homepage
  roll on christmas  
click here to find out more about ship of fools click here to sign up for the ship of fools newsletter click here to support ship of fools
community the mystery worshipper gadgets for god caption competition foolishness features ship stuff
discussion boards live chat cafe avatars frequently-asked questions the ten commandments gallery private boards register for the boards
 
Ship of Fools


Post new thread  Post a reply
My profile login | | Directory | Search | FAQs | Board home
   - Printer-friendly view Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
» Ship of Fools   » Ship's Locker   » Limbo   » Purgatory: Personal Relationship with Christ? Huh? (Page 0)

 - Email this page to a friend or enemy.  
Pages in this thread: 1  2  3  4  ...  9  10  11 
 
Source: (consider it) Thread: Purgatory: Personal Relationship with Christ? Huh?
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468

 - Posted      Profile for Golden Key   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Evo1,

Why not simply say "in my experience,..."? It's simple, and acknowledges that other people might have other experiences.

--------------------
Blessed Gator, pray for us!
--"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon")
--"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")

Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
One reason I don't do what you would like me to is, believe it or not, I am different to some/all of you.

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Evo1, when you're not in a direct argument with somebody, I really can appreciate your insight. A little earlier in these posts we were having a wonderfully polite and civil conversation which I enjoyed.

It's when the argument begins to flare up that you begin making absolutely no sense.

For instance, let me get this straight. People who don't feel like they have a PRWG don't want others telling them that they do, so they request that people would stop telling them that they DO have one, and that it is NECESSARY to have one.

Now some of you are insisting that it's just as harmful to you if we ask you to be sensitive to that?

Nobody is asking you to stop referring to your own relationship with God in any way that you would like. I'm not, anyway. Refer to your relationships however you wish, and let us refer to ours as we wish. What is harmful about that request?

The stubbornness here is astounding. Yes, people are all different--deal with it and be sensitive to the differences. You can't then say "Yeah everyone is different so don't get on my case just because I think everyone should be just like me, after all everyone is different so it's hurtful if you tell me I can't act like that!"

It just doesn't make a bit of sense.

-Digory

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mousethief:
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
When are you going to understand that we are all different?

O! O! The irony! It hurts, ma, it hurts!
Speechless.
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I'm not even going to start to make a reply to the prior poster, I could, it would be a long post and no-one would end up in any different place so I won't. Let's just say I am quickly learning why this place is called "Ship of Fools" [Biased]

But that said, I do apologise for my argumentativeness earlier. I have had a very tough couple or three months, so tough in fact that if "I am not Job" knew just how tough it was he would probably change his name to "I am not Job, but I think Evo1 might be".

The upshot may well have been that I have allowed myself to be drawn into argument rather than debate - and I am sorry for that.

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
LutheranChik
Shipmate
# 9826

 - Posted      Profile for LutheranChik   Author's homepage   Email LutheranChik   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I told myself I wasn't coming back to this topic thread again, but...

Is there perhaps a confusion between the terms <i>personal</i> and <i>private</i>?

I'm thinking of Dr. Mark Allen Powell, NT prof at Trinity Lutheran Seminary (Columbus, OH) and author of, among other books, <i>Loving Jesus</i> -- I'm going to be hearing him lecture in February; that'll be kewl -- saying that, in Christianity, our relationship with Christ) can certainly be <i>personal</i>, but it's never <i>private.</i> (Or as my own pastor would put it, "It ain't me and Jesus under a blanket with a flashlight." Is that helpful at all to anyone?

Posts: 6462 | From: rural Michigan, USA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Kelly Alves

Bunny with an axe
# 2522

 - Posted      Profile for Kelly Alves   Email Kelly Alves   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by professorkirke:
Evo1, when you're not in a direct argument with somebody, I really can appreciate your insight. A little earlier in these posts we were having a wonderfully polite and civil conversation which I enjoyed.

It's when the argument begins to flare up that you begin making absolutely no sense.

For instance, let me get this straight. People who don't feel like they have a PRWG don't want others telling them that they do, so they request that people would stop telling them that they DO have one, and that it is NECESSARY to have one.

Now some of you are insisting that it's just as harmful to you if we ask you to be sensitive to that?

Nobody is asking you to stop referring to your own relationship with God in any way that you would like. I'm not, anyway. Refer to your relationships however you wish, and let us refer to ours as we wish. What is harmful about that request?

The stubbornness here is astounding. Yes, people are all different--deal with it and be sensitive to the differences. You can't then say "Yeah everyone is different so don't get on my case just because I think everyone should be just like me, after all everyone is different so it's hurtful if you tell me I can't act like that!"

It just doesn't make a bit of sense.

-Digory

Very classy reply, Professorkirke. I could not think of a single response myself that would not either lower myself or drag things straight to Hell.

--------------------
I cannot expect people to believe “
Jesus loves me, this I know” of they don’t believe “Kelly loves me, this I know.”
Kelly Alves, somewhere around 2003.

