|
Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Inclusivity and dumbing down
|
Raptor Eye
Shipmate
# 16649
|
Posted
I understand 'dumbing down' to mean a diminishment of excellence to reach those who have no appreciation of it.
I dislike the expression as it's sometimes used in a way which indicates snobbery. Is it condescending to offer what people will appreciate, in the hope that it will lead on to greater appreciation?
Is it OK to 'dumb down'?
--------------------
Be still, and know that I am God! Psalm 46.10
Posts: 4359 | From: The United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fool on the hill
Shipmate
# 9428
|
Posted
Inclusivity need not mean "dumbing down". It should mean smarter teaching.
Posts: 792 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
Yes, dumbing down is an awful phrase, but I think that an element of simplication is OK in teaching, and presumably, elsewhere.
I used to teach linguistics to undergrads, and I used to take postgraduate topics, (e.g. the psychological reality of Chomskyan universal grammar), and sort of water them down a bit, and slap a bit of lipstick on them, plus jokes, in order to make them palatable. If I had taught it to sixth-formers, I would have made corresponding dilutions and cosmeticizations.
I would say this is a standard teaching technique, in fact.
--------------------
I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ariel
Shipmate
# 58
|
Posted
So much is simplified these days for ease of access, in so many areas of life, that it sometimes comes across as if written for the hard of understanding. And if you make everything simple and easy, nobody ever has to stretch, or aspire, or exert themselves to understand anything. Some of it distinctly comes across as basically pitching stuff at the lowest common denominator.
Posts: 25445 | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leorning Cniht
Shipmate
# 17564
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Raptor Eye:
Is it OK to 'dumb down'?
You have to meet people at their level.
If you're a couch potato and want to get fit, you don't just get up one day and run a marathon. You don't walk into an elementary school and write Einstein's field equations on the blackboard, and if you have a roomful of people who are just beginning to pray in silence, you'll start with a short silence.
To me, "dumbing down" would be removing the "complicated" bits from discussion at all. "Dumbing down" would be insisting that the likes of Paula Radcliffe should run at my pace, and should take a breather every ten minutes.
Posts: 5026 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
CL
Shipmate
# 16145
|
Posted
Dumbing down is what happens when a person or organisation has absolutely no respect for the intelligence of their prospective audience.
Posts: 647 | From: Ireland | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
ken
Ship's Roundhead
# 2460
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
I used to teach linguistics to undergrads, and I used to take postgraduate topics, (e.g. the psychological reality of Chomskyan universal grammar), and sort of water them down a bit, and slap a bit of lipstick on them, plus jokes, in order to make them palatable. If I had taught it to sixth-formers, I would have made corresponding dilutions and cosmeticizations.
I would say this is a standard teaching technique, in fact.
Yes. And its not called "dumbing-down", its called "teaching".
"Dumbing-down" would be if you thought the hard stuff didn't matter, so no-one got taught it, even those who were willing and able to learn it.
--------------------
Ken
L’amor che move il sole e l’altre stelle.
Posts: 39579 | From: London | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Raptor Eye
Shipmate
# 16649
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
Dumbing down is what happens when a person or organisation has absolutely no respect for the intelligence of their prospective audience.
Couldn't it just as easily be showing respect for the general intellectual level of a prospective audience?
--------------------
Be still, and know that I am God! Psalm 46.10
Posts: 4359 | From: The United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322
|
Posted
Do we think God might have had a similar problem by becoming incarnate? How many times in the gospels is it evident not just that the multitudes didn't get the point, but the disciples were not much better?
--------------------
Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson
Posts: 7610 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
quetzalcoatl
Shipmate
# 16740
|
Posted
The OP exhibits a form of poisoning of the well, and involves a kind of dumbing down of the idea of pedagogic simplification!
--------------------
I can't talk to you today; I talked to two people yesterday.
Posts: 9878 | From: UK | Registered: Oct 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Schroedinger's cat
Ship's cool cat
# 64
|
Posted
I would consider "dumbing down" being explaining in a patronising way. To teach people at their level does not necessarily mean that the material has to be dumbed down, it means it has to be taught at the recipients level.
This can be done without patronising. In fact, the best teachers can do this in a way that really enhances the recipient. Dumbing down tends to mean that the teacher has little respect for those they are teaching. To my mind, that diminishes the teachers more than the taught.
