Thread: Is it really the Last Jedi? Spoilers, too!! Beware! Board: Heaven / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=012936
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
OK, this is for all of us who are jedi, clones, Corellian Scum, Sith lords, and other beings who have thoughts and opinions about the upcoming Star Wars movie.
Here's one trailer for those who haven't seen it.
Trailer.
Now, it looks suspiciously like Rey is talking to Kylo Ren, which upset Daughter-Unit and I greatly. However, since the backgrounds in that clip are different, I'm hoping that's a deliberate red herring!
D-U, my S-i-L and I will be seeing The Last Jedi the evening before it officially opens. But until then, speculate away! Let us know when new trailers are out! Help us! You're our only hope!!
Posted by simontoad (# 18096) on
:
Before the last film came out, the one with the Death Star AGAIN, I binge-watched the previous films. This was a huge mistake, as I became incensed at what I saw as a recycled storyline. I was so upset that when a bloke in the cinema got up and walked out I thought he was protesting and almost got up and followed him out, fist in the air. He came back a few minutes later, so it would have been really embarrassing if I had done it. Me: Solidarity brother. These bastards are ripping us off blind. Did they do the script during the writers' strike? Him: I'm just going for a piss mate.
When I spoke to my brother about it, he said I was crazy and pointed out all the differences, which were minor but sufficient. My big beef was that the Death Star had basically the same design flaw as the one Luke blew up, and I raved and ranted about that until my brother calmly pointed out that I was an idiot.
In order to curry favor with my Nephews, I have pre-purchased the video game Star Wars Battlefront 2: 2017, and my minor participation in the beta has re-kindled my interest in the franchise. I think I might see that film with Rey again, the Rogue Nation one, and this new one too. If I'm really polite about them, the nephews might look after me in my dotage.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by jedijudy:
Now, it looks suspiciously like Rey is talking to Kylo Ren, which upset Daughter-Unit and I greatly. However, since the backgrounds in that clip are different, I'm hoping that's a deliberate red herring!
Is this the thing that people were upset about and described as a big spoiler? To me that looked like a classic example of misleading scene-cutting in the trailer. You can't tell who either Rey or Kylo Ren is talking to in that scene: I think it's cut from two different scenes to make it look like they're talking to each other. But I guess we'll see!
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I thought the big give-away was that Kylo-Ren is going to kill his mother. They have to write Carrie Fisher out of the series somehow (sniff).
I predict some very recycly Jedi-training (but without Yoda).
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Was there anything in the trailer that suggested Kylo killing Leia? If so, I missed it (not that I mind an excuse to watch it again).
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
I took the scene where Leia was looking out the window of whatever space ship that was, and Kylo Ren with his finger on the trigger could be another red herring, or it could be how Carrie Fisher (msriparig) gets written out of the story.
Simontoad, that annoyed me too, but it seems the Evil Empire, or First Order or current bad dudes all seem to think they'll eventually get the Death Star right.
Bad Guy 1: "Let's just make it bigger!!"
Bad Guy 2: "Yeah, that'll work!"
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on
:
Isn't it usual that Jedi have trouble with their teachers in some way? Daddy issues have already been repeated. Maybe we're going to do mummy issues now. It's in Freud somewhere, who got it from the ancient Greeks. What symbology is the big eared white cat-goat in the trailer. An archetype perhaps?
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I thought the big give-away was that Kylo-Ren is going to kill his mother. They have to write Carrie Fisher out of the series somehow (sniff).
Adam Driver ( throwing down script) :"Are you shitting me? Are you out of your minds? Little kids will be shin- kicking me in the streets! "
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
For being such a great human being, Adam Driver sure plays a believable evil bad guy!
I'm hoping for a story of redemption, but what do I know?
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Oh, I think we're getting a Kylo Ren redemption arc, but not to be completed in this movie. Also I think killing BOTH your parents might be a bit too far to come back from for a redemption story, but that's just me.
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I thought the big give-away was that Kylo-Ren is going to kill his mother. They have to write Carrie Fisher out of the series somehow (sniff).
Adam Driver ( throwing down script) :"Are you shitting me? Are you out of your minds? Little kids will be shin- kicking me in the streets! "
"Leia shot first".
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
OK. I just saw The Last Jedi! WooHoo!!
I'm not going to tell you all anything. Yet.
Daughter-Unit and my handsome Son-in-Law and I all thought it was a magnificent movie! There were so many surprises and we thought things were going one way, and they went another! And it was so good to see Carrie Fisher again.
When more of you have seen it, and we think it's safe to discuss, I think we should do so and parse out what will happen next! Oh boy, oh boy!
Posted by sharkshooter (# 1589) on
:
I can't believe we have to wait two full years before Episode IX comes out.
Posted by Prester John (# 5502) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by sharkshooter:
I can't believe we have to wait two full years before Episode IX comes out.
Two years is nothing. If Lucas was running things we would have to wait for the next presidential administration before seeing it. He took way too long.
Posted by sharkshooter (# 1589) on
:
Yeah, but I had lots more years left back then.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
D-U and I were debating things about the movie this morning. It's fun to talk to her since she's as much a fanatic as I am. I did raise her right, and she married another one just like us!
We're going to see it again on Sunday. There was so much going on, there are things we have to check out. Of course, we may have to go a few more times to make sure our observations are correct.
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on
:
I saw it on Friday. Some bits i liked, some bits i didn't but on the whole I think it was a great film, a solid addition to both the overall story and the individual character arcs and that it set up the next film without us being able to guess exactly what will happen in the next film
Once we are able to discuss freely, without fear of spoiling, there are a few points I would like to chew over with other people
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Wet Kipper:
Once we are able to discuss freely, without fear of spoiling, there are a few points I would like to chew over with other people
I agree, Wet Kipper.
D-U and I saw it again yesterday, and enjoyed it as much or more than the first time. For some reason, the funny parts were even funnier because we knew they were coming!
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
THIS COMMENT CONTAINS SPOILERS
I saw it on Saturday.
This is a bumph sentence to fill space lest anyone failed to understand the top line.
OK?
Some have commented favourably about the film's humour. I thought it was laid on a little too thick at the start. There were some really obvious plotlines that could have been explored, but I thought they were dodged quite well.
