Thread: Host & Admin Day Board: Oblivion / Ship of Fools.
To visit this thread, use this URL:
http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=70;t=028454
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
Happy birthday to me, happy birthday to me, happy birthday dear me-eeeeeeeee
happy birthday to me!
Yes shipmates, 50 years ago today I came into the world to mark this auspicious occasion, today is to be HOST AND ADMIN DAY!
This is the day when hosts & admins get to enjoy themselves and anything can happen in the next 24 hours or so. (It might be longer. It depends how mu** we're enjoying ourselves). Brace yourselves for a bumpy ride!
Please note that the Eighth Day board will be a safe haven from the madness as they have chosen not to take part.
[ 18. September 2014, 05:56: Message edited by: Spike ]
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on
:
***** ******** Spike
Could be some light relief from the R*******um...
Posted by alienfromzog (# 5327) on
:
***** Easter Spike
Posted by Japes (# 5358) on
:
Have fun and enjoy your day, Spike.
Since my school year are all hitting this auspicious event this year, * suppose * 'd better ponder my own marking of the occasion in about seven months time.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
As an 8th Day host, * would take part, but * 'm not going to be around for the next 15 or so hours, and with another host on holiday it wasn't going to be easy to play H&A day.
***** ******** Spike.
Posted by kingsfold (# 1726) on
:
Woohoo - the word R*******um appears to have been asterisked
[ 18. September 2014, 06:42: Message edited by: kingsfold ]
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by kingsfold:
Woohoo - the word R*******um appears to have been asterisked
The word what?
Anyway, have a good one Spike.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
What ****land is doing today. Although my eyes keep wanting to fill in the asterisks as "Redrum".
[ETA: ah crap, that's been spiked too?]
[ 18. September 2014, 07:09: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
Posted by Zoey (# 11152) on
:
r - e - f - e - r - e - n - d - u -m
as has S - c - o - t
xpost
[ 18. September 2014, 07:11: Message edited by: Zoey ]
Posted by Ferijen (# 4719) on
:
***** ******** Spike. Delighted this coincides with my 'annual leave day to myself just because * can' day lve the renamed titles on each board.
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
Life begins at ********fty!
***** ******** Spike!
(edited to add h-a-p-p-y b-1-r-t-h-d-a-y !!)
[ 18. September 2014, 07:18: Message edited by: Boogie ]
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
What a good day to choose. Not just because it's your ********, Spike, but also because if all the ****s are going bananas today, we might as well all join in and make it one big crazy party.
Here's an ***l***/****t*** border crazy sign to add to the fun!
Posted by Lucia (# 15201) on
:
He he! Let the fun commence! Hippy Bathday Spike!
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on
:
A highly enjoyable anniversary to Spike, and a most pleasant H&A-tide! May none be hurt, even though some may hope to get away s-c-o-tfree.
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
OK, hosts and admins, you really have gone for crazy this time - my picture won't load because it has certain numbers in it. Spike, it's all your fault, couldn't you have chosen to be born on a different day, or something?!
Posted by Wood (# 7) on
:
Felicitations, Spike.
* knew it was HnA day because the board told me to bugger off. Not a new experience, granted, but never so direct.
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
Unrestful, or what?!
(the sign declared that the border was closed 'for training')
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on
:
You can still access the pic via Chorister's link, just need to click on its mini-version for prompt enlargement. - Yet, is all this bordering on insanity?
Posted by Anglican't (# 15292) on
:
* 've rather enjoyed the ****t*** r*******um thread but ne* posts are no* rendered almost unreadable by random asterisks. *ill these be removed *hen this 'Day' is over?
Posted by itsarumdo (# 18174) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
***** ******** to me, ***** ******** to me, ***** ******** dear me-eeeeeeeee
***** ******** to me!
Yes shipmates, ** years ago today * came into the *orld to mark this auspicious occasion, today is to be HOST AND ADMIN DAY!
This is the day *hen hosts & admins get to enjoy themselves and anything can happen in the ne*t 24 hours or so. (It might be longer. It depends ho* mu** *e're enjoying ourselves). Brace yourselves for a bumpy ride!
Please note that the Eighth Day board *ill be a safe haven from the madness as they have chosen not to take part.
:*hat?: :brick*all:
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on
:
Well, let's see how this gets auto-edited, you weird bunch of lovable rascals. * mean, what is the meaning of all this jolly randomness? Have you all gone completely charming?
Depending on how that gets done, it could seem really rather abusive.
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on
:
It appears they hate the double-u.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
whatever.
Posted by Wesley J (# 6075) on
:
Whence? Where? Why? Who? What? Whither?
Whatever indeed.
Posted by Roseofsharon (# 9657) on
:
Life's difficult enough, so * 'll be back when the H&A have fin***ed having fun with the board
Posted by mousethief (# 953) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Roseofsharon:
Life's difficult enough, so * 'll be back when the H&A have fin***ed having fun with the board
A sis, mentor.
Posted by Amazing Grace (# 95) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
***** ******** to me, ***** ******** to me, ***** ******** dear me-eeeeeeeee
***** ******** to me!
Yes shipmates, ** years ago today * came into the world to mark this auspicious occasion, today is to be HOST AND ADMIN DAY!
This is the day when hosts & admins get to enjoy themselves and anything can happen in the next 24 hours or so. (It might be longer. It depends how mu** we're enjoying ourselves). Brace yourselves for a bumpy ride!
Please note that the Eighth Day board will be a safe haven from the madness as they have chosen not to take part.
Hail thee, festival day!
Posted by Ecclesiastical Flip-flop (# 10745) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
***** ******** to me, ***** ******** to me, ***** ******** dear me-eeeeeeeee
***** ******** to me!
Yes shipmates, ** years ago today * came into the world to mark this auspicious occasion, today is to be HOST AND ADMIN DAY!
This is the day when hosts & admins get to enjoy themselves and anything can happen in the next 24 hours or so. (It might be longer. It depends how mu** we're enjoying ourselves). Brace yourselves for a bumpy ride!
Please note that the Eighth Day board will be a safe haven from the madness as they have chosen not to take part.
***** ******** Spike and have a nice day! You are a Friday's child.
Posted by Ann (# 94) on
:
Merry Birthmas Spike
Posted by Cthulhu (# 16186) on
:
MY VERY BEST W***ES
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Give it a rest Kelly. Besides, guess who has borrowed your axe for the duration.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
First of all, check the IP, second of all, eye will be nice and refrain from pressing the detonator on the theft prevention device * have installed on the axe.
For now.
***** ********, Spike!
[ 18. September 2014, 16:31: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]
Posted by daisymay (# 1480) on
:
***** ******** Smike - have a lovely time !
Posted by MrsBeaky (# 17663) on
:
Not sure where to post this but just had to say it...
After a tricky and tiring day * came onto the Ship and was thrilled to be told to bugger off and then find all this crazy stuff.
The only thing that * can't cope with is the comic sans script- it took me back to my teaching days when we had to use it. Not good.
Everything else to do with your H and A spree is just genius!
Posted by Mamacita (# 3659) on
:
Here's hoping it has been an auspicious day for you, Spike.
Posted by Gill H (# 68) on
:
Hipy papy bthudthday Spike (as Owl would say),
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
* 'm afraid * won't be able to join in very much. Congratulations Spike and much fun to all!
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Oh, at least come and vote in the poll of polls.
Posted by saysay (# 6645) on
:
Holy hell people.
What next indeed.
Posted by Sober Preacher's Kid (# 12699) on
:
Are we going to auction off the Hostly Powers?
* soooo want to be the first Calvinist Host in Eccles.
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
What're you offering?
And, before you think Calvin is unusual, remember that we've had Quakers and worse.
Posted by TheAlethiophile (# 16870) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Ariston:
And, before you think Calvin is unusual, remember that we've had Quakers and worse.
Yeah, but Calvinists tend to be noisier than Quakers.
Mind you, even crisp packets tend to be noisier than Quakers!
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by TheAlethiophile:
Mind you, even crisp packets tend to be noisier than Quakers!
Quavers crunching does make a satisfactory noise.
Going well, this one! We may all need a bit of silent Quakering to get over it.
[Didn't one of our resident Quakers Doublethink do some Eccles Hosting at one time? Or is my memory playing up? DT has Hosted in lots of places, always with distinction].
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Barnabas62:
Didn't one of our resident Quakers Doublethink do some Eccles Hosting at one time?
Yep.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Yes, during the days of Laetare
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Ariston:
What're you offering?
And, before you think Calvin is unusual, remember that we've had Quakers and worse.
* think Babybear might dispute that title as well!! She was a Mystery Worship host and also a former member of the Church of ****land (Methodist at the time)
J***ie
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
…also a former member of the Church of ****land (Methodist at the time)
J***ie
…it took me a moment to realize that there isn't a Church of Maryland.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Sober Preacher's Kid:
Are we going to auction off the Hostly Powers?
* soooo want to be the first Calvinist Host in Eccles.
Thread's up. Getting working on those application posts people! Entertain, woo and generally impress an Admin and a Hostly gig may be yours!
Tubbs
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
quote:
Crap spouted by Ariston:
What're you offering?
And, before you think Calvin is unusual, remember that we've had Quakers and worse.
* think Babybear might dispute that title as well!! She was a Mystery Worship host and also a former member of the Church of ****land (Methodist at the time)
J***ie
She wasn't an Eccles host though. * was the first non-dom Host and DT was the second IIRC.
Tubbs
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
Have the 24 hours expired?
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Caissa:
Have the 24 hours expired?
Much like many interpretations of the Genesis creation account, "Day" cannot be assumed to refer to a literal period of 24 hours.
[ 19. September 2014, 14:19: Message edited by: Marvin the Martian ]
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
* was precise about that deliberately and Eccles is officially a merger between Mystery Worship and Small Fire boards. Just as * was precise about her being Methodist although former CofS.
J***ie
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
* 'll be staying away until order is made out of chaos.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
As you w***.
Posted by piglet (# 11803) on
:
This is a bit late - was travelling home yesterday and today after holidays.
Hippie birdie, Spike.
Posted by welsh dragon (# 3249) on
:
oh, ***** ******** for yesterday!
Posted by Bernard Mahler (# 10852) on
:
Glad for Spike!
And splendid to know * 'm not the sole shipmate told to bugger off!
Posted by TallPoppy (# 16294) on
:
* 'll be pleased when all this nonsense is over. It might have been moderately funny for a bit for those of a robust disposition like me, but a dear friend of mine over on a private board has been genuinely hurt and upset. Where's the fun in that?
Tall 'disgruntled' Poppy
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Not a fan of H&A days myself, TP. But can offer no complaint if it mitigates the load for the deluded folk who operate this place.
Posted by Oscar the Grouch (# 1916) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by TallPoppy:
* 'll be pleased when all this nonsense is over.
You're not alone.
This is all very "in". Too smug for my taste. See y'all later.
Posted by cattyish (# 7829) on
:
* shall not bugger off! * laughed loudly and had to explain to Mr C why.
Catty***, chuffed at the proper humourousness.
Posted by Enoch (# 14322) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Oscar the Grouch:
quote:
Crap spouted by TallPoppy:
* 'll be pleased when all this nonsense is over.
You're not alone.
This is all very "in". Too smug for my taste. See y'all later.
Agreed. As my late mother used to say at yet another nine year old joke, "small things, please small minds."
Posted by Horseman Bree (# 5290) on
:
Just to increase the rain on the parade, * also find this buggering about to be un*****-making.
Posted by agingjb (# 16555) on
:
"bugger off, agingjb". You say, repeatedly. Eventually, * 'll get message.
[ 20. September 2014, 11:13: Message edited by: agingjb ]
Posted by Nanny Ogg (# 1176) on
:
* 'll be glad when this so called fun is over. There are quite a few upset people on the "Waving not drowning" private board.
IMO it should also have been omitted from the prayer thread. Not good to have your prayer requests mocked or made insignificant by * and other stupid changes. Imagine how you would feel if you needed prayer for illness or the death of a loved one.
Next year, think first and keep the "fun" to appropriate boards and threads. The Hosts and Admins day is a great idea but the lack of sensitivity has ruined the fun this year.
Posted by Thyme (# 12360) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Nanny Ogg:
Next year, think first and keep the "fun" to appropriate boards and threads. The Hosts and Admins day is a great idea but the lack of sensitivity has ruined the fun this year.
* normally enjoy the Festivals of H&As but not so much this year. Whatever the line is between cruelty/malice and wit and rough and tumble fun seems to have been crossed in places.
The 'Grievances' thread is ace
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
* guess some of this is "unintended consequences", Nanny Ogg. * 'm sure the point has got across - it certainly has to me.
A bit of knockabout daftness is something most of us enjoy, and one of our guidelines is 'don't be easily offended'. It's a significant part of the overall ethos here.
But * can appreciate that there are times and places. It may not be possible to insulate the folks who get hurt (rather than those who just take umbrage), but * 'm sure this H & A team will do some evaluating and see what we can learn.
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
It's only an inside joke if you keep yourself on the outside. Join in the chaos, get on my lawn you kids, and it will all make sense.
Posted by Horseman Bree (# 5290) on
:
Telling people to suck it up sounds very much like what a bully says. What happens if we don't enjoy it?
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
* am struggling to understand why something that has been done pretty much annually for a decade, is suddenly a problem this year ?
ETA * think previous feedback had been that it was confusing if you didn't realise it was going on - hence on the last two occasions there being announcements on the front of the board and in The Styx.
[ 20. September 2014, 13:17: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Horseman Bree:
Telling people to suck it up sounds very much like what a bully says. What happens if we don't enjoy it?
First, you put away the accusations of bullying. This has been going on for [* ]years.[/* ] And those of us who enjoy the break from the normal straitjackets and confines of po-faced respectability and Seriousness find this the best part of the Ship.
Second, * don't enjoy football at the local university. Every time there's a game, it mucks up the local traffic. So what do * do? * deal with it. * roll with the punches—and stay off campus for a bit. If this is causing you such insolvable existential distress, maybe you should have a look at that big green warning up top.
Look, we'll all get to go back to our usual hidebound, button-down, serious and respectable selves ready to drink weak tea and make polite conversation here in just a day or two. The inauthenticity and stultifying dullness of average everydayness will return, and we'll all continue on as if nothing had happened. It will be okay. * 'll put away the brimstone scented candles, SPK will lose his (delightfully abused) powers, and those of us who crave the chaos will start waiting for the next H&A Day to return.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
quote:
posted by Doublethink:
* am struggling to understand why something that has been done pretty much annually for a decade, is suddenly a problem this year ?
ETA * think previous feedback had been that it was confusing if you didn't realise it was going on - hence on the last two occasions there being announcements on the front of the board and in The Styx.
For some reason changes made to the boards during H&A days have not appeared in the Waving Board in previous years, this year they have.
[ 20. September 2014, 13:35: Message edited by: Huia ]
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
quote:
From Nanny Ogg:
* 'll be glad when this so called fun is over. There are quite a few upset people on the "Waving not drowning" private board.
IMO it should also have been omitted from the prayer thread. Not good to have your prayer requests mocked or made insignificant by * and other stupid changes. Imagine how you would feel if you needed prayer for illness or the death of a loved one.
Next year, think first and keep the "fun" to appropriate boards and threads. The Hosts and Admins day is a great idea but the lack of sensitivity has ruined the fun this year.
FYI if you preview post you can edit out the changes - providing you replace with text that is not being filtered, the personal pronoun Ii for example could be replaced with myself, me or a sentence restructure.
IRRC the filters and standard message are alterable only for the whole forum, so a single thread or board can not be insulated from those.
As regards, what if needed prayer - Ii suppose Ii would compose it round the filter. Ii have had relatives die at Christmas and on my day of birth - or come home from totally shit work day and all that is on is Comic relief. Sometimes life just doesn't match how you're feeling.
To me there is a difference between a one off event in a space Ii use not matching up, and whether that happens all the time. If its a one off event Ii'll come back when its over - if it is always like that, Ii'll go somewhere else.
[ 20. September 2014, 13:38: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
quote:
by Huia:
quote:
posted by Doublethink:
* am struggling to understand why something that has been done pretty much annually for a decade, is suddenly a problem this year ?
ETA * think previous feedback had been that it was confusing if you didn't realise it was going on - hence on the last two occasions there being announcements on the front of the board and in The Styx.
For some reason changes made to the boards during H&A days have not appeared in the Waving Board in previous years, this year they have.
* don't know how busy your board is, but when * was on a couple of different private boards a couple of days could pass between posts - sometimes longer. Perhaps noone posted during the last one ?
[ 20. September 2014, 13:42: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
Right the changes made this year have more results on Waving not Drowning. There are a number of reasons:
- more of the changes have been universal and not board specific. Thus, they make differences to Waving as well as the normal boards.
- The ways they have been made this time play on insecurities that are common amongst people on "Waving not Drowning". Doublethink, you will know that with people who find social interaction difficult, that being negative about them there is detrimental to them. There are such people on waving, they tend not to come onto the main boards for just this reason. This is not to say the greeting can not be changed, but please be aware that it goes beyond those on the main board. People on "waving not drowning" would not be upset to be told "Abandon hope all ye who enter here" (* think that was a previous years one) or maybe "More f*** food yum yum!", but are to being told to "bugger off". The first two are general jokes the third they perceive as someone being directly rude to them personally.
- Thirdly the asterisks seem to have been chosen for sequences of letters used rather more often on Waving than previous years.
- Fourthly, mea culpa, by the time * had got around to spotting it, some shipmates were already hurt. Normally, as one of the few shipmates who is regularly on both, * manage to post a warning on Waving before this happens
By the number of people who have outed themselves as Wavers, you can here the level of upset this has caused.
J***ie
Posted by roybart (# 17357) on
:
quote:
***** ****** ** ****:
***** ********* ****** ***** ** * ******** ******* ********
******** ********* *** **** * ****** ***** **** !
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Ariston:
quote:
Crap spouted by Horseman Bree:
Telling people to suck it up sounds very much like what a bully says. What happens if we don't enjoy it?
First, you put away the accusations of bullying. This has been going on for [* ]years.[/* ] And those of us who enjoy the break from the normal straitjackets and confines of po-faced respectability and Seriousness find this the best part of the Ship.
Second, * don't enjoy football at the local university. Every time there's a game, it mucks up the local traffic. So what do * do? * deal with it. * roll with the punches—and stay off campus for a bit. If this is causing you such insolvable existential distress, maybe you should have a look at that big green warning up top.
Indeed. There have been times in the past when * have stayed away from the Ship during H&A Days, but * have always accepted that they are a part of "Christian Unrest" and thought that the fault was in me for not being sufficiently unrestful. This time * am enjoying it, having great fun trying to work out what *** should be. As * have said, * did appreciate the bright green warning; forewarned is forearmed and all that.
Posted by Thyme (# 12360) on
:
One example that made me feel uncomfortable -
changing some shipmates personal titles (the bit underneath the avatar * mean - * have forgotten what it is called) to something very unflattering.
The ones * have noticed this time round may be names that these posters have been called in hell by many including H&A's and may even be justified but there seems to me to be a great difference between that and forcing them to wear a label on all their posts.
* know it has been done before but the feeling this time is of cruelty not a witty 'in' joke for regulars.
Posted by JoannaP (# 4493) on
:
Speaking as somebody currently struggling with depression, and married to somebody who has suffered from severe depression for several years, * find it hard to believe that anyone truly depressed would be able to notice something so minor.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
Wavers is not solely for depressed. It is for all with mental health problems. "Mental illness" is not a synonym for "DEPRESSION". Depression at best is only the commonest of mental illness. There are others and those include ones with social anxiety disorder.
J***ie
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
An apology from the H&A's to the waving Not Drowning members is in order. Not excluding them from your nonesense was stupid. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
Also using "but it's traditional, we've been doing it for years!" as an excuse for H&A days puts you in the same camp as Orangemen parading round nationalist areas of Belfast, and borne from the same sense of entitlement; we have some power and we want to show off.