It is quite possible to be inclusive and not dismissive.
--------------------
Blog
Music for your enjoyment
Lord may all my hard times be healing times
take out this broken heart and renew my mind.
Posts: 18859 | From: At the bottom of a deep dark well. | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
The Silent Acolyte
Shipmate
# 1158
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
Dumbing down is what happens when a person or organisation has absolutely no respect for the intelligence of their prospective audience.
Hear! Hear!
And one of the most hatesome occasions of dumbing down happens during that execrable exercise of patronization called the Children's Sermon.
Posts: 7462 | From: The New World | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
South Coast Kevin
Shipmate
# 16130
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
Dumbing down is what happens when a person or organisation has absolutely no respect for the intelligence of their prospective audience.
My instant response to this comment, CL, was to scoff and mock (in my mind, I mean). But I could well be reacting against something you didn't actually mean. ![[Hot and Hormonal]](icon_redface.gif)
Would you - and others - perhaps give one or two examples of what you'd consider to be dumbing down, in the church context? Thanks in advance. ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
--------------------
My blog - wondering about Christianity in the 21st century, chess, music, politics and other bits and bobs.
Posts: 3309 | From: The south coast (of England) | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
One of the most hatesome occasions of dumbing down happens during that execrable exercise of patronization called the Children's Sermon.
I've never heard the term used in reference to Christian worship, and I wasn't sure if this is what the OP was hoping to discuss.
It's more often heard in the context of education, where it's supposedly backed up by an anti-elitist, 'all shall have prizes' mentality. Regardless of where we stand on the challenges in education, I'm not convinced that the modern church has inherited exactly the same theoretical underpinnings, so adopting the language of 'dumbing-down' for this environment might be rather confusing.
Having said that, I know what you mean. It's clearly not easy for preachers to pitch 'all age worship' it at the right level for everyone.
Posts: 6668 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
One of the most hatesome occasions of dumbing down happens during that execrable exercise of patronization called the Children's Sermon.
I'd have to agree-- as would most kids I've asked.
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
I've never heard the term used in reference to Christian worship, and I wasn't sure if this is what the OP was hoping to discuss.
This very popular book certainly does.
[code]
[ 24. March 2014, 21:22: Message edited by: Eutychus ]
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967
|
Posted
Ah - dumbing down to reach out? I see. This suggests that dumbing down is an evangelistic strategy. However, not all churches are as intentional about their evangelism to be able to use that as an excuse!
Posts: 6668 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Sioni Sais
Shipmate
# 5713
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
Ah - dumbing down to reach out? I see. This suggests that dumbing down is an evangelistic strategy. However, not all churches are as intentional about their evangelism to be able to use that as an excuse!
That is where and why teaching is needed, not lecturing. AFAIK only the former is mentioned as a Spiritual Gift.
--------------------
"He isn't Doctor Who, he's The Doctor"
(Paul Sinha, BBC)
Posts: 24276 | From: Newport, Wales | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
Ah - dumbing down to reach out? I see. This suggests that dumbing down is an evangelistic strategy. However, not all churches are as intentional about their evangelism to be able to use that as an excuse!
Well, note the author (Marva Dawn) calls it "reaching out
without dumbing down". iow, she, like others here, hears "dumbing down" as a negative, and is suggesting that she's figured out how to be "inclusive" without dumbing down.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967
|
Posted
I'm sure it is indeed possible to reach out without dumbing down. But The fact that the author mentions dumbing down at all suggests that this is a big challenge for some churches.
However, my point was that for many churches (of the type I'm most familiar with) evangelism isn't a huge priority, so dumbing down for that particular reason is unlikely to be a problem. But it might occur for other reasons.
Posts: 6668 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
However, my point was that for many churches (of the type I'm most familiar with) evangelism isn't a huge priority, so dumbing down for that particular reason is unlikely to be a problem. But it might occur for other reasons.
Dawn is writing primarily to American evangelical churches, where evangelism is pretty much the prime driving factor for everything, including any "dumbing down".
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967
|
Posted
I take your point. I'm not sure if this is what Raptor Eye was getting at, though. In the UK, claims that churches are offering a poor diet of teaching and preaching are made in several different directions. I don't think it's an evangelical v. mainstream/liberal thing.