Posts: 35076 | From: Pura Californiana | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
Golden Key
Shipmate
# 1468

 - Posted      Profile for Golden Key   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
But that said, I do apologise for my argumentativeness earlier. I have had a very tough couple or three months, so tough in fact that if "I am not Job" knew just how tough it was he would probably change his name to "I am not Job, but I think Evo1 might be".

[Votive]

--------------------
Blessed Gator, pray for us!
--"Oh bat bladders, do you have to bring common sense into this?" (Dragon, "Jane & the Dragon")
--"Oh, Peace Train, save this country!" (Yusuf/Cat Stevens, "Peace Train")

Posts: 18601 | From: Chilling out in an undisclosed, sincere pumpkin patch. | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
I'm not even going to start to make a reply to the prior poster, I could, it would be a long post and no-one would end up in any different place so I won't. Let's just say I am quickly learning why this place is called "Ship of Fools" [Biased]

The little winky face doesn't make you any less of an ass. I would have PMed you, but you've added me to your "ignore" list because I am such a terrible, rude, irrational, offensive person.

-Digory

PS Sorry hosts, I didn't think it was worth a whole new thread in hell. At least not yet.

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by LutheranChik:
I told myself I wasn't coming back to this topic thread again, but...

Is there perhaps a confusion between the terms <i>personal</i> and <i>private</i>?

I'm thinking of Dr. Mark Allen Powell, NT prof at Trinity Lutheran Seminary (Columbus, OH) and author of, among other books, <i>Loving Jesus</i> -- I'm going to be hearing him lecture in February; that'll be kewl -- saying that, in Christianity, our relationship with Christ) can certainly be <i>personal</i>, but it's never <i>private.</i> (Or as my own pastor would put it, "It ain't me and Jesus under a blanket with a flashlight." Is that helpful at all to anyone?

Your posts are always helpful, LC. [Smile] (Just don't forget to use square brackets [] and not the carats <>.)

However, I think the main argument that has circulated and stagnated here for the last 500 posts is not furthered by your distinction. Let me point to one of your phrasings though--

quote:
...our relationship with Christ can certainly be personal
--you didn't say "is always personal." That's all that matters to me. Certainly and without doubt many people right here on this thread have very personal relationships with God. But when they tell me and others that we

a) must have a PRWG to be Christians, and

b) actually DO have a PRWG without even knowing it,

well, it's just uncalled for. It's unnecessary and it's offensive, and if people would just take this advice from those of us who have been hurt by this type of philosophy, they would perhaps save others from experiencing a similar misfortune.

Either that, or they could stubbornly refuse to acknowledge it and instead pick apart wordings and concepts and go back on arguments. Ah, choices.

-Digory

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
RuthW

liberal "peace first" hankie squeezer
# 13

 - Posted      Profile for RuthW     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Hosting

quote:
Originally posted by professorkirke:
The little winky face doesn't make you any less of an ass. I would have PMed you, but you've added me to your "ignore" list because I am such a terrible, rude, irrational, offensive person.

-Digory

PS Sorry hosts, I didn't think it was worth a whole new thread in hell. At least not yet.

The little apology doesn't make you any less in violation of the Ship's third commandment. This sort of thing is absolutely out of order in Purgatory, and you knew that when you posted it. If you don't wish to post abuse in Hell, don't post it at all.

RuthW
Purgatory host

Posts: 24453 | From: La La Land | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
My apologies, RuthW. You're right.

I re-read over the wording of the Commandments after I'd posted and saw just exactly how out of line I really was. Won't happen again.


-Digory

...goes off mumbling something about the stupid PM ignore feature...

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
o00o
Shipmate
# 3147

 - Posted      Profile for o00o   Email o00o   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I would like to thank Nicodemia, Professor Kirke, Josephine, Karl and others for their contribution. I have been following this thread closely but have refrained from posting (bar once back on page one) because this is too close and difficult an issue for me at the moment. What has been said has helped me clarify my own thoughts, and has encouraged me greatly.

I would like to ask a question to Professor Kirke, Karl, Nicodemia et al - how, if at all, do you practise prayer, bible study, "quiet times" etc, and are there good resources/books that you find useful?

I have spent all of my Christian life so far in a envangelical environment that strongly emphasises the PRWG angle, and the necessity of daily "quiet times" talking with God etc. For me these have been a permenant struggle and driven by guilt rather than any more positive motive. I have not even been attempting private prayer or bible study regularly for several months now due to the negative feelings associated with everything. I know I need some form of bible study/prayer but I don't know where to look and am scared of picking up something that is going to damage my only recently returning desire for God, rather than help.

On a similar note, what sort of churches do you attend? Fortunately I am moving house in the new year so I can make the change to a different without too much more difficulty.

Thank you.

--------------------
11 o'clock - time for a Little Something

Posts: 168 | From: UK | Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Hello, oOOo.

Thanks for your honesty. It's always refreshing. [Smile]

I'll give you my opinion, with a strong preface that they are only my opinions and should be treated as such. For the longest time I have struggled with the very things you're talking about in your post--the "necessity" of a certain kind of prayer, "quiet times," and other ritual practices. I have found many of them to be quite useless and to have negative effects on my outlook on God.

