homepage
  roll on christmas  
click here to find out more about ship of fools click here to sign up for the ship of fools newsletter click here to support ship of fools
community the mystery worshipper gadgets for god caption competition foolishness features ship stuff
discussion boards live chat cafe avatars frequently-asked questions the ten commandments gallery private boards register for the boards
 
Ship of Fools


Post new thread  Post a reply
My profile login | Register | Directory | Search | FAQs | Board home
   - Printer-friendly view Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
» Ship of Fools   » Community discussion   » Purgatory   » Jolly Jape or Deep Offence?

 - Email this page to a friend or enemy.    
Source: (consider it) Thread: Jolly Jape or Deep Offence?
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
If this (*) is a correct record of the event, is any action required?


(*) https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/duke-of-edinburgh-‘asked-if-bearded-man-was-terrorist-while-joking-with-crowds’/ar-BBHz Q2H?li=AAmiR2Z&ocid=spartanntp

Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
Cathscats
Shipmate
# 17827

 - Posted      Profile for Cathscats   Email Cathscats   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I would think the best thing to do is not report it (too late, I know). After all this old man saying silly things is not new.

--------------------
"...damp hands and theological doubts - the two always seem to go together..." (O. Douglas, "The Setons")

Posts: 161 | From: Central Highlands | Registered: Sep 2013  |  IP: Logged
Schroedinger's cat

Ship's cool cat
# 64

 - Posted      Profile for Schroedinger's cat   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
"Reported by the Sun and the Mail" - so not any reputable news outlets then.

If he said it, it was a joke in poor taste. If he had believed there was a terrorists, he would have done something rather more significant, I think. I don't think it is really offensive, just tasteless.

I am of the view that it is probably made up. Putting offensive jokes into his mouth is an easy trick.

--------------------
Blog
Music for your enjoyment
Lord may all my hard times be healing times
take out this broken heart and renew my mind.

Posts: 18744 | From: At the bottom of a deep dark well. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Ian Climacus

Liturgical Slattern
# 944

 - Posted      Profile for Ian Climacus     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
What action would be required, if it were true? He's hardly likely to go to a social acceptability class.

He does like a(n ill-considered) joke it seems. He won't be around long. Won't change. I'm not sure why we need to hear about these.

[ 01. January 2018, 08:22: Message edited by: Ian Climacus ]

Posts: 7733 | From: On the border | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bishops Finger
Shipmate
# 5430

 - Posted      Profile for Bishops Finger   Email Bishops Finger   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Perhaps he was referring to this chap?

[Paranoid]

IJ

--------------------
Our words are giants when they do us an injury, and dwarfs when they do us a service. (Wilkie Collins)

Posts: 9727 | From: Behind The Wheel Again! | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Russ
Old salt
# 120

 - Posted      Profile for Russ   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
It seems that a joke was intended.

Humour depends on tone of voice and timing that don't come across in newspaper reports.

It may or may not have been funny to those who were there and heard it first hand. The fact that it doesn't seem funny to us who weren't there doesn't mean that action is required.

Hope I'm able to crack a joke when I get to that age.

--------------------
Wish everyone well; the enemy is not people, the enemy is wrong ideas

Posts: 3104 | From: rural Ireland | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Russ:
It seems that a joke was intended.

Humour depends on tone of voice and timing that don't come across in newspaper reports.

It may or may not have been funny to those who were there and heard it first hand. The fact that it doesn't seem funny to us who weren't there doesn't mean that action is required.

Hope I'm able to crack a joke when I get to that age.

So racism is ok if it is trying to be funny and is perpetrated by the husband of a reigning monarch??
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
"Reported by the Sun and the Mail" - so not any reputable news outlets then.

If he said it, it was a joke in poor taste. If he had believed there was a terrorists, he would have done something rather more significant, I think. I don't think it is really offensive, just tasteless.

I am of the view that it is probably made up. Putting offensive jokes into his mouth is an easy trick.


Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Schroedinger's cat:
"Reported by the Sun and the Mail" - so not any reputable news outlets then.

If he said it, it was a joke in poor taste. If he had believed there was a terrorists, he would have done something rather more significant, I think. I don't think it is really offensive, just tasteless.

I am of the view that it is probably made up. Putting offensive jokes into his mouth is an easy trick.