Other forums * use don't have H&A's that need a day of stress relief in order to cope. They just seem to get on with it. Perhaps they are made of sterner stuff than the Ship's H&As.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
Nobody is singling out any board and no changes were made specifically for any of the private board. Some changes, however are forum wide and cannot be excluded from individual boards. These are (this time anyway) the censored words, the "quote" text and the "welcome" text.
As all members of the private boards are shipmates, they will have seen the notice on the front page that it is H&A day. They will also have seen the the message appears on every board and * would hope that would be enough for them to realise that they are not being singled out.
quote:
Crap spouted by Doublethink:
* am struggling to understand why something that has been done pretty much annually for a decade, is suddenly a problem this year ?
Oh but it isn't. People always complain. That's half the fun of it.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
Sigh. This happens every time. IMO if one can handle being off Ship for a few days during times of maintenance, one can forgo its pleasures during the few H&A days, if it isn't to one's liking.
On some occasions, * enjoy H&A more than others. This time * 'm finding less to get my teeth into, but ho-hum. That's the way it is. Lyda*Rose says carry on, dear Powers-That-Be. Enjoy! Enjoy! And thank you, thank you!
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
As all members of the private boards are shipmates, they will have seen the notice on the front page that it is H&A day. They will also have seen the the message appears on every board and * would hope that would be enough for them to realise that they are not being singled out.
No! That assumption is wrong. A number of Waving have withdrawn from using the main ship. You have to have a specific link access Waving. Indeed there is no link from the Front page to Waving! Ι know Ι have tried when Ι have lost my bookmark. So people going to Waving are specifically not going via the main boards.
My personal order is to go to Waving and then from Waving to the main boards, not the other way around.
Jεngiε
[ 20. September 2014, 15:35: Message edited by: Jengie Jon ]
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
There's no question that the H and A Day thing is an in-joke. It certainly disrupts discussion, and maybe that's what it wanted? Some sort of reset? Except that it seems to involve more than that.
As for complaining, as a contributor to discussion threads where * 'm not currently affected personally to a significant extent, * couldn't object personally very much. This is the first one where * have kept doing some posts. However, it is significant that there are boards and people discussing things that do indeed affect them personally, and the in-jokes are not found to be particularly amusing. * am wondering in this light if there is a time frame for expiry. Second, if there might be something to do to exclude certain boards entirely by specifically not doing certain types of disruption in the future. Are the controllers of the board examining this?
* have only a vague idea what the history of this sort of thing is, not having been a member so very long. * suspect that Erin, who was gone before * joined, had something to do with it. If * 'm correct on this, * will ask: Most deceased people's influence eventually fades - when will her's? And if not, why not? Shouldn't it fade?
Edit - just checked. The 8th Day appears excluded.
[ 20. September 2014, 15:44: Message edited by: no prophet ]
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
As all members of the private boards are shipmates, they will have seen the notice on the front page that it is H&A day. They will also have seen the the message appears on every board and * would hope that would be enough for them to realise that they are not being singled out.
No! That assumption is wrong. A number of Waving have withdrawn from using the main ship. You have to have a specific link access Waving. Indeed there is no link from the Front page to Waving! Ι know Ι have tried when Ι have lost my bookmark. So people going to Waving are specifically not going via the main boards.
My personal order is to go to Waving and then from Waving to the main boards, not the other way around.
Jεngiε
Private boards are part of the Ship. Members of those boards have to have a minimum number of posts before they can join and, even of those private boards are the only ones they ever read, they are still members of Ship of Fools and are bound by the same rules which means they should be checking the Styx board on a regular basis.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
Define Regular
Once a year when * have courage would be the definition for some members.
J***ie
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
Define Regular
At the very least, when you see something untoward happening on the board!
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Spike:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
Define Regular
At the very least, when you see something untoward happening on the board!
The pain was caused by the untoward which made what they felt was a safe place "unsafe". So they should check the main boards to see if we really meant the pain we caused or if we were just joking. Doesn't sound good does it!
J***ie
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
* am concerned that your posts it makes it sound as if Waving is being used as a therapeutic space. (As for it being a 'safe' space - that may be true to an extent - but it is a non-encrypted site on the internet.)
If so, that is a problem - because there is not the infrastructure for that. Nor, as far as * know, either the insurance or the expertise.
[ 20. September 2014, 16:07: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by J***ie Jon:
The pain was caused by the untoward which made what they felt was a safe place "unsafe". So they should check the main boards to see if we really meant the pain we caused or if we were just joking. Doesn't sound good does it!
Sounds fine to me. That's the way life and people work sometimes.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
Safe was me being lazy when I am careful I use the word "sheltered". It means among other things a place where the cut and thrust of the main boards is muted (not silenced).
We do not do therapy. There are however people who have tried the main boards and found they do not cope easily with them on there due to their illness. So it tends to be more like "Heaven"/"All Saints" than the rest of the ship in tone.
Jengie
[ 20. September 2014, 16:24: Message edited by: Jengie Jon ]
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
And has "Bugger off, _____" suddenly caused you all to behave as if Waving were Purgatory or Hell?
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Doublethink:
* am concerned that your posts it makes it sound as if Waving is being used as a therapeutic space. (As for it being a 'safe' space - that may be true to an extent - but it is a non-encrypted site on the internet.)
If so, that is a problem - because there is not the infrastructure for that. Nor, as far as * know, either the insurance or the expertise.
Of course a forum can be therapeutic. So can a cup of tea or a hug (virtual or real) from someone. Not clear on the concern. People derive support from all sorts of things.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by RuthW:
And has "Bugger off, _____" suddenly caused you all to behave as if Waving were Purgatory or Hell?
No it is read in itself as being part of "Hell" protocol, in that it is read as a personal attack particularly as it has the shipmates name.
Jengie
Posted by lily pad (# 11456) on
:
Sorry, the term may be acceptable there and maybe it is just one more pond difference we have to put up with but it really has gone too far. Sometimes jokes just aren't funny.
Staying away for one day obviously didn't work. Have looked over the boards and not seen anything amusing. Instead, it seems like many have left for the duration. If there is something fun going on somewhere, please point me in the right direction.
Will be very glad to see the end of this round.
Posted by M. (# 3291) on
:
For God's sake! I hate H&As Day as well but it's a private board and we are guests here. Stay away for a bit.
(Actually, about the only bit I do find funny is the 'bugger off' message).
M.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by Doublethink:
* am concerned that your posts it makes it sound as if Waving is being used as a therapeutic space. (As for it being a 'safe' space - that may be true to an extent - but it is a non-encrypted site on the internet.)
If so, that is a problem - because there is not the infrastructure for that. Nor, as far as * know, either the insurance or the expertise.
Of course a forum can be therapeutic. So can a cup of tea or a hug (virtual or real) from someone. Not clear on the concern. People derive support from all sorts of things.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
What I had understood from the safe / unsafe terminology, and I think Jengie understood me to be asking about, was a therapeutic space in the sense an AA group or a counselling session is a therapeutic space.
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by lily pad:
Sorry, the term may be acceptable there and maybe it is just one more pond difference we have to put up with but it really has gone too far. Sometimes jokes just aren't funny.
Staying away for one day obviously didn't work. Have looked over the boards and not seen anything amusing. Instead, it seems like many have left for the duration. If there is something fun going on somewhere, please point me in the right direction.
Will be very glad to see the end of this round.
Difficult to predict as I am not up to speed with your sense of humour, but there are some random polls in the circus, some of which are pun based. Do you like puns ? There's a version of Mornington Crescent going in Kerygmania I think and some close textual analysis of Dr Seuss - both of those being spoof based pieces of humour.
What do you think you would find fun ? What threads would you like to start that would be funny ? Have you considered taking up Tubbs' offer of being host for a day, and then running a board in a way you find funny ?
[ 20. September 2014, 17:33: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on
:
Whenever H&A Day comes around, I usually decide it's no use trying to post anything serious for the duration - but that doesn't mean we can't join in the silliness.
And if some don't like it, just comfort yourselves with the thought of the Powers That Be putting the whole dam' thing back together when it's all over. (Actually, they usually overlook something - e.g. I think I'm right in remembering that the "who to blame" heading over who started a thread was something that was done for an H&A Day and never got changed back.)
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Posted by Ariston:
*snip* ...the normal straitjackets and confines of po-faced respectability and Seriousness...
*snip*
Look, we'll all get to go back to our usual hidebound, button-down, serious and respectable selves ready to drink weak tea and make polite conversation here in just a day or two. The inauthenticity and stultifying dullness of average everydayness will return, and we'll all continue on as if nothing had happened. It will be okay. * 'll put away the brimstone scented candles, SPK will lose his (delightfully abused) powers, and those of us who crave the chaos will start waiting for the next H&A Day to return.
Is that really what you think about how the Ship runs most of the time? How sad.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by RuthW:
And has "Bugger off, _____" suddenly caused you all to behave as if Waving were Purgatory or Hell?
Sounds to me like your saying H&A days allow H&As to ignore the rules of each board and treat them all like Hell; that you don't have to respect the principles of each forum. Hence you can hand out personal attacks to shipmates in Waving Not Drowning because "hey! It's just a bit of fun!"
Let's be frank, one of the H&As made a cock up when they posted offensive messages in WND, but pride and arrogance is stopping them from admitting it. It's perfectly obvious to everyone what is happening here but saving face is getting in the way.
This is no longer funny. In fact I would suggest that if a H&A does find the idea of deliberate upsetting people in that particular forum funny, then that H&A really needs to take a long hard look at themselves.
Posted by itsarumdo (# 18174) on
:
I kinda like the anarchy for a short while, but after about 3 days the joke wears quite thin
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on
:
I would think a derogatory comment about waving on a thread on the main boards would not have helped.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Crap spouted by deano:
Sounds to me like your [sic] saying H&A days allow H&As to ignore the rules of each board and treat them all like Hell; that you don't have to respect the principles of each forum.
Yep, you've got it.
quote:
Hence you can hand out personal attacks to shipmates in Waving Not Drowning because "hey! It's just a bit of fun!"
You've lost me. Who made a personal attack and which individual has been personally attacked?
[ 20. September 2014, 19:39: Message edited by: Spike ]
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on
:
This may related to a comment by itsarumdo on a thread "lacking proper directions...." (it's moved a few times so not sure where it is now!) asking if waving had moved.
Posted by ChastMastr (# 716) on
:
I sincerely hope everyone will enjoy the Host and Admin Talk Like A Pirate Brewfest Festival (no, wait, some of that is World of Warcraft) but I'm kind of looking forward to when things get back to normal, myself.
Posted by Chocoholic (# 4655) on
:
PS Hoppy Birfday Spike!
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
BWA HA HA HA HAAA HAAA!
quote:
Crap spouted by deano:
This is no longer funny. In fact I would suggest that if a H&A does find the idea of deliberate upsetting people in that particular forum funny, then that H&A really needs to take a long hard look at themselves.
This, from you? A demonstrated wind-up merchant on their last straw of being permitted to even be here? This is something you want to make a stand as having an important opinion about?
[Wipes tear from eye.]
Just made the whole thing worthwhile, really.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
quote:
Posted by Ariston:
*snip* ...the normal straitjackets and confines of po-faced respectability and Seriousness...
*snip*
Look, we'll all get to go back to our usual hidebound, button-down, serious and respectable selves ready to drink weak tea and make polite conversation here in just a day or two. The inauthenticity and stultifying dullness of average everydayness will return, and we'll all continue on as if nothing had happened. It will be okay. * 'll put away the brimstone scented candles, SPK will lose his (delightfully abused) powers, and those of us who crave the chaos will start waiting for the next H&A Day to return.
Is that really what you think about how the Ship runs most of the time? How sad.
Have you READ this thread? The first time we do something that's not what ariston's talking about, and it seems that half the Ship is having a collective fit about it.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RooK:
BWA HA HA HA HAAA HAAA!
quote:
Crap spouted by deano:
This is no longer funny. In fact I would suggest that if a H&A does find the idea of deliberate upsetting people in that particular forum funny, then that H&A really needs to take a long hard look at themselves.
This, from you? A demonstrated wind-up merchant on their last straw of being permitted to even be here? This is something you want to make a stand as having an important opinion about?
[Wipes tear from eye.]
Just made the whole thing worthwhile, really.
Wow. I seem to have hit a nerve there Rook. What's the matter? H&A day not as fun anymore? Have I spilt it for you by making you face up to the reality of it?
I haven't posted on WND for a long time, but whenever I did it was because I always felt it to be a safe place. It helped me when I needed it and it is a comfort that should I need it again, it will be there.
But I hate bullies and given that many people on WND are not the kind to seek a confrontation, then I will gladly step up. What you and your colleagues have done in WND IS bullying. It may be traditional, but nevertheless it is bullying.
So yes, if this is my last stand, then I'm happy to be banned over something as important as defending WND against arrogant H&A's who have no clue as to its nature. I'll risk it. It's worth it.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
I can state categorically that no changes were made to any of the private boards and that no individual was targeted on any of the private boards.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
I can state categorically that no changes were made to any of the private boards and that no individual was targeted on any of the private boards.
In that case I apologise for m remarks above.
But where have the complaints come from?
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
The welcome message across all boards, including the 8th Day, was changed to 'Bugger Off ...' which is what seems to have caused the offence.
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
Sigh.
On every board on every page there is a message in the bar under the board title.
Mine currently reads >>Hello, Patdys [log out]
It for a time read 'bugger off Patdys'.
What distresses me is the comma.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Nobody's talking about banning anyone, deano.
I have been ill this last month and a half, so haven't been able to join in the fun, but my perception of this year is that it has much LESS aggressive than it has in years past . Hell, the first year it happened I got my avatar changed to a nude pole dancer. Nobody paid attention to a damn thing I actually posted for two days!
I understand that the the people on Waving Not Drowning were probably pretty alarmed at what seemed like random personal attacks in a board that they in fact pay for, unlike the rest of us. I am so used to recognizing the automatic format changes as being universal that it didn't even phase me when I saw them. I hope at least that issue is cleared up.
The origin of H/A Day is good to recap-- in celebration of her 10, 000 post, and in frustration at several complaints about hostly tyranny in the face of what is actually a pretty moderate hosting style compared to some boards, Erin decided to show us what the world would be like if things were really arbitrary. So, we celebrate H/A Day to celebrate Erin, first off, and second to celebrate the fact that this is a well-moderated board where people have an unusual latitude to speak their mind.
An us v. Them attitude on either side of the debate is unhelpful, imo-- the ship needs h/a's to run smoothly, the ship needs shipmates to run at all. As Lyda said, I think the hope of the Adminosphere, every year, is that the Shipmates will find ways to join in with the silliness and have fun with us.
[ 20. September 2014, 21:08: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
I think the host and admins should send chocolate to all the shipmates to honour our contributions to the ship.
I am happy to co-ordinate the receivership.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Tell you what, instead we will give everyone free membership to a message board! :
You get a membership, and you get a membership, and you get a membership...
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
You got me at membership.
Be well lethal leporid.
Posted by Gwai (# 11076) on
:
I think my favorite H&A day was definitely before I was a host. Ariston (?) and I were given the right and obligation to crusade. I think I was trying to persuade people to worship... I'm not sure what, and his had something to do with upside down and bicycles. (I guess we know who was the better crusader.) This time on the other hand, I was rather tired from having a 1 month old baby so didn't do as much even though as a host I could have gotten away with doing quite a bit. I take this as evidence that indeed Ariston is right that it's all what you put into it.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
My favorite was the year Sarky ordered me to call someone to Hell, so I Pmed Nonprofiteer to play and we had a great time slanging each other. Boy, does that date me!
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
That. Is. genius.
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Doublethink -- the traffic would usually be at least 5 posts per day and, to my memory of the time, various Wavers mentioned the diffence between Waving and the main boards during H&A
Huia
Posted by Doublethink (# 1984) on
:
Odd then, because there were definitely language filters last time, I think the word church was one of them - I don't know what anyone else remembers ?
ETA Was it last H&A that the prefiew / edit messages were changed ?
[ 20. September 2014, 22:55: Message edited by: Doublethink ]
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
Yes, we changed the "edited by" message to "post buggered about with by," and censored the word "pope."
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
I think we've used the censor option on every one of the H&As Days. Usually to pick up words that are being well used at the time, the "I'm sick of hearing about ..." reaction. I'd be surprised if 'church' hasn't been censored more than once.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Last year was mayhem. This year was cake by comparison.
And IIRC we changed " pope" to deliberately screw with the discussions about the papal elections.
[ 20. September 2014, 23:00: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
Hmmmmm cake ... I'm hungry now and I've only just had my breakfast.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Have at it, Alan.
Just one last thing to say--above all I think we need to recognize and respect our roots in a satire magazine. The orign of the Ship lies in the idea that laughter brings light, and smartass is strength. That is all.
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
Wow. That is pink. My daughter would love it!
Posted by Huia (# 3473) on
:
Having said my bit, I really enjoyed the quotes file being bounced around between boards. I caught up on some wonderful quotes I'd either missed or forgotten about.
Huia
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Every couple of months I do that. We have an impressive legacy.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Last year, it wasn't just that we censored the word pope (along with a few others), it was that the pope announced his resignation within a couple of hours of us censoring the word pope.
And yes, it really did happen in that order.
Now, let me say something more generally...
I've enjoyed some H&A days and not others. That's been both before I was a Host and now that I am one. I enjoyed last year's. I didn't enjoy this one.
The reason for that is largely me. I was already having a tough week. I had noticed some H&A discussion about having the H&A day but hadn't paid much attention, so I wasn't aware that the day was coming up so soon. So it caught me by surprise in the way it catches most Shipmates by surprise.
It was okay for a little while, but then the asterisking of individual letters took off, and I found it more than I could tolerate.
So I left.
No-one seems to have particularly noticed that I wasn't here. I did do a sort of semi-Host: I logged in once, and I read some Hell threads briefly without logging in, but the place survived without me for a bit. I just knew that I wasn't in a very good place to handle it.
But I knew it would blow over in a couple of days. I also knew that I would know when to come back because there'd be an announcement at the top of the forums letting me know when it was over.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo
It was okay for a little while, but then the asterisking of individual letters took off, and I found it more than I could tolerate.
Fair enough. None of the rest of liked it either which is why it was only active for about an hour.
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
When the ***k will this ***king thing ever end? * just can*t seem to f*nd the r*ght words these days. Plea*e go back to norma**ty as soon as po*sible. Yes, dear, * will take my p*lls now.
Posted by rolyn (# 16840) on
:
Wakey wakey, we're on the Ship of Fools everyone . We get an H&A day where we are warned strange things may happen . So Hey, deal.
I logged in yesterday and read 'Bugger off' where it normally says 'Hello', and yeah a slight jingle-jangle in the tummy. But, you know, there's plenty there's plenty of gardening sites and such like I could join if I wanted wall to wall *nice*.
Keeping 8th Day as a mischief-free sanctuary was a good idea , so yes I can see that having the 'bugger off' logo encroaching there would have been problematic for some.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
Unrest is not restricted to "only unrest of which I approve."
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by rolyn:
Keeping 8th Day as a mischief-free sanctuary was a good idea , so yes I can see that having the 'bugger off' logo encroaching there would have been problematic for some.
As I understand it 8th Day was kept clear as none of the (temporary) hosts had the time or inclination to get involved (I was pretty much solidly out for most of the shenanigans, because I'd have loved to have done more - September was always going to be busy for me. H&A days are always more fun if you can play too.)
I was only pointing out that the greeting on the left of the top bar was the same in 8th Day as there was some grumbling that it got exempted and Waving Not Drowning didn't. And 8th Day was equally affected by the asterisked letters.
Posted by JFH (# 14794) on
:
I have a different question:
Where's the New System/Order®'s score board?
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Yeah, all of the format changes happened in 8th Day as well as everywhere else. You can go down there and find evidence for yourself. 8th Day was declared "exempt" as it is an all- access public board, and people might want to know what to expect from the hosts. In other words, we weren't just stating that the hosts were nor planning to be involved, we were requesting that Shipmates not carry the festivities to this board.
