleaded guilty and confessed what they did during the genocide, they have no concept of the emotional impact of what they did.

It is also horrifying in its showing of the banality and normality of evil. One quote that summed the whole thing up for me was, 'For me it was strange to see the children drop without a sound. It was almost pleasantly easy.' These people weren't killing people they didn't know, these were their neighbours, people they drank with, people they went to church with.

It was interesting that most of the killers regarded themselves as Christians but managed to put their faith 'on hold' during the genocide. 'During the killings, I chose not to pray to God. I sensed that it was not appropriate to involve Him in that,' says a church deacon.

The book was horrifying but I think it is one of the few books that I feel it was important for me to read. There are very few books where someone sits down, interviews people like this and then publishes their words. To read this is to understand them a bit better and maybe understanding them might lead to preventing them in future. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Finally got my long-awaited copy of "Boneland", Alan Garner's conclusion to the Weirdstone trilogy, set 50 years on. Different people will have different opinions, but I disliked this book.

Essentially, the story is about Colin, now a bearded astrophysics professor aged around 60, who can't remember anything before the age of 13, and who's mentally unstable. He lives in a shack in a quarry and never leaves the Edge, which he must always keep in sight. He's haunted by looking for his sister who disappeared one night. He hears her voice from time to time, and has counselling sessions with Meg, who is trying to get him to remember. As well as the mental instability, Colin is described in the book as a bit Asperger's, and he's obsessed with birds. It's interspersed with the story of a nameless shaman who is trying to cut the image of a woman into a rock to bring her to life.

In between Colin hears his sister's voice (she's never named) and this is far removed from the Susan that you might expect from the earlier books. This one can be mocking and malicious and there are some distinctly creepy moments.

It wasn't a comfortable read. It felt more disconnected and stranger than "Thursbitch", and like peeking into the mind of someone suffering some kind of mental illness.

I think it probably is quite a clever book. It is a multilayered story with a lot of echoes of the earlier stories, and the end is quite clever... but I didn't enjoy it. If you're a Garner fan who hasn't read this, it's very different from the earlier novels so be prepared for something of a jump in perception and approach.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Hmm that's interesting, Ariel. I have the book but haven't read it yet. Thanks for the warning that it's a different kettle of fish.

Heard Alan Garner speak at the Cheltenham Festival of Lit last year and he was absolutely riveting. He spoke about his life as a writer, and read a bit from this latest book, raising goose-pimples. I think he is extraordinary. I was a Weirdstone of Brisgamen fan at 14 and now I am, well, considerably older than that; most other writers I loved at that age are no longer with us...it was wonderful to go and hear him and get the new book signed, lo these many years later!
 
Posted by comet (# 10353) on :
 
Reading on the death of Iain Banks, and I'm interested. have not read his work. Where do I start?
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
Reading on the death of Iain Banks, and I'm interested. have not read his work. Where do I start?

If you don't mind space opera, read Consider Phlebas. Or any of the "Culture" novels, but that was the first published and sets up the scene quite well. Or for a taster, the short stories in the collection State of the Art. Some people think Use of Weapons is the best of the Culture novels. Other people don't. They are all good.

If you think that Serious Literature mustn't have spaceships in it, then any of the books which don't have an "M" in his name on the cover. (They did it deliberately as a clue to readers - I think he regretted it a little after a while) All those novels are independent of each other, there is no series or sequence, so no particular reason to read any before any other. The first published was The Wasp Factory which must be one of the weirdest (and in some ways ickiest) novels that ever got onto the shelves of mainstream bookshops without being branded as horror or fantasy. Its very funny though. The Crow Road is perhaps the best-known or most popular of these novels, though not my favourite, I think I liked the Bridge best.

But, apart from the Culture books which are a loose series set in the same imagined universe, all his books are very unlike each other. That's one of the good things about them. There is almost no repetition The ones I've read are almost like books written by different authors, written in different styles in different genres. And almost all very good. So read any of them first! And then read the rest.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
My favourite Banks novel is Whit, but I haven't read them all. I've been rather put off The Wasp Factory but now I know it's supposed to be funny, I might give it a go. Whit features a rather flaky religious community; the heroine is delightful and the whole book is both funny and thought-provoking.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Cara, I am so envious. I will definitely be getting this book. It would be cheaper for me to download on my kindle, but my brother in Miami wants to read it too so I think a tree book is the way to go.

My favourite Alan Garner book is Red Shift .

Ariel, I'll come back and read your review when I read the book, but thanks for posting it otherwise I may have missed out.

Huia

[ 10. June 2013, 08:13: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by Haydee (# 14734) on :
 
My favourite Iain Banks is Espadair Street - lots of very funny moments and an intriguing back story.

I loved Whit as well though - the naïve heroine who misunderstands while the reader does understand!
 
Posted by ken (# 2460) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
My favourite Alan Garner book is Red Shift .

I think that is the best one, but my favourite one is The Moon of Gomrath! I guess I read it at about the right age to appreciate the sentimental and nostalgic character of it - a few years later maybe I'd not have liked it so much. I also loved the appendix which listed his sources - I went to the library and read most of them.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I treated myself to a basic Kindle the other day, and as an inaugural read, chose Sylvia Townsend Warner's Lolly Willowes. The writing is beautifully evocative, and the bits about the suppression of women's lives as pertinent as ever they were.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I got Red Shift as a school prize once - I chose it because I loved Wierdstone of Brisingamen and the Moon of Gomrath, but I didn't really understand it.
I've just treated myself to a copy of Boneland - which I will be approaching with caution after Ariel's review!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I hope people who have yet to read "Boneland" will post and say what they think. I'd be most interested to hear some other perspectives. I read it a second time and understood it better, but can't say that I like it.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just finished reading Life After Life by Kate Atkinson after a very long wait for a library copy. It was very good, but I need to let it settle a bit before I can write about it.
 
Posted by LutheranChik (# 9826) on :
 
I just finished a murder mystery by Susan Wittig Albert. Her protagonist, China Bayles, is a sleuthing Southern herbalist. The series hasn't yet "caught" me in the way that some of my other favorite mystery writers have, but I'm going to go on and read another of her books.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts is the book I am currently reading. It is researched and published by the editors of Popular Mechanics magazine, a popular periodical about engineering for the layman. It recruited some of the best scientists, structural engineers and demolition experts in the world for its report. I am reading it on Nook.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
In the bookshop the other day I spotted a book called Entry from Backside Only by Binoo K John which looks at the emergence of a distinct Indian English, or perhaps a family of Indian English. It's good fun.

and yes, it was the title that grabbed me first. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I've borrowed a gem of a book from a friend - 'Lost Treasures of Britain' by Roy Strong. It shows in full colour many of the mediaeval treasures which have been lost to the country or damaged due to deliberate acts or accident eg. the Reformation, Civil War, Fire of London, World War 2. Strong's argument is an interesting one - that, although these treasures were special and it is a huge shame that they were destroyed, the various waves of destruction paved the way for future innovators to produce their own contemporary art and architecture which, over time, has come to be valued as much as that which they replaced.

He argues that the wish to preserve the past, in a sentimental way, is a fairly recent phenomenon and one which would have been alien in many periods of history, where iconoclasm and recycling of building materials was the dominant ethos.

Were these people of history being wanton vandals or merely being practical and 'green'?
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I hope people who have yet to read "Boneland" will post and say what they think. I'd be most interested to hear some other perspectives. I read it a second time and understood it better, but can't say that I like it.

The copy I reserved became available at the library today. I also read an online review by Ursula Le Guin. It does seem to be a book that requires a bit of effort, and possibly more knowledge of English myths than I have. I'll take the plunge in the weekend and see how I go.

Huia
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I just picked up a copy of Captain Marvel: In Pursuit of Flight today - and I do hope there's more stuff like this out there. The superheroine has a sensible costume without showing acres of bare flesh, she's not someone's girlfriend, and the plot (a time travel one) takes in the women pilots who ferried planes around for the RAF and USAF in the Second World War, and the Mercury 13 women who trained to be astronauts and were denied access to the programme anyway. I thought it was brilliant stuff, and I'm adding Carol Danvers/Captain Marvel to the list of people I want to be when I grow up!
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I recently finished another Billy Connolly travel book, this time the book that accompanied the series he did a few years ago riding the length of Route 66 on a trike. I didn't enjoy it as much as the other one I read a few months ago (when he travelled the North-West Passage in Canada), but that was mainly because the Canada book had millions more pictures and better quality paper [Smile] The actual writing was charming, as with the Canada book he just meets interesting people and finds the good in them, muses about life, reminisces about life in Scotland, raves about quirky art, and just throws himself into the trip. He's definitely a great travel companion.

Now I've just started my first ever Agatha Christie novel, "The Mystery at Styles" (it's a Poirot mystery). Each summer rather than choose a single book that we all read, my book group chooses a theme and then we all find random books that fit the theme and discuss them. This year the theme is the 1920s - although this book is set during WW1, it was published in the 1920s so that's a good enough link for me. I've only read the first chapter so far, and she's introduced so many characters - all of whom could have 'done it' - I might have to reread it just to get my head round who's who. The characters are mostly really posh - one man keeps referring to his mother as 'the mater' which made me laugh.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:

Now I've just started my first ever Agatha Christie novel, "The Mystery at Styles" (it's a Poirot mystery).

Originally The Mysterious Affair at Styles but snazzied up for a modern readership I suppose.

I'm currently reading Colin Watson's Snobbery With Violence which is a study of 'tec fiction c 1890s to 1970s and he discusses Poirot, and why he is Belgian, how is 'foreignness' is made acceptable to the readership etc.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Is that the Colin Watson who wrote the lovely Inspector Purbright and Miss Teatime at Flaxborough comedy crime novels? Quite wonderful.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Is that the Colin Watson who wrote the lovely Inspector Purbright and Miss Teatime at Flaxborough comedy crime novels? Quite wonderful.

The same.

I'm glad to see those are now available for Kindle.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Thanks venbede and Firenze - another author to follow up.

Huia
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:

Now I've just started my first ever Agatha Christie novel, "The Mystery at Styles" (it's a Poirot mystery).

Originally The Mysterious Affair at Styles but snazzied up for a modern readership I suppose.
Or rather, that I got the title wrong [Hot and Hormonal] "The Mysterious Affair at Styles" is correct.
 
Posted by Pancho (# 13533) on :
 
I am currently reading "The Great Gatsby" after having first read it a very long time ago and I am also reading "The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin". I am enjoying both of them a lot.

[ 13. July 2013, 07:06: Message edited by: Pancho ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
My bedtime book for the last few days has been Fannie Flagg's Fried Green Tomatoes at Whistle Stop Cafe which I finished last night - it really is a great read. The murder and cannibalism is amusingly done and the euthanasia bit is light and gentle. Poor Sipsy, she had a heck of a life!
 
Posted by que sais-je (# 17185) on :
 
Found "The Gift" by Lewis Hyde (first pub 1979) in a charity shop. Perhaps not quite 'a masterpiece' (Margaret Atwood) but one of those books which makes you want to change your life a bit.

It begins as a work of anthopology: how gifts work in various tribes: S Pacific Islanders, N American Indians, Black 'Projects'. The subtitle "How the creative spirit transforms the world" is about art as gift giving and to be honest I didn't think the arty sections were as good as those on how gift giving supports communities.

I'd never heard of it before. Has anyone out there read it?

[corrected typo]

[ 18. July 2013, 11:36: Message edited by: que sais-je ]
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
I have really been getting into Douglas Hofstader's "I Am A Strange Loop", which is about consciousness and personality (but with all sorts of connections to e.g. Godel's theorem).

I was never able to make it through "Godel, Escher, Bach" by the same author (which my best friend used to rave about), not because I didn't like it but because it was too... well, I suppose too rich might cover it. It's extremely readable, but there's so much in it that it takes some time to digest it.

Anyway, I feel a Purgatory thread on consciousness coming on... but not until I've finished the book... otherwise it feels a bit like "posting a reply before you've read the rest of the thread"....
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Currently reading Moon Shot, the true story of the events leading up to and including landing on the moon in 1969. I remember the day vividly as Deke Slayton and Alan Shepard were instrumental in getting the US there first. Introduction by a man who walked on the moon, Neil Armstrong. It's a good chronicle of a very exciting time.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I'm reading Roger Lovegrove's "Islands Beyond the Horizon" - he takes 20 obscure islands from around the world and talks about the past and present human contact/habitation and the impact of that and other influences (eg volcanic eruptions) on the flora and fauna of each island. It's introducing me to several islands I'd never heard of before, and I've found it fascinating.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
Just finished "The Gowk Storm" by Nancy Brysson Morrison. I was crying by the end. She created an entirely believable sense of isolation, both physical and emotional. I intend to track down some of her other novels.
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
Not sure if this merits its own thread, or if this is quite the right place, but -

Can anyone recommend me a good, readable, 1-volume history of the USA? (Available on Kindle would be a plus.) I've decided I'm pathetically ignorant of it, and need educating.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
Not sure if this merits its own thread, or if this is quite the right place, but -

Can anyone recommend me a good, readable, 1-volume history of the USA? (Available on Kindle would be a plus.) I've decided I'm pathetically ignorant of it, and need educating.

Howard Zinn's "A Peoples History of the United States" has a class struggle bias, but it will probably cover a lot of areas you didn't know. I'd suggest looking at wikipedia to see what is controversial is criticized for, but it is readable and gets away from "The great people did it all" model.

r
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Today while I was meant to be working at a school library I read Yoko's Diary which is the diary of a 12 year old schoolgirl who lived in Hiroshima and was killed by the atomic bomb dropped in August 1945.

As well as a translated transcript of the diary itself there are explanations by the editor of customs and terms used and a note about Yoko by her brother, who was out of town when the bomb was dropped. He managed to track down the woman who was with Yoko when she died.

The book is aimed at high school students, but it would be a pity if it was limited to that age group. It's an amazing book and I learnt a lot reading it.

And now for something completely different ... on my kindle I'm re-reading Elizabeth Gaskell's Wives and Daughters.

I haven't read anything else she wrote. Does anyone have a particular favourite?

Huia
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I love Mrs Gaskell's books - do read "Cranford", it's the best known; and "Sylvia's Lovers" is a good read too.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I second Gaskell's "Cranford." I can also recommend "North and South."
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
Howard Zinn's "A Peoples History of the United States" has a class struggle bias, but it will probably cover a lot of areas you didn't know. I'd suggest looking at wikipedia to see what is controversial is criticized for, but it is readable and gets away from "The great people did it all" model.

r

I've just read the first few pages on Amazon's preview. Oh my! It's fantastic! Thank you, Palimpsest.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I've recently started "Pink Brain Blue Brain" by Lise Eliot. She's a neuroscientist and is explaining all the various research about gender differences from conception to puberty - and basically how few significant differences there actually are. It's very interesting, although I think I need to dig out some fiction or travel writing or something to balance it.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I read Elizabeth Gaskell's (as she is known now - I've no problem with Mrs, but that's not how she's normally known now) Mary Barton - a C19 novel about the imposed squalour and bravery of the English industrial Northern working class that make Dickens' Hard Times look trite. Unfortunately, Dickens if far more readable.

I find Cranford a bit twee.

I'm re-reading the admirable Robinson Davies' The Lyre of Orpheus
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Forgot that I'd read Cranford, which for some reason I keep confusing with Middlemarch . With Cranford I kept waiting for something to happen.

Thanks for the suggestion of Mary Barton venbede. I have read Hard Times so it will be interesting to compare them. Generally I don't much like Dickens, but haven't read anything by him for ages, so I might try again.

Huia

[ 14. August 2013, 02:49: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Managed to holiday read:
The postman always rings twice (James M Cain),
The householder (Ruth Prawer Jhabvala),
The haunted book (Jeremy Dyson) and
The Year of Living Dangerously (Christopher Koch).
All stunningingly good books. Holiday reading always seems more intense, especially with a good run of books.

I also tried to read The alchemist (Coelho) and gave up . Clearly a popular book, but after the first chapter I wanted to throw it across the room. Have donated it to a cousin in case she can make more of it.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Reading the Sherlock Holmes novella A Study in Scarlet for the Ship's bookclub. I am leading the discussion next month.
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
Read John R. Oren's "Stewart Headlam's Radical Anglicanism." Incredibly badly written but very interestintg.

Re-read Helene Hanff's books this past week. Delightful.

Now onto 'Moon over Soho' by Ben Aaronovitch - the second in the series of Peter Grant books. Described as 'like Harry Potter for grown ups' and they are a bit. A Met detective solves crimes - using magic.

Thurible
 
Posted by Earwig (# 12057) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Thurible:
Now onto 'Moon over Soho' by Ben Aaronovitch - the second in the series of Peter Grant books. Described as 'like Harry Potter for grown ups' and they are a bit. A Met detective solves crimes - using magic.

Hel-lo! I like magic, I like detectives. Will check this out - thanks!
 
Posted by Thurible (# 3206) on :
 
I enjoyed the first one very much - the second one I'm enjoying a bit less but it's still good fun.

Thurible
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Thurible:
Read John R. Oren's "Stewart Headlam's Radical Anglicanism." Incredibly badly written but very interestintg.

He was a fascinating man.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I have got to the end of the Lymond series! I finally finished Checkmate a few days ago, which was quite a rollercoaster ride...

I'm now reading The Madonna of the Sleeping Cars by Maurice DeKobra and translated by Neal Wainwright, which has to win some kind of award just for the title. It's enormous fun, a 1920s spy story set in London but translated from French. Was out of print for 50 years but has been reissued recently by Melville House. [Smile]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Not a book but something tweeted by my local bookshop that made me laugh - 17 things only book lovers will understand.

My pile of books to read keeps growing - I keep forgetting a book while travelling and then buying two because it's such a good offer.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Two very different memoirs I've recently read, both brilliant. Two Flamboyant Fathers by Nicolette Devas. She was Caitlin Thomas's sister and writes amazingly about her extraordinary childhood and young womanhood. The fathers are her own father Francis McNamara and the painter Augustus John, a father figure large in her life. She too became a painter and then later turned to writing. There's so much that is interesting, not just her background itself, but also about what drives an artist, what it's like to grow up surrounded by artists, how she discovered her own desire to paint, what made her and her (very different) sister Caitlin the way they were, etc. Fascinating and well-written-although, ni her rackety childhood, wonderful in so many ways, she didn't learn to read until she was eleven.

The other memoir is about another girl growing up with artists, Angelica Garnett's Deceived with Kindness .
As many will know, she was the daughter of the painter Vanessa Bell and niece of Virginia Woolf. Grew up thinking Clive Bell her father until in her late teens her mother told her it was Duncan Grant instead. Even if you are not interested in the whole Bloomsbury scene, it's a very interesting and well-written book about this mother-daugter relationship, growing up with artists, a fascinating look back by an adult who has, by the time of writing, been through a marriage with the friend of her parents who stood by her cradle and vowed to marry her...and birth of four daughters...is looking back and trying to understand the pattern of her life.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Has anyone else tried reading may we be forgiven by a.m. homes? It won The Women's Prize for Fiction - formerly the Orange Prize. I read the first 50 pages, then checked the Amazon reviews to see if it got better to find most reviews said the first few pages was the best bit and that I wasn't alone in not liking it. I suspect I'd like her short stories.

However, I enjoyed The Veteran by Frederick Forsyth - 5 short stories with twists - some better than others, but worth reading. They all have very different settings and Forsyth's research is, as always, detailed and fascinating. It was published in 2001, but the stories read as if they've been written over a number of years, one was dated 1977 and another was set in 1997.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
Has anyone else tried reading may we be forgiven by a.m. homes? It won The Women's Prize for Fiction - formerly the Orange Prize. I read the first 50 pages, then checked the Amazon reviews to see if it got better to find most reviews said the first few pages was the best bit and that I wasn't alone in not liking it.

I gave up reading this after it gave me a nightmare. I found it to be a series of anxiety inducing situations so I stopped reading for my mental health!
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I loved it, thought it was amazing and when I finished it immediately went on amazon to order other books by her. I loved the claustrophobia the story induced in me.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Ian Mortimer's The Time Traveller's Guide to Elizbethean England: both fascinating and salutary.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
My Young Man's favourite comic book superhero is Captain Britain, so he's lent me the origin story and a story called Before Excalibur. So I now know how Brian Braddock, physics student and heir to an ancient manor house with a supercomputer in the cellar, gets to be Britain's very own superhero with the help of Merlin. It then gets very complicated with alternate worlds, time travel and an Elfquest-esqe mutant girl called Meggan, who he ends up living in a lighthouse with.
Fun, but aimed squarely at teenage boys in the 1970s and 80s I think.

However, he also lent me Jenny Sparks, which is about a girl superhero who is also the spirit of the 20th Century. It's written by Mark Millar and it's excellent!
 
Posted by Haydee (# 14734) on :
 
Elizabeth Gaskill - North and South - a wonderful book with a believable tension of attraction/not wanting to be attracted that is most unusual in Victorian novels (the respectable ones anyway [Biased] )
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Haydee:
Elizabeth Gaskill - North and South - a wonderful book with a believable tension of attraction/not wanting to be attracted that is most unusual in Victorian novels (the respectable ones anyway [Biased] )

I like Mrs Gaskell very much, at least from Mary Barton so thanks for this tip.

I have just read a wonderful book about Taizé, Taizé: a meaning to life by Olivier Clement, a French writer, now Russian Orthodox though he grew up in an atheist environment. Short but profound, it discusses the importance of religion in life, and why so many people are searching, and how and why Taizé offers spiritual nourishment to so many in such a special way.

I am reading a memoir by Lamin Sanneh, who grew up Muslim in the Gambia and is now a respected academic, has a chair in World Christianity at Yale. Summoned from the Margin: homecoming of an African is an incredible tale of a boy driven to get an education and also to find his spiritual home--he has ended up a Catholic. He is a wonderful witness to the positive aspects of Islam and indeed did much studying on a pacific tradition of Islam which rejects the imposition of Shariah law or of any sort of conversion by force--far less by the sword--a tradition which has had an important effect in West Africa. His story of trying to become a Christian and being initially rejected by churches both in Africa and in the USA is very poignant as well--though I must add that there is no whining in his memoir, he continually gives thanks and praise to all those who have helped him on his path. Fascinating.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I found a copy of Michael Palin's "Sahara" in a secondhand bookshop at the weekend, sat down to read it last night and got instantly hooked. The story unfolds with charm and humour, the photos are a real delight - it's so easy to take travel photos that look like holiday snaps but so far each one of these is a gem. Enjoying this immensely.

I also managed to get "Mayhew's London", by a Victorian doing some investigative journalism into the kinds of people he meets on the streets. I'd read extracts from this, and this is an abridged version, but it's a fascinating read. The interviews he did are reported exactly as the interviewees told their own stories, so you get a real sense of the people they were.

Many of the stories are very moving. Medical science has advanced so much since then that many of those people would never have been in that position now - there were a far higher number of disabilities and misfortunes as the legacies of illnesses in those days, but everyone still had to work to make a living somehow.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I attempted to read The Morville Hours last week - I'd wanted to read it for quite a long time - but somehow it just didn't grab me. Beautiful writing, about a part of the world I'm familiar with (Shropshire and the Welsh Borders), but it seemed very easy to skip paragraphs. Maybe if I'm in a more contemplative mood I'll try again.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I just finished reading J. K. Rowling's The Casual Vacancy. It was very well-written and well-crafted; otherwise I wouldn't have finished it.

The 'casual vacancy' is an empty seat on the Parish Council after a man has died unexpectedly.

What I didn't like was that almost up to the end, Rowling is very detached from her characters. Moreover, most of them are petty and not likeable. There are adults and teenagers in the book. The teenagers look better than the adults, although they do many bad things.

Right at the end of the book, I came to like some of the characters better.

I think to some extent the nature of this book is a reaction to the Harry Potter books.

Moo
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I recently finished "God: the Autobiography" by Franco Ferrucci. It's a short book (luckily; I doubt I'd have finished it otherwise) which is basically set up with God reminiscing about the process of creation/evolution. There was very much a sense of him not really knowing what he was doing or thinking through the consequences, and whilst I have some sympathy with the thought of him starting things off and letting them take their course without him micro-managing every last little tweak of creation, this God just seemed so very clueless that it really didn't work for me. In parts it reminded me of Paolo Coelho (absolutely one of my least favourite authors) in that there would be odd sentences where at the time of reading I thought they were kind of profound - but I then instantly forgot them - and the overall effect was really not very satisfying. OK if you like that sort of thing, but I was glad when I finished it.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I'm still obsessed with my novel, which I cannot tinker with until 1 November and compiling questions with vetting from my wife fore the Ship's Book Group.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Interesting, Moo, re The Casual Vacancy . I haven't read it--have been put off by some of the reviews which emphasised that it's pretty dark.

I don't at all blame JKR for wanting to write something completely different, though. She has spoken in interviews of the sense of freedom this gave her.
 
Posted by listener (# 15770) on :
 
I can't find who mentioned Augustus Carp, Esq., Being the Autobiography of a Really Good Man but want to thank them. Most enjoyable but I dare not pass it on to the humourless person I think it now describes.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Stejjie:
Currently ploughing through Margaret Thatcher's autobiography for my Newly Accredited Minister studies. Which could be subtitled "Why I was right and everyone else was wrong." And, for all the (genuinely) fascinating insights, at times it can be very,very dull, with painstaking detail about things that most people wouldn't be interested in.

Could do with something very light and funny and inconsequential to read afterwards. Any recommendations?

If you haven't read it, E.F. Bensen's Lucia series is the epitome of light and funny.
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
If you haven't read it, E.F. Bensen's Lucia series is the epitome of light and funny.

A lot of people love that book but i found it trivial and superficial.
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
quote:
Originally posted by Palimpsest:
If you haven't read it, E.F. Bensen's Lucia series is the epitome of light and funny.

A lot of people love that book but i found it trivial and superficial.
Trivial and superficial seem perfect for a relaxing no stress read.