What struck me most about the film was the abandoning of the sequential timeline that has been a feature in most of the other Star Wars films, instead opting for parallel stories. This was done to some extent in The Empire Strikes Back with Luke's training on Degobar (sp?) while the others went to the cloud city. But the plot of the The Last Jedi was sufficiently different, so I don't think any accusation of trying to copy The Empire Strikes Back would stand up to much scrutiny.
The only bit I really didn't like was the "flying/floating" scene. I thought it was a good juncture and was thinking "Ah, so that's how they resolved that point" only to then have that particular element of the film continue.
Though I did twig that there was something off with the beard colour later on in the film, which was quite well done, but as I said: I did spot it.
By the way, anyone else thing the crystal critters should've been called ice foxes? Crystal critters is such a crap name.
Posted by Ian Climacus (# 944) on
:
** SPOLIERS **
** REALLY, SPOILERS **
** LAST WARNING **
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
The only bit I really didn't like was the "flying/floating" scene. I thought it was a good juncture and was thinking "Ah, so that's how they resolved that point" only to then have that particular element of the film continue.
I didn't get this bit at all. I am not a huge fan (ducks), so does this relate to something else in a previous episode? What was the point? Did she "harness" the force, or did it surround her, to keep her alive in space?
I didn't get it.
But then I only have a small brain.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ian Climacus:
** SPOLIERS **
** REALLY, SPOILERS **
** LAST WARNING **
I am not a huge fan (ducks),
That's OK. I have come to understand over the decades that not everyone is quite as fanatic as I am.
quote:
...so does this relate to something else in a previous episode?
I didn't get it.
If I understand what you're asking, some of us were wondering how Leia would get written out of the Star Wars Universe. Apparently the Force wasn't done with her yet!
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on
:
Is what I'm about to ask actually a spoiler ?
.
.
I'm not sure really.
..
..
.
but I'll put in some blocking text anyway
..
(edited to add) - i then looked at this posy in the "today's threads, and discovred that lines of dots, or blank spaces with carriage returns is not enough to push the contentious text out of the scope of the "preview" of my contribution when it appears in that view
Hopefully this additional prose will assist in the "blinding" process
.
.
Was anyone else hoping they would categorically confirm Rey's parentage one way or the other, or explain her "abilities" ?
I say categorically because I do not trust anything Kylo Ren said in their conversations
[ 19. December 2017, 10:05: Message edited by: Wet Kipper ]
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on
:
and then the edited post didn't show the extra text in that preview. So i'm adding a throwaway post to make it not the "newest" entry
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
THIS COMMENT CONTAINS SPOILERS
I saw it on Saturday.
This is a bumph sentence to fill space lest anyone failed to understand the top line.
OK?
Left in for obvious reasons. Read on at your own peril - this gets pretty spoilery towards the end.
quote:
Some have commented favourably about the film's humour. I thought it was laid on a little too thick at the start.
Yes, I'd have to agree there. I felt at times that they were making a bit of a mockery of the whole thing.
quote:
The only bit I really didn't like was the "flying/floating" scene. I thought it was a good juncture and was thinking "Ah, so that's how they resolved that point" only to then have that particular element of the film continue.
One thing I really liked was immediately before then, when everyone in the entire cinema thought one person was going to pull the trigger, only for them to back out at the last minute, only for two nameless mooks to do it instead. The double subversion of what was expected was just incredible.
I agree that the floaty-flying bit was pretty darn WTF. But without it we couldn't have had the awesome scene nearer the end where she casually stuns him on the bridge of the cruiser without saying a word.
quote:
Though I did twig that there was something off with the beard colour later on in the film, which was quite well done, but as I said: I did spot it.
I spotted it too. Not just the beard, but the saber colour, the avoidance of certain death by many many guns and the ducking and diving gave it away for me.
I could have believed the saber colour was a genuine mistake if not for the fact that they'd got it right earlier in the movie.
quote:
By the way, anyone else thing the crystal critters should've been called ice foxes? Crystal critters is such a crap name.
"Crystal critters" is almost certainly just a nickname that character thought up on the spot rather than the official species name. And wasn't it nice that a creature like that was thrown in with a genuine and important part to play in the plot rather than just as a bit of CGI eye candy?
.
In no particular order, some other SPOILERY things I want to say about the movie:
- OK, Rian, we get it. War is bad. But maybe you shouldn't lay that message on quite so thickly in a movie called Star Fucking WARS?
- R2D2 is a master of emotional manipulation.
- Dark Side caves are trippy as fuck.
- Why do Resistance bombers move so bloody slowly? They're in space ferchrissakes!
- Why do First Order turbolaser bolts follow ballistic trajectories? They're in space ferchrissakes!
- Why do resistance ships stop moving when they run out of fuel? They're in space ferchrissakes!
- Snoke. Fun character, shame he had to split.
- "Don't go this way, Ben". *sniff*
- Now that's what I call ramming speed. Every jaw in the room was on the floor at that scene.
- "That's how we'll beat them. Not fighting what we hate, but saving what we love"
- "I don't want to do this right now" "yeah, me too"
- So that's where blue milk comes from.
- Luke: parking X-Wings underwater since 1980.
- Best. Lightsaber kill. EVER.
- "Amazing. Every part of what you just said was wrong."
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
Martin, when the new ship launches, I fully expect you to deploy quote 15 quite liberally in Purgatory and Hell.
The silent moment was pretty good. Though I was bugged by where I'd seen that actress before. I just couldn't place her. Until I saw the final credits and twigged which other film featuring creatures I'd seen her in.
As for the best lightsabre kill, there were a few options. Was it the the one where the character was sat down or the rather forceful eye poke?
Posted by Sipech (# 16870) on
:
*Marvin* - bloody autocorrect.
Posted by Wet Kipper (# 1654) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
from what was Originally posted by Sipech:
THIS COMMENT CONTAINS SPOILERS
I saw it on Saturday.
This is a bumph sentence to fill space lest anyone failed to understand the top line.
Left in for obvious reasons.
Read on at your own peril - this gets pretty spoilery towards the end.
[*]Why do Resistance bombers move so bloody slowly? They're in space ferchrissakes!
agreed, even though lot of mass would still need lots of energy to move it in space, you'd think they would give them stronger engines.