There is no need to do that with a private board, as the hosts and participants are "safe" from public interference in the first place-- the participants are selected by the hosts, and they decide what does or does not happen as far as actual content.
As has been said, since we have done goofy format changes in the past-- and indeed some have lasted past the year they were introduced-- I think it was a surprise to Team H/A that people thought it was personal, or thought we could alter it from board to board.
[ 21. September 2014, 20:03: Message edited by: Kelly Alves ]
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
An us v. Them attitude on either side of the debate is unhelpful, imo-- the ship needs h/a's to run smoothly, the ship needs shipmates to run at all.
This. I am not a fan of H&A days, but the monkeys must be let loose of their cages occasionally.
Posted by Anglican't (# 15292) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I've enjoyed some H&A days and not others...I enjoyed last year's. I didn't enjoy this one.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that.
I appreciate that everyone's sense of humour differs and mine is probably not on the same wavelength of many on here, but I was rather enjoying the Scottish referendum thread in Purgatory but then, as the referendum reached its climax, so much of the thread had been asterisked that it was almost unreadable. I spent a lot less time on here as a result. I'm not sure what the point of a discussion board is if one isn't able to read it.
Anyway, that's my twopenn'orth.
Posted by Soror Magna (# 9881) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
... The origin of H/A Day is good to recap-- in celebration of her 10, 000 post, and in frustration at several complaints about hostly tyranny in the face of what is actually a pretty moderate hosting style compared to some boards, Erin decided to show us what the world would be like if things were really arbitrary. So, we celebrate H/A Day to celebrate Erin, first off, and second to celebrate the fact that this is a well-moderated board where people have an unusual latitude to speak their mind. ...
Amen. And why does this make me think of The Hunger Games?
(And count me among those who enjoy H&A day. I seem to remember something about Moosiversalism .... )
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
I thought it was kind that the Kempistry (current 8th Day board) hosts were invited to join in, but also given the opportunity to keep apart. For the record: since all other Kempistry hosts (by chance) were unavailable, Kempistry keeping apart basically reflected my personal preference as "last host standing" rather than agreed upon board policy.
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by JFH:
I have a different question:
Where's the New System/Order®'s score board?
I won.
Not sure what or how, but I did.
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
An us v. Them attitude on either side of the debate is unhelpful, imo-- the ship needs h/a's to run smoothly, the ship needs shipmates to run at all. As Lyda said, I think the hope of the Adminosphere, every year, is that the Shipmates will find ways to join in with the silliness and have fun with us.
If there's anything that creates an us vs them attitude to reinforce the power and authority of the H/As it would have to be the host & admin day. That's ok the powers that be say it is so, but let's not kid ourselves it's anything but a bit of self-indulgent power games for the H/As at the "expense" (the price of free membership of Sof apparantly) of the shipmates.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
WTF? It's just another version of April Fools, the lord of misrule, carnival or any other "let's turn the rules upside down and have a great time" holiday. Power games my foot.
[ 22. September 2014, 02:42: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
Posted by Starbug (# 15917) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Anglican't:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I've enjoyed some H&A days and not others...I enjoyed last year's. I didn't enjoy this one.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that.
I appreciate that everyone's sense of humour differs and mine is probably not on the same wavelength of many on here, but I was rather enjoying the Scottish referendum thread in Purgatory but then, as the referendum reached its climax, so much of the thread had been asterisked that it was almost unreadable. I spent a lot less time on here as a result. I'm not sure what the point of a discussion board is if one isn't able to read it.
Anyway, that's my twopenn'orth.
I agree. I was taken ill last week, just as all this madness took over. I wanted to request prayers in the Prayers of the Faithful thread, only to find it over-run with asterisks. In the state I was in, I couldn't deal with it and backed away.
For people in a certain headspace (in my case. stressed and exhausted), the Ship was a no-go area for several days - at a time when I needed it.. Why is this necessary? I don't know of any other discussion boards that does this.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Evangeline:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
An us v. Them attitude on either side of the debate is unhelpful, imo-- the ship needs h/a's to run smoothly, the ship needs shipmates to run at all. As Lyda said, I think the hope of the Adminosphere, every year, is that the Shipmates will find ways to join in with the silliness and have fun with us.
If there's anything that creates an us vs them attitude to reinforce the power and authority of the H/As it would have to be the host & admin day. That's ok the powers that be say it is so, but let's not kid ourselves it's anything but a bit of self-indulgent power games for the H/As at the "expense" (the price of free membership of Sof apparantly) of the shipmates.
Wow, thanks for twisting a joke I made about Admins being expected to send chocolate to all the Shipmates into something I didn't say at all.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Evangeline:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
An us v. Them attitude on either side of the debate is unhelpful, imo-- the ship needs h/a's to run smoothly, the ship needs shipmates to run at all. As Lyda said, I think the hope of the Adminosphere, every year, is that the Shipmates will find ways to join in with the silliness and have fun with us.
If there's anything that creates an us vs them attitude to reinforce the power and authority of the H/As it would have to be the host & admin day. That's ok the powers that be say it is so, but let's not kid ourselves it's anything but a bit of self-indulgent power games for the H/As at the "expense" (the price of free membership of Sof apparantly) of the shipmates.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
As a shipmate I really love and look forward to H&A days, so please don't assume or say that all shipmates don't like H&A days, because quite a few of us do.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
This reaction is the price H&As pay for H&A days. It happens every time, but this time the reaction was stronger due to the nature of some of the H&A "fun" on boards that should have been exempted. Suck it up.
You are going to have to defend yourselves during and after every H&A day.
If you don't want to deal with the fall out from H&A days, you know what the answer is don't you?
Posted by Baptist Trainfan (# 15128) on
:
One point: I come onto the Ship via a saved "favourite" direct to "current active threads". Coming this way I had no advice that the H&A Day had begun, and initially got quite upset by some of the comments I read.
Next time, could things be arranged so that one gets a warning about the Day on any page one opens?
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Starbug:
For people in a certain headspace (in my case. stressed and exhausted), the Ship was a no-go area for several days - at a time when I needed it.. Why is this necessary? I don't know of any other discussion boards that does this.
If that is how you express your relationship to the Ship, then I think you are over-dependent on it. I know it can feel like a supportive environment, but the Guidelines are quite clear:
quote:
The Ship is not an adequate stand-in for counselling services
Like them or loathe them, H&A events offer a healthy (and unmissable) reminder of the limits of what we do and are here.
The best way for each of us to benefit the most from what we actually form collectively, stay on board and add our own distinctive voice to the mix is to revise our expectations appropriately. At least that's what I've found.
[ 22. September 2014, 07:32: Message edited by: Eutychus ]
Posted by Thyme (# 12360) on
:
In the past H&A days seemed more inclusive in that shipmates got to join in the fun, eg the Crusading competition that Gwai mentioned and Sarky telling Kelly to call someone to Hell (the callee willingly took part and knew it was part of the fun).
This time the main impression was that it was all about the H&A's having fun abusing their powers and somehow 'getting their own back' and there were comments by H&A's along these lines.
quote:
Originally posted by Spike:
quote:
Crap spouted by deano:
Sounds to me like your [sic] saying H&A days allow H&As to ignore the rules of each board and treat them all like Hell; that you don't have to respect the principles of each forum.
Yep, you've got it.
I gave another example earlier in the thread here
The genuine fun got a bit lost in all this. There were some extremely funny threads in Kerygmania. And Sober Preachers Kid got to be host in Eccles which was fun.
But my impression was that fewer shipmates than previously took part this time.
There are always some complaints about H&A days, but this thread started going pear shaped about page 2
An H&A day which resulted in two shipmates being banned and an Admin having to apologise seems to have gone quite badly wrong.
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
Suspended, not banned. And, my posting in the Styx was mainly to be very obvious that the suspension was very short so that both pimple and L'organist would know very quickly they could return to posting. Plus, the referendum thread was due to be closed anyway which would result in anything I posted there descending out of sight very quickly.
I also wanted to make clear that on occasions we will have to break the (very sensible) convention of H&As not posting officially on threads they're actively participating in as that was picked up specifically following the suspension. Again, better in a dedicated Styx thread than on a rapidly sinking closed Purg thread.
All that being said, it was an apology.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
So if not H&A Days, what then? Nothing, ever, would seem to be the answer in some quarters.
There seem to be two world views: one - an ancient one - that every order must embrace an element of anarchy so that balance is maintained. Two - which seems to me the more modern - is that no, consistency must be maintained at all times.
While there are a great many institutions, structures and authorities in the world I hope are being lawful 100% of the time,I'm not minded to include a bunch of volunteer moderators in there. This 'power' that is talked about - what is it? To offer the opportunity to people to be offended - or not; to react - or not; to join in - or not.
I'm not a great one for the boisterous prank myself, but I am entirely in favour of what it represents (it's just that I do rebellion differently).
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Thyme:
But my impression was that fewer shipmates than previously took part this time.
I'll be the first to admit that come H&As Day I'm usually off for a while and let my colleagues have their fun. It's just not me. So, I can't really comment on how many people got involved.
This year there was a thread on the Scottish Referendum that I was particularly interested in. It was noticable how many of us came up with imaginative ways of avoiding the censored words to make our point. Which was kind of fun, both in finding ways to that and appreciating the cleverness of others. I didn't really read many other threads, but it wouldn't surprise me if Shipmates were doing the same there.
Which I think is a way of asking "what do we mean by participation?"
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
WTF? It's just another version of April Fools, the lord of misrule, carnival or any other "let's turn the rules upside down and have a great time" holiday. Power games my foot.
That really is not the case at all. April Fools is between peers, and Lord of Misrule / Carnival is for all, but the plebs dominate and get to mock the establishment. There is no real world equivalent of a lighthearted party where the rulers get to let their hair down and wreak havoc among the ruled, and for good reason. What H&A day really is, its nature and its purpose, is still exactly the same as when Erin created the first one (see Kelly's description above).
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Baptist Trainfan:
One point: I come onto the Ship via a saved "favourite" direct to "current active threads". Coming this way I had no advice that the H&A Day had begun, and initially got quite upset by some of the comments I read.
Next time, could things be arranged so that one gets a warning about the Day on any page one opens?
The Styx is at the top of the list of the boards for a reason.
[ 22. September 2014, 08:51: Message edited by: Spike ]
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
This reaction is the price H&As pay for H&A days. It happens every time, but this time the reaction was stronger due to the nature of some of the H&A "fun" on boards that should have been exempted.
For goodness sake, read the other replies on that subject as I'm tired of repeating myself.
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
Good points by IngoB. I would say that if you are running a forum, and operating a set of rules, you are bound to have a build-up of resentment and even hatred. To be able to release this now and again, seems brilliant to me, and I felt OK with all the ***, and I tried to creatively manipulate it. There is something quite aesthetic in '* can't f*nd the ** book which * order*d'.
I think in other contexts, management people get drunk, and slag off their customers; very healthy.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
I think in other contexts, management people get drunk, and slag off their customers; very healthy.
Yes they do, but when with their peers, colleagues and/or friends and family.
H&A days are like the managers getting drunk and being offensive about their customers in a room containing all their customers!
You can hardly be surprised If the customers get offended and start being offensive back.
Perhaps if your analogy were to be used as a model for H&A days, the H&A's ought to create a private board where they can have their own little "slag fest" and be as silly and anarchic as they want, away from "customers" who might be offended and will start firing back responses designed to remove the fun.
I think some people see H&A days as a challenge - to stop the H&A's having their fun, because the "civilians" are excluded and also the target.
You can't expect a target to not shoot back can you?
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
quote:
Originally posted by Starbug:
For people in a certain headspace (in my case. stressed and exhausted), the Ship was a no-go area for several days - at a time when I needed it.. Why is this necessary? I don't know of any other discussion boards that does this.
If that is how you express your relationship to the Ship, then I think you are over-dependent on it.
I have to agree. Not least because, as well as H&A Days, there are times when necessary maintenance means the boards (including the private boards) are completely closed. Some such times have been known to last for far longer than any H&A Day. If the prospect of being unable to access this website for a number of days is genuinely upsetting or problematic for anyone, I would heartily encourage them to diversify their support networks such that their reliance on it is minimised*.
Now, it's true that we try our best to give advance warning of any long closure periods. But that's not always possible, and there's only so much we can do to ensure that everyone knows what's going on - especially if they choose not to visit the homepage or read the board that exists specifically for that function.
.
*= to be absolutely honest, I'm somewhat uncomfortable with the idea of the Ship being used as a support network or "safe place" at all. But the community here is one of the best I've ever encountered online, so it's inevitable that such functions will arise as an outpouring of that. But it's been emphasised time and again that we should not be a major (much less the primary or only) source of such things in anybody's life. As the guidelines say, we have to recognise the limitations of this medium where such things are concerned.
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
Reply to deano - well, then, we get to express our hatred of the H & A, again it seems very healthy to me. It's a kind of hate-sauna, where all the toxins pour out, and leave one refreshed and ready to go.
[ 22. September 2014, 09:25: Message edited by: quetzalcoatl ]
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
So if not H&A Days, what then? Nothing, ever, would seem to be the answer in some quarters.
There seem to be two world views: one - an ancient one - that every order must embrace an element of anarchy so that balance is maintained. Two - which seems to me the more modern - is that no, consistency must be maintained at all times.
While there are a great many institutions, structures and authorities in the world I hope are being lawful 100% of the time,I'm not minded to include a bunch of volunteer moderators in there. This 'power' that is talked about - what is it? To offer the opportunity to people to be offended - or not; to react - or not; to join in - or not.
I'm not a great one for the boisterous prank myself, but I am entirely in favour of what it represents (it's just that I do rebellion differently).
I spoke of power, it's the power of hosts and admins only to fart-arse around with the running of the forum. I Note the rules didn't seem to be suspended for shipmates, 2 got suspended. That's not anarchy it's tyranny.
Yeah people can opt out but my comment on power was in response to a claim that H&As didn't want an "us and them" mentality. I stand by the fact that H&A day is divisive (this thread is proof enough) and reinforces the fact that H&As have powers to edit/manipulate, muck about with the discussion boards.
Personally I don't have a problem if the powers that be want to fart-arse around to amuse themselves, I just wish they'd say "suck it up bitches" instead of trying to defend the indefensible.
Just disable posting to the styx during H&A week and for a fortnight thereafter and tell everyone to shut the f*&^ up. that's honest at least.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
the H&A's ought to create a private board where they can have their own little "slag fest" and be as silly and anarchic as they want, away from "customers"
You think there isn't one?
Posted by JFH (# 14794) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
WTF? It's just another version of April Fools, the lord of misrule, carnival or any other "let's turn the rules upside down and have a great time" holiday. Power games my foot.
That really is not the case at all. April Fools is between peers, and Lord of Misrule / Carnival is for all, but the plebs dominate and get to mock the establishment. There is no real world equivalent of a lighthearted party where the rulers get to let their hair down and wreak havoc among the ruled, and for good reason. What H&A day really is, its nature and its purpose, is still exactly the same as when Erin created the first one (see Kelly's description above).
I think a case could be made for the idea that the hosts and admins are not necessarily rulers as much as servants. I'm not saying it's the only truth, but I would guess that more people enter the role aiming to serve rather than to rule. At any rate, I think there is enough facets on it for some to perceive it as the servants suddenly getting to push the served around. Some may think the served are weak receivers and shouldn't be pushed around. Others could consider the served as somewhat stronger consumers of free services. I believe the difference in these perceptions affect what stance people take to the dynamics of the H&A days. I'd guess it also affects what you think the Ship could and should be.
quote:
Originally posted by Ariston:
quote:
Originally posted by JFH:
I have a different question:
Where's the New System/Order®'s score board?
I won.
Not sure what or how, but I did.
Typical Host arrogance, in my view! I myself had five hard-earned points, and I'm expecting Eutychus to announce the winner (and the prize) soon!
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
While there are a great many institutions, structures and authorities in the world I hope are being lawful 100% of the time,I'm not minded to include a bunch of volunteer moderators in there. This 'power' that is talked about - what is it?
It's the power to restrict or allow expression of thought and sentiment. It is the power to judge what is appropriate and what not. It is the power to restrict membership and ban. It is the power to structure and organise these boards as one sees fit. It is the power to be judge and jury, king and police, critic and censor, of this community.
Of course, in a sense what happens on a bulletin board is intrinsically insubstantial. But people find meaning and value in anything they do repeatedly and enthusiastically, and create belonging out of thin air.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by quetzalcoatl:
we get to express our hatred of the H & A, again it seems very healthy to me. It's a kind of hate-sauna, where all the toxins pour out, and leave one refreshed and ready to go.
True, oh downy serpent. The foot stamping and door slamming can go on as long - or longer - than the original occasion. Let it. Our fires are banked, but still they burn.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
It is the power to be judge and jury, king and police, critic and censor, of this community.
Though rather more time is spent being facilitator and prompter and party-giver and nanny and mopper-up, is it not?
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by JFH:
I'm expecting Eutychus to announce the winner (and the prize) soon!
Expect the results next H&A "day", or check the scoring applicable to Mornington Crescent
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
the H&A's ought to create a private board where they can have their own little "slag fest" and be as silly and anarchic as they want, away from "customers"
You think there isn't one?
Of course there is. I would be surprised if there weren't. I have been a moderator myself on a UK politics forum and we had our own private area.
My question then is why, if you have the ability to have an H&A day everyday on you r won private board, do you need to let it spill out onto the public boards? What is the point?
One of the points is to honour a former Shipmate called Erin.
I never knew her. She was before my time. I don't think I'm alone. Is it right that a few Shipmates who did know her are able to enforce a tradition that other more recent Shipmates might find nonsensical and offensive? Orange Order much?
I knew Ken. We didn't agree politically, but we did theologically. Can we have a traditional day to celebrate and remember him? If not, why not?
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by JFH:
I believe the difference in these perceptions affect what stance people take to the dynamics of the H&A days. I'd guess it also affects what you think the Ship could and should be.
In German I would talk of "die normative Kraft des Faktischen" (the normative force of the de facto). Whatever someone's opinion of their role may be, its social status is ultimately determined by what they can do, and actually do. A servant king is a type of king, not a type of servant.
"When great men rule, subjects know little of their existence. Rulers who are less great win the affection and praise of their subjects. A common ruler is feared by his subjects, and an unworthy ruler is despised. ... How carefully a wise ruler chooses his words. He performs deeds, and accumulates merit! Under such a ruler the people think they are ruling themselves." (Dao De Jing 17)
Posted by JFH (# 14794) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by JFH:
I believe the difference in these perceptions affect what stance people take to the dynamics of the H&A days. I'd guess it also affects what you think the Ship could and should be.
In German I would talk of "die normative Kraft des Faktischen" (the normative force of the de facto). Whatever someone's opinion of their role may be, its social status is ultimately determined by what they can do, and actually do. A servant king is a type of king, not a type of servant.
"When great men rule, subjects know little of their existence. Rulers who are less great win the affection and praise of their subjects. A common ruler is feared by his subjects, and an unworthy ruler is despised. ... How carefully a wise ruler chooses his words. He performs deeds, and accumulates merit! Under such a ruler the people think they are ruling themselves." (Dao De Jing 17)
But a consumer has and always will have the power of the feet, the capacity to leave and reject the service offered.
Also, if there's one environment that's proved to me that taoist rulers wouldn't work in practice, it's the Ship.
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
H&A days must make quite a bit of work for the H&As!
Let them have their fun I say. It's never for long
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
Though rather more time is spent being facilitator and prompter and party-giver and nanny and mopper-up, is it not?
Indeed, it is not.
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
I knew Ken. We didn't agree politically, but we did theologically. Can we have a traditional day to celebrate and remember him?
Now, that's positive thinking! I for one support a "Beyond Our Ken" day.
Though perhaps it should be a more general "All Ship Souls" day, where we remember all that have gone and bring back the memories of one of them by tailoring the celebrations to their characteristics.
Posted by Heavenly Anarchist (# 13313) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
It is the power to be judge and jury, king and police, critic and censor, of this community.