If he did say it and nothing is done, then does this open the door again to "I was only joking" types of excuses?
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
Bishops Finger
Shipmate
# 5430

 - Posted      Profile for Bishops Finger   Email Bishops Finger   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
No, racism is not OK, even if said 'jokingly' (and who is to say whether it is meant that way, or not?), and by a prominent public personage.

Philip's age, sadly, means that he comes from a generally racist and bigoted generation, which will soon be gone, but he's also old enough to Know Better.

The problem here seems to be a lack of concrete evidence as to what was said, to whom, and in what manner. The Tits and the Heil are hardly reliable sources of Real News....

IJ

--------------------
Our words are giants when they do us an injury, and dwarfs when they do us a service. (Wilkie Collins)

Posts: 9727 | From: Behind The Wheel Again! | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
SvitlanaV2
Shipmate
# 16967

 - Posted      Profile for SvitlanaV2   Email SvitlanaV2   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
There's no single race that's shackled to terrorism, so racism doesn't seem to be the issue. (But we all know Prince Philip probably is a bit racist, though. That's not news!)

If anything, it's more like Islamophobia. Fortunately, though, the guy in question doesn't seem to be a Muslim, and wasn't offended by the bad joke.

Posts: 6542 | From: UK | Registered: Feb 2012  |  IP: Logged
Rossweisse

High Church Valkyrie
# 2349

 - Posted      Profile for Rossweisse     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
He's on my list of Public Figures Who Should Just Shut Up. (I probably needn't say who heads that list.)

--------------------
I'm not dead yet.

Posts: 14914 | From: Valhalla | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
Schroedinger's cat

Ship's cool cat
# 64

 - Posted      Profile for Schroedinger's cat   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
No, it is not acceptable, whoever it is done by. I was trying to point out that it may have been said as a joke. It is a bad joke, and not acceptable.

I don't think it was intended as offence. That is important, actually. There are such a lot of racist and sexist and ablist comments made by people who mean them, and who act on them. That is far worse.

--------------------
Blog
Music for your enjoyment
Lord may all my hard times be healing times
take out this broken heart and renew my mind.

Posts: 18744 | From: At the bottom of a deep dark well. | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Augustine the Aleut
Shipmate
# 1472

 - Posted      Profile for Augustine the Aleut     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
According to the Guardian, the bearded man thought that it was funny.
Posts: 6211 | From: Ottawa, Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Arethosemyfeet
Shipmate
# 17047

 - Posted      Profile for Arethosemyfeet   Email Arethosemyfeet   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
According to the Guardian, the bearded man thought that it was funny.

That's because he wasn't the target of the joke.
Posts: 2888 | From: Hebrides | Registered: Apr 2012  |  IP: Logged
Augustine the Aleut
Shipmate
# 1472

 - Posted      Profile for Augustine the Aleut     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Arethosemyfeet:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
According to the Guardian, the bearded man thought that it was funny.

That's because he wasn't the target of the joke.
I'm not so sure.

As a bearded person myself, I have twice been at the receiving end of terrorist jokes. In once case, I saw it as weak attempt at humorous badinage, and returned it with an equally weak smile. In the other, it was a passive aggressive response to the presence of someone from outside that social circle. In my experience, these things tend to come from people of a certain generation. In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

Posts: 6211 | From: Ottawa, Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Stetson
Shipmate
# 9597

 - Posted      Profile for Stetson     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Arethosemyfeet:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
According to the Guardian, the bearded man thought that it was funny.

That's because he wasn't the target of the joke.
Yes. If I see a guy with a big nose, and say, "Hey, you must be a bloodsucking banker!", it doesn't really matter if the guy himself is cool with the joke. Because the joke depends on "Big nose = Jewish = bloodsucking banker", which is offenisive to Jews, even if the guy I'm talking to isn't Jewish.

[ 02. January 2018, 13:49: Message edited by: Stetson ]

Posts: 6476 | From: back and forth between bible belts | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
Augustine the Aleut
Shipmate
# 1472

 - Posted      Profile for Augustine the Aleut     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
I save that response for the 18-30 age range. While old enough to know better, they are more likely to be able to change. 90+ and moderately functioning is a triumph, and WWII veterans get a fair bit of flexibility with me. YKMV.
Posts: 6211 | From: Ottawa, Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
balaam

Making an ass of myself
# 4543

 - Posted      Profile for balaam   Author's homepage   Email balaam   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
No, as that generation has been brought up for the first 50 years of their life being told it is OK.