But I expect the "plan" was for more stalling time to allow them to be directly over the thing before de-cloaking or whatever it was they did
[*]Now that's what I call ramming speed. Every jaw in the room was on the floor at that scene.
but why did she wait until so many of the transports had been picked off (and conveniently not the "main characters' one) before she decided to do that ?
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sipech:
As for the best lightsabre kill, there were a few options. Was it the the one where the character was sat down or the rather forceful eye poke?
Eye poke.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Wet Kipper:
but why did she wait until so many of the transports had been picked off (and conveniently not the "main characters' one) before she decided to do that ?
For that matter, what in hell were the other Star Destroyers doing during that whole set piece? If I was in charge of the First Order fleet I'd have told two of them to go to hyperspace for half a second, drop out right in front of the Resistance ship and either pulverise the shit out of it or force it to waste fuel going to hyperspace itself.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Wet Kipper:
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
from what was Originally posted by Sipech:
THIS COMMENT CONTAINS SPOILERS
I saw it on Saturday.
This is a bumph sentence to fill space lest anyone failed to understand the top line.
Left in for obvious reasons.
Read on at your own peril - this gets pretty spoilery towards the end.
[*]Why do Resistance bombers move so bloody slowly? They're in space ferchrissakes!
agreed, even though lot of mass would still need lots of energy to move it in space, you'd think they would give them stronger engines.
But I expect the "plan" was for more stalling time to allow them to be directly over the thing before de-cloaking or whatever it was they did
There is also the question of how when a ship in orbit (i.e. freefall) opens its bomb doors the bombs would drop at all. We'll chalk that down to Movie Space Physics Is Not Real Physics.
quote:
[*]Now that's what I call ramming speed. Every jaw in the room was on the floor at that scene.
but why did she wait until so many of the transports had been picked off (and conveniently not the "main characters' one) before she decided to do that ?
Takes a minute or two to steel yourself for a suicide move.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Anyhoo, I gather the nerdier end of the Star Wars fanbase (that's a bit like saying "the more Charismatic end of HTB") don't like it much. From what I gather the objections are:
1. Fan theories uncomfirmed - ie Rey's parents not being anyone in particular, the "who is Snoke" question being answered with "that dead guy".
2. Too many main characters being female, brown or both. qf. Ghostbusters remake, Gamergate.
I despair of my fellow geeks sometimes. There are some right misogynistic knob-ends amongst them. I suppose it's natural that when your one hope of the companionship of the opposite sex is the only girl in your Warhammer group, and you're competing against thirteen other geeks, and she's going out with the captain of the football team anyway, there's a bit of resentment, but, guys, give it time, wait until your earning potential in SQL and Linux Development starts being sexier than a fading ability to score from the opposite side of the field and you'll be right.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Questioning the physics in Star Wars is like counting bullets shot from a cowboys six-shooter.
It misses the point and if that is what pulls you back, perhaps it is not the genre for you.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
I have been studiously avoiding this thread until now but finally got the cinema last night.
Spoiler buffer
Spoiler buffer
Spoiler buffer
I liked it but less than the previous one. I found it a bit overlong and thought it took a while to get going.
Kylo-Ren isn’t villainous enough for me. I get the rationale for making him a conflicted character – after all, they were always going to be on a loser if they tried to come up with another baddie as evil as Darth Vader – but I still find him a bit wet behind the ears. I’m glad he’s lost the mask, OTOH. It was never as badass as his grandfather’s.
I was glad to see Yoda who has always been my favourite Jedi.
I’m intrigued that they kept Princess Leia alive until the end of the film and am intrigued as to how they’re going to write her out.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
Kylo-Ren isn’t villainous enough for me. I get the rationale for making him a conflicted character – after all, they were always going to be on a loser if they tried to come up with another baddie as evil as Darth Vader – but I still find him a bit wet behind the ears.
I disagree, mostly because I think Vader's evil has always been a bit oversold. I mean, what does he actually do in the original trilogy?
ANH - picks up a guy by the throat, fails to get Leia to talk, watches passively as Tarkin destroys Alderaan, kills Obi-Wan (mostly because Obi-Wan lets it happen) and takes out a few X-Wings before being shafted by Han's heroic return.
TESB - force chokes a couple of subordinates, hires a few bounty hunters, sets a trap to catch Luke, fails to catch Luke despite being a clearly superior Force user.
ROTJ - handles a dispute with some contractors who look like not hitting their deadline, lets the rebels get through the Death Star shield, accepts Luke's surrender, mopes around a bit due to conflict between the light and dark within him, loses to Luke in a lightsaber fight, kills the Emperor, turns to the light, dies.
Kylo, by contrast, has killed Max von Sydow in cold blood, directly ordered the extermination of an entire village, literally mind raped two leading characters, murdered his own father, taken out every resistance fighter in a pretty darn cool bit of flying, killed his mentor in order to replace him as Supreme Leader, and made several good attempts to kill Luke (he didn't know it wasn't really Luke). And all while being far more conflicted about it than Vader was, which means he's having to actively and knowingly choose every act of evil rather than merely doing what he believes is right as Vader did.
It's the choice and conflict that make him such a good villain. The choice because it means he's actively trying to be evil, and the conflict because you never know what he's going to do next.
quote:
I’m intrigued that they kept Princess Leia alive until the end of the film and am intrigued as to how they’re going to write her out.
I wasn't massively surprised about it, as I knew they'd finished shooting the movie before Carrie died. They'll probably write her out via a time-skip between this movie and the next. Bets on the first line of the next opening scrawl being "Leia has died"?
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Vader is like Gandalf in that it is the implied power rather than its detailed use that makes them powerful.
People in the ST universe fear Vader and that is enough for the space western that the original movie is.
It is a valid story telling technique and we saw how bad Lucas is at filling in the details, so...
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
OK, there are few people who hate spoilers more than I do.
But this is a thread that the title explicitly states might contain spoilers. It was started before the film’s release and there are loads of people who haven’t seen it.
Do we need a seperate thread to more organically discuss the film without risking spoiling it for people who do not mind speculation but do not want actual details confirmed?
I don’t mind putting in rows of stops or filler text to buffer what I write, but that will not be enough for some.
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
I’m glad he’s lost the mask, OTOH. It was never as badass as his grandfather’s.