So, instead I have found that I need to let God define the relationship I am going to have with him by the desires he placed there at the point I was created. First, I love music. So I spend a considerable amount of time listening and reflecting on thought-provoking music. Many times it's Christian worship music that I enjoy, but other times it's secular music that I find to be inspirational in some way. It gives me a great time to reflect and meditate. Second, I need to write in order to think, so I spend some time just writing out some thoughts about things I don't understand, or whatever happens to pop in my mind about God, no matter the tone. The church I go to has 4 different preachers who rotate giving sermons on Sundays, and the church is rather large. I find that it helps me to somewhat disappear, sit somewhere and just soak it in and let myself interpret it in a way that is relevant to my own life. I sit with a journal and even if I think the pastor is spewing some sort of nonsense, it provokes all sorts of thoughts that I channel to (what I think are) good ends.

Lastly, I come here, which also gets my mind focused on all sorts of God-flavored things. Anything that points me there, like reading good inspirational books (check out Brian McLaren and Donald Miller if you're looking for some stuff that's a little different). That's kind of how I deal. [Smile]

-Digory

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by professorkirke:
I would have PMed you, but you've added me to your "ignore" list...

Evo1,

If you would kindly take me off of this ignore list, we could avoid cluttering up Hell with another useless thread.

-Digory

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I don't respond too favourably to threats I'm afraid.

For the record, Digory is on my ignore list for sharing details publicly the last time I PM'd him. He also posted a message warning everyone that he did not see a Private message in any way Private unless the sender explicitly made it clear.

PK, I really don't see that we have anything further to say to each other, if you wish to continue to shower me with personal insults, go ahead and open a Hell thread but I do not wish to do the same to you anymore.

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Josephine

Orthodox Belle
# 3899

 - Posted      Profile for Josephine   Author's homepage   Email Josephine   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by o00o:
I would like to ask a question to Professor Kirke, Karl, Nicodemia et al - how, if at all, do you practise prayer, bible study, "quiet times" etc, and are there good resources/books that you find useful?

What works for me is what lots of the PRWG types would call "empty ritual." For me, of course, the rituals aren't empty at all. Following the patterns the Church has devised over the last 2000 years or so, rather than trying to come up with something on my own, makes a difference for me.

So I keep the prescribed fasts. I give alms. I attempt to follow a rule of prayer (a set of prayers to be said at a particular time each day), although I find that very difficult. Quiet times and improvised prayers just don't do it for me at all, though.

I also find reading the lives of the saints and writings by the saints to be extremely helpful.

--------------------
I've written a book! Catherine's Pascha: A celebration of Easter in the Orthodox Church. It's a lovely book for children. Take a look!

Posts: 10273 | From: Pacific Northwest, USA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
St. Sebastian

Staggering ever onward
# 312

 - Posted      Profile for St. Sebastian   Email St. Sebastian   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by o00o:
I would like to thank Nicodemia, Professor Kirke, Josephine, Karl and others for their contribution. . . . What has been said has helped me clarify my own thoughts, and has encouraged me greatly.

Ditto!

--------------------
St. Seb

In Spite of Everything: Yes.

Posts: 962 | From: Burlington, North Carolina | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
I don't respond too favourably to threats I'm afraid.

Oh man. I give up.
__________________________________________________


ooOOoo or St. Sebastian or anyone else, you can PM me if you have any other questions or whatever.

Otherwise, I think this thread has run its course. See you all in other, new and budding threads! [Smile]

-Digory

Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
corvette
Shipmate
# 9436

 - Posted      Profile for corvette     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Original sig by Evo1:

Just think how horrid I'd be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus


[Big Grin]

and just think how wonderful Jesus is, that even i can be forgiven. [Smile]

Posts: 494 | From: ecclesia sans frontiers | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lynn MagdalenCollege
Shipmate
# 10651

 - Posted      Profile for Lynn MagdalenCollege   Author's homepage   Email Lynn MagdalenCollege   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by josephine:
What works for me is what lots of the PRWG types would call "empty ritual." For me, of course, the rituals aren't empty at all. Following the patterns the Church has devised over the last 2000 years or so, rather than trying to come up with something on my own, makes a difference for me.

I too find great richness and depth in liturgy (I go to an anglo-catholic charismatic "smells & bells" episcopal church, if you can wrap your brain around THAT set of contrasts!) - the prescribed prayers are rich and full, if you bring your own "content" to them (does that make sense? I know what I mean, but no idea if anybody else will).

I also have the wonderful opportunity to spend Tuesday afternoons (usually 3-4 hours total) at church in a very small "listening prayer" or "prophetic intercession" prayer group, so the "quiet" stuff works well for me, personally.

I'm also one of the worship leaders Sunday morning, so I do a lot of worship in music (in our main service, we use 10 songs in two primary sets, so that's a fair chunk of music), listening to it, singing along, being part of a team or sometimes an individual leader, depending on what is needed, etc.