I've just read Death Comes for the Archbishop by Willa Cather which was recommended by Michael Arditti in his top 10 books about priests. I absolutely loved it. It's about two priests sent as missionaries to New Mexico just after it has become part of the USA. The descriptions of place are amazing and the characters of the priests are excellent. It's an extremely moving book and I totally recommend it.
 
Posted by goperryrevs (# 13504) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cara:
Interesting, Moo, re The Casual Vacancy . I haven't read it--have been put off by some of the reviews which emphasised that it's pretty dark.

I don't at all blame JKR for wanting to write something completely different, though. She has spoken in interviews of the sense of freedom this gave her.

I agree with Moo that a lot of the characters weren't likeable. It was dark, and hard going in places. It was one of those books that I got a lot more out of after I finished it, rather than enjoying as I read it. It's a very observant picture of British society, crossing class boundaries and pretty unashamedly pointing out hypocrisy and tragedy. I'm very glad I read it, I've not read anything else like it.

I'm halfway through The Cuckoo's Calling, which is much more readable with really likeable characters. It somehow manages to be contemporary and proper-classic-old-style crime fiction at the same time. Very enjoyable. She's a pretty versatile author.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Currently reading House of Many Ways which has pushed down The Scarlet Fig by Avram Davidson, a collection of pieces of his Vergil Magus epic and Ship without a Sail, a new biography of Hart.

This is the peril of trying to sort out the book overflow piles to donate to the Library Sale. All sorts of unread books keep popping out. It's almost as bad as my days as a student librarian reading shelves against the card catalog and having to pass by so many interesting books...
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by goperryrevs:
I agree with Moo that a lot of the characters weren't likeable. It was dark, and hard going in places. It was one of those books that I got a lot more out of after I finished it, rather than enjoying as I read it. It's a very observant picture of British society, crossing class boundaries and pretty unashamedly pointing out hypocrisy and tragedy.

It wasn't the people living in the Fields that I found so obnoxious. It was the middle-class people who plotted revenge on anyone who irritated them.

I especially disliked the relationship between Shirley Molleson and her daughter-in-law Samantha. Given the fact that they were stuck with each other, it was silly to keep feeding the flames.

Moo
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
Someone lent me a copy of Diary of a Wimpy Kid but I really didn't like it. And I think that if I had read it when I was a twelve year old, I wouldn't have found these jokes funny either.

I guess my fault was also to compare it too much with The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, which I did like.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have recently done a reread of an online author I particularly like - all 18 books - and have also been doing a reread of Harry Potter and am now halfway through Deathly Hallows - I have the new [or A new] Eoin Colfer on the stocks for next - Warp 1 - I started it at the book fair in town the other day and am now anxious to get into it. Apart from his attempted continuation of Hitchhikers Guide I have enjoyed everything I have read by him. After the Colfer I think I may go a-Delderfield-ing.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Someone lent me a copy of Diary of a Wimpy Kid but I really didn't like it. And I think that if I had read it when I was a twelve year old, I wouldn't have found these jokes funny either.

I guess my fault was also to compare it too much with The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, which I did like.

Secret Diary of Adrian Mole and all its sequels are absolutely brilliant --funny but also tender, deep, etc etc. Great books and probably appreciated far more by adults than children, indeed not written especially for younger readers as far as I know.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Someone lent me a copy of Diary of a Wimpy Kid but I really didn't like it. And I think that if I had read it when I was a twelve year old, I wouldn't have found these jokes funny either.

I haven't read it, but.it was reasonably popular with the 11 -12 year olds who used the library at a school where I volunteered.

Huia
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
goperryrevs, re The Casual Vacancy:
quote:
It's a very observant picture of British society, crossing class boundaries and pretty unashamedly pointing out hypocrisy and tragedy.
Yes, it is, and as several other people have said it's well-written. It looked to me as if she was aiming for a 21st-century equivalent of Middlemarch - but that could be because I reread Middlemarch quite recently. She obviously had far more sympathy for the teenage characters than for the adults; but honestly, is it really likely that the dead guy was the only half-decent adult in the whole town? The law of averages suggests otherwise.

I didn't like it - partly because it's not the sort of thing I usually read, I suppose, but also because I don't think she has a real talent for doing tragedy (though the funeral scene was well done). I always thought the 'whodunit' and comedy in Harry Potter were the bits that worked best. I wasn't surprised to hear that she'd written a detective/thriller story.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
goperryrevs, re The Casual Vacancy:
quote:
It's a very observant picture of British society, crossing class boundaries and pretty unashamedly pointing out hypocrisy and tragedy.
Yes, it is, and as several other people have said it's well-written. It looked to me as if she was aiming for a 21st-century equivalent of Middlemarch - but that could be because I reread Middlemarch quite recently. She obviously had far more sympathy for the teenage characters than for the adults; but honestly, is it really likely that the dead guy was the only half-decent adult in the whole town? The law of averages suggests otherwise.

I didn't like it - partly because it's not the sort of thing I usually read, I suppose, but also because I don't think she has a real talent for doing tragedy (though the funeral scene was well done). I always thought the 'whodunit' and comedy in Harry Potter were the bits that worked best. I wasn't surprised to hear that she'd written a detective/thriller story.

Interesting, Jane R. This is the kind of response to the book that I've seen enough times now to put me off reading it.... especially as I thought the Harry Potter books were brilliant.Middlemarch certainly does repay re-reading. I admire it and love it so much.

I am now reading a really interesting book (I've mentioned it already in another thread) called Keeping Faith: a skeptic's journey among Christian and Buddhist monks by Fenton Johnson. Its scope is much wider than the title implies, he looks not just at monasticism but at the whole search for meaning in life, why we search, different ways of doing that; looks at the Christian and Buddhist traditions, their different approaches, what they have in common...many literary and historical references, but lightly done, and all interwoven with his own search--grew up Catholic, is a gay man, now skeptical about faith but still drawn to it, and seeking to understand why....

I am in the middle, so don't know where it's going or will end up. Has anyone read any of his other books? One of them was a memoir of his childhood and also the story of his lover and the lover's death from AIDS....( Geography of the Heart ) and there are two novels, Crossing the River and Scissors Paper Rock .
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Just finished James Shapiro's Contested Will on the various proponents of 'real' author of Shakespeare. What was so interesting was how he places them in the context of all sorts of presuppositions of their own - and our - day on what poets should be like, what authorship is, how creativity works. Plus wider currents of thought - the Higher Criticism or psychoanalytic theory.

It's one of those books that make you question assumptions, which is always a good thing. Plus a very entertaining read.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
One of my daughters gave me that a few years ago. I love it.

My favorite bit was the account of a nineteenth-century 'scholar' who was determined to find a code in the plays saying Bacon had written them. He ended up saying that Bacon had written the code first, then the plays to fit it! [Ultra confused] [Eek!]

Moo
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
on a slight cross domain tangent, I've finally gotten the books organized in the living room, dining room and spare bedroom so they are all on shelves. A bunch went to the basement library (stacks) and a whole bunch went to the library sale. I've found a number of books I bought that slipped aside.

I'm currently re-reading a few Rex Stout Nero Wolfe mysteries out of nostalgia for old New York.
Next I've got to start some homework for getting a new programming job. I'm still reading chunks of the final Avram Davidson Vergil Magus series; "The Scarlet Fig"
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just finished reading The President's Hat by Antoine Laurain, translated from French by three people on behalf of Gallic Books. It is rather wonderful in a whimsical way. About President Mitterand's hat being left in a Parisian brasserie and changing the lives of all the people who come across it. Read it in an afternoon.

I'm now re-reading Lindsay Davis's The Course of Honour about the empereor Vespasian and Caenis.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
I finished Alex Preston's 'The Revelations' today. Has anyone else tried it?

It's about a thinly disguised Alpha course in London and the clever but tortured young people who are running it. It's highly readable, but it doesn't quite ring true to me, although I've never attended an Alpha course. Why would such messed up people be given such a heavy responsibility? And why are all the Christians such unattractive characters? And despite the importance of 'the Course' being stressed at every opportunity very little is said about the reason behind it: Jesus Christ.

More than this, the novel seems slightly dated, even though it was only published last year. Alpha is presented as a being on the cusp of world domination, whereas it's already a cross-denominational, global phenomenon with a broad demographic; the characters' glorification of wealth takes no account of the financial crisis; and the ethnic and social diversity of London's Christian community is completely ignored. Yes, it's a novel not a social document, but it's clearly trying to say something timely about 'narrow evangelical Christianity'.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm in the middle of Alice in Sunderland, by Bryan Talbot, and it is brilliant! It's a comic, detailing the links between Lewis Carroll, the Liddell family and Sunderland, taking in all the history of Sunderland and the surrounding area from prehistoric times up through the Venerable Bede to the shipyards and trade of the 19thC century.
It starts with the characters in the Sunderland Empire, and does a run down of all the famous actors and comedians who have performed there - including Sid James, who died on stage and is reputed to haunt the theatre.
I'm somewhere in the middle of the book at the moment, where the author gets up in the middle of the night and has a crisis of faith about comic books - he thinks he should be writing about superheroes in cloaks and tights, and maybe he invented it all anyway and Sunderland doesn't really exist!
Highly recommended!
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I'm enjoying - and I mean enjoying - Maddadam, the third volume im Margarer Atwood's Oryx and Crake trilogy. Is there anyone apart from me who likes this collection? Oryx and Crake itselft (the first book) is grim, of course, but I thought by RL book group would like the second book (The Year of the Flood if only because the religious group - God's Gardeners - is almost (but not quite) totally unlike* Quakers. They didn't.

Well, I can see why this third one didn't make it onto the Booker shortlist - the humour apart from anything else - but although perhaps I shouldn't commit before finishing, I think the three of them make a terrific read.

*Spot the Douglas Adams allusion
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I'm reading a racy baseball-themed novel that my wife put on her Nook for me called Stealing Home. It's about a young woman who seduces a baseball player to steal a valuable good luck charm so she can sell it and save the life of a 2-year-old girl with fatal heart disease. It was written by a young lady called Jennifer Seasons and seems promising....
 
Posted by Clotilde (# 17600) on :
 
I'm in the closing chapters of Jane Shaw's book 'Octavia, Daughter of God' a fascinating biography of Mabel Barltrop and her followers in the Panacea Society.

How such 'proper' middle class English ladies could come to believe what they did and live how they did is a wonderful story.

Highly recommended!
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just finished Trieste by Dasa Drndic and translated by Ellen Elias-Bursac (sorry, the advanced diacriticals are beyond my coding skills). It is an almost unbearable account of WW2, the Holocaust and the Lebensborn project in the Balkans and Italy and mixes fiction with history, interviews, pictures and so on rather in the style of W.G. Sebald. I found the fictional voices utterly compelling, but that I was always wondering which parts were fictional and which weren't. Not at all easy to read but important.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clotilde:
I'm in the closing chapters of Jane Shaw's book 'Octavia, Daughter of God' a fascinating biography of Mabel Barltrop and her followers in the Panacea Society.

How such 'proper' middle class English ladies could come to believe what they did and live how they did is a wonderful story.

Highly recommended!

Just checked it out -- looks absolutely fascinating! I love stumbling across historical stories I've never heard of and will probably read this one ... thanks.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I finished my re-read of Dodie Smith's I Capture the Castle today - it is so long since I last read it that I had forgotten how it ended. Actually the plot is perhaps not as important as the wonderful writing!
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Ah WW you are so right. I first read it at 18 (the perfect age) but on re-reading it later in life I admire it just as much, if not more. Did you know that Dodie Smith wrote it in her forties when in California during the war, and desperately missing England...this nostalgia infuses the whole book. But how at that age does she create the fresh voice of young Cassandra? And make it seem so easy and so natural?

Also, I think her father's books, "Jacob Wrestling," and the new one (hope I'm not revealing too much) are among the most intriguing books-within-books in literature.

Dodie Smith is under-appreciated--it is, for example, appalling that the Disney cartoon of 101 Dalmations is called "Disney's 101 Dalmations," as if they thought of it! I think her name appears fleetingly in the credits somewhere...
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
just to add--Dodie Smith wrote many volumes of interesting autobiography, and Valerie Grove has written a good biography.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cara:
...Also, I think her father's books, "Jacob Wrestling," and the new one (hope I'm not revealing too much) are among the most intriguing books-within-books in literature...

Yes, I am fascinated by the second one, the whole concept, as much as it is put forward in the book, is fascinating.

* * * *

When I last had broken bones, back in 2011, I read Delderfield's The Dreaming Suburb and today I have started The Avenue Goes to War and am already gripped by it. Another under-rated writer.

[ 09. October 2013, 10:32: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
 
Posted by Clotilde (# 17600) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
quote:
Originally posted by Clotilde:
I'm in the closing chapters of Jane Shaw's book 'Octavia, Daughter of God' a fascinating biography of Mabel Barltrop and her followers in the Panacea Society.

How such 'proper' middle class English ladies could come to believe what they did and live how they did is a wonderful story.

Highly recommended!

Just checked it out -- looks absolutely fascinating! I love stumbling across historical stories I've never heard of and will probably read this one ... thanks.
Quick entry just to say I've opened a thread in PURGATORY about Octavia and Joanna Southcott's Box - indeed 'absolutely fascinating!'
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just finished reading Sunset Song by Lewis Grassic Gibbon for what must have been about the thirtieth time. It's a book I return to over and over again just because it is so beautiful.

It's based in a small Scottish farming community at the start of WWI. It uses a really distinctive way of writing and a lot of Scots words to create a complete reality. It talks (because it doesn't feel like you're reading instead it feels like you are being talked to) about how the community was affected by a war that had nothing to do with it.

It is in many ways a tragic book and each time I read it I want the bad things not to happen and I cry every single time I read it. But along with being haunting it is incredibly beautiful.

Maybe my connection to it is my connection to my family's past. My family were historically crofters in a nearby area. Maybe the use of the Scots reminds me of my older relatives who still use Scots when they're talking. The book feels like part of me and I feel like part of the book (if that isn't too Pseud's corner).
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished Revelation, the fourth Shardlake novel by CJ Sansom. I'd read the second one, Dark Fire, before this, and found it enjoyable as a quick historical detective read. This one is rather better, and I think it's because of the vivid background details - Westminster Abbey turned into a building site after the dissolution, for instance. It deals with a serial killer, though, and there's a built in problem with mysteries about serial killers in that the detective can't discover them until they've killed almost everyone they were intending to. Here the killings revolve around the angels pouring out seven vials in Revelations. There's also a sub-plot about a boy in Bedlam which ties into the main plot perhaps a little too neatly, and a faint hint of possible romance between Shardlake and a fellow lawyer's widow.
I like the characters, so I shall probably read the other three in the series should I come across them.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I've read so many excellent works of historical fiction this year -- currently enjoying Elizabeth Gilbert's The Signature of All Things very much. It doesn't quite manage to make botany interesting to me, but it does make the life of the (fictional) botanist very interesting! I love Gilbert's writing style.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Having recently come back from a holiday in Norwich, and visiting her shrine, I'm currently reading a book about Julian of Norwich ('In search of Julian of Norwich' by Sheila Upjohn), which looks at some of the puzzles surrounding her life, setting her writings into context.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Cara:
just to add--Dodie Smith wrote many volumes of interesting autobiography, and Valerie Grove has written a good biography.

Dodie led a full life and her autobiographies are sparkling. I recommend them too.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Last night I finished the latest Eoin Colfer - Warp 1 - The Reluctant Assassin which was good fun. It drags a bit in the middle but it is the usual Colfer good fun and dry humour.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Has anyone else read Proof of Heaven: a neurosurgeon's journey into the afterlife by Eben Alexander?

A neurosurgeon who ends up in a coma due to a very rare infection, and who experiences, although his brain waves appear entirely flat and incapable of hallucinations or anything else, a near death experience?
As NDE's tend to do, it changed him for ever, took away his fear of dying, turned him from a skeptic about God and the afterlife into a believer, and completely changed his life.

I found it pretty convincing.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I have recently finished Brothers by George Colt.

He is the second of four brothers, and the book intersperses the history of the relationships between the four and histories of other brothers.

He argues that if John Wilkes Booth had been older than Edwin Booth, he would probably not have assassinated Lincoln. Edwin accompanied his father on his acting gigs and took care of him. (He was mentally ill and alcoholic, but a very great actor.) John stayed home and was doted on by his mother; he developed a huge amount of self-confidence and charm. Edwin was all about responsibility.

The author argues that if John had been forced to undertake the responsibilities that Edwin did, it would have given him a more objective view of life.

He tells the stories of several other sets of brothers also.

It is a very interesting book.

Moo
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I recently finished "Chasing the King of Hearts" by Hannah Krall, translated from Polish by Philip Boehm. It's a wonderful book and very powerful, despite its short length. The true story of a Polish Jewish woman, Izolda, and her determination to get her husband out of a camp. This led her to travel across much of the Third Reich, bartering her way to survival. It's a very different approach to Holocaust literature from Trieste, which I also read recently. Trieste is an endless account of horrors while CtKoH hints at them leaving much more to the reader's imagination.

From the sublime to the ridiculous - I thought Ian Sansom's The Norfolk Mystery would be a little light relief with local interest. Unfortunately, the main character is (intentionally) very irritating. I'm not sure the desired effect was to make me want to throw the book across the room though. Coupled with the fact that it referred to the clergyman character as "the reverend" throughout... I actually couldn't finish it and just skipped to the last chapter to find out what happened.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I had the same problem with the Sanson book. Was he trying to riff on the idea of the omniscient detective, or what?

I read half a dozen books the other week, largely during some very long flights to and from S Africa. Some period detective - including a Georgette Heyer. As you'd expect, briskly plotted, some acerbic social observation (and what a lot of servants one had in those days) - entertaining, but not engaging.

I was more taken with some modern days fantasy - Neil Gaiman and a writer new to me, Ben Aaronovitch. I've read the first Rivers of London novel, and downloaded the second. Anyone else familiar with the series?
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I was more taken with some modern days fantasy - Neil Gaiman and a writer new to me, Ben Aaronovitch. I've read the first Rivers of London novel, and downloaded the second. Anyone else familiar with the series?

I've read all the Rivers of London books, and think they're largely well-plotted and definitely enjoyable. I do like books where a normal character suddenly finds themselves somewhere completely unusual, it's one of the things Neil Gaiman does well, and Ben Aaronovitch does a good job too. Not great literature, but quite good fun.
 
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on :
 
I've read all the Rivers series, and only yesterday finished rereading Gaiman's Neverwhere. All of them were great, as were Kate Griffen's series about Jonathan Swift, and the offshoot, Magicals Anonymous. Fantasy is one of my favourite genres, and I particularly liked these, as they were set in London and used all sorts of English folklore. Much as I enjoy Greek/Norse gods, and the legends of other countries, it is great to find our own legends being used (and slightly shocking that they are less well known than the foreign stuff).

In fact I find it odd that both Milton and Tolkien wanted to write a great English myth. Milton ended up writing a Hebrew story, Tolkien a Norse one, but we've had to wait until now to get something that is truly indigenous.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Just finished reading 'The Five people you will meet in Heaven' by Mitch Albom. An easy-read, feel-good sort of book, totally non demanding for bedtime reading. And I woke up in the morning, still alive, which is more than could be said for all the people inhabiting the book.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I had the same problem with the Sanson book. Was he trying to riff on the idea of the omniscient detective, or what?

Glad it wasn't just me! I've no idea what he was playing at.

I'm supposed to be reading She Rises by Kate Worsley at the moment, but instead I'm catching up with Inspector Montalbano, inspired by him being back on the telly. I'm currently on The Track of Sand.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I never did manage to get into the Kate Worsley book.

I did very much enjoy the Montalbano though, and am now on the next in the series - The Potter's Field.
It's very interesting reading them after having seen the TV adaptation, especially as Salvo is always moaning about his age, needing reading glasses etc and is clearly at least 10 years older than the actor who plays him. That wouldn't make such good TV though, I guess. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm in the middle of In Our Time, a collection of scripts of the Melvyn Bragg Radio 4 programme, which covers just about every subject you could think of. They did a fascinating four parter on the life of Darwin, recorded in places like Down House (his home) and the Natural History Museum. The rest are from the studio, and there's only one so far that I wasn't interested in - on Kierkegaard. The one on tea, on the other hand, was totally fascinating!
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I'm reading "Sexy Orchids Make Lousy Lovers, & Other Unusual Relationships" by Marty Crump. It's this month's free ebook from the University of Chicago Press. It's about how animals relate to themselves, other animals, plants and bacteria/fungi, and for what reasons (sex, food, shelter, etc). I particularly enjoyed the section on how animals co-exist with plants, for mutual benefit. It's in the form of a series of anecdotes which has reminded me of watching a nature documentary - it's not in any great depth (just as well, I'm not a zoologist) but is like the reading equivalent of watching a series of anecdotes about various animals and plants before the presenter goes onto the next anecdote about something else. I'm very much enjoying it.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Keren-Happuch:
Salvo is always moaning about his age, needing reading glasses etc and is clearly at least 10 years older than the actor who plays him. That wouldn't make such good TV though, I guess. [Big Grin]

We're a week behind with the TV series and in the last one they said he was 49. He's 56 in this book so not quite ten years out...
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I've just finished The Red Queen, part of the Cousins' War series by Philippa Gregory. It's the story of Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII, told (unfortunately) in the present tense with Margaret as the narrator.

Interestingly, it's not really all that sympathetic to her: she comes out of it as what I imagine she was: a scheming, ambitious and bitter woman who will stop at nothing to get what she thinks is, quite literally, her God-given right.

Like most fictionalisations of the events of late 15th-century England, it leaves you hanging as to Who Did It*, but hints quite strongly that it was the perfidious and ambitious Duke of Buckingham, at Margaret's behest, a theory I find readily plausible.

* i.e. killed the Princes in the Tower
 
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:
I've just finished The Red Queen, part of the Cousins' War series by Philippa Gregory. It's the story of Margaret Beaufort, mother of Henry VII, told (unfortunately) in the present tense with Margaret as the narrator.

Interestingly, it's not really all that sympathetic to her: she comes out of it as what I imagine she was: a scheming, ambitious and bitter woman who will stop at nothing to get what she thinks is, quite literally, her God-given right.

Like most fictionalisations of the events of late 15th-century England, it leaves you hanging as to Who Did It*, but hints quite strongly that it was the perfidious and ambitious Duke of Buckingham, at Margaret's behest, a theory I find readily plausible.

* i.e. killed the Princes in the Tower

I'm reading her biography by Elizabeth Norton, which is very good. I think she had a lot of reason to be bitter and ambitious, as an heir to the house of Lancaster she was used as female pawn throughout her childhood. Her wardship was passed around according to the King's favour, Edmund Tudor who she married when she was only 12, was her second husband (the first was unconsummated) and owned her wardship. Her marriage to him was consummated at such a young age that it broke convention, all out of desperation to sire a male Lancashire heir to the throne. She was widowed at 13, almost died giving birth and was almost certainly left damaged and barren from the experience. She was barely a teenager! She married again within a year and spent the rest of her teens separated from her child whose wardship was passed around and fighting for his rights.
I am quite sympathetic to Margaret [Big Grin]
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I recently read Patrick Gale's A Perfectly Good Man.

I was in a seriously bad state at the time and found it riveting and deeply consoling - more than consoling, inspiring that life and God were worthwhile.

Gale is clearly sympathetic to religion but is better known as a gay writer (not that that ought to define him). The witness to the hope and healing that can be in religious faith and practice were all the more powerful to me coming from outside the church.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
I will look out for this Gale book. I heard him speak at a literary festival once and was captivated. I think I've only read one of is books, though. (Hmmm....which?)


I have just finished Dickens's Hard Times. I thought I'd read all Dickens's novels but didn't remember this one. I think it is one of the best. Very moving portrayal of life in the industrial north, and also great depiction of the people in "the horse-riding," a sort of circus. A good story and of course some splendid characters.

I discovered Dickens rather late in life--in my thirties. We had his books at home when I was growing up, and I think I tried one when I was too young. When I finally read him again at an age to appreciate it, I remember being so happy that there were many more novels to enjoy...he really is a genius.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I recently read Patrick Gale's A Perfectly Good Man
I was in a seriously bad state at the time and found it riveting and deeply consoling - more than consoling, inspiring that life and God were worthwhile.

quote:
Originally posted by Cara:
I will look out for this Gale book. I heard him speak at a literary festival once and was captivated.

I recently read Gale's Notes from an Exhibition for a real-life Quaker book group. Quakers feature in the book but that wasn't why we chose it (though it might be why the book-club support librarian pushed it in our direction). Anyway, this too is inspiring and consoling in its way. The book's structure is brilliant, but I don't want to discuss that in detail, because although it's not a surprise - it's kind-of inevitable - talking about it here might put someone off reading it - and it shouldn't.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I just read "The Goldfinch" by Donna Tartt.
It starts out with a boy who steals a painting when in a museum being bombed and follows him for 20 years. It has a compelling sense of story which carries it a long way till it dissolves in some abstract ruminations about the nature of the universe that should have been edited out.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I loved Patrick Gale's Notes from an Exhibition and had meant to read anything else I saw of his, but put myself off with Tree Surgery for Beginners where my suspension of disbelief couldn't quite cope with some of the events. I guess I ought to have another go.

I've just read War Horse (I know) and was really unimpressed by the writing. The other book in my bag was collected poetry by Siegfried Sassoon. I can see why the story has been picked up for the films and plays, but this isn't one of my favourite examples of Michael Morpurgo's writing. (We're putting together schemes of work on WW1 literature and history to teach English, History and an Art & Design unit)
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I mean to read Notes from an Exhibition soon - it's on the shelves. I read a number of early Gale novels about ten years ago and don't remember being that impressed.

F R Leavis (perversely) once said Hard Times was the only worthwhile Dickens novel. It's not. My big criticism is that Dickens is completely condemnatory of trade unions. How the blazes else are the workers ever to get some respect and a decent standard of living? (Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton is much less sentimental.)
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
I was more taken with some modern days fantasy - Neil Gaiman and a writer new to me, Ben Aaronovitch. I've read the first Rivers of London novel, and downloaded the second. Anyone else familiar with the series?