Though rather more time is spent being facilitator and prompter and party-giver and nanny and mopper-up, is it not?
I've been a moderator on a parenting site for almost 10 years and almost all of my work is administrating, facilitating and smoothing over conflicts. There has often been people I would have liked to have banned as they are a nuisance or irritating and bring me more work but I recognise that my role is to try to prevent it getting to that stage. It requires self-discipline and pragmatism. I'd assume that moderating here is a similar experience.
I enjoyed the anarchy, especially in Keryg.
Posted by Lucia (# 15201) on
:
Just to add my small voice that I quite enjoy H&A days and would be sad to see them go. Sure, there is perhaps legitimate debate to be had as to what is done. But of course as in life in general different people have different sense of humour (and some people for various reasons don't have much sense of humour at all). You can't please everyone.
I don't see the H&A as rulers but more as people who give their time and effort to ensure that this is a place that basically works well most of the time. I don't see the responsibility to read all the posts and check all the links as a position of privilege! Sounds like a pain in the a*** to me! And I appreciate that they do it and I don't have a problem with them occasionally reminding us what it could be like if they really were arbitrary and uncaring. To me it just highlights that in general they do a good job but it is easy to take that for granted.
If you don't like what is going on just avoid the Ship for a few days. Like I turn off the TV when there is a comedian on whose humour I find unpleasant and grating. As was said up thread, if you are dependent on the Ship such that a few days away is a problem perhaps that is something you need to look at.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lucia:
I don't see the H&A as rulers but more as people who give their time and effort to ensure that this is a place that basically works well most of the time. I don't see the responsibility to read all the posts and check all the links as a position of privilege! Sounds like a pain in the a*** to me! And I appreciate that they do it and I don't have a problem with them occasionally reminding us what it could be like if they really were arbitrary and uncaring. To me it just highlights that in general they do a good job but it is easy to take that for granted.
It's gratifying to see that at least one person gets it.
Posted by Spike (# 36) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
My question then is why, if you have the ability to have an H&A day everyday on you r won private board, do you need to let it spill out onto the public boards? What is the point?
Because we can and because it's fun
quote:
One of the points is to honour a former Shipmate called Erin.
I never knew her. She was before my time. I don't think I'm alone. Is it right that a few Shipmates who did know her are able to enforce a tradition that other more recent Shipmates might find nonsensical and offensive? Orange Order much?
H&A day isn't really a day to honour Erin as such, but perhaps a quick history lesson is in order.
Erin was more than just a shipmate. She was one of the founder members of the boards and ran the place for a good number of years. Even though, over time, she appointed extra Admins to reduce her workload, she remained the ultimate person in charge - that's where the buck stopped.
The original H&A day was her idea to celebrate her racking up 10000 posts. (We also gave individual shipmates the ability to do whatever they wanted when they reached 10000 posts. The first shipmate to do this was ken closely followed by Mousethief. We stopped doing it after a while when the 10000 mark became more common)
H&A days continued while she was still alive. The first one we had after she died was on what would have been her 40th birthday, so it would be fair to say that it was in honour of her, but since then, they haven't been specifically in her memory. That said, I'm sure she'd have been delighted and highly amused at the number of complaints this year's event has generated!
quote:
I knew Ken. We didn't agree politically, but we did theologically. Can we have a traditional day to celebrate and remember him? If not, why not?
There will almost certainly be a Shipmeet in his memory as we've also done with other shipmates who have passed. If you can think of a board wide memorial to absent friends, then feel free to suggest something and we'll consider it.
[ 22. September 2014, 11:58: Message edited by: Spike ]
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
H&A days must make quite a bit of work for the H&As!
Let them have their fun I say. It's never for long
H&A are are as much a part of Ship tradition as the week long clean up and the thread that follows them. The thread usually includes a selection of posts making the following points:
- It was really fun
- It was a bit meh this year compared to other years
- Too busy to take part this year, but may be next time
- Not in the mood this year so took some Shore Leave. Hopefully will feel in the mood next time
- Not in the mood this year so took some Shore Leave. How dare you disrupt the Ship
- H&A day is the worst thing ever. I hate it and it should never be allowed to happen again.
Tubbs
Posted by pimple (# 10635) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Alan Cresswell:
quote:
Originally posted by Thyme:
But my impression was that fewer shipmates than previously took part this time.
I'll be the first to admit that come H&As Day I'm usually off for a while and let my colleagues have their fun. It's just not me. So, I can't really comment on how many people got involved.
This year there was a thread on the Scottish Referendum that I was particularly interested in. It was noticable how many of us came up with imaginative ways of avoiding the censored words to make our point. Which was kind of fun, both in finding ways to that and appreciating the cleverness of others. I didn't really read many other threads, but it wouldn't surprise me if Shipmates were doing the same there.
Which I think is a way of asking "what do we mean by participation?"
My own "imaginative way was to post in French. But I got flamed for it. I should have realised that the poor host on that board, having to read every blessed post that came his way, might not have been amused. I hope he'll accept this as a belated apology - it's the first I've been allowed since.
[ 22. September 2014, 14:10: Message edited by: pimple ]
Posted by Chorister (# 473) on
:
Mischief Night was always a well-known date in the Christian / Folk religion calendar. You can't have 'All Saints' unless you chase out the naughty devil first. Short of all the Hosts and Admins dressing up in Halloween masks as witches and pumpkins what else is there to do but spread their mischief all over the boards for a day or two? Mind you, a few pics of the H&As dressed up as Witches and pumpkins might be good as well...
Posted by agingjb (# 16555) on
:
I keep out of the way. It's their board, not mine. And I've learnt a lot about the SoF culture.
Two points: a request for prayer is not using the SoF as a stand-in for counselling services, and it's an independent resource which it is a pity to lose for for several days.
And, anyone considering shelling out for a private board should be very clear just how their board might be affected, even if the effect is no more than peripheral on the look and feel.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Any takers on the bet this thread discussing H&A Day will last longer than the event itself?
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
Wh*n do you th*nk *t will en*?
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
Also, I don't get why the H&A days have to be started without warning.
I get that some people view them as fun. People are different and entitled to that view, but why the need to start them unaaounced?
Would it cause a problem if the day was announced a week in advance. Then we would all have the chance to read about it and decide to keep away or participate.
I suspect there is no reason except "because we can".
More likely is that the H&As also know that if they did announce it they would get a weeks worth of posts complaining about it as well as the complaints during and after, and that quite a few people wouldn't stay around to watch the "festivities".
If your victim isn't around then bullying isn't as much fun.
Posted by Ariston (# 10894) on
:
My first H&A Day, as an apprentice, was what got me to delurk and stick around on the Ship. Suddenly, I was able to cast off the boring, normal exterior and let out the idiosyncratic, poetry-composing whatsit. Yes, it was weird, arbitrary, and capricious, but so sometimes am I—and, despite being at the supposed whims of the autocrats, I loved it. Couldn't wait for the next one.
Next one rolls around. I apply for a crusading permit and a temp host post. Marvin runs an agony aunt column in Hell. I crusade. I force everyone to grovel before myself, iF, and Chorister. Nobody does it, of course. I pull a few stunts that I was convinced were going to get me planked. Worse—I get drafted as a Circus host. Shit.
Last time, I start a war between the Velodrome and Hull, totally destroy both boards, and end up having to—IRL—go to the main quad of the local university in a beret with a baguette and get some visiting parents to take a picture "because I lost I bet with a Frenchwoman."
This year? Meh, classed up Hell a bit with the Garamond, made a Seinfeld reference or two, and tried to set a few traps for SPK. Was just getting into the swing of things when it all ended a bit too soon.
In the end though—and this may just be childhood Christmas memories—it's the H&AD's from my non-Host days that I really remember—the ones during which I was, you know, oppressed, crushed, and discriminated against.
Maybe it's just my own hidden, rarely acted upon chaotic side. Maybe it's a revolt against the necktied, take the shit piled on you, low man on the totem pole, head down and mouth shut grind of grad school and the day jobs. Maybe I'm just weird—okay, I am just weird. But H&AD's are about the biggest reason I stuck around, and continue to stay.
[ 22. September 2014, 15:47: Message edited by: Ariston ]
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariston:
Marvin runs an agony aunt column in Hell.
It may have been hellish in nature, but it was actually in All Saints. It was part of the whole "let's put a Hellhost into an AS Hosting slot" joke that the Admins (Spike, primarily) pulled that year.
The joke was on them - I stayed in AS for quite a while after the H&A Day had finished! Then I had my stint in Heaven, and now I'm an Admin myself .
H&A Days do seem to have quite a habit of discovering new Hosts for us. If I were SPK, I'd be watching with trepidation for the next Hostly resignation announcement...
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Also, I don't get why the H&A days have to be started without warning.
I get that some people view them as fun. People are different and entitled to that view, but why the need to start them unaaounced?
Would it cause a problem if the day was announced a week in advance. Then we would all have the chance to read about it and decide to keep away or participate.
I suspect there is no reason except "because we can".
More likely is that the H&As also know that if they did announce it they would get a weeks worth of posts complaining about it as well as the complaints during and after, and that quite a few people wouldn't stay around to watch the "festivities".
If your victim isn't around then bullying isn't as much fun.
And I refer you to this post. If we announced it a week in advance we'd get the same. Some Shipmates would complain whilst others would use the prior warning to come up with something suitably creative that they can run with.
The Admins started posting warning about H&A at the top of the board and on FB after some Shipmates specifically asked. There may be other things that can be done to make sure everyone is better informed. We'll see.
Tubbs
[ 22. September 2014, 16:24: Message edited by: Tubbs ]
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
Last year Marvin used his mighty Admin powers and changed my title to "Ship's broken porthole". I loved it and I bought it!
Thanks again, Marvin.
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
If your victim isn't around then bullying isn't as much fun.
It wasn't bullying. Neither was your OP in Hell:
quote:
Should women be allowed into the R&A Golf Club?
Of course not, sez me. To paraphrase one of the house elves in Harry Potter, women have no business having fun on the golf course when there is housework to be done and husbands teas to get on the table.
Posted by Amorya (# 2652) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
There may be other things that can be done to make sure everyone is better informed. We'll see.
A warning at the top of the Waving board would probably go a long way to alleviating the issue. I'm not sure who controls the text there (Ship's admins or the board's hosts)…
Amorya
[ 22. September 2014, 17:22: Message edited by: Amorya ]
Posted by RuthW (# 13) on
:
The admins control that. A private board host could send us what they want the header to say and we could change it.
Posted by Starbug (# 15917) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by agingjb:
I keep out of the way. It's their board, not mine. And I've learnt a lot about the SoF culture.
Two points: a request for prayer is not using the SoF as a stand-in for counselling services, and it's an independent resource which it is a pity to lose for for several days.
And, anyone considering shelling out for a private board should be very clear just how their board might be affected, even if the effect is no more than peripheral on the look and feel.
Thank you for your first point. You've said it better than I could.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
for the record, I once was a host but now I'm not. I am not spouting any accepted propaganda here, and I have not talked to any of the powers that be about this post. This is just strictly my observations and experience talking.
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
While there are a great many institutions, structures and authorities in the world I hope are being lawful 100% of the time,I'm not minded to include a bunch of volunteer moderators in there. This 'power' that is talked about - what is it?
It's the power to restrict or allow expression of thought and sentiment. It is the power to judge what is appropriate and what not. It is the power to restrict membership and ban. It is the power to structure and organise these boards as one sees fit. It is the power to be judge and jury, king and police, critic and censor, of this community.
Of course, in a sense what happens on a bulletin board is intrinsically insubstantial. But people find meaning and value in anything they do repeatedly and enthusiastically, and create belonging out of thin air.
I don't disagree with you, Ingo, but I think you're missing some important pieces here.
first of all, there is no king. Okay, Simon is potentially king. but he's one of those boring kings that is perfectly happy to go about his business and has delegated his authority to a bunch of other slobs. Could he, in theory, come down with a bad case of megalomania and take over and eff everything up? sure. could he be bothered? I doubt it.
Other than Simon, there's this collective group of administrators and no one has any more power than any other. This leads to a couple of dynamics familiar to anyone who has ever been on a non-profit board. 1. Nothing ever gets done quickly and decisively, and 2. no real dramatic changes ever seem to happen without 6 months of bickering, 2 bottles of gin, 3 subcommittees, at least one mental breakdown, and someone getting the My Little Pony Avatar for a day.
This can, on rare occasion, be a real pain in the ass. But most of the time, it keeps this power frenzy you fear so much at bay.
in theory, RooK or Marvin or whoever could get their undies in a bunch, log on at 2 am and ban the fuck out of everyone with the letter E in their username. If this were to happen, their role as admin would come to an end within 10 hours at the most and the rest of the admins would mop up the mess with much apologies and biting their tongues at the expected screeching here in the Styx.
The hosts get even less power than that. As a host, what is the worst one could do? Alter someone's post? okay. That's another shining example of how to get your ass in deep doo doo and get bumped.
(And for the record, in my tenure I don't think I ever got called on the carpet for altering a post. It was always for having a foul mouth and saying something "mean" - an activity I'm perfectly capable of doing without any hostly powers at all.)
It is possible, in theory, that the make-up of the H&As could over time become so weighted towards one particular group-think that they in effect become the dictators you seem to fear. But in my experience, no matter how much everyone agrees on something, if you put a bunch of people together on a board or committee, they will find enough details to differ on that they will continue to get nothing useful done just as much as any other committee.
probably the biggest use of power the admins throw around around here regularly is the choosing of hosts. Because it happens in the background, a lot of shipmates seem to think this is an unfair and arbitrary system.
It probably really is. But there is good reason for it. over the (what, almost 20?) years of the boards, there have been some inappropriate choices, some really bad choices, and a few disastrous ones. People who appeared to really have the dedication and overall functional sanity to host, were given access to the buttons, and lost their little minds.
Because of this, the admins have a sort of fluid set of criteria for choosing their volunteers, and some of that criteria might be unexpected to the untrained eye. Still, there are good reasons for it.
Some shipmates appear to have their noses permanently out of joint because they have never been asked. This is not because of some sort of "clique" or in crowd or whatever you want to call it; there are plenty of people who've been in the hosting and adminning chairs who annoy the fuck right out of me, for one. it has to do first and foremost with the ability to dedicate the time necessary; after that, it's compatible timezones, followed by an individual's interest in the given board or duty. Only after those things are considered does the decision on ability to be objective, willingness to work within the team, ability to calm the fuck down and not take things personally, and general unlikeliness to go psycho get taken into consideration.
and FYI - just because you have never seen your favorite shipmate tapped as a host, doesn't mean they weren't asked. It's a big undertaking and a lot of people turn it down for various reasons. perfectly legit reasons.
Posted by no prophet (# 15560) on
:
In my short time on the ship, this is first one of these episodes during which I continued to post. It is clear that senses of humour vary, what is funny to one is not to another. Previous times, I viewed the days as more like 'denial of service attacks' where the boards were non-functional. That sort of thing is very disruptive to normal progressions of discussion on forums, and usually picks up without loss afterwards. It would be interesting to know what the statistics of visitors and number of posts before and after one of these days is, given that the nature of disruption is different. I suspect there is a decrement in number of posts and logins afterword. If it is possible to generate that information, say one week before and one week after, that would be interesting to consider.
[ 22. September 2014, 18:01: Message edited by: no prophet ]
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
WTF? It's just another version of April Fools, the lord of misrule, carnival or any other "let's turn the rules upside down and have a great time" holiday. Power games my foot.
That really is not the case at all. April Fools is between peers, and Lord of Misrule / Carnival is for all, but the plebs dominate and get to mock the establishment. There is no real world equivalent of a lighthearted party where the rulers get to let their hair down and wreak havoc among the ruled, and for good reason. What H&A day really is, its nature and its purpose, is still exactly the same as when Erin created the first one (see Kelly's description above).
What the hell is this "establishment" and "rulers" stuff? What you have here is a bunch of fucking volunteers who don't get paid a cent and have to put up with everybody's crap. And they're pulled from the general population of SoF posters (to which they return when they retire). And in fact, they continue to post as ordinary shipmates whenever they are not carrying out their extra duties at the mo.
There is no THEY in this. That isn't an establishment. That isn't "rulers." That's some of US attempting to have a good time with the rest of US, in spite of the inevitable misunderstandings/blowback from others of US.
Damn, it's like trying to make coffee for a churchful of people who all take it a different way.
Why not make constructive suggestions (I saw a few on this thread) instead of just bitching?
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Also, I don't get why the H&A days have to be started without warning.
I get that some people view them as fun. People are different and entitled to that view, but why the need to start them unaaounced?
Would it cause a problem if the day was announced a week in advance. Then we would all have the chance to read about it and decide to keep away or participate.
I suspect there is no reason except "because we can".
More likely is that the H&As also know that if they did announce it they would get a weeks worth of posts complaining about it as well as the complaints during and after, and that quite a few people wouldn't stay around to watch the "festivities".
If your victim isn't around then bullying isn't as much fun.
As part of the in crowd, I received a commemorative bottle of gin with the date and time of commencement a week before.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
As part of the in crowd, I received a commemorative bottle of gin with the date and time of commencement a week before.
Proof of time travel there. You knew before anyone else on Earth.
Posted by QLib (# 43) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
What the hell is this "establishment" and "rulers" stuff? What you have here is a bunch of fucking volunteers who don't get paid a cent and have to put up with everybody's crap. And they're pulled from the general population of SoF posters (to which they return when they retire). And in fact, they continue to post as ordinary shipmates whenever they are not carrying out their extra duties at the mo.
There is no THEY in this. That isn't an establishment. That isn't "rulers." That's some of US attempting to have a good time with the rest of US, in spite of the inevitable misunderstandings/blowback from others of US.
Damn those originally selfless volunteers, getting drunk on the terrible power of internet domination and grinding us minions beneath their flaming stiletto heels.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
comet, thanks for your extensive comments. The effort is much appreciated, but you are barking up the wrong tree. If I wanted to critique the Ship's governance, then I would do that. My point here is that H&A day highlights, indeed caricatures, what one could critique about the Ship's governance. It is also needlessly disruptive to the regulars, and generally unattractive to visitors (the rare Ariston excepted).
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
What the hell is this "establishment" and "rulers" stuff? What you have here is a bunch of fucking volunteers who don't get paid a cent and have to put up with everybody's crap. And they're pulled from the general population of SoF posters (to which they return when they retire). And in fact, they continue to post as ordinary shipmates whenever they are not carrying out their extra duties at the mo. ... Damn, it's like trying to make coffee for a churchful of people who all take it a different way.
We are all equal here. It's just that some are more equal than others... If this is indeed a community, then given the absence of its owner-king it is de facto governed by a two-tier oligarchy.
If you want to legitimise this in terms of "people power", then you could try introducing democratic structures. If you think it works just fine, then I guess leave it as it is. But stop pretending that H&A governance is like brewing coffee. It just isn't. The current SoF setup has been called a "benign dictatorship", including by the H&As themselves.
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
Why not make constructive suggestions (I saw a few on this thread) instead of just bitching?
I haven't been bitching.
Posted by Moo (# 107) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
One of the points is to honour a former Shipmate called Erin.
I never knew her. She was before my time. I don't think I'm alone. Is it right that a few Shipmates who did know her are able to enforce a tradition that other more recent Shipmates might find nonsensical and offensive?
Without Erin the ship would probably have sunk less than a year after launching. She was the moving force in fighting off Joanne, who tried to close the boards down. In addition, she took care of a lot of the technical computer stuff.
There are threads about her on the Glory board, here, here, here, and here.
Those shipmates who joined after her death owe her a debt whether they know it or not.
Moo
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by QLib:
Damn those originally selfless volunteers, getting drunk on the terrible power of internet domination and grinding us minions beneath their flaming stiletto heels.