Old dogs, new tricks.

--------------------
Fearfully and wonderfully mad
Love the dinner, hate the din.
ن
blog

Posts: 8919 | From: Somewhere else | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Stetson
Shipmate
# 9597

 - Posted      Profile for Stetson     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
I save that response for the 18-30 age range. While old enough to know better, they are more likely to be able to change. 90+ and moderately functioning is a triumph, and WWII veterans get a fair bit of flexibility with me. YKMV.
So, how much flexibility would you give this WWII veteran for some of his statements? Born earlier than the prince, so with even more of an excuse not to know any better.
Posts: 6476 | From: back and forth between bible belts | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by balaam:
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
No, as that generation has been brought up for the first 50 years of their life being told it is OK. Old dogs, new tricks.
That's always assuming they don't know better -- the 50 year thing can serve as a convenient smokescreen IME
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stetson:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
I save that response for the 18-30 age range. While old enough to know better, they are more likely to be able to change. 90+ and moderately functioning is a triumph, and WWII veterans get a fair bit of flexibility with me. YKMV.
So, how much flexibility would you give this WWII veteran for some of his statements? Born earlier than the prince, so with even more of an excuse not to know any better.
None - unless he's proven not to be of sound mind. Racism, sexism, ageism, mindless so called banter are wrong irrespective of speaker, context or intent.
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
Augustine the Aleut
Shipmate
# 1472

 - Posted      Profile for Augustine the Aleut     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stetson:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
I save that response for the 18-30 age range. While old enough to know better, they are more likely to be able to change. 90+ and moderately functioning is a triumph, and WWII veterans get a fair bit of flexibility with me. YKMV.
So, how much flexibility would you give this WWII veteran for some of his statements? Born earlier than the prince, so with even more of an excuse not to know any better.
I think I used the phrase "benefit of the doubt." With Governor Wallace, there was no doubt.
Posts: 6211 | From: Ottawa, Canada | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Russ
Old salt
# 120

 - Posted      Profile for Russ   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
So racism is ok if it is trying to be funny and is perpetrated by the husband of a reigning monarch??

Hate to be the one to break it to you, but men with beards aren't actually a different race...

HRH lost an uncle to terrorism. If he can't joke about it, who can ?

--------------------
Wish everyone well; the enemy is not people, the enemy is wrong ideas

Posts: 3104 | From: rural Ireland | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
One is reminded me of the "Muslims aren't a race so it's OK to hate them" defence. Beards, Islam, they're just signifiers of "you are other, you are lesser, you are threat, you are not a proper person like me"

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17822 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Gee D
Shipmate
# 13815

 - Posted      Profile for Gee D     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I took it differently, a go at those ready to see a nest of terrorists in every mosque as once there were Reds under the bed. Here's a man of Arabic origin with a beard, fits the stereotype of a terrorist, and the jibe is not at the man but the stereotyping.

--------------------
Not every Anglican in Sydney is Sydney Anglican

Posts: 6890 | From: Warrawee NSW Australia | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged
Russ
Old salt
# 120

 - Posted      Profile for Russ   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
One is reminded me of the "Muslims aren't a race so it's OK to hate them" defence.

Hating people is not OK. Hating Islam for what it does to people seems perfectly reasonable.

But the word "racism" specifically refers to race, and is thus inapplicable here.

quote:

Beards, Islam, they're just signifiers of "you are other, you are lesser, you are threat, you are not a proper person like me"

Having noted the difficulty in not having reliable witness of what was said or the tone of voice in which it was said, it's not clear that HRH's joke was putting anyone down as not a proper person. Except perhaps terrorists, who deserve to be put down...

--------------------
Wish everyone well; the enemy is not people, the enemy is wrong ideas

Posts: 3104 | From: rural Ireland | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Russ:
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
So racism is ok if it is trying to be funny and is perpetrated by the husband of a reigning monarch??

Hate to be the one to break it to you, but men with beards aren't actually a different race...

HRH lost an uncle to terrorism. If he can't joke about it, who can ?

No one can. It's not a laugh.

It's nothing to do with beards but with someone's feeble attempt at a joke which actually correlates beards with terrorism.

Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Russ:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
One is reminded me of the "Muslims aren't a race so it's OK to hate them" defence.

Hating people is not OK. Hating Islam for what it does to people seems perfectly reasonable.

But the word "racism" specifically refers to race, and is thus inapplicable here.

quote:

Beards, Islam, they're just signifiers of "you are other, you are lesser, you are threat, you are not a proper person like me"

Having noted the difficulty in not having reliable witness of what was said or the tone of voice in which it was said, it's not clear that HRH's joke was putting anyone down as not a proper person. Except perhaps terrorists, who deserve to be put down...

The tone is totally immaterial. It's the content which would have every police force in the UK arresting the perpetrator if he wasn't the Queen's husband.

In any event, even if we don't know precisely the tone. we are aware of numerous issues from the past.

Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
RdrEmCofE
Shipmate
# 17511

 - Posted      Profile for RdrEmCofE   Author's homepage   Email RdrEmCofE   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
I am of the view that it is probably made up. Putting offensive jokes into his mouth is an easy trick.
PROBABLY? The Sun and Daily Mail have proved by their other fascist style ult/right headlines recently that they are propaganda rags of the first order. If anyone should be prosecuted it is the editors of these obscene publications.

--------------------
Love covers many sins. 1 Pet.4:8. God was in Christ, reconciling the world to himself, not holding their sins against them; 2 Cor.5:19

Posts: 102 | From: Southampton | Registered: Jan 2013  |  IP: Logged
Stetson
Shipmate
# 9597

 - Posted      Profile for Stetson     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RdrEmCofE:
quote:
I am of the view that it is probably made up. Putting offensive jokes into his mouth is an easy trick.
PROBABLY? The Sun and Daily Mail have proved by their other fascist style ult/right headlines recently that they are propaganda rags of the first order. If anyone should be prosecuted it is the editors of these obscene publications.
Wouldn't the typical Sun/Mail schtick not be to make up a story about someone being racist, but to make up(or at least ridiculously exaggerate) a story about someone over-reacting to racism?

"Students in schools run by Labour-councils are being given extra credit for burning effigies of Prince Philip as protest against his light-hearted joke about beards." That sort of thing.

--------------------
I have the power...Lucifer is lord!

Posts: 6476 | From: back and forth between bible belts | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
Stetson
Shipmate
# 9597

 - Posted      Profile for Stetson     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Exclamation Mark wrote:

quote:
The tone is totally immaterial. It's the content which would have every police force in the UK arresting the perpetrator if he wasn't the Queen's husband.
Yes. As in...

"Do you realise your horse is gay?"

The kid didn't even have to say anything negative about homosexuals to get himself arrested there.

--------------------
I have the power...Lucifer is lord!

Posts: 6476 | From: back and forth between bible belts | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
decampagne
Shipmate
# 17012

 - Posted      Profile for decampagne   Email decampagne   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Whatever it may be, it's clearly not a police matter. I'd say it was dry observational wit. Anyone who doesn't like it is welcome to sulk.
Posts: 86 | From: Oxfordshire | Registered: Mar 2012  |  IP: Logged
Gee D
Shipmate
# 13815

 - Posted      Profile for Gee D     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Stetson:
Exclamation Mark wrote:

quote:
The tone is totally immaterial. It's the content which would have every police force in the UK arresting the perpetrator if he wasn't the Queen's husband.
Yes. As in...

"Do you realise your horse is gay?"

The kid didn't even have to say anything negative about homosexuals to get himself arrested there.

Arrested for simply making either of those comments? You'd have to be pretty sensitive to see a breach of the peace in either of them.

--------------------
Not every Anglican in Sydney is Sydney Anglican

Posts: 6890 | From: Warrawee NSW Australia | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged
Arethosemyfeet
Shipmate
# 17047

 - Posted      Profile for Arethosemyfeet   Email Arethosemyfeet   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I rather think the police horse incident has little to do with the homophobia or otherwise of the remarks and a lot to do with a policeman trying to pin something on an irritatingly drunk student. It's not exactly uncommon for the police to decide something's a crime and then try and work out which crime later if the perpetrator pisses them off enough.
Posts: 2888 | From: Hebrides | Registered: Apr 2012  |  IP: Logged
Bishops Finger
Shipmate
# 5430

 - Posted      Profile for Bishops Finger   Email Bishops Finger   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
With all due respect, it's not as though Oxford hasn't had badly-behaved students even further back in time (the horse incident seems to have occurred in 2006)...