I read the first three Rivers books back end of last year and have had the last one waiting to be read since it came out in the summer. Which is a comment on my fecklessness not the books which I really liked.

If you liked them you might also like Paul Cornell's London Falling. It's another urban fantasy[*] novel set in London, involving the regular police getting involved in supernatural goings on. It's possibly a bit darker with less of the humour of the Rivers books but I thoroughly enjoyed it and am looking forward to the sequel.

Currently after having read well into and then set aside several books (see above re: lack of feck) I'm back to my background task of catching up on Discworld novels and have started Monstrous Regiment (was in Edinburgh recently and saw the Mary Queen of Scots exhibition in which a copy of the original tract was on display). Enjoying it so far.

[*]a genre that's sadly so flooded with the mediocre that I hesitate to use it, but this is an example of something that genuinely fits that description so...
 
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:

I'm somewhere in the middle of the book at the moment, where the author gets up in the middle of the night and has a crisis of faith about comic books - he thinks he should be writing about superheroes in cloaks and tights, and maybe he invented it all anyway and Sunderland doesn't really exist!
Highly recommended!

Thank God he got over it and finished the book-- I agree, it's fantastic!

Just began Mary Roach's latest, Gulp which is an examination of eating and digestive process, including lurid descriptions of various research techniques that were necessary to determine things like digestion rates, nutrient absorption, etc. If If it sound boring to you, I highly recommend you pick up anything by Mary Roach-- she unearths the fascinating aspects in everything.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I mean to read Notes from an Exhibition soon - it's on the shelves. I read a number of early Gale novels about ten years ago and don't remember being that impressed.

F R Leavis (perversely) once said Hard Times was the only worthwhile Dickens novel. It's not. My big criticism is that Dickens is completely condemnatory of trade unions. How the blazes else are the workers ever to get some respect and a decent standard of living? (Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton is much less sentimental.)

I too have Notes from an Exhibition on my shelves, but they are far from me, and I haven't read it yet.

Well, that was ridiculous of Leavis is wrong, of course many of Dickens's other novels are worthwhile, in all sorts of ways.

Yes, the trade unions are portrayed negatively in the book, I agree, and did gather from the introduction that there is much controversy of this aspect of the novel.

(And Eliz Gaskell's Mary Barton is indeed brilliant.)
in this and many other aspects).

But still, I think it's a wonderful novel, despite the too-good-to-be-trueness of the factory worker Stephen Blackpool and the unclearness around the reason why he disagrees with the union...
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I've just finished Revelation, the fourth Shardlake novel by CJ Sansom. I'd read the second one, Dark Fire, before this, and found it enjoyable as a quick historical detective read. This one is rather better,... There's also a sub-plot about a boy in Bedlam which ties into the main plot perhaps a little too neatly ...I like the characters, so I shall probably read the other three in the series should I come across them.

I really enjoyed the first, Dissolution, which I think is one of the best; Sovereign was also very good; I wasn't quite so keen on Heartstone - too much about the Mary Rose - maybe I'd just OD'd on Sansom by that point.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I've just read Stone Cold by Robert Swindells, another teen fiction book that I've picked to work out how to teach it, but it's an amazing book and worth reading. I knew I appreciated Robert Swindells' writing from supporting the teaching of Wicked a few years ago, but this book reminded me how well he writes and tackles issues. Stone Cold has homelessness as a central issue, which remains relevant, Wicked deals with under age drinking and alcoholism.

His books are aimed at teenage boys, but it's not preachily defined, enough is inferential and touched on to make them layered and interesting.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I'm re-reading the Mistress of the Art of Death books by Ariana Franklin. Excellent stuff, set in 12th-century England, featuring a lady pathologist who investigates murders for Henry II.

Sadly, there won't be any more in the series, as Ms. Franklin died a couple of years ago.

[Frown]

PS I've just Googled her - someone seems to have written a posthumous sequel ... [Yipee]

[ 10. December 2013, 17:59: Message edited by: piglet ]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I've just finished Revelation, the fourth Shardlake novel by CJ Sansom. I'd read the second one, Dark Fire, before this, and found it enjoyable as a quick historical detective read. This one is rather better,... There's also a sub-plot about a boy in Bedlam which ties into the main plot perhaps a little too neatly ...I like the characters, so I shall probably read the other three in the series should I come across them.

I really enjoyed the first, Dissolution, which I think is one of the best; Sovereign was also very good; I wasn't quite so keen on Heartstone - too much about the Mary Rose - maybe I'd just OD'd on Sansom by that point.
I've been OD'ing on them in quick succession after first seeing them recommended on this thread. I'm now reading Heartstone and disappointed to realize that when this one's done I'll actually have to wait for the next one to come out -- it's been so great reading a series with 5 books already written.

Does anyone else reading this series wish poor Shardlake would get laid finally? Or, more delicately, find a lady who returns his esteem?
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just started Philip Pullman's retelling of the Grimm tales. Haven't got very far in yet but it's interesting to see how they differ from what I remember, and stories I'd never read before as well.
 
Posted by North East Quine (# 13049) on :
 
I've just read "Dedicated Lives" - a history of various small Episcopalian religious communities in Dundee, including the Community of St Mary the Virgin and St Modwenna, by Edward Luscombe, former Bishop of Brechin, and Stuart Donald, Epicopalian Archivist.

It includes some great photos, and fascinating details of an aspect of Victorian Dundee which was new to me.

This year is the centenary of the death of Mary Lily Walker , which was the impetus for both this book, and the biography of Mary Lily by Eddie Small, which I've also read.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
'The Image of Christ in Modern Art' by Richard Harries - having attended a couple of Gresham Lectures by him in London a few years ago, I wanted to try to understand some of the more modern religious paintings and sculptures I come across when visiting Cathedrals - perhaps if I understand them better I will appreciate them more. In only 156 pages, it is necessarily a whistle-stop tour, an overview, but that is a good starting point. Sadly, there don't seem to be any Christas or Chocolate Christs, the subject matter is fairly conservative - religious art thought worthy to have a place in modern cathedral life, rather than for shock value.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Leszek Kolakowski - 'Is God Happy?' A breathtaking series of essays by a Pole, about the failings of Communism (and also some deep thoughts about religion), all the more surprising for many having been written about 60 years ago, but suppressed by the communist government, and only very recently been published in English. He cuts through the pretence like a knife - I had never before seen the similarity between the artificial constructs holding communism in place and those used in religious cults, such as at Waco.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I am reading part of my own book, a failed NaNoWriMo project which fell about 8000 words short of the required 50,000 words, and doing a bit of editing. I am also working my way slowly through the works of the late Dame Agatha Christie.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
Recently been enjoying Ben Aaronovitch's Rivers series, as recommended here. I finished Susan Howatch's A Question of Integrity, but can't think of much Heavenly to say about it - maybe I'll start a Purg thread in the New Year, if I have time for a good argument. Just finished Kate Grenville's The Secret River - excellent, but very dark towards the end, but a true kind of darkness - very real and very human. In a way, I know and understand more about the way white settlers behaved towards aborigine than I thought I wanted to know - yet I'm still very glad I've read it.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I did just reread "A Talent to Deceive", Robert Barnard's book about Agatha Christie. I found it insightful, although I'm not the keenest fan of Christie.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I am still Delderfielding - I know it is not classic literature but he is a good storyteller. I am nearly at the end of the second volume of A Horseman Riding By which was the first I read of his some 30 or more years ago - my mum insisted I read it, which rather put me off, but I did and I liked it as much as I like it now.

Thanks to PeteC for putting me in touch with Abe Books which I have found to be a great, if economically dangerous, resource.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Have just finished reading Christmas present Asterix and the Pechts, 'translated into Pechtish' or sort-of Scottish dialect. The detail in the illustration is incredible, down to the stone carvings in the background and woad tatoos. Some characters have new Pechtish names: Obelix's dog, Dogmatix in English, is now Geitbiglix. Also I'll be borrowing some of the phrases. From now on, my Scottish friend who, when excited, has a little period of quicker and thicker-accented speech will be said to have 'the Bubbly Jocks'.

I'd forgotten in the intervening 2½ decades how good Asterix books are, and this one is a cracker.
 
Posted by Starbug (# 15917) on :
 
I started off reading Tune In by Marc Lewisohn. This is part one of a three-volume biography of The Beatles, which covers up to December 1962. I've been waiting for this book (like other Beatles fans) for nearly 10 years, so it's disappointing to get a third of the way through the book and find that, actually, I don't really like these young men. In fact, so far, they're coming across as the kind of intimidating louts that I'd cross the street to avoid. For example, their treatment of Stu Sutcliffe - while they're happy to bully him (even his so-called best friend, John Lennon), they don't have the guts to actually fire him from the band.

After waiting for this book for so long, I'm now feeling the need to intersperse it with others. One of my Christmas presents was the novel Valentine Grey by Sandi Toksvig, which is about a young girl who pretends to be a man in order to fight in the Boer War. It's an excellent read so far. As well as Valentine's story, there's also a touching love story between her cousin Reggie and his lover, Frank.
 
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on :
 
Bereft of books over New Year I climbed out of my arrogance and read a Grisham on New Year's Day. Most pleasant. Now, inter alia [Roll Eyes] I'm reading Captain Corelli's Mandolin. Love summer reading [Yipee]
 
Posted by Smudgie (# 2716) on :
 
The gift of a Kindle from the Smudgelet for Christmas has broadened my opportunities for building on my rediscovered love of reading... though possibly not doing much for my new year's resolution of "getting things done". At the moment I'm Kindling Mappamundi by Chris Hewitt which is a nice easy read and my "real" book is The Summer House by Santa Montafiore which I am really enjoying racing though - another easy read and a fairly predictable storyline but one of those books you can laze away a good hour with.

Zappa, I've been a John Grisham fan for years - he's another author I'm planning to read more of.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I'm currently reading national treasure Clare Balding's autobiography "My Animals and Other Family", about her childhood through the 'lens' of the various family pets and horses (her dad was a champion racehorse trainer). I'm really enjoying it, it's written with a very light touch, particularly when you consider what an unusual childhood it was - the Queen came to tea twice a year when she visited her horses there, and as well as family there are all sorts of characters around the place - nannies, stablehands, owners, etc. She's remarkably sanguine about her (pretty distant, ISTM) parents, and always writes with humour and affection. Definitely recommended.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I finally managed to get my hands on Asterix and the Picts. Not as good as some of the classic Asterixes, but definitely a worthy continuation of the legacy.

(Sorry, just saw that it was mentioned before on this thread.)

[ 05. January 2014, 10:31: Message edited by: LeRoc ]
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just read my way through the complete set of James Bond stories. They were thoroughly entertaining if one puts the racism and sexism in their time context. Remarkably silly as well. It was entertaining to see the difference between the books and the films too. I now think I should read something a bit more serious.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I was reading The 4.50 to Paddington, but my wife apparently took the Nook with her to church. I cannot find it anywhere about the house! I am nearly done....
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I had a lovely lot of books for Christmas which should keep me going for a while. [Big Grin]

I'm currently reading Roads to Berlin by Cees Nooteboom, translated by Laura Watkinson, which I'm finding fascinating. And I'm also slowly working through Philip Pullman's retelling of the Grimm fairytales, - nice to dip in and out of, and with interesting notes at the end of each story. Even if the stories themselves are occasionally odder than I'd remembered!
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I've just started reading The Cost of Sugar ('Hoe duur was de suiker') by Cynthia Mac Leod about the Dutch slavery system in Surinam. Very gripping.


quote:
Keren-Happuch: I'm currently reading Roads to Berlin by Cees Nooteboom, translated by Laura Watkinson, which I'm finding fascinating.
I don't think I've read this one, thanks for pointing me to it.
 
Posted by Clotilde (# 17600) on :
 
I wish I hadn't so many book tokens! I use Amazon mainly and I just don't go to bookshops, and if I do I can't remeber what I want. I suppose browsing in a bookshop and buuying just what tickles the fancy is the best way with book tokens.

I picked up a couple of Max Hardcastle's 'Tales from the Dales' books on our church book stall and thought I will give one at least a go. I love the Yorkshire Dales!
 
Posted by Clotilde (# 17600) on :
 
Thinking of Yorkshire Dales I wonder if along the lines of this thread's name 'discount ticket to everywhere' - you read a novel about a place before or after visiting.

Sometimes I do and I find it great fun. Its not always easy to track down books to help one do this but sometimes I have managed.

For example I read a great Eric Ambler years ago just after visiting Nice and the French Riviera and it help evoke the places I'd visited while also giving fresh insight too.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Well, I've never been to Chartres and am not likely to do so in the near future. But I am enjoying getting into a novel by Salley Vickers which is set there, called 'The Cleaner of Chartres'. Perhaps I'll want to visit once I've read the book?
 
Posted by Clotilde (# 17600) on :
 
Years ago I enjoyed a holiday in Reykyavik, the capital city of Iceland. We saw many of the sights of the city and went into the interior too.

Later I read some of the novels of Arnaldur Indridason - and saw a very different Reykyavik to the one I had visited.

The tourist sees something different from the resident, I guess. Different perspectives, neither right, neither wrong!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chorister:
Well, I've never been to Chartres and am not likely to do so in the near future. But I am enjoying getting into a novel by Salley Vickers which is set there, called 'The Cleaner of Chartres'. Perhaps I'll want to visit once I've read the book?

It's lovely, (the book: for some reason I've been depressed the two times I've been to Chartres.)
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Has anybody else ever read a book wishing a different author had got ahold of the plot?

I've been reading The Flanders Panel by Arturo Perez-Reverte. The plot revolves around the restoration of a 15th century Flemish painting of a chess game and a mystery involving the players portrayed - but then one of the researchers ends up dead. *gasp* Is it connected? Will our heroine survive to solve the puzzle? Will anybody give a damn by the time we find out? It's written in a consciously literary way, leaving no detail unwritten but telling you nothing. The characters, to a man, are brattish and a bit stupid. The painting barely gets a mention after the first half, the rest of the story unravels in all directions by the end leaving truck-size plot holes. I was so disappointed and frustrated I nearly called the book to Hell and kept wishing somebody else could have rewritten the book. [Mad]
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I'm within 30 pages of finishing Ray Bradbury's Death is a Lonely Business, the first Bradbury I've ever read.

A strange, unsettling book, dripping with atmosphere. It's a stylish noir mystery, but with a generous dash of surrealism thrown in. Vivid characters, densely-painted locations and a level of creepiness that's made me averse to reading it at night.

Off to find some more by Mr Bradbury soon...
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished "I Capture the Castle" by Dodie Smith.

I enjoyed this at first, but found it a bit tedious as it progressed. Interesting, well written and full of character but quite insular. None the less, it does keep you wondering which of the three men in her life the heroine is going to end up with and whether her father will write anything again.

One of those books that you read once but probably not a second time, IMO.
 
Posted by Barefoot Friar (# 13100) on :
 
Has anyone read "Love in the Time of Cholera"? What did you think?
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
I've just finished Longbourn, Jo Baker's retelling of Pride & Prejudice from the point of view of the servants. Mrs Bennet and Mr Collins come off better than you might expect, and Wickham is slightly more villainous! It's very good, readable and with attention to detail - often speech in this type of book jars as not quite right, but this didn't feel too far off. The household side of things also feels authentic, I remember reading some things about women in the home when I was at university and this all tied together with that, so I got the overall impression of a well-researched, well planned book. I started it on my commute home on Tuesday and finished it at lunchtime today, having wanted to read it in every spare minute and only not finishing it earlier because I had the tail end of a migraine to deal with!
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
Oh, I want to read that, Scot's Lass! I've just finished PD James' Death Comes to Pemberley - wasn't going to bother with it having seen iffy reviews when it first came out, but enjoyed the TV version in a low expectations, Christmassy kind of way and then found a copy for 20p in a charity shop...

Anyway, I did enjoy the book but was quite startled by how much was altered for the telly. Some of their changes seemed to make more sense of it and others less. I mostly liked the dialogue and found some of it quite convincingly Austenesque while other parts slipped more into standard crime novel. And a niggle which others on here might understand - I was so pleased for most of the book that the clergy were addressed as Mr Surname and then right at the end she slipped and Reverend Surname started creeping in. Grr!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just started Hobson's Choice, by Harold Brighouse, and I'm already delighted by the first scene, where Maggie sells boots to her sister's suitor. It's one of the great Manchester/Salford novels, and I thought it was about time I actually read it, having found The Manchester Man a year or so ago (and I enjoyed that, too - but how the hero suffers!). I've seen the film, of course, with Charles Laughton and John Mills.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
This week I've been reading two new books that have been quite absorbing. The first is "Twelve Years A Slave", which probably doesn't need explanation as the film's now in the cinema. It's a very articulate, well-written book that puts the author's point of view across extremely well; he doesn't play it for emotion, which makes the story more moving as it unfolds. The gaps, and silences, are also quite revealing. "I worked there for several years..." and you can only imagine what that long, dreary period in his life must have been like. The happy ending leaves you wondering about the others who weren't so fortunate.

The other book is "A City of Women" by David Gillham. Set in wartime Berlin, this tells the story of Sigrid, a young married woman whose soldier husband is mostly away at the Russian Front. Unfulfilled, she gets involved with a lover, and bit by bit, is drawn into the world of helping Jews to evade capture by the Gestapo.

Written in the present tense, so the story unfolds almost as a living thing moment by moment, there are plenty of twists in the tale. Despite the period references, this book sucks you in to a modern-feeling, claustrophic, tense setup as Sigrid slips increasingly more deeply into a frightening world where anyone can betray anyone at any turn. A very atmospheric read and for once a novel where you can't predict the outcome.

[ 07. February 2014, 17:21: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I've just whizzed through Love Virtually by Daniel Glattauer, translated from German by Jamie Bulloch and Katharina Bielenberg. It's a love story told entirely in emails between two people who've never met but start emailing by accident. I found it gripping but rather unsettling and wasn't sure I liked either of the main characters all that much. Still, it's the sort of thing I want to see more of in translation, being non arty and pretentious, just a good story!
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
Reading Sarah Water's The Night Watch again. Love how she captures the greyness of wartime/postwar (both periods are covered) London.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scots lass:
I've just finished Longbourn, Jo Baker's retelling of Pride & Prejudice from the point of view of the servants. Mrs Bennet and Mr Collins come off better than you might expect, and Wickham is slightly more villainous! It's very good, readable and with attention to detail - often speech in this type of book jars as not quite right, but this didn't feel too far off. The household side of things also feels authentic, I remember reading some things about women in the home when I was at university and this all tied together with that, so I got the overall impression of a well-researched, well planned book. I started it on my commute home on Tuesday and finished it at lunchtime today, having wanted to read it in every spare minute and only not finishing it earlier because I had the tail end of a migraine to deal with!

I loved this one. One thing I really liked was how the story of Sarah and James sort of echoed the much better known Elizabeth/Darcy story -- making the point that it wasn't only middle-class and rich people who could be the subject of an engaging romance.
 
Posted by Doc Tor (# 9748) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
I'm within 30 pages of finishing Ray Bradbury's Death is a Lonely Business, the first Bradbury I've ever read.

A strange, unsettling book, dripping with atmosphere. It's a stylish noir mystery, but with a generous dash of surrealism thrown in. Vivid characters, densely-painted locations and a level of creepiness that's made me averse to reading it at night.

Off to find some more by Mr Bradbury soon...

Something Wicked This Way Comes is probably my favouritist book ever. Just sayin'
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
A Perfectly Good Man by Patrick Gale - very topical as it starts with assisted suicide and then looks at its effects on various characters in a Cornish village, including the vicar who is accused of being an accomplice.
 
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on :
 
Out on a Limb: What Black Bears Have Taught Me about Intelligence and Intuition by Benjamin Kilham. Wow! Bears were one of my childhood nightmares. Every time my sister rolled over and rustled the covers, I was sure it was a BEAR! Okay, that was long ago and I (mostly) got over it, and could honor bears as Wild Creatures Part of Nature. But still scary.

I loved this book. First, it's grounded in 20+ years worth of hands-on no-foolin' observation of bears in the wild. Second, the author figured out how to successfully raise bear cubs to return to the wild (you might have seen a National Geographic tv special about it). Third, I learned a ton about bears (for instance, here's a fun fact: did you know fresh deer poop to bears, is like pro-biotics to us -- good for digestion?). Fourth, the author's ideas of how bear society might resemble early human society sparked my imagination.

Overall, I feel much better about bears for reading this book.
 
Posted by Keren-Happuch (# 9818) on :
 
I recently finished Snow White Must Die by Nele Neuhaus, tr. Steven T Murray. It's about a young man Tobias returning to his home village after being jailed for the murders of his girlfriend and another girl, and the impact his arrival has on a tight-knit village community. Very good, in parts, irritating in others. The weird thing is that it's the 4th in a series but the first one to be available in English.

Now I'm reading Bar Flaubert by Alexis Stamatis, tr. David Connolly. Haven't really got going yet, but it's intriguing.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
I am still Delderfielding - I know it is not classic literature but he is a good storyteller.

I'll say. About ten years ago I happened upon, Charlie, Come Home and read it almost in one sitting, then hogged all the rest in a matter of weeks. His characters are absolutely real.

Right now I'm in the middle, in every sense of the word, of The Snow Child by Eowyn Ivey.

A middle-aged, childless couple give up their comfy life in Pennsylvania to try homesteading in Alaska in 1920. The hardships, long nights, severe weather and loneliness of the life has left them both depressed -- almost to suicide in the woman's case.

Then they make a "snow girl," out of the first soft snow of the winter and things take on a different tone. The book is beautiful and weird and I'm not sure if I love it or am trapped in it.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
The book is beautiful and weird and I'm not sure if I love it or am trapped in it.

I know what you mean - I read this some months ago and it keeps you interested and curious to know what happens next, but at the same time, it's an uneasy and not very comfortable sort of read.

I have a secondhand copy someone gave me, but am wavering between not wanting to pass it on but also not wanting to re-read it.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
Hm, interesting. The Snow Child is in my to-read pile, now I may read it sooner, intrigued by these reviews. It was recommended to me by a woman browsing alongside me in a charity shop! And of course I knew about it...
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
A Perfectly Good Man by Patrick Gale - very topical as it starts with assisted suicide and then looks at its effects on various characters in a Cornish village, including the vicar who is accused of being an accomplice.

I thought I mentioned reading it last autumn, when I was having major difficulties and it was one thing that made me feel life was worth living.

I've just finished Notes from an Exhibition also by Gale, with some of the same characters. Also readable and humane but not in the same league as

I'm not sure it's exactly an assisted suicide though. Just one where the other person present, not aware of the impending suicide, doesn't call medical help but prays. The real meat of the book is the vicar and his family.

As this is in chapter one, this is not a spoiler. A Perfectly Good Man.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
I recently read Patrick Gale's A Perfectly Good Man.

I was in a seriously bad state at the time and found it riveting and deeply consoling - more than consoling, inspiring that life and God were worthwhile.

Gale is clearly sympathetic to religion but is better known as a gay writer (not that that ought to define him). The witness to the hope and healing that can be in religious faith and practice were all the more powerful to me coming from outside the church.

I thought I mentioned it before.

On a totally different level, I've been chuckling at Angela Thirkell's Wild Strawberries. Barbara Pym meets P G Wodehouse.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished Hunter's Moon, a Green Arrow graphic novel (well, collection of the original comics) which is the sequel to The Longbow Hunters.
To my delight, I found that these are the stories I was reading as they came out in the mid 80s. Some bits I had completely forgotten (or never saw - I don't think I got every issue of the comic), and other bits are vividly remembered, like Green Arrow beating up some muggers in a park and telling them they've restored his faith in human nature! Mike Grell, the author, will be at a convention in London next month, and I'm quite excited about the chance to go and see him!
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
I'm within 30 pages of finishing Ray Bradbury's Death is a Lonely Business, the first Bradbury I've ever read.

A strange, unsettling book, dripping with atmosphere. It's a stylish noir mystery, but with a generous dash of surrealism thrown in. Vivid characters, densely-painted locations and a level of creepiness that's made me averse to reading it at night.

Off to find some more by Mr Bradbury soon...

Something Wicked This Way Comes is probably my favouritist book ever. Just sayin'
I was just about to buy a Kindle copy of Something Wicked... this morning when I noticed Bradbury's short stories had been hugely discounted, so I bought those instead.

I read a couple this afternoon - The Night and Homecoming. My goodness, what that man could do with the English language!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
After my comments on Patrick Gales’s A Perfectly Good Man I received a private message from a Shipmate who had put me on their Ignore List so I could not reply.

Trying to remain heavenly, I would say here so s/he can read it:

ONE A Perfectly Good Man is not about nor does it condone assisted suicide. As a trained volunteer at Cecily Sanders’ St Christopher’s Hospice, I do not support euthanasia.

TWO If my correspondent had been aware of my domestic arrangements (sharing my life and bed for the last thirty years with another man) I am sure my correspondent would have been more tactful in her/his comments on homosexuals (sic).

THREE If I’m looking for amusing pot boiling trash, I can imagine Ben Aaronovitch (who my correspondent suggested as preferable to Patrick Gale) would be a good idea. As it was I was undergoing an exceptionally nasty course of chemotherapy last autumn, during which reading A Perfectly Good Man gave me faith in the working of God’s grace, for which I am deeply thankful
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
ArachnidinElmet:
quote:
I've been reading The Flanders Panel by Arturo Perez-Reverte. The plot revolves around the restoration of a 15th century Flemish painting of a chess game and a mystery involving the players portrayed - but then one of the researchers ends up dead. *gasp* Is it connected? Will our heroine survive to solve the puzzle? Will anybody give a damn by the time we find out? It's written in a consciously literary way, leaving no detail unwritten but telling you nothing. The characters, to a man, are brattish and a bit stupid. The painting barely gets a mention after the first half, the rest of the story unravels in all directions by the end leaving truck-size plot holes.
Oh, I'm glad it wasn't just me! I read it last year and was completely underwhelmed.

