Source: (consider it)
|
Thread: Purgatory: The political junkie POTUS prediction thread
|
Ps118
Shipmate
# 13655
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Alogon: quote: Originally posted by cqg: I don't think she'll concede the nomination nor will she officially end or suspend her campaign. She wants to take this all the way to the convention -- and perhaps beyond.
What will her point be?
It's interesting that she can point to a few landslide victories late in the game, without nearly giving her a majority of delegates. But the more she points to these, the more she suggests that late votes should count more than early votes-- or perhaps that there should not be such early votes-- the very opposite of her desire to get the excessively early votes counted. The irony should not be lost on us.
I'm with cqg. Harold Ickes reserved her right of appeal on Saturday. She may still try to get more delegates from MI and FL. And superdelegates can switch sides, as they've been doing lately, going from her to Obama. They can go back. She's still in this because shit happens. Especially to black men. That hasn't changed. She may suspend her campaign, but it's not over. It is all thick with irony. I think she'd like to say primaries count more than caucuses. Her people made the rules, now they wish they had a Republican-style, winner-take-all system.
After the RFK comment, HRC lobbying for the VP slot seems indelicate to me. Sam Nunn, Jim Webb, Wes Clark, Colin Powell (yeah, right). Early on, I wrote HRC a letter about the claims she was making about her experience as first lady. I said that, if she wins, it won't be a victory for women, it will be a victory for marriage, and there's no feminist value in that. The last thing Obama needs is to name marriage as his VP.
What about McCain - Bloomberg? I haven't even heard it floated, but why not? I'm glad the McCain - Condi rumors seem to have dried up.
Posts: 185 | From: USA | Registered: Apr 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Campbellite
 Ut unum sint
# 1202
|
Posted
I think it fitting that Obama offer Hillary a position. I would suggest the embassy in Kigali.
-------------------- I upped mine. Up yours. Suffering for Jesus since 1966. WTFWED?
Posts: 12001 | From: between keyboard and chair | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
SeraphimSarov
Shipmate
# 4335
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Gort: ...or Lower Slobovia.
or Our next Ambassador to Iraq??
-------------------- "For those who like that sort of thing, that is the sort of thing they like"
Posts: 2247 | From: Sacramento, California | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
Ouch.
Well, Hillary just finished her big speech knowing Barack has won the nomination... and didn't mention the fact once. More rambling self-congratulatory BS regarding her long fight for health care, the end of war, helping the economy. To top it off, she mentioned that her 18 million voters "need to be respected"... whatever the hell that means.
Oh, and "I won't be making any decisions tonight". Sheeesh. Just go away you pompous windbag.
-------------------- --Formerly: Gort--
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Og: Thread Killer
Ship's token CN Mennonite
# 3200
|
Posted
"Need to be respected" is a clear call for something tangible in the way of a sop to her.
But, "not making any decisions tonight" means its over....you don't say that if you are going forward.
-------------------- I wish I was seeking justice loving mercy and walking humbly but... "Cease to lament for that thou canst not help, And study help for that which thou lament'st."
Posts: 5025 | From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
SeraphimSarov
Shipmate
# 4335
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Og: Thread Killer: "Need to be respected" is a clear call for something tangible in the way of a sop to her.
But, "not making any decisions tonight" means its over....you don't say that if you are going forward.
or it can also mean avoiding saying what she should have said "Barack Obama is the nominee of our party and I support him against John MCCain" I thought it was shameful. [ 04. June 2008, 02:14: Message edited by: SeraphimSarov ]
-------------------- "For those who like that sort of thing, that is the sort of thing they like"
Posts: 2247 | From: Sacramento, California | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Og: Thread Killer
Ship's token CN Mennonite
# 3200
|
Posted
She says that tonight in front of this crowd and the chorus of boos from the crowd would be replayed for weeks.
She says that in a press conference on Friday afternoon and nobody notices much.
She probably says it Thursday. Monday would be too long.
-------------------- I wish I was seeking justice loving mercy and walking humbly but... "Cease to lament for that thou canst not help, And study help for that which thou lament'st."
Posts: 5025 | From: Toronto | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Og: Thread Killer: ...But, "not making any decisions tonight" means its over....you don't say that if you are going forward.
Yeah, well, it's over whether she wants to publically embrace it or not. I have a bad feeling about this. Tonight was the perfect time for her to come out in support of the party's nominee... not leave everyone wondering what SHE wants.