That is his whole character concept right there though: try as he might he's never as badass as his grandfather.
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
quote:
Originally posted by Wet Kipper:
but why did she wait until so many of the transports had been picked off (and conveniently not the "main characters' one) before she decided to do that ?
For that matter, what in hell were the other Star Destroyers doing during that whole set piece? If I was in charge of the First Order fleet I'd have told two of them to go to hyperspace for half a second, drop out right in front of the Resistance ship and either pulverise the shit out of it or force it to waste fuel going to hyperspace itself.
Have star destroyers ever been much more than set dressing in any Star Wars movie? I get that they're big and scary, but I'm trying to think of a time since Episode IV that one's actually landed a shot in anger. Even then, they don't shoot much.
Along with the obnoxiously slow bombers, I'm chalking this one up to Star Wars being Japanese WWII flying ace movies in space—lots of carrier combat, dogfights over battleships and carriers (that were by then outdated and vulnerable to small attack ships), and the like. The bomb bay shots—and slow bomber/fighter escort scenes—make more sense in that context.
For whatever reason, that's always explained Star Wars. Lucas is more interested in the warrior monks, ronin, and fighter pilots than anyone else.
Think that's enough filler. As for Rey's parents being "nobody"—probably true. She really is Just Nobody from Nowhere, put among a bunch of royalty from Somewhere. It's a new age of the Force; no more dynasties, giant temples, or preordained heroes, but rather a renewed, reformed Force.
Also, rather conveniently, it might free up Episode IX to do its own thing. That's something that's always plagued the Star Wars Expanded Universe—the desire to remake the films, but under different names. Palpatine has clones. The Imperial Remnant rises. We replace the Death Star with another Death Star with the Sun Crusher. It's the same old same old all over again.
Expanded Universe solved this by killing Chewie and starting the Yuuzhan Vong war. Suddenly, there was something New among galaxy far, far away, something that didn't fit in the old Tale of the Force. It seems LotJ is doing what TFA should have done—killing the old plot lines along with the old characters, giving them their dignified exits, and ending their dynasties. The story of Anakin Skywalker finally ended; now there's room to tell entirely new stories, without hewing to those bloodlines or baggage.
I am going to miss seeing the alien biomonsters and their living starships on screen, though.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
There is of course going to be a third movie. Like the Ramans, SW does everything in threes.
I saw it today in Georgia, for =cheap.= Tickets are a third what they are in DC!
This movie is at least an hour too long. Nearly 3 hours! I have only contempt for the pandering to the toy market (the puffin-like creatures, the crystal cats, etc.) I have long ago given up on the notion of physics or space. But gosh! If you have a fleet of unarmed troop transports, and they're being picked off one by one, why not split off and separate? You have nothing to lose at this point.
If there is a less charismatic and convincing villain than Kyle Ren, I have yet to see him.
[ 27. December 2017, 20:20: Message edited by: Brenda Clough ]
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Spoilers
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
There is of course going to be a third movie. Like the Ramans, SW does everything in threes.
I saw it today in Georgia, for =cheap.= Tickets are a third what they are in DC!
This movie is at least an hour too long. Nearly 3 hours! I have only contempt for the pandering to the toy market (the puffin-like creatures, the crystal cats, etc.) I have long ago given up on the notion of physics or space. But gosh! If you have a fleet of unarmed troop transports, and they're being picked off one by one, why not split off and separate? You have nothing to lose at this point.
If there is a less charismatic and convincing villain than Kyle Ren, I have yet to see him.
You did not watch the wretched 3 which shall not be named, then? Kylo Ren is a vast improvement over young Darth Vader.
I hate the @#&^%@!!!! porgs, but blame Lucas for that. Fucking Ewoks. And toys were part of the point from the very beginning.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Oh Lord, I have purged the loathsome Anakin from mind and now you h ad to bring him back. At least that actor (totally negligible otherwise) was conventionally good-looking.
Oh, and another gripe: limp and wooden dialogue. This too is a SW hallmark of course. What's deeply annoying is the sense that fixes would be easy. A pass through the dialogue, of course, but a larger tidying of the plot. Improvement is so close, so easy...
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
If there is a less charismatic and convincing villain than Kyle Ren, I have yet to see him.
One word: orange.
Posted by Doc Tor (# 9748) on
:
POI: Lucas is not to blame for the porgs. UNESCO is.
Skellig Michael is a specially protected site - and is inhabited by a large colony of puffins. And rather than digitally remove all the puffins, the CGI people gave each of them a virtual porg suit.
I liked the porgs. Especially roasted.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Doc Tor:
I liked the porgs. Especially roasted.
I imagine Chewy would have liked to like them also!
Posted by Timothy the Obscure (# 292) on
:
Saw it today. Not bad (mostly harmless). Of course I'm more of a Trekkie, really, but not a snob about it...still...when spacecraft run out of fuel, they stop accelerating, but don't slow down. (And BTW--with reference to Rogue 1--is it really credible that people with a technological level that includes FTL spaceships rely on a data storage system composed of a vast tower of VHS cassettes? Just saying...)
It was too long, and dragged in the middle. The bad guys' dialogue was just as tediously trite as ever (Carrie Fisher apparently rewrote some of her own lines--they should have let her rewrite Snoke's). But it worked overall. I'm looking forward to the next one, though I expect they're frantically rewriting the script, since obviously Leia was supposed to be in it...
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Timothy the Obscure:
Saw it today. Not bad (mostly harmless). Of course I'm more of a Trekkie, really, but not a snob about it...still...when spacecraft run out of fuel, they stop accelerating, but don't slow down. (And BTW--with reference to Rogue 1--is it really credible that people with a technological level that includes FTL spaceships rely on a data storage system composed of a vast tower of VHS cassettes? Just saying...)
It was too long, and dragged in the middle. The bad guys' dialogue was just as tediously trite as ever (Carrie Fisher apparently rewrote some of her own lines--they should have let her rewrite Snoke's). But it worked overall. I'm looking forward to the next one, though I expect they're frantically rewriting the script, since obviously Leia was supposed to be in it...
Yes. If Han Solo shuffled off the mortal coil in the first, and Luke is now no more as of this film, then Leia's up at bat for the next film. You can see it coming, ponderous as an aircraft carrier on the ballet floor.