I've got a wonderful "Bible in a Year" which is Oswald Chambers! That's been delightful and I tend to read a day's worth before going to sleep at night (helps me to "set my mind" on the things of God before sleeping). I try to do some Bible reading in the morning to get myself rightly oriented at the start of the day (I need it!) and I also try to do some "study" several times a week, working through one specific book at a time - usually utilizing one of a number of different Bible teachers I respect.

--------------------
Erin & Friend; Been there, done that; Ruth musical

Posts: 6263 | From: California | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116

 - Posted      Profile for Mudfrog   Email Mudfrog   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
At risk of repeating what's been said or offending those who haven't/don't want a PRWG, can I clarify what I think evangelicals mean when they talk about PRWG?

It doesn't always mean an intense, emotional, ecstatic, charismatic experience.
It doesn't mean suddenly becoming enthusiastic about private prayer and daily quiet times or giving out leaflets and singing Graham Kendrick songs.

But the term 'personal relationship' is, I believe, a term that was coined to challenge people who feel they can inherit their faith from parents, or who feel that Christian culture is enough. In fact I think the phrase has less to do with 'relationship' than with 'personal'.

I think what it simply means is that Christian faith has to be your own decision, your own journey and pilgrimage, rather than assuming you can be included in the crowd if you stand near enough.

I guess therefore, that whatever type of believer you are, if you have a belief that is considered, deliberate, aand meaningful to you, and has a focus on God, then that is your PRWG.

Even if it's not expressed or 'felt' in an emotional way.

Does that help or make sense at all?

--------------------
"The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid."
G.K. Chesterton

Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Oh, that makes perfect sense, but the thing is that that was not explained by the purveyors of the PRWG when I was a charismatic evangelical.

To me, it still has a semantic problem - it's a personal relationship, but not analogous to any other personal relationship you might have.

I think the phrase "individual search for God" would be more useful, unless anyone's going to claim they've actually found Him. [Biased]

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Mudfrog
Shipmate
# 8116

 - Posted      Profile for Mudfrog   Email Mudfrog   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
Oh, that makes perfect sense, but the thing is that that was not explained by the purveyors of the PRWG when I was a charismatic evangelical.

To me, it still has a semantic problem - it's a personal relationship, but not analogous to any other personal relationship you might have.

I think the phrase "individual search for God" would be more useful, unless anyone's going to claim they've actually found Him. [Biased]

individual is a very good word.

i think your charismatic friends may have inadvertantly mislead you - which is a shame.

--------------------
"The point of having an open mind, like having an open mouth, is to close it on something solid."
G.K. Chesterton

Posts: 8237 | From: North Yorkshire, UK | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Oh, I don't know that they did. Most of them did seem to have an emotionally expressed relationship with God, where He spoke to them quite clearly. They naturally assumed that was for everyone. What is disconcerting is that there were no more mature people prividing a balance by pointing out that it isn't necessarily that way. Or perhaps there were; I've got a sneaking suspicion that I was so taken by the idea of this clearly felt, emotionally expressed PRWG that I wasn't listening to what caveats there may have been. It is a very seductive and attractive idea, which is why I think folk need to be so careful about how they express it.

The only time I thought God had clearly spoken to me I though He told me to go and be a primary school teacher. Evidently I was wrong, since I flunked the course in the final year and I am now an IT systems analyst. [Biased] Still, I met Mrs Backslider there, so maybe God can even work through me mistaking my own imagination for Him. Or perhaps He doesn't map things out and it just all works out in the end; I don't know any more.

Back to answering o000o's question, one of the most interesting things I've found about myself is that the eucharist has risen in relative importance against other aspects of church services, probably because the elements are something real and concrete that I can hang my not particularly strongly believed faith on to. It's a pointer to an objective external reality (I'm not one for non-realism). Songs, hymns and prayers can require me too much to focus on something I cannot sense - the bread and wine at least are real physical objects, and possibly, just possibly, they can give me a glimpse of the real metaphysical Presence of God.

[ 06. December 2005, 07:55: Message edited by: Karl: Liberal Backslider ]

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
To me, it still has a semantic problem - it's a personal relationship, snip...

[Ultra confused]

So what have we been arguing about?

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Evol - what I meant was that the purveyors of the PRWG are saying "it's a personal relationship, but not analogous to any other personal relationship you might have"

Perhaps I should have used inverted commas.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Ah, I see that now.

Thank Goodness, I was really confused then [Biased] .

Just to be sure (be patient with me) you were saying that to you, what the evangelicals are saying is that it is a personal relationship, but not one like any other?

I get that.

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
PerkyEars

slightly distracted
# 9577

 - Posted      Profile for PerkyEars   Email PerkyEars   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
The only time I thought God had clearly spoken to me I though He told me to go and be a primary school teacher. Evidently I was wrong, since I flunked the course in the final year and I am now an IT systems analyst. Still, I met Mrs Backslider there, so maybe
...maybe that was what you were there for. [Big Grin]
Posts: 532 | From: Bristol | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
Ah, I see that now.

Thank Goodness, I was really confused then [Biased] .

