Ship of Fools: Hey RuthW

Thread: Hey RuthW Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.

To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=026289

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

What did you want to discuss?

Posted by RuthW (# 13) on :

Nothing. You're the one who was discussing the call I made on the Moses thread, which is why I referred you to the Styx.

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

I told you I wasn't interested in discussing it.

Posted by RuthW (# 13) on :

You were discussing it!

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

No, I wasn't.

Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :

SO, I am noting-- officially--as an Admin--- that you now have the opportunity to ask why suggesting someone is lying is a personal attack,and instead of exercising that prerogative you are playing Poke the Host.

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

I don't understand why you're doing this to me, I never wanted any such exchange.

Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :

Then why did you not drop the exchange I am talking about when asked?

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

Look at the post I made above that. I'd already said I wasn't interested.

Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :

... you actually directed me to evidence that, in response to a Hosts request for a personal dispute to be taken elsewhere, you basically made more personal comments about another shipmate before again making reference to her call (for the record, saying "I am not interested in discussing the call" is discussing the call. If it doesn't have anything to do with the topic, it doesn't belong on the thread. Your response, if any, should be "Ok" and to do do what the Host said.)

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

Why are you doing this?

Posted by RooK (# 1852) on :

Let's just be absolutely clear:

When a Host makes an official post, ALL discussion about that post should be made in The Styx. ANYTHING posted as a response to an Official Host Post, aside from brief acknowledgement or apology, is deemed a violation of Commandment 6.

To be EXTRA clear:

Responding to a Host to say that you do not want to discuss their Host Post, IS A MOTHERFUCKING VIOLATION OF COMMANDMENT 6.

ARE.
WE.
FUCKING.
CLEAR?

Posted by Plique-à-jour (# 17717) on :

Sorry, this is hilarious. Ban away if you must, little man.

Posted by RooK (# 1852) on :

No, seriously: do you understand the words we are typing?

Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Plique-à-jour:
Sorry, this is hilarious. Ban away if you must, little man.

Why send a man in to do a woman's job?

In other words, I just saw your dumbass TICTH post. I concede to your wish to be banned. Reinstatement will be on the condition that you provide ample evidence that you have read and clearly understand the 10 Commandments (of The Ship, she said, to head off wiseass stunts.)

Like--oh, I don't know-- a three page essay with appropriate references and footnotes, maybe.

Kelly Alves
Admin

[ 27. September 2013, 19:08: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]

UBB.classic^TM 6.5.0