Mind you, I don't care for the consciously literary style at the best of times...

Rereading Lord of the Rings at the moment - ran out of new books to read and no time to go to the library.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
...Rereading Lord of the Rings at the moment - ran out of new books to read and no time to go to the library.

NOOOO [Eek!] I have nightmares like that.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
After my comments on Patrick Gales’s A Perfectly Good Man I received a private message from a Shipmate who had put me on their Ignore List so I could not reply.

Trying to remain heavenly, I would say here so s/he can read it:

ONE A Perfectly Good Man is not about nor does it condone assisted suicide. As a trained volunteer at Cecily Sanders’ St Christopher’s Hospice, I do not support euthanasia.

TWO If my correspondent had been aware of my domestic arrangements (sharing my life and bed for the last thirty years with another man) I am sure my correspondent would have been more tactful in her/his comments on homosexuals (sic).

THREE If I’m looking for amusing pot boiling trash, I can imagine Ben Aaronovitch (who my correspondent suggested as preferable to Patrick Gale) would be a good idea. As it was I was undergoing an exceptionally nasty course of chemotherapy last autumn, during which reading A Perfectly Good Man gave me faith in the working of God’s grace, for which I am deeply thankful

Ship's policy on personal attacks extends to PMs as well as to what is posted in public.

venbede, if you consider the PM system is being abused, you are free to bring it to the attention of the Admins.

But I would ask that we don't discuss it here.

Firenze
Heaven Host

 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
ArachnidinElmet:
quote:
NOOOO I have nightmares like that.
Nightmares about reading Lord of the Rings?! Surely you jest.

On the other hand, rereading it has reminded me why I found Aragorn so annoying. All this talk of women being treasure makes me want to slap him. At least Faramir talks to Eowyn like she's a real person.
 
Posted by Kitten (# 1179) on :
 
I assumed that the nightmare related to running out of new books
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Yes, sorry, I meant running out of new books. Thinking about having nothing to read makes me break out in a cold sweat. Luckily, a look around my living room (and bedroom, and spare room etc) shows that's unlikely to happen any time soon.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Well, I thought that was what you meant... [Biased]

I never said I'd run out of things to read. That's not going to happen here either - when I finish the new books I just reread some of my favourites from the rest of the collection (est. between 5 and 6 thousand).

I did enjoy reading Simon Morden's 'Arcanum' a couple of weeks ago, though. Great idea, brilliant world-building, good characters. Highly recommended to anyone who likes fantasy, and I'm not just saying this because he's a shipmate.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Hmm, that's interesting. That sounds like my Mother's habit of buying books little and often. She reads them more or less straight away and when she's done, rereads, buys a new one or steals mine.

I buy books less often in higher quantity, to be read at some point in the future, and consequently about 50% of my books are unread. The only exceptions are books in series bought as they come out. The book I'm reading at the moment (about a field archaeologist who can see ghostly images of the past on her digs) was bought about 15 years ago and has been sat on a shelf waiting to be read.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I read *very fast* so a TBR pile doesn't last very long around here... Your book about the archaeologist who sees images of the past sounds interesting. Details, please!
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Books are the only thing I receive at Christmas and birthday. Having received Wright's Paul and the Faithfulness of God at the start of November, I'm currently at about page 700, also known as "just short of half way".

My pile of unread books is currently stacked up on my floor and comes to half way up my thigh. Probably the most foreboding volume there is Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
The book about the archaeologist mentioned above is 'The Falling Woman' by Pat Murphy. I'm finding the characters a little unsympathetic at the minute, but the writing itself is enjoyable, and it's turned out to be a very quick read.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Scots lass:
I've just finished Longbourn, Jo Baker's retelling of Pride & Prejudice from the point of view of the servants.

Thanks for posting about this. I'm just getting to the end and have enjoyed it enormously. There are one or two things I'm not sure I agree with, but they're interesting rather than irritating, and thinking about them has actually enhanced my enjoyment of the book.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have just finished The Shock of the Fall and thought it was phenomenal, one of those rare books that is raved over but actually truly deserves the hype. It is a portrait of a young man with schizophrenia, written in the first person. The author, Nathan Filer, is a registered psychiatric nurse – presumably one of the ones who get referred to in the book as “Nurse Whatsit and Nurse Thing and Nurse the Third”.

It’s not a nice book, exactly, but fantastically well written and very compelling. You know that something terrible happened in the narrator’s childhood but only find out very late in the game what it was. His schizophrenic hallucinations are linked to this incident.

The narrator admits that one of the worst things about his illness is how selfish it makes him, but I found the character strangely likeable. He doesn’t turn up to appointments, goes off his meds for a while – but in a funny way you can see how it all makes sense to him. And now and then, despite claiming to be totally selfish, he does something genuinely kind.

I also found the book a real eye-opener about mental health services in the UK. The narrator ends up inside a police cell for his own safety (his first major schizophrenic episode – the emergency services have nowhere else they can take him) and his description of an acute psychiatric hospital is grim (“There is literally nothing to do.”). The book ends when his community mental health centre gets closed down.
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I read The Shock of the Fall recently too and thought it was a fantastic book. It's also written by someone who has some understanding of how crap UK mental health support can be and how much worse it is getting. I was speaking to my psychiatric nurse (a job I believe the author does or did do) today and she says her case load is now three times what it was a year ago and everyone is struggling to cope and it's become crisis management instead of support to prevent crises. Typical short term thinking.
 
Posted by Silver Swan (# 17957) on :
 
I recently read Mark Vonnegut's new memoir, Just Like Someone Without Mental Illness, Only More So and would like to read his earlier one, Eden Express. He is a very honest writer as well as being insightful and witty.
Here's an excerpt - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130537541
 
Posted by The Machine Elf (# 1622) on :
 
I've just finished 'The Social Amoebae: The biology of cellular slime molds' by John Tyler Bonner. It's probably the best written science book I've ever read - completely clear explanations to someone who hasn't studied biology since high school, but every fact backed with a citation to original research papers if you want to look further.

It describes cellular slime molds (the ones which live as individual amoebae, then when they run out of food gang together to form 'slugs' which crawl to the surface to form fruiting bodies to distribute spores, rather than the plasmodial ones which map subway systems) and various attempts to find the chemicals which govern the various social formations and might give clues how cells in higher animals differentiate and develop.


TME
 
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on :
 
I've just finished a book about the great ideological clash of the 20th century--no, not the Cold War, John McMillian's Beatles vs. Stones. It's cultural history, not music criticism, so he doesn't take a side, and it's not as if there are a lot of new facts to be revealed, but he does have some interesting insights. Not that he's going to change anybody's mind.

[ 10. March 2014, 01:54: Message edited by: Timothy the Obscure ]
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I'm currently reading My Antonia by Willa Cather, and really enjoying it.

I have had some difficulties with my new Sony ereader and only chose to download this book at the library as part of learning to use the system, but it's a wee gem. I can see that I'm going to get more practice downloading her other books [Smile]

Huia
 
Posted by Jade Constable (# 17175) on :
 
Nadia Bolz-Weber - worth reading? Anything similar by anyone a bit less intimidatingly cool?
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
The Price of Salt by Patricia Highsmith. I had read her "talented Mr. Ripley," series but not this one, probably because it was published under "Claire Morgan." I imagine, in 1952, she didn't dare write about lesbians under her own name.

It opens with our young protagonist, Therese working at a mind numbing job in a department store and dating a nice young man whose proposals she keeps refusing. Then a striking woman walks up to Therese's counter to buy a doll for her daughter and the world slips sideways. From Carol, Therese is intensely aware of the "salt" that was missing in her other relationships.

As Therese pursues Carol we worry for both of them; not just that one might hurt the other, but that the people around them might make them pay a terrible price for stepping out of the conventional line.

There were some very suspenseful parts but ultimately this is not one of Highsmith's mysteries, rather an intriguing, often lyrical love story.

What prompted me to read this was the news that Cate Blanchett and Mara Rooney are making a film of this called Carol. I can't wait.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
Some while ago somebody on these boards mentioned Phil Rickman's Merrily Watkins series, which I have very happily been reading through. Then I came across his new series about Doctor Dee, and I'm reading the first one, The Bones of Avalon - not only John Dee but Glastonbury, alchemy, witchcraft, murder, King Arthur.... cor! it's wonderful. I'm eagerly awaiting the next book, The Heresy of Dr Dee, to turn up through my letterbox, so thankyewverymuch whoever mentioned Phil Rickman here [Yipee]

[ 21. April 2014, 13:07: Message edited by: Pine Marten ]
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I just finished "A Time to Keep Silence", by Patrick Leigh Fermor. This is a lovely short (less than 100 pages) account of his travels to various monasteries (two in France, Benedictine and Trappist, and the abandoned rock monasteries in Cappadocia in Turkey) and his reflections on monastic life from the perspective of an outside observer. It was a really lovely book to read over Easter, and I now really really want to go and see the Cappadocian monasteries.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
I made the big mistake of using some of my rare spare time downloading free Nook books. Now, there are a lot of wonderful classics that are free. The ones I looked at recently are no more classic than my cat.

I don't even want to tell you their titles because they are so awful.

Just for y'all, I'll continue digging through them in case there is a gem hiding in the sewage. I'll let you know.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
Just for y'all, I'll continue digging through them in case there is a gem hiding in the sewage. I'll let you know.

We appreciate your noble sacrifice.

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Free ebooks is the great demonstration of the proverb, "You get what you pay for."
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Many years ago, I recall a talk by a editor who was not worried about the web ruining his business. One line stands out in memory;

"part of what you pay us for is not for what we publish, but for what we don't publish. You pay us to filter out the slush pile."
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
I've just finished 'The Orphan Choir' by Sophie Hannah.

Wow! Although the writing style is a little annoying in places, the main storyline is quite breathtaking, combining choir interest with examination of psychological breakdown and a little injection of a ghost story for good measure. I'd recommend it to anyone with an interest in Cathedral Choirs and the experience of sending a child to boarding school, in particular - although general interest as a parent and / or understanding of the Anglican church would also be relevant to an enjoyment of the story.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I've just finished Initials Only by Anna Katharine Green, having been intrigued by a reference to it in another Whodunnit. I had not heard of the lady before but she is known as "the mother of the detective novel", was admired by Wilkie Collins and inspired Agatha Christie.

The prose style was rather startling at times (and I did not get used to the police looking for "clews") but it was certainly readable - and it made me think more about physics than I have for a while!

I have now bought a collection of 35 of her novels for 37p (aren't Kindles wonderful?).
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
Now reading 'Perfect' by Rachel Joyce. Set in the 1970s, an eleven year old boy worries irrationally about the extra 2 seconds that are to be added to the year in order to balance slight discrepancies in time measurement, and what effect that will have on his family.

Wonderful detail on how a sensitive and thoughtful boy of that age views the world, sees life and interacts with family and friends.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I'm reading The Sultan of Zanibar by Martyn Downer, a life of Horace de Vere Cole, a noted Edwardian hoaxer.

Frankly I don't recommend it. It is possible that some authors could make a bit of a hoot out of this selfish and irresponsible man's high jinks (ie telegraphing the Mayor of Cambridge and visiting him as the Sultan of Zanizibar dressed up by a London theatrical costumier) but this author tries to find deep significance in this tedious stuff with a fairly superficial grasp of the background.

It is though a reminder of the deep division between late C19 and early C20 Britain for some. But I am not impressed.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Following a visit to Edinburgh I've got one of Iain Rankin's Rebus detective novels and Iain Bank's Complicity. Not my sort of thing, but I'll be interested.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
Following a visit to Edinburgh I've got one of Iain Rankin's Rebus detective novels and Iain Bank's Complicity. Not my sort of thing, but I'll be interested.

Ooh, Complicity. I really enjoyed that. Like a lot of Banks books, definitely doesn't end up in the place you think it will at the beginning.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
I made the big mistake of using some of my rare spare time downloading free Nook books....

I don't even want to tell you their titles because they are so awful.

Just for y'all, I'll continue digging through them in case there is a gem hiding in the sewage. I'll let you know.

Try Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's original Sherlock Holmes books: they're in the public domain!
 
Posted by JFH (# 14794) on :
 
Would this help? Of course, there may be formatting issues. If not, that "next" button should go quite a far way, and if not, that search window works quite well with words like "Jack London", "Fyodor Dostoevsky", "Chesterton" or whatever pre-1930 you'd fancy.

(I suspect most of you already know of Project Gutenberg, but in case you don't and want something e-booky, that's a good place to go. It's legit, most of all.)
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Have finally got to the three-quarter mark in my marathon through N.T. Wright's Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Should hopefully complete it by the end of June.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Kevin:
Try Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's original Sherlock Holmes books: they're in the public domain!

Ah, but I have a leather bound actual book of all the Sherlock Holmes stories! My children and I have read it many times.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I finished my re-read of Vanity Fair and enjoyed it even more than I did the first time.

Contiuing my re-reading of Victorian novels I've downloaded Anthony Trollope's Palliser series, which in my mind has never quite measured up to his Barset series (but I may change my mind of that).

Today I googled Victorian novels and discovered mention of some authors I had never read; George Gissing, ( Grubb St and An Odd Woman , Mrs Oliphant ( Hester) and Susan Ferrier.

Has anyone read any of these? What did you think of them?

Huia
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
THE book to read by Margaret Oliphant is Miss Marjoribanks. I've read it three times - at about intervals of a decade - and found new aspects in it each time.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
Have you tried Elizabeth Gaskell's Wives and Daughters? That's one of my favorite Victorian novels.

As far as Trollope is concerned, I prefer the Palliser series to the Barchester novels, even though the politics in the Palliser books don't interest me that much. The characters are very well-drawn.

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
At the instigation of another writer friend this year I read TENANT OF WILDFELL HALL, by Anne Bronte. Yes, sister of Charlotte, one of THOSE Brontes. A grand book and proto-feminist in its way; when the heroine refuses to cohabit with her dissolute and drunken husband, or let him abuse their little boy, it was a scandal in its time.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
The Tenant of Wildfell Hall is really good - I was surprised by it!

I've just finished The Luminaries. I struggled to get into it a bit, but then was really gripped by it and the action seemed to speed up towards the end - I definitely read the second half faster! It's pretty hefty, so one to read when you have a reasonable amount of time. The characters are quite well-drawn and are the types of people you might expect to find in a gold-rush town, with the exception of the fact that of the three people who are actually prospecting, one is dead and another is missing for a large proportion of the novel. But it's not really about the gold rush, so that's not a problem! She doesn't describe the town in great detail, but there's enough throughout the novel to give me a good mental image of Hokitika. And to make me think that perhaps I ought to read more about the gold rush!

It won the Booker, which doesn't always equal readable, but this is definitely worth it.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Mrs Oliphant ( Hester) and Susan Ferrier.

Has anyone read any of these? What did you think of them?

Huia [/QB]

Margaret Oliphant. Her Miss Majorbanks is in Penguin and I enjoyed it. She was very prolific.

Susan Ferrier was Regency rather than Victorian and only produced three novels. I've read one (not Marriage, but I can't remember the title). She is sometimes compared to Jane Austen, but she is far more diffuse (most novelist are).

Charlotte M Yonge was no fool, despite her reputation for in-yer-face piety. The Heir of Redclyffe might interest you.

Have you read any other Thackery? Pendennis is a good read, I seem to remember, as is The Newcomes. I've read Esmond twice and really don't appreciate it.
 
Posted by Ian Climacus (# 944) on :
 
Wow. Thank you all for a great list of books.

May I ask how you keep up-to-date with new releases or find out about "classics" or older books you may enjoy? I tend to either stumble across an author (at the library; through a friend; browsing my eReader's bookshop...) then devour everything by them if I enjoy it.

I did notice BBC Radio 4 has a book programme and there are columnist in newspapers, but I worry they may be a bit high-brow and intellectual for me.

Thanks.
Ian, enjoying entering the monastic world in Patrick Leigh Fermor's A Time to Keep Silence currently.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
The BBC Radio 4 bookclub and book programmes various* are fairly wide ranging - this month's bookclub was The Slap.

Book at Bedtime, Book of the Week, A Good Read and the rest
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Thanks for the comments. I have not read Anne Bronte at allso well keep her in mind.

Moo, I loved reading Wives and Daughters and have Elizabeth Gaskell down as an author to follow up. The BBC also produced a televised version of this which I enjoyed.

Iain your local library may have lists of books that could be of interest on their website as well as readers and staff reviews of books. Ours is a treasure trove which I haven't yet fully explored.

Regarding The Luminaries a nit picking friend said it can't really be set in Hokitika as it doesn't have any sandflies in it [Biased] (the West Coast of the South Island is notorious for them). He did say he thought it was well written though.

Huia
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
I've heard very good things about George Gissing. Apparently Grub St in particular has good women characters.

I promise I'm not being biased just because he came from the Rhubarb Triangle (there's a mini Gissing Museum in town).
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Elsewhere, a friend and I have proposed a Bronte sitcom. It should be titled something like THOSE CRAZY BRONTES, and star somebody like Michael Palin as Patrick Bronte. The absentminded vicar of a remote Yorkshire parish tries to raise a brood of four madcap teens perpetually getting into fun trouble. In episode 1, Emily and Bramwell paint the inside of the church door with modern art (= Alma-Tadema, probably), throwing Sunday's sermon completely out of whack.
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
New Grub Street by Gissing is a pretty grim story of someone failing to make a living by writing. Like plays about the theater, writers writing about writing has a certain energy.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chorister:
Now reading 'Perfect' by Rachel Joyce. Set in the 1970s, an eleven year old boy worries irrationally about the extra 2 seconds that are to be added to the year in order to balance slight discrepancies in time measurement, and what effect that will have on his family.

Wonderful detail on how a sensitive and thoughtful boy of that age views the world, sees life and interacts with family and friends.

What did you think of it in the end? I read it a couple of weeks ago too and found it quite moving. I semi-suspected the identity twist at the end.
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Elsewhere, a friend and I have proposed a Bronte sitcom. It should be titled something like THOSE CRAZY BRONTES, and star somebody like Michael Palin as Patrick Bronte. The absentminded vicar of a remote Yorkshire parish tries to raise a brood of four madcap teens perpetually getting into fun trouble. In episode 1, Emily and Bramwell paint the inside of the church door with modern art (= Alma-Tadema, probably), throwing Sunday's sermon completely out of whack.

[Killing me] I'd definitely watch that!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Finally finishing the Niccolo Chronicles by Dorothy Dunnett. The last volume is Gemini, and is set mostly in late medieval Edinburgh. I may possibly go on from this to re-read the Lymond Chronicles, so I can work out how, exactly, they are related - and to enjoy the Errol Flynn-like adventures of Lymond himself, of course.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Mrs Oliphant ( Hester) and Susan Ferrier.

Huia

I saw Hester in a bookshop today and snapped it up. I looks interesting.

Apparently, Virago published a number of Mrs Oliphant's novels in the 70s when I bought one (The Rector?) Only Hester and Miss Majorbanks are currently in print. Her ghost story A Beleagued City was much admired by Robert Louis Stevenson.

The novel I've read by Susan Ferrier was The Inheritance. Wiki says her greatest influence was Maria Edgworth.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
Hester was Book of the Week on Radio 4 not long since. This thread's reminded me that I recorded it at the time and haven't listened to it yet. Hmm.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I am currently ploughing my way through Moby Dick. Ye gods and little fishes*, Herman Melville manages to make Charles Dickens look concise. How many ways are there to say “Captain Ahab had an implacable vendetta against the whale and lay awake all night brooding over it?”

I tried reading it years ago and never finished it (which is extremely rare for me). I’m now beginning to remember why, although I’m determined to get through it this time.

*or great big fishes, I suppose, considering the subject matter
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
True, but that's sort of the point. It's not about the plot, it's about giving him a jumping-off point for meditations on everything even vaguely related to whales, the sea, the color white... Sort of like a very long literary fugue.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
"Eight Days of Luke" by Diana Wynne Jones and "Broken Homes" by Ben Aaronovitch just arrived this morning. A hard decision which to read first, but I've gone for the DWJ - good as usual.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
MOBY DICK is a book I could only ever read once. Like WAR & PEACE. (You have the battle of Borodino and you're not going to take us there? They're just going to =talk= about it?!?) Whereas I could read PRIDE & PREJUDICE once a year.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
I'm fifty pages into (Mrs)Margaret Oliphant's Hester and it seems gripping. More balls than Trollope, but then she's a woman.

I have read War and Peace twice, once within the last five months and I could consider it again.

I only read Moby Dick once a very long time ago and I mean to re-read it. But somehow, there's always something more interesting.

If I wasn't distracted by other books, I could well read the entire ouevre of Jane Austen every year.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I just finished re-reading Lady Susan and the two unfinished novels, The Watsons and Sanditon.

I enjoyed all three. The Watsons is vintage Jane Austen. Lady Susan, which is a very early work, gives a picture of a completely unscrupulous woman. I am very curious about how Sandition would have turned out. It is about the early stages of the transformation of a seaside village into a resort. Because Jane Austen never wrote anything like this, it's not clear how the novel would have ended.

Moo
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Moo Reginald Hill, a British mystery writer based one of his books on Sandition which I had not read bfore. I did mean to go back and read it, but haven't yet done so.

The Odd Women is now waiting for me to collect at the library [Yipee] I think I'll wait until tomorrow when they have the drop-insession to help with technology as it's a biy of a challenge to get to.

Huia
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
The Jane Austen outside the Big Six that I love is the juvenilia Love and Freindship (sic). A glorious send up of the sentimental, melodramatic novel.

A sensibility too tremblingly alive to every misfortune of my freinds, my relations and above all myself, was my only fault, if fault it could be called. (I quote from memory.)
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I've just finished The White Princess by Philippa Gregory - one of the Cousins' War series about the Wars of the Roses. This one is told through the eyes of Elizabeth of York, who was forcibly married to Henry VII after he won the Battle of Bosworth to unite the houses of York and Lancaster. Quite unputdownable, and it made me want to read the ones I haven't read yet (The White Queen, about Elizabeth Woodville, Lady of the Rivers about her mother, Jacquetta of Luxembourg and The King's Curse, told through the eyes of Margaret of Warwick).

I'm even beginning to forgive her for writing them in the present tense, which I find annoying, particularly in books set 500 years in the past.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Somebody at my wonderful library clearly has an interest in classic thrillers, so I have just read Dashiell Hammett's Red Harvest. Oddly, the thing it reminded me of most strongly was the movie Dogville; I found it hard to believe that a place could be that cut off from centralised authority and still accessible by car!

I wanted to rewrite the first paragraph and reduce the number of simple sentences by using a relative clause but soon got used to his style, which did fit the action very well. As it is written in the first person, we know very little about the main character, not even his name, which felt odd, but it was a gripping read.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I recently finished a selection of poetry by Kevin MacNeil called "Love and Zen in the Outer Hebrides". I'm not a poetry natural, but did find this collection pretty accessible (it probably helps that I've been to the Outer Hebrides), although the more Buddhist themes were a bit beyond me sometimes.

I've got a couple of books on the go now: Mark Haddon's "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" (which I've had for years and years but never got round to reading), and Charles Maclean "Island on the Edge of the World" which is a history of St Kilda. I'm yet to be convinced of "Curious Incident..."'s status as life-changing. It's clever, yes, and gripping. But I haven't completely warmed to it yet. The Maclean book yet again is making me want to visit St Kilda, it's such a fascinating place, with such a tragic history.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:

I'm even beginning to forgive her for writing them in the present tense, which I find annoying, particularly in books set 500 years in the past.

Yes - some of her novels feel more like a vicarious fantasy than anything.

Currently reading "Broken Homes" by Ben Aaronovitch, the fourth in the series about Peter Grant, the young London policeman who deals with supernatural crimes. I loved the first three books but somehow this fourth one isn't grabbing me half as much and I feel I can take it or leave it.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
A sensibility too tremblingly alive to every misfortune of my freinds, my relations and above all myself, was my only fault, if fault it could be called. (I quote from memory.)

My favorite phrase from Love and Freindship describes someone opening someone else's desk and "gracefully purloining" some money. I love the idea of purloining gracefully.

Moo
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
Moby Dick can be hard slogging. The Arion Press edition reprint makes it easier because of all the lovely wood block Barry Moser illustrations.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:


Currently reading "Broken Homes" by Ben Aaronovitch, the fourth in the series about Peter Grant, the young London policeman who deals with supernatural crimes. I loved the first three books but somehow this fourth one isn't grabbing me half as much and I feel I can take it or leave it.

I felt the same. Very disappointing.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I rather enjoyed Broken Homes - partly the sarky comments about post-war architecture and partly seeing just how formidable Nightingale can be in a fight! And it's got quite the cliffhanger ending....
 
Posted by Evensong (# 14696) on :
 
Has anyone read the new David Bentley Hart book The Experience of God? Any thoughts? Is it readable or very heavy going?
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I'm rereading Iain Baines "The Hydrogen Sonata". I had just read his non SF book "The Quarry" about a Asperger teen taking care of his father who is dying of cancer and enjoyed it.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I just finished am unpublished book bu a Shipmate: it is a story of true love written by SHipmate Mr. Curly and his colleague Stephen. For more info on this, see the Writer's Block thread on this board. He may let you beta-test this as he did me.

For my part, I am struggling with my second unpublished novel which may involve vampires and zombies: I am not sure yet!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I rather enjoyed Broken Homes - partly the sarky comments about post-war architecture and partly seeing just how formidable Nightingale can be in a fight! And it's got quite the cliffhanger ending....

The Nightingale bit was good, I agree. He's my favourite character, anyway. I'm re-reading it to see if I like it any better.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
Moo, thank you for mentioning Never Cry Wolf I am about halfway through and I love it.

Jodie Picoult has also written a book where one of the main characters lives with wolves. I don't know how accurate the information is, but I found it more interesting than the actual story.

I also have The Dog Who Wouldn't Be on reserve at the library.