Posts: 6668 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
Arabella Purity Winterbottom
Trumpeting hope
# 3434
|
Posted
How complex/complicated/difficult should it be then? I'm pretty well-educated (five degrees, one in theology) and there have been occasions when I have not understood what the heck a preacher was trying to say because they used superduper theological jargon.
I think you need to consider your audience, which is a golden rule of communication. Most parishioners don't have a long theological background from which to make sense of complex theological argument. Again, I'm reminded of Trinity Sunday - every year when I was growing up, I experienced the complete mystery of the Trinity, and it remained a mystery, even with the best of preachers (our vicar was excellent).
I think if you remove the pejorative "dumbing down," and reposition it as "considering your audience," you might have some chance of communicating effectively.
--------------------
Hell is full of the talented and Heaven is full of the energetic. St Jane Frances de Chantal
Posts: 3702 | From: Aotearoa, New Zealand | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Latchkey Kid
Shipmate
# 12444
|
Posted
I agree with Arabella Purity Winterbottom. Many do not consider their audience.
Some seem to use technical jargon/club language to try and impress others or seem spiritual. If you cannot express ideas in the language of the audience you are communicating something other than content.
Propositional truth statements are good shorthand and quick communication for those in the club (church) but narratives speak more to a person's experience. And I don't think narratives are inherently dumbing down.
[ 25. March 2014, 01:18: Message edited by: Latchkey Kid ]
--------------------
'You must never give way for an answer. An answer is always the stretch of road that's behind you. Only a question can point the way forward.'
Mika; in Hello? Is Anybody There?, Jostein Gaardner
Posts: 2592 | From: The wizardest little town in Oz | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
lilBuddha
Shipmate
# 14333
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
The OP exhibits a form of poisoning of the well, and involves a kind of dumbing down of the idea of pedagogic simplification!
This is my read also.
--------------------
I put on my rockin' shoes in the morning
Hallellou, hallellou
Posts: 17627 | From: the round earth's imagined corners | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
MrsBeaky
Shipmate
# 17663
|
Posted
I'm just back from 12 days in the UK with my elderly mother and yesterday went straight into a board meeting with a very important discussion which left me reeling as I hadn't had enough time to adjust back culturally and I didn't communicate as well as I would have liked....
As others have said, I think it is all about how we do the communicating not the content. "Dumbing down" suggests to me that we are making judgments about other people's capacity. Whereas , as a teacher in many different contexts I've always thought it was about presenting the same content in the most appropriate and attractive way for each context so that people might consider interacting with it/ learning from it/ applying it to their lives.
To my mind, taking the trouble to craft my communication is an important part of inclusivity.
--------------------
"It is better to be kind than right."
http://davidandlizacooke.wordpress.com
Posts: 693 | From: UK/ Kenya | Registered: Apr 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
South Coast Kevin
Shipmate
# 16130
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by MrsBeaky:
To my mind, taking the trouble to craft my communication is an important part of inclusivity.
Oh yes, completely. I posted upthread that it would be great to get a few concrete illustrations of what people mean by 'dumbing down', because if they simply mean 'crafting your communication style / method according to the context' then I'm all for dumbing down!
The Silent Acolyte mentioned children's talks as one area in which dumbing down can often happen. What does this mean though? Do children like or dislike children's talks, and if they dislike them why is that? Is it because they're too simplistic and dumbed down or for some other reason?
--------------------
My blog - wondering about Christianity in the 21st century, chess, music, politics and other bits and bobs.
Posts: 3309 | From: The south coast (of England) | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Boogie
Boogie on down!
# 13538
|
Posted
You don't 'dumb down' by making things accessible!
You don't dumb down a building by making it accessible to wheelchairs. You don't dumb down books by printing them in braille. You don't dumb down the curriculum by making it accessible.
It's certainly not about teaching to the 'lowest common denominator' - it's about adjusting your teaching style to the learner. Good teachers do this minute by minute, not just in the planning.
Some children have dyslexia and are very intelligent. Get them to learn as non-dyslexic children and you won't see that intelligence - they will become bored and disruptive. Teach them in accessible ways and they will shine.