Just to be sure (be patient with me) you were saying that to you, what the evangelicals are saying is that it is a personal relationship, but not one like any other?

I get that.

Unfortunately, what they often said was "it's a personal relationship". My problem is that if it's not analogous to any other personal relationship, then I can't find locate the phrase in any semantic space.

Let me explain.

Suppose you tell me that you have a tree in your garden. I know what a tree is, so I will naturally think you mean that you have a large woody plant with roots, branches and leaves, because that's what trees have.

So when someone says they have a PRWG, I know what a personal relationship is, so I will naturally think that that person talks to God, gets responses, knows He's there, can interact with Him, has a degree of intimacy and so on and so forth. If it turns out that this PRWG has none of these features, I find it rather confusing that it's called a PRWG, just as I'd find it strange if you actually had a giant thistle with no wood, no branches, and no leaves, but called it "a tree, but not like any other tree".

What I seem to be getting on this thread from the PRWG side is "a tree, but not like any other tree". One that doesn't have branches, leaves or roots, because it isn't like any other tree. What I'm asking is why you call it a tree then.

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PerkyEars:
quote:
The only time I thought God had clearly spoken to me I though He told me to go and be a primary school teacher. Evidently I was wrong, since I flunked the course in the final year and I am now an IT systems analyst. Still, I met Mrs Backslider there, so maybe
...maybe that was what you were there for. [Big Grin]
Maybe it was. The thing is, had "God" (because I don't think it was He) said "Go to Nottingham Trent University" that would have been one thing. But "God" actually said "I want you to go and become a primary school teacher". That, had it really been "God", would have been a lie.

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Lynn MagdalenCollege
Shipmate
# 10651

 - Posted      Profile for Lynn MagdalenCollege   Author's homepage   Email Lynn MagdalenCollege   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Karl, we've got those giant thistle trees out here in California!!! - we call 'em "palm trees"... [Cool]

--------------------
Erin & Friend; Been there, done that; Ruth musical

Posts: 6263 | From: California | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158

 - Posted      Profile for Teufelchen   Email Teufelchen   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
What I seem to be getting on this thread from the PRWG side is "a tree, but not like any other tree". One that doesn't have branches, leaves or roots, because it isn't like any other tree. What I'm asking is why you call it a tree then.

Sorry to hijack your metaphor here, Karl, but as with the 'not pizza, but bread and wine' argument I advanced much earlier in this thread, the tree-unlike-any-tree is exactly the symbol of God's personal relationship to us:

Faithful cross, thou sign of triumph,
Now for us the noblest tree,
None in foliage, none in blossom,
None in fruit thy peer may be;
Symbol of the world’s redemption,
For the weight that hung on thee!
Venantius Fortunatus, tr J M Neale

As I said before - some Christians clearly do feel a personal relationship with God in what is sometimes called the Jesus-is-my-boyfriend sense; others such as Karl equally clearly find such a conception impossible. Unless there's some disagreement about that, I'm not sure where the problem lies.

Oh - and to seize someone's substitution of 'erotic' for 'personal' - isn't that experience more often found among Catholic mystics than evangelicals? I may be wrong, but this is my recollection.

T.

--------------------
Little devil

Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Karl: Liberal Backslider
Shipmate
# 76

 - Posted      Profile for Karl: Liberal Backslider   Author's homepage   Email Karl: Liberal Backslider   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Yeah, Teuf, but from the context those lines are clearly metaphorical. There was never any indication that the PRWG was a metaphor.

But this is a tangent of a tangent.

--------------------
Might as well ask the bloody cat.

Posts: 17938 | From: Chesterfield | Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Teufelchen
Shipmate
# 10158

 - Posted      Profile for Teufelchen   Email Teufelchen   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
Yeah, Teuf, but from the context those lines are clearly metaphorical. There was never any indication that the PRWG was a metaphor.

I know - my paragraph after the verse was intended to address the issue more generally, not to comment on the verse. I guess I'm saying that there are at least three ways of seeing this:

1. A personal emotional/erotic relationship with God, where a perception of God's human immediacy is an important dimension of one's faith.
2. A sacramental, sacrificial personal relationship, where God's transcendent nature is made personal and immediate by representation in religious activity.
3. A purely philosophical attitude, without any personal engagement to speak of.

Unless anyone is saying that one or more of these approaches to God is intrinsically invalid, surely our disagreements are not with each other, but with those beyond this thread who've presented that attitude to us at other times?

T.

--------------------
Little devil

Posts: 3894 | From: London area | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
What I seem to be getting on this thread from the PRWG side is "a tree, but not like any other tree". One that doesn't have branches, leaves or roots, because it isn't like any other tree. What I'm asking is why you call it a tree then.

Then let me deal once, for all, with this point - and I shall be as sensitive as an Evo1 can be [Biased]

What I would say, about my relationship with God, is that it is very much like other personal relationships of mine (no metaphors, real ones like father/son, mother/son, friend/friend, teacher/student and so on). Some times it is close, sometimes it is distant and some times, positively non existant.

He speaks to me and tells me things I could never otherwise have known and he comforts me in times when no-one else could.