Alongside these I'm reading Phineas Finn on my kindle. It seems really weird to be reading a Victorian novel on a e reader, a kind of time clash.

Huia
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Alongside these I'm reading Phineas Finn on my kindle. It seems really weird to be reading a Victorian novel on a e reader, a kind of time clash.

Obviously I am unimaginative as that has never struck me; when I first got my Kindle, most the things I downloaded were from Gutenberg and tended to be from the 19th century.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
The majority of my reading has always been set in the 19th century. I haven't tried going there through Kindle.

I'm currently reading, Jack Finney's Time and Again, set and written in 1970, except that it's also set in 1882 because it's about time travel. I like that the way the character travels has a lot to do with simply reading books and newspapers set in that period. I've experienced more than once in my life, the slight shock of looking out the window and seeing current American things after being lost in Victorian England for days.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I was very pleased to pick up a hardback copy of Queen's Play by Dorothy Dunnett yesterday, while browsing the Honesty bookshop. I was thinking about re-reading the Lymond series after I finish Gemini (the last Niccolo book), and this will give me an extra push to do it.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I've been having an orgy of science-fiction recently. Reread Simon Morden's Samuil Petrovich trilogy (Equations of Life, Theories of Flight, Degrees of Freedom), then Hive Monkey by Gareth Powell. All excellent. The Petrovich books are about a post-apocalypse London; Hive Monkey is also alternative history, featuring an intelligent macaque (sequel to Ack-Ack Macaque, which I got for Christmas; steampunk meets James Bond). I can't say much more without giving the whole plot away, but suffice it to say that no book featuring a nuclear-powered airship can be entirely devoid of interest.

[ 19. May 2014, 13:00: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
When Pete was here last winter he introduced me to the Vish Puri books by Tarquin Hall - okay, it's not great literature but it is well written, humourous detective stories. Great fun and a bit of a taste of India in all its contradictions.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
TIME AND AGAIN is a great time travel novel. However, I advise you to avoid the sequel like the plague. Finney wrote it after a gap of many years, and it is in no way as good as the first.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Thanks, Brenda, I will heed your warning. Just recently I read a later-day novel by a writer I had loved earlier. It seriously tainted my feelings about the first book.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
I've been having an orgy of science-fiction recently. Reread Simon Morden's Samuil Petrovich trilogy (Equations of Life, Theories of Flight, Degrees of Freedom)

I am leading the Ship's book group in February with a new 700-page book by Simon M. The first three chapters were great! See the thread for details and join us next year.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
When Pete was here last winter he introduced me to the Vish Puri books by Tarquin Hall - okay, it's not great literature but it is well written, humourous detective stories. Great fun and a bit of a taste of India in all its contradictions.

Good to know that the taste of India is authentic. I must admit I read "well written, humourous detective stories" much more than great literature these days. (On reflection "these days" is superfluous.)
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Sir Kevin:
quote:
I am leading the Ship's book group in February with a new 700-page book by Simon M. The first three chapters were great! See the thread for details and join us next year.

I was planning to - I've already read it, and it's good all the way through.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
... set in the 19th century. I haven't tried going there through Kindle ...

I knew these Kindle thingies were clever, but I didn't realise they did time travel ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Had an interesting conversation yesterday regarding trilogies. I've read the 1st part of The Forsyte Saga and in my review, I made a comparison to The Lord of the Rings. I received the following comment:
quote:
The Lord of the Rings is not a trilogy; it's a single work in six parts. It was only published in three volumes rather than one, or even six, for technical (cheaper to make three books than a huge one) and marketing reasons.
So my query to shipmates is this: when is a trilogy not a trilogy? Or when does a work in several part cease to be a single work and become a compilation?
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
The Forsyte saga is more than 3 books too ~ isn't it 9? I read it a while ago now, but I thought it was three trilogies.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Terminology is difficult.

LOTR is not really a trilogy, but it is always called that since it did appear in 3 books. It was (as others have pointed out) a gigantic single novel snipped by publisher demand into three chunks. I am told that post-war paper shortages forced this.

A true trilogy therefore must be three novels about the same people/place/subject. They should each stand independently alone as single novels (none of this 'continued' stuff on the last page). A good example might be the Space trilogy of C. S. Lewis (OUT OF THE SILENT PLANET, PERELANDRA, and THAT HIDEOUS STRENGTH).

You can see that there is nothing in particular special about the number three, and duologies, quadrologies and so forth are easily found. After the number gets fairly large, people give up and simply call it a series. A great example might be the Vorkosigan series, by Lois Bujold -- I think she is up to 14. She wrote each one so that it would stand entirely by itself, but reading all of them is enormously enriching and in fact you cannot just read one anyway, since they are the equivalent of methamphetamine between covers.

Another variant is the roman fleuve, the extremely long novel. This tends to be chopped into hunks and published every 300 pages or so. The premiere example of this would be the Aubrey and Maturin series by Patrick O'Brian. I think it ran to 20 volumes. These must be read in order otherwise you will lose track.
 
Posted by Stercus Tauri (# 16668) on :
 
I staggered off the plane back from Scotland a few days ago hauling Tatlow's "Highland Railway Carriages and Wagons" - an essential read; to re-read on the plane, Ian Bradley's "Columba - Pilgrim and Penitent", a good book, demythologising the saint and still leaving a heroic holy man; and four copies of the new blockbuster by North East Quine's talented son Alex, "Attack of the Giant Robot Chickens". He is a writer to watch.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Yesterday morning I finished my re-read of Kenneth Grahame's The Wind in the Willows - the short biography of the author in my new copy gave me some better insights into the book - but really it is just a good and fun read.

Do other people agree that presentation helps a lot? This new copy, a cloth covered hardback with a nice font and all well spaced on cream paper was just a joy to read partly because it was a better presented book.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Totally. (This is one reason why I won't have an e-reader.) Paper, font and design play a large part in the enjoyment of a book, IMO.

I have Garth Nix's "Sabriel" books which are all set in some slightly wacky font or other, most likely intended to appeal to the youth market, but which actually detract from enjoyment of the text - for one thing it's a bit distracting. It reminds me a bit of a serif version of Comic Sans. But until they're reissued in some other more mainstream font, there's nothing to be done.

Meanwhile, I just finished reading Diana Wynne Jones' "Eight Days of Luke" which a shipmate recommended to me. Very enjoyable and interesting and like much of her work, bears a second read as you try to figure out who the characters are.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Diana Wynne Jones is a glorious writer, and all of her works are worth reading!

Book and font design is a sore point for me, because I have impaired vision. The annoying tendency for 'steampunk' novels to be printed on cream colored stock in dark brown ink means that they are essentially illegible to me. (And any deviation from a standard font is a killer too.) Ebooks are wonderful because I can pump the font size. At my very worst I was reading books that were formatted about four words per page. But at least I could read them!
 
Posted by Garasu (# 17152) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
LOTR is not really a trilogy, but it is always called that since it did appear in 3 books. It was (as others have pointed out) a gigantic single novel snipped by publisher demand into three chunks. I am told that post-war paper shortages forced this.

Brandon Sanderson's Stormlight archives has run into a similar injunction... and Jack Chalker was forever complaining that his books had to be chopped up into trilogies...
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There's a new Sanderson out -- I saw it yesterday at the Baltimore SF convention. It is nearly cubical in shape. The PB edition is thick enough to kill a man with. Printing and binding technology has clearly improved since Tolkien's day.
 
Posted by Tina (# 63) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by venbede:
The Jane Austen outside the Big Six that I love is the juvenilia Love and Freindship (sic). A glorious send up of the sentimental, melodramatic novel.

A sensibility too tremblingly alive to every misfortune of my freinds, my relations and above all myself, was my only fault, if fault it could be called. (I quote from memory.)

I re-read that a while back, after seeing a post from ken of blessed memory that 'Love and Freindship is hilarious when you realise she's taking the piss'. Run mad as often as you chuse, but do not faint ...

Count me as another one who's reading through all manner of old stuff on an e-reader via Project Gutenberg. Did a chronological re-read of Jane Austen's work, now reading Trollope's Palliser novels, along with various eighteenth-century novels I skim-read 15 years ago for my dissertation, but didn't really appreciate at the time. (Does make me realise just how good Jane Austen is though, the plot structures feel quite modern ...)

Also borrow e-books from my local library, and have been working my way through Mary Hoffman's 'Stravaganza' Young Adult time-travel series!
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Just finished The Martian by Andy Weir. Enjoyed it it even if there were a little too many sciencey info dumps for me personally.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Listening to everyone talk about their Kindles, etc. makes me fear that I won't be able to get my large print books in paper stacks much longer. I'm currently reading, "Life after Life," by Kate Atkinson and it's so huge, about four inches thick, that I can barely hold it with my arthritic thumbs. An affliction common to those same old people who need large print.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
What you need is a bookchair and a laptray. Put together with you most comfortable chair and they make a very easy way to read.

Jengie
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Cool. I'm imagining the laptray with legs that will fit over my dachshund, who must always be in my lap in the recliner I bought just for her, with a "chaise" foot area so she won't fall through. All I ask is perfect comfort for everyone.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I decided not to go back to the beginning of the Lymond books by Dorothy Dunnett, because A Presumption of Death by Jill Paton Walsh was on my "to-be-read" shelf as well. It's a new Lord Peter Wimsey/Harriet story, set at the beginning of the Second World War, with Peter away doing intelligence work and Harriet at Talboys dealing with the Home Front, the children, and the murder of a land-girl. The details of rationing and so on are very good, and she does a good imitation of Dorothy Sayers.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There is a new Walsh Lord Peter just out --I must go and look for it. I found the first 3 or 4 only mildly interesting, but with the last one, suddenly, three-quarters of the way in, the entire work leaped to life and it was thrilling. (If and when you get there you will know it.) I am hoping that in the new volume she will have retained that thrill.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Tina:

Count me as another one who's reading through all manner of old stuff on an e-reader via Project Gutenberg. Did a chronological re-read of Jane Austen's work, now reading Trollope's Palliser novels, along with various eighteenth-century novels series!

How are you enjoying the Palliser novels? I'm now up to The Prime Minister and am really enjoying them. Some years ago (OMG - maybe 25 or 30) they were adapted for TV with Susan Hampshire (I think) playing Lady Glencora.

Huia
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
There is a new Walsh Lord Peter just out --I must go and look for it. I found the first 3 or 4 only mildly interesting, but with the last one, suddenly, three-quarters of the way in, the entire work leaped to life and it was thrilling. (If and when you get there you will know it.) I am hoping that in the new volume she will have retained that thrill.

I've just read it (The Late Scholar). As with all the Jill Paton Walsh Wimsey books, it doesn't quite capture the flavour of the original, but is a good read in its own right. I liked that this one was set at Oxford.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
I agree she does a good Sayers pastiche. But I always notice how she is weaving in back references to the Canon - plus putting in self-conscious contemporary references. There isn't the freedom of someone working with their own imaginative material.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I've been reading The Collected Letters of Dorothy L. Sayers, and I think she would have hated having other authors use her characters.

I'm not sure she would have minded someone else finishing Thrones, Dominations, but I am sure she would have objected to someone else making up brand new stories.

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There are plenty of authors who feel that way. Are there any Modesty Blaise fans here? The author, Peter O'Donnell, took care to fix it so that no one else could write more of them.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Having been unable to resist 40 stories by Frances Hodgson Burnett for 37p, I am now reading The Secret Garden, I think for the first time. I'm guessing that, if I had read it as a child, I would not have been so appalled at the way Mary is treated by the adults in her life. Having read a defintion of emotional abuse a couple of days ago dos not help.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
I've been reading The Collected Letters of Dorothy L. Sayers, and I think she would have hated having other authors use her characters.


I felt that way about the Geraldine Brooks novel, March based on the father from Little Women. Brooks has said in interviews that she always thought the character, Marmee, March's wife, was a simpering goody-goody -- so she changed her completely. I liked her the way she was and wondered why Brooks didn't just write a novel from scratch and invent her own feisty, firebrand, with feminist ideals far ahead of her time?

Don't get me started on, Mrs. Poe.

I don't mind the purely playful spinoffs about zombies in Austen-land or novels based on very peripheral characters, but why completely rewrite cherished characters or disregard what we do know about people in history?

Sorry, if that's too hellish for Heaven.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
OTOH, Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea has been widely recognised as an impressive novel in its own right.

In my postgrad year at library college we had to do a themed bibliography of children's books. I chose as my theme ones which built on pre-existent stories - the best was probably T H White's Mistress Masham's Repose, which imagines transported Lilliputians. And of course he also reworked the Arthurian material.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
Having been unable to resist 40 stories by Frances Hodgson Burnett for 37p, I am now reading The Secret Garden, I think for the first time. I'm guessing that, if I had read it as a child, I would not have been so appalled at the way Mary is treated by the adults in her life. Having read a defintion of emotional abuse a couple of days ago dos not help.

Yes - I read that recently and felt exactly the same (and wait till you come across Colin later in the book!). There was also a lot of classist stereotyping which I found quite hard work. I hadn't read it as a child, and had to try and remember how much 'of its time' it was. I did read (and reread, several times) "A Little Princess" as a child, and would like to reread it as an adult, but I'm worried that reading it with 21st century adult eyes will spoil the childhood memory of a magical story.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Burnett's adult work is even more dodgy. If you read THE MAKING OF A MARCHIONESS it is frightening, how often the author has to assure us that the heroine is intelligent. (She acts like a moron.) The characters within the book praise the heroine as 'healthy,' which I gather to mean 'fertile'.

And if you ever get to THE SHUTTLE, her fantasy (it is no other) about trans-Atlantic marriages, it has the character with the most repellent given name EVER. A poor little boy is dubbed Ughtred; I can only hope it is a traditional name.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JoannaP:
[qb] Having been unable to resist 40 stories by Frances Hodgson Burnett for 37p, I am now reading The Secret Garden, I think for the first time. There was also a lot of classist stereotyping which I found quite hard work.

I first read it as an adult. What bothered me most was that Dickon's mother, who did not have enough money to give her children all the food they wanted, bought a skipping-rope for Mary. She could have talked to the housekeeper about the fact that Mary needed something to play with.

Moo
 
Posted by Tina (# 63) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
quote:
Originally posted by Tina:

Count me as another one who's reading through all manner of old stuff on an e-reader via Project Gutenberg. Did a chronological re-read of Jane Austen's work, now reading Trollope's Palliser novels, along with various eighteenth-century novels series!

How are you enjoying the Palliser novels? I'm now up to The Prime Minister and am really enjoying them. Some years ago (OMG - maybe 25 or 30) they were adapted for TV with Susan Hampshire (I think) playing Lady Glencora.

Huia

Yeah, I'm enjoying them a lot - I'm also up to The Prime Minister now. I think part of the appeal for me is they're very mixed characters and you often aren't sure how their lives will pan out and whether the good or bad will win out - for example I started the PM thinking Ferdinand Lopez was a confident, decent bloke being discriminated against for his parentage; but now he seems to be a bit of a git [Paranoid] And Lady Eustace is sooo bad but fun to read about!
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I loved A Piece of Justice by Jill Paton Walsh and was disappointed by the Lord Peter Wimsey books in comparison.

I've just acquired my daughter's cast off Kindle (she's bought a i-Pad) and am reading the stuff on it I want to read before I deregister her and register it to me and start putting my own choices on. I'm looking forward to Project Gutenberg and the other out of copyright books.
 
Posted by L'organist (# 17338) on :
 
I assume you mean the unsuccessful, IMO, Wimsey stories penned by JPW?

After all, Jill Paton Walsh was only 5 years old when the last Wimsey story by Dorothy Sayers was published.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Yes, sorry, thought that was implicit. I find the Dorothy L Sayers books fascinating, with all their dated prejudices and mores, and found someone pastiching them not so great.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
So did I. But I do urge you to skip over to the second-to-the-newest one, THE ATTENBURY EMERALDS, and read it. Actually, just read the latter third. Suddenly plot and character line up and sing together in harmony. It's amazing.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I like listening to the Lord Peter mysteries on Radio 4, but have never actually read them. I think I saw a teleplay several years ago.

I just finished the June selection for Ship's book club and really enjoyed it!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
If you were going to begin, I suggest THE NINE TAILORS, Sayers' best Lord Peter novel. A few of them really do have to be read in order, but this one is a delightful outlier. And if you don't like it then you don't have to get tangled up in the others.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
I wish Jill Paton-Walsh would stop writing faux Lord Peter books and go back to her own writing, which I enjoyed.

I honestly can't think of novels written as sequels by an author other than the original, that I have enjoyed I thought Pemberley was dire, despite enjoying that author's other books.

There was one short story written as a sequel to Jane Eyre that I rather enjoyed. I can't remember who wrote it but it became obvious to Jane that Bertha Mason had actually been driven mad by Rochester who was trying to do the same to her.

Huia
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Oh, I'm glad I'm not the only one who dislikes Jill Paton Walsh's pastiches of Dorothy Sayers! They just don't work for me. Marrying Bunter off to a freelance photographer and giving him a cosy little mews flat so he can carry on being Wimsey's 'man' is Simply Wrong; modern ideas of how servants should be treated retrofitted onto an earlier society. It's nearly as bad as the later Pern books (I'm thinking of 'Masterharper' in particular here).

[ 06. June 2014, 08:52: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I have finished Moby Dick out of sheer bloody-mindedness. I am never going to read it again. Man that was a chore.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
[Overused] I never got beyond the first paragraph...
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Haven't tried Moby Dick yet. In terms of the epics, I have a copy of War & Peace at home, but I want to warm up to it with Crime & Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov first.

Have just finished volume 2 of The Forsyte Saga.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Agree about the direness of Bunter in the mews. And oh lord, the latter Pern novels are to be strictly avoided.

I did read MOBY-DICK. Once was enough. I also read WAR & PEACE, and was annoyed. If the entire thing is going to revolve around the battle of Borodino, darn it I want a battle! I do not want to trail around on the verges of the conflict.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Lass:
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
Having been unable to resist 40 stories by Frances Hodgson Burnett for 37p, I am now reading The Secret Garden, I think for the first time. I'm guessing that, if I had read it as a child, I would not have been so appalled at the way Mary is treated by the adults in her life. Having read a defintion of emotional abuse a couple of days ago dos not help.

Yes - I read that recently and felt exactly the same (and wait till you come across Colin later in the book!). There was also a lot of classist stereotyping which I found quite hard work. I hadn't read it as a child, and had to try and remember how much 'of its time' it was. I did read (and reread, several times) "A Little Princess" as a child, and would like to reread it as an adult, but I'm worried that reading it with 21st century adult eyes will spoil the childhood memory of a magical story.
Oh God, I see what you mean about Colin. Ten years old and he has never spoken to another boy [Eek!]

By way of contrast, I have just finished Kate Atkinson's Case Histories and will definitely look for the next one in the library. I am not entirely sure about the "literary detective novel" sub-genre but Kate Atkinson does it better than Susan Hill.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
Moby Dick has been on one of my library shelves for over twenty years. Some day, some year, I shall drag it down (again) and read it.

La vie en rouge, did you read it in French or English? If French, you have my humble admiration!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
In defense of Burnett, it is only fair to say that Victorian and Edwardian medical practices would curl your hair. For instance after childbirth new mothers were to be kept in a dark room for six weeks. They had to nurse the newborn, of course, but they were fed on a diet of toast and water. Even the recipe fort his convection is depressing -- toast the bread and then boil it in water until it's a jelly. Strain off all the solids and feed the fluid to the patient.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
. It's nearly as bad as the later Pern books (I'm thinking of 'Masterharper' in particular here).

Oh that was dreadful. Emotional torture porn. Just. Why.?
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Although I have a copy on my shelves I have never managed Moby Dick, I just can't get into it at all - and I have tried, honest.

I am currently wallowing in a bit of Delderfield [again] - the Swann trilogy this time - and am on the second volume. An under-rated writer who seems quite out of fashion these days. I really can't get on with his book Diana - something else I have tried several times but ultimately been so bored I have chucked it back on the shelf for another day - that will probably never arrive.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Although I have a copy on my shelves I have never managed Moby Dick, I just can't get into it at all - and I have tried, honest.

I've never managed Moby Dick either. I had to read Billy Budd for a college course, and I disliked it intensely.

Moo
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
Moby Dick is worth the effort IMHO. I was a great fan of Melville's cold bedroom thesis for a long time (that a warm bedroom is one of the great discomforts of 'civilisation'). However, I will admit that I can't actually summon the stamina to re-read it at the moment.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
[Overused] I never got beyond the first paragraph...

I see I'm not the only one. IMO, life is too short to waste it reading stuff you don't enjoy, when it's your own spare time and it's supposed to be for pleasure.

I've been rediscovering some childhood favourites, and musing on the difference the lack of technology makes to a story. Hard to imagine a modern-day version of the Narnia Chronicles:

"Where's Edmund?" said Lucy. Everybody looked around the Beavers' comfortable little home, and Mrs Beaver hurried to turn the television off, but there was no sign of him. Susan sighed, and reached for her mobile phone. Somewhere far away in the snowy landscape, Edmund's pocket started to vibrate. He muttered a rude word and deleted Susan's text message. He glanced around, checked Google Maps Narnia for the White Witch's Castle, keyed in her postcode, and then hesitantly, rang the number she'd given him to let her know he was on his way...
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
That's interesting, I rewrote the first chapter of the very same story, as if it happened in modern times. Perhaps we should form a publishing team, Ariel?!
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:

...I had to read Billy Budd for a college course, and I disliked it intensely.

Moo


It's better as an opera than as a book! I saw it in Santa Fe a few years ago.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
In defense of Burnett, it is only fair to say that Victorian and Edwardian medical practices would curl your hair. For instance after childbirth new mothers were to be kept in a dark room for six weeks. They had to nurse the newborn, of course, but they were fed on a diet of toast and water. Even the recipe fort his convection is depressing -- toast the bread and then boil it in water until it's a jelly. Strain off all the solids and feed the fluid to the patient.

I didn't know about the toast thing but I do find the social history and insights into attitudes one picks up from reading older fiction fascinating. It is true of more recent fiction as well; some of the casual anti-Semitism spouted by characters in whodunits written in the 30s is shocking.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Oh, very good, Narnia with cell phones (although, where are the towers for connectivity?). I believe that modern pupils, reading ROMEO & JULIET in high school, wonder why Juliet didn't just send her boyfriend a text: "faking death, ttyl"
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Ha!
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
...whereas back when I was at school you had to fall back on pointing out how unromantic their relationship would have been if they had survived to set up house in Padua (or similar) and live on into their dotage. I remember writing an essay on that very subject...
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm going for a bit more comfort reading - this time it's Madeleine l'Engle's Two-Part Invention, about her marriage, and being in theatre in the 1940s. She seemed to spend a lot of time fending off the unwanted advances of various men, despite not being seen as conventionally attractive.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
Daughter-Unit, knowing her mother well, gifted me with "William Shakespeare's Star Wars, Verily a New Hope" for Mother's Day.

It was very enjoyable, and several place had me laughing out loud! There is quite a bit of "Henry V" misquoted, as well as a bit of Star Trek.

It's a nice, light read, and even though some of us know the story, there are enough asides to put a little extra flavor in the retelling.

Fun for people like me. You know who you are.
 
Posted by The Rogue (# 2275) on :
 
Having watched the BBC series recently I am now reading the Three Musketeers and enjoying it. I am quite surprised at how much of it is in the programme. I have all the books but will probably look at something else before carrying on with them.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
They are just starting the BBC series here. I may have to look at it, if it is actually within shouting distance of the novel. (The best film version was the one starring Michael York!)
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Just finished reading A Natural History of Dragons and Tropic of Serpents by Marie Brennan.

Brilliant books. Simply brilliant. No doubt a lot of people will compare them with the Temeraire books (American woman, writing about dragons) but the style is completely different. Alternative universe very well-imagined; author obviously knows her history and has had experience of field trips in difficult circumstances. The protagonist is a woman born into a society reminiscent of mid-Victorian Britain who wants to be a naturalist and study dragons. The first book is all about how she achieves her ambition; the second is about her next expedition and what happens after the 'Happy(ish) Ending' of the first. Can't wait for the third (hoping very much that there will be more in the series, of the same high quality).

I just checked Amazon and discovered she's written another series about fairies... off to investigate that. I really like this author's style.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
They are just starting the BBC series here. I may have to look at it, if it is actually within shouting distance of the novel. (The best film version was the one starring Michael York!)

It isn't. Not even if you had a megaphone. Actually, not even if you had a mobile phone.

Quite good fun, though: I like the King best. I mean Capaldi acts his socks off as Richelieu, but it's a bit like finding caviar in an iced bun.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
but it's a bit like finding caviar in an iced bun.

Thanks for that image. I want to wash my mouth out.

Today I finished The Duke's Children which is the last of the Palliser novels. I liked the series better that the Barset novels as I find the characters more interesting.

I've now started The Odd Women by George Gissing, though I may splice in some contemporary light reading.

Does anyone else find themselves using old fashioned language in their everyday speech after immersing themselves in Victorian or Regency novels? [Hot and Hormonal]

Huia

[ 09. June 2014, 09:01: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Today I finished The Duke's Children which is the last of the Palliser novels. I liked the series better that the Barset novels as I find the characters more interesting.

I like them better also, although I confess I tend to skip the political stuff.

Moo
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Am finally coming towards the end of Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Just 150 pages to go, but am over the "hump" of the central theology which is really rather dense.

Am also just a few pages from the end of my latest "coffee table" book, Julian Baggini's The Pig That Wants To Be Eaten. For what it is, it's pretty good, though as one might expect Baggini's take on religion is an exercise in getting the wrong end of some sticks and in other cases just getting the wrong sticks.

In the mean time, am pressing on with Friedrich Engels' The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. Though as it is a volume also containing (and headed as) The Communist Manifesto, it prompts some interesting looks from my fellow commuters.
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I'm still in the fifteenth century: I found an Anne Easter Smith book that I'd forgotten I had called Queen by Right which tells the story of Cecily, Duchess of York (mother of Edward IV and Richard III).