-------------------- --Formerly: Gort--
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
This just in from MSNBC: After several Obama attempts this evening to contact Clinton by phone, contact was finally established.
Obama: "We need to sit down and talk."
Clinton: "I'm sure it will happen soon."
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ps118
Shipmate
# 13655
|
Posted
I couldn't believe it last night when she said that people keep thinking it's over, they thought it was over after Iowa, after Super Tuesday, etc. Ummmm, exactly who thought it was over after Iowa? The same people who thought the Republican process was over after Huckabee won Iowa? Even after Super Tuesday, I don't think anyone was saying it was over. She was disturbed from her perch on the pedestal of inevitability, but I've never understood how she could with a straight face cast that as failure after which she's the comeback kid.
Posts: 185 | From: USA | Registered: Apr 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
moron
Shipmate
# 206
|
Posted
Barack Obama is (apparently - she hasn't hung it up yet ) the Democratic nominee.
A remarkable effort on his part and you gotta give him credit: it's no mean feat.
Posts: 4236 | From: Bentonville | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
IconiumBound
Shipmate
# 754
|
Posted
Interesting contrast in the staging of all three speeches last night. But I was struck when MSNBC reported that all TV's and other outside sources of news had been banned from Hillary's location by her handlers. [ 04. June 2008, 13:39: Message edited by: IconiumBound ]
Posts: 1318 | From: Philadelphia, PA, USA | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
ToujoursDan
 Ship's prole
# 10578
|
Posted
Maybe I misread her speech last night but all the compliments for Obama and his people and appeals for party unity suggested to me she was softening her supporters for the final blow.
Of course I could be wrong...
-------------------- "Many people say I embarrass them with my humility" - Archbishop Peter Akinola Facebook link: http://www.facebook.com/toujoursdan
Posts: 3734 | From: NYC | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
moron
Shipmate
# 206
|
Posted
Some fallout from the Obama campaign although it looks like self-inflicted damage to me: signing up to be part of the religious hierarchy comes at a price.
Probably another thread though.
Posts: 4236 | From: Bentonville | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
RuthW
 liberal "peace first" hankie squeezer
# 13
|
Posted
The Dems party leadership is calling on superdelegates to make their choice by Friday, which will force Clinton out. And with any luck will force her to shut up.
McCain's speech last night is getting bad reviews across the board, including from folks on his side. Apparently the lime green backdrop was not a good look for him.
Posts: 24453 | From: La La Land | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Living in Gin
 Liturgical Pyromaniac
# 2572
|
Posted
You know you're in trouble if you're a Republican and even Fox News is saying your speech sucked.
-------------------- It's all fun and games until somebody gets burned at the stake.
Posts: 1893 | From: Cincinnati, USA | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
ToujoursDan
 Ship's prole
# 10578
|
Posted
I watched McCain. Not only was the speech bad, but he looked awful. I know his released medical records say he is healthy but you have to wonder.
-------------------- "Many people say I embarrass them with my humility" - Archbishop Peter Akinola Facebook link: http://www.facebook.com/toujoursdan
Posts: 3734 | From: NYC | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Presleyterian
Shipmate
# 1915
|
Posted
With every self-centered, ungracious, "It's all about me" phrase out of her mouth, Hillary Clinton reminds me more of Glenn Close's character in "Fatal Attraction."
When she says "I won't be ignored, Barack," lock up the bunnies.
Posts: 2450 | From: US | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
SeraphimSarov
Shipmate
# 4335
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mjg: Some fallout from the Obama campaign although it looks like self-inflicted damage to me: signing up to be part of the religious hierarchy comes at a price.
Probably another thread though.
Just one of many stunts by Father Phleger. I was thinking "Father, you need to see your Cardinal"
-------------------- "For those who like that sort of thing, that is the sort of thing they like"
Posts: 2247 | From: Sacramento, California | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
RuthW
 liberal "peace first" hankie squeezer
# 13
|
Posted
Woo hoo! She's gone! We'll have to suffer through the reporting of her shindig on Saturday, but for all intents and purposes, she's doner than a done thing that's done.
And Obama has Caroline Kennedy on his three-person veep-picking team, and he's apparently not going to be rushed into offering it to Clinton. Dude is smart.