But all that said, I do not project those experiences on anyone else. I know that's the case for me but I also know that it's only my personal stubborness which made it necessary for him to communicate with me in this way. I fully respect and admire other Christians who view and interact(or not) with God in wholly different ways than me.

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Josephine

Orthodox Belle
# 3899

 - Posted      Profile for Josephine   Author's homepage   Email Josephine   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mudfrog:
I think what it simply means is that Christian faith has to be your own decision, your own journey and pilgrimage, rather than assuming you can be included in the crowd if you stand near enough.

I know what you mean, Mudfrog. And for most of us, most of the time, it's incredibly important that we have our own relationship with God. That's why, in the Liturgy, when we say the Creed, we say, "I believe in one God ..." and later, before the Eucharist, we have another prayer that begins with "I believe" --
quote:
I believe, O Lord, and I confess, that thou art truly the Christ, the Son of the living God, who came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am first. And I believe also that this is thine own most pure Body, and that this is thine own precious Blood. Therefore, I pray thee, have mercy upon me, and forgive my transgressions, both voluntary and involuntary, of word and of in deed, in knowledge and in ignorance, and make me worthy without condemnation to partake of thy most pure Mysteries for the remission of sins and unto life everlasting. Amen.
Of thy mystical supper, O Son of God, accept me today as a communicant, for I will not speak of thy mystery to thine enemies, neither like Judas will I give thee a kiss, but like the thief will I confess thee, remember me, O Lord, in thy kingdom.
May the communion of thy holy Mysteries be neither to my judgment nor to my condemnation, O Lord, but to the healing of soul and body.

I have to believe; I have to partake; I have to receive. No one can do that for me.

Yet, there is that man, when Jesus asked him if he believed, responded, "Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief." And, for me, that's one of the greatest, most important, and most wonderful things about the Church. When I struggle to believe, I can go there, and stand in the crowd, and the faith and the prayers of those gathered there can carry me along with them. When the crowd starts moving, if I have just enough faith to put myself in it, I can be carried along. I only have to have enough discipline to go -- and knowing that there are people there who look for me to be part of the crowd helps me get there. And when I get there, when it's time to partake of the Eucharist, I only have to have enough faith to open my mouth. That's all. God, through the people he has gathered there, can take care of the rest.

I struggle to keep a rule of prayer. It's really hard for me to talk to someone who doesn't talk back. And even when I can, I struggle to find a quiet time and place to try to get myself focused and centered on God. It's just really hard for me. But a wise and kind deacon I know told me that monastics are given a daily rule that causes them to have to get up in the middle of the night for prayers, and they are given obediences at the monastery that might not be what they would choose, and a severe fast; the point of all of that is to teach them to deny themselves and follow Christ. I don't have a monastic rule, and I couldn't keep one if I did. I can hardly keep the miniscule rule my priest has given me. But I've been given kids with special needs, and they are given to me to teach me to deny myself and follow Christ.

The command to pray without ceasing is given to us, not as individuals, but as a Church. So when I can't pray, because I am reading special educaiton law, or researching pediatric gastric reflux, or whatever it is I'm doing, I can trust that someone else is praying. As the earth turns on its axis, somewhere, someone is praying Vespers, even when I can't. And then Complines, and Matins, and the prayers of the hours. The world is wrapped in prayers. And because I'm part of the crowd, I'm carried along with and supported by the prayers of all those who can and do pray when I can't find the time or the place or the peace in my heart to do it.

[fixed code]

[ 06. December 2005, 16:49: Message edited by: RuthW ]

--------------------
I've written a book! Catherine's Pascha: A celebration of Easter in the Orthodox Church. It's a lovely book for children. Take a look!

Posts: 10273 | From: Pacific Northwest, USA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
quantpole
Shipmate
# 8401

 - Posted      Profile for quantpole   Email quantpole   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Thanks for that Josephine - makes a lot of sense and has helped to break down some more barriers. [Smile]

Just one question, as it is something I struggle with.
quote:
The command to pray without ceasing is given to us, not as individuals, but as a Church.
How do we know the commandmant is for the church and not as individuals? I know it is physically impossible, but have previously taken it as a bit of hyperbole to emphasise the importance of prayer in our lives.
Posts: 885 | From: Leeds | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged
Jason™

Host emeritus
# 9037

 - Posted      Profile for Jason™   Author's homepage   Email Jason™   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evo1:
quote:
Originally posted by Karl: Liberal Backslider:
What I seem to be getting on this thread from the PRWG side is "a tree, but not like any other tree". One that doesn't have branches, leaves or roots, because it isn't like any other tree. What I'm asking is why you call it a tree then.

Then let me deal once, for all, with this point - and I shall be as sensitive as an Evo1 can be [Biased]

What I would say, about my relationship with God, is that it is very much like other personal relationships of mine (no metaphors, real ones like father/son, mother/son, friend/friend, teacher/student and so on). Some times it is close, sometimes it is distant and some times, positively non existant.

He speaks to me and tells me things I could never otherwise have known and he comforts me in times when no-one else could.