IJ

--------------------
Our words are giants when they do us an injury, and dwarfs when they do us a service. (Wilkie Collins)

Posts: 9727 | From: Behind The Wheel Again! | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged
Doublethink.
Ship's Foolwise Unperson
# 1984

 - Posted      Profile for Doublethink.   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by Augustine the Aleut:
In the case of a 90+ veteran, I would give them the benefit of the doubt.

So you cut more slack on the basis of age? Shouldn't they be old enough to know better?
Age related brain changes to the frontal lobe mean that the very elderly start to lose the inbitary control they originally gained in their teens. So I do think there is an extent to which great age is a mitigating factor.

--------------------
All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell

Posts: 19205 | From: Erehwon | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Enoch
Shipmate
# 14322

 - Posted      Profile for Enoch   Email Enoch   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Arethosemyfeet:
I rather think the police horse incident has little to do with the homophobia or otherwise of the remarks and a lot to do with a policeman trying to pin something on an irritatingly drunk student. It's not exactly uncommon for the police to decide something's a crime and then try and work out which crime later if the perpetrator pisses them off enough.

It's also a characteristic failing of organisations that place a high value on loyalty to the organisation to be amazingly thick-headedly reluctant to admit that they've made a mistake, to go on making excuses for themselves, to carry on digging themselves into a hole, even when it's objectively blatantly obvious they are wrong.

Possibly, a charge of being drunk and disorderly might have stuck. But that wasn't the charge they'd chosen. It should have been obvious that there's no basis for saying a horse might be gay was either homophobic or was going to cause harassment, alarm or distress to anybody.

--------------------
Brexit wrexit - Sir Graham Watson

Posts: 7469 | From: Bristol UK(was European Green Capital 2015, now Ljubljana) | Registered: Nov 2008  |  IP: Logged
Leorning Cniht
Shipmate
# 17564

 - Posted      Profile for Leorning Cniht   Email Leorning Cniht   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Enoch:
It should have been obvious that there's no basis for saying a horse might be gay was either homophobic or was going to cause harassment, alarm or distress to anybody.

It might not harass anyone, but the clear implication of "do you know your horse is gay" in this context is that being gay is undesirable and inferior. IOW, pretty much exactly evidence of homophobia. It's low-grade homophibic twaddle from a drunk idiot.

But I agree that he was really charged with "acting like a dick to a policeman."

Posts: 4940 | From: USA | Registered: Feb 2013  |  IP: Logged
Stetson
Shipmate
# 9597

 - Posted      Profile for Stetson     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Arethosemyfeet:
I rather think the police horse incident has little to do with the homophobia or otherwise of the remarks and a lot to do with a policeman trying to pin something on an irritatingly drunk student. It's not exactly uncommon for the police to decide something's a crime and then try and work out which crime later if the perpetrator pisses them off enough.

Depending on how much thought the cops put into a disguised lese-majeste charge, our equestrian guardian of the public safety might have calculated that accusing the guy of homophobia would come off as more high-minded than just drunk'n'disorderly.

I guarantee you that there were at least a few gays and gay-allies who were cheering on the cop, oblivious to the fact that he was likely just throwing his weight around. (No slight against gays, most communities contain people who can be duped into supporting any act of authoritarianism done ostensibly on their behalf.)

Posts: 6476 | From: back and forth between bible belts | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by decampagne:
Whatever it may be, it's clearly not a police matter. I'd say it was dry observational wit.

In that case Donald Trump is the driest, most on the ball person I've ever heard of
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
jacobsen

seeker
# 14998

 - Posted      Profile for jacobsen   Email jacobsen   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by decampagne:
Whatever it may be, it's clearly not a police matter. I'd say it was dry observational wit.

In that case Donald Trump is the driest, most on the ball person I've ever heard of
Except for behind the ears.

--------------------
But God, holding a candle, looks for all who wander, all who search. - Shifra Alon
Beauty fades, dumb is forever-Judge Judy
The man who made time, made plenty.