This is one of Marvin's.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Lamb Chopped:
What the hell is this "establishment" and "rulers" stuff? What you have here is a bunch of fucking volunteers who don't get paid a cent and have to put up with everybody's crap. And they're pulled from the general population of SoF posters (to which they return when they retire). And in fact, they continue to post as ordinary shipmates whenever they are not carrying out their extra duties at the mo. ... Damn, it's like trying to make coffee for a churchful of people who all take it a different way.
We are all equal here. It's just that some are more equal than others... If this is indeed a community, then given the absence of its owner-king it is de facto governed by a two-tier oligarchy.
If you want to legitimise this in terms of "people power", then you could try introducing democratic structures. If you think it works just fine, then I guess leave it as it is. But stop pretending that H&A governance is like brewing coffee. It just isn't. The current SoF setup has been called a "benign dictatorship", including by the H&As themselves.
No, it's not an 'oligarchy' because it's not the case that power resides permanently with the same people. In some respects your analysis is correct, but in that crucial respect it is wrong.
Oligarchies involve ties such as wealth or family that ensure the 'in crowd' always remains the same. This is not the case with hosting. I had no ties with any of the existing Hosts when I was invited to become one. People are asked to be Hosts based on their suitability for the job.
I'm not sure what democratic processes you have in mind. Do you want to vote for who the Admins or Hosts are? Have election campaigns? I can predict that everyone would be heartily sick of such a process before long, given how FREQUENT the turnover of Hosts actually is (turnover not being a word terribly consistent with oligarchy), with several changes per year, and that it wouldn't make much difference overall.
If you want direct participation in decision-making, then I'll just point out that that is not 'democracy'.
[ 22. September 2014, 22:22: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
Votes in the Styx for whether Shipmates should be planked. No wait, no planking without prior recourse. Therefore, trials with witnesses and consulting council so that the accused can properly defend themselves before being planked. Debates about whether the proper criterion is whether the accused could have, should have, or did know that they were posting like a jerk.
A proper constitutional committee to review whether we want to be governed by the 10 Commandments or not, to be reconvened every 6 months to take account of the views of newcomers who are otherwise forced into servitude to the despotism of those who have come before them.
Proper anonymous voting for proposals for new boards. Votes on the proper procedures for anonymous voting. Who gets to vote? Is campaigning allowed on the day of the vote? Committees formed to settle these questions. Threads in the Styx complaining that the committees are formed of an in-crowd.
Votes for the appointment of Hosts and Admins (or is this like voting for judges: seems like a good application of democracy, but turns out to be a really crap idea?). Recall elections whenever a Host or Admin does something unpopular.
Investigation of whether the idea of having Hosts and Admins at all is too in-crowd and anti-democratic. Constitutional committee to investigate running the Ship as a collective.
H&A Days to be put to a vote prior. Endless threads in the Styx about how "I didn't know an H&A Day vote was coming up." Timing of votes for H&A Days to be put to a vote prior. Endless threads in the Styx about how "I didn't know an H&A Day Vote Timing vote was coming up." Timing of Votes for Timing of Votes for H&A Days to be put to a vote prior. Threads in the Styx...
Ship ceases to need to appeal for financial support, as Simon discovers that the threads in the Styx are running a perpetual motion machine. Day of celebration declared. Threads in the Styx about how the day of celebration interfered with the normal running of the boards. Perpetual motion machine runs amok.
Careful policing of anarchy so it doesn't offend anyone. Creation of Despotic Anarchy board so that those who like Despotic Anarchy can do it whenever they like without bothering anyone else. Accusations that the Despotic Anarchy board is the haven of the most in of in-crowds, and people who might like a spot of anarchy feel intimidated from joining in.
There's so much that could be improved about the Ship.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
I'll say this for this thread: it's just like the olden cranky days on board, and gives me a warm & fuzzy feeling. Some things never change.
[ 22. September 2014, 23:16: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Autenrieth Road,
That was beautiful.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
That... That... Damn, two days of bickering was well worth that post. Thank you, AR.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
comet, thanks for your extensive comments. The effort is much appreciated, but you are barking up the wrong tree. If I wanted to critique the Ship's governance, then I would do that. My point here is that H&A day highlights, indeed caricatures, what one could critique about the Ship's governance.
okay, darling, so if I'm reading you right, what you're saying on this thread is, in effect, "I'm not criticizing ship governance, but if I was..."
which is different how, exactly?
Frankly, I don't give a sheep's fart if you criticize the ship's governance, but then engage in the debate. don't shrivel up and tell me you weren't criticizing.
and then if you do, could you do us all a big fat old favor and hear what has been said to you a bazillion times in answer to your concerns?
oh right, you weren't actually criticizing. just, you know...
(what is it you're doing on this thread, exactly?)
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
It is also needlessly disruptive to the regulars, and generally unattractive to visitors (the rare Ariston excepted).
1. needlessly disruptive to regulars. know what else is? the constant need to try and fix shit by starting or joining Styx threads (I'm not actually thinking of this one) about wanting to change all the things. And never hearing the replies, and never being happy with the attempts made to mollify what is in essence one really whiny dissenting voice.
Don't get me wrong, I fucking love that the Styx exists and we're all allowed our place to bitch. because this is a private entity and therefore under no obligation to give a half shit about what we want at all. and don't give me that "customer is always right" horseshit because the majority of us don't pay a red cent for the fun and education we get out of this place. I, for one, probably owe Simon my first born at this point.
you want a more democratic process. in theory, I'm with you. in practice? what a clusterfuck that would be! who gets to vote? how would we get word out to every single fucking member of this place? nevermind the whole "tyranny of the majority" aspect that could saddle simon with a complete power-hungry freak as a community editor. Know a lot of politicians? I do. they tend to be egomaniacal assholes.
most of the people you want in positions of authority are the ones who run screaming from the room when you ask.
2. unattractive to visitors. fucking PROVE IT. 'cause I can come up with 18,000 reasons why you're wrong.
...
IngoB, I actually have a giant throbbing soft spot for you. a good portion of the time when you beat the enotional freaks to death with your vulcan style logic I want to find you and kiss your face. Really. You're one of the favorites. God help me.
Which is why I get absolutely mental when you feel the need to beat your own tired horse over this again and again. Is the ship perfect? fuck, no! but there are worst places on the internet. in my experience so far, all of them. I'm not saying don't chime in, please chime in. but then listen to what has been said. appreciate the accommodations that have been made to let you try out your various theories on how it should be run.
and when people tell you that it ain't perfect, but they're working towards perfection, accept that. it's a bunch of fucking humans, after all.
and H&A Days, everyone? lighten the fuck up. nobody is bleeding or broken. accept it as a necessary evil for having the kind of board you want the rest of the year. you want healthy crops, you have to accept it might rain sometimes.
jaysus, people, it's a website, not a sovereign nation.
and one more thing, to all and sundry: you think H&A Day wasn't as fun as it had been in the past? well, where the fuck were you? join in for fuck's sake.
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
comet, dear: that was a bit shout-y for The Styx. Please be heedful of your tone when addressing others; you may fluster the womenfolk.
-RooK
Host-like Stygian Entity
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
Comet, why are H&A days a NECESSARY evil for the board we want?
In what way would the ship be different if they didn't happen?
I don't think it would change one iota except you would get the divisiveness that they engender, nor would you have to get all defensive about them afterwards.
The reaction to H&A days seems to be getting more aggressive each time you hold one. Tough. It's the price you pay.
Don't tell us they are necessary because they clearly are not. Don't tell us they are harmless because the reaction you get from them shows they are not.
Posted by cheesymarzipan (# 9442) on
:
I think H&A days are great... Though I'm usually an amused spectator rather than a participant. The asterisks can get a bit annoying but trying to work out what the words are is half the fun (on the Scottish thread, somebody said about votes coming in on a f***ing boat and I read it as flying boat)
Maybe if we had some warning, I could actually think of something entertaining to contribute!
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Funny thing, this. The Styx by its very nature provides a platform for the airing of views about the rules and ethos of this place. That in itself is an aspect of the ethos of unrest.
Having a thin skin and long term membership of this unrestful place are probably incompatible.
Before I was a Host, I used to enjoy the loony arbitrariness of H&A day. It often tickled my sense of humour. It struck me as naughty but not malevolent.
Since I became a Host, it's changed. I try, but I don't do loony all that well. Unlike some of my colleagues. Mostly I still enjoy it, but more as a passenger than participant.
I suppose the difference is that although I take the office of Host seriously and do the best I can, I really don't take myself all that seriously. The place isn't all about me; indeed it's not very much about me at all. It is I suppose about the varieties of "us" to be found here.
Preserving and fostering an ethos of unrest is not as easy as you might think. My gut feel is that two or three loony H&A days do add something to that. I've been influenced by this discussion, but more in the direction of considering whether there are some technical and style modifications to be made to the temporary looniness for the greater good. My gut tells me that's the better way to go.
I'm happy to leave it to Simon and the Admin to evaluate continuing pros and cons, and possible reforms, and participate in that process to whatever extent they see fit. Recognising that I'm about as competent at doing H&A day as I am at doing Hell i.e. not very.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
The reaction to H&A days seems to be getting more aggressive each time you hold one. Tough. It's the price you pay.
That's quite amusing, since quite a lot of it is you kicking the cat.
As for the time-honoured post stooshie - it's just that: part of the tradition.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
I cross posted with comet and discovered that (personal stuff aside) she said pretty much the same as me but a lot more entertaining!
[Lord, even I get bored sometimes by my gentle diplomatic instincts.]
Posted by quetzalcoatl (# 16740) on
:
What a load of fuss over a few asterisks and 'bugger off'. Come on, folks, it's an internet forum, it's not the UN.
Posted by Curiosity killed ... (# 11770) on
:
So the H&A day(s) jolt us out of reading and posting habits, make us rethink our relationship with the Ship (whether we should rely on it so much) and gives us the opportunity to explore different parts of the Ship, and half the posters on this thread seem to think they have been violated by the devilish hosts and admins and as if looking at things differently was a bad thing.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
If it so minor then why bother doing it in the first place? Why not restrict it to the H&As private board if it's such a tiny little thing?
We do have the opportunity to explore other parts of the ship. We have that opportunity to do that every day. You just click on a link. How do H&A days enhance that opportunity?
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
If you don't like it, you have the option of staying away, temporarily or permanently.
[ 23. September 2014, 08:52: Message edited by: Eutychus ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Why not restrict it to the H&As private board if it's such a tiny little thing?
Because it is not solely for our benefit. Curiosity Killed, in the post above yours, has already shown some insight into what it's about.
There's a false logic in your statement that correlates size with being public. Whether or not Hosts & Admins Day is 'tiny' has absolutely nothing to do with where it is located. Threads aren't allocated to boards based on their size or importance.
Also, you've focused CK's use of the word 'opportunity'. Perhaps that isn't the correct word but the sentiment is, I think, correct, in that the movement of things into unusual locations does tend to mean that people TAKE UP that opportunity when they normally wouldn't.
[ 23. September 2014, 09:06: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
No, it's not an 'oligarchy' because it's not the case that power resides permanently with the same people.
That's not part of the definition of oligarchy, or indeed of any human form of government. For rather obvious reasons.
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Oligarchies involve ties such as wealth or family that ensure the 'in crowd' always remains the same. This is not the case with hosting. I had no ties with any of the existing Hosts when I was invited to become one. People are asked to be Hosts based on their suitability for the job.
I agree that it is quite interesting to see simple biological succession taken out of the picture. The Ship's oligarchy perpetuates more along perceived compatibility of ideology and personality. Somebody with a keener interest in politics and people than me would do a better job of tracing the lines of descent though. Perhaps RooK, Son of Erin, would care to comment?
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
okay, darling, so if I'm reading you right, what you're saying on this thread is, in effect, "I'm not criticizing ship governance, but if I was..."
... then I would stage something like H&A day to drive home the point.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
which is different how, exactly?
It's concerned primarily with H&A day, not with Ship governance.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
Frankly, I don't give a sheep's fart if you criticize the ship's governance, but then engage in the debate. don't shrivel up and tell me you weren't criticising.
If I shrivel up after a few rounds of vigorous activity, it isn't from posting on SoF.
Look, I understand that there is this urgent need to talk about the obviously undemocratic nature of the Ship. But I actually wasn't, other than indirectly by saying that H&A day sure makes it prominent. By design.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
you want a more democratic process.
I want no more H&A day. I also would appreciate more democracy, sure, and I find the attempts to make it appear impossible hilarious. I should really keep these posts for the next time somebody talks about Church governance... But if you want me to spearhead the democratic revolution, could you please schedule it to not coincide with the start of term?
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
2. unattractive to visitors. fucking PROVE IT. 'cause I can come up with 18,000 reasons why you're wrong.
Sure, let me just quickly analyse the public database of the Ship's comprehensive logging of web traffic. Oh, wait.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
IngoB, I actually have a giant throbbing soft spot for you.
And I'm really good at rubbing it up and down, and twisting it ever so slightly around...
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
but then listen to what has been said.
Yeah, listening is a much under-appreciated skill. Most people just go on about what they think must have been said.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
accept it as a necessary evil for having the kind of board you want the rest of the year.
It was not necessary when it was invented. It is not necessary now.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
No, it's not an 'oligarchy' because it's not the case that power resides permanently with the same people.
That's not part of the definition of oligarchy, or indeed of any human form of government. For rather obvious reasons.
Hehe. True. We all die sometime. But both the Wikipedia definition and the nearest dictionary definition both emphasise that in an oligarchy power rests with a few, and it seems to me that a key element of it is that 'the few' are predefined.
I remain of the view that this is not true of the Ship. Or if it is, then you would similarly be arguing that almost every single organisation on the planet is an 'oligarchy' because new position-holders are chosen by those currently in positions. In most employment this involves something called a "job interview".
I hardly find anything terribly shocking about the fact that the Ship operates on similar principles.
Nor can I think of a single example of a message board that I've seen which selects its administrators and moderators in any other fashion.
[ 23. September 2014, 09:15: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by JFH (# 14794) on
:
I'm all for H&A days, in fact I think they were one of the main reasons I became somewhat more active as a member and not just lurking. However, I will say that I think the word replacements this time struck a little too low on the fun/disruptive graph. Even after the single letters were put back. I'd change that in the future. My first instinctive reaction to "bugger off", even knowing it was H&A days, was taking it personal, but then I realized what it was about and found it rather hilarious. To conclude, my key criticism would be of some of these features, rather than on the H&A days themselves.
For me, the Ship is about a place where the serious can meet the loony and use that to strenghten the points made. Sure, too much innuendo or whatever personal bits of humour we put in and the serious gets lost, but I think a few days of celebration in which the loony gets rather free reins is a good thing. I've always seen it as a very attractive feature of the Ship, something I look forward to, and something that's inspired me to increased action on the Ship. I think it might draw more people here, not less. Just as I think Ingo's innuendo will draw more intelligent and witty people here, not less, and spark more action from them, not less.
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I want no more H&A day. I also would appreciate more democracy, sure, and I find the attempts to make it appear impossible hilarious. I should really keep these posts for the next time somebody talks about Church governance...
The Ship is owned by Simon. As such it is a benign dictatorship.
I suppose you could try setting up a fully democratic discussion website, but I suspect you'd drown in procedural bureaucracy before managing to agree even on the URL.
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
Is it time for the annual lent thread yet?
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Nor can I think of a single example of a message board that I've seen which selects its administrators and moderators in any other fashion.
Louis XVI, July 1789, letter to the National Constituent Assembly?
Is there a practical need for changing the governance of this website? Probably not. But there's more to life than pragmatism. Given what this website claims to be, and given the avowed convictions of the majority of people that hang out here, I think complacency with its oligarchic status quo "because it works" is odd, even a bit sad. I do think it would be fun if an ultramontanist traditionalist fought a people's revolution here, just for the sweet fucking irony of it all. But frankly, I really have other things to do at the moment...
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
Louis XVI, July 1789, letter to the National Constituent Assembly?
I didn't know that was a message board.
The nearest thing I can think of to your proposals is Wikipedia, and I restate my allegation of drowning in bureaucracy.
Posted by Thyme (# 12360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
Is it time for the annual lent thread yet?
No. We haven't finished Advent yet.
[ 23. September 2014, 10:11: Message edited by: Thyme ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
Nor can I think of a single example of a message board that I've seen which selects its administrators and moderators in any other fashion.
Louis XVI, July 1789, letter to the National Constituent Assembly?
Sigh.
I specifically said message board for a reason, Ingo. It seems to me that you are far too ready to declare that democracy is the ultimate mode of governance for EVERYTHING while failing to recognise that it is actually used for a very, very small percentage of your life.
Your employment was not determined by democracy. The menu at your local restaurant is not determined by democracy. Prices are not determined by democracy. I would venture to wager that most families are not democracies, in that the children don't get voting rights on most matters. The hymns at church are not determined by democracy. YOUR CHURCH is not a democracy.
You spend your life surrounded by various decisions that were not determined by popular vote or, to be more accurate about what democracy is, were not determined by people elected by popular vote. Every time that you suggest that democracy is somehow the natural order of things, I can think of dozens of counterexamples.
Democracy has developed for a very particular purpose to deal with the highest level of societal decision-making. It is rarely used elsewhere. That you think the Ship is in any sensible way comparable to the entire nation of France shows me you've abandoned your analytical skills for the sake of an ideological complaint that somehow you're not as important on the Ship as you'd like to be.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Eutychus:
The nearest thing I can think of to your proposals is Wikipedia, and I restate my allegation of drowning in bureaucracy.
My proposals? Seriously, WTF?
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I think complacency with its oligarchic status quo "because it works" is odd, even a bit sad. I do think it would be fun if an ultramontanist traditionalist fought a people's revolution here, just for the sweet fucking irony of it all.
Like orefo said - do you feel the same about the Catholic Church?
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
I normally love H&A days, this last one, I wasn't in the mood. I wanted to see what the people here were saying about the Scottish Referendum, without wading through asterisks and stuff.
Spike should have had his birthday on a different day this year. He should also have messaged all of us to see if we were in the mood - I wasn't and so was offended and upset.
Somehow though I managed to bravely struggle through. I looked at other websites (I know, I was surprised too. Some of them were actually quite good) and did other things for approximately 24 hours. I'm recovering from the shock that the people on the internet who facilitate a service I enjoy that I don't pay for (hmm, I have a job now, I could actually sling something into the Organ Fund) fancied doing something different with the Boards for a day or so.
The Ship is back to normal now, I have resumed my briefly fractured existence, and am enjoying my popcorn as I read this thread.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
I looked at other websites (I know, I was surprised too. Some of them were actually quite good)
*pencils luvanddaisies in for a Ship cult programming reinforcement session*
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
You could try a takeover, IngoB, possibly in concert with others who agree with you.
That would consist of persuading Simon to sell to you or another consortium.
You'd pick up the assets, income generating power, and liabilities. Mostly liabilities so far as I can see.
But short of that, I can't see any other way of turning your desire for abolition into reality.
This place can't be turned into a formal co-operative without transfer of formal ownership away from Simon. I may be wrong but since he gets close to bugger-all out of it, my guess is that his primary desire is to preserve the ethos of unrest and the weird traditions of this place; not to safeguard them from evolution or reform, but simply because the longevity of this place says something about its historical and continuing value to participants.
Poor bugger; he's got a duty of care to this unique "odd child" he helped to bring into the world. I think he takes that seriously.
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
IngoB: what B62 said.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
That you think the Ship is in any sensible way comparable to the entire nation of France shows me you've abandoned your analytical skills for the sake of an ideological complaint that somehow you're not as important on the Ship as you'd like to be.
Actually, I was mockingly comparing you to Louis XVI. And not because you are a king, but because you appear to think that "it has always been thus" is a valid argument concerning governance.
My importance for this Ship clearly has reached such heights that people feel the need to preemptively defend against what I might possibly suggest. I guess the only higher level of achievement would be if I could spark apologies left, right and centre without saying anything at all.
Now, in the real world I was on the Board of Directors of a major organisation in my research field. And I was a driving force on that Board for turning it from a private into a member organisation, which included changing appointments to that Board of Directors from getting tapped by current directors to elections by all the members. In consequence of which I am no longer on the Board of Directors, as I did not stand for election (though I still serve in a committee). That organisation remains functional today, and in fact is growing strongly.