--------------------
Garden. Room. Walk
Posts: 13030 | From: Boogie Wonderland | Registered: Mar 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by South Coast Kevin:
The Silent Acolyte mentioned children's talks as one area in which dumbing down can often happen. What does this mean though? Do children like or dislike children's talks, and if they dislike them why is that? Is it because they're too simplistic and dumbed down or for some other reason?
I'd have the thought the the problem is age range. If you pitch your sermon perfectly for a seven year old, all those younger and older will find it a less than perfect fit, the same is true of any age upto adulthood. Almost always, the majirty will not be the age you pitch at, regardless of which age you chose.
Trying to get something that works in parallel is, I think, much more difficult. In childrens film and tv, that is intended as 'family viewing' it is generally done with a combination of double entendre and nostalgia to keep the adults and older children onboard - together with intermittent prattfalls for the youngest to laugh at.
I doubt you can directly translate this approach to worship and preaching. I suppose - folk enjoying a nativty play and carol service by tiny tots is pulling for nostalgia and cuteness, but that won't work every time.
[code]
[ 25. March 2014, 07:45: Message edited by: Eutychus ]
--------------------
All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell
Posts: 19219 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jane R
Shipmate
# 331
|
Posted
If you pitch your sermon perfectly for 'a' seven-year-old, I can guarantee that there will be several other seven-year-olds it misses completely. Seven-year-olds are not a homogenous mass.
Also, preachers who don't know much about children tend to underestimate them. Children spend a large chunk of their lives in formal education. They are capable of understanding quite complicated ideas and they are very quick to notice when someone is patronising them.
They are also less tolerant of bad preaching than adults; if you are used to being taught by someone who has a clear purpose in mind and has thought through exactly how they are going to transfer the knowledge in their brain to yours, you are not going to put up with someone rambling aimlessly for 20 minutes about things vaguely connected to the Gospel reading.
Posts: 3958 | From: Jorvik | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
South Coast Kevin
Shipmate
# 16130
|
Posted
Jane R - your post above speaks to several of my hobby-horses about how we do church. Of course seven year olds are not a homogeneous mass who will all derive equal benefit from the same sermon (likewise, neither will all 4 year olds, 15 year olds, or indeed adults).
I also agree 100% about children being less 'polite', and would this has significant benefits. The politeness and social customs that most adults have learnt mean that, IMO, many bad sermons and unhelpful teaching activities generally (teaching is about far more than sermons, another bugbear of mine!) don't get called out for what they are.
--------------------
My blog - wondering about Christianity in the 21st century, chess, music, politics and other bits and bobs.
Posts: 3309 | From: The south coast (of England) | Registered: Jan 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
The Phantom Flan Flinger
Shipmate
# 8891
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
Some of it distinctly comes across as basically pitching stuff at the lowest common denominator.
If we don't pitch at least some stuff at the lowest level, then how can we make sure everyone understands us?
--------------------
http://www.faith-hope-and-confusion.com/
Posts: 1020 | From: Leicester, England | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Chorister
Completely Frocked
# 473
|
Posted
One of the things I like about my church is that there is the sermon, pitched at the level of the reasonably educated adult, then there is a presentation / play by the children with a very simple message. Because it is presented BY the children, rather than FOR the children, it is not at all patronising. And the simple message is clear to all, including those who would find a formal sermon difficult to grasp. (For example, it is very popular with a group of mentally handicapped people, from a local residential home, who come to church each week.) However, sometimes the strangest thing happens - the children's message, whilst on the surface very simple, is at times very profound, and even the clergy admit that it is, at times, more effective at getting a difficult concept across than the more learned sermon!
--------------------
Retired, sitting back and watching others for a change.
Posts: 34626 | From: Cream Tealand | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bullfrog.
Prophetic Amphibian
# 11014
|
Posted
I reach my audience at their level.
You simplify things for convenience.
That person is dumbing it down.
Aiming lower than the cognitive level of your audience is certainly a mistake, but so is aiming too high. Personally, and I not boast of this, I have a history of committing the latter, and it is a problem.
I suppose nobody calls it "dumbing down" unless you're obviously teaching below the potential comprehension level of your audience. But sometimes you do have to make accommodations for context.