My co-worker told me this morning that all the black people on her bus were talking yesterday about how deeply afraid they are that Obama will be assassinated. All I can think is, for him and for his Secret Service detail.
Anyone up for making early predictions about November? I'm going to be optimistic and say Obama by 5 percentage points.
Posts: 24453 | From: La La Land | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
iGeek
 Number of the Feast
# 777
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: And Obama has Caroline Kennedy on his three-person veep-picking team, and he's apparently not going to be rushed into offering it to Clinton. Dude is smart.
Yeah. I wonder what Caroline thinks about HRC's invocation of Uncle Bobby's demise. Crazy as a fox smart.
I will be happy to be proven wrong on Saturday. Please let it be a definitive concession with unassailable support for the putative nominee so that the party can work undivided for a great outcome in Nov.
Posts: 2150 | From: West End, Gulfopolis | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged
|
|
kentishmaid
Shipmate
# 4767
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by RuthW: My co-worker told me this morning that all the black people on her bus were talking yesterday about how deeply afraid they are that Obama will be assassinated. All I can think is, for him and for his Secret Service detail.
I suppose this just shows how naive I am, but my first thought on reading that was "Surely not?". It surprises me that that would be the case in this day and age.
And my gut feeling on seeing the footage of both Obama and McCain on television yesterday was that Obama looked more Presidential. I don't know how much sway that holds with any of the electorate, but I'm guessing that it might make a difference to some voters. Does that seem likely?
-------------------- "Who'll be the lady, who'll be the lord, when we are ruled by the love of one another?"
Posts: 2063 | From: Huddersfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ps118
Shipmate
# 13655
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by kentishmaid: quote: Originally posted by RuthW: My co-worker told me this morning that all the black people on her bus were talking yesterday about how deeply afraid they are that Obama will be assassinated.....
....It surprises me that that would be the case in this day and age.
I'm terrified something will happen to him, I have been since Iowa, and I'm not alone.
"Fifty-nine percent of Americans (and 83 percent of African-Americans) said they were concerned “that someone might attempt to physically harm Barack Obama if he’s the Democratic nominee for president,” according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll from March 2. Twenty-four percent of those polled said they were “very concerned” about that possibility."
I heard this poll cited on one of the punditry shows a few weeks ago. I think it was Clarence Page on The McLaughlin Group, but I tracked it down here.
Posts: 185 | From: USA | Registered: Apr 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
I suspect the unseen secret service protection for Obama is unparalleled. The number of dark suits casting suspicious looks at the crowds around the Dem nominee are just the front line. He's had heavier coverage and earlier than any candidate in history.
Think positive.
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Clint Boggis
Shipmate
# 633
|
Posted
If you ask people whether thay are concerned about something, they are quite likely to say they are, even if they hadn't really thought about it. Is the survey likely to be more sophisticated than this? I hope so.
What's the reason for perceived additional risk? His colour? His name? What?
Does anyone think he has more protection than HRC, GWB or McCain? Won't they just provide pretty good protection for any high profile public figure who's at risk?
Posts: 1505 | From: south coast | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Lamb Chopped
Ship's kebab
# 5528
|
Posted
The problem is of course that he's going to attract all the usual nutcases and the racist nutcases as well. But the Secret Service are no idiots, so I'm sure they're on top of it. As much as anyone can be, I mean.
And I expect they allocate their resources based on perceived level of threat. To the nation, that is. But by this point in the election, losing one or the other of the big party candidates would be only slightly less messy than losing a lame duck president. [ 06. June 2008, 01:08: Message edited by: Lamb Chopped ]
-------------------- Er, this is what I've been up to (book). Oh, that you would rend the heavens and come down!
Posts: 20059 | From: off in left field somewhere | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Beautiful Dreamer
Shipmate
# 10880
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Ps118: quote: Originally posted by kentishmaid: quote: Originally posted by RuthW: My co-worker told me this morning that all the black people on her bus were talking yesterday about how deeply afraid they are that Obama will be assassinated.....
....It surprises me that that would be the case in this day and age.
I'm terrified something will happen to him, I have been since Iowa, and I'm not alone.
"Fifty-nine percent of Americans (and 83 percent of African-Americans) said they were concerned “that someone might attempt to physically harm Barack Obama if he’s the Democratic nominee for president,” according to an ABC News/Washington Post poll from March 2. Twenty-four percent of those polled said they were “very concerned” about that possibility."