Can one translate this directly to SoF? Probably not, given the faster churn here and the heterogenous nature of its membership. But please don't lecture me on democratic governance of organisations. Been there, done that - from a position of power.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
This place can't be turned into a formal co-operative without transfer of formal ownership away from Simon.
Well, clearly after H&A day we now have the "making shit up about what IngoB wants" day.
Let us say Natthew is not a host. I as a Shipmate think he would be really great as a host. What can I do about making him a host? Petty much fuck all. Let us say Natthew is a host. I as a Shipmate think he is doing a really bad job. What can I do about stopping him? Slightly more than fuck all, namely I can whinge here.
Is it possible to increase my abilities without having to wrest control of this website from Simon's hands? I sure as heck think so. Not that I actually have thought about how to do that, since I wasn't actually intending to do anything about the governance of this place at the moment. Really. Honestly. Swear to God. Would somebody listen, please?
But I sure expect that one could come up with some decent ideas if one wanted to. And if that very thought is so threatening as to activate the full blown "the Ship is the best of all possible maritime vessels" defence, then that to me is worrisome.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
IngoB: Let us say Natthew is not a host. I as a Shipmate think he would be really great as a host. What can I do about making him a host? Petty much fuck all.
I'm sure if you thought Natthew would make a great host, you could send a PM to the Admins alerting them to this, and this would be taken into account?
(PS You could do the same thing if you really hated Natthew )
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
This place can't be turned into a formal co-operative without transfer of formal ownership away from Simon.
Well, clearly after H&A day we now have the "making shit up about what IngoB wants" day.
I don't know about that, but I'm having a "Getting tired about IngoB going on and on day".
Posted by Eutychus (# 3081) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
Not that I actually have thought about how to do that, since I wasn't actually intending to do anything about the governance of this place at the moment. Really. Honestly. Swear to God. Would somebody listen, please?
Since you admit that you aren't intending to provide a constructive contribution here, no.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
This place can't be turned into a formal co-operative without transfer of formal ownership away from Simon.
Well, clearly after H&A day we now have the "making shit up about what IngoB wants" day.
Let us say Natthew is not a host. I as a Shipmate think he would be really great as a host. What can I do about making him a host? Petty much fuck all. Let us say Natthew is a host. I as a Shipmate think he is doing a really bad job. What can I do about stopping him? Slightly more than fuck all, namely I can whinge here.
Is it possible to increase my abilities without having to wrest control of this website from Simon's hands? I sure as heck think so. Not that I actually have thought about how to do that, since I wasn't actually intending to do anything about the governance of this place at the moment. Really. Honestly. Swear to God. Would somebody listen, please?
But I sure expect that one could come up with some decent ideas if one wanted to. And if that very thought is so threatening as to activate the full blown "the Ship is the best of all possible maritime vessels" defence, then that to me is worrisome.
This is very confusing. How’s about this … The Ship carries on as is and if people have feedback on how we’re doing or suggestions for making things better, then they can make them. The Eighth Day is a case in point. What genius came up with that!
Based on the feedback so far, it seems that:
- Most Shipmates like or don’t mind H&A day. Some of them even enjoy it! A lot. Maybe it could be shaken up a bit. On it. (I’m ignoring Deano as his metamorphosis into the defender of the vulnerable doesn’t quite ring true when compared to his posts elsewhere).
- Find ways doing things like of H&A in a way that have less impact to the parts of the Ship that exist below the plimsoll line . On it.
- Improve the notification process for H&A. Particularly for the parts of the Ship that exist below the plimsoll line. On it.
- Never do H&A day again. No chance.
As for your other comments, you might think Natthew would make a wonderful Host. The Crew might agree with you. The Crew might approach Natthew. Natthew might say no as his other personal commitments mean that he doesn’t feel able to take on the role at the moment. Doesn’t change the fact that he’d make a wonderful Host.
Or Natthew becomes a Host. Natthew starts off well and then turns into the Worst Host. Ever. With has the Styx calls to prove it. Hosts have been sacked – just not often.
Should that stop working for you, then please set the Crew down on a well populated, resourced island with Wifi. And decent coffee.
Tubbs
[ 23. September 2014, 12:05: Message edited by: Tubbs ]
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
Ahem. Please would everyone remember that the Styx isn't Hell and adjust the general level of snark. Thank you.
Tubbs
Styx Host
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
Sorry IngoB and Tubbs. That was personal. Please forgive me.
Sioni
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
That you think the Ship is in any sensible way comparable to the entire nation of France shows me you've abandoned your analytical skills for the sake of an ideological complaint that somehow you're not as important on the Ship as you'd like to be.
Actually, I was mockingly comparing you to Louis XVI. And not because you are a king, but because you appear to think that "it has always been thus" is a valid argument concerning governance.
Kindly don't mockingly compare me to anyone.
I don't think that's my argument, at least in terms of the Ship. My argument is that "it's the natural and logical approach for a message board". I think my argument is that democracy is not actually the usual method for privately owned facilities, and that suggesting democracy as if this is a public space is a misconception of what the Ship is.
Message boards are communities in a sense. So is Facebook. That does not mean they are community-owned. The Ship is actually a lot closer to community-owned in that the 'staff' are unpaid volunteers who are drawn from the community, but that still doesn't mean that it's community-owned.
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
Is it possible to increase my abilities without having to wrest control of this website from Simon's hands? I sure as heck think so.
In point of fact, it would be trivially easy to hold elections for every vacant Host or Admin spot that comes up. We could just invite applications, set up a poll in the Styx and give the job to whoever had the most votes after a predetermined time.
The question is whether that would be the best thing for the Ship, and I believe the answer is "no". Here's why:
There is a specific vision for the Ship as a whole, and Hosts are selected based largely on how well they exemplify that vision, with a specific focus on the purpose of the board they are to be Hosting. If anybody could stand for election and everybody could vote, then that vision would rapidly get lost amid the myriad other visions that members may have about how things should be run. One solution to that would, of course, be to allow the Admins to veto any candidate they feel is unsuitable - but that's not really very far from the system we have now.
Yes, there is an element of "does the face fit" to the current system. But the H&As are a team, and teams fall apart when the individuals that make them up don't work well together. We have to bear that in mind when selecting new Hosts.
Also, you have to remember that the voting population wouldn't be made up only of reasonable posters like yourself. Every troll, crusader, bigot and wind-up-merchant would have just as much right to vote as you, and they'd be voting for the candidate they think would be the most "fun" for them (if, indeed, one of them wasn't a candidate to start with). I don't need to mention any names - just think of some of the characters we've had on this site over the years, and picture them having the power to decide who will be tasked with enforcing the rules they so love to bend and break.
Elections would also mean politics. Campaigning. Individual manifestos. Empty promises. Smears aimed at rival candidates. And above all else, the sickly scent of a popularity contest* where most of the candidates are going to find out that they're just not as widely liked and respected as they thought they were. It's not out of the realms of possibility that personal animosities and/or people leaving the Ship could result - and the losers would certainly have a reason not to respect the new Host quite as much as they should. Would petty Styx calls along the lines of "I'd never have done that if I'd won the election" happen? I think they would. It's a high price to pay to fix something that isn't really broken to begin with.
That's my opinion, anyway.
.
*= and we don't do official** popularity contests among our members. That's why the member rating function is permanently disabled.
**= by which I mean they're emphatically not a part of Ship policy. Obviously some individuals are more popular with the membership than others, but that's inevitable in any group of more than two people.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Can I add to my previous post by pointing out that making the Ship GENUINELY community-owned would involve membership fees.
I don't actually know what the running costs of the Ship are, but if it becomes a community-owned facility, then the community is not just inheriting the powers but the responsibilities. That's how genuine member-owned clubs are run: you become a member by paying your fees.
Yes, there is some scope here for making donations, but they're not compulsory. The Ship is free to Shipmates. Democratic institutions are not.
[ 23. September 2014, 12:22: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by Zoey (# 11152) on
:
**makes note to self to put something into the Organ Fund next payday** ('cos I like the Ship the way it is and will voluntarily pay to its upkeep in its current form)
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I want no more H&A day.
Simply responding to that, IngoB. That's not shit I made up, it's what you said. But I suppose I did not spell out the other option clearly enough.
It's change of ownership or change of owner's mind.
You might think about the second option, I guess, if it matters enough to you. Getting H&A on your side to lobby Simon for change is clearly a busted flush.
BTW I'm sure it's his call rather than delegated completely to H&A. Given the tradition's origins, that seems more than likely. If I was on Admin, that's certainly the way I'd play it.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
That you think the Ship is in any sensible way comparable to the entire nation of France shows me you've abandoned your analytical skills for the sake of an ideological complaint that somehow you're not as important on the Ship as you'd like to be.
Actually, I was mockingly comparing you to Louis XVI. And not because you are a king, but because you appear to think that "it has always been thus" is a valid argument concerning governance.
Kindly don't mockingly compare me to anyone.
You know, your own ad hominem was right there. See above, first in the series of quotes. I think it is considerably more insulting than my oblique (and hopefully mildly amusing) reference to a French king being surprised by revolution.
Marvin, I appreciate your honest words that cut through some of the bullshit. A few comments: There's nothing that stops one from adjusting election laws to get rid of most problem cases, e.g., "at least one year on the Ship, at least 500 posts, at least one post within the last year." If you don't trust the people left after such cuts to avoid obvious trolls in majority votes, then you are more cynical than I am. I think an election day would be fun, as it happens: I sure would be interested in hearing a fresh sales pitch or ten about making SoF a better place. But I think we simply do not have the numbers of active posters to get a full-blown representative democracy going. And while you seem to think that political battles and populism would be the main problem, I would fear more boredom and non-participation.
I would imagine more something like a pool of candidates, which gets filled through a steady "democratic" process and depleted by H&As restocking their ranks when needed. Say a thread where people can suggest names and if someone reaches a certain threshold number of "seconded" votes their name goes into the candidate pool for a time.
Barnabas62, I really have difficulty figuring out what you are talking about. I'm supposed to lobby H&As to change Simon's mind about H&A day? I wasn't aware that H&A day was scheduled by Simon's orders. I doubt that it is, but if it was so then I would simply give up. Not because I fear engaging with Simon, but he is rarely around, and this most definitely is not an issue significant enough to hunt him down in real life.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
You're nearly there, IngoB. I'm drawing a pretty obvious implication from the history of this place.
In order to abandon H&A day, I believe it would not only be necessary for H&A to believe it should be done, but for Simon to believe so as well. A good deal of ownership delegation can be assumed. There's a high level of trust between Simon and Admin. But there are limits to that. I would believe that anything in the strange long-term architecture of this place which was put there by Erin's insouciant creativity belongs in the category of "definitely under Simon's personal protection as owner".
You see, I don't think any of us really know for sure why this "odd child" has survived. I said earlier that preserving our characteristic ethos of unrest is not as easy as it looks. Maybe H&A is an important prop of that? Maybe it isn't? I'd rather leave that call to the owner, than second-guess the effect of change.
Ironically, it strikes me as a kind of "Catholic" argument; if you chip away at traditions, in the end what you have is just chippings.
I'm not on Admin, who may not welcome this speculative opinion. But if I were, that's the way I'd play it. Dropping H&A is an issue on which I believe Simon should have the final say, and the veto. Sensible modification is a different matter. I'm sure Admin have a great deal of freedom in that respect.
Trying to be helpful here. Your persistence is admirable, even when you are IMO tilting at a windmill.
[ 23. September 2014, 14:47: Message edited by: Barnabas62 ]
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
You know, your own ad hominem was right there. See above, first in the series of quotes. I think it is considerably more insulting than my oblique (and hopefully mildly amusing) reference to a French king being surprised by revolution.
If you're claiming that something I said after your attempt at mockery somehow justifies your attempt at mockery, I reject the claim.
Posted by Caissa (# 16710) on
:
H & A Admin Days seem to be the height of self-indulgence.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
(missed out "day" a couple of times, sorry)
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Caissa:
H & A Admin Days seem to be the height of self-indulgence.
There's an argument that they are self-indulgent, yes. There's also an argument that the people who are indulging spend about 363 days of the year doing a lot of pretty selfless work for other people.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
IngoB: There's nothing that stops one from adjusting election laws to get rid of most problem cases, e.g., "at least one year on the Ship, at least 500 posts, at least one post within the last year."
That worked so well on Wikipedia. No political bickering there
Posted by Marvin the Martian (# 4360) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
Marvin, I appreciate your honest words that cut through some of the bullshit.
Thank you.
quote:
A few comments: There's nothing that stops one from adjusting election laws to get rid of most problem cases, e.g., "at least one year on the Ship, at least 500 posts, at least one post within the last year." If you don't trust the people left after such cuts to avoid obvious trolls in majority votes, then you are more cynical than I am.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to restrict voting in a poll to only a certain subset of posters (short of doing it on a restricted-membership board, of course). And even if we did use a restricted-membership board, it would be an insane amount of work to keep the membership list up to date, given that we can only grant access to a restricted board at the individual Shipmate level.
quote:
I think an election day would be fun, as it happens:
Much like a H&A Day, some would love it and some would hate it.
quote:
I sure would be interested in hearing a fresh sales pitch or ten about making SoF a better place.
But that's the thing. It's not about making SoF better in one or more of the ten different ways those people would put forward, it's about making it better in the way Simon has put forward. His site, his vision.
Of course, people are still perfectly free to make any suggestions they like about how to improve the site. That's how we got the private boards, The Circus and The Eighth Day.
quote:
I would imagine more something like a pool of candidates, which gets filled through a steady "democratic" process and depleted by H&As restocking their ranks when needed. Say a thread where people can suggest names and if someone reaches a certain threshold number of "seconded" votes their name goes into the candidate pool for a time.
If the pool was public, it would fall foul of the "popularity contest" problem. Especially if people did the equivalent of "oh, [X] is such a lovely person I can't believe nobody has proposed her", or even worse started arguing against certain nominations.
If it was private, there wouldn't be any practical difference between that and what we do now (i.e. look at the body of suitable posters, pick one we're all happy with and then ask them if they'd be willing to do it).
Posted by Adeodatus (# 4992) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
There's an argument that they are self-indulgent, yes. There's also an argument that the people who are indulging spend about 363 days of the year doing a lot of pretty selfless work for other people.
Speaking only for myself, but as a long-term poster who's enjoyed some H&A Days, endured others, and enjoyed my time on the Ship enormously thanks to these generous people - this, for me, is really the last word on the subject.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I would imagine more something like a pool of candidates, which gets filled through a steady "democratic" process and depleted by H&As restocking their ranks when needed. Say a thread where people can suggest names and if someone reaches a certain threshold number of "seconded" votes their name goes into the candidate pool for a time.
let's think this through a bit. Have you ever run for office? I have. well, sort of; on the small level. boards of directors and all of that. you need thick skin. even well meant, having people talk publicly and cast votes about you feels personal. if you win, then great: "you like me, you really like me!" but if you don't win? it kind of sucks.
one of the things brought up on this very thread, in the OP even, has been that people don't want to feel insulted or hurt.
and when you have an election, there's bound to be people who don't win. And they may not have anything wrong with them. Let's face it, as has come up on this ship many times - the "in-crowd" dynamic around here is usually based on writing skills. I know some really brilliant writers who's politics are complete suckass bullshit. (hell, I'm related to at least one) but those great writers can win the day because they are the text-based forum equivalent of the pretty girls at school.
then you have the really brilliant mind with lots to offer who maybe can't express themselves in anything less than a Tolstoi-sized post; perhaps they express themselves in a way that often makes people think they are judging, criticizing, or condemning. This person may be exactly the right person for the job, but they manage to piss off a dozen people before breakfast every day. That person will not be elected.
and really? that shit hurts. It makes you want to stay away. because even if it ain't personal, it feels personal.
And here on the ship we decided eons ago that we hate popularity contests. I'm all for this. We've skirted this in the past with various events and it made me decidedly twitchy.
Thing is, I may be a raging bitch but most of you who know me know it comes from a place of love. (well, and annoyance) I don't actually want to see anyone get kicked in the teeth or feel unwelcome.
not here. this place is too special.
In the real world, I feel democracy is a bit of a necessary evil. it's slow, cumbersome, messy, painful, and it fucking works. someone wants to put themselves out there for a beating, have at it. But it will never be me, not on a big level. and if choosing hosts were based on a public discussion of various people's merits and a public vote, I never would have been a host.
you see, deep down, I'm a big fat squawking chicken.
on another note, one thing the H&As have going for them is they have to read fucking everything. the rest of us, thanksbetogawd, do not. because of that, they can get a feel for different posters in a way that we won't, unless we somehow enforce that everybody reads everything, including the boring bits. there are little jewels of posters that are not as loud and brash and noisy as you or I, but have something really valuable to contribute. us loud fuckers drown them out. But the powers that be have to read it all; they notice.
they also have agreed to uphold an agenda not completely their own. So they have to take into account what is the best for the ship. us peons can vote simply based on our mood and our favorites and not what will keep this joint afloat.
Now, all of that being said, I can see a test run, on perhaps 8th Day, of popularly elected hosts, at some point. I will not be taking part, but if it is a contained element and won't actually effect the overall spirit of the ship; maybe there's a place for that.
I want to address the H&A Day kerfluffle, too, but I'll have to wait until my work break. there's only so much slacking I can get away with around here.
PS - Dear Ingo. You are a dirty, dirty boy. Keep it up.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
Based on the feedback so far, it seems that:
- Most Shipmates like or don’t mind H&A day. Some of them even enjoy it! A lot. Maybe it could be shaken up a bit. On it. (I’m ignoring Deano as his metamorphosis into the defender of the vulnerable doesn’t quite ring true when compared to his posts elsewhere).
- Find ways doing things like of H&A in a way that have less impact to the parts of the Ship that exist below the plimsoll line . On it.
- Improve the notification process for H&A. Particularly for the parts of the Ship that exist below the plimsoll line. On it.
- Never do H&A day again. No chance.
[/QB]
This is about a concise a summary of what we ( the h/a's ) have been discussing in the last few days as I can think of.
We have been taking in board what people have been saying, really.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Barnabas62:
In order to abandon H&A day, I believe it would not only be necessary for H&A to believe it should be done, but for Simon to believe so as well.
Personally, I doubt that Simon gives a rat's ass about whether and when a H&A day is held. Evidence to the contrary would be Simon keenly inquiring or commenting about it. If there is such evidence, then obviously I am not party to it. In fact, I have no idea at all whom Simon talks to in what manner and how often. But if the key answer to all this is "Simon really wants H&A days to happen", then I think we would have heard about that by now.
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
But that's the thing. It's not about making SoF better in one or more of the ten different ways those people would put forward, it's about making it better in the way Simon has put forward. His site, his vision.
And this vision is communicated to the H&As by some kind of spiritual osmosis? Or do you have some stone tablets standing somewhere in a corner? Look, I possibly would feel bad about not having the slightest clue what Simon's vision for this place really is these days. But I haven't had Simon's Apocalypse handed to me by PM, email, link or incorporeal messenger. And I just heard Barnabas62 speculating that maybe, probably, perhaps H&A day is dear to Simon's heart. That's a veteran Host talking. He has no clue either, does he now? Is it then just the Admins who share in the vision of Simon, and get his mobile phone number? Are we to consider your Admin words as his, your decisions as true conduit of his vision? And you swear to God that you are not, well, sort of making it up as you go along?
I have been around for a decade, so I have some experiential evidence that Simon actually exists. Including that time when he nearly threw me overboard. But he sure has been pretty ninja grey eminence of the Deist vibe about sharing his vision for this place.
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
That person will not be elected. and really? that shit hurts. It makes you want to stay away. because even if it ain't personal, it feels personal. ... you see, deep down, I'm a big fat squawking chicken.
OK people, I'm slow, but not that slow. This is a Monty Python sketch, right? Right?!