Like the Philippa Gregory book, quite unputdownable, but unlike PG she tells it in the past, and as a narrative rather than as though the author were one of the characters.

I still don't understand why Hilary Mantel gets all the history-as-fiction plaudits - give me either of these ladies any day!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am just about to start one of the Oscar Wilde mystery novels by Gyles Brandreth. They are a fast read and appear to be accurate in their historical detail, always an irresistible trait.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by piglet:
I'm still in the fifteenth century: I found an Anne Easter Smith book that I'd forgotten I had called Queen by Right which tells the story of Cecily, Duchess of York (mother of Edward IV and Richard III).

Like the Philippa Gregory book, quite unputdownable, but unlike PG she tells it in the past, and as a narrative rather than as though the author were one of the characters.

I still don't understand why Hilary Mantel gets all the history-as-fiction plaudits - give me either of these ladies any day!

Thank you for this recommendation. I love good historical fiction (esp when written in the past tense) and will look out for this.

I'm not a fan of Hilary Mantel either. I read one of her books and didn't like it much, a feeling that was clinched by listening to her on the radio when she was discussing her latest novel, which all sounded a bit pretentious to me.
 
Posted by moron (# 206) on :
 
Sorry if I've overlooked comparable recommendations but this post is an alternative to starting another thread so sue me.

Anything by Mary Doria Russell is nearly beyond my ability to put down; typically fatigue is the culprit.

From The Sparrow to Children Of God to Doc to A Thread Of Grace to whatever is next in no particular order have been a very enjoyable time investment. She makes implausible plot twists well erm you know because of the believability of the complex characters she creates.

Very good stuff. [Overused]
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
piglet:
quote:
I still don't understand why Hilary Mantel gets all the history-as-fiction plaudits ...
Better PR? Also, she writes in a consciously literary style - which is what turned me off her, btw - it seemed like she was constantly shrieking 'Look how clever I am!' Really great authors don't need to do that, but it does get the attention of the Booker panel.

I got halfway through 'Wolf Hall' and found myself yawning over it - well, I did know how it ended, having studied sixteenth-century history to A-level.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Moo:
quote:
Originally posted by Huia:
Today I finished The Duke's Children which is the last of the Palliser novels. I liked the series better that the Barset novels as I find the characters more interesting.

I like them better also, although I confess I tend to skip the political stuff.

Moo

I skipped the stuff about the Duke's decimal currency, he was a bit tedious about the detail. On the other hand I did read up on the Married Women's Property Act and about an estranged husband having the right to force his wife back to live with him (Robert Kennedy and Lady Laura). I wondered whether Trollope was punishing both Lady Laura and Mabel Grex for steppping out of their roles by not giving them happy endings. I thought Silverbridge was an insufferable snob, but then he had been brought up knowing he would become the Duke of Omnium right from when he was a child.

I think Phineas Finn is still my favourite character.

Huia

[ 10. June 2014, 08:42: Message edited by: Huia ]
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Huia
I wondered whether Trollope was punishing both Lady Laura and Mabel Grex for steppping out of their roles by not giving them happy endings.

I don't think so. I think that he was more concerned with his craft than with dispensing happy or unhappy endings according to the merits of the character.

One of my favorite characters to read about is Lizzie Eustace, although I would have hated to know her in real life. One minor character I like is the factor of the Scottish estate.

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
He might not have been consciously thinking "ooh, pushy dame, must remember to smack her down before the last page." But there is a consistent tendency over the entire literature of the period to be sure that overly powerful women (especially sexual ones) had to Pay A Price in some way. It was a cultural expectation.
The big complaint about PRIDE AND PREJUDICE was the heroine's intelligence and outspoken quality. Austen heard and obeyed, and wrote MANSFIELD PARK.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just finished Two-Part Invention, by Madeleine l'Engle, and it turned out not to be comfort reading after all - but it is a very good book, being a moving account, towards the end of her husband's last illness and death.
Maybe I'll go for Diane Duane's A Wizard of Mars next. I've read the rest of the Young Wizard series and enjoyed them, and being Young Adult it can't be too harrowing, surely!
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
You could be safe with Diane Duane (it's been a while since I read anything of hers, but I don't remember her being particularly harrowing). But Young Adult fiction in general... perhaps not. They quite often have depressing themes. Or at least that's how it seems to me.

OTOH Diana Wynne Jones is usually classed as young adult, and she's not depressing at all...
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
A Wizard of Mars isn't harrowing--well, except to its characters. Just bring a bag of tomatoes, hey?
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Diana wynn Jones is a marvelous writer. One of the ones who should have lived forever.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Really quite excited - last night I downloaded the Hugo awards packages to have a look at before I vote. This wasn't even possible when I last went to a WorldCon!
It's a great perk of Con membership, and I was very pleased to see that Paul Cornell's comic The Girl Who Loved Doctor Who was one of the graphic story nominations that is included (along with Girl Genius and a rather creepy George RR Martin offering called Meathouse Man). I wanted to read Paul Cornell's comic when it first came out, but missed the publication date because I don't live anywhere near a decent comic shop, so last night I had a look, and thoroughly enjoyed it. The Doctor goes to a convention and meets Matt Smith!
I seem to remember writing some fan fiction with a friend (to be fair, I think she had most of the good ideas) in which Spock goes to a Star Trek convention (time travel is obviously involved). It's one of those things that fans want to see their favourite characters do, and Paul Cornell did it brilliantly.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Finally finished N.T. Wright's Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Took 6.5 months to get through. [Ultra confused]

As a follow-up, have now started on Ludwig Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. [Help]
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
Quick book question - can anyone tell me some non-freaky twins in literature? I saw a play last night that had strange twins, and it occurred to me that many things with twins in make them a bit odd, which I find irritating as a (non-freaky, non-identical) twin. The only normal ones my friend and I could come up with were the Weasleys in Harry Potter.

That did mean that I'd instantly forgotten the twins in the YA book I've just read - Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell, which was not only about twins but about HP-style fan fiction and which I recommend if you want something enjoyable that will take about 3 hours to read - but to be fair to myself, my friend wouldn't have known what I was on about if I'd used that example. But now I want to try and find some others!
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I loved Fangirl.

As for non-freaky twins, there was nothing freaky about either set of Bobbsey Twins (Bert and Nan, Freddy and Flossie) except having such impressive detective abilities at such a young age. I guess it depends how stretchy your definition of "literature" is.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
IIRC the Elinor Brent Dwyer Chalet School heroines include one set of twins and they seem to largely be typical of her heroines i.e. early naughtiness leads to later head girl material under the reforming influence of the Chalet school.

Jengie
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
In Josephine Tey's Brat Farrar there are ten-year-old identical twin girls who are minor characters. They are very different in their interests. Ruth is very concerned with the impression she makes on others. She cares a lot about how she's dressed. Jane's main interest in life is horses, and she is indifferent to dress.

Moo
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
In Lori Lansens's The Girls, the twins are, in one sense, "freaky" in that they are conjoined twins but not at all freaky in the spooky sense I think you mean.

It's one of the most beautiful novels I've ever read, about sisterly love and the courage of people who live with disabilities.

Surprisingly not depressing but very life affirming.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There are always the twins Daisy and Demi in LITTLE WOMEN, who seem to have been created by the author mainly so that she could use the cute names. In the later sequels the children are quite ordinary, the duller background kids to the more wild ones in the bunch.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
Scots Lass

Diana Evans' novel '26a' is about a pair of twins growing up in Neasden. It's not freaky, but the twins' lives are complicated by their parents' unhappy marriage, and also by the fact that their father is a white Northerner and their mother a black Nigerian. There's a hint of magic realism that the twins' deep connection with one another and their Nigerian ancestry emphasises, but social realism is predominant, I'd say. It's an interesting novel and well worth reading.

Regarding my current reading, I've recently finished Peter Mayle's 'A Year in Provence' - the charming granddaddy of what seems like a whole subgenre of travel books. I've now headed to the Far East with 'China Road' by Rob Gifford.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I have slowed down in my reading of Remember, Remember (The Fifth of November) by a British author whose name I have forgotten. It is a brief history of the UK and I do not wish to go back 156 pages in order to find the lady's name as I am reading it on Nook study. It is a v. good history in spite of its short passages. I am about halfway through it....

Can anyone recommend a short history of The Great War? I am listening to the events of 100 years ago on Radio 4 and the music on Radio 3. My grandfather fought in World War I as a US Navy officer. I think my sister or I have his sword somewhere.... I remember seeing it in the cellar as a kid in Pasadena.
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I continue apace ploughing through all the nineteenth century children’s classics available for free on Kindle.

I can’t believe I never read Black Beauty before. It’s a flipping amazing book and I has a big sad that I've finished it already.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Black Beauty is my 10-year old daughter's favourite book at the moment. I've lost count of the number of times she's read it.

I discovered yesterday that my husband had secretly ordered a copy of The Serial Garden without telling me - all of Joan Aiken's Armitage stories in one volume, including four that have never been published before. So I spent yesterday afternoon reading that from cover to cover. I think my favourite is still the one about the baby griffin (Mrs Nutti's Fireplace).
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Oooh! Many thanks for telling me about that; now I just have to decide whether to keep it myself or give it to my mother... [Smile]
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
You could buy more than one copy, you know [Biased]

Just discovered that Seal of the Worm by Adrian Tchaikovsky is due out this week, so that's next weekend's reading taken care of...
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Oh, I'm glad I'm not the only one who dislikes Jill Paton Walsh's pastiches of Dorothy Sayers! They just don't work for me. Marrying Bunter off to a freelance photographer and giving him a cosy little mews flat so he can carry on being Wimsey's 'man' is Simply Wrong; modern ideas of how servants should be treated retrofitted onto an earlier society. It's nearly as bad as the later Pern books (I'm thinking of 'Masterharper' in particular here).

I have just read A Presumption of Death, which I did quite enjoy, but it was clearly not a Sayers novel! Having said that, it has inspired me to reread Sayers for the first time in yonks, so it is not entirely bad. I thought JPW did quite well on the social attitudes of the time (as far as I could tell) but I was rather dubious about some of the espionage related stuff. Even if Lord Peter did know about Bletchley Park, there is just no way he would have mentioned it to Harriet.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I have just read A Presumption of Death, which I did quite enjoy, but it was clearly not a Sayers novel! Having said that, it has inspired me to reread Sayers for the first time in yonks, so it is not entirely bad. I thought JPW did quite well on the social attitudes of the time (as far as I could tell) but I was rather dubious about some of the espionage related stuff. Even if Lord Peter did know about Bletchley Park, there is just no way he would have mentioned it to Harriet.

To clarify, Peter may well have known that there were boffins somewhere who could crack codes but he would not have known that they were at Bletchley Park.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
There is a new Paton Walsh Wimsey out, and I have it on reserve at the library. But if does not come up to the last quarter of ATTENBURY EMERALDS, I am going to give up on these. An intolerable deal of dross, to not very many flakes of gold.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I am going to read THE LAST LION: Vol. 1, by William Manchester. It is the biography of Winston Churchill.
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I've just finished Burial Rites by Hannah Kent which is the fictionalised account of the last execution of a woman in Iceland in 1830. I loved the book. The story of the crime wasn't what was fascinating, it was the details of what life was like in Iceland at the time. There was no prison so the woman was sent to live on a farm until her execution and the relationship between her and the farmer's family, her priest and the story of her day to day life was written beautifully.

I definitely want to go to Iceland now.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
I just started that yesterday, Chive! I'm only about fifty pages in but I had to stop and look at all the Iceland images online. What an amazing place.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
I'm currently reading "1000 Years of Annoying the French" by Stephen Clarke. It's basically a romp through the last millennium of Anglo-French relations and history, 1066 to the Channel Tunnel and beyond, specialising in pointing out where the official French versions of historical events are, let's say, perhaps a tad airbrushed. It's quite fun, and it has to be said that thus far the English aren't exactly coming across as swashbuckling heroes either, though I think Bill Bryson would probably have done a better job with the material (I suspect Clarke was trying to be Bryson-esque here).
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Oh, I'm glad I'm not the only one who dislikes Jill Paton Walsh's pastiches of Dorothy Sayers! They just don't work for me. Marrying Bunter off to a freelance photographer and giving him a cosy little mews flat so he can carry on being Wimsey's 'man' is Simply Wrong; modern ideas of how servants should be treated retrofitted onto an earlier society.

Sorry, I'm going way back to a much earlier post to pick up on this comment which I didn't have time to ask about when it was posted. I'd love to know more about what this is Simply Wrong, from the perspective of someone who knows more about the time and place than I do.

Like most readers I like the JPW Wimsey books far less than the originals (but still have read all of them). I thought one of the things JPW did well was to explore how class boundaries shifted and the master-servant relationship changed post WW2. It seemed believable to me that while those roles were so rigid in the prewar world, in the 1950s Bunter's son could conceivably be going to school with Peter & Harriet's sons, and that Bunter would be struggling to maintain old-school propriety in a world where it was no longer expected. But, not having lived through that change in postwar British society, I can see that my assumptions may have been wrong. I'm just not sure why they're wrong and as the portrayal of class is one of the things that fascinates me most in the original Wimsey novels, I'd love to hear someone explain a bit more why JPW gets it wrong.

As my old thesis supervisor used to say (till it drove me almost mad), "Can you unpack that a bit more for me?"
 
Posted by Pine Marten (# 11068) on :
 
I'm coming to the end of Rebecca's Tale by Sally Beauman, a sort of sequel to Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca, and told by four different narrators, including Rebecca herself. It's very well-written, imaginative and an absolute page turner, filling in Rebecca's history and that of the de Winter family. Three of the narratives are set in 1951, and Rebecca's in 1931.

I don't know the author's other books but I might look out for them based on this one.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
What is wrong with Paton Walsh's Wimsey? What I miss, terribly, is the facility with language and scholarship that Sayers gave her hero. Her Lord Peter was erudite and carelessly witty. If you are in trouble you might write a letter to Sherlock Holmes, but Lord Peter was, famously, the man that everyone wants to have tea with (in the Picadilly flat, with Bunter bringing in the scones). Paton Walsh completely fails to capture Lord Peter's voice and charm; I have no desire to share a scone with him.
And she lacks Sayers' literary power. She is an adequate mystery plotter, but that's the most you can say. With DLS at the wheel you always had the sense that she could zoom off anywhere -- drop in an untranslated suicide note in French, say, or have Lord Peter dressed in as a harlequin and driving a sports car through the countryside. The Paton Walsh books proceed on their track without any twists or tricks or fireworks. Entirely more plodding in tone. (Partially this could be blamed upon the period -- clearly the Roaring 20s is more fun than the war years or the 50s.)
The books are different, and less. Like eating cheese food from a can, instead of real cheese.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Trudy said:
quote:
I thought one of the things JPW did well was to explore how class boundaries shifted and the master-servant relationship changed post WW2. It seemed believable to me that while those roles were so rigid in the prewar world, in the 1950s Bunter's son could conceivably be going to school with Peter & Harriet's sons, and that Bunter would be struggling to maintain old-school propriety in a world where it was no longer expected. But, not having lived through that change in postwar British society, I can see that my assumptions may have been wrong. I'm just not sure why they're wrong and as the portrayal of class is one of the things that fascinates me most in the original Wimsey novels, I'd love to hear someone explain a bit more why JPW gets it wrong.
SPOILERS FOR ANYONE WHO HASN'T READ 'THRONES, DOMINATIONS' AND 'THE ATTENBURY EMERALDS'


Well, you're right that there was a big shift in the master(mistress)/servant relationship post-WWII. You can trace it through passing comments in Agatha Christie or R. Austin Freeman's books; by the late 50s/early 60s the balance of power has definitely shifted in favour of the servants, who expect a little self-contained flat and plenty of spare time instead of half a bedroom in the attics and being at their employer's beck and call with only one half-day off a fortnight. But my objection to JPW's portrayal of the shift is that she has it happening before the Second World War (in 'Thrones, Dominations' which is set round about the time of the abdication crisis in 1936). Judging by comments in real contemporary fiction (as opposed to pastiches of it) the accepted career progression for a gentleman's personal gentleman was *either* to become the butler when his master got married *or* to save up enough money to buy his own business (usually a pub) and leave domestic service entirely. In either case he should have been able to get married. I think it would have been quite unusual for a valet to get married without giving up his job; the job involved being available to dress and undress his master at all hours of the day and night and wasn't really compatible with family life (NB: Downton Abbey is a modern pastiche of early 20th-century life too; and although Julian Fellowes is writing about his own social class he does sometimes ignore historical accuracy in order to make The Story more interesting/palatable for modern viewers).

Another problem is Bunter's wife. She's a great character and I have nothing against her personally, but she must be middle-class and Bunter is presumably working-class; the divide between them is at least as great, if not greater, than the divide between Harriet (middle-class) and Wimsey (upper-class). This is glossed over; Sayers might have allowed Bunter to marry a middle-class businesswoman, but she wouldn't have ignored the difficulties. It *is* possible for people to marry outside their own social class (mentioning no William and Kate in particular); to some extent it always has been. But in many ways it's easier for women to 'marry up' than it is for men, because of Teh Patriarcy (the traditional expectation was that women joined their husband's family on marriage). Paton Walsh appears to be unaware of this distinction.

Finally and most glaringly, the comments on the current political situation (scenes outside the Palace when the abdication is announced, Wimsey saying Edward isn't fit to be king) Just. Would. Not. Have. Been. Published. Not so soon after 1936. Not even if they are a fair representation of DLS's private opinions. No publisher would have touched the book with a bargepole. No commercially successful writer (which Dorothy Sayers was) would have considered putting such controversial comments into a work of light fiction. That was the final straw for me.

I borrowed 'The Attenbury Emeralds' from the library but didn't think much of it. If she had to kill off St George to satisfy her fantasy of making Peter Wimsey the Duke, she might at least have made more of it. He deserved better than to be dismissed in passing. After that I gave up on the rest of the series.

<disclaimer: I am not a social historian of the period either and all of this is what I've picked up from reading various authors who were roughly contemporary with Dorothy Sayers; a real historian will probably be along to correct me in a minute>
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
FWIW I believe that DLS herself suggested that St. George was on the bubble, and that Peter (and then Bredon after him) were going to succeed Gerald.

I found ATTENBURY utterly dull until the final big crisis (which I will not spoil for you). Suddenly the work snapped into focus, the characters' sufferings became genuine, and the work sat up in its coffin, flinging the heavy oaken lid aside, the Tesla coils crackling ominously above it, and was alive as the ominous organ music rose to a crescendo and the lightning bolts creased the sky above the castle battlements.

If the Creature can still groan and totter along, however marginally alive in spite of its sutures and bolts, in the next volume, then I am in. Otherwise, I am out.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I agree with you, Brenda, that the voice (both in narration and in dialogue) which is so much the hallmark of DLS's Wimsey books, is missing in the JPW novels, and it's what I miss most. I'm not actually much of a mystery reader outside of these books and a few others, so I don't care much how the mystery unfolds; it's character development that I read for. I don't think there are many literary characters whose characterization is so closely wedded to the author's style as LPW's is with DLS's writing -- which, in a way, makes him the worst candidate to be taken over by another writer.

Thanks, Jane R, for "unpacking" the bit about social class and the servant/master relationship -- that does make a bit more sense now. I think most of what you say is probably right, although I disagree with you about it feeling wrong for JPW to include things in her novels that DLS wouldn't have been able to get away with publishing. Surely that's the advantage of writing the books in another era as historical fiction -- you can print things that people might have said, thought and done at the time that wouldn't have made it into contemporary books? I mean, presumably there were a lot of people at the time -- and Lord Peter, if a real person, might well have been one of them -- thinking or saying privately that Edward wasn't fit to be king. In that sense, surely the modern writer is able to be MORE accurate than the contemporary writer, who was constrained by the sense of what could and couldn't be published?

I guess I read the JPW books (and will continue to read any others she writes in this series) because I love these characters so much that even watered-down Peter and Harriet is better than NO new Peter and Harriet. But it does read a bit like fanfic, or like (as I said in a blog review) like watching actors playing the part of the Wimseys onstage, as opposed to watching the Wimseys themselves.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R
Another problem is Bunter's wife. She's a great character and I have nothing against her personally, but she must be middle-class and Bunter is presumably working-class; the divide between them is at least as great, if not greater, than the divide between Harriet (middle-class) and Wimsey (upper-class).

I think she could have grown up working class and learned skills that enabled her to join the middle class. She is apparently an expert photographer; I have no problem believing that someone like that could have started out working class.

Moo
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I suppose it's just possible that Bunter's wife might have grown up working class, but it's unlikely. You're forgetting sexism. Photography might have been an acceptable hobby for a middle-class girl with indulgent parents; it's not as likely that a working-class family would have allowed it or had the money to spare for professional-quality equipment (if her father had been in business as a photographer I think the family would have counted as lower middle-class rather than working-class). Ambitious girls from working-class families tended to go into nursing or teaching; setting up in business as a photographer requires a certain amount of capital investment (cameras and lenses were expensive back then).

There's also the question of occupation (allied to class); an independent businesswoman normally wouldn't consider marrying a domestic servant, even a highly superior and presentable servant like Bunter. From her other writings it is clear that Dorothy Sayers thought married women should be allowed to continue in their careers if they wanted to, but as someone from an age where they were expected to give up work on marriage I think she'd also have handled the question of Mrs Bunter continuing her business differently.

Trudi:
quote:
I think most of what you say is probably right, although I disagree with you about it feeling wrong for JPW to include things in her novels that DLS wouldn't have been able to get away with publishing. Surely that's the advantage of writing the books in another era as historical fiction -- you can print things that people might have said, thought and done at the time that wouldn't have made it into contemporary books? I mean, presumably there were a lot of people at the time -- and Lord Peter, if a real person, might well have been one of them -- thinking or saying privately that Edward wasn't fit to be king. In that sense, surely the modern writer is able to be MORE accurate than the contemporary writer, who was constrained by the sense of what could and couldn't be published?

I take your point about modern writers being able to say things that contemporaries couldn't. Peter might have been one of those who thought privately that Edward wasn't fit to be king; on the other hand he might have been someone who thought it was Edward's duty to be king, however personally inconvenient it might have been, and disapproved of the abdication. We don't know, because the Peter that Jill Paton Walsh writes about is not the same character as Dorothy Sayers' Peter. That short story about him going to buy a secret formula from a French nobleman suggests that DLS might have seen him as the kind of person who put Duty to his country before his own private wishes.

I don't think 'more accurate' is a good description of historical detective stories. Modern authors writing a pastiche may have taken care to research the period; they may be free to show things that would not have been made explicit in contemporary fiction (such as political questions, or the exact nature of the relationship between Clara Whittaker and Agatha Dawson in Unnatural Death ), but they won't focus on the same things as a contemporary writer would have done and their understanding of the period will be different. Compare Regency romances with Jane Austen's works, for example; in both cases you have young women going shopping and worrying about what to wear at an important ball, but Austen merely sketches in a few details whereas a lot of modern writers who do Regency romances feel compelled to describe every detail of the heroine's dress. Austen was writing for people who knew what kind of things a young lady would wear to a ball, so didn't bother.

Don't get me wrong, I do like historical fiction. I'm even willing to put up with some historical inaccuracies if the story is good enough. I just don't like seeing Dorothy Sayers' characters being put through their paces by someone else...
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
I agree. Prefer Lord Peter on television or BBC radio, adapted from original stories by the original author!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Wimsey is so powerfully Sayers' creation that he is not a good example of a successful hand-me-down. Sherlock Holmes, however, has had many successful books written by authors other than Conan Doyle. My personal favorite is THE SEVEN PERCENT SOLUTION by Nicholas Meyer.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
Isn't that more saying that Sherlock is a caricature?
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
Well, again, I think that's because of how closely LPW's character is tied to DLS's actual use of language -- it's much easier for another writer to adapt Sherlock Holmes (and so many have, often quite successfully) because the character is not so inextricably tied to the author's literary style.

I doubt there are any Wimsey fans who think the JPW novels are as good as the DLS originals (and none, I'm sure, who like them better) -- among LPW fans I know, the division is between those who think the JPW novels are flawed, but still worth reading, and those who think it was a terrible idea and the new novels are really not worth picking up. I'm in the former category.

I do think, though, that that whole question (addressed so well in your post, Jane R) about the relative merits of historical fiction as opposed to fiction written in the specific time period in question, is quite interesting. I read a lot of historical fiction (and write it as well) and I think often it does get at things that contemporary writers couldn't have gotten away with (or wouldn't have thought of) writing about. Your example of DLS's Unnatural Death is a good one -- she has to do some much beating around the bush just to let the reader know that these two women were lovers, whereas a modern writer could have said it much more plainly. But then, people of the time probably would have been very oblique in how they referred to that kind of relationship. I like that modern writers, re-creating a historical period, can be more direct about certain things -- whether it's having a character say that Edward VIII would have been a lousy king, or coming out and telling us that two characters had sex. (I had a terrible time as a younger reader with the scene in Busman's Honeymoon that's set shortly before Lord Peter and Harriet's wedding -- with all the allusions to shabby tigers and faint Canaries, I could never figure out if they'd actually had sex before the wedding night or not). And modern novelists will often write stories about people and settings that a contemporary novelist wouldn't have thought worth writing about. I love Pride and Prejudice, of course, but I also love Jo Baker's Longbourn because when I read novels of that era I always wonder what the servants were up to, and how much work it took to keep that whole edifice (even the edifice of genteel poverty like that of the Bennett family) running smoothly.

On the other hand, there are things -- and it's not even physical details, it's little things of thought and attitude -- that a contemporary novelist grasps that it's very hard for a modern writer of historical fiction to get right. No matter how much research you do, there's no substitute for living in the time period you're writing about and sharing the prejudices and preconceptions of your characters.