--------------------
Some say that man is the root of all evil
Others say God's a drunkard for pain
Me, I believe that the Garden of Eden
Was burned to make way for a train. --Josh Ritter, Harrisburg
Posts: 7522 | From: Chicago | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Raptor Eye
Shipmate
# 16649
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
I take your point. I'm not sure if this is what Raptor Eye was getting at, though. In the UK, claims that churches are offering a poor diet of teaching and preaching are made in several different directions. I don't think it's an evangelical v. mainstream/liberal thing.
Thank you all for your thoughts. I wanted to keep it broad, and have found the different perceptions interesting.
I think it's an important issue for all churches, if they want to reach out: to the people who come occasionally as well as those who currently don't come at all.
--------------------
Be still, and know that I am God! Psalm 46.10
Posts: 4359 | From: The United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984
|
Posted
My fundamental point is that the variability in comprehension across the age range 3 to 16 is higly likely to be much wider than that of the adult congregation ( which will probably be a bell curve round average ), and that if you are not pitching to average adult, you will always be pitching to a smallish minority.
--------------------
All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell
Posts: 19219 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Fr Weber
Shipmate
# 13472
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by The Silent Acolyte:
quote:
Originally posted by CL:
Dumbing down is what happens when a person or organisation has absolutely no respect for the intelligence of their prospective audience.
Hear! Hear!
And one of the most hatesome occasions of dumbing down happens during that execrable exercise of patronization called the Children's Sermon.
I suspect that the beneficiaries of the Children's Sermon are not the children to whom it is ostensibly addressed, but the adults who think it's cute to see the children gathered around Father on the altar steps. And that they feel themselves thereby exempted from the duty of educating their children in the faith is probably not incidental, either.
--------------------
"The Eucharist is not a play, and you're not Jesus."
--Sr Theresa Koernke, IHM
Posts: 2512 | From: Oakland, CA | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
no prophet's flag is set so...
Proceed to see sea
# 15560
|
Posted
If you know your crowd, to whom you're speaking, does this not make it different? If you have prepared tightly, then the crowd doesn't seem to be engaged, do you change on the fly?
--------------------
Out of this nettle, danger, we pluck this flower, safety.
\_(ツ)_/
Posts: 11498 | From: Treaty 6 territory in the nonexistant Province of Buffalo, Canada ↄ⃝' | Registered: Mar 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Langton
Shipmate
# 17601
|
Posted
I have experience of this in another field, my hobby as a railway modeller. At present, the annual exhibitions put on by most clubs are suffering from diminishing attendances. Partly this is just general social change about the place of railways, and indeed of physical modelling rather than virtual/computer games, but one analysis suggests that for typical modern families the shows have become… er… boring compared to other modern entertainments.
One response to this situation is seen in clubs like my own – although in our case it wasn’t initially a deliberate response, but simply because our annual exhibition is done for the national Methodist children’s charity, Action for Children. We consequently have not only a need but a responsibility to entertain lots of local families who may not be railway minded the rest of the year, so that they will keep coming back knowing they will enjoy it.
Our shows therefore have above average of ‘family-friendly’ exhibits such as layouts you can actually drive or otherwise interact with, often but not always featuring a certain blue tank engine. Where allowing touching isn’t sensible, we still expect exhibitors to very much be willing to ‘show and tell’ about what they’re doing. As well as being fairly successful in keeping a high audience at our own exhibition, our ‘flagship’ layout recently came home from the National Model Railway Exhibition, no less, with a trophy for innovation; and one of the cited reasons for the award was our out front ‘story-tellers’.
If you can stand horror movies, google up ‘Romiley Model Railway Show You Tube’ and you will see pics of our show a couple of years back and a clip of me in action with my own ‘visitor participation’ layout, which was obviously appreciated despite a slight glitch in that particular ‘run’.
Other clubs are beginning to follow the same route; but others aren’t, and often the reasons they give are that they are ‘serious modellers’ and don’t want to ‘dumb things down’. One major club recently staged their annual event, and when the show manager produced a poster with ‘that tank engine’ on it, there was nearly a minor war in the club.