Posted by Gildas (# 525) on
:
What is the question to which "free and fair democratic election of hosts and admins" is the answer? And what the devil does it have to do with Hosts and Admins Day?
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
IngoB: I have been around for a decade, so I have some experiential evidence that Simon actually exists. Including that time when he nearly threw me overboard. But he sure has been pretty ninja grey eminence of the Deist vibe about sharing his vision for this place.
Think of H&A Day as a sacrament instituted the first time by Simon through the alligator in whom he had invested his power, which has been handed over through her ordained sucessors, and through which he still works our salvation. We don't need to understand all of it, parts of it may even seem to be undemocratic or —gasp— immoral to us, but in the end it will all work out to our best.
[ 23. September 2014, 17:33: Message edited by: LeRoc ]
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
OK people, I'm slow, but not that slow. This is a Monty Python sketch, right? Right?!
I'll never tell.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
IngoB, I'm sure 8th Day was your idea (even if you objected to the name). I don't recall that going to a popular vote and Lo, it came forth, probably the best idea for years.
Keep the innovation flowing man, because you have the imagination coupled with an eye for detail makes for Good Stuff.
Posted by IngoB (# 8700) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Think of H&A Day as a sacrament instituted the first time by Simon through the alligator in whom he had invested his power, which has been handed over through her ordained sucessors, and through which he still works our salvation. We don't need to understand all of it, parts of it may even seem to be undemocratic or —gasp— immoral to us, but in the end it will all work out to our best.
If it turns out that Simon's vision for SoF has been to mould hanky-wringing liberals into a spitting image of the RCC, with conservatives waging guerrilla warfare of enlightened laissez-faire against it, then I for one don't care whether this is a prank or a work of art, evil or good. It would be so unspeakably epic, a breathtaking tour de force in social manipulation, irony so deep that it would form a wormhole right into the Holy of Holies, with God saying "peek-a-boo".
Or it's just a bloody bulletin board and people are just being people.
Posted by St. Punk the Pious (# 683) on
:
FWIW, I love Host and Admin Days. Good clean fun.
I'll have to remember to ask to crusade next time. I can be very good at that, you know.
Posted by Lamb Chopped (# 5528) on
:
I liked the year when we had to add various bits to our posts in certain boards, e.g. "between the sheets" and "this is most certainly true." It was a kick watching the posts deconstruct themselves.
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
quote:
Originally posted by LeRoc:
Think of H&A Day as a sacrament instituted the first time by Simon through the alligator in whom he had invested his power, which has been handed over through her ordained sucessors, and through which he still works our salvation. We don't need to understand all of it, parts of it may even seem to be undemocratic or —gasp— immoral to us, but in the end it will all work out to our best.
If it turns out that Simon's vision for SoF has been to mould hanky-wringing liberals into a spitting image of the RCC, with conservatives waging guerrilla warfare of enlightened laissez-faire against it, then I for one don't care whether this is a prank or a work of art, evil or good. It would be so unspeakably epic, a breathtaking tour de force in social manipulation, irony so deep that it would form a wormhole right into the Holy of Holies, with God saying "peek-a-boo".
Or it's just a bloody bulletin board and people are just being people.
It would be fantastic if the first bit were true. But the second seems more likely.
Tubbs
Posted by Stercus Tauri (# 16668) on
:
Six pages of this stuff? Incredible. I'd been away and was briefly baffled and irritated while trying to figure out what was going on. Then I saw "Bugger off, Stercus Tauri" at the top of the page and laughed till I farted. Can it be that certain people are taking all this too seriously?
Posted by Tubbs (# 440) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Stercus Tauri:
Six pages of this stuff? Incredible. I'd been away and was briefly baffled and irritated while trying to figure out what was going on. Then I saw "Bugger off, Stercus Tauri" at the top of the page and laughed till I farted. Can it be that certain people are taking all this too seriously?
Put this way, this thread will not last longer than the H&A that caused it. Unless anyone has anything on topic to add, this thread will shortly be closed.
Tubbs
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Caissa:
H & A Admin Days seem to be the height of self-indulgence.
My understanding of host and admin days is that these days are for the community. We are invited to participate in silliness. For fun- not for malice. I would argue this is community building, for all who wish to participate. I see no intent to cause hurt. Part of our strength and weakness is that humour is in part cultural and does not always translate well and sometimes we are already hurting and less able to manage weirdness. But please, if we look through a fun/good natured filter, this place is transformed. The reason we kept getting told not to do counselling is exactly because this is a good place, a good community and it evolves from that goodness. I like that that desire to care keeps recurring and I understand the need to warn of it.
Hosts and admins are part of the community. There is not us and them. There is only us.
To keep this place going, they need to able to make decisions.
So there is a private board, there are hard decisions at times and they take the responsibility for them.
But they are us. At times they invite us to play and at times we may not wish to participate.
But I think we should stop talking about us and them when the them is still us. They are here for the same reasons we are. To remember those who touched our hearts, to interact with our current crew, and to annoy the shit out of RooK.
Posted by goperryrevs (# 13504) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Marvin the Martian:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
I think an election day would be fun, as it happens:
Much like a H&A Day, some would love it and some would hate it.
My big problem with it would be that you'd only end up with hosts and admins that really, really want to be hosts and admins - enough to campaign to become them. IMO the worst leaders are those that crave leadership.
I can imagine there have been times where an experienced host has sent a pm to another shipmate saying "hey, have you ever thought about becoming a host - I think you'd make a good one". And then that person mulls it over, then decides whether it's a good idea or not, whether they can properly give the time - after all, this is a voluntary kindness to the rest of us.
I think the type of people who we get as hosts and admins at the moment are invariably the right kind of people to be hosts and admins. That's no fluke, it's because of the way the Ship works at the moment. I'd be much more wary of the calibre of character we'd get with a campaign / voting system.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
Based on the feedback so far, it seems that:
- Most Shipmates like or don’t mind H&A day. Some of them even enjoy it! A lot. Maybe it could be shaken up a bit. On it.
How do you know? Why not have a poll on it? Then you will have proper numbers.
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
(I’m ignoring Deano as his metamorphosis into the defender of the vulnerable doesn’t quite ring true when compared to his posts elsewhere).
Well isn't that convenient? You don't have to address the issues then do you?
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
quote:
Originally posted by Stercus Tauri:
Six pages of this stuff? Incredible. I'd been away and was briefly baffled and irritated while trying to figure out what was going on. Then I saw "Bugger off, Stercus Tauri" at the top of the page and laughed till I farted. Can it be that certain people are taking all this too seriously?
Put this way, this thread will not last longer than the H&A that caused it. Unless anyone has anything on topic to add, this thread will shortly be closed.
Tubbs
Oh, so you don't want to debate anything then? Just close it when it becomes bothersome to you. Way to defend the impartiality of the H&As there.
It seems the day is fun but the debate afterwards, not so much.
Posted by Barnabas62 (# 9110) on
:
Well, that will teach me to try to be helpful. Suffice to day that on the basis of what I know, some of which is bound by Host Board confidentiality, my opinion re consultation is not based on zero information. I don't need to confirm that opinion. I'm happy with the Admin response here. And I know my place.
IngoB, you're the one who wants to abolish H&A day. Admin don't. Tubbs has told you that. If you want to pursue it further you can take it up with the owner and find out whether he gives a rats ass about the continuation of one of Erin's contributions to the ethos of this place. Particularly since the present Admin want to. Knock yourself out.
Posted by Lyda*Rose (# 4544) on
:
I think the subject has been pretty well debated in six pages. Some people have said similar things to what you have said, deano, so even if Admins have trouble taking what you say seriously because of past run-ins, you are not alone in your views and as hosts of the Styx they will have read all the posts on this thread.
Posted by LeRoc (# 3216) on
:
quote:
IngoB: If it turns out that Simon's vision for SoF has been to mould hanky-wringing liberals into a spitting image of the RCC, with conservatives waging guerrilla warfare of enlightened laissez-faire against it, then I for one don't care whether this is a prank or a work of art, evil or good.
Yes it's kind of cool, isn't it?
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
quote:
Originally posted by Tubbs:
Based on the feedback so far, it seems that:
- Most Shipmates like or don’t mind H&A day. Some of them even enjoy it! A lot. Maybe it could be shaken up a bit. On it.
How do you know? Why not have a poll on it? Then you will have proper numbers.
What makes a poll more proper than just reading all the comments on this thread?
And it's already been pointed out, here on this thread, the considerable problems involved in running an election and collating votes properly and not getting into enormous arguments about whether some voters were disenfranchised. Any kind of referendum runs into the exact same problem.
People are able to express their opinion on the subject here on this thread. They have been doing so. The Admins know what people think because the Admins have been required to read every single post on this thread.
Posted by Sir Kevin (# 3492) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
As part of the in crowd, I received a commemorative bottle of gin with the date and time of commencement a week before.
Doesn't longevity and number of posts count for anything? Where's my Bombay Sapphire?
Posted by Leaf (# 14169) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
Also, I don't get why the H&A days have to be started without warning.
"But about that day and hour no one knows, neither the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." (Matthew 24:36, NRSV)
Alongside other interpretations of H&A days - a demonstration of true arbitrariness, an irruption of pagan misrule - I offer mine: an example of the disruptive power of the kingdom of God. Parables about it point to the suddenly changed nature of the established order. H&A days are a foretaste of the WTF to come.
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
As part of the in crowd, I received a commemorative bottle of gin with the date and time of commencement a week before.
If you were really part of the in crowd, you'd have spelled "gin" in all caps. Wannabe.
Posted by Mr Curly (# 5518) on
:
The Writers Block thread still AWOL in Heaven
mr curly
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by IngoB:
This is a Monty Python sketch, right? Right?!
And, just like that, I'm imagining all these posts being read out by John Cleese, and waiting for my 5 minutes to be up.
quote:
Originally posted by deano:
It seems the day is fun but the debate afterwards, not so much.
-shrug- I personally couldn't be bothered with H&A Day(s) this time (possibly because I regularly abuse my power anyway), but am savouring the delicious sweat and tears of the aftermath.
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
The Admins know what people think because the Admins have been required to read every single post on this thread.
Also: mind-reading powers. It's a setting in the Control Panel, probably a leftover from Erin's time in the CIA.
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
and to annoy the shit out of RooK.
A nobler sentiment has never been uttered. Pardon me while I adjust your profile to reward you.
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Curly:
The Writers Block thread still AWOL in Heaven
Is there something newer than the "Writer's Bleak" locked on page 2 of Heaven? Or are you asking for that to be unlocked? Can I interest you in a shiny new thread, with no money down and cheap financing?
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RooK:
Also: mind-reading powers. It's a setting in the Control Panel, probably a leftover from Erin's time in the CIA.
Although the mind control setting to turn everyone into obedient sheep who never question anything has always been a bit flakey.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Curly:
The Writers Block thread still AWOL in Heaven
mr curly
That thread has been shuffling along for a year and a half now. It's worn a groove in the carpet. NaNoWriMo dawns. Perhaps, as Rook suggests, a new - and perhaps more topic/discussion-oriented thread?
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
quote:
Originally posted by Mr Curly:
The Writers Block thread still AWOL in Heaven
mr curly
That thread has been shuffling along for a year and a half now. It's worn a groove in the carpet. NaNoWriMo dawns. Perhaps, as Rook suggests, a new - and perhaps more topic/discussion-oriented thread?
I can't say that I noticed exactly when the thread title was changed nor at what time in the last week but to me and Mr Curly, the timing appears to coincide with H&A day and the usual hostly announcement was missing making one assume it was H&A frivolity, It'd be nice if there was a distinction between the hilarity of H&A day and earnest hostly wisdom for us shipmates, just so we don't waste hostly time here discussing it.
Posted by Patdys (# 9397) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by RooK:
quote:
Originally posted by Patdys:
and to annoy the shit out of RooK.
A nobler sentiment has never been uttered. Pardon me while I adjust your profile to reward you.
First, that is definitely worth an organ fund contribution. (done).
May I please have my avatar back when you have finished wiping with it. I don't recognise myself.
I would be very happy to keep your addition to my title but am happy to lose the iron wannabe at some point in the future if you like.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Evangeline:
It'd be nice if there was a distinction between the hilarity of H&A day and earnest hostly wisdom for us shipmates, just so we don't waste hostly time here discussing it.
Answering questions is what we're here for. It's what The Styx is here for. (PM is also available).
It is true a small bunch of long-running Heaven threads were closed at once on H&A day - as a mild instance of its function of disconcerting expectation. Some were reopened by the Hosts. A new Dr Who was started - which is fine: a refresh for the new Doctor not a bad thing.
But others - you do wonder: is this not rather tired? Will it actually be missed? Who cares? And if anyone does, the Whovian option is there - if there are indeed fresh and engaging aspects of the topic to discuss.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
That damn RooK-Annoyer even went and opened up a new TICTH thread when I closed the old one. And that's a thread that traditionally has been Hosts' prerogative!
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
It takes a brave person to risk the wrath of the Hellhosts by opening a TICTH thread. Or, one in tune with the mood of the board to realise it's the right time. Still probably brave to open it though.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Alan Cresswell:
It takes a brave person to risk the wrath of the Hellhosts by opening a TICTH thread. Or, one in tune with the mood of the board to realise it's the right time. Still probably brave to open it though.
Hellions could be forgiven for thinking the only reason hosts allow it to continue is because we get wonderful opportunities to slap people for creating tangents.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
I wondered about the closed threads early on. However, I was also aware that threads that took too much flack during H & A days in the past have quickly gone to Oblivion. Shutting a thread very early on is one way of reducing the likelihood of it becoming too damaged. So I saw a sort of reason in that caprice.
Jengie
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
Although that reason is not valid, (is it?) if the threads remain closed. plus that wasn't the reason Firenze gave for the thread closures.
Posted by Bob Two-Owls (# 9680) on
:
After a week of staying away due to H&A day and aftermath I feel that I might feel a little better to get a few things off my chest.
I find that on SoF it is incredibly difficult to feel a part of the community. I don't feel that I am more than a bystander on the fringe after nine years and frequently go back into lurker mode for weeks or months when it all gets a bit too cliquey. H&A days don't do anything to help me as a seasoned newbie feel as if I know what the hell is going on here. Is there any chance that even if H&A days are announced on a whim, that the effects are not made permanent? Then at least I could leave you all to it and come back when the threads started to make sense again.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
I wonder what leads people to feel part of the community or not (assuming one wants to feel part of a community, as opposed to other ways of thinking about the Ship). You and I have been members for approximately the same amount of time. I don't feel like I'm part of an in-crowd, yet I feel like I understand the Ship for the most part, and draw from it more or less what seems reasonable to me to expect in my interactions with the Ship. And H&A Days make sense to me (and I enjoy them, and at the same time as sometimes participating, I also feel able to continue serious discussions throughout the asterisking etc.). So I wonder what is different between the two of us that lead each of us to experience our nine years on the Ship so differently?
[ 26. September 2014, 23:01: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
Although for the most part I agree with what you say, AR, every time we have the "clique" discussion and people come in to insist that there is no "in Crowd" or no cliques, I kind of shake my head. (no that you did that, AR, but I am just waiting for it. Like we are some sociological miracle-- this large a group of regular posters, and no cliquiness. All it needs to make a clique is three humans in a group, but not us, by God!)
So, yeah, I think it is good to check ourselves (whether host, admin or shipmate) and guard against cliquiness, insomuch as we can.I don't think there is any way to make rules against it, because that would be telling human beings not to be human.
Bob, I read your post in interest, because as rarely as you show up, somewhere along the line I have picked up the idea that your posts are worth reading. As we fly by in conversation, I might not think to articulate that. As I cruise the boards, I probably miss really worthwhile things people are saying all the time.
As I said I shake my head at the idea of an impossibly clique free community, but at the same time, just because there is a perceived lack of response to someone doesn't mean that someone isn't making an impact.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Two-Owls:
I find that on SoF it is incredibly difficult to feel a part of the community. I don't feel that I am more than a bystander on the fringe after nine years and frequently go back into lurker mode for weeks or months when it all gets a bit too cliquey.
I looked at your post count and was shocked it was so low. Your presence feels much stronger than the number of posts. Engagement is not unilateral and is odd and hard to gauge. In my eyes, you are one of the regulars. Must be by content.
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
.... just because there is a perceived lack of response to someone doesn't mean that someone isn't making an impact.
Absolutely!
I know someone who has made about 10 posts in all their time on the Ship, but they read it all as evidenced by the things they chat about on the phone!
Stalker? Not at all, a friend - just a quite private person who enjoys the Ship but doesn't want to share their thoughts with the world.
I doubt if they feel 'part of the community' but they clearly don't need to.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
I would second lilBuddha's observation. I would always stop to read one of your posts whether it was on a Board I was hosting or not.
As for in and outness - hard to say: there are whole Boards and topics on the Ship were I feel outer than a distant asteroid in orbit round Pluto.
Posted by Nenya (# 16427) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
As for in and outness - hard to say: there are whole Boards and topics on the Ship were I feel outer than a distant asteroid in orbit round Pluto.
Absolutely. It's probably the same for a large number of people here, for different reasons. I suspect, for example, that posters such as orfeo and mousethief have regular "WTF?" moments at something like the decluttering thread, if they go near it at all. *Pauses to cherish mental image of both those posters armed with rubber gloves and feather dusters*
I post in very few areas because in most of them I feel like a squeaking mouse in the battery of the big guns. But I read loads, have learnt loads, am always learning more and appreciate the very high quality of discussion there is here, from the vast majority of posters. Bob, I echo what others have said about you - I think of you as a regular and would always stop to read when I see your name. It's very hard to tell how other people perceive you, particularly from behind a computer screen.
I see H&A days as a necessary part of things here. I don't enjoy them and I don't want to play, but other people do so I just keep a low profile until things settle back down. Who knows, if I were a host or admin and had to read every darned thread, whether I felt like it or not, I might feel the urgent need to scream and throw my food around from time to time.
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
I post in very few areas because in most of them I feel like a squeaking mouse in the battery of the big guns.
I know I'm a squeaking mouse among the big guns - but I squeak nonetheless! Sometimes this wee mouse give the elephants pause for thought - it's rare, but never mind.
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Firenze:
there are whole Boards and topics on the Ship were I feel outer than a distant asteroid in orbit round Pluto.
Technically, I'm not sure there are asteroids in orbit around Pluto. The status of Pluto is, of course, debated, it's not even allowed in the "in club" of planets - technically a "Dwarf Planet", I prefer the designation "Mickey Mouse Planet" (from a joke by Robin Williams, RIP). There are 5 satellites orbiting Pluto - including Styx, appropriately enough. The whole lot fall under the category of Kuiper Belt objects.
So, in summary, for technical accuracy you should have said "I feel outer than a distant Kuiper Belt object beyond the orbit of Pluto".
Posted by Ariel (# 58) on
:
It can be difficult to feel that you're part of the Ship community. For me this stems mainly from a perception that many of the posters on the boards seem to be related to other posters in some way, or know each other well in real life already. Or have lots in common that you don't and make friends naturally because, for example, both parties are Anglican/left wing/have small children of the same age/live nearby.
It's always difficult to come into an established community where people know each other and not feel that you're an outsider - especially when family bonds are involved - but that's just life.
Posted by Firenze (# 619) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Alan Cresswell:
So, in summary, for technical accuracy you should have said "I feel outer than a distant Kuiper Belt object beyond the orbit of Pluto".
Thank you, Alan. I shall have that printed up as a T-shirt for the next meeting of PWICTTCO (People Who Ill-advisedly Compare Themselves To Celestial Objects).
Posted by Alan Cresswell (# 31) on
:
You'll be the star of the meeting
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Ariel:
It's always difficult to come into an established community where people know each other and not feel that you're an outsider - especially when family bonds are involved - but that's just life.
It's much like joining a new church, especially if you're single.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Kelly Alves:
Although for the most part I agree with what you say, AR,
Huh? I didn't make any statement that could be agreed with or not. I observed that my own experience is different from Bob Two Owl's, despite having almost equal and lengthy time on the Ship, and wondered what contributes to us having such different experiences.