I heard this poll cited on one of the punditry shows a few weeks ago. I think it was Clarence Page on The McLaughlin Group, but I tracked it down here.
I can see what you are saying. On one hand, I know there are still some racist/moronic assholes out there...I have myself heard of people saying they wouldn't vote for him because of his name, because he is a Muslim (which has been proven false), etc. But at the same time, I would hope that there are enough of us voting who weren't raised racist to where we would be beyond such considerations. We shall see.
-------------------- More where that came from Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!
Posts: 6028 | From: Outside Atlanta, GA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Campbellite
 Ut unum sint
# 1202
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by kentishmaid: I suppose this just shows how naive I am, but my first thought on reading that was "Surely not?". It surprises me that that would be the case in this day and age.
We said the same thing in November 1963.
-------------------- I upped mine. Up yours. Suffering for Jesus since 1966. WTFWED?
Posts: 12001 | From: between keyboard and chair | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mere Nick
Shipmate
# 11827
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Clint Boggis: What's the reason for perceived additional risk? His colour? His name? What?
apostasy [ 06. June 2008, 05:37: Message edited by: Mere Nick ]
-------------------- "Well that's it, boys. I've been redeemed. The preacher's done warshed away all my sins and transgressions. It's the straight and narrow from here on out, and heaven everlasting's my reward." Delmar O'Donnell
Posts: 2797 | From: West Carolina | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
I wouldn't be too concerned with the rag-tag band of flea-bitten cave dwellers that call themselves Al Qaeda. They don't represent the vast majority of Muslims who basically want the same things for their children that you or I do. That majority is fed the same fear-mongering propaganda the average US citizen receives and for the same reason: to maintain the power structure of the wealthy. The world is slowly becoming educated to this divisive bullshit.
-------------------- --Formerly: Gort--
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mere Nick
Shipmate
# 11827
|
Posted
Oh, I'm very concerned. I e-mailed the secret service months ago about it. If only 1% of the muslims just in this country get all worked up about it, protecting him could be an unusually tough gig. Then imagine what kind of trouble it could be if he, the world's best known apostate of Islam, travels to Saudi Arabia or other such country. He might be about as welcome as a Danish newspaper cartoon.
-------------------- "Well that's it, boys. I've been redeemed. The preacher's done warshed away all my sins and transgressions. It's the straight and narrow from here on out, and heaven everlasting's my reward." Delmar O'Donnell
Posts: 2797 | From: West Carolina | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
Just how concerned do you think the average Muslim is for apostates? How concerned is the average Christian for apostates? Don't buy into this media crap - particularly the internet variety. The boogeyman is not out to get you.
-------------------- --Formerly: Gort--
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
piers ploughman
Shipmate
# 13174
|
Posted
It's not the 'average Moslem' anyone's concerned about (whatever that is). It's something like the typical media construction of the average Moslem. Some of those who approximate this image are certainly capable of attempting something really terrible on an apostate such as Obama.
-------------------- Eternity is in love with the productions of time. William Blake.
Posts: 2121 | From: perth wa | Registered: Nov 2007
| IP: Logged
|
|
moron
Shipmate
# 206
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Mere Nick: apostasy
From the article
quote: Furthermore, his administration would struggle to positively engage the Muslim world, where Islam isn't just a religion, it's the way of life. Conservative Muslim populations that are riddled with poverty and low literacy rates can be more readily swayed to join the cause against the "Great Satan" (the US) if their imams and mullahs shout that it is led by an apostate.
Diplomacy is highly personal. The leaders of America's Middle Eastern allies – such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar – already feel besieged by jihadists and disgruntled citizens who see their governments as toadies of the West. The murtad card could intensify that pressure, so leaders of these countries might be compelled to distance themselves from Washington.
ISTM the question is how many people will be influenced by the AQ types given some case could be made the more moderate may perceive Obama as a positive step forward for the US. My take is you have to play to the middle rather than the fringe so IMO Obama as prez would be more beneficial than not, at least in this regard.
But that dynamic is exactly why I still think him being elected is not the slam dunk many here think: overall the US is not anywhere near as 'left' as he is so I still predict McCain wins by a small percentage, largely because he's perceived as more 'moderate' and more experienced.
If it comes down to 'the vision thing' (gotta love Bushisms ) only, Obama will be the next POTUS. There's a part of me that wouldn't mind seeing it, just to see if he can do what he says he can.