I am beginning to sense that the Jedi’s fatal error was going big. They had an HQ, a large number of members, all that fancy stuff in #s 1-3. They had all the trappings of power and success. They made the classic error of the winner — they became their enemy.
So it all went to pieces, a long process detailed in #s 4 through 8, and at the end of this movie they’re eating dirt like they deserve. Fine. It’s in this movie that we see how they really have to win. From the bottom, as a liberating force of justice for the toilers in rags at the bottom of the economic pile. They don’t need brown hoodie robes. They need pussy hats.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Drat, hit send too fast. Here is a grand review that says it better.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
I saw it Friday.
I liked it. I would've done a few production things differently, but it was basically good. I went to a morning (cheap!) showing of the plain film--no IMAX or 3D, which was exactly right for me. I do need to see it again, though--unusually, the theater had the volume way down, so I didn't get all the lines.
I'm still processing it, a bit, so will post more later.
But I don't have to dodge related ads and media anymore!
Posted by Sarasa (# 12271) on
:
I saw it last week and enjoyed it to. As my hearing is dire I always go to subtitled performances which is useful - I certainly wouldn't have got a lot of it otherwise. I liked the DJ character, who I assume will turn up in Part 3 and despite all the battles the basic message about saving what you love.
Posted by The5thMary (# 12953) on
:
If I haven't seen the first one (I know whiny Kylo Ren kills his dad, Han Solo), will I be completely lost watching this new movie?
I avoided the previous one because I just couldn't bear the thought of it being schmaltzy as hell..."here's Leia, looking a hundred years old...and, Chewie, good old Chewie...". and what seemed to me a completely
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
SPOILERS for entire series of NUMBERED Star Wars films (in this and later posts).
Yes, SPOILERS, really. {Our chief weapon is fear and surprise.}
SPOILERAMA! (Our two chief weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency.}
SPOILERS, LLC. {Our three chief weapons are fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, and an almost fanatical devotion to the pope.}
SPOILERS & Spam, served in the Comfy Chair.
--Rey’s parentage:
It’s possible that her parents were “nobodies”, but I don’t think Kylo Ren was telling the truth. It’s unclear whether Jedi potential is usually passed down, or a spontaneous occurrence in an individual, or simply developed in training. There weren’t all that many Jedis in Ep. 1, before Anakin (later Vader) was born.
Anakin was special. He was actually a child of the Force. Per his mom, she either hadn’t been with a man to cause that pregnancy, or she was a virgin. (Wasn’t quite clear to me.) When the Jedis took him in, they refused to take his mother, too. (IIRC, Liam Neesen’s character said something like “I don’t have any orders about that.) This led to horrible circumstances for Anakin’s mother, pushed him over the edge, and drove him to the dark side.
He’s the father of Luke and Leia, and passed Force potential down to them. Very strong in Luke, partly due to training. Leia has it, too, but more quietly, and she may not have had formal training. But that’s (presumably) allowed her to save herself in Ep. 8 (TLJ).
She passed the potential down to Ben/KR. His development and then training went very, very badly. But he has abilities that even Vader didn’t have, like reaching out directly to Rey. And Rey’s abilities are *at least* as strong.
Star Wars works with patterns, as myths and folklore often do. (And, remember, George Lucas purposely set out to create what he called “a myth for our times”.) There were all sorts of shout-outs to the other films.
Given that, the most like scenario is that R and B/KR are some sort of siblings or close relatives. One possibility—and this is EWWW ICKKK—is that, before Luke and Leia knew they were siblings, they were together. (NOTE: I’m not sure of the ages of R and B/KR, so this might not fly.) And had offspring. Maybe Leia didn’t tell Luke, and gave up the baby. (Probably Rey.) That would explain Luke not having any clue who Rey was.
Might also be that Luke had a child with someone else. Or an embryo was frozen, or…
OTOH, it could just be that the Force felt the need to produce more children of its own.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
{/end SPOILERS}
Buffer before next post, 'cause I missed the edit window.
Posted by la vie en rouge (# 10688) on
:
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
I personally like the idea that after all Rey really is a nobody from nowhere. It’s the uprising of the little people in the face of the ones who have always held all the power. I’ll feel a bit bummed if she turns out to be hidden nobility after all.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by la vie en rouge:
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
Spoilers incoming
I personally like the idea that after all Rey really is a nobody from nowhere. It’s the uprising of the little people in the face of the ones who have always held all the power. I’ll feel a bit bummed if she turns out to be hidden nobility after all.
Agreed. It also fits with the message of TLJ that the force is for everyone, not just the elites.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
After TLJ I'll be very disappointed if turns out Kylo Ren was lying and Rey really is "someone special." The message that nobodies from nowhere can be heroes was my favourite thing about TLJ.
The movie was a mixed bag for me. I was bored during the first hour, and kept drifting off to sleep and waking up with a jolt whenever something exploded. The first time I really loved the movie was when Luke just randomly milked that four-titted beast on his island and knocked back the mug of milk. Like ... why?
Loved Yoda lecturing Luke about failure.
I have problems with the geopolitics of the larger story arc. If the Empire was defeated at the end of the original trilogy, and the Republic has been ruling ever since (about 30 years?), presumably the Republic is pretty well established by the beginning of TFA. I thought the First Order was represented in TFA as a smallish terrorist organization romanticizing the totalitarianism of the dead Empire -- kind of like neo-Nazis in Europe today. That seemed plausible.
But then, how do we get to a position a short time later, at the beginning of TLJ, where the First Order seems to be all powerful and the remnants of the government that has been in power for the last 20-30 years is reduced to a small band of "Resistance" fighters? That would be hard to pull of in a single country ... much less an entire planet ... much less a multi-planetary system. Were there large pockets of Empire loyalists all over the galaxy being kept in check during the years of Republican rule, who all rose up very quickly in response to the success of the First Order? Was this explained during one of the bits where I dozed off?
(Actually there's a fascinating tangent here -- it's obviously much easier to stir up audience sympathy for a small band of beleaguered rebels than for a large, entrenched government trying to hold its own against terrorists -- so I feel like the filmmakers had to turn the heroes into a small band of rebels even though it doesn't make sense in-universe. But again I may well have missed something).