Now I certainly have seen efforts at ‘something for the children’ which constituted not only ‘dumbing down’ but also tacky modelling and all too often weren’t all that exciting either. But there is a good way to do it. One way is to ask relevant questions. In the railway context these include things like
“Do you realise how old people have to be to remember when British Railways was a steam railway?” (answer, for useful memories, you’ve probably got a bus pass) or
“Do you realise how little modern people have anything to do with railways, and how horrendous that experience often is?” (answer, again, too many modellers don’t realise) or
“Do you realise that these days just showing model trains doesn’t automatically make for a ‘family event’? Do you realise that these days you’re competing for the family audience with museums which are no longer, as my classmates used to joke, dead ‘mausoleums’ but lively places with lots of interaction and pro-active explanation going on, and free entry?" (One year I went to a model rail show which had a Friday evening opening, and earlier I had been to Imperial War Museum North with a special of the ‘Horrible Histories’ version of WWI. Even I came close to finding the museum more interesting that day!)
With layouts like my own we aim to ‘put on a show’ which not only means the visitors get to drive the trains, but we do a lot of serious explaining as well, at an appropriate level for the guest driver (and I’ve had at least one who wasn’t even three yet!); meanwhile another member of my team is out front talking to the young driver’s family and the general public both about our exhibit and about modelling generally.
Now obviously a model railway show and church are different kinds of event - we certainly aren’t there just for trivial entertainment, to start with – but a lot of this kind of thinking is surely applicable to church, with suitable adjustment.
As regards the ‘Children’s Sermon’ thing, one line of thought I increasingly meet is that churches should rather take the attitude of classical Jewish practice, whereby children are considered adult at 13 or thereabouts, and are expected to take part in the main services. Correspondingly this would be a challenge to the churches that the services should be attractive and challenging to the 13-year-olds, but not lose their high quality teaching for the adults – that is, NOT be ‘dumbed down’. (I'm not suggesting that there shouldn't also be separate 'teen-appropriate' activities, of course)
Posts: 2245 | From: Stockport UK | Registered: Mar 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Arabella Purity Winterbottom
Trumpeting hope
# 3434
|
Posted
Good analogy, Steve.
The other side of the story is when you have a very erudite section of your audience/congregation, and they forget that others don't have their education. I remember once running a Lenten study in which we were looking at images of the crucified Jesus. My intention was to get people talking about their response to the images. It was quite a diverse bunch of about 15 ranging from senior public servants to an ex-member of a biker gang.
The session was completely hijacked by a retired minister whose response was entirely sermonising. When another participant started to wonder about the impact of having nails driven into your hand, he jumped on her and told her off for having such a facile response. And so it continued for another painful hour. Afterwards, most of the group said to me that they would like to have the session again if we could guarantee the exclusion of the retired minister.
I'm sure he thought it was all dumbed down, but the end result was that everyone else, including me, felt thoroughly told off and miserable.
--------------------
Hell is full of the talented and Heaven is full of the energetic. St Jane Frances de Chantal
Posts: 3702 | From: Aotearoa, New Zealand | Registered: Oct 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Raptor Eye
Shipmate
# 16649
|
Posted
I can relate to both situations, thank you Steve and Arabella.
--------------------
Be still, and know that I am God! Psalm 46.10
Posts: 4359 | From: The United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2011
| IP: Logged
|
|
tclune
Shipmate
# 7959
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
However, my point was that for many churches (of the type I'm most familiar with) evangelism isn't a huge priority, so dumbing down for that particular reason is unlikely to be a problem. But it might occur for other reasons.
Dawn is writing primarily to American evangelical churches, where evangelism is pretty much the prime driving factor for everything, including any "dumbing down".
To my mind, an excellent case in point is Rick Warren's suggestion that communion be removed from the standard worship service because it makes "seekers" uncomfortable. ![[Help]](graemlins/help.gif)
--Tom Clune
--------------------
This space left blank intentionally.
Posts: 8013 | From: Western MA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by tclune:
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
However, my point was that for many churches (of the type I'm most familiar with) evangelism isn't a huge priority, so dumbing down for that particular reason is unlikely to be a problem. But it might occur for other reasons.
Dawn is writing primarily to American evangelical churches, where evangelism is pretty much the prime driving factor for everything, including any "dumbing down".