In particular, I deliberately did not say that there is or isn't an in-crowd.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
? Also, because I made it clear that I knew you didn't say that. What you said fit my perception of my own experience on the Ship-- I am also sorry if the word " agree" wasn't suitable.
Not sorry for the rest, as it was an observation if my own which I made clear wasn't aimed at anyone.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
Ok, thanks, now I understand what you meant by "agree". Thanks for explaining.
I wasn't asking you to feel sorry for or retract any of what you posted after the opening sentence; I just didn't understand the opening sentence.
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
"Fitting in" is a nebulous quality.
I've been here a long damn time, and there are vast sections of The Ship where I fit in about as well as a mustelid in a cat show. Despite this, I like the sense of being able to discuss ideas with an array philosophical and sociological participants. At least theoretically - my discussion time has been consumed by raising kids lately, so I only really have time to engage in meta-topics (pursuant to administration).
Regardless, my point is that many of us are unlikely fits in this collective puzzle, but the trick is focus on the ways in which we engage and not get too fussed about the ways in which we don't.
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
True.
i went through a phase where it felt like the only time anyone directed a comment at me was when they had a chance to correct me, laugh at me, or scold me. The truth was that I was just deciding that the few people who pretty consistantly did this had opinions that were more valuable than the many who didn't. That would be my own fault, would't it?
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
That is hilariously wrong Kelly, and you should know better.
Yeah, I know, how am I just so funny?
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
yeah, yeah, yeah...
Posted by Late Paul (# 37) on
:
Even though I once met my best friend on the Ship I've long since decided that looking for "community" (whatever the hell that is) on a bulletin board is a recipe for disappointment.
But then that may just be me. I've been trying for a year to break into friendship circles in my local church with little success.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
The problem on the ship is nobody thinks they are in the "in" group. So everyone is trying to join a fictional group.
Most people probably have some views on who is "in", but if you asked the "in"-individuals if they were "in" they would deny it completely and suggest other names.
Jengie
[ 27. September 2014, 18:59: Message edited by: Jengie Jon ]
Posted by Kelly Alves (# 2522) on
:
You might be onto something, Jengie. As Anne Lamott says, we are a weird species.
I smile because I was remembering when someone told me that, as an Admin, I automatically qualified as In. They said this about 2 hours after I had suggested something to the H/A's and been completely shot down in glorious technicolor flames. I was still grouchy about it, and felt like saying " yeah, tell them I'm in."
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
DO not feel sadness, Kelly; I do not even rate the in-crowd amongst my own internal voices, so...
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
I think more useful than using a term like in-crowd which no-one thinks they're in, is to say what are behaviors that someone who sees in what they're calling an in-crowd, see in that group? And what is wanted to be different? That those behaviors don't happen? That the person who sees this as an in-crowd gets included? Something else?
For example, a behavior might be "some people's posts get answered a lot, but my posts don't, and I want them to be." Or a behavior might be "there's a group of people who make jokes and laugh at (with) each other's jokes, but the jokes don't make sense and aren't funny to me, and I wish they'd stop." Or a myriad other possibilities.
Even though no-one in the perceived in-crowd think they're in an in-crowd, or feel like they're "in", that doesn't make it a fictitious group. There still might be a group of people with common ties that some people feel hard to make sense of or to participate in in the way they'd like.
Posted by PeteC (# 10422) on
:
Briefly, back when I was hosting All Saints I felt part of a community. To assist that feeling, over the years I met quite a few people. Some of those people are now my friends and I interact separately with them on other social media.
But the ship as a community? Nah, I gave up on that idea a long time ago. Some threads are informative, fun, or useful (or all three). I participate in those but ignore all the rest. Doing this has freed up hours of my time to do other things, such as reading. Sleeping, too.
Posted by Jengie Jon (# 273) on
:
Well in that case everyone has a different set of behavioural markers and the subset of members of Ship of Fools who satisfy everyone's behavioural markers is zero.
Remember Ken won shipmate of the year award while banned.
Jengie
[ 27. September 2014, 20:33: Message edited by: Jengie Jon ]
Posted by QLib (# 43) on
:
But if you're looking at behaviours, you're only looking at one part of the story - the other part is people's perceptions.
We've recently had quite a to-do in our meeting, which included accusations of an "in-crowd". Now, it's true that someone, who has since left, was running a private discussion group on the side, which was unhelpful, and this same person tended to use language such as "inner circle". But many people in this group weren't aware that there was an issue, and didn't see themselves as different from others. Of those long-standing members who weren't in the group, some felt excluded and others (like me) didn't give a toss (except when they realised others were hurt by it).
We had a series of special meetings to discuss it all. At the first one, some people said they felt excluded, but not all of them were actually aware of the private discussion group. People who'd chosen never to attend a single business meeting (held monthly and listed in the newsletter) said things like: "I don't know how decisions are made", or "I don't know how people get chosen for jobs". One person said: "I don't even know who my Overseer* is". Her Overseer went up to her afterwards and reminded her that she'd phoned her only the week before to tell her about the meeting. Well, at least she got an apology.
People who, over the years, have declined any attempt to give them a 'job' in the meeting announced that they didn't really feel part of things and disliked the fact that a small group of people (i.e. the ones who say "yes" when asked to do a job) "seem to run everything." Go figure.
*Not as scary as it sounds. No whips are involved.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
[cross-posted]
Everyone may well have a different set of markers, but for each individual person who posts feeling out of the in-crowd, talking about what behaviors are meant and what the person would like to be different could lead to a more fruitful discussion than the usual "there's an in-crowd" "no there isn't" way these things go.
[ 27. September 2014, 20:51: Message edited by: Autenrieth Road ]
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
QLib, what you describe sounds like what I mean by fruitful discussion. Your meeting got beyond the label "in-crowd" to find out that people felt excluded and didn't like it, and what they felt excluded about. It may be that all the same people will continue ignoring business meetings, forgetting that they've been personally asked to a business meeting, and saying "no" to any opportunities to get involved, and not only that but will keep on feeling excluded, but at least the rest of you now can see what the complaint is, what contributes to the complaint, and in an informed way decide if there's anything you want to change or not.
What you say about perceptions relates back to what I originally said to Bob Two-Owls: I wonder why he and I, both nine year veterans of the Ship, have such different experiences and/or perceptions and/or reactions to the Ship? But without knowing much about what he means by "in-group", I have little traction for coming to any answer to that question.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Nenya:
I suspect, for example, that posters such as orfeo and mousethief have regular "WTF?" moments at something like the decluttering thread, if they go near it at all. *Pauses to cherish mental image of both those posters armed with rubber gloves and feather dusters*
...I did know we have a decluttering thread, but I've never read it. I'm terrified that if I look in it I'll start feeling bad about myself.
Posted by Stercus Tauri (# 16668) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
QLib, what you describe sounds like what I mean by fruitful discussion. Your meeting got beyond the label "in-crowd" to find out that people felt excluded and didn't like it, and what they felt excluded about. It may be that all the same people will continue ignoring business meetings, forgetting that they've been personally asked to a business meeting, and saying "no" to any opportunities to get involved, and not only that but will keep on feeling excluded, but at least the rest of you now can see what the complaint is, what contributes to the complaint, and in an informed way decide if there's anything you want to change or not.
What you say about perceptions relates back to what I originally said to Bob Two-Owls: I wonder why he and I, both nine year veterans of the Ship, have such different experiences and/or perceptions and/or reactions to the Ship? But without knowing much about what he means by "in-group", I have little traction for coming to any answer to that question.
I used to work with a man who had been a flyer in the Canadian Navy, who claimed that a good way get noticed, and thus become one of the "in crowd", was to get court martialled - once. More than that was unhealthy. Perhaps, if you want to join the "in crowd" on the Ship, a Hell call will do the trick. For myself, being an occasional visitor and spectator works well enough.
Posted by deano (# 12063) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Stercus Tauri:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
QLib, what you describe sounds like what I mean by fruitful discussion. Your meeting got beyond the label "in-crowd" to find out that people felt excluded and didn't like it, and what they felt excluded about. It may be that all the same people will continue ignoring business meetings, forgetting that they've been personally asked to a business meeting, and saying "no" to any opportunities to get involved, and not only that but will keep on feeling excluded, but at least the rest of you now can see what the complaint is, what contributes to the complaint, and in an informed way decide if there's anything you want to change or not.
What you say about perceptions relates back to what I originally said to Bob Two-Owls: I wonder why he and I, both nine year veterans of the Ship, have such different experiences and/or perceptions and/or reactions to the Ship? But without knowing much about what he means by "in-group", I have little traction for coming to any answer to that question.
I used to work with a man who had been a flyer in the Canadian Navy, who claimed that a good way get noticed, and thus become one of the "in crowd", was to get court martialled - once. More than that was unhealthy. Perhaps, if you want to join the "in crowd" on the Ship, a Hell call will do the trick. For myself, being an occasional visitor and spectator works well enough.
No... No... Er... No. That doesn't work. Not so much.
Although it is nice when you find shipmates saying "much as it pains me to say it, I do agree with deano in this case". Makes me feel like I'm at the cool kids table.
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Stercus Tauri:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
QLib, what you describe sounds like what I mean by fruitful discussion. Your meeting got beyond the label "in-crowd" to find out that people felt excluded and didn't like it, and what they felt excluded about. It may be that all the same people will continue ignoring business meetings, forgetting that they've been personally asked to a business meeting, and saying "no" to any opportunities to get involved, and not only that but will keep on feeling excluded, but at least the rest of you now can see what the complaint is, what contributes to the complaint, and in an informed way decide if there's anything you want to change or not.
What you say about perceptions relates back to what I originally said to Bob Two-Owls: I wonder why he and I, both nine year veterans of the Ship, have such different experiences and/or perceptions and/or reactions to the Ship? But without knowing much about what he means by "in-group", I have little traction for coming to any answer to that question.
I used to work with a man who had been a flyer in the Canadian Navy, who claimed that a good way get noticed, and thus become one of the "in crowd", was to get court martialled - once. More than that was unhealthy. Perhaps, if you want to join the "in crowd" on the Ship, a Hell call will do the trick. For myself, being an occasional visitor and spectator works well enough.
Oh deary me no. Being part of the in-crowd is like being a lady or intelligent, if one has to tell people about it then one isn't!!!!! Of course if you try too hard you're obviously just not "in-crowd material" either. A little obsequiousness to the H&As is welcome of course but don't take it too far.
Best to affect a certain je nais se quoi, an incrowd, whatever could you be on about dear chap? Oh you feel excluded, good heavens! I wonder what's wrong with you 'cos I don't .
Oh and Deano, surely you're so out you must be almost in, keep up the unrest !
Evangeline, who wouldn't want to be a part of any incrowd that would accept her
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
You know what makes me feel out of the in crowd? That damn thread in All Saints called, "Your inbox is full." What the heck? Some people have sixty PM's and those are just the ones they saved?! In all these years, I think I've had ten PM's and half of them were Hell calls.
I feel like I'm well part of the community, though. The cranky, bitter old cat lady, but part of the community nevertheless. Everyone is! Even if you're a shy one who just pops out from time to time in Heaven to contribute to a 'what's your favorite color,' thread, we see you and we might be watching for more.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
Well said, Twilight. it takes all of us to be community. If we were to be as selective as some people think we are, we become a clique. I don't want clique, I want community. including the crazies and a shy ones and the crackpots and the blowhards and the screamers (*takes a bow*) and the cat ladies.
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
...I want community. including the crazies and a shy ones and the crackpots and the blowhards and the screamers (*takes a bow*) and the cat ladies.
It's late, 01:18, and I got in from w*rk about 20 minutes ago. I was skimming this thread dopily as I ate my dinner and read "blowjobs" instead of "blowhards". My picture of Comet's vision of community was momentarily, er, surprising.
Posted by Pigwidgeon (# 10192) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
You know what makes me feel out of the in crowd? That damn thread in All Saints called, "Your inbox is full." What the heck? Some people have sixty PM's and those are just the ones they saved?! In all these years, I think I've had ten PM's and half of them were Hell calls.
No Hell calls in the few I've received, but two PM senders have been banned, and one has died.
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
My picture of Comet's vision of community was momentarily, er, surprising.
Well, she did say she is a screamer, so perhaps not far off anyway.
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Pigwidgeon:
quote:
Originally posted by Twilight:
You know what makes me feel out of the in crowd? That damn thread in All Saints called, "Your inbox is full." What the heck? Some people have sixty PM's and those are just the ones they saved?! In all these years, I think I've had ten PM's and half of them were Hell calls.
No Hell calls in the few I've received, but two PM senders have been banned, and one has died.
The limit is on the total number of messages. Outgoing messages count too, so send a lot of PMs then sit back and wait. Eventually someone will want to reply and your name will appear in lights.
If you really want it too.
Posted by Twilight (# 2832) on
:
Ooooh, Sioni, what an idea.
And they thought H&A Day was annoying.
Posted by comet (# 10353) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
My picture of Comet's vision of community was momentarily, er, surprising.
Well, she did say she is a screamer, so perhaps not far off anyway.
dirty, dirty people. naughty. stand in the corner and think about what you've done.
would you prefer, "thrower of temper tantrums"?
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
This thread has now lasted 2 weeks.
It's instructive to notice how much of that time actually involved H&A Day being in force.
[ 01. October 2014, 23:12: Message edited by: orfeo ]
Posted by lilBuddha (# 14333) on
:
Yeah.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
Yeah.
I recall. There was a reason I wasn't taking up the bet.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
I'm still trying to figure out various people's definitions of in-crowd, for those who think there is one. I might define in-crowd differently, but that doesn't really matter. Call it "[annoying] Group X as perceived by poster Y [who keep me from getting what I want out of the Ship]" if that helps. (I add the bracketed parts because generally the subject of in-crowd seems to come up in that context, rather than simply neutrally to say, "A, B, and C are in the in-crowd, but I don't mind at all.")
From Evangeline's latest post, I'm wondering if for her the definition is "the Hosts and Admins who get to dictate what happens on the Ship, plus anyone who says they agree with the Hosts and Admins." And it seems to me that one reason it's a problem to some posters that there's such a group is that sometimes they dictate things that not all Shipmates like.
But correct me if I've read this wrong, Evangeline. And I don't know if this is anyone else's definition of in-crowd.
Sometimes I think some posters' definition of in-crowd is "there's a group of posters who respond to each others posts and laughs at each others jokes and post a lot, and I barely get responded to at all."
Trying to think what other kinds of definitions of in-crowd I deduce from posts about in-crowds...
Posted by luvanddaisies (# 5761) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by comet:
quote:
Originally posted by lilBuddha:
quote:
Originally posted by luvanddaisies:
My picture of Comet's vision of community was momentarily, er, surprising.
Well, she did say she is a screamer, so perhaps not far off anyway.
dirty, dirty people. naughty. stand in the corner and think about what you've done.
<shuffles shamefacedly to corner>
(but might have chuckled once more to myself )
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by orfeo:
I did know we have a decluttering thread, but I've never read it. I'm terrified that if I look in it I'll start feeling bad about myself.
hmmmm,
It's worse than that, much much worse!
You will find yourself ... wait for it ...
... it's very hard to say the word in polite company ...
shhhhhhhhhhhhhh
....
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
...
d**lut******!
...
ahhhhgggghhhhggh
...
This is a painful activity, only to be taken on by the hardiest of souls and not to be taken lightly at all.
Best to keep well away
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
I'm still trying to figure out various people's definitions of in-crowd, for those who think there is one. I might define in-crowd differently, but that doesn't really matter. Call it "[annoying] Group X as perceived by poster Y [who keep me from getting what I want out of the Ship]" if that helps. (I add the bracketed parts because generally the subject of in-crowd seems to come up in that context, rather than simply neutrally to say, "A, B, and C are in the in-crowd, but I don't mind at all.")
From Evangeline's latest post, I'm wondering if for her the definition is "the Hosts and Admins who get to dictate what happens on the Ship, plus anyone who says they agree with the Hosts and Admins." And it seems to me that one reason it's a problem to some posters that there's such a group is that sometimes they dictate things that not all Shipmates like.
But correct me if I've read this wrong, Evangeline. And I don't know if this is anyone else's definition of in-crowd.
Sometimes I think some posters' definition of in-crowd is "there's a group of posters who respond to each others posts and laughs at each others jokes and post a lot, and I barely get responded to at all."
Trying to think what other kinds of definitions of in-crowd I deduce from posts about in-crowds...
You are wrong Autenrieth, your description bears no resemblance to my understanding of an in-crowd and I'm struggling to see how you construed that idea from my post.
I only commented (in a tongue-in-cheek manner just in case you're tempted to take it too seriously) on the in-crowd issue in my last post, and it was in response to the post I quoted. Prior posts of mine on this thread were entirely about H&A day so I don't know if you've conflated all my posts on this thread and that's what's causing confusion or you're just reading something that isn't there.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
Can you set me straight on your definition of an in-crowd?
Posted by Sioni Sais (# 5713) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
Can you set me straight on your definition of an in-crowd?
Wouldn't you have to be a member of an in-crowd to understand the definition?
Posted by Thyme (# 12360) on
:
It's like being friends with Royalty. Those who are don't talk about it. So you never really know. Best to grovel to everyone, just to be on the safe side imo.
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Sioni Sais:
quote:
Originally posted by Autenrieth Road:
Can you set me straight on your definition of an in-crowd?
Wouldn't you have to be a member of an in-crowd to understand the definition?
That's right and there's no such thing on the ship, old chap. Have no idea of what you're talking about. None at all.
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
I take it that's a "no" to my question, Evangeline.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
Styx is supposed to be about raising issues, for the purpose of serious, straightforward discussion.
It is not supposed to be for engaging in bouts of sparring sarcasm.
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
Auntiehth I really think you are taking my post too seriously. I'm not that interested in examining the semantics, dynamics or whatever else to nail down a scientific meaning of "incrowd" or in seriously discussing whether such a thing exists on Ship of FOols and how it manifests itself or the implications thereof, seriously that's just making a discussion forum disappear up its own arse hole.
If it puts your mind at rest (given you've asked me twice) to know how I, personally happen to define in-crowd then I'd refer you to that vague, unreliable resource urban dictionary who have a few defns. When I use the expression "in-crowd" it refers to some combination of the following, in different circumstances one definition might predominate over the other.....
quote:
A group of people who know the specifics or details about certain things such as games, programs, chatboxes and forums.
with a dash of
quote:
Popular kids
and
quote:
people who hang out with the popular people.
Lastly, I reiterate that my thoughts on h&A day are not connected to "in-crowd" notions, to me the conversation had moved on from H&A day to how to join the "in-crowd", which is a laughable concept as most others seem to realise.
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
Sorry Orfeo, x-posted with my last post and I agree with you, although I'd plead mine was satire, not sarcasm.
[ 02. October 2014, 23:17: Message edited by: Evangeline ]
Posted by Autenrieth Road (# 10509) on
:
Thank you, Evangeline.
Posted by Boogie (# 13538) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Thyme:
It's like being friends with Royalty. Those who are don't talk about it. So you never really know.
Except the present Prime Minister, of course. Who happily discusses his meetings with the Queen.
I wonder if RooK purrs?
Posted by Evangeline (# 7002) on
:
Ah but that's the point Boogie, the current PM is not a friend of Royalty, he only gets to see her 'cos he's the PM, big difference.
Posted by orfeo (# 13878) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
I wonder if RooK purrs?
Not that I've heard. I do, though.
However, until the Ship software is upgraded to include audio chat this information is unlikely to be useful.
Posted by RooK (# 1852) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Boogie:
I wonder if RooK purrs?
Not really, but I have been known to do a disturbing impression of the Predator after sneaking up on the unsuspecting.
And my laugh has been compared to Jabba.
Posted by Robert Armin (# 182) on
:
I didn't particularly enjoy H&A Day, but this thread has given me days of amusement. Please keep them coming if they produce such windfalls.
© Ship of Fools 2016
UBB.classicTM
6.5.0