You never know.
Posts: 4236 | From: Bentonville | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
It's finally happened. Dennis Kucinich spent 4 hours on the floor of Congress last night introducing 35 articles of impeachment for charges against George W. Bush including "alleged crimes of misleading us into war, torture, domestic spying, gross negligence leading to mass casualties," etc, etc.
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Amanda B. Reckondwythe
 Dressed for Church
# 5521
|
Posted
Let us see what comes of them.
-------------------- "I take prayer too seriously to use it as an excuse for avoiding work and responsibility." -- The Revd Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 10542 | From: The Great Southwest | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
jlg
 What is this place? Why am I here?
# 98
|
Posted
Procedural questions:
What, exactly, is "impeachment" under the constitution of the the USA and whatever laws have modified it since then?
Can impeachment proceedings continue after the President is no longer in office? (I somehow thought it was a 'removal from office' sort of thing. I suspect this misunderstanding is not uncommon.)
Who, other than the President, is (or might be) subject to impeachment?
I now defer to the various shipmate lawyers to debate the fine points of all this, and I probably won't post again, since I don't have a clue, but do hope to learn a lot.
Posts: 17391 | From: Just a Town, New Hampshire, USA | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Amanda B. Reckondwythe: Let us see what comes of them.
Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) has stepped forward to co-sponser the resolution but Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared that impeachment proceedings would remain "off the table." There may be a vote tomorrow on proceeding. quote: Originally posted by jlg: Procedural questions:
What, exactly, is "impeachment" under the constitution of the the USA and whatever laws have modified it since then?
As I understand it, Congress debates articles of impeachment then vote on whether to present the case to the Senate where an actually trial begins to remove the president from office. Criminal proceedings happen after removal from office.
Most likely, it will go nowhere. Bush is too close to the end of his term and congress has other issues on the table. The current presidential campaigns further complicate the politics involved.
But still, someone has officially read charges into the record.
[the charges are being read again right now - check it out on C-SPAN.] [ 11. June 2008, 01:22: Message edited by: Gort ]
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Choirboy
Shipmate
# 9659
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by Gort: But still, someone has officially read charges into the record.
The only satisfaction we may get, besides the condemnation of history.
I understand they've arranged to buy an old fotomat to hold the presidential library.
Posts: 2994 | From: Minneapolis, Minnesota USA | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Ps118
Shipmate
# 13655
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by jlg: Procedural questions:
What, exactly, is "impeachment" under the constitution of the the USA and whatever laws have modified it since then? (snip) I now defer to the various shipmate lawyers to debate the fine points of all this, and I probably won't post again, since I don't have a clue, but do hope to learn a lot.
I'm a recovering lawyer, and I couldn't improve on the American Bar Association's explanation. It doesn't mention the impeachment of President Clinton, who was, as I'm sure we remember all to well, impeached by the House and acquitted in the Senate by a larger margin than Andrew Johnson was.
Posts: 185 | From: USA | Registered: Apr 2008
| IP: Logged
|
|
jlg
 What is this place? Why am I here?
# 98
|
Posted
Thanks for the link, Ps118. It was the penalty (removal from office) part that I couldn't remember clearly.
ETA: Thanks also to Gort! [ 11. June 2008, 17:54: Message edited by: jlg ]
Posts: 17391 | From: Just a Town, New Hampshire, USA | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
tclune
Shipmate
# 7959
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mjg: I give him huge credit for taking on the Democratic powers that be. Bill Cosby was virtually pilloried for this kind of comment: it will be interesting to see how Obama fares.
Wow.
I guess I'm more cynical than you are. This seems like a low-risk way of reaching out to those red-necks who he needs to woo. His African American base is not likely to bolt for McCain over this to any noticeable degree, and working class whites have always liked to see a black man upbraid the black community. I don't particularly blame him for doing this, and I think he probably said things that he more-or-less believed, but the motivation seems to me most likely to be to pander to working class whites.
--Tom Clune
-------------------- This space left blank intentionally.
Posts: 8013 | From: Western MA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Swish
Shipmate
# 8566
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by tclune: quote: Originally posted by mjg: I give him huge credit for taking on the Democratic powers that be. Bill Cosby was virtually pilloried for this kind of comment: it will be interesting to see how Obama fares.
Wow.