But all that said, I do not project those experiences on anyone else. I know that's the case for me but I also know that it's only my personal stubborness which made it necessary for him to communicate with me in this way. I fully respect and admire other Christians who view and interact(or not) with God in wholly different ways than me.

[Overused] Thank you, Evo1. That's (and I'm being quite honest here) one of the best things anyone's said on this thread.
Posts: 4123 | From: Land of Mary | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged
Josephine

Orthodox Belle
# 3899

 - Posted      Profile for Josephine   Author's homepage   Email Josephine   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by quantpole:
Thanks for that Josephine - makes a lot of sense and has helped to break down some more barriers. [Smile]

Just one question, as it is something I struggle with.
quote:
The command to pray without ceasing is given to us, not as individuals, but as a Church.
How do we know the commandmant is for the church and not as individuals? I know it is physically impossible, but have previously taken it as a bit of hyperbole to emphasise the importance of prayer in our lives.
Would you be happy with, "Because that's what I've been taught"? Hmm. Maybe not.

But because it is physically impossible, the Church had to decide whether to interpret it as hyperbole, or as a command to the community, because, as you say, it doesn't work as a literal command to individuals. And I've been taught, since becoming Orthodox, that it is a command to the Church, to the community. As a part of that community, I need to do my part to keep the prayer going. But it's something we all do together.

It seems to me, as I've said before, that Christianity in past times, and even now in other places, is much more communal than what is typical in the US and western Europe. We're in it together. It makes sense to me.

--------------------
I've written a book! Catherine's Pascha: A celebration of Easter in the Orthodox Church. It's a lovely book for children. Take a look!

Posts: 10273 | From: Pacific Northwest, USA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Evo1
Shipmate
# 10249

 - Posted      Profile for Evo1   Email Evo1   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by professorkirke:
Thank you, Evo1. That's (and I'm being quite honest here) one of the best things anyone's said on this thread.

[Hot and Hormonal] Then I wished I'd said it a long time ago [Biased]

[Axe murder]

--------------------
Just think how horrid I would be if I didn't have a Personal Relationship with Jesus

Posts: 1058 | From: Hull, England | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged
Lynn MagdalenCollege
Shipmate
# 10651

 - Posted      Profile for Lynn MagdalenCollege   Author's homepage   Email Lynn MagdalenCollege   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
posted by Josephine:
The command to pray without ceasing is given to us, not as individuals, but as a Church. So when I can't pray, because I am reading special educaiton law, or researching pediatric gastric reflux, or whatever it is I'm doing, I can trust that someone else is praying. As the earth turns on its axis, somewhere, someone is praying Vespers, even when I can't. And then Complines, and Matins, and the prayers of the hours. The world is wrapped in prayers. And because I'm part of the crowd, I'm carried along with and supported by the prayers of all those who can and do pray when I can't find the time or the place or the peace in my heart to do it

You may believe it because it's what you've been taught; I've never been taught that but I really like it and see the truth of it. I'm not sure it's the ONLY way to apply the passage (so often things aren't "either/or" but "both/and") but yeah, this is a good understanding. I have had a few occasions when I could barely pray but I could feel the prayers of faithful friends (and only God knows how many other saints) upholding me... BTW, I love compline.

--------------------
Erin & Friend; Been there, done that; Ruth musical

Posts: 6263 | From: California | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Basket Case
Shipmate
# 1812

 - Posted      Profile for Basket Case   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Well, if you consider "pray without ceasing" as hyperbole, then aren't all the other commandments hyperbole, too?

Thou shalt not covet...etc. etc. Impossible to live up to them, but these commands do set the standard for us, so we know what to strive for.

Posts: 1157 | From: Pomo (basket) country | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Josephine

Orthodox Belle
# 3899

 - Posted      Profile for Josephine   Author's homepage   Email Josephine   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I don't follow you, (gracia). One can't pray when one is, for example, unconscious. But I can't imagine anyone saying you sinned by failing to pray then. The commandment doesn't apply when you're out cold. So it doesn't literally mean "without ceasing," if it's a command given to each of us individually.

Which, as I said, I don't think it is. "Thou shalt not covet," on the other hand, is given to each of us individually. The command is in the singular, not the plural. So we're expected to refrain from coveting. And I don't see any reason to believe that it's impossible to refrain from coveting, any more than I would say it's impossible to refrain from murder.

--------------------
I've written a book! Catherine's Pascha: A celebration of Easter in the Orthodox Church. It's a lovely book for children. Take a look!

Posts: 10273 | From: Pacific Northwest, USA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Basket Case
Shipmate
# 1812

 - Posted      Profile for Basket Case   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
I guess you're saying that since "pray without ceasing" was given to a body of believers instead of to each individual (historically), that makes it a qualitatively different "command" than the 10 commandments per se.

My point is that it is no more possible to obey all the commandments than it is to obey Paul's instruction, so I don't accept that "pray without ceasing" is too demanding to be considered as an individual requirement (because I do believe that the 10 commandments are, also, though they are a standard to measure our actions by).