Posts: 7855 | From: Æbleskiver country | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged
Higgs Bosun
Shipmate
# 16582

 - Posted      Profile for Higgs Bosun   Email Higgs Bosun   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I'm a bit puzzled. The article linked to in the OP states that the man concerned has a ginger beard. So, it could not be a case of "that man looks like a muslim, is he a terrorist?"

Are Scottish people likely to be terrorists?

It seems to me to be more pogonophobic than islamophobic.

Posts: 299 | From: Near the Tidal Thames | Registered: Aug 2011  |  IP: Logged
jacobsen

seeker
# 14998

 - Posted      Profile for jacobsen   Email jacobsen   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Only if confined to the debatable lands, with bonuses including whisky and cattle. [Big Grin]

--------------------
But God, holding a candle, looks for all who wander, all who search. - Shifra Alon
Beauty fades, dumb is forever-Judge Judy
The man who made time, made plenty.

Posts: 7855 | From: Æbleskiver country | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged
Dark Knight

Super Zero
# 9415

 - Posted      Profile for Dark Knight   Email Dark Knight   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
quote:
Originally posted by decampagne:
Whatever it may be, it's clearly not a police matter. I'd say it was dry observational wit.

In that case Donald Trump is the driest, most on the ball person I've ever heard of
One might even say he was a stable genius.

--------------------
Wronger than a drooling idiot on stupid juice - but I understand his argument.
mousethief (paraphrase)
----
Love is as strong as death (Song of Solomon 8:6).

Posts: 2921 | From: Beyond the Yellow Brick Road | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged
Ian Climacus

Liturgical Slattern
# 944

 - Posted      Profile for Ian Climacus     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Higgs Bosun:
I'm a bit puzzled. The article linked to in the OP states that the man concerned has a ginger beard. So, it could not be a case of "that man looks like a muslim, is he a terrorist?"

Are Scottish people likely to be terrorists?

It seems to me to be more pogonophobic than islamophobic.

Thanks for my word of the week!

Though I did think there existed the occasional Middle Easterner with red hair.

Posts: 7733 | From: On the border | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged
BroJames
Shipmate
# 9636

 - Posted      Profile for BroJames   Email BroJames   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ExclamationMark:
<snip>The tone is totally immaterial. It's the content which would have every police force in the UK arresting the perpetrator if he wasn't the Queen's husband.<snip>

Content isn't everything - context is also important, and the news story has completely shorn the remark of any context.

I think Gee D's suggestion is equally plausible:
quote:
Originally posted by Gee D:
I took it differently, a go at those ready to see a nest of terrorists in every mosque as once there were Reds under the bed. Here's a man of Arabic origin with a beard, fits the stereotype of a terrorist, and the jibe is not at the man but the stereotyping.

It's easy to imagine HRH getting irritated with the concerns of (say) a personal protection officer worrying (unduly from HRH's POV) about terrorists, and taking a pop at those concerns with that remark by picking out an unlikely person from the crowd.

The story tells us that the man was bearded, but they don't offer any hint as to whether the fact that he was bearded was why he was pointed out - maybe it was just because he stood out because he was tall or red-headed. The story and headlines are written to highlight the beard, but that might tell us more about the preconceptions of the teller than those of the Duke of Edinburgh (preconceptions either about the Duke of Edinburgh or about bearded terrorists).

Finally, every story of the remark is hedged around with "reportedly" or "it is claimed" which are indicators of editorial uncertainty about the accuracy of the report.

Posts: 3319 | From: UK | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged
ExclamationMark
Shipmate
# 14715

 - Posted      Profile for ExclamationMark   Email ExclamationMark   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Clearly one rule for Philip, another for us. Find every excuse to let him off the hook and any opportunity to pillory anyone else.
Posts: 3795 | From: A new Jerusalem | Registered: Apr 2009  |  IP: Logged
BroJames
Shipmate
# 9636

 - Posted      Profile for BroJames   Email BroJames   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
No. I would cut you (or anyone else) exactly the same amount of slack if there was a story in The Sun or The Mail reporting, on the basis of anonymous sources, an unwise but newsworthy remark you were alleged to have made.
Posts: 3319 | From: UK | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged


 
Post new thread  Post a reply Close thread   Feature thread   Move thread   Delete thread Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
 - Printer-friendly view
Go to:

Contact us | Ship of Fools | Privacy statement

© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0

 
Check out Reform magazine
sip of fools mugs from your favourite nautical website
 
  ship of fools