I guess I'm more cynical than you are. This seems like a low-risk way of reaching out to those red-necks who he needs to woo. His African American base is not likely to bolt for McCain over this to any noticeable degree, and working class whites have always liked to see a black man upbraid the black community. I don't particularly blame him for doing this, and I think he probably said things that he more-or-less believed, but the motivation seems to me most likely to be to pander to working class whites.
--Tom Clune
Have to disagree with you here. From reading Obama's books (especially Dreams from my Father) this issue seems one that is very close to his heart, and one he has written on and spoken on a lot. I'm not saying that there aren't political advantages, I'm saying that to ascribe it to political opportunism vastly overlooks his work in this area. It was, after all, something he saw as being at the heart of the poverty he encountered in his work as a community organiser in Chicago.
-------------------- Sorry Ted. I was concentrating too hard on looking holy.
Posts: 114 | From: Sheffield | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
Comper's Child
Shipmate
# 10580
|
Posted
Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't.
Good for him speaking up on this never-ending problem which affects all Americans ultimately.
Posts: 2509 | From: Penn's Greene Countrie Towne | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
Alfred E. Neuman
 What? Me worry?
# 6855
|
Posted
And so the fear mongering strategy of the Republicans is revealed. In a recent interview with Fortune magazine, McCain political advisor and Washington lobbyist, Charlie Black admits that in the event of another terrorist attack on the US, "Certainly it would be a big advantage to him [McCain]." Gosh, fellahs, why not simply take out a full page ad in Al Jezeera explaining how to influence the US election?
Addressing the National Restaurant Association [of all people], McCain accused Obama of making light of the threat posed by Iran's leadership and added this stirring comment: "They are the chief sponsors of Shiah extremists in Iraq and their President has called Israel a stinking corpse!" I suppose the Iranian President's remarks were a bit more inflammatory than the accusation his country is a member of the Axis of Evil, but where does this sort of insult exchange end? Is it condusive to rational debate? Are we all to die in the Apocalypse of the Big Dicks?
It's not surprising McCain is turning to the subject in which he feels his political strengths lie. He has often resisted pork barrel spending and higher taxes but admits, "The issue of economics is not something I've understood well." I've got news for you Senator McCain: In spite of your apparent 'shoot first and ask questions later' approach to diplomacy, the issue of economics is at the root of international politics and you would do well to inform yourself of the issue before rattling your limp-dick saber.
Posts: 12954 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
moron
Shipmate
# 206
|
Posted
Ouch. I just found this: strong words from Mark Shields
quote: Obama has long acknowledged and accepted the basic reality that you cannot change Washington until you change the way we finance our politics and our campaigns. True, his campaign has done what was considered impossible by bringing in so many new, small contributors, which is healthy for American democracy. But don't, as some Obama folks do, call this a different form of public financing. It is not. Public financing imposes spending limits.
Obama did not "aggressively pursue" any agreement. He did not sit down with John McCain.
He did not do what he told us he would do. He may very well win the White House. But even if he does, Barack Obama will still be just one more politician who broke his word.
Posts: 4236 | From: Bentonville | Registered: May 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
tclune
Shipmate
# 7959
|
Posted
quote: Originally posted by mjg: David Brooks is labeled 'conservative' but IMO he's usually pretty evenhanded: last week on the PBS News Hour he was as worked up as I've ever seen him on Obama's campaign financing decision, and even Mark Shields wasn't defending him.
I think that Brooks is pretty even-handed, too. But I confess that I don't see the outrage in Obama' choice on this. He did it badly -- he should have said what everybody knew to be true, that he was opting out becuase he could raise so much money. It wasn't some sort of tortured virtue, it was a political calculation. Fine. The only thing that I found foul was pretending that it was something else.
I think that Obama would have a point in inidcating tht he is raising lots of money in small amounts from individuals who are not going to dictate poiicy in exchange for their donation. So the great worry about vast sums of money is not as big a deal in his campaign. But that is a happy accident more than anything else.
But, when the smoke clears, this whole issue seems rather secondary to me. I'd much rather that they focussed on their approaches to the big economic issues, like the fuel crisis, the mortgage crisis, providing health-care access for everyone, etc. I'll vote on their positions on those things, not on whether they did the "morally upright" thing of taking money from the taxpayer to finance their campaign.
--Tom Clune
-------------------- This space left blank intentionally.
Posts: 8013 | From: Western MA | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged
|
|