Posts: 1157 | From: Pomo (basket) country | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Josephine

Orthodox Belle
# 3899

 - Posted      Profile for Josephine   Author's homepage   Email Josephine   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by (gracia):
I guess you're saying that since "pray without ceasing" was given to a body of believers instead of to each individual (historically), that makes it a qualitatively different "command" than the 10 commandments per se.



Yes.

quote:
My point is that it is no more possible to obey all the commandments than it is to obey Paul's instruction, so I don't accept that "pray without ceasing" is too demanding to be considered as an individual requirement (because I do believe that the 10 commandments are, also, though they are a standard to measure our actions by).
I'm still missing something, I'm afraid. Are you saying that you believe that God doesn't really expect or intend us to keep his commandments? Or that we're not capable of it anyway, so it doesn't matter what God expects or intends? Or something else?

--------------------
I've written a book! Catherine's Pascha: A celebration of Easter in the Orthodox Church. It's a lovely book for children. Take a look!

Posts: 10273 | From: Pacific Northwest, USA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lynn MagdalenCollege
Shipmate
# 10651

 - Posted      Profile for Lynn MagdalenCollege   Author's homepage   Email Lynn MagdalenCollege   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
quote:
Originally posted by (gracia):
I guess you're saying that since "pray without ceasing" was given to a body of believers instead of to each individual (historically), that makes it a qualitatively different "command" than the 10 commandments per se.

gracia, I think it's direction and instruction, not law. So yes, that is qualitatively different. Paul (and others, but mostly Paul) gave a lot of instruction to the nascent church - "this is how you walk it out" - and since his emphasized that we are saved by grace through faith and that not of ourselves, that he wasn't establishing a new set of laws for the church to keep (obviously, ymmv).

--------------------
Erin & Friend; Been there, done that; Ruth musical

Posts: 6263 | From: California | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged
Matt Black

Shipmate
# 2210

 - Posted      Profile for Matt Black   Email Matt Black   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
This is going to come out wrong however I write it so Karl and Josephine please bear with me... [Biased]

To return to the linkage or otherwise between those on the autistic continuum and PRWG, Mrs Black is a speech and language therapist and is frequently involved with under-5s who are on the continuum. One of the things which has deeply troubled her from time to time is the conflict between her evangelical faith and its insistence that we all have a PRWG on the one hand, and the fact that those individuals at the severely autistic end of the continuum frequently strike her as lacking the capacity to form a personal relationship (as most of us understand that) with anyone, including God/Christ on the other. The logical extension of the evangelical insistence on the PRWG is that such individuals are incapable of being saved, even that they lack a soul, a concept which, needless to say, both my wife and I find abhorrent in the extreme.

Both of us have found reading this thread a great relief and release from the above tyranny of logic, and my thanks to Josephine and Karl in particular for your candour and proof that "there's more than one way to skin a cat" on this issue. [Overused]

--------------------
"Protestant and Reformed, according to the Tradition of the ancient Catholic Church" - + John Cosin (1594-1672)

Posts: 14304 | From: Hampshire, UK | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
Nicodemia
WYSIWYG
# 4756

 - Posted      Profile for Nicodemia   Author's homepage     Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
Josephine said (a few posts back}

quote:
Yet, there is that man, when Jesus asked him if he believed, responded, "Lord, I believe; help thou mine unbelief." And, for me, that's one of the greatest, most important, and most wonderful things about the Church. When I struggle to believe, I can go there, and stand in the crowd, and the faith and the prayers of those gathered there can carry me along with them. When the crowd starts moving, if I have just enough faith to put myself in it, I can be carried along. I only have to have enough discipline to go -- and knowing that there are people there who look for me to be part of the crowd helps me get there. And when I get there, when it's time to partake of the Eucharist, I only have to have enough faith to open my mouth. That's all. God, through the people he has gathered there, can take care of the rest.

It was this belief, which Josephine puts so much better than I can [Overused] and the thought of the "crowd of witnesses" - living on earth and in heaven - that got me through a long, and dreadful period of dryness, despair and almost non-belief.

And hooray that Matt and Mrs Black are no longer bound by one definition of what it means to know God. [Smile] And [Votive] for your work, Mrs. B

Posts: 4544 | From: not too far from Manchester, UK | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged
Lynn MagdalenCollege
Shipmate
# 10651

 - Posted      Profile for Lynn MagdalenCollege   Author's homepage   Email Lynn MagdalenCollege   Send new private message       Edit/delete post   Reply with quote 
amen.

--------------------
Erin & Friend; Been there, done that; Ruth musical

Posts: 6263 | From: California | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged



Pages in this thread: 1  2  3  4  ...  9  10  11 
 
Post new thread  Post a reply Close thread   Feature thread   Move thread   Delete thread Next oldest thread   Next newest thread
 - Printer-friendly view
Go to:

Contact us | Ship of Fools | Privacy statement

© Ship of Fools 2016

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.5.0

 
follow ship of fools on twitter
buy your ship of fools postcards
sip of fools mugs from your favourite nautical website
 
 
  ship of fools