It's heartbreaking to me that they were so obviously setting the third movie up to be Carrie's big star turn, after Han and Luke getting the focus in TFA and TLJ. I assume Kylo's inevitable redemption arc would have come about as a result of a climactic confrontation with his mom, and eventually Leia's heroic death would have triggered something in him ... but I guess that's the movie we'll never get to see, and I'm very sad about that.
I continue to give the new Star Wars movies full marks for excellent representation of women and people of colour, not just in a token "Hey look! Strong Female Character Kicking Ass!!" kind of way, but in the sense that they show women in all kinds of roles, including background and relatively minor roles, just as if women actually made up about half the population of the galaxy and were as varied and unique as men are. The same seems to be true for how they represent non-white characters, suggesting the galaxy far, far away is a genuinely varied and diverse place.
They'll also score some points for LGBTQ representation if they ever bring that Poe/Finn romance that fans are shipping to fruition, though there wasn't much in the TLJ to support that, alas.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
I am reliably informed that movies #1-3 (the Anakin ones) are tactfully ignored as hard as possible. No midi-chlorians. This at least is wise, but then we do lose the Virgin Birth of Anakin.
I believe that the creators' current goal is to get away from this "you are born with the Force" thing, which inevitably produces a hereditary elite. (If you were not born with the Force you might as well give up and go become a brain surgeon.) They didn't like the way #1-3 was going with the mythos. Notice how it has now changed. Luke Skywalker (the second-to-last Jedi, right?) confides the big secret to Rey: that the Force is everywhere, for everybody. They are moving it from a hereditary monarchy, with but a single heir, to a populist democracy. Remember that closing scene? Surely this is a harbinger of the direction to come: the poor and oppressed, touching and seizing the power that is open to all.
Posted by nickel (# 8363) on
:
saw it today.
.
.
.
(Not that any of this is important spoiler-wise.)
.
.
.
I loved bad guy Snopes' dress -- shiny and swishy! Bowie's "Queen Bitch" is still playing in my head. I also thought I saw an homage to Blazing Saddles' closing scene. At least, that's what the romp through the casino reminded me of. I would have appreciated it if at least one of the light-saber fights had been cut short by good guy pulling out a pistol, a la Indiana Jones. I adored the crystal foxes, could have used more of them.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
.
.
.
I have problems with the geopolitics of the larger story arc. If the Empire was defeated at the end of the original trilogy, and the Republic has been ruling ever since (about 30 years?), presumably the Republic is pretty well established by the beginning of TFA. I thought the First Order was represented in TFA as a smallish terrorist organization romanticizing the totalitarianism of the dead Empire -- kind of like neo-Nazis in Europe today. That seemed plausible.
But then, how do we get to a position a short time later, at the beginning of TLJ, where the First Order seems to be all powerful and the remnants of the government that has been in power for the last 20-30 years is reduced to a small band of "Resistance" fighters? That would be hard to pull of in a single country ... much less an entire planet ... much less a multi-planetary system. Were there large pockets of Empire loyalists all over the galaxy being kept in check during the years of Republican rule, who all rose up very quickly in response to the success of the First Order? Was this explained during one of the bits where I dozed off?
I thought the Republic PTB were the ones targeted by the Death Star***uh***Planet big gun thing in TFA. Although, how the First Order were able to finance and build that thing (was Snoke the snake rich?) without those same Republic folks knowing about it was a bit of a puzzle to me.
You can tell Kylo Ren is related to Anakin by his whiny temper tantrums. I don't know how the kid can focus enough to actually do magical Force things!
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
I think that Ben and Rey are twins. Think about it - Luke and Leia were twins. Twins in a family are hereditary. So Leia has twins, but somehow it is understood that they are in danger or will be a danger. So (like Luke and Leia) they are split up as babies and Rey is spirited away somewhere. Maybe things went wrong with her adoption and she ended up as a nobody.
But it might explain why she and Ben have this unique communication.
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
Yes, I lean towards twin theory, too. There are lots of cross-references, call-and-response moments, in TLJ. At least to the previous film and the original trilogy.
Example: In TLJ, when Rey confronts Luke with her light saber, Luke very purposely bares his flesh hand, referencing when he lost his other hand to Vader, his father.
And then there's R2 playing the old hologram of Leia to make a point.
[ 07. January 2018, 01:47: Message edited by: Golden Key ]
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Um ... but didn't Leia meet Rey in either this movie or the previous one? I certainly do not recall an OMG here's my missing baby moment. Surely you would -notice- if you had twins; that's not the kind of detail that would escape your attention. Recall that Princess Amidala died giving birth to her twins (Luke & Leia). Obstetrics is clearly not one of the areas of science that the galaxy is very interested in developing, not like ray guns or combat robots. They cannot have an artificial-womb technology. You could postulate a donor-egg carried to term by a surrogate mother, but again, you can't just donate an egg like donating a fingernail clipping. Harvesting an egg is a major thing.
Posted by gustava (# 15593) on
:
Maybe cousins? With Luke having a weak moment somewhere along the line and never knowing the result?
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Why do you need Rey to have lineage? Personally I think Rey's no-one in particular status is deliberately to wind up the fan theories. "Nope. You're all wrong."
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
Why do you need Rey to have lineage? Personally I think Rey's no-one in particular status is deliberately to wind up the fan theories. "Nope. You're all wrong."
I really hope she has no lofty lineage and that Kylo Ren was telling the absolute truth, because the idea that the heroes can be nobodies from nowhere was, to me, a major theme of TLJ that would be vastly undercut if Rey turned out to be yet another missing Skywalker.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Here is a great think piece about Luke Skywalker's motivations.
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
Of course, if we were to pick up the episodes 1-3 storylines then the Jedi didn't go in for relationships, marriage and all that emotional attachment stuff. Which would mean that trained Jedi having children would be unusual, and the majority of those taken into training in the Jedi order would have been from families without prior Jedi members. So, the dynasty of Anakin-Luke/Leia-Ben/Kylo is the anomaly and Rey being from nowhere the norm.
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
There is also the question of how when a ship in orbit (i.e. freefall) opens its bomb doors the bombs would drop at all.
There was evidently some form of artificial gravity within the bombers. So, when released the bombs would fall through the ship in response to that artificial field. Once outside the ship those bombs would continue to move in the same direction.