But of course, that doesn't stop historical fiction writers from trying!
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Few writers can bear to inhabit past attitudes we now deplore. Could you really write a hero or heroine who was, quite incidentally, racist or snobbish and stayed that way? There's always the urge to give anachronistic views from the get go, or have them develop them ('Eulalia suddenly realised that slavery was just plain wrong!')

It would be better of JPW's Wimseys could be just a teeny bit reactionary now and again.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
And distance is hard. We can just about get our heads around Victorians; there are still Edwardians alive here and there. Medieval people are more alien, and by the time you get back to the Roman empire -- to pre-Christian thought -- it starts to become really difficult.
I wrote a novel in which the time-traveling villain hid out in 300 AD. That he was so at home there enhanced his villainy wonderfully, but from his point of view of course he was fitting in and adapting fine.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Few writers can bear to inhabit past attitudes we now deplore. Could you really write a hero or heroine who was, quite incidentally, racist or snobbish and stayed that way?

The novel is frequently a form that expects its protagonists to change in some way, so you probably couldn't have a novel that focused on a white slave owner, for example, without having their attitudes develop regarding black people. That doesn't mean they'd end up happy to marry their daughter off to a black man (I'm sure there were plenty of white abolitionists who wouldn't have gone that far!), but their perspective would have to develop in some important way. Their minds would no longer be closed.

Love, of course, often transgresses acceptable racial and class barriers, which must be why it's useful as an indicator of moral as well as emotional transformation in the novel.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
No doubt. But that is about writing a historical character from the POV of a modern sensibility. What I am questioning is whether any writer can create a character as if writing as a contemporary.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Yes, but that's not the point, Svitlana. A modern writer would (obviously) write a novel from that point of view; any unrepentant slave-owners would be The Baddies and would probably get their comeuppance by the end of the book. But for Americans of the late eighteenth century, being a slave-owner was not incompatible with being pillar of society or even with being opposed to slavery in principle; Thomas Jefferson owned hundreds of slaves, for example, and only freed a handful of them. So eighteenth-century novelists writing about American society might have slaves around in the background for local colour (aargh - no pun intended) but their focus would be on the interactions of the white characters. British writers of the same period would not have featured working-class characters as the protagonists; not if they wanted their books to be published, anyway. Jane Austen couldn't have written Longbourn because at the time she was writing nobody was interested in the servants' relationships, whereas there were dozens of girls with inadequate dowries hoping to find a Mr Darcy of their own.

There are probably lots of basic assumptions we make (as members of modern society) that would seem odd to someone from the eighteenth century. We are opposed to killing animals just for their fur, but most of us are happy to wear leather and willing to tolerate vivisection. We care about the environment, but we also burn large quantities of fossil fuel so we can gossip on the Internet and holiday on the other side of the world. We hardly bat an eyelid at pictures of half-naked women on advertising hoardings, but any woman who tries to breastfeed her baby in public is labelled a slut. I'd love to know what the novelists of the 22nd century will make of us.

[ 09. July 2014, 12:01: Message edited by: Jane R ]
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
We went to Larger Local Town to order Himself some new specs today then had a wander round the shops and the small branch of a larger local book chain was having a sort of book-fair thingy.

Yes, I do know it is dangerous for people like us to go to places like that.

Anyway, there, in full view, was a copy of William Dalrymple's latest - an analysis of the Anglo-Afghan wars of the 19th Century. How could I say no to that?

I couldn't.

Only available in India this year - first published in UK in 2013. And just under six quid for 500+ pages.

If I can finish with Paul Theroux tonight I can start the new Dalrymple tomorrow, cricket permitting.

[Cool]
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Mmm. Firenze, I have tried it, climbing deep into the head of a historical figure. And a male one, to boot, but no point in doing things by half measures.
There's a sample up here:
http://bookviewcafe.com/bookstore/sample/revise-the-world-sample/
Tell me if you think I succeeded.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Mmm. Firenze, I have tried it, climbing deep into the head of a historical figure. And a male one, to boot, but no point in doing things by half measures.
There's a sample up here:
http://bookviewcafe.com/bookstore/sample/revise-the-world-sample/
Tell me if you think I succeeded.

Alas, against my principles. Which are that critiques should only be conducted in the sacred privacy of one's writers' group.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
No, it's already out. I will certainly never rewrite it, and so no critique needed. Like the lady in the Sondheim song, I never do anything twice.
 
Posted by SvitlanaV2 (# 16967) on :
 
Firenze and Jane R

I think I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about a novelist today writing about a slaveholder of the 18th c., for example.

I'm well aware that a novelist of the 18th c. would see the issue very differently from how we might see it today, but there were nuanced perspectives then, as there are today.
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
Meanwhile I am reading what is, one sadly suspects, the last Discworld novel, Raising Steam.

Quite apart from Mr Pratchett's sad state of health, I do wonder where the series could have gone - Ankh Morpork has become so civilised.
 
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on :
 
I was quite disappointed with Raising Steam, so I hope that the Tiffany Aching book which is meant to be still to come is good! If not then it will be a bit of a sad end to a great series.

I've just started The Goldfinch, and so far have read past my stop on the tube twice, I've been that absorbed in it. Plan A was to hold out and take it on holiday in a fortnight, but I've started it now and I'm not sure it will last that long...
 
Posted by moonlitdoor (# 11707) on :
 
Just to show to Trudy Scrumptious that there are some strange people around, I loved the Attenbury Emeralds. I've no pretension to being a literary critic, I am just a reader. Maybe it was because I have liked all Jill Paton Walsh's books, I am a big fan of Knowledge of Angels, and her Imogen Quy books as well.

As for Sherlock Holmes I recently read The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz, which I liked the best of any Sherlock Holmes books I've read, including any of Conan Doyle's originals.
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I really liked the Jill Paton Walsh Imogen Quy books and wish she'd write more of them rather than mangling Lord Peter Wimsey.

Referring back to the discussion of historical novels managing to give an authentic feeling of the times, I find reading Pat Barker, certainly her books set in WWI, give me a similar feel to books written at the time.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by moonlitdoor:
Just to show to Trudy Scrumptious that there are some strange people around, I loved the Attenbury Emeralds. I've no pretension to being a literary critic, I am just a reader.

Oh, I've liked all of them -- but did you like them as well as, or better than, the originals? That's the opinion I said I'd never heard anyone voice. Lots of people like JPW's version of LPW, including me, but usually with the caveat that they're not as a good as the originals.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I read HOUSE OF SILK. It was OK, but no more than that.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I hope the Heaven Hosts won't be too mad at me for this but it seems to me that this is probably the best place for me to ask this little question.

Sometimes when I read a story which really moves me I will read it again within a few days or a week, sometimes starting again as soon as I finish the first round. The most recent example is an internet story which I won't reference but often with printed books as well. The earliest time I can recall when I did this I was about 18 or 19 [so getting on for 50 years ago] and I have certainly been doing it pretty regularly since.

I was going to ask does this make me weird? but then I don't care if I am or not, so - do other people do this?


[edited to make a bit more sense]

[ 10. July 2014, 09:41: Message edited by: Welease Woderwick ]
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
I have done it a few times with books I really loved, but I don't do it as a regular thing. I don't think it makes you weird.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I do this as well. If you're weird, so am I... but I don't see what's weird about rereading a story that you really enjoyed. It's no weirder than buying DVDs of your favourite films or TV shows so you can watch them over and over again, surely?
 
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on :
 
There are some texts I have re-read - but never immediately, always at intervals of years or decades. Usually (if they are good) I will find more and different levels in them. If they're not, then I can see how much they were a hook for my own imagination.
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
I do it--sometimes immediately. Lewis considered this the mark of a good reader.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
I have thought of doing this because my memory is so poor these days that I want to be able to retain more of the story. But then I have so much else to read that it feels like a waste.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I read most things twice--the first time very fast, to get the overall picture. Then I reread it with a much sharper focus.

Moo
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
Yes, I love to reread. I will only keep a book that I plan to reread. (I try to borrow from the library as much as possible.) That I have twenty floor-to-ceiling bookcases in my house groaning with books shows you how bad this can get.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
I use the library for about 95% of my books (God bless them) but I do buy certain ones that I know I will always want to read every few years. About ten years ago, I had a nice collection of keepers that all became useless when I graduated to large print. Now I just have about fifty, LP keepers.

Selected from that source are one or two that I keep in my bedside nightstand for opening anywhere when I'm having trouble sleeping and need something to put my imagination in the right place.

I always read in bed before sleep, but if the book is too exciting or, worst of all, too funny, like last week's "The Rosie Project," I need a few pages of something else to settle me down.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
Sometimes when I read a story which really moves me I will read it again within a few days or a week, sometimes starting again as soon as I finish the first round.

I was going to ask does this make me weird? but then I don't care if I am or not, so - do other people do this?

To do it so soon, yes, I would say a little weird. The fact that you re-read is not unusual, though. There are some books I like to re-read every few years (The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, The Cost of Discipleship) but I am more of an extensive reader than an intensive one.

As it is, I tend to buy books that I think I should read and end up with a big pile of unread books on my desk/floor/bed.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
The other new thing in my life is ebooks. I have vision issues, and have found that reading on an I-pad is a great blessing -- I can pump the font up as big as I need. And the number of public-domain classic books available is just about infinite. I used to travel with a suitcase full of heavy paperbacks, but no more. Thousands of books fit onto this one I-pad.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
The ability to bump up the font size for those of us who have more reading difficulties as we get older, is one of the great, rarely-mentioned pleasures of e-reading. I've been reading a lot of paper books lately (because I read outdoors more in summer, and my e-reader screen is not great in sunlight, plus I don't want to risk it near the lake or pool) and I keep wanting to push that little button to make the words bigger!
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
Jane Austen couldn't have written Longbourn because at the time she was writing nobody was interested in the servants' relationships, whereas there were dozens of girls with inadequate dowries hoping to find a Mr Darcy of their own.

Richardson's Pamela and Fielding's Joseph Andrews are both centred on the emotional lives of servants, ie Pamela and Joseph. Pamela in particular was a cause of great interest.

I think Jane Austen didn't write about servants for the same reason she never describes any long dialogue in which men only are present, because she has no first hand experience.

You can say she insults servants by ignoring them, but at least she doesn't patronise them by treating them as comic relief.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I find myself using that embiggening gesture (fingertips together and then spreading them out) on screens that are not touch screens.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I'd forgotten Pamela was a maidservant, probably because she ends up marrying the squire... I was trying to think of an eighteenth-century novel that treated a working-class character's relationships with other working-class characters as seriously as Adam Bede or Mary Barton and couldn't think of one. Joseph Andrews is a parody (though otherwise a good example of a novel with a central working-class character).
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I bought a Kindle so that I could read on a moving bus. The most important thing for me is to have the lines far enough apart that I can follow them even when the bus is moving.

Moo
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:

... Sometimes when I read a story which really moves me I will read it again within a few days or a week, sometimes starting again as soon as I finish the first round. The most recent example is an internet story which I won't reference but often with printed books as well. The earliest time I can recall when I did this I was about 18 or 19 [so getting on for 50 years ago] and I have certainly been doing it pretty regularly since.

I was going to ask does this make me weird? but then I don't care if I am or not, so - do other people do this?

You may be weird but you have company...

I reread stories, usually after a while. Sometimes it's because I skimmed something and want to go back, sometimes it's because a sequel has come out and I want to see the first book in the light of the later one.

I just read a collection of blog essays by Jo Walton called "What Makes this Book so Great. Re-Reading the Classics of Science Fiction and Fantasy" by Jo Walton. So if you're a Science Fiction reader, you're not alone. Reading the book gave me an urge to read several books and series of books I had missed and the urge to re-read several I haven't read in a long time.

Her articles included some feedback comments, so you can tell she's not the only one who re-reads. What she found odder was the practice of skimming, which I do a lot. Apparently her audience was divided approximately evenly between skimmers and those who never skim fiction. Your Mileage May Vary as the saying goes...
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I sometimes do that - immediately reread a book. Not every book and not always. Usually a book I've read very fast because the plot rollicked along and I wanted to know what happened next. I go back to read the characters and settings - which I probably skimmed the first time in my haste to find out.

I also have some much loved books Pride and Prejudice is among them, which I return to when I want something reassuring.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I only keep books that I want to re-read. At the last count, it was over 500 but that stretches back a lifetime with very old childhood favourites on the shelves along with more recently acquired ones. I don't usually buy books that I know I'll only read once, unless there’s no other way of getting hold of them. I almost never re-read them immediately. There are only three that I've done this with.

Meanwhile, I've started reading The Harafish by Naguib Mahfouz, in translation. As they say on the internet, "it comprises a series of episodes in a dozen generations of a family from the Egyptian urban rabble (the 'harafish')." The translator's done a good job on what is clearly a beautiful piece of prose.

As with some foreign-language novels and films, there is a distinct difference in the style and tacit assumptions used. The episodes are more like small vignettes that leave you intrigued as to what happened in the intervals between them. Characterization of the main characters is succinct but convincing and the writing is articulate, observant and a little bit poetic in places so a pleasure to read. Interestingly, there are no hints as to what era this is set in, though obviously time progresses. I picked this book up at random from a free book exchange table, hadn't expected it to be something I’d want to read, but actually, it is quite interesting.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I'm rereading Diana Wynne Jones' The Merlin Conspiracy at the moment, in fact. I haven't finished it yet (I only picked it up yesterday and didn't get all the way through before bedtime) but I'm enjoying it a lot more than I did the first time through. Not sure why I didn't like it the first time; maybe because there are two narrators and the action keeps switching between them.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
I find myself using that embiggening gesture (fingertips together and then spreading them out) on screens that are not touch screens.

It also doesn't work on anatomical features.

My, these restraining orders are tough things!
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Have just acquired a very battered old copy of Edward Rutherfurd's "London", which a relation recommended to me years ago. Fascinating stuff - another of those novels that tells you the story of various generations of the same family, in this case from the day the Romans arrived to modern times. Enjoying this a lot.

These sorts of books are tantalizing - you just get into one setting when the scene changes, and you jump forward a few hundred years and start getting used to new characters.
 
Posted by mark_in_manchester (# 15978) on :
 
quote:
I do it <re-reading>--sometimes immediately. Lewis considered this the mark of a good reader.
That's funny; I'm currently re-reading The problem of pain. [My] self-congratulatory nonsense apart, it's rather good.

[edit to clarify ownership of nonsense, narrowly avoiding possible blasphemy charge]

[ 11. July 2014, 21:18: Message edited by: mark_in_manchester ]
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Have just acquired a very battered old copy of Edward Rutherfurd's "London", which a relation recommended to me years ago. Fascinating stuff - another of those novels that tells you the story of various generations of the same family, in this case from the day the Romans arrived to modern times. Enjoying this a lot.

These sorts of books are tantalizing - you just get into one setting when the scene changes, and you jump forward a few hundred years and start getting used to new characters.

I love his books. 'Sarum' is best - telling the story of Salisbuty starting with Stoneheng.e

Less good is one of Russia called 'Ruska'.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Yes, my aunt recommended Sarum so I'll be looking out for that next. I'll be particularly interested to read it as my ancestors came from there.

[ 12. July 2014, 09:52: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on :
 
I loved Sarum. The early stuff is brilliant and fascinating. I read it while I was living in Salisbury Diocese and was visiting the cathedral fairly regularly, which added to the interest. However, I did think that the last 100 years felt a bit rushed as if he got bored or wasn't that interested in the modern changes.
 
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Have just acquired a very battered old copy of Edward Rutherfurd's "London", which a relation recommended to me years ago. Fascinating stuff - another of those novels that tells you the story of various generations of the same family, in this case from the day the Romans arrived to modern times. Enjoying this a lot.

These sorts of books are tantalizing - you just get into one setting when the scene changes, and you jump forward a few hundred years and start getting used to new characters.

I love his books. 'Sarum' is best - telling the story of Salisbuty starting with Stoneheng.e

Less good is one of Russia called 'Ruska'.

Anyone read his "Paris"? I picked that up on a sale rack at the bookstore the other day. Haven't started it yet.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
Just read The First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North. I enjoyed it quite a bit. It's a book about a character who lives his life over and over and it plays a bit like a thriller in different parts of the world and different times. I suppose it has something in common with Life After Life which I read last year but I found this more fun. Although I was a bit tempted to start writing things down and drawing diagrams...
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have started the Dalrymple I bought last week - The Return of a King - he really is an excellent writer, great stuff. As always thoroughly researched and LONG! I'm taking it gently and reading some lighter stuff online between sessions - I think I'll need to read it again in a few months to get the full benefit.
 
Posted by venbede (# 16669) on :
 
Dalrymple is very readable. I bought the Afganistan book this spring on impulse and finished it in under a fortnight.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Curiosity killed ...:
I loved Sarum. The early stuff is brilliant and fascinating. I read it while I was living in Salisbury Diocese and was visiting the cathedral fairly regularly, which added to the interest. However, I did think that the last 100 years felt a bit rushed as if he got bored or wasn't that interested in the modern changes.

We both read it several years ago. Dunno if I finished it, but I am sure Z did.
 
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mark_in_manchester:
quote:
I do it <re-reading>--sometimes immediately. Lewis considered this the mark of a good reader.
That's funny; I'm currently re-reading The problem of pain. [My] self-congratulatory nonsense apart, it's rather good.

[edit to clarify ownership of nonsense, narrowly avoiding possible blasphemy charge]

Yes, but you also need to acknowledge that Lewis himself later saw it as inadequate. I do not recall precisely where but I think either in "A Grief Observed" or a piece written around that.

Jengie
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
IMHO Lewis saw it as inadequate for the same reasons why all theodicy is inadequate--because it doesn't do much for you in the agony of the moment. It appeals to logic, not to emotion--and emotion is what's crashing over us during a crisis from hell.

I think Lewis' PoP is fine if you take what it has to give--a logical framework--and don't ask from it what nothing earthly can give--adequate emotional comfort in a time of grief and pain. IMO the only person who ever managed to do that was Jesus, on the occasions where he raised the dead or healed v. nasty illnesses. The rest of us have to make do with inadequate comfort.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
...and now for something completely different:

I heard about a kids' books called Better Nate Than Ever and was impressed by the reviews so I bought it. It arrived yesterday and I finished it last night. Okay, it is written for 9 - 13 year olds so it is no great intellectual shakes BUT it is well written and has some realistic themes - the 13 year old protagonist can't decide if he is straight or gay, etc.

If you like kids books [I do because I can generally understand them] give it a go and let me know what you think.

However I may have to sue the publisher for unauthorised use of an image of a far younger me if you see what I mean.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I have just finished the Dalrymple book on Afghanistan* - superb! Anyone with a liking for history or good writing or just plain arrogant stupidity might well enjoy it. It is not a comfortable tale but it is superbly well told.

[*Return of a King Dalrymple, William - Bloomsbury London 2013]
 
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
... However I may have to sue the publisher for unauthorised use of an image of a far younger me if you see what I mean.

Actually, I cannot see what you mean. Instead I see this

Looking for something?

We're sorry. The Web address you entered is not a functioning page on our site.

Go to Amazon.in's Home Page

 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
Ha! Wodders, you were never young - at least not here on the Ship!

(My wife and I were still in our late forties when we became Shipmates...)
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by lily pad:
quote:
Originally posted by Welease Woderwick:
... However I may have to sue the publisher for unauthorised use of an image of a far younger me if you see what I mean.

Actually, I cannot see what you mean. Instead I see this

Looking for something?

We're sorry. The Web address you entered is not a functioning page on our site.

Go to Amazon.in's Home Page

Sorry - try this one.
 
Posted by ChastMastr (# 716) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
I only keep books that I want to re-read.

I go slightly further--I try to only buy books that I want to re-read (comics included).

I need to re-read my Lewis. [Frown]
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Re-reading Dunsany's "At the Edge of the World" which I haven't read since teenage days. It's always interesting revisiting a book you used to know well when young, and haven't read for a long time, as you see it with a kind of dual perspective: your own memories as you rediscover familiar phrases and imagery, but at the same time, you are able to see it from an adult point of view.

"At the Edge of the World" is a collection of short fantasy stories, rich in the author's usual purple prose, full of tales of gods and heroes. I've been enjoying rediscovering it. Interestingly, he attributes the names of his fictional cities and countries to his classical education, but a lot of them sound much more Arabic to me. Another instance of Victorian Oriental romanticism, I think, whether he consciously realized it or not.
 
Posted by Good for Nothing (# 17722) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by chive:
With Doublethink's permission I have started a new book thread with the title being a great quote from Mary Schmich.

Over the last couple of weeks I have read my way through the complete Sherlock Holmes stories. I tend to read and reread them every few years and every time I pick up on something that is fantastic, wonderful and entertaining. The relationship between Holmes and Watson is always entertaining and the descriptions of the clothes and the lifestyles people had then fascinate me. There is some racism (and the highly unlikely name of a character called Mohamet Singh) but that's just of it's time although it reads badly now.

I find it fascinating that Conan Doyle, who was a believer in spiritualism and all sorts of oddness, could write a character like Holmes.

Today I bought The House of Silk by Anthony Horowitz which is supposedly a new Holmes book. It will be a wee while until I read it (due to my purchase of many of the suggestions on the previous book thread) but I can't imagine it will be anything like as good as the real Holmes. We shall see.


 
Posted by Good for Nothing (# 17722) on :
 
House of Silk is a great read about a very dark subject.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
This weekend, I was planning to make a start on Erin Morgenstern's The Night Circus. Has anyone here read it?

I bought it a while back but pushed it down my reading pile. The reason was that when I bought it, I did so at the same time as I bought Penelope Lively's Moon Tiger. The person behind the till commended me on such a great pair of books, saying she'd read them both and loved them. However, Moon Tiger only got my commendation for the worst book I read last year. So if The Night Circus is similar, might I be in for an epic disappointment?
 
Posted by chive (# 208) on :
 
I really loved The Night Circus and recommended it to a friend who really loved it. Suspension of belief and acceptance of magical reality is a must though.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I was mildly disappointed by <i>House of Silk</i> but I am notoriously whiny and demanding about fiction. My favorite of the not-Doyle Holmes works is still <i>The Seven Percent Solution</i> by Nicholas Meyer. Have you read the Russell novels by Laurie King?
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Brenda, you would have had the italic code you tried to use in your post, had you done square brackets intead of angle brackets. Also, if you don't want to type codes manually, there are preset buttons for the most common codes, next to the smileys, which you will see when you next want to post to a thread.

You might like to experiment with these on our code practice thread in the Styx. It's not compulsory, but it can be helpful to try out things on a dedicated space if you wanted to do so.

Cheers

Ariel
Heaven Host
 
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on :
 
I've just started reading Inferno by Dan Brown* and am wondering if I'll be at a disadvantage because I haven't read Dante's original ... [Paranoid]

* Sorry about that - I confess I quite enjoyed The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'm reading The Science of Discworld II: The Globe - and it must be good because I'm starting to take notes! In between chapters about the wizards visiting Roundworld's London at the time of Elizabeth I (they're staying with Dr Dee) are scientific chapters talking about how human minds work. It's fascinating.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I picked up "Empire: Wounds of Honour" by Anthony Riches, at a book exchange shelf at a railway station. I didn't think I'd like it much but after a few pages I was absorbed by the story as it unfolded. It's the story of a young man whose father sends him away to Britain to avoid the emperor's paranoia, and he joins one of the legions.

Of course, he is a bit of a hero in a Boys' Own kind of way, but the book has a refreshingly contemporary and authentic feel to its description of life in the Roman army and the battles (which is what most of the book's about) that made it worth reading for me. It won't be everybody's cup of tea, but it's a good first novel and I'd read more by this author.
 
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on :
 
Bodies of Water by T. Greenwood. In 1960 two ordinary suburban housewives fall in love with each other.

This was truly a "can't put it down," book for me. I gave myself a bit of eyestrain. The love story was beautiful and the sense of impending doom from the inevitable fall out was palpable. This writer really knows what it's like to be so in love you do crazy, risky things and have to pay the price later.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I've been on a reread spell recently with Mel Keegan's Fortunes of War, Captain Marryat's Children of the New Forest and Thorne Smith's The Night Life of the Gods. I finished that last one last night and am not sure what comes next.
 
Posted by ChastMastr (# 716) on :
 
I've started re-reading Screwtape Letters! [Smile]
 
Posted by Zappa (# 8433) on :
 
I'm cranking up the reading these days, having recently completed Vasily Grossmann's monumental Life and Fate, Simmons' I'm Your Man (biography of Leonard Cohen) and now reading inter alia Paul Ham's Hiroshima Nagasaki , Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four (A-List) and Cecilia Hewlett's Rural Communities in Renaissance Tuscany, and Edmond Jabès' Book of Questions (B-List). I may never finish the B-listers though!
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
If you are a science fiction or fantasy reader, and if you are in London this coming week, the World Science Fiction Convention is in town down at the Docklands. I will be on the program -- catch me and say hi!
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I'll look out for you, Brenda! I'm very excited - I've been meeting people all week who have been to Hay-on-Wye to shop for books as part of a tour round the UK before they get to WorldCon, and they've all been lovely to chat to.
 
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Eigon:
I'll look out for you, Brenda! I'm very excited - ...

[Yipee] me too. I've been doing some military-style organisation with printouts and diagrams to try and get to see as many writers speak as possible.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ChastMastr:
I've started re-reading Screwtape Letters! [Smile]

We remember them fondly, the novels of one Clive Staples Lewis. I am sitting here in front of a fan in our study with the inadequate ductwork.
 
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ChastMastr:
I've started re-reading Screwtape Letters! [Smile]

Ever heard the John Cleese audiobook? Perfect casting. He reads it superbly.
 
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on :
 
Am currently going through a bit of a glut. Having recently finished Socialism: Utopian and Scientific and Stem Cells: A Very Short Introduction have picked up Rowan Williams' Being Christian which is as good as it is short (a bit like the inverse of Tom Wright, the longer the better!) and am enjoying The Night Circus.

Am still ploughing my way slowly through Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations which is interesting, but such hard work.

Meanwhile the coffee table book for dipping into is now Plato and a Platypus, having finished Professor Stewart's Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities.