To my mind, an excellent case in point is Rick Warren's suggestion that communion be removed from the standard worship service because it makes "seekers" uncomfortable.
--Tom Clune
Of course, if you're committed to worshipping in a context where Communion takes place every week then this suggestion wouldn't make much sense. But Warren probably comes from a tradition where Communion happens less often than that, and isn't seen as the core of every worship experience.
Having said that, if Warren's church doesn't practice Communion very often then that should leave plenty of time for church leaders to explain to newcomers what it is, what it means in their faith tradition, and why it's nothing to be afraid of. And alternatives could be given - the chance to receive a blessing, or to use the time for private prayer, etc. Alternatively, Communion could be offered before or after the main worship service for those who wish to partake of it. But I'm sure Warren isn't suggesting that Communion should never be offered at all!
[ 26. March 2014, 11:39: Message edited by: SvitlanaV2 ]
Posts: 6668 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by tclune:
quote:
Originally posted by cliffdweller:
quote:
Originally posted by SvitlanaV2:
However, my point was that for many churches (of the type I'm most familiar with) evangelism isn't a huge priority, so dumbing down for that particular reason is unlikely to be a problem. But it might occur for other reasons.
Dawn is writing primarily to American evangelical churches, where evangelism is pretty much the prime driving factor for everything, including any "dumbing down".
To my mind, an excellent case in point is Rick Warren's suggestion that communion be removed from the standard worship service because it makes "seekers" uncomfortable.
--Tom Clune
I'm guessing Rick was not far from her mind when she was writing...
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
ken
Ship's Roundhead
# 2460
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Steve Langton:
“Do you realise how old people have to be to remember when British Railways was a steam railway?” (answer, for useful memories, you’ve probably got a bus pass) or
“Do you realise how little modern people have anything to do with railways, and how horrendous that experience often is?”
I'm 57 and I don't remember steam railways. I'm pretty sure I've never travelled on a train pulled by steam in this country. The local railway lines in my home town were electrified when my parents were children.
As to the second question, I travel by train almost every day, and hundreds of trains go past my flat every day. There are ten or eleven railway stations within a mile of my front door. Three within three hundred metres.
quote:
As regards the ‘Children’s Sermon’ thing, one line of thought I increasingly meet is that churches should rather take the attitude of classical Jewish practice, whereby children are considered adult at 13 or thereabouts, and are expected to take part in the main services. Correspondingly this would be a challenge to the churches that the services should be attractive and challenging to the 13-year-olds, but not lose their high quality teaching for the adults – that is, NOT be ‘dumbed down’.
A thirteen-year-old who wants to be in church, who chooses to be there for themselves, and who is interested in what is going on, will be just as good at following most "adult" teaching as the adults are. Better, probably. The exceptions will be more to do with personal experiece of death, deperssion. despair, disease and so on, which you would assume most older people will have gone through, but some lucky teenagers might not have had yet.
A thirteen-year-old who does not want to be in church, who has been dragged along by their parents, is going to miss almost everything you say, will be bored stiff, and will probably need more entertaining than teaching if they aren't to switch off completely.
One past childhood, age has a lot less to do with capacity to learn than motivation does. A typical teenager might not be an adult intellectually, but they are much more like an adult than they are like a young child. Treating the 13-16s as if they were 10-12 is insulting. Treating them as if they were 7 or 8 is insane. But some churches do.
--------------------
Ken
L’amor che move il sole e l’altre stelle.
Posts: 39579 | From: London | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
ken
Ship's Roundhead
# 2460
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by tclune:
To my mind, an excellent case in point is Rick Warren's suggestion that communion be removed from the standard worship service because it makes "seekers" uncomfortable.
Out church tends to avoid Communion at services where numbers of newcomers might be present, such as if there are baptisms, and things like Remembrance Day, and Haverst Festivals. and Carol services near Christmas. I disagree, but its a minority opinion.
--------------------
Ken
L’amor che move il sole e l’altre stelle.
Posts: 39579 | From: London | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Langton
Shipmate
# 17601
|
Posted
No basic dispute on what you say about 13-year-olds. The issue is what we can do so that they will be willing and that we don't carry on too long treating them as children and assuming they won't want the adult experience; and of course seeing to it that the adult services are that bit relevant and challenging.