Though it doesn't answer why they didn't just fire a whole load of missiles from a greater distance before they got shot up.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
In the Star Wars universe it is a waste of time to consider the laws of physics. (All those big booming sounds, when the ship explodes in deep space, yeah right.)
Posted by Sparrow (# 2458) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
Um ... but didn't Leia meet Rey in either this movie or the previous one? I certainly do not recall an OMG here's my missing baby moment. Surely you would -notice- if you had twins; that's not the kind of detail that would escape your attention.
If so, I don't remember them meeting. But maybe they were both placed under some mental block so they wouldn't recognise each other?
Posted by Scots lass (# 2699) on
:
They definitely meet, at the end of TFA. Finn is rushed off to a medic and Leia hugs Rey. No "my lost child!" moment.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
Are we doing the "spoiler space" thing?
<Snip>
They'll also score some points for LGBTQ representation if they ever bring that Poe/Finn romance that fans are shipping to fruition, though there wasn't much in the TLJ to support that, alas.
No. just fucking no. We don't need pasted on storyline romance. We need relationships that just are, in situ, as no big deal.
Finn is just there, another character. Yes, they do have a line to explain why he is not a clone, but his blackness is just there. They need more background humans with colour variation, and they are getting slightly better at it. LQBT+ characters need to be an accepted part of the universe, not special one-off story lines.
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
I guess I don't understand why it would be "pasted on" as opposed to "in situ" if two characters of the same gender, who (at least in the eyes of many viewers) appear to have a strong bond and possibly an attraction between them, were to be seen as a couple? Why wouldn't Poe and Finn be a natural love story?
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Trudy Scrumptious:
I guess I don't understand why it would be "pasted on" as opposed to "in situ" if two characters of the same gender, who (at least in the eyes of many viewers) appear to have a strong bond and possibly an attraction between them, were to be seen as a couple? Why wouldn't Poe and Finn be a natural love story?
Love stories are ancillary in the Star Wars universe. Even in the Three Which Shall Not be Named, the love storyline was secondary at best. Even though it was supposed to be a driver of Anakin's downfall. Where it did feature, it didn't help the story.
To do it justice, the relationship should be more real, and that would take over the film. If there had been hints in the first two, I would have less objection.
I want more LGBT+ characters in film. But I want them in ways that best serve LGBT+. As much as it would please a few fans, I don't think this would.
Black people have not been amazingly helped by being added on characters. (Side-kicks, comedy foils, magical helpers, etc.) Where they are main characters who happen to be black, it helps more.
Posted by The5thMary (# 12953) on
:
I apologize for my truncated posting the other day. I was attempting to use my smartphone to be part of the fun and found, to my dismay, that smartphones and Ship Of Fools are not a match made in heaven! My laptop is crying, sighing, and dying and my wife and I are trying to come up with funds to get it fixed. So, long story short, I promise not to post here unless I'm using a computer!
Question: A friend asked me if I wanted to see The Last Jedi. I very much want to but as previously posted, I hadn't seen the earlier one. I know Han Solo bit the dust at the hands of his whiny brat son and new characters abound. Will I be completely lost if I go see this? I plan on seeing the first new one sometime next week but tomorrow is the only chance I'll have to see this new one before it comes out on DVD.
Posted by jedijudy (# 333) on
:
You will probably not understand some of what is going on, and who certain people are if you see TLJ before TFA. IMHO!
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
If you've seen the original three, from long ago, that will give you maybe 2/3 of what you need, IMHO.
[ 15. January 2018, 04:07: Message edited by: Golden Key ]
Posted by sharkshooter (# 1589) on
:
Before I saw it for the first time, I made sure I re-watched the entire series (1,2,3,R1, 4,5,6, and 7) in order.
Just in case.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by sharkshooter:
Before I saw it for the first time, I made sure I re-watched the entire series (1,2,3,R1, 4,5,6, and 7) in order.
Just in case.
Wrong order. The correct order is:
4, 5, then 2, 3, R1 as flashbacks, 6, 7. 1 didn't exist, it is a figment of a diseased imagination, because Jah Jah Binks.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Neither did “2” or “3” for the same reason
Posted by Golden Key (# 1468) on
:
For me, the best order is: 4, 5, 6, 3, 7, 8.
I like parts of 1 and 2. But why in the world did Lucas portray characters is a speciesist/racist way? (Not just Jar-Jar's people (though I like him very much, and they're great warriors), but also the Asian-looking ambassadors.) If other characters saw them that way, that's one thing. But to actually portray them that way...
ETA: I saw 4, 5, and 6 when they first came out, back in the day, so I view the rest from that perspective. I don't think 1-3 should've been made. But 7 and 8 are back on track with the old-school ones.
[ 16. January 2018, 01:29: Message edited by: Golden Key ]
Posted by Dafyd (# 5549) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
1 didn't exist, it is a figment of a diseased imagination, because Jah Jah Binks.
There is an argument that Jah Jah Binks is not even the worst part of the film.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
This is from the Washington POST, but should amuse. It seems that some men's rights activists, displeased by all the women in the film, cut their own version of it. Unfortunately bobbing all the women out makes it only 48 minutes long and very nearly incomprehensible, but hey. Il faut soufrir pour etre belle.
Posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider (# 76) on
:
Well I suppose a thousandth of a credit point can be given for them for being open that the main problem they have with it is their personal misogyny.
Minus several million, of course, for being misogynists in the first place.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
If they had cut all the persons of ethnicity as well they could probably get it down to 20 minutes.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
If they had cut all the persons of ethnicity as well they could probably get it down to 20 minutes.
Misogyny is its own thing. Racism was pretty much a feature of feminism for years.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
So I went to see this film for a second time and it definitely stood up to repeat viewing.
The things I enjoyed seem to be the same as others:
-the stunning fight/action scenes. That light sabre battle: choreographed, but not so slick as to be false.
- if they are going to pair anybody up I couldn't definitely predict how. Very unusual, especially in a cast with this many permutations.
-the acting/chemistry.
-the unpredictability of what will happen in the third film. It's a pity Rian Johnson won't be directing it.
-optimum porg. I liked the fact that porgs only came about as a way of disguising the puffins on Skellig St Michael, cheaper than erasing the birds in post-production. A fortuitous accident.