I need to catch up with writing my reviews.
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I've just finished reading Antonia Fraser's Faith and Treason, the Story of the Gunpowder Plot. It is very well-written and interesting. I learned that Guy Fawkes role in the plot was not nearly as important as that of Robert Catesby.

The book raised a question in my mind. Why on earth did the conspirators assume that if they managed to kill the King and other prominent men, the automatic result would be religious freedom for Catholics? There were many devout Catholics in England, but there were also many devout Protestants, and an even larger number of people who were outraged at the idea of political assassination. If the plot had been successful, there might have been a civil war in which Catholics would have suffered disproportionately.

Moo
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Just a guess, but there'd been such recent, multiple, radical shifts from Catholicism to Protestantism and back again and back AGAIN that perhaps they thought it would simply swing back once more, without major bloodshed.

I would be interested to know who they might have expected to take the throne after the disaster. A Catholic?

Not that any ruler would be in favor of regicide.
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I am now reading Budapeste, by Brazilian writer Chico Buarque (better known as a singer / composer). About a ghost writer who's at a dead end but who finds solace in the Hungarian language. So far it's very good.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
i now hav The Compleet Nigel Molesworth hurrah.

This is all four books in one volume with the original illustrations. I read them as a child, and thought I'd try re-reading them, years later.

After I'd clicked the Submit button to place the online order, I wondered if I'd made a mistake and would find them childish chiz chiz but when the nice new Penguin edition arrived, it was a pleasure to read. The Molesworth stories work surprisingly well from an adult's perspective and as a grown-up you get all the little asides, between-the-line-isms and so on that you didn't pick up as a child. In fact although I was reading them on the train and feeling a bit depressed, they actually made me laugh, and I can't say that of many books.
 
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on :
 
The 100 year old man who climbed out of the window and disappeared (Jonas Jonasson) had me laughing out loud almost to the end - at the main character and also the cheek of the author to write him in as almost the sole rearranger of world history over the last century! I did get a little bored towards the end, though, as the joke did begin to wear a little thin by then.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Somebody put a boxed set of four volumes of "Game of Thrones" on a book exchange table and they were gone within minutes. I managed to snaffle Vol 1, not having read this before or seen the TV series, and am now halfway through and hooked. It's convincingly written - the author's put a lot of work into the details - and so far not as violent as I'd been led to expect. You can see some of the plot twists coming, though.

I'm quite intrigued by the idea of a godswood. Don't know why anyone hasn't thought of that before. Also I like the idea of seasons that last for years. Brian Aldiss did that in his "Helliconia" books, to good effect.
 
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on :
 
I'm reading a collection of short stories by Ted Chiang, Stories of Your Life and Others. The title story is the best so far. There's themes to do with religion and science and science as religion and religion as science. I reckon Shippies would find "Hell is the Absence of God" and "Tower of Babylon" very interesting for example.

Anyone else read them?
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
I've read some Ted Chiang stories a year ago. He's a local author, but I missed a reading he gave this summer. They're interesting in how they literalize some religious landscape and cosmology.
I do have the new Eileen Gunn novel on the stack

I've also been reading some Iain Banks novels.
 
Posted by Cara (# 16966) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
i now hav The Compleet Nigel Molesworth hurrah.

This is all four books in one volume with the original illustrations. I read them as a child, and thought I'd try re-reading them, years later.

After I'd clicked the Submit button to place the online order, I wondered if I'd made a mistake and would find them childish chiz chiz but when the nice new Penguin edition arrived, it was a pleasure to read. The Molesworth stories work surprisingly well from an adult's perspective and as a grown-up you get all the little asides, between-the-line-isms and so on that you didn't pick up as a child. In fact although I was reading them on the train and feeling a bit depressed, they actually made me laugh, and I can't say that of many books.

Any fule kno that the Molesworth stories are one of the great pleasures of life and will provide endless delite.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
This is TRUE.

New rule: anyone posting on this thread hav to do so in the style of nigel molesworth.

(Thinks: that should ensure nobody post, har har.)
 
Posted by Palimpsest (# 16772) on :
 
quote:
Crap spouted by Stejjie:

Could do with something very light and funny and inconsequential to read afterwards. Any recommendations?

if you want classic frippery you could do wurse than the Compleet Molesworth
Mapp and Lucia series

as for historical mysteries, you might want to look at A conspiracy of paper which has an 18th century Jew*** detective in London. of corse he is never gong to be half as good as anything my grate frend peason gets up to, chiz.

* 've always had a fondness for "Fire Burn" by John Dickson Carr. It involves a modern police detective (well 20th century) who is transported to Regency London and a locked room mystery.

so long as it's not doctor who coz you can have too much of a good thing.

[ 19. September 2014, 06:58: Message edited by: Ariel ]
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
* raed a book called "he Athenian Murders' by a bloke with three Spain***-sounding names. It was quite good at first with but the end was a bit of a chizz if you aks me and not a bit like "The Name of the Rose" witch the blurb sed it was. But it was'nt.

And * finely got round to redding "Wild Swans' which is not boreing stuff about burds but dont red it if you don't like histry as their was lots of that.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
and not a bit like "The Name of the Rose" witch the blurb sed it was. But it was'nt.
they all hav to sa that. the other thing they all hav to sa in the blurb on the cover if it is a fantasy book is that it is just like LORD OF THE RINGS. Usually it never bear even a passing resemblance to it, not so much as a hobbit to be seen even from a distance with a super telescope (thank god).
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
Ffotherington-Thomas likes fantasy but he is utterly weedy and wet. He talkt me into going to a fancy dress party with him as Leggolass and me as Gimli. * only went because he sed his pater would give us a ride in the Roller. But his pater had to go to Skotland for the reffyredun so his mater took us instead in pink Honda. Iw ill never live it down. Chizz, chizz, chizz.

The films are good tho, with all the batles.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
I've been reading Kate Mosse's "Sepulchre" and then re-reading "Labyrinth", the first book in her Languedoc Trilogy. It's been interesting to see how the two stories connect. "Labyrinth" switches between the Cathars in the medieval period and a female character in the present day who is drawn into re-enacting and completing some unfinished business from centuries ago.

"Sepulchre" is set partly in Victorian-era France and modern day, and revolves around a pack of Tarot cards and some more unfinished business which the modern-day heroine gets to sort out.

There is a third, "Citadel", which is set during the Nazi occupation and slips back to the time of a 4th century monk. I haven't read this yet and am debating getting hold of a copy. The storylines of the first two books in the trilogy are interesting, but somehow these just seem to fall short of being the kind of classic, gripping stories that you want to enthusiastically recommend and re-read over the months. I can't quite put my finger on why.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
I tried reading one of hers and couldn't get into it, which is odd because it's the type of thing that I would normally like. I think the problem was... detachment (the author's, or mine, or a bit of both). The characters seemed slightly lifeless and I found myself completely uninterested in what happened to them.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
...

I would be interested to know who [the Gunpowder Plotters] might have expected to take the throne after the disaster. A Catholic?

...

According to Wikipedia, James's young daughter Elizabeth would be installed as a puppet Queen, and brought up as a Catholic & married to one. This is slightly ironic, given that in fact in later life, as the 'Winter Queen' of Bohemia, she became bit of a Protestant pin-up girl.

[ 24. September 2014, 10:53: Message edited by: Albertus ]
 
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on :
 
Mistake on the attribution above. That quote about the Catholic--it weren't me, guv.
 
Posted by Albertus (# 13356) on :
 
Oh well, apols
 
Posted by georgiaboy (# 11294) on :
 
I've only recently discovered Sarah Caudwell's work. Here in the US, I've found 'Thus Was Adonis Murdered' (1981), 'The Shortest Way to Hades' (1984) and 'The Sirens Sang of Murder' (1989).
Lots of fun detail about the legal profession in London, incidentals of life of an Oxford prof, and excellently crafted plot and dialogue.

Don't know if there are later entries to her list, but I highly recommend these.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jane R:
I tried reading one of hers and couldn't get into it, which is odd because it's the type of thing that I would normally like. I think the problem was... detachment (the author's, or mine, or a bit of both). The characters seemed slightly lifeless and I found myself completely uninterested in what happened to them.

Yes, it was the sort of thing I'd normally enjoy as well. I think "slightly lifeless" and "detached" are about right. With some novels you can get absorbed in them as the story plays out in front of you; with these I tended to be conscious that I was reading a work of fiction.
 
Posted by Jane R (# 331) on :
 
Could have been worse. Could have been 'The Affinity Engine' by George Mann. Reading THAT was like listening to Les Dawson playing the piano...

...with the caveat that Les Dawson was obviously a brilliant pianist deliberately playing badly, whereas George Mann's writing style is presumably like that *all the time*.

(For non-UK readers: Les Dawson playing the piano )
 
Posted by Melangell (# 4023) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by georgiaboy:
I've only recently discovered Sarah Caudwell's work. Here in the US, I've found 'Thus Was Adonis Murdered' (1981), 'The Shortest Way to Hades' (1984) and 'The Sirens Sang of Murder' (1989).
Lots of fun detail about the legal profession in London, incidentals of life of an Oxford prof, and excellently crafted plot and dialogue.

Don't know if there are later entries to her list, but I highly recommend these.

I believe the fourth and final title is The sibyl in her grave (2000). The author died in February of that year. The crime writer Martin Edwards has an article about her here . I agree that it's a very enjoyable series…
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
[tangent] Hi Melangell! [Big Grin] [/tangent]

Recently the Book Group read one of Laurie R. King's books from her Mary Russell series. Recently I found one of her Kate Martinelli mysteries in a used book store. How could I lose?
[Smile]

This book, "with child" totally sucked me in. King writes intelligently (IMHO) and descriptively. "with child" is the third in the series, so now it's time to hunt the first two and any others King may have written since! Very different from the Mary Russell stories, but just as hard to put down. The library is across the street from my work, which is a Very Good Thing!
 
Posted by Melangell (# 4023) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
[tangent] Hi Melangell! [Big Grin] [/tangent]

Recently the Book Group read one of Laurie R. King's books from her Mary Russell series. Recently I found one of her Kate Martinelli mysteries in a used book store. How could I lose?
[Smile]

[tangent] Hello jedijudy! [/tangent]

I enjoy both the Mary Russell and the Kate Martinelli series - there are currently five of the latter. No. 5, The Art of Detection, appears to bridge both series…(!)

A good source for finding out what my favourite authors have written is Fantastic Fiction which is where I've just checked out the KM series. Lots to enjoy!
 
Posted by balaam (# 4543) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
I'm reading Frankenstein right now, and I have to say I'm pleasantly surprised by it. ... It seems that there different kinds of ethics at play here.

The point being is that the real monster is not the creature but the doctor who created it.
 
Posted by Jack the Lass (# 3415) on :
 
My most recent 3 books have all been by journalists (this was by accident not design), which meant that they have all been well-written, easy reads with a good eye/ear for a pithy phrase.

First up was "Eat, Pray, Eat" by Michael Booth - he's a food writer who goes with his family for an extended trip round India, ostensibly to research for a book on Indian food, but the subtext is to salvage his marriage and family life which have been suffering primarily from his drinking, lack of attention and general mid-life crisis. Midway through the trip his wife announces that she has enrolled him in a 5 week yoga bootcamp in Mysore, and that if he doesn't sort himself out she is leaving. It took me a while to get into, I think that the way he set it up was to make it really clear that he was a bit of a selfish prick who needed to sort himself out, so although it was self-deprecating (and often quite funny, usually at his expense), I found it quite hard to get beyond thinking "you're a bit of a selfish prick". I found I had a ton more sympathy for him once he started the yoga bootcamp, both in terms of his own insights about himself but also because of his descriptions of the realities of an overweight, middle-aged, unfit, cynical person trying to do this pretty hardcore yoga (he talked for example about feeling humiliated lying on the floor to recover while all around the other participants were contorting themselves into all sorts of unlikely positions; I could *so* relate to that from my one (and probably only) humiliating foray into yoga a few years ago. I enjoyed this, eventually, and will keep an eye out for more of his books in the library.

Second up, last week I finished Ron McMillan's "Between Weathers: Travels Round 21st Century Shetland". This was a wonderful book. I had been to Shetland for a couple of days a few years ago and always wanted to go back, and this just fed into that, it was a brilliant evocation of a wonderful place. He is just one of those wonderful travellers who travels without (much of) an itinerary, preferring to just see where the fancy takes him and who he meets, and he was very generous in his writing without romanticising the place. Thoroughly recommended.

And now I'm reading "The Potting-Shed Papers: On Gardening, Gardeners and Garden History" by Charles Elliott, which is a series of essays originally appearing as his column in the American magazine Horticulture. Although American he lives in London and has a garden in south Wales, so writes as both an insider and outsider on the peculiarities of gardening in Britain. None of the essays are longer than 5 or 6 pages, so it's a great book for dipping into, but I am really enjoying it.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I think someone on board recommended A Conspiracy of Paper by David Liss, but I can't find the post in question ... well, if it wasn't a shipmate, I don't know who it was, but I'm very grateful. It's a substantial treat - I'm halfway through at the moment and dragging it out a bit because I don't want it to end.
 
Posted by Wood (# 7) on :
 
I just finished reading a fascinating poetry collection called Dance Dance Revolution by Cathy Park Hong, set in a near-future fake American city-cum museum. Funny and sad, and very, very odd.
 
Posted by deano (# 12063) on :
 
I've just read The Lord of the Rings. I thought this thread was about that. Sorry.

Well I say read, I've read the first third of the book a few times and just got bored with it. I've been trying to get through the damned thing since I was 16. I made it this time at the age of 47!

Was it worth it? On balance yes. I think the pacing is off and had to persevere a few times when the same characters were walking across the same country for days on end, and I did skip over almost all the poetry and songs. But it was enjoyable at the end.

Anyway, sorry for the diversion.
 
Posted by Sandemaniac (# 12829) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by balaam:
The point being is that the real monster is not the creature but the doctor who created it.

Oh yes, very much so! The monster becomes monstrous because of what happens to it, but as balaam says...

AG
 
Posted by Moo (# 107) on :
 
I am currently reading what if?; serious scientific answers to absurd hypothetical questions*. It's by Randall Munroe, the creator of xkcd.

Here is one of the questions and an excerpt from the answer**
quote:
What if a glass of water was, all of a sudden, literally half empty?
.......
But what if the empty half of the glass were actually empty--a vacuum? The vacuum would definitely not last long But exactly what happens depends on a key question that nobody usually bothers to ask: Which half is empty?

Moo


*Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Boston 2014
**p.119-120
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I have just read a review copy of The Great and Holy War by Philip Jenkins. It debunks myths about life in the trenches and the lack of belief. It also shows how most of our problems today were caused by that war.
 
Posted by agingjb (# 16555) on :
 
I'm reading "Impressions of Theophrastus Such" by George Eliot.

A confession, I'd never heard of this book, her last, until I came across a mention in an essay by Geoffrey Hill.
 
Posted by The Weeder (# 11321) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gill H:
quote:
Originally posted by ChastMastr:
I've started re-reading Screwtape Letters! [Smile]

Ever heard the John Cleese audiobook? Perfect casting. He reads it superbly.
I pulled my Screwtape off the shelves this morning, to re-read. I read it every couple of years or so- it never fails to amuse me.

I am also re-reading the Father Brown stories. GK Chestertons stories about this little Catholic priest never fail to hit the spot.
 
Posted by TurquoiseTastic (# 8978) on :
 
I am currently attacking "North and South" for the first time. My goodness. I had completely the wrong idea of Mrs. Gaskell previously - I thought she was a sort of sub-Austen-type writer. More like Eliot with a touch of "Dickens on an aggressive day"!
 
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on :
 
I am eternally grateful to the person who passed along Louis de Bernières’s Notwithstanding. It’s a collection of interconnected short stories describing life in an English village. It’s filled with fabulous characters and surprisingly unsentimental. I loved it and am very bummed that's it's finished already.
 
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on :
 
Just finished reading "Citadel" by Kate Mosse, the third book in her "Labyrinth" trilogy. This one is set in the same part of southern France as the others, but during the Second World War.

It's an odd book. There's less of the timeslip element than in her previous two, so when she does plunge back into the fourth century, it comes almost as an irrelevance and an anomaly. The story of the Resistance fighters is much more interesting and the conclusion not what I had expected.

I was interested to see the author had written this book three times; perhaps that's the secret because it came across as more polished than the preceding two. I'm half minded to get a copy of this as I think this is one that I'll want to read again.

(I wonder if she will write more? When you have a 700-year-old hero like Audric Baillard, there's plenty of scope for him to be involved in adventures in other centuries...)
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I have just finished 'Fabulous Riches' by former pop star, now priest, Richard Coles. It's like a long personal testimony but has been vilified by conservative evangelicals who know next to nothing about the spiritual classics.


This has my detailed thoughts on it.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I have just finished 'Fabulous Riches' by former pop star, now priest, Richard Coles. It's like a long personal testimony but has been vilified by conservative evangelicals who know next to nothing about the spiritual classics.


This has my detailed thoughts on it.

Looks good Leo. One for our book group?
I must be middle class as I wear Boden, have eaten Mivvis and am aware of Jennings and Buckeridge!
 
Posted by leo (# 1458) on :
 
I think a book group could get a lot out of it, provided there weren't any who are prudish.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I have recently discovered Simon Parke's thrillers. I thoroughly enjoyed A Vicar, Crucified, which was clearly written by somebody who knows how the CofE works (or doesn't!). My only quibble concerns Abbot Peter; I don't understand why he left his monastery when he retired as abbot. Finding one of the most accurate descriptions of myself I have seen for a while in the Enneagram types in the Appendix was weird. The second one is already downloaded...
 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
quote:
JoannaP: I have recently discovered Simon Parke's thrillers. I thoroughly enjoyed A Vicar, Crucified
This was discussed by the Ship's book group last year.
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
Thanks for that link; having read the discussion, I am now wondering if I am being too easily pleased...
 
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on :
 
Rather late to the party on this one
Moo said (in August):
quote:
I've just finished reading Antonia Fraser's Faith and Treason, the Story of the Gunpowder Plot. It is very well-written and interesting. I learned that Guy Fawkes role in the plot was not nearly as important as that of Robert Catesby.
I read this a while ago and really enjoyed it. Catesby was such a charasmatic person. Has anyone written a novel or made a film with him as the main character? The end where, mortally wounded, he tries to crawl towards a statue of Our Lady was very cinematic.
The main thing that remained with me from reading the book was Catesby and co escaping when the plot was rumbled, holding up in a houese and then trying to dry their damp gunpowder by a fire.
 
Posted by Tree Bee (# 4033) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I think a book group could get a lot out of it, provided there weren't any who are prudish.

The ship book group would like to read it when the paperback comes out, say, next June.
How would you feel about posting some questions for us then?
 
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on :
 
I have discovered that, as well as the Daisy Dalrymple books, Carola Dunn has written several regency romances. They aspire to be Heyer (in a way that M. C. Beaton's don't) and it can be fun dissecting them in terms of which Heyer inspired which bit. The plots are stupendously silly - and generally seem to involve somebody pretending to be lower down the social scale than they really are - but they are easy to read and good fun.

One day, I might get out of my prolonged comfort reading rut but, in the meantime, these are less than £2 on the Kindle.
 
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on :
 
** Bumped** for Wodders.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
Thanks Huia.

I recently started a rather superfluous new Books thread with the following post. Now I know where this thread is the new one can be deleted.

quote:
I think the previous book thread went the way of all flesh in the last winnowing so I thought I would start another, just for the heck of it.

We went away last week and before going I stood looking at my fiction shelves trying to choose a suitable volume and settled on Le Carre's Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy - I had forgotten over the years since I last read any of his stuff what a really excellent write the guy is - excellent stuff. Now I have remade his acquaintance I may try more later.


 
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on :
 
I'm a great Le Carré fan, although I find reading too much in one go leads to a sense of desperation setting in (you also notice how he plagiarises himself from time to time). A Perfect Spy is my favourite of his.
 
Posted by ElaineC (# 12244) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JoannaP:
I have discovered that, as well as the Daisy Dalrymple books, Carola Dunn has written several regency romances. They aspire to be Heyer (in a way that M. C. Beaton's don't) and it can be fun dissecting them in terms of which Heyer inspired which bit. The plots are stupendously silly - and generally seem to involve somebody pretending to be lower down the social scale than they really are - but they are easy to read and good fun.

One day, I might get out of my prolonged comfort reading rut but, in the meantime, these are less than £2 on the Kindle.

I discovered Daisy recently too. I read an omnibus edition of four books on my Kindle. I loved them. I do like a nice easy read!

As usual I have two books on the go at once. One I read on my Kindle on the way to and from work and at the moment it's Time's Echo by Pamela Hartshorne set both in the present and York in 1577. It's compelling reading as two lives are drawn together. A Kindle recommendation.
My other one is The Food of Love Cookery School by Nicky Pellegrino it's set in Sicily and again is a very easy read I bought in the airport departure lounge.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doublethink:

On the other had, An Instance of the Fingerpost is possibly one of the best mysterys I have read

I found it to be the worst mystery I had ever read!

I got it from the library, but it was so rough going that, try as I may, I could not get through it. I abandoned it about mid-way through...
 
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on :
 
I've just finished Frankenstein, which I'd never read before. My goodness, what a story! There are a couple of bits that don't make much sense, or seem to have been included because they introduce the exotic or the picturesque (I suspect Mary might have been giving in to some unwanted advice from Byron and Shelley), but overall it's phenomenal. Both the Creature and Frankenstein have real moral authority, even though they're utterly opposed, and the final scene (in the ship) is simply beautiful.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
I've just been reading The Lamp of the Wicked, the fifth Merrily Watkins story, by Phil Rickman. This is the one with the electricity pylons and Fred West, and I enjoyed it very much. As I live in the general area, it's very easy to imagine things like Lol's come-back concert at the Courtyard in Hereford and so on.
I picked this one up thinking vaguely it might be the one before Magus of Hay, but of course it's far earlier in the series than that - so I still have to find the one in which Frannie Bliss gets the concussion he's dealing with at the beginning of Magus. (and isn't it easy to slip into thinking of the characters as real people?)
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I have just finished THE KING OF INVENTORS: A Biography of Wilkie Collins by Catherine Peters. This came out in 1993.
 
Posted by Motylos (# 18216) on :
 
Just finished Star Maker by Olaf Stapleton — one of those intriguing interwar ‘histories’ of the future, such as H. G. Wells The Shape of Things to Come, which have an overarching belief in the superiority of the rational man — which has an amazing overview of the world in the late 1930s in the last chapter. Now started Hermann Hesse’s The Glass Bead Game — I am a glutton for genre. But my default is always one of Margery Allingham’s Campion stories. I like her wordcraft and descriptions. Although I also embarked on reading Ender’s Game as I am a bit of a Sci-Fi addict too. With that in mind, has anyone else ever read any Sherri S. Tepper novels?
 
Posted by basso (# 4228) on :
 
I like Tepper. She's very feminist and environmentalist, which can wave big red flags at some readers, but it makes me like her more.

You might start with The Family Tree.
 
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Adeodatus:
I've just finished Frankenstein, which I'd never read before. My goodness, what a story! There are a couple of bits that don't make much sense, or seem to have been included because they introduce the exotic or the picturesque (I suspect Mary might have been giving in to some unwanted advice from Byron and Shelley), but overall it's phenomenal. Both the Creature and Frankenstein have real moral authority, even though they're utterly opposed, and the final scene (in the ship) is simply beautiful.

It was bloody fabulous when read it quite a few years ago and I also read and saw Nosferatu.
 
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on :
 
A friendly, hostly comment to Brenda Clough: please use italics or quotes when providing book titles. Use of all caps comes across as shouting, and my poor nerves get in such a jumpy state when shouting is going on! [Biased]

jedijudy
Heaven Host with sensitive ears...or is it eyes?

 
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on :
 
I just bought a book by Portuguese writer Afonso Cruz. It is called Jesus Cristo bebeu cerveja ("Jesus Christ drank beer"). It seems interesting. It's about a man who's always wanted to see Jerusalem and goes there with his daughter just before he dies. But I admit I bought it for the title also [Biased] I'll be travelling on a boat along the Amazon River again this week, so I'll have plenty of time to read.
 
Posted by Motylos (# 18216) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by basso:
I like Tepper. She's very feminist and environmentalist, which can wave big red flags at some readers, but it makes me like her more.

You might start with The Family Tree.

Thanks, basso, but I have read a number of her works. I find her understanding of alien minds and cultures riveting. Her own background is interesting and has justifiably influenced her feminism and environmentalism.
 
Posted by Welease Woderwick (# 10424) on :
 
I've just finished The Martian by Andy Weir - I have already discussed it with a few folks elsewhere.

Yes, it is a good read BUT I thought it got a bit boring and repetitive in the third quarter.

Will I ever read it again?

Possibly but I think it'll be a while before I'm moved to do so.
 
Posted by QLib (# 43) on :
 
I've just finished Ruth Ozeki's A Tale for the Time Being which I think I prefer to The Luminaries which beat it to the Booker prize in 2013. Well, I like them both, but I could do without all the astrological crap in the latter, whereas the Zen element in Ozeki's tale is much more my cup of tea.

I'm another huge fan of An Instance of the Finger Post - it deals so brilliantly with the post-modernist agenda.
 
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on :
 
I loved Fingerpost. I found a thick trade-paper edition abandoned at a beach resort in Antigua, and instantly adopted it. Kept me happy on the flight home and for days after.
 
Posted by Eigon (# 4917) on :
 
Whenever I see a Daphne du Maurier I haven't read before I pick it up, so I've just whizzed through The Flight of the Falcon, set in an Italian university town a little while after the Second World War, and involving two brothers separated during the last days of the war, while comparing and contrasting with Duke Claudio the Falcon and his brother during the Renaissance. So the ending becomes inevitable as the two stories parallel each other - but I read du Maurier for the atmosphere as much as anything, so I thoroughly enjoyed being immersed in that world.
 


© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0