I'm not going to go too deep in the trains thing on this thread; you rather emphasise my point on why we need to explain steam trains rather than just assume everybody knows - and there are issues of the same kind about what we do in churches. For too many people the experience of trains is an overcrowded commute which doesn't give good feelings about the modern railway. If they find the model show similarly boring....
Posts: 2245 | From: Stockport UK | Registered: Mar 2013
| IP: Logged
|
|
Baptist Trainfan
Shipmate
# 15128
|
Posted
A few comments on the 13 year olds.
1. Some are "big children" and others are "young adults" - it's not easy to relate to both but perhaps better to aim at the more mature end (the Church tends to baby and underestimate children anyway).
2. The adults have to realise that their culture is vastly different to the young peoples'; they must have a generous spirit and recognise that there are bits of the worship that they don't like but which helps the young people. This is the most important (and the hardest) thing.
3. We must not assume that "young person" = "loves hype, bouncy music and worship band". Some will respond better to quiet reflection. Creative and visual liturgy will also be good.
4. Interaction of some kind is vital: young people will want to be involved. Whether that is in drama or via question and answer (or whatever) will depend on the context. This is where Steve's model railway experience has lots to teach us.
5. There is going to be a huge difference between "churched" young people who are familiar with church culture and the Christian story, and others who don't have this background (true of adults, too, of course). If you are really clever you can pitch the worship at several levels at once.
[ 26. March 2014, 16:00: Message edited by: Baptist Trainfan ]
Posts: 9750 | From: The other side of the Severn | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
cliffdweller
Shipmate
# 13338
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Baptist Trainfan:
A few comments on the 13 year olds.
1. Some are "big children" and others are "young adults" - it's not easy to relate to both but perhaps better to aim at the more mature end (the Church tends to baby and underestimate children anyway).
2. The adults have to realise that their culture is vastly different to the young peoples'; they must have a generous spirit and recognise that there are bits of the worship that they don't like but which helps the young people. This is the most important (and the hardest) thing.
3. We must not assume that "young person" = "loves hype, bouncy music and worship band". Some will respond better to quiet reflection. Creative and visual liturgy will also be good.
4. Interaction of some kind is vital: young people will want to be involved. Whether that is in drama or via question and answer (or whatever) will depend on the context. This is where Steve's model railway experience has lots to teach us.
5. There is going to be a huge difference between "churched" young people who are familiar with church culture and the Christian story, and others who don't have this background (true of adults, too, of course). If you are really clever you can pitch the worship at several levels at once.
Excellent insights-- from my experience, all very true, and very helpful-- albeit difficult to pull off.
--------------------
"Here is the world. Beautiful and terrible things will happen. Don't be afraid." -Frederick Buechner
Posts: 11242 | From: a small canyon overlooking the city | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Chorister
Completely Frocked
# 473
|
Posted
Baptist Trainfan's list above speaks a lot of good sense.
IME, the more educated members of the congregation can feel included if a few well-chosen words are peppered into the sermon. They will be fleeting, and pass the others by, but can help to ground the ideas of the sermon in recognisable intellectual argument for those able to do so. They can also be pointers for the curious to delve deeper into the subject, by looking up the words and what they mean, later. (Or even at the time, with the appropriate device!) It is possible to tell a simple to understand story or illustration, and then to say 'This is an example of what theologians / bible scholars call....' before moving on to the next point. I've heard this technique used to great effect in cathedrals and larger churches, where the canons, deans, senior priests have been chosen at least partly for their ability to preach well.
--------------------
Retired, sitting back and watching others for a change.
Posts: 34626 | From: Cream Tealand | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Baptist Trainfan
Shipmate
# 15128
|
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Chorister:
The more educated members of the congregation can feel included if a few well-chosen words are peppered into the sermon ... It is possible to tell a simple to understand story or illustration, and then to say 'This is an example of what theologians / bible scholars call....' before moving on to the next point.
I agree entirely, although one Sunday I had to fight hard (and successfully) to keep the word "proleptic" out of my sermon even though it underlay most of what I was trying to say! After all, I didn't want to give the impression of "showing off"! ![[Cool]](cool.gif)
Posts: 9750 | From: The other side of the Severn | Registered: Sep 2009
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Printer-friendly view