-that it's not just about good vs evil, but the consequences of good people doing bad things. Finn and Rose's little trip and decision to trust the Benicio del Toro character(never trust Benicio del Toro) and Po being a massive brat have terrible consequences, but are in line with the characters and are only wrong if you know what the audience knows. What would have happened to Ben Solo if Luke hadn't had a moment of stupidity?
A nice job
Posted by Trudy Scrumptious (# 5647) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Brenda Clough:
This is from the Washington POST, but should amuse. It seems that some men's rights activists, displeased by all the women in the film, cut their own version of it. Unfortunately bobbing all the women out makes it only 48 minutes long and very nearly incomprehensible, but hey. Il faut soufrir pour etre belle.
Two Hostly reminders:
1. Even a single phrase or sentence in a foreign language should come equipped with translation, if it must be used at all -- remembering that not everyone's French (or Latin or whatever as the case may be) is at the tip of their brain.
2. When posting links to a news article that is behind a paywall, could you please put [paywall] in your post to indicate that this is so? This will save some people a bit of frustration trying to click on links they can't open.
Trudy, Scrumptious Heavenly Host
Posted by Nicolemr (# 28) on
:
I finally got the chance to see The Last Jedi on Saturday. Loved it!
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on
:
We went on the weekend, in 3D. Us and 7 other people. It seemed disjointed, with little bits chucked in for no really good reason. I remember lining up in 1977 for original, and how ground breaking it seemed. Am I just jaded and old 40 years later, feeling they have exhausted the franchise?
Only question: If Snoke was so all powerful, why didn't he heal himself of the decubitus ulcer (bedsore) on his face. Or were they just making him gross along the lines of becoming ugly is the reward for being evil. Kylo Wren has acquired a scare and still has excellent teeth, as good as Rey's. Should we expect his uglification next episode? he's already got a nice scar.
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
Ulcers and other skin ills are an ancient indicator of Bad. Syphilis made it so.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
It seemed disjointed, with little bits chucked in for no really good reason.
Also saw it over the weekend. I agree that it dragged on a bit, and it seemed like a tighter edit could have been helpful. Then again, I don't know what you cut. The whole mission to the war profiteer planet was clearly there so that Finn would have something to do in this movie, but it really hit the point of what the rebellion is up against, and I hope they do more with it down the line.
The throne room fight scene was totally awesome, as was Luke taking on and emerging from that massive barrage. The silent scene was amazing and had me shedding a few tears. Carrie Fisher flying through space? Yeah, I get why people thought it could have been explained better, but the fact that she can use the force seemed relatively clear to me. Seeing her name on the closing credits brought a few more tears- what a force (pun noted but honestly not intended.)
Speaking of female forces, Daisy Ridley is just the perfect blend of delightful and bad ass.
In sum, in spite of the pacing issues I loved it.
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on
:
Re throne room fighting. Evidently light sabres cauterize wounds very well. Snoke's guts didn't spill out of the halves of him.
The big-eyed gerbil bird things were obviously aimed at stuffed toy marketting. Not your Wookie's teddy bear. Chewbacca should have eaten the one he cooked. Reminded me of a Shrek scene "have another rat".
Posted by Brenda Clough (# 18061) on
:
A friend of mine calls these (and the porgs) "visitors from the planet Buy-Me."
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
Re throne room fighting. Evidently light sabres cauterize wounds very well. Snoke's guts didn't spill out of the halves of him.
Helpful for keeping the PG rating, I suppose.
Posted by Og, King of Bashan (# 9562) on
:
One more thing to add (it's a good sign when you still want to talk about a movie four days later).
I loved what they did with the "who are Rey's parents" angle. Loved it. I don't know if it was a complete troll of everyone who spent the last two years wondering what the big reveal was going to be, or what. But I loved it.
I guess I was never one of those people who was overly upset about how they turned force sensitivity into a genetic trait, or the whole line that you have to start as a kid to learn to use the force. But I'm still much happier about the idea that there are kids lurking in the shadows who could become future Jedi. And the bit at the end where the slave kid was using the force to sweep the floor underscored that so well.
We love Star Wars in part because it is a thoroughly unashamed and corny underdog story. This brought that back brilliantly.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Og, King of Bashan:
One more thing to add (it's a good sign when you still want to talk about a movie four days later).
From this I surmise that you are not a film geek and are new to the Star Wars universe.
quote:
I guess I was never one of those people who was overly upset about how they turned force sensitivity into a genetic trait,
But this is at the heart of why The Episodes That Shall Not be Named are so bad. It is a change that rips a hole in the heart of the strengths of the whole saga and, in the end, is no different in effect.
quote:
But I'm still much happier about the idea that there are kids lurking in the shadows who could become future Jedi. And the bit at the end where the slave kid was using the force to sweep the floor underscored that so well.
I like the democratising of the Force. Could have been done without pretending to science it.
Science doesn't belong in Star Wars.
Posted by ArachnidinElmet (# 17346) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
..Chewbacca should have eaten the one he cooked...
Yes. If it's not eaten, then that porg died in vain...
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ArachnidinElmet:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
..Chewbacca should have eaten the one he cooked...
Yes. If it's not eaten, then that porg died in vain...
Damn things should not have been in the film. Cutey little pieces of shite. But that scene bothers me the most. Tears. Really? And has no one involved ever seen a roast bird with feet still attached?
Posted by no prophet's flag is set so... (# 15560) on
:
Addiitonal things which come to mind:
-Cradle Jedi versus converso
-Laity can do what priests do
--Ben Solo was pushed by Luke to become bad, he didn't choose to become bad. What about Judas and Jesus? Luke being Jesus of course.
-12 plus droids and porgs at the movie's end. I was suspicious about the number.
Other: I had to look it up to confirm, but there was a First Order ship landing which was actually a steam clothes iron.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by no prophet's flag is set so...:
--Ben Solo was pushed by Luke to become bad, he didn't choose to become bad.
No, he was already being courted by the Darth Gollum. At most, Luke's mistake was a final push.
quote:
Other: I had to look it up to confirm, but there was a First Order ship landing which was actually a steam clothes iron.
Not quite, but there was an homage. Should watch it again and look for Arty-Deco
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0